Speaker 1: You're listening to the Fuck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, Team, Buck Mike Slater
Speaker 1: in San Diego, filling in here in the Freedom Hut.
Speaker 1: It's wonderful to be here. Thanks for having In this hour,
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about the truth behind hate crimes and
Speaker 1: the moral panic that are elites that are better as
Speaker 1: our superiors are well unfortunately successfully creating in our country.
Speaker 1: But we got to fight back against it. And the
Speaker 1: only way to do that, well, the first thing we
Speaker 1: need to do is to know the truth and get
Speaker 1: the true perspective, because once you have perspective, then you
Speaker 1: can bring peace not only to yourself but to those
Speaker 1: around you. So that's what we're gonna do in this
Speaker 1: our first express VPN. We all are aware with the
Speaker 1: problems with censorship and social media and Twitter and Facebook
Speaker 1: and just tracking you and following your every move, So
Speaker 1: how do we get around that express VPN? You can
Speaker 1: give him a call and you can ask all the
Speaker 1: questions about them, the technology behind all of it, But
Speaker 1: all I care about is it's super easy to set
Speaker 1: up and one tap of a button on your phone
Speaker 1: or computer and you're protected. And then quip one hundred
Speaker 1: percent of your data to protect you from hackers and
Speaker 1: internet bad guys as well. So you can say no
Speaker 1: to censorship. Take back your online privacy at express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck and if you click that link,
Speaker 1: then you get an extra three months of express vpn
Speaker 1: for free. Express vpn dot com, slash buck and protect
Speaker 1: your data today. Eighteen Buck Mike Slater in San Diego,
Speaker 1: filling in for the Great Buck Sexton. It's an honor
Speaker 1: to be here. I want to talk about moral panics.
Speaker 1: That's going to be the theme of the show today.
Speaker 1: We'll start off with this Brocco. He said this the
Speaker 1: other day. This is in relationship, in reaction to the
Speaker 1: mass shootings from the last couple weeks. He said, we
Speaker 1: should be able, Barack Obama, we should be able to
Speaker 1: live our lives without wondering if the next trip outside
Speaker 1: our home could be our last. We should, But in
Speaker 1: America we can't. Like, oh jeez, oh, my betters, that's hysterical.
Speaker 1: That that reminds me of Lebron James. Remember Lebron James.
Speaker 1: While back he said he's scared to leave his house.
Speaker 1: He said, he said, you are literally being hunted. That's
Speaker 1: what he said. He said, you're being hunted every time
Speaker 1: you step foot outside your home. That is hysterical, That is,
Speaker 1: there is zero relation to reality at all. I'll just
Speaker 1: so let's do a couple numbers. We're gonna throw some
Speaker 1: numbers here on the radio. Numbers are kind of hard
Speaker 1: on the radio, so we'll do the best we can here.
Speaker 1: Just number of black people. This is two thousand and sixteen.
Speaker 1: Number of black people killed in car crashes, six thousand
Speaker 1: and seven hundred. Number of black people killed by other
Speaker 1: black people, two thousand, five hundred and seventy number of
Speaker 1: black people killed by white people, two hundred and forty three.
Speaker 1: Number of black people killed by cops. Because that's what
Speaker 1: Lebron James was talking about. Eighteen A number of black
Speaker 1: people in twenty sixteen struck by lightning ninety six. You
Speaker 1: have a far greater likelihood of being struck by lightning
Speaker 1: if you're black in America than you do being killed
Speaker 1: by a police officer. Yet Lebron James says, you're being hunted.
Speaker 1: You're literally being hunted when you step foot out your
Speaker 1: own Barack Obama saying it's it's not safe to go outside.
Speaker 1: That is just whipping people up. That's causing chaos and
Speaker 1: anxiety and division. So let's get some truth. Let's give
Speaker 1: some truth. Your chance of being murdered in America one
Speaker 1: in twenty thousand. Stay out of the drug trade, and
Speaker 1: your chances are even better of not getting murdered. And
Speaker 1: most murders occur with people between people who know each other,
Speaker 1: and most murders actually occur in the home. Now when
Speaker 1: you step foot out of them. Mass shootings are even
Speaker 1: more rare. And that's the context of what Barack Obama
Speaker 1: was talking about. The mass shootings. You have as close
Speaker 1: to a zero percent chance of dying in a mass
Speaker 1: murder as possible. About fifty people a year are killed
Speaker 1: in mass shootings, so you have a one in six
Speaker 1: point six million chance of being killed in a mass
Speaker 1: shooting in a given year. And Barack Obama, the former president,
Speaker 1: is telling people that you should be scared to go outside.
Speaker 1: It could be your last It could be your last
Speaker 1: time you ever to go outside and say goodbody or fan. No,
Speaker 1: that's absurd, that's absolute nonsense. Now. The reason he's saying now,
Speaker 1: it was a couple of reasons. In the third hour,
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about moral panics, and in the exact
Speaker 1: format of a moral panic, and the very quick of
Speaker 1: it is an event happens the media and politicians whip
Speaker 1: people up into a frenzy. Third step is people get
Speaker 1: super anxious and freak out panic. And then the fourth
Speaker 1: is the government swoops in to save the day. That's
Speaker 1: always the final step, even though usually they're the ones
Speaker 1: who cause the problem in the first place. Almost always so.
Speaker 1: The reason Barack Obama is telling you this that you
Speaker 1: should be scared to go outside, is to create the
Speaker 1: illusion that America is terrible. America is evil, America is
Speaker 1: rotten to its core, America is an awful place. You
Speaker 1: should be scared to go outside. That causes people to
Speaker 1: be in a panic. And then the government can swoop
Speaker 1: in and say, hey, it's okay, you're scared. You're scared.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't be scared. What a shame that you scared.
Speaker 1: You know what, I can fix it. Let's just hand
Speaker 1: over all the guns. Go ahead, just just give just
Speaker 1: hand over all the guns to me, or give me
Speaker 1: the authority to take guns from people, and then we'll
Speaker 1: solve this, and then you don't have to be scared anymore,
Speaker 1: and all this panic can just go away. That's how
Speaker 1: that works. You see it now. In a little bit
Speaker 1: of Barack Obama's defense, he did live in Chicago where
Speaker 1: last weekend fifteen people were shot and three people were killed.
Speaker 1: But we don't talk about that because you can't blame
Speaker 1: white supremacy for that, and you can't blame Trump, although
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some people can find some convoluted way.
Speaker 1: Did you just then? I got some numbers here on
Speaker 1: interracial crimes, so we just keep his party going. So
Speaker 1: it's numbers are about the same every every year. I mean,
Speaker 1: I have the exact numbers here from the FBI. I
Speaker 1: love that. I'm gonna share this right here, and I
Speaker 1: know these people are gonna say an email and they're like,
Speaker 1: who's this slater guy comment in from San Diego filling
Speaker 1: it for block sex and thinks he can blah blah
Speaker 1: blah or whatever. I'm gonna get them. It's fine. These
Speaker 1: the FBI statistics. I don't know what to tell you
Speaker 1: if you're upset about it. So I'll be gonna round
Speaker 1: the numbers because they're about the same every year. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's five hundred and seventy six is the actual number,
Speaker 1: but about five hundred and fifty black people kill a
Speaker 1: white person every year. So five hund fifty black people
Speaker 1: kill five and fifty white people, and it's two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty white people killed two hundred and fifty black
Speaker 1: people every year. So it's much more likely that a
Speaker 1: black person kills a white person than a white person
Speaker 1: kills a black person. Now, I know that upsets people,
Speaker 1: but I share this because the perception is the exact opposite. Mean,
Speaker 1: look at Lebron James, Lebron James bronck up. I don't like,
Speaker 1: what's crazy? This is so well the former president and
Speaker 1: Lebron James talk about how they're gonna get killed by
Speaker 1: white people. He can't even go outside. And I come
Speaker 1: on the radio and I say, well, actually, here's the numbers,
Speaker 1: and it's you're way more likely. It's it is more
Speaker 1: likely that a black person kills a white person than
Speaker 1: what you're saying. It is all racist. Say, oh, listen,
Speaker 1: I didn't even bring it up. Like crime is awful,
Speaker 1: like no one should kill anyone. I don't know what
Speaker 1: we're right, but I'm just trying to bring some perspective
Speaker 1: in truth and therefore peace to the situation that this
Speaker 1: is a crime problem, not a race problem. But perception matters,
Speaker 1: because when your perceptions all messed up, you're not even
Speaker 1: you're not even in your right mind. One of my
Speaker 1: favorite questions that people do surveys on his perspective related questions.
Speaker 1: So this one just came out a couple of weeks ago.
Speaker 1: They asked people how many unarmed black men are killed
Speaker 1: by police officers every year? So I'll ask you how
Speaker 1: many unarmed black men are killed by police officers every year?
Speaker 1: What do you think? What? Just give it a ball
Speaker 1: park number, how many unarmed black men are killed by
Speaker 1: police officers every year? Take a stab at him, take
Speaker 1: a shot at it. Forty one percent of liberals and
Speaker 1: they broke it down based off of your political leanings, man,
Speaker 1: forty one percent of liberals believe it's over a thousand.
Speaker 1: Over a thousand unarmed black men are killed by police
Speaker 1: every year. It's like three a day, the truth, But
Speaker 1: thirteen or so, thirteen twenty eighteen, there was thirteen that's
Speaker 1: very different, and then over a thousand. But you see
Speaker 1: what politician and media led moral panics can do. It
Speaker 1: can cause you to cut have wildly wrong perceptions, and
Speaker 1: then people freak out and then we end up making
Speaker 1: really bad policy, if nothing else, but also bad cultural movements.
Speaker 1: People scared to go outside and there's no reason for it.
Speaker 1: I got one just from example from from yesterday. Example
Speaker 1: from yesterday Richard Bluemanthal Senator from Connecticut. He said that
Speaker 1: eight children every day are killed from guns that are
Speaker 1: stored unsafely. He was blaming Republicans for the mass shootings.
Speaker 1: He was blaming Ted Cruz specifically for ducking responsibility. He's complicity.
Speaker 1: He said, Ted Cruise is complicit in all these shootings.
Speaker 1: And he said eight children are day, are lost every
Speaker 1: day from guns that are stored unsafely. I heard that,
Speaker 1: I thought, what in the world he's talking about like that.
Speaker 1: There's no way that's true. So I did some research
Speaker 1: on where he got that. He got that from the
Speaker 1: Brady Campaign. I think it's it's probably the biggest anti
Speaker 1: gun group in the country. And I found the website
Speaker 1: where they talk about this. They called family Fire and
Speaker 1: it's not true. It's not true. It's seventy kids a
Speaker 1: year are killed by accidental discharge, which is not eight
Speaker 1: a day, it's more like one every five days. That's
Speaker 1: a huge difference. Now seventies too many. Everyone should do
Speaker 1: a better job of storing their guns properly and teaching
Speaker 1: kids not to touch guns, not to play with guns,
Speaker 1: use protected act as if every gun's loaded. We like,
Speaker 1: we know the rules, and people need to do a
Speaker 1: better job of being a gun owner, no doubt about that.
Speaker 1: But one kid shot killed every five days from accidental discharge.
Speaker 1: It's very different than eight a day and would therefore
Speaker 1: create very different reactions. But that's Richard Blumenthal's point, right.
Speaker 1: He wants people to be at a panic and freak
Speaker 1: out so that they can come to the rescue and
Speaker 1: save the day by taking guns away from people. So
Speaker 1: what's the problem with these lies? Just yesterday I read
Speaker 1: First Corinthians fourteen four and talked about how God is
Speaker 1: not a god of confusion, but he's a god of peace.
Speaker 1: And First Corinthians fourteen forty it says, but all things
Speaker 1: should be done decently and in order, in order. And
Speaker 1: if you do a study on the word order throughout
Speaker 1: the Bible, God is order. God is order, He is clarity,
Speaker 1: God is peace. And when you spout off wildly inaccurate
Speaker 1: numbers and create these moral panics that have no relationship
Speaker 1: to reality whatsoever. You're not you're not acting decently, and
Speaker 1: you're not creating order, creating confusion, panic and division. Watch
Speaker 1: out for people who are doing that. Mike later in
Speaker 1: San Diego, filling it for the Great Buck Sexton. Mikes later,
Speaker 1: it's brother word, what's going on? Team Buck? Mikes later
Speaker 1: in San Diego, filling it for the Great Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: Super grateful you're here. Oh please don't turn there. I
Speaker 1: know listen when I tune into my favorite show and
Speaker 1: my guy's not there, I am tempted to tune the
Speaker 1: radio off as well. But give this segment a chance.
Speaker 1: I think you'll like it. I want to talk about
Speaker 1: anti Asian hate crimes. There is no anti Asian hate
Speaker 1: crime epidemic, does not exist, not a thing. But after
Speaker 1: the shooting a couple weeks ago in Georgia, that instantly
Speaker 1: became the narrative from the media. I know Buck talks
Speaker 1: to a lot about that. So we'll get some truth
Speaker 1: here as if it matters. Truth doesn't matter, just truth
Speaker 1: even matter in our post truth world. Again, the Four
Speaker 1: stages of a moral panic. You think we know better
Speaker 1: by now, You think the American people would be Why
Speaker 1: wised up when we see these moral panics coming after
Speaker 1: COVID and after George Floyd, and we need to knock
Speaker 1: it off with these already. There's four stages to a
Speaker 1: moral panic. First, something happens, so the bad happens. Second,
Speaker 1: the media inflames it and makes villains and victims. Third,
Speaker 1: people get anxious and panic, and then fourth the government
Speaker 1: comes in and fixes it. So in Georgia we have
Speaker 1: this sex addict psycho who was kicked out of his
Speaker 1: house or being a sex addict, and this whole thing
Speaker 1: killed eight people, six of them Asian, in that massage parlor.
Speaker 1: For some reason, we have this like drive to figure
Speaker 1: out the inner thoughts of a psychotic mass murderer. Like,
Speaker 1: I don't know why we do that. Can you even
Speaker 1: begin to fathom how deprave do you have to be
Speaker 1: to go randomly kill a bunch of people? I can't,
Speaker 1: But if you want to look into the psyche and
Speaker 1: find a motive. Police asked him if it had anything
Speaker 1: to do with race, and he said no, Like, well,
Speaker 1: what are we doing it if it did? If he
Speaker 1: if he was like, I hate Asians, I'm gonna kill
Speaker 1: a bunch of Asians. And then he did, and police said, hey,
Speaker 1: why did you do it. You think he'd say, oh,
Speaker 1: because I hate Asians, but he didn't say. He said no,
Speaker 1: I did nothing to do with race. But that didn't
Speaker 1: stop the media. Here's a key with people who are
Speaker 1: trying to inflame moral panics. Here's how you know or
Speaker 1: one way when they just tell you in a percent
Speaker 1: increase in something without giving you the raw number. So
Speaker 1: the La Times wrote an article and they said there's
Speaker 1: a historic rise of hate crimes. Thirty three percent increase
Speaker 1: in hate crimes against Asians in Seattle last year thirty
Speaker 1: three percent. People like, oh wow, thirty three percent. That's terrible.
Speaker 1: What they don't tell you is that that is an
Speaker 1: increase of from nine to twelve, which isn't right. I
Speaker 1: feel like they put that in there that would negate
Speaker 1: the entire posterics of the article. Whatever, I hate crime
Speaker 1: even is right, so defined differently and right. It's a
Speaker 1: silly thing even to have crimes a crime. So something happens,
Speaker 1: the media fits it into a narrative. In this case,
Speaker 1: you know, white supremacy. It always is. Third the panic
Speaker 1: La Times headline pepper Spray, Instagram and Buddy Systems how
Speaker 1: Asian Americans are dealing with attacks, and it talks about
Speaker 1: how people are buying a pepper spray in bulk. They're
Speaker 1: buying what do you do with bulk pepper spray? Should
Speaker 1: you imagine buying like like a fire extinguisher full of
Speaker 1: pepper spray? Like, what are you gonna do with that?
Speaker 1: You just walk around preemptively shoot it in front of
Speaker 1: you wherever you go. So it just talks about this
Speaker 1: article in the La Times about all these these people
Speaker 1: who have they they're panicking. Thirty one year old guy,
Speaker 1: Vietnamese guys talking about how he's got to make sure
Speaker 1: his batteries always charged so we can video the inevitable
Speaker 1: hate crime that's coming his way. And one woman said
Speaker 1: that you're carrying this feeling of inevitability. She says, I
Speaker 1: can barely get out of bed. You can't live your
Speaker 1: life on guard like this all the time, and I
Speaker 1: don't know what I'm gonna do, and I can't leave
Speaker 1: my house alone. It's like, wow, that is entirely irrational.
Speaker 1: You've maybe heard the line that there's been a one
Speaker 1: hundred forty nine percent increase in hate crimes across the country.
Speaker 1: One hundred forty nine percent increase. Again, without giving you
Speaker 1: the raw numbers, that's from forty nine to one hundred
Speaker 1: and twelve. One hundred and twelve. That's what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here again, one hundred twelve too many? But is
Speaker 1: that worth buying pepper spray and bulk and living constantly
Speaker 1: on guard to the point where you can't get out
Speaker 1: of your bed undred twelve. There's nineteen million Asians in
Speaker 1: this country, nineteen million, there's one hundred and twelve hate crimes.
Speaker 1: That's a moral panic. But then the government swoops in
Speaker 1: saves the day. At least they say they're gonna save
Speaker 1: the day. They always end up making things worse. By
Speaker 1: the way, isn't it interesting Kamala Harris is now all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, our first Asian vice president, Like I've
Speaker 1: never heard that ever until last week. Her mom's from India,
Speaker 1: so she gets it. She can fix it. I mean,
Speaker 1: she understands what it's like to be an Asian American
Speaker 1: or something. So the government's gonna fix it. But the
Speaker 1: government actually caused all this, I mean How did the
Speaker 1: government cause these bad things to happen? Where are these
Speaker 1: hate crimes taking place? La Times? I might be dead
Speaker 1: right now Asian man describes brutal attack on San Francisco street.
Speaker 1: These crimes will taken place in San Francisco, in LA
Speaker 1: in New York, not exactly Trump Bastion's Trumps strongholds. So
Speaker 1: what's happened in San Francisco? In La California? We have
Speaker 1: something called Prop forty seven, maybe past six or eight
Speaker 1: years ago. So like that, it lowers felonies, many felonies
Speaker 1: down to misdemeanors. So these people used to be getting arrested,
Speaker 1: they're not getting arrested anymore. To keep it on the streets,
Speaker 1: there was an attack in a laundrymat. Three fine gentlemen
Speaker 1: attacked those Asian guys sitting inside a laundromat, just came
Speaker 1: in cole cocked him from behind and took his money.
Speaker 1: Those guys were connected. They were caught and connected to
Speaker 1: eight car burglaries in San Francisco. Shockingly, if you keep
Speaker 1: criminals on the street, you get more crime. So you
Speaker 1: have Prop forty seven, we have COVID, we've in California,
Speaker 1: we've emptied out our prisons and jails, or I should
Speaker 1: say our jail. So we just let these criminals out
Speaker 1: on the street, because heaven forbid they get COVID in jail.
Speaker 1: San Francisco just last year elected a straight up Marxist
Speaker 1: as their DA. And I'm not like, that's not an insult.
Speaker 1: I'm not like he's self proclaimed high I'm chez a Boudine.
Speaker 1: I'm a Marxist. I used to work for Hugo Shabaz
Speaker 1: in Venezuela. Vote for me, and I won't prosecute crime
Speaker 1: like that's that was his whole thing. LA Times wrote
Speaker 1: a story about two Asians who are randomly knocked over
Speaker 1: on the sidewalk for no reason. The attacker is named
Speaker 1: Jorge Devis Milton. Black guy goes by Yah Yam Muslim
Speaker 1: who has two prior felony assault convictions. Do you think
Speaker 1: that guy was motivated by Donald Trump calling it the
Speaker 1: China virus one attack in San Francisco made news because
Speaker 1: this guy attacked a ninety one year old lady and
Speaker 1: she beat him up. It was a crazy homeless guy.
Speaker 1: Is that Trump's fault? Story in Oakland a racist tirade
Speaker 1: against an Asian gas station owner. I got the video
Speaker 1: of it. The guys was a Muslim guy, these Arabic
Speaker 1: bumper stickers on the back of his car. He wanted
Speaker 1: to pay for his gas and quarters and got mad
Speaker 1: when the owner wouldn't let him. Is that Trump's fault?
Speaker 1: We got to be very careful these moral panics, because
Speaker 1: there are people who are making a lot of money
Speaker 1: and getting a lot of power by sweeping you and me,
Speaker 1: trying to sweep you and me up in them and
Speaker 1: no longer. Mike Slater in San Diego filling it for
Speaker 1: the Great Buck Sexton, spread the word. What's going on?
Speaker 1: Team Buck? Mike Slatter and San Diego filling in for
Speaker 1: the Great Bucks Sexton. Thanks for being here. Truth and
Speaker 1: you know Bucks talks about this all the time. Truth
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Unfortunately, of course it does. But in our
Speaker 1: society today, so many people just doesn't. Duke University, someone
Speaker 1: posted on a campus bulletin board George Floyd's toxicology report.
Speaker 1: Now listen. We could talk about if that's the most
Speaker 1: effective way to get a message across, but Duke has
Speaker 1: issued now an investigation into it. This is the Dean
Speaker 1: of students. We are completely aligned with the idea that
Speaker 1: a person who causes harm to others in this community
Speaker 1: and elsewhere should be held accountable. Causes harm, what's the
Speaker 1: what's the harm that was caused? We don't have a
Speaker 1: picture of it, but the student newspaper said each and
Speaker 1: on this the document that was posted on the bolton board,
Speaker 1: each compound listed on the toxicology part was underlined with
Speaker 1: a pink pen, and the person wrote notes across the
Speaker 1: top of the page insinuating that Floyd was responsible for
Speaker 1: his own death. Therefore, we need an investigation. Who dare
Speaker 1: post the official toxicology report? Maybe I need a quick
Speaker 1: sidebar here. The jury selection is going on right now
Speaker 1: for George Floyd. The trial starts in just a few
Speaker 1: days here opening statements, I think on the thirty first,
Speaker 1: and it's going to be a horrible time for this country.
Speaker 1: It's all televised, and it's very likely, very like I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously there's a very biased jury. It's all about jury selection.
Speaker 1: I mean, everyone knows about the case. It's I don't
Speaker 1: know how, don't know how they're going to get an
Speaker 1: unbiased jury in downtown Minneapolis. But if you look at
Speaker 1: the evidence, and only the evidence, then it is very
Speaker 1: likely that Derek Chaffin would be found not guilty and
Speaker 1: acquitted and be let free. And if that happens, then
Speaker 1: get ready for every city in this country to be
Speaker 1: burned to the ground. It is going to be a
Speaker 1: very bad time for this country when this trial is over,
Speaker 1: because most people, and even the trial itself. During the trial,
Speaker 1: most people don't know anything that they just saw the
Speaker 1: video and it's it. Most people don't know anything about
Speaker 1: what's going to be revealed through this trial, including the
Speaker 1: toxicology report that he had three times the lethal amount
Speaker 1: of fentonel in his system. I think whoever posted the
Speaker 1: toxicology report the point was. His point was that this
Speaker 1: information is not being shared. That people don't know this truth.
Speaker 1: People don't know the facts. People don't know the truth,
Speaker 1: and you should know it. You should know. Wherever you
Speaker 1: end up staying standing on the issue, right wherever you
Speaker 1: end up, fine, but you should know that. The medical
Speaker 1: examiner said that if they found George Floyd just dead somewhere,
Speaker 1: they'd assumed that it was a drug overdose because he
Speaker 1: had three times the lethal amount of fetanol in his system.
Speaker 1: His lungs were two to three times the weight of
Speaker 1: normal lungs because they were full of fluid because of
Speaker 1: all the drugs. You should know that the medical examin
Speaker 1: and you will know the country will know when this
Speaker 1: comes out in the trial that the medical examiner found
Speaker 1: that there was no sign of any injury to his
Speaker 1: neck or no sign of restrictions to his airway. The
Speaker 1: medical don't yell at me. The medical examiner concluded that
Speaker 1: there was no pressure assigned to his neck that caused
Speaker 1: him to not be able to breathe. So those are
Speaker 1: the facts that that's what the medical examiner report says.
Speaker 1: You can decide what to do with it, but people
Speaker 1: should have that information, right. Apparently, if you post that
Speaker 1: information at Duke, you're harming people and there needs to
Speaker 1: be an investigation. I don't forbid what happens when they
Speaker 1: find the person who posted it. Maybe kick him out
Speaker 1: of school. Here's someone at Duke. H This person was
Speaker 1: met with distasteful remarks that seem to invalidate my feelings
Speaker 1: and experiences. Right, So it's all about I need that
Speaker 1: you need to validate my feelings, you need to validate
Speaker 1: my experience. Okay, but here's the Here is the toxicology report.
Speaker 1: Here here is the medical No, no, no, those aren't feelings.
Speaker 1: That's not my experience. Facts not allowed. I got video
Speaker 1: here and we can't play it because the audio is
Speaker 1: not good. But there's a high school teacher in Ohio
Speaker 1: at a Catholic school. She was fired. She's the theology teacher.
Speaker 1: One of the theology teachers, and one of the students
Speaker 1: on their zoom class had a screenshot of like their
Speaker 1: picture was of Lebron James whearing it I can't breathe shirt,
Speaker 1: in reference to George Floyd, who, by the way, said
Speaker 1: I can't breathe seven times before he was ever on
Speaker 1: the ground. And that's because of what's called pulinary edema,
Speaker 1: which is excess fluid in the lungs. That's why his
Speaker 1: lungs weighed so much. That's caused by a drug overdose
Speaker 1: before he was ever even on the ground. But again
Speaker 1: that'll come out during the trial. Again, we don't have
Speaker 1: the video here, but she we do with the video,
Speaker 1: but you can't hear it, she says, the teacher does.
Speaker 1: Regarding the I can't breathe, she says, that's just not
Speaker 1: true and it perpetuates a myth against police. I'm not sure,
Speaker 1: Lebron James is in the position to be disrespectful to
Speaker 1: police officers, primarily because he probably doesn't go anywhere without
Speaker 1: a bodyguard. And a student came back and said, did
Speaker 1: you just say that it's disputed that George Floyd couldn't breathe?
Speaker 1: And she says, yes, it's disputed, and the student says,
Speaker 1: by who, just like a ghast by who? She says
Speaker 1: the tape and the student is freaking out, and the
Speaker 1: student says, did the medical examiner never mind? I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stay, I'm gonna say something that's gonna get
Speaker 1: me in trouble, and then the teacher was fired because
Speaker 1: of it. But the student didn't finish the thought. That's
Speaker 1: what's interesting about this story. That student did not finish
Speaker 1: that thought, right, she said, did the medical examiner? And
Speaker 1: she didn't finish the thought because she probably never read
Speaker 1: the medical report. She wanted to say something like, well,
Speaker 1: didn't the medical examine say that he died from being strangled?
Speaker 1: She wanted to say something like that, but the medical
Speaker 1: examiner did not say that. In fact, to the opposite,
Speaker 1: he said there was no sign of injury to his neck.
Speaker 1: So she couldn't back it up with anything, so she
Speaker 1: decided not to say anything, which is noble. Teachers still
Speaker 1: gotten fired for it. And that's just the first of
Speaker 1: many of these to come. Certainly, when the trial starts,
Speaker 1: and listen, when the trial starts next week, all this
Speaker 1: is going to come out. It's going to be a
Speaker 1: wonderful lesson in human nature as to what people choose
Speaker 1: to hear and choose to reject. This student didn't want
Speaker 1: to hear anything too emotional. Don't want to hear facts.
Speaker 1: You're not validating my feelings. That's the most important, the
Speaker 1: feelings over facts. You got to validate my feelings over facts.
Speaker 1: Even the idea that that's really been spread a lot
Speaker 1: these last couple of days, that all mass shooters are
Speaker 1: white men, because that was the big thing, like, oh,
Speaker 1: another white guy killing this was in Colorado, Another white guy,
Speaker 1: another white guy. Oh, I know he's white because the
Speaker 1: police didn't kill him. If if it was a black guy,
Speaker 1: they would have killed him. And it turns out he wasn't.
Speaker 1: Why his name was a mod A Syria, some Syrian immigrant,
Speaker 1: all right. So quickly the conversation pivoted to gun control
Speaker 1: as opposed to white supremacy, and here we are. Biden
Speaker 1: wanted to take away your guns again. But again, it
Speaker 1: would push this whole narrative that all mass shooters are
Speaker 1: white men, and that's not true. From nineteen eighty two
Speaker 1: to two and twenty one, there were one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty one mass shooters. Nineteen eighty two to two two
Speaker 1: twenty one, forty years, there's one hundred and twenty one
Speaker 1: mass shooters. Sixty six were white. So about half white
Speaker 1: people are seventy five percent of the country. So I mean,
Speaker 1: we'll call it about right. I mean it said, it's
Speaker 1: actually a lower proportion than right, but shut, we'll call
Speaker 1: it half. So there are It's not all white. All
Speaker 1: shooters are white men, All mass shooters are white man.
Speaker 1: That's not true at all. But again, why are we
Speaker 1: so obsessed with race? Why can't we get down and
Speaker 1: talk about the things that are really at the root
Speaker 1: of this. My favorite, one of my favorite quotes Henry
Speaker 1: David Thureau. He said, there's thousands hacking at the branches
Speaker 1: of evil for every one that strikes the root. Let
Speaker 1: me play this sound clip right here. This is my
Speaker 1: local show. The other day, we talked to Wilfred Riley.
Speaker 1: He's a professor at Kentucky State. He's great. I think
Speaker 1: he's the next generation's Thomas Soul. He's wonderful. I'm with
Speaker 1: two clips I want to play from him. The first
Speaker 1: I asked him about those Richard bluemanthal numbers that I
Speaker 1: shared a second ago, where he said eight kids every
Speaker 1: day are killed by accidental discharges, and that it's not
Speaker 1: eight to day, it's one every five days, which is very,
Speaker 1: very different. So I asked Hi about that, said, how
Speaker 1: like these these wildly outrageous numbers that the left throws
Speaker 1: that throws out, they're not true. What do we do
Speaker 1: with that? Here's what he said. One of the things
Speaker 1: that's so annoying about the quote unquote culture war is
Speaker 1: the use of this idiot apocalyptic language and the numbers
Speaker 1: that go with it. So if you want to discuss races,
Speaker 1: and you could say something like, well, there still seems
Speaker 1: to be a seven percent residual bias against blacks and
Speaker 1: especially Latinos in apartment rentals, but affirmative action compensates for
Speaker 1: much of that. Like, both sides could have a real
Speaker 1: conversation if you describe that as say a genocide. People
Speaker 1: are going to at least you and I and most
Speaker 1: are the people are going to stop taking that seriously.
Speaker 1: In terms of those actual numbers, what the representative did
Speaker 1: I have to imagine is take the total number of
Speaker 1: people under eighteen that are killed every day, that would
Speaker 1: include seventeen year old gang bangers and anti for fighters,
Speaker 1: anybody that's under eighteen, and say that's the number of
Speaker 1: gun tragedies. But that's like saying the total number of
Speaker 1: people shop by the police as a number of unarmed
Speaker 1: black men. The majority of people shop by the cops
Speaker 1: are attacking the cops of the pistol or a rifle.
Speaker 1: I gotta take a breakcare, I want to come back.
Speaker 1: I got Walmer clip from Wilfred Riley that I want
Speaker 1: to play coming up next, And I ask them, why
Speaker 1: do people believe these numbers so easily? Right a congressman,
Speaker 1: senator in this case, can you say these ridiculous numbers
Speaker 1: of just go with it without any critical thought to
Speaker 1: it whatsoever? Why is that the case? We'll get his
Speaker 1: answer on that next. Mike's later and San Diego filing
Speaker 1: it for the great Buck Sexton spread the word eighteen buck.
Speaker 1: Mike's later and San Diego filling in for Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: The theme of this hour has been moral panics and
Speaker 1: the stages of a moral panic, and why politicians and
Speaker 1: activists and people in government push these on us, and
Speaker 1: why we keep falling for them. That's we We just
Speaker 1: went through maybe one of the biggest moral panics ever
Speaker 1: in COVID. You'd think we'd be wise to this by now,
Speaker 1: but we're not. They keep coming rapid fire, and we
Speaker 1: keep falling for them. So I want to play one
Speaker 1: more clip here from Wilford Riley. We talked to him
Speaker 1: on a local show yesterday and he's a professor at
Speaker 1: Kentucky State. He's great again. I think he's the next
Speaker 1: Thomas Soul. Just the way he thinks is a very
Speaker 1: soul esque. So I asked him, I said, why do
Speaker 1: we believe these numbers so easily that people just throw
Speaker 1: out about hate crime statistics or gun violence statistics or whatever.
Speaker 1: Why do we believe it? Here's what he said, Well,
Speaker 1: if that's an excellent question, but I mean it not
Speaker 1: really almost gets down to the nature of man and
Speaker 1: scientific or spiritual terms. I mean, we are some humans
Speaker 1: are a predator species. America is a Warrior Society, or
Speaker 1: at least we were. Traditionally we respond quickly two things.
Speaker 1: And if someone we generally trust NBC News or something
Speaker 1: like this more CNN, MSNBC these days are presenting this
Speaker 1: daily storyline of the problem here's white supremacy. A lot
Speaker 1: of people are going to say, well, I don't think
Speaker 1: my leaders would lie to me. The problem here must
Speaker 1: be white supremacy. And then in this country, the reaction
Speaker 1: from a lot of young, black and white and et
Speaker 1: cetera people is going to be, let's go get these
Speaker 1: white supremacists. And that's one of the reasons you've seen
Speaker 1: sort of left and right clashing in the streets. And
Speaker 1: the reality is that if you'd you look at the
Speaker 1: full membership list for you know, something, storm Front, you'd
Speaker 1: probably find that they are less than twenty thousand actual
Speaker 1: white supremacists in the whole country. We quite real threats
Speaker 1: instead of boogeyman. I think one last point want to
Speaker 1: make before we get to the border in the next hour,
Speaker 1: the term white gosh, just deserve hours. I got two minutes.
Speaker 1: Let me let me quote you. This is Handa Nicole Jones.
Speaker 1: So whiteness doesn't mean skin color anymore. It's a it's
Speaker 1: a culture. It's white culture, white supremacy culture, and there's
Speaker 1: a lot of different aspects to it, and we'll get
Speaker 1: to that. But this is Hannah Nicole Jones, right. She
Speaker 1: is the person behind the sixteen nineteen project. She's the
Speaker 1: leader of what your kids are being taught in elementary school. Right,
Speaker 1: She's the person behind the entire curriculum that's being taught
Speaker 1: in schools today. This is from November fourth of last year.
Speaker 1: She said, whiteness is not static, and it's expandable when necessary.
Speaker 1: A lot of folks we don't think of as white
Speaker 1: think of themselves as white because the lines have never
Speaker 1: been entirely clear. That's the beauty of white supremacy. It's
Speaker 1: extremely adaptable. So whiteness is whatever the activists needed to
Speaker 1: be so they can keep, in the words of James Lindsay,
Speaker 1: keeps scapegoating and drifting. So when and Asians are doing well,
Speaker 1: when Asians get into colleges at a much higher rate
Speaker 1: than black people than well, Asians are acting white and
Speaker 1: they're white adjacent. But then when an Asian is the
Speaker 1: victim of a hate crime, oh well, then they're a minority.
Speaker 1: They're an allied group, victims of white supremacy, another way
Speaker 1: for these activists to get attention and money and power.
Speaker 1: So whiteness is whatever they want it to be. I
Speaker 1: got a video of an Asian woman getting called all
Speaker 1: sorts of terrible slurs on a bus. It's in Miami,
Speaker 1: and the camera pants over and it's some homeless black
Speaker 1: guy doing It's a homeless guy, an addict, surely, but
Speaker 1: the Left can spin that into white supremacy. Really, they
Speaker 1: could spend that into white supremacy. You got his homeless,
Speaker 1: addicted black man, clearly mental issues, sayings offensive slurs at
Speaker 1: an Asian person, and that's white supremacy. I'm not kidding. Well,
Speaker 1: he's poor and homeless and addicted because of the white systems,
Speaker 1: white white power systems that have kept him down, prevented
Speaker 1: him and his ancestors from accessing healthcare and quality housing.
Speaker 1: That got him into a place where he acted like this. Also,
Speaker 1: he learned from white supremacists on how to treat people,
Speaker 1: and he was angry and an Asian person, rightfully so,
Speaker 1: because Asians are white adjacent and so she had privilege
Speaker 1: over him. So what he did was justify I'm not kid.
Speaker 1: That's the academic argument, and they got to do anything
Speaker 1: to make everything white supremacy. Whiteness is whatever you want,
Speaker 1: and that's why you also hear the term whiteness whiteness
Speaker 1: and remember this from the Smithsonian. They talk about aspects
Speaker 1: of white supremacy culture. Whiteness is showing up on time.
Speaker 1: Whiteness is believing in merit. Whiteness is trying to achieve excellence.
Speaker 1: Whiteness is proper English. Whiteness is they call it some
Speaker 1: thing of the written word, supremacy of the written word,
Speaker 1: so writing properly. Whiteness is the concept of a standard.
Speaker 1: These are all white, so white isn't even a skin
Speaker 1: color of these activists anymore. White is an adjective used
Speaker 1: to describe anything bad, and it always will come back
Speaker 1: to your fault. And if you, if anyone truly believes
Speaker 1: that that is a recipe for a functioning society, you're
Speaker 1: out of your mind. These people need to be outright
Speaker 1: rejected and prevented from having any more power and influence
Speaker 1: over our kids and over our culture. Coming next, I
Speaker 1: want to talk about the border. I'm here in San Diego.
Speaker 1: One thousand, five hundred unaccompanied kids are being housed in
Speaker 1: our convention center starting tomorrow. So we'll talk about the
Speaker 1: border next. Mike Slater from San Diego filling in for
Speaker 1: the Great Buck Sextons, bro the word Team Buck, Mike
Speaker 1: Slater and San Diego filling in for the Great Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me listen. I fully understand your disappointment
Speaker 1: right now when I tune in to my favorite radio
Speaker 1: host and some other joker is they're filling in. I
Speaker 1: didn't tune in for Mike Slater. I don't even know
Speaker 1: Mike Slater, and I don't like the sound of him.
Speaker 1: He's not back. Where's back? Buck will be back door?
Speaker 1: But join us for a little bit here. You're already here,
Speaker 1: might as well hang around for while. I want to
Speaker 1: talk about the border. I got a couple of questions
Speaker 1: about the border, simple questions that I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: be a jerk with these questions. There are actually legitimate questions.
Speaker 1: I got three. First, how many this is too? This
Speaker 1: is my questions to Joe Biden, ta Kamala, to Democratic politician,
Speaker 1: to Gavin Newsome, governor of California, et cetera. How many
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants coming across the border is too? Many. That's
Speaker 1: I'm not being a jerk, that's a legitimate question. At
Speaker 1: what point would you say, all right, maybe we should
Speaker 1: kind of figure out what's going on here? Is there
Speaker 1: a point and what does that look like? That's my
Speaker 1: first question. Second, will we ever see anything pictures of
Speaker 1: people coming across illegally or pictures inside of these detention facilities,
Speaker 1: particularly the kids who are staying in convention centers Dallas
Speaker 1: and San Diego in particular. We'll talk about that in
Speaker 1: a minute. Also, how's it decided where these people are sent,
Speaker 1: whether it's what convention center they're sent to while they
Speaker 1: remain in custody, or where they are sent to once
Speaker 1: they're free to go now without even a court date,
Speaker 1: because the system is so overwhelmed, purposefully overwhelmed, by the way.
Speaker 1: Those are my three questions, and I want to break
Speaker 1: down each of those in this segment. Here. First, just
Speaker 1: the general approach that the Biden team has taken to this.
Speaker 1: They're taking the Baghdad Bob approach. Be familiar with. Do
Speaker 1: you remember Bagdad Bob? Oh, we love Baghdad Bob. Baghdad
Speaker 1: Bob was the spokesperson for Saddam Hussein and he was
Speaker 1: the guy who had this press conference outside downtown Baghdad.
Speaker 1: And he's standing there. He says, oh, there's no threat,
Speaker 1: no threat of any proof of existence. Some Americans in Baghdad.
Speaker 1: No infidels, No American infidels in Baghdad. They're not within
Speaker 1: a hundred miles of Baghdad. But it's an illusion. They're
Speaker 1: trying to sell an illusion. Meanwhile, there's American tanks rolling
Speaker 1: in the background behind these guys. Are no Americans none here.
Speaker 1: It's say, this is Joe Biden. No, there's no immigration
Speaker 1: crisis on the southern border. No no immigrants here. There's
Speaker 1: no Quatemalans within one hundred miles of the San Diego
Speaker 1: Convention Center. This is an illusion. And this is why
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and Kamala won't go to the border. They
Speaker 1: gotta keep the plausible deniability right. They're they're they're asked
Speaker 1: every day if they're gonna go to the border. They're like, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, sure, no, one day we'll go. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: They don't want to go because once they go, they
Speaker 1: can't play the ignorance game anymore. They lose their plausible deniability.
Speaker 1: We're never gonna go. The other day, Jensaki called it
Speaker 1: a crisis at the other Biden spokesperson called it a
Speaker 1: crisis at the border. And you're not supposed to call
Speaker 1: it a crisis at the border. So one of the
Speaker 1: reporters said, hold on, you just called it a crisis
Speaker 1: at the border, and she goes a challenge, challenge, it's
Speaker 1: challenge at the boarder. And he goes, oh, does this
Speaker 1: show that there's a difference in how the administration is
Speaker 1: handling it? And she goes nope. Jould just said nope, nope.
Speaker 1: Next question. So it's not a crisis. It's a challenge,
Speaker 1: is all. Now. I want to make the point quickly.
Speaker 1: It's not a challenge personally for them. None of this immigration,
Speaker 1: none of this the immigration affects them. Gavin Newsom, our
Speaker 1: governor in California. He's not affected by this, just like
Speaker 1: he wasn't affected by COVID. His kids went to private
Speaker 1: school since September. Four kids in private school in person
Speaker 1: since September. But he won't let the people of California
Speaker 1: send their kids to school. How about that. You can't
Speaker 1: open up your business, you can't go out to eat,
Speaker 1: you can't be with your family, But he can go
Speaker 1: out with his wife to the French laundry. See all
Speaker 1: that works. Same thing with immigration. His job's not His
Speaker 1: wages aren't lowered by tens of thousands of ilegal immigrants
Speaker 1: coming across the border. His wages aren't lowered. He's not
Speaker 1: affected at this by this at all. There's gonna be
Speaker 1: no Guatemalans in his kids private school, but there are
Speaker 1: at the schools along the border, maybe no kids who
Speaker 1: speak English in any of these classes. So his kids
Speaker 1: school's not affected, his wages aren't affected. No Hondurans are
Speaker 1: going to be shocking up in his poolhouse like they're
Speaker 1: cramped down into the conventions that are So he's not
Speaker 1: personally affected by this at all. He's got no skin
Speaker 1: in the game, which is why they're like, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: come on in, and they're not letting you see anything either.
Speaker 1: And that may be even worse than or at least
Speaker 1: as bad as what's happening, is the fact that they
Speaker 1: won't let us see any of it. San Diego Convention
Speaker 1: right now, there's fifteen thousand unaccompanied minors in federal custody.
Speaker 1: Fifteen thousand, one thousand, five hundred of them are being
Speaker 1: shipped to San Diego, and there's some in the Dallas
Speaker 1: convention Center as well. I think about this, the conventions,
Speaker 1: like a giant convention center full of fifteen hundred thirteen
Speaker 1: to seventeen year olds, unaccompanied kids, no adults, no parents.
Speaker 1: That's like a giant school, right, a four hundred person
Speaker 1: class per class school. It's fifteen hundred kids. It's a
Speaker 1: lot of kids, and it's right. I don't if you've
Speaker 1: been to the San Diego Convention center's right downtown and
Speaker 1: it's just gonna be on lockdown. It's just no one
Speaker 1: in or out right in front of our faces. Like
Speaker 1: who's gonna be guarding as patrolling our convention centers right
Speaker 1: under our nose, and you're gonna know nothing about it.
Speaker 1: There's never gonna be any pictures or anything. You can't
Speaker 1: know what's going on. Came across this article about a photographer,
Speaker 1: a photojournalist. Let me quote some of this year. This
Speaker 1: is amazing. He said, for the past four presidential administrations,
Speaker 1: I've accompanied US Customs and Border Protection agents and photographed
Speaker 1: their encounters with migrants as they enforced immigration policy. So
Speaker 1: he's been doing this for four presidential administrations. A long
Speaker 1: time it's been in this game a long time. He
Speaker 1: works for Getty, so he's not some right wing activist guy.
Speaker 1: He works for Getty. He's been doing it for a
Speaker 1: long time, but he says no longer. Last week, when
Speaker 1: I documented migrant attentions in El Paso, I had to
Speaker 1: do so from the Mexican side of the border, taking
Speaker 1: long range shots. Until now, journalists have not had to
Speaker 1: stand in another country to cover what's happening in the
Speaker 1: United States. Amazing. For decades, the US government has let
Speaker 1: photo journalists a company border patrol agents and other officials
Speaker 1: as they surveiled the land. But since the change in administration, again,
Speaker 1: this is no Trump lackey here, those agents have been
Speaker 1: physically blocking journalists from the river bank. For example, after
Speaker 1: being turned down for official access on a trip in February,
Speaker 1: I followed a Border Patrol transport bus in my own
Speaker 1: vehicle to where they were detaining migrants. They stopped me
Speaker 1: before I got close enough to take pictures. They called
Speaker 1: a supervisor ordered me to leave immediately. We've gone from
Speaker 1: the Trump era zero zero tolerance policy towards immigrants to
Speaker 1: a Biden era zero access policy for journalists covering immigration.
Speaker 1: Here's the key. This development is unprecedented in modern history.
Speaker 1: So not only what's unprecedented the amount of people coming
Speaker 1: across this quickly, that's completely unprecedented, but also the fact
Speaker 1: that no one's allowed to see it. Now, why is
Speaker 1: this guy especially important? This is the guy who took
Speaker 1: the picture of that little girl from Honduras crying back
Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen. Remember this little girl, she's like three
Speaker 1: years old, pink shirt, she's looking up at her mommy, crying.
Speaker 1: And this guy took that picture and Time magazine photo
Speaker 1: shopped it, put a red background to it, and put
Speaker 1: Trump there standing down or standing looking down callously at
Speaker 1: this little girl. And the tweet was, what kind of
Speaker 1: country are we? Right? Trump's border separation policy? What kind
Speaker 1: of country are we? What kind of country does what
Speaker 1: kind of country rips children, rips babies from the arms
Speaker 1: of their mothers? Now, I remember when I saw that
Speaker 1: picture and there's this massive outrage about it, and I
Speaker 1: remember I said, oh, that's there's more to this story,
Speaker 1: I guarantee you. So it turns out that this mother,
Speaker 1: it was nothing like what people pretended it was. This
Speaker 1: mother put the girl down for a second. It was
Speaker 1: eleven PM. The girl was tired, she cried, and the
Speaker 1: mom picked her back up. That was it. That guy
Speaker 1: just took a picture for one second that she was
Speaker 1: on that she was standing on the ground, and the
Speaker 1: family was never separated, And not one moment was the
Speaker 1: mother and this three year old separated, not for a second.
Speaker 1: And this is the second time that this mother has
Speaker 1: come across the border illegally. She was already deported once.
Speaker 1: I bring this up because that at first of all,
Speaker 1: that's just like such a hack job manipulation of that
Speaker 1: picture to emotionally manipulate you into Trump being a horrible,
Speaker 1: evil person. But I bring it up because it was
Speaker 1: that photographer who took the picture. And even then, even then,
Speaker 1: after all, this is the pr nightmare that that picture created.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration never stopped him from doing his job.
Speaker 1: Ten thousand apprehensions on the Rio Grand Valley in Texas
Speaker 1: last week, ten thousand, biggest ever went completely observed by
Speaker 1: the public purposefully, And that is as big of a
Speaker 1: scandal as what's happening at the border itself. Because the
Speaker 1: Left knows that if they can keep you from seeing it,
Speaker 1: then people will get bored move on, and they can
Speaker 1: keep it going. I call it the governor blackface effect, right,
Speaker 1: Governor Ralph Northam in Virginia, right, the blackface controversy, and
Speaker 1: everyone's like, you gotta go, he's gotta be, he's gotta
Speaker 1: get resigned, he's gotta go. Democrats in the state, you
Speaker 1: gotta go, you gotta go. And he just waited, just waited.
Speaker 1: A couple weeks. That went away, and he's still the
Speaker 1: governor as we the people move on to the next
Speaker 1: shiny object. And that's what the Biden administration is doing here.
Speaker 1: They're just hoping we forget about it now. You and
Speaker 1: I will not, but most people will. All conservatives want
Speaker 1: is order at the border. Who is coming? Where are
Speaker 1: you going? We should be in charge of our immigration policy,
Speaker 1: not other countries. Mike Slater in San Diego, filling in
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton. Spread the word. Hey, what's going on?
Speaker 1: Team Buck? Mike Slater, San Diego, filling in for Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Thanks for being here on my local show in San Diego.
Speaker 1: We talk a lot about these diversity inclusion, equity training seminars,
Speaker 1: and we expose all these things and just prepare our
Speaker 1: listeners for when they have to go through one of
Speaker 1: these and when their kids are fed this propaganda as well.
Speaker 1: So Signa just released they didn't release it. Someone leaked
Speaker 1: the Signa Diversity Training SIN seventy three thousand employees. It's
Speaker 1: one of the largest healthcare providers in the country. One
Speaker 1: of the slides it says, check your privilege and it
Speaker 1: lists different groups of privilege able bodied, twenty five to
Speaker 1: fifty five sis mail. Isn't it amazing that cismail has
Speaker 1: become a thing like cis gendered. That means you actually
Speaker 1: are the gender that the doctor said you were based
Speaker 1: on your anatomy. It matches. Oh good, I'm sis sismile, heterosexual, white,
Speaker 1: and Christian. So though that's me, I'm all of those
Speaker 1: buck is all of those whoops, we are super privileged.
Speaker 1: So check your the Christian edition. There is an interesting
Speaker 1: new one Christian. Get ready for that one to be
Speaker 1: ramped up big time. And then what takes this story
Speaker 1: to the next level is there's a chat log between
Speaker 1: an employee and a hiring manager and they were filling
Speaker 1: someone filling a position and there was someone there with
Speaker 1: years of experience and the whole thing, and the person
Speaker 1: says the candidate, a white man could not be interviewed
Speaker 1: because he did not meet the diversity criteria, could not
Speaker 1: even be interviewed. This woke stuff. We could talk about
Speaker 1: it forever. Literally, we've talked hours and hours about this stuff.
Speaker 1: And I have three minutes here, but let me give
Speaker 1: you this takeaway and and please feel free to take
Speaker 1: this and use this share this with someone who needs
Speaker 1: to hear it. We always hear about the work, right,
Speaker 1: you gotta do the work. People do the work. You
Speaker 1: hear these activisties, woke people say, you gotta do the work.
Speaker 1: When people do these groveling apologies, they do the same thing, like, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take some time off so that i can
Speaker 1: really reflect and do the work. Robin D'Angelo. She talks
Speaker 1: about how white people need to do the work regarding
Speaker 1: their privilege. It's always called the work. You gotta understand
Speaker 1: your bias, your privilege. You gotta do the work. This
Speaker 1: is one aspect of how it's a cult. All right.
Speaker 1: You got to do more and more and more and
Speaker 1: more and more, do more, do more works. You gotta
Speaker 1: do works more and more and more so that you
Speaker 1: can try to achieve a higher plane of understanding that
Speaker 1: no one else can achieve. You gotta be more aware
Speaker 1: and more woke than anyone else. So the work is
Speaker 1: what you gotta read. You gotta read the great works, right,
Speaker 1: you gotta read the Cannon. You gotta read their Bible,
Speaker 1: White Fragility, How to be an Anti Racist Between the
Speaker 1: World and Be by Tanahashi Coats. You gotta read the work. Fine,
Speaker 1: read those, But if you don't also read Intellectuals and
Speaker 1: Race by Thomas Soul and Authentically Black by John mcwarder.
Speaker 1: And if you don't also read White Guilt by Shelby Steele,
Speaker 1: books by three brilliant black intellectuals. If you don't also
Speaker 1: read those books, then your work is incomplete. And why
Speaker 1: are you racist? Why are you discriminating against these three
Speaker 1: scholars of color. You gotta you gotta do the work.
Speaker 1: I've done my work, I've read all sides. Have you
Speaker 1: done your work? Feel free to take that and use
Speaker 1: that against, not against, use that with someone. By the way,
Speaker 1: they have a list of words that you can't say
Speaker 1: at signal as well. Right, so no reference to mother
Speaker 1: or father. Right, we've gotta be more trans inclusive. You
Speaker 1: got silly ones like no more man hours. They're now
Speaker 1: called work hours. No more chairman, it's chairperson. Dumb things
Speaker 1: like that. Then you have all gendered terms, right, because
Speaker 1: if you speak of husband and wife, then that's or
Speaker 1: male and female. Then that's perpetuating the binary nature of gender.
Speaker 1: And we all know that genders on a spectrum. But
Speaker 1: here's a third category of politically correct words that I
Speaker 1: that I really want to call out. I call him
Speaker 1: minstrel words. So these are things that have an absurdly
Speaker 1: vague reference to something that maybe one hundred years ago existed,
Speaker 1: maybe that we're supposed to be offended about today. Remember
Speaker 1: Cat in the Hat or Doctor Sus was canceled a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago, and Cat in the Hat is
Speaker 1: the next book of Doctors Sus. It's gonna be canceled.
Speaker 1: And I remember reading, like, I wonder why why it
Speaker 1: was Cat in the Hat gonna be canceled. It's because
Speaker 1: the cat resembles a minstrel show with his floppy bow
Speaker 1: tie and white gloves. And I'm like, what are you talking.
Speaker 1: There's no one alive today he's ever been to a
Speaker 1: minstrel show. No one even knows what a minstrel show is.
Speaker 1: But I'm constantly reminded about things that exist today that
Speaker 1: are a modern day minstrel show. Even so these are
Speaker 1: minstrel show words, right. So one of these is brown bag.
Speaker 1: So it's signal you can't say brown bag anymore, like
Speaker 1: a brown bag lunch, right, You got to replace it
Speaker 1: with learn, lunch and learn or grab and go. I
Speaker 1: don't so I think a brown bag? Why's brown bag offensive?
Speaker 1: Apparently during segregation, which the woke want to get back
Speaker 1: to again, when deciding if a person was black or
Speaker 1: light skinned enough to rent an apartment or eat at
Speaker 1: a restaurant, the person someone would brown bag them and
Speaker 1: use a grocery store bag to gauge their skin tone.
Speaker 1: So listen, I have no idea that ever happened. It
Speaker 1: probably didn't, but the idea that I can't call my
Speaker 1: lunch a brown bag lunch anymore because seventy years ago
Speaker 1: this maybe happened once. Under the premise that every like
Speaker 1: someone alive today, he is offended by this absolutely absurd
Speaker 1: and what what are we supposed to do? Hey, slater, um,
Speaker 1: I'll grab your lunch for you from the break room.
Speaker 1: Which one is it? Oh, it's in the paper bag?
Speaker 1: What color? What color paperbag? Oh? The br um the uh,
Speaker 1: it's in the hazel hazel nut hazel nutbag. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: the um the car Carmel Carmel, burnt Sienna. But it's
Speaker 1: the my lunch, My lunch is in the burnt Sienna back.
Speaker 1: I just want them grab grab the burnt Sienna bag.
Speaker 1: That's mine. Ridiculous. Don't play the euphemism treadmill. People are
Speaker 1: always coming up with more euphemisms to seem and project
Speaker 1: their enlightenment above everyone else, and to prove that they're
Speaker 1: more offended by things than anyone else. That makes them
Speaker 1: more woke. Don't play the game. Mike's later in San Diego,
Speaker 1: filling it for Buck Sexton. Spread the word, Hey, what's
Speaker 1: going on? Team Buck? Mike's later San Diego, filling it
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton. Super grateful you're here. So we've been
Speaker 1: talking about the border and wokeness and stuff. I want
Speaker 1: to switch hears a little bit here and share a
Speaker 1: story that is quite a peak into the crystal ball
Speaker 1: of what's coming for our country. We need to stop
Speaker 1: this transgender moral panic moral panics than the theme of
Speaker 1: the show today. We need to stop it now because
Speaker 1: it's only gonna get worse. And I have a story
Speaker 1: here that seems impossible, but I assure you it's happening
Speaker 1: right now. We'll tell that next first. Express VPN. One
Speaker 1: of the problems with the Internet today, right it's free.
Speaker 1: Everything on the eart's free. Right, Well, no, it's not
Speaker 1: years ago. I remember the first time I heard you.
Speaker 1: Maybe remember the first time you heard that. If it's free,
Speaker 1: then you're not the customer, you're the product. You are
Speaker 1: being sold. You're being sold. So when you're on the
Speaker 1: internet now, you got to think who is selling you
Speaker 1: and who's buying you? Right? Who's getting a hold of
Speaker 1: your search history and your viewing habits, and what are
Speaker 1: they doing with that information? How do you get free
Speaker 1: from them? Express vpn? Right, so, right now, when you
Speaker 1: search for something on lot, or you watch a video,
Speaker 1: or you click a link, you're getting tracked and they
Speaker 1: match your activity with your IPN or your IP address.
Speaker 1: He is me your IP address, But when you use
Speaker 1: express VPN, these companies don't see your IP address. Give
Speaker 1: him a call Express vpn dot com, slash buck and
Speaker 1: stop handing over your data to big tech companies in
Speaker 1: the government. Protect yourself Express vpn dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: and you get three extra months free express vpn dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck to learn more Team Buck Mike Slater,
Speaker 1: San Diego filling in for Buck Sexton. Thanks for being here.
Speaker 1: I want to share a story here that you will
Speaker 1: not believe. I want you to imagine that your wife
Speaker 1: is abusing your child. Imagine that your wife is abusing
Speaker 1: your child, or anyone. It could be anyone. Imagine someone's
Speaker 1: abusing your child, and when you try to stop it,
Speaker 1: you get thrown in jail. You just have to watch
Speaker 1: it happen, and there's nothing you can do because the
Speaker 1: force of the government is working against you. I have
Speaker 1: here a look into the crystal ball as to where
Speaker 1: we're heading with our obsession over transgenderism today and this
Speaker 1: idea of transgender kids. It's so wild. AOC the other
Speaker 1: day said a tweet out about transgender kids, and it's like,
Speaker 1: what do you what are you talking about transgender kids?
Speaker 1: There's no such thing, and we're just supposed to go
Speaker 1: along with that as if this, Oh, yes, she said,
Speaker 1: trans kids are amazing, wonderful and powerful or something like that.
Speaker 1: It's like, trans kids, listen to yourself, and you have
Speaker 1: to comply. The activists, they don't the activists left. They
Speaker 1: don't stop at tolerance. They demand compliance and full blown
Speaker 1: acceptance and celebration of what they're spouting. So here's the story.
Speaker 1: It's in Canada. It's about law C sixteen. This is
Speaker 1: the law C sixteen that got Jordan Peterson famous years
Speaker 1: ago when C sixteen was first proposed in Canada, and
Speaker 1: he said, among other things, he said, this is what's
Speaker 1: going to happen when this law passes. And sure enough,
Speaker 1: here it is. Husband and wife got divorced at the time.
Speaker 1: Their daughter was eleven at the divorce. She's now fifteen,
Speaker 1: and she is transgender. Now there's no such thing as transgenderism.
Speaker 1: She is a gender dysmorphic because the technical term you
Speaker 1: can't change genders. It's impossible. So she is a girl
Speaker 1: and she wants to live as a boy, and she's
Speaker 1: felt that way since around the age eleven. The mom
Speaker 1: wants to give her puberty blocking puberty blockers and hormones
Speaker 1: male hormones. The dad says no, but the court said
Speaker 1: that the dad cannot stop the mom from doing this.
Speaker 1: And the court said that he cannot speak about this
Speaker 1: at all to the press, and if he did, it
Speaker 1: would be a form of family violence. He would be
Speaker 1: committing violence against his daughter if he tried to stop
Speaker 1: her mom from abusing her. So the dad did speak out,
Speaker 1: and the court wrote back. This is what the court said.
Speaker 1: The father's refusal to respect the boy's decision regarding his
Speaker 1: gender identity is troublesome. He was arrested. He's in jail
Speaker 1: right now. Could face up to five years in jail.
Speaker 1: He's in jail right now. He's in jail as we speak.
Speaker 1: I'm not making the story up. This isn't jeez. You know,
Speaker 1: if this law passes, maybe one day this crazy thing
Speaker 1: could happen. Now that's when George Peterson said years ago.
Speaker 1: Now we're there, the crazy thing is happening. Here's the
Speaker 1: original court order. The dad shall be restrained from one
Speaker 1: attempting to persuade the daughter his daughter to abandon treatment
Speaker 1: for gender dysphoria, addressing his daughter by his birth name,
Speaker 1: and three referring to his daughter as a girl or
Speaker 1: with female pronouns, whether to her directly or to third parties. Now,
Speaker 1: conservative let's have taken the story and they say they've
Speaker 1: been kind of they've been kind of characterizing it as Oh,
Speaker 1: he was arrested. For calling his daughter a girl and
Speaker 1: a she. A more accurate, like a little more nuance.
Speaker 1: A more accurate description is he was arrested for violating
Speaker 1: the court order that says he can't call her a
Speaker 1: she or do interviews and speak publicly about it. That's
Speaker 1: it was all those things that he was arrested for.
Speaker 1: But if your ex wife was abusing your daughter and
Speaker 1: making her sterile and destroying her life and mutilating her body,
Speaker 1: you better bet I'd be speaking out. Can you imagine
Speaker 1: the helplessness in front of your eyes as your ex
Speaker 1: wife is doing that to your daughter and the courts
Speaker 1: are protecting it, protecting the mom abusing her. That is
Speaker 1: absolute torture. So listen, We've talked to a ton of
Speaker 1: people on my local show who have de transitioned. Walter
Speaker 1: Walter Hayer excuse me, Walt higher is. He runs this
Speaker 1: group called sex Change Regret dot Com. Wonderful resource if
Speaker 1: you know anyone who is suffering from gender dysphoria, he
Speaker 1: says one and we talked to many people who have
Speaker 1: done this process as well. He says, one hundred percent
Speaker 1: of the time, there's a traumatic event in childhood that
Speaker 1: causes pain and confusion in a child, he said, one
Speaker 1: hundred said, I've worked with thousands of gender dysmorphic kids
Speaker 1: and adults. One hundred percent of the time there's a
Speaker 1: trauma that causes them to hate themselves and to want
Speaker 1: to cancel themselves and be someone else, thinking that would
Speaker 1: make the pain go away. He says, it needs to
Speaker 1: be dealt with psychologically, which is what the data is saying.
Speaker 1: But we have this massive movement today that believes that
Speaker 1: we need to treat this medically and mutilate and shoot
Speaker 1: kids full of hormones. This is insane. This is the
Speaker 1: most insane thing going on today. And the reason why
Speaker 1: this matters right other than just itself, is if the
Speaker 1: left can convince you to go along with this, they
Speaker 1: could convince you to go along with anything. If you
Speaker 1: do not take a stand against pumping little kids full
Speaker 1: of hormones, if you don't take a stand on the
Speaker 1: idea that there are two genders and you can't switch them,
Speaker 1: if you don't stand up for those truths, then there
Speaker 1: is nothing that they can't convince you and get you
Speaker 1: to follow along with There's nothing if they could givince
Speaker 1: a person to say that there's no such thing as gender,
Speaker 1: and you can switch genders please. They got them hook
Speaker 1: line and sinker. There's no there's no line that they'll
Speaker 1: then draw right once you're like, oh yeah, no, there's
Speaker 1: many genders that you can switch them all whenever you want.
Speaker 1: When are you gonna draw the line and be like,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, but don't you know, don't take away my
Speaker 1: second amendment? Right, It's like, no, you're way past that.
Speaker 1: You're way way past that. They're getting you to believe
Speaker 1: the most ridiculous thing conceivable, and there's no going back
Speaker 1: from that. So I'll tell you what happened to this family,
Speaker 1: what probably happened. It's a broken home. Clearly it was
Speaker 1: an unhappy time. Early on they got divorced. That's traumatic.
Speaker 1: And I guarantee you that this daughter thought, as all
Speaker 1: kids doing a divorce, that it was her fault. And
Speaker 1: I bet she thought maybe if I was a boy,
Speaker 1: this wouldn't have happened. I bet at one point in
Speaker 1: her childhood one of the parents said something like they've
Speaker 1: always wanted a son, or they maybe they brought her
Speaker 1: to I don't know, ballet, and the dad made some
Speaker 1: comment of oh, I wish I had a son. And
Speaker 1: we could go to wrestling practice or something. And the
Speaker 1: daughter internalized then of oh, if I was a boy,
Speaker 1: I would have been loved more, or if I was
Speaker 1: a boy than this divorce would have happened. Guarantee you
Speaker 1: it's something like that, if not physical abuse itself. She
Speaker 1: was looking for a way to express her pain. She
Speaker 1: was getting in trouble in school. Her dad said, hanging
Speaker 1: out with boys, cut off her hair, started wearing a toupee,
Speaker 1: attempted suicide. Clearly some serious mental health issues here. And
Speaker 1: the school that she goes to has a program called
Speaker 1: SOG one two three. Everyone has a sexual orientation and
Speaker 1: gender identity. That's s OGI Sexual Orientation, gender identity. It's
Speaker 1: the sex said program they have in Canada where they
Speaker 1: talk all about transgenderism. So the parents, this is actually
Speaker 1: what happened. What I talked before is this conjecture. This
Speaker 1: is what actually happened. The parents sent the daughter to
Speaker 1: the school counselor, and the counselor, trained in this woke,
Speaker 1: inclusive transsexual stuff, changed the daughter's name without telling the parents.
Speaker 1: So the daughter started going by a different name. I
Speaker 1: don't know, I don't know the girl's name. Her name
Speaker 1: is Mary, and now she goes by Bob okay so
Speaker 1: and the schools like, yep, you're Bob. Let's do it.
Speaker 1: You're Bob. She canceled herself. The thing about think Out
Speaker 1: said this is this girl hates herself so much. She
Speaker 1: wanted to run from herself and her life so much.
Speaker 1: She canceled herself, made up a new identity, and the
Speaker 1: school endorsed this and celebrated this and encouraged this, and
Speaker 1: the school forwarded her to this person, doctor Wallace Wong,
Speaker 1: who works in Canada and down the street from my
Speaker 1: house in San Diego. This doctor got in trouble a
Speaker 1: while back. I was given a seminar to parents of
Speaker 1: transgender kids and they were wondering how to get more
Speaker 1: money from the Canadian government. And this doctor said, so,
Speaker 1: what you need is to pull a stunt suicide every time,
Speaker 1: then they'll give you what you need. Kids learn that
Speaker 1: very fast. So they forwarded to this quack doctor who
Speaker 1: thought that this girl needed puberty blockers when she really
Speaker 1: needed therapy. And now here we are, this is exactly
Speaker 1: what Jordan Peterson was talking about. And it's all done
Speaker 1: in the name of this dad is committing family violence.
Speaker 1: So if you don't acknowledge your kids prefer gender, it's violent. Now,
Speaker 1: this was during a divorce, which means the courts had
Speaker 1: some role in this, right. I wonder what happens, what
Speaker 1: will happen or when it will happen in a marriage,
Speaker 1: in a married family, when the father doesn't want to
Speaker 1: go along with this, and it's called a child abuser,
Speaker 1: we'll CPS get involved. Then just about our time, right,
Speaker 1: I got a clip I want to play next of
Speaker 1: a testimony inside in front of a Missouri in Missouri
Speaker 1: from a dad who says his boy is a girl.
Speaker 1: And I want to play that for you next, and
Speaker 1: you can see how far down this road we've gone
Speaker 1: too far. Mike's later, filling in for Buck Sexton, spread
Speaker 1: the word, Hey, team Buck. Mike's slater San Diego filling
Speaker 1: in for Buck Sexton. Thanks for being her, Thanks for
Speaker 1: sticking around. This is a video that was sent out
Speaker 1: by the ACLU. This is the father of a transgender daughter. Again,
Speaker 1: there's notice things transgender. This is a father of a daughter,
Speaker 1: father of a girl who wants to live as a boy. No, no,
Speaker 1: no other way around, flip it around. This is the
Speaker 1: father of a boy who wants to live as a girl.
Speaker 1: And he's speaking in front of the Missouri House of
Speaker 1: Representatives about his experience, and he starts off saying that,
Speaker 1: you know, people don't get it, and he says I
Speaker 1: didn't get it when this is all first happening. But
Speaker 1: here's what he says to me again, this is a
Speaker 1: boy he's talking about. For years, I would not let
Speaker 1: my daughter wear a girl clothes. I did not let
Speaker 1: her play with girl toys. I forced my daughter to
Speaker 1: wear boy clothes and get short haircuts, play on boys
Speaker 1: sports teams. Why did I do this to protect my child?
Speaker 1: I did not want my daughter or her siblings to
Speaker 1: get teased, and truth be told, I didn't to protect
Speaker 1: myself as well. I wanted to avoid those inevitable questions
Speaker 1: as to why my child did not look and act
Speaker 1: like a boy. My child was miserable. I cannot overstate
Speaker 1: that she was absolutely miserable, especially at school. No confidence,
Speaker 1: no friends, no laughter. I honestly say this. I had
Speaker 1: a child who did not smile. We did that for years.
Speaker 1: We did that against the advice of teachers, therapists, and
Speaker 1: other experts. I remember the day everything changed for me.
Speaker 1: I'd gotten home from work and my daughter and her
Speaker 1: brother were in the front Juan and she had my
Speaker 1: daughter had sneaked on one of her older sister's play
Speaker 1: dresses and they wanted to go across the street and
Speaker 1: play with the neighbors kids. It was time for dinner.
Speaker 1: I said, come in. She asked, can she go across
Speaker 1: the street? I said no. She asked me if she
Speaker 1: if she went inside and put on boy clothes, could
Speaker 1: she then go across the street and play. And it's
Speaker 1: then that it hit me that my daughter was equating
Speaker 1: being good with being someone else. I was teaching her
Speaker 1: to deny who she is. As a parent, the one
Speaker 1: thing we cannot do, the one thing is silence child's spirit.
Speaker 1: And so on that day, my wife and I stopped
Speaker 1: silencing our child's spirit. The moment we allowed my daughter
Speaker 1: to be who she is, to grow her hair, to
Speaker 1: wear the clothes she wanted to wear, she was a
Speaker 1: different child. And I mean it was immediate. It was
Speaker 1: a total transformation. I now have a so a couple
Speaker 1: of things. First, the same people who say we need
Speaker 1: to get rid of gender stereotypes also say my son
Speaker 1: wants to wear a dress, therefore he's a girl, which
Speaker 1: is a gender stereotype. Oh my son wants long hair,
Speaker 1: he must be a girl, Andrew Sullivan writer, He says,
Speaker 1: I remember my grandmother telling my mom that I wasn't
Speaker 1: a real boy. Thank god, my parents insisted that this
Speaker 1: atypical boy could very much be atypical and a boy. Right,
Speaker 1: so we gotta understand this fully. There's people who like
Speaker 1: me who say boys were boyclothes, girls wear girl clothes. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's very out of fashion right now, you can't say
Speaker 1: such a thing like that, But I stand with that
Speaker 1: boys wear boy clothes, girl wear girl clothes. Right. Then
Speaker 1: there's people who say, okay, boys can be more feminine,
Speaker 1: girls can be a little more mask Then, okay, that's fine,
Speaker 1: all right, whatever, it's a whole new level to say,
Speaker 1: oh my son likes girl clothes and long hair, he's
Speaker 1: now my daughter. My son likes girl clothes and dolls,
Speaker 1: he's now a girl. Let's get him on the fast
Speaker 1: road to puberty. Blockers in general mutilation and pretend that
Speaker 1: we can make his body match his spirit. And then
Speaker 1: they're the good guys, They're the noble, virtuous, compassionate ones.
Speaker 1: How are people falling for this there's another video of
Speaker 1: making the rounds of a It's a man who's living
Speaker 1: as a woman, sitting on a bed and he's talking
Speaker 1: to a little boy. No, no, little yeah, he's talking
Speaker 1: to a little girl. Says starting to a little girl.
Speaker 1: And the man says, do you like doing quiet girly
Speaker 1: activities or do you like jumping around and being crazy
Speaker 1: and tackling everybody? And the girl says boy activities, and
Speaker 1: then the pervert goes, oh, that means you're transgender. And
Speaker 1: that's okay, that's just what it's called. And it's like,
Speaker 1: oh you, that's that's a bit of a leading question.
Speaker 1: Do you like doing lame, quiet girly things or do
Speaker 1: you like being awesome? Oh? You like being awesome? That
Speaker 1: means your transgender kids like six, do not let this stand.
Speaker 1: You cannot let this go on anymore. But things are
Speaker 1: so twisted, so messed up that if your daughter comes
Speaker 1: to you and says I want to become a boy,
Speaker 1: if you say if, and if you do things that
Speaker 1: helps your daughter be comfortable as a girl, you're committing
Speaker 1: the sin of gender conversion. Right, So your daughter comes
Speaker 1: to you and says I want to be a boy,
Speaker 1: and you help your daughter be comfortable as a girl,
Speaker 1: that's gender conversion. If you pump your daughter full of
Speaker 1: puberty blockers and hormones and give her a double mestectomy,
Speaker 1: that's gender affirmation. See how backwards it is. You must
Speaker 1: stop this now. This is the point of propagandist to
Speaker 1: get you to believe the most ridiculous things possible, and
Speaker 1: then once you believe that, they can get you to
Speaker 1: believe anything. That's what this whole transgender thing is all about.
Speaker 1: Coming up next, I want to talk about why so
Speaker 1: many people in our culture seek victimhood status. Why do
Speaker 1: they seek it and celebrate it? We used to be
Speaker 1: a country that celebrated overcoming obstacles. What has changed? We'll
Speaker 1: talk about that next. Mike Slater in San Diego, filling
Speaker 1: in for Buck Sexton's bread the word Team Buck. Mike
Speaker 1: Slay here in San Diego filling it for the Great
Speaker 1: Bucks Sexton. Thanks for having me, and thanks not for
Speaker 1: changing the station right away immediately when you don't hear
Speaker 1: Bucks voice Bucks the man, but he'll be back very soon.
Speaker 1: It's an honor to fill in for the Great Bucks
Speaker 1: as we've been friends for a long time, so really
Speaker 1: cool to sit in for him. I want to talk
Speaker 1: about victimhood. Have you ever wondered why so many people
Speaker 1: in our culture today seek out victimhood? They seek out
Speaker 1: they declare themselves victim, They celebrate they're victimhood. People are
Speaker 1: tripping over themselves to tell everyone what a victim they are.
Speaker 1: That's weird, that's a new thing. We used to want
Speaker 1: to be seen as someone who overcomes difficult things in life, right,
Speaker 1: You didn't want to be seen as a victim. You
Speaker 1: do anything to not be seen as a victim. You're
Speaker 1: someone who overcomes trials. There would be an obstacle in
Speaker 1: front of you, and you would want people to see
Speaker 1: you overcome it. The larger the obstacle, the greater the triumph.
Speaker 1: But today there's an obstacle in front of you, and
Speaker 1: you just you tell everyone how you like you. I
Speaker 1: can't even and it's backwards. It's the smaller the obstacle,
Speaker 1: the greater the triumph. Right. It's it's a contest to
Speaker 1: see who can be offended by the most mundane, simple
Speaker 1: everyday things. Right. So someone's like, oh, I'm offended by
Speaker 1: mister potato head. No, well, I'm offended by Antiemimah, Oh well,
Speaker 1: I'm offended by cat in the hat. Oh well, I'm
Speaker 1: offended by the fact that they sell cotton at hobby lobby.
Speaker 1: That's my favorite of all this, right, And it's just
Speaker 1: people just trying to out offend or out be offended,
Speaker 1: out victimhood other people with smaller and smaller offenses. But again,
Speaker 1: for all of our history, it's been people trying to
Speaker 1: prove how much better they are by the bigger things
Speaker 1: they've overcome. It's we got it totally backwards. The tinier
Speaker 1: the object, the more fragile you are, the more sensitive
Speaker 1: you are at the smallest total sites proves how weak
Speaker 1: you are, and this is seen as a good thing.
Speaker 1: How did that happen? That's what I want to talk
Speaker 1: about here. So I think what we're seeing there's a
Speaker 1: lot of forces. Surely this is one element. Is a
Speaker 1: lot of self imposed oppression, self imposed people oppressing themselves,
Speaker 1: and people choosing to live a life of oppression. They're
Speaker 1: choosing it. Surely there used to be actual oppression, but
Speaker 1: that's not the situation anymore. So why would someone choose
Speaker 1: to live opressed, Why would someone choose to pretend to
Speaker 1: be oppressed? Why would someone choose to pretend to be
Speaker 1: a victim, especially, I mean there's a lot of hate
Speaker 1: crime hoaxes, right, Why would someone do that? Why would
Speaker 1: you make up a victimhood story? When I say the
Speaker 1: thing about Jose Smalatt, right, Jesse Smalatt, member, he made
Speaker 1: up the whole story about getting beat up in New
Speaker 1: York City. It was like ten degrees the whole thing. Right,
Speaker 1: You'd think the story would be, Oh, these guys came
Speaker 1: out of nowhere and tried to beat me up, and
Speaker 1: I just crushed him. I wrecked him, I destroyed him,
Speaker 1: I beat him up, and I ran away scared. Right,
Speaker 1: you think it could be that, But it wasn't. Oh
Speaker 1: I got beat up by well, Like, why why are
Speaker 1: you pretending to If you're gonna make something up, at
Speaker 1: least make yourself up to be the victor. Why would
Speaker 1: you make yourself up to be the poor victim and
Speaker 1: the whole thing? Okay, so what's this about? Let's back
Speaker 1: it up. Have you ever heard of Munchausen syndrome. Munchausen syndrome.
Speaker 1: It's got an interesting story. I won't bore you with it.
Speaker 1: But there was a guy named Munchausen. He was a
Speaker 1: baron in Germany and he was fighting these wars, or
Speaker 1: he fought in a war in the early seventeen hundreds,
Speaker 1: and he would come back home and he made up
Speaker 1: these wildly exaggerated stories about his military exploits abroad. And
Speaker 1: there was a writer at the time who wrote a
Speaker 1: book and the main character's name was Munchausen, and Munchausen
Speaker 1: would make up these ridiculous stories about he fought a
Speaker 1: forty foot crocodile, and he rode on top of a cannonball,
Speaker 1: and he traveled to the moon and all these So
Speaker 1: Munchausen became a word to describe wild, bombastic, absurd claims
Speaker 1: out of nowhere. That was Munchausen. So was late seventeen hundreds.
Speaker 1: Fast forward nineteen fifty one. There was a British doctor
Speaker 1: who worked at the mental psych ward and he noticed
Speaker 1: people making up illnesses and he called it Munchausen's syndrome
Speaker 1: after the baron, people making up stories, people making up illnesses.
Speaker 1: He's like, this is odd. So you got Munchausen, people
Speaker 1: making up illnesses. Then you have something called Munchausen by proxy.
Speaker 1: This is when somebody intentionally makes somebody else sick, like
Speaker 1: somebody in their care. If you remember the sixth sense,
Speaker 1: that's what that was about. Right, So you make a
Speaker 1: child sick in order to get attention in sympathy for you.
Speaker 1: You can make like, if there's an older person who's
Speaker 1: under your care, you make them sick in order to
Speaker 1: get attention for you. That's munch housing by proxy. Then
Speaker 1: you have munch housed by Internet. Right. This is when
Speaker 1: people make up illnesses or tragedies in their life to
Speaker 1: get sympathy and attention from others on the internet. And
Speaker 1: the Internet is perfect for this because no one can
Speaker 1: tell if you're lying or not. And we all know this,
Speaker 1: and some people do this genuinely, right, And it's not
Speaker 1: meant although maybe it kind of still is. But like
Speaker 1: if you put something on Facebook and you get like
Speaker 1: three likes and a comment, right, But then you put
Speaker 1: something about your dog being sick or something, you get
Speaker 1: a thousand likes and you know, a million comments about
Speaker 1: how sorry they are for the right whole thing. Right,
Speaker 1: that's munch housing by Internet. And some people just lie
Speaker 1: about things. So here's this doctor who sees these people
Speaker 1: making up illnesses and he says their lies had no purpose.
Speaker 1: They did not want to defraud the state or solicit
Speaker 1: charitable donations in pursuit of nothing more than attention and
Speaker 1: an audience. They were willing to tolerate painful and intrusive
Speaker 1: medical procedures. The most remarkable feature of the syndrome is
Speaker 1: the apparent senselessness of it. So I want to argue
Speaker 1: here that this victimhood status that people seek, it's actually
Speaker 1: not that senseless. It makes a lot of sense in
Speaker 1: a twisted way. They have a reason for it. The
Speaker 1: people who make up their victimhood. I think a lot
Speaker 1: of people have lived either a traumatic life or they've
Speaker 1: had a traumatic experience in their life and they're not
Speaker 1: getting They have never gotten the attention they think it deserved.
Speaker 1: Or people have lived a very boring, meaningless life and
Speaker 1: have not received any detention that they've always wanted. Because
Speaker 1: they haven't gotten the attention they deserved or the attention
Speaker 1: they wanted, they attached themselves to a much larger event
Speaker 1: in order to get some attention from that. And give
Speaker 1: me some examples. Ninety eight, there were two people who
Speaker 1: performed at a Holocaust remembrance event. It's a concert and
Speaker 1: they were child survivors of the Holocaust, so it's this
Speaker 1: beautiful event. They each had these haunting, heroic stories of
Speaker 1: the pain and the torture that they experienced inside concentration camps,
Speaker 1: and they talked about how they both escaped and survived
Speaker 1: and amazing stories. They wrote books about it, and they
Speaker 1: traveled around the world talking about it. Well, someone said, hey,
Speaker 1: you two should go get some lunch together and share
Speaker 1: your stories. So they did. They got lunch, and it
Speaker 1: turns out they were both lying, both of them. They
Speaker 1: both made it all up. Why they each lived traumatic lives,
Speaker 1: and they wanted to be attached to something of meaning,
Speaker 1: and they did it by claiming to be a victim
Speaker 1: of a terrible thing, and they got the sympathy that
Speaker 1: they've always wanted. They didn't get sympathy for the actual
Speaker 1: trauma that they did experience in their lives, but that
Speaker 1: didn't matter. They were getting sympathy. Whether they lied to
Speaker 1: get it didn't matter. They were getting it. And this
Speaker 1: happens to an extent in every traumatic event. Another dramatic one,
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. There's one woman. She was on the
Speaker 1: seventy eighth floor and she survived, and she spun this
Speaker 1: harrowing tale. There was at one point there was a
Speaker 1: man who was dying, and he told her to give
Speaker 1: his wedding ring to as soon to be widow, and
Speaker 1: she promised she would, And she was telling all these
Speaker 1: stories and none of it happened. Nine eleven did, of course,
Speaker 1: but she wasn't there. She was a nurse in Spain.
Speaker 1: She wasn't even in the country. She was in Spain.
Speaker 1: She never profited from this, She didn't write a book
Speaker 1: or anything. She just wanted to feel connected to it
Speaker 1: for her own emotional benefit. It gave her a meaning.
Speaker 1: It was a type of Munchhausen syndrome. And like I said,
Speaker 1: every traumatic event people do this to a different degree
Speaker 1: because we're just super narcissistic all the time. So we
Speaker 1: like to center ourselves into every story that exists. So
Speaker 1: every time there's a natural disaster, hurricane Sounami's shooting, fire,
Speaker 1: I guess the shooting is not a natural disaster, but
Speaker 1: any disaster, right, people always want to center themselves. Right,
Speaker 1: where were you when that whole thing? Oh, when I
Speaker 1: first heard about it, me and my family we evacuated
Speaker 1: here and we did this in our house. That and
Speaker 1: whatever right, it's all. It always ends up being about us,
Speaker 1: so we all do it to an extent. I gotta
Speaker 1: take a break here because I got part two coming up.
Speaker 1: But here, here's my first argument. It's something to think about,
Speaker 1: something to chew on. Here. Many of the racial grievances
Speaker 1: today are first or one people who have had lives
Speaker 1: with trauma, and they feel like the trauma has not
Speaker 1: been given the sympathy it deserves. Why do not enough
Speaker 1: people feel bad for me that I was abused? Why
Speaker 1: do not enough people feel bad for me that I
Speaker 1: grew up poor? Why do not enough people feel bad
Speaker 1: for me that I was bullied in school? Why do
Speaker 1: people not feel bad enough for me because of this trauma?
Speaker 1: And they're not getting it? So they associate themselves as
Speaker 1: victims of well, when when it's coming to racial grievance,
Speaker 1: they attach themselves as victims of the one of the
Speaker 1: greatest tragedies in history, slavery. I don't get enough attention.
Speaker 1: I don't get enough attention. I haven't got enough attention
Speaker 1: for this trauma in my life. So I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say I'm a victim of the legacy of slavery? Are
Speaker 1: you well? No? No more than that that those people
Speaker 1: who said they were Holocaust survivors or the woman who
Speaker 1: said she was a nine eleven survivor while in Spain,
Speaker 1: you're not, and you are not any closer related to
Speaker 1: slavery than those people were to those things they made up.
Speaker 1: But it gives you an emotional connection to something that
Speaker 1: gives you the public sympathy that you think you're entitled to.
Speaker 1: So it's people who have experienced a trauma that they
Speaker 1: have not they feel has not been given the attention
Speaker 1: it deserves. Or it's people who feel like they've lived
Speaker 1: pretty meaningless, empty life. And that makes sense. We've all
Speaker 1: grown up in a nihilist culture. Nothing matters. We came
Speaker 1: from chance. This is all there is. You die, there
Speaker 1: is no God, right, It's pretty pretty lame existence. So
Speaker 1: people are empty inside and they've decided there's many ways
Speaker 1: to try to find meaning when you feel like that,
Speaker 1: but they've decided to find meaning by associating themselves with
Speaker 1: a terrible thing, slavery. I'll end it here for now.
Speaker 1: Let me give another thought on this next. But let's
Speaker 1: chew on that for a minute and see what you
Speaker 1: think about that. I got some stories of people doing
Speaker 1: this to a really dramatic degree. We'll do that next
Speaker 1: Mikes later in San Diego filling in for Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: on why people seek out victimhood it's a new version
Speaker 1: of Munchausen syndrome. S about the word. Hey teen Buck,
Speaker 1: Mikela and San Diego filling in for Buck Sexton. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being out. We're talking about a victimhood and why
Speaker 1: people seek out victimhoods status, why they declare themselves victims
Speaker 1: and celebrate their victimoo. We used to be a people
Speaker 1: who sell lebrated overcoming obstacles, and now we're people who
Speaker 1: who look out for ways to be victims. It's very bizarre,
Speaker 1: so why do we do this? And my argument here
Speaker 1: is that it's a type of Munchhausen syndrome where they
Speaker 1: feel like their trauma and childhood has not been has
Speaker 1: not received the sympathy that they feel deserves. So they
Speaker 1: attached themselves to a bigger traumatic event and piggyback off
Speaker 1: of that and get sympathy one way or the other.
Speaker 1: Or it's people who have lived in just a meaningless
Speaker 1: life and try to find meaning by attaching themselves to
Speaker 1: a meaningful thing and you get more sympathy that way.
Speaker 1: If it's a bad thing, of course, like oh, I'm
Speaker 1: a victim of the legacy of slavery, It's like, well, no,
Speaker 1: you're not. Helen Lewis, excuse me, Jessica Krug, excuse me,
Speaker 1: Jessica len Lewis ro an article about these people, Jessica
Speaker 1: Krug in The Atlantic. Jessica Krug. She was a black
Speaker 1: immigrant from the Caribbean. She was a tenured professor George
Speaker 1: Washington University, and she wrote all these books about African
Speaker 1: American history in Latin America, won awards and fellowships, and
Speaker 1: it was all a lie. She was a white Jewish
Speaker 1: girl from the suburbs of Kansas City, but she lived
Speaker 1: life as this black immigrant and she finally admitted to it.
Speaker 1: And she says, when I was a teenager fleeing trauma,
Speaker 1: I could just run away to a new place and
Speaker 1: become a new person. I developed a new identity. It's
Speaker 1: really not that different from transgenderism, as we talked about
Speaker 1: in the last hour. Why do you hate the person
Speaker 1: you really are? What are you running from? She says,
Speaker 1: to say that I clearly have been battling some unaddressed
Speaker 1: mental health demons for my entire life is obvious. Mental
Speaker 1: health is She's likely explained why I assumed a false
Speaker 1: identity initially as a youth and why I continue to
Speaker 1: develop it for so long. The mental health professionals assure
Speaker 1: me that this is a common response to some of
Speaker 1: the severe trauma that marked my early childhood and teen years. Yep,
Speaker 1: it makes sense. HD career. He was a writer and
Speaker 1: a professor of English at George Washington University as well.
Speaker 1: He was a Cuban immigrant. He left Cube at the
Speaker 1: age of seven with his family, wrote all these books
Speaker 1: about that experience. He passed away from COVID unfortunately, but
Speaker 1: when he did, his family released a statement of who
Speaker 1: he really was, and he wasn't a Cuban immigrant. He
Speaker 1: was a black guy from Detroit. His last name was
Speaker 1: not Korea, it was Carol. My favorite example of this
Speaker 1: is Alec Baldwin's wife, Hilaria. She pretends that she's from
Speaker 1: Spain and she would talk in this accent, right, and
Speaker 1: she talks in this Spanish accent, which I can't do.
Speaker 1: And she once she was on My Today Show and
Speaker 1: she was doing a cooking and she's like, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: you put a little bit of this, and you put
Speaker 1: a little bit to that, and you put in some
Speaker 1: how do you say, what's the word a cucumbers? You
Speaker 1: put in some cucumbers. She's from Boston. She's not from Spain,
Speaker 1: She's from Boston. She calls her kids the Baldwin Nitos.
Speaker 1: Her name's Hillary. Her name's a Hilaria. Her name is Hilary,
Speaker 1: from Boston, of two white parents. I got a ton
Speaker 1: of these. Rachel Dalazel is the most famous example. Right.
Speaker 1: She was the president of the Spokane, Washington and AC
Speaker 1: and she's white. Her trauma was that she was She
Speaker 1: says she was raised by a cult like fundamentalist Christian family,
Speaker 1: and she hated her childhood and she would imagine when
Speaker 1: she was a kid that she was adopted. So she
Speaker 1: would make up these fake identities in her head in
Speaker 1: order to distance herself from her existence. And she never
Speaker 1: stopped doing it. It makes perfect sense, doesn't it. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's messed up, but it makes perfect sense. This
Speaker 1: is Munchausen syndrome. It's a type of Munchausen. I don't
Speaker 1: have a funny name for it, right, I mean, you
Speaker 1: got Munchausen. Munchausen by proxy, Munchausen by Internet. I don't
Speaker 1: know what this is called Munchausen by appropriation or so,
Speaker 1: I don't know what the right word is. But when
Speaker 1: you claim to be a member of an oppressed group
Speaker 1: when you're not, we live in an empathetic society too much.
Speaker 1: There's too much value in being seen as a victim,
Speaker 1: especially when we live in a very dicot like we
Speaker 1: live in a Marxist framework where you're either the oppressed
Speaker 1: or the oppressor. Right, So you don't want to be
Speaker 1: the oppressor. You don't want to be the perpetrator. You
Speaker 1: don't want to be the terrible person. So if you're
Speaker 1: not that, well, you got to be the oppressed. You
Speaker 1: don't want to be the oppressor. So you're better off
Speaker 1: just be in the oppressed. And even if you are
Speaker 1: an oppressor, or let's say you pretend to be an oppressor,
Speaker 1: like you're you read white fragility and you're a guilty
Speaker 1: white person, right, Yeah, you claim to be part of
Speaker 1: the oppressor class, but you're now woke version of it,
Speaker 1: and you're a victim of the white supremacy culture that
Speaker 1: has created that has made you an oppressor. So you're
Speaker 1: in victimhood, even though you're it's all very convolute. But
Speaker 1: the point is, you gotta be one or the other.
Speaker 1: Why do why people love to be victims gets attention.
Speaker 1: It's much easier, too, Gosh, it's so much easier to
Speaker 1: be a victim than to actually overcome things. Overcoming things
Speaker 1: is very hard, much easier to be a victim, much easier.
Speaker 1: You know how easy it is to tear down a
Speaker 1: statue piece of cake. I can tear down a statue
Speaker 1: in no time. I could never build a statue. If
Speaker 1: you could give me all all the materials, the bronze
Speaker 1: and the stone and the marble, and say, hey, later
Speaker 1: build a statue like build a statue of George Washington,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't look nothing like George Washington. Be a joke.
Speaker 1: But if he said, hey, Slater, tear down this statue
Speaker 1: of George Washington, just give me a rope, no problem.
Speaker 1: It's much harder to overcome. It's much harder to build.
Speaker 1: It's way easier to be a victim, way easier to
Speaker 1: tear down. And when you do pretend to be a victim,
Speaker 1: you get a type of meaning out of it, and
Speaker 1: people pay attention. These are some extreme examples, But how
Speaker 1: many people around you do a similar version of it,
Speaker 1: claiming to be a victim, claiming to be oppressed when
Speaker 1: they're not, or if they are, it's all self imposed.
Speaker 1: No one wants to hear that. We need to be
Speaker 1: a society that once again values overcoming obstacles in life.
Speaker 1: We need to encourage and celebrate that once again. Mike
Speaker 1: Slater in San Diego, filling it for Buck Sexton, spread
Speaker 1: the word. Hey teen Buck, Mike Slater in San Diego,
Speaker 1: filling in for Buck Sexton. Gosh, we've covered a ton today.
Speaker 1: We're talked about transgenderism. We told a terrific story of
Speaker 1: a father in Canada whose ex wife is abusing her
Speaker 1: child by she's abusing their daughter by given her puberty blockers,
Speaker 1: an old thing, and the courts through him in jail
Speaker 1: because he's against it. We told that story earlier, talked
Speaker 1: all about the border. I'm here in San Diego, the shipping,
Speaker 1: and I think tomorrow the next day, fifteen hundred thirteen
Speaker 1: to seventeen year olds to live in our convention center downtown.
Speaker 1: No photographs of anything, not allowed at all. So we
Speaker 1: talked about Biden's border policies and then what we do
Speaker 1: in the beginning, what was the first segment of the show?
Speaker 1: What did we Oh? Yeah, yeah, we talked about the
Speaker 1: truth of hate crimes and crime statistics, and Obama says
Speaker 1: you should be scared to go outside your house in
Speaker 1: America today. It's like, what are you talking about? So
Speaker 1: we gave the truth about all that you can of
Speaker 1: course find that on the pie Gast section. Our last
Speaker 1: couple of minutes together, I want to talk about the
Speaker 1: difference between the progressive worldview and the conservative worldview when
Speaker 1: it comes to inequality, so super important and once you
Speaker 1: understand this, then everything starts to make sense, like why
Speaker 1: progressive says some things they do about inequality and why
Speaker 1: they're all worked up about it. Also, so when a
Speaker 1: progressive sees an inequality in something, and inequality would be
Speaker 1: or an inequity they called an inequity, it would be
Speaker 1: there's too many Asian and white kids in the advanced
Speaker 1: classes at school and not enough Black and Hispanic kids,
Speaker 1: So therefore we're going to get rid of all advanced classes.
Speaker 1: So they see an inequity there when they see an
Speaker 1: inequity or give another This is my favorite example in
Speaker 1: San Francisco, it's illegal. It was illegal to jump the
Speaker 1: turnstiles to get on their train. Well, a disproportionate number
Speaker 1: of black people were jumping the styles and getting tickets,
Speaker 1: So therefore there's an inequity there and the law is racist.
Speaker 1: So they got rid of the law and now it's
Speaker 1: legal to jump the turnstyles. So when a progressive seas
Speaker 1: an inequity in something, they've fully digested the Marxist worldview
Speaker 1: that the world is constantly and everything in it is
Speaker 1: a battle between the oppressed and the oppressors. So if
Speaker 1: there's an inequity, it's due to oppression. If there's an inequity,
Speaker 1: someone is oppressing the oppressed, and our job as the warriors,
Speaker 1: these social justice warriors, are to find out who is
Speaker 1: doing the oppressing and hold them accountable. Makes sense. A
Speaker 1: conservative looks at an inequity and asks what's at the
Speaker 1: root of this, specifically, what cultural differences exist that resulted
Speaker 1: in this inequity. The simplest example, it's like equal pay day,
Speaker 1: or it was yesterday or something. I don't know, so
Speaker 1: we're back. I just yesterday. I just heard all the
Speaker 1: same old arguments, goodness about how women make less than men.
Speaker 1: It's total nonsense. So they'll throw out this number that
Speaker 1: they made up and they'll say, look, there's an inequity.
Speaker 1: Women are paid less than men. It's oppression, male patriarchy,
Speaker 1: whole thing. They go to. Example that they use. I
Speaker 1: don't know why the left uses is yesterday at the
Speaker 1: White House, Megan Rapino from the US women's soccer team
Speaker 1: spoke talked about how press she was, and it's like,
Speaker 1: give me a break. I don't know why they keep
Speaker 1: using the women's soccer team about how they make less
Speaker 1: than the men's soccer team. It's the easiest example ever
Speaker 1: to rebuke. But anyway, conservatives look at let's say, let's
Speaker 1: do the soccer team. Conservatives look at the fact that
Speaker 1: the women's soccer team makes less than the men's soccer
Speaker 1: team and says, oh, men's soccer is the most popular
Speaker 1: sport in the world, and no one watches women's soccer.
Speaker 1: Therefore women soccer player get paid less. End of story.
Speaker 1: There's a controversy the other day of the men's weight
Speaker 1: room during the NC TWA basketball tournament and the women's
Speaker 1: weight room, and it's like, oh, men's basketball one of
Speaker 1: the most popular sports. Tons of money being made women's
Speaker 1: college basketball is a charity event subsidized by men's basketball.
Speaker 1: I go, what are we like? You're looking like you
Speaker 1: get any weight room? Like? What are we talking? Right?
Speaker 1: But they left? Doesn't look at it. Oh, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: being compressed. Now let's look outside of sports. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: why is there a pay gap? Mathematical matters? Statistically, well,
Speaker 1: women make different career decisions, particularly the decision to have kids.
Speaker 1: San Diego just released the study saying that women make
Speaker 1: less than men in San Diego City san Diego employees,
Speaker 1: and it's like, yeah, that's because there's not a lot
Speaker 1: of female firefighters. Firefighters make more money than anyone else.
Speaker 1: It's just your decisions. Okay, So when you account for
Speaker 1: that type of stuff, all the discrepancy goes away. Does
Speaker 1: that make sense? So you either look at the progressives
Speaker 1: look at who's oppressed, conservatives look at who or what
Speaker 1: cultural differences? What's at the root of this? Why? What does?
Speaker 1: Different decisions are made that result in an inequity, and
Speaker 1: an inequity is not necessarily a bad thing. I got
Speaker 1: another went for you. This one's interesting. I came across
Speaker 1: this one the other day. I had to do a
Speaker 1: little research on this. I've never heard this before. The
Speaker 1: claim is that Filipinos make up four percent of all
Speaker 1: nurses nationwide. Four percent of all nurses or nations are Filipino,
Speaker 1: but thirty percent of nurses who died of COVID were Filipino.
Speaker 1: That's something. What's that about four percent of nurses nationwide
Speaker 1: or Filipino but thirty percent of nurses who died of
Speaker 1: COVID nationwide or Philip polow So the person who made
Speaker 1: this claim, Well, look quick, little backup backgrounding this San
Speaker 1: Diego Union Tribune in our paper here. I don't know
Speaker 1: about your local paper, but our paper is on a
Speaker 1: quest to print the craziest editorials they can find, written
Speaker 1: by the farthest left activist in town. And every day
Speaker 1: it's a new one of these things. I got read
Speaker 1: one the other day and it started off with I
Speaker 1: am writing this. At the beginning, I'm writing this as
Speaker 1: a settler in Kuma Yay Land now known as San Diego.
Speaker 1: That's like the native tribe now known as San Diego.
Speaker 1: As a queer Indigenous Asian American refugee. You're like, oh,
Speaker 1: geez man, that's how we're supposed to start off everything.
Speaker 1: I'm not joking. Every diversity inclusion equity seminar, including our
Speaker 1: local school district here in San Diego, starts off with
Speaker 1: a land acknowledgement. You have to acknowledge, it's the new thing.
Speaker 1: You have to acknowledge that we are on indigenous land.
Speaker 1: And then you go on and you state your identity.
Speaker 1: I am writing this as a settler on kuma Ye Land,
Speaker 1: now known as that's how you're supposed to do there,
Speaker 1: such as one example, let me quote this one here,
Speaker 1: this woman who made this claim. Yeah, let's just read
Speaker 1: this quick um. After a year, the COVID nineteen pandemic
Speaker 1: has taught us many things about the state of the nation.
Speaker 1: One important lesson is that our proposed ethnic studies curriculum.
Speaker 1: Oh all right, let me do a quick background it
Speaker 1: this sorry double sidebar. California just passed a couple days
Speaker 1: ago our ethnic studies curriculum, and it is appalling and
Speaker 1: atrocious as you would imagine. It is horrific, And don't worry,
Speaker 1: it's coming to a state near you. It was sponsored
Speaker 1: by the Bill Bill and the Gates Foundation, and it
Speaker 1: has a lot of power and money behind it, and
Speaker 1: it's horrific. Let me finish this point and maybe the
Speaker 1: next segment I can give you an example how bad
Speaker 1: it is. So she's talking about the ethnic studies curriculum.
Speaker 1: One important aspect of any ethnic studies curriculum must encourage
Speaker 1: the critical thinking skills and sense of ethical responsibility necessary
Speaker 1: to address the disproportionate loss and destruction that black, indigenous,
Speaker 1: and people of color communities have endured. Blah blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah blah blah, right, whatever, and then she goes
Speaker 1: on and gives an example. Okay, and then example is
Speaker 1: Philip nurses in America four percent of Filipino but thirty
Speaker 1: percent of all COVID related deaths. Look at this inequity.
Speaker 1: Look at how Asian Americans are oppressed in America. Okay,
Speaker 1: So what's the real story here? That's how progressive looks
Speaker 1: at it, all right, everything's got to be looked through
Speaker 1: the land of the Marxist lends of oppressor. President, How
Speaker 1: does a conservative look at it? So I'm trying to
Speaker 1: think of when to start. Eighteen ninety eight. We'll start
Speaker 1: here eighteen ninety eight, President McKinley. Okay, we gotta go
Speaker 1: away this again. This is how conservatives think eighteen ninety eight,
Speaker 1: President McKinley started a policy called benevolent assimilation in the Philippines.
Speaker 1: So we won this Spanish American War, which no one
Speaker 1: ever studies. And then after that there was something called
Speaker 1: the Philippine American War, which no one's ever heard of.
Speaker 1: It was two years, so we won, and part of
Speaker 1: that was we sent over Western training for nurses. All right,
Speaker 1: benevolent assimilation. So President McKinley says, hey, let's send over
Speaker 1: our training and trainers and doctors to go train Filipino nurses. Great.
Speaker 1: Fast forward a couple of decades. There was a nursing
Speaker 1: shortage in America, particularly in California, so we turned to
Speaker 1: the Philippines because they spoke English really well and had
Speaker 1: a very similar training. So we could take a nurse
Speaker 1: from the Philippines and they could come to America and
Speaker 1: boom work, no problem, fit right in. That's why we
Speaker 1: have a lot of Filipino nurses. Interesting story, right, that's
Speaker 1: way more interesting than and way more accurate than, oh,
Speaker 1: racist oppressors. But it's like, oh no, that's not it
Speaker 1: just there's this history now that doesn't explain why they're
Speaker 1: dying at such a higher rate. Well, Filipino trained nurses
Speaker 1: tend to work in the ICU and emergency rooms and
Speaker 1: nursing homes more so than other nurses, and that is
Speaker 1: riskier for COVID. Filipinos tend to live in multigenerational housing,
Speaker 1: so it can spread faster. More are going to get sick.
Speaker 1: Filipinos in America also have a higher rate of diabetes
Speaker 1: and heart disease. Are just going to make getting COVID
Speaker 1: more deadly. And then another interesting theory, Filipinos culturally are
Speaker 1: less likely to question authority and speak up about any
Speaker 1: issues that they may have, just part of the culture
Speaker 1: and an issue maybe we don't have enough protective equipment
Speaker 1: or something like that. And some Filipino nurses are immigrants
Speaker 1: and they feel like if they complain, they could be
Speaker 1: sent back, and they don't want to rock the boat,
Speaker 1: so they go along with things that maybe other nurses
Speaker 1: want it. That's how conservative thing. So again, a progressive looks, oh,
Speaker 1: we're being oppressed. A conservative says, oh no, Well, here's
Speaker 1: the history, and here's some differences and different choices and
Speaker 1: different realities and different cultural markers that exists that create
Speaker 1: an inequity. None of this is due to oppression, just
Speaker 1: cultural differences, very different ways of looking at the world. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: the progressive way of looking at the world is the
Speaker 1: one that is winning right now. The thoughtful approach not
Speaker 1: getting it much airtime, which is why I'm glad you're here.
Speaker 1: Mike Slater, San Diego, fill in it for Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: Spread the word eighteen Buck. Mike Slater, San Diego, filling
Speaker 1: in for Buck Sexton today. Thanks for being here. We
Speaker 1: plan on being back tomorrow as well, so hope you
Speaker 1: can tune in again. On my local show, we talked
Speaker 1: a lot about this forty thousand dollars a year prep
Speaker 1: school in Los Angeles. It's called Harvard Westlake. It's one
Speaker 1: of the nicest schools in LA. And they have a
Speaker 1: new anti racist curriculum there. It's absurd or it's horrible.
Speaker 1: It just teaches kids to hate America. I heard a
Speaker 1: great line someone said, the only thing that rivals the
Speaker 1: contempt that young Americans have for this country is their
Speaker 1: ignorance of it. So they have a huge hatred and
Speaker 1: they're being taught to hate America and the only thing
Speaker 1: that rivals at is how little they know about it.
Speaker 1: And just biblical literacy as well. Right, zero Biblical literacy,
Speaker 1: which is what our country is based off of. Right,
Speaker 1: there's so many fun foundational truths that this country is
Speaker 1: based off of. On that, and then not even just
Speaker 1: you know history in general, and then what came before
Speaker 1: is antrel Greece, Ancient Rome, the whole thing. People have
Speaker 1: no idea. And now anytime anyone dare teach maybe something
Speaker 1: like a Biblical lessons or about ancient Greece ancient Rome,
Speaker 1: oh well, that's Western civilization. That's misogynistic, that's you know,
Speaker 1: white centered and all this stuff. It's got to stop.
Speaker 1: We got to cancel it. Isaac Newton was canceled at
Speaker 1: this school. They don't call it the Newton's Laws of
Speaker 1: Physics anymore. They're called the Fundamental Laws because this is
Speaker 1: at Harvard Westlake. Because they want to decenter whiteness. So
Speaker 1: if you call him Newton's laws, that's offensive or not
Speaker 1: inclusive enough of students of color. So they're called fundamentals
Speaker 1: like that's insane. Newton's Laws of Physics do not center whiteness.
Speaker 1: They center the exact specific person who was able to
Speaker 1: define the laws of physics, Isaac Newton. But he's got
Speaker 1: to go. So you kick out Isaac Newton, you kick
Speaker 1: out all Western civilization, all Western great works of literature,
Speaker 1: kick out all the great Western civ thinkers, kick out
Speaker 1: all the great writers of Western civilization, and you replace
Speaker 1: it with Robin D'Angelo and Ibramex Kendy. Now here's the
Speaker 1: next level. And this is the ultimate level. Obviously, when
Speaker 1: you remove God, what do you replace it with? In
Speaker 1: the California Ethnics Studies curriculum they have in it, this
Speaker 1: is not a one time thing. This is not just
Speaker 1: when you're learning about one thing on one day. They
Speaker 1: have regular chance to the Aztec gods. So when you
Speaker 1: remove God out of the equation, what do you think
Speaker 1: people are going to do? Of course, eventually they're going
Speaker 1: to replace it with a bunch of pagan gods. A
Speaker 1: little and a little pagan warship never hurt anyone, right,
Speaker 1: of course, except for the you know twenty thousand humans
Speaker 1: every year that were sacrificed at the altars to these
Speaker 1: gods by the Aztecs. The Aztecs they've built a new temple.
Speaker 1: Eighty thousand people were sacrificed to the god in one day,
Speaker 1: eighty thousand in one day. But yeah, it was the
Speaker 1: conquistadors who were uniquely evil. Columbus as a rapist, Win
Speaker 1: throw up a bigot Washington a slave owner. Our kids
Speaker 1: are filled with ignorance and contempt. But just having prayed
Speaker 1: to the Aztec gods, and that'll make things all better
Speaker 1: ignorance and contempt. And I know this is a little old,
Speaker 1: but I've just reminded here of the Megan Markle. I
Speaker 1: didn't pay it a lick. I didn't pay a lick
Speaker 1: of attention to the Megan Marko. I don't even I
Speaker 1: didn't follow any of it. But my understanding is that
Speaker 1: she was whining and complaining about stuff, and the fact
Speaker 1: that this victimhood, which has been the theme of this
Speaker 1: hour so deep seated in our culture that a girl
Speaker 1: from Canoga Park, La median income fifty thousand dollars to
Speaker 1: grow up to become an actress at all, and then
Speaker 1: grow up to become a literal princess and still complain
Speaker 1: to the Queen of England and the Queen of America
Speaker 1: Oprah about how terrible whole life is and how racist
Speaker 1: white people are, what is wrong with us? But this
Speaker 1: is what happens when you raise kids in this Marxist
Speaker 1: soup and asked to stop. We have to be done
Speaker 1: with it. Mike's later dot locals dot com. I never
Speaker 1: mentioned that the entire show, but then that's our website.
Speaker 1: Everything we talk about is thrown up there, Mike Slater
Speaker 1: dot locals dot com, and you can follow us there
Speaker 1: and bring our local show on our TV show. I
Speaker 1: didn't mention this either. Buck and I we have TV
Speaker 1: shows together on the first, so you can watch us
Speaker 1: both together. I'm on at eleven Eastern is my TV show,
Speaker 1: so you can listen. You can listen, you can watch
Speaker 1: me and Buck. You can listen to me and Buck.
Speaker 1: What an honor to be filmed in for Buck today.
Speaker 1: We'll see if I'm back tomorrow, but it's an honor
Speaker 1: to have been here. Either way. I have a great
Speaker 1: rest of your day. Spread the word