WEBVTT - Will the Shutdown Lead to DOGE 2.0?

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Everybody's business from Bloomberg Business Week.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm Max Chafkin and I'm Stacy Vannoxsmith.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Stacey. Have we got a story for you.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 4>It is about the wildest, weirdest, most interesting man in crypto.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>His name is Justin Sun will tell you all.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 3>About it, Okay, I'm looking forward to that. Before we

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>get to that, We've got, of course, the big news

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>of the week, Max, government shutdown.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh Stacy, we're doing this again.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know, government shutdowns they happen periodically, but

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>this time I think is different. We've got Justin Wolfer's

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>an economists here to help us break that down.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 4>And Stacy the underrated story of the week. Yeah, two

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 4>words for you, little teas splendid.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Daddy's splendid. Daddy's all right, hang around for that, Okay, Max.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>This week the news has been completely are taken by

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the government shutdown. It's all the headlines, it's everywhere, It's

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>all anybody can talk about.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, is Stacy, there is one very very positive economic

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 4>indicator that we need to discuss.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, tell me I want some positive economic indicators.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Life of a Showgirl the new Taylor Swift album hitting

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 4>on Friday tomorrow. As we record this today, as you listen,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, Taylor Swift obviously huge mega phenomenon. She she

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 4>criss crosses the country raising hotel rooms.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Hit pause on the podcast and just go listen to that.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, seriously, this is it does feel like

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 4>a big cultural moment. You know, Taylor Swift obviously the

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>biggest pop star on the planet right now.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>She's had this amazing run.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>She's been mentioned in the Beige Book as I don't

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>know what courses that has moved local economies when her

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>concerts come through town.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 4>That's what I was alluding to, like the arostour when

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 4>it would hit a town, like hotel room prices would

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>go way up, you know, restaurants would sell more.

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I think there were literal earthquakes that.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Happened because people were moving around so much in these stadiums.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 3>So you're saying, this is this moment, is the shutdown

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>versus Taylor Swift? Can she do enough to salvage the

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>US economy? I'm the government shutdown.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump and Chuck Schumer, they all have their calculations

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 4>about where Americans are going to fall and how much

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>pain are people going to be willing to accept? But

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 4>they haven't counted on the fact that everyone's going to

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 4>be distracted for like the next month listening to this.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Album and dissecting all the lyrics.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, that aside Stacy, I mean, the shutdown is happening,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>and like this sense of chaos, political chaos that then

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of tries to spill into the business world that's

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>continuing this week, and I feel like that's maybe where

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>we need to start.

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, and in fact, I was at the University

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of Michigan earlier this week. I got to drop in

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>on economist Justin Wolfer's ECON one oh one class, which

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>was delightful. It's a class of five hundred students and

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>at the end and I tracked some of them down

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 3>and asked them how they were feeling about the economy

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>and like what their worries were about the economy at

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>this moment. Here's what they said. What scares you about

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the economy right now?

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>The cost of living? Like I have like a girlfriend,

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and when we talk about.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 4>Like our future, it's like are we gonna be able

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 4>to get a house or like what are we gonna do.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a lot harder for people to get jobs.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 5>I think that's just a bigger worry and a lot

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 5>of students' minds.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I would agree with And I've applied to

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 6>a bunch of jobs like Panera, bread and.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Things like that, and I haven't heard bag at all.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 6>I was originally given a pelgrant and then it got

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 6>taken away wit how saying I don't know, just like

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 6>the current administration announced that they would be like repealing

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 6>to a certain like student.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Like your pel grant got taken away?

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, just literally gone. There wasn't an edification or email

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 6>or anything.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 3>It's just what was gone that scares you about the

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>economy right now, I would have.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 7>To say the tariffs, And that's really terrifying because President

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 7>Trump does state that the other countries will be paying.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>These taxes, but as we've also learned in econ one on.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>One, American consumers will probably be paying a lot of

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the tax for it.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>The cost of food.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 6>Remember, like back in the day, like you could get

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 6>a candy bar from ninety nine cents.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Right now get king sized candy bars going.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 6>Up to like three dollars, three dollars fifty cents, Like

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 6>at the stadium.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>A bottle of water could be like five six dollars.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>So what, oh is this when you guys go to games?

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you all go to games?

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really University of Michigan, Big ten school, they all

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>go to the games.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>You know what I love about that?

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 4>Like and I say love, but I mean what I

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>appreciate about hearing those voices. We live in an era

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 4>defined by kind of like reality television and social media,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 4>where like presentation is everything, and our politics is playing

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 4>out essentially on screens, and you have these two sides

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 4>like trying to spin stuff. But all these policies, all

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the stuff that's happening in the economy, it has consequences.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 4>And that, like that woman talking about the pelgrant, Yeah,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 4>is a consequence.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean sounds really bad. It sounds really tough.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 4>And I do wonder as we think about how the

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 4>consequences of this government shutdown that we're entering right now

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 4>are going to play out. Those are the kinds of

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>stories that are going to define like how we experience it,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 4>not like what Trump says on TV, not what Schumer

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 4>whoever says on TV. It's going to be stories like

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 4>that and and I don't know, I just feel like

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 4>we have to keep talking to those people. So good job, Stacey.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 3>The teacher of these really lovely students is economist Justin Wolfers,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and he is here today to talk government shutdown. Thanks

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>again for letting me sit it on your class and welcome.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey Stacey, Justinould, what did you think of what your

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 3>students had to say?

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, they're brilliant. They I think, well, try and articulate.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's so lovely to hear young voices

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 7>engaging in our economic debates. We're fighting about the future,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 7>and that's who they are.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Is all around.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 5>That's what I say, Oh, you're for grade inflation now.

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But Justin, we brought you on to talk about the

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>government shutdown, that terrible moment when politics and economics meet

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and it is a mess. And right now we are

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of a shutdown. Before we kind of

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>jump into the more granular issues, what do you see

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>as going on here?

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Mostly politics.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 7>I understand that people's first instinct at a moment like

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 7>this is to call an economist because it feels like

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 7>a big deal economically. I think the reality is, if

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 7>we think about the macroeconomy, the ups and downs of

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 7>GDP and unemployment and recessions and booms and.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Stuff like that. It's just not that big of a deal.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 7>So for folks who are not working in or very

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 7>closely with the government, what I think the appropriate status

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 7>is sort of disappointed parent.

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>But seven hundred and fifty thousand people are not working

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>today because of this, that feels like a big economic deal.

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, Although Stacy, there's one hundred and forty million people

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 7>who are and one hundred and forty million is substantially big.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 7>In seven hundred and fifty thousand, we're probably talking about

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 7>a matter of weeks rather than the full year, and

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 7>so you start to do this sort of math and

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 7>it starts to become fractions of a percentage point. Look,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 7>two things are true, and I want to be really

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 7>clear about it, and I thank you for drawing it.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 7>It can be that something's not a major macroeconomic issue

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 7>yet still is a dumb and horrendous and pointless waste.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 7>And were I president, it wouldn't change the reality that

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 7>a billion dollars is both a tiny fraction of GDP

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 7>and a ton of money and wasting it for no

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 7>reason whatsoever. Feels utterly pointless and utterly disparity.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 4>So justin you're saying it, it doesn't matter economically, or

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 4>at least on a macroeconomic point of view. And I

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>feel like Stacey and I talked about this. We've both

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 4>been business journals for a long time. These shutdowns come

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 4>with some frequency, right, the last one was in twenty eighteen.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>We're constantly hitting the debt ceiling. And if you've been

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 4>through this a few times, a dozen times, however many

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 4>it's been, you basically just start to feel like, eh,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 4>like this is like they're going to get it figured out.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 4>This is a sort of a manufactured political crisis. The

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 4>only thing that matters really is who gets blamed.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 4>I do wonder if this one is a little bit different,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 4>only because this is coming in a larger context, which

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 4>is that the Trump administration has been since the beginning,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 4>since January, just trying in various ways to kind of

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>kneecap parts of the federal government. Right, and to me,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 4>this really feels like an almost repeat of Doge, which

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>might seem weird to say, but like we had during

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 4>the first couple months of the administration, Elon Musk going

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 4>around sort of purporting to close various federal agencies laying

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>people off. I think it's yesterday as we record this

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday, October two, that the workers who took deferred

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 4>resignations are are in fact leaving the government. It's like

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 4>another one hundred thousand workers. And when you listen to

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 4>what the Trump administration is saying, and we listen to

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 4>what russ Vote the head of the OMB is saying,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 4>they see this as an opportunity not just to furlough workers,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 4>but to attack parts of the bureaucracy permanently.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so much. There max so full of ideas. Let

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 7>me start with the first one. You're like, eugh, another,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 7>the government shutdown? Who cares? The problem with that thinking

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 7>is the thing that eventually ends the shutdown is people

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 7>are like, holy cow, this is terrible, and it causes

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 7>political pain for one side or other of politics. That

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 7>causes enough that pushes them back to the table, and

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 7>they sort it allowed. If we all sit around and

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 7>take people like me seriously and say, hey, it's not

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 7>that big of a deal, then actually it will never resolve.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 7>And so I think your point that we're all sort

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 7>of a little bit indifferent, right, Well, battered, bruised, and

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 7>used to large scale shocks to how the government works.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>Right now, this would have been outrageous six years ago,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 7>and you and I I think our blood would have boiled.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 7>And this might be the thirteenth worst thing to have

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 7>happened so far in October. That removes the urgency. And

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 7>if you remove the urgency, that then creates the possibility

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 7>that this one actually runs on a whole lot longer.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 7>So the last one went thirty four days. When I

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 7>say government shutdowns are not a huge event, I should

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 7>say one, We're already shut down most of the government

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 7>two days every week, so if we made it a

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 7>third wouldn't be a big deal.

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 3>So the government gets shut down right now, it's not

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 3>that huge of a deal macroeconomically, and potentially, you know,

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>thousands of people will lose their jobs.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 7>Wait, Stacy, could we just hold up because they want

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>to get the premise right. So what has historically happened

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 7>is non essential employees are told not to do any work.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 7>The government remains shut down for two weeks then and

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 7>then they shutdown ends and they come back to work.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 7>And usually in every past case, Congress has passed a

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 7>law saying even though you didn't do any work for

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 7>those two weeks, we're going to pay you anyway. So

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 7>no one historically was losing their jobs through this. And

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 7>then there's the essential workers who keep working, but they

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 7>keep working without getting paid, and then they'll get repaid later,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 7>So there's no job cuts that are essential to this.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 7>What this gets to, though, is Max's earlier point, which

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 7>is this is a political escalation at the current moment.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 7>This one's different because normally presidents are embarrassed by their

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 7>inability to keep the government open.

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Right this is like a shameful moment, like, oh, you

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 3>couldn't get it together and make a deal again, And.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 5>What we have is escalation.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 7>Certainly in claims the president says he's going to go

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 7>after democratic priorities. He's going to definitely not collect the

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 7>trash from outside Max's house, and so on. This president's saying, well,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 7>you guys are doing me, I'm just going to fight back.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 7>So it sounds like when my kids were five. He

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>has no new powers to fire people right now that

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 7>he didn't have yesterday. So if there was whole departments

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 7>he wanted to shut down, if he could do it,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 7>he could do it. Two days ago, and he could

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 7>still do it in two days time. So the presidents

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 7>claim that this brings on an escalation. There's no structural

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 7>change that creates that escalation. So the escalation, though, is

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 7>that he would be taking advantage of the political moment

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 7>that somehow the press and the people would let it

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 7>slide that he's going to do something, and other times

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 7>we would find repugnant.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, I spent earlier this year a couple of

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 4>months reporting on Russ Vote, who I said, head of

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the OMB, super interesting character. He wrote part of the

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Project twenty twenty five. I think he was involved in

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the last government shutdown in fact, and he was kind

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>of like hanging behind the scenes with Doge.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I described him as like, you know, I can't remember

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the words I actually use, but like the real mastermind

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>or the ideological mastermind or something like that. And what's

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 4>interesting is Vote had been saying for like a decade

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>basically that if we could, we should just like cut

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 4>all these woke agencies, defang the deep state, massively cut

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 4>back in the government, and that that was like a

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>political end in itself, and that's what we saw essentially

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 4>with Doge A couple months ago right where where they

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 4>did this and then discovered, oh crap, it's unpopular. Elon

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Musk suddenly had people protesting outside of his dealerships. People

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 4>were suddenly putting bumper stickers on their cars, you know,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 4>trading their teslas in. People hated this because, you know,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 4>for all the times we sort of complain and grouse

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 4>about the ways that the government doesn't work, like it

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 4>actually does work pretty well.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 2>That was one of the things I think we learned

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 2>with Doge.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 4>And now they're kind of trying to run it back,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 4>but this time blame the Democrats. And like you said,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 4>justin nothing's really changed from a legal perspective, although I'm

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 4>sure there might be arguments to be made about, oh,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's an emergency or something like that, But really

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 4>this is about can we pin this on Chuck Schumer?

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know what the answer to that. I

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>don't think any of us actually know what the answer

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 4>to that. I'm not even sure russ Vote Donald Trump

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 4>or Chuck Schumer knows the answer.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm not a very good political scientist, so I'm far

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 7>less interested in who we pined on, although that's ultimately

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 7>going to be what results. Is right one side or

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 7>the other will find the situation's not working well for

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 7>them and it's better for them to end it. There's

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 7>a deeper economics here, which is why was Dozier failure

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and why would the same logic fail at the current moment.

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 7>So many of us have an image in our minds

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 7>of the federal government is big and bloated and pointless.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 7>And last time I went to the DMV, I thought

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 7>the person behind the count it might actually have been

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 7>a sloth.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 5>There's a kid's movie where it's Zutopia. It is Utopia.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I got three little ones about twenty times.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 7>It's a wonderful movie. But yeah, you walk in and like, literally,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 7>the DMV is run by a sloth. And I've been

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 7>in that DMV and the sloth isn't even cute. They're

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 7>resentful and middle aged and slow moving. And we take.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>That experience with that, I'm just kidding.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 7>We take that experience and we projected on the rest

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 7>of government. There's a few things to recognize here. First

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 7>of all, most of our experiences with government, with these

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 7>annoying officers are actually state and local.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I was just gonna say, you're talking about a state

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 4>agency that's a problem from Michigan.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, but we all have that idea, and that's why

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 7>there's this strong current, particularly through public and politics. Oh,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 7>let's run the government like a business, or let's choke it,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 7>or let's get rid of all these useless employees, which

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 7>is what you're hearing a lot of right now. That's

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 7>the wrong model for the federal government. There's an old

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 7>saying about the federal government. It's an insurance company with

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 7>an army. What do I mean by that? The federal

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 7>government most of its spending is on what we call

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 7>insurance programs. It's unemployment insurance, it's Medicare, it's Medicaid, and those.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Are like not an issue here at all. I mean,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 3>those are mandatory things. That is not This is what

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 3>always blows my mind about the shutdowns. It's not about

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the big stuff, you know. I looked into this. I

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>got really interested in how big a share of the

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>federal budget went to federal workers, and so I actually

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>looked this up, and as it turns out, if you

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>count the military of salary benefits, everything adds up to

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 3>about seven percent of the US budget, and if you

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>don't count the military, it's about five percent. So this

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 3>is a very small part of the budget. And then

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>this healthcare subsidy, the thing that's become a big point

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>of contention between the right and the left, these sort

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 3>of extra subsidies that got rolled out during the pandemic

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 3>to help people afford health insurance. I mean, that is

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 3>like zero point two percent of the budget. That's really little,

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's just it really striking to me that so

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>much is happening over something that is such a small

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 3>part of the seven trillion dollar budget that we spend

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 3>every year.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 7>The federal government's it's a small share of the economy.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 7>Much of its function is printing Social Security chicks does

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 7>checks is still going to go out. There are important

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 7>things the federal government does. Some of them will be

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 7>shut down for a small number of weeks. Maybe I

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 7>just want to come back to this is not a

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 7>macroeconomic moment. Every dollar we waste is a dollar we

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 7>didn't have to waste, and it's all for political posturing.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 7>So it's as if we've just given several billion dollars

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 7>to both Democrats and Republicans to spend on political advertising

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 7>so they can yell at each other.

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 3>And the billion dollars is that the cost or what is.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 7>The cost here, It's going to be several billion, which

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 7>again is a real amount of money. I hate wasting

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 7>a billion dollars. We could spend that billion building schools,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 7>or feeding hungry or giving tax cuts to people whose

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 7>yachts are not big enough, guilding the White House, gilding.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 7>We could probably guild another whole room with that. One

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 7>part of the story we haven't told is the public servants. Right,

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 7>These are real people who I teach the other job

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 7>I have you started with my economic students. I also

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 7>teaching the Ford School of Public Policy. These are young

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 7>things in their early twenties who answered Kennedy's call to

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 7>ask not what your country can do for you, but

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.719
<v Speaker 7>what you can do for your country, who believe deeply

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 7>and profoundly in public service and have gone off to

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 7>school to become smarter at it, and can't wait to

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 7>go back out there and serve the greater good. And

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 7>they're being treated appallingly. They're being treated as if they're

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 7>the public enemy. For the generation of students I'm teaching

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 7>right now, there may not be jobs for them. For

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 7>the folks who are currently in the federal government, which

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 7>includes many of my former students. They're being asked to

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 7>go without pay for as long as the politicians decide.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 7>And that's the thing I will just tell you. This

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 7>is not being an economist, This is being a person.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 7>I find it utterly dismaying the extent to which we

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 7>are using people as pawns in greater political games. And

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 7>I've seen more of that since January of twenty twenty

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 7>five than I've ever seen in my life. And every

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 7>time I see it, it churns my stomach a lot.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow, justin, thank you for being here. Thank you, justin,

0:18:58.680 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much.

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Max, at the top of the show, you promised

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 3>that we were going to hear about the most interesting

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>man in crypto. It is time to deliver.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but we need to back up, and I just

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>need to explain a little bit about Trump and crypto

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 4>because I think that's what the big issue here is.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay. I do feel like the first six months of

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the Trump presidency there's been a lot of crypto news.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Some of it I followed, some of it not so much.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 3>So what is going on right now with Trump and crypto?

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is an industry that Trump seemed to despise,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 4>during his first term. It's also one that I'm sure

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 4>most listeners know. Lots of controversy, lots of allegations, some

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 4>big ups, some big downs, and many of the leading

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 4>lights you know going back a few years ago were

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 4>either criminally charged or convicted or the subject of SEC cases.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 4>And basically Stacy, with a couple of exceptions, all those

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 4>cases pretty much are gone now they've been.

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 3>The President has his own coin, the Converted.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, yeah, he's he's in the crypto business now. And

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 4>there's an amazing BusinessWeek story out right now that kind

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 4>of explains this.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>It's focused on Justin Sun, who.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Is, like I said, this wild figure in the industry.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 4>He's the founder of the blockchain network Tron will explain

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 4>what that is in a second. He owns that big

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 4>famous banana or the banana that was duct taped to

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 4>the wall, oh.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 3>The art piece. Is he the guy who ate the banana?

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>He ate the banana.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 4>And the best thing about this story is that it

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 4>was written by our colleague Zeke Fox, who wrote a

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>book about crypto It's called Number Go Up. It's really

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 4>like the best book that I've read on the subject.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Zeke is basically an expert in all kinds of financial chicanery.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 4>He covered all those ups and downs that I mentioned,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 4>and I wanted to talk to him and try to

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 4>understand the story and why all these guys who I

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 4>thought of as controversial figures, who would never find themselves

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 4>in a room with anybody close to the presidency, are

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 4>now in position of power.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>What do they want? What does it mean for our country?

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 3>So this story is called a crypto Billionaire's Path from

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Pariah to Trump Moneyman, and ze grote it with Muyaushin

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Max take.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 2>It away, Zeke, thanks for joining us.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Max.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 4>So you and I I think have covered aspects of

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 4>this world for a long time. I thought of you

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 4>always as like an expert on the on financial scams,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>of which there are many in the world of crypto,

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 4>and I had kind of gotten interested because of tech

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 4>and politics and the way that crypto guys we're trying

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>to be influential, and Justin Son kind of fits into

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>both of these worlds.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 2>He was sued by the SEC.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty three, accused of I'm selling unregistered securities,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of manipulating the market for tokens and tron He denied wrongdoing,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 4>but then also, and this is where things get kind

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 4>of interesting, the suit was paused after Sun happened to

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 4>pay seventy five million dollars. It's a lot of money

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 4>to a company controlled by the Trump family. And at

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 4>some point he also invested fifteen million dollars. For those

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 4>keeping track at home, that's ninety million total in Trump's

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>mean coin. We're not sure of the timing there. Maybe

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 4>he was before or after the sec thing, but either way,

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>after this big initial investment, Justin Son and the Trump

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 4>family go into business together.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Did I get all that right, Zeke.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as long as we're just very strict on the

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about time here. Son first invested ninety million

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in Trump coins, and then the lawsuit was paused.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why exactly.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm just kind of curious that somebody who had kind

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 4>of followed these figures in crypto for a long time,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Justin Son being kind of an important figure in this world.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Were you surprised when he just like showed up in

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump world, you know, when he appeared at this event

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>in Arlington and like gave a speech next to Trump.

0:22:55.720 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no. Within crypto, Son is infamous as lawyers

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>for Coinbase, the biggest US crypto company, once set in court.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of mysterious, like people aren't quite sure how

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>rich he is or how he made his money, but

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>he's really out there. He loves publicity stunts. He commissioned

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a theme song for his blockchain tron by the Oscar

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>winning composer Hans Zimmer. He paid millions of dollars to

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have lunch with Warren Buffett try to pitch him on crypto.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It did not work.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Buffett not a fan of crypto in general.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Hates crypto. And he ran for prime minister of the

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>libertarian micro state liber Land.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, which, as I understand, that's somewhere in the Balkans.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Is he is he the prime minister.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>He's the prime Minister, right.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And he likes to be referred to as your excellency.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 4>He has a title to that effect from Janata.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the title does come from Grenada, and this was

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>because he was appointed their ambassador to the World Trade Organization.

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take a wild guess of how you

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>get that appointment.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>So at the time, it has since come out that

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>there was kind of a scandal there and diplomatic posts

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>were for sale for one hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>We asked Son how he got his post, and his

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyer said there was no impropriety.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>So Sun is this larger than life figure, and like

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 4>you said, you know, he's sort of everywhere and nowhere

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 4>in crypto. I think over the last like ten years

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 4>or so, this company Tron, was at the center of

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 4>this sec thing that was dropped.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 2>It's his main thing, Like what is Tron?

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Sun's been around since the twenty seventeen ICO

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>boom initial coin offering. Yes, and this was like the

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>first crypto bubble when it seemed like anybody who just

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>said the word blockchain could raise tons of money for whatever.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The pitch was like pretty vague. It was going to

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>be like a new decentralized Internet, it was going to

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>be for content, it was going to be an app store.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But at that time it didn't really matter. And Son

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>had kind of a following from his podcast in China

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>called the Road to Financial Freedom Revolution, and so he

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>raised I think seventy million dollars or so for Tron

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in this ICO despite the kind of vague pitch and

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what tron is is very similar to other blockchains. So

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>if you only think of crypto as like a replacement

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for dollars, that's kind of like a outdated vision of

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the industry, And a blockchain is kind of like a ledger.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>The thing.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 4>The thing usually here is that it's a distributed ledger.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 4>It's like a way of keeping track of payments. But

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 4>there are lots of people who think it could be

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 4>useful for other things like tracking inventory or something like that.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the explanation and.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 4>The one that is used when people are trying to

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 4>explain why crypto isn't just a bunch of guys essentially

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 4>trying to pump up worthless currencies.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and tron has become There's one particular thing that

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's mainly used for, which is a stable coin called Tether,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like a digital dollar, And often when

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>people transact in Tether, they're using tron to do so.

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 4>So and Tether is used by people who are investing

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 4>in cryptocurrencies.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 2>It's also.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Very very useful for people who are trying to move

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>money around without it being noticed, so that could be

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 4>like money launders, criminals, terrorists, and so on.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in the last few years, word has definitely spread

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>around the criminal world that there is this cool new

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>way of moving money from person to person that does

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not involve revealing your identity.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Right, and a bunch of disclaimers here, number one, pretty

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 4>much everyone in the crypto industry. When when people point

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 4>this out, we'll say something like, you know, US dollars

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 4>are used by money launders and drug dealers. No one

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 4>is trying to get rid of the US dollar. Does

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 4>it make the Federal Reserve complicit in drug dealing? We

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 4>are trying to stop illegal activity. This is just like

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of a bad thing that's happening. And then the

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 4>last thing they bring up is that, you know, many

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 4>of these currencies are decentralized, like we don't even control

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 4>like what is happening on this network.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Really, they try to say, like a blockchain like Bitcoin

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>or Tron, it's like the protocols that power email or websites. Right,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't see anyone going after them this technology. Yeah,

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Tron and Tether formed the T three Financial Crime Unit,

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and they've said that even know it's just technology, we

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want people doing bad things here. We're going to

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>try our best to root out crime.

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 4>So just to take a few steps back from the

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of questions around Justin Son, he was part of

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 4>this larger, essentially like romance between Trump and the crypto industry.

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>It started, you know, sort of mid campaign last year.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I BLUs is like July at the Bitcoin conference, and

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I think the conventional wisdom for why Donald Trump, a

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 4>populist who had in the past said that he, you know,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 4>thinks crypto is terrible, he prefers the dollar, you know,

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 4>in all sorts of ways, doesn't seem like the kind

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 4>of guy who would want to embrace crypto. The conventional

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 4>wisdom I think for why he embraced it is basically money.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 4>That this is a big class of donors and they

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 4>were all writing him checks and as a result, you

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 4>had this kind of confluence where Trump took a lot

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 4>of crypto money, he got into the crypto business, and

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 4>he's also been changing policy and making and causing the

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 4>SEC to drop cases such as the one that Justin

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Sun's involved in. If you had to make a case

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 4>for like why Trump would embrace crypto at that moment,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 4>like what is the case for doing it outside of donations,

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 4>just like trying to please donors, like is there any

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 4>way that what these guys are offering, either for the

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 4>American economy or for the global economy somehow like fits

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump's agenda.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Trump argument is that the traditional players

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in a financial system have been discriminating against conservatives. They've

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>been cutting off bank accounts of people like the Trumps

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because of like the perceived risk of dealing with them.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, this is the decentralization thing.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you can't stop money laundering as well as you

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 4>could if it were centralized, but you also can't discriminate

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 4>against ideological viewpoints.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that Trump he has a lot of respect

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for other rich people, and that in the past he

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>may have thought that crypto was not real money and

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that these people were not really rich, But then once

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he saw that they had lots of real money in

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>addition to cryptocurrency, he was like, all right, they seem

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>like my kind of guys. Maybe we should hang out,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if they're buying memberships at mar A Lago, but

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they're donating to his campaign.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I also feel like there's something about Justin Sun that's

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of trumpy, Like he's totally this like self created

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 4>who's like using like all of these tools to sort

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 4>of create an image, like you brought up the Hans

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Zimmer theme song for his company, which is funny, like,

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 4>like what company needs a Han Zimmer theme song? I

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 4>almost want to hear it kind of coming up in

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the background as we're discussing it.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard the theme song?

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I definitely have, but don't I cannot describe it properly.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 4>And then you know he bought this, this piece of art,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 4>the banana that had been duct taped to the wall,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 4>you brought the buffet lunch.

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>He basically like, if there's any way.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>To signal status or to use money to signal status,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 4>just the Sun is gone for it.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually it's kind of funny because like Trump,

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to sell any sort of like status symbol

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that you want as long as it's like a Trump

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>status symbol. Like he's like, pay me money and you

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>can live in a Trump apartment, or you can wear

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a Trump watch or whatever. And Sun is like the

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect customer because he loves to spend lots of money

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on things that might make him look rich or important.

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>He got a Trump watch. In fact, he.

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Got a Trump watch. He actually played a really key

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>role in Trump, the Trump's getting into the crypto business.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So Trump gave the speech he said, you know, I

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>love crypto. I'm gonna deregulate the industry. It's going to

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be great. Everyone liked that. And then a few weeks

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>later Trump said, and I'm going to get into the

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>crypto business myself. I've got this company called World Liberty

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and the crypto industry. A lot of people were like,

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>oh man, this is like you're in it for the

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong reason, right. We thought you just like want to

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to decentralize things. We didn't think you were trying to

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>make money off of us. And so the sales of

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump's first cryptocurrency were really slow. It was looking like

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the project might not get off the ground. They'd set

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>out to sell like hundreds of millions of dollars with

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these tokens and they only sold a couple of million.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And Son stepped in and bought initially thirty million dollars

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in one go, and this like got a lot of

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>momentum for the Trump project. Sun got named and advisor

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to World Liberty, and it kind of put them right

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the Trump's orbit.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 4>And Son, in addition to this money that went into

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 4>World Liberty. He also bought one of the Trump Meme coins.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 4>That's another payment that effectively goes to companies controlled by

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 4>the Trump family. I feel like I have to ask

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the question that like everybody is thinking, but maybe everyone

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 4>is afraid to ask, which is first of all, Justin

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Sun's born in China, he is not allowed to make

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 4>political contributions to political candidates. You're also not, I don't think,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 4>allowed to just say, hey, I'm going to write a

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 4>seventy five million dollar check to help with an SEC problem.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>How is this not improper?

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's making a payment to Trump's or many

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 4>payments to Trump's family, and also getting a bunch of

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 4>policy considerations.

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Trump has made it very clear that he

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>sees nothing wrong with accepting payments with his family, accepting

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>payments from people who have business before his administration. And

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for this to be illegal, you'd have to prove that

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>favors had been done in exchange for these payments. I mean,

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>absence that proof, they can just say, hey, you know,

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Son really wanted to buy these coins. He thought they

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>were investments. And then Trump has you know, said I

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>want to deregulate crypto because I see it as the

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>future of money. And this case against Sun was just

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>one of many lawsuits the SEC had filed. I'm instructing

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>them to toss all of them. So it's not hard

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to find examples where there's a conflict of interest. But

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so far, I haven't seen anyone who's nailed down something

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>where they've proven that like a particular action was taken

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because of a particular payment, which is like the current

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>standard for what constitutes corruption.

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, and like you said, Trump just blends his personal

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 4>identity and his political identity. It's all kind of tied

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 4>up together. And I feel like this story and this

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 4>guy is just like one example maybe the best example

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 4>of what of how Trump is changing, you know, the presidency.

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>There's something that Trump said, and this was about the

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million dollar jet that his administration was accepting

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>from the government of Cutter that I think illustrates his attitude.

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>And he said I could say no, no, no no,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or I could say thank you very much.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 4>And okay, zeke to finish up here. We said at

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the beginning that tron is decentralized. But in August, the

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Billionaires Index published an accounting of Justinsun's assets. That accounting,

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 4>and I'm pulling this from your story, was based on

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 4>material that had been provided to Bloomberg by Justin. Sun

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 4>had all a bunch of his assets, including his art

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 4>collection which I believe was worth fifty five million, his

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 4>plane and airbus two hundred million, and then this crypto wallet,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 4>and using this crypto wallet, Bloomberg calculated that Sun had

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 4>sixty billion Tron tokits, which is a majority of the supply.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And he's suing Bloomberg over this.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So after Bloomberg Billionaires published this valuation, Sun sued

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in federal court in Delaware, and he claimed that this

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>report included details that he'd been promised wouldn't be in there,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>something Bloomberg has denied. And he said that listing his

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto holdings put him at risk of hacking or kidnapping.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>And he also said that the list of holdings that

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>he provided to Bloomberg mistakenly included wallets that did not

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>belong to him, and that he does not in fact

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>own a majority of Tron's tokens. But when Bloomberg went

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask him, which of these holdings are not actually yours?

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>To get a little more detail on what he was saying.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>They did not respond. We've published our story. The lawsuit

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is still pending.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Zeke Fox, thanks for being here.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Max.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 4>All Right, Stacy, the underrated part of the show. You're

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 4>gonna love this story. I feel right, this is gonna

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 4>be an economic indicator that.

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Is meaningful to you.

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 4>Okay, shoot, Okay, I'm joking because I know you hate it.

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 4>But this is a story in Bustle. The headline is

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 4>even the sugar daddies are feeling the squeeze, and it

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 4>is about how the economic forces that we have been

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 4>talking about on the show, the Vibe Session, are impacting

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 4>this sector of the economy, the sugar daddy sector of

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 4>the economy, essentially where wealthy men are essentially women to

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 4>be their girlfriends. These men are feeling less wealthy, these

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 4>sugar daddies, and they are cutting back and there the

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 4>article suggests that people in this world have a new

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 4>term to describe them, splendid daddies, because they're so cheap,

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Because I splend it as kind of a crappier.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Version of sugar.

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 4>And so basically this is the Vibe Session but playing

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 4>out in the world of sex work.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, Okay, well, I obviously care about these issues a lot.

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I wrote a book about women in the workplace, Machiavelli

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 3>for Women, And what this makes me think of immediately is,

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, for most of history, like women's economic opportunities

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 3>was this attaching themselves in whatever way they could to

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 3>a man because that was the only way to earn

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 3>money or one of the only ways to earn money.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I find it a little distressing that that still exists,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 3>but we still have, you know, like a gender pay

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 3>gap is still a really serious thing. So I just

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 3>see when I hear these stories, I just feel like

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the economic limitations of women in the economy have not

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 3>gone like I It makes me sad. I just feel

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 3>like Bustle should do better because it's supposed to be

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a feminist publication and women are having a hard enough

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>time in this economy right now. Women the participation in

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the workforce has gone backwards recently for the first time

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 3>in a long time, because childcare expenses have gotten so high,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and women's earning potential is lower than often their male

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 3>partners or whatever husbands, And so if there's if it's

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 3>a couple, often it's more economically feasible for the man

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to work and the women to stay home. These are

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 3>all the things going through my head right now when

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 3>I hear about sugar daddies. I just feel like it's

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 3>a very old profession finding a rich boyfriend. But I

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 3>just feel like, of all the messions, it is the hardest.

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 4>You're saying, like, of all the economic stories, the fact

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 4>that these guys are like cutting back on their spending,

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 4>we shouldn't be talking about it, like we should be

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 4>talking about something else other than the tough times and sugaring.

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's alarming that this is still a

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 3>career path for women. I'm surprised and saddened that Bustle

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 3>would cover this.

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, Stacy, And when we talked about this offline,

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 4>it was even more Stacy is sort of is being

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 4>gentle right now that she had some.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I've had some time to digest it.

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 4>So but one thing I wanted to say about this

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 4>story is that the story is sort of premised on

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 4>the idea that this is like the vibe session. So

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 4>you have these guys who are like I think the

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 4>lead anecdote is like a tennis coach. He's not able,

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't have as many clients right, people are cutting

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 4>back on their tennis lessons. Therefore he's cutting back on

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 4>his expenses and essentially sending his girlfriends less money and

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 4>and so like.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>That is one possible explanation.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 4>The other possible explanation that the story suggests, and that

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 4>some of the women who are in this world put forward,

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 4>is that these guys are just cheap, and that it's

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 4>not that the economy is bad, it's that, like dating websites,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 4>it's that there's like a market problem.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I would find it funnier if I felt like the

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 3>steaks were lower. I just feel like the stakes are high,

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, like a lot of women are single parents,

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 3>a lot of households count on women, women live a

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 3>long time. I just want to see women able to

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 3>thrive in this economy. But I don't know that I

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 3>do better, do better, report on something else. The show

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 3>is produced by Stacy Wong. Magnus Henrickson is our supervising producer,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 3>and Amy Kean is our executive producer. Kelly garat Handle's Engineering,

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and Dave Purcell factchecks. Sage Bauman heads Bloomberg Podcasts Special

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 3>thanks to Jeff Muskus, Julia Rubin, and Maria ling. If

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 3>you have a minute, please rate and review the show.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 3>It means a lot to us. And if you have

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 3>a story that should be our business, please send us

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 3>an email. Everybody's at Bloomberg dot net. That is, everybody's

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 3>with an us at Bloomberg dot net. We love to

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 3>hear from you. Thank you for listening, and see your

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 3>next time.

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Ye send us stories you hate too, We'll we'll walk

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 2>about those.

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 3>We're fine.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 2>We're good with that.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 3>We want to hear stories you hate. I control max

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 3>with them. Next time, we want us to talk about

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 3>sugar daddies.