WEBVTT - The Fed Weighs Tariffs & Taxes

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>at seven am Eastern on Apple car Player, Android Auto

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Joining us down to get started.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 4>She Wolston Holiday Dress interat how many parties do you

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 4>have tonight?

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 5>My goodness, do you like only one?

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 6>Only one?

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Just one party?

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Joining us.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Rebecca Petis and iconic at JP Morgan of course, a

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 4>tour of duty at Bridgewater as well.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>You came in and you whispered to Paul.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 4>You said, strong dollar.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>How strong a dollar?

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, a lot stronger than consensus has for next year.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 6>So most of the big investment banks are looking for

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 6>weakness in the dollar, especially in the second half.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Of the year.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't see it.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 6>You've got a divergence in interest rates, even though that's

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 6>somewhat priced in, but it's going to favor the dollar.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 6>You have much stronger growth in the US, which I

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 6>think will continue to bring capital to the US, which

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 6>will help the dollar. And in a case where President

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 6>elect Trump decides to go hardcore on the tariffs. We've

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 6>seen historically that that tends to be a positive for

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 6>the dollar and weakness and currencies overseas. So the only

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 6>case where I think the dollar weekends next year is

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 6>if the US moderates while the rest of the world

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 6>is gaining momentum, which moves capital overseas. Possible, but I

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 6>just don't think the probability is as high as what

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 6>consensus is suggesting.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 5>So I'm asking me for a friend here, could the

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 5>euro get to parody?

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the euro is likely to break through parody.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 5>Now next year party, So there you go. I'm putting

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 5>it out there, all right. I mean, for our friends

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that like to go to Rome in Paris, Lisa, that's

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 5>a good thing. For those of us who stay in

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 5>New Jersey, and that's so much of a thing, all right,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>talk to us about the equity markets. I've heard so

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 5>much discussion over the past month or two of out

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 5>international investors coming to the US market. Is is this

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 5>activity unusual? Is it typical? What do you make of it?

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the risk that I think a lot of

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 6>people are pointing out is that the US equity market,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 6>relative to the rest of the world, has gotten very

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 6>expensive and heavily owned by foreign investors, international investors and

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 6>domestic investors, and so there are. It feels like a

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 6>drum beat now of calls that the US is in

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 6>a bubble. The US could slow down next year. We'll

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 6>get money going overseas because the valuations are much better.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 6>And the thing I always come back to is valuations matter,

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 6>but aren't sufficient. You need a catalyst. And that's what

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 6>I keep looking for. Is China pull out all the

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 6>stops and held the consumer. Does Germany get rid of

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 6>the debt break? And is that stimulus sufficient? I'm skeptical

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 6>it is, which makes me think the US can stay

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 6>the outperformer next year in terms of equities. But I'm

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 6>watching those risks.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Given where we are, let's fuld the correlated mess.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>I put out a tweet here we got d x

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Y through one oh seven. I got a ten year

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 4>real yield out to two point zero three percent. To me,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>the single two sentences of the weekend was a guy

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 4>named Sam Row, always suspect Sam Row channeling Liz Anne

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 4>Saunders and Kevin Gordon and Charles Schwab on a beautiful

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 4>scattered dot study that says it's not correlated. You can't

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 4>take one year forward pe multiples like barons one on

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 4>one and say market up or market down. What signals

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 4>do you take from the equity market that bring you

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>over to bonds, that bring you over to foreign exchange.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 6>So it's to me, there's a chicken and egg situation here.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 6>Does the equity market drive the currency? Does the currency

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 6>drive the equity market and pull in bonds too? They

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 6>all influence each other, and often it's which one is dominant.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 6>We'll be driving which one is having the bigger move,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 6>the greater momentum. So you can see a big move

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 6>in bonds if we have a big rise in the

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 6>ten year yield that not purely driven by growth, that

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 6>can poll equity is lower. But we can also see

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 6>if there's growth optimism about US exceptionalism, the tenure can

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 6>go up and stocks go up with it, and the

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 6>dollar goes up.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 5>Everything earlier there's a bubble.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't see a bubble bubble.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 6>I did not say there's a bubble. I said there's

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 6>a rugby morning.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to wake people up there.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 6>I want to be clear what I'm saying. The US

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 6>market is expensive. If you look at a twelve month

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 6>forward price earnings ratio, if you look at EPs growth

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 6>priced in for next year for US stocks, if you

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 6>look at ownership. But we know from history, to your point, Tom,

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 6>that what happened this year has zero correlation with what

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 6>happens next year. So the market could continue to rise

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 6>if we have decent growth in the US and there

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 6>aren't a lot of alternatives for your money. And I

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 6>think that scenario is probably the most likely one.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 5>How About we had the election last month here, big

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 5>change is coming starting in January of twenty twenty five

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 5>here in US policy. Your outlook at all or your

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 5>allocation or where you want to find risk in the marketplace.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the one thing that I think investors should be

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 6>really thinking about our scenarios because we simply don't know

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 6>yet what President elect Trump and his administration are going

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 6>to do in terms of sequencing and size. So when

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 6>do tariffs happen and how big are they, what kind

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 6>of deportation do we see? Those are big downside risks

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 6>in my opinion for the equity market. I don't think

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 6>they're being priced in right now, but we don't know,

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 6>And so if you don't know what's going to happen,

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 6>you have a wider cone of outcomes. You need to

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 6>be having some hedges in your portfolio. So fine, have

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 6>fun with financials that are going to benefit from deregulation

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 6>and growth, have fun with your digital asset related assets,

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 6>so to speak. But then make sure you have a

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 6>few defensive positions as well in case some of these

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.119
<v Speaker 6>negatives become reality. So I would look overseas at the UK,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 6>I would look overseas, possibly at Switzerland. Within the United States,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:09.119
<v Speaker 6>I think things like energy, healthcare utilities can play a role,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 6>not in large size, but some pieces of it. Just

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 6>to give you those hedges for those less friendly scenarios.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Our viewers or listeners have a collective memory of President

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Trump railings a strong dollar. Everything you said is against

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>a genetic structure of Donald Trump. He wants a week

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 4>dollar to keep US exports going.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you suggesting that's done.

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Trump has gotten a little more balanced in his currency

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 6>comments over the last few months, and certainly the Treasury

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 6>Secretary nominee Scott Bessant is also more balanced in terms

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 6>of his view on the dollar. So if the dollar

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 6>is very strong and we're seeing that hurt exporters in

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 6>the data. Of course we're going to get some tweets

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 6>or posts or whatever.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 6>The president elect is into that day, but what can

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 6>he actually do about it. I don't think we have

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 6>a new Plaza accord or a mar Lago accord. I

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 6>don't think that's in the cards.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Golf course in Scotland. He is turn Turny, a turnberrier.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Everybody works killed. Yeah, I can see president elected killed.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 5>Sure, talk to us about avocados.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so I have been Yes, we're talking about avocados.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 5>So amazing.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Surveillance go.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 6>So you think about risks in the next year. And

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 6>one risk that I think is on people's radar screens

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 6>but maybe not enough, is a resurgence of inflation. And

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 6>one area I think you want to watch is food inflation.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 6>US farmers are struggling right now. They can't get enough workers.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Uh and seventy percent of workers in US farming are immigrants,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 6>about half of those are illegal immigrants. If you reduce

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 6>the workers, you can't get the crops out of the ground.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Prices go up, profits go down. In addition to that, though,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 6>the tariffs are a big hit on US farmers. In

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen nineteen, those that year period alone, they lost

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven billion dollars in export revenue. Now, last time

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 6>Trump failed them out, they got over eighty billion dollars

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 6>in government subsidies. This time they don't have as much

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 6>free money flowing to hand out. So why do avocados

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 6>come in the mix. Because ninety percent of American avocados

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 6>come from Mexico. And if we don't have people to

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 6>get those avocados out of the ground here in California,

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 6>and the tariffs on Mexico are causing some retaliation, avocados

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 6>are going to become a luxury good I wrote about

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 6>it in the New York Times this past week.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I saw it, but Paul helped me.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Here. We didn't know what avocado was until what fifteen

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>years ago?

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 5>The guacam only the kids with the quaka, it was guak.

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, if you want, that's a main three Americans.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, double the price of guac for super you

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 6>will have angry voters.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>See, I told you each avocado contains fifty eight milligrams

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>of magnesium.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure, is there anything bad about avocados?

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 5>Lisa, Come on, Lisa, get with it.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 7>It's a healthy fat. It's very good for you.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Avocados. Do you buy him by the bushel at costco?

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 7>We sure do, do you really?

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 5>I do?

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 7>I buy the big bag. They come a little bit hard,

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 7>so you got to kind of put them in the

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 7>cabinet to ripe off. Yeah, but that's the.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Way to do it. The budget deficits has widened. This

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 5>is from your optioned from three point nine percent of

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 5>gross domestic product in twenty eighteen to six point four

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 5>percent today, suggesting that maybe the US government will not

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 5>have the same capability to support farmers in such a scenario.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean they're going to feel pressure to do that,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 6>for sure. Farms are all across the country, our amber

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 6>waves of grain, right, so they're going to be pressure.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 6>But are they going to find the money? It's going

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 6>to be harder to find the money this time. Is

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 6>Elon going to let them have the money?

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Where's the best avocado restaurant in New York City? Oh?

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Massive craving word?

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Rosa Mexicano tabletop guacamole. They come and make it

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 6>in front of you and you can customize it. That's

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 6>still my go to.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Yep, very good.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 6>See I'm now I'm now in holiday mode. You just

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 6>officially got me there.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Becky Patterson, thank you so much for joining us.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple car Play and Android Auto with a Bloomberg Business app,

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta Trace joins us right now with Veda Partners.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 4>She's just been absolutely famous, Henriette, there is really only

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 4>one question. Are there Are there Republican senators that are

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 4>going to push against their president? There was confusion over

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the weekend.

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of things to push back

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>against incoming President Trump over you know, some of the

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>nominees that he's picked, whether it's tanksas or RFK Junior.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>You're starting to see it in individual little baskets. We're

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the government funding bill that has not been

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>released yet because it continues and increases federal spending and

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>creates a problem with you know, eighty to one hundred

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and fifty House Republican members. So I think they're picking

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and choosing which areas they want to fight the president over.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 5>So let's go to that issue here. I'm always when

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 5>you people talk about funding the government and shutdowns. It

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of gets my attention here. Just walk us through

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 5>the timeline about what our Congress is going to be

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 5>doing over the next several weeks as it relates to

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 5>keeping this government open.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, great question.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're going to vote on a National Defense

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Authorization Act, which increases federal spending for that sector by

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one percent to eight hundred and eighty four billion dollars.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not mistaken, it includes you know, fourteen percent

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.599
<v Speaker 1>uptick for a junior enlisted serviceman.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 8>And that's the package that they'll pass this.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Week while we wait to release the government funding bill,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>which will similarly increase federal spending by one hundred billion

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>dollars roughly just to get us into March. So we're

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to clear the decks, but they're not

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>clearing it for any kind.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 8>Of long duration.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just until about March fourteenth of twenty twenty five,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>which means almost as soon as we pass this hurdle

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep the government open, we're going to be facing

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>another shutdown early next year, which very likely could.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 8>Get in the way of the Republican agenda.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Around this first smaller Reconciliation Bill on Immigration, Defense and

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Order, and that's going to be the story of

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>next to its starts.

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Well to the mystery of what Senator is going to

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 4>do with the different controversial cabinet picks. Is the tea

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 4>party ish type of the House going to go against

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>their president on March fourteenth?

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You know? I think this is the real issue that

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we have, which is Speaker Johnson has a zero vote

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>margin until April when he's going to have a whopping

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to vote margin.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 8>So House Republicans lost seats.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Last election cycle, which is something that doesn't get I

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think reported enough, and that's going to be even more

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult for Speaker Johnson to keep the job and to

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the government open into next year. To answer your

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>question directly, absolutely, I think that the Republicans in the

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>next cr will probably lose one hundred and fifty House

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican members when they go to keep the government open

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>under President Trump in twenty twenty five.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 5>All right, So I don't know how that wow, how

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 5>that's going to play out, Henriette, I talked to us.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 5>I guess maybe a little bit more immediate in acounter

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 5>is some of these nominations that still have to go

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 5>through congressional approval.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 9>Where are we with.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Some of the mister heg Seth, Tulca Gabbart, some of

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 5>the more controversial ones. What do we know now?

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right now we're doing effectively a pretty serious

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>media lobbying campaign.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 8>With hag Seth standing next to J. D.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Dance and President Elect Trump at an Army Navy game,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously trying to project physically that they are

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>all aligned and on board, and encouraging members of the

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republican Conference to get on board with passing those members.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what's going to happen is we're going to

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>see some of these folks get a full core press

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump put his weight behind it and say

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>pass this, give me this nominee.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 8>But others A'llah.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Telsea Gabbard, for example, are going to have a much

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>more difficult time.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 8>I keep my eye on the prize.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, I cover bacroeconomic policy, so I don't really care

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about some of those agencies.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 8>I really want to see Scott Bessett of the World,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 8>Damson Greer at USDR.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Those are much more important to me, and I think

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>those folks are very likely to get through those are

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the ones who will we put in tyreso on next year?

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 8>I think that's the prize.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 4>And now, folks, the civics dumb question of the week,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's get it out of the way early here on

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 4>a Monday, Henrietta Trace with.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>A senator's vote.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Are their votes visible or are they liked by a

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 4>ballot box with their secret? Oh?

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 8>No, absolutely visible. You can watch this all on c SPAN.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 8>It's a great family fun. Highly recommend this.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Debt ceiling. She's such a nerve, I know, dead ceiling death.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 5>It's I mean, we've got the clock here in Manhattan.

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 5>It shows us the deficits. And does anybody care in Washington, DC?

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 9>Should they care?

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 8>They talked about caring.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>For sure. Everybody's against deficits, that's for sure. But you're

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not against specific spending cuts. Excuse me, you're not for

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>specific spending cuts. It's much easier to be against things

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>than for them. So while we talk about, you know,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>being against federal spending, let's be mindful that we have

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to increase the debt ceiling next year. And Lindsey Grahm,

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they incoming Senate Budget Committee chairman, notified us last week

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that the debt ceiling, which could pass on party lines

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with just Republican support and a reconciliation bill will instead

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>go through regular order. And that is acknowledgment that they

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>will not be cutting federal spending next year. It is

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>far too difficult a task, especially when you have a

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>zero c margin in the House and only three seats

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 5>How about on the tax front here, how do we

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 5>think this is going to play out on the tax front?

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clear from incoming Leader Foons agenda that

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we will not get a tax bill until December of.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 8>Twenty twenty five. We are only to have the massive.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Light over you know, the salt deduction, over repealing the

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>IRA tax credits for burgeoning industries and clean energy solar,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>wind batteries, et cetera. It's popular to say that we're

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>going to repeal the electric vehicles tax credit, for example,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but that's about one hundred and twenty billion dollars in

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the broader IRA, which has balloomed, as you know, from

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a bill that they expected to be about two hundred

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in private sector uptake to seven hundred and

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion dollars. Who has grown these industries some up

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in Boston, Texas, Ohio, North Dakota, South Dakota was buried

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>by percident. Unfortunately, in red states, about seventy percent of

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that funny Red states.

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>You know what's interesting here, Henrietta, and I've got to

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 4>squeeze this in the salt tax it's called, is a

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>stereotype that is just about democratic states? Or can mister

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump get pressure on the assault tax from Republican states?

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 8>You know, that's a great question. As you know, I

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 8>live down here in Louisiana.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>There are beautiful, nice streets down here where people are

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>paying exorbitant property taxes and mortgages.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 8>That's in Texas, that's in every state in our great nation.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 8>There's big homes that people want this deduction for.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of it weighs on the

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, California Republican contingent. And the

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>reason that's easy is because those are sheets that president

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like Trump and the Republican Party have picked up in

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years, and so they really highlight those members,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, those members are on the hook for fixing

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>this for their constituents.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 4>That's that they got a lot to Henrietta Trace, thank

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 4>you so much for your perspective. Can't say now from

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Louisiana today, which is wonderful. She is with Veda Partners.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Every time she's on. I learned stuff I know every

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 4>single time.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just great.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Our Play in

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with a Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 4>This is a joy and for me and Paul and

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Lisa and Charlie Pellett, this could literally be a three

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 4>hour conversation. We all fly, our loved ones fly. Stephen

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 4>Trent is definitive. It's City group on this. You know,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>it's not American Airlines research. It's all of American research.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Thrilled to have you in the studio. Way too short

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 4>of visit which let's just get the single best buy.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 4>Is it a foreign carrier or a domestic carrier?

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, thank you so much for having me on and

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 10>good morning to you. So in terms of the carriers

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 10>we like the most in the United States, it's going

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 10>to be Delta Airlines is our top pick. We do

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 10>have American Airlines with a by rating and our focus

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 10>group on a long term basis. However, within the America's

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 10>Panama's COPA Airlines, we think is dynamite.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 5>Copa Airlines out of Panama. What's what's the place. I

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 5>know you have a lot of experience covering the transports

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 5>down in Latin America. Give us just kind of the

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 5>macro call, because we don't talk about it a lot.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 5>How do you how do we think about it from

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 5>a thirty thousand foot level Latin America transportation?

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, So when we look at, for example, the

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 10>market there versus the market here, I think there are

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 10>a couple of things I would keep in mind. One

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 10>of the most important things is the lack of capacity

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 10>on a per capita basis, so you have relative to

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 10>the United States, lower employments per capita. The other thing

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 10>I would layer on top of that, Latin America Airlines,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 10>for the most part, of course, generate revenue in local

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 10>currency and faced US dollar indexed seat mile cost, so

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 10>they are not long dollar companies. They actually suffer under

0:19:59.920 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 10>the circumstances. The third thing I would highlight would be

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 10>the lack of affordability to fly in Latin America. If

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 10>you compare the average fare to average weekly per capita

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 10>income versus US, so people that are flying it's less less.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Are they like US and that they have mileage programs

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 4>and all the other accouturements of US airlines or are

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 4>they like something back twenty or thirty years or they're

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 4>just trying to get to the end of the quarter.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they're actually somewhat like the US.

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 10>Ones, and they are more unbundled than what we have

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 10>here in the United States. So a full blown Delta Airlines,

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 10>for example, is sort of would be sort of an

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 10>anomaly in many Latin markets.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Ours Delta and United and the others competing with government

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 4>funded international air carriers like Air France, Cutter, Eddiot and

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the others buying Formula one billboards.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's kind of a tough place, and that has

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 10>been sort of controversial at points in the past. So

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 10>you would be concerned about those issues on the Transatlantic

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 10>for example.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 9>But here in the.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 10>United States, the model is very good. The airlines here

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 10>have de risked their earning stream through co branded card

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 10>loyalty programs and the US consumer itself. The demand we

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 10>see for premium cabin is very good. So I've seen

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 10>big improvements in earnings quality.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 5>How about some of the budget airlines here, that's a

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 5>tough business in this country. I'm thinking Spirit and Frontier

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 5>and all these things. What's going on in that? How

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 5>do you run a budget airline these days?

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 9>You know it's tough. I think it's very difficult. And

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 9>what do you see with the budget airlines today?

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 10>They're all trying to add premium and so when we

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 10>look at this movement to just the front of the cabin,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 10>are they going to imp prove unit revenues on that?

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 9>Yes, they probably will.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 10>But if you're a network airline, you're already a unit

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 10>revenue champion with a strong demand curve. If you're a

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 10>budget airline, historically, I've never been good at unit revenue.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 10>You want to delate the heck out of your seat

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 10>maul cost and you can't do that.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 3>So Stephen Trent helped me here.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Like Robert Crandall was a huge supporter of what I

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 4>was doing, and it was such a joy to have

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>him and missus Crandall from Florida.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>He changed what we do. But is it still cyclical.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the ten year track record of Delta Airlines,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe had some challenges like a pandemic, and I'm sorry

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 4>it's not good enough total return. Is there a new

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 4>persistency to cash flow where they're acting like a blue

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 4>chip stock or is in another up and down airline cardiac.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Arrest with these air with these stocks?

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Look so I think relative to two thousand and

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 10>nine to now, for example, there's a lot that's changed.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 10>The U stairlines, for example, do very little synthetic fuel hatching,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 10>which I would argue is part of the problem. More importantly, however,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 10>the co branded card piece of the pie is really important.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 10>So they're getting cash flow streams from consumers using their

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 10>credit cards.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that more important than Paul sitting on the runway

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 3>at Newark?

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 10>Okay, well that's that's the challenge to Newark has had.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 9>His is use.

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but trumal A is good though. Boy they did

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 5>a good job there.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 9>It's short, it's sure, is so?

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>What all right?

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 9>So is the business flyer?

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 5>I know that the leisure flyers back and above pre

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 5>pandemic levels. Some about the business flyer, what's the new normal?

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 5>What are the Airlines telling me is a new normal

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 5>for business travel.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I think we're like going back to where.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 10>We were in terms of these those distribution channels kind

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 10>of getting filled out again. Uh but pre pandemic business travel,

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 10>are we going all the way back?

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 9>I would say no.

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 10>And that's because in a lot of industries you no

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 10>longer have the consumer in the office five days a week.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 10>So I'm not saying that the flyout Sunday night, fly

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 10>home Thursday night is gone, but I think it's at

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 10>least somewhat diminished. And you've seen some of that flow

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 10>going towards blended travel. People traveling, and you know these

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 10>pre pandemic shoulder.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Periods single best buys delta right.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, for the US quickly, How are.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Their lounges doing because I can't get into it.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think those full lounges are a darn good

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 10>sign of demand.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 9>So that's going very well. And the other.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 10>Equipment and infrastructure they have set up for premium it's great.

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 9>I think American Airlines is.

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 10>Just getting started with co branded cart so those are

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 10>the network carriers.

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 3>I think I get thirty seconds. What's Kirby doing at United?

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm a fan of United as well. I think they're

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 10>doing great. We had them on our focus list. That

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 10>was some very good performance on the backped So we

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 10>continue to think free cash flow for these network airlines

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 10>is still spooling up, and the diversity of the free

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 10>cash flow is no longer coming from just passengers buying tickets.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 9>It's coming from co branded cart.

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Up one hundred and thirty percent this year. Steve was

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 3>pre in a year.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah you know, did you always said spooling cares You

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 4>have to go to talk to say that.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 3>You can only do that if you go to talk

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 3>up at dark Stephen Trent, don't be a stranger. Thank

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>you so much.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>starting at seven am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Surveillance end Our front page is a Lisa Matteo hours.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 4>What do you got, Lisa?

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 7>Some new Apple tech that's going to be coming out.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 7>This is from the Wall Street Journal in Bloomberg Both

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 7>I'm reporting starting next year, they're gonna introduce an iPhone

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 7>that's thinner, so in case you have the one, you

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 7>have it, it'll be a little bit thinner. It's intended

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 7>to be cheaper than the pro models, So that's a

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 7>bonus because it's going to have this simplified camera system

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 7>and that's reducing their costs. On top of that, foldable

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 7>devices that's like the hot new thing. So now they

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 7>want to plan two one for a bigger device, one

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 7>for a smaller device. Bloomberg reporting, it's like kind of

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 7>like an iPad foldable. The problem is that they have

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 7>to improve the hinge that actually allows it to fold.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 7>That's been having some issues. But it's also rethinking the mouse.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 7>The next air tag, you know those ones that sometimes

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 7>you put on your luggage. It's going to have a

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 7>wider range so we can find things a little bit

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 7>further away. And then it's going to shift to an

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 7>in house Wi Fi chair. All this stuff kind of

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 7>coming out next year. I don't, but I know a

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 7>couple of people who do. And it's kind of scary

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 7>because they're tracking but without their knowledge, without the kind

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 7>of slip it in someone's.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Back that's not that's not very nice.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 7>But no parents use it to on their kids, like

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 7>on their backpacks and stuff. So it's being used a lot.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay, have foldable phone to be.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 7>No, well, not a lot of adults are using it,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 7>but it's it's the new like that's the new hot thing.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 7>So now they have to adjust to the times, and

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, they have to find a tech gadget that's

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 7>similar to it, Apple New Tech. So you've heard about

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 7>the problems with school districts cutting back on bus service, right,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 7>So now parents are turning to ride share apps to

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 7>get their kids to school. This was in the Associated Press.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 7>It's interesting. It's not Uber and Lyft that we're talking about.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 7>It's new startups ones called piggyback network. So parents book

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 7>the ride for the kids online with another parent traveling

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 7>in the same direction. So that's the idea of one

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 7>of them. Another is hop skipped. So these are all

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 7>these startups that are beginning because parents are having trouble

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 7>finding ways to get their kids to school.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Somehow.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 7>Buses we do not.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, no, we do not in my town.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 5>But presumably for the elementary schools you lived close by,

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 5>they all over tency look close by, you could walk,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 5>that's fine. Then the middle school and the high school

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 5>not so much. So you drive by the high school

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 5>at pickup time, it's a disaster. As all these parents

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 5>are they are lined up. I'm like, where are the buses?

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah right, yeah no, but that's a problem. So now

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 7>they're going to these apps. I mean, the question is

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 7>is it safe so they can claim to like screen

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 7>the drivers, check their fingerprints, things like that.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll be here in the suburbs, you know, folks. Suburbs

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 3>for me are thirty fourth Street. In the suburbs, you

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 3>don't have a lot of ubers. I mean, if you have.

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 4>A given a high school getting out, they're just flat

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 4>out not enough cars.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 7>And that's why they're they're starting these new startups, these

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 7>startup apps. Some of them. My kids just walked, They

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 7>just just fucked walked a long way.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Maybe bad weather, we go pick them up.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember going through two feet of snow. You know, no,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 4>but you know it was it was like normal that

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 4>everybody did that. Now they got to be you know what,

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 4>you got me a black car and not an suv.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>God.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So if you're not the life of the party,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, if maybe you're a dull person, definitely not, Sweetey.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 7>There was a social club just for those type of people.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 7>It is called the Dull Men's Club. The Washington Post

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 7>has a great article kind of looking into it that

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 7>it started back in nineteen eighty eight, but how it's

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 7>grown like it's it's now includes women. It has like

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 7>one and a half million members about posting about their

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 7>adventures on their Facebook page. So what's an adventure for

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 7>a dull person?

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 9>Okay?

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 7>So they collect milk bottles, so they write about that,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 7>They take out their trash, what kind of potholes they've seen,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 7>what food they've ate. You know, it's the happening place.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 7>They even have a calendar that they put out with

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 7>pictures of their members. Next two things that they have

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 7>fun doing. It's a hot seller. It's a hot item.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Einstein here saying a calm and modest life instead of

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 4>constant restlessness, like going to see the eagles at the sphere.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 4>She did, I'm a charter member, right you we live vicariously.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Three sweetie, okay, last one. Stick with Hollywood. They're starting

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 7>to embrace Saudi Arabia. This was in screen time. I'm

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 7>still kind of going through it. But Lucashaw basically Earlier

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 7>this month, he went to Jetta for the Red Sea

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 7>Film Festival. Of course, yes he did. Vin Diesel, Emily

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 7>Blunt received awards Spike Lee. Many drivers serve on the jury.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 7>So Shaw says that Hollywood is starting to embrace Saudi

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Arabia because you have that pullback and spending across media entertainment,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 7>and it's prompting people in search for money in places

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 7>they never thought of, like Saudi a radio, Why well,

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 7>there was one thing here. The country is offering incentives

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 7>a rebate of about forty percent to film in Saudi Arabia,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 7>so that's one of the draws there. But they've really

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 7>been dumping a lot of money. You've had the money

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 7>going into golf, video game places, building. We wanted to

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 7>have trillion dollar ye futuristic city. So it's starting to grow.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 7>So they're saying this might be the new place to

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 7>start filming.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 4>There's of course, read Lucas the moment it comes out

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 4>and there's some Hollywood pushback.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course, like do we really want to do this?

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 9>Correct?

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 5>At the end of the day, money that's what it

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 5>comes down, exactly, think and it's Hollywood. So I mean

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 5>it's Hollywood.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Had Johnny Depp, guy Ritchie like they've you know, shot

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 7>projects there and they say they're going to go.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 5>So Johnny Depp is back, right, you see, backed up

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 5>making movies and stuff like Johnny Depp.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay. Brought to you by Aaron Taylor Johnson, Thank you

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 4>so much. Craving the Hunter seat in the theaters this week,

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 4>only only you, Lisa.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, did you see pictures of this gentleman?

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 5>No, let me, what's gonna go? Go to his name?

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 7>Aaron Taylor Johnson, Aaron are go ahead.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Right, craving Lisa Matteo on the newspapers. Thank you so much.

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 2>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal