WEBVTT - AD’s Extension, Burrow’s Injury & Wright or Wrong

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by All State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking All State first, Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one seventy. What's Right with Nick Right?

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Today's episode brought to you by Starbucks Ready to Drink Coffee.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Tune into moments that matter to the most with the

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>uplifting boost of Starbucks Mocha Frappuccino chilled coffee drink available

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>now online or wherever you buy your groceries. I actually

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I was all out of the Starbucks ready to drink

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>coffee that I leave here at Trintage where we do

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the podcast. I went literally twelve feet around down the

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>street to the bodega on the corner. They had a

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>whole little cooler of these things, you really can get

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>them anywhere. Guess who else is back? In addition my

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks drink. Diora making her triumphant return, looking nice and

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>tan and refreshed from quite the trip. It's wonderful to

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>see you. I missed you so much. And the shirt

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm wearing today courtesy my wonderful daughter who bought me

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>a present on her trip. It was so kind. I

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>love the shirt. Thank you. Welcome back to you. Excited

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to be back? Yeah, of course, yeah, she's thrilled to

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>be here. By the way, a little scheduling note. We

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>have a podcast today and Thursday, and then the podcast

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and the TV show are off next week for the

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>last vacation of the summer, and then we are into

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the stretch run of football. Shortly after we get back

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>from that vacation, Doorra will do her farewell show, Demons

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 2>will take back over, Diorra will go off to college,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 2>and I will enter a bit of an existential crisis.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>But we will get to that at another time. Here's

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>what missed the cut for today's show. Hard Knocks is returning.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 2>We might talk about that on Thursday. Carson Wentz just

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>really a bad look man. Wearing your Eagles helmet, your

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Washington jersey and your cult shorts and my Philly gambling trip. Well, listen,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you the short version of that. Didn't go great,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>could have gone better, but had a great time, nice

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>little weekend away with the wife, and I have a

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>potential really exciting gambling trip involving my friends at Poker

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Go and phil Helm Youth and all of that that

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>may or may not have happen here in the next

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty days. If I get that locked down, I will

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 2>discuss it with you guys on the pod. But no

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 2>more waiting, do you or what are we starting with today?

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So Michael Parson says that the Hall of Fame is

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>not a big enough accomplishment. He said he wants to

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 3>be known as one of the greatest Hall of famers.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Is he already a lock for Hall of Fame or

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 3>is he getting ahead of himself?

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So he's obviously getting ahead of himself. And I think

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>people underestimate, not just players, fans, media, how difficult the

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 2>NFL Hall of Fame is to get into the finalists

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 2>for this past year guys, and when you look at

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>guys who didn't make it. If we do the finalist

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>or hell that the twenty six semi finalists for the

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame this past season. You have some great

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 2>players who didn't even then make the finalist list. Eric

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Allen not a finalist, Jared Allen Jared Allen was a finalist,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't make it. Willie Anderson didn't make it, and Guambalden

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even a finalist. Tony BASSELLI, I don't even think

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 2>he was a finalist. Let me make sure I'm right.

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, he was a finalist, but he did not

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>make it. Pardon me. Eddie George not a finalist. Devin

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Hester didn't make it, Tory Holt, Andre Johnson did not

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 2>make it, Richard Seymour did not make it. So Reggie

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Wayne did not make it. Patrick Willis did not make it.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Willis. So people throw So, of course Mike is

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 2>off to a good start. That he's got to do

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>what he's done the first couple years of his career

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>for the next decade. So what's the follow up question here?

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Doora which current NFL players are a lock for the

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Fame.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Colin did this on TV yesterday. I'm gonna

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>do a slightly different version, and we will go team

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>by team and and list everyone. And I should have

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>given the producers the heads up on this if someone

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 2>with our wonderful Blue Duck production staff in Los Angeles

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>can just start a document or jot something down, and

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 2>every player that I list put in whichever category. So

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the categories that I have are locks, likely, good start,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and not quite. I think those are the categories that

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I have, and may you know, throw possible on there

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>as well, and we'll see what we come up with

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 2>at the end of it. I'm just gonna go team

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>by team the way they're listed in the standings, and

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>we'll go through it. The Dallas Cowboys have as many possibles,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>are not even necessarily possible, as we're gonna list as

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>many names with the Cowboys as any team, and it's

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 2>only three names. So Tyrone Smith is a likely Hall

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of Famer. He is not a lock Hall of Famer,

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>not yet. But Tyron Smith He's got eight Pro Bowls,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>four All Pros, he was on an All Decade team.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Even that at an offensive line as an offensive lineman,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I can't call him a lock, but he is a

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>likely Hall of Famer, as is his offensive line mate

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Zach Martin. Zach Martin, who's been the best guard in

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the league for quite some time. He has eight Pro Bowls,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>eight All Pros, including six First Team All Pro? Why

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 2>is he not a lock for the Hall of Fame

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and he's damn close. The answer to that is, it

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly difficult to get in as a guard, incredibly difficult.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>He is close to a lock. He is not quite

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a lock, but he is a very likely Hall of Famer.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Tyron Smith is a likely Hall of Famer. Micah Parsons

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>is in the good start category. It's a great start,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not ready at all to he's got again

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>another half decade plus of this level of production. The

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Giants have no one that comes to that is in

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the discussion. The Eagles have one person, Jason Kelcey, and

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I think he is a lock. Jason Kelsey is by

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 2>some people consider him the best center ever. He's a

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>five time I'm First Team All Pro. And whether it

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>should matter or it shouldn't because his resume probably is

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>not quite as impressive as Zach Martin's. But you got

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to keep in mind when it comes to first team

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>All Pros, there's only one center. There's two guard positions available,

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that he's won two Super Bowls, I'm sorry,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>one to one super Bowl, played in another Super Bowl

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to help him greatly. He's a lock Hall

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of Famer. No one else on the Eagles is even

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>really in the discussion, and you can say you're not

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Fletcher Cox. Matt mentioned just to me in my ear,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and I was gonna go through it, and Matt, please

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>keep doing that if you think there's someone I'm way overlooking.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Fletcher Cox, to me is a great example of how

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>hard it is to make the Hall of Fame. Fletcher

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Cox is a very good player. He is not a

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame player. Fletcher Cox is not better than

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Richard Seymour was, and Richard Seymour might never get in.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Fletcher Cox is not better than Bryant Young was, and

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Bryant Young might never get in. Fletcher Cox is very

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>very good. He's not a Hall of Famer. Washington obviously

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.479
<v Speaker 2>has no one, and that takes care of the NFC East.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>The Bears have no one, the Lions have no one.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>The Packers becomes an interesting discussion with one guy, David Bachtiori.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>David Bachtiori three time Pro bowler, five time All Pro,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>two time first team All Pro. To me, David boch

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Tiori just misses. He's behind Tyron Smith. As far as

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>tackles from his era, He's obviously behind a guy we're

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna get to in a bit in tackles from his era.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I think David Baktiari just misses, so that means the

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Packers have no one the Vikings justin Jefferson good start category,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.239
<v Speaker 2>way too early, but the start couldn't possibly be stronger.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>The guy averages basically one hundred yards a game for

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 2>his career, He's been spectacular. He just got voted number

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>two on the NFL's Top one hundred list, which is remarkable.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the highest receivers ever been on that list.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>He gets the good start category. The Falcons the only

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>person they have, and I think people maybe forget that

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>he plays for this team. I forgot he played for

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>this team because he hadn't played for him yet. Is

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Kalays Campbell. Kalayus Campbell is in the just missus category.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Ninety nine sacks, only three All pros Now he wasn't

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>All Decade member, which helps him. But I think kalay

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Is Campbell just misses. The Saints have one person that's

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Cam Jordan, and he is going to be I think

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>people he's going to be a controversial one. But the

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 2>numbers are jarring for Cam Jordan. Cam Jordan, who just

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>signed an extension, has one one hundred and fifteen and

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a half career sacks. So when you look at the

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>all time leaders for sacks, and I understand it's a

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>stat that only been kept, you know, over the last

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>forty years, but if we go to it and pro

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 2>the official leaders on all time sacks, he's twenty third.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 2>If he gets another ten sacks in his career, he

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>moves into the top twenty. He is eight sacks behind

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Robert Mathis and eight sacks behind Von Miller. He's ten

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>sacks behind Dwight Freeney and guys ahead of him on

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the official leader board. Now, Football Reference did a cool

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>thing where they went back and counted the unofficial sacks.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 2>But Cam Jordan, if we just go by the official

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>leader board, cam Jordan has more than JJ Watt, who

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>just retired and is an absolute, no doubt lock Hall

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of Famer. It's one more, but it's more guys with

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>more sacks than Cam Jordan. I'll go through them quickly

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and tell you if they're not in the Hall of Fame.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Smith, Reggie White, Kevin Green, Julius Pepper's not in,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 2>but will be. He hadn't been retired long enough. Chris Dolman,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Michael Strahand, Jason Taylor, Terrell Suggs. Suggs not in, but

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 2>will be. DeMarcus where Richard Dent, John Randall, Jared Allen

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>at one thirty six. He's a finalist but hasn't gotten

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>in yet. John Abraham not in and doesn't look like

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna get in. Leslie O'Neill, Lawrence Taylor, Richie Jackson,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 2>Ricky Jackson, pardon me, Derek Thomas, Freeney, who's waiting? Von Miller,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Robert Mathis, Simeon Rice, Clyde Simmons, Cam Jordan. None of

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 2>those guys are in. So my point is he gets

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>ten more sacks. He's almost assuredly getting in. He just

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 2>signed an extension. He is not a but he is

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a likely Hall of Famer. The Bucks have have one guy.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh so the the Cruisers remind me Jimmy Graham is

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>now in the Saints again. Jimmy Graham, in my opinion,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>has no chance of being a Hall of Famer. Uh.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>He's a two time All Pro. He has gaudy touchdown numbers,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but not much else. Jimmy Graham to me is I

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't even consider him, and it's not well, it's partially

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>because I forgot that he had resigned with the Saints.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not a Hall of Famer. The Bucks people are

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna bring up there's only one person they're gonna bring up,

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans. Mike Evans to me, is once again a

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>very very good player who has never not a day

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>ben Was there ever a discussion is he the best

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>receiver in the league. There's never been a discussion. Is

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>he the second best receiver in the league. He has

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>one really impressive stat which is he has started his

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>career with nine consecutive thousand yard seasons or is it

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>ten consecutive? It is how many seasons has he played.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>He's done it every single year. It's nine consecutive thousand

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>yard seasons. I do not think he gets in the

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame. To me, he is if Andre Johnson

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and Reggie Wayne and Tory Holt, we don't know if

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>they're getting in. There is no argument that Mike Evans

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>gets in. So Mike Evans, to me, is not quite.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 2>The Rams obviously have one guy. It's Aaron Donald. He's

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a one hundred percent lock. There is not even It's

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>not even worth discussing Stafford. It's also not worth discussing

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>He's not even close. The Cardinals have no one. The

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers have one lock in. Trent Williams been

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the best left tackle in the league for a decade.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>He is, and that is gonna hurt boch Tiori because

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>how many left tackles from one ear are gonna make it.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Trent Williams is in, is going to be in. Tyron

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Smith is in root, so I think that hurts Bocktori.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Nicky Bosa is in the good Stark category. Need a

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>lot more sample, but he's in the good Stark category.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And George Kittle is the very very good, not a

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer. And then the Seattle Seahawks have one guy,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Wagner, who to me is an absolute lock. So

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the entirety of the NFC, what we have is the

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>following And I said, We're gonna spend a lot of

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 2>time on this. I think it's fun exercise. Jason Kelsey,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Donald, Trent Williams. In the entirety of the NFC,

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 2>there are three Lock Hall of Famers active right now

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in the entirety of say that again, Matt sorry, uh oh,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 2>and Bobby Wagner. Pardon me, I forgot to Yes, you're right.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's four. Thank you, I had just said, Bobby Wagner.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't put Lock next to his name on my

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 2>little document that I'm making. Thank you for that. So

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 2>there's four Bobby Wagner, Trent Williams, Aaron Donald, and Jason

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey in the entirety of the NFC. As far as

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>guys that are in root, it would appear you have

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Tyrone Smith, Zach Martin who is approaching lock category, Cam

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Jordan as like Lee's, and then I put Nick Bosa

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>and Micah Parsons and Justin Jefferson in the good start category.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the NFC to the AFC. The Bills have one

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 2>no doubt Hall of Famer. We all know who he is,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Von Miller. Von Miller is a no doubt Lock Hall

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of Famer. There's no scenario where he doesn't get in.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 2>He might be a first ballot guy. He's a lock.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>I people are gonna say, Nick, where's Josh Allen on

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this right now? He's not. He's not even close. And

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you can't even put him in the good start category

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>because for a quarterback there's some benchmarks you've got to hit.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not either playoff success or MVPs or something. He's

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>not there. So it's just von Miller right now. The

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins are an interesting team here. I believe at this

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>point tyreek Kill is a lock. Hall of Famer. Tyreek

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Kill is one of the most notable players of his era.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 2>He made an All Decade Team, he is a four

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>time first team All Pro and absolutely if you ask

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 2>the question, was he ever considered the best receiver in

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the league, the answer was yes. Now, it wasn't unanimous,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>but the answer was yes. He's a lock. Then there's

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Ramsey, who and this is why Micah's comments are

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 2>so interesting, where he's like, you know, I want to

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 2>be one of the best Hall of Famers ever. Jalen Ramsey,

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 2>through four years of his career, looked like he was

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a no doubter. Doubt is starting to creep

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 2>in He's a three time first team All Pro, but

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 2>this year is going to be basically a lost year,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>which means the next season he plays will be his

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 2>age thirty season. I have him listed Jalen Ramsey in

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the likely category because he was considered the best corner

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 2>in the league for a period of time, but he

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 2>is not a lock, and he maybe deserves to be

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in the possible category rather than the likely category. He's

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>a tough one. The Patriots have no one. The Jets

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously have Aaron Rodgers as a lock, and that's it.

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Wilson, We're not gonna even call it good start

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 2>yet for him. It's one year. Quinn Williams, no like

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 2>it's you can't even call it good start yet, you'd

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 2>have to be even better than he's been. Aaron Rodgers

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 2>is a lock, and that's it. The Browns have one guy,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and he is. He's a hard one to even put

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in a category. I'm gonna call him likely because the

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>guy is he's been in the league too long to

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 2>just say good start, but he hasn't done enough yet

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>for him to be anywhere close to a lock. And

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 2>that's Miles Garrett. Miles Garrett has seventy five sacks in

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>eighty four career games. He has been his sacks by

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 2>season seven is a rookie then thirteen, ten, twelve, sixteen, sixteen,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to go along with as far as TfL's nine, twelve, eleven, ten,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 2>seventeen eighteen. He is a four time All Pro, a

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>four time Pro bowler, But as we demonstrated previously, he

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 2>has to almost duplicate these last five years for the

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>next five years to be a lock. He in the

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>likely category. The Bengals have two obvious guys in the

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 2>good Stark category, Joe Burrow and Jamar Chase. They are

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 2>way too young to put past that, but they're both

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>in the good Stark category. The Steelers have one guy

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>in the good Stark category and one guy in the

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>not quite category. The good stark category is obviously TJ. Watt.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>They're not quite category is Cam Hayward. The Ravens have

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>one guy that's a lock. Know who he is their kicker,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Justin Tucker. He is a Lock Hall of Famer. If

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna put ever put more kickers in, it has

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to be him. He's a Lock Hall of Famer. The

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Titans have one guy who I think is a likely

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer. Now. I don't know that his career

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>numbers are going to stack up to the other great

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame running backs, but what helps him so

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>much is he has the distinction I was, unquestioned the

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>best of my position of my era, and that's Derrick Henry.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>And because of that, he's not a lock, but to

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 2>me he's likely. He also, right now is the only

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 2>person in his entire division that even made the discussion.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to call Saint Trevor's off to a good start.

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>You can't say that. I gotta be fair here as

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>far as Hall of Fame goes, the Colts, Jags, and

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Texans have no one worth discussing. The Titans only have

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Derrick Henry, and that brings us to our last division.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs have two dead set go ahead.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Your overtime in the first question.

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I know, yeah, I said this one was gonna be long,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think this is a good exercise. The Chiefs

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>have too obvious no question locks in Mahomes and Kelsey.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And I know Mahomes has only started for five years.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't matter. Two super Bowls, two MVPs, two Super Bowl MVPs.

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>The only people with multiple Super Bowls and multiple Super

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Bowl MVPs and multiple regular season MVPs are Joe Montana,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady, and Patrick Mahomes. He is a no doubt

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer, and Kelsey's the greatest tight endeavor. Chris

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Jones is a little old for this. I can't put

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>him in the likely category because he's not that yet.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna put him in the good start category even

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 2>though he's a little old for that, because A his

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 2>numbers are eye popping, especially that position. B. If the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs win another Super Bowl in the next couple years

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and they are can considered a dynasty, they will get

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>some bonus spots for their players in the Hall of Fame,

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and Tyreek was only there for one of them Mahomes

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 2>and Kelsey, Obviously, Chris Jones is the clear cut guy

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that would slide into that next spot. Davonte Adams for

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders. He's the only person that I even considered.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Chandler Jones to me is in that not quite category.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Davante I put as a possible. He's a three time

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>All Pro, six time Pro bowler. We've talked about how

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>hard the receiver position is. We'll see how much longer

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>he's great for, but we're gonna call him possible. The

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Chargers right now have nobody. Joey Bosa is really good.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't had a Hall of Fame career up to

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 2>this point. Neither has Khalil Mack. Neither is Derwin James

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously not justin Herbert and then maybe and this is

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the last one, maybe the most interesting Hall of Fame

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 2>litmus test on this list, and I have him as

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a possible. Russell Wilson with the Broncos. Russell Wilson, nine

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>time Pro Bowler, but zero first team All pros, one

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>second team All Pro. And if he if this era

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>of his career is a disaster, I think he plays

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 2>himself out of the Hall of Fame. So there's the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>entirety of it. You, okay, Scoot, it's crazy because you

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 2>haven't had to do anything yet and you're just out

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>here just dying. I'm just telling you, I mean, you

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>just out you're dying. So there it is. So the

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 2>once again, much like what we did on Thursday that

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, I hope was as interesting the audience it was.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>To me, that's everyone in the league. It is incredibly

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>difficult to even become a Hall of Fame finalist, much

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 2>less make it. By my count, there are only let

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 2>me make sure I'm right on this, we had four

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>locks in the NFC as far as no question about it, Kelsey, Donald,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Williams Wagner. In the AFC we have Von Miller, Tyreek Hill,

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers, Justin, Tucker Mahomes, and Kelsey. So that is

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>six more locks with about a dozen other like lees.

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 2>At any given time, guys, you're probably probably only watching

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty active Hall of Famers and that's where we're at

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's how I see it playing out. So again,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you guys can include in your comments or questions your thoughts.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 2>We'll do that. Actually before the sea block, we'll do

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>this Excite Right thing, deor you want to tell them

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 2>about it right here, if you're feeling up to it,

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>you're just so rude, go ahead.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 3>If you guys think that we missed anyone, that you

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 3>could put it in the chat for the first edition

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 3>of Excite Right and we'll explain what that is later.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and also there are some guys that just retired

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>or aren't currently on rosters but haven't announced their retirement

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 2>that are interesting discussions as well. We can get to

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>them there also, but let's do the rest of the

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>show now door.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis signed a MAX extension and is tied to

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers through twenty twenty eight. LA has a massive

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 3>off season and now their future is secure. Is this

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 3>a smart move by LA?

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a no doubt move. It's unquestionably the right move

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for two reasons. One is Anthony Davis could have been

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 2>a free agent after this coming season if they didn't

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>do this. He had an early termination option, which is

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>similar to a player option. He could just end his

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>contract a year early. You can't let Anthony Davis hit

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>free agency. He's coming off his second best season as

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a Laker, his second best playoff run of his career.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And I understand the Nuggets swept the Lakers, but if

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>you are trying to get through the Nuggets, you need

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to have a seven footer that they at least have

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to deal with, and as far as people alive, if

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to get through Nikolajokic, yes, my number one

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>draft pick for who I would want is Giannis, but

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you could make an argument the number two draft pick

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>is Anthony Davis. He's more of a proven playoff commodity

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>than Joel Embiid. His postseason health history is not worse

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>than Embiid's, and even if you wouldn't beat ahead of him,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>then eighty is third. Like for the rest of AD's prime,

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Jokich is gonna be the Western Conference end boss, at

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>least for the near future. This was an absolute no brainer.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Okay, Jamar Chase wants Joe Burrow to

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 3>be careful, not rushing back from injury. He said, as

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 3>long as you're there after week five and on, you're good. Brother.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>How close is this to jos We're fine in the

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 3>West statement.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a second cousin of it. I listen. I agree

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with Jamar's analysis. I think the Bengals have to be

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>super careful with Joe, and not just because he could

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>reaggravate the calf, but if the calf isn't fully healthy

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and he's not able to escape a big hit, he

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>could suffer a different type of injury, or more devastating injury.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>So I agree they've got to be super careful with him.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I do think Jamar is a little bit putting the

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>cart ahead of the horse when he's talking about we've

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>got bearer goals. We just need you for the end

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 2>of the season. That's that part is maybe a little premature,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 2>but the general sentiment is exactly correct. The general sentiment

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>that they need to be super cautious with Joe Burrow.

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, their Week one game is against

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the Browns, which is the team Joe Burrow's had the

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>most trouble within his career. He has five picks in

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 2>five games, he's only beat him once. So maybe Joe

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>sitting out that game is not the worst thing in

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the world to begin with. I would be super cautious

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 2>with Joe Burrow. I agree with Jamar there. I think

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the other commentary is again maybe a little premature,

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>but I'm fine with it all right.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Last, Mike arrabel is turning over head coaching duties to

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 3>assistant Tarra Williams in the first preseason game. Should more

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>coaches be following suit?

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 2>So I had never thought of this, and now that

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>somebody's done it, and I'm like, oh, that's obvious. And

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 2>it's one of those things that I can't say it's

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 2>obvious because I had never thought of it, but it

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>now feels like, oh, yeah, of course, and I think

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a great idea. I think this is pretty clearly

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 2>forward thinking and it's going to a I think it's

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 2>going to give him a better From a selfish perspective,

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>it gives him a better chance of acquiring better, young,

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>up and coming coaches for his staff because he's giving

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>them opportunities. From a self list perspective, it's a great

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for Royle Williams. And it is absolutely the type

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of thing. Now that I see it, I'm like, oh, yeah,

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I wish that Reid had done this with the enemy,

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and that you had other teams, other coaches who have

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>guys on like should Belichick do it with Gerard Mayo,

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>who's a potential coach in waiting. Are there other teams

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>that should consider doing this if the head coach is

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>fully entrenched. Absolutely so. I think that's a great job

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>by Mike Vrabel. I think it's smart. I think it's

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 2>helpful for his team. I think it's helpful for his staff.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I think this is one of those things that is again,

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>now that someone's done it, it seems like a no

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>brainer that more teams should do it. All right, We'll

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>see who you guys think deserved more discussion on the

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame. Plus we play a game of right

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 2>or Wrong and talk a little Women's World Cup. All

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>that's next, What's Right?

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblst who defined every expectation

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and William Goldenberg, evoking

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 4>the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and thrilling

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.240
<v Speaker 4>wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast including

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Jarrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and Bobby Kanavalli.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey guys, let me remind you. Welcome back in, But

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I gotta remind you my life moves fast between two shows,

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>two kids at home, which is soon gonna just be

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 2>one kid at home. I could use a pick me up.

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks ready to drink coffee delivers an uplifting boost that

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 2>helps you tune in to the moments that matter wherever

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you are. Bottled Frappuccino chilled coffee drink is inspired by

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks Cafe Favorites and comes in four delicious flavors. Mocha

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 2>that's the one I'm drinking today, Vanilla, caramel, and coffee.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I like to start my day with some type of coffee,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>especially when I'm recording a new episode of What's Right.

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 2>My go to drink is Starbucks Ready to Drink coffee

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>for that uplifting boost I need to conquer the day.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I love the range of Starbucks Ready to Drink coffee,

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 2>whether I want to grab a Starbucks frappuccino, chilled coffee

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>drink or the Nitro coldrew. So many good choices for

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 2>whatever I'm feeling that day. Starbucks Coffee Ready for right now.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Shot the full lineup online or in store wherever you

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 2>buy your groceries. All right, welcome back in episode one seventy.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Once again, it's brought to you by our friends at

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks Diora for our first edition of Excite Right, Go

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 2>right ahead.

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, at the top of the show, which was

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 3>honestly only like five minutes ago, we talked to Michael

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Parson's aiming for the Hall of Fame and asked who

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 3>you think will get in. Here's who, Here's who the

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Chat has as their Hall of Fame contenders. Yep, are

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 3>you in or out? A few mentioned DeAndre Hopkins on Titans.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, so I should have at least mentioned him.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 2>I DeAndre was looking like he was going to be

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer the last couple seasons in Arizona,

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that he's now a Titan, I think

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 2>is he's now in the not quite category, which is

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>amazing to me. And there are just at that position

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>right now, Andre Johnson, who Andre Johnson with terrible quarterbacks

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>plus a few years of Matt SHAWB who was fine

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 2>but not great, had fourteen thousand yards seventy touchdowns. DeAndre

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>has eleven thousand yards seventy one touchdowns. And Andre has

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 2>been waiting. So and Andre, to me passes the test

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>of were you, for an extended period of time the

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.959
<v Speaker 2>best or the second best at your position? Unquestionably? Yes.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 2>So I I think right now Deandres and not quite.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna tell you somebody else who I get I

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>believe will get in. But people treat him like he

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 2>is going to walk in first ballot, and I do

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 2>not think that is the case. But I do think

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 2>he'll get in. And is he even on a team

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 2>right now? No, right now, he's not. And that's Julio Jones.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Julio Jones. Now he also passes the test of was

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 2>he the best in the world for a period of time.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 2>But Julio, if he doesn't play again, if again, if

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>we use the Andre Johnson standard, Julio has thirteen thousand

0:37:55.200 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 2>yards and sixty three touchdowns. That's fewer than Andre in

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 2>both categories, and Andre is not in. So again, I

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>just think people underestimate how difficult it is. But all right,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 2>what's who's the next person people mentioned?

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Ortiz says Stefan Gilmore from the Cowboys.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Steven Gilmore is not a Hall of Famer. I know,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 2>we wanted Defensive Player of the Year award. Uh he's not.

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>He's just not a Hall of Famer and he's not

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a be a particularly difficult case. It's five

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 2>time Pro bowler, two time All Pro, very very good player.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not a Hall of Famer. Go ahead, Team.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Maine and others said Lane Johnson Philly.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I should have mentioned him as a possible I don't think.

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I know. Again, people throw around future Hall of Famer.

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Lane Johnson right now. He doesn't have the bona fides.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 2>He's just a three time All Pro, four time Pro bowler,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and he's thirty three playing right tackle. God dogg it,

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna be hard. Jason Kelsey is a lock. I

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 2>think Lane is probably a not quite maybe he maybe

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 2>he should be a possible. I certainly should have mentioned him.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 2>That was my mistake, not even mentioning him. But I

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 2>think he's probably just on the outside all right.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Next, Nasdab said Cooper Cup.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 2>This is not even a discussion. Cooper Cup had one

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame caliber season, one other really good season.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 2>He's I think he's already thirty. It's not even and

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to be rude to the Yeah, he

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 2>just turned thirty. He has no chance. There's literally no

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 2>chance for Cooper Cup. If he duplicated his entire career

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>up to this point in his thirties, he still probably

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get in. That would put him at twelve thousand yards,

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 2>ninety touchdowns, and maybe that would get him in, but

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>he's not gonna duplicate that in his thirties, so it

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter. He has one Pro Bowl, one All Pro,

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 2>one all time season, when he won the Triple Crown.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 2>It was a great year, but he is not even

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 2>close to a Hall of Famer.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Next okay, Francisco. Francisco said Honey Badger from the Saints.

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I I really like Tyron Matthew won a Super Bowl

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>with the Chiefs. He does have that all decade team

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 2>under his belt, but he's not a Hall of Famer.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Very very good player, not a Hall of famer, all right.

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Next okay, Austin Patrick Peterson and Mink.

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Minka Fitzpatrick Patrick Peterson was on So my list of

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 2>guys who just retired. Uh so, Minka, I would put

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 2>in I guess the good start category. He's he has

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 2>to do far more. But he's a three time All

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Pro already, so he hasn't played nearly long enough. Patrick Peterson,

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 2>I believe, is a Hall of Famer, but he's not

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 2>an active player anymore. Oh is Patrick Peterson an active

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 2>player now? Oh he's on the Steelers. Oh, I thought

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Peterson, so I would have included. So that's my mistake.

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a bad job by me. I thought Patrick Peterson retired.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought Patrick Peterson, Well, no, no, he's I mean

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 2>he's an older guy. I think Patrick. I don't think

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Peters sends a lock. I would put him in

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the likely category. But I also thought he had retired.

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 2>That's my mistake. Sorry Steelers fans. I didn't know he

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 2>was on the Steelers right now. I thought he was

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 2>after the Vikings he retired. The guys who just retired

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to me, JJ Watt obvious lock. Jason Peters pretty damn

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 2>close to a lock. He's gonna get in. Matt Ryan

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 2>is not a Hall of Famer. If you think he's

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer, you're just doing counting stuff. I

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 2>know we want a league MVP once. He is not

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer. And to me, and this one

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 2>might be controversial, but as far as guys that I

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they're just retired or just not on

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 2>a roster, Endomikan Sue is not a Hall of Famer.

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>He's very very close and very very good, but not

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 2>a Hall of Famer. So Antonio Brown is not a

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer. Antonio Brown would have been, and was

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 2>en root to it and didn't have much more to do,

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 2>but he Antonio Brown honestly was probably one good season,

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 2>one more good season away from being in. But because

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>of how it ended, and because of the log jam

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 2>at that position, and because he's just so universally considered

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 2>a bad guy, he's not gonna get any favors there.

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's in all right, do youorra? We'll

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>move on from the Hall of Fame stuff? Good job

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.240
<v Speaker 2>with excite right everybody? What's next?

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay? It's the end of an era for US women's soccer.

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 3>The team had their worst World Cup ever and are

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 3>losing a lot of their stars in the in a

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 3>year of injuries in young players. With the expectations unreasonable.

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I don't think the expectations were unreasonable. This team

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 2>just underachieved. They also, I mean after a miserable group stage.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, they they had a penalty kick to advance

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 2>to beat Sweden, and they were the number one team

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in the nation, the number two team or number one

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 2>team of the nation, number one team in the world,

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>number two team in the world. Germany had already been

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 2>knocked out, the number three team in the world. They

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 2>were playing in Sweden, and if Rapino hits that penalty kick,

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 2>and she wasn't the only one who missed, but she was.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, they had two one oper I don't know

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it was Rapino or the lady after. I don't. I

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 2>haven't all scattered in my head now. But they had

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a kick to win it. And by the way, they

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 2>missed three penalty kicks, none of them that they would

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 2>have missed if there wasn't a goalie. Two went over

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the goal and one went off the post. And it

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>is not executed. It's the coach didn't do it. The manager,

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, didn't do a great job this World Cup.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>But those missed penalties. It is this bad execution by

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the players. And so no, I don't I think the

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 2>US is still positioned well in women's soccer. I also

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.760
<v Speaker 2>think the rest of the world has caught up greatly.

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 2>None of this is breaking news. I also think the

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 2>biggest story, unfortunately, surrounding the Women's World Cup's exit was

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:31.720
<v Speaker 2>if you needed more more data that certain folks who

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>claim to be the most patriotic actually actively root against

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and dislike massive swaths of America and Americans, then just

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>look to the reaction of the Women's World Cup laws.

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Because there are folks out there that claim they are

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the most American and were actively rooting against the our country.

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 2>One of our country's most successful teams because they didn't

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 2>like these ladies' politics. And it would be shameful and

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 2>embarrassing if it wasn't so predictable. And some of these

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>absolute fools that are trying to either convince themselves or

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>convince their audience that the US women's national team, again

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 2>a women's professional sport, that that team used to have

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 2>different politics, that that team all of a sudden, you know,

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three, quote went woke when previously what

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you think they were against equal pay, You think they

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 2>were against women's rights, you think they were against gay rights,

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 2>You think that they were rolling every nation in the

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 2>world winning World Cups. This was a super conservative group

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 2>of professional female athletes. Give me a break if you

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 2>believe that, you're an idiot and you don't actually believe that,

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 2>you're just trying to sell snake oil to a deluded,

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 2>mind poisoned audience. And these so many of these folks

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 2>do not actually root for America. They root for Americans

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 2>who either agree with their politics or Americans who disagree

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 2>with their politics but won't say it. And because of that,

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 2>there was a bit of a celebration when these women

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 2>laws and again I don't want to spend any more

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 2>time on it because it's just so predictable, and there

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 2>are just again, big, big portions of this country that

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 2>are there. They're running out of sports that they can enjoy.

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I suppose because athletes have always and will always skew

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 2>left of the Median American political stance. Because athletes skew

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 2>for certainly, female athletes are left of the Median American,

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 2>minorities are left of the Median American and football and

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 2>basketball have a disproportionate amount of minorities. You also, by

0:48:55.760 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 2>the way, in women's soccer, like the if you just

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 2>get forget if they're soccer players or not, if you

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:09.280
<v Speaker 2>get a group of college educated women and then compare

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 2>their politics to again, the Median American, they're gonna be

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 2>left of that group. And some folks are so damn

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 2>sensitive and dare I say, snowflakes, They can't handle it.

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 2>They can't handle differing opinions, they can't handle people advocating

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 2>for full and equal rights of groups they don't think

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 2>deserve full and equal rights or full in equal pay,

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and they'll freak out. And some people just turn this

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>podcast or YouTube show off and are trying to google

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>my email address to send me an angry email, and

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I just couldn't. It would be impossible for me to

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 2>care less about that. And so it's just remarkable to

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 2>me how some folks simultaneously believe they have a monopoly

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 2>on patriotism while also believing that there are entire cities

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in this country, if not a couple states, that are

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 2>not quote real America, and that there are millions of

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Americans that are not quote real Americans, and that even

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 2>when they are literally wearing the flag across their chest

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 2>representing the United States on the international stage, they root

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 2>against them because they dislike who they vote for and

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:34.799
<v Speaker 2>the policies they advocate for. It's just so pathetic. All right,

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>let's play a game.

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead door, So we're gonna play a game of

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 3>right or wrong. Jimmy G has thrown seven interceptions in

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 3>two practices, but Josh McDaniel says he has no concerns

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 3>right or wrong. Nick has some concerns about Jimmy G.

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I always have some concerns about Jimmy G. But

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the Raiders depth chart at quarterback,

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 2>it's not exactly one that's gonna give Jimmy G a

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of competition. It's Aidan O'Connell and Brian Hoyer, so

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be their quarterback. Pardon me the here is

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 2>my only concern for Jimmy G. If he's bad enough

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 2>that the Raiders end up getting Caleb Williams, that it

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 2>will be unfathomable for me if I have to deal

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 2>with Caleb Williams in the AFC West. It's why I

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 2>need the Cardinals to go oh to seventeen and just

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 2>lock that thing in. But yeah, the Raiders are not

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be very good and Jimmy G's not gonna be

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 2>very good, so yeah, right, I have some concerns about him,

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 2>all right, next.

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sorry. The Chiefs posted a video on Twitter which

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.439
<v Speaker 3>may have shown the world their game plan this year.

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes is throwing passes behind his back. Now, right

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 3>or wrong, Mahomes will throw behind the back pass this year.

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean it's I mean he's going to do it.

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 2>He came on first things first and said he was

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna do it. This was in eleven on eleven and

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 2>as all he has to do is do it one time,

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and it greatly helps the Chiefs because when you are

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>game planning for the best offense in the league. Now,

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, and we can run the video again,

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.359
<v Speaker 2>I think we're gonna do it. Right now, all of

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, you now have to game plan that even

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 2>if all the receivers are set out to the right

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and Mahomes is looking to the right, he could do

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that and you all of a sudden have a de

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>facto screen pass going to the left. So yeah, I

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna do it. He told me on the

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 2>show that he does it all the time in practice,

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 2>but he's been afraid to do it. We asked him

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to do it in the super Bowl. He said he

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't gonna do it in the super Bowl. He didn't

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 2>do it in the Super Bowl. But I think he's

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna do it in the regular season.

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, Okay, Russell Wilson will play the first

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 3>game of the preseason. Right or wrong? Russ is at

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:56.879
<v Speaker 3>an all time low.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, he might be at an all time low, but

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say wrong in the context of the question.

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this smart, folks. You know what team plays

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 2>their starters throughout the preseason and has padded practices and

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 2>goes hard at training camp, Andy Reid and the Kansasity Chiefs.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you guys should model yourselves after that rather than

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:18.439
<v Speaker 2>everyone trying to do what Sean McVay did that one year,

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 2>which is plays starters, zero snaps the entire preseason. That is,

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you got to get these guys ready to play. So

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I think ross playing in the preseason is not an insult.

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it's smart, all right.

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Next, Messi now has seven goals in four games since

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 3>coming to the MLS. Right or wrong, Messi's MESSI anytime

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 3>goal will be in many Nick parlays wrong.

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not betting MLS Soccer. Maybe my guess is the

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 2>fact that the producers, the squarest group of betters I've

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 2>ever met, are already encouraging. This makes me think that,

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 2>even without looking at it, that the juice is probably way,

0:53:56.200 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 2>way too high. I'm not betting MLS Soccer. I'm keeping

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the powder dry for football season and our glorious gambling

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:05.760
<v Speaker 2>shows that are coming. Next.

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the Angels decided not to trade show show. Hey,

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:15.640
<v Speaker 3>oh Tani, at the deadline, they lost. They've lost every

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.240
<v Speaker 3>game since. Right or wrong, the Angels are a crime

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 3>against him.

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 2>An Well, yeah, I mean, this is really bad, and I,

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was pounding the drum, don't trade show, Hey,

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:28.839
<v Speaker 2>you should be buyers, not sellers. Go try to make

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 2>a run. They did exactly that, and now they're just

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 2>totally screwed. So I, you know, I still think it

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 2>was the right thing if you have a guy who

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 2>some people are saying could be the greatest player in

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the history of the sport, to not just give up

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:44.879
<v Speaker 2>on him and give up on the season. But it's

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously been a bad look for them to just go

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 2>winless since the deadline.

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, Okay, the landscape of college football has

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:57.840
<v Speaker 3>changed forever. A century of tradition has wiped out in

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 3>a day with the PAC sixteen. Change is continuing, right

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 3>or wrong, you care.

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 2>You're wrong, I don't care. I just don't care. I

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 2>know that I The most miserable time of my professional

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:17.760
<v Speaker 2>career was when I was doing radio in Kansas City.

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I love it. By the way, that was not the

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 2>most miserable time my professional career, but this very specific

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 2>instance of it when the initial conference realignment stuff started

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 2>and we had to talk about Dan Beebe and the

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:36.439
<v Speaker 2>lou Perkins, and it was ku gonna get left down

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and where Mu's going. I didn't care then when I

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 2>covered college sports. I don't care now. I just flat

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I cannot it is. I am wanting to change the

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 2>channel on my own podcast just having this be in

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the show. I do not care.

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Next all right, goodness. Season two of HBO's Winning Time

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 3>debuted this weekend, although with the omission of a notable superstar,

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Demanse was nowhere to be found. Right wrong Demande should

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 3>appear in season three of Winning Time.

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 2>We thought he should appear in season two, but he

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't make the cut. He's now in LA I feel

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 2>like he unfortunately missed his opportunity. I also think he

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 2>thought he was going to be cast as Byron Scott

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 2>when we thought he should be cast as Byron Scott,

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't. It seemed to really disappoint him. I

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 2>think he had put a few eggs in that basket.

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:31.399
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see him on there. I don't think

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna happen. Also, I don't want. I want. It

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 2>is important to me that even if Demanse were to

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 2>like get that opportunity, I would not want him to

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 2>do it. He probably would do it, but it's the

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 2>same way I feel about like, if Deanna were to

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 2>get an opportunity, I want the first child to have

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 2>like a real screen opportunity to be you, and so

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I would be really upset if the Well yeah, but

0:56:57.120 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like I just I don't want that's your thing.

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:03.879
<v Speaker 2>And Deanna now also wants it to be her thing,

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 2>but she's so much younger than you, and so I

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.799
<v Speaker 2>would I don't know, but it doesn't matter. He didn't

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 2>get cast. He didn't even get a callback, even though

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he would have done a great job with it.

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, last one, Okay, it seems like Mark Zuckerbern

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 3>may actually fight Elon Musk. Elon, who's dealing with a

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 3>neck issue, says that if I will be streamed on

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the artist formerly known as Twitter, but zuck says that

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the Tesla Nerd hasn't confirmed anything yet. Right or wrong,

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Musk is duckings up.

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's absolutely right that he's ducking him. Listen,

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Musk is a lot bigger than Zuckerberg. But Zuckerberg literally

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 2>trains for mixed martial arts. He has like an octagon

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 2>in his house. He has professional trainers, and if one

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 2>guy trains and the other guy doesn't. The size part

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even really matter. I think Zuckerberg would be a

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 2>massive favorite in that fight, and I don't think Musk

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 2>wants anything to do with it. I think, like a

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of things, Musk is a lot of talking, a

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of action. All Right, I would like to answer

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 2>your guys questions next. Also, producers, if there is a

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 2>commoner question that took major issue with some of my

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 2>US Women's National team commentary, If they're there, I can

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 2>address those for a couple of minutes as well. If

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not there, don't worry about that. We'll do all

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 2>that next. What's right?

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, Episode one seventy. Now we're gonna answer your

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 3>read your fan question.

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let start with the number the Darrell Clawton. We'll

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 2>do the US Women's National team ones at the end.

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Darrell Claughton says, first time watching the show live,

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say that shirt is fire. Where

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 3>is it from?

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Well, door got it for me? So where is

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 2>it from? From?

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 3>The Scotch and soda in Spain?

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh so? Yeah? Do Youora got this for me when

0:58:48.960 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 2>she was on her trip. It was very nice of her,

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:52.480
<v Speaker 2>but I had a lot of Scotch and soda stuff.

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 2>They should be our newest podcast sponsor, by the way,

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 2>shout out Scotch and Soda and Ted b Where like

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I wear Scotch and soda like almost every podcast, and

0:59:04.200 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Ted Baker stuff. I and Hugo Balls stuff I wear

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 2>almost every TV show.

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll take some Scotch and soda jeans. I'll put that

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 3>out there.

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh will you?

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll let them know. Oh, right here, I'll take

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.640
<v Speaker 3>some jeans. Heard it here first? Okay?

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 2>All right? Next?

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Should I go to five or go to the beginning?

0:59:22.200 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 2>No? No, no, go to Crustacean Yeah.

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Crustaceanation said, I've been seeing some of your poker games

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 3>on TikTok recently, and I was wondering, what's your favorite

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 3>hand to play besides a pocket pair?

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean I think everybody probably, I think the

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 2>most fun hands the player probably suited connectors. I think

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 2>that's for everybody. And I, uh, the yeah, listen, I'm

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:47.200
<v Speaker 2>not really on TikTok, but a lot of a lot

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of my poker stuft from a couple of years ago

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 2>seems to have like resurfaced on TikTok and some of

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 2>yours classmates Center some of them and the But I

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 2>haven't played on TV in a couple of years, and

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I might be as I mentioned earlier, I might be

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 2>playing here at the end of the month that you

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 2>could stream on the Poker Go YouTube channel. I just

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 2>got to work out the details of it, all right.

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Next okay, Johnston asked where do you think is the

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>best landing spot for Caleb Williams and what is the

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>most likely landing spot?

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>All right? The most likely landing spot, without question is

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Arizona because they're gonna be terrible. They have their own pick,

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and they have Houston's first round pick, so they're the

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>most likely landing spot. The best landing spot I think.

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the best landing spot would be the Rams.

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>So you have Sean McVeigh and you'd be in LA,

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>you'd be in the NFC. I think for all those,

1:00:53.760 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams would be the best. But I

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>think Arizona is the most likely of the landing spots.

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Next okay, Lewis Luis l asked, Nick, what do you think?

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>What do you think the chances are that Austin Reeves

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>is the Lakers number one player this coming season. He

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>seems to be cooking it up for the Team USA

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 3>so far.

1:01:19.000 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>If Austin Reeves is their best player, then it's a

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>total unmitigated disaster. And I like Austin a lot, but

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>it means either Lebron fell off a cliff or got injured,

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and it means Anthony Davis definitely got injured. There is

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>no scenario where Lebron and Anthony Davis are healthy and

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Austin Reeves is their best player. There's just none. So

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>that's why it would be a disaster.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Austin He's gonna come get you.

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>No. I like listen, I like Austin Reeves, but he

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>would tell you that he is no change. If he's

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>better than Lebron and Lebron's healthy, it means Lebron that

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, age came up and grabbed him.

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And there's no scenario where he's better than a healthy

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Davis. It just doesn't exist. Now. Could Austin Reeves,

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, be a fringe All Star maybe, and that

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>would be a great development for the Lakers, but it

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>being their best players, no chance, all right.

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Next one, Michael asked, are you higher on the Cowboy?

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Why are you hiring?

1:02:13.800 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Why are you higher on the Cowboys than the Niners.

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 3>This year.

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:24.439
<v Speaker 2>I just think the Niners. I think them putting all

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>this faith in brock Purty based on the winning record

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, even though the play was not exemplary and

1:02:33.760 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>coming off elbow surgery is risky, and I think that

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 2>last year, I loved the roster, I really liked them,

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think they missed their opportunity. And I just

1:02:45.760 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the people are way too down on the Cowboys.

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys went twelve and five and the losses were their

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>first game of the year against the Eagles with their

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>backup quarterback overtime Aaron Rodgers overtime to the Prince and

1:03:02.760 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>week a meaningless Week eighteen game. They rolled the Bucks

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in the first round of the playoffs. They then lost

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to a Niners team that at that point in time

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>had won twelve consecutive games by an average of like

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>seventeen points. And I think people are two down on

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys and a little too high on the Niners.

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>All right now, all take over here On the soccer stuff,

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Keaton Holbrook says the US women's national team got complacent,

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>moved the goalpost with expectations, celebrating getting out of the

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>group stage, the team was arrogant, have soul searching due

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>after this World Cup listen. I think that's a fair critique.

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't hate the celebrating after getting out of the

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>group stage. I know a lot of people did, but

1:03:43.360 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they didn't seem to have the sense of urgency the

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>moment demanded, and obviously their attacking play was brutal. That

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:56.440
<v Speaker 2>to me is a totally fair criticism. How much is

1:03:56.480 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>on the manager, how much is on that they were

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>relying on older players and not really embracing the next generation.

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure because I'm not gonna pretend like I

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>am following the US women's national team a year round,

1:04:09.080 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, outside of the World Cup cycles. But yeah,

1:04:12.840 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that to me's a very fair criticism. Suavamente said, Uh,

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the one girl is kind of arrogant, though I don't

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>like that in any of my athletes. Again, that's a

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>fair critique as long as you apply it across the board.

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I've never understood the concept of people preferring false humility

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to earnest, honest arrogance, but a lot of people do.

1:04:42.680 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people would prefer their pro athletes or

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 2>celebrities be fake and pretend to be humble when we

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>know they're not really uh and they and so the

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that to me is fair, even if it's not how

1:05:04.680 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel. I'd prefer honest arrogance over false humility every

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>day of the week. But it is what it is like.

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>That to me is not a criticism specific of the

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>women's national team. TJ says Nick trying to make everyone

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 2>believe he speaks the gospel and political issues is so embarrassing. Listen,

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I speak the gospel on a lot

1:05:31.400 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of things that are actual politics. You want to have

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a discussion. It wouldn't be good for the pod, but

1:05:38.200 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you want to have a discussion about tax rates, about

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the most efficient way to actually deal with poverty in America,

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe at being outside of government programs. You want to

1:05:54.560 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about whether you know America does or does not

1:05:59.280 --> 1:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>spend too much on defense spending. You want to talk

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not there should be upper bound age

1:06:08.880 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>limits like there are lower bound age limits on politicians.

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I will not only will I have those discussions with

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you if we were to be able to have them,

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I will have them with you with an open mind

1:06:21.000 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>because there are a lot of things I'm like, oh,

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you know more about than me, or I had not

1:06:26.400 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 2>considered I am not, you know, locked in on a

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>position where I speak like I speak the Gospel are

1:06:36.120 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>not on political issues where I speak like I'm speaking

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the Gospel are on equal rights issues, human rights issues,

1:06:47.640 --> 1:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>and those issues go ahead, have been hijacked and turned

1:06:55.880 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>into political issues. I do not find talking about race

1:07:01.880 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>to be political, and I would think, and I've made

1:07:08.520 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 2>this point before and I will make it again, it

1:07:11.120 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly insulting to conservative Americans to assert that speaking

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>on race in a is it speaking on a racial

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>justice or social justice slant. It is incredibly insulting to say, oh,

1:07:34.920 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>that's liberal, because the implication there, obviously then is the

1:07:40.720 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>opposite side of the issue is the conservative position. And

1:07:44.720 --> 1:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>who would want to be anti equal rights or anti justice?

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>But such is the world in which we live, where

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>everything is political, and there are certain things that I

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 2>simply know in the minerals go back.

1:08:10.480 --> 1:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>There's also some things that just simply aren't really up

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.960
<v Speaker 3>for debate, shouldn't be up for debate.

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 2>There is a right and a wrong there is that's.

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:24.479
<v Speaker 3>When people make it political, when they try to find

1:08:24.520 --> 1:08:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a way to make it to.

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Try to muddy the waters on things, and I am

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I am actually more strident than I am, actually muting

1:08:37.120 --> 1:08:40.559
<v Speaker 2>my certainty a bit when I discuss certain things on

1:08:40.600 --> 1:08:51.799
<v Speaker 2>the show. And I deeply believe that the most vocal

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>critics of our US women's soccer team, the vast majority

1:08:57.680 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 2>of them, are bad faith acts, are simply trying to

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>find another another issue to try to further divide us

1:09:14.880 --> 1:09:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for their own personal financial game. I believe that, and

1:09:22.120 --> 1:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>it is It's just all culture war all the time,

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and it makes us take our eye off the ball

1:09:33.360 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>on solving bigger ticket issues and bigger problems and really

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>having the ability to move forward. And I got no

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I have no quarter for it. And so when it

1:09:48.080 --> 1:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>bleeds into my world, which is the sports world, it's

1:09:53.200 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>just I can't stand it. And so do I sound

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>self righteous and self assured and like I'm speaking the gospel? Yeah,

1:10:07.320 --> 1:10:12.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's just because I have the utter certainty that

1:10:13.040 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>on these things, I'm gonna fall on the right side

1:10:17.120 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of history. And that is exactly as arrogant as it sounds.

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But luckily I'm right. Talk to you on Thursday