WEBVTT - Auto-Tune the TechStuff

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology with

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I am the tech editor here at how stuff works

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And sitting across from me, as he always does,

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>is senior writer Jonathan Strickland. And I would like to

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>rock and roll all night and party every day. Well,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can, thank you. Let's start off with a

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>little listener mail. This little listener mail comes from Charlie. Hey, Charlie,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sorry at a little unicorn moment there, says okay, you

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that video? All right, Charlie the unicorn. We're

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>watching it after this episode. Hi guys, I'm a big

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fan and longtime listener. I've been noticing a lot of

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>positions have been using something known as auto tune more

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>prominently than ever lately. How does this work? Is this

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a new technology? Keep up the great work, Charlie, so um.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Auto tune has been around for a while, as it

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>turns out, and another podcast covered this briefly, and it

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't high speed stuff. Although they do talk about autos

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and tuning. It was stuff from the B Sides, which

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>had an episode about auto tuning, but we were going

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to cover it as well. So auto tuning is also

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>known as pitch correction. Yes, it's when it's it's being

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>able to do digitally nudge a person's voice. So it's

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>closer to being on pitch um Now in the good

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>old days, and by the good old days, I mean

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the old in the old days, what you would do

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is you get a group of musicians in the studio

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and you would start recording tracks, and whenever the lead

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>vocalist would uh would flub a note, you would just

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>make a mark of that and you would do another take,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and you do another take, and you do another take,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and even for the ones that sounded good all the

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>way through, you would do extra takes and then you

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would cobble together the best sounding song from those multiple

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>takes using actual editing UH procedures. Yes um. Speaking as

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>someone who's gone through this process, I can tell you

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not not nearly as much fun as it sounds,

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't really sound like all that much fun.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And before digital techniques, we're talking about things like splicing

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sections of tape together with you know, a razor blade

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, splicing material, trying to get it

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so that you have one long, continuous take that is

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in tune right, and you have to be very careful

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure it's all matched up just right so

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can't detect the break beaus taking pains, taking work,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and before that, you're pretty much just stuck with whatever

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you got ding. Like if if if you were recording,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>especially on something like say, I don't know a wax cylinder,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't matter if you flubbed it. That was how

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna go out, warts and all all. But

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>But as as we began to get better at editing music,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>are standards started to go up, and we began to

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>refuse to listen to music that seemed to have uh

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some flaws, and that we the fewer the flaws, the

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>better in our opinion. Uh, in general, there's still people

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>out there who prefer the more genuine music, if you

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>want to call it that. I'm not going to get

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>into that argument, because, uh, there are those people who

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>love the super produced stuff, and they're the people who

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>love the strip down stuff. And I don't think anyone

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. Um, and you know, it's all a matter

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of personal opinion at any rate, So editing that was

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the only way you could really get rid of a

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>flubbed note. But then a fellow by the name of

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Harold Hildebrand, better known as Andy to his buddies, came

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>up with a special kind of software. It's this is

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, the oil industry's contribution to music.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>That is not the joke. It really is. Mr Hildebrand,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, before he got into the world

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of making musicians sound better than they really do, was

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a geophysicist. He created seismic data processing software, and this

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was a software that would sort of measure the the

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the seismic vibrations for oil companies to kind of get

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea of where the best oil deposits were, whether

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or not that were any oil deposits, that kind of thing,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's called auto correlation. Basically, once this sound

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>goes into the ground, the reflections based on the material

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>uh that is made up and you know, in the

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>area that they're using the the sound give them an

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of what the composition of of the earth is

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>underneath their feet essentially and can tell them where pockets

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of oil are stored, so it gives them a good

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of where to to drill. And he uh Andy

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Hildebrand made a lot of money, a whole lot of money,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>retired at forty Yeah and clear. Really the next step

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who creates that kind of software is finding

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a way to get people to sing better. Well, the

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>way I heard it, a friend challenged him, said, okay, fine,

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you're so smart, you're looking for something to do. Why

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't you fix it so I can sing better? And

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>so he did. Yeah. So this is using a method

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>called digital signal processing. And the idea here is that

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>every sound that you hear is is really due to

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>vibrations everything. Yes, every sound is something vibrating against something else,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually it becomes air molecules vibrating against one another,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and then the vibrations hit your ear and uh, and

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>your brain manages to uh to translate this into sound

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what we perceive as sound. So uh, the the notes

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that we hear are vibrations at particular frequencies, and in general,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the higher the frequency, actually not in general, the higher

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the frequency, the higher the sound, the pitch and the

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sound right, so um, let's see if I can find

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>then the information I actually wrote down what the different

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>divisions were. I think four hundred and forty vibrations per

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>second is an A note. That is correct, So that's

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>your basic A. So you're basically is four vibrations per second.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I'm sitting here with a musician, so I

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>expect you to correct me whenever and I get things wrong. Well,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I had a tuning fork, but I had forgotten we

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>were doing this today, so I left her to have them.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a shame that would have been coming. Alright,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So four and forty isn't a and then you can

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>if you increase that the vibrations per second, you then

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the notes go up. And uh so I actually, let's

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>say four vibrations per second would be a B note.

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Five and eighty seven vibrations per second or thereabouts would

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be a C note, which is not Shaving and haircut,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that's about these days. Never mind, I

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>can't tell I was about to out one of our

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one of our coworkers who did recently spend more than

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars on a haircut. But I will not

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>do that because this person will kill me anyway at

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>any rate. So, yes, the vibrations determine what the note is.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And so let's say that you're trying to sing an

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a note. Now, if you're trying to sing an a note,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is your vocal cords are vibrating to generate

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this and that's what's generating the sound. Right. So uh,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>most of us are not capable of holding an a

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>note perfectly, um, for any extended time. I mean we're

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna are are It's going to wander a little bit. Yes,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I I tend to Uh, I tend to sing a

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>little sharp, to be honest, Yeah, I tend. I tend

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to sing in a different key, but at any rate,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>so uh, or sometimes my wife prefers it if I

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sing in a different state. Um. But the so if

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you if you visual is each note with a line

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to the right. So let's say you know you

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have a B C yeah, and you have the lines

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to the right, uh, and you think of the person singing,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it tends to look kind of like a sign wave.

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it usually tends to hover around the note,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>unless the person is a terrible singer, in which case

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it may not be anywhere close to the note they're

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be singing generally, if you can never mind. Yeah,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see what you're see what I'm saying.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's say let's say I'm trying to sing an A,

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but I have terrible pitch and I'm tone deaf, and

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually singing what is closer to a B. Well,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I would argue even that someone who

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is a really good singer is going to waiver in

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>pitch somewhat because the vibration of your vocal chords depends

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot on how much air uh you're putting in,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you are running out of breath, yeah, it

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>tends to peter l your your attending. Yeah, the pitch

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of your voice is going to change. So so, I mean,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>even even the best singers are going to have this problem.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So what Hildebrand did was he decided to create some

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>software that could nudge this these these variations around a

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>note or sometimes you know, hitting the wrong note entirely

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and put them where they're supposed to be, so kind

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of smoothing out the peaks and valleys across the line

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so to to make it a more a more consistent note,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or to even shift it up or down the scale

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so that it hits the note it's supposed to be on. Now,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you can only do this a little bit within within

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of notes of where you're supposed to be

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>without its sounding artificial, right, And there's there's a lot

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of other little factors in there, because the the auto

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tune software gives you some control over how quickly the

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>pitch shifts up. But you can you can actually set

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the range, uh the key that you're supposed to be

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>singing in, so it can it can. It has some

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of what you're trying to do, so you can.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You can have an auto detect, like if if you

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>put on auto detect. Essentially, what the software does is

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it assumes whatever note you're singing closest to is the

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>note you wanted to sing. Yes, So if you are

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>at least a decent singer, the auto function of auto

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>tune should get you pretty much where you wanted to

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be in the first place, even if you were, you know,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a little off. You can also do it manually, however,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so let's say that that someone has hit just you know,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>just really misjudged it. They're singing the national anthem and

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when they get to uh uh the Land, you know,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Land of the Free, and they hit that high note,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just way off. Well, then you might need to

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>manually put it closer to the note it's supposed to

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>be on. So it doesn't sound terrible, right, it doesn't

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>work so well live, well it can not the manual. No, no, live,

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's auto. But now that that isn't that. One of

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that impressed me about the auto tune software

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>is that it can be used live. It could be

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>used in real time. Now granted that's when it's using

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the automatic feature, not the manual functure. As you were

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>pointing out, you are correct. Otherwise you would have like

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the highest paid sound engineer on the planet, like rapidly

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>switching the the pitch. So yeah, the software has this

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>very complex algorithm and it can it can. The cool

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>thing is it can it can adjust the pitch without

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>really affecting the tone of the voice. Now, this is

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot different from the old way of changing the pitch,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>which was just essentially playing it faster than you had before.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you're thinking like those three rodents of recent movie fame,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chipmunks. Yeah, alright, so we're going to give Liz

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a little challenge here. We're going to we're going to

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>speak in our normal tone of voice, but we're going

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to do so slowly so that Liz can speed it

0:11:49.960 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>up later from or of voluble statter speaking there anyway,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So by by speaking that up, Liz could could adjust

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the pitch of our voices. But of course that means that,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole tone sounds different and it's going

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>much faster than before. The neat thing about auto tune

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is it doesn't adjust the speed of the voice. It

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really affect the tone that much, unless again, you're

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to push it much further up or down the

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>scale than where it originally started. Um, so it makes

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it sound more natural. Now, this method has been in

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>use for years to just kind of tweak notes here

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and there. It wasn't really used as kind of an

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>artistic thing until more recently. Yes, Actually, I I'll never

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>forget the first time I heard Shares Believe and I thought,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>could anyone make a more annoying song than that? It

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>turns out yes, because I had not heard peanut butter

0:12:54.640 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>jelly time at that point. Peanut butter, yes. But uh,

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but but in in the case with Share, she actually

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>took a feature of the auto tune software that was

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>never really intended to be used as as a performance

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>thing and turned it into a performance And you remember

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>when you were talking about how you adjust the speed

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>when the pitch changes, she essentially switched that to zero. Yes,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a range that the software has between

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>zero and four hundred milliseconds, which is four tenths of

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a second. Especially and uh, you have the option that

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how long it takes for the pitch to shift

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to what it thinks it's supposed to be right, And

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and you may think, well, why would you want to

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>set that at four hundred? It makes it create a

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more natural sound, because we you know, we don't tend

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to sing notes perfect notes one right after the other,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>especially jumping around a lot, unless you're talking about like

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>uh an Aria by Mozart and which case, I mean,

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>those are amazing, but most of us can't sing those.

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Most of us, when we sing, we tend to slide

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit from one note to the next. And

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if you take that that sliding out, it suddenly sounds

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>robotic and unnatural. But if your share and you're creating

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this song. Believe that turns out to be the effect

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to go for in the first place. So

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you turned this thing that would normally be considered a

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>total a total mistake. You wouldn't want it to be

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in there because you wouldn't want people to detect that

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you had electronically altered your voice and turn it into

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a performance. And it ended up working out very well

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for her and got a lot of radio play and

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>slowly made me go crazy. Yeah, and of course then

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you had I wondered what did that now? Yeah, that

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a contributing factor. I can't lay all the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>blame and shares feet. No, but it's uh, but that

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>explains why her voice sounds like it is snapping from

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pitch to pitch without any kind of any kind of

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>glas Sando without any kind of you know, break glas

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Sando music theory coming in here, so you know. On

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, there are artists who have essentially

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>made their living off of this. That would be you

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>know Pain Yes, who not only made several songs featuring

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>auto tune, but also the was the name behind the

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>iPhone feature that allows people to download the the app

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>The t paining app and and do live auto tuning

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of their own voices, and he's unapologetic about about using

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the software. Um, it's a performance, it's it's like any

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>other tool. Now. Now, some people even argue that anyone

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>using auto tune is cheating. Yeah, and that's that's what

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the detractors say. But what he's doing with

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it is on purpose, So it's you know, he's like, no, no,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this is my Yeah, I intended to do that. That

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was the whole purpose of it, which I think that's

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>totally legitimate. I mean, it's just like taking a musical

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>instrument and playing in a way different than than the

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>way it was originally intended. That doesn't make it invalid.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It just means that you're innovative. Right, So the same

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.359
<v Speaker 1>thing I just like share, I think was truly innovative

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with that the way she she used auto tune. I may,

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I may hate the song, but I can't argue with

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it was innovative. I could have done without.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The seven fifty or so songs that I've heard since

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>then that are all using auto tune in that way

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is no longer innovative. It's just a different way of

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>performing and they think of it as cheating. Now, granted,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of artists have been using this, a lot of

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>producers have been using as It's very possible that some

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>artists don't even know it was used on their their

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>particular records. Um, they probably do, because suddenly they aren't

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>having to do a lot of uh retakes and overdubs.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>They're doing, you know, one or two takes per song

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and heading for home. And that's down on the amount

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of studio time that you need to spend, and you

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know that's expensive. And hilder Brand points out that auto

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>tune does not make you a singer. Um. Auto tune

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>can help correct pitch, it can help you be you

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>can help you sing on pitch, and it will help

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>help you sing the right notes. But if your vocal

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>tone is not a good pleasing vocal tone, such as mine,

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what my my singing tone is pretty terrible. Um, even

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>with auto tune, my singing is not gonna be great.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna be the right notes, which granted, is

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an improvement, but it's not gonna be something you're gonna think, Hey,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>this is who I want to be listening to on

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that five hour flight that I got coming up. Can

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you can you auto tune karaoke? You could, you could

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>do and yeah, why not? You could have a microphone

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>built in with the auto tune and you could you

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>could have it automatically auto tune your your your vocals.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>That's got cheating, I mean considered cheating. Yeah, well I

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>don't considering some of the people I've heard sing karaoke,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I be willing to entertain some cheating. And I know

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who have heard me sing karaoke would entertain

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>some eating. Um. And we were actually thinking at one

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>point of having Liz auto tune some of some of

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>us bits of bits of what we were doing here. Oh,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny. We I'm surprised we haven't mentioned

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>other phenomena that have used auto tune, not just in

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the music industry, you mean, like auto tune the news. Yeah,

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there's this great YouTube series where these guys have taken

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>news clips from you know, any like Usually it's about

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a week long period, but they take they take big

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>news clips and then they put it through auto tune

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and turned them into songs and they cut the news

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>clips up so that it makes it more Yeah, yeah,

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>so that you get phrases and things, and sometimes they'll

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have someone repeat something five or six times to make

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>it more like a song. They are absolutely hysterical videos.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>There's also I've seen the auto tuning of the baby crying.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The baby's crying, but they put it through auto tune.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing is that auto tune it is

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a software suite that you can purchase. But um but

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you can download a demo version and try it out

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for a while on your computer. It's only gonna last

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for a trial period, and then you are going to

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be prompted to purchase it. And then of course there's

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the app on the iPhone that you can get. Um,

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>so you can. That's that's considerably cheaper at yeah, yeah,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so but you can. You can play around with this

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff and uh and and kind of see, you know,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how how it is that the big names are able

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to get that really great produced sound on their tracks.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I would never have expected this to come from a

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>geologic technology. No. I I had real money on astrophysics,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but not geophysics. Maybe quantum physics. Maybe you know that's

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that's funny because technically it's called pitch quantization. Yeah, I

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I read through kind of now now, when when asked

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what sort of things go into his uh calculations,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Hildebrand said, and this is a direct quote out multiplications, additions,

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and a few divisions, but designed by an extensive theoretical

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>foundation and digital signal processing, encompassing the physical principles of

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>sound production, physics of hearing, disciplines of modeling, filtering, linear

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>systems theory, estimation theory, numerical analysis, calculus, music theory, and

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>other disciplines pretty much including the pretty much, yeah, pretty much,

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>it's right there, it's right there. Yeah. No, that was

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>a direct quote that wasn't a frequently asked questions section.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>He he actually seems to be a sort of a

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>humorous kind of guy. He did, well, I mean you

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have to after after and he specifically stated that he

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>had never intended anyone to use it in the way

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that t Pain and Share have used it and numerous

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>other people at this point, however, it was always meant

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of a behind the scenes, you no

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>way of just just tweaking a track, rather than an outright, uh,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cat is out of the bag kind

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I do think. Uh. This this has led

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to the rise of music that is maybe just a

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit too perfect for some people. So speaking of

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the people who are remember how we were saying some

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>people really like low fi, some people really like hi fi. Right,

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I've had people say that song is just too perfect

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for me. Well, they could always listen to me sing

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be cured of that right away. Amen. Um, so,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>do you have anything else to add for our discussion

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>on auto tuning? And not really? Um, it's just kind

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of uh, it's kind of funny. It's pretty much baked

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>into most studios at this point that that they have

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it there, but um, you know, it's it's pretty ubiquitous

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point, right. So, Um, here's where I'm gonna

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>throw it out there, and Liz, I'm gonna apologize to

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you because you're gonna have to hear this unfiltered. In fact,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to play it unfiltered once and auto

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>tuned once just to let people know how horribly I sing,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>go for it, all right, guys. This song, by the way,

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>has been in the public domain for about five years,

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to hear anything from you. Guys.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You know you should have warned me. I would you

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like to step out of the room. Um, alas, my love,

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you do me wrong to cast me off discourteously. Alas,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>my love, you do me wrong to cast me off discourteously.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>There we go. That's all I'm gonna do. I don't

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to hit you too hard. That's bad enough right there.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I could have done no never mind best copyright. So yeah,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that was written, by the way, by Henry the Eighth,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>by the grace of God, King of England and France,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Lord defender of the Faith and Lord of all Ireland. Um. Deceased,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes for quite some time. So anyway, hopefully it's better

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>than singing I'm Henry the Eighth. I am right. Hopefully

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Liz will be able to uh to auto tune that,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and if not, hopefully she'll be able to cut that out. Alright,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So that wraps this up on auto tune. I hope

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that answers your question, Jane. Uh. And now that leads

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>us to our second round of listener mail. Let's listen

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>mail comes from Nathan, and Nathan says, Hi, guys, I

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>was just wondering if you or anyone at your organization

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listens back to your podcast and can hear what sounds

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to me like an air conditioning hum in the background.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Would it be possible to edit that out? Look forward

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to hearing back from you. Cheers Nathan, Nathan, that could

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be one of many things that could be a fan.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It might be the fan, and might it might even

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>be the fan of my laptop, because you know, you know,

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I need that so that my computer does not overheat

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and shut down. And there's a refrigerator in the hallway.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>There's yeah, there is an air conditioning system. And here's

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing. We're dying in here. It is so hot

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in here. Please don't take our air conditioning away. And

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if I asked Liz to try and edit that out,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that would drive her crazy. So unfortunately, I

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think we're kind of stuck with what we have until

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we're we're renovating our our studio space.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what's gonna sound like when we're done. You know,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it only homes because it doesn't know the words. Very good, Chris,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>That is exactly right. So if you have any other questions,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>comments you'd like to criticize Chris for his joke, you

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>can write us tech stuff at how stuff works dot com.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Check out our blogs blogs dot how Stuff works dot com.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Check out the website itself, how stuff works dot com,

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>because it's awesome. It is, it's so yeah, it's a

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>great website, it's great resource. Um. Remember, we are no

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>longer doing tech stuff live while we are renovating our

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>studio space. So that's gonna last for probably about six weeks,

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna think about what we can do

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.239
<v Speaker 1>with that video series when we get back, because we're

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a little bit more flexibility than we did before.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So I feeling of you have any cool ideas of

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what you would like to see in a video series

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from tech stuff. Um, Like, for instance, you would say,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I would love for the video series of tech stuff

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to have the stuff you should know guys in it.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Right a tech stuff at how stuff works dot com

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and Chris and I will talk to you again really soon.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>For moral thiss and thousands of other topics, visit how

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com and be sure to check out

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the new tech stuff blog now on the how Stuff

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Works homepage, brought to you by the reinvented two thousand

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>twelve camera. It's ready, are you