WEBVTT - Bear-Market Flashback

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg weekly

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>market podcast. I'm Sarah Pontac, or porter on the cross

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Set team, and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And the Shirley to Sarah's Laverne. Maybe, but you're gonna

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>go Shirley to Sarah's temple or something. Maybe I'm the Liver.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Shirley and you're the Liver, and I don't know.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll work on Wolvern either way. Either way this week

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on the show, agree to disagree with me, but we

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have may just witnessed the best week for crazy things ever.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Bankruptcy stocks are soaring evidently traders on the robin Hood

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>investing app are going all in. Then all of a sudden,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a five percent stock decline reminiscent of the infamous days

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of March? Is it a sign potentially of market froth?

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Our guests and yes, PLU all guests way in right? Sorry?

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And I I you know, I gotta give you a

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>shout out because I think you've covered basically all these

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy things by yourself this week. You've been doing some

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>amazing reporting in the world of crazy things. Uh. You

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>stole my thunder with the bankruptcy stock surging. That was

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna be my crazy thing of the week. But as

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I came prepared with a backup, so so

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>we're good. I think there there's multiple backups, so many,

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so many crazy things this week, and I thank you,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you for the shout at Mike. But I also

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>will admit I'm ready for the weekend. I'm a bit,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit tired. But let's bring in our guests

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to help us break it all down. Uh. Two of

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>our favorite Sarah. I'm glad to have them both the

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>double header here with us, UH this week, joining us

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for the I don't know how many times it's got

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to be at least five or six. Is the head

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of macro strategy at med League Global Advisors, Mr Ben Emmons. Ben,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show, a good and also joining us.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while, but I'm I'm psyched he's back.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a macro strategist at Bloomberg itself. Uh. He writes

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the Macroman Calm. He's a blogger, UH for the Market's

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Live blog. I believe he holds a doctorate in armchair

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>epidemiology from the University of Google. Is that right, Cameron Price, Uh,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually Google University. That's total, totally separate institutions. Can

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone go ahead and get that degree? Cameron, Well, you

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have to put in quite a bit of quite a

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of work, I gotta say, with at least thirty

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>seconds of search. We need dedicate that was that of course,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was a great line from one of Cameron's columns, sort

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of making fun of how everyone is an expert in

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>infectious diseases these days. UM, so we will not pretend

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to be experts in infectious diseases, but very much experts

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are guests in markets. So but let me start with you. UM.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been sort of optimistic about this rebound

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in stocks to some degree. Um. And you know, full disclosure,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this podcast here on Thursday, June eleven, the

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>markets down about five percent. Who knows what Friday will

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>look like or even Monday. Maybe we'll see a bounce back,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but at the moment, things look like they've turned on

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the dime. Uh. And for one thing, I think it's safe.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We can all agree that this market was a little

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bit overextended, a little bit overbought, and was due for

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>some consolidation. Perhaps this seems a little bit more than consolidation.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure how much it matters what the

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>catalyst is considering how overbought the market was, but I'm

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just curious your take. I mean, it seems to have

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>really uh started to roll over a little bit before

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the FED meeting, it accelerated after the Fed announcement and

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the press conference, and then uh Thursday morning, it was

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just off to the races with the selling just a

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>nest the tape from the get go. So I'm curious.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people are blaming it on sort of

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this resurgeon in the virus um. Others talking about how

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, POW is not exactly optimistic about the

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>economy and the economic projections sort of backed that up. Again,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how much it matters. I feel like

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a market that was due for a little bit

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of a calm down. But walk us through what you're

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the state of the market right now. What

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>caused this nasty dip on Thursday? And um, is it

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>just a a sort of correction in an overbought market

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or is it the beginning of some more weakness? Do

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you think, yes, A certainly. I can. So what I

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>noticed on Monday, actually Monday evening, um those news out

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that koreation he cut off communication with Soft Korea, and

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the end dropped like almost two big things, like really quick,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like roundies I think against the dollar, and I spinkings

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>to a friend of mine over in Asia, and I

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was kinda trying to figure out, like, why is suddenly happening, right,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that was the only news that we

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that was the case, because the Japanese government actually

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>came out I think I can forty five minutes later

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>after that news broke, which apparently broke already over the weekend,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but I guess it came in the market on Monday,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is Monday night Asia, by the way, that

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so our time, you know, specific time, like six year time,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>nine at night something like that, And and I was

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese government kind of responded like, you know, we're

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>watching this carefully, the situation. And so I think that

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a geopolitical tension. That's that that

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>started a bit of this flight to safety idea. I

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>think the treasuries from there took that on as well

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as usual Golden and Swizz Frank, but it's nothing to

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do but what we're actually seeing today maybe that indeed,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people have reassessed a bit that the reopening euphoria, as

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you say, it was pretty exuberant, and it's taken somewhat

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the off the table. People points still point

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>too that the fat yesterday delivered the exact message that

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the market was looking for. It's a v shape for

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>coffee on the short term, but a long road. I

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>had rates state low quee stage in place, and it's

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of a message like, you know, not much more

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>euphoria behind that, right, And I think that and the

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>acknowledgement that the job or report was strong but not

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we need to see a lot more

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. We would like to see a lot more

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of it. As I think that tone was kind of

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>added to the simmering view political little tension with North

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Korea in the background that that triggered what we're seeing

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>now today. The people then start liquidating maybe some of

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>these trades that was so popular that you know that

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Sarah and actually written about on the retail side. I

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was a little skeptical on that part, thinking that that

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>actually came early to the party these times of late right,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and tends to be when they're late retail investors, they

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to be then the ones that really drive that

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we pushed the market b down and start overreacting. But

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of the day, I think

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of the sequence of events that that

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with. Added to that, perhaps also that I

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>think what people are looking at though as a background

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>story is I think two other stories you want to highlight.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Um One, the story around Hong Kong continues to be

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>something to be able to carefully watch. So what I've

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>noted was that this and the swings in the ad

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>rs right that are on the exchanges here is huge, right,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and and that indicated that there's a lot of speculation,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Chinese company looking to move away from

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>US markets and go listen in Hong Kong. The flood

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of IBOs has picked up quite a bit in Hong Kong.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>There's been a fair bit of dollar demands in Hong Kong,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like as in people holding dollars to deposits and banks

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have risen quite a bit, right as in it's not

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the capital flight system mind, people that kept I guess

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>hoarding the dollar instead of the Hong Kong dollar. So

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like there's a there's plenty of reasons to

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be concerned. You just gotta take your pick. But I

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to focus on the reopening, though,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because something I've heard from a fair amount of investors

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this week that I just personally do not understand at

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>all is them saying that a second wave of the

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is priced into markets. So even though we're seeing

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers starting to increase in the likes of California, Texas, Florida,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>where I personally am right now a little bit nervous, um,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, you know, it shouldn't really matter all that

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>much because markets are expecting a second wave. It is

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that the truth, like, should that? Should we buy into

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that narrative? I don't. I don't buy that. I don't

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>buy that. I don't get it at all. But then

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I have investors at certain firms which I won't name,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>saying this to me before the five percent decline on Thursday,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that is, and it just doesn't make any sense to me. Um,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So if anyone can make sense of it, I would

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>love to. I would love to hear that so so well.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked at it said we're going to get the

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>second wave, because it was actually communicated already in March

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>by Fauci that look what when we're doing today, we're

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna prepare for the second wave. Right, So the fact

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that the second wave will becoming is there, and and

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the dreadful story about that, this eighteen Spanish flu scenario

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the second wave is worse than the first wave, right,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure if that plays are roll here today.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But what I do think matters to markets mostly is

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that if we get the second wave, that indeed picts

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>are quite quite requite a momentum that there would be

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a governor or a mayor or anyone right that's in

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>charge of a city, county. Then support suddenly says, okay,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to close this thing down, and it starts

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with one and a bunch of others followed because they're

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>getting worried politically that they may be responsible for more fatalities, right,

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're making a decision on we gotta shut things

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>again down. That would be I think very negative for

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>markets because think about what's priced in in that sense,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in that V shape idea is that the reopening when

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you reopen eCOM tiki United States economy, you get immediately recovery.

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's kind of what it's shown, right the

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>data when you look at mobility data or in kind

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of like real time data, sales or whatnot of people

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>can be hired, that's all jumping really quickly, with the

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>capacity of airlines jumping quickly. So I think that the

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>market is really nervous if the if the second wave

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>leads to another lockdown. I think my personal view, it's

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>politically not possible, like we would really push ourselves into

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a depression, right, I think that's in this season of

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>political season, not possible. But I do think there's worries

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the market that certain parts of the country may

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>end up that way simply because the local governor or

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>mayor who's in in charge is putting her or her

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>or his feet on the ground. Kevin, I wanted to

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bring you in here at a bit um. Both you

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and Sarah have written really well this week about this

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>whole retail trader phenomenon. You know, you had a column

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about what you call this is the phase of

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the market where garbage starts to float. Floating garbage. I

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.359
<v Speaker 1>love it. Floating garbage A great line. Now, I obviously,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, these retail traders uh their home, their board,

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of entertainment. They might have some

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>spare cash from their stimulus checks, or that the extra

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits, whatever, it is not a lot of options

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of blow your money foolishly on gambling or

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive trips whatever you otherwise do. So I think, I mean,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious that these traders have puffed up some ridiculous stocks,

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like the the bankruptcy stocks that you both have written about,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hurts, chess, Peak Energy, arguably the surgeon inflows

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the jets, the air travel etf is A is

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>another example. I think the debate though, and where it

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>gets sort of I get greeted with skepticism is when

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I suggest to people that they're also maybe part of

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what lifted the entire market over the past couple of months.

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know, from from sort of an a U M. Standpoint,

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>even all these retail traders together are a a sort

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of drop in the ocean compared to institutional investors. But

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that their exuberance is kind of set

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>off signals that that has has helped the rest of

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the market sort of float higher than it it should

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have in the last couple of months. Well, I think

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to acknowledge that this is not a regular market.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And while it's always tempting to point to catalysts as

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to why things are moving, fundamental catalyst or whatever, um,

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact is is that it takes a lot less

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>flow to move the price than it used to. I've

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>got a measure of market liquidity, and it's off of

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>its lows, but it's basically still shows worse stock market

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>liquidity than at any point uh in the last quarter century,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>other than the very nid deer of the financial crisis. UM.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, you see a lot more sort

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of student body left, student body right price act. If

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at the TICK index the New York Stock Exchange,

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Sarah pointed out that it hit an all time low Thursday,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>having hit an all time high last month. And indeed,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a long term chart, you can

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>see the amplitude in terms of highs and lows of

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the TICK index is unparalleled in the history of that index,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>which is suggests that everybody seems to be moving the

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>same way at the same time at the same time

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's not really much liquidity. So if Davy day

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Trader says, I'm buying Spirit Airlines, well guess what Davy

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>day Trader has two? Well whatever, I'm not, I'm not

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>one of them, right whatever. Anyway, he's got this this

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>legion of people hanging on his on his sort of

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>every word, and if every if each one of them,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a million people each by five thousand

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of stock, that's all of a sudden, a

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollar trade that's going to move the price.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Right Um, And Okay, that's that's an exaggeration, but I

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think it does speak to the dynamic of what's going

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on here. For those who don't know Davy Day Trader,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that is Dave Portnoy. He's the founder of the website

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>bar stool Sports. This guy was most famous recently for

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>his reviews of pizza. He would go to pizza joints,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>take one bite, and give you a review. And that's

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what made him famous. Well, what happened was he

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sold part of his business to this uh this Penn

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>National Gaming, got paid in stock. The stock went up,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then it collapsed and it came back. And so you

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know he also got some cash. It was a pretty

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>wealthy guy, right, and he can't gamble on sports because

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>there is no sports. So he started trading stocks basically

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and coincidentally more or less about it at the time

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the low And guess what, you know, a blind

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>monkey throwing dart in a newspaper trading from the longside

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was gonna make money over the last two and a

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>half months. And that's uh, you know, and that's what

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he's done. I'll give it to him. I mean, it's

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>been great marketing on his behalf. Everything going on right

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>now in him day trading and people following along. But

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it feels like in the year of the anecdotes are endless. Okay,

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you have Davy day Trader, as he's called one. My

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>colleague vill Donna this past week was talking to a

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>strategist over at bat t I G who was telling

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>her how all of a sudden, his eye doctor's son

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is asking her which stocks he should be buying. At

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I've been spending my days just watching

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Robin Tracks, which watches Rob Tracks, Robin Hood uh and

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street bets once again, and I think of

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke Cowell'll say r I p no longer with the

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>step Bloomberg, but wishing him the best. No, wishing him

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the best. Missed him very much. But he wrote this

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>almost infamous story back in February, right before everything blew up. Uh,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And it was about the Wall Street Bets crowd and

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood traders and kind of speculating that there could

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be some type of dot com bubble out and about,

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, it feels like it's back.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yet we're in the midst of a recession. We just

0:16:54.320 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>experienced this extremely fast bear market and fast rebound. But

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way it feels very speculative. I mean, what

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of that type of environment that

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we're in right now? Well, yeah, I mean it is

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in many ways very reminiscent of the dot com era. Um,

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the Wall Street bets, the reddits of

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>today were the sort of the Yahoo message boards of

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty long years ago. To some extent, I suppose it's

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult to square this idea that there's a zillion people

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>out of work and struggling with this notion that people

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have all the spare cash to play with the market. Uh.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a sort of cliche there's caricature that

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that sort of the millennials living at home took their

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stimulus checks and opened robin hood account of Yeah, maybe

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there's maybe there's something to it. I'm sure that some

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the some of the individuals involved with this are

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are are professionals or software engineers or whatever. You know,

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>people who can work from home do have disposable income,

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, more disposable income than they used to because

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't go out anymore. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there there is something to it, and you know, it's

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>almost enough to make me when I take off my

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>flip pops, put on a pair of shoes and go

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get them shine so I can get some stock tips.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about this all coincides with sort of

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>universal commission free trading to you know it. It's you know,

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing if you have a few hundred bucks

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to invest in the market, but a trade costs ten

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen bucks, you're gonna be sort of a little

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more gunshy than if you can do it for free.

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>To some degree. But Ben, let's let's bring you in

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on this. What do you make of all this is?

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Is this a uh sort of a sustainable effect that

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to deal with in the market now,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>these davy day traders, or is it, you know, something

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that a real institutional investor should just kind of forget about.

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, Mike. I think that you do

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to keep the retail traders in mind because as you know,

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as camera point camera points out right, people are at home,

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they have other time, they have more spare time. I

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>guess like it's a different work environments you said of

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>work doing this right, because you deal with a lot

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of people around you work. So I think I think

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that may play a hole that you have less distraction

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>besides the money that you may have access and you know,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget you have the savings right now thirty

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>three percent, right, so there's a lot of people have

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. I think just sitting on the

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sideline and then looking for new opportunities, right which this

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>would become again the next opportunity. We were getting a

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>decent dip here and people come back, right. So I

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't add to that is that this this dot com

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>bubble air that we went through late nineties. Think about

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the stocks on that that are working on vaccines for

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, right, Like you know, some of those are

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>just also completely through the roof. Other than this hurts

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and other like stocks. This another kind of bubble kind

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of environment in the background, right, and one of them

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>will become the true winner, right and has to vaccine

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and that there's the magic ocean, ocean if you will.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>But but there's a lot of speculation there, right, So

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the temple will continue. People will continue to

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>come back in seeking out those types of opportunities as

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>well then just buying Apple and Google and you and Test.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess right, you know you standard trades. I think

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna stay here, just kind of tactical retail

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>style trading here until the path of the economy is

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>more clear. Obviously it's really hard to know in the

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>short term. But you said, I mean people will come back.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you get the sense that, like Mike said, we

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>are recording on a Thursday, we don't know what will

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>happen on Friday, but that people will be willing to

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>come back and and step in at these levels. I mean,

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>if I just use a benchmark as an example, ensure

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that might be skewed because you have much more leniency

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>towards your mega cap names like Google and Microsoft for example.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.959
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if you look at the valuation for

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the SMP right now, it's still well above what it

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was back in Februar. Werey on a forward basis, So

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think people will be as willing to come

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>back in and quote unquote catch a falling knife so easily? Look,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's optimism out there that we're going

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to see the end of the of the tunnel here

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>right It's just not going to stay this way. It's

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in a contagious virus, but it's not gonna dictate our

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>lives forever because there's such a political pressure on getting

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine and therapeutics, and we've made a huge amount

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of investment in in the personal protective equipment and the

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>system is more flooded with that now that there is

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a formal comfort, I think compared to the February situation

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that that was not in place. Therefore we have to

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the lockdown. And so the lockdown scenario, my view,

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is a is a scenario that's not as likely maybe localized,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 1>but not nationwide or globally. So it remains really I

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think an opportunity of this future rebound of the economy

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that you do want to play why you want to

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>come back and take opportunity here as you have these

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like this, you know that I am more on the

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>domistic side that way, as opposed to those who really

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think that we know, the pandemic was just really what

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pushed the new normal into a into a new depression,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to get a new normal triple like

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really really, really bad. If we're gonna get deflation

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna not grow much of all of all,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to army unemployed people out there, and

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we're just not going to get out of it. That

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't firmly don't believe in that, because there's been

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of effort done here to actually not

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>be in that scenario, and I think the market is

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>right to not buy that that that depression scenario. But

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>staying on the optimistic side, hence there's gonna be de

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>buying again here coming in. If not not tomorrow, it

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 1>will be in the next weeks or so, you know,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>driven my data and driven by just what I said,

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like the optimism of that we can get out of us.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I would disagree in the sense that you don't have

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to think that there's going to be depression to think

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that stocks or allow the investment here. I mean, paying

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a dollar in time cents for a dollar is never

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. It doesn't matter what the economy is doing.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you buy stocks here, essentially you're

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>paying a dollar in a quarter for five cents. If

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at the ratio of US market cap to

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the size of the economy, even taking out the Corona

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>hit UH in the first quarter, we're basically at all

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>time highs. That implies an expected return over the next

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>decade it's negative. So personally, I have no interest in

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hopping in here, and I wouldn't have interest for many

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>many percents. H since both you guys are macro focused,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to ask a little bit about the dollar.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the dollar bears are out in force

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>these days, and I know there's been I don't know

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's quite consensus or maybe just the loudest voices

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have been the dollar bears over the years, and they've

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of not necessarily been right. Um. Something really caught

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>my eye today is is uh. One Goldman strategist has

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a call for something like a depreciation in the dollar

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. I don't know exactly how

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>many years, but um, oh, Kvin, I gotta wonder, you know.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of putting you on the spot here

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>because I know you haven't written about the dollar in

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a while, but if you do have an outlook for

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, and also I feel like if we go

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if the dollar weakens as much as in the next

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, the narrative will switch from sort of

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a oh a week, dollar is good for the economy

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to uh, wait a second, this is this is bad. Um.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 1>What's your outlook for the dollar? And am I right

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of that much of a weakness would

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be not necessarily a bullish economy story. Well, you know,

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting question. And in so far as we

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are kind of reliving in two thousand parallel in the

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>stock market, maybe the follow through will be a sort

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of mid two thousand's um episode with the dollar um.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as if US demand comes back and you have

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>this massive pent up demand and part of consumers, whether

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it emerges this year or next year, two, I don't

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>know what that could very easily entail. Would be an

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary rise in the trade deficit at the same time

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that monetary policy is committed to being super easy and

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy is obviously a mess. So if you have

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the current account deficit blowing out to five six of

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>GDP at the same time that you still have a

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tremendously large budget deficit, you could see suddenly US moving

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world recovers a bit and

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and and risk sentiment and proves on a more structural basis.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You could move from this environment where there's been this

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of structural shortage of dollars for for years, to

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>reverting back to where we were starting and say two

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, where there was a structural surplus of dollars.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to happen? There's a chance. I'm not

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>convinted to base case, but if this this individual is

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be right about a tremendous declined the dollar,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that's probably what what it will look like. UM. I

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>would say as an addendum that there's certainly an argument

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to be made to be want to want to be

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>long sort of real assets versus every currency, because none

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of these currencies pay you a dime, and the fiscal situation,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>all these countries is terrible, and we know that we

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>can't trust the price of financial assets because for various

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons that we've talked about, and I'm sure there's a

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing we'll talk about talk about some more. Uh,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>there's an argument to be made for owning something that

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hurts when it falls on you. You know, Era Cameron

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>gave us the perfect segue two crazy things there, and

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I totally dropped the ball on it. You're grabbing it,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You're grabbing it and running with it. Now that's my bed.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you get us, get us started. What's the

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>craziest thing you've I know you've written about twenty crazy

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>things stories this week, So what's your what's your top?

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So there there are so many, Uh, it's really hard

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to choose one that I will go with. UM. On Monday,

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the day that the SMP turned positive for what at

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the close and also in the middle of the day,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>if you were to look at the members of the

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>SMP since March, every single one of them was positive.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know Cameron then took it a step further, uh,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and he ransom programs and found that was the first

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>time that we've ever seen every single stock move higher

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>together over an eleven week period, which is pretty crazy. Um,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy. And then one more just for you, Mike,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because I know you love leveraged et s so so

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>um hate them. Yeah dat. I've actually been spending my

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>days just sitting on robin track dot net, which tracks

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>what users on robin hood are doing. And on Thursday,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as stocks are selling off, what were they adding up?

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>What was number three on the most popular most increased

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>interest list while it was t vix So let me

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>products just for you, Mike, what could possibly go wrong

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>with that trip? Nothing? All right, Cameron? Cameron told me

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>he has a doozy for the crazy Things segments, so

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>expectations are high. Well, I mean this is coming from

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>finance geek, so my definition of crazy interesting might not

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be the same as year. So you know, we know

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that the robin Hood folks love bankrupt companies. We know

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that they love companies named after inventors. Obviously, Tesla has

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>been a darling for years, and as I'm sure you know,

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>last week saw the debut of Nicola U, named after

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the same scientists first name, and I've already looked he

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a middle name. My next career move so

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as I'm sure you saw, or as you may have seen,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at one point, uh Nicola had a market cap greater

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>than four despite having zero revenues, which is crazy enough

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as it is, right, But here's my crazy thing. The

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>option market for Nicola is the wildest thing I have

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>ever seen in my life. So the issue is that

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no because it's a new stock, you can't borrow it,

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to short it, you can't. So

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the only way you can you can bet against it

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is to buy putts. So the structure of the option

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>market is Bologny. So the stock is UH sixty, give

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or take. So I'm looking at the July options, the

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>July sixty calls, So the at the money calls trade

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at a two and are priced around eight dollars. That's

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy enough as it is. The sixty puts are trading

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a two eight and are priced at twenty eight dollars,

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So the at the money put is worth twenty dollars

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>more than the at the money call, which is crazy,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 1>but that's not But that's still not the craziest thing

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen. I got this one from a friend. In

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Nicola options, there's a option traders will know, there's a

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>thing called a box where you can sell it call spread,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>say forty fifty call spread, uh, and then you sell

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it put spread against it. The thing can only ever

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>be worth ten dollars. A forty fifty box can only

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ever be worth ten vols. Well, I've been a friend

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>who sold the Nicola July call spread for eight dollars

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and eighty cents. He sold the fifty forty Nicola put

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>spread for eight dollars. So we sold something that could

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>only ever be worth uh, ten dollars for sixteen dollars

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and eighty cents. And that, my friends, is the craziest

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>thing I've seen this week. That's that's pretty good, Ben, Ben,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You've got some tough competition with that one. Oh, that's tough.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>That's good stuff. Wow. You know that I have a

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>financial one I have and I have one for Sarah

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>actually that I want to mention. It's that kind of

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>local thing for Sarah. Actually, I've been tracking this Hong

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Kong situation. Um, so you know, the A d R

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>swings were pretty dramatic, like if you take you know,

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like companies that you never heard of of, a Jian

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Group or Wins Finance whould just swing like nine hundred

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eight on a d R A d R s by

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, like our you know, the most liquid things

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he can trade, right, that's I mean, I think that's

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really really locally traded on on our exchanges here. I

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think that just again speaks to this tension that's there,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>right as a real tension building from money coming of

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>adugunized stage back to Hong Kong. That that these that

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>these ad R prices show aside from their their extraordinary swings,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>right which again back to the herds and other American

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>airline step swings, it's kind of similar, right, So there's

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this really awkward phenomenon, so that that that is unusual,

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if not crazy. And then I guess the local one.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I popped up some website, you know, legitimate website, I thinks,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>U P I is, I guess the trending website. I

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>clicked on a few things and I read here the

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>following a python hunter in Florida known as the Python Cowboy,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>might have had a new records as by bagging in

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventeen foot snake by putting up a fierce fight.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And that this is in Martin County, trapping Wildflife Rescue

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>owner Mike Kimmel. That's the Python cowboy in Florida. I

0:32:54.360 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>thought of, I can't, I can't, I can't say I'm surprised. Well, actually, um,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>funny story, not funny. Actually supposedly the last week or

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>so there was a seven foot alligator found in the

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>water right outside my house. So safe to say, I'm

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not going in the water anytime soon. So python's alligators.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what you get down here, Ben Emmons and Kevin Christ.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>We will have to leave it there. Thank you so

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on the show today. There's always What

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Goes Up. We'll be back next week. Until then, you

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We love it if

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you took the time to rate interview the show on

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, so more listeners can find us. And you

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter. Follow me at Sara pont Sec,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike is at Reagan Anonymous, and Cameron christ Is at

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Rule. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at Podcasts.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Jordan Gospore. The head

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast is Francesca Levie. Thanks for listening, See

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you next time.