WEBVTT - "Madoff Speaks" Author: Bernie Madoff Resented His Investors

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Cornard made Off, the

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan investment advisor who promised stellar returns to his A

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>list clients and instead you frauded them of more than

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen billion dollars in history's largest Ponzi scheme, has died.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He was eighty two. We want to get more color

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>on the man behind the scam, Bernie made Off, and

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we do that. We're so fortunate to have Jim Campbell.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Jim is the author of an upcoming book entitled Made

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Off Talks. He's also hosted the radio shows Business Talk

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with Jim Campbell and his crime show Forensic Talk with

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Jim Campbell. Jim, thanks so much for joining us. I

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know you have your book coming out on Bernie made Off.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Made Off Talks available April. Talk to us about out

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the access you had to Bernie made Off for this book.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just really interesting. Well, first all, thanks

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. Obviously something most have happened today,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and it is big news. Actually, Um, it was very

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It was really fortuitous in the sense that I was

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>doing an interview from my show on a book on

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>made Off and they let me speak off the record

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>with Andrew made Off, and UM, I told him would

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be very open. I asked him tough questions. He obviously

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>was doing nothing publicly because he was under all kinds

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of assault from the Southern District of New York and

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>recific made Off trustee. He introduced me then to Ruth Madeoff,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>who again fortuitously had just moved to Greenwich, where I live,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and we developed a relationship. She introduced me to Bernie.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Bernie and I communicated. I had got over four hundred

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>pages between handwritten letters emails. Um, he's very Nixtonian. He

0:01:54.560 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>had this need compulsion to kind of explain everything. Fascinating guy. Um,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you'd just be amazed about him. He was not driven

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>by greed, um, ironically driven by control. And let me

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>just tell you then you can ask you whatever you want.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The biggest single thing that blows my mind is he

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>built side by side one of the most ethical, innovative,

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and leading businesses on Wall Street. That was his market

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>maker at the same time, two fours down behind the

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>locked uh door with several unsophisticated folks, he built the

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest criminal enterprise in Wall Street history. It wasn't like

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 1>he got in trouble had to double down and then

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>do a Ponzi scheme he thought he would get out of.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>He built them side by side. So I wonder do

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel sorry for Bernie made off? I know he

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>committed I guess you could say heinous crimes, although they

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were you know, financial and nature. Um he did bankrupt

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who, you know, their lives were

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>made considerably worse afterwards. They were suicide, one of whom

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was his own son, though um Mark killed himself in

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and ten and then Andrew died of lymphoma

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fourteen. I mean, do you feel bad

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for the guy? I think the way to answer that

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>question is was he a pure social path? Um who

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sentce you was a financial terrorist? And the answer is no,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not black and white. He ran the firm like

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a family. He paid for folks sudden medical expenses their

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>honeymoons traditionally, and so it was not black and white.

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, he has the sociopath aspects of

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>very little empathy. He had resentment for his victims in

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>some sense, he thought they were greedy. They were always

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>asking him for more. He could never say no. So

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a mixed bag. He's obviously can never

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be forgiven for what he did, and he could never

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>come to grips essentially with honestly admitting it. But he's

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not at you know, pure sociopath evil God what I found.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Let me just say Ellie was out, you know,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the famed Nazi hunter, Holocaust survivor, Nobel Peace Prize winner,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was asked if he could forgive made off and he

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>said no. To forgive first of all, and this is

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a direct quote, would mean that he would come on

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>his knees and asked for ask for forgiveness. He wouldn't

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>do that. Um. Is that right? Did he never do

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that even to someone like Ellie Wizzell Well, let me

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, and this is kind of an irony. Um.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a one satins letter to Andrew, and Andrew's

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>partner fiancee Um that said, I'm so sorry, Dad, essentially

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>apologizing for the scheme not even a look. But it

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>was one set. At the same time, I was getting

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>six seven single spaced letters in beautiful, exquisitive handwriting, explaining

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and rationalizing everything. So yeah, he had a tough time.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>He had an ego that could never admit any kind

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of loss, which is not something to be a tribute

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and the trait you want to have if you're in

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the investment business, where losses are are part of the game,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>similar to President Trump in that way. And so there's

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge denial mechanism. And though he did not ask

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for forgiveness, he told me Um he felt he felt

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>really bad for his his uh you know, his victims

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything he knew he'd done wrong. He was devastated

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>by what he did to his sons. He essentially killed

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>both because Andrew died slowly of cancer. But I spent

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with victims, and Um, it's it's

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>very very hard to forgive a guy, um, knowing what

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>he what he the damage that he calls Jim and

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your communications with made off. You know, did you talk

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to Hi about the angle? Only angles that fascinates me

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it seems like he took advantage of

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>his friends, um and maybe praying upon their Jewish religion. Hey,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know that's where a lot of his

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>relationships came from, whether it's a synagogue or just you know,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>uh circle of friends and pomp Beach or Adam Hampton's.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And it seemed to really prey upon you know, his friends,

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that his Jewish friends. Did that come up at all?

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he's um in a sense, it was almost

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a financial holocaust, and in the Jewish community, UM to

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>betray financially um, you know, fellow brotherren is almost beyond conception,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the reasons he was so successful.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's example of the two sides of him. His his

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>he had big four investors who he basically took his

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lower net worth investors and passed the money onto them

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and what I call a reverse Robin hood and um

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the uh, one of the four Norm Levy

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>he was very close to and and and worked hand

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in hand and when he died even sort of took

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>care of him to keep control over him. At the

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, he was the executor of his non real estate.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Asked that he was a big real estate investor. He

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stole twitter in fifty million to pump into his headge fund. So, um,

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do you fathom this guy? It is

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an it's an amazing, um, you know thing

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that I have been sort of blessed with to try

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to diagnose this and get under the hood. Did he

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>have any friends at the end, Jim, you mentioned that

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you have that you have a relationship with Ruth, And

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I know at one point, I think after mark suicide,

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>she said she was never going to talk to Bernie again.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But surely she must have remained in contact if she

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hiked you up. Yeah. She Um. The first thing is

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that that she's really was almost cult like controlled by him,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and she had a very hard time decoupling from him.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>She was thirteen years old when they started dating. She

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>believed his rationalizations and minimizations at first. By the time

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I met her, she was presenting to me at least that, um,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that he was going to that she was

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>cutting off relations to the degree she could. He emailed her,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he phoned her, They were in communication. Still they were.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>She was also obviously through me funnel uh stuff to him.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But um, it was very hard for her to get through.

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, she was also very hurt, as I

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>say in the book, by um some sexual affairs that

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he had that actually related more to control of his

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>investors than it did to the pure sex. But that's

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>all in the book. You'll find Also in the book,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I will just uh, I'm the first meteor media source

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe to determine if Ruth, Mark and Andrew were

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>complicit in any way. The FBI and the SIF the

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>trust stee believe that they had to have known, and

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I have I've got a it's in chapter eight, folks, right,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting real quick? How is his time in prison,

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the ten years? How hard was it? Did he have

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>any friends or any supporters or is he really alone?

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>My understanding was that actually, you know, he's charismatic, and

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>uh he is. He is a non con con man

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's so low Keith and I think he gained

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of respect that a lot of the prisoners

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>thought he was kind of cool. We'll pull off what

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>he pulled off, and he's kind of a survivor that way. Um.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>He's been sick for a while, though pretty badly and isolated.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the hospital wins all right. Jim, Hey Jim,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate you taking time here on this really

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>important day. Jim Campbell, he's the author of the upcoming

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>book it's due uh out in stores and on online

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>on April seven, entitled Made Off Talks, so that should

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be very interest giving the timing that we have here. Jim,

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Point based public

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>offering today via directed listening. We're still waiting for that

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to open, but it is certainly has the attention of

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a global Wall Street. Meltem Demror's cheap strategy officer from

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>coin Shares Group, joins us here today. Give us your

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>thoughts of what's the feeling inside coin Shares today. Quick delineation.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Coin Base is listening today. Coin Shares, which is my firm,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>listed about a month ago, so look really great day

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>for the industry. Coin Base is not only going to

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be a great validation, not just for crypto assets, which

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are two trillion dollar market now, but for the companies

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>building in the crypto ecosystem slated to be und billion

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar I p O. I think we're going to tap

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty billion by the end of the week.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Coin Base will be bigger than Golden and Stacks, which

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. But really the monumental moment here is we're

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>firmly planting the flag in the ground. Crypto is an

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>asset class. Crypto is an industry, and for investors, this

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is a place where you can no longer afford to ignore.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>You have to be allocating to this sector. You can

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>do it be the assets themselves. That's what we do

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at coin Shares. We have five billion in assets under

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>management in our change trade of products. Or now with

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>coin base, you can buy equity in high growth sintech companies.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're super excited. So let's talk about the well,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, the differences right. Coin Base is an exchange,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the largest US cryptocurrency exchange. What you offer with your

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>exchange traded product is the ability to and correct me

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>if if I'm wrong to buy bitcoin, but I don't

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have to. I can buy bitcoin with your E t P,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't have to figure out how to hold it.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I put it in? I don't know what it's

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>called cold storage or whatever. Um you guarantee my security,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, I know what I'm talking about, Meltham. No,

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>But the point is you. Um, you basically take the

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>busy work out of it for an old gen Z

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>guy like me, and I don't have to worry about

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>someone stealing it. I I still own it though, Yep,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So coin Shares we've been around for the

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>last seven years and basically what we do. We're an

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>investment firm that does a lot of different things. Were

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>best known for products, which again you can go onto

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>any old brokerage platform type in a ticker and hold

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto exposure in your account. Coin based lifts you buy

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the underlying assets directly, which is different right there. They're

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>more of an exchange and a bank effectively. But again,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of innovation in this space. We're seeing a

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of different companies going public over the coming months

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and years, and we're really excited. You know, I manage

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>our venture portfolio. We're also interesting in a lot of

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>these companies with our balance sheet capital and we're just

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so excited to see huge validation. I just want to

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>say one more thing on the coin based on listing.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>What's really cool. Here's Colin Based didn't do an I

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>p O. They're going to market through a direct listing,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>which I think is great, um. But more importantly, this

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>listing is going to be the biggest direct listing and

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest capital markets events we've seen in

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the venture space in the last ten years. So I

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>think again, the fact that this is a crypto native

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>comp ane that's able to achieve this type of outcome

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>just validates why it's so important for investors to allocate

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to this space. And then I think again, just a

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>huge moment for this industry. After seven years of being

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>called crazy and the traditional financial world shutting us, we

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are now being accepted because we speak in the language

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that investors understand, which is money. Well, you know, my

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>my heartache is UM. When I started researching and reporting

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin in two thousand twelve, I bought some, put

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it in my blockchain wallet and promptly forgot the password.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not feeling the pain as much as

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the bigger whales that did the same. But Um.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The benefit I guess of an et P which you

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>offer is that I would be able to what call

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody and say, hey, help me out here exactly. And

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also the other element that's really important is you

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can hold exchange trigger products in your retirement account. Right,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so tax advantage savings really important. Through me, Are you

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>going through a tunnel? Are you in an elevator right now?

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm right hear me? Okay, yeah, okay, you're

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking up a little bit. We got you, okay. So, look,

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that big opportunity with E T t s is the

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts. Americans hold the majority of their wealth in

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>their homes and in their retirement accounts. So we want

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to get crypto into every retirement account so that people

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>can grow their their wealth through this asthet class and

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>through these businesses in their tax advantaged savings, especially as

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Government looks to tax earners and savers

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>alike at a much higher basis than the years going

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>forward given all of the deficit that we're seeing in

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this country and in the world more broadly. Meltime, you

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about maybe some of the uptake of some of

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this cryptocurrencies at there give us a sense for the

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>institutional appetite for all things crypto. There's concerns that maybe

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing the uptake from some of the big

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. What's your experience, Yeah, absolutely, so, look from

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an asset allocation perspective. We produced the weekly fund Flows

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>reports that tracks all of the inflows and outflows into

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto products that are publicly traded right now, those products

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have over sixty billion in assets under management between them.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>The last two quarters have seen record inflows. And I'll

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just share one more fact. Gold has typically been the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>preferred portfolio diversifier for institutions. What we are seeing right

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>now is over the last two quarters, gold products and

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>gold ETF have seen twenty billion dollars in outflows. Crypto

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>products have seen seven billion dollars in inflows. And so

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what we have here is a sector rotation. Investors and

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>allocators need diversifiers in the current macro climates. Our research

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>has found a four percent allocation to bitcoins is the

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>optimal portfolio diversitycation to balance risk and reward. JP Morgan

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>says one percent that we think our research is better

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at four per cents um. But look, investors are looking

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to diversify. They're looking for places to generate return. With

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>real inflation at two point five to three percent and

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed in comic close to zero and real rate it

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>close to zero. We think crypto and bitcoin will play

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>an increasingly important role in investor portfolios and allocators are

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>starting to come out of the woodwork. They're starting to

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>allocate in size, and nowhere is that more apparent than

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the inflows we're being into these products. All right, Melton,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>great to get some time with you. I hope we

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>can talk to you a little bit more after this.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Melton um Demers has been really a huge driving force

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. She's on the she founded the World

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Economic Forum Blockchain Council, and you've probably seen her if

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you watch c SPAN testifying in front of Congress on

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies. She also teaches at m I T as

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>well as ox Ford and UM. Right now, you know,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we're focused on the coin based direct listing. It's indicated

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to open at three five and no now indicated to

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>open at three six five dollars in the NASDAC debut.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much more to talk about around crypto,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>especially as here in Europe they're talking about digital currency

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're focused on privacy. I wonder how much of

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that she believes. We'll get her back on again soon.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, John Tucker. They're talking about some of

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the big banks that have come out today. JP Morgan

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs Wells Fargo. We have one of the top

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>bank analysts on Wall Street Quick Chris Whalen joins, us

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Whalen Global Advisors, And Chris, let me get

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>your reaction first to JP Morgan. I mean, everyone is

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>saying it was such a great quarter, and yet the

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>shares are down for the third day in a row. Well,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's because we're counting last year's earnings. Very simply, if

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you back out the release of loan loss reserves, which

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>they had put aside when COVID first exploded on the scene, Um,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we're now taking them back into income. So if you

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>really look at the numbers, their expenses were up, revenues

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were flat, and as you mentioned in your intro, loan

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>demand is soft. Um. You know, it's funny in the

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>classical economics texts, when rates rise, you're supposed to see

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>an expansion of margins on lending. We're not seeing that. Uh,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>net interest margin is being squeezed. So I think, honestly, uh,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it may be record gap earnings because the accountants and

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the Fed let them take four and a half billion

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars back into income from loan loss reserves. But if

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you back that out, the numbers don't look so good.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what the more astute observers on

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the street are going to trade based on how concerned

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>are you about the commentary from JP Morgan about the

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate loan growth or the lack thereof in terms of demand.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you view as temporary that event Actually,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as this economy reopens, we will, in fact see lenders

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>come back into the market, our barbarers come back into

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. We've had soft loan demand for a while.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the street typically hasn't focused on this.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>They just focus on the press release, maybe the first

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>paragraph of the press release when it comes to earnings.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But banks are in a very difficult environment now because

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the FED has created scarcity and just about any asset

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>class you look at, and the competition for big commercial

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>loans is intense. So in order for banks to win

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that business, they have to be willing to drop their rate,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases the banks just fold their arms

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, no, I'm going to just leave the reserves

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>at the FED. I don't need to work for nothing,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what quantitative easing really means. It means financial

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>assets have no value and so I think the FED

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to rethink what they're doing because if we leave

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>current policy in place, I think banks are going to

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be in trouble by the end of the year. There's

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of interest earnings that they have to

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>have to survive, and we are going to test those

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>limits because of people like Janet Yellen and j Powell.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>They just don't get it. You know, they're they're working

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>with a playbook that's twenty five years old. Yeah, but Chris,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we're coming out of this pandemic.

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It's all about getting the economy open. And these banks

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are printing record profits. Nobody's going to cry for these guys. Well,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>they're printing record gap profits. But if you back out

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the low loss reserves, they're not doing that. Well, um,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>look at again, look at the results if you take

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that out, because remember that's last year's profits were counting.

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not this year. Market stuff. I mean, you know,

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the consolidation in the banking industry has resulted in five

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>six of these players just racking up numbers that and

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I used to work on the street, we'd never even

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>think of these levels of profitability. Well, no, and and

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thank God, because it is the transactional side of people

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like Goldman and JP Morgan that's gonna save them temporarily

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>from quantitative easing, the the ill effects on net interest

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>margin and on the return on earning assets, which is

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>really all that matters with banks. You know, banks a

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>big portfolio. If they're not making money on their assets,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you can survive for a while when the FED pushes

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the cost of funds down. The cost of funds for

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry today is about eleven billion dollars for

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty trillion dollars worth of assets. Think about that, and

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's just helping them look okay. So over the next

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>several quarters, the benefit of that cheap funding is gonna

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually EBB and the the earnings on assets are falling

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just as fast. So it's kind of a race to

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom right now on banks, the mid sized banks,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it could be an example the bank I

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>love Western Alliance that just bought a big mortgage company,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a Mara home from Apollo. They're gonna do okay because

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the smaller banks have more pricing power. They're they're chasing

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller loans. But the big banks, you know, they are

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>in a world a hurt right now because the competition

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for large assets is global. Every private equity fund, every

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sovereign fund, they're all chasing the same customers and so

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>JP Thank god they have capital markets. Is any of

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the big banks positioned well to deal with this situation then,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris or do you look down? Um? The latter two,

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the smaller, midsize and smaller banks look the best bank

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in the top five as US bankrupt consistently, they have

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>actually been taking more losses in the other banks half,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>which I see as a sign of strength. They're cleaning house.

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of forbearance on the street. So as

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.479
<v Speaker 1>an analyst, when my clients asked me about these banks,

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I tell them off. And I don't know because the

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>FED has countenanced forbearance on commercial credits, especially commercial real estate,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that I think we're going to regret. Because their hope

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the economy bounces is yere. You know, people

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to New York City, we start to see

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>utilization of commercial assets return. I'm not sure that's going

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I think the ravage is right. I think

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>New York City is in trouble, and all the lenders

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>who have exposure to commercial real estate and cities like

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>New York, Chicago, Los Angeles. I think they've got a long,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>long road ahead of them. Hey, Chris, thanks so much

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for joining us to really appreciate your take on some

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of these big bank earnings uh that we are dealing

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with this morning, and also more to come later this week.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Whalen. He is chairman of Whalen Global Advisors, based

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in New York and getting some guy to here. Coin

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Voice a coin base indicated to open at three and

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>at forty. We'll have more coming up now. I want

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to get over to Bloomberg. Business Week reporter William Turton

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>has written a story with Joshua Bruce dun about a

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>kid really twenty three year old coder who kept q

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and On online when no one else would. That's the

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>headline from your Business Week story. Um who is this kid?

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not. He doesn't appear to be a white supremacist

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>or um a q and on follower? Um where did

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you find him? Hi? Thanks for having me. Nick Limb

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is the CEO and founder of a company called Bonmo Tech,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which is based in his hometown of Vancouver, Washington, and

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they provide various web services. But most importantly they provide

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a what's called the cd N service, which prevents websites

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>from being knocked offline by kind of malicious attacks. And

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>so you know, websites like eight coun and the Daily Stormer,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>which is like white nationalist website, have been kind of

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>dropped by mainstream providers of that service, like cloud Player

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for example. So Limb's company von Tech kind of steps

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in to fill that void, and his clients, um, you know,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>as far as we can tell, is a very small

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>amount of people who kind of run some of the

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>most extremist websites on the Internet, alright, So it kind

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of goes to I think a lot of folks when

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think about uh technology and social media and the

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>spread of extremist views. I think obviously of the brand

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>names the facebooks of the world, but there's also, as

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you point out in this Business Week story, there's a

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of smaller players involved as well. This is is

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more than just Facebook, right, and you know, there's this

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting debate going on right right now about

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the platforming and social media censorship, right, But so what

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>if you take it a little further and think about,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, does someone have a right to have a

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>website even you know, even if it has kind of

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the most abhorrent views um and limb is is kind

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, and what he explains as the maximum

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for free speech. Um. And you know, he kind of

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>summed up his his ideology when it comes to this

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>issue to us, you know, very simply by just saying,

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't care as long as it's not illegal in

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the US. You know, he's happort it. But he believes

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in free speech. Then you're saying, well, right, that's what

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that's what he says that that I think how he

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>justifies you know, kind of exclusively offering his services to

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, extremely far right uh websites, He exclusively offers

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>them to them or is he just the only one

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that will accept them? Are you saying he actively white

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>supremacists that's true, Yes, he does. You know, we found

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>an instance where he you know, actively courted Andrew England,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>who runs the white supremacy of website Daily Stormer, and

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>offered him free services. Um. But you know he claimed that,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he offers his services to everyone, but the

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>only ones that we could find really were sites like

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a coon in the Daily Stormer who else does this, um,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean it's it's hard to believe that

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this twenty three old with this small company is the

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>only one providing I guess technical support for some of

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>these extremist groups. Is is this a collection a lot

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of small players out there, William? Well, you know, as

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>we know in the story cloud Flare it's still offer

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>services to sites that kind of have these extreme mists used, right.

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>They they've only really dropped support of certain sites um. Um,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, under a lot of kind of public scrutiny

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and pressure, right and this is an extremely nuance and

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue, which cloud Flaire has itself talked about. UM.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's as far as I know, there's

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no one really like Nick um, you know, considering

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>most people don't actually have problems using using mainstream providers

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>unless there's kind of a massive backlash that comes from it.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>It's funny I would have thought you'd see in in

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>UM maybe Eastern Europe or Asia, the hosts of these

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Q and on UM supportive websites. Now I say that, um,

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>William without thinking about Facebook and Twitter, which Paul mentioned

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the top I don't obviously UM surf the web and

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>go to these little niche places. But I do see

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>these kind of weird views, I guess if I can.

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make a value judgment of it,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>but I do see these kind of Q and on

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>views spreading across everyday Facebook pages, right, I mean, you

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>know the Facebook difficulty and moderating content has been well documented,

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of course. I mean, I think it's just sort of interesting. Um,

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know how even if you try to d platform someone, right,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like if if cloud player stops offering its services, state Coon,

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there's someone like Nick who can kind of build the gaps.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's really just a question of how hard these

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sites want to try to keep themselves online. And then

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're you're at a point where you're kind

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of playing this cat and mouse game, right, and so

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>what effectively what are you doing? Right? You're kind of

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>chasing different sites to different service writers, but maybe you're

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not actually kind of confronting the real question of the

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>content and how to how to address it, you know, societally.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So well, has there been any pushback on Nick Limmon

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and his company van wall Tech? Has been any regulatory pushback,

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>legal pushback, um? Anything that might people try to stifle

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>his operation. Yeah, you know, we feature a researcher in

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the story who kind of had made it a personal

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>mission of his too to disrupt Limb's operations. And so

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he you know, found one of the providers that helped

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>provide Limbs his services and wrote them and they took

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>them offline. But you know, as I was just saying,

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Nick quickly found someone else to to keep the services going.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, there's always I think gonna be

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>someone that that will be able to offer this kind

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I guess. I guess the question is is

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he um is he helping to keep any illegal content

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out there? I mean you mentioned, for example, not just

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>white supremacist websites, but there are also you know these

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of four chan eight chan. I guess it's more

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>into eight coon now I can and keep up um.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 1>They also that's intense at all. They also branch they

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>also branch into really uh illegal things like child pornography.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Right well a coon, you know fans shown pornography, or

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at least it says it does, and and Limb is

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very clear that you know, if if you know something

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was illegal, he wouldn't support it. Right now, in practice,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what does that actually look like it's It's hard to tell, um,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think these people aren't actually really

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that interested in having much legal liability. They're they're more

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in seeing how far they can push the First Amendment.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>UM and uh, you know, as far as kind of

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.239
<v Speaker 1>any regulatory illegal pushback, I mean, not much has been

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>written about Limb or his company, UM, and he actually

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>avoided a lot of scrutiny during the kind of peak

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of Q and on. But you know, I am curious

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens next. I don't anticipate any legal

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>regulatory perspect because Limb, you know, as far as I

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>can tell, isn't doing anything illegal. Interesting. William, thanks much

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for bringing this this story. William Turton, cybersecurity reporter for

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. His story on a small part of the

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet as but certainly a big part for some of

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>these extremist websites. You can find his story in this

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>week's edition of Bloomberg Business. Sweet Thanks for listening to

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>put on fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio