WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Analyzing the Miracle

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a Break? Absolutely?

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, A bar Garcia, and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, September twenty first, twenty twenty, Season sixteen,

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>episode number twenty seven. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We're live in this WBC Mortgage Studios at the start

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>at Dave and Amber joining us from their homes, and

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we got about forty five minutes to break down what

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw yesterday. That was That was one of those

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>games that I love being a part of because it's

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. There's so many emotions that you

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>feel as the game's going on. There's so many moments

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that you think, oh, this is going one way and

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>then it flips. And then the great part about it

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is at the end of the day, the team that

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of rooting for actually ends up winning. So

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there's really nothing I have to complain about in that game.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna break down everything. There was so much

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to break down that game. Cowboys win forty to thirty nine.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It was actually a historic game. Wait wait, did you

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>say there's really nothing you have to complain about in

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that game? Yes, but at the end of the day,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean they won. At the end of the day,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they won. So yeah, there were gonna be some complaints

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I have and Amber, you know, because during the game

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I was losing my mind at certain parts. But yeah,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>when you get a win then it kind of changes,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It kind of changes everything. But it was a historic

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>day for the Cowboys. Here's it's interesting thing. I saw

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ESPN Stats put this out last night. Entering Week two

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL season, teams that were teams were four

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty to nothing when they scored thirty nine

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>points and had zero turnovers since nineteen thirty three, Like,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the NFL, there's never been a

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>team that scored thirty nine points, didn't have a turnover

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and ended up losing the game. And yesterday the Cowboys

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>showed the Falcons how to get to that one that

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>lone one of those four hundred and forty one game.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's go around the table. I want everybody to

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>tell me what do you think is the biggest story

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out of this game. We're gonna start first with you, Amber.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest story currently, I would say, is

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the questioning behind the coaching staff and the play calling

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and some of the decision making, not just from this

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>specific game, but also looking back at Week one. I

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's still some questionable moments there as far as

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the decisions that we're made. So I would

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have to say the biggest conversation I've been seeing going around,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just the question mark on whether or not McCarthy

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and his group of coaching have been making the right

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 1>decisions at the right time. Nick, I think it's it's

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott. I mean, it's just it's playing the way

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he did and and you know, I've been wanted to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of question him being a clutch player, and he's

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>still got more of that to do, because you know,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he this was one game, but he's you know, he's

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>got a good body of work leading up to this.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>The last couple of years, he hasn't been and the

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 1>team hasn't been as clutch, but they were on Sunday.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And it starts with him he's a linebacker that plays quarterback.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's he's tough as nails, and he showed it in

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this game how resilient he was, and um, you know

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it was it was unbelievable, you know, just just the

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>way he kind of led the team back like that,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all of them did, I mean, and it was fortunate.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>They were fortunate to win. But I thought, you know,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Dak been I've been asking for and he showed it.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>When you show his stat line, he was thirty four

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>forty seven seventy two percentage completion and four and fifty yards,

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one passing touchdown, three rushing touchdowns, five rusgertes for eighteen yards.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>First time in the history of the NFL anyone's done that. Absolutely,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns and four hundred passing yards and then one fumble.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Had a phenomenal day statistically, Dave, what's the storyline of

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this game for you? I'm so disappointed by the energy

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>happening right now. And if we were all in the

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>same room together, I would have cut y'all all off

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. But it's hard to do over zoom.

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But like, are you actually kidding me? I mean, Nick's

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent right, The story of the day is

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott. Like whether it's four because he wears four,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>four because he scored four touchdowns, four because he threw

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for four hundred and fifty yards. He put the entire

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>franchise on his back in a hopeless situation, played like

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>an absolute badass mofo. I want to curse, but I won't.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's so big because I mean, Dak's

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>done stuff like that his entire career. It didn't always

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>look that flashy, but even going back to his rookie year,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's done stuff like that. It didn't happen in twenty nineteen,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. It's the story of why they didn't get

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs is because they came up short in

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>these types of games. Obviously games not they weren't this crazy,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>but they were on the short end of the stick.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Every time they wound up in a one score game.

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>They flip the script against every odd, imaginable yesterday, and

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott was at the center of it all. And

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the most confident guys I've ever been around,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>football player or otherwise. But I just have to imagine

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that he's feeling good today knowing like, yeah, I still

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>can do this. I did this six times in twenty eighteen,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and here I am again pulling it out of the fire.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>My other big impression is, like, listen, a whole bunch

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff went wrong. There's a whole bunch of stuff

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we can criticize, and we'll get to it, I'm sure.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>But like, that's why you're a football fan, Like that's

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>why you should love this sport is for stupid crap

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like that. And if you can't just laugh at the

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>absurdity and just say wow, I'm I'm thrilled that the

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>team I care about got to be part of a

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>win like that, Like that's that's why you do it well.

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And we can critique it because that's our jobs. But

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>just take a deep breath and have a nice laugh

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>because that was incredible. Yeah, it's interesting day because you

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>wake up in mornings like this the day after games

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, and it's so fun listening to people around

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the nation responding it. And I'm not talking about football.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about people around the nation and other sports,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>other athletes, other celebrities that were watching the game, and

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just funny just to listen to all the different

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody talking about this game and at the

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>end of it, how was get to win? Like that's

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the fun of games like this is that everybody's got

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>an opinion. Everybody saw it, and it was just really, really,

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>really fun to be able to be a part of it.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>If the Cowboys had played that game in a national

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>window like they usually do instead of at noon during

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ten other games, we'd be talking about it as one

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of the best regular season games of the last ten years,

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>which it still was, but it didn't have that. You know,

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't on its own. If it had been on

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>its own in a primetime window, it would be it

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would be on another level than it already is before

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we get to the moments that matter. I do want

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to stick with that topic of Dak Prescott. Nick, you

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>brought it up and talked about how how clutch you

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>thought he was in that game. I saw a couple

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of different things on social media where people were kind

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, he didn't play that great for most

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the game. I think there is a perception out

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>there that he didn't play great throughout the game. It

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was just clutch in the end. I take exception to that.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think of all the players on the Cowboys team.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he was one of the most consistent players

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the game outside of the fumble. I don't know

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that I had a problem with anything else. He'd be

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at the rest of the day. What did you think? Yeah,

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I thought he you know, yeah, he fumbled

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>early on, But that was the story of everybody who

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>messed up early in the game. I mean they redeemed themselves.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody, but I'm just saying, you know, fumbled by

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>by Dak, fumbled by Zeke, fumbled by Schultz, goodwe d

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball. You know, Fossil, you know, I mean, Fossil

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>redeemed himself. And it maybe it wasn't even what he did,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>his decision yesterday, but his decision a couple of weeks

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>ago or months ago to practice that kick. So a

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of them redeemed themselves. But I thought, Dak, I thought,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who comes from the tent to a quarterback sneak?

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Who does that? I mean it's like, is your head okay,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a concussion? No, okay, well then go lead

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with your head and ram it into there to twenty

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>players and see if you can score touchdown. Go okay,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and He's like, Okay, what he does? Yeah, what do

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys think? You guys agree that, I mean pretty

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much do out the game Dak I thought was great.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>What did you guys think, David Amber The first thing

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I did, the first thing, sorry, Angie, The first thing

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I did this morning was watch you know, the NFL

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>put up a four minute cut up of all of

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Dak's big plays. It was four freaking minutes long. It

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was four minutes long, a cut up of his of

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his completions and his his rushing touchdowns. Yeah, I mean

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he fumbled. He was trying to do too much. I

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thought the entire team was pressing in the first quarter

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and it only made it worse. Whether I mean anything

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>from Tony Pollard making inexplicable decisions to take kicks out

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone to you know, guys fumbling because

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking ahead of time and they so. Yeah, Dak

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>does that. He's trying to do too much. He's trying

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to turn a busted play into a game. Fumbles and

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>from there on out, honestly, what did he do wrong?

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>He had one questionable throw in the third quarter that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>could have been picked. He was looking for Amari Cooper

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline and threw into double coverage. Other than that,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he made a bad decision the

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. I mean, I thought he was

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>fantastic from about the midway point of the first quarter

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>through the end of the game. I think it's it's

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the three best games he's played in his career.

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, as indicated by that seventy

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent completion rate, that is a huge number. I think,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Amber, what are your thoughts. I was gonna

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm the first one to make to start

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the argument of whether how great Dak is and the

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that he, to me, has always needed great players

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>around him in order for him to be successful. It

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the case in this game, at least that's not

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>how I took it. The way he played, I felt

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that he was regardless of the mistakes. Let's just forget

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. It wasn't a situation where I felt that

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he was forcing the ball to a specific player. It

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a situation where he was needed to rely on

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these great players specifically. And again we know cite Lamb,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup. They made great catches and great plays at

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>key moments, but at the same time, taking into account

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he didn't have the starting two tackles,

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he was able to play the game. And there wasn't

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a single instance where I was like, damn, Dak, what

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? He was able to be a leader

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he did. We know how much confidence he has in

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>himself and the way that he is not able to

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get startled by the situation, whether it's better or no.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We saw him get out of the feel hurt. He

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>had something I don't remember what it was, but he

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was getting checked by the medical staff, and that he

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>got back riding to the game, made a play. So

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he was just so consistent throughout the game as far

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>as the kind of leader that you need someone to

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be in such a crazy game like that. So to me,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he was absolutely amazing. What we're gonna do is we

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>have these moments that matter. We started the segment last week,

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do it, continue it this week, and we're

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>going to go through some of the big moments of

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the game. Obviously, there were a lot of questionable At

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>least I'll say this, there were a lot of situations

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>in that game where you questioned what the coaches were

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking and what players were thinking. So we're gonna go through.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I have like four or five of those

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna go through real quick. And actually, what

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do is, let's go ahead and take a

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>quick early break. We got a couple of minutes before

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>our normal break. We're gonna go and tecond early break.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna come back. We're gonna jump into those moments

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that matter, and we're gonna start with that first fake

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>punt and talk about that and the circumstances around it.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come right back. This is

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. We're back in the tasty

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Pepper and cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor bab

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>cream Soda. Is he a new Combonet's music to my ears? Okay,

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doctor time any glass? Music to my ears and mouth?

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>New Doctor pepper and cream Soda. Dela's just do bay.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to use what the pros use. How about

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you can get the Jack Black Starter a

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites for just ten

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The Starter includes four Jack Clack

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized and tense therapy lip.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys. The Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and Team pride too, You can

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own stetson. You can look just like

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>dot Dallas, Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as we travel places, often we find the

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>places we want to travel aren't really places at all.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and new nephews.

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why at American Airlines we've been using enhanced cleaning

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>measures so you can feel confident and every step until

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you get to them. So as always, our people can't

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>wait to take you to yours American Airlines. You are

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>why we fly back to the break. Cowboy fans, have

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you picked up new gear for the twenty twenty season?

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>All news styles are arriving now. Visit your Dallas Cowboys

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Pro shop or shop dot com Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>for the newest arrivals. Yeah, if you get a chance

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to go check out that sixtieth anniversary hat collection. Pretty

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>good stuff if you like those nineties hats, they got

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>some of those and they're they're pretty sweet. And actually

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorites is that they got the old

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the old d hat that I think this was around

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>day Andrew sign. It has like the trucker style in

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the back, you know, mesh. Yeah it's called mesh, but yeah,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they call them truck or style hats. But anyway, yeah,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that hat I got. I got one of those,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So it makes you go check that out on cowaspproch

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for Derek. Yeah, is that not what it's for? It is? Okay, good,

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, So we're gonna get into the stop. Dave

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into the moments that mattered here, and

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I got four of them for you, guys. I'm gonna

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>walk you through these, and I want you guys to

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tell me what you think the significance was of these

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>plays and some of the decision making that was made

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in them. Let's start first with first quarters five to

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven left in the first quarter. Atlanta's up fourteen nothing.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's fourth and fourth of Dallas twenty nine, so they're

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>backed up in their own territory and Dallas runs a

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>fake punt where Chris Jones attempts to pass to CJ. Goodwin,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>passes low, Goodwin can't make the catch. Do you think

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a good decision there in your own backed

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>up that far in your own territory, down fourteen nothing

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to go for a fake punt. Let's

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>start first with you, Dave. This is a really classic

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>case of like your opinion being dictated by the result.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And I felt it at the time. I was like, man,

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>awfully early to be this desperate, like you have that

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>little faith in your defense that you think you got

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to do this right here on this yard line to

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>keep this thing from getting out of control, like, maybe

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>put a little faith in your defense. They've already forced

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a punt or two. Having said that, if Chris Jones

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>throws a better pass or c. J. Goodwin doesn't slip

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>looking back for it, it's amazing, and we're talking about

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it like it's amazing. You know, the Chris Jones fake

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>four years ago where he ran for forty yards against

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia comes to mind. I don't remember the specific circumstances,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was an aggressive call and everybody loved it

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>because it worked like Gangbusters, So I will you know,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it felt desperate at the time, but I'll just say

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the thought that they're going that they are

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be this aggressive. We know if John Fossil

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>loves to fake punts and do stuff like that, I'm

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in favor of it as a trend, even if I

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't love it at the time. Camber, I liked it.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I liked the call. I thought I'd whipping asking for

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>creativity and for them to be, you know, risky in

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>certain scenarios, and that's exactly what they gave was. But

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to execution. I don't I don't know

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>how often they've been practicing this during their practices. Is

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this something that the coaching staff was feeling comfortable with

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>their players making or being able to make that kind

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of play. I don't know, but it just comes down

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to the player. I thought the call was great, but

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they were lacking any execution. Nickum, Yeah, I actually got

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a got some win that this might happen. And I

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation with someone about that. They he'll throw

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the ball to CJ. Godwin or Cedric Wilson, and I

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>my question was why CJ. Goodwin? Why why don't you

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>throw it to a receiver. It's like, well, whoever's going

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to be open. But you know, today's point that was

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that was I don't know if it was desperate because

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they were. That was like on Friday, They're like, they're

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this at some point and then they're gonna

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>find the time where the look is right. So the

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>look was right, and and CJ. Goodwin's going to be

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more open because he's really fast and he's one of

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the best special teams players on the team, if not

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the best, and so when he's running, I mean, they

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>know that if he stops, he's gonna be wide open.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The pass was lower than it needed to be and

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he fell and he didn't look like a receiver. But

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I regret and I was gonna mention that

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. I was like, watch watch for this

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>because it could it could happen, because I didn't think

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna do two fake punts. But I mean, I

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just think it was a look they were looking for.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Chris Jones got to throw the ball

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>better than that. Yeah. Actually I loved this call, and

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>during the game, I actually love the call because you're

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>already down fourteen. Oh you kind of want to get

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>something going and established some momentum and try to flip

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the game a little bit. And to me, the call

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>was great. I mean, they obviously whatever they saw and

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever they were working on, it presented itself there. They

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just didn't execute it, and that you put on the players.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't put that on the coaches. I think it

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>was a good decision. I think the timing was good.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I just think in that situation, the players got execute

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't do it very well. And that's where

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you run into the issue of, well, the guy is

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a special teams player and a backup secondary player, like

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood that he's going to run a great route

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and catch it. Yeah, you're kind of playing with it

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a little playing with fire a little bit there. But

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, I think the call

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>was right, and I think I didn't have a problem

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with him doing it. Let's move on to the next

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>moment that matter mattered. It was seven or four left

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter. Atlanta's up twenty one seventeen, I'm sorry,

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine seventeen. Third and two at the Dallas forty one.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Gage gets a direct snap. He throws a deep past

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones, and Jones drops it. Now, of course, that's

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>not what you would expect to see from Julio Jones

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>already in Dallas territory. Atlanta lines up to go for

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the fourth down conversion, only to get a penalty for

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>having too many men on the field and that forced

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>them to punt it. My question for you guys, if

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta scores on Jones drop, probably don't lose the game.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You guys agree or disagree with that call. Agree. I

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just did a video for BOS. Turning to the going

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the game, that was the in my opinion, the

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest play of the game. You guys agree that the

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>whole sequence of that, and then not because they're not

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna get stopped on fourth and two. That's why they

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>did it on third and two, because they're not going

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop you on fourth and two. Then stopped you

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>all game until they get a penalty. But it was

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the stop the Cowboys needed. And then they flip it

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Mary gets that long catch which they needed

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a big, quick touchdown to go the other way. So

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that whole sequence is, to me, the difference of the game.

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>How shocked were you, guys? No, I just I have

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to laugh because you know, there's there's a fatalist type

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of Cowboy fan, and given how long the Cowboys have

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>been waiting to win another Super Bowl, there's a lot

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. And people are always like, we never get

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>those breaks, that stuff never happens to us. It's always

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>us doing the dumb stuff. And I mean that that

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>is a break that is that was such a ridiculous

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>break that the best, the best receiver in football drops

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an open touchdown pass and then you make a bow

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and had a decision like that that robs you out

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of getting points out or being able to go for

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>it on fourth down. Yeah, if either one of those

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>players goes in different way. We're talking about a loss,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt in my mind, but you know where

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that happens. I was talking to a coach after the game,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and he was saying high school coach, not one of

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the coaches, but he was saying that that happens when

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you do personnel like that. When your quarterback goes over

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>here and you've got like gauge throwing it, it messes

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>up your whole personnel. So then they get in there

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and then he thinks he's staying on the field and

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, that kind of led to the

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth down, which I didn't even I don't think about

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. But but yeah, I mean, so

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just all small little things, a five yard penalty,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but that that wiped them, you know, off the field,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and then that was the break the Cowboys needed. But yeah,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones dropping that pass like that, Like, how shocked

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>are you guys that the Cowboys were able to hold

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones to only two catches. You only had four targets,

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but two catches for twenty four yards? Do you think

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that was more function of the defense, which we're gonna

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about the defense a little bit later. But do

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that was more of the defense or do

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you think Julio just had a rough day, Dave. Wasn't

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he dealing with an injury he was? Yeah. I will

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>say this though, the whole thing a little bit. Yeah,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this, I have watched I have

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>watched Julio Jones play a lot of football because he's

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>only been on my fantasy team a lot of years.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Even when he's hurt, that what we saw yesterday is

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not typical Julio Jones. He still makes plays even when

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>he's hurt. The guy's a machine, so right that he

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>should have caught that one, right, I mean, didn't he

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just maybe Trayvon wasn't ready. Yeah. I really like him though,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Trayvon Dix, if he can just actually catch the ball,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be he's gonna drop. No, no, no, no.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say it was a drop. What I said

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was he makes some extraordinary plays, like him getting in

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>position to even be able to knock that ball down.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That takes extraordinary talent, outing his ability. If he can

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>catch it, now he turns into that next level player

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've been looking for. The cornerback position for a while, right,

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I bet you. I bet if it was the other

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>way around, they might have called interference on it. If

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it was the defensive guy, you know, if he because

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he can't close someone's hands like that, can't you get

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. On offense, it doesn't work. Hey, the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys got another break. They got an offensive pass interference

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't call this week. Did you see that?

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was yeah, it was Tiki ta yah. Yeah.

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But the guy also flopped too, and you're like, I'm sorry,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not Jalen Ramsey. I mean, Jaylen can flop and

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets it. You can't flop, you'd get up? Who

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are you? He just lost the game because he was

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to you know, get him, get him charge. Sorry,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, We're would have to go back, and I'd

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>have to. I'd have to. I'd have to watch the

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>tape for sure to see what the Dallas defense did

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to Julio. It's fair to say he struggled because he

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dropped a touchdown pass. But that's what I always say,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is like, I mean Ridley and Ridley gauge and Hurst

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>ate him alive. So you know, I think the Cowboys

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>probably focused on Julio, but it's it's not like they

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>shut down the passing attack, and they did score thirty

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>nine points, so something worked for them. Yeah, let's move

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on to the next moment that mattered. This is fourth

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter to twelve, fifty three left in the fourth quarter,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's up thirty six twenty four, and it's fourth and

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>five at the Dallas forty. Dallas runs another fake punt.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>This time it is a direct snap to Darry and Thompson.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you like this decision to go for it on

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth down? Let's start first with you, Nick. No. I

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't like that one because again, you've got Pollard in there,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and like, it's like, let your running backs run the ball,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>not your safety. And if fourth and five, if the

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys lined up on offense, would they run Zeke up

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the middle on fourth and five? I doubt it. I

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>mean they might, but it's like, if you're gonna just

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do that, then why don't you let the guy that's

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>already got three hundred and seventy five yards passing? Whyn't

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you just let them try to get five yards? If

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you really want to go for it, don't give it

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to Darry and Thompson to run the ball up the

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>middle with those blockers that that's not Connor Williams up there,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's like Joe Thomas and the Schultz blocking and left.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't didn't like that call. Yamber absolutely agree.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that if that was their decision going in,

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that should have Just like you, they always say you

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>want your best guys on the field. So if you're

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going with that mentality that you're just gonna go try

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to get those five yards, then keep your best guys

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>on the field and make it happen. So I completely

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with everything that Nick said. I don't think that

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was the right call for me, Dave. It has it

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>has been a law. I can't remember hating a call

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more than I've hated that, Like anything Jason Garrett ever did,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember a time where I hated something more

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>than I hated that. Because what's what is the benefit

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of a fake? It's that the defense doesn't see it

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>coming right, Who in their right mind would be surprised

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>by a fake? When you're down by twelve and the

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, you know you need to generate offense. You

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know you need to stay on the field. You've already

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>faked it. Your special team scored Nator has a reputation

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>for faking it. Put your offense on the field and

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>just go for it. Nobody is surprised by that. I

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hated it so much, and I mean Amber and Nick

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>already covered it. But yeah, I thought it was awful. Yeah,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad. Glad. Now I'm glad we all agree because

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the way I looked at it. I didn't

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with them going for it on fourth down.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>It was all about the fact that there was no

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>surprise in doing a fake punt at that point. So

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>put your offense, which, by the way, your offense was clicking.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That was a part of the game where they were

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>actually moving the ball pretty well. Take a shot, go

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for it on fourth down. Put your guys out there,

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>let them actually make a play and see if you

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>can get a first down and keep the change moving.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the final memorable moment that I

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about. This one happened in the fourth quarter,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about four fifty seven left in the game. Dallas is

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>down thirty nine to thirty. At this point, Dallas scores

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a TD on a pass from Dalk from Dak to

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Schultz by the way, really really I thought, really really

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>great route. And we'll talk about Schultz a little later

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the show as well, but I thought it was

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a really great route. Though it was really great passed,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they convert, they get the touchdown, Mike McCarthy opts to

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>attempt a two point conversion rather than take the point

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>after touchdown. After the game, Mike McCarthy was asked about it,

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and he says that he would prefer to know earlier

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>than later whether he would need to score twice, which

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting take that I'd never really heard a

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>coach put out there before. My question for you guys

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is do you agree with the strategy? Let's start first

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with you Amber. No, not at all. I kept going

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and I wish I had I wish

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it on a piece of paper because I

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>had it on my phone on my note and I

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>kept writing every single scenario. I'm like, let me try

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of this reasoning as to why you

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>would try to go for a two point conversion in

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this specific play at this time of the game. And honestly,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it came down to me not being able to make

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>much sense of it. I would have rather getting to

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a point where I can tide the game rather than

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>risk it on that last play of the game where

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we're gonna talk about it in death here

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with the kick. But that's that's that's how improbable. I

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>think that they got lucky in that play and they

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>won the game because the Falcons didn't do what they

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to do. And I know that there was

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>some confusion there as to Okay, at what point should

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you grab the ball, at what point do you go

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for it or what? But they just got really, really

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>fortunate and it ended up working in their favor this time.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But just going back of it, I just cannot make

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>much sense of that call, Dave. Let's let's lay let's

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lay this out and give it some context, because it's

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a you could you could write

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a thesis about this if you wanted to. Like, this

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a willy nilly decision on Mike McCarthy's part. There's

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>been a ton of study done about this. The numbers

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>show that it is actually a sensible thing to do.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen coaches like Doug Peterson do this before. If

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you think back to the Eagles Packers game last year.

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe the Eagles scored to take a seven point

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>lead and Doug Peterson went for two and he didn't

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>get it. But again, the numbers bear that out, like

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the charts and say, this is

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what the numbers people say you're supposed to do. So

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not like Mike McCarthy pulled this out of thin air.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of stuff out on the Internet that

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you can read about why it makes sense me personally,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and I will acknowledge I'm terrible at math. That's why

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I became a writer, is I don't understand stuff like that,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time I can't fully wrap my

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>head around it. The idea is that, and Mike McCarthy

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>said it, you want to know as quickly as possible

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>what you need or what you don't need. So it's

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>almost like it's almost like Pavlov's or not Pavlov's dog,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger's cat is like the two point conversion is just

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of hanging out there in the ether, and the

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sooner you figure out whether you have it or not,

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the better off you all. And it worked in the

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cowboys favor. They caught every break. It imaginable, and they

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>made it work. But in my mind, I think you

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance of kicking the extra point there,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and then it is an eight point game and you

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>take it down to the end and you either get

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the extra point or you don't. But at least you

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get two more possessions. You only need one.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And I can hear the analytics people right now. The

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys tried that against the Jets last year and they

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>lost on the two point conversion. So it's not guaranteed

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to work. But the thought that you're going to get

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball two more times in less than five minutes

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is crazy to me. And what's even crazier is that

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it actually worked out. Like you're talking about a point

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>zero one probability, and the Cowboys got it yesterday and

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. Nice

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>shout out there on Shrodden, just cat, and I love

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that that reference. All right, go ahead, Nick, which I'll

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just say all that stuff said. I still don't like it.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I still don't like it, but there's way smarter people

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who say it's the right thing to do. So all right, Nick,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they can sit right here and I'll argue with them

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all day. I don't care. I've said it one hundred times,

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Butcarthur can sit right here with the Super Bowl ring

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in my face and I'll argue with him. A terrible call,

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible decision. You don't do that at all, And I agree.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's what they just said you. You need

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to know what you need to do, like he wants

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to find out what he wants. Hey, the Falcons have

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>scored thirty nine points on your ass the whole game.

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You need to stop him. That's what you need to do.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And you need to stop him once, not twice. So like,

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what else, what else. Analytics sound great,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but the game is telling you what's happening. The game

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is telling you. And what I hate about it is

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is that if you get the when you get the

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>ball back and you're down by nine, you got to

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>score twice your offensive. I mean, your best player is

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Zeke and he can't really be a factor because you

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>now have to score twice. You have to run down.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It worked out for them, that's great, but to me

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think, I think it was a terrible decision

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and I see it happen all the

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>time now I see coaches do it, and I definitely

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>don't understand it. But yeah, it worked. It didn't work

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because of that. It just worked out. It didn't work

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, oh, they went for two. It worked,

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they got lucky, they went they You can't tell me

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you're using analytics if you're going to rely on an

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>onsite kick, which is what is the percentage of that

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>nine percent? Eight percent? So I don't know six six percent.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it worked out for them, But man,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a terrible move. Yeah. It's the

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting part here to me is I kind of see this.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I see the point on both sides. I was, by

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, I was losing my mind when he did it,

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking what was that? That is a horrible Nick I

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>texted you. I was like, I'm starting to worry a

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the coach's ability to make the right

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>call because I don't know if that's a good call

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like that just and I'm combining with it with other

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>calls that I've seen over the last two weeks that

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, it's another text that I sent to you.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh yeah, Nick did say in the first quarter.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>First quarter, Nick did say they were going to win

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this game. But that's a typical Nick calling the kickoff

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. Nick he does. Don't act like I didn't

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>put it on Twitter. You put it out, you did.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely do it, You absolutely do. But but it

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was hinted on that that that player like they have

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to stop him here because twenty four nothing. I'm not in,

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in on twenty nothing, but not twenty four.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But but I think the interesting thing is what you

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>always hear from coaches. What I've always heard from coaches

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>over the years I've watched football and played football when

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school, was you always keep yourself

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in the game as long as you possibly can. And

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the purpose of taking the extra point. You take

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the extra point, and you defer the thing of having

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to go for two until later because you just want

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep giving your team hope and giving your team

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to know that, hey, if we get to touchdown,

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>then all we need a two point conversion, rather than

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>hey we need a point, we need a touchdown, we

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>need an extra point, and then we got to get

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the ball back and go down and score again. You know,

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you can make the argument that going for two actually

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>lost the game for the Falcons. Because they're up twenty

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>six to seven, they decide they just want to go

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>up a nice even twenty one points. Why, I mean,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just just keep taking points until you need it, because

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>it would it would have changed some things. Now you

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>lost by one point, yeah, the game would have been

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. But I mean, at that point

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the game, third quarters, just keep taking your points,

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>your points. I will say this one one of the

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>arguments that I've heard is, hey, you're gonna have to

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>get a two point conversion either way. At some point

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you had to get a two point conversion here, and

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna have to go for it. So why

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>not go ahead and go for it early? And then

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>again goes back to what Mike McCarthy said, you at

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>least know where you are in the game, rather than

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you miss it with the like in the Jets game,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't get the two point conversion and then everything's done.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>My argument back to that is you're probably still in

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the same boat. You still now have to go and

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>get an onside kick, which they were somehow miraculously able

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to convert, and then go down to get a field goal.

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that that changes anything. My point

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you still put yourself in a situation early

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>where you did, to some degree make your team feel

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like there was a larger uphill climb in order to

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>tie or win that ball game that you put yourself

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in by taking that two point try early. I still

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think the right call is to go ahead and take

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your extra point there, Good Dave. I'll steal this line

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>from my buddy Cowboys Stats and Graphics, which, like, you

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.959
<v Speaker 1>should follow that account on Twitter. It's it's great, which

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 1>he said last night. If you can divorce yourself from

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea that losing late is better than losing early,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can open yourself up to this line of thinking,

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>which I appreciate that, Like, he's not wrong, but I

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't get all the way there because I think

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 1>purely analytical people like they want football to be baseball

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so badly, and it's it's just not for me, Like

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>some of these decisions don't happen in a vacuum. That's

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a great point. If you go for two early and

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't get it, you run the risk of demoralizing the

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>entire team, which maybe that's not you know, maybe that's

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not right. Maybe you should have a more professional mindset,

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but human nature is what it is. There are so

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>many ridiculous moving parts that go into every facet of

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a football game that you can't approach it from a

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>purely analytical standpoint. In my opinion, love analytics. I think

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they're great, but sometimes I do think like gut feeling

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and all that other stupid crap come into play. Now.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the irony is that it worked out for

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. It did. I think if you do if

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you run that sequence, if you run that sequence ninety

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>nine times, I think you lose one hundred. I mean,

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, if you run it one hundred times, I

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think you lose ninety nine. But who am I to

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>talk too much trash? When they pulled it off, I

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they really needed a miraculous moment, which was that,

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean that an onside kick. Without that, then we're

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talking today about the fact that you didn't give you

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance. I don't think you gave your team the

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>best chance to win by keeping them in a situation

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where it could come down to that final two point conversion.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go and take our final break when we

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come back. I do want to talk about a couple

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of players and how they performed yesterday, including Dalton Schultz. Nick,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that last week. We'll talk about that when

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American maid

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to be on the field with America's team. Want to

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>show your Texas and Team pride two You can by

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just like how

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Stetson Hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the day, I was the guy who always got

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the tough yards, and that's why I run with John

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Deer today. In fact, I have a John Deer three

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any yardwork

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I need to do, even the tough yards way out back.

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>So if you have one acre or a thousand, John

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Deer has the equipment that's just right for you. Visit

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a John Deer Dealer today and run with us. We

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>are the official tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Want

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to use what the pros us? How about the official

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now,

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack skincare favorites,

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>plus a full sized and tense therapy lip bomb. Go

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black dot

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>com slash Cowboys. The Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>We're back in the tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>taste buds. It's new Doctor pepper and cream Soda. Let's

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>take a listen, Doctor Baba cream soda. Is he a

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Newcombonut's music to my ears? Okay, doctor music to my

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>ears and mouths New Doctor pepper and cream sodas just bad.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break. You can still tour at and

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>T Stadium, the home of the Dallas Cowboys. You could

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>run on the field, to the locker rooms and so

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>much more. At and T Stadium tours presented by seed

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Geek or available daily. Visit at and T stadium dot

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>com for details. Yeah. Interesting. Speaking of at and T Stadium, yesterday,

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were able to get twenty one thousand people into

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the stadium and all by all accounts, it looks like

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty successful. They had people in the pods

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>based upon you know, you kind of sat with your

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>friends and family that were with you. Everybody else was

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>socially distant, and I know, it was a nice environment.

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It was nice to be back in an environment where

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you actually could hear crowd noise and it felt like

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a regular game to me, as opposed to Week one,

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that felt very very weird. Yeah, it where I was sitting,

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I was away from you guys, but which sucked. But

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting in a spot where the you know,

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the window was opened. You could kind of hear the

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>crowd and somebody mum. But when they got the onsite kick,

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that seemed loud to me. I mean, that

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>seemed like that was not as loud as it could be,

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't really notice. I mean, it seemed like

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a big deal. Yeah, it was good. It

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was It was fun to be in that environment, and

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly after so many, so many months of being isolated,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it felt good to be in an environment where there

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were people and uh, and they were actually enjoying a

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>game together. So what happens when it's really cold, like

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>in December, They're gonna keep them keep it open like that.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they will. Yeah, I think you have to.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to and a baby. And by

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, even at that, it's not gonna be nearly

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as cold as if you're doing an outside game in Pittsburgh.

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And they managed to filter stadium during a normal season,

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think, I think you'll be fine. They can

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>always have to play in Cincinnati and it's not gonna

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>be that bad. It'll be all right. Real quick, I

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>did one too before we end the show, talk about

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of players and their performances yesterday. Dalton Schultz

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. He was a guy that we've given like,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about how he's not the answer.

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think when Blake, yeah you did you absolutely

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.760
<v Speaker 1>cut him on last Monday, I think it was Blake

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin goes down and I think all of us agreed

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board that the Cowboys needed to do something.

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>They need to consider something. I know I was looking for,

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>pushing for them to go and look at Delaney Walker.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>But yesterday Dalton Schultz shows up in a big way

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for the team. He does have the fumble early in

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the game, but he comes back. He has ten targets.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He catches nine of those passes for eighty eight yards

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. My question is, at this point, do

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel like the Cowboys, between Schultz and Bell have

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>enough at tight end for you to feel comfortable with

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position moving forward for the rest of

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the season. Let's start first with you, Nick, because you're

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that called this on Friday saying you expected

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Schultz is gonna have a big game, Right, Yeah, I

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>expect us that our expectations of him to be a

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. I don't know if I'm still comfortable

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. I mean, I do think his nine catches

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight yards was a product of the game being

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>more wide open stuff like that. I don't think he

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>is your prototype tight end to be the blocker and

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>catcher and all that stuff. Um, but he did a

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>nice job and and he he did catch the ball. Well. Again,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in a twenty one to seventeen type

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of game that he's he's the right answer there. But

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's he's got a spot for sure. And

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought he did a nice job catching the ball

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and all that. Uh, he surpassed my expectations. I thought

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>he would be better than than he was last week,

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>but not not to this point. But I still think,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not I mean, he's not like the

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that's just going to be overpowering at the Lion

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage. Dave Um Well, I mean, I gotta give

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>him a shout out first, because yeah, I mean everybody

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody killed him last week, at myself included. I'm not

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like trying to not be part of that. Everybody was

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>very critical. Even going back, you know, people were saying

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:03.479
<v Speaker 1>he might not make the team out of training camp.

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>There's competition, YadA, YadA. I thought he played great. No

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>disrespect to him. Like all I'm doing is I'm putting

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a pin in it, like this is something that I'm

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>monitoring week by week. He played great. I don't think

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at Lanta's defense is anything special. I don't think you're

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>always going to be in a situation where you're just

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely airing it out all the time like this. Yeah,

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Nick Nick is right. The stats kind of

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gets skewed. You're probably asking your tight ends to do

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>less in the running game when you're trailing by two

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>scores in the second half. So I was really impressed.

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not looking I'm not looking for tight ends

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I'm also not just satisfied. And you know,

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we're all good at the tight end position. But I

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>thought he was great, and but you still want to

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>cut him, just like Dave said, I'm gonna put a

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>pin on that one. I mean, it was great. It

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was forgetting the first part of the game, because everyone

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>played bad basically, but forgetting that, I thought it was

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>really nice. And credit to him for making the plays

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that he did. It was nice to see him take

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>some of what he did during training camp and apply

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it into an actual game. I was one that really

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>really doubted him and said I didn't think he would

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to carry that from training camp into a game.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So kudos to him. But at the same time, am

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I fully convinced. Absolutely not. I need to see more.

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cowboys will won't go out and get

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>it tight end. I think that after what they saw there,

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just kind of stayed put for another week

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and keep going with what they have. But I'll say this,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he would have a game such a

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>game against a better defense. So I think that next

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>week it might get ugly a little bit there. But

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>great job for him in this game, you know. I

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.240
<v Speaker 1>will say this. One thing I think I've learned about

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>him is I think what I'm trying to convince myself

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of is that he just is what he is and

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be that great all around tight end

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a great blocker and a great pass catcher. What

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he is is he's a guy that can catch the

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ball pretty well. He's a guy that can win when

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>he is the fifth option on the offense. So basically,

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>defenses are gonna say, in most instances, they're gonna say,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll let that guy have one guy like, we're not

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna double Dalton Schultz. We got too many other problems

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with, and I think he can win in

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those scenarios. So when you look at it

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint, this type of high powered offense which

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 1>yesterday they get the forty burger. It's something we've thought

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that they could be since they got Ceedee Lamb Right.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think when you look at it from that standpoint,

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and even going to Amber's point, I think even a

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>great defense a really good defense. I think when you

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>look at how they're gonna play the Cowboys, they're still

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be focused on a lot of other guys before

0:45:57.840 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they get to Dalton Schultz. And I think Dalton Schultz

0:45:59.920 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the guy that's going to be

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the benefactor there. He's gonna be the guy that's gonna

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of opportunities this year. And I think

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 1>in those situations, I think he's shown that he can

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of catch the ball and buy a lot. Now,

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I still question sometimes he makes some bonehead decisions. We've

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>seen that before when he's gotten on the field. But

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that all being said, yesterday made me a little more

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a little more comfortable in the idea that I think

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>he could play this role on this team with these

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>weapons pretty well. And it made me feel pretty good

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about what they can do with him and with Blake Bell.

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, here's what I'm gonna do real quick. We're

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna end the show, but it's amazing to me that

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we were able to get to an entire show coming

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>off a game where both starting offensive tackles did not play,

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was not the storyline of the game of

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the show on Monday. I thought you were going to

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>refer to the play that everyone's talking about, but we

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>did not talk We did not talk about. But that's

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>another one that we're gonna get to tomorrow, so it

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:55.319
<v Speaker 1>makes you tune in tomorrow. We got a lot more

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff we got to dissect from this game, and we'll

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>do some of that tomorrow. We'll also give you guys

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a bigger picture look at the NFC. So there's a

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lot going on in this division and a lot of

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it is actually helping the Cowboys, I think long term.

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk about all that tomorrow too. Then for

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Even, Dave Helman, Hellman, Amber Garcia, I am Derek Eielton.

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.479
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.