WEBVTT - Karen Hao on the Reckless Race for Global AI Power 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>These companies have consolidated a historic amount of economic and

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>political power, just like the empires of old. You do

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>not need to unlock the benefits of AI through a

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>corrosive approach. So why are we not holding these companies

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 2>to those higher standards?

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Karen Howe, who says the AI industry is a reckless

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>race for global domination, I think you do have a

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>problem with the people at the top. Right.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>We often obsess over the cast of characters at the top,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, who's the

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>less bad guy? And what I'm saying is that's not

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the only option. We shouldn't have to live with companies

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>that are so vastly powerful, where one person at the

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>top is able to decide all these things.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>From Bloomberg Weekend. This is the Michelle Hussein Show. I'm

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Hussein. I don't know if you at the point

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that you tap a prompt into Chat, GPT or CLAWD, Gemini,

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft co Pilot, whatever you use, if you ever stopped

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for a moment and wonder how the data got there

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. I suspect you don't. Few of

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>us do. These AI tools have been revolutionary in the

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>last few years in the way that so many of

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>us have changed how we work or how we learn.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But Karen Howe, who's talked to me for this episode,

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>wants us all to step back and to really think

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about what the process involves. That is, not only the

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>land used for the data centers, the water, the energy involved,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>but the actual process of gathering and preparing the data,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>where it comes from. Who does the work in putting

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it together. Karen trained as a mechanical engineer and then

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>did work in Silicon Valley before turning to journalism. She's

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>written a book called Empire of Ai, and it's that

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>use of the word empire to describe the top AI

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>companies that I ask her to explain right at the

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>start of this It started, I think, when she spent

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a few days inside Open Ai observing them. They were

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not a well known company at the time she wrote

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about them in a less than flattering way. Today, it

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is safe to say that there is no love lost

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>between Karen Howe and the top execs of the AI world,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get a sense of that in my written

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>notes that accompany this conversation. As ever, you'll find them

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Forward slash Michelle, you'll get the

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>backstory to this conversation and what I followed up on afterwards.

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Karen and I in London, where there was something on

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the table that caught her eyes she came into the studio.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a different way that I make notes ahead of

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a conversation, with a spider's web style diagram that reminds

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>me what I really need to cover. So that moment

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>between us is where this begins.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I love this mind map. Do you do this? Oh?

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I do do this.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>This is awesome.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I do this, but I wish my writing was a

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit Nita.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's so me. I can just about.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I can just about, but no, it helps me. But

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I never did it before this show began.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm always so fascinated by the format in which people

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>take notes, because it really is such a window into

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>how they they think. Yeah, and I'm such a linear

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>thinker that diagram confuses me.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So what does this reveal about me that I

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think in a I don't think in a linear way,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in a non linear way.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Way I think, which I think is probably a lot

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>more information done.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Essentially it's what enables recall because you know you don't

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be referring to it too much as whatever

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>helps imprint it in your in your brain. So at

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>least I feel it's hope question very good. You're reading

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>upside down now? Yeah? Okay, Well, Karen, I would love

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to start with your own words, because you write in

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Empire of Ai that over the years you found only

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one metaphor that encapsulates the nature of what these AI

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>power players are, and that is empires not engaged in

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>overt violence and brutality, as we know from history, but

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they too seize and extract precious resources to feed their

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>vision of artificial intelligence. Now, that is a real attack

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on the companies behind some of the defining tools of

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>our age. What is it that's made you feel so strong?

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 2>These companies have consolidated historic amount of economic and political power,

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 2>and they are becoming fast the supreme powers in the world,

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>just like the empires of old. And they do this

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>through the dispossession of resources, labor value from the majority.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 2>They claim to resources that are not their own, the

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>data of individuals, the intellectual property of artists, writers and creators.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 2>They exploit an extraordinary amount of labor through both the

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 2>workers that they use and exhaust to produce their technologies

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as the workers whose jobs get automated away

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>by the deployment of these technologies. So there is this

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>category of work that is involved in the production of

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>these technologies, including content moderation, including the labeling and cleaning

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>of training data. That's called data work. That kind of

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>work is now the number four fastest growing work in

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the US. And the types of people who are doing

0:05:55.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>this work are scientists, lawyers, college graduates, PhD graduates, and

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they are essentially providing their knowledge and their expertise to

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the training of these models, but under deeply exploitative, poorly

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>paid conditions where they are not working nine to fives.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>They are in their homes waiting for work to arrive.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 2>They never know when it's going to arrive. They never

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 2>know when it's going to go away. They're being pitted

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>against each other. You know, I've been covering this kind

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of work for almost eight years now, and it's the

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>same story again and again with every single community that

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>it hits. You see the same exact patterns of exploitation.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying that we should be thinking about the

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>exploitation of labor at the point that we're using clawed

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>or chatt GPT.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, So other industries have had similar problems. The

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>fashion industry also engaged in a lot of labor exploitation

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of environmental degradation. The answer was never

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>let's just get rid of clothes altogether. The answer was

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>always let's hold ourselves to higher standards in producing clothes

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>without those problems.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>It's still work, though, isn't it. And there are so

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>many communities where in different parts of the world there

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is an absence of work altogether. I just want to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you whether you think that there are definitely challenges

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in this industry and your work really details them and

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>deconstructs them. But is there an aspect of this that

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is about the challenges of our age that it's not

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily more exploitative than what's gone before. It's the problems

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of our time.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to what you were saying

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>that it is work though, because what is happening with

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>this US case now is that the people are actually

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>people that are highly educated and could have gotten full

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>time employment, but the reason why they do not have

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>access to better work now is also because of the

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>AI industry.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Taking away jobs.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>It's because of the way that the AI industry designs

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>its technology and sells it as a tool for automating

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>knowledge work. And so there's a shrinking job market for

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the unemployed population in the US twenty five percent of

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>them our four year college degree holders. That's a historic record.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And so it's not actually just giving work to people

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>who don't have work. It's actually degrading the work opportunities

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that exist right now, taking knowledge workers out of a

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>full time employment kind of situation into a gig work

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of situation.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to a country like Malta, which

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>has just signed a major agreement with OpenAI where everyone

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>who lives in Walta is going to get free access

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to chat GPT plus for a year. They're going to

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>go on a course to learn how to use it.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And the government of Malta is very proud of this

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>agreement because it says it puts Malta at the full

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>front of the digital age.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I've met a lot of policymakers from developing countries, from

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 2>smaller countries that do see themselves as they can only

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>participate in this revolution if they offer themselves up for

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 2>sale just because you know, the government is proud of

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 2>this partnership and they think that this is what gives

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>them the seat at the table, that it's actually leading

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.359
<v Speaker 2>to their citizens having a more dignified life.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But their government would see it as equipping them for work,

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or access to knowledge or everything else that they will

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>need to use large language models for.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I would argue they are being exploited, and I would

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be curious what the multi people think, not what the

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>multi government thinks. And the reason why I think they

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>are being exploited is because they are having their data

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>harvested to train the next generations of models. And that's

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's why these companies are going out and

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 2>striking these partnerships. They need more and more and more data.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 2>They need more and more and more data centers to

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>produce their technologies. And one of the challenges when it

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>comes to searching for different sources of data is that

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>they have run out of Internet data. They've run out

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of high quality Internet data, and so now one of

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the best sources of high quality data is straight from

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the user. And so if they can strike these whole

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of country partnerships, I mean you get a whole of

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>country database to upload freely all.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Kinds of thing like everything that's if I was part

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, it would be everything that's on my phone, which

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is which is.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Every Yeah, everything you used. You know. Some people think

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>of this as just oh, well I was using Google.

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I was, you know, saying a lot of things to

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Google and personal data as well. But I mean, I've

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>never seen people upload their medical files to Google to

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 2>ask for an interpretation of it. But people do that

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>with CHATGBT, with Gemini, with Claude, and that's intimate medical information.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Is there no positive side of it for you, Karen?

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that uploading of medical data, if it's done with consent,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't it part of the progress of science. You might

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>get something that troubles you diagnosed, or you might be

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>part of helping wid diagnosis.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 2>What I have problems with is the fact that it

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>is in the hands of deeply powerful companies that have

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.119
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no accountability to the people that they're actually affecting

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>around the world. And this is why I call them empires.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the governance structure of an empire. You at the

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>top are able to make hundreds of decisions in a

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>day that then have cascading effects on billions of people

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 2>around the world, and there are no formal mechanisms by

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>which those billions of people can actually challenge, contest, provide feedback.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 2>That's why we've historically moved from empires to democracies, because

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 2>democracies are these institutionalized ways for people to say when

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>they like something, when they don't like something, and how

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>they want to collectively govern and self determine their future.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you actually saying that the power of these companies

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is greater than the power of governments.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>They are definitely increasingly becoming that way, which.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Means even the US government, the most powerful country in the.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 2>World, I would say so. I mean, when there was

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the recent spat between Andthropic and the Department of War,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the Department of War used the nuclear option to try

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and get a company to fall in line, which is

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 2>to threaten to declare this company as a supply chain risk,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>which would.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Affect its work right across the US government.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>The company Anthropic still did not fall in line.

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But isn't that because it did well in another way.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It took the moral high ground, and maybe we can

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about that a bit later, but it got lots

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more users from the pr of that momentolutely.

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>One in the situation, both pr and in the SPAT.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying is this was a moment that demonstrates

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that these companies can, in fact have more power than

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.479
<v Speaker 2>the US government. They are will to actually go against

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the US government because they know that whatever penalty comes

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 2>at them from the government might actually be counterbalanced by

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the other benefits that come directly to the company.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>By profit elsewhere. So tell me, then, Karen, what is

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the answer, Because I know there's a call to action

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in your book. You clearly think that things can be

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and should be done another way. What are you hoping for?

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And do you think a figure like the Pope, like

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>a unique figure way outside the sort of government policy realm,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of person who might provide some kind

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of roadmap here.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important for all leaders in society, whether

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 2>religious or otherwise, to be thinking about these questions and

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how to ultimately protect human agency at a

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>time when the way that Silicon Valley conceives is this

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>technology is in fact threatening it. And we've seen Popelio

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 2>be quite strong on these issues and identify early on

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in his papacy that this is a particular issue where

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>he is deeply concerned about the pathway of technology development

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 2>undermining human dignity. And to go to your question of

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 2>what is actually the answer here, I mean, one of

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the things that I always say is AI is like

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the word transportation, transportation refers to everything from bicycles to rockets,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and in the same way, AI refers to a very

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>vast collection of different technologies, some of which are designed

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of like rockets. They're very resource intensive and they

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>exact a lot of cost to produce, and so in general,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>we only deploy rockets for a very narrow subset of

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 2>transportation needs. We never go around and say every single

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>person should have a rocket and use that rocket for

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>every single one of their transportation needs. That would destroy

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the environment, and it would also just be really inefficient

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and probably not actually get people to places faster because

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>of the amount of time it would take to boot

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 2>up the rocket. And so what I suggest is in

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>my book and throughout my other work, is that we

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 2>need to shift our portfolio of AI technologies to better

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>reflect the kinds of specialized AI that we in fact

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 2>need to tackle real societal challenges, things like improving healthcare

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>and accelerating drug discovery. Deep Minds alpha fold it is

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>an example of a system that I call a bicycle

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of AI. It is a system that predicts with high

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 2>accuracy how an amino acid sequence will fold into a

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 2>protein structure. This is really important for accelerating the understanding

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.239
<v Speaker 2>of human disease and then designing drugs to target those diseases,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>and it won the Nobel Prize for chemistry. This is

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>a technology. Even though it's called AI and Chatchibt's also

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>called AI. Deep Mind's alpha fold is one that is

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally different from how chatchebt is produced and how it operates.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>It uses very little data, it uses very little computing resources,

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and there's so hewpful and there's no need for labor

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>exploitation either, and it's still able to provide a lot

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of benefits. So my question is, when you look at

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the portfolio of AI technologies, wouldn't you want to pick

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the ones that have great benefit very little cost. Why

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>would you want to pick the ones that have very

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>great costs? Right?

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But these are value judgments, right, And something that you

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>think has no value, someone else might like. Let's take

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>AI in defense. We know already that many armies use

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it for targeting and the use of weapons. You and

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I might see that as wrong. Others might see that

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this is necessary defense. It's part of the defense of

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>your realm, and if you're not going to do it

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>through the tools of our age, then you're going to

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fall behind and the bad actors, terrorists, bad governments, whatever

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to get you.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think that's a particularly controversial issue where people

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>fall in different places. But what I'm arguing is there's

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>many different ways to produce AI. You do not need

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>to unlock the benefits of AI through a corrosive approach.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>So why are we not holding these companies to those

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 2>higher standards.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm conscious that both anthropic and open AI are heading

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>towards public offerings of their shares. Is that a moment

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that you think could bring greater accountability, that once a

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>company is public and it's got all kinds of investors

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's got annual general meetings, that a level of

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny that is lacking comes in a useful one.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I do think it could be. I am hopeful that

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>it could be, because when companies become public, they do

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>institute more government structors. But I Laigh this critique on

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>existing public companies as well. I call Google, Amazon, Microsoft

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>empires of AI as well. I do think that ultimately

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>governance needs to come from the public and from publicly

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>elected officials as well, not just the market forces and

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>not the founders.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you don't have faith in the actual

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>people running these companies. A lot of your book is

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 1>about open Ai, and Sam Mortman in particular. Tell me

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the story of how you got to know him and

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the company back in the beginning of this work.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I started covering AI in twenty eighteen for MIT Technology Review,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 2>and that is a publication that focuses a lot on

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>fundamental AI research. So I was reading scientific papers every week,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>talking with researchers at universities and corporate labs and open Ai.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, it became part of my radar because at

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the time it was a nonprofit fundamental AI research lab,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and it was one of the only ones. There was

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 2>open Ai, then there was Google, then there was deep

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Mind and just a few others, but that was kind

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of it. And so in twenty nineteen I proposed to

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>open Ai that there were a lot of changes happening

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>at the organization. They had just created a for profit

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 2>arm they'd just gotten a big investment from Microsoft, that

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe they wanted to reintroduce themselves to the public, and

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 2>I suggested that if they were interested in that, I

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 2>could profile them. So I went to the corporate offices

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and embedded within the organization for three days, interviewed a

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of employees and executives, including Sam Wltman. Sam Wtman

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 2>was actually not very important at the time, so no,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>because he had just officially become CEO. He was previously

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 2>just co chairman and didn't really have much to do

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 2>with the organization at all. And so they set up

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>interviews for me with Greg Brockman, the chief technology officer,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>in Ilios Setskaver, the chief scientist, who were the main

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>runners of the organization's day to.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Day and they didn't like the profile you wrote.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>They did it, they they did not.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>You said at that time that there was a misalign

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>between what they were actually doing and their promises. What

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>was it that made you say that? What did you

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>see that led you to that.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>At that time? The misalignment that I saw was they're

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>called open a eye for what they said was a

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>commitment to transparency, and this organization was already deeply secretive,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 2>and I noticed this culture in the way that employees

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 2>were very very nervous about what they said to me

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and where I was allowed to go within the offices.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>So that seemed already quite bizarre. And they also said

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 2>as a nonprofit that they would never commercialize their technologies, and.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course they're fully for profit, which is the

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>source of the case that collapsed between Elon Musk and

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Sam Ortman. Is Elon Musk then the good guy in

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this for you?

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>No? No? I mean, here's the thing. I think we

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>often obsess over the cast of characters at the top,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and we're always trying to think, like, who's the good guy,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 2>who's the bad guy, who's the less bad guy that

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm able to settle with? Because that's all the option

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>set there is. And what I'm saying is that's not

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the only option set. We shouldn't have to live with

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>companies that are so vastly powerful where one person at

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the top is able to decide all these things. It's

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.479
<v Speaker 2>a governance structure that's the problem. It's not that I

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>think the problem will be solved if we just swap

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>out one of these characters for one another. Or for

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a new person.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think you do have a problem with the

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>people at the top, right or certainly the small number

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of people at the top, And you kind of know

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the world that they came from because you were part

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of that same world. You went to MIT work for

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a startup. This could actually have been the industry of

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your life. It could have been reporting from the outside.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>So I get the impression that you do have a

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>problem with these characters.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I do have a particular problem with the culture

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 2>that they're steeped in and the ideologies that they have,

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 2>because it's an imperialist ideology. I mean, you know Sam

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Altman said before he stepped into his position as CEO

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>of Opening Eye, who's the president of y Combinator, and

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>he said, I'm going to invest in ten x more

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>companies year after year until I invest in every company

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>under the sun. And there's this kind of sense of

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>all the people that are steeped in that Silicon Valley

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>culture which I was a part.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Of, which was pretty young at the time, though maybe

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it was hubris foolishness.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Except that it's echoed through the way that he approaches

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Opening Eye strategy. Lets scale the models tenx more every

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>year until we have reached the scale of the human brain.

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, like He's always thinking in these kinds of terms,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and all of them are thinking in these kinds of

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>terms of let's just keep scaling and scaling and scaling

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>and its growth at all costs. And that is very

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 2>particular to the culture of Silicon Valley innovation right now.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 2>So I do have a particular problem with the culture

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and with the people that have grown up in that culture.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>And also I don't think that the fundamental issue that

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm articulating in this book will be solved by simply

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 2>swapping in another person.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Are there any less bad guys? Like do you think

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic is a more principled company than Open AI? No,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>even though it stood up to the Pentagon.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>So interestingly, Dario amade Ceoanthropic said that he actually did

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 2>not have issues with full autonomous weapons. In fact, he

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>believed that this was a technology where the US probably

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 2>should keep up. The problem was simply that he didn't

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 2>want this version of Claude to be used for that.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And claud has been used in AI assisted targeting, It's

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>been used in Iran. I think it's reportedly been used

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on the raid on Madua and Venezuela as well.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you also following the Chinese AI players Deep Seek

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and other companies like that very very loosely? Do you

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>believe that they behaved for le or do you accuse

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>them of imperialism?

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Also, it's really interesting they do behave differently because of

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>a very particular reason. So when chat Gibt first came out,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 2>all of the Chinese tech giants did the same thing

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>as the the other US tech giants, which was try

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to make their own version of Chatchibt. I was at

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street Journal at the time, so it was

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>actually right before Chatgibt came out. The US government used

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>this mechanism called export controls to block Chinese companies from

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 2>getting access to the most cutting edge AI computer chips,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and those are the ones that are designed by Nvidia,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And so all of a sudden, the entire country of

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>China and these Chinese companies faced an enormous constraint on

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the core resources that US companies were using

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to supercharge their AI development. So Chinese companies had to

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 2>take a different route. They were not able to scale

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 2>the same way that the US s companies were, and

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that I think is what led to deep Seek. Deep

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Seek was an example of a Chinese company figuring out

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>how to develop the same capabilities of AI these AI models,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 2>but for a significantly less fraction of computational resources. Deep

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Sek illustrates the exact point that I'm making that it

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>is in fact possible to produce AI different types of

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 2>AI and also the same exact kind of AI with

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>significantly less resources and therefore have a much less corrosive

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>impact on community and planetary health. So why are we

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>not doing that?

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, are you more comfortable by the leaders in

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>this industry being from the United States rather than from China,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>even though you think there's a lack of governance, do

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you still think the fact that you and I can

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about the US players these companies in the way

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that we are, that there is again a degree of

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny and accountability which is entirely absent in China. On

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that field, I think there's.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>A tendency a lot in the media to assume that

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the race is between US and China, between nation states

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 2>rather than open versus closed models, And for me, I

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 2>feel much more comfortable developing an open source ecosystem around

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>AI innovation, and I feel comfortable if that open source

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>model is coming from China or if it's coming from

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the US, because it's open, it's scrutinizable, it's something that

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>can be audited, it can be improved on and built

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 2>upon by many researchers and scientists around the world. Closed

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>models simply don't do that. And there are plenty of

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>open source models coming out of China as out of

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the US, but also the major dominant players that I

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 2>critique are all.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Closed and they've ended up being the most successful ones.

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it depends on how you define success.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, fine, fair enough. I want to ask about

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you as well, Karen, because you've clearly devoted a huge

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of time and energy to your work in this area.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know that you said like you were looking

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for some kind of service in your life, like what

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>would you do with your life? Do you think this

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is your mission that pointing out the flaws in these companies,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>digging into this critical industry of our time. Have you

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>found your mission in this?

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I would say my mission has always been to ensure

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 2>that everyone is able to live a dignified life in

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 2>this particular moment. I see the AI industry and its

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>approach to I development deeply challenging the ability of people

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>around the world to live dignified lives, and so I'm

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>focusing on holding them accountable. But that doesn't necessarily mean that,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the rest of my life, I'm just

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be fixated on this thing because hopefully it

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>won't be a problem.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you ever work for one of these companies? No,

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>categorically no. I mean it's a big thing to say no.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Never too, not least because of the massive amount of

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>money that are involved these days in the way that

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they recruit.

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>If I orchestrated my life around money, I wouldn't be

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>a journalist.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>So are there other players than perhaps the smaller ones

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>where you do see principle where you can imagine perhaps

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 1>being tempted to work for them. We had Fay Failure

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast a few months ago, and she clearly

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>feels very strongly about values and the most important thing

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is that you're a person with values and you bring

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that to your work, and that that's the answer.

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 2>When I say that I'm not willing to work for

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>any of these companies, I'm talking about them persevera. I'm

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>not talking about literally all AI companies that could ever

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>come to pass. I think if there were companies out

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 2>there that started focusing on the kinds of problems that

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I think are important to solve, and also are developing

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>AI with an approach towards protecting human agency, sustainability and

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>so forth, then yeah, I would happily consider I mean,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>not that I think I would be a very good

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>asked that to them. I think I'm better off being

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a journalist. But that's what I meant. I mean. In fact,

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 2>in my epilogue of my book, I talk about a

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>nonprofit organization called Tahiku Media that built this AI speech

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 2>recognition tool for the Todeo Maori language language of the

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 2>indigenous people in New Zealand, and they have a really

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>beautiful story around how they went about developing their AI model.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>They went to their community and first asked, do you

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>even want this tool? We think that it would help

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 2>with revitalizing the Maori language. We can open up our

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 2>archives of all of this Todayo Maudi that they had

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 2>recorded as a radio station for over thirty years, and

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to listen to that audio. You'll see

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the transcriptions. You can click on the words and get

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>translations automatically. But they were like, also, we recognize that

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 2>speech recognition tools can be used to surveil our community

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>as well, And it was only through participation with the

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>community and the consent of the community that they then

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:04.959
<v Speaker 2>start developing this technology. They only used two computer chips

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to train their model, and this is just a totally

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>different approach. And so you know, if the Eucomedia we're hiring,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, sure, why not.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you respond as passionately as you

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do to an example like that, do you think that

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is to do with your own heritage and the fact

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that being Chinese American you have been able to see

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the world from at least two angles through what you've

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>seen from your parents and growing up.

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>In the US. Yeah, I do think so. I think

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that growing up Chinese American made me realize that there's

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>always many, many signs to a story. There are always

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>many worldviews and many value systems by which you can

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>approach the world. And when I see one particular narrative,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 2>one view of the world, really monopolizing the conversation, saying

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 2>this is how it's going to be, This is the

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>way that the world works. It just makes me question, well,

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>what are the other stories that are not being told?

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Who are the other people that are not at the table,

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that don't get a voice to contest and challenge this

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>dominant narrative.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Finally, Claude or chat GPT, what do you use neither? Really?

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 1>What is the alternative in your life?

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>None? My mind?

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't, okay, but you do. You do Google searches obviously,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, but you don't at all, And you don't

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>feel it holds you back, You don't feel.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel it actually liberates me.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That is quite inspiring to hear, Karen. How I'm going

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to think more about that and much else that you've shared.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Thank you so much for having me.

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we left things as we liberated Karen

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from the studio, and I hope you found her as

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thought provoking as I did. I want to add one

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>note to the discussion on Malta, where all residents over

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen can do an AI literacy course and get free

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>access for a year to either Chat, GPT plus or

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft three six y five Personal Copilot. Karen said people

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in Malta were having their data harvested to train the

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>next generation of models, and we put this to OpenAI

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and to Microsoft. OpenAI directed us to users being able

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to opt out of having their data used for training.

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft said we do not train on data from users

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of Copilot within Microsoft three sixty five apps with personal subscriptions.

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Karen also said she'd liked to know what the people

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.959
<v Speaker 1>of Malta think rather than the government. A recent survey

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>suggested more than fifty percent of Maltese expect AI to

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have a positive impact on their lives over the next decade,

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was above the EU average. It is also

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>worth noting Sam Altman's own perspective in something that he

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>said in a blog post a few months ago. He wrote,

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the fear and anxiety about AI is justified. We are

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the process of witnessing the largest change to society

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in a long time and perhaps ever. He added, AI

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>has to be democratized. Power cannot be too concentrated. This,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is just one of several conversations that

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>we've had on the show that relate to AI. So

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes you'll find links to episodes with

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Mustapha Suliman of Microsoft AI. He gets pretty evangelical about

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what AI personal assistance can do. And you can also

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>contrast that with signals Meredith Whittaker, who is having none

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of Mustapha's AI can buy your Christmas presents. And there's

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the conversation with fay Fei Lee, the so called godmother

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of AI, where she describes the light bulb moment when

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>she understood how images could be gathered into a data

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>set to train AI. And with that my final note

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>which is on the team. The producers are Jessica Beck

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Martlouth. The video producer is Andy Haywood. Our

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>social media is by Alex Morgan and the music is

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>composed by Bart Walshaw. The audio mixing was by Richard Ward.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Our executive producer is Louisa Lewis and at Bloomberg Weekend,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>our thanks to Brendan Francis Newnham and our executive editor

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Bell. Until next time, goodbye,