WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: Big Apps That Flopped

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's care Price host of tech Stuff. We're taking

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a week off, but we'll have a fresh episode for

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you next Wednesday. You're not gonna want to miss Oz's

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the CEO of Colossal Biosciences. I know, I

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>was surprised by just how close we may be to

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing back the Wooly Mammoth and what that could mean

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for our planet. So definitely check that out next week.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>In lieu of headlines today, we wanted to share an

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech Stuff from February twenty twenty four about

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest apps to ever flop. The tech

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>industry moves really fast. It always has, but now it

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's moving in hyper speed given the popularity

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of vibe coding programs like Cursor, Codex, and Copilot. With

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>these tools, you no longer have to be an expert

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>software engineer to write code, and now you have to

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be a designer either. Last week, Google launched Stitch, a

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>program that can help you build web or mobile app

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>front ends. But just because you can, it doesn't mean

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you should. In the episode you're about to hear, Jonathan

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Strickland reminds us that not every pitch is a promise,

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the most compelling apps can fail. Take a listen.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts. And how the

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>tech are yet? So, once upon a time, we used

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to have these things called programs. And I say that

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>because now we don't call programs programs anymore. We typically

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>call programs apps. I think that really started to become

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a thing upon the ascent of the consumer smartphone, which

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>was sparked by Apple, which was then cranked up by Android,

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and that we really had the era of the app.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>At that point. We used to, like I said, call

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>them programs. Now they are applications, whether it's for a

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 2>phone or a computer. I guess app stores sounds better

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>than program emporium anyway. For thousands of entrepreneurs, the dream

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 2>is to build an app and to become rich beyond

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>your wildest dreams. Right, You design an app and then

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the money rolls in. Maybe it's because some bigger fish

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>out there, like some Google or Apple or Meta, decides

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that you're just too good to be left unacquired. And

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>then they spend a bucket load of cash on you,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>hopefully ten times more than what you're actually worth. Or

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe you actually figure out how to be profitable all

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>on your own, you actually have a business plan and

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>you have a way of generating revenue. You would be

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the rare Silicon Valley project that actually works as a

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>business business on its own. That again is the dream.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>But dreams don't always come true, and sometimes even apps

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that seem to be strapped to a rocket for success

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>end up blowing up and going up in flames. So

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>this episode is about apps that fall into that category,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>apps that at one time seemed like they were a

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>sure thing, only they flamed out down the line. One

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of the apps I originally planned to put on this

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>list was four square, but as it turns out, that

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>app and the company behind it is still chugging along,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 2>just in a slightly different role than it was before.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>See I remember when four square launched and folks would

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>use it to check in to locations that they were

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>visiting in the real world. So some places would even

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>start to offer special discounsel right, like twenty percent off

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>your first drink if you check into the bar via

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>four square. Because it was seen as a kind of

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>viral marketing. Other folks were worried about the privacy issues

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 2>of this kind of behavior. In fact, some folks created

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a website called Please rob Me, and this site satirically

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>would scrape data off Twitter for four square check in notifications,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>so please rob Me would then list people who were

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 2>saying they were not currently at home. Now, the whole

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>point wasn't to actually inspire a wave of burglaries, but

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 2>rather show why it's dangerous to broadcast your location to

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the world in general. Then it might not be a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>good idea, and maybe people should think harder about their

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 2>personal privacy. In twenty fourteen, for Square actually changed dramatically.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>The company launched a companion app called Swarm Now. This

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 2>app contained all the social networking features that for Square

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>used to have, so all the check in stuff, all

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>the geolocation stuff that was kind of seen as the

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>critical element of four square and the one that you

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>should be worried about that went to Swarm. For Square

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 2>meanwhile became four Square City Guide, which became a discovery

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and recommendation app, and it would help you figure out

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 2>places that maybe you should visit based upon your past experiences, right,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 2>It would say, Okay, I see that you're in downtown

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 2>New York, and because of the places that you used

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>to go to in your hometown, here are some places

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>we think you should probably check out because you'll really

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>like them. You didn't have to use both of the

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>apps if you didn't want to, but they did compliment

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 2>one another, So if you used Swarm, four Square would

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>tap into that check in data to help inform what

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>recommendations it should give you. Those apps are still available today.

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Like I just thought that four Square had come and

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>gone because I haven't personally used it in a decade,

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.119
<v Speaker 2>But the fact is it's still a thing. One really

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing to me is that forour Square's business largely

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>involves licensing its technology to other companies, which include Uber, Airbnb, Snapchat,

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and lots more. The check in feature that four Square

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>developed powers numerous other apps. So while our perception was

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that four Square was a relic of the past, that's

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>just not true. That's totally my misconception there, and again

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 2>it's because I haven't really paid attention to four Square

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>in a decade. But it is interesting to me that

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, they found success in a different way than

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>what they set out to do. I still don't have

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>any real desire to read download either four Square or Swarm. However,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>on a related note, there is also the story of

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 2>yik Yak. Now, this app actually did flame out, but

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>then it was resurrected again just a few years ago,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>so for those of y'all who do not know the story,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 2>A couple of guys launched an anonymous location based messaging

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>platform back in twenty thirteen, and the way it worked

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>was that you would open the app and you would

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>connect via putting in your phone number. This would end

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>up allowing you to post to the platform, but you

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>would only be able to read messages that had been

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>posted by people within a certain distance of your physical location,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>such as within a five mile radius, and you could

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>post a message anonymously, and again only people who were

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>in a five mile radius of your location would be

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>able to read your message, So as you would travel around,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you would see new messages, while ones that were now

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>out of physical range would disappear from view. The focus

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>on geolocation, coupled with anonymity, made the app extremely popular

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>with school campuses, and Yakyak largely catered to that audience.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>This also meant there was a lot of abuse. There

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>was no accountability, right, There was no connection to a

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>specific person, so people could post the platform and they

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>could bully other folks or worse. So there were these

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>stories popping up all around the United States about how

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the app was bringing out the absolute worst in people

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and endangering folks right Like, let's say that you belonged

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to a minority population in a particular campus university of

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Even if someone's not specifically calling you out, it might

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>be easy to figure out who people are talking about,

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>which could definitely hurt your mental health, or they could

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>even be calling for more extreme acts that could endanger

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>your physical health. So pressure built against the company, and

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>eventually yaikyak cave to it. So in twenty fifteen, Yayik

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>made a massive change and required users to register a

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 2>handle with the site. So all messages now would be

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 2>attributed to a handle. They wouldn't be fully anonymous. Now,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>it was still a handle, not your name, so it

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>wasn't exactly the same thing as signing your name to

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>your own words, but it was a lot closer than

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>what had come before. Hardcore users hated this change, and

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>eventually yak Yak kind of backed off a bit and

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>made it an optional feature, but by then the user

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>base had been alienated and had dwindled, and in twenty seventeen,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the company announced that the app was shutting down due

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to that dwindling user base. They actually did a sell

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>off Square, the company that is behind online payment systems.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 2>They purchased essentially the IP but really more like they

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>purchased the engineering talent of YikYak and brought them on board,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and it was for reportedly like just a million dollars,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>which is still a lot of money. Don't get me wrong.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>A million dollars is a lot, but it's nothing compared

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>to what yik yak was valued at a few years earlier.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 2>And so yak yak effectively stopped being a thing in

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen, and it stayed in the grave for four years.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>But then in February twenty twenty one, a group of

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>new owners who remained mysterious and unnamed. Like everywhere I

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>look to find out who the heck owned yaikyak between

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one and twenty twenty three, didn't have information

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>about that anyway, They purchased yak Yak and announced plans

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to relaunch, and sure enough, late in the summer of

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, the app came back. Now two years later,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three, another company called side Chat scooped

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>up yik Yak now side chats. Shtick was essentially the

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 2>same as yak yak. Sidechat had an anonymous posting platform

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 2>that largely was targeting college campuses. Side Chat was not

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>as popular as yak yak. A lot of yak yak

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>users felt that Sidechat's user interface was inferior, and initially

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 2>yak yak users were getting messages where they were being

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 2>urged to migrate to side chat and they hated it.

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Eventually that would change, where yik yak would remain a thing,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>but effectively transformed into side chat. You know, its interface

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 2>became more of side Chat's interface. By the way, I

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>based this all off of blog posts and articles and

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>message boards because I wasn't onn yik yak at the time,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 2>so I had no idea of what was going on.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>But while the initial yik yak was popular with campuses,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 2>this new version specifically focused on university students, like almost

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 2>like exclusively, as opposed to it being a community based

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>thing or a regional based thing. It was specifically a

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>campus based thing, and occasionally it sounds like it would

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>even make mistakes and accidentally assign someone to a university

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that was not the one they actually went to, which

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 2>could be really hairy, right because if I were to

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 2>join Yak Yak and it suggested I was a student

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>at Georgia Tech, that's fighting words because I attended the

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>University of Georgia. Now that probably means nothing to most

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>of you, but just know those two schools have had

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a long standing rivalry that goes between being you know,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 2>good natured ribbing and genuine, deep seated loathing. So if

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>you had one student misidentified as going to the other school,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that could be fighting words. Now, I should say that

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Yak Yak currently is only back for iOS users, as

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I record the podcast. Now, the relaunch did at one

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 2>point include Android, and apparently it was only active for

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>a very short while before in the spring of twenty

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, the company said that they were shutting down

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Android support in order to focus on building out features

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>for the iOS version. Now, again, I can't check this

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 2>app out. I'm an Android user. Plus I'm not a

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>college student, so I have to rely on articles and

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Reddit posts to read up on it, and it sounds

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to me that in the past you could register for

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>yik yik just with your phone number, but now since

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the side chat acquisition, you have to supply a university

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>email address to create an account university or college email address,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't have one of those, you can't

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 2>have an account, and that has upset a lot of

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>users because it meant that they're one. If they're not

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>in college, they can't be part of this anymore. Though honestly,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't see why you would necessarily want to be,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>but then that's probably because I feel a lot of

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>empathy for the folks who were bullied, but it all

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>so is a reason. One reason they don't want to

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>do it anymore is because their actual identity would be

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>associated with their account, maybe not directly, like the actual

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 2>posts would be anonymous, but the site would know who

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you were because you would have an email address tied

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to your identity to register for the site. Arguably, you

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>could say the same thing is true because for the

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>old version, because you had to supply a phone number,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>So unless you're buying burner numbers just for yekiyak, it

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>would be pretty easy to figure out who you were.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>But it also means that if you're not a college student,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>or you're not on faculty or staff, then you're completely

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>out of the loop. There's a lot of competition in

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the anonymous message board space these days. Seems to me

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of the companies behind these apps typically

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 2>will reach a level of success that brings more attention

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>to their activities and perhaps their flaws, let's say, and

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>then they feel pressure to change things in order to

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 2>make their apps less prone to abuse because now people

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>are paying attention to them and calling them out. And

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>then subsequently, after making these changes, the apps decline in

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 2>popularity because it turns out the user base the stuff

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that they really liked happened to be the same stuff

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that also facilitated abuse. Not to say that users all

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed and piling on folks and abusing people, but that

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the same features that made it easy to abuse folks

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>were also the features that people just really liked. That

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems to be the life cycle for these

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>kinds of applications. They launch, they go viral, they get

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>really big folks notice that sometimes really awful people are

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>using that app to do really awful things. The app

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>then ends up making changes in an effort to not

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>be held accountable for these things, and then it alienates

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the user base, both the good and the bad users.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>It then declines in popularity, then it fades into memory,

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>your rents and you repeat. Now, I can't say for

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>certain that's what's happening with ya Yak. There are a

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of users who say that it's not as good

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>as it used to be, that they don't see the appeal.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>The fact that it doesn't it's not available for Android

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>users is a huge thing. It means that a large

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>amount of the population can't even access it. Maybe the

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>company will manage to relaunch for Android and regain some momentum,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>or maybe it's on the path back toward obsolescence. Okay,

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got more failed apps to talk about. Before we

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>do that, let's stop for a moment and thank our sponsors. Okay,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>we're back. So no list of failed apps would be

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>complete without Quibbi. Holy cats, this was a massive whiff

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>with a whole lot of money and some really heavy

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>hitters in both the entertainment and tech industries at the wheel,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's still crashed and burned. It was the brainchild

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of Jeffrey Katzenberg, who had forged a legendary career in Hollywood.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, he became really well known at Disney and

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>then created dream Works. And Quibi was hoping to tap

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>into that same magic that Hollywood success and also the

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>same magic that TikTok moosts. That was the key was

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>can we make something inspired by the success of TikTok,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and that was namely short form content, And in the

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>case of Quibi, the short form would be videos that

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>would last ten minutes or less. However, unlike TikTok, Quibi

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>productions would have some serious money behind them. We're talking

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>about really high production values, stuff that you would see

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 2>that would be akin to a television or film studio.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And if TikTok could knock him dead with diy shorts

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>created by just any Yahoo out there, surely an entertainment

0:16:55.240 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>app with serious Hollywood credentials could make a killing right now.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>On the tech side, former HP CEO Meg Whitman was

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 2>on board, and Whitman and Katzenberg brainstormed the structure and

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>execution of Quibbi. They also are argued a lot Witman

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>would later essentially say that Katzenberg would undermine her decisions

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and was micromanaging, and there seemed to be a lot

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 2>of bad blood at the top levels at Quibbi, which

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>was just one of many problems. But the company signed

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>on various actors, directors, writers, and associated people to create

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>content for the site. They poured approximately a billion dollars

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>to that effect. Some of the content created consisted of

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>standalone short videos right like it was just a one

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and done ten minutes or less video, but some were

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 2>actually serialized. They were longer pieces and divided up into

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>ten minute long chapters. This in turn was a really

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 2>tricky because, like, if you're gonna divide a movie into

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>ten minute long chapters a way to entice people to

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>continue after a chapter is over, and in my opinion,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 2>it becomes like a Dan Brown novel where every chapter

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>ends in a cliffhanger to try and incentivize people to

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 2>go to the next chapter. And personally, I find that

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of narrative exhausting and not very satisfying. I am

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>not a Dan Brown fan, nothing against him, I just

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't appeal to me to end every few pages

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>with another cliffhanger. Anyway, they also made a really odd

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 2>decision when it came to framing, because the whole point

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 2>of Quibi was that it was intended to be consumed

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>on smartphones. And as I'm sure you're aware, we're used

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to watching television programs in landscape format, that is, the

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>picture is wider than it is tall, right, But for phones,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>we often hold phones in portrait mode, where it's taller

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>than it is wide. Otherwise you have to turn the

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>dang phone on its side, and there's a chance you'll

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 2>end up watching a tiny video with huge black bars

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>above and below it. So one choice Quibi's founders made

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>is that all content should be viewable in full screen,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>whether the user was holding their phone in portrait or

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 2>landscape mode, and that you could switch back and forth.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>So you could hold it in portrait mode and then say,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I don't want to see this in

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>wide screen, turn your phone landscape. It would switch, and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>in both versions the image would completely fill the screen

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 2>of your phone. That's a big deal, even though it

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 2>might not sound like it, because if you're a director

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>or cinematographer, part of your job is making sure all

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 2>the important information for the viewer is available within the frame.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Obviously that's going to be different if the finished product

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 2>is to be viewed in portrait mode rather than landscape.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>You need to figure out how are you going to

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 2>frame the image so that it works in both formats,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>or you might have to use things like pan and

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>scan or switching view to get the information across. Right, Like,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you might have a scene where you have two characters,

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>one far left and one far right on the screen.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 2>They're talking to each other, and then landscape mode, that's fine,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 2>you can see it, but you switch into portrait mode

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 2>and now there's not enough room on the screen to

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>get both characters in frame. What do you do? Do

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 2>you have an empty frame where both characters are off screen,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>one off screen left and one off screen right. Do

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you just focus on one character and then you switch

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>whenever the dialogue changes so that you get a different

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>view when character one speaks versus character two? Do you

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>pan back and forth? Which is that swimmy effect you

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>often get if you watch like old old home video,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>not home video, but you know videos that were made

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 2>for home video use, you will often get that scanning feature.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Because televisions were in the old four to three aspect

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 2>ratio and they couldn't incorporate a wide screen picture unless

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they did the bars at the top or bottom or both,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people hated them. They wanted to

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>have the image take up the whole screen. So you

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>end up having this digital panning, which I absolutely detested. Well,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 2>you have to make those decisions, or do you end

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>up blocking all of your shots so that all the

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>relevant information can be seen in one view, even if

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>it's portrait, in which case you might just have a

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of unused space, like negative space in the frame

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching it widescreen, or maybe you shoot with

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>multiple cameras so that way, one camera is taking the

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 2>landscape version of the shot, one camera's taking the portrait

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>version of the shot. Like, there's a lot of complex

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>things you have to think of behind the scenes from

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a content creator standpoint, beyond just the technology of if

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you turn your phone, you want the frame to be

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>completely full. So this was a real issue that goes

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a technical challenge, and they did not have enough time

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how to deal with that in a

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>way that was satisfying anyway. That whole design decision became

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a big hurdle. But another hurdle was that Quibi was

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 2>meant to be mobile only by design. It was not

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>intended to be an app that you would access on

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 2>a computer or smart television or streaming box or anything

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 2>like that, and something that was outside the control and

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>not predicted by the folks at Quibi when they were

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 2>putting together their business plan was the COVID nineteen pandemic,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 2>which took a lot of us totally by surprise. So

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Quibi was really intended to be used for a world

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>that was on the go, right. The use case was

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that you would be out in the real world and

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>you would have time to kill. Maybe you're waiting in

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>line of the bank, or maybe you're sitting on a

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>subway and you're on your way to work and you

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>just need something to distract you from the tedium of life. Boom.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Quibi is there to save the day. High production value,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>scripted entertainment or you know, like game shows or whatever,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>but still high production value, not the type of stuff

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you would see typically on a site like TikTok. Except

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the app launch just as the world was shutting down

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and going into quarantine in twenty twenty, so the use

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>case for the app was no longer relevant at least

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 2>not for the several first months of the app's existence.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Plenty of critics said that even without the pandemic, Quibi

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>would have just totally failed. But certainly the lockdown was

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a massive blow to the service when there were plenty

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of other options folks could access when they were at home.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Why use Quibi if you have access to Netflix or

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the billion other streaming services that are out

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 2>there now. The Verge has an article going through other

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 2>reasons why Quibi flopped. The writer Julia Alexander argues in

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 2>that piece that one big reason is that none of

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the shows on Quibi were particularly good, and that is

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a really tough problem. It is hard to convince folks

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to flock to your streaming service if the stuff you're

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>streaming isn't very entertaining or compelling. Alexander actually says, quote

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>most titles felt like jokes straight out of thirty Rock

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 2>end quoteff if you don't know what that means. Thirty

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Rock was this sitcom, a satirical sitcom about creating a

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>late night comedy variety show akin to Saturday Night Live,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and often the show was joking about different shows that

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the network was launching, and they were always ridiculous, and

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, you would never really expect to see such

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 2>a show in the real world. Well, Quibi apparently brought

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of shows to the real world. Initially, Quibi

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 2>offered a free subscription for a few months to early users,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of a trial period, but once that trial period

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>ran out, users were then given the option to subscribe

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to the service either for five dollars a month, which

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>was an ad supported experience, or eight dollars a month

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to be free of ads. But since,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>as Alexander points out, there really wasn't much compelling content

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 2>on the streaming service, most folks declined the offer once

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>it stopped being They were like, that's it, I'm out,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing here to keep me here. Julia Alexander also

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>argues that Quibi was doomed even if there had never

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 2>been a pandemic, and it's quite possible that she was right, because,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>as we do know, Katzenberg and Whitman were at odds

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>with each other. There was a lack of good content

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 2>on Quibi, there were a lot of other competing services

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 2>already out there, and there weren't a lot of good

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 2>arguments to say why use Quibi when there are these

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>other alternatives, right, And to Alexander's point, the people at

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Quibi never really settled on what Quibi actually was, or

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 2>what it was for, or what its mission was. And

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>because there was this lack of clarity, there was really

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>little chance of success. Now we'll never know if Quibi

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>would have succeeded had there not been a pandemic, or

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>if it would have survived, but we do know that

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Quibi launched on April sixth, twenty twenty, and it was

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>shut down by December of twenty. It didn't even make

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 2>it a full year. And considering how much money was

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>behind that app, like, remember, this is an app that

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>spent a billion dollars just on the content, that's not

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>even on the engineering or anything else. Well, that's a

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>massive flop, like big time flop in the tech world.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And while we're on the subject of short form entertainment,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about a precursor to TikTok, something that kind

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of was forging the path that other services like TikTok

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 2>or Instagram reels would follow. And I'm talking about the

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 2>venerable and missed app Vine, at least it's missed by

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>some people, including me. So in twenty twelve, Don Hoffman,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Colin Krol, and russ Yusupov developed and launched the app Vine. Now,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 2>for those of y all who have never experienced Vine,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>it was a short form video app where you could

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 2>record and then post a six second video clip and

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it would automatically loop once it reached the end, so

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>it would play out the six seconds or however long

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>it was. It could be less than six seconds, and

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>then once it was at the end, it would start

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>over again until you scrolled to the next you know, Vine.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>And this made the app ideal for meme worthy content,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 2>so it was great for stuff like pranks or funny

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>visual gags or amazing feats of skill, like if someone was,

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, shooting a basketball from half court and sinking

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it perfectly, nothing but net perfect Vine, right. And it

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 2>also meant that folks started to get really creative. They

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>started to look at Vine as sort of a challenging

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 2>platform and they wanted to create content specifically for it,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and they would create six second long stories, typically comedic. Right.

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>You'd have a setup and then a punchline and it

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>would all take place in six seconds, but sometimes it

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>would include things like scene changes. This was not easy

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to do in Vine because there were no real editing

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>tools to speak of within the app. You could record,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>then you could pause recording, and then you could start

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 2>recording again. But you had just that six seconds to

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 2>do everything, and you couldn't cut and edit clips together.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>So if you had like a really good take in

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>the first three seconds of one version and a really

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>good conclusion in the last three seconds of another version,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't pair those together. You had to get it

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 2>all done in one go, which meant if you made

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a mistake, your options were either post the imperfect version

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>or keep trying till you got it right. Even so,

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>with these restrictions, folks flocked to Vine to make some

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing short videos, and they ranged all over the place.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I mostly think of the comedic ones, but there were

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>other ones too. There were some that weren't, you know, comedic.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 2>They were like heartwarming or you know, they might make

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you weepy, depending upon the content. Vine was a phenomenon

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>shortly after launching in of twenty twelve, and it was

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>enough to convince Twitter to acquire the company in October

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twelve for thirty million smackaroos, which is not

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>bad for a newly launched app. A couple of years later,

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen, some successful Vine creators all banded together

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to move into an apartment complex which became kind of

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>a ragtag collaborative studio in a sense, and they found

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>further exposure on mainstream media. Like their success on Vine

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>translated to larger platforms like classic ones on television. But

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>even by twenty fourteen, things were starting to get rocky

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 2>for Vine. One major reason is that Vine was in

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>trouble due to hefty competition. You see, the same year

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that Vine launched, back in twenty twelve, Meta which at

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>that point was just known as Facebook, acquired Instagram for

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 2>a billion smack aarreous that's really a princely sum. And

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>then in twenty thirteen, Instagram introduced the ability to post

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 2>video clips of up to fifteen seconds in length, so

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>already more than twice as long as a Vine. Instagram

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>also already had a huge user base, which was made

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>even larger by Facebook's integration, and it took a big

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 2>old gulp of Vine's milkshake as a result. Now, this

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>move should not have surprised anyone, because even Back then,

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Facebook already had a reputation for scooping up companies that

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 2>could otherwise distract Facebook users. Instagram was actually a great

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 2>example of this. Instagram was one of those acquisitions where

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Facebook says, Oh, this other app is starting to get

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 2>people's attention, which means their attention isn't on our website,

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 2>which means we're not making money from them. I don't

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>like that. Let's fix it. And Facebook typically had one

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>of two ways that they would fix this problem. They

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>would buy the company and incorporate it into Facebook's corporate structure,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and thus it became a bonus. It was added to

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Facebook's value, it was no longer taking away. Or they

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>could copy it, and if they copied it, then they

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>could undermine their competitor. And in the case of Vine,

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Facebook shows that option. They would just mimic the defining

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>features of the competitor, either in Facebook or in one

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 2>of their other properties, and they would try to sap

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the user base back over to Facebook without having to

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 2>buy the competition. That's kind of what was going on

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>with Vine, and it worked. The money began to shift

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>from Vine to Instagram, and that money was largely coming

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>out of marketing departments. So brands were partnering with popular

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>creators in an effort to manufacture some viral marketing campaigns.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>And these could be really cost effective, right, Like, if

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>you're a creator, a deal might land you a ton

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of money, but that ton of money would still be

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>tied up compared to what a traditional mainstream marketing campaign

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>would cost a company. So then there you go. That's

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 2>where the money was for Vine. But then Instagram was

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>offering a longer form factor, right, more than twice as

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>long as what a Vine was, and that was far

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 2>more attractive to a lot of marketers out there. Like

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking fifteen seconds, you're talking half of a

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 2>traditional television commercial. So the shift of money and influence

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 2>meant that creators would also jump ship from Vine to

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Instagram or in some cases to other platforms like YouTube. Now,

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>not everyone did it, but it was really challenging to

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>go in for that small pool of money that was

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 2>still available for Vine creators. And it was also scary

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to port your work from one platform to another because

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>there was no guarantee the audience would follow. Right. Just

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>because you were popular on Vine doesn't mean you're going

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>to find the same success If you move over to

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Instagram or to YouTube. You know, some folks could do that,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and maybe they would lose some of their audience, but

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>they would have enough to be able to not lose

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 2>too much momentum. For others, it would mean having to

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>start from scratch, and there's no guarantee that you'll strike

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 2>gold twice. But since that pool of money was getting

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>smaller and smaller over at Vine, most creators didn't need

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of convincing they had to switch or else

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>they weren't going to make any money anyway. So Vine

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 2>went into further decline, and in twenty sixteen, Twitter announced

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>it was going to shut down Vine, which happened in

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>early twenty seventeen. And we can still feel the influence

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>of Vine today in the form of Instagram reels and

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>TikTok videos, and it's possible that neither of those things

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>would have happened without Vine. And I know lots of

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 2>folks who to this day lament the loss of Vine.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So farewell Vine. We hardly knew Yee, Okay, we're going

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to take another quick break. When we come back, We've

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 2>got a couple more examples I really want to talk about, Okay,

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about some more fails, and this next one

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>is one that I absolutely loved, even as I recognized

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>that it was a hot mess from the get go

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and it probably wasn't a practical solution for ninety nine

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 2>percent of the population out there. So I'm talking about

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Google Wave, And honestly, I could do a full episode

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 2>just about Google apps that have come and gone, and

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I actually have done that at least once

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 2>or twice in the past. But Google Wave has a

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>special place in my heart. So Google launched this bizarre

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 2>app back in two thousand and nine, and it was

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a real time online collaborative tool, and it was kind

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 2>of like a Frankenstein's Monster of features. There were elements

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:46.439
<v Speaker 2>of email worked in there, Instant messaging was worked in there,

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 2>online word processing, and lots more.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 2>You could create a document in Google Wave, you could

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>invite online collaborators and all of you could work within

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>that document at the same time, and you would be

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 2>able to see what others were doing in the document,

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 2>like word by word. You could watch as they made

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>typos and corrected and stuff. It was all going at

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the same time, and the app would also keep a

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 2>history of all the changes made to the document. So

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe someone's going off the rails right and you're like, no, wait,

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 2>we can't none of this is working for this document.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 2>You could actually wind things back to an earlier version. Now.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I only used Google Wave with one other person, who

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 2>was my former co host, Chris Pillette. We used Google

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Wave to build out a run of show for a

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>streaming video series we used to do way back in

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the day. So once a week we would do a

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 2>streaming video that was kind of like a tech news

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 2>program live on TV in the middle of the day

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Eastern time, and we would use Google Wave to organize

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>our show and even to make changes on the fly

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>while streaming our video content. And it was an ideal

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>tool for that situation. The trouble was, I couldn't figure

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 2>out any other use case where it would really makes

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>sense for me, just this one thing I would do

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>once a week for my job. For a lot of

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>folks out there, they never found a good use for

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Google Wave. By the way, I really miss that streaming

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>video show. One of the fun things that we used

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>to have and that show is that occasionally either Matt Frederick,

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the hosts of Stuff they don't want you

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to know would do this, or sometimes Tyler Klaig, who's

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 2>now like the head of our podcast production. Both of

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 2>them are still with the company. I would do a

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 2>tweet of the week segment and they would hold up

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bird on a stick. They would be out

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of frame and they would poke a bird out stick

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to be in front of my face and they would

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>make a tweet sound, which just shows how far those

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>guys have come since we were doing the streaming news show. Anyway,

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 2>features in Google Wave would eventually find their way into

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>lots of other Google applications, but Google Wave itself was

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>just not very long for this world. Google supported it

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 2>for about a year. Then they essentially he said, you

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>know what, this isn't working for us, and they shifted

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 2>it off to the Apache Software Foundation in twenty ten.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Folks suggested that Google's decision was due to lots of

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 2>converging reasons, ranging from just a confusing interface that was

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 2>turning away new users to internal conflicts that were happening

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>within the development team, especially at the leadership level. There

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 2>were stories that there were leaders who were disagreeing on

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>what Google Wave was even supposed to be, which meant

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that the development team was put in this really difficult

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 2>position in the middle to try and create all things

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 2>for all people, which was impossible, so they ended up

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 2>creating something that was for nobody. But even the Apache

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Wave version is no more. The nonprofit group had Wave

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in an incubator status for almost a decade, but in

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen the Wave became still waters because development ceased

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and Wave just never graduated out of that incubator status. Now,

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't say that I would still be using Wave

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to this day if it were still around, but that's

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.479
<v Speaker 2>mostly because tech stuff is a pretty simple project. I research, write,

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and record all the episodes, and then super producer Tari

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>she edits and publishes the episodes, so there is collaboration there.

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Tari and I do collaborate, but it's divided really neatly

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>into a production phase and a post production phase. Perhaps

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 2>if I were more actively working on shows that had

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 2>multiple collaborators, I would feel Waves loss more keenly. But

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I really liked using it, even while I recognized how

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 2>weird and janky it was. Now this list could go

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on much much longer, but I figure I'll conclude with

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a rock Star like story, and that story involves a

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>company called pay by Touch. While most of the apps

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about so far were ones that you would

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 2>either use on your phone or on your computer, pay

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 2>by Touch was different. Okay, it was an app that

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 2>was a service, and this service would let you pay

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 2>for purchases at a point of sale, primarily in places

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 2>like supermarkets here in the United States. You had to

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 2>do was swipe your finger on a fingerprint sensor at

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the cash register, and your biometric data would correspond to

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 2>your pay by Touch account, and an electronic transaction would

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>take care of your grocery bill by deducting it from

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 2>your checking account or from a credit card, and you

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>could go on your merry way without ever having to

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 2>hand over cash or write a check or use a

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 2>credit card physically. Just swipe your finger, good to go.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 2>This was the future, and it was all in two

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand and two. The idea of having your financials directly

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 2>tied to your own identity was one that had been

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>around for a while but not really accomplished. So again,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>it was really considered to be convenient, and you could

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>even tie your biometrics to things like a store loyalty account.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So by using your fingerprint. You could then apply discounts

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 2>or coupons to whatever it was you were buying. And

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 2>this was coming out in two thousand and two, you like,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 2>five years before we would get the first iPhone, So

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 2>these d You know, obviously, we have lots of contactless

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 2>payment solutions, mostly tied to mobile phones, but back in

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and two, this was really revolutionary. Now, the

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 2>services did face challenges. One big one was that folks

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 2>were a little anxious about having their money tied to

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>their fingerprints. There seemed to be something invasive about that. Heck,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're the type of person who prefers to use

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>cash for your transactions, it absolutely goes against your preferences. Also,

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the thought of a third party company potentially having insight

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 2>into your purchase history seemed creepy. But despite the slow

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 2>going and low adoption rate, pay by Touch did grow

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and got lots of investors. It expanded its business into

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>various supermarket chains. But then the company would ultimately declare

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 2>bankruptcy in two thousand and eight. So what happened, Well,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>part of what happened was a failure to communicate to

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the public the benefits of this system. Just really bad

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.959
<v Speaker 2>marketing and education the concept again including things like tying

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>biometrics to loyalty programs and stuff that just didn't really

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 2>get communicated effectively in most locations, and some stores were

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>just using the system for loyalty programs and customers would

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 2>still pay for their purchases using more traditional means. So

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 2>there was this element of distrust that the company was

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 2>never able to overcome, possibly for good reason, because another

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>big reason for the company's failure was in its leadership.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 2>The CEO of the company was a guy named John P. Rogers,

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and he had had some trouble with the law that

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 2>largely went unnoticed when he was getting investments for his company.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 2>At least a couple of women had accused him of

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>violent behavior, one saying that he had abused her, the

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 2>other saying he had trashed her home. Both of them

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 2>had been connected romantically with him. He had also been

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 2>pulled over by police and arrested on suspicion of driving

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 2>under the influence of cocaine, and apparently he was known

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to have had issues with drug addiction. Investigation suggested that

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Rogers had been rather extravagant with corporate funds that he

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>had spearheaded efforts to convince those with really deep pockets

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to invest in Pay by Touch that paid off in dividends.

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 2>He raised around three hundred and forty million dollars, but

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 2>by two thousand and eight the coffers were empty, and

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the investigation suggested that one reason for this was that

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Rogers appeared to have been dipping into corporate funds to

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 2>pay for an extravagant lifestyle, complete with drug use. And

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 2>when I say extravagant, I mean that the investigation suggested

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 2>he was burning around eight million dollars a month, which

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of money. And it would turn out

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that Rogers had a history of failed businesses, something that

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 2>no one had really noticed when Pay by Touch was

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 2>just getting off the ground. He had managed to keep

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>his history kind of out of the spotlight, and investors

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't ask any tough questions. They just were excited about

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>this potential opportunity to completely revolutionize the way we pay

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 2>for stuff at retail locations. Obviously that was key to

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 2>him securing investments. Ultimately, pay by Touch went could put.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Some investors pursued civil litigation against the company and against Rogers,

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 2>but he never faced criminal charges. For how things went

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 2>down which is kind of wild. I wasn't there, so

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe the evidence was all circumstantial, maybe

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 2>there was not a solid case against him, But it

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 2>does seem to fall in line with the perception that

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 2>the rules are different depending upon who you are and

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>your station in life. I don't know if that's actually

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the case in this particular instance, but on the surface

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it seems to reinforce that idea anyway. That is just

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 2>a quick list of some major apps that received a

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of attention but ultimately flamed out. As I said,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 2>we could go on much much longer with this list.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 2>There are tons of other examples, and I'll probably do

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 2>more episodes about them in the future. And you should

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 2>expect these kind of things, right because again, creating an

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 2>app is seen as one of those gateways toward insane

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 2>so excess in Silicon Valley, like it seems like everyone

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in Silicon Valley is behind some sort of app, and

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 2>we might only hear about a small percentage of them.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Some of those cases are because the app is just

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 2>so incredible and useful that it's undeniable how valuable. It is.

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.240
<v Speaker 2>In other cases, it might be that it's a peculiarity,

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>and it gets some momentary notice, and then ultimately that

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't stand the test of time, and in a few

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>cases it may just be notorious and infamous, as I

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 2>would argue the pay by Touch story ultimately became once

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 2>the history of Rogers became more public knowledge. Anyway, I

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 2>hope you enjoyed this episode. I hope you are all well,

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 2>and I will talk to you again really soon. Tech

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 2>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 2>listen to your favorite shows.