WEBVTT - #thisleague UNCUT: NBA Trade talk

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to this League Uncut in the rule.

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Of twenty four hour NBA news.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 3>This you lo, Chris Hans, It's time, works time, It's

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 3>so time.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>This League uncut is underway in on fire. This should

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>be a good one. Hello friends, Thursday afternoon.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 4>As Chris and I tape this latest edition of this

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.959
<v Speaker 4>League Uncut, the finals are over. The twenty twenty two

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 4>to twenty three season is in the books. Trade season,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 4>or at least the chatter it generates, is already underway.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 4>The Denver Nuggets championship parade is raging right now as

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 4>we speak, as we tape, and we will get to

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 4>the Nuggets eventually.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>We will put a bow on their title run.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 4>The first championship in that franchise is forty seven season

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 4>run in the NBA, and of course there were nine

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 4>glorious seasons before that in the ABA. First title in

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.639
<v Speaker 4>more than fifty years for Denver. We will, I promise,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 4>get to that. But first we got to start with

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 4>the trade chatter because it has been so aggressive already.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>You just say trade season.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Do we gotta spell that with a s ZN like

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 4>I tweeted out a couple of pieces before we started

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 4>taping this I feel a little I feel a little

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 4>too old to be saying trade season and spell it.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>S z N. If anybody can get away with it,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's forty five and older. You can.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>You can do that, so you get I.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't even remember. I don't even remember forty.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Five to Nice.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>That was a long that was It was almost a

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>decade ago.

0:01:59.680 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's just jump right into it. Bradley Beal, I think

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the situation is more advanced than it's been described. I

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>think the end is near. Bradley Beal, Damian Lillard, Draymond Green,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 4>all drafted in twenty ten twelve, with you.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Donnis Haslam retiring.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Now, those three are tied for the third longest tenure

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>with one team. The only players who've been with their

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>teams longer the Splash Brothers Stephen Curry drafted in two

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>thousand and nine Klay Thompson drafted in twenty eleven. Those

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 4>are the only two players with a longer longevity run

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 4>than Bradley Beal in Washington, Damian Lillard in Portland, Draymond

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Green yet another Warrior at this point, you know, Dame Lillard.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>His name keeps coming up.

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>We have no indication yet that there's any real real

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 4>trade smoke there. But Bradley Beial to me, the trade

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>smoke is very, very very legit.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you see?

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I think you know, you look at that.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>There's new regime over there. There's a new general manager

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>over there in charge of the basketball operations over there,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Michael Winger. So you have to understand that when changes

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like that are made, oftentimes they want to establish a

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>new team, establish a new identity, a new culture, and

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that often leads to personnel changes on the roster and

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Bial being the main stay there. The Wizards were

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere. They haven't went anywhere in a while,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and so if that's going to be the case, I mean,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's obvious to look at some form of

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a rebuild and I think, well, that's not a thing.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Bial doesn't want to be a part of rebuild.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And thus why we're, you know, in the situation we

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are now. This is the realist that has ever been

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with Bradley Beal, and I think that's what needs to

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be relaid out there. Like we've heard of Bradley Beal

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>talk over the last few years, linking him to the Lakers,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>or to the Miami He you know, that's been going

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on for the last three four years. This is as

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>real as it's gotten. Let me know what you think,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but Stein, I would be surprised if he's a member

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Wizards going into next season.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you have that? Are you? Are you that? Do

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 3>you just feel that strongly about it as well?

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I do?

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you because the crazy part about this, though,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 4>is Bradley Beal holds pretty much all the cards, which

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 4>is makes this such a unique situation. I wish I

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 4>could remember exactly how old I was when I first

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>heard the term no trade clause, and it was I know,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>I was pretty young because in baseball, it was it

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 4>was a thing, you know, I was.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Baseball was my first love, you know.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to say early by the early eighties, the

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 4>prospect of the no trade clause in baseball was starting

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 4>to get more prevalent. Like I said, I really should

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>have researched this better. It might have even been late

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>seventies in baseball. But in the NBA, I've written about

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>this a bazillion times because I've always found this a

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 4>pretty interesting subject. In the NBA, a no trade clause

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 4>is so hard to come by. You have to have

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 4>eight years of service time and four with the same team.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 4>But the wrinkle that makes it tough is it can

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>only be in a new deal and most of the

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 4>best players in the league they do extensions. They play

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 4>out their rookie scale, play out their rookie scale deal,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 4>then they do a rookie scale extension. Then you know,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>they typically extend off of that. Like you have to

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>get all the way to unrestricted free agency to get

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 4>a no trade clause to add it into a new deal.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 4>And that's exactly what Bradley Beal did last summer. He

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 4>went to unrestricted free agency and then sign that massive

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>five year, two hundred and fifty one million dollar deal

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 4>with the Wizards.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 2>And the Wizards they gave him a trade kicker fifteen percent, and.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 4>They gave him the no trade clause and it is

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 4>the only full no trade clause on the NBA map.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 4>And because Ted leonsis blessed that last year, Bradley Beal

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>and his agent Mark Bartostein they are in control of this.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 4>The Wizards cannot trade Bradley Beal unless he blesses it.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think, as we've seen, because you know, you mentioned.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, there was talk last year, will he try

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 4>to go to the Lakers? Will he try to go

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 4>to the Heat. You know, Bradley Beal has stuck with

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the Wizards his whole career.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>He's not just gonna go anywhere.

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 4>He's not just gonna say yes to the deal Washington

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 4>wants to make that might bring Washington back the most

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>in terms of assets. By all accounts, Miami. That is

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the team that is most intriguing to Bradley Beal.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe others will emerge.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 4>As this process goes on farther, but at this point,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not the Knicks. I don't think Boston or Philly.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't think either one of those Eastern powers is

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:25.679
<v Speaker 4>even pursuing this. You know, Miami right now, that's the team.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 4>And because of that no trade clause, it really puts

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Washington in this brutal position of they're probably gonna and

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 4>you know what, whether it's Miami or someone else, even

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 4>if some other team emerges, Miami's going to have to

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 4>consider trade proposals that they probably would not have considered

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 4>because again.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Bradley Beal is the ultimate decision maker here.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I would throw Brooklyn in there as well as a

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>team that interesting, I could potentially get in the mix

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if Bill. You know, that's again you talked on just

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>how scarce it is for an NBA player to have

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that no trade clause. So that eliminates a lot of teams.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So I know, like fans like to you know, they

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>love rumors, they love rumors, they like nuggets, they like

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the details, they like to stay on top of how

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>things are progressing. But with the Bill situation, we have

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that no trade clause, it's going to eliminate a lot

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of those potential rumors out there, and it's going it.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Could be boring. I don't know.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is something that's going to

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>play out where he's linked to the Mavericks, he's linked

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to here, he's linked to here there. Those reports still

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>may get out, but they might not hold validity because

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of the power that Bill holds in it. And so

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's one thing to be you know,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but I expect over the course of over the weekend

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>leading to next week, we'll see a few teams start

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging in the Bill sweepstakes. And then we'll we also

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>here may start hearing about teams that Bill doesn't want

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to go to as well. That can very much happen.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember when Anthony Davis was requested his trade in

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>He didn't have no trade clause. It wasn't like that, but.

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I reported it was probably a few weeks before the

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline. I reported that he had no interest in

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>being traded to the Boston Celtics. Remember because at that

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>time the Celtics were in place, and so a lot

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of times what that does when when the word gets

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>out that a player is not interest interested, it messes

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>up there and messed up their value, and then teams

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>start to think, well, is it worth having a is

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it worth bringing a player like ad over because he

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>may just bounce at the end of the year, Like

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it's it worth trading away all those assets for a

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>year rental. We've seen what happened with Toronto Fadl semi

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>worked out because they got a championship out.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Of it with with Kawhi Leonard.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>But those are things you have to weigh, and those

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are the type of stories or developments that could come

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>out of the process of us continuing to monitor Bradley

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Bill's situation.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you said it, ad The hammer ad had was

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 4>if I get traded somewhere, I don't want to go.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going to leave in free agency at the

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 4>first opportunity. But this hammer that Beal has really is

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the mightiest hammer you can have, because you know he

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>can block the trade. It was the end of May

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 4>when Washington struck the deal to hire Michael Winger to

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 4>basically take over Monumental Sports. He has oversight of both

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 4>the Wizards and the WNBA's mystics. And you know, from

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>that point in rival front offices, this expectation has been

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 4>building that a teardown was likely, that the Wizards were

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna go on this aggressive path to remake the roster,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 4>and obviously that starts with Bradley Beale. And look, I

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 4>think in a perfect world, the Wizards would love to

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 4>know that they could get draft picks and cap relief.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 4>But again, because Beale holds so much sway here with

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that no trade clause, it's gonna force the Wizards to

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 4>look at proposals that they just nor they wouldn't even

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 4>consider if they had more leverage and ability here. But

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it will make it a lot easier if it would

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 4>be a lot easier if if Bradley Beal would tell

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>us exactly where he is or isn't willing to go.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 4>But I'm gonna leave it to I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 4>leave it up to a reporter like Chris Haynes to

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 4>get to the bottom of that, which I'm actually gonna

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually I'm not a betting man, but I'm gonna

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 4>bet on Haynes to be among those who among those

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 4>who very likely will figure out exactly where mister Beal does.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>And doesn't want to go.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 4>But it's it's funny how you said how much the

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 4>people you know love these kind of stories. Today in

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Dallas we had huge news locally where Norm hitchkis, who

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 4>is an absolute institution locally. He's been on Dallas radio

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 4>for nearly fifty years. I mean, you know, he had

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 4>the first morning show in Dallas in terms of sports,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 4>and one of the first in the country. I remember

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 4>seeing him on ESPN Baseball broadcast before I moved to Dallas,

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 4>and you know, I've lived here a quarter century now,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 4>and you know he's been on the radio that whole time.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Just he's Norm Hitchkiss is a Dallas sports franchise. Onto

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 4>his unto himself when I posted my congratulatory note to

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Norm after he announced his retirement. The first response on Twitter,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 4>when is your next pod discussing Mavericks trade in draft chatter?

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>So that just tells.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 4>You nobody has time for Nobody has time for sentiment

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.479
<v Speaker 4>right now or anything else they want.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 2>They want the trade talk.

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And they are quick with it. It makes me believe

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that they got that in draft. So no matter what

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you tweet, you could have tweeted rest in peace to somebody.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>We don't care about that. Where's where's Chris Paul going?

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Don't even think about It's funny you brought him up too.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 4>I got a call from a team today. What do

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 4>you know about Chris Paul? What is Haynes telling you

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 4>about Chris Paul?

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, heyes.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 4>What Haines is telling me is what's on the pod.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Everything we've said on the pod. That's what I listen

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 4>to the pod. That's what I said.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 3>That's a good way to bring on me a star.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a good way.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>It works.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 4>But try so Look, Bradley Beal, on one hand, you

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>know that that it's a five year, two hundred and

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 4>fifty one million dollar deal. So look, any team that's

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 4>trading for him, you really have to do some serious

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 4>numbers crunching to fit him in because in this new CBA.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's really my question with.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 4>The Heat that Okay, maybe Bradley Beal is going to

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 4>want to go to Miami, and maybe that's the direction

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 4>this is going to go. But what kind of deal

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 4>can the Heat assemble to bring in Bradley Beal as

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 4>basically your third guy? Their two main guys are going

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to stay Jimmy and Bam. This is Jimmy's team and

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Bam out of Bio with the defense he plays that

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, the interior anchor that he is. I mean,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>that's the twosomewhere it all starts. If you're bringing in

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Bradley Beal at that number again in this new CBA,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be really tough to put a balanced

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>roster around three guys making that kind of money. So

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 4>to me, I do wonder is this the direction that

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Miami really wants to go? And I think it is

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 4>at this point, But I throw in the disclaimer that, okay,

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 4>does someone else they like better than Bradley Beal become available?

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 2>And the natural name to throw out is Dame.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 4>But again, as we speak as we're recording this on

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 4>the afternoon of June fifteenth, Damian Lillard to this point

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 4>is not in trade play for Miami or anyone else.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 4>So at this point, I do think Beal is at

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the top of Miami's list, but it is fluid. Things

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 4>could change if Dame or someone else they.

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Like becomes available.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's move to the first big potential underlying

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the word patental trade story that emerged.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>After the NBA Finals.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 4>We are as we're recording this, we're one week away

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 4>from the NBA Draft on June twenty second. New Orleans

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 4>interest in Scoot Henderson has become a significant talking point.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people around the league are buzzing about this,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 4>and the reality is the Pelicans they have the fourteenth pick,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and to make sure they have a shot at Scoot Henderson,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 4>they would need the number two pick because the Hornets,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 4>who hold number two, are still deliberating between Scoot Henderson

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 4>and Brandon Miller, which one of those players would they draft.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 4>If the Hornets keep the pick, they've kind of kept

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>the league off balance. Some days you hear it's going

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 4>to be Scoot. Some days you hear it's going to

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 4>be Miller. That's obviously by design. The Hornets are trying

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>to keep teams off balance. But the talk is, and

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, I went into I went into this in

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 4>depth with a story on Wednesday, and based on what

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm hearing, yes, the Pelicans are legitimately considering. Doesn't mean

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 4>they would one hundred percent do it, but they are

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 4>considering the prospect of trying to assemble a deal for

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Charlotte's number two pick that would feature Zion Williamson. And

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 4>at first blush, you say.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Wait a minute.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 4>For only four years removed from Zion going number one overall,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 4>New Orleans would actually seriously consider trading him. And again

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 4>the word I'm hearing is yes, it's something that they

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 4>are weighing. What do you see in the Fresno crystal

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 4>ball here? Could you see New Orleans actually parting with

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Zion to get up to number two in the draft

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 4>or number three? Lynn is the other kind of variable here.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 4>But if you trade for number three, you might not

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 4>get Scoot. Charlotte might stay on too, might hold firm

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 4>and take Scoot Henderson at number two. So look into

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 4>your crystal ball. What do you see, mister Haynes.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the only way.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, as answer your first question, do

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they could move Zion, Yes, I do. Giants

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>availability has been an issue, you know, there have been

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>questions about how he has how he has attacked his

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>several rehab stints. So you have that, and then you

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just have the urgency of the Pelicans. They're trying to win,

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to do something now. So you put all

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that out there that leads me to believe. Yes, I

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do agree that they would consider moving him now when

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to moving up to try to get scooted

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>unless Charlotte lets everybody knows that they're going with Brandon,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which I.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't think Charlotte should do. I don't think they will do.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you keep that very close to the Vest

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to give yourself the opportunity to get the best deal possible,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to get New Orleans to want to do a deal

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>with you opposed to a deal with the Blazers at

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>number three. And so I think from New Orleans standpoint,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>if they really want Scoop, they have to figure out

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 1>a deal to get that second pick. And that's what

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Charlotte should hold close to the Vest and

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans that they've been looking for. They've been in

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>need of a point guard. You know. CJ has been

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>playing that position, but he's more of an off guard.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know will that make New Orleans better?

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, Scoop. Look, I had to I was invited

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:47.959
<v Speaker 3>to Scoots.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>He had a personal workout in Atlanta last week, but

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I was covering. I was covering game three or Game

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.479
<v Speaker 1>four of the finals, and I couldn't make it. But

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>just from the video footage I watched from a couple

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of his workouts, Man.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>The guy, I mean, body wise, he's NBA ready.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's like he's really he's really a physical

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>specimen already. And he's played in the G League and

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's nineteen, and a lot of nineteen year olds are

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not ready day one of the NBA. But the fact

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's played against grown men already, I think that

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>puts him a step above probably his his counterparts. So

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, if New Orleans really wants that,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they gotta go. They got a trade for

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that number two pick. I don't think he can mess

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>around and try to wait and hope that he falls

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>number three and try to do some with Portland. I

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think that would be a catastrophic move.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 4>You've always been plugged into the Scoot Henderson camp. He's

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 4>never going to admit it. They're never going to publicly say,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 4>but just if you were surmising, will use that word

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 4>instead of speculating, would he be excited to land in

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 4>New Orleans?

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>You think that's something that would appeal to him?

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, I haven't.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I haven't spoken with him since this had this had

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>surface before it was just Charlotte New Orleans. And I

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>know he's a big Dame fan, and you know, I

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think at some point Dame and Scoop might talk in

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the near future, but so yeah, I haven't. I haven't

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>spoken to them, uh in recent days since this new

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>surface about New Orleans. So I really I don't know

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>how he feels about it.

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I guess so he's been He has been pretty outspoken

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 4>about the Portland thing, hasn't he like he he wants to.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>He's convinced that he can he can become that.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 4>If he ended up with the Blazers, that he could

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 4>play next to Dame and be an instant contributor.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>He wants he wants to play next to Dame. He

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to play the next Dame. So you know, Dame

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>has a decision. You know, I know this is a

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>scoot New Orleans topic, but you know, Dame kind of

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a nice segue into into what Dame is going to do.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>He has a decision to make. Is he going to

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be happy with the number three pick? The players also

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have believe that twenty third pick as well. So it's

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like Portland they can do a few things like if

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they keep the number three, if Dame feels good about

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of him and Scoop being able to work together,

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and he thinks that, you know, Scoop can take help

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>take this team to the next level, then there's other

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>packages that Portland could look into trading the number twenty

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>three pick along with we've been hearing you know, Athrety

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Simon's name being available.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Does Simons in the number twenty three get you.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>A good quality starter waterline all star player?

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Does it? I don't know.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And so Portland has a lot They got a lot.

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Of decisions to weigh.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But as it pertains the Scoop, you know, he believes

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he's ready day one, he believes he's prepared, he believes

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>he's yeah, very confident he believes he's prepared more than

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody in this draft class. And so for New Orleans standpoint,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that bodes well for them if they're able to make

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that happen.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>The thing is with Zion, so let's transition to Zion.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Thing with Zion.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>One thing teams are telling me is that no doubt,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>when Zion is healthy, he's a specimen.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>He's unstoppable.

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the sheer force that he provides in that

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>painted area and on an office and end, he just

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>overpowers everyone. But one thing teams want to see is

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>his medicals. That is going to be very very important.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Teams getting to look at his medicals and then deciding

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from there what to do. I don't know what those

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>medicals look like. I don't know the story that that's

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going to tell. But if these trades talks pretended to Zion,

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying the trade talks because it's just this

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is right now, is just New Orleans would consider. But

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>if it gets really serious, teams are going to have

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at the medicals, and then from there. Once

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>one team looks at the medicals, and if say, for example,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>say the medicals they're bad, They just do not look good.

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get out there, and then that's going

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to mess up the trade value for the Pelicans in

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>general as it pertains to Zion Williamson. So that's that's

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>like steps further down the road if we get to it.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to give fans a little peek inside

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>how these things work.

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I get the question.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 4>So many of my readers on my substack have been

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 4>asking me to try to gauge Zion's value, and it's

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 4>really hard to do that because, yes, you know, like

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 4>you said, you just look at the pure numbers. When

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Zion's on the floor, he averages twenty six on nearly

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 4>sixty one percent shooting from the field. I mean, you

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 4>can't be more efficient offensively than he is.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, his rebounding, to me, that's.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Always been an area that he needs to, you know,

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 4>deliver more. That's an area where he can certainly improve.

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>But we also saw in New Orleans early this season

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 4>when he was rolling and the Pelicans were rolling that

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, he can play make too, So I mean,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>he has considerable offensive gifts. But then there's just no

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 4>way to get around the fact he's only played in

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fourteen out of three hundred eight possible

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>regular season games.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 2>There's just no way to dodge that.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 4>And the two main things I can add the reason

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 4>why this is a consideration for New Orleans, why they

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 4>are weighing the prospect of trading Zion Williamson after just

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 4>four years together. You know, as one trusted league observer

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 4>put it to me, there is a rising level of

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 4>exasperation within the Pells organization about those availability issues, about

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 4>the way he.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Has approached the game. But the other thing, and this

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>is this is just as significant.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 4>It really appears that if the Pels were forced to

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 4>consider trading Zion or trading Brandon Ingram, they're much more

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 4>apt to trade Zion at this point that Ingram has

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 4>reached a level in that organization where he is considered

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 4>the safer from a trade when looking at those two guys.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 4>So those are two significant developments. And look, we've spent

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 4>the first half hour of this pod. You know, the

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 4>season has been over for minutes, and again the championship

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 4>parade is going on as we're recording this, and already

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Zion Williamson Bradley Beal in potential trades.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that speaks to what.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Kind of off season in terms of player movement we

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 4>are likely in for. It is not a stellar free

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 4>agent class. Spending money for free agency is very limited.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 4>It's only a few teams that have significant cap space,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 4>and they're not contending teams. So I don't know what

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna get in terms of free agent fireworks. But

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the prospect of trades connected to next week's draft, right

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 4>after next week's draft, before the NBA calendar year moves

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 4>to twenty twenty three to twenty four, and even in July, trades, trades, trades,

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 4>I think we're going to see a fair few, so

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 4>buckle up for that. Lastly, mister Haynes, I think we

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 4>need to dedicate this edition of This League Uncut and friends.

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 4>As always, remember please rate, review, and subscribe to the

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 4>show via Apple Podcasts.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Or wherever you get your pods. Please do that for us.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 4>But this episode, it must be it must be said.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 4>We're doing this with a serious hat tip to the

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Denver Nuggets, the NBA's new champions, first time champions. The

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 4>last time we did a pod, it was with the

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 4>series score at three to one, a very very unsightly

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Game five, Miami mucked the game up, mucked with an

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 4>m just as they would have wanted to, made it ugly,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 4>made it messy. Denver still finds a way, finishes the

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 4>series off. Nikola Jokic NBA Finals MVP in an eleven

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 4>zero runaway in that vote no MVP debate in the finals,

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 4>and man, all I can say is, you tricked us, Denver.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 4>You tricked me. That seven and ten finished to the

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 4>regular season. I paid way too much attention to it.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 4>It made me question whether the Nuggets were truly ready

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 4>for a playoff run.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It was all a ruse.

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 4>They mowed through the postseason sixteen and four, and critics

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 4>will say, yeah, you know, they didn't play a top

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 4>three seed, which has never happened in the you know,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 4>in the in the sixteen team playoff era, and this

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 4>was year forty of that playoff era, and somehow they

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 4>didn't play a number one seed along the way. But

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, this was a this was a season I

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 4>think you got to somewhat throw the seedings out. The

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Lakers made it to the conference finals as a number seven,

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 4>but they were not a number seven, and they took

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 4>out the defending champion Warriors to get to the West Finals.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And Miami.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 4>We can't look at them as your usual number eight

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 4>after what they did to fifty eight win Milwaukee and

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 4>fifty seven win Boston. So you know, downgrade the Nuggets

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 4>championship if you want because you think they didn't see

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 4>enough powerhouses on the way. But come on, man, Nikola

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Jokic age twenty eight, first player in NBA Playoff history

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 4>to lead all players total points, six hundred, total rebounds,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and sixty nine total assists one hundred and ninety.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Incredible coronation for the Nuggets, and they shut a lot

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 4>of people up. And again, as we're taping this, the

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 4>parade is going on, and I'm seeing tweets while we

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 4>record about wow Jokic with some curse action.

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Here, Nikola Jokic said to the.

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Roar of five hundred thousand plus fans in Denver, this

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 4>is a tweet from our buddy Mark Spears.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 4>I told them I didn't want to stay for the parade,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 4>but I bleeping want to stay for the parade.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>This is the best. This is amazing. So there you go.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Loves parades. Michael Malone's been talking smack all day.

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Long, rightfully, so rightfully, so I told you start our

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>last part.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, listen, we're going to the next pot.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna be congratulating the Dinner Nuggets, congratulating

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Joker on winning Finals MVP, and you know they're gonna

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up in five, and they did. I didn't

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>see anything left in Miami covering that series. I felt

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Miami Heat they emptied their clip, as small

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as a clip that they were dealing with.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>It was empty. They'd have nothing left.

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And Denver was just too much depth, too much talent,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and Miami Heat worked hard, they worked their butts off,

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably one of the most hard hardest working

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league, especially the most hardest working team

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, and I think that got them to

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this point. But at the end of the day, when

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you're the two last two teams standing, it's going to

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>take hard work and it's going to take some talent

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and depth, and they just didn't have the latter two

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to extend this series out. And so

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Denver Nuggets, may you credit them. I've been seeing like

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>people try to discredit the Nuggets run or diminished or

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the value the competition they had or to run.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 3>All you can do is play the opponent that you're giving.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You know that that opponent they had a path, They

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>had to get through some obstacles to get to that point.

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's weak to try to devalue the Nuggets championship.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 3>They are champions.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They were the best team. They were the best team

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season all season long. They respected the

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>course of the regular season. They were not about all

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>this low management stuff.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>They went in and they had.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>A plan and they executed, and so I applaud them.

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>They were a fun team to watch. I hope people

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>got got a chance to really see how valuable the

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Kolaki is. You know, that is a He's a great,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>great player that you should already have amongst the top

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>centers of all time already. I'm gonna let you say something,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but I want to ask you about later about the

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all time great sinners. And I want to see if

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you agree with me or not. This is a conversation

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I was having with my brother a few days ago.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think about the dinner Nuggets run?

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 4>When you really look at it, The signals were there,

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 4>and again, I you know, I put myself high on

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the list when they wobbled at the end of the

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 4>regular season seven to ten finish, I did start to

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 4>ask those questions again about these guys.

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 2>But the truth is, you.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Know, they took sole possession a first place in the

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 4>way on January seventeenth. They never relinquished it, So they

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 4>basically were the top seed in the West for three

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 4>months before the playoffs started, and that enabled them to

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, that certainly contributed to that kind of wobble

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 4>at the end. They maybe lost some focus because they

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 4>knew they had the West wrapped up, but they mowed

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 4>through the four teams in front of them. I really

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 4>feel like Miami the crusher for them. What any chance

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 4>they had of winning the finals was lost when they

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 4>got dragged to seven games by Boston. You go up

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 4>three to zero on Boston, Finish them off in four,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 4>finish them off in five.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>At worst, finish them off in six.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 4>If Miami does any of that, any one of those

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>three options, the Heat can go to Denver early before

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 4>the finals, get acclimated to the altitude, give themselves a

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 4>better foothold in the series. They still won Game two

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 4>as it is, but yeah, I mean the only game

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 4>they won they shot nearly forty nine percent from three

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 4>the four games they lost, they were sub thirty five

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 4>percent from three in all four defeats. So the Nuggets

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 4>earned every bit of this championship. Jokic was great, Murray

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 4>was great, all the others were great. I mean, they

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 4>had the best team and were trying to tell us that.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 2>Again, they tried to show they were.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 4>They gave us a lot of hits for three months

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 4>before the playoffs, and we just didn't want to see him.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 4>And you know, now we'll see in this wild offseason

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 4>who can close the gap because Denver, Okay, Bruce Brown,

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 4>they're in danger of not being able to re sign him.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 4>But you know already you're hearing people kind of compare

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 4>it to the Bobby Porter situation. Will Bruce Brown elect

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 4>to stay with the Nuggets for possibly less money.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Than he could make on the open market.

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Because he loves the situation so much, just like Bobby

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Ports did in staying with the Bucks after they won

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 4>it all. But you know, most likely Brown would be

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the only key departure from that team. So there's a

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of work for a lot of teams.

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 2>To do in the West just to close the gap.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 4>So man is it going to be a wild and

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 4>crazy and busy offseason, these nests again.

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe I hope I'm not jinxing it with

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 2>all this hype.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 4>I really hope I'm not, But I don't think I am.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 4>I think we are going to see many, many, many trades.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Stan question I have for you, now go for it already.

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>We're just talking about what Nikola Jokis has done to

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this point, and then you know what we think he's

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to do for however many.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Years as of now, has he corracked your all time

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 5>top six center category?

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Has he coracked it? So?

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 4>The five ahead of him are Kareem Russell, Wilt Shack.

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Who am I leaving out?

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I put a lodge one in there? Yep, that's five.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll put it like this. He's absolutely an all time

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 4>great to me. And the only reason you could even

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 4>say that he wouldn't be is because he's only won

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 4>one title. You know, he's won for one in the finals.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's see how many titles he ends up with. But

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 4>you know what I feel even stronger about is it

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 4>really bothered me that he wasn't in the top seventy five.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he to me, I was not an official

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.479
<v Speaker 4>voter on the top seventy five, but to me, even

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 4>at that point, he should have been a top seventy

0:37:55.040 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 4>five player. And you know, he has a tru tremendous

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 4>chance to ultimately crack the top five. You know, I

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 4>guess we consider dunking a power for it rather than

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>a center.

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>But there's no question. I mean, this guy is an all.

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Time great and he has nothing to prove to nobody

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 4>at this point.

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, STEI, I maybe taking another I maybe taking it

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to a controversial place, but we do that here in

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>this league, and this this is a podcast we could

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>believe if we could erase it if we want to.

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's act now and worry about the consequences later.

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, Stey Bill Russell? What the greatest winners of

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>all time? Why is he a top five sinner of

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>all time? Take winning out of it.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I think defensively, he was such a game changer that

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 4>he would you know, offensively, you know, all those centers

0:38:55.200 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 4>you named have better offensive credentials. But it's not just

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the winning with Russell, it is the defense. Block Shots

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 4>weren't even a thing when he played, or when Wilt played,

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 4>so It's like, we don't really have the raw statistical

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 4>data to tell us how great these guys are, and

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 4>we don't have the footage. This has always been one

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 4>of my major, major complaints and laments about being an

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 4>NBA fan and trying to be an NBA historian. Baseball

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 4>was my first love. That was the first sport I

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 4>was really introduced to. And what but like even at

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 4>a young age, like you know, you're not even ten

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 4>years old, and you know about Babe Ruth and lou

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Gerrig and Ty Cobb and Bob Gibson and on and on.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, I mean, I could name a zillion guys.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 4>You learn these stories as a baseball fan when you're

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 4>so young. But in basketball, pardon me if I've told

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 4>this story before, but it's important. I feel like, you know,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I can't tell it enough. When I started covering the

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 4>LA Clippers halfway through the ninety four season, Elgin Baylor

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 4>was the general manager of the Clippers, and I remember

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the first extended conversation I had with Elgin and I said,

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't believe I've never really.

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Seen footage of you playing. You know.

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.800
<v Speaker 4>He retired during that amazing Lakers early in that amazing

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Lakers season when they won thirty three games in a

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 4>row and won the title in seventy one seventy two.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 4>So I was only two or three. I never got

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 4>to see Elgin Baylor play. And when I told the

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Clippers that a team official with the Clippers actually went

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 4>to the league and paid NBA Entertainment to make like

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>a forty five minute VHS tape of Elgin highlights. And

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 4>I didn't get to keep the tape. I don't have

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 4>it anymore, but they let me borrow it and watch it,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 4>which was so cool to see just what was in

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 4>the vault at the league. Because again, this stuff, it's

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 4>we don't we do. It's such a bad job with

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 4>NBA history. So like Bill Russell Wilt like, we've seen nothing,

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, my age or your age, We've seen nothing

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 4>from what these.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Guys could really do.

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 4>So the number of rings Bill Russell has, you just

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 4>you cannot diminish it.

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I love a cheme too.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 4>I would say if Jok isn't there already, that he

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 4>will pass a keem. But I see a lot of

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 4>our contemporaries they rate a cheme higher than I do.

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 4>So again it's also Iya the Beholder stuff too.

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We have to remember Hakm was first of all, probably

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>had the best foot work it that of a big

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>forget big, just best footwork period as a basketball player.

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Even still to this day, I don't know, I don't

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>see anybody who has the pivots like Hakm did, Kobe,

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan, they were, they were close. But the thing

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about Hakim he was dominant offensively, but he was dominant

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>deficively too. I still, uh, you know, I still got

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ha Keen higher than Joker right now. But back to

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill Russell Stein, you know the King Baby Tumble was

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just defense. Alonzo Morning earlier, his earlier in his years

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>was a two way player, then transition to just being

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a defensive player. But for a center, Bill Russell, I believe,

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look this up because I want I want

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to have it accurately. You know, the big man position.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Usually for centers, they average a field goal percentage career

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of fifty or higher. Do you know what Bill Russell's

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>field goal percentage is for his career?

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Not off the top of my head, hit me.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>His field goal percentage for his career is, drum roll,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>forty four percent from the field. Bill Russell was sixteen

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty ten center, which you know that was that was

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>center size back those days. That does like that doesn't

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do anything.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't change.

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't change my feeling one ounce, because I think

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 4>field goal percentages were generally way lower.

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 2>In those days than they are now.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But but not just he was just not just that.

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 4>Justin Kubatko, who does a wonderful substack called Statitudes. Justin

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 4>is one of my favorite NBA historians and researchers and

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 4>just fantastic with the numbers in the history of the game.

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Before the finals, he went back and did a piece.

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, the final NBA Finals MVP didn't start until

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.919
<v Speaker 4>I believe nineteen sixty nine, so there were many many

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 4>years that the NBA didn't even do a Finals MVP.

0:43:56.800 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Justin did a piece and went back and awarded the

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 4>finals that the mythical Finals MVP, who his numbers said

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 4>should have won the award all those years that the

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 4>league didn't hand out a Finals MVP trophy, and by

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Justin's very unofficial count, but I take it as pretty

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 4>reliable that Russell would have won the Finals MVP six times.

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 4>So there's a reason why the Finals MVP Trophy is

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:32.280
<v Speaker 4>now named the Bill Russell NBA Finals MVP Trophy because

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 4>the man was an undeniable.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Winner, game changer. And you know what, for me, whenever I.

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 4>Think about top ten, top five, top twenty, whatever it is,

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I do think the off court stuff does matter. And

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 4>his impact on a social scale was so tremendous. I

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 4>do think that factors in, even though it's not an

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 4>on court things. It's like it's like Alan Iverson. You know,

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 4>we could really analyze Alan Iverson's efficiency and we can

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 4>theoretically grade him down as an all time great because

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 4>of efficiency issues. But the cultural impact that Alan Iverson had,

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 4>to me, that is worth bonus points. He never won

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 4>a championship, he got the phil he got Philly to

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 4>one finals, but his popularity and cultural impact, I do

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 4>factor that in when I'm assessing Alan Iverson's career resume,

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 4>and I think with Bill Russell, it's got a factor in.

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Also, I'm not even gonna argue with you, because this

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>is Bill Russell we're talking about. You can never win

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation, You could never win an argument if people

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>perceive you to be diminishing Bill Russell's legacy at all.

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna leave it there, but that I remember,

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I found that stat out was.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Like forty from the field sixteen center.

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know what's funny, because it's that you bring

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 4>that up, because when I did my I was not

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 4>a voter on the top seventy five, and I actually

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 4>regret it now. Like in my New York Times years,

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 4>I was at the Times for three and a half years.

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:14.879
<v Speaker 4>At the Times, we were not allowed to vote on

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 4>anything official with the league because the Times philosophy was

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 4>we cover the story, we don't participate in making the news.

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 4>And so when I started my own sub stack in

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 4>July of twenty twenty one, I'm coming up on my

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 4>two year anniversary here, I adopted the same policy and

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I basically said, I'm gonna I'm no longer going to

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 4>vote on any NBA awards. The league asked me to

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 4>come back and be a voter, I said no, I'm

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 4>not going to do it. But when they asked me

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 4>to do top seventy five, I said no, and I

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 4>really regretted it because I do love the history of

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the game, and that is one vote that I really

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 4>do now wish I had broken my own rule. To

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 4>be a part of, and my seventy five ended up

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 4>being very different from the ultimate seventy five. I remember

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 4>I left off Dolph Shase, who was one of the

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 4>initial greats in the league in the very very pre

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Russell stages of the NBA. And I had some very

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 4>prominent NBA historians come at me and just crush me

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 4>for saying, how could you not have dolphshes in your

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 4>top seventy five? And I omitted Dolph Shase in large

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 4>part because I did look at his field goal percentage,

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 4>and I'm pretty sure his career field goal.

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Percentage is sub forty.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 4>So that's why I say, in those days, even big

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 4>men didn't you know, there were no zions converting at

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent in the early days of the NBA.

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So maybe I was too hard on Dolph Shase.

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.399
<v Speaker 4>And now that's kind of entering my thinking here when

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 4>you bring up mister Russell's field goal percentage.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's why.

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm glad I'm speaking to an NBA historian,

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's coverly way further than you know, way earlier

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>than I was, So I'll respect it.

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Respect all right, everybody that was not that was not

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a Laane.

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 4>I expected us to go on Trade Talk Thursday, But

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 4>there you go. We'ved in some history, we'ved in some

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Denver Nuggets championship celebrations. But yes, at the forefront, Bradley

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Beal is this It is Washington finally going to trade him? Well,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:35.399
<v Speaker 4>the Pelicans actually trade Zion Williamson in connection with.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 2>The NBA Draft. Major, major questions to ponder.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Chris and I will be back with you soon, and

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 4>by the next time we get together for one of

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 4>these there will no doubt.

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Be tons more.

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:55.839
<v Speaker 4>Transactional discussion to get into because the transaction game has

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 4>fully taken over from the games themselves. For the next

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 4>two three weeks at least, Summer League isn't too far

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 4>in the distance. Chris Haynes and I will both be

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 4>in Las Vegas. We got a surprise in Vegas that

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 4>we're working on. Can't reveal it yet, but I promise

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 4>it will not disappoint. That does it for this edition

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 4>of This League Uncut Friends again, Please rate, review, subscribe

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 4>to the pod so the gems that mister Haynes loves

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.320
<v Speaker 4>to reveal on this show comes straight.

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 2>To your phone. That does it? Back again? Soon everybody

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 2>enjoy all the transaction of talk out and that'll do

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it for us. See you next time. This league uncut

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it is and iHeartRadio production Chris Haynes and Mark stime

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I