WEBVTT - Presidents Have Tried To Censor the Media Before…and It Backfired

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:27.804
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:27.844 --> 0:00:31.124
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova and I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:31.924 --> 0:00:33.884
<v Speaker 2>Stay in the show. Have you been canceled ever?

0:00:34.204 --> 0:00:38.644
<v Speaker 1>Maria, I have not been canceled. Have you ever been

0:00:38.684 --> 0:00:39.324
<v Speaker 1>canceled night?

0:00:39.484 --> 0:00:40.364
<v Speaker 2>Oh people have tried.

0:00:40.444 --> 0:00:43.004
<v Speaker 3>If you listened to the last episode with elehone, you

0:00:43.044 --> 0:00:45.084
<v Speaker 3>know you come at the King, you best not miss

0:00:45.524 --> 0:00:49.044
<v Speaker 3>fucking blue Sky. Idiots on fucking Twitter and now they

0:00:49.084 --> 0:00:49.884
<v Speaker 3>moved to Blue Sky.

0:00:51.164 --> 0:00:54.004
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's how you really feel, Nate about.

0:00:56.004 --> 0:00:59.244
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a strategy of the week.

0:01:00.684 --> 0:01:03.404
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it is and sometimes of the strong.

0:01:04.684 --> 0:01:06.804
<v Speaker 3>Today in the show, we're going to be talking a

0:01:06.844 --> 0:01:10.324
<v Speaker 3>little bit about Jimmy Kimmel. Maria, I think you're going

0:01:10.364 --> 0:01:13.044
<v Speaker 3>to have some historical points of view. I'll just I'll

0:01:13.124 --> 0:01:14.164
<v Speaker 3>just be rampting.

0:01:15.404 --> 0:01:17.204
<v Speaker 2>Evidence. I'll just have takes.

0:01:18.844 --> 0:01:22.324
<v Speaker 1>We will we will go into some historical context in

0:01:22.364 --> 0:01:25.684
<v Speaker 1>a discussion of free speech and how it has evolved

0:01:25.924 --> 0:01:29.684
<v Speaker 1>throughout the history of the United States. So on. On

0:01:29.724 --> 0:01:37.684
<v Speaker 1>that note, Nate, let's let's talk some Jimmy Kimmel. Last week,

0:01:37.804 --> 0:01:42.124
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel's show was canceled indefinitely by the powers that

0:01:42.204 --> 0:01:48.844
<v Speaker 1>be at Disney and ABC, and we are taping this

0:01:49.044 --> 0:01:52.884
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, September twenty second. We just found out that

0:01:53.004 --> 0:01:56.564
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel Live Show is going to be returning. By

0:01:56.604 --> 0:01:58.564
<v Speaker 1>the time you guys here this Wednesday will have been

0:01:58.804 --> 0:02:01.404
<v Speaker 1>last night. But I do want to stress that we

0:02:01.524 --> 0:02:04.284
<v Speaker 1>have not actually seen or heard the return yet. But yes,

0:02:04.444 --> 0:02:09.044
<v Speaker 1>they just made an announcement that they will be bringing

0:02:09.524 --> 0:02:14.844
<v Speaker 1>Me Kimmel back to the air after discussions with mister

0:02:14.924 --> 0:02:21.964
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel about the future. And the original cancelation was very,

0:02:22.084 --> 0:02:25.804
<v Speaker 1>very different from anything we've talked about on the show

0:02:26.164 --> 0:02:28.564
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like cancel no, no, in some ways

0:02:28.564 --> 0:02:32.924
<v Speaker 1>hold on, may I finish in terms of cancel culture

0:02:32.964 --> 0:02:36.524
<v Speaker 1>because it was coming from Brendan Carr, the chairman of

0:02:36.564 --> 0:02:41.964
<v Speaker 1>the FCC, who exerted pressure on the brass at Disney

0:02:42.044 --> 0:02:45.684
<v Speaker 1>to cancel the show and made some very veiled but

0:02:45.764 --> 0:02:48.924
<v Speaker 1>not that veiled threats that you know, we're probably going

0:02:49.004 --> 0:02:50.884
<v Speaker 1>to pull your license.

0:02:51.404 --> 0:02:53.004
<v Speaker 2>It was like, hey, we can do it's the easy

0:02:53.044 --> 0:02:55.564
<v Speaker 2>way of the hodway. You sound exactly exactly.

0:02:55.644 --> 0:02:57.884
<v Speaker 1>It sounded like we were back in the Sopranos, you know,

0:02:58.204 --> 0:03:04.164
<v Speaker 1>or or you know Sopranos because a much worse written

0:03:04.244 --> 0:03:07.164
<v Speaker 1>version of the Sopranos, someone who didn't actually know how

0:03:07.204 --> 0:03:09.204
<v Speaker 1>to write and decided the easy way or the hard

0:03:09.204 --> 0:03:12.004
<v Speaker 1>way was the way to write this dialogue. But yeah,

0:03:12.044 --> 0:03:14.844
<v Speaker 1>so that's what happened. And that's why I said, that's

0:03:14.924 --> 0:03:17.644
<v Speaker 1>a different from what we've been talking about, because there's

0:03:18.124 --> 0:03:20.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, cancel culture, and then there's the chairman of

0:03:20.244 --> 0:03:23.444
<v Speaker 1>the FCC saying, hey, if you can say anything we

0:03:23.524 --> 0:03:28.284
<v Speaker 1>don't like, we're gonna yank your license. So in response,

0:03:28.324 --> 0:03:30.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were tons of protests. There was a

0:03:30.324 --> 0:03:34.964
<v Speaker 1>lot of people canceling their subscriptions to you know, Hulu, ABC, ESPN,

0:03:35.044 --> 0:03:37.924
<v Speaker 1>all of these things. And Nate, I'm actually very curious.

0:03:38.244 --> 0:03:40.204
<v Speaker 1>I do want to give some background to this in

0:03:40.244 --> 0:03:43.364
<v Speaker 1>a second, but while we're setting kind of the present

0:03:43.444 --> 0:03:46.644
<v Speaker 1>day context, I'm curious what you think the you know,

0:03:46.764 --> 0:03:50.244
<v Speaker 1>financial impact of this was, because I actually I saw

0:03:50.284 --> 0:03:53.884
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people canceling subscriptions that I wouldn't have expected,

0:03:53.924 --> 0:03:56.484
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder, you know, I wonder if this is

0:03:56.924 --> 0:03:59.724
<v Speaker 1>in any way a financial decision as well, whether that

0:03:59.884 --> 0:04:02.364
<v Speaker 1>actually had an effect or not. I don't know. I

0:04:02.404 --> 0:04:05.204
<v Speaker 1>want to think that it did, but I'm actually just

0:04:05.284 --> 0:04:08.484
<v Speaker 1>curious what you what your take on that particular element is.

0:04:08.804 --> 0:04:10.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I worked for Disney for ten years.

0:04:10.924 --> 0:04:14.404
<v Speaker 3>I've ESPN and ABC News, so full disclosure, you know,

0:04:14.484 --> 0:04:18.164
<v Speaker 3>I have you know, a pension which is a Disney stock.

0:04:18.484 --> 0:04:20.884
<v Speaker 3>But I also hate their guts, so that bias probably

0:04:20.884 --> 0:04:25.524
<v Speaker 3>outweighs my financial motivation. But like, look, these companies tend

0:04:25.524 --> 0:04:29.924
<v Speaker 3>to make decisions very expediently.

0:04:29.564 --> 0:04:30.884
<v Speaker 2>Is one way I would put it.

0:04:31.124 --> 0:04:35.204
<v Speaker 3>Right, Maybe you have people who have vision about individual products, right,

0:04:35.244 --> 0:04:37.084
<v Speaker 3>but like I think at the end of the day,

0:04:37.924 --> 0:04:42.404
<v Speaker 3>Bob Eiger cares about theme parks and movies and big

0:04:42.404 --> 0:04:47.964
<v Speaker 3>franchise IP right use gigantic projects and like and probably

0:04:48.004 --> 0:04:51.844
<v Speaker 3>sees ABC News as this thing that like, you know,

0:04:52.284 --> 0:04:55.484
<v Speaker 3>still I think probably makes money. I mean, TV news

0:04:55.724 --> 0:04:57.124
<v Speaker 3>does not get the ratings at once to you, but

0:04:57.164 --> 0:05:00.644
<v Speaker 3>it's not that expensive to produce as compared to like

0:05:00.684 --> 0:05:02.804
<v Speaker 3>scripted drama or things like that.

0:05:03.164 --> 0:05:05.084
<v Speaker 2>But like, increasingly these big.

0:05:04.924 --> 0:05:06.644
<v Speaker 3>Networks have wondered, do we even want to be in

0:05:06.684 --> 0:05:09.284
<v Speaker 3>the news business at all? Right, Like the head of

0:05:09.404 --> 0:05:12.844
<v Speaker 3>Disney doesn't really care about like the creative or journalistic

0:05:12.844 --> 0:05:15.604
<v Speaker 3>integrity accept to the extent that like you know, it

0:05:15.724 --> 0:05:19.644
<v Speaker 3>might create problems for talent down the line. So yeah, look,

0:05:19.724 --> 0:05:22.524
<v Speaker 3>the president I would draw is to the Washington.

0:05:22.204 --> 0:05:24.204
<v Speaker 2>Post, which is all by Jeff Bezos.

0:05:24.404 --> 0:05:26.844
<v Speaker 3>I'm a keen observer of media, particularly when it comes

0:05:26.844 --> 0:05:31.324
<v Speaker 3>to covering American domestic politics. Right, I would say five

0:05:31.404 --> 0:05:34.004
<v Speaker 3>or ten years ago and people would say, well, you know,

0:05:34.084 --> 0:05:37.124
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times is the most presigious and highest

0:05:37.164 --> 0:05:41.324
<v Speaker 3>grossing newspaper at least center left newspaper media brand in America.

0:05:41.644 --> 0:05:43.964
<v Speaker 3>But the Washington Post is nipping at their heels. They

0:05:43.964 --> 0:05:46.764
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of talent on domestic politics. They're kind

0:05:46.764 --> 0:05:49.484
<v Speaker 3>of coequal. They break a lot of stories, they win

0:05:49.844 --> 0:05:53.404
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Pulitzers, and they've made one decision after

0:05:53.404 --> 0:05:55.644
<v Speaker 3>another have led to a lot of the other kind

0:05:55.644 --> 0:06:01.364
<v Speaker 3>of cancelations, canceled subscriptions, you know, when they squashed a

0:06:01.764 --> 0:06:05.164
<v Speaker 3>op ed endorsing Kamala Harris. And again I don't really

0:06:05.164 --> 0:06:07.004
<v Speaker 3>think that like newspapers should be in the business of

0:06:07.084 --> 0:06:10.444
<v Speaker 3>endorsing candidate, at least for national office. Have always found

0:06:10.524 --> 0:06:13.684
<v Speaker 3>that strange in some ways. I find that as six

0:06:13.764 --> 0:06:17.924
<v Speaker 3>between otbed and news kind of strange. But that led

0:06:17.964 --> 0:06:21.364
<v Speaker 3>to I think maybe tens of thousands to hundreds of

0:06:21.404 --> 0:06:24.444
<v Speaker 3>thousands of canceled subscriptions. And meanwhile, if you look at

0:06:24.764 --> 0:06:28.604
<v Speaker 3>the talent, right, like, if you took like the fifty

0:06:28.644 --> 0:06:32.644
<v Speaker 3>biggest name brands at the Washington Post from two years ago,

0:06:32.724 --> 0:06:36.564
<v Speaker 3>I think literally half might be gone and absolutely are

0:06:36.644 --> 0:06:40.124
<v Speaker 3>voluntary based on on feel like did not have editorial

0:06:40.164 --> 0:06:41.244
<v Speaker 3>support of the masthead.

0:06:41.604 --> 0:06:43.204
<v Speaker 2>And you know that's a challenge.

0:06:43.204 --> 0:06:44.644
<v Speaker 3>I mean it might be in a world where like,

0:06:45.044 --> 0:06:48.684
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think the Washington Post has significantly declined

0:06:48.724 --> 0:06:52.764
<v Speaker 3>in both revenue and relevance, right and like, yeah, I know.

0:06:52.844 --> 0:06:54.884
<v Speaker 3>I mean they're going to be very sensitive things like

0:06:54.884 --> 0:06:56.604
<v Speaker 3>like Hulu subscriptions.

0:06:56.604 --> 0:06:58.364
<v Speaker 2>That's the way these businesses work, right.

0:06:58.564 --> 0:07:01.404
<v Speaker 3>Like again, ordinarily, sometimes I think boycotts are a little

0:07:01.404 --> 0:07:02.524
<v Speaker 3>pretentious and cilly.

0:07:02.684 --> 0:07:04.204
<v Speaker 2>Like the way these big.

0:07:05.444 --> 0:07:08.764
<v Speaker 3>Gigantic, generic kind of media brands work is, you know,

0:07:08.844 --> 0:07:11.044
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to get yelled at by people, right,

0:07:11.324 --> 0:07:13.284
<v Speaker 3>They're risk averse, and so if they're like, well, this

0:07:13.284 --> 0:07:15.684
<v Speaker 3>could jeopardize our whole business, and I think that's that's

0:07:15.684 --> 0:07:17.084
<v Speaker 3>probably part of it.

0:07:18.644 --> 0:07:20.164
<v Speaker 2>I Mean, one thing to understand.

0:07:19.724 --> 0:07:22.364
<v Speaker 3>About Trump is he does a lot of things that

0:07:22.404 --> 0:07:25.484
<v Speaker 3>I think are very extreme and objectionable. And I think

0:07:25.524 --> 0:07:27.804
<v Speaker 3>this is one of the clear things that like is

0:07:27.884 --> 0:07:32.124
<v Speaker 3>classic authoritarian capital a right, you look at Turkey or

0:07:32.204 --> 0:07:34.564
<v Speaker 3>Russia or other countries where there's been to pull back

0:07:34.564 --> 0:07:39.004
<v Speaker 3>from democracy, and like finding a pretense to cancel broadcast licenses,

0:07:39.404 --> 0:07:45.164
<v Speaker 3>is is capital a authoritarian? They did kind of pulled back,

0:07:45.244 --> 0:07:49.324
<v Speaker 3>and Carr kind of said, well, I was just pontificating,

0:07:49.444 --> 0:07:52.484
<v Speaker 3>and well, it's important that they, you know, and people

0:07:52.524 --> 0:07:55.724
<v Speaker 3>have a heuristic where they're kind of discount what it is,

0:07:56.004 --> 0:07:56.524
<v Speaker 3>you know, they.

0:07:56.604 --> 0:07:59.724
<v Speaker 1>They could have not pulled back. Yes, this is true now,

0:07:59.804 --> 0:08:00.484
<v Speaker 1>but lo I will.

0:08:00.324 --> 0:08:02.284
<v Speaker 3>Say it's I criticize them in my newsletter over that

0:08:02.284 --> 0:08:04.284
<v Speaker 3>we can like, you know, I will say good for

0:08:05.204 --> 0:08:08.844
<v Speaker 3>Disney for uncancelling Kimmell, who, by the way, did fuck

0:08:08.924 --> 0:08:11.404
<v Speaker 3>up in some let me just you know. The fuck

0:08:11.484 --> 0:08:14.724
<v Speaker 3>up is that he said or strongly implied that the

0:08:15.284 --> 0:08:21.604
<v Speaker 3>person who allegedly killed Charlie Kirk was MAGA, and that

0:08:21.684 --> 0:08:23.724
<v Speaker 3>MAGA was trying to MAGA made America creager and was

0:08:23.764 --> 0:08:26.484
<v Speaker 3>trying to deny the fact that like he was MAGA.

0:08:26.724 --> 0:08:33.284
<v Speaker 3>And you know, Kimmel said that on Monday Evenings episode

0:08:34.564 --> 0:08:37.124
<v Speaker 3>based on really no evidence whatsoever, based on kind of

0:08:37.204 --> 0:08:40.524
<v Speaker 3>like you know what I think are properly called kind

0:08:40.564 --> 0:08:45.044
<v Speaker 3>of conspiracy theories on Blue Sky and Twitter and know

0:08:45.124 --> 0:08:48.444
<v Speaker 3>and everyone uses that phrase insensitivity, Like I think this

0:08:48.684 --> 0:08:54.284
<v Speaker 3>to a certain extent, the job of comedians is to

0:08:54.804 --> 0:08:57.244
<v Speaker 3>press the line on sensitivity. So I think sensitivity is

0:08:57.284 --> 0:09:01.804
<v Speaker 3>like a dumb euphemism, right, He Jimmy Kimmel spread misinformation.

0:09:02.524 --> 0:09:04.604
<v Speaker 3>But I'll tell you what, who hasn't at some point

0:09:05.524 --> 0:09:06.844
<v Speaker 3>it's script TV. It's not like to be known the

0:09:06.844 --> 0:09:09.124
<v Speaker 3>reason I'm lest forgiving, but like it's far far below

0:09:10.004 --> 0:09:13.484
<v Speaker 3>a canceling offense, right or a firing offense.

0:09:14.244 --> 0:09:18.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And just to give a bit of history to

0:09:18.524 --> 0:09:20.564
<v Speaker 1>that particular point. But then I also want to go

0:09:20.684 --> 0:09:23.124
<v Speaker 1>even a little further back to highlight something else that

0:09:23.164 --> 0:09:27.404
<v Speaker 1>you said. There was a pretty substantial Supreme Court decision

0:09:28.004 --> 0:09:31.644
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen sixty four New York Times versus Sullivan,

0:09:32.244 --> 0:09:37.044
<v Speaker 1>And that decision came out of an ad that The

0:09:37.044 --> 0:09:41.364
<v Speaker 1>New York Times had run, and they basically were trying

0:09:41.364 --> 0:09:45.724
<v Speaker 1>to contribute donations to defend MLK on perjury charges. And

0:09:45.764 --> 0:09:51.244
<v Speaker 1>the ad had some factual inaccuracies, and LB Sullivan, who's

0:09:51.364 --> 0:09:55.564
<v Speaker 1>the Sullivan of the case, said that he felt personally

0:09:55.644 --> 0:09:58.764
<v Speaker 1>criticized even though he was never actually mentioned by name

0:09:58.804 --> 0:10:01.884
<v Speaker 1>in the ad. He sent a request to The Times

0:10:01.924 --> 0:10:07.804
<v Speaker 1>to retract the information and wanted damages. The Times refused anyway,

0:10:07.844 --> 0:10:11.244
<v Speaker 1>this went all the way up to the Supreme Court,

0:10:11.684 --> 0:10:15.644
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times

0:10:15.884 --> 0:10:19.484
<v Speaker 1>and establish the standard known as the actual malice standard

0:10:19.564 --> 0:10:22.284
<v Speaker 1>or reckless disregard of the truth. So basically, if you

0:10:22.284 --> 0:10:24.884
<v Speaker 1>want to win a libel suit, you have to prove

0:10:25.444 --> 0:10:30.244
<v Speaker 1>that the person who was making this statement knew it

0:10:30.324 --> 0:10:33.924
<v Speaker 1>was false and acted with an malicious purpose, right, with

0:10:34.044 --> 0:10:38.044
<v Speaker 1>an intent to harm the subject. Which was a huge,

0:10:38.524 --> 0:10:42.084
<v Speaker 1>kind of huge win for free speech because these factual

0:10:42.084 --> 0:10:45.204
<v Speaker 1>inaccuracies that were in the ad, they weren't on purpose, right,

0:10:45.244 --> 0:10:47.644
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they wanted to take this guy down

0:10:47.724 --> 0:10:50.404
<v Speaker 1>and so but they just said, you know, okay, yeah,

0:10:50.524 --> 0:10:53.644
<v Speaker 1>like factual inaccuracies, but it's not enough to suspend our

0:10:53.724 --> 0:10:55.844
<v Speaker 1>license and to get rid of this. And this was

0:10:55.924 --> 0:11:00.684
<v Speaker 1>kind of a landmark First Amendment free speech decision, but

0:11:00.884 --> 0:11:03.164
<v Speaker 1>something that I want to kind of go back even

0:11:03.444 --> 0:11:06.884
<v Speaker 1>further in history. The reason, by the way that I

0:11:06.964 --> 0:11:09.204
<v Speaker 1>invoke the actual malice standard is I think that Jimmy

0:11:09.204 --> 0:11:13.564
<v Speaker 1>came well you know, also you can be factually inaccurate

0:11:13.604 --> 0:11:16.924
<v Speaker 1>and not actually fullifol of that standard. Right, you didn't

0:11:16.924 --> 0:11:20.444
<v Speaker 1>say it knowing that you were blatantly saying something untrue.

0:11:20.924 --> 0:11:22.684
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time he probably thought that he

0:11:22.764 --> 0:11:23.884
<v Speaker 1>was saying something.

0:11:24.004 --> 0:11:24.564
<v Speaker 2>That was right.

0:11:24.604 --> 0:11:28.044
<v Speaker 1>Whether you know he was correct journalistically or not is

0:11:28.084 --> 0:11:31.404
<v Speaker 1>a different story. But going even further back, Nate, one

0:11:31.444 --> 0:11:35.244
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you said was that, you know, networks,

0:11:35.444 --> 0:11:40.084
<v Speaker 1>places like Disney are constantly way playing this calculus, right.

0:11:40.084 --> 0:11:42.164
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to get criticized, and they're trying to

0:11:42.204 --> 0:11:44.964
<v Speaker 1>figure out, like what do we do, how do we

0:11:45.564 --> 0:11:49.684
<v Speaker 1>sidestep that? And it's really interesting to me because I

0:11:49.684 --> 0:11:52.604
<v Speaker 1>think that all of the free speech attacks in the

0:11:52.684 --> 0:11:57.524
<v Speaker 1>United States have shown this kind of constant calculus, and

0:11:57.564 --> 0:12:00.404
<v Speaker 1>it's not always worked out the way that the person

0:12:00.604 --> 0:12:03.204
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. So I think this the oldest kind

0:12:03.204 --> 0:12:05.724
<v Speaker 1>of attack goes back to seventeen ninety eight with the

0:12:05.724 --> 0:12:10.644
<v Speaker 1>Sedition Act, right, And this was John Adams when he

0:12:10.724 --> 0:12:13.884
<v Speaker 1>basically said they were in a war with France. It

0:12:13.924 --> 0:12:17.164
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a declared war, and he wanted to silence media

0:12:17.204 --> 0:12:20.044
<v Speaker 1>critics of the government, and so he passed an act

0:12:20.044 --> 0:12:23.204
<v Speaker 1>that said it was unlawful to publish any quote, false,

0:12:23.324 --> 0:12:28.644
<v Speaker 1>scandalous and malicious writing against the government end quote. And

0:12:29.084 --> 0:12:33.164
<v Speaker 1>the measures were huge, fins up to two thousand dollars.

0:12:33.284 --> 0:12:35.044
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much is that, I don't even know.

0:12:35.364 --> 0:12:39.084
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen ninety eight, like that's insane, two years in prison.

0:12:39.764 --> 0:12:42.884
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of publications started censoring themselves. But

0:12:43.044 --> 0:12:47.244
<v Speaker 1>what ended up happening, and they actually used it very punitively.

0:12:47.564 --> 0:12:51.724
<v Speaker 1>They ended up sending people to jail. Several newspapers had

0:12:51.724 --> 0:12:55.804
<v Speaker 1>to shut down. But what ended up happening was that

0:12:55.884 --> 0:12:58.644
<v Speaker 1>there was a huge backlash against this right. This was

0:12:58.684 --> 0:13:02.004
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Federalists. Jefferson came to power on

0:13:02.244 --> 0:13:07.604
<v Speaker 1>like a huge wave of support, and even later the

0:13:07.964 --> 0:13:11.204
<v Speaker 1>Justice Samuel Chase of the Supreme Court, who had been

0:13:11.324 --> 0:13:15.804
<v Speaker 1>very pro Sedition Act, he was impeached for this. So

0:13:15.924 --> 0:13:20.204
<v Speaker 1>basically everyone was galvanized against it. So it ended up

0:13:20.804 --> 0:13:25.804
<v Speaker 1>just having a huge, huge backlash to that. Attempt to

0:13:25.884 --> 0:13:29.204
<v Speaker 1>stem free speech happened again during World War One with

0:13:29.284 --> 0:13:32.964
<v Speaker 1>Woodrow Wilson, who was a scholar who had actually defended

0:13:33.124 --> 0:13:36.764
<v Speaker 1>free speech, and he tried to get another Sedition Act.

0:13:36.964 --> 0:13:40.204
<v Speaker 1>Then we had McCarthyism in the fifties who tried to

0:13:40.204 --> 0:13:43.924
<v Speaker 1>bully journalists and do all of that that again big

0:13:44.644 --> 0:13:48.844
<v Speaker 1>backlash people did. The people who stood up to McCarthyism

0:13:48.884 --> 0:13:51.324
<v Speaker 1>have fared much better in the eyes of history than

0:13:51.364 --> 0:13:54.804
<v Speaker 1>the people like McCarthy himself. Then we've got New York

0:13:54.804 --> 0:13:58.204
<v Speaker 1>Times versus Sullivan. Then we get Richard Nixon, and so

0:13:58.284 --> 0:14:00.804
<v Speaker 1>it's very funny when you started saying that you think

0:14:00.804 --> 0:14:04.484
<v Speaker 1>the best kind of example is the Washington Post. I

0:14:04.564 --> 0:14:06.524
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going to go in a totally different direction,

0:14:06.684 --> 0:14:09.844
<v Speaker 1>because the other time that an FCC license was threatened

0:14:09.924 --> 0:14:12.924
<v Speaker 1>was against the Washington Post when they were trying to

0:14:12.964 --> 0:14:16.524
<v Speaker 1>publish the Pentagon Papers. They published them anyway, and obviously

0:14:16.604 --> 0:14:22.004
<v Speaker 1>they won that battle. But Nixon was probably, other than Trump,

0:14:22.044 --> 0:14:27.004
<v Speaker 1>the single most vindictive president against the media. He ousted

0:14:27.124 --> 0:14:31.404
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Lourie for an article that he wrote in nineteen

0:14:31.444 --> 0:14:34.364
<v Speaker 1>seventy one for the La Times, so he actually just

0:14:34.404 --> 0:14:38.604
<v Speaker 1>banned him from the White House. And you know, he

0:14:39.524 --> 0:14:43.044
<v Speaker 1>basically said that the press, whom he started calling the

0:14:43.044 --> 0:14:48.004
<v Speaker 1>media that comes from Nixon, was the enemy, and told

0:14:48.204 --> 0:14:52.964
<v Speaker 1>his Vice president Spiro Agnew, to constantly attack the media.

0:14:53.324 --> 0:14:57.084
<v Speaker 1>He referred to them as a small and unelected elite

0:14:57.644 --> 0:15:01.644
<v Speaker 1>and basically create a rift so that people wouldn't trust

0:15:02.644 --> 0:15:05.924
<v Speaker 1>the media. And he even threatened lawsuits if anyone used

0:15:06.084 --> 0:15:10.724
<v Speaker 1>tricky Dick in print, so that you know, it became

0:15:10.764 --> 0:15:14.324
<v Speaker 1>incredibly petty, and he did kind of this. Trump is

0:15:14.364 --> 0:15:16.884
<v Speaker 1>really taking a page out of his playbook in a way,

0:15:16.884 --> 0:15:22.364
<v Speaker 1>because he had the irs investigate tax returns by Seymour,

0:15:22.404 --> 0:15:26.764
<v Speaker 1>Hirsh and other journalists that the White House didn't really like.

0:15:27.244 --> 0:15:30.164
<v Speaker 1>And so the thing that I found that I thought

0:15:30.204 --> 0:15:35.564
<v Speaker 1>was the most ridiculous is this was pre Watergate, Gordon

0:15:35.644 --> 0:15:42.204
<v Speaker 1>Liddy and Howard Hunt discussed murdering a journalist, Jack Anderson,

0:15:42.444 --> 0:15:47.764
<v Speaker 1>like actually killing him, so that he would stop basically

0:15:48.004 --> 0:15:51.364
<v Speaker 1>the leaks that were damaging to Dixon into the administration

0:15:51.804 --> 0:15:56.564
<v Speaker 1>and stop any further criticism of the administration. They considered

0:15:56.564 --> 0:16:00.244
<v Speaker 1>things like putting LSD on his steering wheel so that

0:16:00.284 --> 0:16:03.404
<v Speaker 1>he would start hallucinating while driving his car and get

0:16:03.404 --> 0:16:05.404
<v Speaker 1>into a car crash, which isn't.

0:16:05.244 --> 0:16:07.804
<v Speaker 2>Free osc Yeah, exactly.

0:16:08.564 --> 0:16:12.364
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they realized how LSD. Yeah. Anyway, and

0:16:12.404 --> 0:16:14.404
<v Speaker 1>then Lyddy, this is a quote from Lyddy. He said,

0:16:14.404 --> 0:16:18.564
<v Speaker 1>I would have knifed him or broken his neck end quote.

0:16:19.044 --> 0:16:22.604
<v Speaker 1>So this is all to say that, you know, we

0:16:22.684 --> 0:16:25.404
<v Speaker 1>see these sorts of attacks in the past, and every

0:16:25.444 --> 0:16:27.924
<v Speaker 1>single time they have not worked out well, but every

0:16:27.964 --> 0:16:30.924
<v Speaker 1>single time the media has actually fought back. Right the

0:16:31.004 --> 0:16:36.124
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post published Pentagon papers, Laurie had a career in journalism,

0:16:36.164 --> 0:16:39.884
<v Speaker 1>like people would hire him after that, and Seymour Hirsch

0:16:39.964 --> 0:16:43.924
<v Speaker 1>obviously Pulitzer Prize, like all of these people are storied

0:16:44.124 --> 0:16:48.084
<v Speaker 1>journalists and people who had the support of the country.

0:16:48.484 --> 0:16:52.484
<v Speaker 1>And with Kimmel at the beginning, it was the first

0:16:52.524 --> 0:16:56.764
<v Speaker 1>time that an organization had gotten a threat from the

0:16:56.844 --> 0:16:59.684
<v Speaker 1>FCC and rather than saying no, fuck you, you know,

0:16:59.724 --> 0:17:03.324
<v Speaker 1>we're the media and this is freedom of press, said okay, okay,

0:17:03.404 --> 0:17:07.604
<v Speaker 1>we'll fire you until they didn't. So this is I

0:17:07.604 --> 0:17:10.644
<v Speaker 1>think a very interesting moment. But those historical precedents I

0:17:10.644 --> 0:17:14.044
<v Speaker 1>think are really interesting to keep in mind, especially because

0:17:14.084 --> 0:17:16.084
<v Speaker 1>they did not turn out well for the government.

0:17:17.364 --> 0:17:32.324
<v Speaker 3>And we'll be right back after this break. I think

0:17:32.324 --> 0:17:34.524
<v Speaker 3>with anything we're covering in today's age, you have to

0:17:34.524 --> 0:17:40.004
<v Speaker 3>be aware that most commentators have a bias towards thinking

0:17:41.364 --> 0:17:43.684
<v Speaker 3>history begins when their age eight, you know what I mean.

0:17:44.684 --> 0:17:47.324
<v Speaker 3>In the longer sweep of like how does this moment

0:17:47.324 --> 0:17:50.764
<v Speaker 3>in America relate to There's a lot of miles in

0:17:50.804 --> 0:17:53.044
<v Speaker 3>the sixties, right, the Civil War. I mean that, you know,

0:17:53.244 --> 0:17:55.444
<v Speaker 3>I think I think one has to be careful with

0:17:55.524 --> 0:17:58.764
<v Speaker 3>those comparisons, and it might be concerning enough that we

0:17:58.884 --> 0:18:02.404
<v Speaker 3>seem to be losing decades of progress.

0:18:01.484 --> 0:18:02.844
<v Speaker 2>On some issues, right, yep.

0:18:04.524 --> 0:18:06.204
<v Speaker 3>I mean there was the other president, which is you know,

0:18:06.804 --> 0:18:11.004
<v Speaker 3>do you know who Jimmy Kimmel.

0:18:09.604 --> 0:18:10.204
<v Speaker 2>Used on ABC.

0:18:11.724 --> 0:18:17.044
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember Bill Maher because Bill Maher's politically incorrect

0:18:17.564 --> 0:18:21.284
<v Speaker 4>got canceled because he said the nine to eleven terrorists

0:18:21.724 --> 0:18:23.124
<v Speaker 4>were courageous and we.

0:18:23.004 --> 0:18:27.644
<v Speaker 3>Are not lobbying cruise missiles from thousands of miles away, right.

0:18:27.884 --> 0:18:32.964
<v Speaker 3>He said that like seven days after nine eleven. It

0:18:33.084 --> 0:18:35.764
<v Speaker 3>was litigated in the press for a much longer time.

0:18:35.884 --> 0:18:38.324
<v Speaker 2>Eventually his show was.

0:18:39.964 --> 0:18:42.044
<v Speaker 3>Let lapse, and then he went to HBO and I'm

0:18:42.084 --> 0:18:44.884
<v Speaker 3>sure made lots of money and became more than ye

0:18:45.324 --> 0:18:48.044
<v Speaker 3>you know, part of cancelation. And now I want to

0:18:48.044 --> 0:18:51.124
<v Speaker 3>be clear, I thought that their cancel culture was a

0:18:51.164 --> 0:18:54.844
<v Speaker 3>thing that liberals I call them progressives because it's a

0:18:54.884 --> 0:19:02.444
<v Speaker 3>very illiberal attitude, right, that progressives really were bloodthirsty for

0:19:02.684 --> 0:19:04.484
<v Speaker 3>a number of years kind of picking in the year

0:19:04.564 --> 0:19:07.044
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty or so, I thought it was an embarrassment

0:19:07.044 --> 0:19:09.364
<v Speaker 3>to the liberal tradition of free speech. I think there

0:19:09.444 --> 0:19:12.924
<v Speaker 3>hetty and jealous, and they don't understand how in a

0:19:13.084 --> 0:19:16.364
<v Speaker 3>relatively free country that when you suppress speech, it usually

0:19:16.364 --> 0:19:19.404
<v Speaker 3>only makes it more compelling and like and more powerful. Right,

0:19:19.924 --> 0:19:22.444
<v Speaker 3>And they thought they could contain the information ecosystem.

0:19:22.604 --> 0:19:24.044
<v Speaker 2>They accomplished nothing that they wanted.

0:19:24.284 --> 0:19:30.564
<v Speaker 3>And you know, they have direct moral responsibility for contributing

0:19:30.604 --> 0:19:34.564
<v Speaker 3>to a climate in which free speech is compromised. With

0:19:34.564 --> 0:19:36.924
<v Speaker 3>that said, Maria, as you said, people have always been

0:19:37.044 --> 0:19:43.844
<v Speaker 3>hypocritical about free speech. The definition's always been contingent and

0:19:43.924 --> 0:19:49.164
<v Speaker 3>evolving in practice, right. And so you know, if you

0:19:49.484 --> 0:19:52.044
<v Speaker 3>were around for September eleventh when Bill mahrg got canceled,

0:19:52.084 --> 0:19:54.924
<v Speaker 3>the Dixie Chicks and Phil Donahue and and other you

0:19:54.964 --> 0:19:57.764
<v Speaker 3>know people, you know you're not like, you're not surprised

0:19:57.844 --> 0:19:59.804
<v Speaker 3>very much by by any of this.

0:20:00.044 --> 0:20:02.684
<v Speaker 2>And now if I'm Trump, now it's my turn. Now

0:20:02.684 --> 0:20:03.284
<v Speaker 2>it's my turn.

0:20:03.524 --> 0:20:05.844
<v Speaker 3>And I felt, I think justifiably, there was a lot

0:20:05.884 --> 0:20:08.604
<v Speaker 3>of bullshit from progressives when they were in power, right,

0:20:08.684 --> 0:20:11.124
<v Speaker 3>and we went rever right and by the way, I

0:20:11.124 --> 0:20:13.964
<v Speaker 3>don't think progressives have often stood up for like the

0:20:14.044 --> 0:20:18.404
<v Speaker 3>higher minded principles either, right, they don't think like good

0:20:18.404 --> 0:20:21.604
<v Speaker 3>poker players, where it's like, okay, what is the equilibrium

0:20:21.644 --> 0:20:24.244
<v Speaker 3>If everybody adopts this attitude, it's kind of contient, like

0:20:24.284 --> 0:20:27.084
<v Speaker 3>the golden rule, right, have decided to get along, if

0:20:27.124 --> 0:20:29.084
<v Speaker 3>you know, literally just put yourself in the person's shoes

0:20:29.124 --> 0:20:31.364
<v Speaker 3>and say, eventually your public is going to win back

0:20:31.404 --> 0:20:33.084
<v Speaker 3>in office. And by the way, eventually we'll be a

0:20:33.084 --> 0:20:35.484
<v Speaker 3>Democrat back in office, maybe in in I guess for

0:20:35.484 --> 0:20:37.244
<v Speaker 3>early in Trump term three and a half years, right,

0:20:37.764 --> 0:20:40.964
<v Speaker 3>you know, turnabout will be fair play then, But like

0:20:41.444 --> 0:20:43.444
<v Speaker 3>perpetually you're losing it.

0:20:44.124 --> 0:20:48.764
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that we forget that. We forget that

0:20:49.164 --> 0:20:53.644
<v Speaker 1>free speech was created to protect speech we don't like,

0:20:54.164 --> 0:20:57.204
<v Speaker 1>but not speech that we agree with. People forget this

0:20:57.364 --> 0:20:59.524
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They're like, yes, free speech. Wait, you

0:20:59.564 --> 0:21:02.684
<v Speaker 1>said something that I disagree with. You can't say that.

0:21:02.964 --> 0:21:06.004
<v Speaker 1>And we've said this on the show before, and you know,

0:21:06.244 --> 0:21:09.484
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to constantly give you history lessons, but

0:21:09.564 --> 0:21:13.484
<v Speaker 1>remember we talked about Skochie, Illinois, Nate and kind of

0:21:13.724 --> 0:21:16.644
<v Speaker 1>and the ACLU on this show before. For people who

0:21:16.644 --> 0:21:20.444
<v Speaker 1>missed that episode. I was basically kind of a case

0:21:20.564 --> 0:21:24.964
<v Speaker 1>that went to the Supreme Court that involved letting neo

0:21:25.044 --> 0:21:29.204
<v Speaker 1>Nazis march in a Jewish in a predominantly Jewish community,

0:21:29.444 --> 0:21:31.444
<v Speaker 1>and the ACL you took it on, and I remember,

0:21:31.604 --> 0:21:35.524
<v Speaker 1>I still remember learning about that and being like, holy shit,

0:21:35.804 --> 0:21:38.484
<v Speaker 1>Like fuck those guys. But yes, like you have to

0:21:38.524 --> 0:21:42.284
<v Speaker 1>protect the speech that you most disagree with, because that's

0:21:42.404 --> 0:21:45.524
<v Speaker 1>the whole point, right, that is what free speech means.

0:21:45.804 --> 0:21:48.284
<v Speaker 1>It means that we can disagree. It means that we

0:21:48.284 --> 0:21:51.284
<v Speaker 1>can have civil discourse. It means that we can all

0:21:51.564 --> 0:21:54.684
<v Speaker 1>have all of these different ideas, and it's okay. So

0:21:54.924 --> 0:21:57.924
<v Speaker 1>I actually nate agree with you that, you know, the

0:21:58.044 --> 0:22:00.204
<v Speaker 1>liberals went way too far. I think this was the

0:22:00.244 --> 0:22:02.444
<v Speaker 1>case in academia, you know. I think this was the

0:22:02.444 --> 0:22:06.924
<v Speaker 1>case at my alma mater, Harvard, where certain professors lost

0:22:06.924 --> 0:22:10.484
<v Speaker 1>their jobs right for I was saying idea, you know,

0:22:10.564 --> 0:22:14.804
<v Speaker 1>for engaging in research that was not politically correct, and

0:22:15.044 --> 0:22:18.524
<v Speaker 1>that's not what academia is about. As long as you

0:22:18.724 --> 0:22:22.324
<v Speaker 1>are not academically dishonest, as long as you're actually kind

0:22:22.364 --> 0:22:26.284
<v Speaker 1>of trying to figure out what the truth is, you know,

0:22:26.324 --> 0:22:29.244
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to hold different opinions. But I think that

0:22:29.804 --> 0:22:32.924
<v Speaker 1>as you say, this isn't like we've devolved, like this

0:22:32.964 --> 0:22:36.124
<v Speaker 1>is horrifying, like that this is now the spiral right,

0:22:36.204 --> 0:22:39.164
<v Speaker 1>and instead you need to kind of reset and go

0:22:39.284 --> 0:22:41.964
<v Speaker 1>back to those first principles and say, Okay, you know,

0:22:42.204 --> 0:22:45.004
<v Speaker 1>free speech, we're for it. The Supreme Court has to

0:22:45.044 --> 0:22:49.004
<v Speaker 1>say this country is for free speech, and the FCC

0:22:49.244 --> 0:22:53.044
<v Speaker 1>can't be threatening licenses because of something somebody said that

0:22:53.084 --> 0:22:55.644
<v Speaker 1>they don't like, and we can't be in a climate,

0:22:55.724 --> 0:22:58.284
<v Speaker 1>you know. After that, Trump doubled down and said, yeah,

0:22:58.324 --> 0:23:01.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, you shouldn't criticize the president. If we don't

0:23:01.044 --> 0:23:03.524
<v Speaker 1>like you or you say something bad about me, there

0:23:03.524 --> 0:23:05.964
<v Speaker 1>are going to be consequences. I mean, it's insane right

0:23:06.004 --> 0:23:08.484
<v Speaker 1>for a president to say that, But we're at the

0:23:08.484 --> 0:23:10.724
<v Speaker 1>point where people there are a lot of people who

0:23:10.724 --> 0:23:13.044
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's insane and who are like, yeah, serves

0:23:13.044 --> 0:23:16.884
<v Speaker 1>you right, you shouldn't criticize the president. And the funniest

0:23:16.924 --> 0:23:23.284
<v Speaker 1>thing is what has prompted this whole conversation is the

0:23:23.364 --> 0:23:26.284
<v Speaker 1>death of Charlie Kirk, who I think, you know, I

0:23:26.324 --> 0:23:29.164
<v Speaker 1>didn't know him and I didn't know much about him

0:23:29.244 --> 0:23:32.404
<v Speaker 1>until he died. To be perfectly honest, But I think

0:23:32.444 --> 0:23:35.684
<v Speaker 1>he would be someone who actually would be opposed to

0:23:36.444 --> 0:23:38.604
<v Speaker 1>all of this because he was a proponent of free speech.

0:23:40.044 --> 0:23:42.524
<v Speaker 3>No, and you know a lot of these videos have

0:23:42.564 --> 0:23:46.444
<v Speaker 3>circulated on social media of him, like debating on college

0:23:46.484 --> 0:23:48.364
<v Speaker 3>campus is kind of like his big thing, and like,

0:23:48.964 --> 0:23:53.204
<v Speaker 3>you know, he he was good at that. And the

0:23:53.204 --> 0:23:55.364
<v Speaker 3>whole idea was it's an open for him, come debate me,

0:23:56.204 --> 0:23:58.724
<v Speaker 3>bro right, and like here, I'll get myself in trouble

0:23:58.724 --> 0:24:01.404
<v Speaker 3>with probably only a very small fraction or audience. Right,

0:24:01.564 --> 0:24:05.284
<v Speaker 3>you know, there aren't that many I don't think super

0:24:05.364 --> 0:24:13.484
<v Speaker 3>eloquent spokespeople for the Trumpian movement. Okay, and yet half

0:24:13.524 --> 0:24:17.244
<v Speaker 3>the country forty nine point nine percent, he won the

0:24:17.284 --> 0:24:20.084
<v Speaker 3>popular vote. You know, half the country voted for it

0:24:20.684 --> 0:24:24.164
<v Speaker 3>last time. And like and like, you know, you have

0:24:24.244 --> 0:24:29.204
<v Speaker 3>to live in that world. And if you're not going to, like,

0:24:29.924 --> 0:24:32.924
<v Speaker 3>you know, give a platform to Ben Shapiro or Charlie kan,

0:24:32.964 --> 0:24:34.204
<v Speaker 3>who the fuck are you going to give a plat

0:24:34.484 --> 0:24:36.444
<v Speaker 3>form too? You know what I mean, you have to

0:24:36.444 --> 0:24:38.764
<v Speaker 3>be willing to have you know, again, I believe in

0:24:38.804 --> 0:24:40.844
<v Speaker 3>speech broadly, not I just don't think of speech as

0:24:40.844 --> 0:24:42.884
<v Speaker 3>the free amendment. But I believe in like we have

0:24:42.964 --> 0:24:45.804
<v Speaker 3>to have a more tolerant tolerance is a word I

0:24:45.804 --> 0:24:51.604
<v Speaker 3>would use, right, A more tolerant ecosystem for disagreement.

0:24:52.204 --> 0:24:55.604
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely more tolerant. And I would also say kinder right

0:24:55.644 --> 0:25:01.484
<v Speaker 1>where your knee jerk reaction isn't like fuck this person.

0:25:01.764 --> 0:25:04.764
<v Speaker 1>But okay, you know this doesn't sound right to me,

0:25:05.924 --> 0:25:09.244
<v Speaker 1>But where are you coming from? Like to try to understand,

0:25:09.604 --> 0:25:12.524
<v Speaker 1>to at least try to come from a place of

0:25:12.604 --> 0:25:15.804
<v Speaker 1>kindness and not a place of pitchforks, and like, let's

0:25:15.804 --> 0:25:19.164
<v Speaker 1>burn you down, which is I think, you know, to

0:25:19.204 --> 0:25:21.964
<v Speaker 1>bring this back to Kimmel, which is I think the

0:25:22.084 --> 0:25:25.924
<v Speaker 1>natural end of all of this rhetoric is, you know,

0:25:25.964 --> 0:25:29.364
<v Speaker 1>we're going to burn you down, and we're going to

0:25:29.484 --> 0:25:32.764
<v Speaker 1>remove you from the air, and we're going to threaten

0:25:33.084 --> 0:25:36.204
<v Speaker 1>the license of your parent company, and we're going to

0:25:36.284 --> 0:25:39.604
<v Speaker 1>show you whose boss. And as you started off you

0:25:39.644 --> 0:25:43.564
<v Speaker 1>know the segment by saying, Nate, you know, this is

0:25:44.244 --> 0:25:47.484
<v Speaker 1>authoritarianism with a capital A one oh one, right, Like

0:25:47.644 --> 0:25:50.524
<v Speaker 1>this is the playbook? Like this is what you do

0:25:51.124 --> 0:25:54.844
<v Speaker 1>is you take opposition, You take things that you don't

0:25:54.884 --> 0:25:59.644
<v Speaker 1>agree with, and instead of tolerating them having discourse, you

0:25:59.764 --> 0:26:03.044
<v Speaker 1>just remove it, you say no, and then you remove

0:26:03.044 --> 0:26:06.524
<v Speaker 1>the people and next step jail right like that, that's

0:26:06.564 --> 0:26:09.764
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Next you start jailing the journalist. You don't

0:26:09.804 --> 0:26:12.244
<v Speaker 1>just remove them from air. And this has happened in

0:26:12.284 --> 0:26:14.924
<v Speaker 1>the United States before, and we had come a long

0:26:15.044 --> 0:26:17.884
<v Speaker 1>long way since then, and now it seems like we're

0:26:17.884 --> 0:26:21.444
<v Speaker 1>devolving again. The United States has been falling right on

0:26:21.644 --> 0:26:25.684
<v Speaker 1>all of the rankings of freedom of press and freedom

0:26:25.724 --> 0:26:29.204
<v Speaker 1>of society, all of those global rankings. All of a sudden,

0:26:29.244 --> 0:26:31.844
<v Speaker 1>the United States has gone from being a leader to

0:26:32.724 --> 0:26:35.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some cases, falling out of the top ten.

0:26:35.084 --> 0:26:39.804
<v Speaker 1>And that's not where you want to be going. We'll

0:26:39.804 --> 0:26:51.124
<v Speaker 1>be back right after this. Like I said, we're taping

0:26:51.164 --> 0:26:54.284
<v Speaker 1>this on Monday, and I'm very curious to know what

0:26:54.884 --> 0:26:57.844
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel is going to sound like when he comes on

0:26:57.964 --> 0:27:00.604
<v Speaker 1>the air, because there's also, as we talked about last

0:27:00.644 --> 0:27:04.204
<v Speaker 1>week Nate chilling effects right and self censorship, and you

0:27:04.284 --> 0:27:07.364
<v Speaker 1>can imagine a future where people are like, Okay, well,

0:27:07.404 --> 0:27:09.524
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to tread really lightly and not talk

0:27:09.524 --> 0:27:13.124
<v Speaker 1>about certain people and not talk about certain topics and

0:27:13.404 --> 0:27:17.044
<v Speaker 1>engage in self censorship, which people have been doing for

0:27:17.084 --> 0:27:19.964
<v Speaker 1>a number of years. And I think that happened with

0:27:20.564 --> 0:27:24.004
<v Speaker 1>the first wave of actual cancel culture. I just I

0:27:24.084 --> 0:27:26.884
<v Speaker 1>keep wanting to stress that the Kimmel thing is different

0:27:26.884 --> 0:27:31.084
<v Speaker 1>because it was coming from the FCC. So that's censorship.

0:27:31.124 --> 0:27:33.564
<v Speaker 1>That's media censorship, which is a very different thing.

0:27:34.044 --> 0:27:39.204
<v Speaker 3>It's different. I mean there are you know, different does

0:27:39.244 --> 0:27:44.404
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily mean worse or better. I mean, I feel

0:27:44.404 --> 0:27:45.044
<v Speaker 3>like people are like.

0:27:45.084 --> 0:27:47.764
<v Speaker 1>In this case, I think it means worse. I understand

0:27:47.804 --> 0:27:50.324
<v Speaker 1>that word does not, but I think government censorship is

0:27:50.364 --> 0:27:53.404
<v Speaker 1>worse than well.

0:27:52.484 --> 0:27:56.964
<v Speaker 3>I kind of believe in the fourth estate in a

0:27:57.004 --> 0:28:03.404
<v Speaker 3>sense of like media both kind of upper highbrow media

0:28:03.524 --> 0:28:06.324
<v Speaker 3>meaning like the New York Times and publications like that,

0:28:06.364 --> 0:28:08.884
<v Speaker 3>and kind of lower media like mass entertainment. Like you know,

0:28:09.004 --> 0:28:13.044
<v Speaker 3>they have a lot of shared cultural powers, like I don't.

0:28:13.084 --> 0:28:16.724
<v Speaker 3>I think they're equal to a branch of government de

0:28:16.844 --> 0:28:18.364
<v Speaker 3>facto in terms of the amount of power they have

0:28:18.404 --> 0:28:21.644
<v Speaker 3>and when they act in unison, right, when you organize

0:28:21.644 --> 0:28:25.164
<v Speaker 3>attemps to cancel people that may originate, you know, from

0:28:25.244 --> 0:28:29.124
<v Speaker 3>progressive to now them a livelihood, like I I it's different.

0:28:29.484 --> 0:28:31.404
<v Speaker 2>It's probably less capital a authoritarian.

0:28:31.724 --> 0:28:35.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's also awful, Like I I'm not I'm not

0:28:35.964 --> 0:28:38.244
<v Speaker 1>trying to say anything nice about the Jeff Bezoss of

0:28:38.244 --> 0:28:41.204
<v Speaker 1>the world. Don't get me wrong, I think that it's

0:28:41.484 --> 0:28:43.044
<v Speaker 1>really scary on that level too.

0:28:43.564 --> 0:28:46.924
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you know, I would like to see more liberals,

0:28:47.044 --> 0:28:48.844
<v Speaker 3>especially they want to have the moral hot ground. If

0:28:48.884 --> 0:28:53.204
<v Speaker 3>progressors want to say, we're just in a fucking wrestling

0:28:53.284 --> 0:28:57.204
<v Speaker 3>match with the GOP and will win through not brute force,

0:28:57.284 --> 0:28:59.844
<v Speaker 3>but will win a maybe we're we think we're smarter,

0:29:00.004 --> 0:29:03.564
<v Speaker 3>will win a tactically battle or whatever else. Right, you know,

0:29:03.644 --> 0:29:06.244
<v Speaker 3>I would like to say I've seen a couple like

0:29:06.244 --> 0:29:08.684
<v Speaker 3>Abby Phillip, who was an anchor on CNN right, had

0:29:08.684 --> 0:29:09.564
<v Speaker 3>a good segment about this.

0:29:09.684 --> 0:29:11.724
<v Speaker 2>But like, I would like to see more liberals say

0:29:12.164 --> 0:29:12.964
<v Speaker 2>we fucked.

0:29:12.764 --> 0:29:18.404
<v Speaker 3>Up, right, we fucked up by abandoning free speech as

0:29:18.404 --> 0:29:20.644
<v Speaker 3>a principle, by pretending. You know, all these people that

0:29:20.724 --> 0:29:22.724
<v Speaker 3>do the cancel and they never have any heterodox quote

0:29:22.764 --> 0:29:25.804
<v Speaker 3>unquote opinions themselves, right, they always like have tuikie cutter

0:29:26.164 --> 0:29:28.244
<v Speaker 3>opinions because they're not Actually, I mean, I don't like

0:29:28.284 --> 0:29:31.484
<v Speaker 3>these people, so I'm not going to say anything overly generous, right,

0:29:31.604 --> 0:29:33.684
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think a lot of people formulate their

0:29:33.684 --> 0:29:35.604
<v Speaker 3>political beliefs because of pure pressure.

0:29:35.804 --> 0:29:35.964
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:29:36.324 --> 0:29:39.484
<v Speaker 3>And one of the problems with journalism and kind of

0:29:39.484 --> 0:29:42.204
<v Speaker 3>the liberal academy more broadly is like, and that includes

0:29:42.204 --> 0:29:45.364
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fucking lonely souls who who are looking

0:29:45.404 --> 0:29:48.284
<v Speaker 3>to be joiners, right, And I'm I'm against that, you know.

0:29:48.364 --> 0:29:51.524
<v Speaker 3>I think if you've never pissed an audience off or

0:29:51.564 --> 0:29:53.804
<v Speaker 3>your own audience off, then like, how can you have

0:29:53.924 --> 0:29:56.204
<v Speaker 3>lived in a very complicated world like we live in

0:29:56.284 --> 0:29:59.524
<v Speaker 3>for you know, decades and not at some point had

0:29:59.564 --> 0:30:01.164
<v Speaker 3>an opinion that differed from your tribe?

0:30:01.244 --> 0:30:03.684
<v Speaker 2>Right? You know, that's totally fine if you each want

0:30:03.684 --> 0:30:05.084
<v Speaker 2>to go in like and open a.

0:30:05.124 --> 0:30:09.124
<v Speaker 3>Nice little you know, pasta restaurant or something and get

0:30:09.124 --> 0:30:10.164
<v Speaker 3>along with your customers.

0:30:10.204 --> 0:30:10.364
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:10.404 --> 0:30:13.044
<v Speaker 3>But if you're a political commentator and you've never said

0:30:13.044 --> 0:30:15.924
<v Speaker 3>anything that pisses someone off, then you are fucking like

0:30:16.164 --> 0:30:18.644
<v Speaker 3>terrible at your job. You shouldn't be canceled scent upliveing cancelation.

0:30:18.804 --> 0:30:18.924
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:18.924 --> 0:30:21.244
<v Speaker 3>But like, but you just tell that you don't have

0:30:21.284 --> 0:30:23.684
<v Speaker 3>any independent minded opinions and if you always align with

0:30:23.684 --> 0:30:26.604
<v Speaker 3>one party, the parties are these weird monstrosities. It's like

0:30:26.644 --> 0:30:29.284
<v Speaker 3>saying I think that like PEPSI coo everything that It's

0:30:29.284 --> 0:30:31.524
<v Speaker 3>like being a fanily of like PepsiCo or Coca Cola

0:30:31.764 --> 0:30:35.124
<v Speaker 3>or something. Right, Like, everything this gigantic, faciless corporation makes

0:30:35.204 --> 0:30:37.244
<v Speaker 3>is the best thing on earth. Right, It's you know,

0:30:37.284 --> 0:30:40.164
<v Speaker 3>that's what the political parties are. They're these kind of mediocre,

0:30:40.284 --> 0:30:43.004
<v Speaker 3>gigantic brands that are trying to cater to the mass

0:30:43.004 --> 0:30:45.324
<v Speaker 3>consumer and are pretty darn good at it.

0:30:45.404 --> 0:30:45.564
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:45.604 --> 0:30:47.524
<v Speaker 3>But like, but you're just being a fanboy if you're

0:30:47.564 --> 0:30:49.644
<v Speaker 3>always on the always advocating the party line.

0:30:49.844 --> 0:30:53.404
<v Speaker 1>Oh, absolutely, absolutely, you're being a brown spokesperson. I think

0:30:53.484 --> 0:30:57.804
<v Speaker 1>actually the the uh tie that you made to like

0:30:57.924 --> 0:30:59.684
<v Speaker 1>coke or Pepsi or something like that is a really

0:30:59.724 --> 0:31:02.084
<v Speaker 1>good one. Right, You're just being a brand spokesperson for

0:31:02.884 --> 0:31:05.804
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party or the Democratic Party. And this is

0:31:05.844 --> 0:31:07.764
<v Speaker 1>why this is something that you and I talk about

0:31:07.804 --> 0:31:10.124
<v Speaker 1>on the show frequently. I don't think either one of

0:31:10.204 --> 0:31:13.884
<v Speaker 1>us likes the two party system. One of the main

0:31:13.924 --> 0:31:17.324
<v Speaker 1>problems I have with it is that it discourages independent thinking.

0:31:17.564 --> 0:31:17.764
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:31:17.804 --> 0:31:20.164
<v Speaker 1>Too many people are like, oh, i'm a this, I'm

0:31:20.164 --> 0:31:21.924
<v Speaker 1>a that you apply the label and then you figure

0:31:21.924 --> 0:31:25.244
<v Speaker 1>out what do I think based on that, not what

0:31:25.284 --> 0:31:27.604
<v Speaker 1>do I think? Therefore, what do you know who do

0:31:27.684 --> 0:31:30.164
<v Speaker 1>I support people don't get that granular, or of course

0:31:30.164 --> 0:31:33.164
<v Speaker 1>some people do. But that kind of critical independent thinking

0:31:33.244 --> 0:31:36.524
<v Speaker 1>is something that we should be encouraging, we should be fostering.

0:31:36.764 --> 0:31:40.044
<v Speaker 1>We should be creating a culture where people are rewarded

0:31:40.364 --> 0:31:43.324
<v Speaker 1>for heterodoxy, not for its own sake, but just for

0:31:43.444 --> 0:31:47.324
<v Speaker 1>having their own mind and for being able to say

0:31:47.364 --> 0:31:51.244
<v Speaker 1>what they think. And there are you know, you can agree,

0:31:51.324 --> 0:31:54.684
<v Speaker 1>you can disagree, but yeah, we should be living in

0:31:54.684 --> 0:31:57.884
<v Speaker 1>a society where people think for themselves. And this is

0:31:58.604 --> 0:32:02.244
<v Speaker 1>something that both parties are absolutely to blame for, and

0:32:02.284 --> 0:32:04.084
<v Speaker 1>we are not in a good place right now. So

0:32:04.164 --> 0:32:07.524
<v Speaker 1>I really hope that everyone comes to their senses, including

0:32:07.524 --> 0:32:12.004
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, that we actually start supporting free speech

0:32:12.084 --> 0:32:15.364
<v Speaker 1>and what it actually means right, which means that Jimmy

0:32:15.444 --> 0:32:18.684
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel could have fucked up something that he said and

0:32:18.724 --> 0:32:23.564
<v Speaker 1>then said, oh, you know, this wasn't actually true, and

0:32:23.604 --> 0:32:26.724
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't removed from the air. It's kind of that

0:32:27.284 --> 0:32:30.844
<v Speaker 1>sort of a culture, as opposed to one where we

0:32:30.884 --> 0:32:36.404
<v Speaker 1>start getting threats and trying to strong arm people into

0:32:37.204 --> 0:32:39.884
<v Speaker 1>cow towing whatever the party line happens to be right,

0:32:39.924 --> 0:32:43.604
<v Speaker 1>which could be liberal and it could be Republican and

0:32:43.724 --> 0:32:47.364
<v Speaker 1>it could be either one. I think that that's such

0:32:47.404 --> 0:32:50.924
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly dangerous moment. It really does bring me back

0:32:50.964 --> 0:32:53.084
<v Speaker 1>to the Soviet Union and that is not a good feeling.

0:32:53.844 --> 0:32:57.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and usould create more sigma for cowardice.

0:32:57.124 --> 0:32:58.884
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know there were some people like in

0:32:58.924 --> 0:33:00.804
<v Speaker 3>the whole Charlie kirk Kimmel thing, I mean, like you

0:33:00.804 --> 0:33:03.004
<v Speaker 3>know Ted Cruz of all people.

0:33:03.564 --> 0:33:05.884
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I was about to say I actually agreed with

0:33:06.004 --> 0:33:07.804
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz for once in my life. I was like,

0:33:07.804 --> 0:33:10.644
<v Speaker 1>what is happening, Ted, Crew? Like this is bad?

0:33:11.724 --> 0:33:13.764
<v Speaker 3>You probably are more familiar with the research on this, right,

0:33:13.764 --> 0:33:16.924
<v Speaker 3>But like when when a small number of people who

0:33:17.004 --> 0:33:21.884
<v Speaker 3>are influential or actually have something to lose, right when

0:33:21.924 --> 0:33:25.084
<v Speaker 3>they speak up. You know, even Michael Eisner, the former

0:33:25.324 --> 0:33:29.604
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Disney, I don't know if he's a friend

0:33:29.604 --> 0:33:31.404
<v Speaker 3>of me with Bob byker or right, but he said,

0:33:31.404 --> 0:33:32.324
<v Speaker 3>what the fuck are you doing?

0:33:32.444 --> 0:33:32.684
<v Speaker 2>Bob?

0:33:32.804 --> 0:33:35.724
<v Speaker 3>Right, And like, I'm sure that's you know, Disney's company,

0:33:35.724 --> 0:33:38.204
<v Speaker 3>where people are usually pretty nice, right, And so that

0:33:38.284 --> 0:33:40.524
<v Speaker 3>might have had an influence too, Right.

0:33:41.204 --> 0:33:43.484
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's a lot of research on that night. It's

0:33:43.524 --> 0:33:45.764
<v Speaker 1>a very good point, and yes, all it takes is

0:33:46.004 --> 0:33:49.244
<v Speaker 1>one even just one influential voice, and that can completely

0:33:49.364 --> 0:33:52.764
<v Speaker 1>change the dynamic and what people feel empowered to say

0:33:52.884 --> 0:33:55.124
<v Speaker 1>or do. But this is a really interesting topic and

0:33:55.164 --> 0:33:58.404
<v Speaker 1>I think one that we are going to keep revisiting

0:33:58.444 --> 0:34:01.244
<v Speaker 1>on this show. And I hope Nate that our show

0:34:01.284 --> 0:34:04.124
<v Speaker 1>is still on the air even if we say something

0:34:04.204 --> 0:34:05.924
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the FCC might not like.

0:34:07.004 --> 0:34:09.644
<v Speaker 2>What's your most cancelable opinion? See, that's like a question

0:34:09.684 --> 0:34:10.204
<v Speaker 2>you can answer.

0:34:11.084 --> 0:34:13.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's come back to that. I think that'll

0:34:13.364 --> 0:34:16.524
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting and interesting segment. No, I actually I

0:34:16.564 --> 0:34:18.244
<v Speaker 1>think that that is an interesting segment.

0:34:18.364 --> 0:34:19.604
<v Speaker 2>What's the most cansful opinion?

0:34:19.644 --> 0:34:22.564
<v Speaker 3>That It's like, it's actually your seventh most canceful opinion

0:34:22.564 --> 0:34:23.564
<v Speaker 3>probably you know what I.

0:34:23.444 --> 0:34:24.964
<v Speaker 2>Mean, right right?

0:34:24.964 --> 0:34:26.764
<v Speaker 1>You have to do the game theory of that and

0:34:27.124 --> 0:34:28.204
<v Speaker 1>you have to play that out.

0:34:29.364 --> 0:34:29.644
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:34:30.164 --> 0:34:33.884
<v Speaker 1>We hope you feel more educated about free speech, which

0:34:33.924 --> 0:34:36.804
<v Speaker 1>is something that really is core to risky business and

0:34:36.804 --> 0:34:39.604
<v Speaker 1>to our ability to have this show, and to me

0:34:39.884 --> 0:34:43.924
<v Speaker 1>as an ex Soviet immigrant, it's something near and dear

0:34:43.964 --> 0:34:47.204
<v Speaker 1>to my heart. So good luck, Jimmy Kimmel. I hope

0:34:47.204 --> 0:34:48.924
<v Speaker 1>that your return to the air was a good one.

0:34:54.604 --> 0:34:56.364
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show reach

0:34:56.444 --> 0:35:00.244
<v Speaker 1>out to Us at Risky Business at pushkin dot Fm.

0:35:00.404 --> 0:35:03.764
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanakova and by.

0:35:03.644 --> 0:35:04.684
<v Speaker 2>Me Nate Silvery.

0:35:05.164 --> 0:35:08.804
<v Speaker 3>The show was a cool production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:35:08.884 --> 0:35:12.204
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer

0:35:12.284 --> 0:35:16.044
<v Speaker 3>is Sonia gerwit Lydia, Jean Kott and daphnew Chen are

0:35:16.044 --> 0:35:19.284
<v Speaker 3>our editors, and our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:35:19.764 --> 0:35:21.164
<v Speaker 2>Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:35:21.804 --> 0:35:24.004
<v Speaker 1>If you like this show, please rate and review us

0:35:24.044 --> 0:35:26.724
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, but once again,

0:35:26.844 --> 0:35:28.644
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:35:28.684 --> 0:35:30.884
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.