WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Lindsey Piegza & Todd Jablonski

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea, and we're going to hear from Doctor

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Pigs with a huge quality Economics, and from Todd Jablonski

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>out with a Kraken in Seattle. But we actually came

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 2>up with single best idea today. We had on Gerard

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Cassidy from RBC Capital Markets and he and I have

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>a tradition going back decades. We're talking JP Morgan City

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Group and all that, and then at the end of

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the interview, I always say Gerard small cap, small stock,

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>single best idea by Old Cell, and that's jargon for

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>Global Wall Street about when you're with an analyst, what

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>is their single best idea, it's always a buye. I mean,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to say sell this. That's not the

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>way the DNA goes. But his was Puerto Rico. I

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>was stunned Gerard Cassidy's saying, guess that's what Puerto Rico's

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>recovered lots of federal aid and his single best idea

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>was Banco popular. So there you are with how we

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>came up with the title the single best idea Today

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>was to take notes with Lindsay Pieg of Stiefel and

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>halfway through the interview, she floored Paul Sweeney and me

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>with a statement on the FED raising rates.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Right now, the FED is backing itself into the corner.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 3>The FED should have risen rates, It should have raised

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>rates higher now that they see inflation reversing course for

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>three consecutive months since the start of the year, they

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>need to re engage raise rates to a sufficiently restrictive

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>level to get price pressures under control and we can

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 3>start to talk about a sustainable recovery. The longer they

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>slow play this, the more price pressures become entrenched into

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the economy, and the more difficult it's going to be

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to ever get us back to that two percent target.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily think our recession is necessary to get

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>price stability, but I do think that a much slower

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>growth rate would likely be the outcome, which is not

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 3>necessarily again, is something that we need to avoid at

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>all costs.

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Lindsay pigs with Steifel and I really can't say enough.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 2>It's not an outlier call. There are people with great

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>respect for the idea. What does the FED do when,

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of course the fallback is to say they're not going

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to cut rights, They're not going to raise rates. I mean,

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that could be one outcome, But how do you frame

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>out the need to raise interest rates? I would suggest

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 2>the zeitgeist, if you will, is completely unprepared for that.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>That was absolutely fascinating one of our great joys. And

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>of course this is the reach of Apple car play

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and YouTube and all of Bloomberg Radio and the different

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>tune in is just one example. The reach of Bloomberg

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Radio is it is across the nation. I didn't believe

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this years ago when we started this, the idea that

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>someone at three or four am in California would actually

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>wake up to listen to this stuff.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yeah, right.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>And then of course the international audience the Pacific Room

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in Asia in the evening was a big surprise when

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>we were doing Bloomberg on the Economy, and so it's

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>always great to have people in from the left coast

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in Seattle, which doesn't get enough attention culturally. Todd Jablonski

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 2>holds court out there with Principal Asset. He writes an

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 2>incredibly smart short note, it's out on the principal asset

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 2>Management's got a great cut on sixty forty investing right

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>now and in factor investing, but just simply with Microsoft

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>coming out the juggernaut at Seattle. We talked to him

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>about Washington State.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 4>I would say about half of the spouses of my

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 4>coworkers in Seattle are employees of Microsoft, and I am

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 4>stunned at the different array of businesses that that firm

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 4>can get into. The cloud computing move I think was

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>a brilliant strategic design, and I've been really impressed in

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>everything from that to cloud computing. Like when it comes

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 4>to these tech giants, I think that the resourcing advantage

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>they have in competition is enormous. That leads to the

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>big getting bigger, and I think that we can continue

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 4>to see this trend Gorow. That's part of the reason

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm overweight large cap stops in the US, and I

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>can see these giants continue to become much larger.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Different views. I'm thinking a couple of days ago, Patrick

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong at Pleurimi and he's got the same outcome as

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Todd Jablonski from London to Seattle, but they sort of

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>get there on different paths. Patrick armstronge of course looking

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>at financials, technology margins, growth rates, and I think there

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>was a spirit there to Todd Jablonski saying, look, this

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is about American exceptionalism, it is about innovation and overused word.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we'll see that tomorrow. Today we've got meta

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Facebook out. I'm sorry, it's not meta, it's Facebook. Get

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 2>over it. It's Google, not alphabet. But the answer is

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get a lot of these really different stories,

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 2>each different on radio. Look for Tim and Carroll in

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon. They'll have all that coverage on Apple car

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Play and on YouTube across all of Bloomberg as well.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>You get Apple out May second, May third, and then

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>you really want to hear what Mark German has to

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 2>say about it, and we'll get there in the first

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>week of May. We are on Apple car Play and

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>on Android play. This is building each and every day.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Just talk to Jumana Preteci, who will be driving our

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Dubai coverage, our Middle East coverage from Morocco to Persia.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>And Jumani made very clear that all of this digital

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>stuff is an incredible international audience, particularly across Africa. Good

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>morning and good day to all of you on the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>African continent. And then on YouTube, you go in and

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you search Bloomberg podcasts and you look for you don't

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>look for me, you look for Lisa Matteo, and we're

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>all there in a white chick lit and you click

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>on it and there we are. It's seven to ten

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that we do this Wall Street time so again on Apple,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 2>car play and YouTube. Two highlights from today. This is

0:05:48.720 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>single best idea.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Man nal Or.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Factors were include the Lamber