WEBVTT - SpaceX Weighs Tender Offer, Geopolitical Turmoil

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Wait Inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 3>This is just one of those days, right Amy, It's

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>just hard to keep up. It just fast and furious.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 3>You're doing great, all right, Amy Morris There, Hey listen,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 3>folks who do want to get to a Bloomberg exclusive.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is in talks to sell insider shares in a

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.319
<v Speaker 3>transaction valuing the rocket and satellite maker at about three

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty billion. That's accring to those familiar with

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the matter. It's a massive jump, highlighting the post election

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 3>gains across Elon Musk's business empire. It turns out it's

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>good to be acquainted with the president elect.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Just look at Tesla since you know, November up forty

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 4>in the month of November alone. Back SpaceX, though, would

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 4>be a significant premium to a previously Muld evaluation of

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and fifty five at billion dollars, as reported

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 4>by Bloomberg News and other media outlets.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Just last month.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX was last valued at about two hundred and ten

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 5>That was a tender offer earlier this year.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>For more on all of this and the big glon universe,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 4>back with us as Max Chafkin Bloomberg Business with Columnists.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 4>He's also the co host of Elon Inc. The podcast.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>He's also the author of the contrarian Peter Thiel and

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley's Pursuit of Power. Max joins us here in

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 4>the studio. So SpaceX operates in a space where they're

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 4>pretty much the only player in certain certain elements of it.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at what Boeing had to like call,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, the US government had to call on SpaceX

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>to rescue those astronauts because Boeing couldn't do it.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 6>They are the only player in the United States for

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 6>at launching astronauts, and they are the major player for

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 6>all rocket launches of all kinds.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so that huge share of the market overall. Why

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 4>why is the world so much better for SpaceX under Trump?

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Because SpaceX is a government contractor and most of its

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 6>money comes from the US gun That would have happened

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 6>under It's true but so, but you know, it's it's

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 6>easy to get you don't want to you don't want

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 6>to overstate their dominance. So they dominate, But there are

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 6>a bunch of other players, including a bunch of large

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 6>defense contractors that also have programs uh, both for launches

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 6>and also for for astronauts.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 7>And if you look at.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 6>The plans for the Moon mission, right it, SpaceX is

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 6>only one of a handful of companies that have contracts

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 6>for this mission. Now if now, Trump could very easily

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 6>change that mix, and and there's already talk. Musk has

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 6>has suggested that it would be you know, better to

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 6>to skip the Moon and you know, go straight to

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Mars or something like that. So so there are lots

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 6>of ways that Trump or Trump administration could help elon Musk.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 6>And like the most basic basic one has to do

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 6>with Starlink. So starlink was in the running for subsidies

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 6>for rural internet. It lost out on some of those subsidies.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Musk has been very angry about that, and the nominee

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 6>Trumps nomine to run the FCC was one of the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 6>voices saying, hey, this is a great injustice. He's a

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 6>huge fan of SpaceX and of Elon Musk.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 7>So, so like, even if.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 6>You don't see some kind of dramatic shift in space policy,

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 6>this is very likely to lead to more revenue for

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX than it was already going to get. And you

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 6>know that's why the valuation has gone up. It's actually

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 6>much more straightforward than the case for you know, why

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Tesla should be worth forty or fifty percent more than

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 6>was worth before.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So in other words, their businesses make sense and it's

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>likely to just keep growing exactly.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there's there are there are a bunch of clear ways.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 6>And you see analysts, both telecom analysts and space analysts

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 6>talking about this.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 7>This is not Isn't that some kind of like hypothetical.

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 6>You have to squint and imagine some some weird huge

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 6>regulatory changes to to you know, how how the government

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 6>regulates Elon musks empire. This is just like the government

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 6>taking out it's it's very large paycheck and and giving

0:03:58.160 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk a little bit more money.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting because we're seeing it play out. So this

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 5>is this is this, This is.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Playing out in the private markets right now. We've seen

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>it play out in the public markets over the last

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>month with Tesla forty percent basically in the month of November. Yeah,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 4>why why is SpaceX more of a beneficiary than Tesla,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Because certainly public market investors are saying, hey, Tesla's a

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 4>huge winner here too.

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean it's it's essentially the same argument, and

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 6>I would be surprised. You know, this is what makes

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 6>it surprising is the size of the figure and the

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 6>fact that they just had they just wrote up the

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 6>valuation very recently, as you said. But I would not

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 6>be shocked if everywhere in Elon Musk's empire, so x

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 6>XAI that's his AI thing, the boring company.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 7>If we are, if they are also quietly.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Doing this kind of thing, looking at higher valuations, looking

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 6>at what they can do to take advantage of this moment,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.559
<v Speaker 6>because investors are very excited about this, and we should

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 6>one thing to I should note about SpaceX that also

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 6>makes it different from Tesla. And one of the reasons

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 6>why this is more likely, it's more likely that they

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 6>will benefit is that they have a good argument for this.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 7>Their product, as you said, is good it.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, they are doing a good job, so you

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 6>don't have to squint and see some kind of back

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 6>room political thing you could just move the needle a

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 6>little bit and it might lead to a lot.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 5>Max mentioned X.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Axios reported earlier this week that Fidelity actually wrote up

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 4>the value of X, which is, you know, in the

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 4>last few months they've written down the value of their

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 4>investment in X, but a lot of that.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Might have to do with XAI.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's no I think it makes sense that

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 6>they wrote the value up. And we've been saying that

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 6>on the Elon podcast that this was going to happen.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean X.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 6>If the election of Donald Trump a few weeks back

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 6>showed us anything, it is that Elon Musk's media company

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 6>is influential. And yes, the advertising business isn't looking great,

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 6>but they have other ways to make money AI and

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 6>making their data available to AI companies including X is

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 6>one way.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 7>Subscriptions could be another way. This is a company that has.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 6>Gotten more important than it was before, and I think

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 6>there's a case for raising the valuation.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>We were just showing some footage of was it last

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>month where president like Donald Trump was there with Elon

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Musk at another launch by SpaceX having said that, so

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 3>great for Elon to be able to say, hey, Trump,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>you know he's there right very accessible in terms of

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>talking to him. If they have a falling out, does

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 3>everybody kind of rethink some stuff, and especially when it

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 3>comes to valuations.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Look, any time you a business politicizes itself, it creates risk.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 6>And one of the reasons that business leaders try not

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 6>to do this, try not to show up on stage

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 6>with Donald Trump, is because if there is a break

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 6>or if the political wind shift, then.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 7>All of a sudden, you're in a box.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Now, I would say that I think Elon Musk has

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 6>a lot to work with Even if the relationship this

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 6>probably stressful and inevitably, you know, there may be a

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 6>fracture interpersonal relationship.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 7>Even if it falls apart.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.559
<v Speaker 6>Musk is going to have power or both in terms

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 6>of at the negotiating table with the US government as

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX tries to sell it more launches or tries to

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 6>sell at satellite internet services, because the competition is not

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 6>that well established, because no one is shuttling astronauts back

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 6>and forth, and also because Elon Musk will be important

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 6>within the conservative movement whether or not Donald Trump likes him.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>So are all the other billionaires who are doing space

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Bezos and Richard Brandson. It's not happening anymore.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 7>No, No, they are all trying to do this.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 6>And we saw Bezos, you know, offer his congratulations to

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 6>the President elect on x on Twitter, where he hadn't

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 6>posted for a long time. He also saw, you know,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 6>the Washington Post declined to make an endorsement, which at

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 6>least some critics we're seeing as a you know, politically

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 6>motivated thing designed to help Bezos' rocket company.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 7>Now he denied that.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 6>No, he very much wants to sell launches to the

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 6>US government. And you're going to see other defense contractors,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.119
<v Speaker 6>traditional defense contractors push back.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 7>And it's not like they have nothing to work with.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 6>These companies provide jobs and states, they operate factories, they

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 6>have constituencies as well.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 7>So it's not like Elon Musk.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 6>Can can overnight take over the entire aerospace industry. He's

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 6>just in a much better position than he was a

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 6>month ago.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so Max talking about how powerful Elon is or

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 4>t love excuse me, Yeah, Max talking about how powerful

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Elon is. Certainly when it comes to Tesla, when it

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 4>comes to having the year of the President elect.

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't win all the time.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, there's a Delaware judge that

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 4>seems to sort of have an edge right now.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's going on with this pay package.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 6>So for a second time, Elon Musk's very very large,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 6>historically large pay package, which you know, as of now

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 6>is worth more than one hundred million dollars according to

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 6>the Bloomberg story that we published, although has been worth

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, fifty billion dollars. The last time it was

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 6>rejected was rejected. Now, if you remember a judge had

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 6>rejected this, there was a shareholder vote. Shareholders approved the

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 6>pay package, and the thought, at least from Elon Musk

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 6>and Tesla's point of view, was that this would essentially.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 7>Invalidate the Delaware ruling.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 6>The judge said, no, you can't undo a court ruling

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 6>by having a vote of shareholders. That's a novel application

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 6>of law. That's invalid. And so we're sort of back

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 6>where we started. Tesla's shareholders would very much like to

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 6>keep Elon Musk happy, which as far as they many

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 6>of them see it, and he sees it, means paying

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 6>him a huge amount of money, and Delaware is not

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 6>amenable yet, although we'll see, Musk and his lawyers have

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 6>said they're going to appeal to the Supreme Court of Delaware,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 6>so it's possible they could overturn it, and then it's

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 6>also possible he could just take his business to Texas,

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 6>as he's threatened to do.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 4>We do you does this change when I know this

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 4>is a state issue right now? But does this change

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 4>when Donald Trump becomes president?

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 6>No? I mean it's a state issue. And it's also again,

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Musk has already.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 7>Moved the company to tech Exis.

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 6>You could imagine trying to do this again and then

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 6>fighting it out in a Texas court, which in theory

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 6>would probably be more amenable to the pay package than

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 6>than Delaware was. I just look at this as it.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.479
<v Speaker 6>Musk doesn't need the money right now. He's very wealthy.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you don't need to start a go fundme page

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 3>for him.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 7>No, he'll be fund on.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 8>Later.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm sure he'll take any checks we send him,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 6>but he doesn't need the money now. I do think

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 6>this is a reminder that Elon Musk cannot He cannot

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 6>change the laws of gravity, and he cannot.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 7>Change the law laws.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 6>You know, there are a lot of people making huge

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 6>investments in his companies right now, including in Tesla, and

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 6>even with this SpaceX deal based on some kind of

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 6>vague sense that politics will sort of shift the laws

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 6>of business in his favor. And but there are there

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 6>are laws of business that are not in his favor,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 6>and this is one of them. He's he's repeatedly gone

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 6>out against this Delaware judge. Remember this is the same

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 6>judge that forced him to buy Twitter slash x.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 7>So, so you know, he can't do everything.

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 6>And again there are going to be battles ahead, legal battles,

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 6>political battles, and and he's vulnerable to you know, the

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 6>whims of law and democracy and all that, just like

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 6>everyone else.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he can't get it everything he wants.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 7>What almost what?

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, why is the Why is the money so important

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 4>to him? I don't know, honestly, Like if you were

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 4>let's see, you know here it goes in.

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 3>There, it's it's three hundred and fifty three.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Billion dollars ethicly SpaceX right. I mean, he's what's an

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>extra fifty billion dollars? What can you buy with four

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred million dollars that you can't buy with three hundred

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 4>and fifty million dollars.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, he has said that he intends to, you know,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 6>play a big role in the midterm elections. There also

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 6>there's chatter about potential huge donations to British politicians, so

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 6>maybe he wants to just a little extra cash for

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 6>his political stuff. But really I think this is more

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 6>for him and the people who back him. About the principle,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 6>and Elon Musk is somebody who has put now now

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 6>a principle. You know, I think there are people who

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 6>would snicker at that. But Elon Musk has put his

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 6>own role in Tesla, in Tesla and its growth central

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 6>to its brand, and he sees this as an.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 7>Attack, you know, right, rightfully wrongly.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Max Chafkin always appreciated co host of the Elon Inc Podcast.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 3>A new episode downloading you're.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen on

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Apple car Play and then brought auto with a Bloomberg

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Business app or want us Live on YouTube.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I got to say to politics, yes, you know,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 3>there is so much going on Russia, Ukraine, Middle East,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>US China relations. And then it feels like, out of nowhere,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 3>what has become one of our most read stories on

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg. It's been a top the list for most

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>of the day about a declaration of martial law in

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 3>South Korea by the South Korean President Yun, only to

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>be followed hours later by the country's parliament voting to

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>lift the declaration. I gotta say, Tim, it's a bit

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 3>of a whipsite, yea it is.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 4>We got a great live log on it from our

0:12:58.280 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>team over at Bloomberg News. If you're on the URN,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 4>do check that out by going to tliv here with

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 4>what is going on? Sidney Siler Senior Advisor, nonresident or

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 4>career Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies. Sidney was

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the National Intelligence Officer for North Korea at the National

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence Council from twenty twenty to twenty twenty three, one

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 4>of the nation's top experts when it comes to North

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Korea and Carol. Before that, he was the US Forces

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Korea Senior Analyst and Senior Defense Intelligence Expert for North Korea,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 4>serving as the principal advisor and senior expert on Korean

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Peninsula security issues to the USFK Commander and the US

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Defense Intelligence Enterprise.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 3>All Right, we had to lay it out, and this

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>is why we wanted to talk to Sidney. Hey, Sidney,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>great to have you here back on Bloomberg. Tell us

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 3>about marshal law. Came as a shock I think to

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 3>many domestically and abroad when they declared martial law. But

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the country has a history of martial law and military rules.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>So give us the history. What's important for the Bloomberg

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 3>audience to know at this hour.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, thank you first vote for the vitation to speak

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 9>on this. The history is relevant and important only because

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 9>it's so from a different era. It's worth a warning

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 9>not to actually view these recent developments in that context.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 9>North Korea, as you call the Korean Peninsula, divided right

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 9>after World War Two, underwent a war trying to unify

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 9>from nineteen fifty to fifty three, and South Korea's history

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 9>has been moving from a very right wing pro US

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 9>authoritarian dictaintorship to the democracy we have today. Along the lines,

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 9>there's been a couple of military coups, again ensuring a

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 9>conservative hardline towards North Korea authoritarian in terms of its

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 9>domestic system, but a gradual growth today to the economic

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 9>miracle that has begun. And the last coup was nineteen eighty,

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 9>so many years ago, such a different context today. That said,

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 9>you know, it is one of the few tools at

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 9>the dispo of the president. It's one you don't want

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 9>to break the glass on too early when you have

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 9>the type of political deadlock that President Un has faced

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 9>with the opposition, which is all focused on trying to

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 9>regain power. In South Korea has a five year presidential system.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 9>One term you become a lane duck real quickly, and

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 9>the opposition has been tasting blood. With President Un having

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 9>twenty percent and below approval ratings, it was a surprise

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 9>that he chose this tool at this time. At the

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 9>same time, there are elements of it that warned us

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 9>not taking it too alarmedly and have reacting with caution,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 9>as the US government has so far.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, why is that the US government was certainly caught

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 4>off guard? The White House was not notified ahead of

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 4>time about this, but it sounds pretty alarmist. I mean,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 4>the idea of martiall rule in a democracy, that is

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 4>certainly one of those things that I think people would say,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, it'd be fair to respond with alarm there.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Why should we be cautious about doing that?

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, yeah, I hate to draw parallels, but I mean,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 9>if you just look at the dynamics of US political system,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, back around the first Trump administration or even today,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, worries about mobilizing national guards and using military capabilities.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it, unfortunately, is something that we've seen in

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 9>other democracies throughout the world. I think the quickness. You know,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 9>first of all, President yun is a career prosecutor. He

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 9>was very heavily involved in the impeachment that removed Pacinet

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 9>from office, and so you know what he embarked on this,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 9>he does so from a position of understanding the constitution

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 9>and probably understanding that has happened, it would be overturned

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 9>or rejected within hours. And so the fact that the

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 9>system worked so quickly to have the National Assembly come

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 9>together and reject the declaration, and that it looks like,

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, the initial steps involved with martial law are

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 9>being backed off. It is a time to now kind

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 9>of focus on the morning after, as it were.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Hey, I want to also bring into the conversation Rosalind Matheson,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News News director of EMEA. Of course we're talking

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 3>about Europe, the Mid East, in Africa. She's typically based

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 3>in our London bureau, but lucky for us and we

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>have been tapping into her big time that because she

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>is here in New York and with all the news

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>she's here in our New York studio, Raz we're listening

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to Sydney his view and giving us some context. How

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 3>are you seeing about what's going in South Korea? Because

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I have to say, when we all walked in, we're like,

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 3>what is going on? And how do we make sense

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of it?

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 10>Everybody was shaking their heads.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 11>We were quite stunned to see this news and particularly

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, coming in that late night televised address just

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 11>denouncing you know, emergency martial law and the words marshal

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 11>law of course resonating you know, in a very tricky

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 11>environment historically in South Korea. And it's interesting to see

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 11>how quickly again parliament, they managed to get into parliament

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 11>and they voted to overturn it. So the question is

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 11>what was he trying to achieve with this and what

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 11>does he do next? I mean, does he remain defiant

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 11>in the face of parliament and trying marshal military support

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 11>or does he accept you know, what people are saying

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 11>here about his actions and does he resign or is

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 11>he impeached at some point? I mean, it can't be

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 11>necessarily a good outcome for him here. So does that

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 11>plunge South Korean into a further period of political term

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 11>or where you've got to maybe have elections, you've got

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 11>to have a new administration. And what does that mean

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 11>for stability in South Korea?

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Which we think that's North Korea we expects stuff to happen,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 3>not South Korea.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll talk about the North Korean angle in a second,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 4>but City, I want to get your thoughts on you know,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 4>this idea of an unpopular leader declaring martial law. Does

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 4>that make him less popular? I mean, this doesn't necessarily,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 4>as an outsider, seem like something that would you know,

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 4>engender him with a larger group of folks.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 9>Good point. Well, he did open his, you know, his

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 9>announcement by stating that, you know, kind of using deep

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 9>state like language, that there was no Korean agents throughout

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 9>the US government, anti state agents that were out to

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 9>undermine the very you know, foundations of the state of

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 9>the Republic of Korea. So it seems like he was

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 9>hoping to try to galvanize support from the right, his

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 9>conservative base, and maybe even some in the middle who

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 9>would be more concerned about what the opposition was successfully

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 9>doing and building support to challenge the ruling party in

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 9>the next presidential Chile election, or even potentially to impeach Union.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 9>Talk about impeaching Union was already in play, and you

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 9>may have just concluded that, you know, again, he had

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 9>nothing to lose. Most likely, when you look at the

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 9>number of ruling party members who would now join with

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 9>opposition forces, there's probably enough votes to you know, challenge

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 9>whether Union will stay in power. He but Un is

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 9>a guy who does what he believes is is right.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 9>Agree or disagree with his worldview that he was doing

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 9>something for the to protect the Republic of Korea, and

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 9>he was probably willing to accept whatever consequences would come

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 9>out of there.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 3>I wondered Ros if you had a question, because here

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 3>he is like someone who's had some history, understands and

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>has followed and you look at the world more broadly.

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I'm very interested, Sidney.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 11>You were talking about how Ying perhaps felt he had

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 11>nothing to lose, and could he try and galvanize people

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 11>with this maneuver.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 10>But again, in a country that's had.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 11>A really difficult history when it comes to martial law

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 11>and military rule and a real strong sense of wanting

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 11>democracy amongst ordinary South Koreans. I mean, where do you

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 11>see this going for you do you feel he's going

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 11>to have to step down or he will be impeached.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 9>My sense is he'll stay the course. He will say

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 9>he acted in accordance with the constitution definitions, with some

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 9>subjectivity as to whether the emergency justified or warranted the action,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 9>you know. And again, when you look at the history

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 9>of martial law in Korea, it's not forty years passed

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 9>since you know, the last coupdetas that kind of facilitated

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 9>martial law in that nineteen eighty time period. And again,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 9>having been my first tour in Korea in nineteen eighty two,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 9>it is a markedly different environment, markedly different world today.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 9>Other elements of the government system are functioning. They're not

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 9>being rejected, you know, during the martial laws or when

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 9>the when the military seizes power from civilians back in

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 9>you know, nineteen sixty one, nineteen seventy, nine eighty, they

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 9>were overturning the system. So far, all Yun seems to

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 9>be doing is addressing the people in that system. And

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 9>so I think, again, you know, this is not too

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 9>apocalyptic in terms of domestic South Korean politics. It survived

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 9>challenges like this in the past. Yun will not, though, I.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Think sending what does this mean for the relationship between

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 3>the North and the South. Is it an opportunity for

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 3>North Korea to maybe potentially go on the offensive.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 9>So what's interesting when you think about it, that would

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 9>be the natural thought, right that Kim Jong lunn may

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 9>see a weakness in South Korea that he could exploit.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 9>At the same time, Kim Jong Lund's got his own

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 9>challenge and issues at home. Yeah, heavily involved in supporting

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 9>the war in Russia. And perhaps more importantly, you know,

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 9>with many people expecting Kim to do something, he is

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 9>likely not to play into their hand and only provide

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 9>further evidence that what Eton was saying about the North

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 9>Korea threat was right. There's a lot of value for

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 9>North creator to stand down right now.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Sidney, thank you so much, So appreciate you finding some

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>time for us. Sidney Siler, Senior advisor at the Career

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Chair Center for Strategic and International Studies, joining us from

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the nation's capital. Roz Mathison staying with us because I

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 3>got to say, Roz, geopolitics, it's all we've talked about.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 3>I feel like for the last couple of years, and

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even quite sure where to go next.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 5>Which geographically where to go?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Where would you go next? Like when you think about France,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>the Republic of Georgia, the Middle East, ongoing Syria, Aran,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 3>where would you go next?

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's a lot going on, isn't there.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that France is particularly interesting at the moment because

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 11>we are careering towards the collapse of the government there

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 11>as soon as tomorrow, and interestingly because the right and

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 11>the left are joining together to do that, and that's

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 11>going to be a really tricky moment for a very

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 11>big economy in Europe and a lot of political instability ahead.

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if Barnier goes, then you've got a period

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 11>where Emmanuel Macron has to try and find another prime

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 11>minister who'll be able to navigate a very tricky fiscal environment.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if Barneo failed, and this is a very

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 11>experienced politician with many years in Brussels, so he couldn't

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 11>manage it, then who can.

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of Americans, with the system of

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 4>government that we have here in the US and the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 4>dominance of the Democrats and Republicans, might have trouble comprehending

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 4>the idea of the right and left coming together to

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>top of a government.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Explain this to the American mind.

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's not because they're supporters of each other, put

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 11>it that way. In fact, they really don't like each

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 11>other at all. But they have a common enemy, which

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 11>is the French budget, and they all have problems with

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 11>the French budget and they want changes to it. And

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 11>the kind of changes that they're asking for are very

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 11>populist and they're what the markets don't want because you've

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 11>got a very big fiscal deficityel Like, I've seen this

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 11>with you before. Yeah, So it's not so they're comfortable bedfellows,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 11>but they've got a united enemy. And of course the

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 11>backdrop is this is coming at a time when we

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 11>have Donald Trump coming to.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 10>Power in the US.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 11>You've got elections coming in Germany next door. So you've

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 11>got a period potentially of political uncertainty in Germany. I

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 11>mean often after German election you don't have a functioning

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 11>government for sometimes six months or more. You're low coalition

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 11>wrangling that goes on. So you're not going to if

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 11>you're talking about European unity right now, and a unified

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 11>European view on everything from Ukraine to the Middle East,

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 11>to trade to tariffs with the US, to you how

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 11>to handle Donald Trump in a second administration. You've got

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 11>a lot of fragmentation occurring in particularly again the two

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 11>biggest economies in Europe, France and Germany, And so what

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 11>does that do in terms of a cohesive European approach

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 11>to a second Trump administration.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm like questioning where to go next Georgia, Like, is

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 3>that what is going on there? We know there's pro

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>European protests, we're watching that, We've been watching some of

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the footage throughout the day. What do we need to

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 3>know about that?

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 11>There was a little talk about whether that's a Madan

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 11>revolution similar to what happened in Ukraine, that pro European

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 11>push protests, and how successful they can be. But in Georgia,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 11>you know, the protests are big, but they're very fragmented.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 11>There's not a strong sense of who's driving.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Is Russia well that's.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 11>Always a question. That was a question in Ukraine as well.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 11>Obviously during the protests that we saw there. Russia does

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 11>not want these countries going into Europe's orbit. We saw

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 11>that recently, gain questions over the elections in Moldova, for example,

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 11>the referendum in Moldova about joining the EU. Wants to

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 11>pull these countries away and make them argue with each

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 11>other and make that kind of weaker.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 4>We could talk to you about more about Russia, Ukraine,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East, we could talk about Syria and iron

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 4>We don't have time to do any of those things.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 4>What I want to do is just in our last

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 4>forty five seconds, talk about the significance of all of

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 4>this happening against a backdrop of the changing administration here

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, one that was caught off guard

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 4>by South Korea today.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 11>Well, that is the question, but also it just reflects

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 11>a changing world beyond the US. You know, we're in

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 11>a world where the US is no longer the singular

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 11>dominant power. So you've see a lot of change erupting

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 11>from that. Countries deciding to work out can they have

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 11>that power block? Are they in that group instead? Where

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 11>do they belong? The rise of the global South in

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 11>that so a lot of fragmentation into different power groups.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 11>And that's just natural when you see, you know, arguably

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 11>a declining singular global power and more of a multi

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 11>polar world.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Twenty seconds is there any Is there a common thread?

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Is it the rise of populism? Is it just another

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 3>cycle in the world's history. How do you see that.

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 10>It's a bit of everything.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 11>But it is that question again of populist movements in

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 11>several countries.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 10>It's not just all on.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 11>The right, I would add as well, it's parties on

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 11>the left and the idea of you know, public saying

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 11>I want to party. A leadership is going to talk

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 11>with you know, talk with me, not at me. And

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 11>so politicians who are stute you pick up on that

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 11>are the ones who are being successful.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't go home.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Just I was just going to say, this is why

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 4>we love Bloomberg because people like you.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Ros Mathis and Bloomberg's news new

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>director News director, I should say, overseeing Ema.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 3>All right. Just about one year ago, our Bloomberg News

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 3>team put together a great story highlighting the stock optimists

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 3>who nailed twenty twenty three and saw more gains ahead.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>One of those stock optimists who made the right call

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 3>last year's Ryan Dietrich. Dietrich expected the US economy to

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>avoid a recession in twenty twenty three. Check it did right.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Some say a little bit of a rolling recession, but

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 3>really we kind of missed it in a big way.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 3>You also bet inflation would cool sooner than the market

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 3>was expecting.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Check it's it's still getting there. It's still getting there.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 5>We're still getting there.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 7>Sticky.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 3>He added exposure to stocks during the banking turmoil in

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 3>March twenty twenty three, and as the S and P

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 3>five hundred sank in October of twenty twenty three. You

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 3>gotta say, tim check check good calls.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Ryan Dietrich T, chief market strategist at the RIA

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 4>and platform for advisors of the Carson Group. He joins

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>us here in the Bloomberg Business Week.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 8>Well done, well, Carol can hold on.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 5>The year's not over here?

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 8>Every time I present or something and I have you

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 8>come and give that little intro that was that was

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 8>very nice.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Listen, we are when people make bad calls. We kind

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 3>of pointed out, oh yeah, and the same goes for

0:28:58.480 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 3>when you make a really good call.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, thank you.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 8>It was two years ago this month, December of twenty two,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 8>Carson Group went on a record. We went overweight stocks.

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 8>We manage real money for our advisors, and we said

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 8>no recession. It wasn't very popular, but as we know

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 8>now we're looking at fifty four new all time highs,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 8>the back to back twenty percent games. We can get

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 8>into all of it, but yeah, it's it's been a

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 8>great run.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 4>So some people might say the US stocks are expensive

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 4>right now by certain measures, but you argue that they're

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 4>still room with Do you argue the bull market is

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 4>still young?

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 8>That's correct, you know. I mean a couples that answer

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 8>this one. Stocks are a little pricy. I mean you

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 8>look at the forward s and P five hundred earnings,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 8>they are a little bit pricey. But then you look

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 8>at other parts of the market. I've come on with

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 8>you guys for two years talking about some of these things.

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 8>Small caps still are cheap, mid cap still our cheap industrials, financials,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 8>there are parts that are cheap. Yes, large caps are expensive.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 8>When you talk about bull markets. So it's so fascinating.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 8>This one's about two years old right October twenty two,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 8>so I had two years, so we'll call it twenty

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 8>five twenty six months right now. Once a bull market

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 8>gets into its third year, like this one is right

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 8>now into the third, that's yeah, not really, because it

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 8>looks like a cruise ship. Once they get moving, they

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 8>keep moving. I went back forty years, last five bowl

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 8>markets that got into a third year. Everyone that made

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 8>it to at least their fifth year, and actually it

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.239
<v Speaker 8>was an average of eight years. I'm not saying this

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 8>one's gonna go eight years. We're just saying these cycles

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 8>can last a lot longer than you think.

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 4>But we're stocks as expensive in their second year as

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 4>they are now in other bull markets.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 8>I guess the short answer is no, that's a great point,

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 8>they're not. And one other concern, if you want to

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 8>use that is if you look at like we gained

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 8>over sixty percent, okay the first two years, is bol

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 8>market looking at like the last nine bowl markets that

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 8>made it into the third year, that third year is

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 8>up only like two or three percent. So some consolidation,

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 8>we think we're gonna gain more than that the next

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 8>twelve months will be clear, but those are some things

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 8>to think about. We just had a huge rally. We

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 8>don't see a recession. Look at the economic data, all

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 8>time highs and construction spending just yesterday, you know, all

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 8>time highs and earnings estimates we still think are going

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 8>to be strong, that we can get into more of

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 8>the weeds of that. But there's no recession coming. So

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 8>we still be overweight equities like we have been for

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty four months now.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm looking at the equal weighted S and

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 3>P five hundred and it's up about just shive eighteen

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 3>percent for the year. S and P five hundred is

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 3>up about twenty seven percent. If I look at both

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 3>equal weighted, just coming off overbought levels, I'm assuming. Let

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>me just pull it up on the Bloomberg the RSI

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and if you look at the relative strength on the

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred, yeah, overbought. So I mean,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>what is it? Just momentum creates momentum, which to me

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't say that's necessarily good thing to buy into. It's

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a different if it's fundamentals, it's earnings based, it's you know,

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 3>those kind of things that I can actually trade on.

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's different things you can look at there. When

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 8>you think about the equal weight, what's that tell us?

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 8>What tell us is a lot of participation, right, we

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 8>know that. Look at various advanced cline lines of we've

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 8>seen it brought me downs. Oh my goodness, yes, absolutely,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 8>just two weeks ago, right, there's eleven sectors. Ten of

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 8>them outperformed the SP five hundred. Last week, eight of

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 8>them outperformed the SP five hundred. What's happened since the election?

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 8>Small caps, midcaps, A lot of other areas, not just tech,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 8>not just communications, have been doing well. So that's that

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 8>broadening up. But I'm with you one hundred percent. Those

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 8>are the technicals. Then we look at the fundamentals. I mean,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 8>what are the credit spreads doing. You mentioned March of

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 8>twenty three when you have the banking crisis. Yeah, we

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 8>didn't really see much stress in the credit markets. Think

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 8>about the yen carry trade on win those three very

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 8>scary days early here in August. You know what the

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 8>US dollar did. US dollar went down. Then historically when

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 8>the dollar goes up, that's a worry. Now, I will

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 8>say right here and now one of our worry.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 3>We're sold as a safe haven.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 8>Exactly seen of the safe haven. But you've got dollar strength.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm surprised, honestly, dollar has been as strong as I'm sorry,

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 8>the market, stock market's been as strong as it has

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 8>been with the dollar strength we've seen so into next year.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 8>If the dollar continues to strengthen, that is a concern

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 8>of ours. We don't expect it to, but if it does,

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 8>that could be a sign then you know, maybe a

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 8>little more risk off is in play, but we're not

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 8>seeing it yet.

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's be clear, what is the difference going into twenty

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five versus what you saw a year ago?

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 8>Sitting question, Yeah, that's good. Well, I guess we're one

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 8>we're all one year older, you know, and that's that's

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 8>for sure. But I will say one big difference what

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing now kind of the other answer. We are

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 8>seeing broadening out. We are seeing a lot of participation.

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 8>Remember those last two months last year big rally small

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 8>caps rustled too by small caps gain like twenty one percent.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 8>Then they were flat the first six months of this year.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 8>But since the middle of the year, we are seeing

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 8>more of a broadening out, which is a nice thing. Also,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 8>manufacturing has not done very well in our country. We

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 8>get it. But just look at that data we saw yesterday.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 8>Maybe we're starting, you know, maybe telling me there's a

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 8>chance here, you're starting to see a bottom, if you will,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 8>in some of the manufacturing data, which is a positive.

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 8>But services has been strong on the whole time. Earnings

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 8>have been pretty strong in the whole time. So there

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 8>are some similarities. But you know, the reality again is

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 8>one more thing on this. So we're up another Let's

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 8>assume we're up twenty percent this year. I know we're

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 8>not there yet, but we probably will be. We looked

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 8>to back to back twenty percent gains since nineteen fifty

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 8>found eight of them. What happened to next year? Marco

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 8>was up six out of six times, up thirteen percent

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 8>on average. So it's not like a huge game. But

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 8>just because we're up twenty percent two years in a row,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 8>that is not a reason to be bearish. And there's

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 8>other stuff to look at. I get it, but that's

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 8>just something to be aware of.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Any of those eight years have a new president in

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the White House.

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 8>That's a very good question. I'm not sure, but I

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 8>can dive into that for a second here. When you

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 8>look at you know, uh, well, as a new president

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 8>is a re elected president. I get, we can look

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 8>at it either way. But when you look at re

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 8>elected presidents, year one stocks do really well and you're

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 8>two to do really well, it's later in a re

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 8>elected president's term they don't do as well versus the

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 8>exact mirror image of that what we just saw President

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 8>Biden first second year not as good, but third and

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 8>fourth are strong. And again get into the weeds of

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 8>why this is probably because you know what you're gonna get.

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 8>There's less uncertainty with someone who's potentially won a reelection,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 8>and I get it this time is a little bit different.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 8>But the reality again is, you know, you look what's happening.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 8>And then we can get into the F word the

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 8>FED if you want. I mean, that's another big driver here.

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, I want to do before we get to the

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 5>F flord, let's do the T word tariffs.

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 8>What's that? Oh?

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, because and I think Carol was getting at this,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 4>but yeah, I it was Thanksgiving that is coming gone

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately in the rearview.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 5>But I'm wondering about the.

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 4>What that does to the market if President elect ends

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 4>up going through with the tariffs that he's threatened. We

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 4>had any head of trays on last week from data

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 4>who said, you know he's going to do it. If

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 4>he says he's going to do it, what does that do,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 4>especially to small caps?

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, what do we know? We had a fifteen

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 8>month rally after the election in twenty sixteen. February fourth

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 8>is when we all say, slapped on tariffs and the

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 8>market didn't have a very good year in twenty eighteen.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 8>Maybe there are other factors in there, but that's the

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 8>reality what happened now. I will say this, we're all

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 8>talking about it now, all right, mister market's probably priced

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 8>a lot of this in the reality is, if you

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 8>do the twenty five percent tariffs on you know what,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 8>it's Canada and Mexico and ten percent tariffs on China

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 8>the full thing, that probably will slow down the rally

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 8>we've seen, maybe potentially cause a little bit more inflation.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 8>I will say this, though you look at inflation, you're

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 8>your CPI in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen when those

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 8>tariff started, It's not like we saw massive inflation. I

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 8>get it. Parts of the economy saw inflation, but the

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 8>overall economy you really didn't see inflation, so that's something

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:56.479
<v Speaker 8>important to remember.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 3>My last question, I get a little hanky when everybody's

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 3>so enthusiastic. We've the story about the strategists and their targets, and.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 5>You should get Warren Buffett on. He's not super enthusiastic.

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody is. And it makes me a little hinky.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Whether it's still corporate real estate or office properties, or

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>whether it's private credit because we don't have much transparency.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 3>What's the one thing that you think man keep an

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 3>eye on, because that could be kind of the canary

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 3>in the coal mine.

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think I answered a little bit ago. The

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 8>US dollar, right, if the dollar continues to be strong,

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 8>that's the one thing. And honestly, yields. If yields keep

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 8>going higher, look at the housing data. Housing is an issue.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 8>Small business confidence come back a little bit, but we're

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 8>not seeing small business investment. That's why we think with

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 8>the higher productivity that we're seeing in our country, with

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 8>inflation being last year's problem, the FED still can cut

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 8>one will I'll leave you on this when the FED

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 8>is cut with the market of all time highs. We

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 8>took a look at this using Bloomberg data back in

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 8>nineteen eighty. One year later, SP's been higher twenty times.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 8>It's happened twenty out of twenty times one year later.

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 8>So we just saw a cut of all time highs.

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 8>You know. Recently we might see another one cut near

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 8>all time highs here in December. That is a bolish thing.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 8>Do not fight the Fed, is what they taught us

0:36:58.080 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 8>a long time ago. We'd still side with them.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that kind of still holds it, so it always does. Hey, Ryan,

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much. Happy holidays.

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate it and love being in your city.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Thank you nice having you in studio, Ryan Dietrich. He's

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>chief market strategist at the Carson Group. As we said,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 3>joining us here in our Business Week studio.

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty Carol.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Many Americans agree there's a housing crisis totally radically different

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 4>though than from the last housing crisis. So instead of

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 4>the values of homes dropping too fast as they did

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 4>during the foreclosures debacle starting in two thousand and seven.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 5>You covered that a lot.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh my god, I remember going to people in

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>uh I think it was Florida, forgive me, I'm trying

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to remember, but talking to homeowners who were just you know,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 3>losing their homes, couldn't afford it. It was just a really,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 3>really tough situation and just such a low And we

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 3>know homes not only important for people to live in,

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's often their biggest investment.

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 4>So fast forward a few years and instead of home

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 4>prices dropping too fast as they did during that foreclosure

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 4>debacle back in two thousand and seven, they've stayed stubbornly high,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 4>locking many would be buyers out of the market, raising

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 4>rants and adding to anxiety about the cost of living.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Amy Rubinstein has spent her career in real estate. She's

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 4>seen the industry through different cycles. She's the CEO of

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Clear Investment Group. It's a Chicago based firm focuses on

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 4>distressed mid size multifamily assets I think three hundred to

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 4>twelve hundred unit portfolios and secondary and tertiary markets here

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 4>in the US. The company currently has assets in Syracuse,

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 4>New York, Columbus, Ohio, Shreveport, Louisiana, and in Illinois and

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Decalm in Chicago.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Amy, welcome, thank you, thanks for having me here.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 4>So let's talk a little bit about the overall market

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 4>right now and where you're seeing opportunity because we spend

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time talking about high prices. Yes, but

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you're going after a different type of market.

0:38:58.440 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Where are you see value?

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, we're looking at renters who are renters

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 12>by necessity and not lifestyle renters, so a little bit

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 12>different than that housing market. But you know, we see

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 12>a lot of We particularly love to invest where there's

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 12>stable markets, not necessarily growth markets, because growth markets have

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 12>a lot of speculation in them. They're really looking towards

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 12>the future, what's going to happen, and they're usually priced

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 12>that way. But we like markets that are very, very stable,

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 12>and of course we do try to stay away from

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 12>so stable. You're just saying not a lot of price fluctuation,

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 12>Well I'm not so much there. But stable as far

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 12>as population, as far as rental growth, it at least

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 12>keeps up with inflation, as far as job opportunity and

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 12>employment stability. So it's that it's that kind of stable

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 12>that we're looking for.

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Pricing is going to go up, right.

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 12>That's as far as like we're in a we've been

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 12>in a period of time where multifamily the real estate

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 12>market is really segregated as far as different asset classes.

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 12>But multifamily itself right now has had a bit of

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 12>a pause for the last two years. Right There haven't

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 12>been a ton of transactions going. And now I think

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 12>we're starting to see those transactions pick up and so

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 12>pricing will start to rise with it. But we did

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 12>have quite high pricing in twenty twenty twenty twenty twenty

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 12>one and then started to drop down twenty twenty two,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty three.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Where exactly do you play in terms of what you

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 4>do with an asset when you get it?

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you then do you own and operate it? Do

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 5>you flip it? Explain for everyone what you do.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 12>What we particularly do is we look for assets that

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 12>are distressed themselves in communities that are stable, and so

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 12>we look for things that have severe problems and then

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 12>we solve those problems and then we go ahead and

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 12>turn around and sell it.

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So what kind of problem, for example, a property

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 4>in Syracuse.

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 12>High vacancies, high delinquencies. Sometimes that comes with some crime.

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 12>Sometimes that comes with physical distress. Well, it almost always

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 12>comes with some physical distress. And we're figuring out, what

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 12>are all those problems, Why isn't this particular property performing

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 12>like the ones that are surrounding it, and then how

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 12>do we get it to be stable so that we

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 12>can then go ahead and sell though.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 3>It's when you buy distressed property, it's not like everything's

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 3>in distressed. You're saying, here's one property and there's other

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 3>properties multifamily around them that are actually doing okay, So

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>why is it this particular property exactly?

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 12>Exactly that's what we're looking for, because then we understand

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 12>the value because.

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to necessarily buy into an area where

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 3>it's all distressed.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 12>No, because that's speculative. Then you have to guess, how

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 12>do you get this whole community back up and running,

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 12>which is a thing. It's just that's a lot to overcome. Right,

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 12>So we're saying we understand the value of our asset

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 12>because we know the value of all of our neighbor's assets.

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 12>Now our assets not performing, so we have to figure

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 12>out how to get it to that performance place.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 4>In general, real estate is a pretty efficient market. Yes,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 4>what are you able to do that other players aren't

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 4>able to do? Like why is that thing sitting there

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 4>distressed until you come along?

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 12>I think a lot of buyers look for what is

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 12>your incoming cap rate? What are you going to buy it?

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:52.399
<v Speaker 12>What's your NOI going to be when you first buy

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 12>that property? And for us, that's not going to deter

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 12>us if the property is negative cash flowing, because what

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 12>we're really looking for is where are we going to

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 12>get this property to what is the NI going to

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 12>be when we complete this property? And what is the

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 12>cap rate going to be when we sell this property?

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 12>As opposed to where is it now? Where is it

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 12>now is just a variable, it's a place mark, right,

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 12>So we're saying, all right now we're negative cash flowing.

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 12>Here are all the problems on the table we needed

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 12>to get it to this point, and we know exactly

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 12>where that point is because we're not trying to change

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 12>our asset class and how much time and how much

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 12>money is it going to take us to get from

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 12>point A to point Z? And that's basically our what

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 12>our company does and what we when we raise a

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 12>fund we're looking to. Our diversification comes from our geographic diversification,

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 12>but the assets that we're buying all look exactly the same.

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 3>You keep saying NI net operating income, correct, all right,

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 3>So basically you're looking at expenses versus the income that

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 3>you're getting from property. So it's kind of a basic

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 3>metric that tells you a lot. What does your sector

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.959
<v Speaker 3>that you are involved in tell us more broadly about

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the real estate market?

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so we specifically are working with affordable housing, not

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 12>affordable housing from a technical government standpoint. There's no restrictions

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 12>on the properties that we buy, but we're servicing a

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 12>tenant based sit somewhere between thirty five and eighty five

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 12>thousand dollars of annual household income. And what we're right now,

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 12>we're really servicing an area of great need because we

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 12>are buying assets and even selling our assets far below

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 12>replacement cost.

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So when someone's trying to build.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 12>A new property, they're not going to be able to

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 12>compete with the pricing that we're going to be able

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 12>to offer, and that's created a major shortage of affordable

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 12>housing in the country because the costs of construction are

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.439
<v Speaker 12>really high right now, with interest rates high, the cost

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 12>of construction is high, and therefore new affordable housing is

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 12>not coming under the market.

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 3>So what are the rents that you typically charge in

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that kind of affordable housing?

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 12>It could be somewhere on average between seven hundred and

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 12>twelve hundred dollars of rent.

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, how long?

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 5>How long does it typically take you to turn a

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 5>building around?

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 12>We're stabilizing anywhere from twelve to thirty six months.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 4>And do you what's the scale that you're able to

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 4>bring given that it's relatively geographically diverse, so you need

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 4>to have different people in those areas. It's not like

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 4>you have one local company that you work with that

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 4>you can scale that goes around and fixes things up.

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 4>You have to actually find those folks market.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 12>We're big on those sporting pa Well, we want to

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 12>support the local markets that we're in. Those are the

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 12>people that we're servicing. Those are the people we want

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 12>to give the jobs to. So when we get to

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 12>a property, we'll bring our staff out there to get

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 12>it started up and running. But we're really trying to

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 12>help to hire locally so that we can actually help

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 12>that community that we're in. It's beneficial for everybody that.

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 3>How much is about getting it up and running well

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 3>so that you can then sell it off. Like how

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 3>long do you hold on to a property?

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 12>We're somewhere from two to four years usually, okay, typically

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 12>what we're.

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Doing, Yeah, what does turnover look like in terms of

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 4>tenants during that time?

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:46.479
<v Speaker 12>So our goal is not to displace people we really want, but.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Don't you have to raise rent in order to actually

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 4>make the changes and have the money.

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 12>Beauty of what we do is we're really trying to

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:57.399
<v Speaker 12>go for efficiencies of the particular property itself. So we're

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 12>really trying to figure out why aren't people paying their

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 12>rent today, why are there so many vacancies today? And

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 12>how do we sell for that? More so than how

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 12>do we hike up everybody's rents, Because we're not trying

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 12>to gentrify our areas. We're really trying to dig into

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 12>that particular community. We want everyone to stay in their places,

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 12>we want them to pay rent. We want to be

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 12>able to offer that affordable housing. We're not trying to

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 12>price people out of that market. So it's less about

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 12>raising people's rents and more about getting people to pay

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 12>rent and to move into our builty But.

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 4>If someone's not paying their rent, then they can't really

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 4>stay right.

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 12>So if someone is absolutely not paying the rent, usually

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 12>we find that people aren't paying their rent for various reasons,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 12>and maybe they're not getting the services that they need,

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 12>which is really why we have a massive shortage of

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 12>affordable housing. I mean, yes, it's also because you can't

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 12>get new construction, but it's also because you have a

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 12>lot of owners who've run out of money and they're

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.720
<v Speaker 12>no longer putting money into their properties, and so someone

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 12>has to come back and restore that value.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 3>We've only got about twenty seconds left. You've been doing

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 3>this forever, twenty years. You founded your company back in

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three. I am curious when you find

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 3>that distressed property among other properties that are doing well,

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 3>is it typically the reason it's not doing well because

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 3>owners are run out of money.

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 12>Yes, that's what our fund is really based off of,

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 12>just buying deals where the sellers have been in distress,

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 12>where there's there are dollars that have been lost on

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 12>the table, and we're going to come back and bring

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 12>back that value.

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Pretty that is yeah, pretty interesting stuff. Amy, Thank you

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 3>so much, Thank you, thanks for stopping by. Amy Rubinstein.

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 3>She's chief executive officer of Clear Investment Group. Joining us

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 3>right here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 5>This is Business Week.

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 2>each weekday. He's starting at two pm Eastern on Apple

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Car Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 3>M.

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Mac A Journal.

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 12>Yah about you? Let me drive you?

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, honey, please, how do the riding gravels?

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me?

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 3>I want to drive.

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question time.

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 5>This is the drive to the globes down.

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Similar thing we'll buy around.

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:16.720
<v Speaker 5>On Bloomberg Radio.

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, TikTok, everybody. We've got just about eighteen minutes

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 3>left in today's trading session, getting ready to wrap up

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 3>with the Tuesday trade. Just as you heard, Amy Morris,

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 3>we're kind of rolling over our best levels of the

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 3>session on both the S and P and the Dow

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 3>No excuse me, S and P and the Nasdaq one hundred,

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 3>but little change, really flat on the day, and I

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 3>just feel like we're taking maybe a bit of a breather.

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 3>We're going to hear from Jay Powell Fed Chair J

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Powell tomorrow. We just talked with our Stuart Paul about that,

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and of course you got the big jobs report on Friday,

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 3>so those will be really key in sentiment, economic backdrop,

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and then what it means, particularly the backdrop that companies

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 3>are going to be living under for at least the

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 3>next month or so. All right, let's get to it.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Our drive to the closed guest on this Tuesday is

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Alexis Brown Robert. She's COO at Alexis Investment Partners and

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 3>she joins us from Houston, Texas. She the firm, i

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 3>should say, has about one hundred and seventy million dollars

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 3>in assets under management. Alexis, good to have you here

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 3>with us. Tell us a little bit about the investors

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 3>that you predominantly deal with, institutional retail, family offices. Just

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 3>give us some background.

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 13>Well, Hi, Carolyn, Tim, thanks so much for having me on.

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 13>It's great to be here and it's great to meet

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 13>you guys.

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 3>So what we have is we really work with a

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 3>variety of people.

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 13>We do work with high net worth individuals, individual investors

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 13>in general, we work with small businesses retirement plans. For

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 13>one case, we primarily though host a run and exchange

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.359
<v Speaker 13>trade and fund called the Alexis Practical Tactical ETF, and

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 13>that's really the core of what we do, since that's

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 13>where we make most of our tactical trades. It's really

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 13>a flexible, go anywhere portfolio. It's one hundred percent of

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 13>what I'm invested in and what my father's invested in.

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 13>Were a father daughter team, it's really just the two

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 13>of us in the shop.

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 4>But you got the name of the fund. It's not

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 4>called you know Dad, Yeah, Okay.

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 3>To be there.

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 13>My dad just really enjoys naming things Alexis or after no.

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>No, So I'm totally kidding.

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 13>Really it's I was the first Alexis and obviously I'm

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 13>his child, and he named the firm Alexis Investment Partners.

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.720
<v Speaker 13>So prior life, he has been in this for thirty

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 13>odd years and was chief investment officer president of a

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 13>series of funds out of a firm out of San Francisco.

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 13>And then when I went to college and decided to

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 13>follow in his footstuffs like I had always dreamed, I

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 13>had grown up in the business idolizing him and getting

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 13>to do jobs of his prior firm even when I

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 13>was in high school researching.

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>And then when I went to college and decided.

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 13>To pursue this, he created Alexis Investment Partners and from there,

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 13>together we launched the Alexis Practical Tactical ETF. And the

0:49:56.239 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 13>Trickerson was Lexi there because it is the core of Alexis.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 13>It's the core of what we do. We're benchmarked seventy

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 13>to thirty, but we can go as high as one

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 13>hundred percent equity as low as we want.

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't tend to go quite.

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 13>To those extremes, but we're very flexible and really our

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 13>goal is to add value through full market cycles by

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 13>participating more and upmoves than we do in the down

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 13>and some of the ways we look to achieve that

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 13>are by incorporating a broader range of asset classes, so

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 13>not just being stuck in equities and bonds. And it's

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 13>really been all in this environment and being more model

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.320
<v Speaker 13>informed instead of just purely model driven.

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 4>So it has six about ninety six million dollars in

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 4>assets in the Alexis Practical Tactical Fund expense ratio of

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 4>about one percent is the money in the fund? How

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 4>much of the money in the fund is from your

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 4>clients like you place them in there, versus people who

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 4>externally end up buying the fund.

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 13>I want to say about seventy five million and maybe

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 13>close to eighty is ones that we that are part

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 13>of the Alexis Investment Partners bucket, and then the rest

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 13>is from outside investors. We do have a partnership with

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 13>a firm out in Florida that has about a billion

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.879
<v Speaker 13>dollars in assets where we're a model provider for them

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 13>for their tactical sleeves also called practical tactical and so

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 13>a portion of that goes into the fund as well.

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's interesting the let's see the holdings, am I

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 4>looking at the right page, Carol, I think is that

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 4>gold is the top? Is the top holding here?

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 7>Is that right?

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Gold is the top holding? That is correct?

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 13>So, like I said, we incorporate a broader range of

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 13>asset classes. Obviously, inflation has been a big worry for

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 13>investors as well as geopolitical.

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Risks and monetary risks.

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 13>I mean, it's not just the American Fed that's moving

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 13>things around right now. Federal reserve banks all over the

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 13>world are having to deal with very tough monetary conditions,

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 13>and so gold has a tendency to do very well

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 13>environments like that, and it has been so that is

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 13>currently our top holding. Now we're not bears by any means,

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:11.879
<v Speaker 13>if you look through we're actually quite neutrally positioned right now.

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 13>We're right about that seventy percent equity exposure as well.

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Interesting tell us about and have you uped that recently

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:22.760
<v Speaker 3>or have you reduced that recently?

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's fluctuated.

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:29.359
<v Speaker 13>We had upped it and then we reduced it, and

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 13>right now we're kind of nibbling back into things. We're

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 13>really looking at it as there's a lot to like

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 13>in markets at this moment.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 3>There's equity markets in general or markets in total.

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 13>That's a really good question, I guess both, because we

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 13>do have equity exposure. We have bought into a reads

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 13>position lately. We do like our golds position really the

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 13>part that we're not so crazy about sponds. We'd prefer

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 13>cash and just other alternative there. But I think from

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 13>an equity perspective, things are still looking strong and still

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 13>looking good there, but it's not the only place we

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 13>want to be, and we do want to recognize that

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 13>this has been a great year. Despite all of the

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 13>headwinds and the crazy headlines, it's been a really great year,

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 13>and so it would be very normal to take a

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.359
<v Speaker 13>breather here, and we'd want to have some buying power there.

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Listen, it's been a great two years, certainly for the

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 3>equity side of things, right. Anybody who's trying to be

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a bear as that our short this market has had

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe some moments of opportunity, but it's been tough. Having

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 3>said that, post election, did you guys rethink any allocations.

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the election has been a funny one. So

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about half our clients.

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 13>Are super happy and the other half are freaking out

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 13>and not happy at all.

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't have the country for the world, true.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very so. I think really, no matter where you

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are politically.

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 13>Though, there's going to be good and bad to this administration,

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 13>like there is to every administration. I mean, on one hand,

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 13>you have tariffs and deportation and those are definitely risks.

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 13>And then on the other hands, I mean, you do

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 13>have a much better business environment, you have taxes, and

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 13>so from a market's perspective, we've really chosen to focus

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 13>more domestically Since then, I would say there's just not

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.720
<v Speaker 13>a lot of benefit to being foreign in foreign stocks

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 13>that we can see given that environment, And we do

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 13>see a lot of fit to being domestics and from

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 13>a more of a client side, from a financial planning side,

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 13>we have no tax cuts are probably going to continue,

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 13>so roth conversions, we've been pushing those out, whereas we

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 13>may have had more urgency around those otherwise.

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 3>And the key Q too. You like those big cap

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 3>tech names, right, you're still okay with that? Just quickly

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:45.800
<v Speaker 3>get about twenty seconds.

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 13>Yes, No, we still do like tech for sure. I

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:52.919
<v Speaker 13>mean they have come up a long way, but they

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 13>have great earnings. When you're looking at AI productivity, that's

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:57.799
<v Speaker 13>really where it's going to be.

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, with thing as important.

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 13>As AI, similar to we saw with the Internet, it's

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 13>important to recognize that other players are going to be

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 13>the ultimate beneficiaries.

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Of that AI trade.

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 13>So while we still definitely do love tech, we also

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 13>are a fan of diversifying outside of there because a

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 13>lot of those names are really good out.

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Of it as well. I want an ETF named after me.

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 5>You can do it, I can do it.

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I recommend it.

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 3>That ETF. By the way, I have twenty nineteen, almost

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent this year. Alexis Brown Roberts, thank you so much.

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, all available on Apple, Spotify,

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:41.720
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Easter on Bloomberg dot com,

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.879
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg journyale