WEBVTT - Fantasy Football Week 10 Recap: Winners, Losers, EHHH 0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.720 And listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best 0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:17.360 Friends Forever show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences. 0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:47.199 Den Yeah, welcome your bab, your bye gyro Stake, pretic, 0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:52.880 Bright step Hall, your go host five. I love it 0:00:53.400 --> 0:01:04.480 from what I know. All right, Why lady, gentlemen, and 0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.039 welcome to the Fantasy Football best Friends Forever. I am 0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.720 Frank standfel No, Greg Susman. He's out celebrating his wedding. 0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.839 We'll get into that a little bit later on. Eh. 0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.440 I will join us a little bit later on the 0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.640 show as well. But welcome to everybody to the Sports 0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.480 Grade TV Network Zoomo Channel seven nineteen, also now on 0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.600 the Stir Network as well. We're gonna welcome you all in. 0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.399 It was an awesome, awesome Week ten in fantasy football. 0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.320 We're gonna get into all the winners, the losers, the 0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.440 situations a little bit later on. A lot of running backs, 0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.560 backfields that we want to talk about, the split, the 0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.840 way that things broke out yesterday between Kareem Hunt and 0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:51.280 Nick Chubb, David Johnson and Kenyan Drake, the Bucks backfield situation. 0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.160 But before all that, I want to talk about the 0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.840 real winner from week ten. Somebody that remains undefeated, and 0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.400 no I'm not talking about this Francisco forty Niners. They 0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:07.000 have not played yet. The Internet, the Internet remains undefeated. 0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.880 All we needed was one clip of Dak Prescott, I 0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.480 don't even know what you want to call what he 0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.639 was doing stretching before the game, and this thing went 0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.680 viral on Twitter last night. And I'm telling you, if 0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.160 you have not had the opportunity to go down the 0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.799 rabbit hole that is hashtag Dak dances to anything, then 0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.840 please do that for the rest of the day, because 0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.600 as you can see now if you're watching on the 0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.519 Sports Creed TV network, this is some kind of stretch 0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.360 that he does before the game to get himself ready 0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.120 to go, to loosen up his hips or whatever it 0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.440 might be. It clearly worked because he had a good game, 0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.040 but it's pretty ridiculous to watch. And we do appreciate 0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.400 everyone listening on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network to the 0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.400 BFFs listening to us on podcast form, but this is 0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.799 what you can see when you watch the BFFs live 0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.200 here on the Sports Creed TV network. We've got to 0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.640 get to everything. It's not just you know what's happening 0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.240 on the field throughout the games. We gotta talk about 0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.040 everything that's going viral as well. So this Dak Prescott, 0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.240 Dak dances to anything. Um, we saw suave a mente 0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.000 that was by far my favorite one. But yeah, shout 0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.079 out to Dak Prescott and the Internet remains undefeated as well. 0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.919 Before we jump into all these winners, losers and as situations, 0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:23.480 do you want to wish a Happy Veterans Day to everybody, past, present, 0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.160 future service men and women around the country who helped 0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.480 keep this country safe. So Happy Veterans Day to everybody 0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.960 out there as well. The biggest winner I think it's obvious. 0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.240 I mean every week he's a winner, and you're a 0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.480 winner if you start him in fantasy football as well. 0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.720 That is Lamar Jackson. I mean what Lamar Jackson is 0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.080 doing this season. I had to do a triple take 0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.200 earlier today. I tweeted that out earlier drink. This man 0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.280 is eleventh in the NFL and rushing yards he is 0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.520 a quarterback. How do I know that he's a quarterback? Well, 0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.400 he posted a perfect passer rating yesterday one fifty eight 0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.440 point e. Lamar Jackson. That isn't now the second time 0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.000 this season that Lamar Jackson has posted a perfect passer ratings. 0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:08.720 So for anyone out there who's saying, oh, well, this 0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.280 is a gimmicky offense, he only did it against the 0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.200 Miami Dolphins. Yes, he did it against the Cincinnati Bengals yesterday. 0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.280 But you know what, other really really good quarterbacks are 0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.920 playing against the Miami Dolphins, they're playing against the Cincinnati Bengals. 0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.559 Are they posting perfect passer ratings. I don't see anyone 0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.480 else out there posting perfect passer ratings. So one of, 0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.440 if not my biggest winner yesterday and every single week, 0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.760 is Lamar Jackson again, second perfect passer rating on the season. 0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:42.800 Aaron Rodgers has one perfect passer rating in his entire career. 0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.279 And with that, I will welcome in my good buddy 0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:53.080 w W superstar Eric Young. What's going on in a Y? Yes, sir, 0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.000 oh are you wearing the Titans helmet? I see you 0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.880 now up in the studio. Shout out to e Y 0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.960 and his Tennessee t Ends. I texted you as soon 0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.400 as they got the victory yesterday. Really really fun game 0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.640 between the Titans and the Chiefs. Of course, on the 0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.479 back or rather the legs of Derrick Henry. The guy 0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.240 is just unstoppable right now, you y, I honestly wanted 0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:13.560 to give you a moment at the top of the 0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.360 show here to just try and kind of wax poetic 0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.840 when it comes to Derrick Henry, because again we've heard 0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.760 fantasy analysts for weeks now, for months, e Y telling 0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.920 us sell Derrick Henry, Sell Derrick Henry. He can't keep 0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.839 it up. He doesn't catch the ball out of the backfield, 0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.960 which means that he can't be this good for fantasy football. Well, 0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.400 he just keeps being this good for fantasy football immediately. 0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.680 Two hundred yards rushing on the ground yesterday, two touchdowns. 0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.280 He is currently your RB four on the season overall. 0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.800 E Y, that is your man, Derrick Henry. Yeah, a 0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.080 little late getting to the show, coming off a bit 0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.040 of a bender from celebrating the Titans big win just 0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.960 got home and uh it has nothing to do with 0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.640 Apple and they're awesome updates. Um, yeah, laptop is is 0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.680 work like a breeze. But I mean, look at if 0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.080 people are going to tell you to sell Derrick Henry, 0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.559 go ahead and listen to him. If they have Derrick Henry, 0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.440 buy him from him, because Derrick Henry is the number 0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.640 one running back. He's been a number one running back 0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.840 all season. Look at his production, look at his stats. 0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.840 If someone tells you, oh, well, he doesn't catch the ball, 0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.280 or he's this, or he's that, then stop listening to 0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.360 what they're saying. They're obviously not paying attention. This is 0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.360 a team that wants to run the ball. This is 0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.880 a team that wants to lean on Derrick Henry, and 0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.599 when they do that, they're successful. Now there are times 0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.600 when they get away from that. Last week, he had 0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.560 two carries in the first half. No one knows why 0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.640 that's the thing, but it was a thing. So yeah, 0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.760 Derrick Henry is a number one running back. The stats 0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.680 can back it up. But don't care if he catches 0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.640 footballs or not. Um, that's not part of his game 0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.120 and he doesn't need that to be part of his 0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.400 game to produce. So guess what I was right again? 0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.280 Guess what EY was right again? EU. I would like 0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.240 to take this time to apologize to you as well, 0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:03.680 because I bet under on rushing yards for the season 0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.359 for Derrick Henry. The prop for him was one thousand, 0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.000 one seventy five rushing yards for the season. I bet 0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.560 the under I knew that they were going to lean 0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.280 on him a lot. I just didn't think that Derrick 0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.720 Henry was going to be this good. So I'm a fool. 0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.680 You were right, and I apologize, No, nothing to apologize about. 0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.680 I mean the roality is is that was the consensus 0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.480 in the off season. That wasn't for for me. Um. 0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.560 I see this guy run in real life that you 0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.120 can't even understand how fast he is. All he has 0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:32.600 to do is get to the second love what you 0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.440 saw that in yesterday's game. As soon as he got 0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.480 he got into where the linebackers were, I yelled, He's gone. 0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.560 And that's exactly what happened. Nobody could catch this guy. 0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.960 And I mean second half. Do you see any guys 0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.520 that are five pounds wanting to tackle this monster? Absolutely not. 0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.520 This is how they win football games. Derrick Henry is 0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.880 the man coming up next. We get it to the 0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:59.560 winners losers right here. Fantasy BFFs NFL season is so 0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.640 you can be on the eighth person away in one 0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.600 million dollars in a fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My setting 0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.240 their lineups using the Daily Order dot Com DFS line 0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.240 of optimizer if you're playing daily Fantasy Sports and not 0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.840 using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing there all. Sign 0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.760 up down for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, 0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.640 smarter DFS projections, and better results into Promo Code Action 0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.880 first head percent discount is as promo Code Action first 0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.200 head percent discount Daily Order dot Com where millionaires are made. 0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.040 Welcome back to the fantasy pfs right here on the 0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.520 sports Cred TV network. I am Frank Stanfeld. Make sure 0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.360 you follow us on YouTube and Instagram at sportscrid tv 0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.760 as well. Happy Veterans Day out there to all of 0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.199 our service men and women around the world, around the 0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.040 country as well. E y, you don't really join us 0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.760 on Monday, it's very often. But what we like to 0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.920 do is we'd like to talk about the winners, the losers, 0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.560 and the situations from this previous week. And we're gonna 0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:14.760 do that starting now. The BFFs presents winners. I won, 0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:22.120 I won, Losers, you suck. You are one pathetical loser 0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:35.640 and I have no idea what's winners, losers and situations. 0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.160 We're gonna try and break through everything from Week ten 0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.800 of the fantasy football season, and e Y, I wanted 0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.439 to start with Christian Kirk of the Arizona Cardinals. I 0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.160 believe he was one of the biggest winners, if not 0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.160 the biggest winner from yesterday. Six catches, a hundred and 0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.480 thirty eight yards, three touchdowns on ten targets going up 0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.719 against this Tampa Bay Bucks defense. And since Christian Kirk 0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.760 has returned to the y, he has led this team 0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.640 in targets, He has led this team into air yards. 0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.400 He is being targeted down the field. It is very 0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.440 clear that he is their most talented wide receiver at 0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.640 this point. It was nice to see Larry Fitzgerald back 0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.920 in the mix. Andy Isabella keep an eye on Andy 0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.439 Isabella starting to play a little bit more here as well. 0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.720 But e Y I mentioned on Friday, I had Christian 0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.199 Kirk inside my top twelve wide receivers and he he 0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.280 came through in a big way. Yeah, Christian Kirk looked amazing, 0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.800 even on a day when Larry Fitzgerald was figured back 0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.319 in uh and looked pretty decent, made to made a 0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.480 couple of real good catches. Christian Kirk, I think showed 0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.040 up and showed everybody look at this is the number 0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.160 one in Arizona. It's a really interesting offense. The quarterback 0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.400 is super mobile, super accurate, and is only gonna get better. 0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.960 In my opinion, UM, I felt this thing. Uh playing 0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.920 the better cardonos in the pit League are our home 0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.840 league for the Fantasy Network. UM thirty six points, six 0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.000 points from one player. So yeah, it's uh probably gonna 0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.320 lose this one this week, not probably, definitely gonna lose. 0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.760 And uh, Christian he played in my rosters, thank you 0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.559 for when he played against me. I'll get you. Look, 0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:08.959 you're not the only one who's gonna lose in the 0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.120 Pit League this week. E y. The BFS for all 0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.120 the jokes that we made regarding our producer Alex Passano 0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.520 downstairs about him having five quarterbacks. Fantasy karma exists everybody. 0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.040 Alex Passano took us down this week and deservedly so. 0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.959 So yeah, I'm gonna just blame Greg Sousmen for that one. 0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.320 If you didn't open up that cannon worms, we probably 0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.240 would have won. Regardless, Let's move over to another winner 0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.959 on the other side of this game. E y, And 0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.000 that was O. J. Howard, the ghost of O. J. 0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.520 Howard back from the past yesterday played eighty two of 0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.360 eighty three snaps. They ran forty seven routes on fifty 0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:51.040 five Jameis Winston dropbacks season high seven targets, fifteen percent 0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.599 target share, four receptions, had a touchdown as well. And 0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.679 I tweeted this out yesterday, drink, I'm trying to figure out, 0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.760 e y if this is something that we can actually 0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.760 trust moving forward when it comes to Oja Howard or 0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.320 do you think that they just wanted to get him 0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.520 involved because they knew that it was a really good 0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.400 matchup for tight ends going up against his defense. Which 0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:13.760 side of the fence do you tend to lean on. 0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.240 I'm not gonna trust him yet. Like, the guy's had 0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.920 one game all all year where you're like, oh, there's 0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.959 there's o J. Herroard. There's the guy that everybody in 0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.079 the off season thought he was going to be. The 0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:30.439 guy with the crazy athletic intangibles, massive, fast, good hands. 0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.760 I mean, he's got every tool. But the reality is 0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.880 is he's just never ever gotten done. Bruce arians has 0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.760 proven in the past that he's not a guy that 0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.079 uses tight ends. He's showing us again this year, and 0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.520 the reality is it's been a moving target. One week 0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.160 it's great, next week it's it's o J. Howard or 0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.439 it's neither of them, or it's O J. Howard with 0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.480 a massive game like this, I mean it's too much 0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.320 of a moving target for me. I know tight end 0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.840 is a mess, but I don't trust O J. Howard yet. 0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.840 I mean, if you have him, I feel like next 0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.800 week you have to start him. But I'm not like 0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.280 pursuing him in a tray. Uh. You know, I don't 0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.319 want any part of that headache if I can avoid it. 0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.480 And I'm closer to where you're at regarding O J. 0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.840 Howard right now, Ey, because I've been burned so many 0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.520 times this year when it comes to him. This was 0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.719 one of no It was the best matchup that you 0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.480 could possibly get four a tight end. So O J. 0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.360 Howard comes through here and there can be value, right 0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.319 Like if he is the third option in the pasting 0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.280 attack for this Bucks offense, like we all expected him 0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.559 to be coming into the season, there is value there 0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.640 for sure. I just don't know if it's going to 0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.800 be consistent on a weekly basis, so we'll find out. 0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.360 This was obviously a great game for him. He played 0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.760 a ton As I mentioned, he only sat out one 0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.319 snap in this game, ran a ton of routes as well, 0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.160 so it seemed like they made it a thing to 0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.760 get him involved. So we'll pay attention to this moving forward, 0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.600 but I still do lean closer to where you're at, 0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.080 e Y. Where I want to see this maybe another 0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.640 week before I fully trust O. J. Howard once again, 0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.319 like I did coming into the season, I want to 0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.839 talk about the backfield situation for both of these teams, 0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:03.400 the Bucks and the Arizona Cardinals. And let's start with 0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.640 the Cardinals. E Y. I think David Johnson a very 0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:10.360 clear loser in this game. Five rushing attempts for two yards. 0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.560 He had only one target, one reception for eight yards. 0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.040 And I put Kenyan Drake in the situation right, So 0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.880 me and Gregg put players in the category when you 0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.200 know it's it's not clear whether they're we're a winner 0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.640 or a loser. And for me, that's how I feel 0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.320 about Kenyan Drake, Like it's not a good thing that 0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.240 he's splitting touches and splitting work with David Johnson, but 0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.840 he was clearly the better running back yesterday. David Johnson 0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.280 yesterday play of the snaps, five carries and one target. 0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.120 He also lost a fumble. Kenyan Drake of the snaps 0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.400 ten carries and seven targets, so seventeen running back opportunities. 0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.400 What do you what do you make of this backfield 0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.360 situation from yesterday? Y? Yeah, I feel like the Cardinals 0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:58.120 are just going to continue to be this really frustrating situation. Um, 0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.920 now that Kenyan Drake is there, are just going to 0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.280 amplify the confusion of like who to play. As a 0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.200 guy that owns Kennyan Drake and David Johnson in the 0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.120 ton of places, uh, it's making the decision to start 0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.560 either of them very difficult. Kennyan Drake came out with 0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.640 no Edmonds and no David Johnson and showed the NFL 0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.640 who he is. That's what I believe. I mean, this 0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.160 is a guy that you've been hearing about for how 0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.360 many years? He's been stuck in Miami Kellen Blodge. For 0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.240 some reason, it's starting above him. Nobody knows why he's 0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.360 not getting any volume. Uh, and without volume, you can't 0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.160 show the kind of running back that he really was. 0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.760 The first game, literally the first game in Arizona, probably 0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.960 barely knows the playbook. He was a machine. Now, this 0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.280 was a super high, high scoring game and I had 0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.480 talked about the stat of the Arizona Cardo's line up 0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.600 with four wide receivers and sometimes five wide receivers, more 0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.160 than any team in the NFL. And it's going to 0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.200 affect the fact that the running backs are just not 0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:53.800 gonna get a ton of volume. I think that's going 0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.000 to be the offense and it's going to be, you know, 0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.840 a dart throw. And whether you play these guys, David 0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.520 Johnson is pooh jeezus. It's just so sad. A guy 0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.040 that was so good and so dominant and now he 0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.640 looks like he's in a definite time share. And the 0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.280 weaker part of that too. And you know, the worst 0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.720 part E y two is watching that game yesterday, David 0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.960 Johnson doesn't look like himself. I don't know if it's 0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.840 all the injuries have kind of caught up to him, 0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.880 but you know, it doesn't seem like he has much 0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.600 lateral movement. It seems like the feet are kind of slow, 0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.200 like he's stuck in mud. Uh just doesn't have a 0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.560 lot of you know, just duk ability, you know, the 0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.040 the ability to make somebody missing. You just don't see 0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.800 that out of David Johnson right now. Uh, I did 0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.240 want to again bring up Andy Isabella season high thirty 0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.320 seven percent of the Snaps season high end routes as well. 0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.360 We heard a lot about Andy Isabella in tow the 0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.160 draft season that they traded up to get him. They're 0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.640 excited about him, and it seems like maybe over the 0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.840 second half of the season they start to face out 0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.400 some of these other guys that haven't really shown up yet, 0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.040 like the Pharaoh Cooper's, the Trent shur Fields and all 0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.080 these other guys. Uh, if Andy Isabella is on the 0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.160 field consistently in these four wide receiver sets, maybe he's 0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.400 somebody we looked too. So just pay attention to that 0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.119 situation as well. When it comes to the Bucks running backs, 0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:10.760 here e y, Ronald Jones the snaps eleven carries, eight 0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.560 targets and eight receptions. The guy had eight receptions coming 0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.320 into the game yesterday. He had eight receptions in yesterday's 0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.840 game alone. So I don't think many people who are 0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.359 expecting that type of pass game usage from Ronald Jones 0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.000 Peyton Barber place of the Snaps Now, I don't think 0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.080 that Ronald Jones is a clear winner here e y, 0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.080 And I'll explain why. The targets are good, the receptions 0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.399 are great. He fumbled, and in the second half it 0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.720 seemed like the team went back to Peyton Barbera a 0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.080 little bit more. Peyton Barbera actually had a goal line 0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.480 rushing touchdowns. So as much as I like the pass 0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.160 game uses for Ronald Jones, I do worry a little 0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.960 bit about that fumble and the fact that Peyton barber 0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.680 played a lot in the second half. Yeah, I guess 0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.720 we're gonna find out, um what Arians thinks about it. 0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.560 I mean, he came out before the game and said, 0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.840 look at you know, Uh, Ronald Jones are starting running back. 0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:01.879 That's something that I've been hoping for. I think a 0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.720 lot of people have been hoping for. Peyton Barber is 0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.240 a serviceable running back in the NFL, but for me, 0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.000 just not a starter. Ronald Jones has the tools, He's 0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.879 proving that he worked on his pass catching in the 0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.920 off season, and he's obviously better at it. So I 0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.640 think they should just give him a run and see 0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.160 how he does. Give Rojo a run. Please Bruce Arians 0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.400 when we come back. More winners losers situations from Week 0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:30.040 ten of the fantasy football season. I want to light 0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.359 the lamp on draft Kings and FanDuel this NHL DFS season. 0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.840 Then joined Daily roado dot com and learned from the 0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.960 best daily fantasy sports players. Get updated fantasy hockey projections 0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.040 for NHL DFS b LIND combinations and build stacks for 0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.760 tournaments in the Daily Rodo NHL DFS Lineup Optimizer. If 0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.520 you are playing daily fantasy hockey without using Daily Rodo, 0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.200 you are doing it wrong. Enter the Promo Code Action 0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.200 for a ten percent discount. That's Promo Code Action for 0:18:55.280 --> 0:19:06.280 a ten percent discount. Get in the game with DraftKings 0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.480 sports Book, where listeners of this show can get a 0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.359 deposit bonus up to five hundred dollars. Here's how it works. First, 0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.760 create a DraftKings sports Book account and make a deposit 0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.000 and place your first bet, and Draft Kings will match 0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.560 it with a fifty percent bonus up to five hundred dollars. 0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.200 This offer is eligible for all users, plus new users 0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.960 will get a free risk bet of up to two 0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.919 hundred dollars. Just go to sports grid dot com slash 0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.919 d k to play that sports gride dot Com slash 0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.000 d K gambling problem called Gambler twenty one and over, 0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.520 New Jersey only eligibility restrictions apply. Welcome back to the 0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.359 Fantasy best Friends Forever right here on the Sports Grade 0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.960 TV network Zoomo Channel seven nineteen. We are extremely pleased 0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.560 to welcome in our new stir audience as well. You 0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.920 want the edge, get on the grid here on Sports Grade. 0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.480 Also want to give a shout out to my guy Sussman. 0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:06.720 Congratulations once again getting married this weekend. Judy. Lucky Lady 0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.760 Cuckoo for Sussman was the hashtag that we were going with. 0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.040 E Y it was a blast as well. Uh, And 0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.840 of course, as I suspected with Nondo de fino there, 0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:20.639 I was very intoxicated. Yeah, I'm kind of bombed. I 0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.639 missed it. Man. To be honest, is uh weddings are 0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.040 always fun. Happy for Greg and Judy both. They're actually 0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.480 uh in my town, spending a couple of days. They're 0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.679 gonna come over tomorrow. I'm gonna fire up the kitchen. 0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.199 I actually consider myself a pretty good cook, so I'm 0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.359 gonna cook for them tomorrow. We have some drinks and 0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.879 hang out in my newly revamped bar room and and 0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:45.800 uh have a good time. So looking forward to that. 0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.600 All right, Well, you might have been a little sad 0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.000 that you missed out on the wedding, but uh, I'm 0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:52.720 pretty sad that I'm gonna miss out on that. So 0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.280 hopefully I can make my way out to Nashville one day. 0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.960 I would love to join you in the e Y 0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.040 residence in that backyard, you know, maybe when it's not 0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.840 so cold. Uh, some drinks, maybe a cigar or whatever. 0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.240 I've seen. I've seen the lifestyle, e Y. And I 0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.760 gotta say I'm a big fan BFFs Fantasy Summit this 0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.320 uh this summer. Maybe maybe maybe we make something like 0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.960 that happen. We gotta make it happen. Of course, let's 0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.560 get back into the winners, losers, and situations from Week 0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.440 ten of the fantasy football season, and Ey, I wanted 0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.200 to talk about the Cleveland Browns because there was a 0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.440 lot of confusion heading into this week regarding this Brown's 0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.159 backfield and how they were going to be utilized. Uh 0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.240 And honestly, I came away thinking that Nick Chubb and 0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.000 Kareem Hunt are both winners based on how they were 0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.080 used yesterday. And I will elaborate a little bit more 0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.080 right now when it comes to their usage. Nick Chubb 0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.040 of the Snaps great you'd like to see that. Twenty carries, 0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.359 four targets, twenty four running back opportunities for Nick Chubb 0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.640 a hundred and twenty one yards. You'll take that perfectly fine. 0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.680 Seems very similar to what his usage has been, even 0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.879 for Kareem Hunt was back in the mix with Kareem 0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.800 Hunt back, Hunt played fifty eight percent of the snaps, 0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.600 so they combined here for a hundred and thirty eight 0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.119 percent of the snaps. There were a lot of snaps 0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.200 where they were on the field together. Four carries for 0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.640 Kareem Hunt. Maybe as a Kareem Hunt owner, you don't 0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.160 like to see that, but nine targets. The nine targets 0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.040 yesterday represented twenty percent of the targets share. And you know, 0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.040 given the snaps that he played to you, I played 0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.399 thirty eight snaps. It was again fifty eight percent of 0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.960 the Browns overall plays, and fourteen of those came either 0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.200 out wide or in the slot. So if this is 0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.840 how they're going to utilize Kareem Hunt, I said yesterday 0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.320 that I think Kareem Hunt can be a flex in 0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.720 PPR leagues moving forward. And if Nick Chubb is still 0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.280 getting you know, twenty to twenty five opportunities and he's 0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.200 pretty much where he's been at the entire season. I 0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.840 think both of these Browns running backs are winners based 0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.960 on yesterday. What do you think? Yeah, I believe that too. 0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.080 And this is, uh, this is what I thought was 0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.159 going to be the case coming into the year. His 0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.640 nick Job is still going to be the starting running back. 0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.000 He's going to get you know, the majority of the carries, 0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.320 and Kareem Hunt is going to be um a souped 0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.840 up Duke Johnson basically. So that's that's what they showed us. 0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.080 You know, Kareem Hunt is a talented player. He's going 0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.239 to touch the ball. He's going to catch a ton 0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.680 of balls and and make guys miss in space. And 0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.160 Job is going to continue to pound the ball. Catching 0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.119 the ball is not like he's not you know, he 0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.320 can catch the ball, but it's not the biggest shiny 0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.200 object in his uh, in his skill set. So you know, 0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.880 this is a perfect setup of perfect one in two 0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.320 running backs. Both of them are going to be productive. 0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:40.280 I believe um Cleveland Browns one. So you mean it's 0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.800 a good thing. Yeah, they're winners in general themselves. Getting 0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.320 to three and six on the season, taking down the 0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.159 Buffalo Bills yesterday. I think I thought Jarvis Landry was 0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.520 a big winner as well as nine catches for ninety 0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.440 seven yards and a touchdown on ten targets against this 0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.560 stout Bills secondary. There's now three games in a row 0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.320 where Jarvis Landry has had double digit targets. Why so, 0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.520 I think Jarvis Landry is trending up, you know, high 0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.280 end wide receiver three, maybe even low end wide receiver two. 0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.919 It's crazy to say, but Landry and Odell Beckham's value 0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.480 might be the same at this point. I don't think 0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.280 that that's a stretchy Odell Beckham yesterday had twelve targets 0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.920 only brought in five of those for fifty seven yards. 0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.000 I think Odell Beckham and and Jarvis Landry have similar 0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.119 value right now. What do you think? What I know 0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.720 for sure is Odell Beckham is that is maybe the 0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.639 biggest disappointment of the year. Um. Everyone was for certain 0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.160 that Baker Mayfield was going to be the best quarterback 0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.200 that he's ever played with, and that still maybe true. 0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.720 But the Cleveland Browns can't get out of their own way, 0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.560 whether it's play calling, coaching, uh scheme, whatever it is. 0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.920 I'm not smart enough to know, but this is not 0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.879 a good offensive football team where everyone thought that they 0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.159 would be pretty high powered, especially bringing Odell Beckham over. 0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.320 If to me, if you would ask me, I would 0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.240 swap them. Jarvis Landry should have should have been picked 0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.840 before out Odell Beckham. Um, that was never going to happen. 0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.560 No one thinks that Landry is overall a better football player, 0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.000 but maybe in how the offense after has to run, 0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.000 they're more effective. When Baker Mayfield goes back three steps 0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.640 and let the ball out of it, get it out 0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.639 of his hands when he holds onto it, they're in 0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.520 trouble in Odell Beckham, h Look, he can get short 0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.040 past the two. I don't know why they don't try 0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.080 to get him on more slant screen stuff like that. 0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.679 This guy makes stuff happen when the balls in his hands. Uh. 0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.760 And they're too busy trying to force long balls to him. 0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.560 And that's just not what they're they're able to do 0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.639 on the season. E Y. Jarvis Landry currently wide receiver 0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.879 twenty three. Odell Beckham is wide receiver thirty four. So 0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.439 you're absolutely right right now, Jarvis Landry has more value 0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.159 on the season uh, and I'm not sure that that 0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.359 is going to change. I believe you know, this was 0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.760 the toughest schedule coming up for Odell Beckham. I'd i'd 0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.639 have to pull up the rest of what they have 0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.160 going on moving forward in terms of the schedule. Let's 0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.399 see here Pittsburgh. Miami is good, but two of their 0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.760 next three games are against Pittsburgh. That secondary has been 0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.520 ridiculous since they brought over Manca Fitzpatrick the Sincinny Bengals 0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.840 in Week fourteen. Week fifteen against the Cardinals, Patrick Peterson 0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.560 hasn't looked like himself, So you gotta mix bad coming 0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.040 up for Odell Beckham the Dolphins is a good matchup, 0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.280 the Bengals is a good matchup the Cardinals. He should 0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.320 be able to take advantage. But those games against the 0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.960 Pittsburgh Steelers, I don't think you're really gonna feel good 0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.520 about Odell Beckham in those games. So Jarvis Landry for me, 0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.160 a very clear winner from yesterday. On the other side 0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.680 of the ball, here e y, the Bills running back 0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.440 situation was one that we were monitoring, and I'll put 0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.000 Devon Singletary in the category because he got the snaps. 0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.800 Would you like to see the snaps nice eight carries, 0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.760 seven targets, only had fifty total yards. Frank Gore played 0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.480 only thirty one percent of the snaps, five carries in 0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.960 one target, but once again was given the opportunity on 0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.359 the goal line, did not punch it in. But the 0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.399 fact that they were still going to Gore here e 0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.680 y tells me that Devin Singletary is not fully the 0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.400 guy yet, Like, yes, he's getting more work and he's 0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.760 getting more touches, but it's not like he is a 0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.600 workhorse now for the Buffalo Bills. So I came away 0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.600 thinking that this is still in the category when it 0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.000 comes to the Bill's backfield. What do you think? Yeah, 0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:09.680 and I agree with that, and like Frank Gore still 0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.800 one of my favorite players of all time. But the 0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.000 reality is everywhere this guy goes, this is what happens 0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:19.119 to the running back situation. This is a super experienced, 0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:24.200 intelligent running back that knows how to play whatever situation. 0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.920 In the NFL, the coaches are going to lean on 0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.480 a guy like that, They're going to trust him in 0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.840 every situation. Devin Singletary is smaller than Frank Gore. Devin 0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.359 Singletary is a rookie and has not proven himself. I mean, like, 0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.360 I think he's going to be a good running back, 0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.680 and he probably is overall athletically a way better at 0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.200 fleet than Frank Gore, but that doesn't make him a 0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.440 better running back. Being a great athlete Kelln Balage does 0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.240 not make you a good running back. Frank Gore gets 0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.720 the tough yards. Obviously they're going to trust him on 0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.119 the goal line, and it's going to make singletary probably 0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.680 for the rest of the year. Yeah, think that makes 0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.720 a lot of sense. Let's move over to this Ravens 0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.000 and Bengals game. Already talked about Lamar Jackson. Waxed a 0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.560 little poetic on him. The run that he had yesterday 0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.000 just completely ridiculous to spin move spins out of two guys. 0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:17.120 I retweeted a video earlier today of the Michael Vick 0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.160 run against the Vikings in overtime, which was a historic run. 0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.600 Uh side by side with that Lamar Jackson run. And 0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.639 as great as Michael Vick was as a runner, Lamar 0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.800 Jackson is better. He just is. And it's not a 0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.760 knock on Michael Vick. Michael Vick was awesome, but I 0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.119 think Lamar Jackson is just in a different stratosphere right now. 0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.400 Mark He's Hollywood Brown h four catches for eight yards 0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:40.880 and and a touchdown. Did not play a lot of 0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.880 snaps and this one didn't run a lot of routes. Honestly, 0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.040 they didn't need him to. You know, they were just 0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.920 dominating on defense here. Uh. They got the big lead 0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.680 thanks to Lamar Jackson and mark Ingram. I didn't want 0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.680 to talk about mark Ingram a little bit here. Nine 0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.440 carries for thirty four yards and a touchdown. You know, 0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.800 the game set up for him to get a lot 0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.640 of work. But I think what the Ravens are thinking 0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.400 right now is they want to keep mark Ingram fresh 0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.800 for down the stretch. Let's not forget he still is 0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.440 a running back that has passed at thirty year old 0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.680 Mark and they want him to be fresh for the 0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.640 playoffs here e y. So you know, as good as 0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.440 the Ravens are playing right now, mark Ingram's usage and 0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.680 I got the step from Florio last night. He tweeted 0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.000 this out. Since week six, Marking Gram is playing just 0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.720 the snaps and averaging thirteen and a half touches for 0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.720 a game. I think that that is a combination of 0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.760 you know, they have a lot of leads, they're trying 0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.600 to keep Ingram safe and the fact that Lamar Jackson 0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.400 is running the ball as well as he is. Yeah, 0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.600 I mean this is a running football team. But the 0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.720 reality is is the number one runner is going to 0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.880 be the quarterback, Lamark jack and Jackson is absolutely electric 0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.160 with the ball in his hands, that's throwing and passing. 0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.920 People that say that he can't throw their insane. Uh 0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.120 look at he's not Aaron Rodgers. He's not you know, 0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.400 Tom Brady, He's not that kind of thrower. But he 0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.800 can do things that that those guys can't do. And 0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.400 the reality is you have to respect the fact that 0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.440 in a moment known as he's going to tuck the 0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.200 ball and run and that opens passing lanes all over 0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.720 the field. And we've saw it all year. So you 0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.160 got to remember, Gus Edwards is there. Gus Edwards is 0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.720 still an excellent running back and non forget about offseason 0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.320 Darling Justice Hill. So the reality is is Ingram it's 0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.480 going They're in the business of winning football games, and 0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.160 having him touch the ball ten or fifteen times is 0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.120 going to make them more deadly and more reliable come 0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.040 playoff time. So that's where you're gonna see. I still 0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.440 like Ingram. But if you have Ingram and you don't 0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.920 own gust Edwards, go after him. Trade for him if 0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.640 you can. It's hard to find a winner on an 0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.719 O and nine football team, especially the Cincinnati Bengals. Here 0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.960 e y. But when we come back, I will tell 0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.200 you who I think was a big winner from week ten. 0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.080 And yes he is on the Bengals roster. It's the 0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:56.000 bfs right here on the Sports grad TV network. I 0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.720 want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunt go 0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.800 on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com 0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.440 and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with 0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.120 the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the 0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:12.800 most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news, 0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.680 lake swap support and much more safe ten percent on 0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.440 winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily 0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:39.160 Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Welcome back 0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.440 to the Fantasy best Friends forever right here on the 0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.960 Sports Crede TV Network. No, we're not gonna be talking 0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.480 about DJ Hark, but that was the metal version of 0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.720 baby Shark. And I mentioned before the break that we 0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.320 were gonna talk about a Bengal on the oh and 0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.320 nine windless Cincinnati Bengals team that I thought was a 0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.440 winner from yesterday. E y, and that's Joe mix of this. 0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:05.800 Nat was a season high, career high thirty carries yesterday 0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.840 as well three targets a hundred and fifty one total yards. 0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.360 Geo Bernard is also banged up. I believe he's dealing 0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.520 with a knee injury, so we'll have to pay attention 0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.880 to that. But if you're telling me that we're gonna 0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.040 get a massive workload, maybe not similar to this, right, 0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.720 Like I wouldn't expect thirty plus touches on a weekly 0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.080 basis for Joe Mixon. But if you're telling me that 0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.600 we are now going to consistently get twenty to twenty 0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.120 five touches out of Mixing while Ryan Finley is the 0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.000 cornerback because frankly he is not a good quarterback or 0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.280 or at least isn't a good quarterback yet, then yeah, 0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:38.960 sign me up. I think Joe Mixon is a winner 0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.080 from yesterday. Yeah, I'm actually two weeks ago I I 0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.280 started my get Joe Mixon everywhere campaign. Um, I got 0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.040 him in a few places, and then the truth is 0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.760 is I drafted this guy very, very high. I feel 0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.600 like this should have been the Bengals strategy from the beginning. 0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.560 This is the your best football player, even when a J. 0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.520 Green is there. This is your best football player and 0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.440 needs to be touching the ball at least twenty times. 0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.320 So as long as he's gonna be getting that kind 0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.480 of on the volume, signed me up man all day long. Yeah, 0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.120 And I saw a few people talking in the chat 0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.600 that you know it took him thirty carries to just 0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.000 have a solid day a d and fourteen yards three 0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.480 point eight yards per carry. Again, it doesn't matter when 0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.440 you're getting volume like that. It trump's inefficiency. It doesn't matter, man. 0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.600 Like Again, if you're giving me twenty twenty five touches, 0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.000 then Joe Mixon is back in the mix. No pun 0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.880 intended as a low end RB two. I really do 0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.360 believe that even with the inefficiency that comes with him. 0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.920 Let's hope that Zach Taylor doesn't mess this up, because 0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.080 Zach Taylor has been known to mess these things up 0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.719 so far this season. Please just throw the ball more 0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.520 to Joe Mixon. Will you let's see one thing that 0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.520 I ask He's a great receiver. Let's get more targets 0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.120 to Joe Mixon. E y. One of the biggest losers 0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.360 from yesterday, the New Orleans Saints man inside the Superdome 0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.600 at home. They put up just nine total points in 0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.320 this game against an Atlanta Falcons defense that had been 0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.680 struggling mightily. I understand the Falcons were coming off the 0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.120 by but all the credit in the world to the 0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.840 Atlanta Falcons in the spot for slowing down Drew Brees 0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.880 slowing down the Saints running backs. So the Saints were 0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080 very clear losers from yesterday. But I do think one 0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.320 of the winners on the Falcon side of things is 0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.480 Brian Hill. Right based on the information that we have 0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.520 right now, is Avonta Freeman dealing with a midfoot spring. 0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.000 It sounds like he's going to miss some time. And 0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.960 Brian Hill played the snatch yesterday saw twenty carries, had 0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.160 two targets as well. Next week the Falcons are going 0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.600 up against the Carolina Panthers. I have a feeling that 0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.120 we're gonna be talking about Brian Hill a lot tomorrow 0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.239 on the Waiver Wire show. I think he's a very 0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.040 clear winner here as well. You y yeah, Brian and 0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:43.759 Brian Hill looked really good in the off season. The 0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.120 reality is, look, there's a division game, and this happens 0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.160 in football. The Atlanta Falcons are going to bring their 0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.319 a game every single time they play the New Orleans Saints. 0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.040 They could be the worst team in the league, they 0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.359 could be in dead last. The reality is is they're 0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.239 going to get up and they're going to compete in 0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.840 this kind of a game. They went in UH to 0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.000 New Orleans and and punch them in the face. And 0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.520 it's good to see. As the Atlanta Falcons team that 0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.160 everyone was very high on. I don't know. There wasn't 0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:09.879 a ton of winners on that side of the ball. 0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.400 Julio Jones didn't do a whole lot um, but Brian 0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.920 Hill is going to be UH that that's a winner 0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.120 for sure, UM and and people that have him. If 0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.200 if you UH were stationed him on your bench as 0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.200 the backup to UH Freeman, which maybe not maybe it 0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.320 was Edo Smith, but you're going to reap the benefits. 0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:28.919 I can say in the Dynasty League. I've been holding 0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.120 him all year, so I'm already nine and one in 0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.520 that land, so I mean, I don't really need the help, 0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.240 but the rich get richer, the rich get richer. Indeed, 0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:41.279 e Y holding onto Brian Hill and Edo Smith was 0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.080 placed on I R over the weekend as well, so 0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.759 this is just a very clear spot for Brian Hill 0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.319 to take over and again a good matchup in Week 0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:52.640 eleven going up against the Carolina Panthers. Austin Hooper scored 0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.360 a touchdown yesterday but got hurt, so he's a loser 0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.279 for me. Pay attention to that situation. The backup tight 0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.640 end there is Luke star Ker, and at Ryan has 0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.359 been known to throw the ball to the tight ends, 0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.319 so pay attention there because if Austin Hooper misses any time, 0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.239 then Luke Stocker might be in the mix as a 0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.520 deeper league tight end. AD. Calvin Ridley to me, I 0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:16.960 feel like Calvin Ridley is in the AD category because 0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.239 he's playing more snaps, which is a good thing. He's 0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.200 on the field and he's running more rouse, but the 0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.080 targets haven't been there, so it's like, yes, there's a 0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.480 few positives, but ultimately the production hasn't been there. So 0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.799 I want to be excited about Calvin Ridley. I feel 0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.640 like everybody was after they traded away Mohammed san New 0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.840 but he hasn't really taken advantage of this opportunity. He 0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.720 hasn't really been given enough of an opportunity. The targets 0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.879 are just not there for Calvin Ridley. On the other side, 0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.600 the New Orleans Saints here, a lot of people were wondering, 0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.840 e why how this backfield was gonna play out, considering 0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.440 that Latavius Murray going into the by was just ridiculous. 0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.040 If you remember Week eight and nine combined, he was 0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.400 the RB one in both of those weeks, so he 0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.759 was performing very well. But with these Saints playing in 0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:01.960 the negative game script, we saw a lot of Alvin 0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.000 Kamara here. Kamara played seventy eight percent of the snaps 0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.920 four carries but did have ten targets here and Latavius 0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:13.239 Murray just of snaps, five carries and two targets. I 0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.640 don't know if we have a definitive answer here, e y, 0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.240 because if this was more of a neutral or positive 0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.000 game script, there was a chance that Lettavias Murray might 0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.400 have been more involved. But it's very clear that when 0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.080 they're trailing in games Alvin Kamara is still the guy 0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.759 in this backfield, and I know that some people were 0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.600 worried saying that he wasn't coming into this game. So, 0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:34.600 you know, how do you feel overall about the Saints 0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:39.560 backfield right now? Overall? It's confusing. You know, Sean Paynton 0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.520 is an unbelievable coach and has produced an absolute gold 0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.920 mine of fantasy performers over his career in New Orleans. 0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.360 But what's confusing to me is you know, Ingram was 0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.799 used every ting. I know he was drafted by by 0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.239 the Saints and him and Kamara shared a lot of 0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.319 the work, and I thought that's what Latavius Murray had been. 0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.759 I mean, look, Avious Murray is I think, I mean, 0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:05.000 statistically is the number one or in the top three 0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.440 goal linebacks in the NFL over the last four or 0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.719 five years. And the fact that this guy isn't being 0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.160 used that much when Alvin Kamara is in the line 0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.880 up is very confusing to me. I feel like Kamara 0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.440 is probably better used with fifteen to twenty touches or 0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.600 you know, like somewhere you know, twenty being on the 0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:25.279 high rather twelve or fifteen is more a better use 0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.279 of Kamara uh and have the other running back pick 0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.320 up the other carries. That's not what's happening. Kamara is 0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.320 being used more than I thought he would be in 0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.319 more than I think he should be. The Tavius Murray 0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.800 is a good football player and excellent running back and 0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.920 should be seeing some more more touches. Yeah, I always 0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.319 like in a situation like this. E y to Lamar 0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.000 Miller back in the day, right when he was on 0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.600 the Miami Dolphins, fantasy owners kept begging, give us more touches, 0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.160 more touches. Then he went to the Houston Texans and 0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.240 his efficiency went down because he started getting more touches. 0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.520 But he just wasn't His body was not built, was 0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.560 not made to handle that type of workloads. So overall, 0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.440 I think Alvin Kamara is in a similar spot. I 0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.120 agree with you. I think you know, if we got 0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.400 fourteen a sixteen efficient touches out of Alvin Kamara in 0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.200 the Saints offense on a weekly basis, then that's perfectly fine. 0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.160 We've seen in the past, that's enough for him to 0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.600 be a top five, maybe even top three running back 0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.600 for fantasy. Let's get let's say it's Murray, those other 0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.880 ten to twelve touches. We also saw what he was 0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.160 capable of when he was filling in for Alvin Kamara 0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.960 him self. I think Jared Cook also a clear winner here, 0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.680 had ten targets yesterday. Cook, Kamara and Michael Thomas combined 0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:36.680 for thirty four of the Saints forty four targets yesterday. 0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.080 So that's a very concentrated targets share. And if Jared 0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.879 Cook is seeing that much of the target share consistently, 0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.200 then he is definitely a tight end that you want 0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.399 to add right now. So make sure you go out 0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.320 there and look for Jared Cook on your waiver wires. 0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:52.640 You know. I just want to bounce around a little 0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.560 bit here quick, because we only got a few minutes 0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:56.040 left in the show and I want to try and 0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.040 hit on as much of the action from yesterday as 0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.840 we possibly can. So let's jump over to the Kansas 0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.960 City Chiefs. They didn't win the game. E wise, Titans 0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.000 won the game, but Patrick Mahomes first game back over 0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:12.479 four yards three touchdowns. Tyreek Hills saw a career high 0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:17.520 nineteen targets. His previous career high was fourteen. The ninet 0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:22.319 targets yesterday represented thirty nine percent of the Chief's targets share, 0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.680 so I have both of those guys as clear winners 0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.000 for fantasy purposes. And then Damian Williams as well, while 0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.200 he fumbled and that calls a touchdown for the Tennessee Titans. 0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.799 He played seventy percent of the snaps once again, that's 0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.480 back to back weeks over seventy of the snaps here 0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:40.600 e y. And he had nineteen carries. Nineteen carries represented 0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.680 eighties six percent of the Chiefs running back carries in 0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:47.080 this game. So I think, and Travis Kelsey scored a 0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:48.960 touchdown as well. I think if we have the very 0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.560 clear Mahomes is QB one, Tyreek Hills wide receiver one, 0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.759 Kelsey has tightened one, and Damian Williams is RB one, 0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.520 that makes life much much easier for fantasy owners when 0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.239 it comes to the Chief's offense. E y. Yeah, the 0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.640 McCoy scratuate was pretty confusing for me. I haven't been 0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.960 following that situation as close that I probably should, but 0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.880 but that was the very confusing. Damian Williams the guy 0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.959 that was drafted super high and drafted as a number 0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.000 one running back, and he's shown he can be that 0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.319 when he's given that opportunity. Uh Mahomes. I mean, there's 0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.600 no question in fifty years they're going to be talking 0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.920 about this guy. He's only getting better. He's hurt. I mean, 0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.919 it's obviously when he would scramble and run out. He's 0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.160 definitely not as fleet as foot as he was dealing 0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:34.480 with uh an ankle and the dislocated kneecap obviously is 0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.759 going to hinder him. But it doesn't matter. This guy 0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.120 is an absolute animal at the quarterback position. Can make 0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.120 a throw from from any level, any platform, our mangel, 0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.759 it doesn't matter. He's unbelievable. Tyreek Hill is the is 0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.640 the fastest guy in the NFL. I don't care what 0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.760 anyone says, especially with the football in his hand. He's 0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.560 he's little, but it doesn't matter. He will jump you, 0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.719 he will work you, he will position you. And there's 0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.040 time yesterday where I was just like, how is Tyreek 0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.279 kill that open? Know? You mean, like it doesn't make 0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.560 any sense. It's because he's He's one of the top 0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.840 receivers in the whole league as route running. His ability 0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.120 to stop on a diamond face the quarterback makes him 0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:12.279 almost impossible to cover. But this the Titans laid down 0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.960 what I think is the perfect recipe, the perfect game 0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.360 plan to beat these guys. You run the ball, you 0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.800 control the ball, you keep the ball away from Mahomes. 0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.360 He had an unbelievable game and they and they lost 0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.359 because their defense is not good. They're having a hard 0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.279 time stopping people, especially the run. Once the running back 0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.000 gets into the secondary, they're a mess, an absolute mass. 0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.240 And they laid down a game plan like everyone should 0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.759 be working against the Kansas City Chiefs this way, run 0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.400 the ball, run the ball, run the ball, absolutely, and 0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.759 the Patriots kind of created that blueprint last year. We 0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.799 saw that in the playoffs when Sony Michelle scored three 0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:49.279 rushing touchdowns against the Kansas City Chiefs. And I think 0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.560 that the Tennessee Titans really piggybacked off that that game 0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.480 plan yesterday and it made a lot of sense. Obviously, 0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.400 um the run defense, specifically for the Chiefs is not 0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.320 a good one. Their secondary has actually played better this 0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:03.440 year than I think most people expected. But the way 0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.680 to attack the Chiefs is on the ground. As e 0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:10.680 Y mentioned, let's move over to MetLife Stadium Day. Marenzi 0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.319 dubbed this game instead of the Snoopy Bowl, the poopy bowl. 0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.360 He said that both of these teams did. Jets and 0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:20.719 the Giants were messier than quote a port authority bathroom. 0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.880 I can't disagree with him at all. And I think yesterday, 0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.120 e y, we saw two very clear winners in Darius 0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.600 Slayton and Golden Tape. Because this Giant's defense is not good, 0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.040 they're gonna get into shootouts, They're gonna be a negative game, 0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:35.479 script games where they need to throw the ball. Evan 0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.400 Ingram is banged up. Sterling Shepard, I'd be surprised if 0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.000 he plays again this year, and now Sae Kwon Barkley 0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.279 is banged up as well. Two very clear winners for me, 0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.240 Darius Slayton and Golden Tate. Two top five wide receivers 0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.840 this week were those Giants wide receivers, and say Kwon Barkley. 0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.160 E y, what in Heaven's name did we get yesterday? 0:43:55.719 --> 0:44:00.919 Thirteen rushing attempts for one yard? The Jets traded away 0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.440 Leonard Williams. I understand they've been good against the run, 0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.840 but thirteen rushing attempts for one yard? What do you 0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:12.560 make out of this Giant's offense? The Sequin Berkeley thing 0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.320 is I mean it's just ultimately confusing. This is a 0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:20.080 guy that that last year when the New York Giants 0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.200 were a bad football team last year as well, and 0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:24.319 it didn't matter. So this is a guy that I mean, 0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:25.920 look at, you're not going to sit him, You're not, 0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.000 you know, I don't think he ever has a game 0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.400 like that ever again in his career. He's a freak athlete. Um, 0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.000 one of the best running backs in the league. But 0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.520 it's absolutely perplexing that that that was the thing. The 0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:40.120 Sterning Shepherd thing is, uh, you know, the concussion thing. 0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:42.920 I'm not going to get into what I think, uh, 0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.200 because we know what I think. Um, so yeah, I 0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.239 just I don't know. It's a it's a mess and 0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.799 and game is absolutely right that it was a messy game. 0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:54.800 But look at there's fancy winners on both sides, so 0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:56.959 so you just you gotta pay attention to who's getting 0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:58.880 the ball. Hernon's now out so we don't have to 0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.120 deal with that mess anymore. Tight End continues to be 0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:04.760 an absolute nightmare. Some other quick winners here, Eric Ebron, 0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.640 Todd Gurley, Gerald Everett as well one very clear loser yesterday, 0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:13.160 Cooper cup zero catches what's up with that? What's up 0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.799 with that? For Eric Young? I am Frank Stamfle Thank 0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:17.760 you so much for watching. This was the Fantasy BFS 0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.160 on the Sports Screed TV network. We'll see you again tomorrow. 0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:25.759 We hope NFL season is now upon us so you 0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.680 can become the eighth person away one million dollars in 0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.520 a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament by setting their lineup using 0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.200 the Daily Order dot Com DFS lt of optimizer. If 0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.319 you're playing daily Fantasy sports and not using Daily Order 0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:39.400 dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign him down for 0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.360 the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, 0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.319 and better results. It's a promo code action, first head 0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.319 percent discount. Is that's promo code action, first head per 0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:52.319 cent discount. Daily Order dot Com where millionaires are made. 0:45:56.960 --> 0:46:03.719 What appen? What it? Here's what you missed on the BFFs. 0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:06.680 Are you wearing the Titans of it? I see you 0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.480 now up in the studio. Shout out to e Y 0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:11.480 and his Tennessee tight ends. I texted you as soon 0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:13.839 as they got the victory yesterday. Really really fun game 0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.920 between the Titans and the Chiefs. Of course, on the 0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.680 back or rather the legs of Derrick Henry. The guy 0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.319 is just unstoppable right now, you y, I honestly wanted 0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:23.560 to give you a moment at the top of the 0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.280 show here to just try and kind of wax poetic 0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.640 when it comes to Derrick Henry, because again we've heard 0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:33.399 fantasy analysts for weeks now, for months, e Y telling 0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.440 us sell Derrick Henry, Sell Derrick Henry. He can't keep 0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.280 it up. He doesn't catch the ball out of the backfield, 0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.279 which means that he can't be this good for fantasy football. Well, 0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:44.560 he just keeps being this good for fantasy football. Nearly 0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.040 two yards rushing on the ground yesterday, two touchdowns. He 0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.840 is currently your RB four on the season overall. E Y. 0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.040 That is your man, Derrick Henry. Yeah, a little late 0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:56.960 getting to the show, coming off a bit of a 0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.279 bender from celebrating the Titans. Big Win just got home 0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.920 and uh it has nothing to do with Apple and 0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:08.840 they're awesome updates. Um laptop is is working like a breeze. 0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:10.480 But I mean, look at if people are going to 0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.359 tell you to sell Derrick Henry, go ahead and listen 0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:14.960 to him. If they have Derrick Henry by him from 0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:17.000 him because Derrick Henry is the number one running back. 0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.000 He's been a number one running back all season. Look 0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:23.239 at his production, look at his stats. If someone tells you, oh, well, 0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.520 he doesn't catch the ball, or he's this, or he's that, 0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:29.200 then stop listening to what they're saying. They're obviously not 0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.839 paying attention. This is a team that wants to run 0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:33.759 the ball. This is a team that wants to lean 0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.440 on Derrick Henry, and when they do that, they're successful. 0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:39.600 Now there are times when they get away from that. 0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.080 Last week, he had two carries in the first half. 0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:44.920 No one knows why that's the thing, but it was 0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.400 a thing. So yeah, Derrick Henry is the number one 0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:49.399 running back. The stats can back it up. I don't 0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:52.239 care if he catches footballs or not. Um, that's not 0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:54.000 part of his game and he doesn't need that to 0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.200 be part of his game to produce. So guess what 0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:02.000 I was right again? Us? What ey was right again? EU? 0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:03.719 I would like to take this time to apologize to 0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:07.960 you as well, because I bet the under on rushing 0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.920 yards for the season for Derrick Henry. The prop for 0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.719 him was one thousand, one seventy five rushing yards for 0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.600 the season. I bet the under I knew that they 0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:16.960 were going to lean on him a lot. I just 0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:18.759 didn't think that Derrick Henry was going to be this good. 0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.520 So I'm a fool. You were right, and I apologize, No, 0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.040 nothing to apologize about. I mean, the reality is is 0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.040 that was the consensus in the off season. That wasn't 0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.200 for for me. Um. I see this guy run in 0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:34.880 real life that you can't even understand how fast he is. 0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:36.879 All he has to do is get to the second 0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:38.640 love what you saw that in yesterday's game. As soon 0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:40.640 as he got he got into where the linebackers were, 0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.960 I yelled, he's gone. And that's exactly what happened. Nobody 0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.920 could catch this guy. And I mean second half. You 0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.160 see any guys that are five pounds wanting to tackle 0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.319 this monster? Absolutely not. This is how they win football games. 0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:55.960 Derrick Henry is the man.