WEBVTT - Vogel Expects Fed Plan for Treasury Holdings by Year's End

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. I want to talk about the

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>treasury market and what happened to the foreign buyer. I

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>am so happy to bring in Jim Vogel, interest rate

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>strategists at ft N Financial, A fantastic analysts. I read

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>his reports every day. Jim, I would love to get

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>your take first off on whether we're starting to see

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign investors come back to the U. S. Treasury market

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>after abandoning it in December. Not yet on a large scale.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>What we're really seeing is some buying when we get

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>these odd currency fluctuations, but it's not enough necessarily to

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>say that the foreign buyers are back. So, in other words,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>even though there is a higher proportion of indirect buyers

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at some of the recent auctions, in other words, that's

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>usually a category that includes foreign money, but also that

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>includes hedge funds. It's been increasing, but it doesn't necessarily

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>represent that China and Japan are coming back. No, not

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>yet in the kind of support that the treasury market

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>became accustomed to over the last five to six years. Hey, Jim,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>could you just comment on what's going on with the

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>US dollar? And and and am I correct in thinking

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that we saw this big searche in dollar since the

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>November election and that after the new year we still

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>saw some strength. But then they started to be conversation

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>aations about you know, how long things would take in

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>taxes and interest? Right, what can you tell us about

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of trajectory of the dollar. The dollar is

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>still going to regain some of its strength, but it

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was way too strong in December because for a while

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>people feared that the Fed was falling behind the potential

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump slash Republican stimulus that everybody was talking about.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It became part of the Trump trade, and so on

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>that basis, if the FED was behind, then they would

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>have to catch up, say with a big increase or

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a quick increase at the March meeting. That thinking from

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>December has totally wilted, particularly after we saw average hourly

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth revisions last week. So there's this debate right

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>now that's been going on, which is, are we headed

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>toward an inflationary reflationary time period or are you going

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to see treasury yields go back down in the wake

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of disappointing growth. Where are you weigh on this? Uh,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to stabilize inflation once we move past a

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of other uh, the next couple of months that

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to see increases in the indexes. And but

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we are not really set for say the ten year

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the two percent level when people

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>were less concerned about inflation. Uh. It's still an early

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>days in the Trump administration, and the people that believe

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tips are the right place to be are hurting this week,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but they have certainly been winning and are ready to

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>commit more capital to that market. How much does the

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign bid that we were talking about earlier play into

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>your thesis? For the most part, do we see the

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>overseas UH fixed income investor staying focused primarily in the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>European market. Right now. We do not see them as

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>major players in the US, except when there's a risk

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>style event that may come over from EU banking or

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>other matters such as that. So we're back up for

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. No, when you say that they're focused

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on on the on the EU, are they looking to

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>buy German debt French debt now that yields have risen there?

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean where where are they focused? Yeah, for the

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>most part, they're focused on Germany and France, and then

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>everything else keys off those relationships there. And so the

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>big news in addition to the treasury rally this week

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is that both German and French tenure yields have returned

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to roughly their two month average. Do you see the

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>rally continuing unfortunately for a bit longer, Yes, because we

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>still have to retain firmer footing, and when we have

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the big sell off in December, we totally bypassed this

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>area between two thirty and two thirty five. There are

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>no technical indicators for traders to go, oh, finally we've

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>reached here and now we can start selling again. And

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>until we just sort of leach out some of this

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar trade and a couple of other points, we can

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>stay below to th D seven on tens UH into

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>next week. Jim, what do you think is a likely

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>outcome for year and ten year treasury yields? We're still

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the two five to fifty camp. We don't see

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that rates spike in the at some

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>point as we look at FED or possibly UH stimulus

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>from the fiscal side in Washington, they could go up to,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>say to sixty, but we believe they'll come back down

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's people are looking at the federal UM picture

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on a linear basis and not with all the different

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ramifications that follow any particular Washington UM fiscal move. The

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>other really big topic that people have been talking about

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bond world is whether the Federal Reserve will

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>start to unwind their four point five trillion dollar balance sheet.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>There's been discussion about whether they'll start doing that as

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>soon as early later this year. There's also been discussion

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>about whether they focus more on their mortgage holdings or

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>their treasury holdings. Where do you weigh in on this?

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We believe that we will look far more at their

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>treasury holdings. Uh, there are four hundred billion dollars of

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>treasuries that have to be reinvested in two thousand and eighteen.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's the far more immediate um UH horizon that

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>requires a policy decision, and we think they'll be looking

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at it very closely in the second half of this

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>year to at least communicate to the market a fairly

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>detailed plan. Kim, is there any plan for if the

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>economy is currently at its peak, end will either plateau

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>or we will see a slowdown? Uh, there is nothing

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the broader numbers that indicate that we've peaked. The

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the worst trend that we've got is the

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter personal consumption grew at two and a half

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>percent versus the six quarter average of two point eight.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But but that's still quite reasonable given um the FEDS

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>goal of continued um solid growth in the US economy.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That's still ahead of their formal forecast. So you think

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that things are kind of just going to be steady

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year, What do you think? What's what's the

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest potential surprise on the horizon that could change your view? Uh.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The biggest that would be a more coherent action plan

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, where the White House and Congress are moving

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>together very quickly. Um to say accomplished, say corporate tax

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>reform in significant detail, not necessarily pass it, but have

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it out there on a two hundred day calendar, as

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>opposed to what people like to talk about in terms

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the one hundred day calendar. Interesting, very good. Thanks

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for pinpointing that. Jim Vogel. He is interest rate strategist

0:07:52.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for FTN Financial, joining us from Memphis at Tennessee. While

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we want expertise in the world of technology media, well

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>turned to only one person, Paul Sweeney, US director of

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Research and senior Media Internet Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. I

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>urge you to go to b I go on the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg for a variety of detailed reports and insights into

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a variety of industries. Paul Sweeney, where do you want

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to start? You want to do Disney or you want

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to do uh Time Warner and the A. T. T. Combo.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Disney is usually the most fun story to

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about. And you know they had a kind of

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a mixed quarter last night. Uh they beat on the

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>EPs line, but they missed on revenue and the ESPN numbers.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're still a little bit soft and uh,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of a problem because their cost based

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>continues to go up. At ESPN, sports rights continue to

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>go up. In fact, they are in the first year

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of new NBA contract, which is six million dollars of

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>incremental expenditures for them. So the cost of sports rights

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>continues to go up. And that's obviously you know, ESPN

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>has has the monopoly there, but the revenue trends remain

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>challenge at ESPN. They're dealing with chord cutting, they're dealing

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>with skinny bundles, and they have to figure out a

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>way to kind of tap into the digital growth opportunities

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for ESPN. But ESPN still has a very steady and

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>desirable group of viewers. No, I mean, this isn't exactly

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to go away. I know, it's it's

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>by far the most valuable cable network out there, and

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it continues to grow revenue and profits continue to grow,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just at a slower growth rate um and so again

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>some investors at work, certainly, but it's you know, it's

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's half almost half the operating profit of the Walt

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company. So it's a major driver of of the company.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So the question for the Walt Disney Company, like all

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>kick cable networks, is you know, how do they bring

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>their content direct to consumers? Uh, you know, through some

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>type of streaming service. UM. It looks like people are

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on the margin cutting the cord. So you have to

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think about new ways to reach your consumers with your content.

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've seen some examples like HBO has

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>taken Hbo direct to consumers. It's called HBO now and

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you can subscribe to it directly, and you know, and

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we're off to see, you know what ESPN decides to do.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Paul, there's been some speculation that Disney might

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>spin off ESPN as its own entity. What do you

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think the likelihood of that is. I think in a

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>near to intermediate term, that's very unlikely. Um. This is

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>still again half of the almost half of the operating

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>profit of the company here, so it's a major part

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the business. UM and it's still a extraordinarily valuable

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the business. Throws off tremendous amounts of free

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. But I think to the extent that they

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>ever get to the point where, you know, the growth rate,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, turns materially negative and it ends up being

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a real drag on the valuation, which I don't think

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it is now. Then clearly there will be an opportunity

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to to spin this asset out, and there'll be a

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand for that, but I don't think that's

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>anything in the near term. Paul, I wonder if there's

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody that has access to the Internet that doesn't either

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pay a telephone company or a k able company some money.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about like cable operators, whether it's Comcast or Charters, Spectrum, Verizon,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so on. Right. Well, and unless you're a millennial, so

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the younger demos are in fact are kind of corded

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>never's if you will. They've never signed up to any

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of pay TV service. Um. And so the question is,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do you reach those people? Um? And

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's actually that that percentage of the population is actually growing,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the folks that do not pay it's a small percentage today,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's growing. Where do they get their service? Where

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do they get their connection to the internet? Just public WiFi? Well,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll get it, yeah, you're right, So they'll they'll either

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>get a public WiFi or maybe they'll just subscribe to

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a standalone you know, uh, broadband connection through a cable

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>company or through a telephone company. But the question is

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>will they pay for a big video product, and that

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the margin, the millennials tend not to

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be doing that. But again, if you're isn't that what

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>T mobile I was gonna say, isn't that what T

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Mobile was trying to do by giving away? We're not

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>giving away, but like getting you unlimited video for certain

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>types of video. Fair does Disney needed that kind of

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more direct pipe into people's homes? I think they do

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>um and I think they're moving, but they're moving more

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>slowly than others are. And the reason to moving more

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>slowly is because they have more to lose. They get

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>almost seven dollars per subscriber per month for ninety millions

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>subscribers to ESPN. It's hard to walk away from that

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>order even potentially cannibalize that business. So that that's why

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been more reluctant to do that versus some other companies.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you take a look at a T

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and T. One of the big reasons that they bought

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a Time Warner is because they have you know, so

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>many wire line and wireless customer relationships, but they don't

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have any content and so that's why they stepped up

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay eighty five billion dollars for Time Warner. Well,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about Time Warner, they have a strategy that perhaps

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>others will adopt, squeezing cable and satellite distributors for more

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and more money. And this is one of the reasons

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>why they reported better than expected earnings. Correct. Yeah, the

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers came in a very very strong for them, a

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>good good quarter for them, which is nice for a

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>T and t um. The big driver for Time Warner

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>was the fact that they did continue you to have

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>strong affiliate feed growth in their cable networks and that

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about affiliate feed growth year of a year, which is

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>by far the best in the industry. What was driving

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that is they just over the last two to three

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>years renegotiated most of their distribution contracts with the cable

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>companies and the satellite companies and they were able to

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>get big increases. The reason they were able to get

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>big increases is because they just invested a ton of

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>money in their programming, particularly sports programming, uh the NBA,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in the n c a A. Uh So they put

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their money where their mouth is. And then they turned

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>around the distributors and they're like, Okay, we're giving you

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>better content. We want to get paid more, and they did.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Paul Sweeney, director of North American

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Research and media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. P and L

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by proper Cloth, the leader in

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>men's custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com, ordering custom

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>shirts has never been easier. Create your custom shirt size

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>by answering ten easy questions. Select from over five d

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>fabrics to suit your personal taste. Surets start from eighty

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>five dollars and are delivered in just two weeks with

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>proper Clouds Perfect Fit Guarantee. Remakes are completely free and

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>expert staff are standing by to help. For premium quality,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>perfect fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com Custom shirts

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>made Smarter. Pim Fox, I know that you've been looking to,

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>uh potentially buy a Jaguar Land Rover. If you want

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it, you need to buy it soon because

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it could cost seventeen dollars more than it costs Now.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in somebody knows all about this.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Alan Baum, principle at Baum and Associates, a Michigan based

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>research firm that just did a study looking at how

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>much auto prices could increase as a result of the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>border tax. Some pretty big numbers, huh, Allan, yeah, and

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim that seventeen thousand may not to pass. That's what

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers say in terms of our analysis. Obviously, companies

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>will make their own decisions on what the how they

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would price their product, right, But the point stands that

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>basically the border tax will make it a lot more

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>expensive for some companies, and more so than than others.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, Volvo or Mitsubishi or Volkswagen would face a

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bigger challenge than say Ford or General Motors, right, And

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's based upon where they make their product, the price

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the product, and how much of the product, even

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's made in the US, is imported. Um and

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so Jaguars obviously and land Rover obviously on the far

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>end there because their products are imported and their high price. Well, Alan,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for the record, I'm I'm all. I'm a public transport person,

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so I I just gaze into the windows of the showrooms.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But if I were to gaze under the hood, I

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>might find that most of what's in there, at least

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>some of it anyway, was be made in Cana the

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico, right, because GM and other automakers are still

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>facing this uncertainty because of the president's vow to institute

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this border tax. And from the Center of Automotive Research,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they say that's seventies six percent of the seating and

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>interior trim come from outside the US. Electronics more than

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>six engine. I mean, if you want to break system,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>chances are it's you know, might come from overseas or

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhere outside the US. What are they going to do

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to change that? That's a big deal. And of course

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's based upon labor UH and scale and so you

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>want to do UH, you know, for the kind of

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>investment that you're gonna be making there, you're gonna make

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>large volumes and so yes, that is clearly the the issue.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that that our study showed is a

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>company like Sword UH that makes small and midsize cars

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>UH in Mexico, as opposed to f C A UH

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and UH and GM both make large pickups. A company

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like Ford is better off because the value of the

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>products they're shipping from Mexico is less than that of

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>f C A UH and UH and GM. So that's

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>why you've seen Forward perhaps being a little more supportive

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of this concept, although obviously all auto companies would prefer

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>to have their cost reduced um particularly their tax rates,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>which seems to be something that's that's being considered, and

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not have their taxes increased in the form of this

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>border tax. You know, I gotta say, on one level,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>your study shows exactly why some people want this border tax,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because it essentially would incentivize these overseas companies to either

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>move jobs here removing the potential tax, or else not

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be competitive in the same way. I mean, isn't that

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly the point? Well, yeah, I mean, I'll be slee.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump is is being responsive to the issues in

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>his campaign. The companies, of course, are less excited by

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that because this is a global industry. They've been working

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on that premise for years. Uh. And if we talk

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Detroit Three, they are in fact making fewer

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and fewer of their vehicles, not just in the US

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>but in North America because they're looking at ways to

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>improve their position across the globe. And the companies that

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>are based in Japan and Germany are in fact coming

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>here to produce because they're looking to do the same thing,

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>except in reverse, and that is increase their position here

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in North America. Would that be a much more intelligent

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>way to move in your in your estimate, Well, those

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have been the rules of the game. That's what automakers

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and for that matter, businesses across the board have been doing,

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>uh to to capitalize. I mean, you know, the obvious

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>growth in the automotive market in terms of volume is

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>not in North America, and for that matter, it's not

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>in Western Europe China. It's in China, and it's in

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe, and so that's that's where the development is

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>coming now. The difference, of course, is the North American market,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly US, remains incredibly profitable relative to those markets, and

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>so obviously companies are very interested and attached to this market,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course is a good thing for us here

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US particularly. I was just gonna say, particularly

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're making pickup trucks and SUVs, that's correct. On

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, uh, you uh, you don't want to

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be making one set of products for North America and

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>one set of products for the rest of the world.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I seem to remember a bankruptcy or two that happened

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in a few years back where that was part of

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Thank you very much. Alan Baum is a

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>principle at Baum and Associates based in Michigan, doing a

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of research on the automobile industry and visa. It

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>will be interest think to see how the Republican tax

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>plan actually moves forward, because they're getting a lot of

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>pushback from like, for example, automobile dealers. Will be interesting

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>also to see how much the foreign automakers have a

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>voice into the White House. Well, I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>give a round number. I'm going to give a round number,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>well almost round number A hundred and two. That is

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the ranking for company. It's not around number I said.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not around number A hundred and fifty. Maybe it

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>would be the round number, but it is okay, a

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty second place. Molus ranks in global equity. Tell

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people what right is a boutique firm? And somehow they

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>managed to win the assignment to manage the most coveted

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I p O of this century arguably. I want to

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>bring in Ruth Avid. She's an IPO and deals reported

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg in London. Ruth, how did Bollas get this. Hi,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question, since everyone has been trying their

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hardest to get on this deal. And I think you

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>know you've you've heard of banks going and pitching this

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for months, and we had something last month saying that

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ever Cohen Mollis had been shortlisted. But keep in mind

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that these are just the boutique banks that are getting

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on the mandate, right, they're also speaking to the global

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>investment banks, so the Goldman Sachs and hsbcs and city

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 1>groups of the world to get more of them in.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking about a company that says it's

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have a valuation of two trillion dollars, So

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd imagine even if they list like a five percent stick,

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a hundred billion I p o. And, as you said,

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>probably the largest of the century. Um, it's gonna take

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of banks and a lot of people to

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>get it over the line. Can you give a little

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>detail of the people involved in making this decision and

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>how this is going to affect the other investment banks.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think investors are taking into account of fact that

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a big coup for Mulist and there's going

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, I mean it is the It

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is the government which will have a big say in

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>who gets the mandates and what kind of do we

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>know the people? For example, I mean do we know

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the key people involved in making this happen? I mean

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a relationship business. Yes. I mean if you're saying,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is ken Molly's pitching strongly? Yes, and he's doing a

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>great job at it, Like I just want to know

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more about him. You want to know, like who did

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he who do you have dinner with? Exactly? Just or well,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so I know a lot of the people came from

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>ups for example originally, Ruth. What I'm curious about is

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what how much are the fees potentially that we're talking

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about here, I mean, just to give a sense of

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just how much bankers were salivating over this deal. So

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>typically I po fees are about two point five to

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>three percent of the deals size. But that's just you know,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just the overall numbers and not something to get

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>too excited about. Because state deals, and this is one

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that whether it doesn't matter what market you're in,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a government deal is going to pay you much less

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>than a private company. So it's more of the prestige,

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>right and it's more of them, like oftentimes the underwriters

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that would not be moreless, but the other big banks

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>managed to make money by getting commissions from the investors

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that they bring in. So you'd imagine that fees would

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>probably be on government deals they're less than a percentage,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they'd be split between so many banks. But

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this is going to help moreless when they go and

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pitch for other roles. I mean, this is the biggest

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I p or the biggest deal that they've ever done. Well,

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this is well, this is certainly helping their stock today.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the stock is you know, a dollar five

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>or thirty six seven. This is a stock that was trading,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in thirty four now we're up to thirty six.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>It seems that there's a model, is it or a a reason?

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it because was the people behind you know, just

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>can since he owns you know, he's party owner of

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the of the company, does that have anything to do

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that what made them select this particular? Ken Mollis, I

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think the it's not just I mean, so I don't

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think it is just a relationship story. I think it's

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>also them looking at the other banks that were pitching

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out which one would be the

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>best for what they want to do, which one would

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>be the would fit with what the Saudi government is

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>saying best, because you know, for instance, we know that

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Rothschild and Lazard. I've also been speaking to them and

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>typically those are the kind of boutique banks that get

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in there. But they weren't on this deal at all.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean even last week last month when we were

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about banks being shotlisted, it was ever Coen Mollis.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So they probably wanted a bank that is not very

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>well known and where they think even to an extent

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they may be able to avoid leaks and have them

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>working in secrecy on this that that probably wasn't so successful.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Um and and so now these banks are going to

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be working the bigger investment banks when they come in

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and managing everything and trying to get this deal off

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the ground. But keep in mind, this is not going

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen until the first or second quarter of two

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen. And that's an optimistic prediction. So the

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>great I mean, the investors are that are coming into

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the stock today are making a long term bed and

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and well, I guess we'll have to see what happens

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you say that this want to take place until the

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. Well, yeah, first, second, third, yes, but it's

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a two thousand seventeen deal, is what I'm

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to say. Yeah, got it. Yeah, it's already priced in.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for illuminating all this for us.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Sir Ruth David I p O and deals reporter for Bloomberg.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and L is brought to you by proper Cloth, a

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized technology

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to order

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>your first custom shirt today.