1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg 2 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,920 Speaker 1: Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern 3 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:22,000 Speaker 1: on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. 4 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:25,680 Speaker 1: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch 5 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:27,440 Speaker 1: us live on YouTube Now. 6 00:00:27,640 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 2: Joining us for extensive comments is loud brainer. We are 7 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 2: thrilled that she is here, young duty at Wesleyan in 8 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 2: Connecticut and up to Harvard and her public service, and 9 00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:41,199 Speaker 2: really were the more policy effort? Well, I'm dying to 10 00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 2: ask you this question. We just head on the show 11 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 2: Magnificent Stephanie Stancheva out of Harvard, and then I see 12 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 2: a Nobel Prize of Claudia Golden out of Harvard. What 13 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:57,279 Speaker 2: was it like for you to have the courage to 14 00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 2: do economics a number of years ago? How lonely was 15 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 2: it to be a woman in economics back in the 16 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 2: time of Laurence Summer at the school. 17 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:12,280 Speaker 3: Well, I would say that by the time I got 18 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 3: to Harvard, obviously we did have some women on the faculty. 19 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:20,679 Speaker 3: Claudia Golden arrived while I was there, Susan Collins was 20 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:24,040 Speaker 3: there for a period of time. There were some really 21 00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:29,280 Speaker 3: outstanding young women professors, and you know, it was an 22 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 3: exciting time. I care a lot, of course about how 23 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 3: we use economics to better outcomes in policy, and so 24 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 3: it was just great to be studying with some of 25 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:47,600 Speaker 3: the people who have really shaped economic policy making in 26 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:49,440 Speaker 3: the preceding decades. 27 00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 2: Doctor Braner, I was laying out the differences between a 28 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 2: Clarida and a Brainer, where you look at Dsge and 29 00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 2: all the mathewness of Clarida and Gertler, and you were 30 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 2: the really historic policy the effort of getting things done 31 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 2: in economics color. The nature of the uncertainty now that 32 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:11,200 Speaker 2: the FED has to face is we bounce from copper 33 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,400 Speaker 2: down the most in forty years to a non printed 34 00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:19,360 Speaker 2: India trade agreement. What's the nature of our present uncertainty? 35 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 3: So, on the one hand, we know a lot about 36 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 3: how tariffs generally affect the economy. We had a little 37 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:34,560 Speaker 3: trial run back in twenty eighteen when Trump, the first 38 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:38,600 Speaker 3: Trump administration, imposed tariffs on China, mostly on China as 39 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 3: well as steel and aluminum. We do know that tariffs 40 00:02:42,320 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 3: raise prices. Ultimately, that that time between when tariffs are 41 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 3: imposed and when you can see it actually in prices 42 00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 3: varies a great deal, but the last time through four 43 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 3: to six months. And we also know that tariffs are 44 00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 3: like a supply shock and they can disrupt the labor market. 45 00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:03,800 Speaker 3: So we know all of that. What we don't know, 46 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:08,040 Speaker 3: and where this uncertainty is so important is twofold. First 47 00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:10,920 Speaker 3: of all, we have not seen tariffs at these levels 48 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:16,119 Speaker 3: for decades. These are smooth, holly level tariffs in many cases, 49 00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:20,040 Speaker 3: and so the extent of the changes we just haven't seen. 50 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:23,520 Speaker 3: And secondly, of course, the administration is still in the 51 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 3: process of telling us what those tariff levels are in 52 00:03:26,639 --> 00:03:30,960 Speaker 3: those trade agreements are not yet very firm or very clear. 53 00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:34,440 Speaker 4: Low. What did you take away from the FED minutes 54 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 4: yes the FED news yesterday, the meeting yesterday from Fed 55 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:38,800 Speaker 4: Chairman Jpow What was your takeaway? 56 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 3: So the takeaway I think was that the large majority 57 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 3: of members of the Open Markets Committee want two more 58 00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 3: months of data and they will get it before the 59 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 3: next meeting in September. That they are still quite concerned 60 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 3: about potential risks to the upside to inflation, which has 61 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,240 Speaker 3: been running high over the last few years, and of 62 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,680 Speaker 3: course that means they have to be particularly attentive to 63 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:13,600 Speaker 3: inflation expectations. But that they're also attentive to potential weakening. 64 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 3: And of course we got the GDP report on the 65 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 3: same day, and if you look underneath the hood, there 66 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:23,360 Speaker 3: has been quite a bit of moderation in those core 67 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 3: domestic components, particularly the consumer, over the first half of 68 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:31,839 Speaker 3: the year. So they are balancing those two potential risks, 69 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 3: and they really want that additional data before they make 70 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:42,080 Speaker 3: a decision to move further potentially on cutting rates. 71 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:44,080 Speaker 4: You know, LOI, We've had a number of guests over 72 00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 4: the last several days, maybe even weeks, say, well, it 73 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 4: just kind of feels like a year ago, or maybe 74 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 4: the Fed decided not to move in July when the 75 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,120 Speaker 4: data suggested maybe they should, and then they were forced 76 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 4: to maybe go a little bit more than they wanted 77 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,080 Speaker 4: to do in September. You feel like the Fed might 78 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 4: be behind the times here a little bit in terms 79 00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 4: of cutting rates. 80 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,359 Speaker 3: So I think there is always that risk that the 81 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 3: Federal Reserve, in the effort to get more data to 82 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 3: be more certain, waits a little longer than would have 83 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:19,160 Speaker 3: been ideal with the benefit of hindsight. But we already 84 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 3: were talking about just how much uncertainty the evolving tariff 85 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 3: landscape is injecting into the outlook for the dual mandate 86 00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 3: for both inflation and unemployment, and that explains, I think 87 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 3: why they are stuck waiting. 88 00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 2: I've got two things to talk about here, doctor brainer 89 00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 2: that I think are important. What a nasty I'll ed 90 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 2: by you in the Washington Boast a few weeks ago 91 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 2: it was the close ara out Low Brainerd going after 92 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:55,600 Speaker 2: the president. The treatment of chair of Chair Pole love Brainerd. 93 00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 2: Is things smoothed down a little bit even with Trump 94 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 2: treats even the morning is well, does the industry have 95 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:05,080 Speaker 2: mister Powell's back? 96 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 3: Well, Look, I think what has been surprising to me 97 00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 3: is to hear the President talk about lowering rates as 98 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:19,719 Speaker 3: though it is the Federal Reserves responsibility to lower rates 99 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:25,279 Speaker 3: for US Treasury debt management. And that, of course is 100 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 3: exactly how central banks go wrong in emerging markets like Turkey. 101 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:36,719 Speaker 3: When the President the administration lean on a central bank 102 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:41,720 Speaker 3: to prioritize lowering the cost of borrowing to the government, 103 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 3: it undermines the inflation control credibility of the central bank, 104 00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:51,040 Speaker 3: and so for me, of course, what is very important 105 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 3: is that the Federal Reserve continue to have that credibility 106 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 3: for inflation fighting. Now it's more important than ever, having 107 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:02,559 Speaker 3: just come off period of high inflation and of course 108 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:08,159 Speaker 3: facing some inflation from tariff, so that independence is more 109 00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:09,039 Speaker 3: important than ever. 110 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 2: Well, I look at the tariff you know what's changed 111 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 2: since your Washington Post op ed. I look at the 112 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 2: tariff debate, erning Tedesky doing great work at the budget 113 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,520 Speaker 2: lab at Yale, allile Yale's to college in New Haven. 114 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 2: I don't know if you're familiar with that, but you know, 115 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 2: I look lol at the tariffs now, JP Morgan modeling 116 00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 2: eighteen percent, clearly Smoot Hawley nineteen thirty three, maybe back 117 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 2: to the Gilded Age. Will the president be overcome by 118 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:41,920 Speaker 2: events if we see job jobless increase, if we see 119 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:45,840 Speaker 2: GDP decrease, do you just assume at some point, like 120 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:49,200 Speaker 2: mckinnley adjusted, and I think it was nineteen oh one, 121 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:53,320 Speaker 2: is Trump going to have to adjust to the failure 122 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:56,400 Speaker 2: of the magnitude move in tariffs? 123 00:07:57,280 --> 00:07:59,440 Speaker 3: Well, it's very hard to say right now. Of course 124 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:03,200 Speaker 3: I don't have any insights into that, but I would 125 00:08:03,280 --> 00:08:06,280 Speaker 3: say what is clear to me, because I have been 126 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:09,960 Speaker 3: listening carefully to the Treasury Secretary and the President, is 127 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,480 Speaker 3: that they see tariffs as a way of raising revenues, 128 00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 3: and they have a very aggressive revenue target for tariffs. 129 00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 3: They want to raise hundreds of billions, three hundred billion 130 00:08:22,160 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 3: dollars a year in tariff revenues, which is an order 131 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:29,840 Speaker 3: of magnitude larger than what we have seen recently, and 132 00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:33,559 Speaker 3: that means that tariff rights have to be at those 133 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 3: high smooth Haley levels with the attendant potential effects on 134 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 3: the labor market. And we've already seen substantial slowing in 135 00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:49,719 Speaker 3: the second quarter in terms of underlying private domestic final demand. 136 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:55,400 Speaker 3: Consumers look like they are feeling a little bit cautious. 137 00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:59,959 Speaker 3: We can see that even in today's personal consumption expenditures day, 138 00:09:00,280 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 3: which really was very modest growth. So yes, I do 139 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:08,160 Speaker 3: believe there's some risk that by trying to achieve those 140 00:09:08,280 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 3: very aggressive tariff revenue goals, they really are putting a 141 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:15,120 Speaker 3: big dampener on what could be a very dynamic and 142 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:17,079 Speaker 3: exciting period in American growth. 143 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:20,839 Speaker 4: Lyle, the FED has that dual mandate, of course, of 144 00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:24,320 Speaker 4: full employment and price stability. Do you think one is 145 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 4: taking a precedent over the other these days within the Fed? 146 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 3: Well, I think we heard the chair talk about both 147 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:36,800 Speaker 3: sides of the dual mandate yesterday risks to the upside 148 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:41,480 Speaker 3: potentially on inflation, and we see it in this morning's 149 00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:47,520 Speaker 3: preferred Fed inflation gauge. You see those core goods going 150 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:50,080 Speaker 3: back up again after a long period where they had 151 00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 3: been coming down. But of course you also see it 152 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:58,360 Speaker 3: in the labor market, where private hiring has really ground 153 00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:01,959 Speaker 3: to a halt. Now super market is in balance. As 154 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 3: the chair told everyone yesterday multiple times, the unemployment rate 155 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 3: has remained low, and that in part reflects the fact 156 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:14,120 Speaker 3: that labor demand is falling at the same time that 157 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 3: labor supply is also being constricted on the immigration front. 158 00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 3: So it remains in balance. But I do worry about 159 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 3: downside risks to employment. 160 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:27,960 Speaker 2: Love bringing it a young upstart economist up at Harvard. 161 00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:31,040 Speaker 2: His name is let me look here, Jason Furman. I 162 00:10:31,040 --> 00:10:34,760 Speaker 2: think you may be familiar with Jason Furman. I love 163 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:38,960 Speaker 2: what he's doing onannualized analysis. Folks out moments ago on 164 00:10:39,360 --> 00:10:42,880 Speaker 2: Twitter from Professor Firman driving x ten up at Harvard. 165 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:48,079 Speaker 2: One month core PCE three point one percent, three months 166 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 2: two point six percent, six months annualize three point two percent, 167 00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:58,360 Speaker 2: twelve months two point nine percent, I'm sorry, Rick Michigan 168 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 2: and John B. Taylor at Stanford, those guys maybe policy 169 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,680 Speaker 2: they're on different pages. They're in the same page that 170 00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:09,400 Speaker 2: core pc inflation all is too high, isn't it. 171 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:14,200 Speaker 3: Well, the core PCE inflation is too high, and it's going, 172 00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:19,079 Speaker 3: unfortunately in the wrong direction. That is the bind. So 173 00:11:19,400 --> 00:11:23,520 Speaker 3: you know what we were seeing before a lot of 174 00:11:23,520 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 3: the tariffs started to get imposed was actually, finally services 175 00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 3: inflation were coming down. Core goods had already come down, 176 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:37,199 Speaker 3: and so core inflation was trending down towards the target. 177 00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:41,720 Speaker 3: Now it is detouring with those core goods lifting it again. 178 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:45,400 Speaker 3: And core services actually in the last two months were 179 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:49,839 Speaker 3: a little stronger than we had previously seen. So it's 180 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:52,959 Speaker 3: moving in the wrong direction, and of course that's a concern. 181 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:57,600 Speaker 2: And Paul I can't emphasize enough the granularity of these 182 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:03,000 Speaker 2: are full time pros, heavyweights analyzing the tariff impact, guessing 183 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:07,959 Speaker 2: out to Labor Day, guessing out to Christmas, guessing into 184 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:12,120 Speaker 2: next year. And the answer is nobody's talking disinflation. 185 00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:15,920 Speaker 4: Disinflation. How about the consumer, lyle, how do you, given 186 00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:17,959 Speaker 4: the backdrop, so to Tom just outlined here, how do 187 00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 4: you think the consumer is these days. 188 00:12:21,520 --> 00:12:26,480 Speaker 3: Well, we've got some insights into consumers and their feelings 189 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:30,960 Speaker 3: about both the economy currently and their expectations through some 190 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:34,439 Speaker 3: of the consumer surveys, and of course a little bit 191 00:12:34,520 --> 00:12:37,720 Speaker 3: less negative, but still quite negative relative to where it 192 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 3: had been before the tariff agenda started rolling out. They 193 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 3: seem to be worried that prices just are still too high, 194 00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:51,360 Speaker 3: and of course that now is creeping back into more goods. 195 00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:54,079 Speaker 3: But housing has been a problem for a while, and 196 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:58,400 Speaker 3: that goes to the President's concerns, valid concerns. I think 197 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:02,319 Speaker 3: that mortgage rates are quite high and then the housing 198 00:13:02,360 --> 00:13:03,559 Speaker 3: market is frozenly. 199 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:05,400 Speaker 2: One more thing, I'll be quick here. This is the 200 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:08,280 Speaker 2: magic of Twitter, if they would get if they get 201 00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:12,840 Speaker 2: their ex straightened out. I've got Jason Furman, Steve Rattner, 202 00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:17,839 Speaker 2: and Ernie Tedesky back to back to back in my feed. Lyle, 203 00:13:17,960 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 2: this is stunning from Ernie Tedesky. Now at Yale, durable 204 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:26,199 Speaker 2: goods have risen by one point seven percent other than 205 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 2: the depths of COVID. That's the strongest six months rise 206 00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 2: since nineteen eighty seven. Does Washington understand that, Lyle brainerd So, 207 00:13:39,160 --> 00:13:42,160 Speaker 2: I think Ernie is doing a great job pointing out 208 00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:43,679 Speaker 2: the granular. 209 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:48,960 Speaker 3: Effects which have to be in part reflecting tariff effects. 210 00:13:49,280 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 3: And when we get pronouncements from the White House, sweeping 211 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:56,400 Speaker 3: pronouncements that a country is going to see twenty five 212 00:13:56,480 --> 00:14:01,839 Speaker 3: percent tariffs, nineteen percent tariffs, you really wonder whether they've 213 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:04,720 Speaker 3: had the time and the bandwidth to do the kind 214 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:08,080 Speaker 3: of detailed analysis that would allow them to see that 215 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:10,560 Speaker 3: some of those tariffs they're imposing are actually going to 216 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 3: disadvantage American producers because input prices are going up. It's 217 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 3: going to actually not only hurt American consumers, but in 218 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:25,080 Speaker 3: many cases, like in US domestic auto producers, is actually 219 00:14:25,120 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 3: making their supply chains more expensive and will make them 220 00:14:29,400 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 3: less competitive. 221 00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:35,480 Speaker 2: This has been fabulous. I got goosebumps right, that's great. Love, Brainerd, 222 00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:37,960 Speaker 2: thank you so much with Richard Clarita in this hour 223 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 2: on our nation's economy and what it means for us. 224 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:44,920 Speaker 2: Thank you to ninety two nine FM Boston or Boston 225 00:14:44,960 --> 00:14:55,440 Speaker 2: News Bureau for bringing us doctor Brainerd. This morning. 226 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:59,400 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live 227 00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:02,480 Speaker 1: weekday after noons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen 228 00:15:02,520 --> 00:15:06,080 Speaker 1: on Applecarplay and Android otto with the Bloomberg Business app 229 00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:08,040 Speaker 1: or watch us live on YouTube. 230 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 2: We are honored to have with us Richard clarda always 231 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:14,560 Speaker 2: with Columbia University, with Pimco as well. The former Vice 232 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 2: chairman of the Fed, Ian Lincoln at Bank of Montreal, 233 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:24,040 Speaker 2: the iconic Bank of Canada, just published and he said, 234 00:15:24,080 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 2: I'm sorry, every inflation series is ticking up. Do we 235 00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 2: see tariffs in the minutia of price change already? Do 236 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:35,320 Speaker 2: we see tariffs now? 237 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 5: Sure, they're starting to show up to some extent in 238 00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:41,800 Speaker 5: the inflation data, in particular in those sectors exposed to tariff. 239 00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 5: Goods prices are moving up. The overall indexes are are 240 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:50,200 Speaker 5: coming in more or less in line with expectations because 241 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 5: services inflation continues to fall. 242 00:15:53,880 --> 00:15:56,560 Speaker 4: So if you're the Fed, yeah, what did you hear 243 00:15:56,640 --> 00:15:59,480 Speaker 4: yesterday from our chairman? Yes, he send it a little 244 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 4: bit more hawkish than maybe the statement. 245 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:06,040 Speaker 5: I don't know, Harry Truman. I think once said he 246 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:09,360 Speaker 5: wanted he wanted to meet the one armed economist because 247 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 5: he kept getting on the one hand, on the other hand, 248 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,080 Speaker 5: I think that was that's what we got yesterday from 249 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:18,280 Speaker 5: from chair Powe. You know, very balanced. I think the 250 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:20,800 Speaker 5: revealing moment was when he was asked by a reporter 251 00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 5: about whether or not the dots at the June meeting 252 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 5: were indicative of where the committee was where they showed 253 00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 5: two cuts this year. He basically said, look, that was 254 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:33,640 Speaker 5: six weeks ago. We're not paying attention to that. So 255 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:37,160 Speaker 5: he clearly, I think, came in with the goal of 256 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:41,720 Speaker 5: giving himself and the committee optionality in September to pause 257 00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:44,480 Speaker 5: or to cut, and I think I think he achieved 258 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 5: that for sure. 259 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:47,360 Speaker 2: I got to get this side of the way. I 260 00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 2: have to ask, have you been contacted by the Trump 261 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:56,480 Speaker 2: administration about future employment in our central Bank? I have not. Okay, 262 00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:59,080 Speaker 2: we're waiting on it. There was Psias Glenn Ubberd the 263 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:03,120 Speaker 2: same question at the same silence treatment as well. In 264 00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:07,640 Speaker 2: your work in folks, this is wicked fancy mathematics called 265 00:17:07,720 --> 00:17:14,640 Speaker 2: dynamic stochastic general equilibrium theorem. Uncertainty is outside the system. 266 00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:19,600 Speaker 2: It's what we call exogenous. Our listeners, our viewers are 267 00:17:19,680 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 2: living indgenous uncertainty right now with all of these shocks 268 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:27,639 Speaker 2: to the system led by tariffs. How do you color 269 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 2: the uncertainty that the PhDs, the FED face. 270 00:17:33,720 --> 00:17:37,359 Speaker 5: It is elevated. I think perhaps less elevated than it 271 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:40,280 Speaker 5: may have been after Liberation Day. I think, in particular, 272 00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:42,320 Speaker 5: I think we have a better sense and firms have 273 00:17:42,359 --> 00:17:44,320 Speaker 5: a better sense of where we're going to end up 274 00:17:44,359 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 5: in terms of the new trade regime. And importantly also 275 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:51,680 Speaker 5: we now sort of know the parameters of fiscal policy, 276 00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 5: tariff revenue, the deals that are being caught in terms 277 00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 5: of investment in the US. So there is uncertainty, but 278 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:01,560 Speaker 5: I think it's moving in both directions. For the economy, 279 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:02,920 Speaker 5: do we have clarity? 280 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:04,880 Speaker 2: I mean, I look at the Yell budget lab Ernie 281 00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:10,200 Speaker 2: Tanowsky and that crew yesterday, Bob Michael modeling eighteen percent 282 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 2: blended work at JP Morgan maybe up to twenty percent 283 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 2: as well. How do people like you that have actually 284 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:21,000 Speaker 2: studied the history give us I like to say, there's 285 00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 2: Hubert Heaver tariffs, we're back to the thirties, We're back 286 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 2: to FDR and some you look at the series, we're 287 00:18:27,480 --> 00:18:34,199 Speaker 2: back late McKinley like, how do you process the magnitude 288 00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:36,200 Speaker 2: change in tariffs? 289 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:38,879 Speaker 5: Well, sure, and we haven't seen we haven't seen trade 290 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:41,920 Speaker 5: policy like this in a very long time. I think 291 00:18:42,080 --> 00:18:45,200 Speaker 5: right now I would say the economy's shown good resilience 292 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 5: so far, both both in the labor market and on 293 00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:52,159 Speaker 5: the GDP side. But I think anyone who pretends to 294 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:55,639 Speaker 5: have a precise model or estimate. But I think importantly 295 00:18:55,720 --> 00:18:58,320 Speaker 5: what's going on here, Tom is you know that the 296 00:18:58,359 --> 00:19:01,600 Speaker 5: Trump folks are really trying to change the trading regime, 297 00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:05,080 Speaker 5: and it's early days in that, but I think that's 298 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:07,639 Speaker 5: an important part of the story as well. 299 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:14,280 Speaker 4: So, Richard, we had two FED Board governors dissented yesterday. 300 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:16,399 Speaker 5: Both very good friends of mine and former colleagues. 301 00:19:16,480 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 4: So I FED people tell me that's kind of something 302 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:20,439 Speaker 4: we should pay attention to that. 303 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:21,320 Speaker 2: What did you make of it? 304 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 5: It's the first time I think in thirty plus years 305 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:30,720 Speaker 5: that two governors have dissented. Reserve Bank presidents dissent more 306 00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 5: and more frequently. Both Chris Waller and Mickey Bowman, I 307 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:39,240 Speaker 5: think before the meeting indicated that that was going to 308 00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 5: be their preference, and I think that I'm sure they 309 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 5: came into the meeting with sound and reasonable arguments for 310 00:19:45,200 --> 00:19:48,359 Speaker 5: beginning rate cuts right now. We'll probably hear from them 311 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:51,160 Speaker 5: after the blackout is over as well. But share Powell 312 00:19:51,200 --> 00:19:54,320 Speaker 5: also acknowledged that he thought it was a good discussion 313 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:56,320 Speaker 5: at the committee. 314 00:19:55,720 --> 00:19:59,399 Speaker 2: Do they negotiate descents like if there's someone who's the 315 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 2: third descent? Did they say, now you can wait to 316 00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 2: the next meeting. Come on, you know, not at the 317 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:08,040 Speaker 2: table in the Eckles building. Wait the tables under construction 318 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:12,040 Speaker 2: fore right now? But is there a discussion within the 319 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 2: propriety of American we're all on the same page economics 320 00:20:17,080 --> 00:20:19,959 Speaker 2: that we almost negotiate who and who does not dissent? 321 00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:24,200 Speaker 5: I wouldn't, I wouldn't call the negotiation. What does happen? 322 00:20:24,240 --> 00:20:27,400 Speaker 5: And I think this happened under Bernanki and yelling as well. 323 00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 5: But certainly during my time at the Palfeed, the chair 324 00:20:30,240 --> 00:20:35,320 Speaker 5: before each meeting had individual conversations with all all eighteen people. 325 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:38,440 Speaker 5: Interesting and so there's there. You know, no one gets 326 00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:41,760 Speaker 5: blindsided going into the meeting about about the views on 327 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 5: the on the outlooks. 328 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:45,240 Speaker 2: This is original. This goes back to Larry Myers and 329 00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:49,040 Speaker 2: Green spent in that meeting. Is it a courtesy that 330 00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:51,480 Speaker 2: you tell the chairman where you're heading? 331 00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:55,639 Speaker 5: Again, those conversations were typically by the. 332 00:20:56,480 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 2: Share really unhappy and showed ups today. No, no, no. 333 00:21:01,960 --> 00:21:06,320 Speaker 5: The During my time there, the chair did have individual 334 00:21:06,359 --> 00:21:10,200 Speaker 5: conversations with all eighteen folks. Obviously they were nineteen total, 335 00:21:11,240 --> 00:21:14,680 Speaker 5: and the purpose of those conversations was so that both 336 00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:17,960 Speaker 5: sides had a sense of where policy makers were heading 337 00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 5: going into the meeting, and then during the meeting, which 338 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:22,800 Speaker 5: go on for a day and a half. Sometimes minds 339 00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:25,400 Speaker 5: change as well during the meeting, but at least going 340 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:27,960 Speaker 5: into the meeting, people all have a sense of where 341 00:21:28,000 --> 00:21:29,240 Speaker 5: other folks are. 342 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:31,160 Speaker 4: I tell you what's changed this in the last couple 343 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:35,080 Speaker 4: of days, Richard is. I think after yesterday's discussion, the 344 00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:37,359 Speaker 4: market's kind of pulling back a little bit on the 345 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:41,800 Speaker 4: two rate cuts this year. I don't know before between 346 00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:43,840 Speaker 4: now in September, the Fed's going to get some more 347 00:21:43,840 --> 00:21:46,760 Speaker 4: inflation data. They're going to get some more labor market data. 348 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:49,159 Speaker 2: Yeah. Are they just going to wait for that? 349 00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:49,560 Speaker 5: I guess. 350 00:21:49,640 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 4: I mean that's being data dependent. I guess right. 351 00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:55,760 Speaker 5: The chair indicated that yesterday. I think that that would 352 00:21:55,840 --> 00:21:59,560 Speaker 5: make sense. He'll also have another bite at the communications 353 00:21:59,560 --> 00:22:04,280 Speaker 5: apple to mixed metaphors at Jackson Hole in three weeks 354 00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 5: and not always, but oftentimes the chairs do use Jackson 355 00:22:08,520 --> 00:22:12,879 Speaker 5: Hole as a way to preview the September meeting. So 356 00:22:12,920 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 5: perhaps another motivation for the two handed economist. Yesterday from 357 00:22:17,840 --> 00:22:22,159 Speaker 5: Jay Powell is I'll have the stage to himself at 358 00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:23,159 Speaker 5: the end of the month. 359 00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:24,960 Speaker 2: For all of you on your commute across the nation. 360 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 2: A wonderful treat today within the technology earnings allow Brainer 361 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:31,520 Speaker 2: scheduled to be with us here later on in this 362 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,240 Speaker 2: half hour, of course, all every work with our central bank, 363 00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:37,679 Speaker 2: and now Richard Clarida with us with Pimco, a former 364 00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 2: vice chairman. I hate torst and Slock because on a 365 00:22:40,840 --> 00:22:44,760 Speaker 2: Wednesday he sends me an email from Apollo Global Management 366 00:22:45,200 --> 00:22:48,320 Speaker 2: with six seven things to read, and usually the top 367 00:22:48,359 --> 00:22:51,200 Speaker 2: ones are a little light quick reads. Here's what he 368 00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:58,000 Speaker 2: sends today. Clarida post pandemic, global inflation, disinflation and central 369 00:22:58,040 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 2: Bank policy responses, goes on, It's like a movie. It's 370 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:04,000 Speaker 2: got a British movie. It's got a long title. Yeah, 371 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 2: Nber a paper you just published with your thoughts on 372 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:11,359 Speaker 2: twenty one and twenty two. Take this important paper that 373 00:23:11,400 --> 00:23:15,560 Speaker 2: Torsten Slock mentions and bring it forward to present day 374 00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:16,679 Speaker 2: policy making. 375 00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,600 Speaker 5: I'll give you the quick elevator version. Please, global surgeon inflation, 376 00:23:23,040 --> 00:23:26,040 Speaker 5: Where did it come from? How do we think about it? 377 00:23:26,040 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 5: And what are the lessons learned, and the basic point 378 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:30,639 Speaker 5: of that paper is essentially to summarize a lot of 379 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:33,480 Speaker 5: sort of one stop shopping. If you don't read fifty papers, 380 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:35,240 Speaker 5: you can read my summary of the papers. And the 381 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:38,879 Speaker 5: basic story is the inflation came from three factors. A 382 00:23:38,960 --> 00:23:41,840 Speaker 5: once in a century pandemic which led to a shock 383 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:47,320 Speaker 5: to supply, triggered a fiscal and monetary policy response, and 384 00:23:47,320 --> 00:23:48,879 Speaker 5: then on top of that, of course, you had the 385 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 5: Russian invasion of Ukraine. Policy reacted right, rates, inflation came down, 386 00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:58,159 Speaker 5: central banks were confident enough to cut rates. So I 387 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:01,000 Speaker 5: think the lessons learned to me is once in a 388 00:24:01,080 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 5: century pandemic shocks are very challenging for policy, and on 389 00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:08,159 Speaker 5: the other side of it, inflation expectations are anchored. And 390 00:24:09,160 --> 00:24:09,880 Speaker 5: that's where we are. 391 00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:12,480 Speaker 2: Peter Orzag at Lazard Now I'm in a shop at 392 00:24:12,560 --> 00:24:16,400 Speaker 2: Lazard and also working and Brookings really emphasize the supply 393 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:19,800 Speaker 2: side shocks that we had. Are we there now? Is 394 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 2: the tariff uncertainty now one big supply side shock. I mean, 395 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:29,240 Speaker 2: witness copper, biggest drop for years that yesterday. Sure. 396 00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:33,320 Speaker 5: The other thing I'd like to emphasize as well is 397 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:34,720 Speaker 5: the unemployment rate is low. 398 00:24:34,760 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 2: And that is great. 399 00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:39,720 Speaker 5: It's at a very low historical level, but there's still 400 00:24:39,840 --> 00:24:42,119 Speaker 5: room for the labor market to expand. In terms of 401 00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:45,800 Speaker 5: labor force participation, it's about a point below where it 402 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:51,359 Speaker 5: was decades ago, especially among men prime age male. So 403 00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:55,119 Speaker 5: a low unemployment rate is good, but the economy's capacity 404 00:24:55,200 --> 00:24:57,760 Speaker 5: depends upon labor force as well, and I think there's 405 00:24:57,800 --> 00:25:00,560 Speaker 5: still room to run there. 406 00:25:02,080 --> 00:25:05,800 Speaker 4: President Trump continues his pressure on this fetter reserves, saying 407 00:25:05,800 --> 00:25:08,960 Speaker 4: that they should be cutting rates. But we have folks 408 00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:11,440 Speaker 4: that we really respect come through the studio that's say 409 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:14,879 Speaker 4: that is behind again. It really needs to cut rates. 410 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 4: I mean, whether you look at real rents or whatever. 411 00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:18,960 Speaker 4: I mean, if you look at the real time data, 412 00:25:19,040 --> 00:25:21,160 Speaker 4: it's already there. The conditions are already there. 413 00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:22,000 Speaker 2: The cut rates. 414 00:25:22,000 --> 00:25:22,840 Speaker 4: How do you think about that? 415 00:25:24,160 --> 00:25:26,879 Speaker 5: I think a straight reading of sort of standard monetary 416 00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:29,920 Speaker 5: policy rules, including the ones I worked on with Girtler 417 00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:33,560 Speaker 5: and Galley, for a pretty wide range of assumptions, would 418 00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:36,840 Speaker 5: indicate that there's some room to cut rates from current levels. 419 00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,479 Speaker 5: The details will depend on the model and your views 420 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:42,680 Speaker 5: of inflation, but anywhere in the range of you know, 421 00:25:42,840 --> 00:25:47,560 Speaker 5: of fifty to seventy five basis points from here under 422 00:25:47,600 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 5: the view that Waller and Embowman of express that the 423 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 5: tariffs are not really an inflation shock, they're a price 424 00:25:53,720 --> 00:25:57,119 Speaker 5: level shock. And so I think that is the case, 425 00:25:57,160 --> 00:25:59,760 Speaker 5: and I think Chirpell himself a month or so ago 426 00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:03,400 Speaker 5: indicated the butt for the trade policy uncertainty, they would 427 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:04,680 Speaker 5: probably be cutting rates now. 428 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:08,880 Speaker 2: But this is important, Richard. Yeah, I really can't say enough. 429 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:14,280 Speaker 2: We are slaves to trend? Oh shuret for we cut rates. 430 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:18,840 Speaker 2: It establishes a vector. Oh yeah, that we must follow. 431 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:23,240 Speaker 2: Why I'm speaking for President Trump now, good morning, mister president. 432 00:26:23,280 --> 00:26:25,320 Speaker 2: If you'd like to call in, we'd love to talk 433 00:26:25,359 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 2: to you. Why in God's name can we just announce 434 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:32,280 Speaker 2: let's just do a one off rate cut and see 435 00:26:32,280 --> 00:26:36,400 Speaker 2: where we stand in September or end of October. Why 436 00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:38,040 Speaker 2: are we slaves to trend? 437 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:43,959 Speaker 5: I think that's the sixty four billion dollar question, and 438 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:48,879 Speaker 5: it reflects the evolution in monetary policy. If you go 439 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:51,080 Speaker 5: back to when Tom, you and I start our careers 440 00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:54,640 Speaker 5: in the in the eighties with with Vulgar, Vulgar would 441 00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:56,680 Speaker 5: never give you an indication of where rates we're going. 442 00:26:56,640 --> 00:26:58,399 Speaker 2: To be, Thank you, thank you. Years. 443 00:26:58,440 --> 00:27:00,560 Speaker 5: It was one meeting at a time, and for the 444 00:27:00,560 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 5: first half of green Span it was one meeting then 445 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:03,359 Speaker 5: at a time. 446 00:27:03,400 --> 00:27:05,159 Speaker 2: But this is really important, folks. 447 00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:08,080 Speaker 5: Well, two things happened. The academic literature to which I 448 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:11,720 Speaker 5: contributed said there can be benefits to providing guidance on 449 00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:15,720 Speaker 5: the rate path, and so I think policymakers fall in 450 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:18,520 Speaker 5: love with that idea. They doubled down on it when 451 00:27:18,560 --> 00:27:21,200 Speaker 5: we hit the zero lower bound, and it made sense 452 00:27:21,240 --> 00:27:23,600 Speaker 5: to do that. But one of the points I make 453 00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:26,440 Speaker 5: in the paper that you nicely plugged, Tom, is that 454 00:27:26,960 --> 00:27:31,000 Speaker 5: monetary policy is not immune from the laws of economics. 455 00:27:31,200 --> 00:27:33,800 Speaker 5: There are benefits and cost to decisions, and there are 456 00:27:33,800 --> 00:27:37,159 Speaker 5: benefits in cost and diminishing returns. And I think you 457 00:27:37,280 --> 00:27:40,480 Speaker 5: raise a very good point. We could be in a 458 00:27:40,520 --> 00:27:43,800 Speaker 5: different world if basically the FED and other central banks said, 459 00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:45,560 Speaker 5: you know, there's a lot of uncertain we're going to 460 00:27:45,600 --> 00:27:47,000 Speaker 5: do one meeting at a time. 461 00:27:47,119 --> 00:27:49,080 Speaker 2: Let me cut to the chase. Are we live in 462 00:27:49,200 --> 00:27:53,000 Speaker 2: physics envy. We have a lot of fancy people, including 463 00:27:53,000 --> 00:27:56,919 Speaker 2: Clareness math folks. It's world class. I can't taste their shoelaces. 464 00:27:57,160 --> 00:28:00,600 Speaker 2: I can't tell you I'm a dinosaur. There's not a 465 00:28:00,640 --> 00:28:05,160 Speaker 2: dinosaur you're a dinaso. But are we slaves to the 466 00:28:05,160 --> 00:28:08,600 Speaker 2: certitude of inertial force where we set up a vector 467 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:12,920 Speaker 2: and we've got a momentum of something. Are you kidding me? 468 00:28:13,240 --> 00:28:14,159 Speaker 2: We can't, wouldn't. 469 00:28:14,440 --> 00:28:17,960 Speaker 5: I wouldn't say we're slaves. But that mindset has a 470 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:20,840 Speaker 5: very very powerful hold on a lot of thinking in 471 00:28:20,960 --> 00:28:22,879 Speaker 5: markets and in policy making. 472 00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:24,480 Speaker 2: Paul, get one more question. 473 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:26,960 Speaker 4: In I'm going to take a million dollar cowboy bar 474 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:32,920 Speaker 4: out out west somewhere next month, what should the FED 475 00:28:33,000 --> 00:28:36,359 Speaker 4: chairman say in Jackson Hole? Should he change his tune, 476 00:28:36,359 --> 00:28:39,000 Speaker 4: should he try to set up the market for September? 477 00:28:39,040 --> 00:28:41,040 Speaker 4: What do you think we will hear when Tom's out 478 00:28:41,040 --> 00:28:42,440 Speaker 4: there in a million dollar caboy bore. 479 00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 5: I think he's probably going to devote his remarks to 480 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:51,280 Speaker 5: previewing or laying out what they've decided in terms of 481 00:28:51,320 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 5: their framework. And I think what he will do is 482 00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:58,200 Speaker 5: embrace more or less traditional inflation targeting, saying we're not 483 00:28:58,480 --> 00:29:01,800 Speaker 5: close to the zero bound now, and policy will act 484 00:29:01,840 --> 00:29:05,120 Speaker 5: symmetrically in terms of what he does in terms of 485 00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:09,080 Speaker 5: the next meeting in September or the rest of the year. 486 00:29:09,240 --> 00:29:11,160 Speaker 5: I think it will depend in part on the data 487 00:29:11,160 --> 00:29:14,520 Speaker 5: that we get between now and then, and it will 488 00:29:14,560 --> 00:29:18,920 Speaker 5: depend as well on his assessment of his understanding of 489 00:29:19,680 --> 00:29:22,120 Speaker 5: the current trade regime. 490 00:29:22,240 --> 00:29:26,280 Speaker 2: Ye, I will read your paper and they'll have Can 491 00:29:26,320 --> 00:29:30,560 Speaker 2: I do a report card on a three by five card? Exactly, 492 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:34,320 Speaker 2: Richard Claire to thank you so much, Absolutely brilliant, folks. 493 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:37,880 Speaker 2: That was an absolute clinic on some of the trends, 494 00:29:38,320 --> 00:29:42,520 Speaker 2: the physics, the background of how these officials, saying Richard 495 00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:45,040 Speaker 2: Claire to the former vice chairman of the FED. 496 00:29:45,600 --> 00:29:49,520 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday 497 00:29:49,520 --> 00:29:52,560 Speaker 1: starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android 498 00:29:52,560 --> 00:29:55,600 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen 499 00:29:55,680 --> 00:29:58,960 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 500 00:29:59,480 --> 00:30:03,640 Speaker 1: Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty A Mere Panda. 501 00:30:03,400 --> 00:30:06,200 Speaker 2: Joins us from JP Morgan, where they're looking at the 502 00:30:06,280 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 2: tech juggernaut from sixty thousand feet. How does tech in 503 00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 2: America in this clear you know, I'm going to take 504 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:18,160 Speaker 2: the ego of dish exceptionalism. How does it affect an 505 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:19,960 Speaker 2: overall investment outlook? 506 00:30:20,600 --> 00:30:22,960 Speaker 6: When we think about the history of US exceptionalists and 507 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:25,800 Speaker 6: over the last call it decade fifteen years. It's been 508 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 6: about economic exceptionalism when we think about this miracle of 509 00:30:29,600 --> 00:30:34,120 Speaker 6: high growth, relatively low inflation, relatively low interest rates as well, 510 00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 6: but it's also been about corporate exceptionalism. And going forward, 511 00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:41,800 Speaker 6: we may have some deterioration in some of that economic exceptionalism, 512 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:45,480 Speaker 6: but certainly you still have that corporate exceptionalism, and it's 513 00:30:45,560 --> 00:30:49,200 Speaker 6: rebirthing itself. It's just reviving itself time after time, in 514 00:30:49,240 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 6: twenty twenty three with the Ai Revolution, but also much 515 00:30:52,560 --> 00:30:55,440 Speaker 6: before that in the first phase of some of these companies. 516 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 6: So it has been spectacular to watch some of these 517 00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:01,240 Speaker 6: very mature companies reinvent them themselves and grow profits as 518 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:01,520 Speaker 6: they have. 519 00:31:02,120 --> 00:31:05,000 Speaker 2: I just plugged into the Total Return Index five five 520 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:08,080 Speaker 2: five on Microsoft. Yeah, which is where it's going to open. 521 00:31:08,120 --> 00:31:14,440 Speaker 2: I guess last ten years twenty nine percent per year, And. 522 00:31:14,160 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 4: I'm looking at it today and I'm like, how do 523 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:17,680 Speaker 4: you not own it? Even today? 524 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:20,360 Speaker 2: I don't own it? Thank you. Triple Lover's dog cash 525 00:31:20,520 --> 00:31:24,000 Speaker 2: mirror up to be asleep like a baby. All good, Mira. 526 00:31:24,880 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 4: What have we seen from earnings? What have you guys 527 00:31:26,480 --> 00:31:28,280 Speaker 4: seen from earning so far? And what do you what 528 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:29,920 Speaker 4: do you think of the market needs to see from 529 00:31:29,960 --> 00:31:30,720 Speaker 4: earnings cycle. 530 00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:34,040 Speaker 6: Earnings have been pretty healthy, but also remember the fact 531 00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:36,680 Speaker 6: that estimates for earnings were basically cut in half for 532 00:31:36,760 --> 00:31:39,520 Speaker 6: this quarter since the beginning of the second quarter and 533 00:31:39,600 --> 00:31:42,000 Speaker 6: over the course there so the bar was relatively low. 534 00:31:42,240 --> 00:31:45,360 Speaker 6: We're seeing earnings surpass that you are seeing the MAG seven, 535 00:31:45,400 --> 00:31:47,960 Speaker 6: of course so far blowing the lice out on earnings, 536 00:31:48,200 --> 00:31:52,440 Speaker 6: expected to contribute about two thirds overall to earnings growth 537 00:31:52,480 --> 00:31:54,880 Speaker 6: over the course of this quarter, but that should broaden 538 00:31:54,960 --> 00:31:57,680 Speaker 6: out over the next couple of quarters. So the good 539 00:31:57,760 --> 00:32:00,840 Speaker 6: news is that we are not only hanging our hat 540 00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:06,160 Speaker 6: on MAG seven. Profits across the board story is improving incrementally, 541 00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:08,680 Speaker 6: But when you think about how that passes through to markets, 542 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 6: the MAG seven are driving about a third of the 543 00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:15,720 Speaker 6: returns in markets. So the market does not does demand 544 00:32:15,920 --> 00:32:18,800 Speaker 6: that the MAG seven continue to post these types of profits. 545 00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:21,160 Speaker 6: When I think about it from a broader allocation perspective 546 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:23,000 Speaker 6: in terms of what clients do and don't own, we 547 00:32:23,040 --> 00:32:25,360 Speaker 6: should also remember that given the comeback in the MAG 548 00:32:25,400 --> 00:32:28,320 Speaker 6: seven itself, you probably already own a lot, so it's 549 00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:31,520 Speaker 6: not necessarily requiring us to double down on it. There 550 00:32:31,520 --> 00:32:33,160 Speaker 6: are names that you want to have in your portfolio, 551 00:32:33,440 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 6: but also think about broadening out beyond that. Given the 552 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:37,960 Speaker 6: fact that this year, for the first time in a while, 553 00:32:38,160 --> 00:32:39,520 Speaker 6: we've got choices. 554 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:41,440 Speaker 4: Well, one of the choices is, and we saw people 555 00:32:41,600 --> 00:32:43,680 Speaker 4: make this choice earlier in the year, is they move 556 00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:46,920 Speaker 4: money out of the US into rest of world, maybe 557 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:51,480 Speaker 4: even European equities for example. How did you guys view 558 00:32:51,480 --> 00:32:53,720 Speaker 4: that kind of trend and did you guys participate. 559 00:32:54,160 --> 00:32:57,680 Speaker 6: We did see investors, at least at a headline level, 560 00:32:57,800 --> 00:33:01,120 Speaker 6: more interested outside of the US, but also didn't necessarily 561 00:33:01,160 --> 00:33:04,840 Speaker 6: see investors actually selling the US. You still have foreign 562 00:33:04,880 --> 00:33:07,440 Speaker 6: investors owning about a quarter of the treasury market at 563 00:33:07,440 --> 00:33:10,520 Speaker 6: about twenty percent of the equity market, and you also 564 00:33:10,560 --> 00:33:14,680 Speaker 6: see Americans and foreigners doubling down not only the retail segment, 565 00:33:14,760 --> 00:33:17,640 Speaker 6: but also increasingly the institutional segment. So I don't think 566 00:33:17,640 --> 00:33:21,360 Speaker 6: that sell America narrative is intact. However, I do think 567 00:33:21,400 --> 00:33:24,240 Speaker 6: that people are putting that incremental dollar towards some of 568 00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:28,080 Speaker 6: the other more diversified opportunities across the board internationally, and 569 00:33:28,120 --> 00:33:30,920 Speaker 6: it's not just the dollar. We're seeing the dollar move 570 00:33:30,920 --> 00:33:33,440 Speaker 6: a little bit higher, as Tom pointed out, and yet 571 00:33:33,720 --> 00:33:37,640 Speaker 6: international equities have survived on a number of different catalysts. 572 00:33:37,640 --> 00:33:40,560 Speaker 2: Bob Michael stopped me cold yesterday. It was a single 573 00:33:40,640 --> 00:33:44,680 Speaker 2: sentence of the Fed decides show Parole and Casman are 574 00:33:44,720 --> 00:33:49,320 Speaker 2: modeling now as earning. Tedeski at Yell budget lab eighteen 575 00:33:49,560 --> 00:33:54,160 Speaker 2: percent tariffs back to thirty three, thirty four, and Bob 576 00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 2: even goes up to twenty percent, which to me is unimaginable. Folks, 577 00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:01,720 Speaker 2: this is like McKinley terrorists in the Gilded Age. If 578 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:06,080 Speaker 2: we get that, what happens to an investment strategy in America. 579 00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:09,120 Speaker 6: We do have to be mindful that if we get that, 580 00:34:09,200 --> 00:34:13,440 Speaker 6: it's probably going to result in higher inflation and slower growth. 581 00:34:13,560 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 6: But we also have a little bit of a wrench 582 00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:17,400 Speaker 6: in the works here when we think about where we 583 00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:19,480 Speaker 6: get to in the beginning of next year, in that 584 00:34:19,520 --> 00:34:22,200 Speaker 6: we're going to start to see the impacts of fiscal stimulus. 585 00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:24,400 Speaker 6: When it comes to some of those tax cuts, some 586 00:34:24,520 --> 00:34:26,719 Speaker 6: of them are extensions, but there are some sweeteners in 587 00:34:26,760 --> 00:34:28,600 Speaker 6: there that are going to add some fiscal stimulus to 588 00:34:28,640 --> 00:34:31,800 Speaker 6: the economy that could potentially keep inflation a little bit higher. 589 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:33,360 Speaker 6: It could also boost growth. 590 00:34:33,920 --> 00:34:37,200 Speaker 2: Do rate cuts come to rescue? Are rate cuts just 591 00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:40,960 Speaker 2: to normalize, or can they actually add on to the 592 00:34:41,000 --> 00:34:44,920 Speaker 2: stimulus of the huge fiscal bill. They could. 593 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:47,480 Speaker 6: I'm not sure that rate cuts are actually as relevant 594 00:34:47,760 --> 00:34:49,440 Speaker 6: when we think about the fact that over the last 595 00:34:49,480 --> 00:34:52,040 Speaker 6: couple of years you've actually had even higher interest rates, 596 00:34:52,040 --> 00:34:55,239 Speaker 6: and you've had twenty plus percent markets even outside of 597 00:34:55,280 --> 00:34:57,000 Speaker 6: the mag seven. The S and P was up eight 598 00:34:57,000 --> 00:35:00,480 Speaker 6: percent ten percent over the last two years perspectively. So 599 00:35:00,520 --> 00:35:02,719 Speaker 6: we don't need rate cuts to save the market. I mean, 600 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:04,919 Speaker 6: the market doesn't look like it needs any saving at all. 601 00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:07,719 Speaker 2: Have you been in the new building, not yet. 602 00:35:07,920 --> 00:35:10,320 Speaker 6: I've seen it. You can see in through the windows 603 00:35:10,360 --> 00:35:13,480 Speaker 6: from the building across the street. Very exciting, very exciting. 604 00:35:13,520 --> 00:35:15,360 Speaker 2: It's just, you know, then, all that's going on in 605 00:35:15,400 --> 00:35:17,640 Speaker 2: New York City in this tragedy is just great to 606 00:35:17,680 --> 00:35:22,200 Speaker 2: see the leadership at JP Morgan and Sitadel and others 607 00:35:22,200 --> 00:35:25,520 Speaker 2: on Kevin, I really can't say enough about it. You're Panda, 608 00:35:25,560 --> 00:35:29,320 Speaker 2: Thank you so much. Global Market Strategist JP Morgan, Investment 609 00:35:29,719 --> 00:35:30,480 Speaker 2: not Management. 610 00:35:36,760 --> 00:35:40,640 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday 611 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:43,720 Speaker 1: starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Coarclay and Android 612 00:35:43,719 --> 00:35:46,760 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg business app. You can also watch 613 00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:49,759 Speaker 1: us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the 614 00:35:49,760 --> 00:35:50,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg terminal. 615 00:35:50,880 --> 00:35:54,560 Speaker 2: Now we go ever stronger market. Lehman is with Citizens, 616 00:35:54,840 --> 00:36:00,640 Speaker 2: JMP Securities. He is definitive on the culture of San 617 00:36:00,680 --> 00:36:05,839 Speaker 2: Francisco in Silicon Valley. This goes way back to Montgomery 618 00:36:06,400 --> 00:36:08,799 Speaker 2: and other aims in the past. This is a guy 619 00:36:08,960 --> 00:36:12,920 Speaker 2: with sell side, get out the Excel spreadsheet, cred but 620 00:36:13,080 --> 00:36:15,720 Speaker 2: also done em and A. I want to talk about 621 00:36:15,719 --> 00:36:19,680 Speaker 2: picking up the pieces off of First Republic May of 622 00:36:19,760 --> 00:36:23,839 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. You've been intimately involved, not so much 623 00:36:23,840 --> 00:36:27,640 Speaker 2: in the details, but his San Francisco and Silicon Valley 624 00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:31,520 Speaker 2: recovered from that tobacco recovering. 625 00:36:33,719 --> 00:36:37,439 Speaker 7: And it's a good theme with what we talked about today, 626 00:36:37,440 --> 00:36:39,800 Speaker 7: and we'll talk about with Meta because it's about AI 627 00:36:40,440 --> 00:36:44,680 Speaker 7: and it starts with the election we had last year 628 00:36:45,000 --> 00:36:48,120 Speaker 7: and Daniel Lurie becoming mayor. So a year ago the 629 00:36:48,200 --> 00:36:51,480 Speaker 7: mayor Lendon Breed had about a thirty percent positive and 630 00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:54,360 Speaker 7: a seventy percent negative. Today Daniel Lurie is a seventy 631 00:36:54,360 --> 00:36:56,960 Speaker 7: percent positive and a thirty percent You probably couldn't get 632 00:36:57,000 --> 00:36:59,120 Speaker 7: a seventy percent positive on anything today. 633 00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:03,400 Speaker 2: You're Buch Frank Cautron yesterday. Yeah, this guy is like Frank, 634 00:37:03,800 --> 00:37:06,200 Speaker 2: you're more qualified than anybody I know to give me 635 00:37:06,239 --> 00:37:11,200 Speaker 2: the X axis on AI. Is AI equivalent to anything 636 00:37:11,280 --> 00:37:14,400 Speaker 2: in the past? And how far out do you see this? 637 00:37:15,400 --> 00:37:17,640 Speaker 2: As I'm speaking as an amateur, this boom. 638 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:20,520 Speaker 7: It's I hate to say it because the stocks have 639 00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:22,759 Speaker 7: moved so much, but it's early and Met is a 640 00:37:22,760 --> 00:37:25,360 Speaker 7: perfect example of that. Some of the things that they're 641 00:37:25,400 --> 00:37:28,759 Speaker 7: starting to work on and starting to see are showing 642 00:37:28,840 --> 00:37:31,080 Speaker 7: in the numbers, but it's really just the beginning. And 643 00:37:31,239 --> 00:37:34,160 Speaker 7: I'll give you one example, Tom. They they even talked 644 00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:37,040 Speaker 7: about some of the the using large language models for 645 00:37:37,080 --> 00:37:39,640 Speaker 7: the first time, and as you know, those have been 646 00:37:39,760 --> 00:37:41,920 Speaker 7: we've been talking about those for a bit. But they're 647 00:37:42,080 --> 00:37:45,880 Speaker 7: starting to use those for some of their offerings. And 648 00:37:45,960 --> 00:37:48,120 Speaker 7: so we've already seen the numbers show up. We're already 649 00:37:48,120 --> 00:37:50,799 Speaker 7: seen what they're doing with Capax, but it's showing up 650 00:37:50,800 --> 00:37:52,960 Speaker 7: with the numbers already, and we're just at the beginning. 651 00:37:53,080 --> 00:37:54,399 Speaker 8: So as much as these. 652 00:37:54,320 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 7: Stocks have run in, as much as we've seen great 653 00:37:57,719 --> 00:38:00,520 Speaker 7: gains in the stock market, I hate to say this 654 00:38:00,560 --> 00:38:01,960 Speaker 7: because it's going to spook some people. 655 00:38:02,239 --> 00:38:03,400 Speaker 8: We may be early. 656 00:38:03,440 --> 00:38:06,640 Speaker 4: Interesting and Mark, I mean you're responsible for the state 657 00:38:06,640 --> 00:38:11,000 Speaker 4: of California, the business, investment, banking business for citizens in Californa. 658 00:38:11,000 --> 00:38:13,560 Speaker 4: That's like one of the biggest economies in the world. 659 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:17,640 Speaker 4: Talk to us about California writ large, because we've heard 660 00:38:17,680 --> 00:38:19,719 Speaker 4: so many stories about people leaving New York, people leaving 661 00:38:19,719 --> 00:38:22,560 Speaker 4: California for Texas and Florida and so on. So how 662 00:38:22,680 --> 00:38:24,000 Speaker 4: is the economy in California. 663 00:38:24,120 --> 00:38:26,000 Speaker 7: So it's gone from the fifth biggest economy of the 664 00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:29,800 Speaker 7: world the fourth biggest. Citizens has now a major footprint 665 00:38:29,800 --> 00:38:31,960 Speaker 7: there where before it had a minor footprint. As you know, 666 00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:36,920 Speaker 7: they bought my predecessor firm, JMP, but they've gone in 667 00:38:36,960 --> 00:38:40,040 Speaker 7: a variety of markets, whether San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Orange County, 668 00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 7: Los Angeles, San Diego. Citizens now is a footprint and 669 00:38:43,080 --> 00:38:45,920 Speaker 7: private banking and some of the halo that First Republic 670 00:38:46,040 --> 00:38:48,960 Speaker 7: had we've been fortunate to garner because we've just hired 671 00:38:48,960 --> 00:38:51,200 Speaker 7: some of these people who are really how many. 672 00:38:51,040 --> 00:38:54,160 Speaker 8: People say they love their bank and young people. 673 00:38:53,880 --> 00:38:56,040 Speaker 7: At First Republic love their bank, and we've been able 674 00:38:56,080 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 7: to garner some of that halo because it's all about 675 00:38:58,000 --> 00:39:01,760 Speaker 7: service and it's all about coordinating. We're coordinating across the platform, 676 00:39:01,800 --> 00:39:04,600 Speaker 7: so of our mid tier piers, we're coordinating across a 677 00:39:04,640 --> 00:39:06,920 Speaker 7: private bank and investment bank of commercial and consumer. 678 00:39:07,120 --> 00:39:11,719 Speaker 2: How will Silicon Valley defend against Lord Dell down in 679 00:39:11,800 --> 00:39:14,960 Speaker 2: Texas and Texas building out they're doing with the New 680 00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:19,239 Speaker 2: York Stock Exchange in Texas. Y'all Street, y'all street, what 681 00:39:19,280 --> 00:39:24,440 Speaker 2: are you watching land? How does California strategically defend against 682 00:39:24,440 --> 00:39:26,720 Speaker 2: the Dell juggernaut in Texas? 683 00:39:27,760 --> 00:39:30,319 Speaker 8: I think it's a big pie. I think we have 684 00:39:30,360 --> 00:39:31,440 Speaker 8: some things going for us. 685 00:39:32,080 --> 00:39:35,600 Speaker 7: Obviously we are as I'd like to say, the Golden 686 00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:36,600 Speaker 7: Gate Bridge isn't leaving. 687 00:39:36,840 --> 00:39:38,879 Speaker 8: Cal's not leaving. Stanford's probably not. 688 00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:40,640 Speaker 2: Leaving, so educational funding. 689 00:39:40,680 --> 00:39:43,640 Speaker 7: When I hear everybody's leaving San Francisco, I just have 690 00:39:43,800 --> 00:39:45,920 Speaker 7: my best guess is Call and Stanford are staying and 691 00:39:46,000 --> 00:39:48,279 Speaker 7: yet and the talent and the dollars that are being 692 00:39:48,280 --> 00:39:50,440 Speaker 7: spent on AI. You can look at the statistics the 693 00:39:50,560 --> 00:39:53,759 Speaker 7: dollars that are being spent in San Francisco, that's a 694 00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:54,279 Speaker 7: big number. 695 00:39:54,719 --> 00:39:58,719 Speaker 2: The horrific tragedy in New York City we're living in 696 00:39:58,760 --> 00:40:02,960 Speaker 2: the last seventy two hours with Blackstone, their commitment before 697 00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:06,920 Speaker 2: all of this horror to Western Pennsylvania is just absolutely 698 00:40:06,960 --> 00:40:11,840 Speaker 2: extraordinary again Carnegie Mellon University of Pittsburgh and that so 699 00:40:11,960 --> 00:40:15,480 Speaker 2: are we going to see a greater at the margin 700 00:40:15,640 --> 00:40:17,680 Speaker 2: cash commitment into Silicon Valley. 701 00:40:17,960 --> 00:40:19,360 Speaker 7: I think what you're going to see is a public 702 00:40:19,400 --> 00:40:22,360 Speaker 7: private partnership, and San Francisco is leading that. Like I 703 00:40:22,360 --> 00:40:25,680 Speaker 7: said at the top, Daniel Luriy and the business leaders 704 00:40:25,719 --> 00:40:29,600 Speaker 7: in San Francisco are committed to finding ways to exploit 705 00:40:29,840 --> 00:40:30,640 Speaker 7: the talent. 706 00:40:30,360 --> 00:40:32,400 Speaker 8: Base that we have. Some of the ills that we 707 00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:33,400 Speaker 8: have are being fixed. 708 00:40:33,800 --> 00:40:37,240 Speaker 7: And I think there's nothing we like more in this country. 709 00:40:37,640 --> 00:40:40,000 Speaker 7: To kind of denigrate things, but there's nothing we like 710 00:40:40,080 --> 00:40:43,040 Speaker 7: even greater that than a resurrection story. And I think 711 00:40:43,040 --> 00:40:45,400 Speaker 7: you're seeing that real time in San Francisco. And I 712 00:40:45,440 --> 00:40:48,080 Speaker 7: think that public private partnership is the most important thing. 713 00:40:48,520 --> 00:40:51,320 Speaker 4: Mark we heard from some of the big banks reported 714 00:40:51,360 --> 00:40:53,960 Speaker 4: earnings last week. We heard some pretty positive rhetoric from 715 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:56,439 Speaker 4: the Jamie Diamonds of the world, the Brian Morny hands 716 00:40:56,440 --> 00:40:59,960 Speaker 4: of the world, talking about the big global capital markets business, 717 00:41:00,120 --> 00:41:02,000 Speaker 4: global banking business. How are you seeing it in the 718 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:04,560 Speaker 4: mid market in California. 719 00:41:05,000 --> 00:41:06,359 Speaker 8: It's definitely picking up. 720 00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:09,400 Speaker 7: I think you're seeing the first signs of a resurrection 721 00:41:09,520 --> 00:41:14,239 Speaker 7: of the IPO market. It has not been like we 722 00:41:14,320 --> 00:41:16,480 Speaker 7: saw in twenty twenty one, and I will not predict that. 723 00:41:16,600 --> 00:41:18,239 Speaker 7: But you're going to see the back half of this 724 00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:20,600 Speaker 7: year a bunch of tech companies and a bunch of. 725 00:41:20,520 --> 00:41:22,320 Speaker 4: Who saw Figma price last night exactly? 726 00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:24,239 Speaker 7: And you're going to see several after Labor Day, and 727 00:41:24,239 --> 00:41:26,799 Speaker 7: you're gonna see more going out of twenty twenty six. 728 00:41:27,080 --> 00:41:30,560 Speaker 2: Tell us about electric generation, you know there's there's an 729 00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:33,759 Speaker 2: angst about it. I think nationwide. I'll say in Virginia 730 00:41:34,120 --> 00:41:36,440 Speaker 2: leading the way. But is there going to be a 731 00:41:36,480 --> 00:41:38,360 Speaker 2: power suck with the lights don't go on in the 732 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:41,960 Speaker 2: Golden gate Bridge because of all the AI wrapped around 733 00:41:42,239 --> 00:41:43,680 Speaker 2: the San Francisco Giants. 734 00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:45,640 Speaker 8: Yeah, not. 735 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:50,600 Speaker 7: As going to an eight and the postly All Star break. 736 00:41:50,640 --> 00:41:52,880 Speaker 7: There's two and eight after they also, right, but it's painful. 737 00:41:53,000 --> 00:41:54,799 Speaker 2: I traded with the Red Sox. 738 00:41:55,040 --> 00:41:56,720 Speaker 8: I did, and I'm not sure Devers is happy. 739 00:41:56,760 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 2: But his new homes have to see that, thank you. 740 00:42:00,120 --> 00:42:03,200 Speaker 7: But my hunch is no, I think there's going to 741 00:42:03,200 --> 00:42:07,160 Speaker 7: be the kind of innovation that we're seeing in technology. 742 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:09,480 Speaker 7: You're going to see in power generation and it is 743 00:42:09,520 --> 00:42:12,040 Speaker 7: a land grab right now. And the Warren talent for 744 00:42:12,120 --> 00:42:16,640 Speaker 7: that is real. With the kind of AI purchase that 745 00:42:16,680 --> 00:42:18,640 Speaker 7: we've seen Matta make and Microsoft make, can we. 746 00:42:18,560 --> 00:42:21,759 Speaker 2: Go back to Mark Leman old school forget about this 747 00:42:21,840 --> 00:42:24,880 Speaker 2: executive m and a bank backed and all that. The 748 00:42:25,040 --> 00:42:29,680 Speaker 2: cash use of these juggernauts that we all own, we're 749 00:42:29,719 --> 00:42:33,120 Speaker 2: all living. Did they understand they have to deploy cash 750 00:42:33,239 --> 00:42:38,360 Speaker 2: to shareholders within buybacks or as Paul mentions always dividend growth. 751 00:42:40,320 --> 00:42:42,479 Speaker 7: If you're talking about the Big seven or Big eight, 752 00:42:43,280 --> 00:42:46,279 Speaker 7: I think, like we said, it is kind of a 753 00:42:46,320 --> 00:42:50,160 Speaker 7: Warren talent right now. And when you see the headlines 754 00:42:50,200 --> 00:42:52,520 Speaker 7: that Meta got for spending fifteen billion dollars for half 755 00:42:52,520 --> 00:42:54,719 Speaker 7: a company, they really spend fifteen billion dollars on a 756 00:42:54,719 --> 00:42:57,440 Speaker 7: bunch of talent and it barely is you know, it's 757 00:42:57,440 --> 00:42:59,520 Speaker 7: not one percent of the company, right so it looks 758 00:42:59,520 --> 00:43:01,680 Speaker 7: like an enormous number in an enormous bet, but it's 759 00:43:01,719 --> 00:43:04,000 Speaker 7: really not. And when you see the kind of returns 760 00:43:04,000 --> 00:43:06,399 Speaker 7: that the companies get on their investments and their investments. 761 00:43:06,080 --> 00:43:09,040 Speaker 8: Are people I think right now they think a bigger. 762 00:43:08,760 --> 00:43:12,319 Speaker 7: Investment is in that race, and it is a race 763 00:43:12,640 --> 00:43:14,720 Speaker 7: and there's four or five incumbents, and then there's obviously 764 00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:17,720 Speaker 7: open Ai, which we saw their valuation recently, and others. 765 00:43:17,760 --> 00:43:19,960 Speaker 7: But there aren't going to be twenty of these. And 766 00:43:20,960 --> 00:43:22,800 Speaker 7: there's one other thing that I think is really important 767 00:43:22,800 --> 00:43:25,160 Speaker 7: to know is that there are a couple of companies 768 00:43:25,200 --> 00:43:27,279 Speaker 7: that have resurrected. I have said for a very long 769 00:43:27,320 --> 00:43:29,440 Speaker 7: time there's only two tech companies who reinvent in themselves. 770 00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:30,600 Speaker 2: It's App on Microsoft. 771 00:43:30,800 --> 00:43:33,040 Speaker 7: But look at the market cap ascent of Oracle, look 772 00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:36,320 Speaker 7: at the market cap acent of IBM, and these companies 773 00:43:36,320 --> 00:43:40,680 Speaker 7: were left for dead basically obviously they really are. So 774 00:43:41,040 --> 00:43:44,279 Speaker 7: when you it's about leadership, and it's about talent, and 775 00:43:44,320 --> 00:43:46,800 Speaker 7: it's about drive in future. 776 00:43:46,440 --> 00:43:51,280 Speaker 2: Twenty seconds, Intel helpless. 777 00:43:51,080 --> 00:43:53,160 Speaker 7: You know, uh and video is going to market cap 778 00:43:53,200 --> 00:43:55,040 Speaker 7: is going to go out more than into three intels 779 00:43:55,040 --> 00:43:59,120 Speaker 7: today and I just I hate to be pessimistic. 780 00:43:59,160 --> 00:44:01,200 Speaker 8: It's really hard to find to wait that path for that. 781 00:44:01,280 --> 00:44:03,799 Speaker 2: I got goosebumps this week of technology, Mark Lehman with 782 00:44:03,880 --> 00:44:07,680 Speaker 2: his CEO citizens at JMP. That's a great brief before 783 00:44:07,719 --> 00:44:09,000 Speaker 2: we speak with enerrog Rana. 784 00:44:09,320 --> 00:44:13,240 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday 785 00:44:13,280 --> 00:44:16,600 Speaker 1: starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto 786 00:44:16,680 --> 00:44:19,680 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live 787 00:44:19,719 --> 00:44:23,319 Speaker 1: on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just 788 00:44:23,360 --> 00:44:26,040 Speaker 1: say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty the. 789 00:44:26,080 --> 00:44:27,960 Speaker 2: Way we roll. We got Mark Lehman with us here 790 00:44:27,960 --> 00:44:32,480 Speaker 2: with citizens JMP and anrog Rana on the physics of 791 00:44:32,520 --> 00:44:36,120 Speaker 2: this AI moment. He's with Bloomberg Intelligence and has been 792 00:44:36,440 --> 00:44:40,560 Speaker 2: absolutely dead on and I have courage for a long 793 00:44:40,680 --> 00:44:45,719 Speaker 2: tail of AI excellence ANIAG after what we saw yesterday. 794 00:44:45,800 --> 00:44:49,760 Speaker 2: I want you to frame out capital spending for twenty six, 795 00:44:50,400 --> 00:44:54,959 Speaker 2: twenty seven, and even twenty eight. Is it a linear expansion, 796 00:44:55,480 --> 00:44:59,040 Speaker 2: does it accelerate into the coming years, or is this 797 00:44:59,080 --> 00:45:01,399 Speaker 2: as good as a get. 798 00:45:01,760 --> 00:45:03,640 Speaker 9: So at least for the next two years, we think 799 00:45:03,760 --> 00:45:06,239 Speaker 9: the number are numbers are going to go up, the 800 00:45:06,320 --> 00:45:08,319 Speaker 9: rate of growth is going to slow down. But it's 801 00:45:08,360 --> 00:45:10,800 Speaker 9: tough to call out twenty seven and twenty eight because 802 00:45:11,320 --> 00:45:13,920 Speaker 9: right now we have just started to see the benefits 803 00:45:13,960 --> 00:45:17,640 Speaker 9: of all these investments that, for example, Microsoft has made. 804 00:45:17,960 --> 00:45:20,480 Speaker 9: So I think a lot depends on the pace of 805 00:45:20,520 --> 00:45:23,640 Speaker 9: adoption and more so on the enterprise side. To see 806 00:45:23,640 --> 00:45:25,920 Speaker 9: what twenty seven and twenty eight looks like. But at 807 00:45:25,920 --> 00:45:28,400 Speaker 9: this point we feel very confident about twenty five and 808 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:29,000 Speaker 9: twenty six. 809 00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:30,840 Speaker 2: So I mean, for. 810 00:45:30,960 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 4: Microsoft, give us the two or three things that the 811 00:45:34,160 --> 00:45:36,480 Speaker 4: bulls are really hanging their hat on here. Again, we're 812 00:45:36,480 --> 00:45:39,280 Speaker 4: gonna looks like we're going to hit four trillion dollar 813 00:45:39,400 --> 00:45:40,440 Speaker 4: market cap here today. 814 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:43,960 Speaker 9: So patly, I mean the simple you know, basics is 815 00:45:43,960 --> 00:45:47,439 Speaker 9: when when a company's size gets bigger, the growth rates 816 00:45:47,520 --> 00:45:50,600 Speaker 9: stops or slows down. In the Microsoft's case, you could 817 00:45:50,640 --> 00:45:53,600 Speaker 9: see that growth in Azure is accelerating. This is now 818 00:45:53,600 --> 00:45:55,960 Speaker 9: a seventy five billion dollar business as of the end 819 00:45:56,000 --> 00:45:59,279 Speaker 9: of lean a lost quarter. So in that case, when 820 00:45:59,280 --> 00:46:03,520 Speaker 9: you see growth rate in the thirties accelerating, that basically 821 00:46:03,560 --> 00:46:06,239 Speaker 9: shows that the AI adoption rate is picking up. And 822 00:46:06,600 --> 00:46:09,040 Speaker 9: you know, people just assume that this is just the 823 00:46:09,080 --> 00:46:12,200 Speaker 9: beginning of the adoption curve. Right now, all we're seeing 824 00:46:12,239 --> 00:46:15,319 Speaker 9: is the infrastructure spending and that's the benefit everybody's seeing, 825 00:46:15,360 --> 00:46:18,040 Speaker 9: whether it's Nvidia or you know, Dell servers, et cetera. 826 00:46:18,400 --> 00:46:20,320 Speaker 9: But now what we're seeing is adoption rate on the 827 00:46:20,360 --> 00:46:22,839 Speaker 9: cloud side, and I think that is really what is 828 00:46:22,880 --> 00:46:24,359 Speaker 9: exciting a lot of people out there. 829 00:46:25,719 --> 00:46:28,040 Speaker 4: So on argument, Well, take a look at Microsoft here, 830 00:46:28,120 --> 00:46:34,000 Speaker 4: I mean, what percentage of the cloud an AI do 831 00:46:34,040 --> 00:46:37,000 Speaker 4: you feel like is their market share versus some of 832 00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:39,640 Speaker 4: the competitors, because we still have to hear from Amazon. 833 00:46:40,640 --> 00:46:43,319 Speaker 9: Yeah, so when you look at just the cloud infrastructure site, 834 00:46:43,320 --> 00:46:46,160 Speaker 9: you know, they are the second biggest player after Amazon. 835 00:46:46,239 --> 00:46:48,600 Speaker 9: Amazon's you know rund rate as well, over one hundred billion. 836 00:46:49,040 --> 00:46:51,439 Speaker 9: But Amazon's growing in the you know, let's say around 837 00:46:51,480 --> 00:46:54,439 Speaker 9: the eighteen to twenty percent range. Microsoft now is showing 838 00:46:54,480 --> 00:46:56,880 Speaker 9: that they're growing, you know, thirty eight thirty nine percent. 839 00:46:57,120 --> 00:47:00,160 Speaker 9: That's a very big difference between the two. So, I mean, 840 00:47:00,320 --> 00:47:03,360 Speaker 9: just imagine as seventy five billion dollar business growing in 841 00:47:03,400 --> 00:47:06,600 Speaker 9: the mid thirties. And that's because they have that direct 842 00:47:06,640 --> 00:47:09,600 Speaker 9: relationship with open ai where they're getting the direct benefit 843 00:47:09,680 --> 00:47:11,799 Speaker 9: of U and B using more chat, GBT. 844 00:47:11,800 --> 00:47:13,680 Speaker 2: And right, let's do a two part question. I'll get 845 00:47:13,680 --> 00:47:16,520 Speaker 2: the apple on the back end of this color out 846 00:47:17,080 --> 00:47:21,279 Speaker 2: the nature of their businesses. Dani's is very big that 847 00:47:21,440 --> 00:47:27,440 Speaker 2: Microsoft is the enterprise cloud a person. What is Amazon? 848 00:47:27,640 --> 00:47:32,680 Speaker 2: What is Oracle in the rest? What's the character of 849 00:47:32,719 --> 00:47:34,200 Speaker 2: those cloud businesses? 850 00:47:35,320 --> 00:47:37,360 Speaker 9: I think that's probably one of the most important questions 851 00:47:37,400 --> 00:47:39,400 Speaker 9: for people to think about it right now, when you 852 00:47:39,440 --> 00:47:42,040 Speaker 9: look at somebody like an article there, I would say 853 00:47:42,080 --> 00:47:46,200 Speaker 9: primarily an infrastructured AI infrastructure player at this point, which 854 00:47:46,239 --> 00:47:48,399 Speaker 9: means you want to go there, you want to rent 855 00:47:48,400 --> 00:47:51,759 Speaker 9: out the GPUs and you are training your models. Microsoft 856 00:47:51,800 --> 00:47:54,520 Speaker 9: is basically said, that's the business they're not so keen on. 857 00:47:54,840 --> 00:47:57,840 Speaker 9: They really want to rent out capacity for training to others. 858 00:47:58,200 --> 00:48:00,400 Speaker 9: But they are really on the infant size, which is 859 00:48:00,600 --> 00:48:03,160 Speaker 9: when an application is running, they want to run that 860 00:48:03,239 --> 00:48:06,360 Speaker 9: application because they eventually want to grow with that application. 861 00:48:06,760 --> 00:48:08,520 Speaker 9: We think that's a more high value product. 862 00:48:08,760 --> 00:48:12,279 Speaker 2: So then bring it to Apple. This afternoon, Apple and 863 00:48:12,360 --> 00:48:15,520 Speaker 2: Google have a search agreement. Do you just assume there's 864 00:48:15,560 --> 00:48:19,000 Speaker 2: going to be an announcement that Google Gemini becomes part 865 00:48:19,040 --> 00:48:23,000 Speaker 2: of the Apple family. What do you see anaragus salvation 866 00:48:23,600 --> 00:48:25,760 Speaker 2: for Apple's AI, Miss. 867 00:48:26,640 --> 00:48:29,160 Speaker 9: Tom As far as I am concerned, you know, that 868 00:48:29,280 --> 00:48:31,880 Speaker 9: is the biggest overhang on the stock that nobody talks about. 869 00:48:32,360 --> 00:48:35,520 Speaker 9: That twenty billion our payment that comes from Google is 870 00:48:35,920 --> 00:48:38,399 Speaker 9: very high margin business adds really to the free cat 871 00:48:38,400 --> 00:48:41,600 Speaker 9: flow and the valuation of the company. If they ever 872 00:48:41,840 --> 00:48:43,799 Speaker 9: make a deal on that, I think it will be 873 00:48:43,960 --> 00:48:44,840 Speaker 9: good for the company. 874 00:48:44,880 --> 00:48:45,960 Speaker 2: It will be good for the stock. 875 00:48:46,400 --> 00:48:48,840 Speaker 9: But one of the good things Mark German has reported 876 00:48:49,000 --> 00:48:51,719 Speaker 9: is Apple's ready to go out and partner with other 877 00:48:51,760 --> 00:48:54,839 Speaker 9: companies to get their AI into their ecosystem. I think 878 00:48:54,880 --> 00:48:57,759 Speaker 9: once they do that, that's another overhang that goes away from. 879 00:48:57,680 --> 00:48:59,560 Speaker 2: Its all wants to get in here, let me be quick. 880 00:49:00,080 --> 00:49:01,359 Speaker 2: What are they waiting for? 881 00:49:03,480 --> 00:49:05,759 Speaker 9: I think it's a little bit of they take their 882 00:49:05,800 --> 00:49:09,359 Speaker 9: time and making these decisions. They are not yet. They 883 00:49:09,480 --> 00:49:12,280 Speaker 9: never do things in haste, and I think that speaks 884 00:49:12,320 --> 00:49:15,200 Speaker 9: to the way they treat their user base. They want 885 00:49:15,200 --> 00:49:17,719 Speaker 9: to protect their privacy, they want to make sure things 886 00:49:17,760 --> 00:49:20,560 Speaker 9: are fine for them. So again, I'm not gonna get 887 00:49:20,640 --> 00:49:22,279 Speaker 9: rid of my phone just because the AI is a 888 00:49:22,320 --> 00:49:24,759 Speaker 9: little bit slower. I can't make some pictures, but I 889 00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:26,800 Speaker 9: think it's gonna come over the next twelve months. 890 00:49:27,040 --> 00:49:28,880 Speaker 4: I mean that kind of goes to my point on 891 00:49:28,960 --> 00:49:31,600 Speaker 4: a rogaman. Every time I hear you and other smart 892 00:49:31,600 --> 00:49:34,040 Speaker 4: people like Mandep Seing talk about AI in the context 893 00:49:34,040 --> 00:49:39,080 Speaker 4: of Amazon or Microsoft, it just the initial question is 894 00:49:39,480 --> 00:49:42,680 Speaker 4: what about Apple? So it's I kind of feel like 895 00:49:43,080 --> 00:49:45,600 Speaker 4: they don't have to be first, but boy, they just 896 00:49:45,600 --> 00:49:48,800 Speaker 4: feel like they're getting every single day farther and farther behind. 897 00:49:48,960 --> 00:49:50,759 Speaker 4: I kind of feel like time is of the essence 898 00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:52,520 Speaker 4: for them to announce something major. 899 00:49:53,680 --> 00:49:57,120 Speaker 9: Yeah, I completely agree with you. But at the same time, 900 00:49:57,320 --> 00:50:00,000 Speaker 9: this is a company that controls probably the most important 901 00:50:00,480 --> 00:50:03,879 Speaker 9: distribution system for consumers out there. I mean, people will 902 00:50:03,920 --> 00:50:06,359 Speaker 9: stick to the phone no matter what if they get 903 00:50:06,440 --> 00:50:08,840 Speaker 9: if they get it wrong, but you know, Paul, that 904 00:50:09,000 --> 00:50:11,120 Speaker 9: really makes a huge difference for them. So this is 905 00:50:11,120 --> 00:50:14,160 Speaker 9: why they're taking their time. They're using multiple models to 906 00:50:14,200 --> 00:50:15,719 Speaker 9: figure out what's best for them. 907 00:50:15,920 --> 00:50:17,680 Speaker 2: I mean an rog just to keep up with you. 908 00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:20,120 Speaker 2: This guy's physics University of Deli. You know, I know 909 00:50:20,880 --> 00:50:25,200 Speaker 2: it's amazing. I mean anerrag I did MSFT equity. Tom 910 00:50:25,200 --> 00:50:28,799 Speaker 2: Sikunda said, time you gotta do more. Turn stay with 911 00:50:28,840 --> 00:50:31,400 Speaker 2: me on this, two hands on the steering wheel, okay, 912 00:50:31,719 --> 00:50:39,279 Speaker 2: Ani rag MSFT Equity, AAPL Equity. Hs I did a 913 00:50:39,400 --> 00:50:45,200 Speaker 2: ratio spread analysis, and Apple's failing off of Microsoft by 914 00:50:45,360 --> 00:50:51,040 Speaker 2: two standard deviations, which you know is ginormous. Where's the urgency? 915 00:50:51,440 --> 00:50:54,759 Speaker 2: And Cooper Tino, Well, think about it this way. 916 00:50:55,239 --> 00:50:58,839 Speaker 9: Microsoft sales last night grew at fifteen percent. Apple's gonna 917 00:50:58,880 --> 00:51:01,759 Speaker 9: grow at five percent. I've been debating I always never 918 00:51:01,840 --> 00:51:04,960 Speaker 9: understood why there was always their you know, valuations were 919 00:51:04,960 --> 00:51:07,360 Speaker 9: at parity at that point. Now we are coming to 920 00:51:07,400 --> 00:51:10,920 Speaker 9: a point when the valuation shows the growth potential of Microsoft. 921 00:51:11,200 --> 00:51:14,000 Speaker 9: Imagine a company this size growing at fifteen percent. I 922 00:51:14,000 --> 00:51:18,120 Speaker 9: mean that's pretty big. Apple six seven percent max at 923 00:51:18,160 --> 00:51:20,040 Speaker 9: the best at this point. If they come up with 924 00:51:20,080 --> 00:51:23,040 Speaker 9: a new iPhone seventeen, maybe it goes to seven or eight, 925 00:51:23,160 --> 00:51:26,200 Speaker 9: but that's where it ends. Frankly, doesn't go in double 926 00:51:26,200 --> 00:51:29,799 Speaker 9: digits under no circumstances. Can I see Apple growing in 927 00:51:29,840 --> 00:51:30,560 Speaker 9: double digits? 928 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:35,560 Speaker 2: Interact thirty seconds? Is elon in this discussion? Yes? 929 00:51:35,600 --> 00:51:38,360 Speaker 9: But the question I always you know, wonder whether Zelan 930 00:51:38,480 --> 00:51:40,640 Speaker 9: or Meta is how are they going to monetize their 931 00:51:40,719 --> 00:51:41,760 Speaker 9: large language models. 932 00:51:42,040 --> 00:51:42,680 Speaker 2: Now this is. 933 00:51:42,640 --> 00:51:46,480 Speaker 9: Where Microsoft really has the biggest distribution army in the 934 00:51:46,640 --> 00:51:49,360 Speaker 9: enterprise world, so they will stick there. You know, AI 935 00:51:49,440 --> 00:51:52,560 Speaker 9: products across every enterprise out there, even if it's not 936 00:51:52,640 --> 00:51:54,640 Speaker 9: the best. I do not know how the others are 937 00:51:54,680 --> 00:51:56,440 Speaker 9: going to monetize that is. 938 00:51:56,400 --> 00:51:59,880 Speaker 2: This great Mark Linman back to back with the enter Atlanta. 939 00:52:00,160 --> 00:52:03,920 Speaker 2: Yep is in the on deck. Certain, yeah he is, 940 00:52:04,000 --> 00:52:06,640 Speaker 2: He's on the subway. It's just is that how you're 941 00:52:07,239 --> 00:52:10,080 Speaker 2: it's coming in than very good interog. Thank you so much, 942 00:52:10,160 --> 00:52:14,240 Speaker 2: an rog Rana. They're with great seats for the Chicago Cubs. 943 00:52:14,320 --> 00:52:15,680 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it's unbelievable. 944 00:52:15,680 --> 00:52:17,440 Speaker 4: It's a burgeoning tech cub Chicago. 945 00:52:17,680 --> 00:52:20,200 Speaker 2: It is. It is a tech hub. Androg Rana, thank 946 00:52:20,239 --> 00:52:23,040 Speaker 2: you so much. That was fascinating on the different ais, 947 00:52:23,080 --> 00:52:24,560 Speaker 2: I don't pretend to understand it. 948 00:52:24,760 --> 00:52:29,600 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, 949 00:52:29,680 --> 00:52:34,000 Speaker 1: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday, 950 00:52:34,120 --> 00:52:37,360 Speaker 1: seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com, 951 00:52:37,480 --> 00:52:41,320 Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. 952 00:52:41,600 --> 00:52:44,719 Speaker 1: You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube 953 00:52:45,000 --> 00:52:47,000 Speaker 1: and always on the Bloomberg terminal