WEBVTT - Conference Championship Breakdowns!

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>whatever stupid stuff they decide to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>here's your host, Paul Chargion.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchi and

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>my co host today, the ailing Matt Harrison.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my knee pit is really Oh that's a throwback

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>right there.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's your showing your age if you get

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the knee pit. We haven't had a knee

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pit reference on this show. And what do you think,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like ten years.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 3>It's been a while, but I heard you and uh,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Paul Allen and Chad Greenway talking about Dennis Pitta today

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and it brought me all back to the Todd heat

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Memorial injury report, all that good times back then.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>The Todd Heap Memorial injury Report. That's how we started

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>those episodes of Fantasy Football Weekly, back in the day

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>when it was really hard to get injury information. So

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're like, the first thing we got to get out

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the way is who's healthy and who's not. Now,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just not times have changed and.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 3>We figured out how to work it into the matchups,

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, take less time.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think it is better this way

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've that we've done it. But we missed Todd Heap.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>I was always my intention to get Todd Heap on

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the show. But and we could probably get him now

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>because what's Todd Heap doing? He'd probably enjoy the opportunity

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to come on the show, But well, you know what

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>are we going to do with him now?

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>He's probably in a hospital somewhere.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope he's not dead somewhere with all the things

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that have gone wrong for him. And I hope he'd

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>take it with a sense of humor to know that

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a show out there that named their injury

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>report after Todd Heap.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Who knows, he might be really angry about it.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Could be, it could be. We're gonna have a ton

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of fun today, Matt. We're gonna break down the AFC

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and NFC championship games fantasy football weekly style with letter

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>grades and all the players and see how see who

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>we like, who we don't like, what kind of sleepers

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>we can unveil a lot of ways you can put

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this to good use DFS betting. In some cases, you

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>may sell fantasy leagues playoff fantasy leagues, so you can

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>change rosters. I'm in one of those. We've got one

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of them ageeteen leagues dot Com, so there's a lot

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>of different ways you could skin this cat. I want

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to start with the Eagles Commander's game. That's our first

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>game on Sunday. And I think, if I'm correct about

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the scheduling on this, I haven't. I haven't looked at

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it a while, Matt. I think we're going mid afternoon

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first game and then prime time for the

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>second game.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Correct, Yeah, two pm Central time, so three pm Eastern

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 3>is the first game.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Got you? Got you? And that first game is Commander's Eagles.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That is your game, Matt. Let's well, let's take it

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>away and maybe you can start where if you want.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, the a story here for sure on

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Commander's side is Jade and Daniels.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Why wouldn't we start with him? I mean, he's the

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 3>top scoring fantasy player in the Fantasy in the playoffs,

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>so far, better than Lamar and Josh Allen and Stroud

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 3>and Saquon and Derrick Henry, all those guys had two

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>games as well. He's seen this Eagles defense twice before,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>and Eagles defense that has faced the thirtieth best strength

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>of schedule this year, so maybe not.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The toughest matchups.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>So when they met in Week sixteen, Daniels threw for

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and fifty eight yards and five touchdowns, and

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 3>then he added eighty one yards on the ground on

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>nine carries, and then last week Stafford was Yeah, last

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>week Stafford was able to throw for three twenty four

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>and two in snowy conditions. I don't know if I

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>trust this Eagles defense to be this like stone cold

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>lock that everybody seems to think it is, and it doesn't.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Seemed like the moment is too big for Jade and Daniels.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So I've got an A grade on him, and I

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 3>think he's my favorite quarterback of the four going this

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>weekend in terms of.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Just like fantasy point potential. Yeah, I could.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I think the Eagle ranking all of them, he would

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 3>be my number one.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles secondary has been great, legitimately great. I could

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>see I could see this being an all or nothing

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>scenario for Jadon Daniels, But the five touchdowns last game

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty telling you know. What we know is it

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>won't be like the moment's too big for Jaden.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Dan definitely, because that kid is I think, definitely I

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>shoot for the moon kind of guy. And his favorite

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>target is Terry mclaur and Terry, who's been the top

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>scoring wide receiver in the in the playoffs so far

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 3>for Fantasy only, Nico Collins has more receptions than Terry

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs, and I have a feeling that McLaurin

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>will get one more reception to at least tie Nico

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 3>Collins this week. McLaurin scored in seven of his last

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 3>eight games, including the Week sixteen matchup against the Eagles,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 3>where he managed five catches sixty yards in a score.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is in Week eleven, McLaurin was almost

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 3>blanked by the Eagles one catch, ten yards yep, and

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Philly is number three in the league and fewest yards

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>allowed to perimeter receivers this season. I've got a be

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>on McLaurin, but since it's an offseason show, I can

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>give him a B minus.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, ah, okay, look, you stepped up, you're sick,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the show. Anyway, We're gonna give you this minus.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, I think the sleeper here is Diami Brown,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>who is actually the Darius Slay slayer, and he's let

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 3>lock go against Darius Slay in this one. According to

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Pro Football Focus, in thirty career receiving snaps against Darius Slay,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 3>Diami Brown is averaging three point seven yards per route run.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty significant for that snap total. Yeah, and Brown

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 3>is sneakily tied with McLaurin in receptions during the playoffs

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>with eleven and has more yards than Terry.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Danny Brown is only forty four on DraftKings,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 3>and he's kind of a nice contrarian play. I built

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>some internal lineups over at fanball dot Com with with

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>my coworkers there. I switched out McLaurin for Diami Brown

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and just took the cash discount. I'll throw a C

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 3>grade on him, but it's probably closer to like a

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 3>C plus grade for Diami Brown.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You're really pushing the envelope, now, Yeah, See that was

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>what I always fear. You do it one time and

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>then the flood gets open.

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, see that's what happens.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>That's well. Now, it's the problem is, you guys can't

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just take the win. You have to expand it.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>I have regrets, all right, all right, Uh, the last

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.119
<v Speaker 3>receiver you might want to start as Zach Ertz. He's

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 3>were on a team high three hundred and eighteen routes

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 3>from the slot this season and thirty five percent of

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles receptions allowed this season. We're out of the slot. Okay,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>so you're looking at roughly one third of your target

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>totals maybe going to zach Ertz in this game. We

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>don't forget, by the way, Yes, absolutely a big revenge

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>game in Philly. Scored in the first game, not in

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the second, so there's some opportunity for Ertz to cross

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the goal line in that revenge game. I like Ertz.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I think he's my second favorite tight end. Play this weekend.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>He gets a B grade for me. And then I

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>think the Brian Robinson Austin Eckler thing. This is super interesting.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Robinson did absolutely nothing in the wild card round versus Tampa,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>but he was pretty steady last week in the Detroit game,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 3>fifteen carries, seventy seven yards, two touchdowns, which was fantastic. Yeah,

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>five point one yards per carry. He was not targeted

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>at all last week though, and I think that's because

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Austin Eckler's finally all the way healthy.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, Eckler running Mike, He's healthy. He looks good.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. He caught four of his eleven or four of

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>his are sorry, he caught all four of his targets

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>for forty one yards. That's an average of ten point

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>three yards per catch, which is down from his season

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>average of ten point five yards to catch, by the.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Way, Yes, but that's actually by the way. Yeah.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 3>He leads running backs in the league in yards after

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 3>catch per reception this year with eleven point nine.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 3>He's basically receiving the ball behind the line of scrimmage

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 3>and scampering out for about twelve yards every time. It

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 3>is only meeting with the Eagles. This season, Eckler had

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 3>eight catches and eighty nine receiving yards. So I think

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 3>that there's a possibility, and this is my boldest take

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of the weekend, Eckler might see more targets this weekend

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 3>out of any player in both games.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow. That's probably betable somehow somewhere, And you know, I

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bet the reception side is definitely betable, and I bet

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it definitely would I bet his odds enormous.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 3>I'll give Eckler a B grade here. Robinson gets a

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>bench grade for me.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Though.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.359
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles have only allowed five running back rushing touchdowns

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>on the season, so things will probably dry up and

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 3>it will be more like he did against Tampa, which

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 3>was not very good in the run game. Switch over

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Eagle side. Saquon Barkley is A. He's an

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 3>A grade. He's the fantasy Fonsie. He's the fantasy Ardvark.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>He's the building block of anything you do in playoff Fantasy.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 3>You can't even fade him, no, like of the four

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 3>teams left, he's the only running back that should be

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>in one hundred percent of DFS lineups like he should

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>do like you fade him, you're just playing with fire.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>In two games against Washington, the first one twenty eight

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>touches one hundred and ninety eight yards and two scores,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>second one twenty nine touches one hundred and fifty yards

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and two scores. And Washington faced Detroit last week and

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Jamior Gibbs and Gibbs could have done whatever he wanted

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>against the Commanders, and yeah, for so for reasons unknown,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>after averaging seven and a half yards per carry. Gibbs

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 3>only had fourteen carries. He got one hundred and five

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>yards and two scores. He added six catches for seventy yards.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>He could have done whatever he wanted and Detroit went

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 3>away from him. Yeah, in situations, it's crazy. The Commander's

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 3>defense ranked dead last in the league in average rushing

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 3>yards before contact to running backs.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So there's gonna be some room to work with.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 3>There's room to work with, and you're giving Saquon the ball.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Thirty touches is in play for Saquon, and if the

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Eagles lose, it will be because they went away from

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Saquon in the run.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, you know, and you may have heard this

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and listeners may already know it highest over under in

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the history of Vegas for rushing yards on a players

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>over under. Depending on where you're looking, it's between one

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty six and one hundred and thirty yards.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow. For Barkley, I think it's in play.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It is in play, and I you know, it's funny.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You can make a case that you should ladder it

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>up from there because he obliterates this number from on

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty regular basis. So there's there's still a scenario

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>where not only does he go over the say one

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty yards, but he goes way over it

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and nobody nobody be shocked.

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So the key to the rest of this game, I

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>think is Jalen Hurts. It changes everything you do in

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>fantasy and betting depending on which Hurts is out there. Now.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 3>The last time he faced the Commanders, he got that

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 3>concussion that knocked him out of the game and knocked

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles out of number one seed contention. He has

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 3>managed one hundred and thirty one and one and twenty

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>eight pass and.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>It's two games, right, I mean, everybody assumes that Hurts

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is hurt and more more than they're letting on because

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't look like himself and just the productivity is

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>not there.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, get this. Over the season, he's averaging only three

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>point nine passing yards per dropback, and that's the lowest

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 3>total of any quarterback to make the conference championship since

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Pro Football Focus started doing stats in two thousand and six.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, holy cow, look at that.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 3>So not a prolific passer here, and Hurts Week eleven

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 3>win against Washington, he managed two or twenty one passing yards,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 3>did not throw a passing touchdown in that game, So

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not feeling super confident in the Philly passing game overall.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Here why you can still get some Hurts exposure going.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>He ran for thirty nine thirty nine yards in a

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 3>score in the week eleven meeting, and he's ran thirteen

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>times in the two playoff games for one hundred and

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>six yards in a score. So the Eagles are throwing

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>caution to the wind if he's if he's hurt about

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>concussions or anything like that, they're not showing it. They're

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 3>making them run still.

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And and you know what, why not? I mean, you know,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at any loss is your last loss, you may as

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>well run him, I think, Matt.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I've got a C grade on Hurts. He's

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>my least favorite quarterback of the four playing this weekend.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 3>But all it takes is a goal line push push

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 3>or two and he's going to return value for you.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 3>Uh got aj Brown? He has three receptions over two

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 3>playoff games, Yes, which is which is trailing Xavier Hutchinson,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Miller, and DeMarcus Robinson in that department. He's tied

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>with Olamide Zechias and Jalen Naylor in receptions in the playoffs. Oh,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 3>by the way, Jalen Naylor has been out.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Of the playoffs, so that's right.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 3>And also aj Brown reading fine leatherbound books on the sideline,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 3>so we know he's talented. But we also need to

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 3>realize that when the Eagles went on their crazy win streak,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of when his targets dropped and he was

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the squeaky wheel for a little bit there and saw

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 3>some action again for two games, but then it kind

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of went back to what it was before the game

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>he was targeted the most this year was Week sixteen

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 3>against Washington, where he saw fifteen targets in the game

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 3>that Jalen Hurts got knocked out and the team lost

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 3>that game, by the way, so he still has more

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>targets than any other Eagles wide receiver in the playoffs,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>tied with Dallas Goddard at ten so far in the

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>last two games. Problem is, the last seven games of

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the regular season, the Commanders only allowed seven touchdown passes total,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and Goff only managed one last week in catchup mode

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and Baker had two. So we're looking at maybe one

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>touchdown pass in the game for Hurts. I think that

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>would be the safe bet.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the safe bet.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>The odds are that it's Brown getting that, and the

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>sportsbooks agree. Of all the receivers for the Eagles, he's

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>plus one fifty five for at any time touchdown. Brown

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>ranks second in Pro Football Focused grades when facing man coverage,

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and Washington runs the eighth most man coverage in the league.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's like a Sea dart on Brown. But I

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 3>don't feel great about it right now. Devanta Smith, he

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>caught all of his eight playoff targets for seventy six yards,

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>but he's been one of the strangest players to forecast

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 3>since Halloween. Since Week ten, he's had six games under

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>sixty yards and he's scored four times. But he's only

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>had two games with double digit PPR points in that span. Yeah,

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>which is crazy. He's just too volatile. I'm gonna leave

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>DeVonta Smith on the bench, and then Dallas Goddard is

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the last guy.

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I like him here. I'll be interested to hear what

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I got a C grade on Goddard comes in with

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>a questionable tag, but he's gonna definitely play in this one.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Tied for the target lead for the Eagles in the

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>playoffs with ten he has scored. He sees a lot

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of targets when the opposing defense is blitzing. Goddard ranks

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 3>eighth in the league amongst touchdowns in yards sorry amongst

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>tight ends in yards per route run when facing the blitz,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 3>and Washington Blitz is at the sixth highest rate in

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the NFL. So it looks like there could be quite

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a few targets going his way. In the week eleven meeting,

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Goddard caught all five of his targets for sixty one yards. Yeah,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>it seems about where he's gonna be. I don't know

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>if he can get much more than that, though, because

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Hurtz just doesn't throw the ball well.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I still think if he's going to get into that

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>five catch sixty yard range and maybe a forty chance

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of a touchdown, I think that's a B grade for

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a tight end.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, can I talk into it. He's still like zach

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Ertz more than Goddart. But I think I got got

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Art as my third ranked tight end this weekend, all right,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's all I got On the Eagles and Commanders.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>My prediction is I think the Commanders pull this off.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not alone, the betting public is hitting the Commander's

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>money line pretty hard. And I think the Eagles just don't.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles look like they're good at a lot of things.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>They just don't look dominating like you want them to.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Commanders have overcome a lot to get here,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jaden Daniels just has got the vibe of a

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>winner that honestly, Jalen Hurts doesn't seem to have, even

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>though he's won tons of games.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, and if you think about the Eagles right now

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>and all season, really, they've just there's just been doubts

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 3>about the whole team all year. Nick sirianni Is, I

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>mean they're talking about if he would have lost to

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the Rams last week, he would have been fired. Maybe

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 3>if he loses to the Commanders this week, he's fired.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>It's possible. Yeah, And it seems like that locker room's

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of been kind of in dismay right now, and

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it just seems like the Commanders are the team of destiny. Also,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 3>their colors are in the Super Bowl logo, so well then, yeah,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I like that we got that going and it works

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 3>every year.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>If I got to just pick the winner, it would

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be I'm still on Philadelphia because of the defensive abilities

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they've got so much better than what the commanders have

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>seen so far. But you know, we'll see and they,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they they again. Five touchdowns by Jaden in

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the earlier matchups suggest that maybe the Eagles defense is

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and what we think they are. Let's take a quick

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>break when we come back. Buffalo at Kansas City. Stay tuned,

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchie and Matt Harrison

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with you. You'll be back next week if you're alive, Matt,

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Know, yeah, I'll be next week. We'll talk Super Bowl games,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>including my prop bet game, which will be live for

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 3>sale somewhere online next week.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Mysteriously ways to make an already great Super Bowl even

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>better by adding by gamifying your Super Bowl.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>We love it absolutely.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo in Kansas City is the evening game on Sunday Night.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, these teams have met regularly in the postseason,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and they play each other in the regular season pretty often.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's won four straight regular season matches matchups between these teams,

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>three of which were in Kansas City, so they have

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>been able to win in Kansas City before, but they've

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>lost three prost season meetings in the Allen Mahomes era,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>including that crazy twenty twenty two playoff game, which is

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest games of all time.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody's hoping for a repeat of that game.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe different outcome. Yes, yeah, you would really think that

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you could hold a lead when you're kicking off with

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteen seconds left by.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Not the Buffalo Bills.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Not the Bills. Not two years ago. When these teams

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>met a week eleven, Buffalo won thirty to twenty one.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo led it half and then never gave up the lead,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was really closer than that nine point final

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>score would suggest it was. The outcome is very much

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in doubt through most of the game. Current line Kansas City,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he favored by one and a half. The weather is

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be much of a factor. It'll be chilly,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>but not cold, thirty eight degrees, no precipitation. So let's uh.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start with my favorite Bills player, Khalil Shakir.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I loved him in the preseason. He's had a nice season,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>targeted a career high twelve times in the earlier meeting.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The week eleven meeting. Between these twelve times. Shakir usually

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>catches pretty much everything you throw to him, although here

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he turned those twelve passes only into eight receptions in

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the earlier matchup. Now, importantly, he runs from the slot.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna face off against slot cornerback Chamari Connor. He

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>allows an eighty five percent catch rate on passes in

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>his coverage. That is the worst completion percentage of any

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>cornerback in the league. I love this matchup for Khalil Shakir.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The only thing, the only reason I'm giving Khalil Shakir

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a B grade instead of an A grade is they

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't target him in the end zone and he rarely scores.

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He has just four touchdowns on the season despite eighty

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>eight receptions. He's my favorite of the Bills receivers. And

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>then after that, I don't think there's a lot to

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do with Bills receivers. So you've got Shakir and then

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>probably like one of the other receivers will have a

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>good game. But it's Kean Coleman, Amari Cooper, mac Hollins,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>even Curtis Samuel last week, they all ran between ten

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen routes. That's just not enough. You know, they're

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>shuffling these guys in and out. I mean, Shakir's on

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the field a lot. The other four are just rotating

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in and route and ten to fourteen routes is not

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>enough to make any of them fantasy bankable. Whoever does

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>run on the outside, which will primarily be Cooper and

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Coleman and Hollins two, I guess they will get a

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>big dose of Trent McDuffie and Jalen Watson, who are

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>both above average guys. Mcduffy held Nico Collins in check,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and he's way better than all of those guys. So

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got bench grades on all the other receivers. What

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>about Dalton Kincaid, you might be asking, Matt, what about

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Kincaid? Charge, Oh, well, let me tell you about

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Kincaid. You know, I think he's a C grade

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>viable starter because the Chiefs have struggled against tight ends

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all year, allowing the second most receptions and the most

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>yards to tight ends. Frustratingly, though, Kinkaid and Knocks split

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>playing time basically right down the middle, with almost identical

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>average snaps and routes. Run Kincaid invisible for basically three weeks,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but he does average a more respectable four catches per

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>game throughout the rest of the year. So in a pinch,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's only there's only four games. There's not many tight

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>ends to work with here. I guess you will throw

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on Dalton Kincaid. So where does us

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>leave us with Josh, you may be wondering. Over Allen's

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>last seven meetings, Steve Spagnolo has been unable to stop

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Allen's rushing, averaging fifty eight rushing yards and zero point

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>seven rushing touchdowns per game, and that includes four rushing

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his most recent three games against Kansas City.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I love Josh Allen on the ground here. And if

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you look at what some mobile quarterbacks have done to

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City lately Week eighteen, Bo Nicks forty seven rushing yards.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen, Russell Wilson fifty five rushing yards. So and

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on the season, the Chiefs saw the fifth most quarterback

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. So I believe this is a really nice

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>running game for Josh Allen here through the air, I'm

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>less optimistic as usually heard. I've only got the B

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>grade on Khalil Shakir and a C grade on Dalton

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Kinkaid and bench grades and everybody else. And he's thrown

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly and only one touchdown in three straight games against

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, so I don't love him through the air here.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City's coming off an eight sack game, I believe, Yeah,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>eight sack game of c. J. Stroud, which will not

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>happen again here. But still, you know, Josh Allen's mobility

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>will help make sure that. In fact, he's been sacked

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>zero and zero times in his last two games against

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, so I think his offensive line will hold

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up just fine here. I've still got the A grade

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>on Josh Allen because of the rushing.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 3>So no, do you think that people are downplaying how

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>good the Chiefs defense has been this year simply because

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 3>they're sick of the Chiefs.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, the attention is always going to be Patrick Mahomes, right,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But the reason that they won all the games they

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>won sixteen and one in the regular is their defense.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The defense was the was way I think way better.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Well in that way, was better than their offense was

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>throughout the course of the season, my opinion. Let's go

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to Kansas City side. I've got one A grade for you,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelcey, Matt. We got playoff Kelsey last week. Eight targets,

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>seven catches, one hundred and seventeen yards, and a touchdown,

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>looking nothing like the Travis Kelcey who struggled to put

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up just, you know, really modest scoring through most of

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think he scored in three games during

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. Does that sound right, man?

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. So the Bills shut down Kelsey

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in the week eleven meeting, but what happened was because

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they were putting so much attention on Kelsey. Noah Gray

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>got two touchdowns in that game. And I think they'll

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>play Kelsey more straight up because now they've proved. Chiefs

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>proved they can go to Noah Gray if they need to.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think they play Kelsey straight up and good

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>titands generally have success against the Bills. Sam Laporter recently,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry recently, Tyler Conklin last week as they likely,

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and Mark Andrews had good games. So I've still got

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the eight ground and Kelsey. But man, as he looks slow, Matt,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he has lost a step for sure.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you're in the kind of playoff

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 3>league where you set a lineup every week, and if

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 3>you're not near the front or your way behind. I

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>think the Noah Gray angle is super interesting here because

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I think people will just be completely off of him

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 3>because he didn't do anything in the playoff game last week.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 3>He's got that track record, and I think that they

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 3>trust him. I think that he's one of the two

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>or three most trustworthy receivers on Kansas City right now,

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and I like him as a dart throw.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So I love that you brought this up, and I'll

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>do use that as my transition. How could Noah Gray

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be like the second most trustworthy receiver? Well, the wide

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers for Kansas City last week, only Xavier Worthy caught

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a pass. All the rest were zero receptions. Unbelievable. Hopkins,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Brown Smith, Schuster, Watson. They're all low volume, touchdown dependent

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>guys who give you virtually nothing if they don't score.

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 3>If I had to receivers past their prime.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right. In many cases, if I had to pick one,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd go DeAndre Hopkins and just hope that he can

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>like box somebody out at the end zone. But that's

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>but they're all on the bench for this one and

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I and you're right. If it came down to Noah

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Gray or any of those guys. I think I'd be

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>perfectly happy going with Noah Gray. Let's use that as

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to talk about Xavior Worthy. This is the

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>one chief receiver you could actually start. Worthy is an

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy because he's got the four to two speed

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>MATT so he's super super fast, and we want to

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that speed will unlock deep downfield touchdowns. But

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It hasn't been. He's not getting receptions, he's

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>not getting anything downfield. Since week eleven, they totally changed

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the route tree for Worthy and it's all short stuff.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Since week eleven, Worthy he's got thirty nine receptions thirty

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>six of the thirty nine or from nine yards or less.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So he's a short, dink and dunk receiver that they

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>want to try to set loose with the speed.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Huh, that is it? Get this? Since week thirteen, Xavier

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Worthies average distance of target is four yards, that's his

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>average catch is four yards. That's it. And Buffalo allows

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the fourth shortest air yards per target, just six point

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>nine yards. So for Worthy it's all short stuff, bubble screens, slants,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that that they're trying to turn They're hoping

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll break into long, long games, but he usually doesn't.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I've just got the C grade on Xavier Worthy. Also

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the passing game, Samaj p rid could be

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky play now.

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I heard you talking about your love of Samaj p

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Ryan earlier today.

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I liked p Rid in last week did not

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>come through, But this isn't even more a hopeful uh moment.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bills allowed the most running back receptions, the most

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>running back receiving yards, and the second most running back

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns. Samajp RAN's betting line is over under eight

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards receiving. I like him here. He's

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the designated receiving back for the Bills. I don't know

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what the designation actually is. We say designated a lot,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but there is no actual designation.

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, churches, Isaiah Pachecko dead.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's dead. I was wrong. I don't have

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>my Phonsie sounder on this. I had assumed they were

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>saving him up for a big playoff push like last year,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>where they powered through the playoffs largely on the legs

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of Isaiah Pachecko. Nope, that isn't apparently not gonna be

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the case.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>He must not be healthy.

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is getting more usage than Pachecko, although it's

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not very reliable usage and he's not running very well.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But Hunt has scored in three straight games, not counting

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the Week eighteen game which they rest, and he's basically

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>paced Pacheco out in short down a distance workload, which

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is shocking to me. Pachecko was always really good and

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>short down and distance stuff. Buffalo's run defense much improved lately,

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but they've also played some really bad run defense run

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>offenses in recent weeks, like Denver and New England and

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. But still I can get you to a

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Kareem Hunt, I can't on Pachecko. Pachecko's

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a loss here. Just nine six and five

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts the last three weeks for Isaiah Pachecko. It's

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all going the wrong way right now. That leaves us

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Mahomes B grade. I've got an A grade

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on on Travis Kelce and then just like C grades

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of receiving options. That's there's just not

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great matchups I like for his receivers. Now,

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes did get three touchdowns in the Week eleven matchup,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Bill secondary has had some lapses. Andy Reid

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>always likes to attack the slot. Every receiver runs from

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the slot in his offense, and he does like to

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pound the slot. And the Bills have got their slot

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>cornerback is the worst of their three starting cornerbacks, Taron

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson not county Week eighteen. Without their starters, the Bills

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have allowed multiple passing touchdowns and eight to the last ten.

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Patrick Mahomes is in the two touchdown range

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and that feels like a B grade. Who do you winning?

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have winning that game?

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the Chiefs win that one too. I did

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 3>see a nice stat from PFF Mahomes eighth highest graded

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>quarterback against two high coverage looks and the Bills defense

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 3>runs the fourth most too high coverage.

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>In the NFL. All right, that's another angle for Patrick Mahomes.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Is he known for playing well in the playoffs? Does

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he have a track record for playing well in the playoffs.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's been in an AFC championship game or two.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think he has. I think he has. I

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want only I have. I don't have any any quibble

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Mahomes with the Chiefs. Other than the fact

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that the commercials are incessant. I Andy Reid and Patrick

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes are on my TV every game that I watch constantly.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It's my only quibble.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 3>You don't like fumble Ruskie do.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I had to go there? Yeah? Sorry, But I'm rooting

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Bills because the you know, the fan base,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been you know, they've been languishing forever. I would

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like to see a I'd like to see a new

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>team get in. I'd like to see just you know,

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>give some other teams, you know, reasons to think that

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they can go to the super Bowl. And I hate

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Allen keeps getting sort of this loser tag

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like he can't he's not good enough to get his

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>teams over the hump. I'd like to see him do

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that in the way that Yeah, I mean young Ones

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>did and yeah, and Manning did.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I think if Josh Allen is to get there, it's

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>because of him, because they don't really have the weapons

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 3>around him, like Stefan Diggs and some of the other

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 3>weapons that they've had in the past that are surrounding him.

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>And I don't particularly think that the Bills coaching staff

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely outstanding and just knocking the socks off everybody.

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's where I think Kansas City just has all

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 3>of the the advantages here. I think they have a

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>better defense. I think their coaching staff knows what they're doing,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>and I think Mahomes is ready for the moment. And

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>if Josh Allen does it, it's going to be because

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen is playing on the planet.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he might be though. I mean this year

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been a better quarterback than Patrick Mahomes absolutely, yeah,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And I want to think that he is going to

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not sing. He doesn't have to single handedly go win

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this game, but he's gonna have a huge part in it. Yeah,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if only, if only for the narrative, and I think

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great for Josh. And how about this for

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill's fans, They've raised one hundred thousand dollars from Mark

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Andrews charity. Would Eagle fans have ever done this?

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Matt No Bills fans notoriously awesome fans, even though they're

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 3>throwing themselves through tables.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 3>They they've they've always been, uh you know the ones

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 3>that have been there, like when the Damar Hamlin thing

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 3>came down.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 3>No, one was pounding the table harder for them than

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 3>those Bills fans, just making sure that everything was going right.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I seem to remember a punter having an issue a

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 3>few years back where the Bills fans were all over

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 3>that too.

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>They're they're great, didn't they a few years ago? Didn't

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow like beat an opponent for them that got

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Bills into the playoffs and then they pounded a

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money at Joe Burrow's charity?

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that happened as well, like two three years ago. Listeners,

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>listeners will correct me on that.

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe all right, I've got commanders and chiefs, and

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 3>it sounds like you have Bills and Eagles.

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got Bill's Eagles, so we're we can't both

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>be right here.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 3>No, it'll be an interesting pod next week when we

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 3>return to talk about it.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll look forward to that for sure. Thanks for listening, everybody.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly will be back next week as well.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Matt for stepping up despite a nasty case

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of whooping cough. Sure we'll go with it, ye whooping cough. Yes,

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>with a little chlamydia sprinkled in God.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I hope not.

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of explaining to do. We'll talk

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to you, We'll talk to you next week. Everybody. Fantasy

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.