WEBVTT - Tom Petty and the Creation of “Wildflowers”

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Just a quick note here. You can listen to

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the music mentioned in this episode on our playlist,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which you can find a link to in the show

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>notes for licensing reasons, each time a song is referenced

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, you'll hear this sound effect. All right,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the episode. My name is Malcolm Gladwell. Welcome to

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Broken Record. This is the final episode of our first season,

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's a special episode because it's about Tom Petty.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Every now and again there is an artist who provides

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the soundtrack for his or her generation. I think Tom

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Petty was one of those people. He died in October

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen after a fortieth anniversary tour with his band

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The Heartbreakers. Only a few weeks after his passing, Rick

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Rubin and I met at Rick Studio to talk about

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom Petty, in particular about the contrast between that effortless,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>laconic California sound and the man behind it. We didn't

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think of this at the time as something that we

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>would turn into an episode. We were just sitting in

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the old Bob Dylan tour bus at Shango La, drinking tea.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I was never really a Tom Petty fan growing up.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I liked more aggressive music before that, punk rock and

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>harder things. He was a little melodic for my taste.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>And then The Full Moon Fever came out. I remember

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I bought it after I heard maybe the third or

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth single, which was a lot of singles in a

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>row to be really good, to think, Wow, there's something here.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, this is beyond just a good song. And

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I bought the album, and I remember I listened to

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it every day, over and over. It was the only

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>CD I had in my car for probably a year.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>It's perfect driving music. It moved Ricks so much that

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to work with Tom Petty, and when Petty

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>signed a new deal with Warner Brothers Records, Moe Austin,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the head of Warner Brothers, made that happen. Between nineteen

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety two and nineteen ninety four, Rick and Tom Petty

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>recorded a mid career masterpiece and one of Petty's favorite records, Wildflowers.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>We started making Wildflowers, which is the album in question,

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and part of him getting out of his MCA deal

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a record early was to deliver a greatest hits record,

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and part of delivering the greatest hits record was to

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>add two new songs to it, and it's hard to

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>write a song to fit in with the greatest songs

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you've ever written. It's just a difficult task. Almost every

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>time that happens, it doesn't work out well. And we

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>were already working on Wildflowers, and Tom very wisely said,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like what we're making here is

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a very specific body of work, and even though we're

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this, if we have to do

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>songs for the Greatest Hits album, I'd rather do them

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>separately in a separate studio and kind of think of

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>it as its own thing. So while we were set

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>up it Sounds City working on Wildflowers, we set up

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at Oceanway with slightly different band. The original drummer of

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the Heartbreakers was in that session, not in the Wildflower sessions,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so it was the entire original Heartbreakers, and we did

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>two songs, one of which was Last Dance with Mary Jane,

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and that was on the Greatest Hits So it was

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>like to write a hit to order for the Greatest

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Hits album was an unbelievable feat. And then we also

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>recorded at that time with those with that band. Maybe

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to say we probably recorded about fifty songs,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just because there was such a machine of a band.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>They had been a band their whole lives. Have you

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seen the Peter Bugdanovich documentary, Yeah, really worth seeing. It's

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>like four hours long, and when you watch it you're

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>owed by how many great songs he has, Like one

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>after it's like, how can there be this many good

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>songs from one person? You don't put it together that

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all. So the band had been a band since

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they were in high school together. All knew each other,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they knew a million songs. They used to play cover songs.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So because we had the band in the studio and

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Tom was kind of having fun. Once we

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>got the heavy lifting out of the way of getting

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the song we needed, he said the second song would

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>be a cover song, and he thought it would be

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>this thunderclap Newman song, which it ended up being. But

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.679
<v Speaker 1>we recorded, as they say, about fifty songs to choose

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>from fifty. Probably how unusual is that it's not a

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of bands can do it. It's like it's you

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be really good to be able to do that.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But those songs, many of which ended up there was

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a white box set called playback. Most of those songs

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>were on playback, so it wasn't just for I mean

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know that. We didn't know they'd ever come out.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just sort of having fun. But while they

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were in there, we thought, let's take advantage of let's

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just play a bunch of songs. What was How did

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they write music? Was it very collective? No? It was

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>usually Town with an acoustic guitar. More often than not,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would write a song by himself. Then he would often

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>make homemade demo with a drum machine and put on

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the parts that he wanted, So more often than not,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there would be a demo that sounded like a less

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>professional version of the final that we would bring to

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the band, and then that would be the starting point

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>that we'd work. He's writing music and lyrics, everything, everything, everything.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Now the other members of the band contribute a tremendous amount,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but the initial framework was always set by Tom First.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>On occasion, Mike Campbell would bring in a guitar, a

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>guitar idea first, or maybe even a guitar bassed song,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and then Tom would take that, rework it and make

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it into a Tom Petty song. But probably one or

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>two an album. Maybe, is there anyone you've worked with

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>who is who compares to Petty and so terms of

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>how prolific they are, I don't know that he was

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>always so prolific. I think he would go through phases

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>because I remember there were a couple of years where

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>songs were not coming so quickly, and when we recorded

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the fifty songs, they weren't all necessarily new songs. A

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were songs they remember from growing up.

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Some may have been old songs of theirs that they

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>never recorded. Some of them may have been Elvis songs

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or just songs they like. How long were you in

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the studio in that for the Wildflowers album, we were

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in for around two years, but it wasn't every day.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>It'd be like whenever there was stuff to do. So

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he'd like, he'd have five songs and he's like, let's

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>record these five, and we'd go in and it would

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>be a couple of weeks of work or maybe a

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>month of work to get those five, and then he

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>would go back to writing, and then maybe two months

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>later there'd be another batch. It wouldn't do the same thing,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and then at the end we would take it all

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and kind of do whatever it took to get him done.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>So you get him in one of his fertile periods. Yes,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and I had very good fortune in that. The full

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>mun Fever album, the one that I loved, he made

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Lynn, who's from Electric Light Orchestra, who's a

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really brilliant musician and songwriter. They did the Traveling Wheelberries together,

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Lynn really was a hard ass about the songs.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>The songs had to be good and sort of pop

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>song power. So for several years before I got to

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>work with him, he'd been sort of whipped into the

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>song is the most important thing in the world shape.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And then our styles of production are very different, so

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>jeff is more methodical. Everything has to be in time

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and in tune. He won't record a drummer playing the drums.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He'll record a drummer playing one drum, so like for

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole song, he'll just play the kick drum the

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>whole song. He'll just play the high hat the whole song.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He'll play the toms, so everything is very controlled and

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>meticulous and perfect. I try to make more, at least

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it was more about the organic moment

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>where it felt it felt more live and more human

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>warts and all, not to make it sound I would

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>call it like hyper real. So it was. It sounded real,

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but real on a particularly good night like not not randomly,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just playing it. It was a very good version,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that precision of jeff Lynn. Yeah, you can hear it

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in Full Moon Fever. But you but you responded to

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that you liked ful? Yeah, I loved it. I loved it.

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't make it in that way, but it's got

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>great power. When you go back and listen to full moviever,

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>can you detect the Jeff Lynn influence? Absolutely? What's the thing?

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we play it? Can we play a song? Absolutely?

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So there are a couple of Tom Petty songs that

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>are anthems. Yes, they get played it like that gets

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>played in sports, and that's very it seems very counter

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to the ethos. But now I understand why. The precision

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of it is what gives it its its anthemic martial quality.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>And of course it's going to be played at football

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>games when they are but I think I think the

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>leason they played at football games is also I won't

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>back down. I know, you know, I mean no, but

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that. But it's it's the lyric, but it's overlaid.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>The song is is it's like a marching down the road.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Very it's disciplined and absolutely but it's at odds with

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>his image as a kind of hippie yeah, mellow, and

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>this is not his hippie window of music. And that's

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>another interesting thing about the times. It's like Tom was

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>able to manage the changes of the styles of music

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that happened, still sounding like Tom Petty, but being of

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment as well. So like his earlier music, like

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he came out first when it was kind of more

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>punk rocky and it had a little bit more of

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a punk edge. And then that time in music, drum

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>machines were getting popular, so everything on the radio sounded

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>much more like that, even though rarely was it a

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>rock band, but it had that sort of formality. So

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he was able to morph with health. Do you think

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that consciously or is he just so

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in tune with the kind of zeitgeist that he moved along.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a combination of combination of being

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in tune and picking the right people to work with

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at the right time for what was going on. And

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he did that consciously. I think he

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>did it based on who he liked. I know. The

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>way he started working with Jeff was, from what I understand,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was just sort of a mistake. I think they saw

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>each other in cars driving down the stream, just like, hey,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>why don't we get together and do some really Yeah?

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I think so. So now play me something from Wildflowers

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he did with him, the one that came out. Yeah, okay,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so I can, and I want to understand the difference

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>between the Jeff Lynn and the feel Yes, just the

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>production stuff. Do you remember anything specific about about the

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>making of that song. Yeah, I remember I suggested that

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>we try a song using that beat. The song was

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>already written, but I said, let's try it with this beat.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was sort of inspired by the beat the

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>boom boom boom boom ca, which was inspired by Steve Miller. Oh,

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Steve Miller. Yeah, Oh that's it makes the feels like,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>why don't we do it kind of in a Steve

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Miller kind of a rhythmic vibe. Was he very open

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to suggestion, absolutely more so than other artists. Not unusual,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean especially I will say it was the first

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>album we made together, and the nature of my experience

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with him is the first time anybody works with him,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he's on his best behavior. He's the most receptive and

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to do the most work. And then maybe on

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the fifth album we made together, he may not have

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>been as willing to go that extra distance. I think

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he liked to impress the people who but I feel

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like he already did that, so he didn't need to

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. Did you which iteration did you prefer? Early? Early?

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I like what not, Not that he was trying

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to please me, but that he was willing to do

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever it took for it to be as good as

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be. That's always the most fun. Do you

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>consider Wildflowers to be his kind of creative high watermark?

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one of he's had. He's had probably probably three.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Damn the Torpedoes would have been the first one, and

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>then the Jeff Lynn and then Wildflowers. I think those

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are probably the three peak moments. We'll be back with

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>more on Tom Petty's Wildflowers with Rick Rubin after this break.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>We're back with more on Tom Petty's Wildflowers. Petty and

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Rick Rubin recorded dozens of songs during the two year

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sessions for Wildflowers, but only one disc ever came out.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>There's still an entire disc out there that's never seen

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the light of day. Rick actually played it for me

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the most Rick way ever. He just called it

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>up on his iPhone and it was amazing. But I'm

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>afraid we can't share it with you. You'll just have

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to wait for its official release. So tell me how

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it came to be that you had these two records. Well,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we recorded over this two year period. We recorded probably

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty sick between twenty six and twenty eight songs, and

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really know what was going to be on

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the album. And then at the end of it, we thought, wow,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>this is all good. Let's this is This could be

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a great double album, and we put it together as

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a double album and we brought it to the record company,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and the record company suggested it be a single album,

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not because they didn't like the double album, but they

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just said, commercially in the marketplace, having a double album

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily a great thing to do. And it was

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>their first it was his first album with Warner Brothers.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>They just wanted what was best. They really wanted what

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was best for Tom and surprise. You know, Tom historically

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was very anti anyone saying anything about anything. He's very

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>He did things his way always. It would always fight

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the power of authority from any direction. He had a

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fight with MCA for years where they raised the price

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of music a dollar and he wouldn't put out a

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>record unless they sold his at the old price, and

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't put it out. And I think he went

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two years without putting out any music because he he

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted it the way he thought was what he thought

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was right. And he kept his prices ticket prices, Lola,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>because he wanted people to be able to see the

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>show a lot he had a lot of He cared

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very much about his audience and and doing what he

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thought was right by them. I was a little surprised

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that he decided, but I guess he thought, well, this

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>may be better for the audience, which is why he

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>went along with it. I mean, how do you decide

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have twenty four you come forward with twenty

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>four songs or what have you, how do you decide

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>which ones to drop and which ones to go forward with?

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Just experimentation. A lot of it was Tom's instinct and

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>some of it was we'd play them in a sequence.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We'd come up with a sequence. Each one of us

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>might come up with a sequence that we like and

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then play it for each other and then say, okay,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>well this. You know, these three sound really good together,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>these five sound really good together. And then after hearing

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>these you want this feeling. It doesn't really do that yet,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what do we have that could make it feel like that?

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So kind of looking at the arc of the picture.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So there might be like, let's say there are six

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>songs that we'd say, no matter what, these six need

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to be on it, or these eight, whatever it is,

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the balance of it is more what makes

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the journey. You wouldn't We wouldn't do that today, would we?

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>If we recorded twenty eight songs with an artist today,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we would have the choice of either putting out all

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight without thinking about it. Because there's no such

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>thing as a singular double album anymore. We might say

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in today's world, the nature of the speed of digestion,

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that people's attention span is there for maybe five or

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>six songs at a time, So maybe it's better to

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>break it up into four projects and put them out

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>every form of five months, six months, depending on what happens.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It didn't break you, did it break his heart or

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>break your heart? About these songs that never got heard,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember feeling a little bad about I loved the album,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't like what we were putting out wasn't good.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I thought what we put out was. I

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>loved it. I absolutely loved it. This is the thing

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about musicians versus writers. I've never understood the amount of

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the wastefulness of the musical process is just compared to writing.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>If I write a sentence, it will be printed somewhere.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't weigh sentences like every single thing I've ever

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>written has found the lad of day somewhere, Whereas you

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>guys will leave things on the cutting room floors endless.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You have no idea. You have no idea that doesn't

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>drive you. Your screenritter is the same way, where you

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>know you can be a screenwriter of your whole career

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and nothing ever get made. So the end, there's all

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. I'm always fascinated by the relationship of the

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>artist to this unknown It's private work. This lost Tom

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Petty album is private work. Basically, you and Tom Petty,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who's not even with us anymore, and no one else

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>does the guys in the band who all love it,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>who worked, who labored months over these songs that never

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>got released to get them to where they are. Is

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>there any of those unreleased songs in retrospect that you

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think we really blew it with this song? No, but

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they're great. I mean I feel like Wildflowers did exactly

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what it was supposed to do. People really love it,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stood the test of time, and these other songs are

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>When I heard them for the first time, Tom came

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>over and played him for me, probably maybe two years ago,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>two two and a half years ago, and I was

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.959
<v Speaker 1>floored by I had like a vague memory of them,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but some of them just hit me, like, Wow, what

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a great song. How did we ever? How did we

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>miss this? So he came by here too, Did you

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>come here in my house or your house? Yeah? With

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the explicit intent to play the Yeah. He's like, I've

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>been working on the rest of Wildflowers, and I've been

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fixing some stuff that wasn't done at the end, like

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of mixes and things, and I want to

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>play it for you. And he came and he played

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it for me. Did he want to re release it. Yes,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he did. The issue was he very much wanted to

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>re release it. He thought it was really important because

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of the Wildflowers album loomed large in his

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>career and he knew that the second half of Wildflowers

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was an important statement. His issue was he didn't want

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to put it out as a new Tom Petty album

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's not a new Tom Petty album. It was

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>recorded twenty five years ago, and he didn't want to

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>release it as an old catalog album because he didn't

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he thought it deserved more than being a catalog album.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He felt like it was too good to just put

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>out and was sort of looking for the right story

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where it would have the exposure that it deserved, and

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>he never came up with it. Why couldn't he is

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a naive question, But why couldn't he just put it

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as a new Tome Petty album. There's something about the

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>artist's work that has a little bit of a diary

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like aspect. You know it. The work reflects a time

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in someone's life, and you'll hear when if I were

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to play you Tom's last album and then play you

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Wildflowers Too, or whatever it's called, it's it's very different.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think that was his thing, was like I

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have changed as an artist since then. I love that.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have told you this. He told

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>me wildflower scares him because he's not really sure why

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it's as good as it is. So it has this

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like haunted feeling for him. What does that mean? He's

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not like he loves it, but it he It's not

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>like he could turn that on again. He could. He

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make wildflowers to today. That was the point. The

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>point was I can't do this now. This was then,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was where I was then, and it was

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a prolific period. This is an extension of that moment.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Did he mean I can't make something as good as

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that again? Or just that just that just what that is,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>what that is, and that scared him? Those were his words.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised. I was surprised when he said it

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>was he as artists go unusually introspective about his own work.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say so, but how many artists would say,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>would listen to something from twenty years ago, play something

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from twenty years ago and say to you, it scares them.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard anything like that before. It was unusual.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But the closest thing I can remember, and it wasn't

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>said to me. I just heard it in an interview

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was Bob Dylan talking about his early records, saying I

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't write those, like I don't know who wrote those.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't write those. It was like that. It was

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like something magic happened in that moment, And now looking

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>back on it, it's a little scary to me. We'll

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be back with more broken record after this break. We're

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>back with more on Tom Petty's Wildflowers with Rick Rubin.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Why did you guys not just Reese say I can

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have two years later? I have no idea. I don't know. Again,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes to this waste you're so accustomed to, how

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>wasteful the process is. Yeah. The next thing he did

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was a soundtrack album, and there were a couple of

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>songs on the soundtrack album that were from those sessions.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh is that the soundtrack? Where? Wait, that's really a

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>really interesting story. It's a yellow album. Somebody comes to

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>him and says, I want to use one of your

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>songs from my movie. Yeah, it's a really small isn't

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it an Ed Burns movie? Yeah, it's an Ed Burns

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>movie and he says she's the one. She's the one.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'll write a whole new album about it.

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of insane, active, creative bravado. Yeah, that's

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where he was in that moment. Yeah, and I think

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple there are a couple of Wildflower songs that

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>weren't on the original Wildflowers that ended up on that

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing that is that? First of all, does that trigger

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>memories of when you guys were working on it? Not

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on that, but it reminds me of the whole time. Yeah,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember like being in the studio, but it

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like, oh, we were recording that song. But I

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can't remember the feeling of that time. So is so

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what is tie that song to that period in Tom

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Petty's career. Well, it has the leftover remnants of the

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Lynn song influence, so it's very It really works

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>well lyrically and melodically strong like song power song. We

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>did that one very in a straightforward way, kind of

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>almost Jeff Lenny drum wise, very straight suited, and that

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we probably played that a bunch of different ways before

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we decided, oh we like it. This way probably played

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it more like band style, and then it's like, oh,

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>this lends itself more to the kind of hypnotic locked

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in sound. It's a more you know, down tempo, moody piece,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the sarcastic time I hope you never fall

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in love with somebody like you? Is a song like

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>that coming out of his personal experience? Is he? It

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>might it might be coming out of his personal experience,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>or it might be the idea, like he might have

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>had that idea of like I hope you never fall

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in love with somebody like you, and I should write

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a song like that. I don't know. He would never

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>say yeah, Oh, he wasn't a He wasn't kind of

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>emotionally confessional in his no no. And I once saw

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>one time he was playing me demos and he would

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>always sit with the guitar in his lap and kind

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of hunt around while while we were talking. And one

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>time he started playing me a song and he plays

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this song and it's and sings it first verse, chorus,

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sings the whole song and uh, and it's great. And

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I say, wow, that's a great one where that one's

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>when's that one from? He's like, I just that's just now.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, you mean, I said, you didn't write that

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>before I got here, and he's like, no, that just

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>came out just now. And I said what's it about?

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, I have no idea And it was

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like ornate, intricate lyrics. He channeled it. Did you did

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you tape it? And like, h so that became a

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>real song. Yeah, absolutely, It's probably a song on wild Flowers.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember which song it was, but I got

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to see firsthand, and I remember the conversation of what's

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it about? Because it was like the story seemed really intricate.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, that's interesting, where's that? Like? No idea?

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>How much of that did you understand before you met him?

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you understand like, oh, this guy is sort of

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>something special or was a lot of it revealed to

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you when you started working with him more? When more?

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>When I worked with him, I knew he was really

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I knew he really was a song craftsman, which which

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he was, but I didn't realize the the connectedness that

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he had beyond that. It's like there was an the

0:25:54.320 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>emotional quality beneath it was very strong. He didn't he

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>never struck me as an emotional person, but in the

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>work it was there. Yeah. How many albums did you

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do with him? I think we did four or five

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Yeah, but in your mind, the most successful,

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the best of those was the first. It's my favorite. Yeah,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>it seems the one that resonated the most with people.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there was a period after that where after

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the divorce, he sort of fell into a dark period.

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's some interesting thing that came out of that period,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he was he was at his peak. Yeah,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>why did you guys stop booking together? I never knew why,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but I was told something that he wrote, or something

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that was written in the autobiography that was done on him.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not an autobiography, the biography that was done on him.

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>That whatever. The last project we worked on together. At

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the end of the project, while we were mixing, it

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was time for me to start my next project, which

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think was a Red Hot Chili Peppers album, And

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I started the next project, and I think he felt

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>like I abandoned him, which I don't think was the case.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we had already done what we were supposed

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>to do, But he never said that to me. I

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know anything about that. Yeah, yeah, but you guys

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>remained on good terms. Absolutely. Yeah. Do you think it's

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for artists to move from producer to producer?

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Can it? Can? It can be very productive, especially based

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on the story I told you earlier of he wanted

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to impress me in the beginning, So if there was

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>someone knew that he wanted to impress, he would work harder,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So that would be a good thing. Yeah, yeah, does.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Then again, George Martin did all the Beatles records and

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they're really good. So it's like it's hard to say, like,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>no one knows. Yeah, no one knows. No one knows.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>That's a very rick way our first season, you know.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 1>When we began with our first episode of Broken Record

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>earlier this fall, a massive wildfire was threatening both Rick's

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>home and his studio, the historic Shangolaw in Malibu. Many

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of you have asked about what happened to Shangolow. The

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>answer is, miraculously it survived. The fire burned all around it,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but that bit of musical history escaped unscathed. Maybe that's

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>an omen for all of music in the coming year.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in the spring with new conversations and

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>performances from some of our favorite artists Pentatonics, Questlove, Lawyer

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>McKenna in Nashville, Ezra Canning, E, Vampire Weekend, and many

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>many more. Who knows, we might just drop in a

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise in the meantime. Thank you for listening. Broken Record

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Justin Richmond and Jason Gambrell, with help

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>from Bruce Headlam, Mia Lobel, Jaquita, Pascal, Daisy Rosario, Jacob Smith,

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Julia Barton, Jacob Weisberg, and of course el Hefe Rick Rubin.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>To hear the songs featured in today's episode, check out

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Broken Record podcast dot com. This show is brought to

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. I'm maconglat them