WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance: Tesla Slumps, Netflix Soars

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. For this introduction,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to go to a note which was codified

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in market economics long ago at CJ. Lawrence. You had

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a headline, and then you had a subhead, and then

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you had a chart. And it was of course the

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>discussion around the chart that led to the invention of

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>modern market economics and many people. This began with Eddheimen

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at CJ. Lawrence just a few years ago. Ed, let

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>me get to your most recent note, coveted on Wall Street. Remember, folks,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we protect the copyright of all of our guests. Get

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Edheimen note through Evercore Isi Edheimen. We're back in

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the old normal inflation range. Is it all clear on

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the Edheimen front for Jerome Powell?

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say it's all clear, but it's pretty dark clear.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>It's clear enough for them to continue to pursue the pause.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Whether they cut in March, it's a little early. It

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>might you'll want to wait another meeting or two. But

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>my strongest conviction is that inflation is slowing and we'll

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 3>continue to slow. You have rents, wages, but I don't

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>want to overlook that there are some prices that are

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>going up like crazy. But in general I think that

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>inflation is coming down.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>And tell that know.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I have a warm spot of a warm spot in

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>my heart for Milton Friedman, and money growth has slowed down.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm sort of following his right and his footsteps, and.

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at shelter inflation as a part and parcel

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the goofiness of a you've always ignored that you've gone

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>out for granular data and you feature mortgage rates coming down?

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Is the mortgage rates coming down from eight percent? Say?

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it a linear function or is there a tip

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>point where home building becomes normal again?

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>It seems to be a tip point somewhere, a little

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>bit above seven. Boys race War eight, maybe a little

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>over eight, and now they're around seven. And all the

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 3>information that we have shows that housing has bounced back

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 3>pretty nicely. Even Tom, we're getting a little bit of

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>an improvement in rents, which surprises me.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>For three weeks.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>We survey, the survey we've done of apartment companies has

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 3>picked up a little bit.

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, excuse excuse me, it's okay.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>We a love gasping on the show at Heimen. I'm

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>gasping when it's okay, you know, just have some tang

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and move on.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Paul, Hey, save us ed talk to us about the

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 4>labor market. I have been so amazed and surprised, pleasantly

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>so by the strength the resilience of the US labor market.

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>How do you put that into context with everything else

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 4>that's going on out there?

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Economy is still pretty good. But I'm just I'm just

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>telling you what you just told me. It's pretty good

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>because the labor market is still pretty good.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>YEP.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>In about twenty five minutes, we'll get another reading for

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 3>unemplomba claims. But uneplomba claims are the government's best economic indicator,

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and last week they fell below two hundred thousand and

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>was just incredible how low they are. And so until

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the lever market eases up a little bit, the Fed

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>is going to be reluctant to cut rates. I think

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>they'd be happy to be pausing because inflation is coming down.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Now there are I thought you were going.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>To say that you've been surprised at how much wages

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>have slowed given how strong labor markets are. But there

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>are some signs that the laver markets are easing up.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>For example, the Basebook came out last week and like

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>some others, it showed some easing in the labor markets.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>And we survey employment agencies every week like a Manpower Inc.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>And they and they have reported a clear easing up

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 3>in the labor market and in wages, and a measured

0:04:53.279 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 3>by Indeed Lever Market company has showed a way h

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>tracker has come from five and a half down to

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>three and a half. There's a lot of signs that

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>labor has eased, but not enough. I'm not I guess

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess I've been I'm not sure shocked, but I've

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>been surprised. But whatever it is, it's the key. You've

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>got to get labor to ease up. Some to get

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the economy to slow down more than it has. If

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 3>you're plumbing, increases have slowed. From about five hundred thousand

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a month, they were increasing five hundred thousand a month.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 3>In the past three months they've been about one seventy.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's like, you know, watching a frog.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Cook in a path. They don't notice it, but I

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>noticed it.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful. We're going to continue. We are commercial free. Don't

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't go away. We are commercial free across this entire hour.

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Lukashaw to join us on the side of the economic

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>data here but on YouTube and on card play. We're

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thrilled bring you Ed Hyman this morning, Paul Sweeney.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 4>So, Ed, can we officially take I don't know, for

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 4>the remainder of twenty twenty four, can we take the

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 4>recession talk off the table? I've had enough of this.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 4>How about you?

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I probably have been giving you a problem in this,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think so. I appreciate the question, and

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 3>let me give you my best shot. So, the yell

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>curve has worked seven times, six times in a row.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Every time you've had a recession, your curves been inverted.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just saying that we've had extreme monetary titan.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Now it's taken eighteen months for that to work, so

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>long that by the time you get to like month fourteen,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 3>all you and I want to say is like, get

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 3>out of here. It's not going to happen. It's different

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>this time. But the Yell curve inverted, for example, in

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the summurb of six, and the recession didn't start until

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 3>eight eighteen months later. So we still have another four

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>months and if we can stand it. But I guess

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the main thing I'm trying to say from a practical

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>point of view is that I think the economy is

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 3>at a slowing pattern.

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned the plummet increases slowing, and so I.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Could continue to be part of Tom's thought process.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Our company surveys have slowed.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>They were we survey companies and zero to one hundred

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and fifty is in the middle.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>And the surveys two years ago were sixty one and

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 2>last week there were forty nine.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And I want to digress over to your wonderful page

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and your research note on China and what ed Heymen does, folks,

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is textbook at Hymen is he looks at

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the equity market and all the media overwhelm of the

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hangsing in, the indecks, the Hong Kong Index, and the

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Shanghi composite, and you bring it right over ed hein

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to the decline and interest rates in China. Are they

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>going to export a new low yield? Are they going

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to export disinflation? Wow? In deflation to the United States?

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was you got me there. I was going

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>in a different direction. But let me explain.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Their yields, like you point out, have been making new lows,

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>and that helps explain why US yields have been pretty quiet.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And also the weakness in China has helped explain why

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 3>commodity prices have been weak. And it's been pretty clear

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 3>to me that China has been exporting at least disinflation

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 3>or slower inflation and in some cases deflation. There's a

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of news in the papers a day about lithium

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 3>prices which are down eighty percent, and so there's you're right,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 3>they're exporting either disinflation or deflation.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But also.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 3>You go back to the George Soros reflexivity, which is

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that when something can't go on forever, it doesn't, And

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance that we've reached that point in China

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 3>this week with their cut in the triple R and

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>so the stock market there has rallied almost ten percent.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And this morning the price of oil the WTI in

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the US is up to about forty six dollars. It

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>was in the low forties.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 4>So so anyway, so, Ed, I mean, you know, that

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of brings up a good point. I want to

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 4>follow on Tom's question here. If we've got China slower

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 4>than people anticipated, if we've got Europe weaker than people

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>would like to see, particularly Germany, I mean, boy, you

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 4>see that the challenge is there, can the US be

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 4>that decoupled from the rest of the world in being

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 4>a growth marketplace when so much of the rest of

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the world is, you know, if not in recession, darned

0:09:59.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 4>close to it.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 3>No to Alan Greenspan, who enjoyed being inscrutable, but he

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 3>also coined some pretty good dogs, one of which in

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties was that the US cannot be an

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 3>oasis of prosperity. And that's what we have now. I

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>think you're correctly pointing that out. And the data of

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 3>this morning out of Europe is week we also survey

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>companies that have sales week in Europe and that survey

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 3>is about thirty two. The US comparable survey is forty nine,

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to put it in perspective. And then over in China,

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 3>our survey there is about thirty two, and so that

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>gives the world economy, you know.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>A soft inclination.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>But like I mentioned this morning, because I live up

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>right on the edge, the news out of China is

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, all prices have bounced.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Up a little bit, and there's not market has bounced

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 3>up a little bit. So I can't tell if if

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 3>this triple R cut this week is the beginning of a.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Real serious effort.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>They've had some false starts before, but it's a move

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in the right direction and we'll see if it bears fruit.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>And Man, I want you to talk about one of

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the great fears you harken back the nineties, and I'd

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>even take it back to mister Isaacs in the eighties

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. In the zeitgeist of American global Wall Street,

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there is a real fear of our small banks linked

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in to bad real estate loans. Is it a legitimate fear?

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that we need to study or is

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it noise?

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 2>It's not noise. So every week.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 3>On Friday afternoon, I get the GUMMA data on bank

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 3>deposits and they are going down. They're down about two

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 3>or three percent, which is the biggest drop since the nineteen.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Thirties, which is a sobering point by itself.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 3>So I guess back, the bank deposits are essentially the

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 3>money supply. It's eighty five percent of the money supply.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's if you've got to watch it. This is

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>my thirteenth bed tightening cycle, so I'm not this is

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm a I'm a gnarl veteran of these cycles, and

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>right every single one of them has had financial shocks

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:39.479
<v Speaker 3>or crises.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 2>And so the one we had earlier this year, earlier

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me, with SBB and the small banks having a

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 3>deposit running their deposits, that was a shock crisis.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think we're probably gonna get another one before

0:12:58.559 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>this is over.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And I got one last thought here before I let

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you go, And this is a great respect for what folks.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough. And I understand Sweeney and McKee

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa are too young for this, but we used

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually get printed research reports and you would wait

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday to get the CJ. Lawrence Green Book, and

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it would come out. It was Edjimen, and then a

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>guy named Ed yard Denny picked it up. Edjimen, do

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you have the yard Denny optimism? The corporations will adapt

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that we will see a ten fifteen to twenty percent

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lift in the Yard Denny duration of stock prosperity in

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>America getting out to what now forty thousand dow forty

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>five thousand. Do you share that optimism with the gentleman

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>from Yale University?

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't, but I like Ed Yardini a lot, and

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I follow his work, I follow his thanking, I respect him.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 3>When I left CJLR he replaced me.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy. So you know, the world goes around, But.

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 3>I really do think about what he's thinking about, and

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 3>it goes back to, you know, some thoughts about the

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 3>nineteen thirties.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned, I think monetary tightening.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Is extremely strong right now, monetary tightening, and that keeps

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 3>me away.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>My view and our house view is that the market's

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 3>going up, and that's because inflation's coming down.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 2>The fence ont pause, and economy is still fine. But

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I would guess, and Paul, you.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Are needling me a little bit there on the recession

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>of the story, but I think the economy can get weaker,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>arnies will go down, and then it'll be a fight

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>between declining earnings and the FED cutting interest rates.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Edheimen, thank you so much with Evercore. I can't say

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>enough about how he changed modern market economics. I put

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>him and Alan green Span together. They simply changed how

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we digest the game day by day. And I'm in

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you on YouTube on card Player, this is a

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>joy and Paul like, I gotta I just did this

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on LinkedIn and Twitter, which is it's borderline entertainment about entertainment.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Shaw pulls out the typewriter Saturday evening, eight pm.

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And you don't know this, but he's doing this at

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the bar of the Sunset Tower Ill. I mean it's exclusive.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I've sat there with a number of fancy people. I

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mean the owner, Jeff Klein, knows that Lucas Shaw is

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a player. I love what Jeff Clein says about the

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunset Tower Grill. He says it's where a duchess can

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be a devil. A celebrity like Lucas Shaw can dine

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with his family one night and this mistress the next

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's the la that Lucas Shaw covers here. Have

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you ever been in the Sunset grill with fancy people

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>having fancy drinks? I was there. What happens two weeks ago? Okay,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you didn't fall in the swimming pool, right.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 5>I did not follow the simmer.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what happens now with Paul Sweeney and Lucashaw's Hollywood

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>blown up? What are the conversation at Jeff Klein's grill?

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 5>The conversation depending on what company you work for, but

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 5>at a lot of them, is will my company still

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 5>be around, or at least still be independent in six

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 5>to twelve months, I'd say so. You've got Paramount, which

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 5>has been the subject of near constant deal speculation for

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 5>several months, and it's now starting to feel pretty real.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 5>You've got Warner Brothers Discovery, led by David Zaslev, who

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 5>seems like he realizes his company is still not big enough,

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 5>or feels his company still not big enough and wants

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 5>to merge with something else. You've got Comcast sitting on

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 5>the sidelines figuring if it wants to do something. You've

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 5>got Disney and Bob Eyer making cuts and also talking

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 5>about different deals. So there's a lot going on.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I got eight questions. They've got to resell those folks.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We're commercial free this entire hour. We go from Edward

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Hyman and then step it up to Lucas Shaw. I mean,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good here and we're on car play on

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube as well. Paul Swingey with fourteen questions for Lucashaw.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 4>And Lucashaw covers all a media entertainment for Bloomberg News

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 4>out of our stylish LA office. I will mention Lucas.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with Paramount Global. We have to go to

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Sherry Redstone, the daughter of one of the greatest media mobiles.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 4>I think over the last fifty years, Sumner Redstone, she's

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 4>the controlled shareholder. What do you think she's thinking here?

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Why would she consider now after all these years, maybe

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 4>thinking about selling the company.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 5>I think there are two primary reasons. I mean, there's

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 5>been a lot of talk about Paramount over the years,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 5>most of it not real. There weren't she did not

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 5>seem open to selling. But I think now she's looking

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 5>at her business and it is more challenged than it's

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 5>ever been, and it doesn't seem like there's an obvious

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 5>or even a particularly difficult solution. You know, they own

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 5>all these cable networks that are shrinking by the day.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Their streaming service is the sixth best, fifth, sixth best

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 5>streaming service, and it loses a bunch of money. So

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 5>that's one issue. You know, they've had to cut the

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 5>dividend that gets paid to the holding company of her family,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 5>which is sort of like it's piggybank. The other one

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 5>that I've been told by people close to her was

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 5>that she was pretty seriously She's Jewish, and she was

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 5>very affected by what happened in October and is starting

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 5>to devote more of her time and attention to matters

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 5>related to that and education. And so you combine the

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 5>fact that the family empire is sort of crumbling and

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 5>she now has something else that she figured she could

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 5>spend her time and money on, and I think that

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 5>combination means that she's now ready to part with it.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, the reporting today David Ellison, the son of Larry

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Elson of Oracle, Maybe he's considered what do we know

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 4>about David Ellison and how legit he might be as

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 4>a potential buyer.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Look, he is is very impressive. I will say he entered.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 5>You had these two Elison kids, David Ellison and Megan Ellison,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 5>enter Hollywood ten fifteen years ago, and I think a

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of people looked at them with suspicion. You know,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 5>you trust fund kids. Their dad's one of the richest

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 5>guys in the world. They just want to play with

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 5>daddy's money and make movies. Megan Ellison went one direction.

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 5>She made all these art house movies with high end directors.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 5>The product creatively was great. Commercially it was a disaster.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 5>David Ellison basically went in the opposite direction. He decided

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 5>he liked making big, blockbuster movies, and so he went

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 5>and had a deal with Paramount where he co financed,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 5>co produced their biggest movies, Star Trek and Mission Impossible,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 5>and has done pretty well and continues to expand his business. Now,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 5>if he is he the person who's going to have

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 5>a solution for Paramount, that's hard for me to say,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 5>because I'm not sure anyone does. But it would be

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 5>foolish to bet against him because he's proven to be

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 5>a pretty good operator in the last fifteen years.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Down Sunset Boulevard is my favorite leather chairs in America.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a Cuban Seed cigar company, which has literally been

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>there in the middle of World War Two. It's a

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>great story of families that rolls their own cigars. It's

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 1>just a glorious Glories family. Every time I sit there, Lucas,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody fancy walks in. So two guys are sitting there

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, what are they saying about David Zavslov. We've

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>seen New York media right that this guy, after everything

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with Warner Brothers Discovery, is still an outsider with a

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>stock performance. Is mister Zavslov ever more an outsider?

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 5>I have to start by asking what is your favorite

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 5>or preferred type of cigar?

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, what I go for is not treated. I mean,

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Lisa's trying to get me on the

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fancy cherry oaked ones and all that. No, So my

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite run of the mill cigar is a Padrona nineteen

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty four. It's a little lighter than the nineteen twenty six.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I go with that. But you're a Cuban Seed.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one day on their cy stalone walks in.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is that about? You know I didn't say,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mister Stallone. You know, all that Lisa would have gone mental?

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the Rock walked in there? Once? We were here yesterday.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Lisa's going nuts about the Rock. Let's rip up the

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>script right, Yes, how big is the Rock in LA

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>right now? With this deal with Netflix?

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 5>His deal with Endeavor? Or does he have a deal

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 5>with Netflix that I missed?

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Help me here, Lisa.

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 6>He's now part of the board for TKO.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 5>Yes, which is sorry affiliated with Endeavor. Yeah, he's one

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 5>of the Well, I'll do the Rock briefly and then

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 5>we can go to Zaslav. The Rock is one of

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 5>the biggest movie stars in the world. His dependability I

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 5>think in the last couple of years has actually been

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 5>a little shakier than it was before. But he's he's

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 5>a huge star, huge following, and then obviously because of

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 5>his his history with the WWB, joining the board at

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 5>TKO makes lots and.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Things X I do over there, there's a Kleenex full lease. Okay,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>go to Zavizlov. Now this is serious. I mean he

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>was CNN and all that. Where does mister Zazlov fit

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in for twenty twenty four?

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Look, he's had his bumps as the CEO of that company.

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 5>A lot of them, I think have been about how

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 5>he's executed, and the selling of those strategies have just

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 5>they have pissed off a lot of people in Hollywood

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 5>because of the way that he's treated certain filmmakers and

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 5>certain ideas. But his company faces basically the same challenges

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 5>as Sherry Redstone in Paramount. They're just maybe twice as big.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 5>And the two things that I do think they have

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 5>going for them are their TV studio is much larger

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 5>and more productive and so they can keep selling stuff,

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 5>and they have a streaming service that is better than

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Paramount Plus.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike just emailed and I said, my headphones. Mike says,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>forget the Hollywood talk to the market, So hold on, Lucas.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweety's got a bunch of questions. Is Ira Jersey

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>told you the GDB price indext really something in yields

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>come in. Thank you Rich Truman for that to two

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>year yield in a solid two basis points ten You're

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in a big, big three basis points. So there is

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a yield move off the data, and you see it

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the equity markets with a lift here. We'll get

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to the entertainment stocks in a moment, but it's it's

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>ugly on car play on YouTube. Lucas Shaw with this,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about screen time. Paul.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Lucas, you and your team, you're in Hollywood, you're

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 4>based in LA you really got your finger on the

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 4>pulse of what's happening in that town. I got to believe,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 4>as you mentioned earlier, people got to be just really

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 4>scared about the future of their business. You know, as

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>an investor, I don't think I can invest in that

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 4>business right now. And I've been investing in media for

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 4>thirty five years. I can't do it right now because

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea where the business is going. What's

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the feeling in Los Angeles when you talk to the writers,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the directors, the people that are really involved in this business,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 4>are they really scared about the future of media?

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'd say the feelings are mixed, because you have

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 5>to remember that when you're talking about writers and actors

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 5>and directors, a lot of them spent twenty twenty three

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 5>out of work, right They were two prolonged labor stoppages.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 5>The writers went on strike, followed by the actors, and

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 5>so I think some people entered this year are slightly

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 5>hopeful because they at least could get back to work now.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I think those paying attention to the macro story, to

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of to what you said, are a little more

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 5>concerned because they're seeing almost every company, if not cutting back,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 5>kind of leveling off to spend. And you have to,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, think about the fact that over the last

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 5>eight ten years, there's been this sort of unprecedented surge

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 5>in the amount of stuff being made. Yep, just you know,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 5>the number of TV shows from like two hundred to

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 5>six hundred, and that's leveling off. I think people think

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 5>that's going to go down. This business is not collapsing,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, you talk about investing the you know, people

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 5>who've invested in Netflix have done pretty well over the

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 5>last couple of years, certainly over the last ten. But

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 5>what we don't know is which companies are going to

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 5>benefit or kind of survive the shakeout. And there's a

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 5>little bit of market distortion because you've got a couple

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 5>of players in Apple and Amazon who are who can

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 5>spend a lot of money without really worrying about how

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 5>profitable their entertainment businesses are.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 4>That's true, That's that's really tough. How about our good

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 4>friends at Disney. That's one of the stories that I

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 4>think people have a lot of interest in Bob Iger

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 4>coming back. What's the call there on Disney there? What's

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>the feeling in Los Angeles about the future of this company,

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe the future of Bob Byger and the management team there.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, Disney provokes a lot of uncertainty.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Iiger comes back and he had been one of the

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 5>great media CEO is really one of the great CEOs

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 5>of the twenty first century, and they thought that he

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 5>was going to study the company. Then he goes about

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 5>and fires a bunch of people and starts talking about

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 5>what he's going to sell, what he's not going to sell,

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 5>sort of almost seems to be flirting with potential suitors

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 5>through the press to figure out what's possible. But the

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 5>real problem for Iiger and Disney is that they had

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 5>been the most dependable studio in the town. You know,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 5>their every movie they made seemed to become a big hit.

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 5>When they launched their streaming service, they did it perfectly

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 5>with The Mandalorian, the Right, Star Wars Show, and yet

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 5>all at the same time Lucasfilm which makes Star Wars,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Pixar Disney Animation, and the Disney Live Action movie seem

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 5>to have hit a wall. And it's hard to know

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 5>what to do about that, and it takes a few

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 5>years to turn it around.

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to we got to be positive here, Lucas

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and all swing and Lucas here. It's like the world's

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>coming doing at Hollywood. I showed Afterthought the other day

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Greg Peck in twelve o'clock High, and it's just she

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was she fell apart. I mean, come on, it's real

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>war footage nineteen fifties, Hank's and Spielberg. In two days, folks,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV, you're going to see Masters of the Air Lucas.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a bet by the old school on the

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>new technology through Apple TV and a ten year soap

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>opera of getting this thing made. I've been looking at

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the British reviews, The Guardian, BBC in that which are

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.479
<v Speaker 1>massively rave. What's the buzz on Screen Time about the

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Hank Spielberg vehicle on World War Two? Why?

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 5>In general the buzz around Apple original programming is strong.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 5>You know, they have come in and invested in really

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 5>high caliber filmmakers and movie stars to make their TV

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 5>shows pop and stand out. Because you have to remember,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 5>there's nothing else to watch on Apple TV plus but

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 5>their original programming now not to go negative. The challenge

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 5>for Apple is that nobody watches their stuff outside of

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 5>like Lai York because the audio well, partially because they

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 5>don't have that library, and so it's harder for people

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 5>to People don't make it a habit of going into that.

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Shy by paramount and put them out of their.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 5>Misery because Apple doesn't like to do things like that.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 5>They don't do big m and A. They don't seem

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 5>interested in a library. But the shows that they make

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 5>are really good. That's why you know. They just got

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the I don't know, second third most Oscar nominations of

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 5>any studio, largely because of the Scarsesing movie, but also

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 5>the Ridley Scott movie. They've got a really impressive lineup

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 5>of movies coming out later this year. And the thing

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 5>to remember, I mean, all of these companies are still

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 5>making great products.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bring this over to Paul Sweeney's world.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>What did Masters the Year cost?

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 5>I haven't seen what the estimates are, but I would

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 5>imagine a heck of a lot of money.

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of money. See they just see right there? Well,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>come on, it costs one hundred million dollars plus more.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Money than God finance for low rates. Spielberg and Hanks, Ye,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, they're doing that on what nine to ninety

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>nine a month?

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they got Apple's got ten million dollars a free

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 4>cash flow. So to Lucas's point, they can invest whatever

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>they want. Let's go to one of the really positive

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 4>stories coming out of Hollywood or just entertainment business, that

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 4>a being Netflix. They've obviously revolutionized the television business, disrupted

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 4>it like no other business. They said, forever and ever

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 4>and ever, We're not gonna do live events, We're not

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 4>gonna do sports. Who needs that kind of stuff? Then

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 4>they do this deal with WWE. Did that change the

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 4>minds in Hollywood? Are people kind of saying, hmm, maybe

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 4>there will consider live events, maybe make a move for

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 4>live sports, that kind of thing.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I did a poll of some top entertainment industry executives

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 5>at the end of last year, and I asked them

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 5>how many years they thought it would be before Netflix

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 5>got into live sports live events, And the first of all,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 5>I'd say eighty to ninety percent of people said that

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 5>they would as opposed to never, And of those, most

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 5>people thought it would be in the next three years.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 5>I think there was this. Netflix has said they wouldn't

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 5>do a lot of things. They said they wouldn't do advertising,

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 5>now they're doing advertising. They said they wouldn't abandon binge

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 5>viewing or binge releases, which they haven't, but they now

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 5>space out some of their seasons, drop them in two parts.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 5>And so I think over time, Netflix has embraced certain

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 5>traditional behaviors because it turns out that you don't have

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 5>to reinvent everything in the playbook, and once you go

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 5>into an advertising supported service, having a live event that

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 5>can command a lot of years, like wrestling is good.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Now whether they're going to go in and bid a

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 5>couple billion dollars a year for NBA rights that I'm

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 5>still a little skeptical of, but I'm less skeptical of

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 5>it than I was before one minute.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. Off of Tokyo

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and Sundance and the rest of it. The glory we's got,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the rock star life of it was Lucas Shaw. It

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was screen time, the death of the Los Angeles times.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I get.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't sure where you're going.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nobody ever knows, Lucas Lisa never knows where I'm going.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, I grew up where the Los

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Times mattered times. Is it dying?

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 5>Look, my dad worked there for almost forty years. It's

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 5>one of the saddest things I could see. I don't

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 5>know that it's dying, but it's in really, really, really

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 5>really bad shape.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 5>It was one of these newspapers that got bought by

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 5>a billionaire who seemed to want to do the right thing,

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 5>and his and his daughter had certain ideas about it,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 5>but they've just never figured out what the editorial and

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 5>business strategy is to make it a sustainable paper, which

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 5>is insane to me because it's the it's the only

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 5>real newspaper in the second biggest city in the country.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 5>It's becoming kind of the only real newspaper in California,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 5>which is home so many people. And you'd think you

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 5>could figure it out, and I'd it baffles me.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This is great. Lucas and I Paul, you can join

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>us here. We can bring Lisa as well, you know,

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just I can see us at the

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Sunset grill where the Dutchess can be a devil and

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity like Lucas Shack and dine with his family

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one night and his mistress the next. Lisa, this is inappropriate.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why Lucas Shaw's here exactly. Thank you so much

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>with screen time. I put it out on Twitter and LinkedIn.

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Can't say enough. This guy works on all the entertainment

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that we consume. Joining us now in the train wreck

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is Garrett Nelson, CFIA Research, senior equity analyst, Garrett, help

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>me here on Tesla? How bad was the conference call?

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, our point is that this is a stock that

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 7>more than doubled last year, so we think what you're

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 7>seeing in terms of this profit taking is healthy price action.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 7>We didn't think the call was that bad. We think

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 7>the stock is selling off because investors are alarmed about

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 7>the guidance for slowing auto shipment growth in twenty twenty four,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 7>but that was already baked into everyone's estimates, so it

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 7>was understood that they were not going to continue to

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 7>grow their auto deliveries by thirty eight percent this year

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 7>like they did last year.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Is only there are people only buying Tesla's the cliche

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, and we go to Lisa Matteo on this

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>because she's like EV Queen. But the basic idea I

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have is EV's are a failure in America except Tesla,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and so the units are pretty good because that's the

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>only car people are buying. Is that right?

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 7>That's pretty much accurate. If you look, Tesla's market share

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 7>in the US was fifty five percent of the of

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 7>the US EV market last year. Where the real oversaturation

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 7>is is the other forty five percent. All the non

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 7>Tesla evs are just not selling well. They're sitting on

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 7>dealer lots. Inventories in December were one hundred and seventeen

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 7>days supply for EV's overall, which is way above the

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 7>historic average for automobiles of sixty days. So there's a

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 7>huge inventory glut of non Tesla evs.

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 4>So, Garrett, if I'm a bull, if I have a

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 4>buy rating and I think it's a fifty pe is

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 4>based upon my target, I have to be bullish about

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 4>EV's in general, don't I. It's not just a Tesla call.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 4>I have to be a bull on EV's in North America,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 4>don't I?

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Not necessarily you have to be bullish, I think on Tesla.

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 7>We're actually fairly bullish on the EV fairly bearish on

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 7>the EV market overall in terms of adoption rates are

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 7>much slower than we thought we would see a few

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 7>years ago. If you look, seven point six percent of

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 7>all new vehicle sales last year, we're eves. We think

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of automakers were hoping that those percentages would

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 7>be above ten percent at that point. So, but there's

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 7>no question there's a lot of demand for Tesla EV's.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 7>We know the cyber truck reservation count is somewhere north

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 7>of two million units, far and away the highest of

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 7>any vehicle model in the US. And then last night

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 7>they confirmed these rumors of this next gen mass market

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 7>EV where first production could come as soon as mid

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:13.959
<v Speaker 7>next year.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, Garrett, I just bought a new car,

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 4>and I did at the car, I was looking at

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 4>the automobile I was looking at. I did look at

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 4>the EV version, But the premium to go EV over

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 4>ICE was so big, and me I could care less

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 4>about EV's in the environment. I'll do it another way.

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, what do you do here? I mean,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 4>do you have to bring the price down? Don't you?

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that even viable for this industry over the next

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 4>several years.

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 7>So if you look over the last year, the price

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 7>has come down. You look at the EV price premium.

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 7>In December it was only four percent. A year earlier

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 7>was over thirty percent. So twenty twenty three was a

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 7>year in which the EV price premium really collapsed. And

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 7>we think that we're getting near an inflection point where

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 7>evs are are gonna well, they're already very close to

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 7>price parody with internal combustion engine vehicles, and that's gonna

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 7>be a big positive. That's going to stimulate demand.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Garrett, Let's talk about mister Musk, and I do this

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>with great respect, folks, for his technological innovation and all

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's done. You know, forget about the notoriety and

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>all the idiocy. Garrett, Is he devoting chairman or CEO

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>energy to Tesla?

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Good question?

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a good question. There's nearly good in the day,

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 7>So go with it, Garrett.

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That's it. He has all the good ones.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 7>He's spread very thin across SpaceX, Tesla and all his

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 7>other businesses now X formerly Twitter, So there's no question

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 7>he's spread thin. But what's become clear if you look back,

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, the investor days over the last two or

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 7>three years, there's a very deep bench at Tesla. While

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 7>he is the face of the company, the face of

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 7>the brand. Behind him is a very strong capable team

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 7>of brilliant engineers.

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber Business Flash. This is from our European travel correspondent,

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Charles Pellett Europe on five dollars a day Paris. Garrett

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Nelson bans big, ugly American cars and they lead with

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a cyber truck. How's the cyber truck doing? Besides I'm

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to see it on Rudolphine in Paris.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, the Tesla faces a high class problem with the

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 7>cyber truck. We know the reservation count is off the charts.

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 7>The problem with this is the manufacturing methods are much

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 7>more difficult than the Model Y or the Model three.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 7>So and Musk himself has admitted this. It's going to

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 7>be very difficult to ramp production of the cyber truck.

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 7>It's not going to look anything like the ramp up

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 7>of the Model three or the Model Y that we've

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 7>seen in the past years. So, you know, the challenge

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 7>for them is really how quickly can they ramp up

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 7>and get that vehicle in the hands of reservation holders.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 4>So Garrett I looked at the Ford. I actually drove

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the Ford F one fifty Lightning, which is an awesome vehicle,

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 4>but I was actually surprised at Ford cut back the

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 4>production there. So what does that tell you about the

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 4>EV space or is that a Ford specific issue?

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 7>We think again that goes back to the issue with

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 7>non Tesla EV's. The demand just isn't there, and so

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing automakers, you're seeing GM Ford and others start

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 7>to cut back on those models in favor of gas

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 7>powered models which are selling much better. In Ford's case,

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 7>the Bronco.

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I gotta leave it there, Garrett Nelson, Thanks for

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the brief there in Tesla Worring is good for Rabobank.

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right to it. Jane Foley joins us at

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>robobank in London. When is this quiet? Jane? The shop

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>does well right because people are hedging commercial transactions. You're

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>taking in a fee. I mean it must be glorious

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>now that foreign exchange is so boring.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 6>Well not necessarily, I mean I've met clients before. He said, oh,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 6>you know what, we didn't bother hedge in last year

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.439
<v Speaker 6>because the phoney change was flat, and now this year

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 6>we wish we had because it's really eaten into our profits.

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 6>And sometimes they come to us when the door is

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 6>already you know, the horse has already bolted. But so

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily good. But you know, I would say that

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 6>there's still lots to be considering in the foreign exchange. Well,

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 6>we've seen the euro move a little bit this afternoon

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 6>on the back of the Laguard press conference, and of

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 6>course this week we've seen the yen moving too, as

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 6>the market begins to get a bit more excited about

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 6>an earlier possible interest rate hike. Well maybe soon as much.

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me go there, so we're gonna make some money, folks.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>For those of you global wall streets that don't look

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at euro yen, Euro yen is my litmus paper a week.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yen is a bigger number one fifty five, one sixty

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>hit one sixty one last week. What is the tension

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 1>for the institution two shoes of Japan with euro yen ever,

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>weaker yen stronger Euro.

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, again, it depends who you are in Japan. So

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 6>you know the big exporters, the toyotas, etc. Of this world, Well,

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 6>they tend to do pretty well when the yen is

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 6>pretty weak, you know, and then they see demands picking up,

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 6>and that's pretty good for them because even if inflation

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 6>is high in Japan and has been relatively high in

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 6>the last couple of years, they can just export that

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.959
<v Speaker 6>through their pric scenes. But it's the domestic companies who,

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 6>or at least the companies with the domestic audience, domestic

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 6>consumer facing consumer. They're the ones that in the last

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 6>couple of years who've been a little bit uncomfortable because

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 6>they've seen, you know, higher commodity prices, which of course

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 6>have calm off those peaks right now, but they cannot

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 6>or they find it much more difficult to pass on

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 6>the pricing into a country where people have to until

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 6>very recently been reluctant to accept that prices ever go up.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Jane, we did hear from the European Central Bank today,

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Christine the guards standing by comments on a quote likely

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 4>summer rate cut. How does that kind of inform your

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 4>view of some of the European currencies.

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 6>You know that that that speech when she talked about

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 6>the likely summer rake cut was made last week to

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, one of your colleagues in Davos, and I

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 6>think there was a little bit of you know, the headlines,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, take away some of the context of that.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't think you know, she was saying, yes, we

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 6>you know, we'll be cutting into interest rates in June.

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 6>I just think she was being a little bit more

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 6>vague really about that, about that timing. But you know,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 6>I think what's interesting today, particularly from today's comments, at

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 6>least in the market reaction, because the market reaction has

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 6>seen this has been fairly darvas. And I think the

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 6>reason for that is that there wasn't a forceful pushback

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 6>against market pricing, and market pricing, as we know it has

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 6>been pricing in you know, a couple of interest rate

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 6>cuts to say in a six month few many economists

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 6>are more doubtful of that. But if she could have

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 6>used that opportunity to push back on that, and she didn't,

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 6>and I think therefore the market thought, well, you know,

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 6>she's not pushing back on us, maybe maybe the UCB

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 6>could go, could go earlier. So I think that's been

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 6>the takeaway today. But what she did say is that

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 6>they are data focused and I don't think any decision

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 6>yet has been made by them.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Jane the British pound sterling here, you've got a no

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 4>doubt saying hey, politics matter here and the debt of

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 4>the UK Matters talked to us about kind of your

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 4>views on the pound Sterling.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, this comes on the back of some

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 6>data we had earlier in the week that said actually,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 6>in December public financing figures were better than expected, which

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 6>they were. And because that feeds into Jeremy Hunt, the Chancellor,

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 6>who's already indicated in fact he was at to have

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 6>us last week saying this that he will be cutting taxes. Now,

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 6>obviously that is designed to help the Tory parties into

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.919
<v Speaker 6>the election which is expected at the end of the year.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 6>But the toy Party are so far behind Labor, you know,

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 6>good twenty points or so behind Labor, that it probably

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 6>won't make too much difference. But the the issue with

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 6>the fiscal situation, and we had you know, another thing

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 6>teach this morning saying that the new government, whoever wins election,

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 6>will be faced the worst fiscal position that a new

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 6>government has taken in seventy years. And that I think

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 6>is quite interesting because you recall a couple of years

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 6>ago we had the Liz trus Fiesco. The market basically

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 6>said no, you know, we're not going to tolerate unfunded spending.

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 6>And with that memory, I think whoever takes over the

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 6>chancellorship after this election, you know we'll have to take

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 6>upon fiscal discipline, which actually might mean that from the markets,

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 6>this is a boring election.

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Jane. Thank you. Jane Fowley with an FX update. I've

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>been remiss and not doing enough on foreign exchange. You

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>will promise to do more of that. This is the

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. You can also watch the show live

0:42:55.440 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube. The

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>show weekday mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our global headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen and

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Business App.