WEBVTT - The History of Social Networks: Pinterest to Snapchat

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech? Are you all right? Friends? We're

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>soldiering on in our extremely long series about the history

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of online social networks. I believe this is the fifth

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>episode in that series at this point, and by my reckoning,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>we have gone from the mid ninety nineties up to

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or so and so far. If you've been following this series,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you've probably noticed there have been some waves of similarities

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in networks as they have emerged. So early on, we

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>had really simple networks designed to either connect or reconnect people,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with the emphasis gradually shifting to the reconnect for most

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>networks as people were finding their real life friends and

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>family in this strange new world of the Internet. Following that,

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>we learned about some journaling sites that let users keep

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing weblog or blog about their lives and hopes

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and dreams and thoughts. It was part personal diary, part

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>showcase for your work. A lot of those sites are

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>still around today. Many of them have gone through massive changes,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>including changes of ownership, over the years. I'm looking at you.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Live Journal owned by a Russian company at this point.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Then we had an age where profiles became a really

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>big thing, you know, like Facebook and MySpace really grew

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in this era, where people would create a sort of

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>home base online and then they would reach out from

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that home base. There was also a surge of niche

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>oriented social networks around this time that appealed to specific demographics,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like dog owners or people who knit. I didn't really

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about ravelry, but that's another example of a social

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>network that was catering to a niche audience. Also a

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>really exclusive social network for a while, like it was

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>invitation only anyway. Then we get to a bunch of

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>services that focus on microblogging, you know, ditching the long

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>journal format for short, you know, sometimes witty or pithy messages.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>This would be your Twitters, your Plurics, your Jaikus, and

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to a lesser extent, your Tumblers, because Tumbler obviously is

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>more than just short blogs. And that was the next entry,

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really and now we're coming up to the latest in

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this series. We're up to about twenty ten, and we

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>get to Pinterest, the picture perfect social network, at least

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>on the surface. But like many of the companies we've

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>already talked about in this series, Pinterest has a dark

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>side as l and we'll get to that. But first,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>where did Pinterist come from? Well, it all began with

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Silberman. He had worked for Google before he set

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>off to go into business for himself, and first he

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>attempted to create an e commerce app for the iPhone

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that he called Tote t O t E. But apparently

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>users found the design of Tote too complicated. And I

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can believe that it sounds like something that can happen

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>when you consider that Silberman came from Google, because we

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>all know Google's projects are driven by engineers, and sometimes

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that shows. Not to say that the products are bad,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but they work the way an engineer would put it together,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and for people who aren't engineers, it can sometimes come

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>across as needlessly complicated. Anyway, Tote fumbled the bag, as

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it were, and Silverman teamed up with Evan Sharp and

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sciarra, who came out of Facebook and Radius Ventures

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>l C. And together these three brainstormed and idea that

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>would be around an image based social network like photograph based,

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily images that you took yourself. It could be,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but didn't have to be, And it would be almost

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like a combination of scrap booking and social networks, where

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you could create image boards around themes. Maybe you create

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a board around the theme of Edwardian costuming. I can't

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you any of those I've visited, and I'm not

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>being facetious. Maybe you create a different board for things

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like scenic overlook looks, places that just have a gorgeous view.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you create a board that has interesting jewelry on

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it from various creators, or really anything else, if you

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if you like. So they worked on their idea throughout

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, and in March they launched the site

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with a closed beta, so just a small group of

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>users who are testing and out making sure that everything

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>marked the way it was intended. They opened this up

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>slightly and then people in the beta program were allowed

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to send invites to others, but it was still otherwise

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a closed beta. And like we've seen with other entries

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in this series, that kind of exclusivity and controlled entry

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>drove up interest. Like I said in previous episodes, everybody

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to get into the club that barely lets anyone

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in because you want to be one of the cool people.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll hear that again before we're through with this series,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>because once upon a time I got to be a

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>cool person. It um. It didn't stick, obviously, but we're

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>still talking interest here. The team held back on opening

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>up the floodgates, and growth was steady, but you know,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fairly modest. You know, in three months they had three

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand users, and in nine months it was up to

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand, and by a year later, this little niche

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>site was the talk of the social network industry, and

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Time magazine declared it one of the best sites in

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the world at that point. So the growth and users exploded,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and over the years they grew tremendously. These days, the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>number of users are it's somewhere in the four hundred

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty million neighborhood, which is not bad. You know, it's

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not Facebook by a long shot, but four thirty million

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of people. From early on, Pinterest became

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a site that attracted brands to it because companies could

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>create Pinterest accounts and boards and use these boards to

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>showcase products in attractive ways. So it was kind of

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>like getting access to a magazine and being able to

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>turn every single page of that magazine into an ad.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Companies loved this and they worked. Pinterest also became a

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>social network that had far more women as members than men,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which made it a real outlier. In fact, estimates say

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that women make up more than seventy percent of the

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>user base on Pinterest, and it kind of tried to

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>groom and cultivate a reputation for being a woman friendly

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and safe space. More on that in a moment too, now.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>An early obstacle for Pinterest came when folks actually did

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>something no one ever does, and they read the terms

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of service because until the wording said that Pinterest would

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>own all images uploaded to the website. Yeah, you might

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have taken the photo. If you upload it to Pinterest,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Pinterest claims ownership of the image, not you, and in

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Pinterest committed to never selling those images. So you know,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those complicated things. You think, well,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I took the photo, I should have the copyright to

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that photo. But Pinterest was saying, we published the photos,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so now we have the copyright and you agreed to

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it in the terms of service. So that that was

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sticking point early in pinterest history.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>In twenty nineteen, skipping away ahead because I mean the

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>company grows, the company gets lots more users, people begin

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to find really creative ways to use it. But there's

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>no real point in in diving into all that because

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I've pretty much summed up what I would say. But

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, the team decided to hold an initial

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>public offering. So when you go from being a privately

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>held company to a publicly traded company, and it was

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>bringing in a lot of revenue, but it had not

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>yet become profitable. So again pinterest launched in in twenty nineteen,

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to become a publicly traded company. But throughout

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>its history, at this point, it had not once turned

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>a profit. It was operating at a loss. So it's

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing in lots and lots of money, but it cost

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>more just to keep in business. So this is not

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge surprise. It's not like it's an outlier for pinterest.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>We have seen lots of social networks follow this route

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>because the first phase of a social network typically is

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>all about building value by attracting a large user base.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want to get as many people on

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>your service as possible and grow, grow, grow, grow, grow.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>That is your goal. Then once you have a pretty

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>large user base, you try to figure out how to

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>make money off of them or with them, because typically

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>your user base becomes your product and advertisers become your customers. Now,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Pinterest would not host its first profit until twenty twenty one,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>which is last year when I'm recording this. Anyway, in

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, the company went public. Now, at its height,

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the stock was valued at eighty five dollars per share. However,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>as of this recording, it's around twenty three dollars per share,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a fairly drastic drop off. But we've got

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a bigger one later in this episode. Earlier this year,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>back in June two tho Ben Silberman stepped down as CEO.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>He had been in that position since and he stepped down.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He is now the chairman of the board and a

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>guy named Bill Ready has taken the helm of pinterest,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And I guess you could say that Bill was prepared

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to do the job anyway. Ready comes from companies like

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>PayPal and Google and has a long history and things

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like monetization. Silberman likely stepped down in part due to

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue with the company's stock price falling even as

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it was posting its first profits in company history. But

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's also this dark stuff that we need to

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about that came to light over the past couple

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of years. So in so two former pinterest employees came forward,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>two women who accused Pinterest of being a culture where

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>things like racist and sexist behave ivir were running rampant

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>within the company, and that there were issues with pay inequality,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and that the company was known to take retaliatory actions

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>against employees who spoke out about this kind of stuff.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Then Francis Bower Brower, an executive with Pinterest, sued the

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>company on the grounds of gender discrimination and retaliation. Shareholders

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>began to sue the company as well. Because of these

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of issues, employees staged a digital walkout of pinterest.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So my guess is like these actions collectively also contributed

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to Silberman's decision to step down. Now, Pinterest would settle

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Brower's lawsuit for twenty million dollars and had an additional

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two and a half million dollars earmarked for charities that

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>help you know, women and people of color within the

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. Meanwhile, one of the women who stepped forward

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>in twenty would end up working with California lawmakers to

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>draft legislation that protects employees who speak out against their employers.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's legislation that really comes down hard on things

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like retaliation. Then we have the matter of Christine Martinez.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>She claims she is the unacknowledged co founder of pinterest,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that she worked as an unpaid consultant when Silverman and

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Skiera and Sharp were brainstorming on how pinterest would work.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>She filed a lawsuit that specifically named Silverman and Skiara,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>claiming that they they had listened to her advice. She

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>had served as a mentor and the UH council for

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>them when it came to designing a product that was

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>really targeting women users. So she says, like they didn't

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>know anything about appealing to women, so they turned to

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>me and I gave them guidance. She claims to have

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>been the person responsible for deciding that users would organize

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>images on boards, and that she played a part in

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>creating the terminology of connecting an image to a ward

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and calling it a an action of pen it like

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you pen it to your your bulletin board. Now, Unfortunately

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for Ms Martinez, she never had any sort of written

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>contract with the creators. It's not like she was an

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>official contractor or or uh consultant or anything like that.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It was all more of a verbal agreement. She says.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>There was an understanding she would be compensated should the

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>company ever become a success, and when pinterest went public

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen and there was no check in the mail,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>she says she realized that she was not going to

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be compensated and that the co founders, she says, were

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>engaged in idea theft. Thus she files a lawsuit against

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the company. Now, the lack of documentation makes it seemed

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to me like miss Martinez has a pretty tough case

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to make, even assuming everything she says is accurate. For

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the record, I have no reason to doubt her. It's

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just that there seems to be little in the way

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of corroborating evidence at this stage. But again I have

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not involved in the trial. There could be tons of

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff and I'm just not aware of it. So maybe

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. But at any rate, as of this recording,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that lawsuit is moving forward. So Martinez originally filed this

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit back in September one, and then pinterest moved to

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the case in December one, and then June of

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, by being a judge ruled that the case

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can move forward. Justice is ever so swift here in

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Anyway. We'll have to see where this

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>goes and whether Pinterest will defend itself or settle out

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of court. Okay, that's just one more in our line

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of social networks. We've got lots more to come, but

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. We're back. So our

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>next social network also relates to images, but this time

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Instagram. So we've already mentioned Instagram because

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we covered Facebook and Facebook now known as Meta,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>acquired Instagram in for at the time a staggering one

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that would positively be overshadowed by Facebook's subsequent

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of WhatsApp for sixteen billion dollars two years later.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're just gonna talk briefly about Instagram's early years

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and how things changed post acquisition, because a lot of

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we talked about kind of feeds right into

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook entrigue that we already did earlier in this series.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So before Instagram, there was an app called Bourbon, a

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>developer named Kevin's Systrom created Bourbon, which was not a

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>type of whiskey, but rather an app that let you

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>check into new places and gave your friends the chance

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to see where you were from place to place. It

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was spelled bu, r, b, N, and uh. In many ways,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this was similar to four square, the original version of

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>four square, which had launched in two thousand nine. So

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we did get a little brief period of location based

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>check in services that relates to social networks. Some of

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>them would interact with social networks so that you can

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>post your check ins to say, your Facebook account, that

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, and some of these would pivot to

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>do other things. Four Square did this. Four Square pivoted

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>away from the check in business, mostly because there were

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who had safety and privacy concerns

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about these, and it became harder and harder to monetize

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>those without falling into some potential traps when it comes

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to regulators, because I mean, obviously, anytime you're monetizing a

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>person's location, that gets into some sticky situations. So a

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of those would end up moving away from the

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>location based check in stuff. Anyway, System got some financial

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>backing for Bourbon, and he brought on Mike Krieger to

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>help build out the app, but over time they both

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>realized that Bourbon was too similar to four Square and

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that their test users were actually sharing photos like crazy

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>more than they were using the app to check into

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>physical locations. So they decided they would switch rails and

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>instead they would develop the app as a photo sharing

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>social network. But they wanted to change the name as well,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and they came up with the name Instagram because it's

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a play on the phrase instant camera and on the

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>word telegram, which I'm guessing all of y'all already knew,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but I thought I would just throw it in there for,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sake of being complete now as Instagram.

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>The app launched in October, initially just for iOS. Within

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>three months, the app had more than a million users,

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so it was off to the races. A month and

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a half after that, they were up to two million users.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>The trajectory of growth outpaced earlier social networks like Facebook

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter. They were just on a rocket ship, really,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm guessing that's why Facebook would ultimately come forward

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 1>with an offer to buy out Instagram, because, as anyone

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who has paid any attention to Facebook, slash Meta knows

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the company typically tries to do two things. If any

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>other service starts to gain some traction against Facebook's other products,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>first thing they will try to do is buy it,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and if that fails, they will try to copy it

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to keep people on Meta slash Facebook platforms,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>because we all know if you're spending time on someone

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>else's service, well, then you're spending less time on Meta's services,

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and that's bad for Meta's bottom line. But we're not

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>quite up to the acquisition just yet. The early Instagram

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed users to post images, to leave comments on other

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>people's images, and to follow other users, and that was

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>about it. A little less than a year after launch,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Instagram would introduce options that would really change things up

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>make things more attractive for Instagram. They included some digital

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>filters and some image editing features. At the same time,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>iPhones cameras were improving, so it was kind of a

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect convergence of the hardware improving and the software giving

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>more options that attracted new users. And now users could

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>tweak their photos, even adding camera effects before sharing them

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>with their followers, and it really made Instagram pop in popularity.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twelve, Android users would finally get a

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to use Instagram as there was now an Android

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>version of the app, And not too long after the

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>android version came out, Facebook announced its intent to acquire Instagram. Now,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>when Facebook bought Instagram for a billion bucks, the startup

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>app company was really small, like there was a Baker's

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>dozen worth of employees. And for those of you who

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar with one of Baker's dozen, is that means thirteen.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>So imagine being one of thirteen people when the company

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you work for has been bought by by another company

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for a billion dollars. That had to be a heck

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of a day. So Facebook buys Instagram probably because of

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a combination of factors like a desire to scoop up

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>competition because they didn't want the fact that, you know,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Instagram was attracting younger users. Facebook was kind of already

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>having an issue in attracting young users like the users

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they had they had in droves, but it's it was

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>getting harder and harder to convince younger people to come

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>into the service, whereas Instagram that was really attractive to

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of young people. So one thing Facebook was

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>doing was buying audience, but another reason was that they

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>did not want some company like Google or Twitter to

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>get hold of Instagram and potentially get a leg up

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. Now. At the time, the folks that Instagram

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>were assured that they would remain in charge and they

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really have to worry about Facebook interfering with Instagram's

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>operations too much. But as time would go on, the

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>team of Instagram would see Facebook both direct Instagram to

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>incorporate specific features as well as it would lift some

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram's functionality for other Facebook products and thus kind

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of make Instagram less special as a result. So Kevin's

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Systrom and Mike Kreeger both chose to leave Instagram in

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, which was coming in a tough time

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for Facebook, though you could argue not nearly as tough

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>as this past year has been in many ways. So

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by two thousand eighteen, Facebook was already known as essentially

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrating the death of privacy, which it was getting flak four,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but the company was also in the spotlight due to

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>issues like Cambridge Analytica for an Intelligent scandals, concerns about

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>misinformation campaigns, and more. Obviously, a lot of that has

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>not changed in years since. In fact, some of it

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>has just expanded to other types of misinformation, like when

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic broke out and COVID misinformation ran rampant on Facebook. Anyway,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the initial word was that system and Krieger wanted to

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>set out to make something new. And it was about

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a year after that, in two thousand nineteen, when publications

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>like Wired and The Verge started to publish articles that

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gave more details into what may have driven the co

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>founders to leave the company they created, and there were

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. For one thing, apparently Instagram's popularity

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>was a matter of resentment among certain Facebook staff because

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at Instagram as pulling traffic away from

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook proper, and so it became kind of a territorial thing. Now,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it is never good when you have this kind of

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>animosity between different departments within the same company. I know

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>there's some companies that try to foster a sense of

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>competitiveness against each other in these departments. I personally find

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that to be uh counterproductive for the overall health of

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the company. But what do I know. I'm not a

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>billionaire anyway, making matters worse, Zuckerberg would say in an

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings call that Instagram's success was largely due to the

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>support it was getting from Facebook. But as we've already

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>heard in this episode, Instagram was already on an adoption

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>trajectory that was way more aggressive than Facebook's own history.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So it was tough because for on one hand, Instagram

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>staff were being hated on but because of their success,

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and on the other hand, they their success was being

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>claimed by the same department that hated them for being successful.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>So it was kind of a double whammy in that sense.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>But another issue was that there was increased interference and

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>restrictions coming from Mark Zuckerberg himself. In particular, there was

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a time when Kevin Sistram was giving interviews to the press,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and Zuckerberg sequently passed an edict company wide saying no

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one would be allowed to talk to the press unless

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they first got permission from either Zuckerberg or from Cheryl Sandberg.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that rubbed system the wrong way because

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it sends the message that he's not trustworthy, right, he

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>can't represent the company well without permission. He's not towing

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the line. And y'all, I have been on that kind

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of situation in the past, not at iHeart, but in

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the past, I've been in that same situation, and I

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>can definitely tell you it feels like an insult. Anyway,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned before, Facebook was making demands on Instagram

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and lifting features for the core Facebook app, and all

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of that was just not what Systram and Krieger wanted,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and so they split. Anyway, That's about all I have

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to say about Instagram as we did, as as I said,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>cover some of this stuff already in the Facebook entry. Obviously,

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Instagram change a great deal over time. There's

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>been a greater emphasis on algorithms served content, so you're

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>far less likely to see stuff that from your friends

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and family that you follow, and more likely to see

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff that Instagram thinks you want to see. So for

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some people that might be great because you're discovering stuff

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that you otherwise wouldn't know, but for others, it's very

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>frustrating that you're not seeing the stuff you you joined

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Instagram to see. Right. Uh. Then, of course Instagram introduced

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>reels back in twenty twenty. It was a pretty obvious

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt to copy TikTok and convince users not to jump

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>ship to the younger social network, which had limited success,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's another example. You know. Again, if Facebook can't

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>buy it, they try to copy it. Uh. There's also

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing concern that Instagram's model is causing harm to

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>younger users, particularly to young women. So back in late

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, Facebook whistleblower Francis Hogan shared internal documents from

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>her former employer, and she shared them with journalists and lawmakers,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and among those documents were discussions about how Instagram was

0:25:55.560 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially contributing to negative mental health conditions for young women

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular. Uh, that story is still unfolding. It prompted

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook slash Meta to scrap, at least for the time being,

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>their plans to launch a version of Instagram targeting younger users,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which gets into some pretty dark stuff. But I'm going

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to save the rest for another time because I'm sure

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll do episodes about Instagram in the future where we'll

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>really dive into all that. Now, the same year Instagram launched,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>there was a similar social network called Path that took

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the stage. So again we're seeing waves of similar networks

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>hit at the same time. So this time we're talking

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about the centralized theme of a social network centered around

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>sharing photos. Now, Path was founded by Dave Morin, a

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>former product manager at Facebook and the Napster founder Sean Manning,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and a former Napster engineer and future Slack designer named

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Moreau. In so, like Instagram, Path was a mobile

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>based social network service. In fact, it remained mobile based

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout its history. It would never had a desktop site,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and it let users share photos with their friends and family.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But unlike Instagram, Path limited how far and wide users

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>could connect. So originally the service would let users connect

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with up to fifty people max. And the implication was

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that Path is really something for users to rely upon

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.719
<v Speaker 1>with their close friends and family, but it's not trying

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to encourage you to share it with every casual acquaintance

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or friends of friends. This would eventually change over the

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>course of the services life, which spoiler alert, would ultimately

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>come to an end. Path is no longer a thing.

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>A Path would later increase the cap to a hundred

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty connections, and then ultimately would remove the cap entirely

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>because while their approach was meant to give people a

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>sense that this is really for your actual community of

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>friends and family, that limitation meant Path was inhibiting its

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>own growth, and it ultimately meant the Path would not

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>reach a level of success and would would fizzle out anyway.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>When it started off, Path had a similar feel to Instagram,

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which was the appeal for for many users um and

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>yet it felt smaller than Instagram, and that also appealed

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to a certain group of users. They didn't have to

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about their photos being seen by total strangers because

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Path would limit sharing to just their own close contacts. Later,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Path would incorporate other features that made it similar to

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>some of its competitors. Users would be able to post

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>updates that were kind of similar to tweets on Twitter.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They could also use Path to check into locations, kind

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of like four Square or the aforementioned Bourbon But behind

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, things were not going particularly well. For one thing,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in twelve, users became aware that Path was recording user

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>phone contacts, So if you join Path, it really meant

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>handing the company your network of contacts, and at no

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>point to Path apparently alert users to this, let alone

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>secure their permission, which you know that's a big no now,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the US government got very interested in Path

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and what data the company was actually gathering from its

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>users and how the company was using that data, so

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the US Federal Trade Commission or FTC, ultimately would find

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Path eight hundred thousand bucks due to the company storing

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>data belonging to underage users in particular, and the US

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>government ruled that Path would be subjected to review for

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>every two years with regard to its privacy policies and practices.

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, Path was struggling to compete with

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>other social networks like Instagram. It eventually hit a peak

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of around fifteen million users, which is decent, but the

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>company still had a fraction of the users that were

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>found on bigger social networks. A company called Cacao out

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of South Korea would acquire Path, and while past the

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>usage continued to decline in America, it did enjoy a

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>modest amount of popula already in Indonesia. However, even that

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>would not be enough to keep Path going, and in

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the fall of Kal announced that Path would shut down,

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which it almost immediately did. Okay, we've got some more

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to get through before the end of this episode, but

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break. Okay, we're back. We're

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>up to eleven, and that's when we get a flagship

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>product that would mark another concept in social networking, and

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this time it's the concept of disappearing content, as in,

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this product adopted the idea that people should be able

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to share information, and that information should have a limited

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lifespan and after a given amount of time, it disappears forever.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And I am, of course talking about Snapchat now. Snapchat

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>started off as a different named app. It was called

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Peekaboo p I c A b ooh. It was founded

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>by three Stanford students, Avan Spiegel, Bobby Murphy, and Reggie Brown.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And in case you're wondering if the idea was always

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about trying to find ways to convince people to post

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nude and explicit photos and videos, the answers, yes, yes,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the idea the whole time. So just as

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook got its start as a way for Harvard students

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to score how hot their classmates were, Snapchat was all

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about how can we convince people to post risque photos

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of themselves. A lot of startup founders are happy to

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be privileged young men, white men in particular, and they

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are like the worst. And yes, I know I'm editorializing,

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's my show and I don't care anyway. The

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>story goes that Reggie Brown thought up this idea. He thought,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if you could make a site that would allow photos

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to only stay up for a given amount of time, uh,

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and then it would disappear forever, you could probably convince

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more young women to post sexy photos of themselves.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And so then he goes down the hall and he

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>tells his buddy and his party partner, Evan Spiegel about it,

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because these guys were total party boys at Stanford, and

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they decided they would pursue this idea. They were like,

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a million dollar idea. By the way, my

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guess is Reggie was such a party bro that the

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>other two co founders spotted how he might not quite

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>fit in with their plans. So in eleven they pushed

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>him out of the company. So the guy who allegedly

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>came up with the idea of in the first place

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>gets kicked out. He would later sue the two co founders.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>He successfully would be awarded more than a hundred fifty

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. But importantly that was in cash, not in

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a stake in the company, which really important because when

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the company would go public eventually in it turned the

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>other co founders into billionaires. So he got a hundred

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty million, but the other two became billionaires. Uh that

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>same Reggie Brown would later get into trouble with the

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>law a couple of times for doing stuff like allegedly

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>driving recklessly in luxury cars in South Carolina and also

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>allegedly harassing neighbors. He even had a warrant out for

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>his arrest at one point, but apparently had left South

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at the time. But I don't know much else

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about what's happened to him in the years since. Anyway,

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's all gossipy stuff. Let's focus on the app itself.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So Peekaboo launched for iOS in two thousand and eleven.

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown gets pushed out of the company not long after that.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>By September two thousand eleven, Peekaboo changed his names to Snapchat.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>A year later, Spiegel would write in the first blog

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>post for the company, so this is two thousand and

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve a sort of pitch for the app, which has

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>already been out for a while. And surprise, surprise, he

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>left out the bit where the guys developed it in

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the hopes of seeing women take off their clothing. Instead,

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Spiegel said that quote, we're building a photo app that

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't conform to unrealistic notions of beauty or perfection, but

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>rather creates a space to be funny, honest, or whatever

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>else you might feel like at the moment you take

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and share a snap end quote. So now the emphasis

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was really just on real time ephemeral photo sharing. A

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>snap a photo, in other words, would stay open for

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one to ten seconds, depending on what the user had

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>set for that photo, and then it would disappear, so

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you get a chance to see it and then it

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was gone. Snapchat launched for Android in two thousand twelve,

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and once again Facebook started to take notice of a

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>startup that was one pulling focus away from Facebook properties

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and to attracting younger users, something that Facebook is always

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>struggling with. Instagram had given Facebook access to a younger

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>audience than what had been on Facebook, and Snapchat was

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>giving access to an even younger crowd in the form

0:34:55.760 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of teenagers. So stories kind of conflict of this next bit.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But the general sinse I get is that at some

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>point early in Snapchat's history, probably around or so, Mark

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg made an offer to Evan Spiegel to acquire Snapchat,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and Spiegel refused. So then Facebook goes and develops an

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>app called Poke, which was named after the first in

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook app. That app let users send a little poke

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>message back and forth to each other. You would trade

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it off. If you received it, then you could send

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it back and Poke the app was a little different.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It let users send images to each other, images that

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>would automatically delete after viewing or after going unviewed after

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of time. Essentially, it was copying what

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat was already doing. And again, if Facebook can't buy

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>its competition, it tries to run them out of business

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>by emulating them. Poke briefly got a lot of attention,

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was not long before folks kind of bailed

0:35:56.040 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>on Poke and went to Snapchat. So while Zuckerberg I

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>had to use the power of Facebook to squash Snapchat,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at least according to some accounts, that effort failed. Allegedly,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg then offered to purchase Snapchat for three billion with

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a B dollars, but Spiegel turned that offer down too,

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and then supposedly Google made a couple of offers to

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>purchase Snapchat, with one in being for thirty billion dollars

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that's ten times what Zuckerberg had offered, and they still

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>got a no thanks. Snapchat, the company which would later

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>become Snap Incorporated, would introduce other features over time. Tons

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of camera effects would increase snapchats appeal among young users,

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>who could make themselves look like, you know, puppies or

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>monsters or I don't know, kids, I don't know what's

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong with these kids today? Kids who can understand anything

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>they say that takes me back anyway. Users would eventually

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to send short videos to one another in

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>addition to photos, also with the feature that the videos

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would disappear after viewing. Spiegel and team were aiming at teenagers, primarily,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, kids who didn't want to be on Facebook

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>because that's where their parents were, um, nor did they

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want the restrictions in place on Instagram. The immediacy

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and the temporary nature of snaps was what was attractive

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to its users. Snap would also introduce stories that let

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat users post a series of photos and videos to make,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a story. But the big difference here is

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that a Snap is something that a user could send

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to a specific person or group of people. So let's

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>say you took a funny pick of your dog and

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you send it as a Snap to your friend who

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>happens to love your dog, but you don't, you know,

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>blasted to everybody else who couldn't give a crap about

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>your dog. I like your dog, Don't get me wrong,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I love dogs. Some of your friends are real jerks.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But the story, on the other hand, becomes a series

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that anyone following your account can view. So a snap

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a one to one and a story

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a one too many. Snapchat also introduced

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a chat feature that doesn't keep an ongoing log for

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that chat, So when you do open up a chat,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you can read the most recent messages, but nothing before that,

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and anything you post will go to the other person,

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but they also won't see the full history of the

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>chat log. It provides a bit more privacy between the

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two communicators. Now, the US Federal Trade Commission, or FTC,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 1>looked a little bit closer at Snapchat. It was suspicious

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the site wasn't quite as diligent or as

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming about the disappearing nature of material on the service

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as it claimed to users. So the fear was that

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>people were posting images and believing them to only be

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>around temporarily, and thus there was no real risk to

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>privacy when in fact those images might be sitting on

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>servers somewhere, or there were third party tools that would

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>allow people to record things that were posted to Snapchat,

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Snapchat was not alerting users to this like it's

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>You could argue, it's not Snapchat's responsibility to uh to

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to look after all these third party things, but you

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>could argue it is that's responsibility to let users know, hey,

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue, and they weren't doing that. So

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the FTC argued Snapchat had deceived users with regard to

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the disappearing nature of the media that was shared on

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the service. So the FTC pointed out a few ways

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that snaps could outlast what Snapchat had claimed, and in

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the end, Snapchat agreed to pay a settlement to the

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>FTC over these and other issues. Is including the fact

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that Snapchat was apparently harvesting location data from Android users

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>while not disclosing that in terms of service. Snap would

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>also introduce a tool called Discovery, which allowed brands to

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>post content on Snapchat. I'm not gonna go further into

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that because I feel like that's really more of something

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I can chat about in a full episode about the company,

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and in Snapchat introduced spectacles. These are physical glasses that

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have built in cameras. In the frames, they the camera's

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>face outward, obviously because who wants to just see, you know,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the skin on the temple of the person wearing it,

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>and they compare with a smartphone and thus record very

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>short snippets of video. They were initially sold through a

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>proprietary vending machine called snap Butt, but you could later

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>pick them up online. When Snapchat, now known as Snap Incorporated,

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>went public, the stock was to be priced at seventeen

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share. It would end up selling for more

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. Kind of had an up and down first

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>day throughout the day, and it ended on twenty four

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars and forty cents per share, so above what they

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had planned. That's good news for a company at its

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>peak in one shares traded at more than eighty dollars

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>per share. Really good right. However, today, as I record

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this episode, they're selling closer to nine dollars forty cents

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>per share, which is big, old youch Now, this is

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not the lowest that Snap has ever traded, I should add,

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but it ain't great. This past year, Spiegel sent on

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a memo to all employees, indicating that the company would

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be laying off around of the workforce and that it

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>would also refocus on the three main areas of development,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>which are community growth, revenue growth, and augmented reality, with

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>other areas receiving a reduced budget or being eliminated entirely. Recently,

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Evan Spiegel another message, letting employees know that he wants

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>them back in the office for eight percent of the week,

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so four days out of the week for most folks.

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Spiegel has indicated that he thinks that the company isn't

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing as much collaboration as it needs to succeed. This

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is in line with what we've seen with a lot

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of other criticisms that we've heard about working remotely over

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the last year or so. Honestly, I'm not sure how

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>realistic that is, Like, does that actually have the big

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>impact that business owners think or are these other factors

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the economy having a much larger impact on companies.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And one of the places that business leaders look to

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>blame a thing that they actually have control over is

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>whether or not their employees have to come into the office.

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I again, this is me editorializing, but I feel like

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some business leaders fret if they don't have more control

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>over their workforce, if they feel like their workers are

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>not there for them to look in on and make

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>sure that they're actually doing their job as opposed to,

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, slacking off or something. They just suspect that

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>people won't do their jobs if they're not under the

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>thumb of the boss at the office, which speaks very

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>lowly of their opinion of their employees and my own estimation. Um,

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's necessarily the case. I do

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>think because it's something they can have control over, they

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 1>jump on it. Because even executives, even billionaires, realize there's

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff they have no control over and that is terrifying

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to them. For the rest of us, we deal with

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it every day because we're not billionaires, so we have

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>less control over lots of stuff in our lives and

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we just cope. But billionaire's they're a delicate punch anyway. Um,

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they won't have to go back into the office until

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>February of three, and then at that point they're expected

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend of the week they're I'm not sure what

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the reaction has been among Snapchat employees, because this is

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fairly recent news. As a record this episode, but I

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that a lot of people are not terribly

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>happy about it anyway. UM, I should likely do a

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>full episode about Snap and Snapchat really to dive into

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. That's a quick overview of this odd

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>social network. There's a lot more to say. I mean,

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of of various criticisms have been directed

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at Snapchat, some in good faith, some not. Uh, there

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>are lots of controversies around the service. I mean, it's

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>targeting teenagers. But the nature of the app, and when

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that the creators, at least at some level,

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about a way of encouraging women to take

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>naked photos of themselves. That doesn't speak super well, right, Like,

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really problematic to put it lightly. But yeah, I'll

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>leave all that for a future episode because there's multiple

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sides to the story. I don't want to oversimplify it

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and say that this is all a lest civy, this

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>attempt to encourage people to take risk a photos. Uh.

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Snap has pointed out multiple times they actually have no

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 1>way of seeing the content that's sent across their network,

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>which is both important for user security and it's also

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>important for the company's security because if anything ever is

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sent through Snapchat that ends up being dangerous. For example,

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you know, uh, bad actors, some terrorists,

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>whether international or domestic, are using Snapchat to send information

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Then the company has deniability right if

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not able to see what is being sent across

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the network, they cannot be held culpable for facilitating any

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of those communications. So you know, there's that too. It

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>means that you know, if you if you want to

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to have that immunity from culpability, then you

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.919
<v Speaker 1>also can't have access to all the you know, risk

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a photos being sent back and forth. Okay, that's it,

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm done being a prude. Well, we'll sign off on

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>this episode. We'll be back with more. We're coming up

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of other interesting entries and hopefully wrapping

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>up this series. I hope in the next episode we'll

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>see um and then the mean time, I'm still working

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:20.959
<v Speaker 1>on the end of the year episode as well, where

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at some of the big stories that have

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>broken across two in the text space. If there are

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 1>any that you think I should definitively include that don't

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>involve Twitter and elon Musk because obviously those are going

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to go in. Then reach out and let me know.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of ways you can do that.

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>One as you can download the i Heart Radio app.

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's free to download, free to install and use. Navigate

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to tech Stuff by putting tech Stuff in the little

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>search field, and you can leave a voice message by

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>clicking on the little microphone icon. Leave it up to

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds and linked. If you like, you can let

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>me know to use it in a future episode. Um,

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't do it unless you tell me too, or

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer, you can reach out to me via Twitter.

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff hs W

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. YEA. Tech

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.