WEBVTT - Win and In!

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Speculation and advice.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Now along with the guys.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>From guete leagues dot com, here's your host, Paul Jarge.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Yet it is a win and in addition of Fantasy

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Football Weekly Week number fourteen playoffs for next week.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 4>You need a win to get.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 3>In and we're here to help. Scott fish Thor nice

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you got any You got any teams that need

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>a win this week?

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 4>No? No, no, Ragger already no. I yeah, I had

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 4>not a great year. I did make it to the

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 4>playoffs in one league and that's already set. So okay,

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 4>all right, I'm just enjoying the ride this week.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what. I'm enjoying the ride Round three of

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the Scott Fishball playoffs.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Same here. I didn't think I made it, and then

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 4>I found out last week I had made it and

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>not set my lineup for two weeks because I thought

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 4>I was out no way somehow, So you coasted in.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm still it makes all that trivializes all my efforts

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 3>to find a way into round three. Thor, you got

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>any you got any winning in scenarios.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't not winning in but I do have to

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 5>take this opportunity to break about our work. Guillotine League

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 5>where I was I was the last guy standing with

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 5>like four hundred and sixty bucks left, and Matthew Berry

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 5>had been in it, he had like four hundred five dollars.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 6>He gets eliminated last week.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 5>The next highest person, Dwayne, Sorry Dwayne if you're listening,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 5>only have fifty So I got to go seven different

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 5>fifty one.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 6>Dollars beds and just stack up the roster.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 5>I have never had a Guillotine team even close to this, gud.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I am so excited when you get to this stage

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 3>of the season and every one of your players is

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a freaking super stud.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>It is so much, absolutely and that's a whole new problem.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 5>Like it is, yeah, going through and like deciding which

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 5>of these studs is the best matchupsack Yeah, yeah, yeah, you.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Know, like I'm debating Chase Brown, who I love this

0:01:58.640 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>week awesome matchup.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Last night, I started Jremior Gibbs, did not start Montgomery

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 5>because my roster is just so good, and then they

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 5>scored about the same amount of points, so I was like, yeah, okay,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 5>well we'll see what my replacement guy does.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it's so much fun and actually you can

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>still you could start a new eighteen league right now.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I'll still let you do that.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Leagues dot Com, yep, we're here to help with all

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>of your Week fourteen needs. We know this is an

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 3>important week for many of you. We're going to break

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 3>down all the games like we always do Fantasy Football

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>weekly style, with letter grades on all of them. We'll

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>go through and take a chance to me players, three

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>tough questions, and our final week of premature speculation. Guys

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that you want to pick up this week that other

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 3>people will be trying to pick up later, but they're

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 3>all ready on your team. Let's dive into the matchup

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Scott with the Jets at the Dolphins. For the Jets,

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 3>it looks like Breese Hall will not go in this game,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and that takes off the board the most compelling of

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the Jets players.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Possibly possibly so Breese Hall is doubtful. I mean, keep

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 4>an eye on it, but it sounds like he might

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 4>not go. If he doesn't go, Braylan Allen is likely

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>your starter. We might see some Isaiah Davis, but over

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>the last eight games, basically two months Braylan Allen's averaged

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 4>two point eight yards per carry and just five catches,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and he's been very, very inefficient with his limited work.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 4>He did have flashes earlier in the season, and he's

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 4>probably going to be a fifteen touchback if he does

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 4>get the main role, starting only two backs of top

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 4>ninety total combo rush receiving yards and it took twenty

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 4>one and twenty three touches to get there. But the

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 4>amount of volume that Braylan Allen should see gives me

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 4>the volume volume ce here. Over to the passing game,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm a C grade on Aaron Rodgers. It's kind of

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the same story as last week. He's averaging barely over

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 4>two hundred yards per game, but he's got eight multi

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>score games, including four the last five. He leads the

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 4>NFL and passes in pass attempts inside the five yard line.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>It's almost like he just wants to know up his

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 4>passing touchdown numbers, regardless of winning the game or not.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Savage Savage not watching his new series on Netflix.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 4>No, probably not. Probably not. Earlier in the season, we

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 4>talked about Miami's past being possibly a little over their

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 4>skis a little overrated due to matchups in the context

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>that teams didn't have to pass a lot to beat

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 4>them without Tua. Well, they've now allowed multiple scores in

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>to for the last six passers. The first six passers

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 4>against them one hundred and sixty yard average, the last

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 4>six two and sixty eight yard average against them, So

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>they're lighting them up a lot more. I have a

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>se grade on Rogers over to DeVante Adams. He's now

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 4>scored more Fantasy points than Wilson in four straight five

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 4>plus catches in all of them, leads them in targets,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>red zone targets, end zone targets all over Garrett Wilson

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 4>for those four he's definitely taken over his one A

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 4>role in that offense. This is a Miami defense as

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 4>a whole. They're allowing the fewest scorers just seven wide

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>receiver scorers tied with the Jets, and second fewest yards,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 4>so they don't allow quite a lot to the wide

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 4>receiver position. But Adams bounces around the slot the last

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 4>two weeks. Did find eighty two yards and two scores

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 4>over the last two weeks, and mostly he'll be lined

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 4>up on the outside against storm Duck.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Storm Cuck is storm Duck awesome name for a terrible player.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 4>Yes, who's allowing a one hundred and six passer rating

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 4>in his coverage. So I have a B grade on

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Adams and the C grade goes to Garrett Wilson. It's

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 4>that same tough matchup, but he does have four plus

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 4>catches in all the games, has had nine plus Fantasy

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 4>points in all but one game this entire year. So

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 4>like your floor is basically the nine point level, so

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 4>C is easy there. It could get to a B.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 4>We'll see. Tyler Conklin. I'm giving a C grade to

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 4>the tight ends in the last six weeks against Miami

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>six for seventy eight, nine for one zho three in

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 4>a score, fourteen for one, thirty one in a score,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 4>five for thirty four, six for thirty seven in a score,

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 4>and eleven for one to thirty seven.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Miami's getting rocked by tight ends getting rocked.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Those are Those are team totals. But Tyler Conklin gets

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 4>mostly everything eighty five percent of the work in this offense,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 4>so I'm gonna give him a C grade. The promise

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>he's never had more than three targets, so he need

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 4>he really needs to show up in this one over

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 4>to the Miami side. I got a C grade on

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Tua Techno Di Looa. He's averaged over three hundred yards

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 4>and three scores per game over the last three. If

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 4>the road gets tougher against this top jets passed allowing

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>the fewest passing scores and the second fewest passing yards,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>so I can only give him a see here they're

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 4>gaining absolutely tagged on the ground from quarterbacks, but to

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 4>His highest rushing yard day in his entire career is

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight yards, so I can't really count on that.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 4>His dump offs to a Chan and John U or

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 4>where he gets his two two hundred and fifty yards

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 4>and you could probably count in a score or two.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 4>So I got a C grade there, plus sauces questionable,

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 4>which you know could should.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably downgraded to doubtful.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Doubtful, Yes, he is doubtful. Tyreek Hill, who would have

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 4>lined up against Sas Gardner most of the time forty

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 4>percent on that side, he's probably gonna see fifth rounder

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 4>quantest stiggers quantestiggers. Okay, So definite upgrade there for Tyreek Hill.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>He's the safer one out of him and Wattle. Five

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>plus catches in three straight twenty three targets in in

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 4>the last three games where Tua has been lighting it up.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Do the Jets allow the fewest receptions and fewest scores,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 4>though third fewest yards to posting wide receivers. So it's

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 4>just a tough matchup. I'm I'm gonna leave Wattle on

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>the bench. I mean, he had his breakout game in

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Week twelve, but that was one of only two games

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 4>this year where he's top fifty five yards. He only

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>has three scores on the season. It's just really tough

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 4>and against DJ Reid, I just I don't want him

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 4>in there. John new Smith, though, how we're talking baby

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and one yards and two scores eighty seven

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>in a score one thirteen.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 4>The last three games, he's he's Tua's wooby with eighteen

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 4>right an right now, He's got two whoobies out there. Basically,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 4>he's throwing fast and he's throwing short. Despite having you know,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the deep red and hill. This Jets team is top

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 4>five and several categories against tight ends, though no tight

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 4>end is top seventy five yards. Only two have scored,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 4>but none really see John Who's volume. So I'm still

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 4>gonna give Johnny the CE. You could talk me easily

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 4>into a B though, and Devon achan Chan I got

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a B grade on the Jets only allow about one

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty combo yards per game, but mostard is questionable.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 4>And a Chan is a fifteen plus touch guy that's

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 4>averaging averaging six catches per game.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 3>He's number two with Tua among running backs. He's number

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>two in targets, receptions, and receiving yards and number one

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>in receiving touchdowns.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, is that overall? That's overall running back? Yeah, his

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 4>numbers with Tua and six catches per game, that's insane.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Scores seven times in the last six games. So B

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 4>grade there.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland takes on the Pittsburgh Steelers Store. I'm guessing you

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and I are going to diverge on this.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Jameis Winston is the biggest all or nothing quarterback out there.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 6>He's so fun.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 3>He's so fun. We love Jameis Winston, love watching Jameis

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Winston for the good and the bad and the potential

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 3>divine intervention.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I if I.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Gotta go on deliver me from Pick six's Dear God,

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 5>one of the great clotes I've ever heard, it's so good.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>If I gotta go all or nothing on Jameis Winston

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>against the Steelers, I'm on the nothing side.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm closer to the nothing.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 5>So okay, I put a C on Jamis Winston this

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 5>week against the Steelers Week twelve. Now there is weather,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 5>of course, but two hundred and nineteen yards, no touchdowns,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 5>an interception. He did have a rushing touchdownd Nope, so

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 5>no passing touchdowns, thirteen point four fantasy points. Pittsburgh has

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 5>allowed the fewest fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks over the season.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 5>Winston is averaging, to our point before about the Yolo

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 5>of the Yolo game plans forty seven point eight pass

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 5>attempts per game in the four non snow games that

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 5>they played. Any of course, if he has passed for

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 5>four to ninety seven yards, four touchdowns but three interceptions.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's actually one point three pick sixes per game.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 5>So we're gonna to drop a sea on him in

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 5>this matchup. Likewise, for Nick Chubb, since returning from his

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 5>knee injury in Week seven, Chubb is averaging just three

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 5>yards per carry three flat.

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Last week, he plays only.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Thirty four percent of the Snaps had eleven touches for

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 5>forty five total yards. He did have nineteen PPR points

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 5>against the Steelers in Week twelve. Now, of course there

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>was the game script stuff with the weather, uh but

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 5>uh so, Yeah, anyway, I'm gonna give him a ce

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 5>in this one. The guy's close to shot for sure,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 5>but he's gonna get a little volume here, give him

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 5>a sea. Jerry Judy gonna give him a b Forty

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 5>point five PPR.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 6>Points against the Broncos. Absolutely insane.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 4>How come the Broncos didn't put Sartan on it?

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>That's what I kept wondering.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's ridiculous. It's so dumb.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, honestly, I swear sometimes.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 5>He looked like the vintage Alabama Jerry Judy in that game,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 5>the way he was zooming around the field like it was.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 5>It was just good to see. Jameis Winston is his

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>muse apparently for mister Judy. And speaking of that, Judy

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 5>scored thirteen plus PPR points in all five starts with

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 5>Jamis Winston. This is, of course a tough matchup. The

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Steelers are number nine and fewest Fantasy points allowed to

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>opposing receivers and to your guys. You know you guys

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 5>were mentioning the thing last week about certain in the

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 5>previous matchup against the Steelers, Judy only saw Joey Porter

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Junior on thirty thirty six percent. I'm sorry of his routes,

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 5>and Cleveland does cool stuff with Judy where they'll have

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 5>him on the boundary, they'll move them into the slot,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 5>they'll move them all around the formation. So it's really

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 5>difficult for the opposing team to be able to just

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 5>shadow because of that, and so you would expect a

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 5>similar percentage of covers looks from Porter, but probably not

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 5>more than half. Elijah Moore, I'm gonna give him a c.

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Since Week eight, wide receiver thirty five and fantasy point

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 5>thirty five and fantasy points per game. The Steelers in

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 5>general are good against opposing slot receivers. However, I found

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 5>this interesting. Pittsburgh runs single high coverage at the NFL's

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 5>highest rate more against single high since Week a two

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 5>point twenty one yards per route run and almost twenty

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 5>four percent first read share. More does really good against

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 5>single high. So even though the Steeers have a good

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 5>pass defense, even though they're good against opposing slots, the

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 5>coverage look should be advantageous for him, so we're gonna

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 5>give more a. Seeds gonna give David and Joko an A.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Nine catches for fifty two yards and two touchdowns on

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 5>seventeen count them seventeen targets last week, and Djoko has

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 5>scored nineteen plus PPR points two of his last three games.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 5>This is also a decent matchup for him. Tight ends

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 5>have scored at least ten PPR points against Pittsburgh in

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 5>six straight games. So I love and Joco. We're giving

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 5>them an A. On the other side, with the Steelers,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Russell Wilson, give him a B. Three for four hundred

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 5>fourteen yards and three touchdowns last week. You go back

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 5>two weeks ago when they played these same Browns two

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 5>hundred and seventy yards and a touchdown Cleveland. Though, however,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 5>now is dealing with injuries to both Grant Delpit and

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Denzel Ward, so you have the compromise secondary. Wilson should

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 5>do better this time. The Browns last week against Bonex,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 5>my boy gave up two hundred ninety four yards and

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 5>a touchdown. I love that to miss their next so

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 5>we're giving him a B. We're also given Najre Harris

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 5>a b naj RB twenty five and Fantasy points per game,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 5>averaging nineteen point seven touchdows and a bit over eighty

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 5>nine total yards per game. This is a good matchup

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 5>for him. Since Week eight, Cleveland has allowed the second

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 5>highest explosive run rate and the fourth highest misstackle and

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 5>has done the fourth highest misstackle rate. Jalen Warren, I'm

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him a C. He scored ten point four

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 5>plus PPR points three games in a row. Week twelve

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 5>at Cleveland was his best game of the season fifteen

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 5>point four PPR points. He did have this a season

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 5>high snap share in that game, but his workload diminished

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 5>last week. That's something you want to keep an eye on.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 5>The Browns, however, have allowed eight rushing touchdowns their last

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 5>four games, so a good matchup for him. Three running

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 5>backs over that span scored at least thirteen PPR points

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 5>against Cleveland. George Pickens is an A and a must start.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 5>He is Pat Fryarmouth I'm gonna give him a beef.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Four catches for fifty nine yards on four targets in

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Week twelve against these Cleveland Browns. The last two games,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 5>pat Ryermuth leads the Steelers in receptions of receiving yards, and.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Early the first three games with Russell Wilson, he wasn't

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>getting any action.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah is now Yeah, And we had talked like heading

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 5>in when they made that swap of how Russell Wilson

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 5>traditionally hadn't looked for tight ends over his career as much.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if friar Mouth is, you know, he's

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 5>like closing up to him like at the team meals

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 5>and stuff. But Russell Wilson has clearly started to look

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>his way more h and that has led to ten

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 5>plus PPR points three or four games for Pat Fryarmuth.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 5>This is an okay matchup for him. Of course, Browns

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 5>have allowed three tight ends to score eight plus PPR

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 5>points last three games.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's take a break. When we come back,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Falcons taking on the Vikings Bjon Robinson in a bough.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 5>Kirk Cousins revenge and the Kirk Cousins Revenge jangle.

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk that through along with the nine players upon

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>whom you can take a chance when we return to

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 7>Nine winners who are not only start.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Many of these guys available on the way for Why, yes,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you can get at the quarterback position and stuff it.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going with Aid O'Connell, something I didn't think

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I would say this season. We just saw O'Connell go

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 4>for three hundred and forty yards and two scores against

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 4>a much better pass defense than the one they faced

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 4>this week in the Bucks, who allowed the third most

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 4>passing yards on their way to allowing the most fantasy

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 4>points to quarterbacks. Five of the last six quarterbacks to

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 4>face them had multiple scores. That was sixteen total QB

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 4>scores over the last six weeks.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I like it and I need that in scott Fish Bowl. Yeah,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 3>by three starting quarterbacks.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Your six dollars bid we probably he popped up with

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 4>an illness this week.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>That scared me and then they already stated hill placement ritter.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, he's gonna go.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 4>All right, he's gonna go.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>You take a chance at me. Quarterback Tour.

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm going with Cooper Rush against the Bengals. And when

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 5>I was doing my research on this, I started gett

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 5>nostalgic for the twenty fourteen Bahamas ball Central Michigan against

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Western Kentucky, Okay, where Central Michigan led by this Cooper

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Rush had one of the wildest fourth quarter comebacks that

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 5>you'll ever see.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 6>Last twelve minutes of the game, they see him.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 5>You scored five unanswered touchdowns, what to get within one

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 5>point of WKU and they scored the last one with.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 6>No time left on the clock.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 5>They sent Cooper Rush back out for the two point

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 5>conversion to potentially win by one, and the ball.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Got knocked away.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 5>They came up here short on the most epic Yeah,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 5>come back up all the time.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 4>You gonna come up just short this week.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 5>Not for your fantasy teams out there. Since Week eleven,

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Cooper Rush quarterback twenty five four fantasy points per game.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 5>But Rush scored eighteen plus fantasy points in two of

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 5>his last three games, and this is a very very

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 5>good matchup for him. In the last three games that

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 5>the Bengals have played, Lamar Jackson, Justin Herbert, and Russell

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Wilson we just talked about have all scored twenty eight

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 5>point four plus fantasy points against the Bengals. You go

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 5>back to Week eight with the Bengals, Cincinnati's allowed the

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 5>second highest yards per attempt in the NFL and the

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 5>highest passer rating in the NFL.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Like Cooper rush.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>This week, Bengals might be the worst pass defense in

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the NFL. Right this minute, He's gonna feel.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 6>Like he's playing WKU again in the fourth quarter.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Last week I used Will Lovis. This week, I'm gonna

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 3>use Will Lovis. Yeah, last week we got two touchdowns

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and now he's got Jacksonville. So as a reminder, over

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the last month, Will Lovis quarterback eleven in fantasy football points. Wow,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points. That makes him starter worthy in typically sized leagues.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Here's some metrics to back up his improved play again

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>this over the last month. Passer rating eight touchdowns, eighth best,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>touchdown to interception ratio tenth best, yards per pass fourth best.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing I like the most. He's still

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 3>throwing the ball down field. He's a strong arm quarterback.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 3>And it's not like they've just said we need you

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>to dink and dunk your way to confidence, Will Levis.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>He's still throwing down field and he's completing these passes.

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>On the season, Jacksonville has allowed the most fantasy points

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to quarterbacks. They've improved slightly over the last five weeks,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 3>nudging from dead last to twenty seventh in fantasy points allowed.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the running back position, Scott.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I'm going with hear me out here, I'm

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 4>going with Kenneth Gainwell back.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Up sell me the backup to Saquon Barkley.

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 4>The Panthers have played twelve games, sixteen running backs have

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 4>double digit fantasy points against them, So backups they're getting played.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 4>They allow the most fantasy points to backs, most yards,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 4>and most scores. They are just dreadful. This might be

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 4>a blowout where the Eagles are twelve and a half

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 4>point favorites and he gets work. In previous blowouts against

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the Giants, he got fourteen touches on thirty plus naps.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Two weeks ago, the seventeen point win over the Rams,

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 4>he got thirty plus naps and got a score in

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>that one. I think it's a blowout where he gets

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 4>work at the end, gets just enough to make it

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>worth it, all right? On a week with six teams on.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Body, sure, right, we gotta go a little deeper than normal,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 3>all right, Scott, your Scott, sorry, thor your take a

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>chance on me running back Bobby Fish for this.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 4>One, thinks a compliment.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm gonna go at Seahawks running back Zach Sharboney

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 5>against the Cardinals.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 6>Charboney is still available in more than.

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Half of the Yahoo leagues, and depending on how the

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 5>news that we get in the lead up to kickoff,

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 5>might be a must start in this game. With the

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 5>status of Kenneth Walker. But speaking to Sharboney, two catches,

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 5>forty one scrimmage yards and a touchdown last week, he

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 5>played in forty four percent of the snaps in that one,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 5>and you go back to the last five games, he's

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 5>had multiple catches in four of those games. The Cardinals

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 5>have allowed the fifteenth most fantasy points to opposing running

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 5>backs this year, and the Cardinals have allowed the seventh

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 5>more yards per carry. If Kenneth Walker doesn't play, and

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 5>Kenneth Walker did not participate in Thursday's practice, he has

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 5>been labeled the game time decision, Charburney would become a

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 5>must start. But even if Kenneth Walker does play, he

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 5>will clearly not be one hundred percent, and I would

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 5>expect Cherburney's usage to rise this week.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 6>In what is a good matchup.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Rico Dowdell plays the Bengals. Is it possible Rico

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Dowdell is league winner? Good? Yeah, Uncle Rico all ready

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>to go league winner, but I like him this week.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Dowdell last week against the Giants twenty two carries, a touchdown,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 3>three catches for eleven yards, career high twenty five total

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>touches for Rico Dowdell. And last week against the Bengals,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Najie Harris, Jalen Warden, Corderell Patterson combined for one hundred

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards and a touchdown thirteen catches for one hundred

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and forty six yards. Dowdell's facing the Bengals. As I mentioned,

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the middle of the pack defense that's allowed rushing touchdowns

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 3>are one hundred yard games in a whopping Get this,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The Bengals have allowed rushing touchdowns are one hundred yard

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>games in nine straight games.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Wow, jeez, nine times.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 3>And just go to the wide receiver position.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm gonna go with my take a chance on

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 4>me quarterbacks wide receiver at least one of them. Trey

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Tucker again trying to dig deep for people here.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 3>Did DJ Turner get knocked out last week? Maybe? All right,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>keep going anyway.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 4>It's just a great matchup for a guy who had

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 4>a fifty eight yard score last week and seven for

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 4>eighty two the week before, he plays over ninety percent

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 4>of the snaps. The Bucks allowed the sixth most explosive

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 4>plays with thirty nine plays over twenty yards and seven

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 4>plays over forty yards, and they allow the fourth most

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 4>fantasy points to perimeter receivers. I think it's a good

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 4>spot for him.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>It is, and explosive plays are what he's.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 4>All about exactly. That's why I mentioned that, Yep, let's

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 4>go to.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Thor your take a chance on me receiver.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 5>I am also, like my friend Scott Fish, going to

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 5>stack a receiver with my take a chance on me quarterback,

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 5>and I'm going with Cowboys wide receiver Brandon Cooks against

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 5>the Bengals. Cooks last week returned from a seven game

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 5>knee absence against the Giants three catches, sixteen yards and

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 5>a touchdown. He had a fifty one point four percent

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 5>route share in that game. That should spike in this

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 5>matchup now that he's been back, been ingratiated back and

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 5>closer to one hundred percent. And the matchup is ideal

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 5>as we all gang up on the Bengals defense in

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 5>this thing. But the Bengals have allowed the tenth most

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points to appuzzing wide receivers, and they've been getting worse.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Cincinnati has allowed six touchdowns to receivers in the past

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 5>four games, and you go back to Week eight, since

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 5>he has allowed the third most fantasy points per game

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 5>to the wide receiver position, like Brandon Cooks.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>This week, Kean Coleman, We're hoping he's going to come

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>back from his wrist injury. He's really fallen out of

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>memory cause he hasn't played him five weeks, but a reminder,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 3>in the two games before getting hurt in Week nine,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Kean Coleman posted one hundred and twenty five yards and

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 3>then he came back with a five catch, seventy yard

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown game and a target rate of twenty four

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 3>percent and twenty five percent. He was just.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Ascending, Keon Coleman.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Was when he hit this wrist injury. Hopefully comes back

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 3>here because it's a juicy matchup with the Rams. They've

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 3>given up a wide receiver touchdown in six straight games,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 3>and rems outside cornerback Kobe Durant and Darius Williams aren't great.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 3>They rank his Pro Football focuses eighty fifth and sixty

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 3>second coverage cornerbacks. They're just guys. To this point, a

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Mary Cooper total non factor. All of those wide all

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 3>of the wide receivers that went down in the trade deadline,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>none of it really doing much of anything, including DeAndre Hopkins,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>who's been the best of a bunch of those guys.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Continue with our matchups, including Falcons and the Vikings. It's

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 3>the revenge game for Kirk Cousins, and he enters the

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 3>game ice cold. Over the past three games, he's thrown

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>zero touchdown six interceptions. The Vikings lead the league in

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 3>blitz rate at thirty seven percent, and cousins immobility will

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>be tested for sure. Teams have had success against Minnesota

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 3>by throwing fast with first read passes. Kirk can read

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>the play fast enough, but on that arm, it just

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have the zip on it anymore. No, I don't know.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>And plus you know, if the Vikings blitz and they

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 3>start to get through, Cousins does not have the mobility.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>He never had a lot of mobility. He used to

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 3>be able to like slide a little bit or step

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>up in a pocket just to gain half a beat.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>That's gone. This is a brutal game for Kirk Cousins

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and potentially and I've got a bench grade on him.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>As for his receivers, let's go to Drake London and

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Darnell Mooney, who have got B grades.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>For me.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Vikings likely without starting cornerback Stephan Gilmour, which opens up

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 3>a very exploitable matchup. Gilmore's replacement, Fabian Moreau, got roasted

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 3>last week, including allowing a touchdown. Moreau is on his

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 3>fifth team in five years. He was Pro Football Focus's

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 3>eighth worst ranked cornerback last year. Minnesota's been yielding to

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>receivers all year and that has not changed recently. Even

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the inconsistent receivers on Arizona, Chicago and Tennessee the last

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 3>three weeks have posted good games against Minnesota. Mooney and

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>London get B grades. Even though I don't love the

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacking here. Kyle Pitts is a tough call.

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Normally the tough calls just should I drop him or not?

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 3>This week it's should I potentially start Pits. He's been

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>invisible in the past two games. He's only scored two

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 3>games all year, but the Vikings have struggled with tight ends,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>including recently. Two games ago. Cole Kmet came out of

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 3>a deep slump and put up a seven catch game

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 3>on the Vikings and then last week Trey mcbridewold berserk

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>on the Vikings twelve targets twelve catches. So Kyle Pitts

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 3>comes in with a C grade. Bijon Robinson gets a

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 3>B grade in this one. Minnesota will be his toughest challenge.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Only two runners have scored on the ground against the

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Vikings since way back in Week two, and good runners

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>like Josh Jacobs, David Montgomery, Jonathan Taylor, DeAndre Swift, and

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 3>last week James Connor all held to sixty eight scoreless

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>yards or less on the ground. Minnesota ranks number one

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and run defense success rate. They ranked number one in

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>run defense EPA, and the Vikings are pretty good against

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>pass catchers as well. Nobody's top forty four yards through

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the air all year and most don't come getting We're

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 3>close to the forty four yards on average. Opposing teams

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 3>average twenty two air yards against the Vikings. Be John

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Robinson make get most of that, but it's still not

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot, and just to be great for him and

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>for all those reasons, Tyler Algiers on the bench, even

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 3>though he's a good player, not getting used a lot

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 3>right now, by the way, which is a little odd.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Viking side, beginning with the running game,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 3>where Aaron Jones comes in with only a SEA. He

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 3>might be one fumble away from a protracted benching, which

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 3>actually he had last week he had a one quarter benching.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 3>It could be worse than that if he fumbles here.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully it won't be the case, but either way, Atlanta

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a sneaky good run defense. No runner has hit one

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred yards all year, none of top fifty nine yards

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 3>or scored against Atlanta in a month. When did Atlanta's

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>run defense get so good? Falcons have allowed a league

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 3>leading three rushing touchdowns all year. Aaron Jones, I can

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>only get you to a sea and I strongly considered

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 3>a bench here. As for the receivers for the Vikings,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>let's start with Jordan Addison, who comes in with a C.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>He's posted Fantasy relevant output in four of the past

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>five weeks, which corresponds to Justin Jefferson scoring drought which

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>goes back six games. He's got a neutral match up

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 3>against cornerback Clark Phillips, who allows US seventy four percent

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>catch rate, but it's given up just one score this year.

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Addison remains a C grade because of his low volume,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>which creates a little bit of risk.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Here, less risk is.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson his scoring drought, as I mentioned six games,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 3>but could find the end zone against the secondary that's

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>only got one really good cornerback and that's aj Terrell.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 3>But Terrell doesn't usually shadow, so Jefferson's going to have

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 3>going to hit all of the cornerbacks. So the Falcons

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and most of them really just aren't that good. I

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 3>already mentioned Clark, Phillips, d Alford also not great.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 4>Clear cut number one.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Receivers almost always farewell against the Falcons, and that is

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 3>obviously Justin Jefferson.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 4>TJ.

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Howkinson comes in with a B grade here. The Falcons

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>look like an elite tight end defense on paper, but

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 3>they face some of the league's crappiest set.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Of tight ends.

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 3>But if you go back four and five weeks ago,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons faced Jake Ferguson and Ky Dootton, two of

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 3>the best tight ends they've faced all year. Those guys

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 3>combined for twenty targets, sixteen catches, one hundred and fifty

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 3>two yards, and two touchdowns. So we'll try Hawkinson here

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 3>and then Sam Donald b great on him. I'll credit

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons secondary for an unexpectedly good game last week

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 3>against the Chargers, but this is a much tougher matchup,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 3>and the Falcons are a reliably yielding pass defense and

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Donald playing at a very high level right now. I've

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 3>given his receivers A B and C grades and that

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 3>settles Sam Donald into that B range right in the middle.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Falcons allow the fourth highest completion percentage on passes more

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>than ten yards downfield, and Sam Donald is the fifth

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 3>best completion percentage on passes of ten or more yards,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 3>so we could see some downfield aerial attacks for him

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 3>in this game. All right, let's take a break. When

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>we come back, we've got another set of matchups for you,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>including the Los Angeles sorry, Las Vegas Raiders at the

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Scott Fish, you already told us you

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 3>like Aiden O'Connell. We'll find out about Jacoby Myers potentially

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>when we come back as well. Is he somebody you

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>dare start. He's been a big part of this passing game.

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 8>We'll find out too.

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And Miley's banged up right now too. We'll find out

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>when we returned the Fantasy.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 8>Football Week with.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly Paul Chargy and Scott Fish

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and thorn Eystrom with you block a matchups beginning with

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Scott, you've already

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>told us about two Raiders and you take a chance

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>on me segment that you do like you did not

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 3>yet mention Jacoby Meyers. No our favorites on this show.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>We love the way he plays, we love the usage.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 3>He's been pretty fantasy reliable. What do you like about him?

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 3>If anything? This week? I think you like him this week,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 4>It's just a terrible pass defense and there's a lot

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 4>of shootouts with the Bucks, especially recently. I mentioned in

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the last segment the Bucks allow the sixth most fantasy

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 4>points to wide receivers, including fourthmost to the perimeter. It's

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 4>also Jacoby Myers. He moves around a little, but he's

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 4>coming in with a bit of an injury. He's questionable,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 4>but they said he will play, so I'm gonna trust

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 4>him on that in a good matchup. He's got five

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 4>plus catches in seven of his last eight, and his

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 4>three games with O'Connell seven for sixty two in a score,

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 4>six for fifty two in a score and six for

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>ninety seven plays almost every snap. Twenty six targets in

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 4>the last two games. Somehow more targets than Bowers in

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 4>the last two games, which is hard to do, really

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 4>really hard to do. Who I have an a grade

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 4>on the league leader in receptions against a team allowing

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 4>the fourth most yards to tight ends. Let's go over

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 4>to the running game now, where Alexander Mann has been

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 4>practicing on a limited basis and it's starting to look

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 4>like he will go, which put makes me want to

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>put Sincere McCormick and a mirror dula on the bench.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 4>If there is a dart throw, if Madison plays, I

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 4>have him on the bench. If Madison doesn't play, I

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 4>have a little bit of a dart throw on a

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 4>mirror Abdullah. There are six teams on buy a lot

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 4>of good players on buy. Bucks are tenth easiest matchup

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 4>for running backs, but it's nuanced. Their ninth fewest rushing yard,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 4>sixth fewest rushing score. They're good there, but they've allowed

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>the most receiving yards. Yeah, the third most receptions and

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the sixth most receiving scores. They get torched in that area,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 4>four different backs of scores, seven different ones over thirty yards,

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 4>fourteen different packs with at least three catches. I think

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 4>he can get you there in the past game work,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's a game script. They might be

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>behind her in a shootout where he's playing. So let

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 4>me ask you about Sincere McCarthy.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 3>At this time last year, Zamir White got all the

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>work down the stretch for Antonio Pierce.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 4>And here still's excited about it.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Debuted effectively. David put himself in a position debut for

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the next year. Yes, right, I don't know dave is

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 3>quite the right word, but now is since Here McCormick,

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 3>perhaps in that spot where Antonio Pierce gives him a

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 3>long look to see why.

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely think that there was word. He was getting

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 4>a good amount of work in practice this week, but

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 4>of course the mere White and Alexander Madison have been limited.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Emir Abdulla still is more than tripling him in routes

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 4>run even last week with that extended run. So it's

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 4>just a matchup where they're tough against the run, they're

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 4>bad against the past. That's why I have the dart

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 4>throw on Abdullah. But I do like picking up mccure

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 4>mack in case of what you're saying. Yeah, yeah, over

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 4>the Tampa side. Yeah, on the Tampa side. I have

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a Oh I think I have a B grade on

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Baker Mayfield. Yeah, I have a B grade on Baker Mayfield.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 4>I wrote, see, but I had to be Five straight

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 4>quarterbacks have scored multiple times or hit three hundred yards

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 4>against the Raiders. In fact, eight of twelve times over

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 4>the course of the season, a lot of quarterback points

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 4>against the Raiders. Mayfield himself has five straight multiple score

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 4>games and just in the middle of the season. Sorry,

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 4>he had five. I have straight multiple score games in

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the season, but over the last three

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 4>games just one score in each. Because what changed is

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 4>the running backs are amassing two hundred and nine total

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 4>yards per game. They're running an absolute ton. This is

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 4>a defensive backfield, however, that is missing two starters. It's

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 4>it's missing Nate Hobbs and Jakoorin Bennett. So Decameron Richardson

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 4>is going to be on Mike Evans. Richardson has allowed

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and forty three yards in the last three games,

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 4>and he's allowed two scores in the last four. Evans

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 4>is coming in a little injured. But he didn't practice

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 4>on Wednesday and Thursday limited practice on Friday. He's going

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 4>to play, He'll go, Yeah, he'll play with that calf

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 4>injury and you know, whatever's left of the hamstring injury.

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 4>The last couple weeks five for sixty eight, six for

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 4>one hundred, and we're not really worried about him. I

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 4>got a B grade on Evans over to Kate Aughten.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I know that every time we seem to prop him up,

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't really respond the bold strategy. I love him

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 4>in this man, I do too. It's the Raiders are

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 4>bottom five in receptions, yards and scores allowed to tight ends.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Kelsey and Gray combined for one hundred and twenty six

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 4>last week. Johnu a couple weeks ago had one hundred

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 4>and one and two scores since either week before that

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 4>had one hundred and fifty plus and three scores. The

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 4>week before that Kelsey had ninety in a score. They

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 4>give up a ton. I'm giving a B to Kate Otten.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 4>I just think it's a good matchup for him, especially

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 4>because he's the loan tight and he gets a ton

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 4>of targets eighteen target Yeah, ton of targets over to

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the running game. Bucky Irvin's coming in questionable. He has

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 4>been limited and missing a lot of practice time.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 3>By the way I had, I can, I just yeah.

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Last week at this time I called the Bucky Irving

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 3>breakout game and gave him an A.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 3>We got twenty five touches from Lucky Irving and he

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 3>freaking rocked.

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Last week.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Yep, the last two to fifteen plus touchbacks against the Raiders.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Both went over one hundred and both scored. Obviously, Bucky

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Irvin's doing what he's doing on a hundred fifty plus

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 4>total yards. Last week, he finally out snapped, out, touched,

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 4>out routed uh Rashad White, so he gets the A

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 4>grade here. I still think there's gonna be enough for

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Rashad White, who's gained enough pass game work and enough snaps.

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 4>He's still kind of splitting the snaps, just one less

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 4>than Irving last week, and he was still double digit

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 4>touches even in the last three weeks when Bucky Irvin's

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 4>come on.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, we love Bucky Irving. Yeah, Rashad White's not bad.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Ten different back listening. We still like your guy. Yeah,

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 3>it's not about Rashad White. No, it's fine. No, ten

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 3>different backing is awesome.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 4>Yep. Ten different backs have scored against the Raiders. And

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 4>if Bucky Irving somehow doesn't go or come is more

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 4>limited because of the injury, then White's gonna get more.

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 4>So I have a C grade on Rashad White.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to the Saints taking on the Giants.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 6>Store.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 3>I've got Alvin kamer Way up at running back two

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>this week. He's an auto start, right, yeah, yeah, fast

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 3>spot sure.

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Is yeah, I must start on him. The passing game

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe not quite as attractive for the Saints. I'm gonna

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 5>give Derek Karrasi though, since we on car is quarterback

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 5>eighteen and fantasy points per game. But the Giants have

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 5>a horrible pass defense, a really really bad one, and

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 5>they are particularly susceptible to deep passing. Will return to

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 5>that car is only a few dingers away from being

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 5>startable in fantasy, so I'm gonna give him a CEE.

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 6>And speaking of that, the deep ball.

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 5>Thing, Marcus Valdez Scantling, We're gonna give him a C

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 5>as well. Now Taysom Hill is out for the season,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 5>He's joining all the other guys who are out for

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 5>the season that pass catching corps. MVS get this, This

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 5>is the best statphoned all week. MVS has four touchdowns

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 5>in the past three games. You know how many he

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 5>scored with the Chiefs in thirty three games?

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Three four three?

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh okay, yeah wow, yeah, some more in the last

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 5>three games. And he had it as a Chief period

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 5>eighteen point one fantasy points per game since Week ten.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 5>The Giants, for their part, have allowed the eleventh fewest

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points to opposing wide receivers, but they have allowed

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 5>the fifth most deep passing yards per game. MVS is

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 5>your dinger guy, so he might be able to get

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 5>loose deep. Keep the other receivers on your bench. I

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 5>will give Juwan Johnson a see bigger roles coming with

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Taysom out for the year. This isn't the best matchup

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 5>though the Giants, despite having the rans to pass defense.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the one thing organizationally, Yeah it stopped.

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:17.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeh, It's put the clamps on tight ends they've allowed

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 5>this season. They've allowed the second view is fantasy points

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 5>per game to opposing tight ends. Moving over to the Giants,

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 5>of course, here keeping mister Drew lock on the bench.

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 5>He was sacked six times last week. He lost the fumball,

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 5>he threw up pick six. We got the full drew

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 5>locked experience. He did have fifty seven rushing yards and

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 5>a run touchdown to get him to quarterback twenty one.

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 6>But it did help. But yeah, keep him on the bench.

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Tyrone Tracy my former Iowahawkeye boy, giving him a B.

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 5>Tracy has scored fourteen point five plus PPR fantasy points

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 5>in two of the last three games, and this is

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 5>a good matchup against the Saints. New Orleans has allowed

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 5>the seventh most fantasy points to opposing running backs. You

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 5>go back to Week five, eight running backs have scored

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 5>seventeen plus PPR points against New Orleans. I'm also given

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 5>a B to Molik Neighbors. He ranks number ten amongst

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 5>NFL receivers in PFF grade and this is a good

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 5>matchup for an against this in flux New Orleans secondary.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 5>When Neighbors is on the outside, he'll be paired up

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 5>against Alante Taylor. The Saints moved Taylor to the boundary recently.

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Taylor is dead last in the NFL and both the

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 5>yards allowed per coverage snap and also explosive play rate

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 5>against in the last three games.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 5>So if there's a time for neighbors to get loose,

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 5>but you're you're meeting the guy who's gonna facilitate it.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 4>He just to know what he is questionable. He has

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 4>didn't practice Thursday or Friday, so but he should he

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 4>should go his question.

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's I'm thinking he's gonna play. But

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 5>I mean it is a good point, Neighbors, and then

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, speaking to his situation. Since Daniel Jones got bench,

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Neighbors hasn't seen hasn't seen one target of twenty plus

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 5>air yards bomber. Yeah, I mean it's uh yeah, the

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.439
<v Speaker 5>Dink and Dunk Show. Hopefully we can get Drew locked

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 5>to air it out in this one. Neighbors averaging only

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 5>thirteen point nine Fantasy points per game during that span.

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Since since Jones's bench, Ken the Giants get him rolling here.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 5>If he plays, we'll find out. Wandale Robinson. I did

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 5>give him a seed. Tyron Matthew the honey Badger. He

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 5>is expected to play, but he's less than one hundred

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 5>percent injured his shoulder Week thirteen. Matthew hasn't been good

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 5>in coverage this season. Even when he is fully healthy.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Fifty eight point four PFF coverage grade. No team has

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 5>allowed more PPR points to wide receivers than the Saints

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 5>since Dennis Allen was fired. So I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 5>speculatively give mister Wandale to see.

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, Just to note Malik Neighbors, Let's say he

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 4>does miss He's missed two games this year, and Darius

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Slayton got eleven targets in each of those two games.

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a great point.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 6>That'd be a pivot.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>That would be your pivot.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 3>One more matchup for this segment, Jacksonville taking on the

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee Titans. There's not a lot to like on the

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 3>side for Jacksonville with Mac Jones at the helm, but

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 3>we are going to cobble together a couple of C grades.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Brian Thomas. I love his game and he's gonna have

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 3>a great career, but this is not a great spot.

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>He did score last week, but he also got underthrown

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 3>for a touchdown and overthrown for a touchdown on.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Wide open bombs.

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Had those connected, Brian Thomas would have had like a

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 3>two hundred yard three touchdown game. He posted fantasy relevant

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 3>stats in the two of mac Jones's three games in

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 3>which mac Jones played significant reps. So there is that.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 3>So there is a little bit of history of success

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 3>with Brian Thomas and mac Jones.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 4>In my Missed Connections fantasy league. He's gonna be a.

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Touch twice right league winner right there because he runs

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 3>from every spot on the field. Brian Thomas can find

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 3>positive matchups, including against struggling cornerback Jarvis Browne, who we

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 3>talked about last week as a liability against Terry mcclaurin,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and that worked out great. Brownley's allowed a touchdown in

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 3>back to back games and could give up one to

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Brian Thomas here. Evan Ingram comes in with a C grade.

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 3>In three games with protracted mac Jones play, Evans is

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 3>well depressingly quiet, failing to top forty one yards andy

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 3>scored in none of those three. The Titans have allowed

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 3>tight end touchdowns and consecutive games zach Ertz cade Stover,

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 3>But in totality, the Titans have been a good tight

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 3>end defense, ranking tenth best in fantasy points allowed. With

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 3>six teams on buy. I don't know how you could

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 3>bench Evan Ingram I've got a C grade on him,

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and speaking of the bench, that's where I've got Travis

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Etn and Tank Bigsby.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 4>Pains me to say it, because you know how I

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 4>feel about Dank.

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Etn was the hot hand last week, but the snap

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 3>counts were almost identical. In an easier matchup, you could

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 3>start ATN. But the Titans are pretty good run defense,

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 3>ranking top ten in yards per carry allowed defensive run

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 3>EPA run defense success rate. Last week, Washington got up

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 3>early and ran copiously and with success against Tennessee. But

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust the Jaguars offense to get ahead and

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 3>run the ball. So I'm leaving Etn and Tank bigs

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 3>beyond the bench in this game. Parker Washington's coming off

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 3>his best game of his career, but it's a total aberration,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not going to chase last week's months on that.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 4>You like him, he was my prespect it's like four

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago.

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it came together in week thirteen. Yeah, yeah,

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.479
<v Speaker 3>I think if I recall correctly last week third last

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 3>week was twelve targets. In the week before was like

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 3>one catch something like that. Yeah, yeah, all right, let's

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 3>go over to Tennessee. So with Tony Pollard, Taja Spears

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 3>active last week but only saw one touch So you

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 3>want to watch this development because Pollard has been averaging

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 3>roughly half his fantasy points when Spears plays, So you

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 3>have to base a little bit of your thinking on

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 3>with Pollard on spears activity level. Either way, this matchup

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 3>is very favorable. So you'll start Pollard no matter what.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 3>And some way, somehow, opposing runners always get paid against

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars. It's touchdowns or yardage or receiving or all that.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 3>The Jaguars ranked twenty fourth in run defense success rate.

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 3>They ranked nineteenth and run defense EPA and sixteenth in

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 3>misstackle rate, twenty fifth in yards before contact. It's a

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.479
<v Speaker 3>lot of positives for Tony Pollard. If Tadj Spears does

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 3>not play, then well he's gonna play. So we'll just

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 3>leave it at a beet for Tony Pollard. I mentioned

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 3>earlier Will Lebis might take a chance at me quarterback.

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about Calvin Ridley. It's a revenge game for

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Ridley. Jaguars are ranked thirty second in defensive dropback

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 3>EPA and could be without number one cornerback Tyson Campbell

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 3>in this game, and since DeAndre Hopkins was traded away,

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Ridley has a ninety five percent route rate and a

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 3>very healthy twenty nine percent target share on the season.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars allowing the third most fantasy points to wide out,

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 3>So Ridley comes in with a B and that just

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 3>leaves us with Nick Westproo. Kakine Im probably is scored

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 3>in seven of the last eight games.

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 4>On twenty receptions.

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Two catches per game.

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 9>That's mathematically impossible. Unreal, it's all deep bombs. He's averaging

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 9>eighteen yards per reception. Normally I hate these all or nothing,

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 9>low volume players. But again, if the top corner for

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 9>the Jaguars, Tyson Campbell is out, and by the way,

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 9>top safety Darnold Savage might not play in this game either.

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 4>In that case, let's give it a shot. The Jags

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 4>allow the most twenty plus yard plays in the most

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 4>forty yard plus.

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Past perfect Yeah see Gray, Yeah, Westboro, kakine why not

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 3>when we come back? Three tough questions you'll want to

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:18.959
<v Speaker 3>play along?

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 4>See if you can go.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Three and oh, As our panel of experts do their

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 3>bestity code some of the toughest questions in the fantasy

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 3>football landscape be right back our number two Fantasy football weekly,

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Paul Georchi and Scott Fish and thorn icerom with us.

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 3>You can follow us on x I'm at Paul Gearchi

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and Scott is at Scott Fish twenty four and thorn

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 3>icetrom is at thor k U. Rock Yard is a

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 3>game we call three tough questions.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number one next.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Year, what round will Bucky Irving be drafted in? We

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 3>begin with Scott Fish.

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so guys like Barkley Mix and Henry Gibbs, Byjon

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:10.879
<v Speaker 4>Bauers and others might make their way into the first

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 4>with your normal wide receivers like Chase Jefferson, a Monra,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.720
<v Speaker 4>maybe Limb. I don't know guys like that. And unless

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 4>he fully takes over for Rushad White at the end

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 4>of the year here, we're going to have slight question

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 4>marks on him. But my answer is still going to

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 4>be second round, kind of where I was reaching to

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 4>take a Chan, only I feel a little more secure

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 4>with Bucky knowing that he can take a full workload

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 4>if he's the fall back, He's got that same possible

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 4>receiving prowess, Maybe not as much as a Chan, but

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I think second round is where people are going to

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 4>start to take shots at him.

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, thor next year? What round will Bucky Irving be

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 3>drafted in?

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 5>So you have to consider the Rashad White thing. Rashad

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 5>White has one year left on his deal. He is

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 5>not happy with his role. He recently fired his agent

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 5>and I didn't know that. I believe that Rashad White

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 5>is going to push for a trade this offseason with

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:04.439
<v Speaker 5>that one year left on his deal.

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 6>We'll see if he's successful or not. But this is

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 6>the way that I parse it.

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 5>If White is still there, I would say early round

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 5>three for Irving, if he's not late round two and

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 5>maybe or I'm sorry, early round two or maybe even

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 5>late round one, depending on what we see down the stretch.

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Here correct to answer late round one for Bucky Irving

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 3>middle and that's this reminds me of Bejon Robinson from

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 3>last year. We knew Beijon wasn't going to be a

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 3>workhorse back, but his talent was so good we didn't

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 3>care and we just wanted to get Bjon Robinson on

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 3>our teams. And I think that's where we're gonna fly

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 3>where this is going to roll this time too, now.

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Last week, as we alluded to earlier in this show,

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Bucks offensive coordinator Liam Cohen, I think he just succumbed

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 3>to the awesomeness of Bucky Irving and just like I

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 3>gotta get him on the field. The Buccaneers are six

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 3>and six, tied for first place. They can't mess around.

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:57.760
<v Speaker 3>They got to get their best players on the field,

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's Bucky Irving. And what's going to happen over

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 3>the offseason. These people are going to start catching up

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 3>to how good Bucky Irving is statistically metrically, and we're

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna be like, Wow, he is a top five talent

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL and he's gonna end up getting drafted

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in at the end of the first round.

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number two.

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Rest of season. San Francisco running back Isaac Garndo will

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 3>most often be a running back one, a running back two,

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 3>flex or bench thor you get to start this one.

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna go with RB two.

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Garendo very boom or bust type playing style, and I

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 5>think he's going to be the same for fantasy owners

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 5>where they need the explosive plays out of him. And

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, maybe I'm crazy. I don't think he

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 5>is guaranteed to finish the year as the starter. He

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:53.240
<v Speaker 5>is a frustrating player who frequently frustrated as college coaches.

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 5>He was stuck behind brayln Allen at Wisconsin, but part

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 5>of the reason why is because of the lack of vision.

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 5>And then he goes to Louisville's last year, he was

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 5>competing against Juar Jordan, who does not have NFL ability.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 5>George Jordan played ahead of him the entire last season.

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 5>It's why Girndo fell down. Now, Girndo is the SI

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 5>speed freak four three three forty yard dash two hundred

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty one pounds. He almost had the perfect ten RAS score,

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 5>but you do have some of that stuff where I

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 5>wonder if Shanahan could get frustrated with him.

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 6>But I settled on.

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 3>RB two RB two after all that, RB two Okay Scott.

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Rest of season, Isaac Garndo will most often be an

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 3>RB one, RB two flex or bench.

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I was debating RB two and flex just because

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 4>RB two is like thirteen through twenty four. He's a

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 4>starting calver running back with the San Francisco forty nine ers.

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 4>So I ended up love landing on RB two as well,

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 4>although you could talk me into bench. Part of the

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 4>thing is he's got a bunch of he's got like

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 4>four ten plus runs and very short like he's got

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 4>that explosive ability in him.

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 5>He's like Dave Kingman, you know, go back to it's

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 5>the three true outcomes. He's hitting a ding er, he's

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 5>striking out.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Adam done? Was that?

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 6>Adam John Adams done?

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Love it?

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Yeah.

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.760
<v Speaker 4>And the game where CMC was out and Mason left early,

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 4>he ran seventeen routes, caught three or four targets, went

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 4>fourteen for eighty five on the route on the ground,

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.720
<v Speaker 4>including two explosives. So I can see if he's getting

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 4>fourteen fifteen touch volume and he's running the routes at

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 4>that level. RB two seems well within range. Isaac Grendos.

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned converted wide out twenty two receptions last year Louisville,

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 3>so he can catch a little bit. It's the sprinter

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 3>speed on that frame.

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:32.879
<v Speaker 4>You sort of blew through the numbers quickly.

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Four scrolled down four to three. Three.

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, forty yard legitimate world class athlete, and he is skilled.

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, like you mentioned earlier in his college career,

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 5>he was the receiver. They converted him over to running

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 5>back at Wisconsin.

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:49.359
<v Speaker 3>Right we've seen him get Isaac Grendo gets significant work

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.800
<v Speaker 3>in two games this year where Jordan Mason got knocked

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 3>out early. In those games, he averaged seven point seven

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 3>yards per carry. But it is a little all or nothing.

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 3>If he gets that crease, he's gone, and that's you know,

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 3>you're hoping that those happen some games. It may not,

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 3>but I think there's probably enough opportunity here. Patrick Taylor,

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, Izzy about Akanda just joined the team. I

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 3>don't know how quickly he could even get up to

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 3>speed if they wanted him to. Schedule's pretty positive. I

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 3>like him against Chicago this week Rams Miami Lions. Lions

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 3>are normally a tough run defense, but if they're still

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 3>this injured a week seventeen, anything to go here. I

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.760
<v Speaker 3>think if I if I were to end up grading

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Isaac Grendo the rest of these games, and I've got

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 3>him this week, I'm going to give him a bee

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 3>this week. I think it's going to be a bee

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 3>most weeks, and so we'll go RB two for Isaac

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Grendo going forward.

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Tough Question number three.

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 3>This comes from brock Timmian on Twitter, Hi, Rock, should

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:51.919
<v Speaker 3>teams that have locked in their playoff seed be required

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 3>to set the best possible lineup? So here to this

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 3>week fourteen, you already know you are the one seed,

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 3>or you're the two seed, or you're locked into the

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 3>three seed, whatever, Should you be required to set the

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the best winning lineup that you can?

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Scott this is this is right.

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 3>This is a Scott Fish natural kind of question. What

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:09.879
<v Speaker 3>do you think here?

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this is honestly one. I can definitely see

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 4>both sides on. Brian Johnson, our co host, replied to

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 4>it you know on Twitter and said he can probably

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 4>do it as there's probably not there. The guy replied

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 4>that there's no by law on it, so you can

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 4>probably do it, but maybe fix that rule in the future.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of with that. If he can, if this

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 4>site allows him to do it and there's no by law,

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 4>that's probably fair game. I'm generally in the camp of

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 4>the team of no tanking. Uh. In fact, I won

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 4>a game in a homely in my home league against

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 4>you when you were we were fighting for the one

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.720
<v Speaker 4>oh one, and I won it because I will not tank,

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 4>but did not tank to be clear, but neither did I. Okay, no,

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 4>we fought we fought out. We're making moves to actually

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 4>play it play three though, even though we want the

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 4>number one pick. But here's the difference here. The argument

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 4>here is not dropping the kipper kicker. You're trying to

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 4>give yourself a better chance to win the championship. And

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of under the lines of strategy. So the

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 4>absence of bylaws against it and the site allowing to

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 4>do it, and it is a legitimate strategy, I think

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm fine with it in this case.

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 3>All right? So, or should teams that have locked in

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 3>their playoff seed be required to set the best possible lineup?

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 5>No, they absolutely should not. First of all, the were

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 5>best qualify our best. It's subjective. You can't force a

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 5>paying owners lineup decisions if you don't like that owner

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 5>that much and what he's doing.

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Dan schneiderm over the off season.

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is true. That is the biggest mistake, the

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:39.399
<v Speaker 3>single biggest mistake fantasy leagues make. Yes, they don't get

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 3>rid of bad on get rid.

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Of bad owners.

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if someone's doing something that's hurting the competitive

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 5>integrity of the league, get rid of the owner.

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 6>In the off season. You could.

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Make it a rule of any lineup that isn't fully

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 5>filled out is invalid, you know, because that's that was

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 5>a part of this thing. Although that could open up

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 5>the possibility that folks are intentional taking an invalid lineup

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 5>if they thought that that helped their playoff chances. I

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 5>just think you can't stop people from seeing to their

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 5>own interests and you should not try.

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 3>You should always play to win your games. Intentionally losing

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to win the game baby, is never okay. Intentionally losing

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:19.240
<v Speaker 3>is never okay to me, as even if you prefer

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 3>that your opponent wins, you should not just be handing

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:23.600
<v Speaker 3>out free victory.

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 3>The integrity of the league is at stake, and you

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 3>can't do that now. So that's there's just beween intentionally

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:33.879
<v Speaker 3>losing and things like this.

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.280
<v Speaker 5>But if you think it helps your playoff matchup to

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 5>punt the last regular season game, you wouldn't do it.

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 6>No, I would last.

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Last week, you had this exact question in an Empire

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 4>league where you didn't want to cut someone.

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right.

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's say it's this week, six teams are on by

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and you your kicker is on buy. You don't want

0:53:56.160 --> 0:53:59.240
<v Speaker 3>to drop some valuable player to go pick up a kicker.

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm totally fine with that. You're not artificially, You're not.

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 3>You're harming yourself. I don't want you to harm yourself

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and harm your own team by dropping a player you need.

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But I can't see my way to tank purposely losing

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 3>games because you would like to have your opponent win

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 3>so they have a better chance of getting the playoffs,

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 3>because you think you can beat them later.

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Whatever this was, because you don't want to drop anyone else.

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Because you don't want to drop somebody else, you don't

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:25.879
<v Speaker 3>have to make that move.

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 4>All right, Let's get back to the matchups.

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Carolina Panthers taking on the Philadelphia Eagles. Panthers should have

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 3>won last week. They could have won the week before that.

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 3>They did win the two games before that. Carolina's turned

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 3>into a middle of the pack team. It's they've had

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 3>some really nice games. They have talk to me about

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Young, who's playing awfully well right now.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 4>Yes, back to back solid games. But again, both of

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:50.760
<v Speaker 4>those pass defenses were bottom twelve.

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 3>That face, Yeah, the Eagles are not the Eagles.

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Fourth ranked Eagles passed allows just two hundred yards per

0:54:57.160 --> 0:55:00.080
<v Speaker 4>game and just thirteen passing scores in twelve games.

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 3>And since the week six when Cooper dejan moved to

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:05.479
<v Speaker 3>the slot starting slot their number one against them.

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna get there, but I will, I wake

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 4>up rutting. I'll let you have that. So I have

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 4>the entire passing game on the bench. Xavier Legatt is

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 4>basically a three to four catch guy, but it's thirty

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 4>three yards a game and sixty six is his season high.

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't really score. He scored four times though, so

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 4>but I have him on the bench. Adam Thielen four

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 4>targets in his return, saw ten last week, going eight

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 4>for nine, nine to one. He's becoming Bryce Young's will

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 4>be once again like he was at the start of

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 4>last season. So if there is a play here, it's him,

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 4>But he is getting Cooper de Jon in the slot,

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 4>who has really stepped up recently. So your hope is

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe Thielan on a dart throw with everybody else on

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 4>by Cocher injured may or may not play, probably not

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.280
<v Speaker 4>going to play. But the big problem with the running

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 4>game over here Chuba Hubbard and Jonathan Brooks. They split everything.

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Last week, Jonathan Brooks had no nine touches, Cuba had twelve.

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan Brooks got three receptions on three targets. Cuba lost

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the pass game work and their snaps really started to

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:13.680
<v Speaker 4>come back up. Brooks still below him in snaps, but

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.359
<v Speaker 4>it seems like that trend line is Brooks taking over

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 4>and in this matchup, a tough matchup for the run

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 4>I just think that they're going to monopolize each other.

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 4>So I got them both on the bench over on

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the Philly side. Jalen Hurts Man, this is this is

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 4>a story for running game quarterback, rushing quarterbacks because he's

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 4>averaging barely over two hundred yards a game, but all

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:36.240
<v Speaker 4>these rushing scars and all this rushing yards is really

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 4>doing it for him. I still have an A grade

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 4>on him. For the last six quarterbacks against Carolina had

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.760
<v Speaker 4>fifty plus yards and or a score on the ground,

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 4>So that's going to help him right there. And their

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:48.879
<v Speaker 4>bottom ten against the pass anyway, so it's a good

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 4>spot A grade for Jalen Hurts as well as AJ Brown,

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 4>who may see shadow treatment from J. C. Horn according

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:58.240
<v Speaker 4>to make Mike Clay, but in the last two shadow

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 4>games for j C. Horn five for twenty five and

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 4>one to DeAndre Hopkins eight for one hundred and eighteen

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and one to Mike Evans.

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 8>Wow.

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So no fear of that really.

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And they're giving the fifth most fantasy points up

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 4>to the perimeter, So I have to see a secret

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 4>on DeVonta Smith. In the two games prior to his injury,

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 4>they were not very good, but Goddard was playing. And

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 4>we've talked about this a lot of the last three years.

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 4>They've monopolize each other. It's one or the other. Goddard

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 4>is out for this game that the four games got

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 4>it missed three for sixty four and one one for

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 4>two in that Giants blowout where hurts only three four

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fourteen yards, But that's six for eighty five

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and a score, and four for eighty seven in a score,

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 4>so like sixty ninety yards in a score. So I'm

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 4>in with Dallas Goddard out. Grant Calcatara is gonna get

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 4>in here with one of the best tight end matchups

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 4>you can get. Carolina's allowed nine tight end scores in

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 4>twelve games. That's nine times if you want to throw

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 4>that button on there, and the eighth most yards to

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the position. I thought about it, take a chance on

0:57:57.240 --> 0:57:58.919
<v Speaker 4>me here, but I'm just gonna give him a ce.

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:01.760
<v Speaker 4>He plays over ninety percent the snaps when Goddard is out.

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 4>He had eight plus fantasy points in three of those

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 4>four games without Goddard. So it's okay. Spot a grade

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 4>on Saquon Barkley. I don't really need to go over

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 4>it because it's an awesome matchup. And that's why Kenneth

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Gainwell was might take a chance on me player in

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 4>a backup role at the end of that game.

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of take a chance on me players, you mentioned

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Zach Scharbonay earlier or for the Seattle Seahawks. If Kenneth

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Walker is able to go, do you like him.

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Here, Kenneth Walker or Sharbone Kenneth Walker, Kenneth Walk, Yes, Yes,

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 5>I yes, I to me, he'd be a must start

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 5>a if Kenneth Walker does end up going. He was

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 5>a limited participant in practice on Wednesday, didn't practice Thursday

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 5>with the ankle and calf injuries. He has been deemed

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 5>a game time decision, officially questionable on the injury report

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 5>RB eleven and average Fantasy points, but has said to

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.480
<v Speaker 5>RB twenty seven over the past five weeks.

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 3>He looks run down, and yes he does.

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 5>During that span three point nine yards per carry. The

0:58:56.840 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 5>play is clearly regret He might need a week off.

0:58:59.160 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Honestly, he might.

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I ques your A grade here. I think he feels

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 3>like more like a B grade with the injury to

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the potential of aggravation to the injury a unkload reduction.

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna toggle it to a bee.

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, yeah, yeah, because I do think you know, I

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 5>mentioned this during the sharp and anything that if Walker goes,

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 5>I do expect less usage for Walker more for sure. Okay, yeah,

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 5>So we're gonna go down to a bee. Going to

0:59:22.320 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the passing game there with the Seahawks, I'm gonna bench

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 5>keep Geno Smith on the bench. Gino only scored fourteen

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 5>point six fantasy points in Week twelve against the same

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Arizona Cardinals. He only has four games all season over

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty fantasy points. And then the Cardinals. They've allowed just

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 5>four quarterbacks all season to go over twenty fantasy points.

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:43.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't think Gino gonna get there this week. Sam

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Darnold last week was the first quarterback in six weeks

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 5>to get more than sixteen fantasy points against the Cardinals.

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Dk metcalf taken off the injury report on Friday, so

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 5>he is gonna go. Of course, he had dinged up

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 5>his knee week thirteen against against the Jets. He has

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 5>a shoulder injury as well, but again he's going to play.

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Scored ten point five PPR points or less in the

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 5>last two games. The Cardinals have only allowed one touchdown

1:00:07.960 --> 1:00:09.919
<v Speaker 5>to a wide receiver in the past six games.

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So the.

1:00:12.200 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Rounding, yeah, yeah, it is. It's turning quite good.

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 6>Sure is.

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 5>So we're gonna give DK a b We're also going

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 5>to give JSN a B Smith and Jigbait wide receiver

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 5>sixteen fantasy points per game.

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 6>This is a better matchup for him.

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel like since Week ten, Arizona has run the

1:00:28.600 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 5>highest too high coverage in the entire NFL.

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 6>JSN leads the Seahawks.

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 5>With a twenty one percent target share against too high.

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Which makes sense. He beats you in the intermediate range,

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:41.840
<v Speaker 5>you keep the two guys back, you have less guys

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 5>there to defend him. Last time against the Cardinals, JSN

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 5>was wide receiver thirteen for the week with almost twenty

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 5>PPR points. Tyler Lockett and Noah fan, I would suggest

1:00:52.040 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 5>that you bench them. Yes, keep them on the bench.

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 5>Moving over to the Cardinals. Kyler Murray great of C

1:00:58.240 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 5>ten point three fantasy points at Seattle in Week twelve.

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 6>That was good for or bad for? I guess quarterback

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty three.

1:01:05.680 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 5>He's been held under twenty fantasy points three of the

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 5>past four games Seattle.

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 6>The last three.

1:01:10.880 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Games so the Seahawks pass defense allowed only eight passing

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 5>touchdowns in his intercepted the ball seven times.

1:01:16.800 --> 1:01:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

1:01:17.280 --> 1:01:18.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so they've been they've been playing better.

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 5>James Connor, I'm gonna give him a b RB seventeen

1:01:21.720 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points per game. The Seahawks shut down Connor two

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 5>weeks ago, but overall, Seattle has a middle of the

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 5>pack run defense, and Seattle's interestingly struggles against gap runs,

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 5>which why I was surprising they shut down Connor last time.

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Fourth highs yards after contact per attempt against gap runs.

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 6>That's the Seahawks run defense.

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:44.320
<v Speaker 5>Connor seventy one percent of his carries are gap concepts.

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give him a be I think he bounds

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 5>it back this time. Tray Benson, I'm gonna give him

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 5>a bench. I did think about a speculative see here

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:58.120
<v Speaker 5>in sort of the desperation flex van only seven carries

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 5>total the last couple of weeks, and Emery de Mercado

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 5>was on the field more last week against the Vikings,

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 5>but at Benson snaps were to go up in this game.

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 5>I do think that he could do a little damage

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:12.160
<v Speaker 5>himself on some of those gap concepts against the Seattle defense.

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 6>Marvin Harrison. Gonna give him a see.

1:02:15.080 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 5>The Seahawks shutdown Harrison Junior last time that they played.

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Harrison's yards per route run fall all the way to

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 5>one point four to five against Too High, which it's

1:02:25.920 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 5>the Seahawks have been running a ton of since Week ten.

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 5>During that span, since the Seahawks have gone more to

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 5>this predominant too high look, the Seattle has held perimeter

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:39.880
<v Speaker 5>wide receivers of the six fewest PPR points per target

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 5>and the lowest yards per game the entire NFL. But

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 5>I will give him a see. I'm going to advise

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 5>a bench for Michael Wilson. This is a bad matchup

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 5>for Wilson. Seattle's pass defense ranks first in EPA allowed

1:02:53.320 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 5>per play. Seattle ranks number four in yards allowed per

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 5>cover snap to opposing wide receiver as well mentioned that

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 5>they've been doing better recently, so benjam and then Trey McBride,

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 5>my boy who is a part of my hall in

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the Guillotine League, the Afrementary Guillotine League.

1:03:07.040 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 6>When I got my pick at seven guys, Trey McBride

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 6>is one of them. Are that great? A must start

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 6>love Trey McBride.

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Does he gonna score a touchdown? Yet?

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 6>You're gonna score a touchdown in this.

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Ge Josh Allen has a receiving touchdown and no catches.

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 6>On no catches, He's got to receiving touchdown.

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>And we're at like seventy catches right now for Trey

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>McBride without a score, which is I'm calling.

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:29.439
<v Speaker 6>It this week.

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>That is hard to fall all right, tell you shot,

1:03:31.240 --> 1:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I like it. I meant when we come back Chicago

1:03:34.240 --> 1:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>taking on the San Francisco forty nine Ers, Chicago's offense

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>getting a little bit better, We'll tell you whether or

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>not you can start Caleb Williams, DJ Moore, Keenan Allen.

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:45.800
<v Speaker 4>When we returned to Fantasy Football.

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 8>Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>The block of matchups for you, beginning with the Bears

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>at the forty nine Ers. I'm gonna start with the

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:07.760
<v Speaker 3>running game and DeAndre Swift Roshan Johnson's out and that

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>that helps DeAndre Swists prospects quite a bit because Johnson

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>have been housing all the goal line.

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 4>With Whi's questionable too. Now she should go that I

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>mention should go.

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>So now if you can't go, then Travis Homer would

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>be your pivot guy in this game. And it's a

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>late afternoon game, so you might just want to pick

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:24.480
<v Speaker 3>up Travis Homer just in case you need to make

1:04:24.520 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 3>that last minute pivot. The Niners are a shockingly soft

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 3>run defense that's allowed rushing touchdowns in seven straight games.

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 3>The past two opponents have run for one hundred and

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight yards and one hundred and ninety eight yards

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>against the forty nine Ers. DeAndre Swift a B grade

1:04:41.440 --> 1:04:43.520
<v Speaker 3>in this one. Let's go over to the passing game.

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna start with Keenan Allen, who gets my highest

1:04:45.440 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>grade of the week, because slot receivers are killing the

1:04:48.040 --> 1:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers even in Buffalo's blizzard conditions. Last week,

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Khalil Shakir led the Bills in receiving decent. Recent slot

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>performances against the Niners include Jackson Smith and Jigba ten catches,

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Ceedee Lamb thirteen catches. So I like Keenan Allen, here's

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>coming on strong lately with a B grade. DJ Moore

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>has got a quad injury. You're gonna want to watch that,

1:05:11.560 --> 1:05:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and even if even if he plays, quad's reinjured, So

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>be careful here. He's become pretty bankable of late as

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the primary beneficiary of Caleb Williams improved play. He's had

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>seven or eight catches in three straight games. He runs

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 3>overwhelmingly from the left side of the field and that

1:05:26.400 --> 1:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>puts him on cornerback Ronardo Green.

1:05:28.600 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 4>A neutral matchup.

1:05:29.480 --> 1:05:31.720
<v Speaker 3>He's allowing a sixty seven percent completion rate and a

1:05:31.720 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>couple of scores over the course of the season. But

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Green is a skinny kid and DJ Moore a little

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>more physical, and he could beat him that way potentially.

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 3>But let me note that you should know this since

1:05:42.760 --> 1:05:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Thomas Brown took over for the Bears offense. DJ Moore's

1:05:46.680 --> 1:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>a dot. His average distance of target is three yards.

1:05:50.520 --> 1:05:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh, three that's it. I did not expect that, and.

1:05:54.080 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why he's a C grade. Roma Dunesay's on the bench.

1:05:57.280 --> 1:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>His role is starting to come into focus as the

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 3>team's down field receiver, but that also makes him the

1:06:01.760 --> 1:06:04.280
<v Speaker 3>least reliable of the group, and he's got the toughest

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>matchup against Shaveria's Ward and then Latt leaves us with oh,

1:06:08.240 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I just mentioned Cole kmet forty nine ers a lead

1:06:10.720 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>tight end defense, So do not play him. We'll keep

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>him on the bench. Caleb Williams, I've got BC's and

1:06:15.960 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 3>two bench grades on his receiving options, so I don't

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>love him here, but he is playing way better lately.

1:06:20.560 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Hasn't thrown a touchdown in six games, which is a

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterbacking record all time, and his rushing brings up

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>his floor a little bit here. So Niners have allowed

1:06:29.960 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 3>four quarterback rushing touchdowns in the last eight games, so

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>you might get a little something done with his legs.

1:06:34.680 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>But I see like a two hundred yard one touchdown

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:40.160
<v Speaker 3>passing performance and only a C grade on Caleb Williams

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>On the Niner side, George Kittle obvious a Isaac Grendo. Well, actually,

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll stay with the receivers. Juwan Jennings back to back

1:06:48.240 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 3>bummer games for Jennings. First was the Brandon Allen start

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>two weeks ago. That was no good. Then he got

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the Blizzard game that was no good. This time, the

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>force of nature he's going to be dealing with is

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 3>star cornerback Jalen Johnson. Johnson only lows two catches for

1:07:03.880 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty six yards per game in his coverage. He's not

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>allowed more than two catches in his coverage all year long.

1:07:10.400 --> 1:07:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Now my hope is with Matty Eberflu's gone, the Bears

1:07:13.240 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>are gonna let Johnson play more man coverage, which they

1:07:15.800 --> 1:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>almost never do. And I think it's moronic because he's

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the perfect guy to put on Juwan Jennings. And I've

1:07:20.520 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 3>only got a C grade on Jennings on the assumption

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to let Jalen Johnson cover him more often.

1:07:26.840 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>But I still love Jennings as a receiver, and you

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>could talk me into a bee if you had to.

1:07:32.360 --> 1:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Deebo Samuel C grade. He's been an epic disappointment, in

1:07:35.360 --> 1:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>part because it doesn't run the ball at all, But

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe the loss of CMC and Jordan Mason means that

1:07:40.720 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>he will start running more often. Grendo's backup is Izziabanaconde.

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>He's been with the team for four days so I

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's going to be a factor here. I

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>think we might get a few extra runs out of

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Deebo Samuel And honestly, it's the only reason I've even

1:07:52.680 --> 1:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>got the C grade on him. And that brings us

1:07:55.880 --> 1:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to Brock Purdy in the passing game. He's off the

1:07:58.040 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>injury report with his shoulder injury. But Perty's only posted

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>explosive output in three games this year, and they were

1:08:03.360 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>all against easy yielding defenses. That's a little tribute to.

1:08:06.840 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Matt Yeah, I was, I was londering if it was

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>it was.

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 3>That's the opposite of what Chicago is. They are a

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:14.560
<v Speaker 3>tough defense. They were giving up zero point nine passing

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:17.479
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns per game. I've got an A and two C

1:08:17.640 --> 1:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>grades on his receiver, so I've only got the C

1:08:19.840 --> 1:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>grade on Rock Perty in this one. And as I

1:08:22.680 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>alluded to earlier in the show, Isaac Grendo absolutely startable.

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:29.559
<v Speaker 3>Hottest Waiver Wire pickup of the week, and this is

1:08:29.600 --> 1:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>a great opportunity. The way you beat Chicago is on

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the ground. Last week, the Lions runners combined for two

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty eight combo yards against Chicago. Week before that,

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:44.519
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Jones snapped a month long funk against Chicago, and

1:08:44.560 --> 1:08:46.599
<v Speaker 3>the week before that, Josh Jacobs put up one hundred

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:49.679
<v Speaker 3>and thirty four total yards. That's your opportunity for Isaiah

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Garendo A grade.

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:53.479
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I like Girndo a lot in this matchup. He's my

1:08:56.479 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>running back eleven at this moment. All right, let's go

1:08:59.400 --> 1:09:02.479
<v Speaker 3>over to the Buffalo Bills taking me on the Los

1:09:02.520 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Angeles Rams Scott Fish. Yeah, in the Snow Bowl last week,

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:10.519
<v Speaker 3>we got the scoring oddity. Yeah, rushing a lot of

1:09:10.600 --> 1:09:12.439
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards. What do you think in this one?

1:09:12.680 --> 1:09:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for a lot of this, I might throw some

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of that out. It was, It's it's not as attributable here.

1:09:19.320 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen is gonna get the A grade. Probably just

1:09:21.800 --> 1:09:24.880
<v Speaker 4>deserves an automatic. He's got multiple scores in almost every

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 4>single week. Rams middle of the pack, two hundred and

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 4>thirty four yards per game. Half their game's multiple scores.

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Josh gets the rushing and sometimes receiving value. H Keon Coleman,

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:36.600
<v Speaker 4>was you take a chance on me wide receiver? The

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:40.240
<v Speaker 4>only Yeah, The only other starter I had was Khalil Shakir.

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Last week is snow game, and he still managed to

1:09:43.360 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 4>get seven Fantasy somehow. He's uh the leading target getter,

1:09:48.840 --> 1:09:51.479
<v Speaker 4>has scored in three straight against the Rams. Fourteen different

1:09:51.520 --> 1:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers have scored against them total. Khalil doesn't score often,

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:58.000
<v Speaker 4>but he does get six plus catches, seven plus targets

1:09:58.000 --> 1:10:01.519
<v Speaker 4>and fifty plus yards in most games, including the five

1:10:01.640 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 4>before that snowball snow Bowl. Amari Cooper, you can't really

1:10:06.280 --> 1:10:11.559
<v Speaker 4>start snowballs. Yeah, snowballs when they score touchdowns. That was awesome. Yeah, yeah,

1:10:11.640 --> 1:10:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Amari Cooper. I'm not gonna start until he gets more

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:14.519
<v Speaker 4>than half the snaps.

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 3>That would be nice.

1:10:15.880 --> 1:10:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Dalton Concaine shed the non contact injury vest. He might

1:10:20.080 --> 1:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>he might return this week, but he's still gonna split

1:10:22.120 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>with knocks and only one tight end. His top forty

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:27.000
<v Speaker 4>five yards in the last six weeks against the Rams,

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>and it took being targeted nine times to get there.

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:31.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's going to be in the cards

1:10:31.720 --> 1:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>for either of them. James Cook. Cook has scored in

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:37.720
<v Speaker 4>all but three games this year, including seven of the

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>last eight. His yardagen had been dipping down recently one

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 4>hundred plus last week. Over the last two weeks, the

1:10:43.439 --> 1:10:45.599
<v Speaker 4>Rams have given up three hundred and two yards to

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:48.439
<v Speaker 4>total yards to Barkley one hundred and nineteen to Kamara.

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 4>They're getting crushed by runners right now. So I got

1:10:50.920 --> 1:10:53.679
<v Speaker 4>an A grade on Cook. Ray Davis got a bunch

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of quality work in that blizzardy blowout, but that was

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:59.720
<v Speaker 4>his highest total of the season. Before that, he wasn't

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:02.240
<v Speaker 4>getting much, so he's on the bench. Over to the

1:11:02.320 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 4>Rams side, I have a B grade on Matthew Stafford,

1:11:05.439 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 4>who's been really hot lately. Multiple scores in five the

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:10.799
<v Speaker 4>last six, eight scores in just the last three weeks.

1:11:11.120 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Likely to trail here. You know, they're five point underdogs.

1:11:13.800 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 4>It's supposedly going to be a blowout of Corn to Vegas,

1:11:16.800 --> 1:11:19.960
<v Speaker 4>but the Bills. Bills have given up multiple scores in

1:11:20.000 --> 1:11:22.840
<v Speaker 4>three straight prior to the Blizzard game, but only three

1:11:22.920 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 4>quarterbacks have topped the super low bar of two hundred

1:11:26.360 --> 1:11:29.240
<v Speaker 4>and fifteen passing yards. So I'm not sure how much

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 4>we can fully expect out of Stafford, but I have

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:34.559
<v Speaker 4>a B grade there, and he hyper targets his two

1:11:34.840 --> 1:11:38.479
<v Speaker 4>main guys, Cooper Cup and Pooka Nikua. Nikua has ninety

1:11:38.520 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 4>eight plus yards and or a score and also sixteen

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>plus Fantasy games in every game that he's played over

1:11:44.400 --> 1:11:46.479
<v Speaker 4>thirty five percent of the snaps, like he came out

1:11:46.479 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 4>that one, so I'm gonna push it to the side.

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:52.640
<v Speaker 4>So he's basically an ottaway Cooper Cup Rough week for

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Cup last week in that snow game, or rough not

1:11:55.400 --> 1:11:57.640
<v Speaker 4>in the Snow game, but before that, he was on

1:11:57.680 --> 1:12:01.040
<v Speaker 4>a five week absolute tear, scoring four times in those

1:12:01.080 --> 1:12:03.800
<v Speaker 4>five games, fifteen plus in all of thomse game script

1:12:03.840 --> 1:12:05.800
<v Speaker 4>should be in his favor. I know that it's a

1:12:05.840 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>tougher Bills matchup.

1:12:06.880 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 6>I still but.

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Taron Johnson in the slot has really really dropped off.

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:14.040
<v Speaker 3>He used to be great. That's an exploitable matchup for

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Cooper Cup. I think he bounces back nicely here.

1:12:16.200 --> 1:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Sure.

1:12:17.000 --> 1:12:22.479
<v Speaker 4>And for Nick Westbrookakine West DeMarcus Robinson another three target

1:12:22.520 --> 1:12:25.439
<v Speaker 4>game last week, another score. Who would be East? Who

1:12:25.439 --> 1:12:26.559
<v Speaker 4>would be the East version?

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:30.240
<v Speaker 3>If well, that's that's Nick Westbrookakina, Well.

1:12:30.160 --> 1:12:35.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean Tennessee's. I suppose it seems pretty centimes. Yeah, yeah, sure,

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:38.960
<v Speaker 4>the matchup is tough. Regression should happen, but six teams

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 4>on by and based on Nick and him, just ride

1:12:42.400 --> 1:12:44.280
<v Speaker 4>it till bucks you. I'll give him a dart throw.

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't love it. Though I don't love it at all.

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Karen Williams gets an A grade fifteen plus touches last

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>week notching you had another score, and he had another

1:12:52.360 --> 1:12:54.760
<v Speaker 4>one hundred plus game yard game, scoring in back to

1:12:54.800 --> 1:12:58.840
<v Speaker 4>back eleven touchdowns in twelve games, basically a lock for

1:12:58.880 --> 1:13:01.760
<v Speaker 4>seventy to one hundred every week. The only thing that

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:03.920
<v Speaker 4>was starting to worry me he had eleven catches in

1:13:03.960 --> 1:13:07.200
<v Speaker 4>the in weeks eight through eleven. He's only had one

1:13:07.280 --> 1:13:10.800
<v Speaker 4>catch in the last three weeks. If that disappears, I

1:13:10.800 --> 1:13:13.759
<v Speaker 4>don't know, I'm gonna worry a little bit. The Bills

1:13:13.760 --> 1:13:16.360
<v Speaker 4>are bottom three against backs in the passing game, so

1:13:16.400 --> 1:13:19.160
<v Speaker 4>maybe this is the rebound game for him. Korm got

1:13:19.160 --> 1:13:21.240
<v Speaker 4>some workload last week, but I think it's more of

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a fluke, so.

1:13:21.840 --> 1:13:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably yeah, Bench, all right, when we come back.

1:13:26.720 --> 1:13:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we can do it. I think we're nine

1:13:28.280 --> 1:13:29.680
<v Speaker 4>minutes in. You think so, are we?

1:13:29.760 --> 1:13:31.559
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's do a Laurent. Let's work in one

1:13:31.560 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>more Cincinnati takes on Dallas store points everywhere. We already

1:13:35.160 --> 1:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>are already identified all the cowboys that we love, and

1:13:37.160 --> 1:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me. Let's go to the Bengals

1:13:39.400 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 3>side first. It start everybody. I've got Chase Brown at

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>running back four this week?

1:13:44.960 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 5>All right, yeah, and I could definitely see that he

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:49.800
<v Speaker 5>a for me. Brown has gotten over eighty percent of

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:52.800
<v Speaker 5>the snaps in every single game since Zach Moscott hurt.

1:13:52.840 --> 1:13:54.679
<v Speaker 5>This is an awesome matchup for him with a game

1:13:54.720 --> 1:13:58.519
<v Speaker 5>total pushing fifty against a bottom three run defense in Dallas.

1:13:58.520 --> 1:13:59.240
<v Speaker 6>Giving him a name.

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:04.559
<v Speaker 5>Joe Jamar, Chase t Higgins are all a's and must starts.

1:14:04.840 --> 1:14:06.479
<v Speaker 6>Mike kis sick. I'm gonna give him a bench and

1:14:06.520 --> 1:14:07.600
<v Speaker 6>the only reason I bring him up.

1:14:07.640 --> 1:14:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Last week five catch at fifty three yards against Pittsburgh.

1:14:10.240 --> 1:14:12.320
<v Speaker 5>That was the first time all season Kasiki has scored

1:14:12.320 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 5>double digit PPR points with t Higgins on the field.

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:18.320
<v Speaker 5>I'd assume that Kasiki's production returns to its previous mediocre

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:19.320
<v Speaker 5>levels in this game.

1:14:19.600 --> 1:14:20.760
<v Speaker 6>Go over to the Dallas side.

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Cooper Rushers might take a chance on me, guy ric

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:28.040
<v Speaker 5>o'dowdell with Chargers take a chance and Brandon Cooks was

1:14:28.320 --> 1:14:30.080
<v Speaker 5>another one of my take a chance on me guys.

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Ceedee Lamb is an A and a must start if

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:35.040
<v Speaker 5>he plays a questionable he said.

1:14:34.800 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 6>That he's gonna play, so I trust him.

1:14:37.479 --> 1:14:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Tilvert, he's a bench unless Ceedee Lamb was lying

1:14:40.920 --> 1:14:44.679
<v Speaker 5>to us with that shoulder injury. But yeah, CD said

1:14:44.720 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 5>on Thursday that he was going to play. So and

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:49.920
<v Speaker 5>then lastly Jake Ferguson, who is questionable. Gonna give him

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:51.759
<v Speaker 5>a be It looks like he'll be back this week.

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:54.719
<v Speaker 5>Before his Week eleven concussion, Ferguson had at least seven

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:58.320
<v Speaker 5>targets in five of seven games. Cincinnati's allowed thirteen plus

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:01.320
<v Speaker 5>half point PPR points to seven tight ends in the

1:15:01.360 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 5>last eight games, and the Bengals have allowed the fourth

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:05.639
<v Speaker 5>highest catch ade to opposing tight ends.

1:15:05.640 --> 1:15:07.519
<v Speaker 4>All right, we like Ferguson in this one, we do?

1:15:07.720 --> 1:15:10.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Bergie Ferd Yeah, good to have him back, sure

1:15:10.640 --> 1:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>is Yeah, we love the Schooner mocker. Yeah, it'll be

1:15:14.000 --> 1:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>good to have Jake back.

1:15:15.280 --> 1:15:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Would we come back?

1:15:16.000 --> 1:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>We'll jump into Fantasy Football Weekly time machine. As we

1:15:21.240 --> 1:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>go back in time, find out who you want to

1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:25.200
<v Speaker 3>do this week that everybody else will be trying to

1:15:25.240 --> 1:15:27.880
<v Speaker 3>pick up next week when we return to hand a

1:15:27.880 --> 1:15:43.640
<v Speaker 3>final set of matchups. Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of

1:15:43.680 --> 1:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Football Weekly for this week Scott Fish Fantasy Cares. Yes,

1:15:49.920 --> 1:15:52.839
<v Speaker 3>you've got you've done a lot of shopping lately for kids.

1:15:53.000 --> 1:15:55.519
<v Speaker 3>It's so such a great it's such a great it's

1:15:55.520 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 3>got to feel really good. It does work all year

1:15:58.360 --> 1:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>for this time of year so that you can make

1:16:00.760 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the big donation for toys for tots.

1:16:02.360 --> 1:16:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's it's quite incredible. This year, we're probably

1:16:05.280 --> 1:16:07.240
<v Speaker 4>going to spend about one hundred and twenty five thousand

1:16:07.320 --> 1:16:10.320
<v Speaker 4>dollars in twenty five to thirty different cities. I spent

1:16:10.439 --> 1:16:13.519
<v Speaker 4>fifteen thousand here at the Toys r US at Malve

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:17.759
<v Speaker 4>America this last weekend. I brought my family, my wife,

1:16:17.760 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 4>my two kids, and my parents came because they came

1:16:20.600 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 4>into town.

1:16:21.560 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>US is still a thing.

1:16:22.680 --> 1:16:25.280
<v Speaker 4>It is and it's not like a national court like

1:16:25.320 --> 1:16:28.519
<v Speaker 4>it's they got the name, but it's it's locally owned

1:16:28.640 --> 1:16:30.439
<v Speaker 4>that Toys r US and the Mall of America had

1:16:30.439 --> 1:16:33.480
<v Speaker 4>no idea. Yeah, the woman I work with there, she's

1:16:33.560 --> 1:16:37.519
<v Speaker 4>a part owner of it. Oh, she's awesome. And yeah,

1:16:37.520 --> 1:16:39.639
<v Speaker 4>we spent fifteen thousand dollars. And it's fun to watch

1:16:39.640 --> 1:16:42.240
<v Speaker 4>your kids get it understand what we're doing, Like this

1:16:42.320 --> 1:16:45.280
<v Speaker 4>is the first year my six year old truly understand

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:47.479
<v Speaker 4>what we're doing and he's going and picking toys. He's like,

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>I I like this, so other kids are going to

1:16:50.439 --> 1:16:52.080
<v Speaker 4>like this and like, yeah.

1:16:51.920 --> 1:16:52.759
<v Speaker 3>That's special.

1:16:52.960 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 4>It's wonderful. What But really, to the listeners and the

1:16:55.880 --> 1:16:59.760
<v Speaker 4>people in the fantasy community that and you and like

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:02.280
<v Speaker 4>the the whole team here that has made this, made

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:04.880
<v Speaker 4>this possible and help promote and support it, We've done

1:17:04.880 --> 1:17:05.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of good with it.

1:17:05.760 --> 1:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>So thank you for that, and thank you listen for

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>everything that you've done with Fantasy Cares, growing it out

1:17:09.960 --> 1:17:13.680
<v Speaker 3>of your basement into it just a freaking juggernaut and

1:17:14.000 --> 1:17:17.120
<v Speaker 3>it's you know now, it's it is the charitable event

1:17:17.160 --> 1:17:19.719
<v Speaker 3>of the fantasy football community. It's unbelievable what you've built.

1:17:22.240 --> 1:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>It's time jump football Weekly Talk. Jane for pregnanture speculation

1:17:27.760 --> 1:17:30.880
<v Speaker 3>for who would you like to talk about? For premature speculation,

1:17:31.040 --> 1:17:31.519
<v Speaker 3>Scott was.

1:17:31.600 --> 1:17:32.759
<v Speaker 6>Just talking about charity.

1:17:32.800 --> 1:17:34.960
<v Speaker 5>The forty nine ers got some this week by claiming

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:37.880
<v Speaker 5>israel lebonaat for free from the New York Jets.

1:17:37.920 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 6>He is my prespect this week.

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:43.800
<v Speaker 5>So I think Abana Conda is a really good fit

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 5>for the forty nine ers system. I mean, in some

1:17:46.120 --> 1:17:49.759
<v Speaker 5>ways Grindo is too, and Abana Conda not as physically

1:17:49.800 --> 1:17:52.720
<v Speaker 5>talented as Grendo. He has better vision, right, and it's

1:17:52.760 --> 1:17:54.600
<v Speaker 5>the same thing of the guy who's looking for the

1:17:54.640 --> 1:17:55.719
<v Speaker 5>crease to hit the dinger.

1:17:55.800 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 6>They're both home run hitters.

1:17:57.680 --> 1:17:59.479
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think it's out of the question that

1:17:59.600 --> 1:18:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Abona Conda, he's in the building there for a couple

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:04.400
<v Speaker 5>of weeks, that they could start to maybe get frustrated

1:18:04.439 --> 1:18:07.080
<v Speaker 5>by Grendo's lack of vision. Maybe maybe they end up

1:18:07.080 --> 1:18:10.479
<v Speaker 5>giving a Bona Conde shot Bonaconda fifth round pick in

1:18:10.600 --> 1:18:13.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three out of Pittsburgh. Like I said, home

1:18:13.240 --> 1:18:15.400
<v Speaker 5>run hit or four four five speed at two hundred

1:18:15.400 --> 1:18:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and sixteen pounds, ninety eighth percentile, vertical ninety six percentile,

1:18:19.280 --> 1:18:21.920
<v Speaker 5>brought nine to six one ras. Overall, that means he's

1:18:21.920 --> 1:18:24.200
<v Speaker 5>a ninety six percentile athlete when compared to every other

1:18:24.280 --> 1:18:27.240
<v Speaker 5>running backs entered the NFL since like the eighties, with

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:30.479
<v Speaker 5>the jets of Bonaconda average four point one yards rushing

1:18:30.640 --> 1:18:34.719
<v Speaker 5>outside only two point eight inside the tackles, which again

1:18:34.840 --> 1:18:37.799
<v Speaker 5>just underscores the home run hitting thing which the forty

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:41.400
<v Speaker 5>nine ers system facilitates, right, I mean they sort of

1:18:41.439 --> 1:18:44.240
<v Speaker 5>they facilitate that, so so I think a Bonicicona is

1:18:44.240 --> 1:18:46.120
<v Speaker 5>a really good fit, and that's a guy that you

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:49.160
<v Speaker 5>could look to go out and get in the dumpster

1:18:49.240 --> 1:18:50.320
<v Speaker 5>and pick up for free.

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this year's up, Tim high Tower or Ronde maybe.

1:18:53.800 --> 1:18:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Potentially Ron Day shutout Ron Dan, Yeah, no kidding, Yeah, great, Dan?

1:18:58.880 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Scott your premire speculation player.

1:19:01.320 --> 1:19:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm gonna break rules again, and I'm going to

1:19:02.960 --> 1:19:05.200
<v Speaker 4>go two of them. The first one was our last

1:19:05.200 --> 1:19:07.160
<v Speaker 4>week of doing this, so you should Okay, Well, it's

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>really only one and a half, So Braylan Allen is

1:19:11.000 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty to forty percent roster, depend depending on where you

1:19:15.040 --> 1:19:17.720
<v Speaker 4>are are playing. But I think with two and a

1:19:17.720 --> 1:19:21.760
<v Speaker 4>half three weeks now of Brice Hall dealing with this

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:25.360
<v Speaker 4>knee injury, it's possible they're eliminated from the playoffs as

1:19:25.360 --> 1:19:27.960
<v Speaker 4>of last week. Maybe he gets shot down and Braylan

1:19:28.040 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Allen takes the workload for the rest of the season

1:19:30.400 --> 1:19:32.800
<v Speaker 4>and you've got a starting running back. The other one

1:19:32.840 --> 1:19:36.040
<v Speaker 4>is a player I didn't mention in the Buccaneers in

1:19:36.080 --> 1:19:40.120
<v Speaker 4>the Buccaneers breakdown earlier because I don't have any kind

1:19:40.120 --> 1:19:42.160
<v Speaker 4>of grade on him. But it's Sean Tucker. If Bucky

1:19:42.160 --> 1:19:45.559
<v Speaker 4>Irving doesn't play. He missed Wednesday and Thursday, and he

1:19:45.680 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 4>was limited on Friday. If Bucky Irving doesn't play, Sean

1:19:49.000 --> 1:19:52.559
<v Speaker 4>Tucker might get a role this weekend, so possible pick

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:53.000
<v Speaker 4>up there.

1:19:53.400 --> 1:19:55.360
<v Speaker 5>There was some I forgot to mention with mine if

1:19:55.439 --> 1:19:58.120
<v Speaker 5>I can just jump in quickly, which was I found

1:19:58.120 --> 1:20:01.400
<v Speaker 5>this quote from Kyle Shanna hand really interesting about a

1:20:01.479 --> 1:20:03.599
<v Speaker 5>bonaconda after they made that claim, so I just wanted

1:20:03.640 --> 1:20:06.680
<v Speaker 5>to circle back really quick. Kyle Shanahan quote. I liked

1:20:06.760 --> 1:20:09.519
<v Speaker 5>him coming out of college. I haven't studied him a

1:20:09.520 --> 1:20:11.360
<v Speaker 5>ton in the NFL, but he was a guy that

1:20:11.400 --> 1:20:14.320
<v Speaker 5>I had good notes on coming out of college and liked,

1:20:14.560 --> 1:20:16.559
<v Speaker 5>and I know our scouting department thought he was the

1:20:16.560 --> 1:20:19.880
<v Speaker 5>best guy out there being available. So in our situation,

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:22.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm especially glad to get him in here.

1:20:22.520 --> 1:20:25.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well that's promising. You know what else is promising?

1:20:25.360 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 3>Will Lovis. I already mentioned him once in the show and.

1:20:27.720 --> 1:20:29.479
<v Speaker 6>You Love Will You Love the mail Man?

1:20:29.479 --> 1:20:31.880
<v Speaker 3>By way, I'm so far off of Will Levis in

1:20:31.880 --> 1:20:34.840
<v Speaker 3>the preseason do not draft, do not draft, do not draft,

1:20:34.880 --> 1:20:37.519
<v Speaker 3>And for half a year that was the right decision.

1:20:37.960 --> 1:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>But you have to be able to say I'm wrong,

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:43.599
<v Speaker 3>and Will Levis has just gotten better. He's just gotten

1:20:43.640 --> 1:20:46.200
<v Speaker 3>back to the point that even though the Titans are

1:20:46.200 --> 1:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>going to be sitting in the top like seven of

1:20:48.320 --> 1:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the draft, I don't know they're going quarterback that pick. Wow,

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Levis has done enough. This thing is this thing is

1:20:55.400 --> 1:20:58.639
<v Speaker 3>looking a little interesting. So, as I already mentioned earlier

1:20:58.680 --> 1:21:01.360
<v Speaker 3>in the show, vastly and proved he's quarterback eleven over

1:21:01.360 --> 1:21:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the past four weeks. But here's the best part, easiest

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>remaining schedule against the pass Will Levis. You get Jacksonville

1:21:10.080 --> 1:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>twice and Cincinnati Woods and then a neutral matchup with Indy.

1:21:14.880 --> 1:21:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Pretty good. It's all great day, pretty good.

1:21:17.479 --> 1:21:19.559
<v Speaker 4>You know this was this was my prespect on Ta

1:21:19.680 --> 1:21:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Jay Spears last week. Just the matchups are so good.

1:21:22.640 --> 1:21:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I my take a chance on me. Quarterback for the

1:21:26.880 --> 1:21:30.719
<v Speaker 3>rest of the year is Will love for the rest.

1:21:30.560 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 6>Of your life. Will loves baby.

1:21:32.240 --> 1:21:34.519
<v Speaker 4>My son was confused this last weekend why he had

1:21:34.520 --> 1:21:38.680
<v Speaker 4>MAO commercials? Why does Will Livis get commercials? Because I

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:39.280
<v Speaker 4>had to expect?

1:21:39.320 --> 1:21:41.400
<v Speaker 5>And why does he eat bananas with the peel. There's

1:21:41.439 --> 1:21:43.840
<v Speaker 5>so many questions about Will Levis and will never be answered.

1:21:43.880 --> 1:21:45.240
<v Speaker 4>It's Perry never be answered.

1:21:45.280 --> 1:21:47.679
<v Speaker 3>We've got one matchup we do get too. Let's let's

1:21:47.680 --> 1:21:52.519
<v Speaker 3>talk it through Chargers Kansas City to the Sunday night game.

1:21:52.560 --> 1:21:53.000
<v Speaker 4>These met.

1:21:53.120 --> 1:21:55.479
<v Speaker 3>These teams met in a low scoring game back in

1:21:55.560 --> 1:21:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Week four. On the Chargers side, not a lot lot

1:21:58.960 --> 1:22:01.839
<v Speaker 3>to love here. Lad McConkie has got an AC injury

1:22:01.840 --> 1:22:03.920
<v Speaker 3>that could knock him out on any tackle. You have

1:22:03.920 --> 1:22:06.479
<v Speaker 3>to be really careful. Remember Jordan Mason earlier this year

1:22:06.640 --> 1:22:08.960
<v Speaker 3>was trying to play through his AC injury and he

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:11.160
<v Speaker 3>got knocked out twice. So you have to be a

1:22:11.200 --> 1:22:15.439
<v Speaker 3>little bit careful there. And we saw McConkie plays on

1:22:15.479 --> 1:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Sunday night. You'll want to watch his status up until then,

1:22:18.560 --> 1:22:20.599
<v Speaker 3>and you might want to pick up Quintin Johnston as

1:22:20.640 --> 1:22:23.280
<v Speaker 3>an emergency pivot if you need to. He's been great,

1:22:23.479 --> 1:22:26.160
<v Speaker 3>He's coming on strong, lots of catches and yards. He's

1:22:26.200 --> 1:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>only scored in three games this year and not at

1:22:28.200 --> 1:22:30.000
<v Speaker 3>all since Week eight, and that's the only real knock

1:22:30.000 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 3>against him here. Chiefs secondary has been more yielding of

1:22:32.880 --> 1:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yate late. Of the past five games, the Chiefs have

1:22:36.120 --> 1:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>allowed the fourth most yards to wide receivers. So Lad

1:22:39.000 --> 1:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>mcconakee comes in with a b grade the other guy

1:22:41.360 --> 1:22:44.639
<v Speaker 3>in sneaky fashion. You could start Will Disley even though

1:22:44.640 --> 1:22:47.959
<v Speaker 3>he had zero catches last week, but startable here because.

1:22:47.920 --> 1:22:49.920
<v Speaker 4>You just like guys name Will Well that.

1:22:50.000 --> 1:22:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is that. I guess I do. I didn't

1:22:51.920 --> 1:22:54.120
<v Speaker 3>know that, but I do. Chiefs have allowed the fourth

1:22:54.120 --> 1:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>most fantasy points the tight ends. Brock Bauers just hammered

1:22:57.160 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs for ten catches one hundred and forty yards

1:22:59.160 --> 1:23:02.280
<v Speaker 3>at a touchdown. Disley seeing the vast majority of tight

1:23:02.360 --> 1:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>end snaps and routes for the Chargers. His route rate

1:23:05.400 --> 1:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>the past two games is seventy one percent in each,

1:23:07.840 --> 1:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>which is very good by tight end standards.

1:23:10.560 --> 1:23:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to our Let's go to clear bear.

1:23:14.479 --> 1:23:18.639
<v Speaker 3>Justinart, it feels like a low upside game for Herbert,

1:23:18.640 --> 1:23:20.639
<v Speaker 3>who only threw for one hundred and seventy nine yards

1:23:20.640 --> 1:23:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in one touchdown in the earlier meeting with Kansas City.

1:23:23.479 --> 1:23:26.360
<v Speaker 3>If Lad mcconcky were healthier, I'd bump up Herbert to

1:23:26.439 --> 1:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>a B. But as it stands, it's a C. Because

1:23:29.040 --> 1:23:32.799
<v Speaker 3>that wide receiver depth chart is so thin for the Chargers.

1:23:33.040 --> 1:23:35.439
<v Speaker 3>I worry there just aren't enough quality targets to go

1:23:35.520 --> 1:23:39.240
<v Speaker 3>around against a decent but slightly shakier lately. Kansas City

1:23:39.280 --> 1:23:43.160
<v Speaker 3>secondary so c grade on Justin Herbert Gus Edwards, who

1:23:44.120 --> 1:23:47.679
<v Speaker 3>even with JK. Dobbins out last week, Gus only saw

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:50.719
<v Speaker 3>five carries in a close game. The last three weeks,

1:23:50.760 --> 1:23:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Gus has totaled thirty two yards, eleven yards and twenty

1:23:56.479 --> 1:24:01.040
<v Speaker 3>seven yards. He doesn't catch. He's got two receptions on

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the year. Kansas City is an excellent run defense. They

1:24:04.280 --> 1:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>ranked number one in yards per carry, tenth in run

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:10.519
<v Speaker 3>defense EPA, second in yards after contact, seventh in yards

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>before contact. Gus Edwards is on your bench?

1:24:14.080 --> 1:24:17.639
<v Speaker 4>What about command Kamani vidals so soon? Well, we're watching

1:24:17.720 --> 1:24:18.120
<v Speaker 4>my boy.

1:24:18.200 --> 1:24:20.960
<v Speaker 3>We're watching because the Amani gorvad there, but we're not

1:24:21.280 --> 1:24:22.400
<v Speaker 3>We're watching him, but we're not.

1:24:22.320 --> 1:24:25.680
<v Speaker 6>Starting love Kimani all.

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Kansas City side people are are reading this

1:24:30.640 --> 1:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>so wrong with Kareem Hunt and Isaiah Pacheco. Hunt Pacheco

1:24:36.080 --> 1:24:37.800
<v Speaker 3>came in last week and Andy Reid had said that

1:24:37.840 --> 1:24:40.919
<v Speaker 3>he was on a snap count of about twenty snaps.

1:24:41.160 --> 1:24:44.439
<v Speaker 3>He's made no such declaration this time, and Hunt is

1:24:44.479 --> 1:24:47.720
<v Speaker 3>going to get obliterated by Pacheco now here. It is

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>last week Pachecko and when the two ran last week,

1:24:51.040 --> 1:24:53.160
<v Speaker 3>but Checko ran for six yards per Carrie Hunt ran

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:57.320
<v Speaker 3>for two, and Hunt had turned four targets into zero catches.

1:24:57.680 --> 1:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>This thing is over. Pachecko's going to run away with

1:25:00.360 --> 1:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>this job, and I love him in this matchup because

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:05.639
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers, while they are a good run defense, listen

1:25:05.680 --> 1:25:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to what teams are doing against them. To beat this

1:25:08.320 --> 1:25:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Chargers team, they're using workhorsebacks against them, and it's working.

1:25:13.200 --> 1:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Three weeks ago, Chase Brown twenty seven touches against the Chargers,

1:25:18.000 --> 1:25:21.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and forty three yards. Two weeks ago, Derrick

1:25:21.400 --> 1:25:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Henry twenty four touches, one hundred and forty yards. Last week,

1:25:26.320 --> 1:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Fijon Robinson thirty two touches, one hundred and thirty five

1:25:30.160 --> 1:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>combo yards. The way you beat the Chargers is with

1:25:33.240 --> 1:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>work horse backs and repetition, and it's going to be

1:25:35.960 --> 1:25:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah Pacheco for an A grade in this matchup. Oh boy,

1:25:40.439 --> 1:25:42.200
<v Speaker 3>let's go to the passing game. And by the way,

1:25:42.280 --> 1:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Hunt on the bench, Travis Kelcey B grade, Noah Gray

1:25:46.920 --> 1:25:49.360
<v Speaker 3>is turning into a problem. Is it's a problem. He's

1:25:49.360 --> 1:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>ciphoning off five targets per game over the last three weeks,

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>still Kelsey getting enough work with at least eight targets

1:25:56.280 --> 1:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>in five of the last six games where Kelsey's not

1:25:59.320 --> 1:26:03.559
<v Speaker 3>getting anywhere end zone. He's been targeted in the end

1:26:03.640 --> 1:26:08.400
<v Speaker 3>zone only five times all year. Travis Kelcey Noah Gray

1:26:08.800 --> 1:26:09.920
<v Speaker 3>four times this year.

1:26:10.560 --> 1:26:12.639
<v Speaker 4>I'm the one to blame for no Gray because after

1:26:12.680 --> 1:26:14.479
<v Speaker 4>I finally gave up and dropped him from all my

1:26:14.560 --> 1:26:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Dynasty teams.

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:18.040
<v Speaker 3>That's when he took off as good. The Chargers have

1:26:18.080 --> 1:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>been giving up just one touchdown, have given up just

1:26:20.400 --> 1:26:23.559
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown to tight ends all year, so I expect

1:26:23.640 --> 1:26:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey to do the same thing he's been doing. He's

1:26:25.360 --> 1:26:27.000
<v Speaker 3>going to give you plenty of catches in yards, but

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>he is not going to be able to help you

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:31.840
<v Speaker 3>in terms of touchdowns. In all probability, Let's go to

1:26:31.920 --> 1:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the other receivers. Andre Hopkins remains the Chiefs wide receiver

1:26:36.160 --> 1:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>leader in utilization and is the only Kansas City receiver

1:26:39.120 --> 1:26:41.719
<v Speaker 3>you can hope to get any kind of reliable production from.

1:26:42.080 --> 1:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>He's coming off consecutive serviceable Fantasy games for the first

1:26:45.760 --> 1:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>time this year with either of his two teams. Hopkins

1:26:48.360 --> 1:26:50.599
<v Speaker 3>runs from the left, the right, and the slot but

1:26:50.640 --> 1:26:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers have got good cornerbacks at all three spots,

1:26:52.960 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 3>so I don't love his individual matchups at any of them.

1:26:55.920 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Hopkins wins contested catches a lot with his size, but

1:26:58.479 --> 1:27:00.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Charges cornerbacks are all bigger guys. They're

1:27:00.760 --> 1:27:02.479
<v Speaker 3>all over six foot. I can only get you to

1:27:02.520 --> 1:27:06.679
<v Speaker 3>a C grade on DeAndre Hopkins. Xavier Worthy. Last three

1:27:06.760 --> 1:27:11.080
<v Speaker 3>games have represented a nice uptick in usage. We spent

1:27:11.160 --> 1:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the first half of the season where like Xavier Worthy

1:27:13.080 --> 1:27:14.960
<v Speaker 3>needs to score on two touches and that's not gonna

1:27:14.960 --> 1:27:18.640
<v Speaker 3>happen most times. Now last three weeks four four and

1:27:18.800 --> 1:27:22.720
<v Speaker 3>five receptions for Xavier Worthy, so that's a huge improvement.

1:27:23.280 --> 1:27:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Chargers cornerbacks play physical defense, which either means for a

1:27:27.000 --> 1:27:30.559
<v Speaker 3>guy like Worthy who's just straight speed, he's either gonna

1:27:30.560 --> 1:27:32.560
<v Speaker 3>get like bumped off his routes and it's gonna be

1:27:32.600 --> 1:27:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a disaster, or he's just gonna run by these physical

1:27:36.000 --> 1:27:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Charger receivers and make a big play. So I've got

1:27:38.720 --> 1:27:41.360
<v Speaker 3>a C grade on Xavier Worthy as an all or

1:27:41.400 --> 1:27:45.640
<v Speaker 3>nothing play, high risk, high reward. That brings us to

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:48.599
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes, the final chief to discuss here. I've got

1:27:48.680 --> 1:27:51.160
<v Speaker 3>b's and c's on his receiving options. I've got a

1:27:51.200 --> 1:27:55.120
<v Speaker 3>B grade on Mahomes. The Chargers smoked Kirk Cousins last week,

1:27:55.160 --> 1:27:59.120
<v Speaker 3>but had been uncharacteristically yielding in the two games before that.

1:28:00.040 --> 1:28:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Along the season, the Chargers are a very improved secondary,

1:28:02.400 --> 1:28:05.519
<v Speaker 3>allowing just one touchdown pass per game. Mahomes threw for

1:28:05.560 --> 1:28:07.240
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and forty five yards and a score in

1:28:07.240 --> 1:28:09.559
<v Speaker 3>the earlier matchup. That feels about right here. Maybe gets

1:28:09.600 --> 1:28:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to two touchdowns, but I don't see it. I don't

1:28:11.760 --> 1:28:16.080
<v Speaker 3>see an explosive game coming for Patrick Mahomes. Hey, we're

1:28:16.080 --> 1:28:18.880
<v Speaker 3>so forming new guarantee leagues at leagues dot com. Yeah,

1:28:18.880 --> 1:28:21.519
<v Speaker 3>to know that the season four team gets.

1:28:21.479 --> 1:28:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Maybe my coworkers should get in one of those, because

1:28:23.920 --> 1:28:24.639
<v Speaker 5>our league is over.

1:28:24.920 --> 1:28:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It's over.

1:28:25.400 --> 1:28:28.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're gonna get to see give me that crown

1:28:29.080 --> 1:28:31.479
<v Speaker 5>to be the last man standing at the Guillotine League,

1:28:31.520 --> 1:28:33.040
<v Speaker 5>and they will never hear the end of it. I

1:28:33.040 --> 1:28:33.720
<v Speaker 5>promise you that.

1:28:33.800 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I hope that's the case. I hope that's the case.

1:28:36.280 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 3>If you want all of Thorne Neistrum's premium college content

1:28:40.360 --> 1:28:43.200
<v Speaker 3>for the Bowl run, you can use promo code f

1:28:43.360 --> 1:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>f W twenty at fantasylife dot com.

1:28:45.920 --> 1:28:47.719
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, we're getting deep on those balls.

1:28:47.800 --> 1:28:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh I love it at this seasons of the year,

1:28:50.280 --> 1:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent off the premium content at Fantasy Life, Fantasy

1:28:54.520 --> 1:28:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Life Plus. Thanks for listening, everybody. Best of luck in

1:28:57.640 --> 1:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the all in week of Fantasy foot well and we'll

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:02.600
<v Speaker 3>head into the playoffs and get you ready for that

1:29:02.720 --> 1:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>next week