WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: January 9th, 2026

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Nearly twenty energy executives

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>meeting with President Donald Trump today to discuss rebuilding Venezuela's

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>oil infrastructure. The lineup includes representatives from Chevron, Exon, and

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Conoco Phillips, among others. Also attending the meeting will be

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 2>the US Interist Secretary tug Bergham, who joined us now.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Mister Secretary. Welcome to the program sour and a happy

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>new year. Just frame for us. The expectations for today's conversation.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Expectation todays have a great conversation about the opportunity to

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>continue President Trump's agenda, which is the agenda course has

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 3>been always about the safety and security, national security of

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>our country. That begins with you can't have national security

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 3>without border security. You can't have national security without energy security.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's going to be on the table, and of

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 3>course the prosperity of America that's based on energy as well,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 3>because if without a plentiful, abundant, reliable, secure energy, you're

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 3>going to have the inflation like we saw in the

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 3>previous administration. President Trump is turning that around. So this

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>is really at the core, it's a discussion about peace

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 3>in the world and prosperity at home, and what an opportunity,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>economic opportunity to restore normal relations with Venezuela and for companies,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>including many of these that had operations in Venezuela for

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>decades ago when Venezuela was a big economic partner in

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the United States before it's collapse, get a chance to

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>return to that. So looking forward to it, it's exciting

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>and lots of interest in coming to the meeting today.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>They're not enough seats in the room in terms of

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>executives that wanted to join in the meeting today with

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>President Trump.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Bergham, I know that you and Secretary Writer have

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that outreach with the oil and industry right now. But

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing is that they are certainly lining up

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for meeting with the president, but not necessarily lining up

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to go back into Venezuela. What are they telling you.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the very strong interest.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>How can you not be interested in the world's largest

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 3>oil reserves in the same hemisphere. So I think there's questions,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, questions about security, questions about what the long

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>term profile is going to be. But the interest level

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 3>is through the roof across from the small wild catador

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>to upstream, midstream, downstream, the majors. There's so much interest

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 3>to this, and not just an energy people are reaching

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>out because the mining industry collapsed in Venezuela. Their entire

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 3>electrical generation industry has collapsed. The opportunity with sanctions being

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>selectively listed for the US companies to sell into that

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>market as it rebuilds is very interesting. And of course

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 3>we've got a number of energy companies that have spent

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>their careers going into some of the world's dangerous places

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to develop oil resources, and those folks, some of those

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 3>will be in the room today as well.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to take tens of billions of dollars

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>them to allocate capital to go back into Venezuela. Does

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the math make sense when WTI is trading blow sixty

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars a arrow.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, the market is going to decide.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>But I know that one thing that happened this week,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>people keep saying, oh, below sixty, there's going to.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Be no interest.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Through the Department of Interior, we're holding our as required

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>legal lease sales, the one that we held in New

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Mexico earlier this week. On January sixth, three hundred and

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven million dollars of royalty payments enter record, the

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>highest since these leases have begun under the new format

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>over almost forty years. Thirty nine years ago in nineteen

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven was when the new rules came in place.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It was two hundred nineteen thousand dollars per acre on

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the leases in Permian. So I would say

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the interest US and in Venezuela very strong in this

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 3>industry because they see they look ahead and they see

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 3>the demand for energy going up and of course driven

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 3>by economic growth. Twenty twenty six could be a banner year,

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>but also the energy required for US to win the

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>AI arms race. So there's a strong, strong interest in

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 3>this investing in this western hemisphere.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Does the administration have a goal of getting oil to

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars a barrel?

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think what President Trump wants is he wants

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to break the back of inflation. And he knows that

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a component of energy in the food you eat,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the clothes you wear, the car you drive. If you

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>can get energy prices down, that's the best way to

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 3>lick inflation. And affordability is something that matters. President Trump

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>has stopped the runaway in flame the prior administration.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>He wants to keep it going.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>When we talk about how do we get prices down,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 3>part of it is we've cut so much red tape

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 3>in the last year.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 4>We've lowered the break even point.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>That plus the technological innovation from this industry. The oil

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and gas industry is not what it was fifty years ago.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>This is a super high tech industry. You take a

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>look at my home state in North Dakota and you

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 3>look at the capability and the productivity increases of the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>people developing there. It's just been amazing the gains that

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>they continue to make. And again, the shale revolution tied

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>with deregulation, cutting some of the red tape that was

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 3>put in place. We know that their break even point

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>is getting lower and lower, and that's why it makes

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>it the great industry. And that's why we've got the

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>greatest industry in the country in the world because in

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the US we've got competition. We don't have a nationalized

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 3>oil industry that has become a monopoly and lethargic. We've

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>got great companies that get out and compete. We're going

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>to be with some of those great companies today and

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>excited to hear their ideas about how to go in

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and break free the incredible opportunity that is for both

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the US and Venezuela in developing this resource.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Mister Secretary, a.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Lot to unpact there, including about the shale patch. I

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 5>do want to stay on this question of US backing

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 5>of some of these US companies going into Venezuela and

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 5>building out the infrastructure there. President Trump has talked about

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 5>potentially a one hundred billion dollar investment potentially over the

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 5>next eighteen months. Where would the funds come from in

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 5>the United States for some of these energy companies to

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 5>help back those investments.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, the discussions right now have been that the capital

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 3>is going to come from the capital markets and come

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>from the energy companies. I don't see that these companies

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to need a support from the US other

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 3>than things around security. I mean, if we can provide

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>a secure, stable environment. The resource here is so significant

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and so large that it's going to be attractive for

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 3>people to go in and develop that, and particularly as

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the US maintains the embargo.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 4>This is key.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>You reported on it just now, President Trump serious, I

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>mean sanctions under President Trump actually mean a sanction. The

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>failed sanctions under the Biden administration just turned Venezuela and

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>other places into the discount gas stations for China and

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>other countries. And President Trump is We're going to make

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 3>sure that this is secure and we're controlling the flow,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 3>both of energy going in and energy coming out. Venezuela's

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 3>heavy crude requires diluting. It requires a light crude like

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>we've got in the United States. To go down there,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 3>one barrel's got to go into Venezuela for every five

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>barrel that comes out. Russia controlled that market. That market's

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>coming back to the US. And the synergy between our

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>refinery sector in the United States, which was built around

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Venezuelan oil. Getting back to that's great news for refiners,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>great news for gas prices for Americans, great news for

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to sell modern equipment, to modernize this industry.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 4>So lots of news for beyond even.

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>The oil majors, Lots of great news economically as we

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>open up this trading and normalized trading relationship with Venezuela.

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, certainly Valero as a refiner has seen the benefits

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 5>of this. Mister Secretary, you talk about security guarantees, and

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 5>if the safety is there, the oil majors will go

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 5>in with frankly, capital markets behind them. What kind of

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 5>security guarantees are they asking for.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll find out some of that more today. But

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I think what they really want to understand is, you know,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>how serious is the US in maintaining the embargo, How

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>serious is the US in maintaining stability in Venezuela. And

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the actions that they're seeing this week speak

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>loudly to that, the actions of President Trump enforcing the

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>embargo and already the cooperation. I mean earlier this morning,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>President Trump just in the last half hour tweeted out

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that the Venezuelan interim government is releasing political prisoners. They're

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>taking actions to demonstrate that they want to have a

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>successful economic relationship with the United States of America. The

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>interim governments committed that they're going to be buying equipment

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>material from the US companies. I mean, these are all

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the signals that we're looking for that to keep us

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>moving towards normalized relationships.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Mister secretary, as you know, to establish stability in this region,

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>it might require massive expense from the US government, which

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>might require a lot of money from taxpayers. If these

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>oil may just go in with the support of the

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>US government, mister secretary, will the president want a slice

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 2>of that revenue for the US government?

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think President Trump is always looking for good

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 3>deals for the American people, but he also is a

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 3>business person. He understands that we have to have the

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>right economic conditions for companies to go in and deploy

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>their own capital and solve these problems. So I think

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 3>in the end, what we're going to see is we've

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>got to We're so fortunate to have a president who

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>has got the willingness and the courage and the understanding

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 3>of how to use force, just like past presidents. I mean,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 3>we wouldn't have the Panama Canal without bold action by

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Theodore Roosevelt one hundred and twenty five years ago, and

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 3>now under President Trump again taking a corollary of the

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Monroe doctrine, which is saying, Hey, if we've got criminal

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 3>enterprises running countries and destroying countries in our hemisphere, that's

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 3>bad for the neighborhood.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's go in and clean it up and do that.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 3>But when it comes to rebuilding, I think again, what

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>we've seen is that if we can create the right

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>market conditions, we're not going to need taxpayer dollars to

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>go do this. And who's going to benefit the taxpayers

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>because you're going to see lower prices at the pump

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>here in America.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>The reason I bring up this question says, because, as

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, there was some conversation about chips being sold

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>into China and the government getting a share of the

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>revenue associated with those chips, and I wonder if the

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>same kind of thing applies here, because I think the

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>executive's going to g into this meeting later trying to

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>figure out what kind of meeting then coming into is

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>it an opportunity to explore Venezuela themselves or alongside the

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 2>US government, and what kind of agreement could be established

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>further down the road.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think initially it's going to be alongside the

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 3>US government, because that has been stated publicly this week.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 3>The US intends to control the disposition of the oil

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>coming out of Venezuela, and as I said earlier, it's

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 3>going to control whatever material and supplies and in this case,

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the millions of barrels of deliument that need to go

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>in to distract this heavy VENs and crude that is

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be controlled by the US during this period

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>in cooperation with the interim government in Venezuela. So I

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>think that they can hear more about that firsthand today,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>but it's going to match what they've heard publicly this week.

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 3>And I know from talking to a number of these

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>executives this week. Chris Wright has talked to a number

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of these executives week. There is a lot of interest

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>in getting back into the world's largest proven reserves right

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>here in our hemisphere. And again that's a great benefit

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to the entire Western hemisphere, but absolutely it's a benefit

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>to the American citizens.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Stephen major of tradition, writing economic data relative to expectations

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>has softened, there is fundamental support to keep luring the

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Fed funds rate to a level below weather forwards are

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 2>currently implying. Steven joins us now for more. Stephen, welcome

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to the program. So it's always good to see you

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 2>when congratulations on the new seat. Let's talk about the

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>data this morning. How relevant is the jobs report at

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 2>eight thirty with your opinion in mind?

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think your setup said it all. John.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 6>There's other stuff going on, isn't there. So there's the

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>fiscal news perhaps coming through later, and everything else that's

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 6>happening globally. So it's just one it's just one data point,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 6>and I think you've covered it pretty well regarding this one.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 6>What really matters is the evidence about what all this

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 6>does for wages, because I think there's been a clear

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 6>trend these last few months where the path of wage

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 6>growth is consistent with something nearer to the two percent

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 6>inflation target. So what you want today is something that

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 6>doesn't disrupt that. Really. Of course, it's complicated because you've

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 6>got the labor pool being affected by migration factors, and

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 6>you've got some softening of demand for labor that's been

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 6>evident in previous months. Overall, it's all very well looking

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 6>at the unemployment rate and the payrolls number, but it's

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 6>the bigger picture how this fits into the bigger picture

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 6>that matters.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, Steve.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>The bigger picture, I think for many is that we've

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>seen a notable increase in slack, captured by several data points.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Your point of wages, you can point to the unemployment

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>rate rising more recently as well. There is a take

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 2>on Wall Street at the moment, Steve, and I wonder

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 2>if you push back. If things stabilized, particularly with things

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>like the unemployment rate, it closes the door on interest

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts see things differently for the year ahead.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't know about that, John, because so first of all,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 6>given all the things that have been happening, and you

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 6>listed the surprises the shocks that we've been experiencing these

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 6>last few weeks, Given all of that, would you have

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 6>believed that the ten year treasury would have been in

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 6>a range of six basis points. I'm told by my

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 6>colleagues downstairs six basis points this year, six six whole

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 6>basis points. In fact, it's been in a tight range

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 6>for quite some time now, even before the start of

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 6>this year. So you know, I think that the bomb

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 6>markets holding in pretty well. The If you've got at

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 6>a strong data release today, something that indicated the economy

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.479
<v Speaker 6>was much stronger than we expected, I think the cynics

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 6>out there might question whether the data was correct in

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 6>the same way that you could say if it was

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 6>exceedingly I think it's the broader trend that matters. You've

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 6>got to smooth these numbers out over a period of time.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 6>I think the trend in the path is quite clear

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 6>towards lower rates, and therefore there's an asymmetric bias in place.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 6>If you get a shock that says that the rates

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 6>aren't going down, I don't think it's going to bother

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 6>the market that much. But we're skewed towards opening the

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 6>floor for rates and seeing how far they can go down.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't see that many people talking about rate hikes anymore.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 6>It's only a few months ago that that was being

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 6>mentioned on shows like this.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, it seems like Stephen, this is no longer a

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 5>data dependent market, as you just laid out, at least

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>on a data point dependent market, just because people have

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 5>so many questions around the data. This is potentially a

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 5>market though that could be roiled by events, and you

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 5>mentioned some of them, including the IEPA ruling that could

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 5>come as soon as today. What kind of effect would

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 5>it have on the bond market if the tariffs passed

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 5>under the AEPA rule the United States were to be repealed,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 5>pushed back in any kind of way.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that kind of scenario is going to blow us

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 6>out of that six basis point range. And the question

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 6>is whether we would close still outside of the range,

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 6>or whether we'd still be outside of the range next week. Ultimately,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at whether there is a path I'm using

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 6>that word path again towards a fiscal number that is manageable.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is it possible that the deficit is within

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 6>a reasonable level. Now, of course, there could be some

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 6>disruption to the to the president's plans, and it's clear

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 6>there's a risk here. But you know, ultimately the bomb

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 6>market's going to clear. The auctions are going to get done.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 6>That there's a question about at what price and at

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 6>what cost? Because the bomb market is going to get done,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 6>I can assure you of that. The question is whether

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 6>it's going to come at the expense of some other

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 6>asset class.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but that's really the issue, right, See.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 5>When you keep talking about the six bass point gap,

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 5>and you're right. I mean, even when you look at

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 5>the move the forward imply volatility index in tenure treasury yields,

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 5>it's incredibly low. You aren't necessarily seeing much expectation for disruption.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that this is resiliency and our complacency?

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, that's a fair fair point too. Maybe we're

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 6>all just so beaten up and already exhausted with the shock.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 6>I'll I'll give you an anecdote on this. You're putting

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 6>together my most recent piece. Like many analysts, you tend

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 6>to go through it at the weekend. So I'm sitting

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 6>there on a Sunday looking at the text and thinking,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 6>oh no. With the newsflow last weekend over Venezuela, I

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 6>was thinking everything I've written here is irrelevant. But I

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 6>came in on Monday morning and I was still able.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 7>To publish it.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 4>How is that possible?

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 7>It just.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 6>How could I have been so wrong with my judgment

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 6>on the Sunday compared to the Monday. And I think

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 6>that most of us are experiencing the same thing. Anyone

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 6>who's involved in this market at the moment. So it

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 6>could be that we're complacent, but it could also be

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 6>with the fact that we're resigning ourselves to the reality

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 6>that rates aren't going up and they're probably going to

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 6>go down. So, as I said, I think the data

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 6>is consistent with dates going down towards where the forwards imply,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 6>and maybe less, and with some of the changes coming

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 6>at the FED, I would suggest that the balance is

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 6>tipping to rates going even lower.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot has already happened too.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 4>A lot has already happened.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>From Sunday, Stephen the President this week has really taken

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a focus on the housing market. Even if continues to

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>cut interest rates, Is that going to help the US

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>housing market?

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Will that help mortgage rates?

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Look so, so, what proportion is that money of the

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 6>total stock of mortgages?

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 4>It's not that high, is it.

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 6>I haven't run all of the all the numbers yet,

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 6>but we're talking about a few hundred billion in a

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 6>multi trillion market, So I don't know whether how much

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 6>of a game changer is Ultimately getting the ten year

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 6>rate down towards three rather than four would be one

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 6>of the best things that could be done. For the

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 6>housing market right now. So I guess the intervention that's

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 6>just happened is going to help, but I haven't run

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 6>the numbers yet. I don't know whether it's going to

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 6>have a major impact.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I actually mean, if the FED cuts interest rates, is

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that really going to meaningfully help the mortgage market?

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 6>Ah, thank you, thank you. I thought you were talking

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 6>referring to the intervention for Freddie and Fanny. Now, if

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 6>the short rate goes down another one hundred basis points,

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 6>the whole term structure is going to come down. The

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 6>ten year on current form isn't falling as much, but

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't mean to say it won't still go down.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 6>So depends what the delta is between the rate cuts

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 6>and the ten year I would I would suggest if

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 6>policy rates go towards two percent or even less than

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 6>you could imagine that tens are going to have a

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 6>three handle and probably low threes.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Fun of question, Steve, what's more likely year end the

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the tenure yield? Is it three percent? Or west Ham

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>is playing Premier League football?

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 6>That's a possible one to answer. Look, John, the based

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 6>on the fact that west Ham was seven points adrift,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 6>is pretty obvious. Where the probabilities lie there, but you

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 6>think things can change. It looks like a close call

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 6>between the two and I'm I'm not going to give

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 6>you an answer if you don't mind.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 2>premiss of JP Morgan looking for a cleaner read writing

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg consensus of seventy thousand clid and unemployment should

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>be the goldilocks market pricing of low hiring, low firing

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 2>can continue. Pray it joins us now for more prayer,

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Good monic morning.

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Can the right cuts continue?

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean if we get the Bloomber consensus, does the

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 8>FED cut in January? Probably not unless we get some big,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 8>much lower inflation. But look at the market pricing. Markets

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 8>not pricing for the FED to likely cut in in Jam.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 8>The market has the two cuts priced and for the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 8>rest of the year. I think that pricing can remain

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 8>because when we're looking at the totality of data, we're

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 8>still not seeing hiring.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 7>Nothing in the fiscal stimulation in.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 8>The one big Beautiful Bill is essentially saying that that

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 8>companies are going to start to increase hiring. Look at

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 8>this last week, look at all the headlines that we're

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 8>getting policy and certainty is still high.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 7>So if hiring stays.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 8>Low and inflation comes down, in our view, you know,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 8>you look at inflation across the board, whether it's shelter inflation,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 8>whether it's wage.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 7>Inflation, it's all heading lower.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 8>As inflation comes down, I think the Fed is going

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 8>to say, okay, can start to cut you know a

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 8>little bit more. I think it's the bar to cut

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 8>rates is higher. But we do think that the Fed

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 8>later this year is going to cut one or two

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 8>more times. So I think that market pricing of that

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 8>terminal rate stays. That's essentially what that tenure is essentially banking.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 2>On what is going to wake up this bond market,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>this very snowzy, range bound, sleepy treasury market.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 8>I think it's great. I mean, interst rate ball has

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 8>been extremely low. I think the President is focused on

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 8>the tenure. He's told us that before. I think what

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 8>can wake the volatility up would be essentially if we

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 8>get additional fiscal stimulus, not one big beautiful bill, if

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 8>you get tariff dividends.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 7>Now I'm not even.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 8>Sure post AIPA that the tariff revenues will be as high.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 8>We do think that AFP is struck down that the

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 8>President's going to, you know, essentially come up with APA

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 8>like Tariff's under a different name. But you know, if

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.239
<v Speaker 8>there's additional fiscal stimulus, yes, then rates can rise. All

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 8>those deficit hawks can come up. I think that's an opportunity.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 8>If you do get interest rates moving higher, any beast

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 8>in the curve we would look to fade. I think

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 8>the tenure in our base case three seventy five to

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 8>four and a quarter.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 7>I think that's the range we should expect for this year.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 8>If hiring continues to be low and firing starts to

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 8>pick up, I think that's the tail risk here. I

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 8>think the asymmetry in the bond market is rates are

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 8>going to go lower. I think that's what nobody's talking about.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 8>Remember last year, all the narratives around the deficit cell America,

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 8>that's all way behind us. I think now we have

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 8>to think about the tenure being in a narrow range

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 8>housing affordabilities of focus, and the risk is that if

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 8>actually we start to see the layoffs, then rates can

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 8>go lower.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 5>So you think the best part of the Yeald curve

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 5>right now is the tenure.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 8>We do like the five to ten year part of

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 8>the rate curve. I think the front end starts to

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 8>get really tricky. You have to have a clear view

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 8>on inflation in the next month, on the unemployment rate.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 8>But when you're looking at the five year tenure, I

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 8>think that's the part number one that impacts the housing market.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 8>That's the one that the President's focused on. That's the

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 8>one that prices in the feed to slowly get closer

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 8>to that three percent.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 7>And terminal rates.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's the one that we have more

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 8>conviction in that is likely to stay in a low range.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 8>And you know, I think that's what you own, particularly

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 8>if you own risk assets, if you own stocks, if

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 8>you own credit. Your biggest risk here is that the

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 8>economy actually struggles because there's so much complacency about those

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 8>goldilocks continuing.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 5>That makes sense to me, the hedge against some kind

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 5>of falling off a cliff of the economy or significant deterioration.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 5>What makes less sense to me is that the Fed

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 5>has room to cut rates because inflation is lower, and

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 5>that that will naturally bring the entire yield curve lower

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 5>because of the wealth effect, because this is going to

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 5>boost acid prices that much more, which will only encourage

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 5>people to spend that much more. You're going to see

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 5>inflation in some of these higher end items, which is

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 5>really what's been driving some of this.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how do you square that?

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 8>So I think the key shaped economy, the case shape

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 8>market continues.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 7>So to your point, spending.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 8>And you know, if people are getting a refund check,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 8>they're going to spend it. Acid price inflation can stay high.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 8>But what we're looking at what the Fed care is

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 8>about their dual mandate is PCE and full employment. That

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 8>PCE number can on inflation can continue to head lower

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 8>because that's a function of shelter inflation on how you

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 8>know housing, you know beyond housing housing x X housing

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 8>service inflation. Look at those numbers, they're slowly heading lower.

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 8>The tariff effect is going to go away from inflation

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 8>by the middle of this year.

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 7>So I think, you know, if you think about the

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 7>rate cuts.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 8>From the Fed, it was inflation in twenty twenty four,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 8>it was the unemployment rate in twenty twenty five. This year,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 8>you've got two parts through which the Fed can cut.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 8>There is that inflation pard as inflation heads lower, not

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 8>asset price inflation, but PCE, which the Fed cares about

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 8>as we get close to two, maybe it's two point five.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 8>The Fed will feel more confident in the hawks that

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 8>have been very vocal that inflation is above target. They're

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 8>going to then step back and say, okay, we can

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 8>maybe neutral is closer to three and not three and

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 8>a half. I think that's the debate we're going to

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 8>have all year.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 7>What's neutral?

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Create Your reaction to the President last night saying he's

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>giving special attention to the housing market and telling his

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>representatives to two hundred billion dollars of mortgage backed securities

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and home loans.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 7>I think it's great.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 8>Now we don't we don't need you know, just one

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 8>thing for housing. Housing is an extremely complicated issue.

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 7>If they need to.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 8>Fix housing, they need to fix the demand side, the

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 8>supply side. I was a little nervous if all we

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 8>were going to.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 7>Get was on the supply front.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 8>Now I think the President with this latest bit and

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 8>this does not need Congress. Now, the two hundred billion

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 8>is interesting. That's the amount that the agencies can buy

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 8>relative to the cap. That gap can also move high.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 8>I think once they do the two hundred the cap

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 8>can be moved by the FHFA.

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm word you brought that up because the cap

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is fourhund and fifty billion. They've already been accumulating billions,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so this puts us pretty much right at that cap.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But I spoke to a source last night and said, well,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury in Fahfa tried to lift the cap and

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they said no. So if this just ends at the

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and fifty billion, doesn't really.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Do much for the housing market.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think if it's four hund fifty it's two

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion of net demand. And if you think about

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 8>the mortgage market, the marginal buyer for mortgages is really

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 8>as a managers. It used to be the GSS pre

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 8>two thousand and eight. Some of us were around back then.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 8>I used to cover the agencies. Then it was the FED,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 8>then it was US banks, and now if you look

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 8>at it, the banks are saying after SVB.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 7>Well we're not going to touch this.

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 8>I think that's why the announcement announcement is interesting. You

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 8>bring a new marginal buyer in. Other investors that might

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 8>have stayed away will say, Okay, the government's behind this.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 8>The agencies have the ability to buy. I think we

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 8>can step in, but I will say, you know, you

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 8>ask about whether that's important.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 7>Mortgage spreads can compress.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 8>But ultimately, if we look at the mortgage rate, it's

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 8>the ten year that's the much bigger component.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 7>We have to keep the ten yere within that range.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 8>If the President's focused on housing affordability, to keep the

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.239
<v Speaker 8>ten year four percent three fifty to four, keep it

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 8>there and then get those mortgage spreads.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 7>We're talking ten basis points, so you know, I get excited.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 7>I'm a bond person.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 8>Every basis point is very important, but I mean to

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 8>get one hundred You're not getting one hundred basis points

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 8>in mortgage rates because of this, but it does help

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 8>keep vold and then get some mortgage spread tightening through.

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>This might just be the appetizer, not the main course.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Is the Federal Reserve going to come along for the line,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 2>along for the ride along new leadership?

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, so no, I don't think the Fed's going to

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 8>do Q. I mean there's talk around the FED doing Q. No,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 8>the FED is going to working.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Against this effort at the moment, aren't they.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, they are letting the portfolio run off. But I

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 8>think what the FED did in December, which was to

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 8>say that let's make sure the plumbing works. I think

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 8>that's important. They didn't let the repo market freeze up.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 8>So yes, they're letting mortgages run off. The GCS will

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 8>easily offset that. I think on the FED, what we

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 8>really want is a credible, independent FED. And I think

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 8>we don't know who the next FED chair is going

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 8>to be. But if you look at what the Fed's

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 8>done over the last few months, they have reasserted that

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 8>they're independent. This is a committee. The chair is important,

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 8>but it's one vote. I think the FED is doing

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if it was if that was an

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 8>intended reason for them to be as vocal, but they're

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 8>telling us that they can about their dual mandate. Irrespective

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 8>of the chair. I think they're doing their part. They're

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 8>keeping that term premium lower inflation risk premium. Look at

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 8>what's priced into the break even market, it's low. The

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 8>market's not concerned about freed independence rightly.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So this is the Bloomberg Survendans podcast, bringing you the

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 2>best in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can watch

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.