Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Shannon, Thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being well us Happy Monday. If there is
Speaker 1: such a thing, write down our toll free number. It's
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine four one, Seawan. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. I mean, every time
Speaker 1: Hunter speaks, I mean you just get so much wisdom
Speaker 1: how to make crack. Crack is not as dangerous as alcohol.
Speaker 1: Crack is not dirty. I mean you would think it's
Speaker 1: like taking vitamins the way he describes it, right, Linda,
Speaker 1: I mean that is that is pretty priceless.
Speaker 2: I can't get enough of that man, very very special man.
Speaker 1: So Hunters now made it clear not where I'm taking
Speaker 1: the show today, but just as a side note that
Speaker 1: he has no intention of going away quietly. I guess
Speaker 1: Republicans maybe can start demanding that he'd be prosecuted for
Speaker 1: tax evasion on his state income taxes, because his father's
Speaker 1: pardon only covers federal income taxes that he dodged, which
Speaker 1: Hunter reportedly paid back then to the generosity of his
Speaker 1: sugar brother Kevin Morris, according to reports, more supposedly quote
Speaker 1: loaned Hunter millions of dollars over the last number of years,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't appear to be any public information on
Speaker 1: whether Hunter has paid the state income taxes he owed,
Speaker 1: So if you check out Google's AI search has Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden paid his state income taxes? The answer is well.
Speaker 1: Recent reporting indicates that Hunter Biden has paid off his
Speaker 1: state income taxes. According to his legal team, the payments
Speaker 1: included penalties and interests. They were made in twenty twenty one. However,
Speaker 1: this does not shield him from the possibility of facing
Speaker 1: criminal charges related to those taxes. The federal back taxes
Speaker 1: were reportedly paid for by a third party identified by
Speaker 1: ABC News as the attorney confidant Kevin Morris. The fact
Speaker 1: that he paid the back taxes is a separate issue
Speaker 1: from whether he will be held criminally liable for new
Speaker 1: initially failing to pay them. That's why I tell everybody,
Speaker 1: pay your taxes, Just pay them. According to Google AI,
Speaker 1: even if Hunter has paid back to the state taxes
Speaker 1: he owed, he's still quote criminally liable for trying to
Speaker 1: evade those taxes in the first place. But just a
Speaker 1: side note, I digress. Let me start where we left
Speaker 1: off on Friday, because we have a ton of new
Speaker 1: developments as it relates to what is now becoming a
Speaker 1: cancer that is growing on Barack Obama's former administration and
Speaker 1: deep state operators. There's no other way to describe it.
Speaker 1: And it was interesting, and I'll get into more details
Speaker 1: about this team. Obama's now quietly trying to stop the
Speaker 1: American people from hearing about Russia Gate revelations. I'll get
Speaker 1: into more of that in a second. The CIA Director
Speaker 1: John Ratcliffe indicated yesterday that despite the statute of limitations
Speaker 1: on possible crimes committed by members of the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: former CIA director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper,
Speaker 1: I would argue, you have to include Comy in this
Speaker 1: because he signed the Paisa Warrens knowing that the dirty
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation dossier was garbage. Don't forget it was years
Speaker 1: later he finally told Lindsey Graham's committee, oh, knowing what
Speaker 1: I don't now, I never would have signed them using
Speaker 1: the dirty Russian disinformation dossier. But Ratcliffe was on with
Speaker 1: Maria Bartromo and he said, what hasn't come out yet
Speaker 1: and what's going to come out is the underlying intelligence
Speaker 1: that I have sent to the DOJ. And what that
Speaker 1: intelligence shows is that part of this was a Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan
Speaker 1: to be an accelerant to that fake Steele dossier, to
Speaker 1: those fake Russia collusion claims, by pouring oil on the
Speaker 1: fire and by amplifying the lie andaring the truth of
Speaker 1: what was what Hillary Clinton was up to. And Brandon
Speaker 1: testified to John Durham in August of twenty twenty. You
Speaker 1: also testified to the House Oversight Committee in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: and Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, and James Comy testified before the Senate
Speaker 1: Committee in September of twenty twenty. All of that is
Speaker 1: within the last five years, within the Statute of limitations.
Speaker 1: Much of that testimony is frankly completely inconsistent with what
Speaker 1: the underlying intelligence is showing. Let's go to John Ratcliffe
Speaker 1: from this weekend because I think it's extremely relevant in
Speaker 1: terms of where this ultimately may be headed. Now let
Speaker 1: me give a caveat here. I don't want to overpromise
Speaker 1: and underdeliver. We have been promised investigations in the past
Speaker 1: that end up fizzling out for some reason or another,
Speaker 1: or people give up. However, I do feel that this
Speaker 1: is real. With the declassification of Tulsa Gabbard and soon
Speaker 1: now the CIA, I think this is the biggest political
Speaker 1: scandal by far in the last one hundred years in
Speaker 1: this country. Here's what Rackliff said about Brennan, Comy, Hillary
Speaker 1: and others that they could face indictments and criminal prosecutions.
Speaker 1: And then he talks about the Durham Report and classified
Speaker 1: annex showing inconsistent testimony from Brennan, Clinton and co.
Speaker 2: Me me listen.
Speaker 3: So what I think I hear you saying is there
Speaker 3: is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions, accountability from
Speaker 3: those people who may have lied under oath, like John Brennan,
Speaker 3: James Comy, and perhaps Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 4: Well, that's why I've made the referrals that I have
Speaker 4: d and I Gabbert has made referrals, and why we're
Speaker 4: going to continue to share the intelligence that would support
Speaker 4: the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair
Speaker 4: and just bring fair and just claims against those who
Speaker 4: have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this
Speaker 4: stain on our country. What's going to come out is
Speaker 4: the underlying intelligence that I have spent the last few
Speaker 4: months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to
Speaker 4: the Department of Justice that will come out in the
Speaker 4: John Durham Report classified annex. And what that intelligence shows,
Speaker 4: Maria is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan,
Speaker 4: but part of it was an FBI plan to be
Speaker 4: an accelerant to that fake Steele dossier, to those fake
Speaker 4: Russia collusion claims, by pouring oil on the fire, by
Speaker 4: amplifying the lie and bearing the truth of what Hillary
Speaker 4: Clinton was up to. And you're right, Maria. John Brennan
Speaker 4: testified to John Durham in August of twenty twenty. He
Speaker 4: also testified to the House Oversight Committee in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 4: Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in twenty
Speaker 4: twenty two. James Comy testified before the Senate Committee in
Speaker 4: September twenty twenty. All of that's within the last five years,
Speaker 4: and much of that testimony is frankly completely inconsistent with
Speaker 4: what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified
Speaker 4: in the Durham an X.
Speaker 1: What that reflects, now, this is huge news for a
Speaker 1: variety of reasons, and that is that there is an
Speaker 1: active ongoing brand conspiracy investigation opened by Cash Ptel. You know,
Speaker 1: for example, everyone said this to Patrick bet David when
Speaker 1: I was on his podcast last week, When everyone like
Speaker 1: Russia's the judgment, I pull back, and I know that
Speaker 1: there is more to come quote vis A v Epstein,
Speaker 1: not the least of which is if we can get
Speaker 1: a hold of these grand jury transcripts, whatever just Lane
Speaker 1: Maxwell has to say could lead to specific names of
Speaker 1: people that were involved in it. The idea that they
Speaker 1: can't release ten thousand hours of kitty porn could not
Speaker 1: shock or surprise anybody, although maybe it was the expectation
Speaker 1: that when when they said they were going to go
Speaker 1: through it, that it would also be released and that
Speaker 1: somehow they' the cover. I don't think so. I don't
Speaker 1: want to overpromise, I don't want to underdeliver. I am
Speaker 1: just saying that what I have been told by all
Speaker 1: of my sources, in terms of everything that we are
Speaker 1: now discovering and all these declassifications and more to come,
Speaker 1: that it is the tip of the iceberg, and that
Speaker 1: this is exactly what the FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino
Speaker 1: was talking about. I'll never be the same after learning
Speaker 1: what I have learned. Eventually we are going to learn
Speaker 1: how deep this goes and the level at which people
Speaker 1: at the highest levels of our government were active and
Speaker 1: involved in undermining a president before he ever took office,
Speaker 1: and the same people active and involved, and these departments
Speaker 1: active and involved in undermining a president's chances at reelection
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, knowing and verifying the authenticity of Hunter's
Speaker 1: laptop and trying to prebunk what they knew would come
Speaker 1: out because Rudy Giuliani's attorney, Bob Costello, had a copy
Speaker 1: that they knew he would release at the right time,
Speaker 1: which he did in the New York Post story, and
Speaker 1: they had already prebunked it by meeting weekly with big
Speaker 1: social media companies, and the fact that they took raw
Speaker 1: intelligence from senior intelligence analysts and decided, well, we don't
Speaker 1: like what the real intelligence is saying, which was that
Speaker 1: Trump never had any collusion with Russia at all whatsoever,
Speaker 1: and decided to come up with another intelligent assessment report
Speaker 1: that was contradictory, and that senior intelligence analysts, career people,
Speaker 1: rank and file were screaming bloody murder. And there is
Speaker 1: a paper trail of such saying this is outrageous what
Speaker 1: you're doing, and they fought bitterly against it. And I
Speaker 1: think Tulsea Gabbert's release here the new materials described the
Speaker 1: role of the Obama administration in all of this, and
Speaker 1: Barack Obama purportedly himself. And it extends well beyond sabotaging
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen twenty seventeen presidential transition. Remember it was
Speaker 1: when they used the dirty Russian disinformation dossia.
Speaker 2: They were warned not to use it.
Speaker 1: They knew it was bogus from the get go, they
Speaker 1: were warned that it was political in nature from the
Speaker 1: get go. And Hillary's campaign later aided by top the
Speaker 1: top echelon of these three letter agencies, you know, the FBI, CIA,
Speaker 1: Director of National Intelligence, you know, giving this narrative that
Speaker 1: Trump had colluded. They knew damn well it wasn't true.
Speaker 1: The only collusion took place, if you want to make
Speaker 1: the case with Russia, was the Hillary Clinton bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian disinformation dossier. And now you have three
Speaker 1: years of Donald Trump's presidency marred, you know, with a
Speaker 1: special counsel Robert Muller finding no evidence of direct Trump
Speaker 1: putent collusion because it didn't exist, but his investigation sabotaged
Speaker 1: Trump's first term with never ending leaks, and it was
Speaker 1: all designed and the corrupt state run legacy medium mob
Speaker 1: and their involvement in all of this was deplorable and despicable.
Speaker 1: One report that came out this weekend Obama allies or
Speaker 1: hoping the American public never learns the details of all
Speaker 1: of this, citing anonymous sources in the former president's camp quote,
Speaker 1: the battle now is to play this even to make
Speaker 1: sure that thoughts don't start to creep into the mainstream audiences,
Speaker 1: according to a former Obama administration official. The same former
Speaker 1: Obama a told NBC they are counting on mainstream Republicans
Speaker 1: to listen to editorial boards and those in Congress who
Speaker 1: deemed the allegations against Obama's beyond the pal The only
Speaker 1: problem is the newly declassified documents, you know acrosse. The
Speaker 1: mainstream corrupt media, the people that won pull out surprises,
Speaker 1: but they were reporting on the Trump Russia collusion hoax
Speaker 1: that never happened, like the New York Times and the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. They didn't make any you know, front page
Speaker 1: news about the declassification. They were dead wrong. Do you
Speaker 1: think they want to admit they were dead wrong? You know,
Speaker 1: everything that they were saying was just the opposite. What
Speaker 1: they got from the intelligence community was just the opposite.
Speaker 1: Then they got all the warnings. Don't change the real
Speaker 1: assessment here, this is outrageous. We assessed that Russian and
Speaker 1: criminal actors did not impact recent US election results. That
Speaker 1: was in the Presidential Daily Briefing, you know, in December.
Speaker 1: This they knew that it didn't happen. Russian government affiliated
Speaker 1: actors most likely compromised in Illinois voter registration database. That's
Speaker 1: all that they had. They said it was highly unlikely
Speaker 1: the effort would have resulted in altering any state's official
Speaker 1: election result. And criminal activity also failed to reach the
Speaker 1: scale and sophistication necessary to change any election outcome. And
Speaker 1: the brief noted that the Office of Director of National
Speaker 1: Intelligence assessed they didn't like the result of career professionals,
Speaker 1: so they changed it. They altered it, They decided to
Speaker 1: manipulate it to come up with a phony narrative. And
Speaker 1: then the fifty one former intel officials four years later, oh,
Speaker 1: it has all the earmarkings of Russia disinformation.
Speaker 2: One of those fifty one people.
Speaker 1: Not one of them knew a damn thing about Hunter's laptop,
Speaker 1: nor did they examine anything involved in it. Why because
Speaker 1: they wanted Trump to lose. They wanted to give Joe
Speaker 1: a talking point going into a presidential debate. As we
Speaker 1: roll along, eight hundred and nine to point one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: this is so cut and dry, this is this is
Speaker 1: not complicated, not hard to figure out. The communications were
Speaker 1: very very clear in terms of, you know, after they
Speaker 1: found out the real intelligence, they corrupted it, they polluted it,
Speaker 1: they altered it to be exactly the opposite of what
Speaker 1: it was. And then they have this meeting in the
Speaker 1: White House including Clapper and Brennan and Susan Rice and
Speaker 1: John Kerry apparently was there. Loretta Lynch was there, Andrew
Speaker 1: McCabe was there, James call me especially, I think was there,
Speaker 1: and this meeting you know of by Fox Digital Reveal principle,
Speaker 1: agreed to recommend sanctioning certain members of the Russian military
Speaker 1: intelligence foreign Intelligence quin. There was no evidence of it,
Speaker 1: and then they decided to we'll just make up a
Speaker 1: new version of it. Do you understand how corrupt that
Speaker 1: is it was all a lie? You think these conspiracies
Speaker 1: can't exist. Now there's more to the anti Trump Russia
Speaker 1: Gate plot, and between Tulsi and John Ratcliffe, it's going
Speaker 1: to unravel.
Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, we like to take a second to
Speaker 4: hear the immortal Bob Grant's thoughts about the world today.
Speaker 1: Hey, ladies and gentlemen, is sick and it's getting sicker
Speaker 1: now back to the Sean Hannity Show. I was an
Speaker 1: understatement then, and it's getting even sicker. Eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one Shawn. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program twenty five to the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, If you want to save money not sacrifice service,
Speaker 1: you can. If you're with Verizon AT and T T Mobile,
Speaker 1: you are way over paying for wireless period end of sentence.
Speaker 1: Pure Talk they use the same exact cell tower as
Speaker 1: the same five G network. You get the same exact service.
Speaker 1: Average family saves over one thousand dollars a year. And
Speaker 1: Pure Talk you know what, they're not charging you for garbage.
Speaker 1: You'll get unlimited talk and text, plenty of data twenty
Speaker 1: five bucks a month. That's less than half the price
Speaker 1: of these big carriers. During a time when saving money
Speaker 1: really matters. It's never a bad time to save money.
Speaker 1: Let's be real here, and I'm a Pure Talk customer.
Speaker 1: What's your excuse? This is money in your pocket for
Speaker 1: the exact same service. The switch is simple, it's fast,
Speaker 1: it's easy. You dial pound two to fifty, you say
Speaker 1: the keyword save now.
Speaker 2: Do it now.
Speaker 1: You save an additional fifty percent off your first month
Speaker 1: and pound two fifty keywords save now, make the switch
Speaker 1: to Pure Talk Wireless by Americans for Americans Jonathan Turley.
Speaker 1: He said, the release of this declassified material, and there's
Speaker 1: a lot more to come, according to John Ratcliffe, has
Speaker 1: shed new light on the creation of this Russia collusion investigation,
Speaker 1: and many of the names are crushingly familiar. Indeed, Congress
Speaker 1: is moving to round up the usual suspects and lighten
Speaker 1: the new revelations. And he said, not surprisingly, the media,
Speaker 1: which spent years repeating the false narrative of Russia collusion claims,
Speaker 1: is now doing a full court press to kill the story.
Speaker 1: All they want to talk about is Epstein, Epstein, Epstein,
Speaker 1: and we are making progress on that point, according to you,
Speaker 1: with the trying to unseal the Grand jury testimony, which
Speaker 1: would be revealing is Lane Maxwell. Let's find out who
Speaker 1: you know what we'll learn from her too. But many
Speaker 1: previously secured contracts with thems DNC, they all got it wrong,
Speaker 1: and this is it. They lied, they pedaled conspiracy theories
Speaker 1: willingly with joy breathless hysterical coverage, and they have never retracted,
Speaker 1: they have never apologized. And with all this new information
Speaker 1: now all of a sudden, the medium mobs, the legacy
Speaker 1: media mob, which really, for all intent and purposes, is dead.
Speaker 1: They've lost all interest in Russia. Russia Russia, NBC, ABC, CBS.
Speaker 2: You know they do nightly newscasts.
Speaker 1: They did a whopping thirty seconds combined after years and
Speaker 1: years of abusively corrupt and biased coverage. Now they barely
Speaker 1: touch what director Gabbard has now actually revealed and how
Speaker 1: big this is getting. You know, the cable news networks MSDNCS,
Speaker 1: fake news CNN in the case of Fake New CNA,
Speaker 1: and they cut away from Tulsi making her announcement and
Speaker 1: all but said, oh this is this is not true.
Speaker 2: I mean, you can't make it up.
Speaker 1: And then of course the FBI, and if you look
Speaker 1: at them, they've launched their criminal investigation into all of
Speaker 1: these people. Jonathan Turley as a list of the people
Speaker 1: that should be you know, investigated, and the people that
Speaker 1: should be sweating. John Brennan arguably, he says, is the
Speaker 1: most at risk in these new disclosures, which appear to
Speaker 1: contradict his prior testimony before Congress. That's going to be
Speaker 1: a big deal. We'll get into this with Jason Chafitz.
Speaker 1: He was on the House Oversight Committee at the time.
Speaker 1: James Clapper, formerly of the DNI, under Obama, expecting the
Speaker 1: worst and is said to be lawyered up. Clapper was in,
Speaker 1: by the way, how interesting one works for MSDNC, the
Speaker 1: other works for fake news CNN, and you can't make
Speaker 1: that part up either. Clapper was in the briefing in
Speaker 1: July of twenty sixteen when Obama was told the Clinton
Speaker 1: was planning to create a Russian conspiracy narrative. In November
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, Clapper received an assessment from the intelligen community
Speaker 1: that Russia was probably not trying to influence the election
Speaker 1: by using cyber means. He also received talking points from
Speaker 1: the staff saying foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks
Speaker 1: on election infrastructure to alter the US presidential election. December ninth,
Speaker 1: another report stated that Russia and criminal actors did not
Speaker 1: impact the recent US election, and they didn't like that
Speaker 1: intelligent assessment. And then Clapper joining with Obama, Brennan, Rice,
Speaker 1: John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, James Comy, others in
Speaker 1: a meeting where they said, well, we'll do a new assessment,
Speaker 1: except this will contradict the real assessment. And James Comy,
Speaker 1: you know, he would use the contrived Hillary Clinton dirty
Speaker 1: bought and paid for mister higher honor, by the way,
Speaker 1: higher honor, my ass I'm going to believe in this
Speaker 1: for a second. Remember he used that dirty das signed
Speaker 1: three of the four applications. That's nine months. He was
Speaker 1: warned in August of twenty sixteen by Bruce Ord not.
Speaker 2: To use it. It was political in nature.
Speaker 1: They knew by December of twenty sixteen that it was debunked.
Speaker 1: They got rid of what's his name, am I six
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele. At the time Tomi was asked about the
Speaker 1: lack of evidence, Comy dismissed the question by saying, collusion
Speaker 1: is not a word I'm familiar with, you know, putting
Speaker 1: aside the lunacy of the statement. Comy then says, the
Speaker 1: question is whether Americans were in cohoots with foreign intelligence activities.
Speaker 1: In cohoots you know. He then denied knowing in April
Speaker 1: of twenty eighteen that the Clinton campaign had funded the report,
Speaker 1: and Comy routinely seemed unfamiliar with the terms or facts
Speaker 1: that contradicted his investigating of Trump even years later. Andrew McKay,
Speaker 1: but another one on Jonathan Turley's list, another fake news
Speaker 1: CNN contributor, fired after career Justice Department officials found that
Speaker 1: the former acting FBI director not only lied to investigators
Speaker 1: but deserved to be fired. The recommendation embraced by career
Speaker 1: officials in the Inspector General's Office. He's accused of lying
Speaker 1: four times, including twice under oath. McCabe makes appearances in
Speaker 1: the new disclosures he's not only President critical President critical meetings,
Speaker 1: but appears that McCabe was allegedly responsible for blocking Congressional
Speaker 1: investigators from interviewing FBI analysts who supported Brennan and drafters
Speaker 1: of the controversial ICA Intelligence Community assessment. That's the second one,
Speaker 1: not the real one. You know, those and other names.
Speaker 1: I mean it's it's getting interesting, but it that way,
Speaker 1: and I think there's a lot more to come, I
Speaker 1: really do.
Speaker 2: I think this is just a tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 1: We'll get into some good news later with Stephen Moore
Speaker 1: on the economy. It's pretty phenomenal what the President has
Speaker 1: been able to pull off in terms of these trade
Speaker 1: deals that everybody thought would never happen.
Speaker 2: Nobody thought this was going to happen.
Speaker 1: But if you look at now the number of countries,
Speaker 1: countries or were they saying, what did tacos stand for?
Speaker 1: And all these democrats are like eating tacos and I
Speaker 1: don't even remember what it was. But we have a timeline.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump now has trade deals in place with the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom, Vietnam, the big deal he announced last week,
Speaker 1: with Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, finally Australia for the first
Speaker 1: time since mad cow disease I think in two thousand
Speaker 1: and three are now going to import American beef. That's
Speaker 1: great for American ranchers. And now the European Union. I
Speaker 1: mean he announced this trade deal with the European Union.
Speaker 1: Now some Eurocrats France is now complaining of the French
Speaker 1: Prime ministers complaining the trade deal struck by the European
Speaker 1: Commissioner European Union as an act of submission by the
Speaker 1: European Union. Donald Trump, by the way, said he's considering
Speaker 1: rebate checks for Americans. But if you put together everything
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has been able to do and setting the
Speaker 1: foundation for massive economic growth, Howard Lutnik thinks it's fifteen trillion.
Speaker 1: I count eleven, maybe twelve trillion in committed monies for
Speaker 1: manufacturing in the next four years, including vital critical areas
Speaker 1: auto manufacturing, semiconductor chip manufacturing, rar earth metals and magnets
Speaker 1: which are critical for building our cars, etc. But also
Speaker 1: pharmaceuticals critical. Again, we've been dependent on foreign countries under
Speaker 1: this trade deal, which again I think is a massive
Speaker 1: win for President Trump. I mean, the amount of moneies
Speaker 1: that we're going to see come into this country are
Speaker 1: just incredibly high and massive and beneficial for American workers.
Speaker 1: All of this is real money, real manufacturing. Europe is
Speaker 1: committed to buying seven hundred and fifty billion in our energy,
Speaker 1: six hundred billion in new investments in the US. The
Speaker 1: EU is going to buy more US military equipment. That's
Speaker 1: on top of the equipment that will sell to NATO.
Speaker 1: Tariffs raves fifteen percent on most European goods European Union
Speaker 1: goods European pharmaceuticals not included, stealing aluminum stays of fifty
Speaker 1: percent in exchange. Trump agreed not to raise tariffs on
Speaker 1: the EU to thirty percent, and there'll be zero tariffs
Speaker 1: on all US goods deported to the European Union. It's
Speaker 1: about time Steve Moore, who will join us later in
Speaker 1: the program. By the way, America is the big winner
Speaker 1: in this Trump deal. Donald Trump's first six months in office.
Speaker 1: Now you include no tax on tips over time, the
Speaker 1: largest and cuts in history. You add to that all
Speaker 1: of the eleven twelve if lutnx right, fifteen trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in committed manufacturing in the country in the next four years.
Speaker 2: You add to that.
Speaker 1: I don't think you can come up with an actual
Speaker 1: number of you know, with all the President's policies on energy,
Speaker 1: I paying career jobs are going to be abundant. Europe
Speaker 1: agreed to replace Russia's oil and gas imports with American energy.
Speaker 2: That is huge.
Speaker 1: During the first six months in office, Donald Trump, wages
Speaker 1: adjusted for inflation have increased the most in sixty years,
Speaker 1: and remembered in June, it's the first month that we
Speaker 1: had where we had a net surplus in twenty plus years.
Speaker 1: And anyway, wages, real wages, remember Biden administration, real wages
Speaker 1: declined about two point five percent just in his first
Speaker 1: six months. Six months into his second term, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is delivering on his promise to create another middle class
Speaker 1: economic boom. New Treasury Department report reveals middle class blue
Speaker 1: collar workers are experiencing real wage gains not seen in
Speaker 1: nearly sixty years, averaging two percent direct reversal, outpacing the
Speaker 1: CPI Consumer Price Index by a full point over the
Speaker 1: same period. That translates to the most impressive half year
Speaker 1: real wage gain at the outset of a presidency since
Speaker 1: Richard Nixon, which is at zero point eight percent. You know,
Speaker 1: and that was almost six decades ago. In a star
Speaker 1: contrast from Biden's real wage decline by about two point
Speaker 1: five percent. Remember the cost of democracy paying high gas prices.
Speaker 1: Gas prices never got higher, never got as high nationally,
Speaker 1: on the average of three dollars a gallon during Trump's
Speaker 1: entire presidency. His first term, first three years, record low
Speaker 1: after record low unemployment, African Americans unemployment record after record,
Speaker 1: Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, women in the workplace, African American
Speaker 1: youth unemployment. But America clearly is the big winner here.
Speaker 1: One interesting study shows that the Democratic Party is now
Speaker 1: the party of the rich, defined by those earning more
Speaker 1: than two hundred and fifteen four hundred dollars per year.
Speaker 1: According to Pew Research, they had two point five percent
Speaker 1: of the electorate support when Obama ran in eight Now
Speaker 1: it's fifteen percentage points.
Speaker 2: What have I been saying?
Speaker 1: That the Republican Party is the party of working men
Speaker 1: and women and that the Democratic Party has become the
Speaker 1: party of woke radical communists, status Marxist elites. That's who
Speaker 1: they are. Its interesting. Steve morwill join us later. California,
Speaker 1: New York, New Jersey. Actually, if you want the bottom
Speaker 1: ten states that lost the most money domestically because people
Speaker 1: leaving their states, New York is one, California two, Illinois three,
Speaker 1: New Jersey four, Massachusetts five, Maryland six. If you look
Speaker 1: at the states that lost the most people domestically, California one,
Speaker 1: New York two, Illinois three, New Jersey four, Massachusetts five,
Speaker 1: Maryland number six you see some pattern emerging here, is
Speaker 1: that their policies are a disaster, and then grocery prices.
Speaker 1: Democrats put out that email last week. Oh yeah, and
Speaker 1: it turns out, oh it was under their watch when
Speaker 1: grocery prices went through the roof. It is these are
Speaker 1: you know, these are fundamental changes that the President fought
Speaker 1: for and got criticized for and criticized.
Speaker 2: For all the wrong reasons.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the tariffs that we were getting
Speaker 1: in this country is like seven billion dollars. Now it's
Speaker 1: been like thirty billion dollars, which is why June became
Speaker 1: the only month that we've ever had in the last
Speaker 1: twenty years with a budget surplus. By the way, ICE
Speaker 1: arrested over two hundred illegal alien sex offenders in Houston
Speaker 1: so far this year. Houston one city alone, one city,
Speaker 1: oh Thailand and Cambodia have now agreed to immediate unconditional
Speaker 1: cease fire beareus a President Trump? Now for Dan Bongino
Speaker 1: to say he shocked to his core over these recent
Speaker 1: corruption allegations with the deep state that don't have scared
Speaker 1: the living hell out of everybody anyway. So the president
Speaker 1: is trying to bring peace to the world and hopefully
Speaker 1: we can see that unfold. And a federal judge tossed
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's DJ lawsuit against sanctuary city policies. Oh, it
Speaker 1: was a Biden appointed judge, but that will be overturned too,
Speaker 1: because guess what.
Speaker 2: We do.
Speaker 1: You have a constitution. The Constitution is very clear about
Speaker 1: the supremacy clause, and that means that jurisdiction over sanctuary
Speaker 1: cities and state policies that would lie with the federal government,
Speaker 1: not with the radicals in these states. Period of an
Speaker 1: end of sentence. By the way, Democratic parties approval rating
Speaker 1: now at a thirty five year low. Go mom, Donnie,
Speaker 1: keep going Marxist. Mom, Donnie, you keep leading your party
Speaker 1: right right over the cliff and into the ground.