WEBVTT - Nate Silver: The Smoothest Brain On The Internet

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Cool media. Oh my god, you guys, it could happen here,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>meaning our podcast, it could, it is, It's happened.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Robert, shouldn't you rename the podcast? It is happening here?

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Uh huh, that's that's a fun joke that I

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>only hear forty seven times a day. And the whole

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>point of the podcast was, well, initially I was a

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy person saying a bunch of stuff would happen, and

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now it's a bunch of that stuff happened, and even

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more of it looks very likely, and so now I

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>just feel bad all the time.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be cooled. I fucking called it. I

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 3>fucking told you, bro, I said this was going to happen.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you rename the podcast? I just feel bad

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>all the time?

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, why don't you rename the podcast? Robert should have

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>bought more stock and ammunition companies than he did and

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>DGI jeez, should I have bought stock and DGI?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna buy her a little DGI drone here,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there we go a lot of people are going

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to be buying little DGI drones here very soon.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>James, I should point out that I'm buying one. It's

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>not capable of carrying a payload.

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.199
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely a safer investment to pull out your furrow

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>one k Now, when the market's crashing, use that money,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 2>buy drones. Those drones will be worth a lot more

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>in five years.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Or what is that? That is? That is the sound

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 3>of a sound investment, a box of bullets.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like how boomers used to like invest in like

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>silver or gold as like a stable current. No, we're

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>investing in DGI, like physical dghy drones.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We are investing in drones and boxes of gunpowder.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you gotta get it in a bottle, rubbit in

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>a box, it can get light struck or get moist.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>You want to get it in a special black black bottle.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>James, I keep all of my gunpowder. And you know

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how like people used to cocaine by wrapping it in

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>toilet paper and swallowing it.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>No, sure, okay, well if you say sobody.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of toilet paper. Nate Silver has a newsletter and

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be useful as toilet paper more so than

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it is as a newsletter.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I just got like PTSD flashbacks from twenty twenty four.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Would you said that it's okay.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Normally, my rule of thumb is every election, usually starting

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>in like December, the year before election year, I begrudgingly

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fight down a series of panic attacks, vomit three or

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>four times in a bucket, and then head over to

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Nate Silver's blog to see what he's saying about the polls.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I do this. I hate that I keep having

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I have regularly on election the years people were like

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>but he was always wrong. He's like, no, he's reasonably

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>good on polls. He's usually if you read what he's

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>saying about presidential polls, the reality bears out pretty close

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to that. So I read him during elections and I

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hate it because he's never been right about anything else.

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's a gambler. He's a degenerate, filthy gambler.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And so when we're talking about degenerate, filthy gambler stuff,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and by god, election polls are the most degenerate type

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of gambling that exists, he's worth reading. And then after

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the election, no matter how well or badly it goes,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I ignore him again for four years. And I didn't get

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that this year because on February twenty fifth,

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, Nate wrote a column called elon Musk

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>and Spiky Intelligence.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Spiky Intelligence. Am I hearing that right?

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Spiky intelligence?

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And it very helpfully starts with a drawing that I'm

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sure he used some AI, like he must have used

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some AI like video software to do that, just like

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>shows you a kind of spiky star looking thing and

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>then like a blob with rounded edges. I can't begin

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to imagine why Nate Silver thought that, like we needed

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this illustrated.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>I have to see this. Yeah, yeah, I would like

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>it to be shad look at this.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Why did you like, oh promise of AI we couldn't have?

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, wow, yeah, it just it looks like.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe an amoeba if you, if you looks like an amoeba,

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and then like a poorly drawn star.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it? This is? When is an actual thing? This

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>gifts you? Wait, this is a thing.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>This is this is Boba and Kiki with a weird

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>like digital fuzz over the.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Fucker Boba and Kiki.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, Garrison, Yeah.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's like a social experiment to like ask

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>people what like the emotional correspondence of each of these

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>shapes are like, which it's like a sure, like like

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>which one looks, which one looks nicer, which one looks meaner?

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 2>You know that sort of thing. I'm a Kiki type,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>like like I I am a Kiky in terms in

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of my behavior, I am Garrison.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that you bring up Rorshak, all I can think

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of is how cool it would be if Rorshak from

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The Watchman showed up in Nate Silver's house and did

0:04:58.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>his thing.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, I think Rorshak at night Silver friends.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually yeah, no, no, Nate would. But after them getting

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>along for like forty five minutes, Nate would take him

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to an illegal card game, and Rorshak would murder everybody

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the room because they were gambling without a license.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So I'm assuming Nate's going to try to argue that

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that Musk's intelligence is akin to the kiki drug here

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to like the emphathetic right.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Now there, Actually, yes, there is a little bit of

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that in there. He does not mention this Kiki and

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Boba thing. I don't know if that's because I'm supposed

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to just infer it from the image or if he's Okay,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll get your opinion on it. Is is Hee ripping these

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>people off because this doesn't count as enough for him

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to be crediting them if this is the underpinning of

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>his stupid idea, which he credits to his stupid book

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that he came up with later. But I'm just going

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to start reading the stupid column.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, hit us with the second paragraph, because that fuck.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You haven't gotten paragraph one.

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Jack radicalized me immediately.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>There's been a debate raging on Twitter. Noah Smith can

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>run you through the parameters about the intelligence of the

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>platform's owner, Elon Musk. My contribution was to suggest and

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's a little eye in parentheses because we need

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that Elon is obviously pretty bright. And then there's two

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>eyes in parentheses. This shouldn't be conflated with moral judgment.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Highly intelligent people do lots of bad things. Okay, you'd

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think this wouldn't be especially controversial, but since it involves

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon and intelligence, well it was. Elon has run founded

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>or co foundeds Tesla, SpaceX, open Ai, neuralink Xai, PayPal,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and more recently Twitter. He's also managed to steer himself

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>into a position where he's now the de facto chief

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>of staff to the President of the United States. I

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>do not doubt that Elon has gotten lucky in various respects.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of these were long shot bets, and Walter Isaacson's

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>biography of Musk documents he thought he'd be ruined if

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>there had been one more failed SpaceX launch. The success

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of some of these enterprises might also be debated. Twitter

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was a canny play for cultural and political and ones.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But probably And he doesn't bring up in this whole

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>thing where he's talking about, like all a successful company,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not a word about the boring company, not a word

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about hyper loop right.

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, yeah, any of the failure ones.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>His record does seem better if you ignore the two

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>massively publicized and invested absolute failures.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, and last week, I know there was a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>space X lunch. I'm sure it went well. I'm sure

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>it didn't fling debris all over lower.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he didn't nearly destroy several commercial aircraft, also

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>crediting it like, yeah, I guess technically co founded open ai,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but not in a way that mattered. He just shot

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>down money in there and then kind of edged out.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and is actively in a conflict with everybody who

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>did make open ai as prominent as it is. Again,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Nitla has to leave a lot out in order to

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>start making this case.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>But so he's going to argue that, you know, we're

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>going to see how how well this co presidency goes.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>But he's probably a pretty smart guy to get all

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of this stuff done.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's also saying, well, like maybe Twitter won't

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>be profitable, but we'll see how you know, he could

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>probably profit from being the de facto chief of staff.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Not a word from Nate about like, yeah, but he's

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just like, that's just breaking the law. So why are

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>we Why aren't we including in our canny businessman guys

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that get rich selling like shitloads of heroin for the cartels,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Because yes, if you are breaking the laws sometimes that

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>goes well for you financially.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Walter White, they've done some bad things, Yeah, but.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't deny he was a brilliant method, you know.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't care what Elon's SAT score is. Fourteen hundred.

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>According to Isaacson, he's clearly some sort of outlier in

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>many ways people would associate with intelligence, probably even a genius.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet when my first off, it becomes clear through

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this that Nate does not consider a fourteen hundred to

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be an impressive SAT score, and would normally be judgmental

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of someone who had an SAT score of fourteen hundred

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for all of Elon's other genius accomplishments.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And yet, when my partner and I were heading to

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>dinner the other day and we saw some tweet that

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon sent I forget which one because he tweets so much,

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we were both like, man, he's such a dumb ass. Yes,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>someone can be both a genius and a dumbass. Welcome

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to what I call spikey intelligence.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>This gets to like the core of what's annoying about

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Nate is his need to He's one of these guys

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you know what it is. He's an

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>intellectual enclosurist right where he's not confident to be like

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone is very aware of the fact that no one

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is good at everything, and that people have holes in

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>their competence, and that there are like brilliant surgeons who

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>are bad fathers or whatever, because there are different kinds

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of intelligence. This is like a broadly common understanding. Nate

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>has to give it a name so that he can

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sell his books. So he gives it the names. It's

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like an intellectual. Now it's my idea. I'm the one

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>who came up with the concept that smart people can

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be dumbasses. Stop it, Nate, it's annoying.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Capital ass capital I rights to trademark spiky intelligence. Yeah.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Now he acknowledges that this isn't entirely original, and

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>then links to somebody without really like crediting them. Interestingly,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>many of the instances online refer to people of the

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on the autism spectrum. Musk has publicly stated that he

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>has Asperger syndrome. But the concept is simple. While intelligence

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is a multi dimensional phenomenon, the scientific consensus is that

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>there's also something known as a G factor sometimes also

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>called general intelligence. As an empirical matter, most traits we'd

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>associate with intelligence are positively correlated. For instance, math and

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>verbal skills and the gire are correlated. The correlations are

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>loose enough that you'll wind up with all sorts of

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>different permutations on the spectrum of human behavior. And he's

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just going into like he talks about like the absent

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>minded professor, Like it's all just these these very common

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas that like, yeah, people are usually bad at more

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>things than they're good at, right, Like it's there's no

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>need to explain how Elon Musk has been successful at

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>certain things, but Nate does, and he has to keep

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to. Like he makes a comment later in

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>here about how Musk is clearly a brilliant engineer. He

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't back this up with evidence. He just says that, Like, well,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if you read the book that Ashley Vance wrote, he

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously signed off on a lot of great engineering moves,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>which ignores the fact that, like he's not making any

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of these decisions, Like he bought a company that already

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>had good automotive technology. He hired a bunch of rocket

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>engineers to design rockets. Elon is arguably good at hiring

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in certain circumstances, and he is inarguably a great hype man, right,

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the actual brilliance that Elon has is he

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>was very very good at hyping people up and getting

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>people to believe in him until he was too big

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to fail. Like that's the one thing he actually did.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But Nate can't accept that because I think it kind of,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>among other things, it kind of reveals what Nate is,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who is a guy who was really good at one

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>narrow thing and now has a career writing about everything

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and he can't. That's like a dangerous thing for Nate

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to think too hard about.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's learn more about Nate's spiky intelligence after these very

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>soft and soothing ads.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah we're back.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about the danger

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>of being a guy who gets famous for being really

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>good at one thing and then gets a job talking

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about everything, because I've had a version of that experience.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you, you're not ever going to be

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>competent to discuss all of the things that you can

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>make money talking about if you're a popular entertainer. No

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one ever has been, and no one ever will be,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which is why what you ought to do is the

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thing Nate initially tried to do, which is bring on

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people to like run a website with

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you right where you cover more things than one. Unfortunately,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it turns out five thirty was a bad business venture.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It got massively overvalued, a company spent a shitload more

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>money on it that it was capable of making, and

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>now everyone's gotten laid off and Nate left years ago

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to do his sub stack. You know, it's a tragic

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>case in the problem of like Hubris and the fact

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that maybe a guy who's really good at gambling shouldn't

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>run an entire media enterprise. But Nate doesn't like thinking

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. It isn't like thinking about the fact that

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the only thing Elon Musk was ever good at

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was being the guy from the Music Man, because I

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think Nate bought into Elon Musk for a significant period

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, Right, many people clearly does. Yes, Yeah, there's

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>been this thing lately where a lot of folks on

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the left have been like the Oh, you couldn't always

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>tell that he was a con man, You couldn't always

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tell that he was this bad, like he was always

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the worst. I was like, no, Like back in twenty

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>fourteen fifteen, when I was writing about the billionaires and

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>rich people that were evil, I was focusing on Jamie

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Diamond because he had helped create the two thousand and

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>eight five financial collapse and he's seen it. He just

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>seemed obviously much worse than this guy who up to

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that point was pretty much just making cars and rockets.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have two companies doing that. Musk was

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>not top of most people's radars for very good reason,

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which gets to like, there's this thing that's been created

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>because of some of like the sinister beliefs that his

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>grandfather had and his like family background which has a

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of white supremacy in it. To that this has

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>been Elon's sort of like grand plan from the beginning,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and that it's all come together for him, like as

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>if he's he's, you know, a Marvel or a James

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>bond Villa who's been executing this like thirty year plan

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to get where he is.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think when you look at his cognition, like

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not the same man he was ten years ago.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not the same guy he was when he started

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>dating Grimes. And I'm saying he was a good man

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>before then. I don't think he particularly ever was, but

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly his brain has degraded, in part due to

0:14:58.160 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>contact through Twitter.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you can like measure this through his posting

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>as well, Like, yeah, like that the types of posts

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>you would make in twenty seventeen are like completely opposite

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to the way that he would talk about certain social issues. Now,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, he's not like meming about like anarcho syndicalism.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we get to a few of those things. But

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to read another quote from NAT's article because

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to talk about his book on the Edge,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which quote describes a certain community of intelligent people that

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I call the River. These people who occupy a range

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of professions from AI research to poker to venture capital,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are bright, but in spiky ways. In Baron Cohen's dochotomy,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they lean heavily towards the systematic side of the equation.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>They're good at abstract analytic reasoning, but they may lack

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>other forms of intelligence like empathy, judgment, and self awareness.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>They also have some distinctive characteristics largely unrelated to intelligence.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, they tend to be extraordinarily competitive and somewhat contrariant.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And again, what you are talking about all of these

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>people number one, when he says AI research, he's not

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about people who are doing like the gut level coating.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about Sam Altman, right, poker, venture capital. This

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is all gambling. You're all talking about gamblers. The River

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is just gamblers, Nate. It's people like you who who

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>put money on bets, and they are contrarian and competitive

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's how gamblers are. That's the intelligence, that's the river.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Like he's thinking about it as like this specific chunk

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of intellectuals who have You know, there's some dangers, but

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they have great potential to make the world brilliant. You're like, no, no, no, no,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>these are just people who like wind up shooting themselves

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of a sports betting facility. Like that's the river, mate.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I have been turning into a monster during our friend

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>poker nights recently. It's tough garrison.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I've been meaning to talk to you

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>about wearing the full data makeup, because you know your

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>skin can't breathe. If you coat your whole body, You're

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>only supposed to put that on your face.

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't do that every time I played Get.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>A gold finger yourself care.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't put on the data makeup every time I

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 2>play poker, just that one time. Actually, no, I've done

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that twice nowt never minds Okay, okay, he's becoming I

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>also have the little hats. I ordered a twelve pack

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 2>of like of like the little like poker visors to

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>complete the outfaced.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course she did.

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it would be rude, not too for better or worse.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>This typology the river is associated with high achievement and

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>certain highly lucrative professions, especially tech and finance. It is

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>also associated with high variance bankman Free built FTX into

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a company that investors valued at thirty two billion before

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the House of cards collapsed again because he was a dambler.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 3>He's a con man.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again Nate can't just accept oh, he was

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>never actually very smart. He just got really lucky for

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a while and then gave it and then gambled it

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>all away because he wasn't actually as smart as anyone thought.

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Nate says, I interviewed SBF several times for the book,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and I can tell you that he very much falls

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>into the genius but dumbass category.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 3>How about just dumbassy, lucky dumbass. It's not hard.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the genius? Where did he prove that?

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean he proved that by fooling Nate Silver, a

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 2>man who probably values his own intelligence like a great deal.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's the whole thing, right, Nate Silver Khan.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 3>It would be ego death to admit that there were

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 3>just some lucky, dumb white dudes.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>If a guy had won like one of the lotteries,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was like a billion and a half dollars, right, got

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 1>crazy rich and then lost it all in two weeks

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>because he just kept putting half a million dollars at

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a time on twenty one black at a roulette table

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas, and I would be like, well, obviously he's

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a genius, but he's also kind of a dumbass. How

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>else could he have made the money in the first place?

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, no, he got lucky, and then

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>he gambled it all away because he's he doesn't have

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>good judgment. Yeah, so it's important to avoid two pitfalls

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>when encountering people with spiky intelligence, namely, either there are

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>worst traits nor their best ones tell the whole story.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't disagree with that. However, it's a meaningless

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>statement because that's true of every human being ever born. Yeah,

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but clearly Nate doesn't feel that way because only I think.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>The undercurrent here is that only people like this in

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Nate's mind are worth talking about, because only gamblers bring

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the world forward, right.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No one else deserves empathy.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, like you're just addicted to putting money on

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sports games and elections, Nate Silver. Anyway, So here's the

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>two things he wants to warn us up or wants

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>people to avoid. Elon is highly intelligent in several ways,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but that does not mean that everything he does is brilliant.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Some things he does are exceptionally dumb or dangerous, and

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't make excuses for them. But likewise, it's absurd

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that Elon isn't brilliant in many respects just

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because he isn't in others. And if he has merely

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>very good SAT scores, I don't care. Nobody does. It's

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not high school. Nobody cares about his SAT.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Skills, like like like fifty, like fifty five or something

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 2>like what are we doing?

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, you are a middle aged man.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what my SAT score was.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say, like, I never took an SAT,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 3>but I spent more than a decade in full time education,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 3>and anyone who ever told me that SAT schools I

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>immediately hated and never took them. Seriously. I've spent almost.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Twenty years asking people questions for a living, and I've

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>never asked anyone there SAT. Sorry, Garrison.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Although SAT might not be like a stable metric for

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 2>evaluating intelligence, surely Nate has an alternative method.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, Garrison, just how much well he doesn't he

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have an alternative method seeing what you might call

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>an infographic, because the next section of the article is

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a quick inventory of Elon's intelligence. So first he admits

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he tried to track Elon down for his stupid book,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>but he couldn't get him to talk to him. Because Elon,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>even I have to say, Elon does have better shit

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to do than talk to Nate Silver, because Elon is

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>using ketamine to a near fatal degree, and that is

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a better use of his time than talking to Nate Silver.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So since he can't actually talk to two Musk, he's

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>going to model and extrapolate from quote many other Silicon

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Valley big wigs I have met, okay helping him. And

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the fact that quote Musk maintains an extremely

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>public profile. He's turned X into a running diary of

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>his innermost thoughts and in addition to that, the biographies

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of the guy one more caveat. Here I will try

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate the overall trajectory of Elon's career, not just

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his recent antics. So we got down here, and the

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>next segment is dimensions were Musk has exceptionally high or

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>genius level intelligence. So finally Nate's going to prove it,

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna I'm going to show you guys, how

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he how he chooses to do that, what the evidence

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he gives us here is.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is something that we should reveal

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>to the audience after these ads.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Good point care, all right, we're back. So let's look

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>at what Nate shows as is the chief dimension where

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk has shown high or genius level intelligence. Reading that

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>first line, man, So the first words under this are

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>cognitive load capacity in overall horsepower slash ram. He's always on,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean literally look at how often he's tweeting, and

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>then a huge graph that shows the density of tweets

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>posted and win which has been used by other people

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to prove that since sometime in late twenty twenty two,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he's almost never gone more than about three hours without

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>posting a tweet. Like it's just a solid red after

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he buys the site. This like graph of like when

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>he makes his posts, he's never offline. Now he's not sleeping.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>So this is a graph of Elon Musk's tweets from

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen to twenty twenty four showing the time of

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 2>day and when a post is posted, represented by small

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>red dots and Yes, around twenty twenty two, the thickness

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>of the red increases dramatically.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's almost just a straight REDPA like the.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Period of where he must be sleeping in this yeah.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Is very concerning. No, he sometimes sleeps from about six

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to nine am, as far as we can tell, but

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not regularly or often. It's like a streak at twenty

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three where he just isn't sleepy, he's not sleeping.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>And again, he's on drugs. People, I think they're probably prescripted.

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm certain he's on ketamine that has been prescribed.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>When you're this rich, you just get whatever drugs you

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>want to do, recreationally prescribed.

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is drug user behavior. I don't say that

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to judge drug users. I say that as someone who

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>had a drug problem, like this is drug user behavior.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>And specifically Silver he's using sobriety as possible. Sorry, And

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically Silver is using this as an evidence of MUCKs intelligence. Yeah,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>He's scaling his Twitter activity as a sign that he

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 2>must be like a special type of person.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>He's railing adderall and eating ketamine lozenges all day every day.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what this is a sign of. And no one

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to take his phone away anyway. Here's how

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Nate explains why this is smart. In NBA terms, we

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>say this as a player with an exceptionally high motor,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is undoubtedly a valuable trait as the world

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>becomes more complex. Lack's fall. I was simultaneously doing an

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>extensive book media tour, running the election model, trying to

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>build up Silver bulletin, plus some intensive consulting work. Even

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if I mostly kept my wits about me, it was

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of mental and physical strain that would

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>only have been sustainable for a short burst. But Elon

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is taking on I don't know, approximately a thousand times

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>more stress than that, and has done so for years. No,

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not, He just tweets he has a massive number one.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>All of the businesses are being run by people who

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are specialists in those businesses. He gets called on to

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>sit in meetings in and say yes or notice stuff,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and occasionally tells him to do something crazy that causes issues. Right,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're not running smoothly. Tesla's lost more value now

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>than it gained after the election, and SpaceX just had

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>a giant rocket explode again. The boring company has not

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>done anything other than make a useless hole underneath Vegas

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and the hyper loop is nothing right like this. This

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>is just full of shit, Nate, Like what you have

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>just described, Running an election model that's functional, going on

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>a book tour and consulting and writing a newsletter is

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more work than I credit Elon Musk with actually doing.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, more actual effort work.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Risk is mostly like sitting in an occasional meeting doing

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 2>drugs and injecting random women with his sperm yes, and

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>sending tweets.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't do the injecting. I think, oh, god, Garrison, that.

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Comes up to no, no oh, and it's crazy how

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it does. Right before he posts the graph of how

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>much Elon tweets.

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, God, there it is, okay, okay.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Politics and social media poison a lot of people's brains.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Having that much wealth and power has to be intoxicating,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>especially if Muska ostracizes people who might keep him grounded

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>more sympathetically. He's taking on an incredible array of responsibilities,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>doing several really hard jobs at once, each of which

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>would be stressful on their own, while still managing to

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>father thirteen children. I'm tweeting hundreds of times per week. Again,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>equivalent efforts tweeting hundreds of times a week and fathering

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen children. He's not a father to them. No, he

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just he contributed by it. He didn't even have sex.

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, he's usually the lowest possible effort way to

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 3>have a child.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Wait, Like, I'm gonna guess most of the people with

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>penises listening to this come like, that's not a big effort.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't include that. It's like, what did I get

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>done this week? Well, in addition to working forty hours,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I jacked off.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 2>That's a little transphobic. This is this is a joke. Anyway,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 2>continue it said.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it doesn't count as work. No, not

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from us, and less you're a sex worker than it does. Okay,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Like especially I know a lot of male porn stars.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that is a difficult part of the job. That's

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>why they inject their penises directly with erection drugs that

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>kill their hearts.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 2>I would like to get into more of Silver's like

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 2>justification for why why he associates this this high tweet

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 2>load with like intelligence.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, because it shows rapid cognition in thin slicing ability okay,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>m hmm, right, yeah, sure sure. Indeed, in a capitalist

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>system with a significant premium, I'm being first to market.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Making decent judgments fast is often more important than making

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>better judgments slowly. Canonically, vcs imagine themselves rapidly filtering through

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>potential founders, as though on Shark Tank, relying on well

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>known gut instinct. But this also gets people in trouble,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as it has for Elon what is shark Tank's success rate? Yeah,

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I bet there's a quick answer to that.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's consuering. The air has built in free

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>television advertising for any product.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Means than fifty percent of deals they're successfully closed. God, yeah,

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>so I I it out. All This tweeting also shows

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>abstract problem solving capability. This is related to the idea

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of creativity, though in Musk's case it seemingly doesn't manifest

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>itself an artistic prowessly ceeingly, you know what, I'll give

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it to date.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 2>There, I'll give it to day.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with you there. And then, of course,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>instrumental rationality philosophy nerds like to distinguish between two types

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of rationality. Instrumental rationality is aligning means with ens basically

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>figuring out the most efficient ways to get what you want.

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>For this category, I think you have to point towards

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the scoreboard, must have some unparalleled accomplishments, and isn't about

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to let anybody stand in his way. It's also a

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>category often associated with manipulativeness or even being an asshole,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not one for nice guys. Now, and again, if Musk's

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>actual goal is his stated goal getting to Mars, then

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>backing the political party that is actively doing as much

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>damage to the biosphere as possible, ensuring that it will

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not have the carrying capacity necessary to make any kind

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of off world civilization likely, I would argue is a

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 1>stupid decision. But he doesn't actually want us to get

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to Mars, right, He just wants to be in charge

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of everything.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>No, he wants to run his businesses with no government interference.

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 2>That's really it.

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is, yes, yes, yes, and he has been

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>very successful at that. But again it's the successive brute force.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the same way as like, if you hire a

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand people who are willing to like break the kneecaps

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of a guy who annoys you, like you could say,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like I'm very smart when it comes to hurting people

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>who annoy me. But really, you just have a lot

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of dudes who can beat people up for you. Like,

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is that intelligence or did you just have enough money

0:29:59.480 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to hire?

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Or are you just a mob boss? Right?

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you just a mob boss? And a mob boss?

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>No one is allowed to attack because it's going to

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be domestic terror to fuck up a Tesla store soon,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. Anyway, we need ghost dog.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty it's pretty upsetting because you know, a few

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago, I was having a little bit of a

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 2>resist live moment and I actually ashed my clothes cigarette

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>on a parked Tesla. Felt pretty cool about it. But

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>now I guess I can't even do that. It's too dangerous.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, No, you can't.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I could face substantial charges.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 3>You might want to text resist to a certain five

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>digit number or something. That's probably the best way to

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 3>solve this garrison.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I just text resist to every single person in my

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>phone book every day. I mean, it takes about seven hours.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I have fallen behind on work.

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's the only thing we can do to

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 3>my pastus.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 2>The quickest path to intelligence is having a horrible sleep

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>deprivation and drug problem. Apparently, or at least that is

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 2>how you show for it. It's funny because I saw

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Allan Johnson, the billionaire who who's eating his son's blood

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>or now plasma. Oh we had a dead guy posted

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>his only self study on like the damaging effects of

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>sleep deprivation, and I'm pretty sure Musk like retweeted it

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>with like with like an emoji or something like yeah, dude, dude,

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 2>your brain is completely sure.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Now you you are, you are fried. You are the

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>most cooked a man has ever been.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 3>It's an interesting study, Like there there is legitimately interesting

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>things to look at Ela Musk's brain.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes, and there's a lot of actual scientific data

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>put together like exhaustively by researchers studying how not just

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>sleep deprivation but like wealth and power impact the brain.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And like all of it makes a strong case that

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk at this point has done more damage to

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>his brain than like a career one of those career

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>WWE wrestlers who like kills their whole family and then

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>shoots themselves in the chest so someone can study their

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>brain later.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, well before before close, I do want

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>to say, before any psychologists or sociologists or like linguists

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>get mad at me. Yes, I know Boba and kiki

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>is is that is this is a shape language like

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>correlation test I myself as well as Nate here, I

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>have kind of expanded it's it's it's usage to like

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>projecting even more like human or like like emotional qualities

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>onto these shapes or onto these specific words. So please, sociologists,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>leave me alone, do not do not do that message

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 2>me your favorite French. I'm I'm afraid it's already too late.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I already hear like twelve different reddators typing.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>But yes, I think Nate's just using that image there

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>as like a metaphor to like show how, you know,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 2>aggressive or manipulative Musk's own intelligence is as symbolized by

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>by a kiki as opposed to you know, maybe maybe

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>like a Bill Gates, which might be more like a

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>boba intelligence type. Okay, a little softer, a little bit

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>more philanthropy.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just got finished reading nothing but rationalist

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and Zizian literature for two straight weeks, about a quarter

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of a million words by my last count, Garrison, I

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have an enemy to do this again. I'm going

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to get back to my Hitler books. You know where

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>things make sense, where the world's safe.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm returning to writing about the Syrian Civil War,

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 3>which is my comparative happy place.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Ah, the Syrians Civil War.

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a really great world. I do wonder if he's

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 3>trying to avoid some kind of intellectual property thing by

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 3>using that little filter that he used over to Boo BERANKI.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>No, because it would be if it's actually not fair

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>use now as opposed to if you just mentioned that

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thing he doesn't yah because he doesn't talk about them,

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then it is fair use, right, and he could use

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like a little clip of it is and to illustrate.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Point, yeah, like I did with Manu Chow.

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, this is all I want to say again about

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Nate silver until twenty twenty eight. And if you know

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 1>what the upside if democracy really does die is, we'll

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>never have to talk about him again.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>If Trump and Musk really take over fully and do

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a full coup, we never have to talk about Nate Silvan.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Nine minutes from now, I'm wearing a Curtis Yarvin T shirt.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 3>They'll be doing a SOD numbers and he will still

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 3>be analyzing that data. They straight regime capture of Nate Silver.

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it doesn't seem possible that Trump could have gotten

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and four percent of the vote.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>But there's a spikey percentages.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>There's a spikey percentages.

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Why can't Nate Silver just like run like Trump's casino

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>or something? Right, this is just like just like put

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 2>him away.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I understand if Nate because Nate's rich, he doesn't need

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to do the other stuff. And if he was like

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just doing sports betting analysis forever, I'd be like, well, hey,

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what he loves. Right. If I had Nate's so money,

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably just write novels for the rest of my

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>life because that's what I like to do. I don't

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>understand why he keeps writing about politics. He's not good

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>at it, and he can't like it. He needs to

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>feel special.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>He wants to feel like a special boy who knows

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the answers that no one else does.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, anyway, this is us making fun of

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Nate Silver, so you don't well, you can still make

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fun of it. You don't have to read him. We

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>did that for you.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Good Night, It could happen Here is a production of

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 5>cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from cool Zone Media.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Visit our website Coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 5>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 5>to podcasts. You can now find sources for it could

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 5>happen here, listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.