WEBVTT - Stand Back and Stand By

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Col Zone Media. On January twentieth, twenty twenty five, Donald

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump was sworn in as president again. In one of

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>his first acts, that very same day, he signed a

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>proclamation that commuted the sentences of fourteen people who played

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>key roles in orchestrating the January sixth, twenty twenty one

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>riot at the United States Capitol. Everyone else, over fifteen

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred people who'd been charged with crimes and connection with

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the events that took place that day was pardoned. Most

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>of them minority served their time, but the pardons restored

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>their rights to do things like vote, serve on juries,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and buy guns. Hundreds of defendants whose cases were still

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>working their way through the legal system were suddenly relieved

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of that burden. Their cases just went away. And for

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred of those fifteen hundred people, that pardon

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>came while they were still in federal custody serving sentences

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for the crimes they'd been found guilty of committing. Among

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>those two hundred people freed with the stroke of the

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>president's pen that day was Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was a big win for America,

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>so America's back. Four months later, he was back in Washington,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>d C. With a big announcement you want to take

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>away free nothing better to do?

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Episode.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm sorry, that's not the announcement. That's DC Neighborhood

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner Patricia Aguino putting on a one woman protest against

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Proud Boys during that press conference. This is Enrique Tarrio,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Norden, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Real, and Dominic Bazolda versus

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the United States government. That's right. A get out of

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>jail free card wasn't enough. They're suing for one hundred

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. I'm Molly Conker, and this is weird little guys.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a typical episode. I don't know what that

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>actually even means any more, None of them really are.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>But this isn't the story of one weird little guy.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a weird little situation and one that's ongoing.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>This lawsuit is very freshly filed, so there will be

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>more to this story. But it's a story with a

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of weird little characters, weird little guys whose stories

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>you may already be familiar with, and guys whose stories

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>are intertwined with some we've already talked about, and others

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>yet to come. That project I keep saying I'm working

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on is still on the back burner. I'll get to

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it eventually. You can probably hear in my voice that

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little under the weather. I was sick as

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a dog all week. I think I might have finally

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten COVID. I mean, God only knows, because those little

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>testics don't really work anymore. In what difference does it

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really make? But I finally understand what you all have

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>been talking about when you say you lost your sense

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of taste and smell. I mean I heard the word,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I understood intellectually what you meant by them. But

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't sink in until you've got your tongue

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pressed onto a lemon and you feel absolutely fucking nothing.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's weird. So if that is what it was, I

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>guess that makes me maybe the last person in the

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>world to finally get it. I was starting to think

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I really was God's favorite, you know, somehow immune

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to the worldwide plague. It's probably some kind of miracle

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that I managed to escape it for a full five years.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was careful, right, I wear my mask

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in court, but I got tear gased at the Insurrection

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, I was shouldered to shoulder with

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>America's most unvaccinated, masked and coughing in the haze. I

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>spent some time in jail in twenty twenty. I was

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a committed nail bier until last year. I had my

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>grubby little hands in my mouth sixteen times an hour

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>during a global pandemic. I never got it. I did

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>get really sick in the fall of twenty twenty, but

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>according to the CBS drive through nasal swam, that was

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>something else, just some disgusting virus I got as a

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 1>souvenir from an anti vax rally where a man dressed

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>as George Washington fell to his knees screaming about how

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he was America's greatest prayer warrior. But that's neither here

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>nor there, point being. The virus comes for us all.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine now, but I spent the better part of

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the week blowing my nose and complaining and not getting

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>any work done. So here we are again. The lawsuit

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about today was filed on June sixth, twenty

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. The plaintiffs are five proud boys Enrique Tario,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biggs, Ethan Norden, Zachary Real, and Dominic Pazzola. All

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>five were convicted by a jury of seditious conspiracy for

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>their actions leading up to and during the breach of

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol Building on January sixth, twenty twenty one. Tario

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was not physically present in DC on the day of

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the riot, but he was central to planning the attack

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately transpired, and as the leader. Tario received the

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>longest sentence of any January sixth defendant twenty two years.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Nordean was sentenced to eighteen years, Joe Biggs got

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years, Zachary Reel got fifteen, and Dominic Pasola was

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to ten years in prison. All five were released

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 1>after Trump's proclamation about the pardons, but of those five,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>only in Riquet Tario was actually pardoned. Real, Nordeen, Pasola,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and Biggs did not receive pardons. They were on that

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>shortlist of high profile rioters who only had their sentences commuted,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and in this lawsuit they claimed their rights were vile. Obviously,

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get to that. The suit names as its

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>defendants the United States of America, FBI, special Agent, Nicole

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Miller in her individual capacity, and John Doe's one through ten.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>These John Doe defendants are as yet unidentified employees of

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the FBI and DOJ. It's not really unusual at this

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>stage of a suit like this to have these John

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>or Jane Doe defendants. You can identify individual actors through

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the discovery process. The thing about the listed parties that

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>did catch my eye, though, is that they filed the

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>suit against those three named defendants. But in the section

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of the complaint where you specify who the parties at

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>issue are, there are inexplicably a number of additional parties listed.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Every lawsuit is different. The facts are going to be

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>specific to the case, but the structure of a civil

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>complaint is more or less always pretty much the same.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a pretty bog standard structure and a lot of

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>boilerplate language. There's no getting around it. You can't get

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 1>fancy with it. There's a required format at the top.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>You have your little introduction, and then you list and

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>describe the parties. You spell out the justification for jurisdiction

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and venue, and then comes the statement of facts, where

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you tell a little story about what happened and that's

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>followed by your cause of action, why are you suing specifically?

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>What legal theories are we operating off of? Here at

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the bottom you say what kind of damages you're trying

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to recover and whether or not you're asking for a

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>jury trial, and then it's signed, dated, and filed. There's

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>more to it than that. Get a lawyer if you're

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to write a lawsuit. This isn't a crash course

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>on the federal rules of civil procedure or anything like that,

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but you get the idea. Everybody's operating off the same template,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter how you're filling in the blankes here, we're

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>using the same format. So in the section where you

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>list the parties, we can all expect to see the parties,

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the people named in the lawsuit, the people or entities

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.359
<v Speaker 1>who are party to the case, the plaintiffs and the defendants,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the people who are doing the suing, and the people

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>being sued. And in this complaint, we do have those.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got our five proud boy plaintiffs and the name

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>defendants FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller and John Doe's one

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>through ten. But for some reason, this section also lists

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other people and organizations who are not

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>parties to the lawsuit, like the FBI, the DOJ, former

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>DC Metropolitan Police Lieutenant Shane LeMond, and a confidential informant

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that the suit calls Jen Low, despite readily of public

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>information that Jen Loo is a pseudonym used by a

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>woman whose real name is Jenny Lynn Salinis. And this

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>section of the complaint also lists the Proud Boys as

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>an organization, and it's described like this, The Proud Boys

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>are an organization of patriotic political activists dedicated to preserving

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and promoting Western civilization in general and American society in particular.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The Proud Boy's organization and its members have been subject

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to systemic harassment and mischaracterization by far left wing organizations

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Defamation League, and politically biased state and federal prosecutors. I

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>know it sounds like I'm nitpicking, and I am, but

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this section of the complaint is called parties. It's for

0:10:55.720 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>listing the parties to the lawsuit, not editorializing about barious

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>characters in the story that you're telling. It's sloppy and weird,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think I know why, and I think it's

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the same reason that the complaint was filed in the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>federal court in the Middle District of Florida. See. At

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>first I thought this was some kind of mistake. It

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be the first time this particular attorney was connected

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to a lawsuit that was accidentally filed in the wrong

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>district because Enrique Tario famously lives in Miami, which is

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not in the Middle District of Florida. But in justifying

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the chosen venue, the complaint notes that one of the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs does reside in the Middle District of Florida, though

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it misspells the word one and it doesn't specify which one.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, it's Joe Biggs. The Proud Boys

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>owe the Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church in DC over

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars, and according to their most recent filings

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>related to collecting that money, Joe Biggs lives in Belusha County.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's fair. They can file in the Middle District

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of Florida, and venue shopping is normal. They could have

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>chosen to file this in a handful of different federal

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>court districts. The plaintiffs live all over the place. It's

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty normal. To choose the court you think will work

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>out best for you for whatever reason. But I think

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they chose the Middle District of Florida because that's the

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>only federal court district where their attorney is a member

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>of the bar. I'll admit it. I was surprised when

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw who they'd gotten to represent them, and maybe

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't have been. He's like a bad penny. He

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just keeps turning up because they're at the very bottom

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of this very weird, twenty eight page complaint. There's the

0:12:55.840 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>signature Augustus Invictus Esquire. He's come up a handful of

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>times on this show, but it's never really the right

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>time to tell you about him. A couple of weeks ago,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in the episode about the lawsuit filed by Unite the

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Right protesters against the city of Charlottesville because the police

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't nice to them during their Nazi rally, he's the

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>one who ghost wrote that lawsuit. Months ago. In that

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>episode about those astro turfed marches against Sharia law, he

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was the organizer and headline speaker of the march in Orlando,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>And of course, in the episode in fall of last

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>year about the Nazi torch March at Eva, he made

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an appearance as one of the marchers. It's going to

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be a long, strange story when the day finally comes

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for him to get his own episodes. But that day

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is not today. He is, among other things, a practicing attorney.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>On his website, he bills himself as the Attorney for

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Damned. That site, which is ostensibly an advertisement for

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>his legal services, is dominated by this gigantic screen shot

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of a Charlotte Observer article about his own acquittal in

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two on a domestic violence charge, and on

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the site he proudly displays his own mug shot next

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to a professional headshot, juxtaposing these two images to show

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>potential clients that sure, he's a professional attorney, but he's

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>been where they are. He gets it, and he won,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can too. Attorney for the Damned is a

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mantle that's been claimed by others before him, and applied

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to others still. It's the title of two separate books

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>about a different Ohio born attorney, Clarence Darrow, who you

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>may remember from The Scope's Monkey Trial. Another book with

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the same title was written by an attorney who provides

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>state appointed services to those nemed criminally insane, and it

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was the title of an article about death row appeals

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in a nineteen eighty seven issue of the American Bar

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Association Journal. It's a phrase that gets tossed around, but

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, Augustus Invictus is the attorney for the

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>damned in the same way Edgar Steele was like Invictus.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It was Steele who gave himself the nickname, and in

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Steele's case, it was after he unsuccessfully defended the Aryan

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Nations in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The plaintiffs in that case were members of a family

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>who'd been shot at by the security guards at a

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Nazi compound in Idaho. Steele eventually died in prison in

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. He was three years into a fifty year

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sentence for trying to hire someone to murder his wife

0:15:55.120 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>with a pipe bomb. So what I mean is Augustus

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Invictus is a movement lawyer. He's not just there a lawyer,

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a fellow traveler. Back in twenty seventeen, when he

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>was the headline speaker of the United the Right rally

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in Charlottesville, he was also a proud Boy Augustus Invictus,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was second in command of a short lived group called

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fraternal Order of Alt Knights. It was a group

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>within a group. It was a subset of Proud Boys

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>who were especially committed to violence, and it was fully

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned by Proud Boys leadership. Shortly after the group was

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>formed by Kyle Chapman in the spring of twenty seventeen,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Proud Boy's magazine ran an article with the headline the

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>kids are Alt Knights, and the subhead was based Stickman

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>organizes official military arm of the Proud Boys. Based Stickman

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was the nickname that Kyle Chapman earned after beating a

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>counter protester with a stick at a Trump rally in

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>March of twenty seventeen. He wasn't even a Proud Boy

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but after the video of the assault

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>went viral, he was recruited and joined. Broadboy's founder Gavin

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>McGinnis took advantage of Chapman's viral Internet fame and had

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>him on as a guest on his show several times

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in the weeks that followed. McGinnis even claims that he

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>considered making Chapman in the president of the entire organization,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but settled on endorsing Chapman's leadership of this new militant wing.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>In May of twenty seventeen, Chapman invited Augustus and Victus

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to speak at a free speech rally in Boston. Invictus,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>who had already lost one run for Senate and was

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about to announce another one, advocated for armed revolution over

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>political activism, and he urged the crowd to take up

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>arms because the Civil War had already started.

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 3>When comte port, when political port, he's only ineffective, and

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 3>speech and competitions in order rests me nothing.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You have nothing left with four suborbs. If I let

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>myself get going down this path, we'll be stuck on

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this tangent for months. But the point is they didn't

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>hire Augustus and Victus because he was the finest lawyer

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>money could buy. I'm fairly familiar with his work, and

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that he is very much not. They

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hired him because they have a history and they share

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a belief system, and he was very available. He's been

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>struggling to make ends meet for the last few years.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, in part because people are hesitant to hire

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>an attorney who might not make it to their court date.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>He is at this very moment out on bond. He

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>was convicted in October of twenty twenty four on the

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>felony charge of burning an object with the intent to

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>intimidate for his perticipation in that Nazi torch march at

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the University of Virginia back in twenty seventeen. In January

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of this year, a judge imposed a sentence of nine

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>months in jail, but the execution of that sentence is

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>currently on hold pending his appeal. It's not ideal for

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>an attorney to be convicted of a crime. Can have

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>serious consequences for their license and know. The rules vary

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>from court to court. In the state of Florida, the

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>rules are actually extremely clear. Attorneys must self report any

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>felony conviction to the state bar within ten days of

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the conviction order being entered. They're then automatically suspended from

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the bar, and the rules very specifically say that this

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>suspension does remain in effect during any appeals process for

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the criminal conviction. An attorney convicted of a felony can

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>challenge their suspension from the bar. It is by order

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Florida Supreme Court automatic. Those are the rules.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty clear, but they don't seem to have been

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>applied here. I have no explanation for this. At a

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>bond hearing earlier this year, Invictus's criminal defense attorney offered

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a vague assertion that his client had self reported the

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>conviction to the Florida State Bar as required, but says

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they told him that they wouldn't make any determination about

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>suspending his license or disbarring him until after the appeal

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>had concluded. That's what his attorney said. That's all I

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>can tell you. That's not consistent with the rules as

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they're written, and there's no documentation I can find about

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this either way. But if you take them at their

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>word that the Florida Bar said it's okay for him

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep practicing law in a Florida state court, I

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>can accept that Florida's a weird place. But every jurisdiction

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>where an attorney practices law has its own rules, and

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I did look up the local rules in the Middle

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.239
<v Speaker 1>District of Florida. That's the only federal court aside from

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the US Supreme Court where Invictus is a member of

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the bar, and in the Middle District of Florida local

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>rule two point zero four B states that any attorney

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>admitted to practice in the district must report any felony

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>conviction within fourteen days. Suspension from the bar is automatic.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Attorneys in this position can file a petition to stay

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the automatic suspension, and that petition has to be heard

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>by a judge. I think if it came before a judge,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I would be able to find evidence that this happened,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and I can't. Absence of proof isn't proof of absence.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I get that it's possible that it happened, but I

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can't find anything, and I don't know why he would

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to continue to practice law under these conditions.

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear to me if the proud boy's lawyer

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is even going to be allowed to appear in court

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on this case. It's even more unclear what anyone's plan

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is if their lawyer is unexpectedly required to report to jail.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>His current situation is fluid. The judge who granted him

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>his appeal bond could decide at any time that he's

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>changed his mind and he's going to impose the sentence

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>next week. When Enrique Tarrio spoke to a reporter from

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal about this lawsuit, He said that

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>they'd had no trouble at all finding an attorney to

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>take the case, saying, quote, we were able to shop,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and he claims he spoke to more than a dozen

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>law firms, adding I believe attorneys are going to do

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>backflips trying to get JA sixers on board with a

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of lawsuits. And if this suit proved successful, that

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>may be true down the line, but I'm not sure

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been true in his experience, because if he had

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the pick of the litter, I don't think he would

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have picked Augustus and Victus. And the press conference he

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>held to announce filing this suit last week wasn't actually

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the first one. Back in February of this year, four

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>months before the suit was actually filed, Trio held a

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>press conference outside the Capitol Building.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Let me be clear, I'm not talking about violent retribution.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about something much more powerful, accountability and the

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>rule of law.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That is why today we are announcing a lawsuit against

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ. And at that press conference back in February,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Trio said they'd already raised tons of money for their

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 1>legal defense, all in cryptocurrency. Believe it or not, And

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he also said they already had a lawyer lined up,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>everything was ready to go and they were about to file.

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>My question, yet, who exactly is suing for the plaintiffs?

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a lawyer?

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>We do have a lawyer. We'll be announcing that in

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the coming weeks, but right now it's the five of

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 2>us that are going to be suing the DJ.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Just a few minutes after that press conference ended, Enrique

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Tarrio was arrested for simple assault after striking the outstretched

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>arm of a woman holding up her cell phone to

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>take a video of him, But prosecutors ultimately declined to

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 1>pursue the case and the lawsuits still didn't materialize. And

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>then last month, on May third, twenty five, Enrique Tarrio

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>took his mom out to dinner. If you knew anything

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about Enrique Tarrio, you know he's fiercely loyal to his mother,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Zuni du Artes. Kind of a mama's boy, and normally

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I would leave a guy's mom out of this, but

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Tario's mother has been deeply involved in her son's political

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>activities for years. It's her name on the incorporation paperwork

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for the business that has processed online payments for Proud

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Boys merchandise for years, and since the events of January sixth,

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>she's been a vocal supporter of her son and his

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>co defendants. So last month, they're out to dinner, and

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>they're out to dinner at a rather particular restaurant. They

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>were invited to dine at mar A Lago by some

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>unnamed member of the club, and during dinner that evening,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this unnamed friend of theirs introduced them to the President

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of the United States as he was crossing the patio

0:25:54.680 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>where they were eating. That night, Tarrio tweeted, and I

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just had a great conversation with Potus. He called me

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and my mother over while we were at dinner and

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>said he was sorry for what Joe Biden did to

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all j sixers. He knew the hardships me and my

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>family face for three long years. He knew how many

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>times they moved me, and he said he's working on

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>making things right. I thanked him for giving me my

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>life back. He replied with I love you guys. To

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all the Jay sixers. He wanted me to send y'all

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a message, He said, thank you working to make things right.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>What could that possibly mean? Trio's already been pardoned. Trump

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>pardoned him. He's free, his conviction is wiped away. He's

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>technically still a convicted felon for a twenty thirteen conviction

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for his role in a scheme to resell a million

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of stolen diabetic test strips. But that's not

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>what Trump meant. I mean, technically, Trump could pardon him

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for that too. It was a federal crime. But that's

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not it. That's not what he means. This Saturday night

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>meeting on the patio at Mar A Lago was just

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a day after the announcement that the administration was prepared

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to settle the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the estate

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of Ashley Babbitt. Ashley Babbitt was the January sixth rioter

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>who was shot and killed by a Capitol police officer

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>as she was attempting to climb through a broken window

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>during the assault on the Capitol building. In a sane world,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one with normal rules, I don't think that lawsuit had legs.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe maybe they could have gotten it in

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>front of a jury, but I don't think that jury

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>would have awarded her family any money settling it was

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>a choice it was a message. It was, perhaps in

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the minds of those who think the rioters did nothing wrong,

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to make it right. The government is going

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to pay out nearly five million dollars to Babbitt's family.

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Her death is tragic. You may not think so, but

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll never be happy to see someone get shot and

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>killed by a police officer. But let's be so honest.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a wrongful death. I hate to see a

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>cop fire his gun. I never want to see that,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but if it's gonna happen, I think this is one

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of those moments where you kind of have to admit

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it made sense in the moment. I mean, there were

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>hordes of wild eyed conspiracy theorists and they directed a

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>gallows outside and now they're smashing through the windows get in.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>The lawsuit was never a winner, but they settled, and

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly here's a cavalcade of insurrectionist at the court's

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>doorstep with their hands held out. For one hundred million

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars and for what. According to the complaint, their rights

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were violated, specifically their fourth, fifth and sixth Amendment rights.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>They're also bringing a claim of malicious prosecution. We'll take

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>these one at a time. Briefly, the first count is

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth Amendment violations. That's the one that protects you

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from unreasonable searches and seizures, the one that means a

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>cop has to get a warrant to search your stuff.

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Good amendment. I'm a big fan. This one's a little

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. There is a rather serious allegation

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>here that the government violated attorney client privilege by illegally

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>listening in on phone calls and reading text messages between

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the criminal defendants and their attorneys during the course of

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the investigation and trial. If that happened, that's very serious.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to weigh on on whether it did

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>happen in this case, but it's something that can and

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>does happen, and it would absolutely be a gross violation

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of their rights if the government was listening in when

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they were having privileged conversations with their lawyers about their

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>criminal case. If there's evidence that that happened, that should

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>get aired out in court and heard by a jury.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>The other claims made here are something else. The opening

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>allegation under this count reads, quote, first, the defendants had

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>no probable cause to investigate or prosecute the plaintiffs. The

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>defendants were aware that no evidence supported the allegations and

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>had to use underhanded and unconstitutional methods in order to

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:12.239
<v Speaker 1>convict the plaintiffs. Oh, no probabill cause at all, Like

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there was not any reason to suspect that maybe any

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them had potentially committed some kind of crime, Like,

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, what if there was video footage of one

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of them ripping a riot shield out of a police

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>officer's hands and then using that riot shield to break

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a window, then becoming the first rioter to physically breach

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States Capitol Building. I don't know what if

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there was something like that. No probabill cause. Some of

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the other alleged Fourth Amendment violations here are quote deliberately

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>misrepresenting the context, attribution, and content of the text communications

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to create the implication of plaintiffs guilt. I'm

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure that has anything to do with the Fourth Amendment.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could argue that the text messages themselves

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>were improperly obtained. That's a Fourth Amendment issue, But the

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>way a prosecutor characterizes the evidence when it's being presented,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really implicate the Fourth Amendment. I mean, I

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not a lawyer. The second count is

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a Fifth Amendment violation. They claim they were denied their

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>right to due process under the law because the law

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as it was applied here was so vague that a

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable person would have no way of knowing they were

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>breaking it. Quote, because you can be convicted for conspiracy

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with people over whom you have no authority and to

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>whom you gave no orders. Rather, mere statements of approval, agreement,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and enthusiasm are apparently enough to form a criminal conspiracy,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>provided the points of view are offensive enough to the

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>employees of the Federal Breau of Investigation and the Department

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, no matter how attenuated from criminal action they

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>may have been. If I ever do get a whole

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>series of episodes out of Augustus and Victus, there will

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>probably be an hour long rant about his steadfast refusal

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to accept the legal definition of conspiracy. I feel like

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been through this in his work several times, so

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna let it go for now. I didn't

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>bother to dig into the specifics of the prosecution's theory

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of this case, but one of the real stumbling blocks

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and having this conversation with anyone is that most people

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand what it means to be part of

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a criminal conspiracy. You don't have to go to a

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>special meeting where every single person involved gets together and

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>discusses a specific plan and then everyone agrees to specifically

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>carry out that plan. It's way more nebulous than that,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is actually kind of scary, but

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's most basic. It just means that two or more

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>people agree to do something unlawful. They don't have to

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>even succeed at doing it. They just have to make

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some concrete action in that direction. And not everyone involved

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>needs to know everyone else, and not everyone involved needs

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to know the whole plan. So if this core group

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of conspirators planned to, I don't know, do something like

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>break into the Capitol building to stop the certification of

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the election, and then they took some kind of concrete

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>steps towards making that happen, like flying to DC and

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then assembling in a group and then marching towards the

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Capitol and then breaking into it, that's a conspiracy. But

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>when Dominic Pazzola and Ethan Norden crawled through that broken

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>window and breached the Capitol Building and then encouraged the

0:34:55.000 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>crowd behind them to come with them. That could be two.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The planning doesn't have to take place at a second

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>location a week beforehand. It can take place right there.

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about a conspiracy is that once it's

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>in motion, you're on the hook for more than just

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your own actions, and more than just the actions you

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think you agreed to ahead of time. So there's a

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of nitty gritty here about what exactly is alleged

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>by the government what was argued at trial. But my

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>guess is this claim in the lawsuit rests squarely on

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a personal disagreement with what is really just the legal

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>definition of a criminal conspiracy. The third claim is that

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the government violated their sixth Amendment right now to a

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>fair trial. It mostly just copies and paste those same

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>allegations that the government illegally monitored privileged attorney client communication,

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but it also claims that the government intimidated a key

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>defense witness and frightened him out of testifying at trial.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>The witness in question is former DC Police lieutenant Shane Lamond.

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a former police lieutenant because he was sentenced last

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>week to eighteen months in prison for obstruction of justice

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and making false statements, charges that arose out of his

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>close friendship with Enrique Tario. In the months leading up

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to January sixth, he'd been illegally leaking information to Tario

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about the police investigation into him. In the weeks before

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, the DC police were investigating an incident that

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>took place at a Proud Boy march in d C

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in December of twenty twenty. The group tore a Black

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter banner off of a Black church and then

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>burned it in the street. That church now owns the

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Proud Boy's trademark, and the Proud Boys owe the church

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars. But Tarrio's lawsuit alleges that the FBI

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>threatened Lamont with obstruction charges if he were to go

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>through with his plan to testify for the defense in

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Tario's seditious conspiracy trial, and the suit alleges that this

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>caused Lamont to change his mind about testifying. I don't

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>actually have any doubt that the FBI had a conversation

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with Shane Lamond. They were investigating him, and he was

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>charged and convicted of that crime. It wasn't a threat

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>They were conducting an investigation. Whether or not that conversation

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>also functioned to some degree as an intentional witness intimidation

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>tactic is I don't know. That's not the most likely explanation.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>It would be very hard to prove, and it's just

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:04.399
<v Speaker 1>not a interesting to me. The fourth and final count

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of the complaint is malicious prosecution, and this threw me

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for a loop. Quote the defendants prosecuted the plaintiffs despite

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>knowing that the plaintiffs neither participated in the events of

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, nor organized and coordinated them. Indeed, they had

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to invent a whole new legal theory, stack the jury,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>reach attorney client communications, and embed a paid government informant

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to convict them. I'm stry back up for

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a second. What did that say that the government knew

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't participate in the events of January sixth.

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even participate. It's not just that they didn't

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>plan or organize it, and it wasn't a seditious conspiracy.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even participate. That's remarkable. It goes on the

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>defendants made, influenced, and or participated in the decision to

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>prosecute the plaintiffs for which prosecution there was no probable cause,

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and which caused the plaintiff to suffer a deprivation of liberty.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The defendant's misconduct directly resulted in the unlawful prosecution and

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>continued deprivation of the plaintiff's liberty in violation of their

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights, no probable cause, none at all. The problem

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>with this theory is it can't be malicious prosecution if

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you're guilty. It's straight up can't. It's not gray, there's

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>no but there's no exception. That's not how it works.

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not malicious prosecution if you were guilty of the crime,

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and they know that, they even put the definition right

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in there quote. To make out a claim for malicious

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>pri section, a plaintiff generally must show three things. One

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that the criminal proceeding was initiated or continued by the

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>defendant without probable cause, two that the defendant instituted the

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>proceeding maliciously, and three that the proceedings have terminated in

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>favor of the accused. So, if, for example, some politically

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>motivated prosecutor charged you with a totally fake, made up

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>crime that you didn't do, just to punish you because

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't like you. But the jury saw through it

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and they acquitted you. You could sue for malicious prosecution.

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What he did was malicious, unfounded, and the proceedings terminated

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in your favor, meaning you were not convicted. But that's

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not what happened here. They were lawfully legally convicted by

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a criminal appeal, right, They're not appealing the

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>conviction on the basis of improprieties at trial. This is

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a civil lawsuit. I think they're choosing to interpret terminated

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in favor of the accused to mean the pardon, that

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the pardon was exonerative, and that the pardon was part

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the criminal process, thus ending it in their favor.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd always had the general impression that accepting a pardon

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>required admitting guilt, and I think that is a common belief,

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but it might not be true. A nineteen fifteen Supreme

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Court case is generally understood to imply that, but not

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone agrees, and the most recent test of that theory

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>was a twenty nineteen case in the Tenth Circuit Court

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals that held that it could convicted warp criminal

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't admitting he did it when he accepted President Trump's pardon,

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so it may be a gray area. I'm thinking about

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>doing a minisode on those two cases, but don't help

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>me to it, and I didn't have time this week.

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But I do have a plan to get a real

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyer on the phone to answer some of our burning

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>questions about this particular legal quagmire. So I'm not a lawyer,

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but for what it's worth. The current version of the

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Frequently Asked Questions on the Department of Justice's web page

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Office of the Pardon Attorney says this, a

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 1>pardon is an expression of the President's forgiveness and can

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be granted in recognition of the applicant's acceptance of responsibility

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for the crime and establish good conduct for a significant

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>period of time after a conviction or completion of sentence.

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It does not dignify innocence. So when the president pardons you,

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it just wipes out the negative effects of the conviction. Right,

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>So you are no longer convicted of that crime. You

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>can vote again, you can get guns again, you can

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 1>serve on a jury again. You're no longer a convicted felon.

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're still in jail, you come out of jail.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>If you still owe restitution. You don't owe any more restitution,

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but you can't claw back restitution you already paid. And

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean the president is saying this crime never happened.

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It just means you no longer have consequences for this crime.

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, there are varying interpretations of whether

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 1>or not the act of accepting the pardon means that

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you are admitting guilt. I don't think anyone interprets pardons

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be exonerations, but I don't know. I guess there's

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.919
<v Speaker 1>something for everyone out there. And I was really going

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>down the rabbit hole here reading legal journal articles about

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the particulars on the issue when I realized it doesn't

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>even matter. It doesn't matter if a pardon means you're

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>innocent or you're guilty. Because of the five plaintiffs in

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this lawsuit, only one of them was pardoned, and Riekie

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Tario received a full presidential pardon for his January sixth convictions,

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>but the other four didn't. They only had their sentences commuted.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So even if we're on board for this legal theory

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that the pardon made in Rike Tario innocent and thus

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>enables him to sue for malicious prosecution. The other four can't.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They're still guilty, their convictions still stand. They haven't been pardoned.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that fatal flaw on the plan must

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have occurred to their lawyer too, because shortly before filing

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit, those four plaintiffs Bigs Nordine, Pazola, and Real

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>all filed applications for full pardons. Those applications, which the

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit claims are currently being considered, are inexplicably attached as

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>an exhibit to the complaint in full, unredacted. It has addresses,

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>phone numbers, email addresses, names of family members, including ex

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>wives and minor children. It has their god damn social

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Security numbers. It's a genuinely shocking and dangerous act of

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 1>negligence on the part of their attorney. But aside from

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>accidentally exposing four of his clients to identity theft, the

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>documents are pretty interesting. One of the pages of the

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>application asks the applicant to briefly describe the offense they

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were convicted of, and under that it asks do you

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>accept responsibility for your conduct? Explain why or why not?

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And to that question, Ethan Norden wrote, it would be

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>untrue for me to accept responsibility for what I did

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not do and really not possible. Dominic Pozzola conceded that

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he may be guilty of trespassing, but when it comes

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to the felonies, I feel as though the prosecution of

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the felony charges were one hundred percent politically motivated. Zachary

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Real wrote, I never denied that I thought the election

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was stolen. I still believe that the election was stolen.

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But I am happy to see President Trump is back

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>in office and looking forward to being a productive member

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of society again. This pardon will help with that. That

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was one sentence. It's just the one period at the

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>end of that for Zachary Reel, and both President and

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>member are spelled wrong. You know, no hate to the

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>man if he can't spell, but this is a pretty

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>important document. Maybe get somebody to help you. Joe Biggs's

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>essay questions were apparently written on a separate sheet of paper,

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>which is not included. I do hope they remember to

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 1>include the attachments when they sent that to the pardon attorney.

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:25.439
<v Speaker 1>That would be so sloppy. On his application, Zachary Real

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>notes that he's currently living off of his savings and

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>he really hopes he's not going to have to sell

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>his truth social stock to make ends meet. This case

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.399
<v Speaker 1>was only just filed on Friday, June sixth, so as

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing and recording this, no real time has passed

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for any work to have been done on the case.

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The government hasn't filed anything in response, and there's been

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.240
<v Speaker 1>no public comment from anyone involved, aside from Tario himself.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have to wait and see what happens. I

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about my own experiences on January

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sixth on an episode a few months ago, the episode

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>about Matthew Huddle, the January sixth defendant who was shot

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and killed during a traffic stop just days after receiving

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>his pardon. But surprisingly, writing this episode didn't really call

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to mind my own memories of that day. It did

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>remind me of another day, though it was a lifetime ago.

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But do you remember September twenty ninth, twenty twenty. I

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>do the days run together when you work from home,

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but I remember the whole day that day because I

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>had a very weird day. I had to get up

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 1>early and drive an hour to Richmond to go to court.

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd been arrested earlier in the summer while covering the

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>protests against police brutality. It was a bullshit charge and

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they knew it. But that doesn't really matter. We don't

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have to get into it. And when I got to

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.879
<v Speaker 1>court that morning, they told me that they were going

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to drop my charge and they handed me something to sign.

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, to standard procedure, sign this will dismiss your case.

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Never sign anything you haven't read, because I read the

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 1>form and it said that by signing it, I was

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>admitting that I was guilty of a crime, and they're

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still dismissing the charge. I wasn't going to be convicted

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, but I was putting on paper that I

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>did it, which I didn't, So I balked. They backed down,

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't sign it. My charge got dropped. Everything

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ended happily. It took another few months to regain full

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>use and sensation of my left hand because they'd left

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>me handcuffed in a folding chair in the jail parking

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>garage for so long back in July. But that's not

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the point of the story, no, because my clearest memory

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of September twenty ninth, twenty twenty, was later that evening

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting on a friend's couch watching TV, and

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I nearly choked to death on my seltzer and I

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>heard this.

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Are you willing tonight to condemn white subpremises and militia

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:11.479
<v Speaker 3>groups and to say that they need to stand down

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and not add to the violence in a number of

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 3>these cities, as we saw in Kenosha and as we've

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:17.800
<v Speaker 3>seen in Portland.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Do it?

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Ay?

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I would say, almost everything I see is from the

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>left wing, not from the right wing.

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 3>What do you do.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to do anything.

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 3>I want to see peace and do it, sir?

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Do it? Say it? Do you want to call them?

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 2>What do you want to call them? Give me a name,

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 2>give me a stand back and stand by. But I'll

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 2>tell you what. I'll tell you what. Somebody's got to

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:46.720
<v Speaker 2>do something about antifa and the left.

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Stand back and stand by. Somebody's got to do something

0:50:56.280 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about the left. Won't someone rid me of these troublesome

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>anti fascists?

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:01.919
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I would love to know what the president of the

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:10.280
<v Speaker 1>United States and the leader of the fascist street gang

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that tried to steal an election for him, talked about

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for ten minutes on the patio of the President's private

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>club last month, I really would. I don't think we

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>ever will. But just a few weeks after that conversation,

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there's Enrique Tarrio boldly asking for one hundred million dollars

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>from the United States government. I don't think he'll get

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million, but I do believe he's going to

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>get a payout. I'm not the only one who sees

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that on the horizon. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse tweeted a news

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>story about the lawsuit, adding, expect a fixed sue and

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>settle outcome with MAGA do OJ taxpayer resources to political

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>allies is their specialty. Now, this is pure speculation. This

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is my own personal opinion. It's not an assertion of fact.

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not facing this on anything concrete, and it has

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:16.359
<v Speaker 1>let me be clear my opinion. I don't think this

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is a real lawsuit. I mean, it's filed in a

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>real court. It mostly conforms to the federal rules of

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>civil procedure. It looks like a lawsuit. It quacks like

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a duck, you know, but it kind of feels like

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved knows that this doesn't need to hold up.

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to have a strong legal foundation. It

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter that the guy they hired, has never won

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a case and might be in jail by the time

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone's trying to argue emotion. It doesn't need to convince

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a jury. It's not really a lawsuit. It's an invitation.

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's an outstretched hand waiting to be warmly clasped to

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>close a handshake deal. It opens the door for Trump

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to make good on his promise to make things right.

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 1>They can just settle and write everybody a big fat check.

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The Proud Boys are standing back and standing by, and

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>they might be about to get very, very rich. Weird

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Little Guys is a production of Kolsae Media and iHeartRadio.

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's research, written, and recorded by me Molly Conger. Our

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:55.319
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are Sophie Lettterman and Robert Evans. The show

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is edited by the wildly town that Lardy Gaiken. The

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>theme music was composed by Brad Dickard. You can email

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>me at Weird Little Guys podcast at gmail dot com.

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I will definitely read it, but I probably won't answer it.

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing personal. You can exchange conspiracy theories about the

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:11.280
<v Speaker 1>show with other listeners on the Weird Little Guys subreddit.

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Just don't post anything that's going to make you one

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of my work little guys.