1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,479 Speaker 1: FT senior insider Ken Rosenthal with us and he's a 2 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:11,480 Speaker 1: boxing reporter. This week, that's what it felt like with 3 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,280 Speaker 1: Trek Scoobel and the Players Association against the Tigers in 4 00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:18,159 Speaker 1: Major League Baseball, and the result is Schooble and his 5 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,680 Speaker 1: Cy Young Awards physically win. Ken, you wrote this morning 6 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:24,279 Speaker 1: about the heavyweight fight. Can you enlighten us with more? 7 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 2: Yes? And basically what I wrote is that by overreaching 8 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:34,559 Speaker 2: with what they offered, the Tigers and Major League Baseball's 9 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 2: labor relations department set themselves up to fail. And that 10 00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:42,840 Speaker 2: was my opinion. It's an opinion, it's not a fact, obviously, 11 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:46,600 Speaker 2: but it seems to me that you had to offer 12 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:49,519 Speaker 2: Trek Scooble more than nineteen million. You had to do 13 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 2: that before. When you were making your initial offers, they 14 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:56,240 Speaker 2: were only slightly above David Price's record nineteen point seventy 15 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 2: five million in the initial offers, and then in the exchange, 16 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,880 Speaker 2: when you go off for nineteen million, school book comes 17 00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:04,959 Speaker 2: back with thirty two million. If they had been higher, 18 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:08,640 Speaker 2: in my opinion, their position would have been more defensible. 19 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 2: You had to get well above Price eleven years after 20 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:16,720 Speaker 2: he sets that record. And when you didn't do that. Granted, 21 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 2: three person arbitration panel, you never know how they're going 22 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 2: to rule exactly, but it seemed to me it's schooble 23 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:25,199 Speaker 2: because he had the right as a five plus player 24 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 2: to compare himself to all players, not just those in 25 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 2: his service class. Well, then you're bringing in free agent salaries, 26 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 2: you're bringing in Blake's now in his thirty one million 27 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:37,080 Speaker 2: thirty eight million dollar deal. However, you want to look 28 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 2: at it before or after deferrals, and he had a 29 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:42,880 Speaker 2: really strong case at that point. So it seemed to 30 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 2: me that again MLB, with the Tigers and MLB as 31 00:01:48,160 --> 00:01:51,560 Speaker 2: a heavy influence in this process, they sought to make 32 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 2: their point and their point was not going to carry 33 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 2: the day. Did not carry the day as it turned out. Ten. 34 00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:01,400 Speaker 3: You're bringing an opinion, So here's my opinion. Tell me 35 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 3: if I'm wrong or not. Majorally, Baseball was okay losing 36 00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 3: this because of how low of a number they went. 37 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,680 Speaker 3: They don't like the arbitration process. Was this almost like 38 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 3: a oh man, we totally lost moment. Oh next next CBA, 39 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 3: we're gonna go ahead and nix it. 40 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 2: Actually, Eric, I agree with you that they're not crushed 41 00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:29,080 Speaker 2: by this in any sense of the word, but not 42 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 2: for the reason that you just described that it's going 43 00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 2: to be eliminated in the next CBA. I'm sure they 44 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:36,480 Speaker 2: would want to do that with a salary cap coming 45 00:02:36,520 --> 00:02:40,799 Speaker 2: in and the arbitration system either going away or changing dramatically. 46 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:45,120 Speaker 2: But the reason why I don't believe they are that 47 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:48,960 Speaker 2: upset is because school Bolt was a rare guy five 48 00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:51,800 Speaker 2: plus player, right one year away from free agency and 49 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,880 Speaker 2: coming off back to back cy Young Awards. How often 50 00:02:55,919 --> 00:02:57,639 Speaker 2: are we going to see that going forward? We may 51 00:02:57,680 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 2: see it with Paul Skens and that would be the 52 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:02,840 Speaker 2: test case, but you're not going to see it all 53 00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:05,640 Speaker 2: that often. There's only been I believe, twelve players in 54 00:03:05,760 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 2: history who won back to back cy Young Awards, and 55 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 2: none before Schoogle as a five plus player. So I'm 56 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 2: sure they would rather have won than lost, of course, 57 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:20,240 Speaker 2: But are they devastated. No. At the same time, to 58 00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:22,960 Speaker 2: me and I wrote these words, it's a major blow 59 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:26,480 Speaker 2: because you lost, and you lost a very high profile case, 60 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:30,080 Speaker 2: and you lost again in my opinion, because they just 61 00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:32,520 Speaker 2: didn't go far enough with what they were offering before 62 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 2: and after the exchange date. 63 00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 4: With all these points that. 64 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 5: There you go with all the points that you brought up, 65 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:43,440 Speaker 5: and I know Kratzy's talking about the CBA and everything else, 66 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:46,920 Speaker 5: Like for me, I'm like, this is a huge, huge 67 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:50,960 Speaker 5: win for the players expression arbitration is so hard to 68 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 5: win these things, and to see how big a difference 69 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 5: it was from thirty two to nineteen, I think we 70 00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:59,280 Speaker 5: got like Paul Skein's probably sitting back like, oh baby, 71 00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 5: this is really good, and some upcoming players like this 72 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 5: is a huge number for players. 73 00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:05,560 Speaker 4: I just don't understand. 74 00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 5: I think it's it's a lot deeper, and I think 75 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 5: the brass in Major League Baseball, I think that this 76 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 5: hurts some big time. I mean, do you see it 77 00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 5: that way or you're just like, oh, it's a big blow, 78 00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:19,120 Speaker 5: but it's really not. But I feel like it's a 79 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 5: huge win for the players, Todd. 80 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 2: I see it from both perspectives that I just described. 81 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:27,720 Speaker 2: A huge blow in the sense that you lost a 82 00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:31,159 Speaker 2: high profile case, not a huge blow in terms of 83 00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:33,320 Speaker 2: what it will mean going forward, because it was such 84 00:04:33,320 --> 00:04:38,320 Speaker 2: a specific profile that Schooble filled. Now at the same time, 85 00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:40,839 Speaker 2: looking at it from the reverse side, the player's side, 86 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:44,279 Speaker 2: as you just described, Yes, it's a huge win. This 87 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:48,360 Speaker 2: is a record for an arbitration eligible player. Wan Soto 88 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:51,360 Speaker 2: had that record at thirty one million. Schooble now surpasses 89 00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:55,159 Speaker 2: it at thirty two million. And the other thing it did, 90 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 2: and this could help in the future, especially with three 91 00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:01,480 Speaker 2: to four your players who are arbitration and have special 92 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:06,040 Speaker 2: accomplishments like schemes. It raised the bar for pitchers. It 93 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 2: finally brought the pitchers, at least the elite ones, the 94 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 2: very elite ones, up to the level of position players. 95 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 2: And one of the problems in arbitration over the years 96 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 2: that I know has frustrated the player's side is that 97 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:20,640 Speaker 2: they've been unable to advance pitchers salaries in that process 98 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:25,279 Speaker 2: as rapidly as position players. So yes, this does help 99 00:05:25,360 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 2: correct that. But again I will say it's a very 100 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:31,159 Speaker 2: specific case. It's a guy who is five plus and 101 00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:33,800 Speaker 2: it's a guy with back to back Cy Young's. You 102 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:35,040 Speaker 2: still't see that very often. 103 00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:37,960 Speaker 4: Now let's go to the Tigers a little bit more. 104 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:41,160 Speaker 5: Here, Valdez gets picked up three years, one hundred and 105 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:44,479 Speaker 5: fifteen million. School boy got his money. How do you 106 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 5: see this Tigers team now moving forward? I feel like, 107 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:50,560 Speaker 5: you know, in those kind of meetings in the room, 108 00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 5: they're gonna bash you all the way through. You think 109 00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:54,720 Speaker 5: Tarek Scooble is going to be that Guy's like, I 110 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 5: forget this. I'm gonna play my game, not worry about 111 00:05:57,320 --> 00:05:59,800 Speaker 5: anything else because of the Bologne that they went through. 112 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:01,680 Speaker 5: Do you see this Tigers team making a push for 113 00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:05,599 Speaker 5: the playoffs and getting back in and making some damage again, Well. 114 00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 2: Trek Scooble was most likely going to go to be 115 00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 2: a free agent anyway, and most likely is going to 116 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 2: try to win his third straight Cy Young Award. No 117 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 2: matter what they said in the room. That's his makeup. 118 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 2: That's all players makeups. They want to be the best 119 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:21,520 Speaker 2: they can be, and they're not gonna listen to some attorneys. 120 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:24,360 Speaker 2: This was outside council arguing the case for the Tigers, 121 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 2: not the Tigers themselves. They're not gonna worry and be 122 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:30,760 Speaker 2: hurt by anything, especially in Schoobl's case. He won, so 123 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:33,520 Speaker 2: there's no reason for him to carry a grudge. But 124 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 2: certainly it will only, I'm sure, add to his motivation 125 00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:43,159 Speaker 2: and certainly also the team. Now, as I wrote the 126 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:47,480 Speaker 2: day before, they do not intend trade Tarrek Schoobel. They 127 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,800 Speaker 2: have not intended that the entire offseason their intention is 128 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 2: to win, and in speaking to a person who has 129 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 2: briefed on their plans, he repeated that to me. He said, 130 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 2: we are trying to win. So you have these two 131 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 2: pictures to coaess. Now, obviously Schooble is the ace of ases, 132 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 2: but Valdez is pretty good himself and has been an 133 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 2: ace on a World Series team. Obviously they got a 134 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:13,680 Speaker 2: nice one to two punch. And I wrote, in addition 135 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 2: to hearing from that person who had knowledge of the 136 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:20,920 Speaker 2: Tigers thought process, it makes no logical sense to trade Schooble. 137 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 2: You're gonna do that now and your fans are going 138 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:26,240 Speaker 2: to revolt. Now, yes, you're only going to get a 139 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 2: draft pick back for him in return if you carry 140 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 2: him through the season and then of course offer him 141 00:07:31,440 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 2: a qualifying offer. But that's the chance you take trying 142 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 2: to win. And people have said, well, they can still 143 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:40,200 Speaker 2: trade him at the deadline. I don't expect the Tigers 144 00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:43,160 Speaker 2: to be out of contention in the Ales Central at 145 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:44,680 Speaker 2: any stage of this season. 146 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 3: Based on reading your article from today, seems like you 147 00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:51,400 Speaker 3: talk to people who are in the room or briefed 148 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:53,560 Speaker 3: on what happened in the room. Did you get any 149 00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 3: inkling or any any actual words that were said in 150 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 3: the case for Major League Baseball again, Arrek Scooble, because 151 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 3: I mean, it was a joke kind of going around 152 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,560 Speaker 3: on Twitter, like what could they say? What would be 153 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 3: that like he threw the ball between his legs to 154 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 3: try to make it out in the playoffs, Like, I 155 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:12,679 Speaker 3: don't know what they could have said. 156 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:15,840 Speaker 2: I saw some of those tweets myself, Eric, and they 157 00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:20,240 Speaker 2: were very clever. My understanding without knowing specifically what was 158 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 2: said is that they weren't attacking Schooble. What they were 159 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 2: pointing out is that he is more comparable to in particular, 160 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:30,280 Speaker 2: Jacob de Gram. Jacob de Gram had the previous highest 161 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:34,079 Speaker 2: raise in arbitration. It was I believe nine point four million. 162 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:36,680 Speaker 2: I might be wrong about that in that range, and 163 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 2: they were saying, well, if da Graham got that raise, 164 00:08:39,760 --> 00:08:42,800 Speaker 2: then Schooble should only get a similar raise. His would 165 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 2: have been with nineteen million dollars salary eight point eight 166 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 2: five million. So that was the argument. Not so much 167 00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:52,480 Speaker 2: Terrek Scougle's no good. I don't know that you can 168 00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 2: make that case. But even the argument invoking de Gram 169 00:08:57,120 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 2: was questionable because de Gram was a four plus player 170 00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:02,320 Speaker 2: at the time he got that record raise, not a 171 00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:05,319 Speaker 2: five plus. And again, a five plus player you can 172 00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:09,400 Speaker 2: compare yourself to anyone. So it seems to me this 173 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:11,719 Speaker 2: was not an attack on Terrek School. But and I 174 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 2: know hearings can get like that. AJ's talked about his 175 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:18,040 Speaker 2: own hearing, and players have always said, you hear things 176 00:09:18,040 --> 00:09:20,320 Speaker 2: in there you never want to hear about yourself. But 177 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:24,080 Speaker 2: maybe they pointed out a few things. I can't imagine 178 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 2: what they were. But really it was a case of 179 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:29,440 Speaker 2: precedent for them, the league and the Tigers, and it 180 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 2: was a case of compul pitchers to ground being one 181 00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 2: price being another. 182 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:38,400 Speaker 1: And there was a lot of confusion about how all 183 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 1: of this works. I mean, I saw people that know 184 00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 1: the game pretty well tweeting how you can't compare school 185 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: to free agents, and it's like, no, you actually can, 186 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:48,360 Speaker 1: based on special accomplishments, the five plus the whole deal. 187 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:52,480 Speaker 1: And now the aftermath from some people is, oh, well, 188 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: Schoobl's his own case and schemes, but everyone else will 189 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:56,959 Speaker 1: still be in the same realm, And it's like, no, 190 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 1: I disagree on that one, because you can compare arbitration 191 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:02,679 Speaker 1: to arbitration, and now you have Schooble there. So even 192 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,960 Speaker 1: if you're a few notches below in the future, there's 193 00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:09,960 Speaker 1: a big gap between Prices nineteen and Schoobles thirty two. 194 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:13,240 Speaker 1: So my question for you is do you think that 195 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: MLB will try and battle this in the next CBA. 196 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:20,440 Speaker 1: This clearly seems like something that MLB is against and 197 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 1: the players are for, because you go to a panel 198 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:25,440 Speaker 1: and you tell a narrative versus a number, which I 199 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 1: believe was proposed in the last CBA. Morey Brown, who's 200 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:29,760 Speaker 1: been on the show before and it does a nice 201 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,600 Speaker 1: job for Forbes, said he thinks this will further spur 202 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:35,320 Speaker 1: them to make this a big point in the CBA, 203 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:37,680 Speaker 1: not the top, but obviously one of their big points 204 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 1: to get rid of this, or to at least tweak it. 205 00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:42,560 Speaker 2: It has always been a point for them, and I 206 00:10:42,640 --> 00:10:45,040 Speaker 2: believe I have a line in the column saying they 207 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:47,640 Speaker 2: can go after the system as they've done in the past. 208 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 2: I don't expect that to be any different. I expect them, maybe, 209 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:53,680 Speaker 2: as more said, to turn it up. But if you're 210 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 2: going to a salary cap, which is obviously what they're 211 00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 2: going to propose or at least try to get involved 212 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:02,080 Speaker 2: with then, and you're not going to have arbitration in 213 00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:04,319 Speaker 2: any way this shape or form the same as that 214 00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:08,959 Speaker 2: is now anyway, So yes they will try. And yes 215 00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:12,199 Speaker 2: you're right Scott that a future five plus player can 216 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:14,720 Speaker 2: compare him to self the schooble, but he's not going 217 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,559 Speaker 2: to be schooble unless he's schemes. That's the difference. And 218 00:11:18,280 --> 00:11:21,280 Speaker 2: will it drag up those players perhaps, I just don't 219 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 2: know that that's going to happen. But in terms of 220 00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:27,480 Speaker 2: the owners not liking the process, they've never liked the process, 221 00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 2: so I expect fully that they're going to at least 222 00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:35,360 Speaker 2: try to make, if not major changes to the process 223 00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:40,880 Speaker 2: through salary cap, somewhat tweak it if they can do you. 224 00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:43,080 Speaker 3: Think each individual team and this is another one of 225 00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:47,480 Speaker 3: my stupid series, but maybe it could stick because we 226 00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 3: don't want players. The game is about the players, and 227 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:53,320 Speaker 3: we don't want players against the teams, and clearly the 228 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:56,480 Speaker 3: teams manipulate exactly what they think the teams should pay 229 00:11:56,559 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 3: the players. Well, we ever see a world where it's 230 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 3: going to be Major League Baseball versus the Players Association 231 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 3: for trek Scrugle for Paul Schemes and know more of 232 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 3: this piratesss versus Paul Schemes. 233 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 2: Eric, It's actually a fair question, and it's fair because 234 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:22,360 Speaker 2: MLB is involved on the owner's side, the club side, 235 00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:25,440 Speaker 2: and the Union is involved with recommendations as well on 236 00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:29,440 Speaker 2: the player side. So to some extent, it already is that. Now. 237 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:31,640 Speaker 2: I guess what you're suggesting is taking the player out 238 00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:34,920 Speaker 2: of the room entirely and going about it that way, 239 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:39,439 Speaker 2: just having the MLB versus the Union. I just don't 240 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:42,079 Speaker 2: know if the Union would like that. I would imagine 241 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 2: they want the players here in this stuff and want 242 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:47,280 Speaker 2: them getting fired up when they hear these kinds of things, 243 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:51,640 Speaker 2: because it shows in some respects how important it is 244 00:12:51,679 --> 00:12:54,040 Speaker 2: to have the union and the agents doing their work 245 00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:57,960 Speaker 2: that they do an arbitration. So to a very real extent, 246 00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 2: it is exactly what you said right now. I mentioned 247 00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 2: that the Tigers did not argue this case against Schooble. 248 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,839 Speaker 2: They hired outside attorneys to do that. So well, Scott 249 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:12,640 Speaker 2: Boris and people from the Union were arguing the case 250 00:13:12,760 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 2: for Schooble. The Union is very much involved, and maybe 251 00:13:17,760 --> 00:13:21,280 Speaker 2: not to the same extent as the ownership arm, the 252 00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:23,960 Speaker 2: labor relations department. I'm not quite sure about that, but 253 00:13:25,040 --> 00:13:28,600 Speaker 2: it is kind of union versus It'll be already with 254 00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:32,240 Speaker 2: the subset of the player versus the team. 255 00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:35,360 Speaker 5: With all these free agent signings going on, there's still 256 00:13:35,400 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 5: a couple guys out there, Zach Gallen, Bassett, Schurezer. Gallen's 257 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,200 Speaker 5: the guy that for me, it's really intricate, but I 258 00:13:43,240 --> 00:13:45,080 Speaker 5: feel like he still has a couple more good years 259 00:13:45,080 --> 00:13:47,439 Speaker 5: ahead of him. Have you heard of any talks or 260 00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:49,720 Speaker 5: any inklings to where he might get picked up before 261 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:50,800 Speaker 5: spring training starts here? 262 00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:54,200 Speaker 2: So, Todd, there's been a lot of talk about the 263 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:57,200 Speaker 2: Cubs and Gallon really all off season. I don't know 264 00:13:57,280 --> 00:13:59,320 Speaker 2: that it will get there. I don't know even the 265 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:02,680 Speaker 2: Orioles or the Padres or any of these other teams 266 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 2: seeking starting pitchers will sign Zach Gallen to what likely 267 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:09,040 Speaker 2: will be a short term deal with opt outs and 268 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 2: give up a draft pick in the process. So it 269 00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 2: seems to me, and I might be wrong about this, 270 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:18,480 Speaker 2: I'm just giving my thoughts on it. It seems to 271 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:20,640 Speaker 2: me the most obvious place for him to go is 272 00:14:20,720 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 2: back to Arizona on a short term deal with a 273 00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:25,680 Speaker 2: one year opt out so he can get back into 274 00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 2: free agency next year off a better year and without 275 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,720 Speaker 2: a draft pick attached. That would give him a better 276 00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:34,360 Speaker 2: chance to do what he wants to do in the market. 277 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:38,680 Speaker 2: We've seen Scott Boris and with clients do this repeatedly. 278 00:14:38,920 --> 00:14:43,080 Speaker 2: Gollon is represented by Boris, and if the Diamondbacks sign Gowan, 279 00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:46,320 Speaker 2: of course they do not lose a draft pick. So 280 00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 2: from that perspective, it just seems to me to line up. 281 00:14:50,360 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 2: I guess the question for the Diamondbacks will be do 282 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 2: they have the money to do that. They've got a 283 00:14:55,640 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 2: lot invested in some injured pictures right now, but they've 284 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:02,280 Speaker 2: already got Meryl Kelly under contract. If you get Gallon back, 285 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:05,480 Speaker 2: if even for only one year, and then Corbyn Burns 286 00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:09,240 Speaker 2: comes back in mid season, you have an interesting group. 287 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:12,000 Speaker 3: That's kind of a loss for the Diamondbacks. They don't 288 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 3: get a they don't get a pick for him, for 289 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:18,920 Speaker 3: him signing somewhere else. So the Diamonbacks they get they 290 00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:22,080 Speaker 3: do get Zach Gallon, but are they pushing in? I 291 00:15:22,120 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 3: get it. I get it. A team that's been in 292 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 3: on everybody. It's the end of the offseason, and I 293 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 3: saw what you wrote about me on Twitter that I'm 294 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:32,880 Speaker 3: a buffoon, and then I hit below two oh nine 295 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:35,320 Speaker 3: and I'm a negative. Oh that wasn't you, Ken. That 296 00:15:35,400 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 3: was the rest of Twitter. But I said about the 297 00:15:38,960 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 3: Pirates not actually being truly in what were you hearing? 298 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,800 Speaker 3: Because some of those some of those were from you, 299 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 3: And so people are like, well, if Ken says it, 300 00:15:51,760 --> 00:15:54,760 Speaker 3: then it must be true. And I am saying it's true. 301 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:59,160 Speaker 3: But your how how far of a level was it 302 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,720 Speaker 3: that the Pirates We're in on some of these guys. 303 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:06,040 Speaker 2: I'm not writing fiction, first of all, and I'm also 304 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 2: not writing just what the Pirates tell me to think that. 305 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:14,080 Speaker 2: I understand fans think everything we do has an agenda 306 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:18,240 Speaker 2: and we're simply puppets on marionettes. That's not how it works. 307 00:16:18,400 --> 00:16:19,880 Speaker 2: I'm not going to go any further. I'm not telling 308 00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 2: you where I get my information, but I am not 309 00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:28,240 Speaker 2: the pirates public relations are obviously, so you ask how 310 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:30,560 Speaker 2: serious they've been. And this is the question we talked about, 311 00:16:30,560 --> 00:16:33,000 Speaker 2: I believe the other day on FT. But we'll get 312 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 2: into it again here. It seems to me they are 313 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:40,720 Speaker 2: making offers that reflect a player's value. With Ajohanes Swartz, 314 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 2: they offered him about fifteen. He got about fifteen. The 315 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:48,520 Speaker 2: problem for the Pirates is that you can't be winning 316 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 2: that way. Players don't want to go to Pittsburgh when 317 00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:55,040 Speaker 2: they have better competitive teams or more competitive teams in 318 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:57,800 Speaker 2: the mix for them. Suaz did that with Cincinnati playoff 319 00:16:57,800 --> 00:16:59,840 Speaker 2: team last year, the team that he played with for 320 00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 2: seven years. Now. In the case of from ver Valdez, 321 00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:08,240 Speaker 2: they were in and they were aggressive, is my understanding, 322 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:12,840 Speaker 2: but at that aav above thirty eight million. If I 323 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:15,160 Speaker 2: had known they were going to get thirty eight million 324 00:17:15,200 --> 00:17:18,320 Speaker 2: from Ravaldez, I probably would not have even put the 325 00:17:18,359 --> 00:17:21,400 Speaker 2: Pirates in the aggressive category. I didn't know that at 326 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 2: the time I reported it. I just knew that they 327 00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:28,520 Speaker 2: were trying so to win these free agent battles, they're 328 00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 2: going to have to outbid other teams. And if they're 329 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:33,439 Speaker 2: not willing to do that, then you can understand why 330 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:36,600 Speaker 2: they might not want to overpay players. Okay, then go 331 00:17:36,640 --> 00:17:38,640 Speaker 2: to the trade market and try to do it that way, 332 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:44,680 Speaker 2: which they have in getting Brandon Lawe and Justinskin Justinskin Garcia. 333 00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:47,679 Speaker 2: I'm not pronouncing it right, it's the past word. Of course, 334 00:17:48,040 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 2: they have made some interesting trades this offseason, So I 335 00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:56,040 Speaker 2: don't know that they should be derided for trying. You 336 00:17:56,080 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 2: could say they're not trying hard enough, and that's certainly 337 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:01,199 Speaker 2: a fair criticism because they have to do more to 338 00:18:01,240 --> 00:18:04,280 Speaker 2: get these players. But they did sign Ryan O'Hearn two 339 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:08,040 Speaker 2: years twenty nine million, and they are still trying to 340 00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 2: get another hitter, whether it's through free agency or trade. 341 00:18:12,080 --> 00:18:14,320 Speaker 3: Last team I have to ask you about raise his 342 00:18:14,359 --> 00:18:17,720 Speaker 3: eyebrows for me when I see them in on possibly 343 00:18:18,080 --> 00:18:22,080 Speaker 3: trading for Freddy Peralta and we're in on from ber Valdez. 344 00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:25,120 Speaker 3: Is the Minnesota Twins. When their name gets put in there, 345 00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:27,800 Speaker 3: I'm like, do they mean like twins of like like 346 00:18:27,840 --> 00:18:29,919 Speaker 3: two people who look alike that were born at the 347 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:34,200 Speaker 3: same time? Twins? Like? How is what's your reaction when 348 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:37,760 Speaker 3: you're hearing like that type of news from your sources? 349 00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:39,959 Speaker 2: I can't imagine. First of all, I did not hear 350 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:43,200 Speaker 2: the twins on Valdez, so I can't take any credit 351 00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:46,240 Speaker 2: for that or any knowledge of it. Even that would 352 00:18:46,240 --> 00:18:49,000 Speaker 2: shock me. With where they are now, they're in an 353 00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:52,600 Speaker 2: interesting place. Tom Polott has taken over, Derek Falve has left, 354 00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:56,880 Speaker 2: Tom poll Out has said we're gonna be competitive this year, 355 00:18:56,920 --> 00:18:58,720 Speaker 2: and people have laughed at him for saying, well, you 356 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:00,919 Speaker 2: say you're gonna be competitive, but but you're not spending 357 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:04,240 Speaker 2: any money. So from that perspective, might they have thrown 358 00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 2: their hat in the ring on Valdez. Sure? More likely though, 359 00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 2: a Peralta trade would have been appealing to them, because 360 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:14,920 Speaker 2: Paralta is making eight million this year, which is severely 361 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 2: below market for a picture of his caliber. Any team, 362 00:19:19,840 --> 00:19:22,600 Speaker 2: small market teams as well as large market teams could 363 00:19:22,600 --> 00:19:24,560 Speaker 2: have been in the mix for Paralta and absorbed him 364 00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:27,399 Speaker 2: into their payroll. So that would not surprise me at 365 00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 2: all that they were in on Freddie Peralta. When they're 366 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:34,400 Speaker 2: claiming they want to be competitive Valdez. Maybe they were in, 367 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:36,359 Speaker 2: but in like the pirates, they were only going to 368 00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:38,480 Speaker 2: go to a certain level there. 369 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:42,720 Speaker 1: It is Ken, Thank you very much. Fascinating week for 370 00:19:43,320 --> 00:19:46,240 Speaker 1: what first week of February. I'll say I enjoyed the weekend. 371 00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:47,280 Speaker 1: We'll talk to you next week. 372 00:19:47,960 --> 00:19:50,800 Speaker 2: Thanks guys. Chalut. 373 00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:56,200 Speaker 1: We've got power rankings, super duper early ones. SEEBS put 374 00:19:56,200 --> 00:19:58,800 Speaker 1: these out about a week ago. But we've been busy 375 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,080 Speaker 1: and today we're a little it's busy, so we're ready. 376 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:05,160 Speaker 1: Where the league stands with most free agency dost settled. Now, 377 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:07,159 Speaker 1: keep in mind, there are a few moves that have 378 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:12,879 Speaker 1: been made since this happened, so from Bravaldez affecting the 379 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:15,400 Speaker 1: Tigers position on here. Let's keep that in mind when 380 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:19,480 Speaker 1: you're scrutinizing their list. But have fun with it. We 381 00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:22,439 Speaker 1: can start with the tippy top top ten. I'll just 382 00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:25,000 Speaker 1: read it out and then get your thoughts. Okay, go 383 00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:25,720 Speaker 1: on to do it that way. 384 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:26,359 Speaker 4: Go ahead. 385 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:32,800 Speaker 1: Dodgers one, Brewers, two Blue Jays, three Cubs, four Yankees, 386 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:38,880 Speaker 1: five Brave six Mariners, seven Red Sox eighth. The Mets 387 00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:42,880 Speaker 1: check in at ninth. Another NL's team, the Phillies at ten. 388 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:43,679 Speaker 1: How did they do? 389 00:20:44,840 --> 00:20:46,960 Speaker 5: I think they missed one key team on here. I 390 00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:49,320 Speaker 5: got to be honest with you and you guys. You 391 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:51,600 Speaker 5: guys know I've been on this team since day one, 392 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:52,960 Speaker 5: criticizing them. 393 00:20:53,000 --> 00:20:54,800 Speaker 4: Where's the Orioles at Oh? 394 00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:55,520 Speaker 1: Where are my? 395 00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:56,320 Speaker 4: Oh? 396 00:20:56,440 --> 00:20:58,240 Speaker 1: Did I just say you're on the train? Now? 397 00:20:58,920 --> 00:20:59,800 Speaker 4: Just hop on the train. 398 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:00,560 Speaker 1: On the train. 399 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 4: Wow, I'm on the train. 400 00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 1: I mean. 401 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:04,639 Speaker 5: First, when you pick up one of the most prolific 402 00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:07,920 Speaker 5: hitters in baseball and Pete Alonzo, you can't go wrong 403 00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:09,679 Speaker 5: with that. And I felt like they got him on 404 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:11,920 Speaker 5: a nice, easy deal. He probably could have made a 405 00:21:11,960 --> 00:21:14,520 Speaker 5: little bit more money. Blah blah blah. We know the 406 00:21:14,560 --> 00:21:15,240 Speaker 5: whole story. 407 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:18,399 Speaker 4: Undercover pickup Shane Boz. 408 00:21:18,440 --> 00:21:20,520 Speaker 5: I gotta be honest with you. I love Shane Boz. 409 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:23,960 Speaker 5: I think he needed a little change of scenery, get 410 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:27,440 Speaker 5: in a little colder air. He is funny as all heck. 411 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:32,400 Speaker 5: I room with him in the Olympics. He's absolutely out 412 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:33,000 Speaker 5: of this world. 413 00:21:33,040 --> 00:21:34,600 Speaker 4: He's pumping weights left and right. 414 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 5: Listen, Zach Eflin, I gotta be honest. The dude can play. 415 00:21:39,359 --> 00:21:42,119 Speaker 5: He can play, He's been there before. Is he gonna 416 00:21:42,160 --> 00:21:45,200 Speaker 5: wow you right now? Probably not, but another effective starter. 417 00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:48,160 Speaker 5: He's gonna give you, you know, long relief and long 418 00:21:48,200 --> 00:21:50,159 Speaker 5: times there. And the one I really liked too is 419 00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 5: Ryan Helsley. Another guy that they can punch in pretty 420 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:57,480 Speaker 5: much anywhere in that that bullpen and do whatever you 421 00:21:57,520 --> 00:22:00,920 Speaker 5: want with him. So there's a couple other guys, I mean, listen, 422 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:05,320 Speaker 5: Leonti tavars Is Okay, Andrew Kittingridge, Taylor Ward from the Angels. 423 00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:08,040 Speaker 5: I think they should be I shouldn't. I don't think 424 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:09,560 Speaker 5: top five, but I think they should be in the 425 00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:11,840 Speaker 5: top ten team that I would take off. 426 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:18,359 Speaker 4: Oh, man, I would take off. I mean Brewers are 427 00:22:18,440 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 4: number two. 428 00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:21,639 Speaker 1: I think we need to get into that. After you 429 00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 1: kick a team out. 430 00:22:22,800 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 5: Man, I would, I would kick off. I would kick out. Though, 431 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:28,720 Speaker 5: my goodness, gracious, this changes everything. I'd take the Braves out. 432 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:30,119 Speaker 5: I would take the Braves. 433 00:22:30,480 --> 00:22:33,479 Speaker 3: I would, I would. I would spot your I think 434 00:22:33,480 --> 00:22:36,440 Speaker 3: you're spot on with that. I think the Braves can 435 00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:38,920 Speaker 3: be shoot. I think the Braves can be second or 436 00:22:38,960 --> 00:22:41,359 Speaker 3: third best team in the league for sure. There's a 437 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:44,680 Speaker 3: lot of canby though, there's a lot of canby if 438 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:47,919 Speaker 3: this does. It was so it was so unlucky that 439 00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:51,439 Speaker 3: the Braves last year said, okay, five six of our 440 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:54,119 Speaker 3: starters all got hurt like that is ridiculous. That's not 441 00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:56,840 Speaker 3: gonna happen again. All five or six of those starters 442 00:22:56,840 --> 00:22:59,920 Speaker 3: aren't gonna have cy young years though. Either they upgraded 443 00:23:00,040 --> 00:23:03,440 Speaker 3: in their bullpen with Robert Suarez. They brought back Iglacia, 444 00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:06,600 Speaker 3: who was unbelievable. He was great at the end of 445 00:23:06,640 --> 00:23:10,920 Speaker 3: the season. But sixth, I don't think. I don't think 446 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,920 Speaker 3: they're six to me, I think the Mets and Phillies 447 00:23:12,920 --> 00:23:16,480 Speaker 3: are above them. Right now and they have to prove it. 448 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:19,639 Speaker 3: I still think they're a playoff team. But really the biggest, 449 00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:22,720 Speaker 3: the biggest on this list is the Brewers. Like I'm 450 00:23:22,720 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 3: not sure what CBS was doing with this one. How 451 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:29,360 Speaker 3: they had them up there. They were, they had the 452 00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:32,479 Speaker 3: most wins in the National League. I get that they 453 00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:34,800 Speaker 3: got rid of they got rid of pieces and added 454 00:23:36,320 --> 00:23:40,159 Speaker 3: what did they add again? I mean they added Did 455 00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 3: they get Nolan McClain from the Mets for Freddie Peralta. No, 456 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 3: they got Brandon Sproute, who could be great. Obviously, I'm 457 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:51,160 Speaker 3: not kicking the Brewers out of the top ten because 458 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 3: of what they've done and because of my love for 459 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:54,639 Speaker 3: the Brewers, I will not kick them out of the 460 00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:57,719 Speaker 3: top ten. The Braves are kicked out top ten. And 461 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:01,240 Speaker 3: if we could put the list of one time I 462 00:24:01,320 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 3: had a little bit of a switcher route, I think 463 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 3: the Mariners, whatever order it is, I think the Mariners 464 00:24:06,359 --> 00:24:09,320 Speaker 3: are better than the Yankees currently. I think how they 465 00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:12,679 Speaker 3: come into the season, they're better than the Yankees. I 466 00:24:12,680 --> 00:24:16,520 Speaker 3: think the Cubs are They're a little bit. I think 467 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:19,560 Speaker 3: they're a little bit inflated on this list. Are they 468 00:24:19,680 --> 00:24:22,399 Speaker 3: the second best National League team? Because I kicked the 469 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:26,040 Speaker 3: Brewers out. No, I think that. I think that falls 470 00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:29,359 Speaker 3: to the Phillies. Are Mets still until the Cubs prove 471 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:32,920 Speaker 3: that they can have a great season. Is Alex Bregman 472 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:35,760 Speaker 3: taking over for what Kyle Tucker did the beginning of 473 00:24:35,800 --> 00:24:40,720 Speaker 3: the season last year? Like you know, to me, I 474 00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:44,160 Speaker 3: think there's a there's a pecking order in the National League, 475 00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 3: and I still think it runs through the National League East, 476 00:24:46,920 --> 00:24:50,480 Speaker 3: after you have after you have the Dodgers, so I think, 477 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:52,480 Speaker 3: and I think the Mariners are ahead of the Yankees. 478 00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:56,080 Speaker 3: I think the Mariners are the second best team. And 479 00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:58,320 Speaker 3: I think maybe there's a world and I don't know 480 00:24:58,320 --> 00:25:00,960 Speaker 3: who I kick out or the Tigers should be top 481 00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 3: ten just because they have a power packed lineup, our 482 00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 3: power packed rotation. They didn't add to their lineup. And 483 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:14,240 Speaker 3: I know this list came out before Framber Valdez was signed, 484 00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:16,680 Speaker 3: but you know, so that's where I would That's where 485 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 3: I would change. But if you told me at Tigers 486 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:20,080 Speaker 3: are eleven, I'd be cool with that too. 487 00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:24,199 Speaker 4: H agreed. 488 00:25:24,640 --> 00:25:25,879 Speaker 1: I like a lot of what you said. Do you 489 00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 1: want to see the bottom ten? 490 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:28,040 Speaker 3: Yes? 491 00:25:28,040 --> 00:25:28,399 Speaker 2: Please? 492 00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:30,800 Speaker 3: Because I think there's some wrong ones on the bottom ten. 493 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:38,080 Speaker 1: We're going from worst to not as bad thirty Rockies 494 00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:41,600 Speaker 1: twenty nine, Nationals, White Sox at twenty eight, Angels twenty seven, 495 00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 1: Twins check in at twenty six. We put the Cardinals 496 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:47,640 Speaker 1: or CBS did at twenty five, Pirates go to twenty four, 497 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 1: Marlins twenty three, Raising Florida next to them twenty two, 498 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:57,040 Speaker 1: and the A's at twenty one. 499 00:25:57,400 --> 00:25:59,560 Speaker 4: I'm trying to think of who should be down there 500 00:25:59,560 --> 00:26:00,880 Speaker 4: that it's not there right now. 501 00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:03,240 Speaker 1: I think he's smart. Alecan has a name. 502 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 4: What do you got, Crothy? 503 00:26:05,080 --> 00:26:07,199 Speaker 3: I don't think the Pirates should be in there. I 504 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:09,720 Speaker 3: think the Pirates have done enough to improve their team, 505 00:26:10,720 --> 00:26:14,639 Speaker 3: and they still have Paul Skins. Like the record, the 506 00:26:14,920 --> 00:26:18,160 Speaker 3: record or the stat that if the Pirates have scored 507 00:26:18,600 --> 00:26:22,480 Speaker 3: three or more runs in every one of Paul skien starts, 508 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 3: he'd be forty three to one. Like this team's offense 509 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:30,160 Speaker 3: has improved, has their defense declined? I don't know. That's 510 00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:33,639 Speaker 3: hard to say. Maybe maybe there's a there's going to 511 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:36,479 Speaker 3: be a drop off there, but with Paul Skiing's at 512 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:39,479 Speaker 3: the top, I think anything is possible. I don't think 513 00:26:39,520 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 3: the Pirates are in that bottom ten. I also don't 514 00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:46,919 Speaker 3: think the A's of Sacramento. The Aths are in the 515 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:50,680 Speaker 3: bottom ten. I think they did think every Mason Miller, absolutely, 516 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:53,600 Speaker 3: JP Sears was a quality starter for them. I know 517 00:26:53,720 --> 00:26:57,399 Speaker 3: as Era wasn't great. I just think they started to 518 00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:00,959 Speaker 3: acclimate to playing in a Triple A park and how 519 00:27:01,359 --> 00:27:03,400 Speaker 3: they can use that to their advantage the last two 520 00:27:03,440 --> 00:27:04,159 Speaker 3: months of the season. 521 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:04,639 Speaker 2: I think it. 522 00:27:05,040 --> 00:27:06,720 Speaker 3: I think it goes into this season. I think some 523 00:27:06,760 --> 00:27:10,800 Speaker 3: of their guys have There's there's the whole contract boost. 524 00:27:11,119 --> 00:27:12,679 Speaker 3: You get a contract and all of a sudden, you're 525 00:27:12,720 --> 00:27:16,879 Speaker 3: not like you're not sleeping at night. Oh man, if 526 00:27:17,080 --> 00:27:18,920 Speaker 3: I'm gonna get sent down a Triple A Wait a minute, 527 00:27:18,920 --> 00:27:20,280 Speaker 3: I'm already playing in a Triple A park. 528 00:27:20,320 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 2: Wait. 529 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:23,480 Speaker 3: You know. It's just some of their guys are now 530 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:27,160 Speaker 3: solidified in their roles, and I think they're I think 531 00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:29,280 Speaker 3: they're not. I don't think they're a top top or 532 00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:31,119 Speaker 3: bottom ten team. 533 00:27:32,200 --> 00:27:35,439 Speaker 5: Well, there's one team I think that should be in there. 534 00:27:37,119 --> 00:27:39,080 Speaker 5: I would say Tampa Bay had the chance of being 535 00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:40,400 Speaker 5: in Oh they are in there. 536 00:27:40,600 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 1: Now they are in there. 537 00:27:41,600 --> 00:27:45,040 Speaker 5: I'm struggling today. I think I think the power should 538 00:27:45,080 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 5: be there. Honestly, I mean, listen, what have they done. 539 00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:51,440 Speaker 5: They have Paul Skins, Yeah, and they still can't find 540 00:27:51,480 --> 00:27:53,200 Speaker 5: ways to win. Yeah. Did they get a couple of guys, 541 00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,600 Speaker 5: of course they did. But you can't tell me that 542 00:27:55,680 --> 00:28:00,359 Speaker 5: they're a top twenty team right now. I mean, listen, 543 00:28:00,400 --> 00:28:02,320 Speaker 5: they're on the bottom of the list in the NL 544 00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:05,400 Speaker 5: Central each year. They can't find a way to dig 545 00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:08,199 Speaker 5: out of there, and they hurt themselves at the end 546 00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:10,960 Speaker 5: of the day. So they didn't really get that much 547 00:28:10,960 --> 00:28:13,280 Speaker 5: big of names, and it's just gonna be the Pirates 548 00:28:13,280 --> 00:28:13,560 Speaker 5: of old. 549 00:28:13,920 --> 00:28:17,479 Speaker 1: Make Crats do what he's supposed to do, which is 550 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:20,200 Speaker 1: if he is going to defend a team and say 551 00:28:20,240 --> 00:28:23,280 Speaker 1: the Pirates deserve to be twenty or better, I'm fine 552 00:28:23,280 --> 00:28:25,560 Speaker 1: with that. But you know the game. If you think 553 00:28:25,600 --> 00:28:27,399 Speaker 1: the A's and the Pirates do not belong on the 554 00:28:27,400 --> 00:28:30,040 Speaker 1: bottom ten list that is put together by CBS, you 555 00:28:30,119 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 1: must help them replace those two teams. There needs to 556 00:28:33,119 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 1: be a bottom ten. It's not easy. Trust me, I 557 00:28:38,240 --> 00:28:39,160 Speaker 1: went through the extra. 558 00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:42,720 Speaker 3: Give me a sack here, hang on, hang on, I'm. 559 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:43,840 Speaker 1: Telling you it's not going to be easy. We can 560 00:28:43,880 --> 00:28:46,280 Speaker 1: literally go through the teams, it doesn't even take that long, 561 00:28:46,360 --> 00:28:49,720 Speaker 1: and you're going to struggle to find teams that replace them. 562 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:53,480 Speaker 3: I'm looking I'm looking through my you can go through, 563 00:28:53,560 --> 00:28:54,880 Speaker 3: but I'm also looking through. 564 00:28:56,360 --> 00:28:58,520 Speaker 1: I can, but I think the exercise is fun to 565 00:28:58,560 --> 00:29:02,040 Speaker 1: do it this way. Okay, So you're not putting the 566 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:05,040 Speaker 1: the Braves in there, right, they were borderline on the 567 00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:07,200 Speaker 1: top ten. The Diamondbacks, so you're putting them in the 568 00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 1: bottom ten. I'm not Cubs, Red Sox Orioles. We're good. 569 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 1: They're not touching that list. White Sox are already in it. 570 00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 1: I'm not putting the Reds in there. I'm not putting 571 00:29:17,520 --> 00:29:20,200 Speaker 1: the Guardians in there, not a bottom ten. Rockies are 572 00:29:20,200 --> 00:29:22,959 Speaker 1: in there already. Not putting the Tigers, not the Astros 573 00:29:23,320 --> 00:29:26,240 Speaker 1: for me, not the Royals, Angels are already in there, 574 00:29:27,840 --> 00:29:30,240 Speaker 1: Dodgers obviously. I'm just going. 575 00:29:30,120 --> 00:29:33,400 Speaker 3: Down twice twice. 576 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:36,200 Speaker 1: Ls are in there already. Brewers are not going in there. 577 00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:38,600 Speaker 1: Twins are in there already, Mets and Yankees and Phillies 578 00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: are not going in there. Pirates are in there already. 579 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:43,360 Speaker 1: We're almost done with the list of teams. Padres are 580 00:29:43,360 --> 00:29:45,200 Speaker 1: not going in there. I don't think the Giant should 581 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:47,480 Speaker 1: be in there. Mariners are obviously not in there. Cardinals 582 00:29:47,520 --> 00:29:49,160 Speaker 1: are already in there. Rays are already in there. I'm 583 00:29:49,200 --> 00:29:51,000 Speaker 1: not putting the Rangers in there or the Blue Jays 584 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:53,560 Speaker 1: and the Nats are already in there. It is a perfect 585 00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:57,240 Speaker 1: bottom ten. It is perfect. They nailed it. It is 586 00:29:57,360 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 1: very difficult to agree. 587 00:29:59,520 --> 00:29:59,960 Speaker 5: To your point. 588 00:30:00,120 --> 00:30:01,560 Speaker 4: You can move a couple of teams. 589 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:03,760 Speaker 1: That's fine, you know, to like, you. 590 00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:06,160 Speaker 5: Know, put the Pirates of twenty two behind the Athletics, 591 00:30:06,200 --> 00:30:08,720 Speaker 5: that kind of deal. You can do that kind of thing. 592 00:30:08,760 --> 00:30:11,800 Speaker 4: But I don't. I guess, yeah, I don't. I don't 593 00:30:11,800 --> 00:30:13,120 Speaker 4: see anybody else going in. 594 00:30:13,200 --> 00:30:15,720 Speaker 1: No Sunny Days in the chat said Diamondbacks are definitely 595 00:30:15,760 --> 00:30:18,520 Speaker 1: bottom ten. I mean that's fine. I respect opinions, but 596 00:30:18,680 --> 00:30:20,800 Speaker 1: I don't agree. I think that they could get close 597 00:30:20,880 --> 00:30:24,040 Speaker 1: to that. But I don't agree that they're bottom ten. 598 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 3: Okay, that's fair. I mean, I mean I can I 599 00:30:28,520 --> 00:30:32,040 Speaker 3: can definitely, I can see the Rangers. I can see 600 00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:36,120 Speaker 3: the Rangers maybe sliding in there, unless they completely change 601 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 3: the culture and unless Nimo is that shot in the 602 00:30:40,520 --> 00:30:44,880 Speaker 3: arm for the offense. I think, you know, there's a 603 00:30:44,920 --> 00:30:49,000 Speaker 3: possibility there. But that rotation was ridiculous. So yeah, you're right, 604 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:51,920 Speaker 3: I would say I can't. I can't replace them, so 605 00:30:51,960 --> 00:30:53,080 Speaker 3: I can't take any of them. 606 00:30:52,920 --> 00:31:03,720 Speaker 1: Out over under Marlins bet MGM saying seventy two and 607 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 1: a half, Where are we going? 608 00:31:08,600 --> 00:31:11,960 Speaker 4: This is close? I don't think I think they'll be 609 00:31:12,040 --> 00:31:13,800 Speaker 4: under five hundred. But how far. 610 00:31:15,160 --> 00:31:18,120 Speaker 1: Big gap between seventy two and a half and eighty 611 00:31:18,120 --> 00:31:21,680 Speaker 1: one wins which is five hundred? Do you think they'll 612 00:31:21,720 --> 00:31:27,440 Speaker 1: fill in that gap? They traded away some pitching, they'll 613 00:31:27,480 --> 00:31:31,440 Speaker 1: probably trade away more pitching in Sandy al Contra. But 614 00:31:32,320 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: they kind of surprised some people last year. They won 615 00:31:34,280 --> 00:31:36,640 Speaker 1: seventy nine games this past season. 616 00:31:41,360 --> 00:31:43,160 Speaker 4: Man, you guys put me on the spot here, Why 617 00:31:43,160 --> 00:31:43,440 Speaker 4: don't you. 618 00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:44,400 Speaker 1: Just talk about shock taking. 619 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:49,480 Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm gonna say under but really close, I'm gonna 620 00:31:49,480 --> 00:31:54,520 Speaker 5: say under under. Okay, I think that n AL least 621 00:31:54,800 --> 00:31:57,560 Speaker 5: is a gauntlet. I think it's some really good squads. 622 00:32:00,080 --> 00:32:01,920 Speaker 5: Want to see them when I like the Miami Mons, 623 00:32:01,920 --> 00:32:04,040 Speaker 5: I like the organization, like everything about them, But I 624 00:32:04,240 --> 00:32:07,520 Speaker 5: would say closer to seventy I would little under seventy wins? 625 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:11,400 Speaker 3: What do you like everything about them? What is what 626 00:32:11,560 --> 00:32:14,000 Speaker 3: is the like about them? Like I like some. 627 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:15,240 Speaker 4: Dudes on the team. 628 00:32:15,680 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 5: You're gonna you're gonna gonna speak up or you're gonna 629 00:32:17,880 --> 00:32:18,760 Speaker 5: speak out, let's go. 630 00:32:19,560 --> 00:32:22,680 Speaker 3: I mean, I like, I like some of the dudes 631 00:32:22,680 --> 00:32:25,440 Speaker 3: on the team. But that's why I'm taking That's why 632 00:32:25,480 --> 00:32:28,160 Speaker 3: I'm taking the over is because I think this is 633 00:32:28,240 --> 00:32:31,400 Speaker 3: under set, way way too low. I think if they 634 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:35,600 Speaker 3: had said, like seventy four seventy five, I would have 635 00:32:35,640 --> 00:32:40,640 Speaker 3: been like, Okay, they won seventy seventy nine games last year. 636 00:32:41,280 --> 00:32:43,720 Speaker 3: Seventy nine games last year, and I think you sit 637 00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:45,680 Speaker 3: there and you go, okay, yes, I get it. They 638 00:32:45,680 --> 00:32:48,200 Speaker 3: got rid of their best pitcher from last year in 639 00:32:48,320 --> 00:32:52,240 Speaker 3: Edwar Cabrera, but that's what they've been doing. They've been 640 00:32:52,960 --> 00:32:57,280 Speaker 3: pumping out pitching and supposedly they have pitching galore coming 641 00:32:57,320 --> 00:33:00,120 Speaker 3: from the minor leagues. I think this is a seventy 642 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,480 Speaker 3: I think it's a seventy four to six six win team, 643 00:33:04,240 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 3: and so I'm taking the over. I'm not taking as 644 00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:10,600 Speaker 3: big of the over as I have taken, but I 645 00:33:10,680 --> 00:33:13,160 Speaker 3: really like this one. I think they showed that they 646 00:33:13,160 --> 00:33:17,000 Speaker 3: can win games, and they're some of their position players 647 00:33:17,040 --> 00:33:19,160 Speaker 3: have really taken the next steps. And you have another 648 00:33:19,200 --> 00:33:25,200 Speaker 3: full season of stours, you have Augustine Ramirez behind the dish. 649 00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 3: I love it. But I'm not putting any money on it, 650 00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:31,120 Speaker 3: because they could get rid of another picture, they could 651 00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:33,200 Speaker 3: get rid of Sandy Yep part way through the year, 652 00:33:33,640 --> 00:33:36,320 Speaker 3: and I'm so nervous about it. But they could also 653 00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:39,720 Speaker 3: win thirteen games against the Nationals, who have done zip 654 00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 3: zero nothing this offseason. 655 00:33:41,920 --> 00:33:44,720 Speaker 1: Marlins have done just about zip zero nothing too. Don't 656 00:33:45,160 --> 00:33:47,240 Speaker 1: forget about that. Remember the article in the beginning of 657 00:33:47,280 --> 00:33:51,400 Speaker 1: the offseason from Evan Draulic about Marlin's Pirates and they're 658 00:33:51,560 --> 00:33:54,200 Speaker 1: maybe one other, and yeah, the Pirates did a little 659 00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:59,600 Speaker 1: bit more. Marlins didn't really participate again, so Pirates. 660 00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:01,560 Speaker 3: Did a lot. I can't even mention the same the 661 00:34:01,640 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 3: same breath of Marlin. Carlins and Nats are completely bring 662 00:34:07,160 --> 00:34:09,560 Speaker 3: that top ten back, that bottom ten back up again. 663 00:34:10,080 --> 00:34:11,719 Speaker 3: They're hauling there and they earn it. 664 00:34:12,760 --> 00:34:16,520 Speaker 1: Marlin's for me, slide over. I don't feel comfortable about 665 00:34:16,520 --> 00:34:19,600 Speaker 1: it though, but I'll go slide over on that one. Yeah, 666 00:34:19,640 --> 00:34:23,120 Speaker 1: seventy one nine wins last year, Nationals are going to suck. 667 00:34:23,920 --> 00:34:25,839 Speaker 1: But I mean, I think it could be a hook. 668 00:34:26,080 --> 00:34:28,160 Speaker 1: I think it could be a seventy one, a seventy 669 00:34:28,200 --> 00:34:29,400 Speaker 1: two to seventy three. 670 00:34:29,800 --> 00:34:32,359 Speaker 4: Depending on what they do trade deadline and all that kind. 671 00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:34,960 Speaker 1: Of Yeah, that's why they're trading Sandy el Contra at 672 00:34:34,960 --> 00:34:40,360 Speaker 1: some point this year, so the rebuild continues. The biggest 673 00:34:40,400 --> 00:34:42,560 Speaker 1: game of the year calls for a boost pack that's 674 00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:44,800 Speaker 1: just as big be MGM is rolling out. The Big 675 00:34:44,960 --> 00:34:47,240 Speaker 1: Game Boost Pack gives you three different ways to boost 676 00:34:47,239 --> 00:34:49,080 Speaker 1: the odds on your next big game bet. Here's how 677 00:34:49,120 --> 00:34:51,320 Speaker 1: it works. First, log in and your Big Game Boost 678 00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 1: Pack will be waiting for you. Next, add any big 679 00:34:53,560 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 1: game bet to your bet slip, Activate the boost token 680 00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:57,640 Speaker 1: you want to use. Finally, if that bets hits with 681 00:34:57,760 --> 00:35:00,120 Speaker 1: a token activated, you get extra winnings on top of 682 00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:03,520 Speaker 1: your payout. Gambling problem or concern, there's help. Call one 683 00:35:03,520 --> 00:35:08,320 Speaker 1: eight hundred gambler talking bet MGM Super Bowl Sunday picks 684 00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 1: real quick. I know nothing, but I'm just gonna say, Seahawks. 685 00:35:12,719 --> 00:35:18,000 Speaker 5: You man, I'm going against. I think people are putting 686 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:19,920 Speaker 5: the Patriots down. They don't think they're gonna come through. 687 00:35:20,120 --> 00:35:22,480 Speaker 5: I have a fine I think they find a way 688 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:26,840 Speaker 5: to win. Is Brady playing No, But Brady said he wasn't. 689 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:29,160 Speaker 5: Necessarily he's not reading for that. That's why I want 690 00:35:29,239 --> 00:35:30,080 Speaker 5: him to win anymore. 691 00:35:30,120 --> 00:35:36,480 Speaker 1: Well, isn't it like Brady Belichick and he got I pissed. Yeah, well, 692 00:35:36,520 --> 00:35:39,080 Speaker 1: they kind of made his life into a pretty cool life, 693 00:35:39,200 --> 00:35:41,680 Speaker 1: so you probably want to be reading for them. But 694 00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:45,000 Speaker 1: he's a broadcaster. Now, you gotta be neutral. Gotta be neutral. 695 00:35:45,239 --> 00:35:47,120 Speaker 1: Who's winning the super Bowl on Sunday? Where do I 696 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:48,080 Speaker 1: put my money? 697 00:35:48,640 --> 00:35:48,799 Speaker 4: Oh? 698 00:35:48,800 --> 00:35:50,680 Speaker 3: Who's winning it? I don't know who's winning it, but 699 00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:52,120 Speaker 3: it's going to be heads. It's going to be the 700 00:35:52,160 --> 00:35:54,719 Speaker 3: coin toss. I'm locking that in right now. 701 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:58,560 Speaker 4: It's got him mighty. Don't ever, don't listen to him 702 00:35:58,680 --> 00:35:59,239 Speaker 4: ever on. 703 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:04,600 Speaker 1: I'm not touching that one. It's too much time. 704 00:36:05,360 --> 00:36:07,200 Speaker 3: I'm easily swayed. I can go tails. 705 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:09,560 Speaker 4: No, let's go let's talk about you want heads, I 706 00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:10,080 Speaker 4: want tails. 707 00:36:10,120 --> 00:36:12,680 Speaker 1: We're gonna do an hour post show, all right, we'll 708 00:36:12,680 --> 00:36:15,959 Speaker 1: just three to four. We'll talk heads or tails