WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - SCOTUS Guts The Voting Rights Act… Uncapping The House Would Fix It + The “Woke Right” Has Emerged

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, This episode of the Chuck Toddcast is brought to

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you by ship Station. When your company is growing fast,

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>order fulfillment can make or break your success. Ship Station's

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>intelligence driven platform brings order management, rate shopping, inventory and returns,

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>warehouse systems, and comprehensive analytics all in one place, saving

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>customers fifteen hours per week on fulfillment and guess what

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>time is money? So with Shipstation, everything you need to

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>manage getting orders to customers is in one place. You

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>connect to over two hundred sales channels instead of five

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to seven disconnected tools. You've got one. Shipstation compares rates

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>across all major global carriers, United States Postal Service, UPS

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and FedEx, including your own discounted rates. That's pretty good

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>if you have them to find you the best shipping

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>option on every order and discounts up to ninety percent

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>off set up time saving automation. Ship Station picks the

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>best carrier, finds you the best rate, prints labels in bulk,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sends tracking updates, and you're done. One million businesses have

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>trusted ship Station. Trust me. I have a little side

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hustle on sports cards. I think I've mentioned it a

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>few times. The most annoying part is the shipping and

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if stuff's convoluted, you can't get it done. And that's

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of shipstation is it essentially streamlines that shipping process.

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So try shipstation free for sixty days with full access

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to every feature I just talked about. No credit card

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is needed. You go to shipstation dot com and you

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>use the code toodcast to get those sixty days for free.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Sixty days gives you plenty of time to see exactly

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>how much time and money you're going to be saving

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on every shipment. So that's shipstation dot com toodcast. Shipstation

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com use the code toodcast. Hello there, Welcome to

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday edition of the Chuck Toodcast. Has been a

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty busy It obviously started with the scary situation at

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the White House Correspondent's dinner. There's been a little bit

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of focus on that. But hello, we're still in this

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>war pause if you will, with Iran with really no

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>end in sight, and I want to talk a little

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bit about the pretty useless briefing that we got from

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Pete hag Seth with his testimony before the House. Perhaps

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Senate side might be better at this, but you

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>know what, It's pretty clear Pete Haggseth isn't interested in

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>being a public servant and doing the things that you

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>would expect taxpayer funded people to do and explain themselves.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>He is basically got internet brain, right, he has got

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>his brain is rotting from too much time on the internet.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>War is way too much about his woke ideology, woke

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>write ideology, whatever. It is, constantly not thinking about actually

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>doing what would be in the best interest of the administration,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>which is actually make a coherent case for why this

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>war is justified. Because he didn't do a very good

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>job of that, and he does a terrible job at

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick political fights he thinks he's doing. I

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think he thinks he's being helpful to the president. I

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's doing what he thinks it's doing. But

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the big news politically, we got that new map from Florida,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was talking about it yesterday and it was

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of when I was taping that.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>We got the Komi News and I'll have a little

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more on that. But the big news is this

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act, and incredible narrowing.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Some would call it gutting, depending on your point of

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>view on this, but an incredible narrowing of the Voting

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act which essentially eliminates it from usage in the South. Right,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the initial reason for the Voting Rights Act was for

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the systemic way that Southern states in particular disenfranchised black voters,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and the point of creating these majority minority districts or

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>plurality minority districts, particularly in the South was essentially right

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a century's long wrong on this stuff, and it was

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about representation, making sure that there was a seat at

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the table when over for over a century there was

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a denial of a seat at the table. And I

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>want to tackle this in two different ways. Okay, one

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is the near term politics and what does this mean

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for the maps? What does this mean for campaign twenty

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and really more campaign twenty twenty eight and

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>possibly the redistricting of twenty thirty. But I also want

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to do something, and you're going to some of you

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>may already know where I'm going to add, but I'm

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna head onto a hobby horse of a solution that

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think now hopefully people will see, makes a heck

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot more sense than when I was on

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>this hobby horse about a year ago where I even

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>did a ted talk about it. But first let's talk

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about the near term decision. What does it mean? In theory,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you may see a handful of states try to redistrict

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>in the South where suddenly the majority minority districts in

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>say Mississippi, Benny Thompson's district could be at risk. You've

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>got the case was about Louisiana, so there'll be a

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>new Louisiana map. It's likely you will go from two

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>majority African American districts down to one. For what it's worth, Alabama,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the governor has already said no to any sort of

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 1>special session, and it's my understanding the court actually pretty

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much said they can't do anything until twenty thirty. So

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that the state courts that is in Alabama,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>so they're not going to touch in twenty thirty. We

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>already had the new Florida remap was anticipating this, which

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>is why the Darren Soto District, which is mostly a

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rican district in central Florida, basically got carved up,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was arguably in anticipation of this. Isn't at

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this point another district in Florida that somehow this court

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ruling would have any influence on. There's certainly the possibility

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in South Carolina. There's certainly the possibility in Tennessee. In fact,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it is worth I would point you to the down ballot.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It is the down ballot is a publication and a

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>substack that is very much has been on top of this,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and they did a terrific analysis state by state of

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what could happen, what would be at risk. I just

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, rather than me reading to you his work,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I was done by David Near and Stephen Wolf. You

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>should subscribe to them. I do. I don't want to

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>take away subscription dollars for them, but they go through it.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, the top line is Alabama's going

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to be untouched till twenty thirty. Florida has already been done.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgia if they, I doubt there's an attempt at doing it.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to get into why. I think even

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>if they tried to do something in the Georgia legislature,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it would probably implode on them and only elect create

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>more potential democratic seats. And I'm going to give you

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>an example of that in a minute I told you

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about Louisiana. That's obviously this core case was about Louisiana, Mississippi,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina, Tennessee, and potentially in Texas. But again, they've

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>already done their big remap, So let's see what this

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all looks like. I think it's a it's not the

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>way they drew their map. They're anticipating winning over as

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>many Latino votes on the Republican side of the als

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump won in twenty twenty four and to a

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent in twenty twenty two, and I think there's

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>some questions about whether that holds up on that front.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But I want to take you back and sort of

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean, because look, I think we have

0:07:54.880 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a serious issue about representation of this country in our Congress,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to get to that because I think

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a better solution than trying to redo the

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Voting Rights Act, trying to come up with special rules

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and all of this stuff. There is a cleaner, better

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>way to do this. But let's talk about the near

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>term political impact and when it takes you back to

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety it was the nineteen ninety one reapportionment map,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>where essentially it was the Bush forty one Justice Department

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>working with the Congressional Black Caucus, particularly in the southern redraws,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where in conjunction with the Voting Rights Act, that was

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that they needed to have and they got majority increase

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>representation in Congress of African Americans. And essentially the Bush

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department saw it that they had a quote win

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>win situation with Black Democrats. They would draw some majority

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Black districts in the South, and Republicans would suddenly have

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more districts that they could win because essentially they took

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a chunk of Democratic voters and put them all into

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>compact districts. I'm going to tell you the story about

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Georgia in nineteen ninety before this reapportionment began in Georgia

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>four years later. By nineteen ninety four, so at the

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>start of the nineteen ninety decade, Newt Gingridge was the

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>only Republican in Georgia's ten member congressional delegation. At the time,

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a nine one advantage Democrats owned the state.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>After the nineteen ninety one reapportionment that created essentially the

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>maximum African American districts you could create in Georgia, that

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>was driven by the voting by the previous interpretation of

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Voting Rights Act the second and the eleventh Congressional

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>district districts because they increased by one, they went from

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>ten to one. Georgia was a growing state, became majority

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>African American for the first time in ninety two, and

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the delegation went from nine to one to nine Democrats

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to one Republican for ninety two they win. This was

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>an election that Democrats won. Nationally, Bill Clinton wins, Democrats

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>lose some seats in Georgia, their advantage goes from seven

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to four Republicans, and then two years later, after

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the ninety four tsunami for Republicans, it essentially flips to

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>seven Republicans and four Democrats with three African American majority

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>African American districts and one white Democrat. So essentially, in

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>four years, Democrats went from nine to ten to four

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of an eleven. And basically it was because they created

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>these maximum a very much large African American majority districts,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>concentrating black voters in a smaller number of districts. Now,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the good news for African Americans is an increased representation

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US Congress, there were more Black Democrats. What

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it did for the party though, is it actually made

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it harder for them to elect more Democratic members of Congress.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean now? So this is why

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>these this remap is not going to be as clean

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as people think. It isn't going to be automated automatic

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pickups in order to draw these new districts. If they're

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>going to no longer have majority African American districts, well

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be. Then you're gonna have African American

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>voters who are vote sort of eight times out of

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>ten more likely to vote Democratic than Republican. You're something

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have a whole bunch more swing districts. Right.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We sort of saw this already, and we're getting this

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>example in Florida with the with the Soco district. In

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>order for them to essentially eliminate that district, they spread

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>out Democrats into a whole bunch of other central Florida districts.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's in theory taken a lot of likely Republican

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>districts and turn them into quote lean Republican district Well,

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>guess what in a waveyear like we're anticipating here in

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this midterm election with the party out of power sort

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of seeing a surgeon turnout, the party in power seeing

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a depression in turnout all of these Any sort of

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>remap that does this sort of spreading out of Democratic

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>voters and trying to put them in Republican seats is

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>suddenly going to dilute these maps. And what it, in theory,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>could end up doing is creating more swing districts throughout

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the South, which is exactly what we had in the eighties,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and then in pre nineteen ninety and the nineteen ninety

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one reapportionment between the Bush Jets Department and the Congressional

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Black Caucus, we did not have nearly the number of

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>swing districts in Southern states in the old sort of

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Confederate states. So it is a So this is there

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of anxiety on the left about this decision,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to representation. I absolutely understand why

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's so much anxiety about this because in some ways

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's claiming that we've somehow all of the wrongs that

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>took place all the way through nineteen sixty five is suddenly, oh,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>they're all gone. Well, we know they're not all gone,

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and so taking away. This guardrail on representation in the

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>South is quite risky. But just for the political outcome,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for D versus R on this, this

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is not an automatic I mean, yes, it gives a

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican's an opportunity to redraw their maps in the South,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and so there'll be certainly less court pushback on certain things.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Although I still think the Florida map could get some

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pushback based on what's in their state constitution when they

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>passed a fair districts referendum a few years back. But

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear to me that this is going to

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be an automatic net gain for Republicans. If you get

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rid of packed part of and districts, and these districts

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>get unpacked, you are essentially going to create more swing areas.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Now what you may see is you may see some more.

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You may see some reciently charged democratic primaries in some

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>of these districts where you will have a large chunk

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of African American voters, another chunk of Democratic voters of

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>either white Democratic voters, Latino, et cetera. So you might

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see more. You know that there certainly will be more

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a diverse set of candidates perhaps running in primaries. How

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>identity politics works in that is going to probably depend

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on the candidate's running and the issue sets of that day.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But when you're just looking at it as far as

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrats versus Republicans, it's not clear to me, And if anything,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be a wash, if not a potential in

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a waveyear of an advantage for the out party, which

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in this year is this. But again, how many districts

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are we really going to see get changed this year

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this cycle versus those that will happen for twenty twenty eight,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and then of course we have the actual reapportionment going

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirty, so that's the near term political impact.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've already seen, like I said, we've already

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>seen Florida's already did their redraw that would have this

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is the redraw they would have done. They've almost assumed

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that the court ruling was going to be what it was,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with really the darren Sodo district being the one that

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>falls under the Voting Rights Act on this one, Now,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what is a better perhaps a better

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to fight for. Now. You know that one of

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the arcane sort of very political sciencing nerdy things that's

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>out there is this idea of uncapping the House and

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean. Well, in nineteen thirty, after a dispute,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and I've gone some of you have heard me on

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this rant before, but in you know, the House of

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Representatives used to expand with the population of the country,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the number that we would have in the House. Not

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just you don't just decide how you reapportion the foreign

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five congressional districts among the fifty states, of

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>course in nineteen thirty it was among forty eight states,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but also whether the population size has increased enough that

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time to expand the actual House of Representatives itself.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much every decade before nineteen twenty, every single decade,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>after every census, we pretty much we expanded the House,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we stopped doing it. Now, in nineteen twenty,

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll be shocked to know what. You know, there was

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a big impass and both parties were fighting over this,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't agree on how many seats to add

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to the House and which states were going to get them,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and there was a big fight, and eventually they got

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a compromise of let's just lock it down, let's not

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>expand the size of the House. Anymore anyway, they were

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>worried it was getting too big, too unruly, et cetera.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we've back in nineteen thirty we locked in

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and thirty five district and it was one

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>per three hundred and fifty thousand, you know, basically one

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>congressional district for three hundred and fifty thousand people. Well

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we're now at basically one per eight hundred thousand. And

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you see, eight hundred thousand is the size of major cities. Right,

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>there's only like eleven cities in America that have a

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>population greater than that, and we now have we have

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>four and thirty five that are just massive, and so

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's why we have so much factional representation. So, you know,

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I understand the frustration about what we saw today, what

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the Supreme Court, But if you're looking

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a seat at the table, then you should

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>fight to expand the size of the table. Right, we

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have not talked about expanding the size of the table.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>The table being here the House. Now, what was founder's intent.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Founders intent was the House of Representatives to grow with

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the country number one and number two be the most

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>most representative of the people, Right, now, the House of

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Representatives is not representative of the people. Each congressional district

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially is dominated by a faction. It could be a

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>faction on the right or a faction on the left. Right,

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>it's and it is sometimes a faction within that party

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that is able to dominate an entire congressional district. And

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>so look, I know some people are out there going,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, so take Louisiana and Louisianas with thirty percent

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>African American population, if they suddenly have no African American

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>representation or one African American, is that truly fair? If

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a third, right, third of the congressional districts are not

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, right now they are, right, it's about a

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>third of the population. Third of the congressional district two

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>out of six is majority and representative by African Americans. Now,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>another way to do this you could always have multi

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>member districts, right, or this idea that you know, Okay,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the state of Louisiana has six and you you know,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the top six people get elected to those districts. And

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you would think over time that if there's various constituency

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>groups or identity groups want to make sure they have representation.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>As long as they finish in the top six, you

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>could have that. Now again, I don't think we're moving

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to sort of that sort of proportional representation or the

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of multi member districts. It is an idea we

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>usually export whenever we're helping fledgling democracies around the world,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's the fairest way to get various constituency groups

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to feel as if they all have a seat. It detata.

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteisonal pastries, and

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce in a

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.239
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>your belly little gut health there right, and richer in

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>nutrients and oxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>their variety box, they have a gluten free box, a

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>vegan box, and a new protein box. I will tell you.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I have done the gluten free box. I have done

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it a second time. I have also used the code,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the todcast code. If you use the promo code podcast

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at check out, you get thirty dollars off. I've already

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>used it as a gift to somebody else who loves

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this bread. It is hard to find good gluten free bread.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It is fantastic. They give you step by step instructions.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I really dig this. There is nothing like having an

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>artesian bakery in your freezer to chase away the winter chill.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Now is the best time to stay in and enjoy

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>some comforting homemade meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>recommend it. It is worth giving wild Green to try.

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Wild Grain is offering my listeners thirty dollars

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>off your first box plus free croissants for life. Come on,

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>when you go to wildgrain dot com slash toodcast to

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>start your subscription today. That's thirty dollars off your first

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>box and free croissants for life when you visit wildgrain

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast, or simply use the promo code

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Toodcast at checkout. This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so use that code. But there's another way to do this,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>And the other way to do this is simply an

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Act of Congress to expand the size of the House.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't need a constitutional amendment. You don't need new

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>legislation beyond this, beyond deciding. Now, you know, if you

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>ask me, I'd put in a constitutional amendment that said

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>no congressional district can be bigger than point oh three

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population. Yes, I've done the math. Point

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>oh three percent of population is essentially one per eight hundred,

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand. But this by putting it in the constitution.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>In theory, this could fluctuate. Right, if we shrink our

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>population shrinks over time, then you know we might have

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you might actually shrink the House of Representatives. So in

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>this case, it would pretty close to double the size

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the House. But here's what you would have. You're

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially making the table bigger, which means you're going to

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have a more diverse set of representatives when Congress. You're

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have a more diverse set of constituencies represented

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. It's not going to just be by identity

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>group either. You're going to have the opportunity. First of all,

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you have districts that are more compact number one, So

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they truly will be geographic communities of interest, which matters

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You're likely to have less issues, with less

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>need to Jerrymander. I'm not saying Jerrymander wouldn't happen. That's

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>always going to be there. As long as you give

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the states the right to draw the districts, there's going

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to be political influence on how that's done. But when

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you're down, when you're when you're doing one per three

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand, it's just it's just less necessary.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh by the way, so, oh, by the way, you

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>would fix the electoral college conundrum that we've been in

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>right as our population has grown. But the numerator when

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the electoral college it's been sitting at

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>five point thirty eight forever. Well, if you increase the

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>size of the House, you increase the number of electoral votes,

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and then you'll you're going to write size the electoral college,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and so the likelihood of having a split national popular

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>vote winner and electoral college winter being different. You you

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of shrink that from a you know, ten to

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent chance down to a zero to one to

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, zero point five to one point five percent chance.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>So it it creates fairness across the board. It's small

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>d democratic. And here's the other thing to me, this

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that a lot of groups on both sides

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the AUL should be arguing for. Right now, the

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>large states are underrepresented in the House of Representatives. They're

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>also underrepresented in the Senate. Right right, two senators from

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Texas have the same amount of power as two senators

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>from Wyoming. If, by the way, if you do this

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>one para one per three or fifty thousand, you might

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not even add one new seat in Wyoming. Wyoming might

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>still end up being a one congressional district state. But

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you certainly the big states would have more proper representation

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in the House of Representatives. So my point is is

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't I think this There is no there's

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>no ideological advantage to my idea, to this idea. I say,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's my idea, please, it's the founder's idea. We just

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have stopped listening to what they recommend it. But this

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>will This only improves smaller constituency groups that are fairly

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>large but have no representation in the House of Representatives.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Now they're more likely. The Libertarians are more likely and

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>actually have a couple of people actually elected as a Libertarians,

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Greens are likely to have a couple of

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>people elected that way, and you'd certainly lower the barrier

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to entry, and you'd have a lot more diversity, whether

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to age, whether it comes to ethnicity, whether

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to jobs. Right, you also lower the in theory,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have fewer voters you have to win over

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the cost of campaigns is less. So, look, the courts

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have spoken on this, and Congress can do some things

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow, you know, to sort of create a few

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more guard rails here to make sure minority voters aren't disenfranchised.

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Frankly anywhere in the country. I mean, I think one

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the awkward aspects to this is that we were

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>putting the Southern states, which had a history of this

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>under more of a under more of a Justice Department

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny than all the states. And arguably we should be

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>worried about this in all states rather than just the

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>states that traditionally did this. But if you're if you're

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for a way to increase representation and you want

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>more African Americans from the South in Congress, double the

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>size of Congress double the you know we it is

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and it look I'm saying double. You know, I know

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's all this, well, we don't need more politicians

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, and oh my god, it's it's so it

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>would be so big in here. Yeah. Democracy's messy. My goodness,

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>have you seen what India does? They have a messy democracy.

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But it seems to you know, people feel as if

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there's at least opportunity and representation and so. And the

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>House was meant to be a bit unruling. In fact,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>James Madison in the Federalist Papers Federalists fifty seven explicitly

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was arguing for an expense that the House was always

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have to expand. And the argument was this,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he designed the House to grow with the people and

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>remain dependent on the people. He would not like a

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen House at four hundred and thirty five members, which

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>now maps are engineered to dilute the voices of minority votes.

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It violates the initial promise that the House was supposed

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. And remember who we wanted to elect the House, right,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>not the rich more than the poor, not the learned,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more than the ignorant, not the hoitty heirs of distinguished names,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>more than the humble sons of obscurity and unpropitious fortune.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The electors are to be the great body of the

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>people of the United States. But the founders intended on

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Senate not to be sort of a house of lords,

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, elected by state legislatures, to worry about what

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>those states would worry about, a little bit of the

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>cooling saucer. Our house was designed to be the voice

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the people. But when you do this, when you frozen.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We're at one hundred years now where we haven't expanded

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representatives, and yet we've more than doubled

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the size of the US population since then, we have

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>diluted the voices of minority votes. We have essentially created

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>another Senate. So it is founder's intent. I think I

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>could argue conservatives will benefit in some ways, Liberals will

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>benefit in some ways. You know, Conservatives complain that they

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>have no representation, there's no representation in the state of Massachusetts. Well,

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I promise you, if you essentially have twenty congressional districts

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Massachusetts, you're going to get a

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of conservatives elected. Because you're going to have smaller districts,

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have more concentrated areas, and some of those

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>areas are going to produce a conservative. So whether you

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are living in a you're a conservative living in a

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>blue state, or you're a liberal living in a red state,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this will only increase the chances that your voice will

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>actually be representative from your community or at least from

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>your state that you have some like minded thoughts with.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, I really believe that that look this, this

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fight with the judiciary is over. Okay, it is not

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, this is I think it's

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a waste of time to try to keep fighting in

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the courts. If the goal is to get a seat

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>at the table, then start fighting to expand the size

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the table. Stop fighting over the chairs, and instead

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fight over the size of the table. Increase the size

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of the table, and suddenly you can bring your own

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>chair and you'll find your own seat. That is a

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>reform that is small d democratic, and again there is

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>no obvious advantage for anybody except for the American people

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that feel as if that they're no longer represented in Congress.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I ask many of you you live in a congressional

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>district that you feel like has been gerrymandered, you feel

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like you're represented in Congress. I promise you if we

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>go down this road of increasing the size of the House,

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you will feel like you have more representation. And this

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>will you'll have more locally oriented members of Congress. It'll

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be harder to be performative jackasses, right, because there'll be

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more and that part will be diluted. Yeah, we'll dilute

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of political theater. But this is a

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>free market. And here's something else I know about a

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>free market of ideas. When you have more people entering

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the free market, you're likely to get some better ideas

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and how to govern this country. That's the best solution.

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>This is how you take if you're upset about what

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>happened this week in the Spring Court, channel that energy

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>into doing something that would be good all parts of

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the political spectrum. Uncap the House. Let's bring back the

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 1>people's house. It no longer represents the people. It's easy.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to Founder's intents. If you believe in

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a Madisonian democracy, you should believe in expanding the size

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the house. All right, I want to turn a

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit to what I'm calling sort of the sort

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of the woke right moments that we're having, and I

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think in some ways the Komy the sensitivity about Komy. Right. Look,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to defend Komi's actions, and I think

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I said that yesterday. I told you the news sort

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of broke as it came through. I think we're all

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinated to how the heck did they find a grand

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>jury to do this. I think it's pretty clear we're

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going to find out what instructions given to that grand jury.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>This thing may never make it into any This thing

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>could get thrown out the minute the minute. Comey's defense is,

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can we see a transcript of the instructions that were

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>given to the grand jury? And then once we find

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>those out, it could be game set and matching this

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>thing is thrown out. But I'm old enough to remember

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>when the right thought the left was too sensitive? Right,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, any normal rational person you know, can't

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? Are you really telling me that this man

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>who arranged Seashells right was hoping for an assassination attempt?

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you get inside his mind? And you're sure that's

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what that means? The point being is we just had

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>an election where I thought we were trying to sort

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of de sense it like we are. Hey, everybody's taken

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>each other too seriously, and all this stuff that was

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was the heart and soul of some

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Magma movement, right, your great Gutfelds of

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. Right, the rationalizations that they've had about you

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know what's the lefts too sensitive, they're too woke, they're

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>too worried about being nice to everybody. Well, what the

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>hell is this talk about over sensitivity? This is clearly

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>over sensitivity. Right, And then we're seeing and this, here's

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing. This stuff's bad politics, right, Weaponizing the DOJ,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>weaponizing the FCC. I mean Brendan Carr, right, the clown,

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the clown car, Brendan clown Car. And I know I'm

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not I probably shouldn't be a name color, but he

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really is sort of just coming across like kind of

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a dufus on this and again, super sensitive. I'm not

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>going to sit here and say it was a good

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>joke by Jimmy Kimmel. I think the frankly, there's nothing

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is the part that really frustrates me about

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>our politics. Jimmy Kimmel can can both be angry at

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Carr and this White House from not caring about

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendment and at the same time admit, yeah,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I see why, I see how that joke looks terrible

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>after the events of Saturday. That's all right, But everybody

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gets in their corners and you can't ever admit weakness.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, this is unfortunately why I am a

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>believer that this is this stuff. You know, de escalation

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>has to be across the board or it'll never happen, right,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because everybody has this mindset now of well, I'm not

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm not gonna unilaterally disarm whatever that you know

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>means to them in that moment. But again it goes

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>back to apparently an inability to you know, there's no

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>law on the books that says you have to ban

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bad jokes and bad punchlines, right, I mean, it is

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and so but the you know, you got Ted Cruz

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out sort of standing up for Jimmy Kimmel on this.

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I had to tell you this, Brendan Carr and Donald Trump.

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jimmy Kimmel probably ought to give them his

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>six percent rather than his agent because nobody has done

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>more for Jimmy Kimmel's career over the last year and

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a half than Brendan Carr and Donald Trump, uh and

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the woke right, and it is it is,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I you know what this really is. There's this everything

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is retribution, right, Everything is retaliation with Trump, right, everything

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is you know, it's like, why is he so you know,

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you know Trump, there are certain things that he just

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has to change the name of just

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to say he has to change the name of or

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do because he said he was going

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. Right, So he's got to go after Komy

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's got he's now got an acting Attorney General

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that literally was his personal lawyer now just doing retribution

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and things. I think it is notable by the way

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that Todd blanche is willing to go down these ridiculous

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>roads of questionable you know, targeting of political opponents, as

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 1>he's already done, whether it's the Southern Poverty Law Center.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that's going to struggle when an

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>actual judge takes a look at that with combing, that's

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite difficult. And so I think it's

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear as I said about Pambondi before. This is

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody who was a prosecutor for half her career. This

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was not somebody that was going to be comfortable essentially

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>misbehaving as a lawyer. And so I don't think it's

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>an accident that she wouldn't bring these cases and he would.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think it does take you know, I know

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>many of you are not big Pambondi fans that listen

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to me here, but you know, everything is by degree right,

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And as I said before, there was I think that

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was part of the reason why she got pushed out,

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because there were somethings she just wasn't going to do.

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And now Donald Trump has an attorney general that is

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much willing to do all of his bidding whatever

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he wants. So you know, judge these people by the alternative,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not the almighty sometimes. And I had a feeling that

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>some people might miss Pam Bondi once she's gone, believe

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it or not, and one of those people might actually

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be James call me as for what we learned or

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't learn on Capitol Hill about the war. Look, the

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>hearing was useless because hag Seth came in as a

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>partisan and of course, you had plenty of House members

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to do frankly wanted to do their viral

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>moments and hope that they get you know it is

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those where I wonder what would

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>have happened had there been no cameras. Would the questions

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>have been pointed but more substantive rather than pointed and

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of buzzwords. But you know, Hank Seth in there,

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he's the line I used on seeing it is they

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>just think he's got Internet brain rot where you know,

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the Mike Lee disease where you've just certain

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I saw that Jade Vance gave up

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>X for lent. Good for him. I think it's quite healthy.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Just stay off because you'll do in that doom scroll

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and you could see, like Mike Lee is one of

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>these people that apparently just doesn't have anything to do

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at night. He needs a hobby because he spends so

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.240
<v Speaker 1>much time trying to own the libs or own himself

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on social media. He sort of spins himself into into

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy and yet nobody has I don't know how many

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>actual physical, personal, in person relationships he has these days.

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>But Haig Seth also seems to have internet brain right,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and certainly Sean Parnell, who I think does a lot

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>of his right. He was very much somebody also sort

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of of that. But when you look at some of

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the some of the quotes that were out there, right

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he immediately, you know, for a defense secretary to go

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>out there and basically say that the it was Democrats

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans who didn't support this war who were bigger

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>problems than any other adversary. It's look, I don't think

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>he's very well respected. I don't think anybody takes in

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington takes Pete Hegseth very seriously. The problem is he

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>does hold the job of Defense secretary, and it was

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>notable to me that you'd have a partisan hackery from

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Pete Eggseth, and you'd have General Kane being very disciplined,

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>very a political talking about how he believes in the

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that the military is supposed to be a political

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>when literally Pete hag Seth is doing everything he can

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to politicize the military. The biggest failure of hag Set's

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>testimony is his inability to make the case of why

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>this war is necessary, and that's been part of the

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>problem that they've had right, which is, you know, Donald

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump seemed to imply regime change. At the same time,

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Pete Hegseth claims that there is you know, no more

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing any more regime change anymore, that that's

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>not something that this uh, that's not something that this

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Defense Department is focused on anymore. But then he like

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>talks about, well, we're not for regime change, but the

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>regime changed but hasn't really changed, right, But that doesn't

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>seem he couldn't really paint a picture of what an

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>endgame looks like. Uh. And you know, ultimately we kind

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of all know what the end game is going to

0:40:55.239 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>look like. It's just waiting to see when the president

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>accepts the fact that if he is doesn't have the

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>stomach to escalate and send in ground troops, then the

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>only choice he has is to negotiate essentially the nuclear

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>deal two point zero. And maybe it'll take fourth dollars

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and thirty cents a gallon at the guess station. Maybe

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it's until it hits four fifty, But I continue to

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that's where we're headed. And I'll tell you this,

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Hexa did not do. I don't think he did the

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>war any good. And you know, here's the other thing

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that this administration is so bad at and the first

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration was not this bad at it. There's never

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there's never anybody that will say, well, look, I understand

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>why this isn't popular. I understand that why some people

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 1>are upset. They will never accept the premise that criticism

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>might be valid. And I will tell you, you cannot

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>success fully lead in a democracy if you don't know

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>how to accept the premise of your critics. And you know,

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, what

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 1>made them successful two term presidents is that they were

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>really good at that. Some would complain, oh, they're they're

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they're creating straw man. Yeah, it was. Sometimes their arguments

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are pushback was creating straw. But they accepted the premise

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that the criticism was valid, even if they disagreed with

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the criticism. These guys don't accept the premise that criticism

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is valid. They're always trying to blame it on people

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like me, right, anybody in the press. It's got to

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be the press's fault because somehow, you, the American voter,

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are too stupid to come to these conclusions on your

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>own you're easily persuaded by us inkstained wretches in the

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 1>press corps. I mean, when you really think about it,

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the way they the way they treat the American public,

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>they really have for the intelligence of the American public

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because they consistently believe that the problem isn't the substance

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of what they're pushing, that the problem is how it's

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>being interpreted by the press. So do they really think

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the American voter is that stupid? We can all see

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 1>this with our own eyes, and ultimately we're seeing right

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>now in the Poland public's not happy. Public's not in

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>favor of this, and I don't think Pete Hagsif did

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 1>anything this week to improve that standing even among base Republicans.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the check todcast is brought to you

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>by Soul. So if you love that end of the

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>day unwined but hate the hangover, Soul's out of Office

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is for you. These sparkling THHC drinks and gummies give

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you the same relaxed social feeling without the alcohol, without

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the calories, and without the crash. Soul is a wellness

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>brand that believes feeling good should be fun and easy.

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived, THCHC, and CBD products

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>designed to boost your mood and help you unwind. Their

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>best selling out of office Gummies were designed to provide

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood and enhance creativity

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and relaxation. With five different strengths, you can tailor the

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dose to fit your vibe. SO also has a variety

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of products specifically designed to help you get a better

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>night's rest, including their top selling Sleepy Gummies, a fan

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite for deep, restorous sleep. Look, I have made no secret.

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I am a believer in this stuff, in cannabis and

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hemp derived. I do not partake in alcohol. For the

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>most part. I think this stuff is a lot safer

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>than alcohol, a lot less addictive than alcohol. And yes,

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I love these drinks. It is

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the glass of wine and you know after work, that's

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what this is. So no hangover and no excess calories

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>like this. I'm a big fan. Bring on the good

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>vibes and treat yourself to sold today right now, Soul

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is offering my audience thirty percent off your entire order.

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Go to getsoul dot com and use the word podcast.

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>That's getsol dot com promo Code podcast for thirty percent off.

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I too am a customer, ask Chuck. All right,

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>let's do a little ass Chuck. Hey. My first question

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is actually in response to the conversation I had with

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the meteorologists from Watch Duty, Pete Current, jeff Ar Wrights, Hey,

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>great info and guests. My input from living through the

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen Thomas fire in Ventura, California. If the wind

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is howling, there isn't much you can do but get

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of the way. Eighty mile prour winds then,

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but I've had anything over fifty is critical too. There

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was a block home with a flat roof, no attict

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and a metal framed dual pain windows, and all that

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>survived was the blocks. Just devastating. Also, a friend that

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>stayed to protect his home had a stroke a few

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>days later. Yeah, I bet the local stroke center told

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>them that there was a significant increase in cases afterwards.

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is get ready and leave. Your life

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is worth more than protecting property. Jeff, I know that

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just great advice. The same thing is true with hurricanes.

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody thinks, you know, what are you going

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to do against in this case, one hundred and thirty

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>mile an hour wins. You're not going to do a thing.

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember during Hurricane Andrew, we were trying to prevent

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two French It was a French doors set up at

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the house I was staying at, and we're literally three

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of us for about an hour because the doors were

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.879
<v Speaker 1>buckling and we leaned against it. But it was kind

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of ridiculous that we were putting ourselves. It's sort of like,

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 1>if there's an evacuation order, follow the evacuation order because

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>mother nature is undefeated. Matt from Upstate New York rights, Hey,

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>love the podcast. Been following you since your time at

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Meet the Press. Keep up the great work. Well, thank you, sir.

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the pete Hegseth firing more

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>than a dozen generals. My first thought was that the

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>administration was getting ready for larger military action against Iran,

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that this was a way to purge officials who were

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not in line with what the administration is planning. However,

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>grew with your recent opinion that Trump is just seeking

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a way out of this war with Iran for any

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>type of offering possible. I'm not sure what to make

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of this purge. Keep up the good work. Look, this

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>purge is just ideological, right. You know, at first, he's

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going after anybody that he thinks were somehow an affirmative

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>action or some sort of minority driven. Right. He's gotten

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>rid of women that were high ranking, He's purged African Americans,

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:37.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody that he in his own head has decided got

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it because of identity rather than merit. And even though

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>apparently there's plenty of evidence that these people were worthy

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>on the merit. But that's what this is. This is

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of an ideological purge. And then some of the

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff's personal, right, like the guy at the Navy secretary,

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and he certainly has been trying to get rid of

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Army secretary. But that's almost more like political right valries,

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will. But you know, this is it's no

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>different than what Trump and Steven Miller were trying to

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do at the start of the second term with those

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>which was, you know, they believe that the civilian staff,

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.959
<v Speaker 1>they believe that the nonpartisan a political staff, whether it's

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Interior Department or at the Pentagon, are somehow

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 1>standing in the way of their ideology, right, because these

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>people do things like follow the Constitution. These to these folks,

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually try to keep politics out of their

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>decision making. And so that's what this has been about.

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.760
<v Speaker 1>When you really start to look at the list, you'll

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>notice there's quite a few women that he's purged from

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>these ranks, quite a few minorities that he's purged from

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>these ranks. Next question, he goes, great episode. Oh, this

0:48:56.719 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is a question on dynastic. I probably I'll put it dynastic. Okay,

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>we speaking of dynastic, it's a good time for me

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to say the latest episode is up. We do the Steelers.

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It is fantastic. I promise you. If you're a Steelers fan,

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to hear from you because I want

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to know if we did you right on this. But here,

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>let me get this question. He goes, great episode. Please

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>pass along my thanks to Jaa as well my partner

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Jay Adande. As someone who watched those seventy Steelers teams,

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I loved hearing Bill Nunn get his due, and I'd

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>even argue that seventy sixteen might have been their best

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>despite not winning an all quick note that Dolphins would

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have been fifteen to no, not sixteen to no. Heading

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 1>into that game. Also, I didn't realize that Steel Curtain

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>was the first all black defensive front. Such a cool

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>piece of history. Thanks for all the great content. I

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>really enjoying it. Well, I appreciate it. And that's that's

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>what our goal is with Jay and I with these series,

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and said, so, I call it sports History Podcast, but

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it's about It's not just sports history, it's our history, right,

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, especially both Jay and I are pretty

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>close in age, and you know, the seventies and the

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.359
<v Speaker 1>eighties were our coming of age eras, and so yeah,

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we're these the seventies Steelers sort of had a different

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>type of imprint on us. But that's how we want

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this with all of these franchises is

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to you know, let them live and breathe and the

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>eras that they were in and you know what the

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>cultural moments at that time meant. And you know, we're

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>getting ready to dive in to tell you. I read

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the book I read for this one to prepare. The

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>one I read the most thoroughly was Dan Rooney's memoir

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about his seventy five years in the NFL, and it

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was just amazing and in fact, it was Dan Rooney's

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>decision to open with his perspective on the immaculate reception.

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:45.359
<v Speaker 1>That made me think, that's how we've got to open

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the show. So, man, this makes me feel good. Thank

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you for that question. Dan from Arlington, Right hey, longtime listener,

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>also a neighbor here in Arlington, Yes you are. I

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was intioned your take on Israel and the Democratic Party

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and it made me wonder how you see this evolving

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>politically A post Trump posting at Nahu Era. Do you

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think Democrats return to a more neutral or traditionally supportive

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>stance on Israel or is this shift more permanent? And relatedly,

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>does someone like Josh Shapiro have a viable path given

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>where the party is today? So that's a great question.

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the second part first. There's a

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if I'm seeing this with clear eyes,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I will confess to that. I think, you know, we

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all have our biases that we're born with and all

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, Right, which is I think it's going to

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be hard for a Jewish Democrat to win the nomination.

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm wrong about that, but I think it

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>will be this cycle. I think there's always now I

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think if you're going to I think Josh Shapiro is

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>addressing it better than any of the other Jewish Democrats

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that are thinking about running for president. It's quite a few,

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, including Ram Emanuel J. B. Pritzker, Josh Shapiro,

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe even John Ossa, but Shapiro sort of leaned in

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know it, I do think. I

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>think his candidacy if he runs, even if he doesn't win,

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and let's say we all decide that's the reason, right

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>that that's you know, there were some people that never

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>were going to vote for him. There if he uses

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>his candidacy to remind Democrats that you can be a

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>defender of Israel's right to exist and be a critic

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of their policies, and that there is space for that,

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think right now unfortunately, you know, even

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy like now who's not creating space for that,

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>but I think there is you're asking, I, look, I

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is a generational shift, and you know, it

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:44.840
<v Speaker 1>might be a generation before before this goes back to

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I first entered politics, the Democrats were

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>more pro Israel. It was the Republicans had more anti

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Israel politicians in their coalition than pro Israel politicians. Right,

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Papuchannan was a loud voice on that, but he wasn't alone.

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Bob Novak, one of the leading conservative journalists of the

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seventies and eighties, was was a loud voice against military

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>support for Israel. And so it's I'm certainly skeptical, and

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eight you know, I certainly think it is

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it is a higher hurdle for Josha bro I'm saying

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it should be a higher hero of course, but I'm

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just saying I think it's a higher hurdle. But I

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>actually appreciate how he's been trying to lean into it

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of deal with it rather than sort of

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid it. Right. I think this is one

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of those ripped the band aid off, and let's see

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if we can have the correct, nuanced conversation on this

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and get back to being supportive of democracies in the

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Middle East period, right and promoting I mean, to me,

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it was always I thought pretty easy to support Israel

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was at the time. It's only real democracy in the

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, and the United States should always be on

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the side of democracies that exist and should be supportive.

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you could be critical of policy, and

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's that's something our politics isn't mature

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to handle at the moment. Vince C. Berkeley, California. Right, hey,

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>long time listener here. I've lived in New York for

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>most of my life and now I'm in Berkeley, California.

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to revisit a question I said earlier about

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:26.879
<v Speaker 1>statehood for Puerto Rico and DC. How do you see

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the political path forward for either becoming states and what

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>would the implications be for national politics. Well, Vince, I'm

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a believer that the only way for either to get

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>statehood is to go together. I think I think that

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there is Republican support for Puerto Rican statehood. Rick Scott

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>supports Puerto Rican statehood. I think Marco Rubio supports Puerto

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Rican stated and Puerto Rico has a Republican elected governor.

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty bipartisan island. It's a very it's two

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>already competitive politics on the on the in the Commonwealth

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of Puerto Rico. By the way, as an aside, you

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>may have heard it in my interview with with a Teamah,

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if if if the right really wanted

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to put put a wedge in the Democratic Party. Not

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>only do you propose giving Arlington back to d C,

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>but then be and say, well, we'll give We're going

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to take Arlington back from Virginia, give it to d

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>C and let d C be a state. Right. That's

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be if you really wanted to quote own

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the Libs on the right, you know that that would

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 1>create a wedge issue. How badly do you want state?

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Hut right? But in some ways that just shows you,

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>right that the rights not very clever. Everything is every

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>everything is a sledgehammer. You know, every problem is a

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 1>nail and every solution is a sledgehammer. But that's you know,

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it sort of reveals, you know, because if you if

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you gave Arlington back to d C, then you really

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are disenfranchising a big chunk of voters. You better franchise

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>enfranchise them and so come out and support a statehood

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 1>if that's it. If that, and I am curious, I

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the price of statehood was Arlington, would Democrats

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:28.400
<v Speaker 1>still be in favor of it. I actually think they would.

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, again, I'm not trying to carve up Virginia,

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, I'm fine with with with my

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>tax bill right now in Virginia versus what my tax

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bill would be in the district. I only tease a

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit there, but in all seriousness, I think d

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>C statehood in Puerto Rican statehood, either they both happen

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:57.759
<v Speaker 1>together or neither happens, because right now DC is just

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 1>seen as more likely to be two Democratic Senate seats.

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you can convince Republicans and look, you know,

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got to enfranchise voters and your things are going

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to be competitive in Puerto Rico, and it will be

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a competitive state. You might win both. You might win one,

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you might win the euro right, but just certainly get

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it won't. It won't be the dilution of

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>advantages that you think. And I think those on the

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>right that think Puerto Rico is just part of this

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>grand plan by the left to quote unquote rig the Senate,

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 1>well that's pretty insulting to Puerto Ricans, plenty of whom

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have voted Republican for decades. And I think it exposes

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting form. You know, I think if that is

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>your mindset, then you don't believe in a diverse Republican party.

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You believe in the in the in the a white,

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>homogeneous Republican Party, because again, Puerto Rico's, like I said,

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty competitive politically. All right. Next question comes from uh

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Trevor in Austin, Texas, and he writes, hey been a

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fan since the tim Resser days and really appreciate your perspective.

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Always wondered why interviewers don't more often pres Lindsay Graham

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by replaying his January six remarks distancing himself from Trump

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and asking what changed? Is that a matter of access,

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>time constraints or something else? And with his reelection coming up,

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do you expect him to shift his posture again? Well?

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is how you know, how long you

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>know the expression beating a dead horse? Right? You know

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's early on a lot of those questions were asked

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of them, and then you know it's sort of like

0:58:39.760 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>when and you know, you get caught up in the

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 1>news of the moment versus sort of you know, like

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, if I had Lindsay Graham for for forty

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, I'd darn right I definitely asked that question. Frankly,

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'd had him for ten minutes, I'd still want

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to ask that question. He somehow was afraid of coming

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on Meet the Press after January sixth. I wonder why

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that was. But he is somebody that has always been

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fearful of tough interviews and because he you know, and

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he used to be a fairly easy guest book, right,

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and then as soon as as soon as sort of

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 1>he made his decision. But again, you know, Lindsay Graham's

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of problems, right. You know, the Steele

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Dosier got spread around Washington thanks to Lindsey Graham. Right,

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he was one of the biggest proponents of the Steele Dosier.

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the bigger contributors around town of saying, hey,

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this is serious. People need to take this seriously. So look,

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he's always done this for political survival and I think

0:59:44.440 --> 0:59:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a survivalist. And so what does that mean you're asking,

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is he going to sift his posture again, whatever it

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 1>takes to keep that sentency. If he has to become

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a liberal Democrat. Lindsey Graham's will become a liberal Democrat.

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we kind of see, right, you know, Lindsay

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Graham was one type of Republican and then Donald Trump

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>came around, John McCain passed away, and he became a

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>different type of Republican so and part of that was

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>simply his state shifted right. South Carolina Republicans were more

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Maga than they were McCain, and they were pro Lindsey Graham.

1:00:21.880 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately, Lindsay is going to go where his voters go.

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And if his voter suddenly shifted hard left, Lindsey Graham

1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>would suddenly shift hard life. I think he wants his

1:00:33.360 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat that bad. This episode of the Chuck Podcast

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Ethos, And what Ethos does

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is it helps you find life insurance. Let me tell

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you why life insurance bailed me out. My father died

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was sixteen. We didn't have a lot of

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>money when it happened, and we were in a pretty

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>tough financial spot after it happened. I'm an only child.

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly my mother's single, single mother. She had a job,

1:00:57.600 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>suddenly lost a job, looking for another job, and we

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>were struggling. You know, my dad didn't leave us in

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the best financial situation, but he did make one purchase.

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He bought a life insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk

1:01:09.120 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of change, but it was enough when we found it.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And when I say we found it, meaning we went

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>through his desk and we found, oh, look at this,

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>let's see if there's anything here. And it helped us

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out at a time that we really needed it. And

1:01:20.280 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think it's important that if you can,

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>especially if you have young children, if you can get

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>life insurance, you should get it. Life is full of

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen. It is an extra bit

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of security, something you can leave and help out at

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a time when you're not you're not there to help.

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So what does Ethos do well? Ethos makes getting life

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>insurance fast and easy and it's one hundred percent online.

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You can get a quote in seconds, you can apply

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, and you can get same day coverage. They

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>will find you the right fit. There's no medical exam.

1:01:52.600 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You just answer a few simple health questions online. You

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>can get up to three million dollars in coverage and

1:01:57.000 --> 1:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some policies are as low as thirty dollars a month,

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get at your lowest rate from their network

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to get covered

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>today with Life insurance through Ethos. Get your free quote

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at ethos dot com slash Chuck That is e thos

1:02:14.080 --> 1:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and rates

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>may vary. To the last question for the weekend, This

1:02:26.240 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one also comes from Texas. Kelly Ax from Aubrey, Texas Rights, Hey,

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>why died to push back in your point that Democrats

1:02:31.520 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>need to tone things down and focus on being more

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>measured than Republicans. To me, that approach can come across

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as passive, especially when many voters respond to more direct

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and emotional messaging. Should Democrats be more willing to call

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>out what they see as harmful rhetoric and actions more forcefully,

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>even if that means matching some of that intensity, or

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>does that risk doing more harm than good politically? Well, look, Kelly,

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I I think I've made my point clear on this.

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that and I look, I'm just going to

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>look backwards over the last ten years. I think that

1:03:01.040 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have benefited by being the adult party, and I

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think anytime they're not behaving like the adult party, like

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the grown ups in the room, it may make the

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>base feel better, like finally you're punching back. And I

1:03:17.200 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know that there's this mindset of what wrong and strong

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>beats weak and right and short term that might be true,

1:03:25.320 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but long term, being right is going to mean something.

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that this goes back to and

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is a good place to end, because I

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about the Democratic autopsy that we're not seeing,

1:03:40.800 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and Ken Martin and I have a few theories and

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're just theories, and I want to throw them out there,

1:03:46.040 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but finish your question. Answering your question, I get it,

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there's there's sort of this fine line.

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Democrats need you need to be strong,

1:03:55.640 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can be strong in your rhetoric about behaving

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like adults, right versus deciding, oh, let's just start saying

1:04:07.040 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the f wort a lot more and that'll make us

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>cool in the manisphere, right, Like, I think it's learning

1:04:13.080 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the wrong lessons from Trump, you know, I think the

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>right lessons to learn from Trump's success is show up

1:04:20.440 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>everywhere in you know. Whether I don't love this style

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of politics, but frankly, you know, be everywhere all the time. Now.

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you got to do it in a tad

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>more disciplined way. But you know, whatever you think of Trump,

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he is who he is, right, you know, this is

1:04:43.240 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the authentic version of whatever he is, I always say

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>he's authentically and authentic. But it works, right, nobody denies

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that that that Trump bars all these things. So, yes,

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more authentic, don't be so cookie cutter.

1:04:58.240 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that there is a group of voters

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that gravitate towards the adult in the room, and if

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no adult in the room, they're going to look elsewhere.

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think it it is, it is. I know

1:05:16.760 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>right now politics feels binary, but it doesn't always have

1:05:20.480 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to be binary. If you're not if you're if you're

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not careful, I mean, just you know, maybe it gets

1:05:27.720 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you a hollow victory like Labor got in the UK,

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>right Labor Keir Starmer got these massive majorities, but you know,

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>all they were was a reactionary anti Tory party. They

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>got their big majority and they had no idea what

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with it, and they're afraid of offending different

1:05:46.240 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the coalition, so they don't end up doing anything.

1:05:51.560 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So I again, I know what I'm saying is not

1:05:56.880 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>popular in a more partisan corners, and I guess what

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to speak from is from this. You know, look,

1:06:02.840 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I I Others will call me a centrist or

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a moderate. I consider myself an incrementalist, meaning you know,

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm you know, I do think it should If

1:06:16.440 --> 1:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to make change for three hundred fifty million people,

1:06:19.200 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you got to bring as many people along as you can,

1:06:21.640 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and so you take incremental steps in order to get there.

1:06:27.880 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, these are the voters that

1:06:31.040 --> 1:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>decide these elections. They are not a large chunk of

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the primary electorates. And I know this isn't what wins

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a primary, but like I said, I think it. I

1:06:40.800 --> 1:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think there's a chunk of voters, which

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>brings me to and I'm going to close with this.

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually I've got one sports item I want to share,

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to close. I want to close my

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of political side of things. So Ken Martin went

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on Pods of America. It was clear that they had

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a strategy of finally, Okay, we're going to let the

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Pod save America boys beat us up over not releasing

1:07:04.080 --> 1:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the autopsy, but we're going to make it clear we're

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not releasing the so called twenty twenty four autopsy. And

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to people who were involved in being interviewed

1:07:12.080 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for the autopsy, and nobody's quite sure where it comes down.

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think the question is it clearly is going

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to have make some recommendations. And the question I have,

1:07:23.000 --> 1:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think I get what Ken Martin fears, it

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>will start a fight, right, whatever you release, And obviously

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the longer you wait, the more you impact. Right, this

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>autopsy should have been released last Thanksgiving. Let everybody sort

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of get their anxiety out, you know, complain about it,

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>beat up each other, all that stuff could have been

1:07:43.240 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>done over the holidays. You turn the page, you focus

1:07:46.160 --> 1:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on on the midterms, and you move forward. But I've

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>been trying to think, what is it that the autopsy discovered.

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be too critical of Biden and

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to do that. Is it going to

1:07:56.320 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be too critical of the old Democratic establishishment, is going

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to be too critical of progressives? Is it going to

1:08:03.040 --> 1:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be like who is it that they're afraid of picking

1:08:05.760 --> 1:08:08.959
<v Speaker 1>a fight with that the autopsy is going to say, Hey,

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the big problem is this right? It's you know,

1:08:14.000 --> 1:08:17.599
<v Speaker 1>is it a branding issue? Is an ideo ideological issue?

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it too much identity politics? Is it do the

1:08:21.240 --> 1:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>groups have too much power? Right? Is it too many

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>billionaire donors. What you know, there's there's a variety of

1:08:27.080 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>constituency groups that any individual one of those groups might

1:08:32.200 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have been picked on in this autopsy, and maybe that's

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what they're afraid of. But it's certainly not giving, you know,

1:08:41.080 --> 1:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's a and I think we know why.

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>There's just no money going to the d n C.

1:08:45.840 --> 1:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Right Democrats are keeping up with Republicans on fundraising at

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>every level except one the DNC. And I don't think

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>showing this type of fear of being a party leader,

1:08:57.479 --> 1:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>which I think Ken Martin is showing here. It feels

1:08:59.520 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like year of his coalition being upset about something that

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was said in that you know autopsy, Perhaps is why

1:09:09.360 --> 1:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants to keep it sealed. I don't know how

1:09:13.920 --> 1:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful. I hope they at least share it with

1:09:16.200 --> 1:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Democratic strategists, or they share it with candidates, or they

1:09:18.800 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 1>share it with somebody, because what's the point of doing

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it if you're not going to try what's the point

1:09:24.400 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of trying to figure out how to learn lessons from

1:09:26.240 --> 1:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a loss if you actually don't share the lessons that

1:09:30.000 --> 1:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>were learned from the loss. Right, But it's possible that

1:09:35.320 --> 1:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this autopsy will help will help resolve the debate that

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Kelly X and I are having about whether Democrats ought

1:09:46.600 --> 1:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to take the high road or not on things like this.

1:09:51.320 --> 1:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make one comment, and I want

1:09:53.400 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to just make a mass one comment about because I'm

1:09:57.160 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>going to take an unpopular opinion here on being happy

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that the NCAA back is expanding the men's and women's

1:10:08.720 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball tournament from sixty eight teams to seventy six teams. Look,

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see it to ninety six, and I

1:10:14.680 --> 1:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think I even outlined an idea of how easily it

1:10:16.720 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>can be done. And yes, it means Tuesday and Wednesday

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>become Thursday and Friday, you know, as packed of a

1:10:22.040 --> 1:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule as you have on Thursdays. And yes, the more, Yes,

1:10:25.040 --> 1:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have more games on Tuesday and Wednesday. I

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>don't think the two best days of the NCAA Tournament

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are Thursday and Friday, those first round one games right

1:10:34.640 --> 1:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the round of sixty four? Are you telling me I

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 1>could have two more days that are filled with that

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>many games? You're gonna give me two more days of

1:10:45.520 --> 1:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games each? Count me in. That's a good thing,

1:10:51.200 --> 1:10:55.519
<v Speaker 1>isn't that what we want here more schools, rightly, more money,

1:10:56.479 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>more everything for everybody. Right, it's one of those again.

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like expanding the House of Representatives, right, you expand

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the table rather than fight over a minimum number of seats.

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But I want to make one more. Look, and some

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of you may say, well, ninety six is too much,

1:11:12.240 --> 1:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but I know the argument, well seventy six is too much.

1:11:14.360 --> 1:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But here's where you're actually wrong. And I'm just going

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to just do a math equoid for everybody arguing that

1:11:20.400 --> 1:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>somehow this tournament's being diluted by making it seventy six teams.

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty five, when the NCAA expanded to sixty

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:35.759
<v Speaker 1>four teams, there were actually only two hundred and seventy

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>six Division one basketball programs so you had which meant

1:11:42.800 --> 1:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the round of sixty four meant twenty three percent of

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>all Division one programs got into the tournament. Well, now

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there are three hundred and sixty one Division one men's

1:11:54.439 --> 1:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>basketball programs. Okay, there are more actual programs than there

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>were in nineteen eighty five with sixty four, So this

1:12:04.280 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is just twelve more in the field. And so what

1:12:07.400 --> 1:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>is the number Seventy six teams out of three hundred

1:12:10.560 --> 1:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and sixty one means twenty one percent of all Division

1:12:14.040 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I programs will get into the field. It's actually a

1:12:18.200 --> 1:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>lower ratio of Division one programs making it into the

1:12:24.160 --> 1:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>into the NCAA Tournament then when they expanded it in

1:12:27.280 --> 1:12:30.599
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five, when it was sixty four teams out

1:12:30.600 --> 1:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of two seventy six. I know math is a problem

1:12:33.600 --> 1:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for many people and they don't want to hear it,

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but nobody seems to be aware that we keep expanding

1:12:39.840 --> 1:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the size of Division one men's basketball and women's basketball.

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>There are more Division I basketball. We have Grand Canyon.

1:12:47.320 --> 1:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Now we didn't have Grand Canyon. We have Florida Golf Coast.

1:12:49.720 --> 1:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have Florida Golf Coast. Right, you can keep

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>going and going, basically almost one hundred more NCAA programs,

1:12:56.280 --> 1:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>so of course you had to expand. The point is

1:12:59.560 --> 1:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not only to seventy six, not dilute. And you know

1:13:04.360 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest beneficiaries are going to be the sort of

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the high mid majors, the A ten. So yeah, that's

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>why I'm happy fight GW revolutionaries have a better shot

1:13:15.720 --> 1:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in than ever before. A ten probably becomes a four

1:13:19.160 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or five bid league. Now should should become a maybe

1:13:23.320 --> 1:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>a three or four consistently a three to four bid league,

1:13:26.520 --> 1:13:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and maybe as many as five. This should be good

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for the AA whatever they call the American Conference. I

1:13:31.600 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>guess we're only supposed to be called the American on

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that front, and possibly the Mountain West. But this, I

1:13:41.240 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think the criticism is a bit misplaced, and we actually

1:13:45.240 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>look at it by the numbers, we were overdue for

1:13:51.200 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>expanding the NCAA tournament to where it is, and again

1:13:56.080 --> 1:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>next year with seventy six teams, fewer perk out of

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>teams will make the NCAA tournament than when it was

1:14:03.120 --> 1:14:08.479
<v Speaker 1>expanded to sixty four in nineteen eighty five. It's been

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a math heavy episode of the check podcast, but hey,

1:14:11.000 --> 1:14:12.519
<v Speaker 1>this is what you get when you sign up from

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>my podcast. I'm always gonna throw some data at you,

1:14:15.160 --> 1:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>throw some by the numbers at you, because sometimes arguments

1:14:21.200 --> 1:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are just that arguments. Data trumps it all. And with that,

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend, enjoy the enjoy the NBA playoffs.

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I still am I'd like to see a few more

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>competitive games. It feels like we've had way too many blowouts.

1:14:37.840 --> 1:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that'll change. That'll change when we move from the

1:14:42.800 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>first round to the second round. But enjoy that, Enjoy weekend,

1:14:46.720 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and i'll see it Monday. Hey,