WEBVTT - Chiefs MUST-WIN vs. Giants, Packers TEAM TO BEAT? Rams-Eagles MORE TO PROVE? | Nick Wright NFL

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in this episode of What's Driving The Great is

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>brought to you, as always by our great friends at

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile Demons. Great to see you. A little note

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for the audience. We are as we said on Tuesday.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching here today, thank you by the way,

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like great subscriber review do all that stuff that helps

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>us out a ton if you are expecting my up

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to this point in the season, decidedly average picks for

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this weekend and Demandsday's up to this point on the season,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sparkling undefeated teaser that is actually coming to your

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>inboxes or feeds or podcast channels, YouTube, all of that Friday.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So we are going to, like like when we originally

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>did the show, today's show is going to be kind

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of storylines, games, all of that, but our picks will

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>come Fridayday, and I actually, full disclosure, we'll be doing

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>them today, but we're doing it. We're separating into two

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of more digestible episodes because when we do it

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>all together, one of two things happens. Either we race

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>through the picks, which I don't want to do, or

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the pod becomes an hour and a half, which nobody wants.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So and so the so that will be our plan

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, and so you will get those it. Also,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the only thing it prevents is the only downside, so

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to speak, is it does not allow us to pick

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night as part of our picks. But that's fine

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with me. We don't typically bet the Thursday night game anyway,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's no big deal. Everything good with you, Pale

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out in La. We haven't checked in in a while.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Snake's good, life good, everything good.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Snake's good. Life's good. It's raining out here when that's rare,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>so that's nice.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>That's probably good. Yeah, it's definitely good. The snake like,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>oh wow, how about that?

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Didn't know? Oh sure, see I learned something new from

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you every day, all right, straight to voicemail, brought to

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you by boost Mobile. Some quarterback injuries this week lead

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to some uncertainty. We'll get to that later in the show.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>One that we'll get to right now. Justin Fields out

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>against Tampa Bay with a concussion to Rod Taylor. His

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>name is Tarrod Taylor, not Tyrod Taylor. That's a name

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we all mispronounced. I don't know how big of a

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>downgrade that is. I know Fields was awesome in week one.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We didn't see much in week two because he got hurt,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but he'll be in. Shoyotani creates a new fifty to

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty club, fifty home runs and fifty strikeouts, not as

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in him striking out, but as in him striking out

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty batters and Adam Silver talking about NBA Europe in

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven or twenty eight. Adam Silver, however, might have

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more on his hands to worry about right

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>now thanks to Pablo Torre's kind of intrepid journalism on

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>what was or wasn't going on with the Los Angeles Clippers.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to once upon my rival and now a

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who I think just legit probably doesn't like me,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but I earned it. Pablo Torre for his tore pardon

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>me for his great journalism on this and seeing he

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and Cuban go back and forth. It's been pretty good.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And Pablo released new information this morning. Reminder to everybody

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>like great, subscribe review to the pod and on YouTube,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and before we get into it, and I'll go full

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>here fellas a note to everyone out there in the

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Takes world, which honestly is not these days just media members.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously media members, but it's also anybody with any

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>type of following. We joke on first things first, that

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they call me mister Consistency. And while it is a

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>joke that that is what they call me, it is

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not a joke that I try really really hard, and

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my north stars of media and opinion and

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of character is to try to be consistent that

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>what I claim to represent, what I claim to care about,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what the stances that I have sought out, that those

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>logically align, and I don't pick and choose. And so

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a four instance. We talk more

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on this show and the TV show about the Chiefs

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>than just about any team. If Sunday night the Chiefs

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>were to lose to the Giants, or this past Sunday

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>when they did lose to the Eagles, all of a

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sudden on Tuesdays, what's right, we don't get to the Chiefs,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>then I'm a fraud. Then I am picking and choosing

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>when I want to, you know, do what I have

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>made part of my brand. Right when it's good, when

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm winning, I'm all about it, and when I'm not,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I run from it. Right that would be everyone would

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>look at that, obviously and clearly as fraudulent, maybe even cowardly.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The reason I say that kind of oddly, as I'm

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>sure some of you are wondering where this is going

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the first big regular season game

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have played in years, this Sunday Night against

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the Giants is because of this if over the last

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>few years. And this applies to a lot of people,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be it a comic, be it a politician, be it

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a talk show host, be it an internet personality. If

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you have made part of your brand your allergy and

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>your discussed of and opposition to cancel culture, and you

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>are what many of you have called yourself a First

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Amendment absolutist, and you haven't found the time to respond

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or to talk about what is, at least at the moment,

0:06:54.040 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the most direct and undeniable, outright attacks on

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>free speech by a direct state actor that we've seen,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly in my adult lifetime, then you're aphomy. And everyone

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>does not have to have an opinion on everything, and

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is problematic when everyone feels like they

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have to chime in on everything. But if you have

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>made part of your brand, I am starting the free

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>press and I am going to rail against censorship on

0:07:50.760 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>college campuses and cancel culture, and you maybe correctly went

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>after previous administrations for trying to tamp down information that

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is disseminated on social media. If that is what you're

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>known for, if you're one of these comedians who half

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>your bit these days is can't tell jokes anymore because

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll cancel you. And you've decided to sit out what

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen and we'll see how it plays out. But

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from the very top down of the administration, down to

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the FCC, down to the temporary what's the word, not

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>cancelation at least as of yet, but dismissal of Jimmy Kimmel,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>then you're just a fraud. And that's fine, as Wild says.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can't be mister consistency. And again, I want to

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>make this clear. If you have sat out a lot

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the First Amendment, cancel culture, that those conversations on

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever it's happening, you're like, ah, not my purview. I

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>am not. I do not think you have a responsibility

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>right now to be like this is where I take

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>my stand. I do not feel that way. But if

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's been your brand and you are more concerned about

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>folks paying a potential private life penalty because of things

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they've said. By and by private life, I mean being

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>publicly criticized or not getting booked at a theater, and

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>less concerned with what is outright state actor induced attempted censorship.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Then did you ever really believe it to begin with?

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Or were you all just either part of a grift

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or did it really only bother you when you felt

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>like your side was the one under attack. I don't know,

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, you do so question out there.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I have tried to do a

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really good job of staying off the internet the last day,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so I don't this is You're gonna have to take

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>my word for it. I don't know who I am

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or who I'm not talking about here. This isn't like

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a subtweet directed at some single person. Far from it.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just my gut tells me that a lot of

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the folks who have been like more than anything, first Amendment.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>That's it, that's the most That's why it's first. Okay,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a good test to that, and I'm curious for

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone falls on it. With that said, demonse, welcome back in.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk Chiefs Giants.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk Chiefs Giants. A big game for your boys

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>over there in their own head. Yeah, so they got

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the Giants this Sunday. They are zero and two for

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 3>the first time in the Mahomes era they faced the Giants. Obviously,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 3>they are one and eleven in the last twelve at

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Met Life. What is at stake for Kansas City here?

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I if they were to lose Sunday, I or

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they're one and eleven in the last twelve night.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Game night games. So it Met Life.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say it wouldn't that was like that.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>That number surprised me. I'm sure it's not that. I

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder what their record is the Giants in their last

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve last it can't be really good. Might be four

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and eight, but one in eleven in the last twelve

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>night games. Here's the deal. If I'm being honest, I

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will not if they lose Sunday, I won't feel in

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>my bones that they can't rally and make the playoffs.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And if the Chiefs make the playoffs, I'm sure by

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, if they were to fall to Owen

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>three and then make the playoffs, I'm sure by the

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>time the playoffs are all around all really like their chances.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But I am now saying sober minded before the game.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>If they lose Sunday, it will signal that this team

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is not a true contender the way every Chiefs team

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>has been since Mahomes got there, not because they can't

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>rally from zero to three, but because if you can't

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>beat the New York Giants in a game, you've got

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to have without and you should have Xavier Worthy back

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for it. I would think, so the only super key

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>player you're missing is Rashi Rice, then you're not going

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to be good enough over the course of the season

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a real super Bowl contender. So for Giants,

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, five and twelve at home since twenty

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, So it's about what we would have thought.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>So that's what's on the line. I have joked, not

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really joked, that Mahomes has never had to play a

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>meaningful regular season game, and that is a little hyperbolic,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, I think what I've said is Mahomes

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has never lost a meaningful regular season game, and that

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to me was literally true until two years ago when

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they actually had to go on the road in the playoffs.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>With my argument having been the whole point of the

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>regular season is to get the best seat as possible

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and to get home field in the playoffs. And if

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have never gone on the road in the playoffs,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then none of the losses have ever hurt them. Two

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when they did have to go on the

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>road in the playoffs, some of those losses I suppose

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>did hurt them, but none of those games demons felt

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like they had the stakes of Sunday Night that you can,

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think explain away. The first two weeks. Week one,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>whole game plans thrown off by Worthy getting hurt. They

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they don't play well, they can't. Herbert's

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>playing out of his mind, you know. And the Chargers

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>win a neutral sight game okay, you know what I mean,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not what you'd hope for, but okay. Game two, the

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs again can't really get the passing game going without

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>their two star receivers or potential star receivers. Despite that,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and despite missing a kick and despite failing on a

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth down early in the third quarter, they're on the

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>precipice of taking the lead and having control of the game.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And Kelsey makes a mistake. You know what, I mean,

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're playing a great team in Philadelphia. Fine, again,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not good and not excuses and not saying the Chiefs

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>deserve to win either game, but neither one of those

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. If either one of those games had

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in Week five or Week eight or week twelve,

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>no one be concerned about it. You know what I mean. Okay,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you lose a one score neutral site game to a

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>contender in the Chargers. You lose a three point hard

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>fought game to the Eagles, so be it. Because they

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>happen in weeks one and two, and they're on the

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>heels of the Chiefs getting dog walked in the super Bowl.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels seismic, but in reality it's understandable. Losing to

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants this weekend would not be understandable. It would

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>mean that they are there are some systemic issues with

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the team for this season that are not fixable to

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the tune of going on a Super Bowl run. And

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's what's on the line for Kansas City in

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this game. I know you have some follow ups.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Here, Yeah, are you still worried at all about the

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 3>pass rush and Russ coming off of probably his best

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 3>game or one of his best games in his career.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I don't know how you can. I

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you cannot be worried about the pass rush,

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to be totally honest with you, Like Chris Jones tends

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>to get better as this season goes along. I know

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he's an older player. I still believe he's the best

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>de tackle in football. He hasn't been dominant the first

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, but I believe in Chris. The Carloftis just

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>got paid. Carloftis was a first round pick. Carloftis needs

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to be better. And then the other guys Mike Dana

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>who's hurt now, Charles Amenahu who has been disappointing and

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>been wholly ineffective thus far this season. And then you

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have Ashton Gillette Jellette my apologies a rookie, Omar Norman rookie.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>They've got to be able to create some type of

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>pressure without sending a blitz. With that said, I Russ

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>having four hundred and fifty yards last week, to me,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does not play into this at all. Like I last week,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Russ was unbelievable. I don't think that was him all

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden turning back the clock permanently. I think

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that was him turning back the clock for an evening. Now,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>let me give you the bright side of if they win. Okay,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>if they win, and I believe they will win, I

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily think it'll be pretty. I don't necessarily think

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll be easy. But I am narrow deep confident they'll win.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>They win all of a sudden, they are playing a

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Week four game to totally flip every narrative that's existed

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thus far. Because you know who come to Kansas City

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in Week four? Your Baltimore Ravens and the so the

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the what are you shaking your head about?

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Tell me, no, boys need to be worried.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh the Chiefs need to be worried. Maybe, but but

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just follow me down this path. The point I'm making

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Chiefs then will have in front of them

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the ability, if they win Sunday, to say, we win

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this home game against a team we literally always beat,

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're the AFC contender everyone's worried about. We get

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole people freaked out about the Chiefs. They had

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this brutal opening schedule. You know, they dealt with an injury,

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>dealt with the suspension. They're two and two anyway, and

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore leaves that game at best too and two, and

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens in Baltimore Detroit on Monday night

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or I don't know if that's Monday or Sunday whatever,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 2>They actually it is Monday, what I know.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a night game. Oh no, the Chiefs Monday Sunday

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>night obviously, so it's Monday night. And maybe Baltimore is

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the team everyone's freaking out about, right, And so certainly

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>if Baltimore loses to Detroit, people will be freaking out

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if they fall to one and three, so they just

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to turn the whole thing. It will

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not feel that way at all if they lose to

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. If they lose to the Giants, they will

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just feel like a bad team with a great quarterback.

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't believe that's what they are, but they

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>got to go prove it Sunday night.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 3>So you have seven teams above the Chiefs right now,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 3>and the Tears.

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 2>I know that has to kill you.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Is this the worst that you felt about the Mahomes

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>the worst that you felt about the Chiefs in the

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes era.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>No, the worst I felt about them was post It

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was the twenty twenty one season. They had just gotten

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>annihilated by the Bucks in the Super Bowl, and that

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>next year, not only did they start three and four,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but some ugly moments. Week one, they were playing Cleveland

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and escaped with a win. Week two, Baltimore goes for

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a fourth down late and beats them. Week three the Chargers,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if I beat them at the buzzer essentially, and then

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>week five they get annihilated by the Bills. And then

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>week seven they get annihilated twenty seven to three by

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. The Titans, and and so that team fell

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to three and four, and you know, at that point,

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess you include the Super Bowl, had lost five

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>out of eight and it was up until that Super

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bowl against the Bucks, Mahomes had never lost a game

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>by more than eight points. And then all of a sudden,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they get blasted in the Super Bowl. They get beat

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by eighteen by Buffalo, they get beat by twenty four

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>by Tennessee, and a span of you know, two months

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or two football months, that was the low point. Now

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that team ended up going from three and four to

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve and five, and then in the AFC Championship game

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>up twenty one to three at a half time before

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that second half meltdown against Cincinnati. And that was the

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>only year in this six year stretch they haven't made

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. But that was the worst I've ever

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>felt about them. This this so this the Giants.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, I was a let's say, with the Giants

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>win on Sunday, it's getting.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no. A Giants win puts us in totally

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>new territory.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Reminder to everybody, we are so excited to be partnered

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with hard Rock Bet. Everybody knows and loves the hard

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>rock hotels and casinos, and now you can use the

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>top rated hard Rock Bets sportsbook to place your bets

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>all NFL season and beyond. Hard Rock Bet is the

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>only legal sports book in the state of Florida, the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>only one in Florida, and is also available in Arizona, Ohio,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado, with more

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>states launching all the time. You can also play on

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bets online casino if you are in New Jersey.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the football season, We'll be using hard Rock Bet

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>lines to make our predictions for the biggest games as

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we gear up for the NFL season, sign up for

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. Make a five dollars bet and you'll

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bet. If you

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>win again, make a five dollar bet and you get

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets. If you win,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>head over to a hard Rock Bet and sign up

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and make your first deposit today, payable in bonus bets,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida.

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>all other states, must be twenty one plus and physically

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight eighty eight Admit it.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>In Indiana. If you are someone you know as a

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred and nine

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. Gambling problem Call one eight hundred Gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois,

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee or Virginia. All Right, demanse. Let's

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>get on to what actually might be. This might be

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a better game than Detroit Baltimore. It's so certainly the

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>best game of Sunday.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>That might be boring.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>We got a divisional round rematch between the Rams and Philly.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 3>So if you think back to last year, this team

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 3>was twenty yards away from beating Philly. Who do you

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 3>think has more to prove this time come around?

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Which one might be boring? Are you saying.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Detroit Philly Rams? Oh?

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would Philly Rams be boring?

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>They might not throw the ball, dude.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean they might go a little bit or do

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 3>with everything that they need to do to get the game.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think it's going to be a light

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>show or anything like that.

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, No, I agree with you. I don't think

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a recreation of Baltimore Buffalo

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Week one, which, by the way, as did you hear

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what I think it was? DraftKings said about that Week

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>one Baltimore Buffalo game. It was the single worst game

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for them, No, the single the single biggest loser for

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>them ever. Okay, because if you guys remember what I

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about all the early money was Baltimore plus a

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>point and a half. All the late money was Buffalo

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>plus a point and a half. You then, so they

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lost both sides of it, with Buffalo winning by one.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>You then add to it, demons, when when you have

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that many touchdowns and that many points, nobody's betting unders

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on player props. You know what I mean. People are

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>betting overs and touchdown scores, and in game betting, they're

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>betting underdogs live betting. You know, yeah, exactly right. So

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they said that was their single worst result ever. When

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you put it all together, it's not surprising, all right,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Rams Eagles. Who has more to prove? This is tricky

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Rams. I think the Ram the

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>only team to beat the Rams. D I have this right,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna double check. I think the only team to

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>beat the Rams when yeah, since week eleven of last year,

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>when when they've played their starters, is the m is Philadelphia,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and Philadelphia's beaten them twice. The Rams since week eleven

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of last year have beaten New England, New Orleans, Buffalo,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, New York, Arizona, UH Minnesota, and then Houston, Tennessee.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And they're zero to two against Philly. So and this is,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're the defending NFC champs. Obviously they're defending

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champs, so one would think the Rams Philly,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, has been really weird this year

0:27:53.600 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>because they are so unwilling to throw the ball and

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>when they do throw it, they are so unwilling to

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>throw it more than three yards past the line of scrimmage.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason I feel that this has not

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is understandable, this has not been more of

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a story is like where aj Brown is really upset

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is because they're winning. Like, do I think had Kelsey

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>held onto that ball and the Eagles were or Ceedee

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Lamb held onto that ball and the Eagles lost either

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one of these games, would AJ Brown be as okay

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>publicly as he's been with the fact that they're just

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not getting him the ball. They won't throw the ball

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>down the field.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:28:52.680 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Do I think a lingering, lurking potential story is could

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Vrabel, the head coach of the New England Patriots,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>try to make a play before the deadline for the

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>player he used to have in Tennessee who a lot

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of people believe what fractured his relationship with the Titans.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Was the Titans trading away AJ Brown to Philadelphia? Do

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that is possible if things go a little

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>awry for the Eagles? I do do. I think that

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>while Jailing, to his credit, clearly does not care how

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks as long as they win, that that might

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>not be how everyone feels.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I think J Brown is, like, could selfishly be hoping

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>that they lose the game. No, no, no, no, I don't

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>think that.

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think AJ Brown is hoping you throw me the

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>damn ball that I get to show everyone, remind everyone

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how good I am. I just don't know that they're

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that, right, I also think yeah. And but

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>here's what's interesting about the Eagles thus far this year.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Last year, it was really hard to complain about the

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Eagles anything because after Week four last year, they didn't

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lose a single time. When Jalen played and Saquon was

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking records every weekend running, the offense looked amazing. This year,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that is not the case. Saquan's been relatively bottled up

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>each of the two weeks, and the offense has looked

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>stuck in the mud. The other The other interesting factor

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>here is in a week when the Tush Push has

0:30:54.080 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>been so in the news the while the past ers

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we're at the forefront of trying to get the Toush

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Push band with Matt Lafleur, the vice president of that movement,

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with Sean McVey, and Sean McVay was on the record

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who said, he goes listen, I'm probably just a hater

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because we can't stop it. But I also don't, you know,

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>don't like how it looks, don't like it, wanted to

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have it banned. So I think there are a lot

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of really juicy storylines in this game. I also think

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>these are two great teams. Here is my concern. If

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Philly or potentially great teams, I should say, what

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are we doing with the receiver that Quinnon Mitchell isn't on,

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Puka and Davante, one of them isn't gonna have

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>quinnyon Mitchell on him and Adri Jackson ain't the answer.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I find that I cannot wait for this game.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if it's one of my picks in our

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling show. If it were to be one of my picks,

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I would be going with the Rams plus the points

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Rams absolutely can win and I

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of emotional There could be

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>some emotional fatigue for Philly after that Chiefs game and

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden where they're having to defend their

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>beloved push push to the media because folks are finally

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>picking up on that. They're lined up off sides almost

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>every single time, and they jump most of the time.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that is and listen back to back Philly's

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>opening season schedule, Brutal Cowboys, Chiefs, Rams Bucks. Now two

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.479
<v Speaker 1>and zero is the best you can hope for Rams Bucks,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>really tough ones, really interested in seeing them both. See

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's one of my picks. In a bit, let's

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>get to the other game of the weekend, except it's

0:32:59.400 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday night.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so my Ravens are facing off the Lions on

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Monday Night. Now, both these teams are coming off of

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 3>dominant Week two performances or top three in points per

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 3>game this year. Both of them were staring at one and.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Two with the loss. Though who needs this game more?

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Baltimore because they have the Chiefs next,

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and because I don't think Baltimore is ready to punt,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not that they would be punting on it, but ready

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to punt on the one seed. And what the Lions

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know is after this game they have the Browns and

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>then the Bengals without Joe Burrow. So the Lions, even

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with the loss and they're on the road, can steady

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves a bit. Baltimore, on the other hand, beating the

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Browns is nice, but it doesn't make you feel great.

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, Okay, we beat the Browns, bolt and

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how shaky the Chiefs look. Everyone on

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that Baltimore team has had trouble beating Kansas City their

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>whole career. And so this is a home game at

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 1>night against the Lions team that when they played one

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of the big Boys, got dominated. That twenty seven to

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thirteen Packer game was not as close as that score suggests.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That game was twenty seven to six and green Bay

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>coasted home and Isaac Teslat made one of his two

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing catches this season, and they got you know, they

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>made it, I guess somewhat respectable. I'm also you know,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry has had one of the best games of

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>his career and then followed it up with one of

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the worst games of his career. So I find that,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, fascinating going into it. This is your team, Demanse,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what's your confidence level going into this game.

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm pretty confident. I'd say like out of a ten,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 3>it'd be like eight, eight or nine. I think the

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Lions are a good team, but I think we'll take

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 3>care of business.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's my concern for Baltimore. I don't love at all

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the back end of their defense. I like Kyle Hamilton.

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>The rest of it to me is question marks. And

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>now last year that was the case. Early in the

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 1>year and the second half of the year they were unbelievable.

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They clearly thought it might be a need. They went

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>out and got Jayurr Alexander He's a healthy scratch.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Week two. It was weird.

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>They were like, he's not listed on the injury report,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but this is injury related, but either way, he's inactive.

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>The Lions, if they can protect golf, they just have

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so many weapons. And Jamison Williams, even though he's first

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>team All Knucklehead, is a hard guy to deal with. Obviously,

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Aman Ross Saint Brown's great, Gibbs is great, Laporte is

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>really good. I it feels like a game that if

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore can't get there with four, Detroit is going it's

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to be able to move the ball and that this

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a shootout, which I guess. Go

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and listen. DeAndre Hopkins has made three catches this year,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it should have been three touchdowns, one who was ruled

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>down at the half yard line. Zay Flowers, who I've

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>never been a huge believer in, has looked really good.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And Lamar's playing like there's no I mean, that's you know,

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>that's almost a given at this point. But Lamar is,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even by his standards, really playing great football, and so no,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I think this.

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Would be a quarterback passer ready.

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Ever he's got yeah, he just right.

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It was Mahomes. Mahomes then dipped a bit, Rogers took

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>it back, and now Lamar's ahead of both of them. Now,

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way, contractually obligated to remind the audience if

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's career quarterback passer rating regular season plus the playoffs,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Mahome still has the record for regular season, only it's Lamar's.

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know this is the highest total of the weekend.

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>And I don't really bet totals, but if I were

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to to me, this is an overgame, and I just

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think that this feels to me like thirty one twenty

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>eight type of thirty one twenty seven, high flying, high scoring,

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe last team with the ball type of game. All right,

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>let me we got a new sponsor. I want to

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you guys about so smart betters rely on data.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>HOF hands you powerful analytics at your fingertips to tilt

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the odds in your favor to help you avoid that

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just gut wrenching missing one leg of your player parlay.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>HOF gives you all the probabilities and insights you need

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to succeed by using historical data, matchup grades, trends, and

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>player performance insights. Hf's parlay Optimizer for you parlay betters

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out there, let you know which parlay legs look the

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>riskiest to them, so you can adjust before game time

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and maximize your chances of hitting with confidence. Hof crunches

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>millions of data points in seconds. So whether you're building

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the same game parlay or and we're like, may maybe

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just picking a money line a team to go with,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>let the stats that ahof can provide help guide your decisions.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Send your plays from HOF directly to your sportsbook app

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>with one click to save time. HOF trusted by betters

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>with over one million total users and a rating of

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>four point nine out of five on the app Store

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with over seven thousand reviews. That's more reviews than this

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>show has. For limited time only, What's Right listener not

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 1>only get a seven day free trial, but they also

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>get fifty percent off their first month when they use

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>code right at checkout wriighd at checkout. So check it out.

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Download the HF app on iOS or Android. You get

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>inner code right wrighd and you'll be all set. And again,

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you're planning on betting some games this weekend, you get

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seven days free. Give it a try and see what

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you think. Use code right WIGHD on the HOF app.

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, demonse, let's get to tonight's game.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh yes, So everybody's expecting tonight to be a blowout.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a well, I don't think it's Buffalo

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 3>minus twelve or twelve point favorites. Everybody's expecting this to

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 3>be a pivotal game for Mike McDaniel's career. Now they're

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 3>going to have some time with them playing the following

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Monday or I guess the next next Monday, so they'll

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 3>be able to fire him.

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 2>How does this game. Need to look for McDaniel to

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 2>keep his job. What are you expecting here?

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Listen? If they get embarrassed. I do think he could

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>be the rare coach fired in September. That to me

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>is almost always a process mistake, Like if you didn't

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 1>want to fire a coach in the offseason, only giving

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>him three games to me is usually pretty ridiculous. But

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it's been really ugly in Miami. Week one was as

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>bad as it gets, and then Week two is kind

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of a heart wrenching loss that you could have won.

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>They can't get embarrassed tonight. Now, what I will tell

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you about tonight's game is the Bill's injury report that

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw yesterday, which obviously is the last one of

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the week. Gave me pause. Okay, the Bill's injuries are

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all on the defensive side of the ball, and it's important.

0:40:51.120 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Guys Ed Oliver listed as out, Matt Mulano listed as out, Taranjahnson,

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Cam Lewis listed as questionable, with Shaq Thompson listed

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as questionable. Now, the only noteworthy dolphin that's listed as

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>out to me is Darren Waller. Obviously, storm Duck and

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one of their safeties is also out. I think Waller

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>is probably the biggest loss of the three, maybe Storm Duck,

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but Storm Duck honestly is probably just people know him

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's got a sick name, not necessarily because he's

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a great player. This is going to be a very

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>popular Survivor pick. If people are betting Survivor on Thursdays,

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they Josh Allen has absolutely owned Tua and the Dolphins.

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>All we know all of this, and the Bills should

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>blow them out.

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 2>They just should.

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The defensive injuries for Buffalo concerned me a bit because

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>what we do know is if Toua has time and

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't disrupt the rhythm of the offense, that offense

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can be really good. And so.

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 2>In New England, yeah.

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, he had the terrible pick late and he also

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, took the sack late like it ended terribly,

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>but you saw how potent that offense in theory can

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be intermittently in that game. And so I would not

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bet this game either way. I certainly think thirty five

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to ten Buffalo is on the board, But is there

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a is there a chance that at the end of

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter this is fourteen nothing Miami and then

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is like fighting its way back the rest of

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the way. It it's Thursday, which is adds some weird

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff to it. Is this me just wish casting, because

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want the Chiefs not to be eliminated

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>from the one seed conversation by the end of September. Maybe,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But those bills injuries concern me just enough that I'm

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.479
<v Speaker 1>going to give Miami a puncher's chance in this game.

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think that Tua saying, and I don't know

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>if we talked about this on this show yet, Tua

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>saying like I can't run or throw like Josh was unfortunate.

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Like that's just like Tua gave a quote like he

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were a backup quarterback stepping in rather than a guy

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>who's paid like he's a superstar. Right, And yeah, well,

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean now got to play him. He's the guy

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go through every year.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like, yeah, I didn't.

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love that at all. All right, let's go

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to Bears Cowboys.

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 2>All right? Game of the Week with Dallas and Chicago.

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 3>The Cowboys are coming off that forty point ot win

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Bears have allowed the most points in the

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 3>league so far.

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just real quick, both NFC offensive player of

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Week through two weeks has been the two quarterbacks

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to play the Bears, JJ McCarthy and then Jared goff.

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I listen the Bears, Everyone's going to focus on Caleb.

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 1>They allowed fifty two points. Man Like Caleb, I thought

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was fine in Week two. He wasn't great, he wasn't terrible.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't their problem. If the Bears lose this game,

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I you can, in my opinion, put a nail in

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>their play Coffin. So the AFC upper class might still

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 1>be the best of the two conferences, but the NFC

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>middle class is so much deeper this year than the

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>AFCs that I just don't think you can recover from

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 1>zero to three. I am more interested actually in this

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is can Dallas's offense put on the type of performance

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 1>where we say, you know what, we have to take

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>them seriously as a team that's got a you know,

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a very real chance of making the postseason. Dallas's offense

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in Week one against Philly moved the ball at will

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 1>until the weird hour long weather delay, and then was

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>still moving the ball, but Ceedee Lamb was dropping it.

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Week two, obviously, Dallas's offense was unstoppable. If Dak puts

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>up another huge game, then I think that and they

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:03.280
<v Speaker 1>get to two and one with the one loss being

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Eagles, then I think you do have to

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>start saying hold on. Like they've been able to run

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the ball, they've been able to do whatever they want

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on offense, and you look at their upcoming schedule next

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>week home against the Packers, even if you pencil that

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in as a loss at the Jets at the Panthers

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>after that, if they win this game, they have a

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very decent chance to be four and two through six games,

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>having already played four road games like that's something, and

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so not blowing that game against the Giants was huge.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually am more interested, believe it or not, in

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas side of this than I am.

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>The h.

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Well completely, I want to see what Dallas has in store.

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The games have to matter, man, I can't. I can't

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>like pretend I'm you know, I've been optimistic about what

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from the Bears. I think Kale has been fine,

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't been sensational, and the team right now

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>has looked like a mess. They created a way to

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>lose Week one, and they got fifty bald Week two.

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not good. Just is what it is. Hey. You

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ever sign up for a phone plan thinking wow, great price,

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and then after a few months, surprise your bills hire

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile you pay twenty dollars a month forever. That's

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>a limited talk, text and data starting at just twenty

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>five dollars a month, no price, heights, no contract forever. Plus.

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile is now a legit nationwide five G network.

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>They've invested billions building five G towers across the country.

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Visit boostmobile dot com or head to your local Boost

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>store today and get unlimited talk, text and data for

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars a month forever. Five G speeds not

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>available in all areas after thirty gigs, customers may experience

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>lower speeds. Customers will pay twenty five dollars a month

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as long as they remain active on the Boost Unlimited plan.

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, demons, let's get to packers Browns please.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, they've had arguably the best starts of the season

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:22.479
<v Speaker 3>of anybody, with dominant wins over Detroit and Washington. Here's

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 3>a couple of numbers. There are number one in the

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 3>NFC Super Bowl odds. Love is number three at for

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 3>MVP and Micah is number one for Defensive Player of

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 3>the Year.

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Is this is all this too much? Hyper? Do you

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 2>think this is legit?

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I said it after the Mica trade. I'll say

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it again. The most interesting player in the NFL this

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>year is Jordan Love. They have all the pieces. If

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Love can just be steady, there's no reason they shouldn't

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be not only a real contender, but be awesome all year.

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>And he's been steady. I don't think he's been sensational.

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been steady and that's all. You know

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, That's that's fine. He has Coach Mangini

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>had this stat I couldn't believe it. Like Jordan Love

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>only has five games in his career with a passer

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>rating between eighty five and ninety nine, which are like

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>solid good not great games. Every other game the passer

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rating's either been eighty four or below or one hundred

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and above. So he really is he epitomizes the old

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen roller coaster stuff and right, and so I

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>really like what they have in Green Bay, and I.

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 3>Really recuvenated them. They just seem very happy over there, excited.

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Such a great player, man. Yeah, and it's just it is.

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>His impact is felt every plays on the field, and

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are going to really put it

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:14.879
<v Speaker 1>on the Browns this weekend and the and so we

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>will well spoiler alert, that's gonna be part of our

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>pick show on Friday. All right, last game we're getting

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to before we get to listener questions.

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So the Chargers have a chance to start three and

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 3>zero if they go in here and beat Denver, and

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 3>that will be three divisional wins for them, and they

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 3>are in the Chiefs division, as we all know. Are

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 3>you secretly rooting for the Broncos this week?

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>It is better for the Chiefs if the Broncos win,

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. If that's the question, like, I'd rather

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, because if the Broncos win, then the Chiefs

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>are all of a sudden, only a game out of

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>first place.

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>If the Chargers win, then yes, you don't have to Like,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are tied with the Broncos assuming they beat

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, but the Chargers have that separation. The thing

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is this, I'm not worried about the Broncos, so that

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>being tied with the Broncos doesn't really matter because I

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.720
<v Speaker 1>think the Broncos are gonna find some more losses along

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the way. The Chargers have just looked awesome, and I

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>thought they looked defensively. Defensively, they've looked like the best

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 1>team in the league. Now. I talked about it on Tuesday.

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love some of the game management stuff late

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>in that game. And they're gonna miss Khalil Mack. By

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, I sent this to the group chat, Khalil

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Mack listed or according to you know the NFL Injury

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Insiders is going to miss quote or it will be

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>back in quote a few weeks. I'm gonna go ahead

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and plant my flag right now that week eight is

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the absolute soonest he'll be back, and I probably would

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>take after that like a few again, whatever the initial

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting is. But you know about the injury, add a

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 1>few weeks to it and that kind of is exponential,

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 1>where like Burrow three months season over Khalil Mack a

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, six weeks. So that's not good. Obviously, that

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>injury and Herbert getting banged up a bit's not good.

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't I think bo Nicks is gonna

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 1>really really struggle against that Charger defense, Is it at all?

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Allowing to you that have been Patrick Mahomes had the

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 3>same quarterback rating right now our past ratings.

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it, Yeah, I don't like it. Yeah,

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I will be honest with you. I don't like it.

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think that'll change.

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to some of the listener questions from Tuesday

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and then from today.

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Joe asked, how was the steakhouse opening? Nick? Did you

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 2>meet Taylor? Did you meet Taylor?

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>No? So I went Friday. It was great. It was

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>really really good. They did an awesome job. It's like

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a traditional steakhouse with a bunch of Chiefs or Kansas

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>City kind of flares to it, which I thought was

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 1>really cool. It's the same restaurant group that owns Toka Madera,

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which you may you know they have restaurants in a

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>few cities, but I know the one in Aria. Friday,

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were, I know Patrick was going to be there.

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>They ended up not going Friday. They went Sunday for

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick's birthday with he and Travis and Taylor and Brittany

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of them. So I was not there for that,

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So no, I did not. I did not get to

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>meet Taylor. That would have been nice, but I did not.

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, now, I saw your I saw that Mahomes

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 3>tribute birthday video for a second when I got to

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 3>a minute and a half, and I was like, is

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 3>is he going to be in here?

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Is he not going to be?

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did, And then you came up with like

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 2>two minute market.

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Chiefs released like a five minute happy Birthday

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to Mahomes video with a bunch of people being a

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>part of it.

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I was a part of that. That's right.

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh so, Nico asked, if Herbert continues playing like this

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 3>but he loses his first playoff game, does his stock

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 3>rise into the elite level or does he drop with

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 3>what would be a considerable sample of bad January.

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Play Listen, if Herbert keeps this up and then loses

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 1>his first playoff game, that's a disaster. Like Herbert right

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>now is firmly in the MVP conversation, like the I

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>actually think that's worse than just a bad season, like,

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because I think you are right so that that would

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 1>be a worst case scenario for Herbert and Herbert and

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Danny Parkins and Herbert fans. All right, let's get some

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the questions from today.

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Kafreaka asked, would Kansas City rather lose to the

0:54:42.120 --> 0:54:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Giants and beat Baltimore or beat the Giants and lose

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to Baltimore.

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you'd rather lose to the Giants and beat

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore because it's a cross conference game. But I can't.

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't be able to stomach the idea that they

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>lose to the Giants, Like I can't even I can't

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>even deal with that idea. All right, last.

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.760
<v Speaker 3>One, Jason says, Nick, you joked on the show yesterday

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 3>that the Chiefs game this week would be a shave

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 3>your head game. We actually shave your head if the

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs lose.

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's very controversial because the no one close to me

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>wants me to go back to my old haircut except

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for your mother, Demanse.

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 2>And like all like Mike buzzcut.

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Close to it. Yeah and uh, and I'm getting a

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:38.280
<v Speaker 1>little tired of the hair. But it is at this point.

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>It would be a lot of work for a lot

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of people if I were to do it, because we

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have to redo all of the first things, first commercials,

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the head shots, we have to rebrand every

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like I'm kind of like pot committed to this hairstyle now,

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know the I would like to go

0:55:57.840 --> 0:55:58.479
<v Speaker 1>back to it.

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs super Bowl as you've been growing this hair out.

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:05.319
<v Speaker 1>That part's true. Yeah, you know you know what. That

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>part's true. So I don't know what it is. I've

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:09.879
<v Speaker 1>been trying to get Wilds to make a shave your

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>head bat because he would be so devastated if you

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have to shave his and I wouldn't mind, but he

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>won't do it, all right, I would like that would

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be unbelievable. Wild with a skin fade like rate. Subscribe

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>review our pick show coming up on Friday. Demandays Can't

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Lose teaser all that coming up tomorrow. Thank you for listening.

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to boost hard rock volume. Blue Duck our

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>new sponsors at h o F appreciate you all. Talk

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to you guys Friday.

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:37.359
<v Speaker 2>What's right