WEBVTT - The State of Tech Journalism with Kylie Robison and Mike Isaac

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Alone media, nobody say anything weird.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Than me.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Ande, Welcome to Better Offline. This is the second

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>episode of Better Off Live, the life to tape show

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that I do whenever I travel, and I pick up

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>wonderful people like my good friend Mike Isaac from The

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, who joins me today, and of course

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Kylie Roberson, the one for Kylie Robison from The Verge.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Thank you both for coming, thanks for having me, Thank you.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>And today is and I'm definitely checking the date on

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>my phone Friday, the nineteenth of July. So nothing big

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>has happened today other than everything breaking. So for those

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of you listening, this is likely going to come out

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>after the CrowdStrike episode. I had to write the moment

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I got back from breakfast until the moment I left

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for this episode, and there will be a full explainer there.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do this, and again this will

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be after it. So I don't know why I'm even

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that we're in a weird time in the tech industry.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we are watching, at least I think,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the world. On some level. We're watching

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the institutional failures that are just creating more and more problems.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And then also we're watching open AI on the other side,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just like every two days, Like yeah, there's five levels

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of reasoning and we are on number one, which is

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>just a very annoying chat bot that sometimes those things,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and level two will be when it's a smart computer,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and then level five smartest computer of all time or

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>without like an actual product people really care about. It

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just feels strange. I feel weird right now, and I'm

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird anyway.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm just waiting for them to be useful. Does that

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>make sense or like, like I don't know, Like it

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>feels very I mean you tell me, like we're like

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 3>super steeped in it, but like it feels very like

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>everyone I have decided this is the thing we have

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>to build, or this is the thing we're moving towards,

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and like the utility of it almost comes later, like

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>they're sort of like ahead of themselves.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>A little strange.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised, but I'm also steeped in it, and I

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 4>try to get my friends to use it to see

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 4>if it's helpful. My civil engineer partner has started using

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 4>it for seismic projects, which is very very niche thing,

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 4>but obviously it's not accurate.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, orever, that's not ever. That's the thing though.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>They keep saying, well, it hallucinates now, but it won't

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And then you say why and they go, oh, sorry,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how even and they go, well, we will get to that.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah after right, answer this phone call in the other room.

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's like five miles down the road.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Because watching the last few years with the metaverse and

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Crypto and all this, this is kind of beginning to

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>look like I realized there's a product. No, but I

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>remember back in twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two, there

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>were these roadmaps you get. You get the roadmap for

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Border Yacht Club, and it would be like

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the first thing would be whatever they launched, and no,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a big investiment.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Please don't try. That's a joke. Just to be clear.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Times editorial part. If they do, it's my joke.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>You have these roadmaps, it would be like, yeah, step one,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>we released the apes. Step two, we will have a

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>special chat room for the apes. Step eight.

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Step one release the apes. Good you can swear, okay,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 2>just check.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a cuss fill podcast. You can say fucking

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>shit and all the words, okay, but on the rub

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and then step eight would be like a real life

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>club in Miami for apes, And I'm actually being serious

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that is on the roadmap, and they've promised this like

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>metaverse where you can play as your apes in the computer,

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of that seems more real than steps two

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>through five of the open AI reasoning thing. But it's

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>almost like to your point, it's like everyone is just

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>committed to this bit now.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like for me a lot of the time

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>and I'm thinking about it just feels like constant fomo

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>across the industry and like always keeping your eye on

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>like what your.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Competitors are doing.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>And like part of this I think may be legitimate

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>because of people are always like, oh, we missed the

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>smartphone right, or we missed like the next platform play

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that we shouldn't have and that's instructive and because Google

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>really cares about this, we should too. And like like

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>with with self driving, if you remember, like everyone was

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>all in on self driving cars and all these companies

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>spun up and they're all like falling out and it

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>just I don't know, like maybe there's some sort of

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 3>there's there is a logic to it, but to me,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>it just feels like a cart before the horse a

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of the time when when I'm trying to grasp

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 3>like what do we with generally do with gen Yeah,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>that's a good distinction, like jen AI versus like AI

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>being like because AI is not also like not a

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 3>new thing, right, Like it's not. You can't just speak

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>about it as like, Okay, this is just happening.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Me and Edward just talking about this about the generative distinction. Yeah,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I do kind of buy the hyphe

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. I guess I don't know it's good.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 5>Ed knows this.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 4>But did you guys see the lighter model. Do you

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>guys have some opinions about that.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have opinions that tell.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 5>Me, oh god, the lighter model is cheaper.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Uh. They say it's smarter, but technically it's supposed to

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 4>be you know, less computing power for cheaper, so people

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>can build whatever shit they want that they couldn't because

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 4>it was way more expensive with a larger and more

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 4>capable model. And you don't need to like build a

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>shitty little bot with like a giant model anyways, a

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 4>little model exactly.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I get the sense in that.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so but they did that because you know all

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 4>of these Mistral just released a lighter, tinier model, Anthropic

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>has a tiny model, Google has a tiny model, and

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>people developers are more likely to go to those models

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 4>whether I build something, and Chat did not have anything

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 4>of the sort.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So my biggest problem with that is everyone

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is racing to the bottom, and a race to the

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bottom is not traditionally something associated with good outcomes. And

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so it is good that it's cheap or whatever, but

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>also this company is still not profitable. This company is

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>still not particularly useful, and so you've got this situation

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>where everyone's like, well, on top of not being profitable

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and on top of not being super useful, we're also

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all having to make the thing cheaper. It is not profitable, yes,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just and also that will surely increase usage,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which will not fix the sustainability problem. It just feels

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like we're accelerating towards a wall in the tech industry

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and I feel a little bit crazy.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm really interested in that. I mean, there's the

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 4>was it six hundred billion dollar problem, right, yes.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the trillion dollar Goldman Sax problem.

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Yes, exactly.

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>It does feel that way that there it's just like,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>let's just keep dumping money into this thing that it's

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 4>it's not useful now, we hope it'll be useful in

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 4>the future.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. It all just feels kind of disingenuous as well,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're not even dumping six hundred million dollars into

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 1>AI because Google has had AI initiatives. In fact, Google

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>deliberately avoided the metaverse. Yeah, incredible one move by Sun

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Dar Well done, mate, But they've been piling money into

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>AI like over a decadic quite deep mind every time,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but like this is the one you put the money into,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like this is this is your king and it's just

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just artly confusing as well. But I also think

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it puts the tech media in this really weird position. Yeah,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>where I get and I'm not putting anyone on blust,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>including you. I get why people have to say humor this.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh I get it.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I get why people have to say, like, oh yeah,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the five magical layers of reasoning, even though the logic

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with that and by the way, for the listeners and

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just skipping over a thing you should I should have

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>told you about. There was a story that came out

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg and it was saying open AI now has

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>five levels of reason, of steps towards of artific intelligence

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>towards superintelligence, and step one is like chat bop. Step

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>two is like agents agents, and it's just very vague.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>In the story from Bloomberg was like completely flat faced.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>She's like, yep, this is perfectly reasonable. But the logic

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is it's like saying I'm a man and I'm on

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>step one of becoming Spider Man, right, And it's just

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I get why we have to mine Max Journey from

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Royer's sorry Max, well, actually Max Rocks he put he

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>put it to me quite well, and he was saying,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's open a eye is important, though we have to

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>cover them even and I mean, what are you gonna do?

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Just say this is bullshit and he's right. And Bloomberg

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>especially like and even like the Times as well. It's

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>not like your opinion writer, it's Kylie. You can get

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit into the opinion. And we talked about it

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>also in your GPT four, oh mini piece you even

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about the problems associated with there. But it's weird.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It's this weird situation where what happens if this is

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>all bullshit what happens now, and it's been like three

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>cycles of bullshit.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, crypto is instructive, I think there. But I totally

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>agree with you that it it sort.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Of becomes a self fulfilling or like it it becomes

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like weighty because of the attention it gets, and it

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>gets more attention because of that. I do think that

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 3>like there is a way of covering it, and hopefully

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>a way that media learned from a lot of the

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>bubble around crypto, A lot of the bubble around I

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>think self driving again is like another instructive case, just

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 3>because like everything was five years away for twenty years basically,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>and I I think it's like I think you're right.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we're stuck in like a dilemma of you

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>can't ignore it because more like all like half of

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 3>VC is going into AI right now. I literally like

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>those are the numbers, and so so you have to follow, Yeah,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>what was it an ass?

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I need to read my own pero, but.

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 3>I really don't read my own bo But but so

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you can't ignore the money. But at the same time,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think you can. You can at least introduce

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 3>a level of which I hope we're getting better at,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>which is like, Okay, this is like a thing. Everyone

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>thinks it's the thing, but like, can we please take

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the temperature down a little bit? And I do think

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that like Goldman, Sachs and Sequoya notes that you're referencing,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>which poor at least some cold water on it is

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>getting there is moving us towards that.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Sekoya one though, because he's just like, yeah, it's no

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>real problem being solved, super expensive and yeah, but you know,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's good.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just the way you gotta talk to your book.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a great bit in it as well where he

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying like, yeah, the new the new B one

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred processes man video that they're like twenty five percent better,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but only like twenty five percent more expensive. It's not

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like he's saying, look more efficient, because that's if video

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>came up with something which Jensen Wong is incapable of doing,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that was more power efficient rather than more powerful, that

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would actually be significant because look, I would hate to

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>do this. I would be so mad. I just want

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to be clear. If I'm wrong about generative AI, I

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>will look like such a bell end. I'm gonna look

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like the biggest twat in all the world. Everyone's gonna

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>laugh at me. I'm going to point you idiot, but

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not wrong, and I'll disappear if I am. But

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just all of these things keep coming out, and

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, because to your point, sure the media

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>got taken by crypto and the metaverse, I don't think

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not being taken. I think you two are you

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you guys? You're doing the right thing.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Because we're in front of Mike's.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>But also I wouldn't have brought you on here if

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like it that otherwise I would just be

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like in trouble, you fucking But it's it feels like

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the media is kind of flubbing it

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, because there is a level on buff you

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>do this whis good. There's a lack of context any

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of this shit, the sheer amount of money this costs,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>and the way that people look at the tech industry

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>outside of pech is souring so badly because of this,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of like politics. It's people are souring

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because the media, in the chasing objectivity becomes even more

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>subjective because when you don't subjectively apply reasoning to open AI,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, you end up in this weird situation where

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're actually just parroting their talking points.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh yeah.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 4>It's really important to have that distinction. And this is

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 4>a really good advice that I got from one of

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 4>my favorite podcast hosts, is that you should write about

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 4>You should write about what you're what they're doing today

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 4>and not what they're saying they're going to do later.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's a really important distinction and really

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 4>really hard because most of the conversations you're having with

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 4>them is stuff what you're going to be doing with

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 4>this technology, not really stuff we're doing today.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 5>Most of today's kind of.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Boring research safety mechanisms that they're deploying and very like

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>tiny tiny, tiny little steps to the large language model.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 4>But it's not like we're going to solve the climate

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 4>crisis and also destroy the climate and physics.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's it's wild.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like some of the problem around coverage and

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think everyone does this, but I think like

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 3>this is all happening at the same time the media

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is getting destroyed as and so like institutional knowledge goes

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>out the door a long time. Like I feel like

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just speaking for myself, I feel lucky that

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I've had a tech job for fourteen years or covering

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 3>tech for fourteen years, so like still like a drop

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 3>in the bucket as far as like the history of

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the valley, but like I've.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Been through a few of these cycles, so I can

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>at least.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 3>Rattle off shit that I know, like from whatever. And

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like when Google is no longer servicing news

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>in the same way it is, Facebook has pulled out

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>of news completely, like it's it's killing everyone, but the

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>like really big players and even the really big players

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 3>are getting hit.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's just like it's not there are

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 2>a few things going on there. I guess what I

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 2>would say, Do.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 5>We think that the Perplexity incident changed anything?

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So the Perplexity incident for listeners is.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's no I have.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have wonderful listeners who are not in the

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>tech indust trying to learn from me. Your mistake, not mine.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Perplexity AI. They're a company that lets

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you search using the power of AI. When they first

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>announced it was like ship this is Google's dinner being

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>eaten in front of them. Wow. And the latest thing

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they did was they do article summaries, which is just

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>otherwise known as stealing, and they ripped an entire Forbes

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>article I believe it was from and it was fantastic writer. Seriously,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like Forbes has got its problems with several fucking rocks.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>But tech tsk is great.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you have this thing where it would generate

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this story and just rip it off. And they ripped

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>off the Forbes story. And then when Forbes complained, John

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Pachowski is John and he just ripped them public and

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so Perplexity's answer was to add citations at the top

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to four or five places that had aggregated.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>The yeah story.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like, this is the thing. I do

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.479
<v Speaker 1>not understand why the tech media is not more antagonistic

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to these people, because fucking how, come on, man, don't

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>steal my shit. You've already been doing it. Yeah, And

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it feels at this point like some of the tech

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>media are kind of like trying to kick that football

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at Charlie Brown. Yeah, they won't screw us over this time,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And then they do and it's even worse than before.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know if it's like a level of

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 4>complacency though, it's just like, I don't know. It just

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 4>seems like people are so tired and everyone's getting fired

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 4>and things are We're so over, you know, we're so cooked.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 5>It's like it's like, what do we do ever been

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 5>so bad? So I feel like that's a bit of

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 5>it as well. At least that's what it feels like

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 5>to me, is people are like this sucks. I don't

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 5>know what to do.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Also, what's weird as well is everyone's acting like tech

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't fun anymore, and it isn't. When you look at

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what's in the tech media now there is. I'll send

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this to Max zep from tech Crunch. Lovely Fella used

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a Gizmodo. I was talking to him about

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this and it's like, take is this industry when you

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>look at it that combines the best of sports journalism,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>financial journalism, entertainment journalism, and gossip. There's all sorts of

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>weird freaks, strange little weirdos like Sam Altman in this

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>weird broken house. He's like, I don't know why my

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>house is so sharing, like ship into the yard a coyotes.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Samman is currently suing the people who

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sold him a house.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 5>In diligence on as well, because he.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Did no inspection and like a coyote took up residents

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in his backyard, bloody to his house. It's like, I

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I lost money as he drives like a

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar ugly assed car.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh yeah, I didn't even know. I've never even

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 3>heard of that car in my life. I mean, I

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>saw THEE.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying anyone should do this, but if someone

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>let out the tires, very funny.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>No comment.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not saying anyone should do it, but if

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it happened unrelated to me, especially legally speaking, take picture

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>easy better offline dot com, email me THEE.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 5>I did say he was busy this weekend, so that

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 5>makes sense.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah yeah, and it's it's definitely not just hanging

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out with my friend and drinking a bunch of beers.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, like that is great gossip journalism,

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that's just fun.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>She gives a shit.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Katen the Topless BI has done a really good job

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>at this as well, Like there's so much fun in

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this industry. I just bought this weird little thing called

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a GPD Win four and it's like a thousand dollars

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>little computer. It looks like a PlayStation VT. You can

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>run Windows on, it's playing Diablo four on it. That

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>shit's fun. And you've got this weird crap being made

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in China. Now we can't possibly touch it compossibly. Weve

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about Sam Mortman's magic broken API. Thing

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of sucks. And it's just I think that.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Tech journalists touch a lot of I mean, I think

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 4>that's like a narrow vision of what we're talking about.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 5>It's the most popular stuff.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if it's the most written about. Though.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we've gotten away from the time when

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the fun shit. Yeah when it talks,

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's like the money isn't there, and I think

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that that really is it. Like the money to your point,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to cover open AI to some extent because

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>even if they are building nothing, they're taking a lot

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of money to do so, and they're making potentially one

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar deals with Microsoft to build a supercomputer.

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But it feels like the funds just kind of got

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>like we're not enjoying I don't everyone I talked to

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>is kind of just like to your point, kind of

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>like tired, yeah, and everything so on fine, Like I

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>think the I would like it if open Ai actually

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>did what they claim they were doing. That would be interesting.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want jobs to go away, but I'd love

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>like the computer to be smart. I love my phone

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to work sometimes like intelligence Intelligence Tim cooked and he.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It was an episode, but it's just it's frustrating because

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>there is real joy and really interesting ship, like even

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Valley. But it feels like there's less journalists

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco these days. They still are here, but

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not as many. It's not like twenty fourteen twenty

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>fifteen when you had weird indie go go freaks and hackathons,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which is still happening. But they're not getting me attention.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what is I think.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't know the people in San Francisco. The journalists

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 4>I have like a twenty twenty five people deep group

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 4>chap just young tech journalists, well not all tech, but

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 4>journalists in San Francisco.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 3>People in one chat yeah whatever the sms or.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 5>Like wha, yeah, it's just a bunch of wack.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 5>But they exist.

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 4>I think they're still figuring it out and you know,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 4>but not to plug my own company. But it's the

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 4>reason I went to the Verge is because it's just like,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 4>will you pay me to write weird shit? And that's

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>all they do. I mean, they just did a bunch

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 4>of posts on Legos the other day, like.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 3>The yeah oh that I saw that ye yeah yeah.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I literally this morning and I work slack.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I sort of miss blogging, like it

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 3>was very it's very yeah.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 4>Posting just let me just let me say whatever, and

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 4>they do, like I can really just go at it

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 4>with any I love blogging. That's why I got into

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 4>tech reporting.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that is actually text salvation.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Hm, it's blogging.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Save the blog.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not serious, because it's the thing I wrote today,

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>which will become a script and you're gonna read it

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna hear it. You'd be like the

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>newsletter and the podcast was similar, and you fucking do

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an episode anyway. But writing that up and being able

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>to go at it, and I'd realize them in a

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>different position to you too. But it's like opinion journalism,

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>even just even if the opinion is I like it

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's good something some life all things digital when

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there and some great writers came out of There's a

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Beast and once again I'll apologize missread Ronny stories and

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>made a snarky tweet. You have my ass forever. You've

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>got to get give them wrong. But that's the thing.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>It feels like TECK has got so rigid and it's

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>turned into almost different aberrations of Bloomberg type things. But

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>then you occasionally get something out of the journal and

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that's very presient where it's like the training date ya one.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It just yeah, it doesn't feel like tech journalism is

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>given the freedom it needs to actually deal with the tech.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 5>Industry totally, totally.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 4>I haven't had that experience of writing analysis until I

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 4>came to The Verge, and it was kind of beaten

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 4>out of me in a sense, is that you're really

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 4>not supposed to have an opinion, and you're really supposed

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 4>to be, you know, just just very very neutral. And

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 4>then I found a lot of the people who follow

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 4>my work really liked when I said what I thought

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 4>about a specific topic, which is I know, silly and

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of a given for many people, but I think

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 4>it's it's valuable.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, did you come up in traditional orgs.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 5>I came.

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 4>I started at BI so that was I was a

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 4>software developer culture reporter. So it was like this software

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 4>developer built this project and they're doing this ye know.

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Which which was so fun.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 4>But then it was like scoop City, Peloton stuff, so

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 4>that's very you know, and then it just and then

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 4>I came to Fortune and then it was all Twitter

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Fortune Magazine, so it was all Twitter reporting the implosion

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>ex Twitter, and so then that wasn't so fun. I mean,

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 4>it was really fun as a journalist, and then the

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>audience is like, I'm really tired of hearing about this, honestly,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, now I get to do more of the

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 4>like analysis.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Just what sticks out to me is when you really

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>take a step back, this entire industry is just what

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>did Sam Oltman get up to you today? Oh my goodness?

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And he had a bit of that with what with

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>w w DC. You have people taking a photo of

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>him and then he did nothing, which is I love

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that Tim Cook humiliated him. I didn't see it that, no, no, no,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say anything about him. Sam Wilton was there

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and everyone was posting pictures of so yeah, and then

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>no mention of s going to get up, and says

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook, And there was a picture of Eddie Q

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>talking to Samueltman and he looked like he was kind

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of ripping him.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>It was great.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it was like a normal conversation, but I'd

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like to believe.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 6>It was like okay here and I said, sit at

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 6>the back, Samuel, I did I have heard more of

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 6>the It's actually really interesting because like there was this

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 6>period of like, let's I mean, this is in my head,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 6>but I feel like there was the like heyday of

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 6>tech where it was like guys and hoodies and everyone

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 6>was like, ooh, this is aspirational.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Then we went through like a correction of like more

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>accountability journalism and like everyone's going after X company or whatever,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and like I think that exists to some degree now

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 3>still in a big way. But I also feel like

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 3>there's maybe a push from some folks with the sentiment

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 3>that you're giving, which is like can we is there

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 3>like fun or interesting or aspirational things that we can

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 3>write about or think about again that we miss hearing about,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>which I've.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Been I've been thinking about a lot more.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's weird, like to like historically I feel

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>like I've done a lot more of the like critical stuff,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>but I like there are interesting things going on that

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe we could focus on. But it's also not like

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 3>an either or you know, like I still feel like

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 3>you can do both of those things. It's just figuring

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>out who can do that and who wants to do that,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe totally.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's advice that so both Kylie and I share

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the same mentor the wonderful Matt Weinberger. I see enough

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to this the guys sen say bloggers. And one of

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the things he said to me, and I'm sure he

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>said to you is people come to you for your voice.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's true, and it sucks because you have so

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>many people like you, Mike. I'm not saying anything's wrong

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>with the times, but it's not like your style comes

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>through there is.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like a house style. Yeah I have to sort

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of yeah.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But also an interesting fucking fellow and it doesn't get

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to come through. And Fard we need far haadback.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Mike's sweets for sure.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Far had He did the thing about men not washing

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>their asses, and I was like.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 3>God, that was a good If you've not heard of him,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>he is a writer, is a Slate.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>He's at the New York Times, and he would just

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his articles have just him going like

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the American Adrian chills, Yeah.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Adrian Childs, Yeah, guy who writes like I have a.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Urinal in my house and my guests are upset far

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>had did and kind of what Kate in the Topless

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is doing business inside it. And I swear to God

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that is where tech finds its salvation because all of

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this financialization of everything is just fucking boring. I'm sorry,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I will do I do my episodes about it, but

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm pissed off for many reasons at all times. But

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is cutting through the financial stuff

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, what's actually happening. Why did Google Search get worse?

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't because like the computer got unplugged. It's because

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of organizational issues. Why does that happen? It's a cultural issue.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the push of management. But it's when you incentivize

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>an entire assystem to growth. Goh blah blah blah blah.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's heard those rants. But the actual fund is the

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>weird ship being built. It doesn't have to be perfect.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>When I had Alex Krantz in the Verge on for

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>an episode the very first Better Off Live. She was

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about these gaming the same like the gpd wan

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for these weird gaming things, and she's like, it's kind

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of shit, but I love them. Yeah, I feel like

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that is tech to me more than anything. It's these weird,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>quirky things. Like the first gadget I ever really am

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is like a creative nomad CD player sized MP three players.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Wait, it was that huge chunky I had that too,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 3>because it was like a fat piece of shit.

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 2>But it could hold five thousand song.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's all good. Five thousand at the time is incredible.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Love that and it's weird.

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like tech doesn't have to be perfect, but it

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>has to do something. But the tech industry right now

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's not perfect, but it's also not good totally.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just we need to get back. We need crunch

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.239
<v Speaker 1>gear back crunch gear. Crunch gear was the tech they

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>did the gadget thing Neving called away. Legend met him

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in Canada about a month and a half ago. Legend

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>just why about any old ship and it's fun and

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I feel like I will say that Bloomberg

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to financial coverage, is actually excellent and

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>also Ed Ludlow is for Bloomberg TV. Surprisingly he is everywhere. Yeah,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's I feel like we lean less financial for journalism.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't no one's getting anything. It's all people. This

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is not putting anyone on blast his specifically, but no

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one's getting an actual scoop about open AI right now.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all the like real meaty stuff is kind of

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, I think they have a lot at

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 3>stake because everyone's sort of locked down and shut up because.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 5>It's and they're making a lot of money.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, Like why would they they talk shit when they're

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 3>gonna make it?

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 7>But open ai isn't know, but I think the verticals

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 7>the reason so I actually I think about this a

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 7>lot is like how can we how does coverage like

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 7>change or how can like big.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Companies or big institutions like mine or like whatever like

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 3>do that, And like a lot of it is down

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 3>to Okay, a business desk needs a beat reporter for X,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Y and Z companies because this is how you is

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 3>how you do it or this is how we do it,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>and like it's a business desk, so it has to

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 3>have like some form of financial angle. But at the

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 3>same time, like over the past few years, are we

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 3>doing more accountability stuff or does this have nothing to

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 3>do with the business, you know, And like a lot

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>of the times, it can feel very just sort of

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>confused to me, confused.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>On what the what is the mission here?

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Are we saying this is a bad business because it's

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 3>not making money? Are we saying it's a bad company

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 3>because it's bad for the world in X, Y or

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Z way, you know, And the stories kind of feel

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 3>schizophrenic or like at odds with one another, and like

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I don't know if that's a you

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 3>have to define that.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>And then like just also like I can just speak

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>with the times.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>It's like very like this is what a reporter is

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 3>versus an opinion person. And like coming from like blog land,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I have less I like blurring those lines a little

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 3>bit more. But I also work here, so it's one

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of those things, you know.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Fortune was very much like that, where it's a

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 4>very specific tone and we had discussed this before and

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>at the verge it really is. I mean, like I

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 4>just I barely get edited. It's just whatever I'm writing

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 4>at any given time.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Which is fun because it feels like a personal thing.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Misato, for example, she rucks why she

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>has been the one person getting se O right. Mea

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>open invite to the show. Fantastic look at Misto the Verge,

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because she is one of the only people who actually

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>got se O right, and she got it right like

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a year before everyone else, including myself totally Like she

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>whipped my ass on that one. I've had to site.

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It works so much, it's great. That's because of the

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>open remit of The Verge. Now I have my critiques

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of The Verge. You're not going to bring up to

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>day because next episode write me. But that kind of

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>open format reminds me of all things digital, which for

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners who didn't know it was like a kind of

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a predecessor to the Wall Street Journal's Tech desk. And

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Kara Swisher, who I will rip to ship on another episode,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good at mentorship though and team building.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Who's great a talent.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>She helped me a lot, and that's the thing, Like

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I go on Carrot a lot and I'll continue to

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do so come on the show, Carl, let's work this out.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>That would be great, Actually, I would love it.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>She not responded to my emails. I can't imagine why.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing she did was she can't let

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys go loose. And that's why you had like

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason Delray, who was one of the best e commerce reporters.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a fortune now Fantastic News. I didn't actually know that.

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And you, Mike, you got your start there, Jowski, I

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>believe as well.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Like Pat's great. I can't remember, no it.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Was, but you he was a plastic writer early, one

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the best mobile reporters. And also Kara Swisher was there.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And but what made that good was it was kind

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of messy. People just went at some ship and it

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was good. It was and it was actually at the

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>right time. It was not critical enough. But I don't

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think that that was. No one was critical at that time.

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right. I think that. I think that.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I so, yes, A, I think Kars was really good

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 3>at spot. I mean, just take myself out of it.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I think she was good at like she did this

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>recode later just like figure out who's hungry, who's like

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>not been around and jaded for long enough and wants

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to like hit it hard and then go back to

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 3>them and like fortunately I was twenty three at the time,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 3>so I had more energy than I do now, but

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>or no, twenty five. Fuck, I don't know, but maybe

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. But I that is I think about that

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot, just in the like actually Cope used to

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 3>tell me this a lot, which was he was like

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of places, you're asked to like do

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a story and then go get an analyst who can like, yeah,

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>put like pat quote in you know or whatever, and like, look,

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>there's there is they can say a thing that and

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>sometimes when I call these people they do give me

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 3>actually like good er original insights, but like you can

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>also just say what you think based on your expertise

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of the matter and like it like assuming you know

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>what you're talking about or whatever, just have done the

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 3>reporting in the background to get to a point where

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know where you're talking about. Like people respond to that,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I think Twitter has been like my

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 3>hack or work around for a long time until before

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 3>it like fucking broke. But like I think that, yeah,

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 3>that just sort of I'm trying to think of like

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 3>where that exists really now?

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean besides what you guys do all.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 5>Things decreated some like just monster reporters and to.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Hear that you guys got that kind of freedom really

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 4>early on, and like early in your career too, to

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 4>be like, dude, you know this, you spend all your

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 4>time working on this, like say what you think here

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 4>in Yeah, And I think.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>These conditions also created. And I'm not saying it's anyone

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the media's fault, because it's not the media's job

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop them running shitty companies. But I believe that

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that period where and it's like the really the late

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens where the media just kind of was like,

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we trust these guys, right, and then we couldn't like

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we like And I'm not even trying to be nihilistic

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>saying you can't trust the single te fun but I

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I wouldn't have trust Mark Zuckerberg. He's a

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>very damn looking guy as well. But trusting these companies

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake. But also when the whole industry was

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to be enthusiastic because it was fun. Mid twenty

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>tens were a lot of fun.

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I watched Silicon Valley recently, and Cara's on that.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 3>It really stands up by the way it's really good.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually disagree.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I thought it was so good.

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 5>It was shocking.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I watched it and all I could think, and this

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is because pr person I'll watch it went it feels

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like people only like it because it's like they're taking

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>me seriously. I'll take lunch disruptors in it.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>That real they did, Yeah they did.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 5>That's great.

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's the thing. I watched it, and I was

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just I think I was just an early cynic. Yeah,

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just like fresh off my first divorce, just like, fuck

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>these people, but it's my first. But also it's funny

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because things have soured so quickly that I don't think

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone's had time to adjust the irony ears. I think

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of to your points as well. The adjustment that

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was made to not trust these companies was to have

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>less opinion that a lack of object sorry, a lack

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of objectivity was what the problem was, when actually, I

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think we need more I think we need more people.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter Kafker over at Business Inside of former All Things Digital,

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he has had some of the most presient things and

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>business Insider. I can't believe I'm saying this. I do

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>work there occasionally has somehow got ahead of everyone with

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the discourse columns.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, totally good at that.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>But we need more. We need more of the verge.

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>We need more of this stuff. We need more four

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>o four.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 5>But four or four rocks, four or four rocks.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But also, come on, let the freaks out, let them

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>dogs out. You've got you got Cobler over there, you

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>got you got, you got coal, You've got all these

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people who can have just the most ass opinions.

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's also like this insane distrust in media as well.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Come on with it.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 4>So like if you've seen like you have an opinion,

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 4>or if you vote a certain way or anything, it's like, oh, well,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 4>they're just like a plant.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 5>I actually had someone ask me. I won't say who.

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you guys after the podcast, but who asked

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 4>me if I believe that there's like Chinese spies.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 5>And media, I'm not even kidding me.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Damn, you guys.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 5>Definitely know who this is. But anyways, I actually.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't have Actually, so.

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Anyways, there's like this crazy distrust.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 4>And so when I was coming onto the scene, I'm like, okay,

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 4>like I don't want anyone to think that I'm going

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 4>to Jesus Christ. But yeah, so I think it's really

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 4>banged into you at that point. It's just like, Okay,

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 4>everyone kind of hates us and doesn't trust us, Like,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 4>so why should we get to have an opinion?

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I do think there's some So I have to be

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 3>careful anyways, just because of where I work and because

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I will get a handslap if I go too far.

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 3>But like so I kind of know where my internal

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 3>line is, if that makes sense. But like there is

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 3>some element of strategy in holding back sometimes if it

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 3>makes If that makes sense.

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Like you have to say it.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 4>You can let the reader like show them, you know,

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 4>and let the reader have that opinions.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Just think that. Like, look, I think there's two ways.

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a few ways to go about just from a

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 3>reporting sense, Like I know reporters who are very outspoken

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 3>of their point of view, and that works as a

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 3>sourcing tactic, right, Like they'll be like, okay, people will

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 3>come to me because they really I'm not talking about

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the writing side. It's more like a like for me,

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 3>like just in reporting, I'm like, all right, I can

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 3>get a range of folks if I'm it's not really

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 3>fence sitting. But I just I I have thoughts that

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't always put out there, if that which makes sense,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 3>and I think it works to an extent, you know, like,

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>but also there's different strategies.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I know guys who are just like yeah and whatever.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 5>That's also a strategy.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, totally it is.

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>But also I don't get done Like it's not like

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you get random people from Google being like you should

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hear the ship. I'm like, great, what do I do

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with this?

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Use it? Man?

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I have with other people and went by the way,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if I send you a story and you don't pick

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it up. Some exceptions there, of course, I will remember

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about anyone in this room, just to

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>be clear. But the thing is, I think that there

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of a fallacy there, which is if

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't have an opinion, if you're objective, people are

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>still going to say you're not objective. They're still going

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to be like, well, reading between the lines here, what

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you think is like, no, I wrote this, I know

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>what I think, Well, why is it said this because

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of the editor? And they're like, well, so they are

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>also in the pocket of China or someone else. And

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>it's just it it almost feels like there's not enough

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>solidarity between the tech media writ large, but also on

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the editorial the higher editorial side. There's not really a

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>back the fucking or forever, right.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 3>I do think that putting each we all are very competitive,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and like, one thing that actually really bothers me is

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>when companies use this to their advantage and like play

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 3>us off of each other, and like plant they know

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 3>X Person's about to write this, so they're going to

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 3>go to why person and plant it, and or like god,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 3>there's one person who I won't name, who does this

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot and gets spun by a different company to

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 3>go after reporter stories, which is another great tactic that

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 3>companies use. But it's to your thing about like the

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 3>solidarity and press should be more of a thing.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, so if someone is doing that, honestly the best thing.

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know that no one would actually do this,

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>but I'm a gremlin, so I would. If I heard

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that happening, I would just tell everyone. But that would

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the way to stop that.

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 4>That's how it all works. I don't think it's just

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 4>it's not just one person.

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 5>It's how it all works.

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, yeah, the oppositional stuff. It's difficult. And I

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>think the part of the reason I brought you in

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>here was I kind of want the listeners to understan

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>than the chaos of this stuff and how multi lad

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the problems are at the media face in tech because

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's such a weird time and it's you've got tech

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:15.479
<v Speaker 1>crunch under new management. You've got fortune under basically old

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>business inside of people at time a fortune.

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Mink still owns fortune, right is that not even Jesus,

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>let's get you up to dig.

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's the listeners. This is important to know.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>These are lets are being built and.

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Sold owns time now.

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, did you too read the Time

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm doing air quotes listeners. Article about Ariana Huffington

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Ormond's new health.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I didn't read it, now. How is that he really.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Liked it, Charlie Warzaw, I haven't finished the article, but

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 4>he like lee paragraph.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Have you read his read up?

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I have?

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm sorry of your opinions. Yeah, I read like

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 4>the for two paragraphs. It feels like he rips them.

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, paper Machette thinking of But it's good article and

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>he also has a smart point about the belief and

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll include links. Don't worry listeners, Jesus Christ. But the

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>problem with that was was he was in front of

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman and asked him the limpest questions I've ever

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>heard in my fucking life. Charlie, go for the fucking throat,

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>choke him out. Maybe he likes it, don't know. But

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this article, which was a press release.

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Or something.

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dog shit, it was a joint written between Arianna

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Huffington and Sam Ortman and the secret version of chat GBT.

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>That's even worse, and it just sucked. And it was

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all of these made up things about how like AI

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare will into play, and it was a disappointing

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>moment for me in the media. Though Charlie did a

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>great job doing what he did, and there was a

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>guy at Slater also did a good job, but everyone

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>was just there was a bunch of other people just

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>reporting this thing, just blandly. And I don't think that

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.439
<v Speaker 1>people realize how terrible it is for trust with the media,

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>because what a normal person and I know, like I

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>put a past plint my hairdresser and shit, like I'm like,

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>look at shit. And it was like regular people like, yeah,

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this sounds fucking stupid. Yeah, But this whole financialization of

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the tech media, this whole situation where the money is

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of controlling things. Is just leading to this point

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>where these things are going past, and at some point

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I worry that we're going to have the equivalent of

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happened in politics. I say, this is someone who

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will stand to benefit if this happens, So I apologize

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to everyone. But the distrust in the media is going

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to come to tech, and I think, and we'll get

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>to it after the ad break coming up. The whole

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>thing with CrowdStrike, for example, Everyone's kind of reporting what's happened,

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>but not why, and I think the why is what

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>people really need. Right now. Everyone's seen years years of

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry kind of fall on its face and

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>break its dick off and look terrible everywhere, while also

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>being told these people are richer than ever while the

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>products get worse. And I feel like we need as

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the industry as the media industry, which I guess I'm

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of in right.

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 5>You're fully in it. You have a podcast.

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just I don't think people realize at some point

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a racist tech publication is going to pop up. Pirate

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Wires is not going to get be it because it's

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>so poorly written. Do not read it is so bad

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>unless you want to laugh, and also turn on ad blocker,

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't subscribe, don't give them any data. But at some

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>point this whole techno fascist movement into the whole techno optimist,

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which just means fascist when you're quoting Nick Lan, Fuck

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you andresen. But that's my opinion. I guess it just

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 1>feels like we're in this point where tech media needs

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to grow up, grow up, or just grow in a

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>better direction, because otherwise there is going to be a

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>competitor and it's going to be so much worse. I'm

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just worried. I'm just a bit worried about the consequences

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of trust in media. It's gonna happen.

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>When are we gonna do something.

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Very curious if they can You remember Andrews and Horwitz

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 3>put that put publication together, Yeah yeah, and then it

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 3>no one published because like they really realized that, Like

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, getting people to write is hard, getting them

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to like commit to do it and have like a

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 3>regular cadence on doing it, and like turn in your

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 3>copy is hard, and like I think they.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 5>Media is hard. Yeah, Like I think.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 3>They got ahead of their schemes on that. Like people

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>can riff or whatever, but like it's just I am

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 3>waiting to see what that looks like. And I think

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 3>that's why they bet so big on substack, because their

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 3>whole thing is like, all right, if we don't do

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 3>an in house thing, then maybe we'll get a legion

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 3>of people to do it on their own, and then

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 3>like they can sort of like aggregate that in like

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 3>however subtect does. But like, yeah, I'm I'm, I'm I'm

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:58.479
<v Speaker 3>wondering if it's like less an institutional publication and more

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 3>like random bloggers who everyone sort of subscribes to and

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 3>to your point, like just sort of like a fasci

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 3>version of what tech coverage would look like becomes more

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 3>of a thing.

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you a question. What is a podcast?

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Miserable little pile of secrets? But nevertheless, how about you

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have an ad break and we're back. We're back with

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Better Off Live episode two, which is like episode thirty

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two of this show, Good Lord, And of course today

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is the crowd strike situation, and there's an episode about it.

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to it, but this feels like to me,

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at least, we're not gonna get into the technicalities don't worry,

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>because I am certainly not prepared. Right with the crowd

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:54.839
<v Speaker 1>strikes situation, it feels like the beginning of something more

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>than the end. It feels like the final punishment of

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the move fast and break things generate. And my biggest worry,

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and I raised this in the newsletter, is how do

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>people think this is going to improve? Because so the

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>very basic level is an update that went through CrowdStrike

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that's in basically every Windows machine, especially the enterprise ones,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fucked everything up, did a massive kurdl panic and everything. Sure,

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>by the time I say this, there's already a tweet

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>out there that proves me wrong. But nevertheless, put it again.

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 2>On rad this is where we are.

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we're in a situation where organizations just

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fire and hire people so goddamn much that this has

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to happen again, Like there's something something like this is inevitable,

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>especially when you've got generative code, You've got more less

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>software engineers generating more code, and the people above and

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.959
<v Speaker 1>below them are being fired at random. It's the first

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>time I felt scared in this industry. And I moved

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to America in two thousand and eight.

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yeah, good time.

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what to do

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>with it. And also I mean other than the three

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand word news but it's I'm just a bit scared

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because it feels like every tech company is wrung just

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in this very messy way, like they're still in the

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>startup mode but also huge.

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it like I don't know the thing.

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this is naive, but like I often like think

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 3>about things in the window of what is it called

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Handlan's razor, which is like, don't attribute to malice, which

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 3>could be more often chalked up to stupidity or incompetence, right,

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 3>And like I feel like there to be clear, there

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 3>are very many bad people in the world doing bad things,

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 3>but like a lot of the time it's just like

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 3>dumb shit. Someone pushed like a thing to production instead

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 3>of the test code environment or whatever, and now you

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 3>took down half the fucking world.

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, So like I don't I don't know.

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that's like better or worse than

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 3>people maliciously doing things.

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm sound it, I don't think someone at

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>CrowdStrike was like, right, I'm gonna crash every window computer.

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Excellent bit that would be I mean a good bit. Yeah, yeah,

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just to see what I was doing a bit. No,

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the problem is Hanlan's razor here is

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that just tech companies like we must grow, we must grow,

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and if something breaks, will fix it. Right Mmm, totally,

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>except they don't seem to have fixed it yet still broken,

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>might still stuck at the airport.

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you flew in early, I guess, yeah, and I.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Was nearly delayed due to thunder in Vegas. I don't know.

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But also this feels like a situation where the tech

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>media is going to have trouble covering it because it's

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>so complex.

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I bout out early this morning.

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I no, I mean, I do think that's where tech reporters,

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 3>if they're super into it, can like shine. And I

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think cybersecurity reporting is like as much of a

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 3>specialty at mainstream publications. It's like like it's like random,

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Like the guy Brian Krebs is like his independent dude

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 3>who he used to work at the Post but now

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 3>he's just a hardcore security researcher guy who has his

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 3>own blog and everyone in the security industry trust him. Basically,

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 3>and like but yeah, like that, I mean, yeah, yes,

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 3>who's great Joe Cox, Joe is awesome. Uh So, like you,

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a version of this that could shine. But I

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 3>think you're I'm very curious. There are already like things

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 3>blaming well, actually you might have a different take on this.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 3>There are things that are blaming Microsoft that are uh

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 3>there was like a headline that was like Microsoft fucks

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 3>up the whole world or whatever, right right, and like,

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 3>technically it wasn't their fault, but your your position is

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 3>ultimately it is their.

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Fault, yes, because they Microsoft runs Windows. But also the

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>reason the CrowdStrike managed to fuck up so much is

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because Microsoft could have built this themselves and indeed have

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a competing product, a Falcon. There was a whole exlusive

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>explanation for that, but it kind of sucks, and they

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>were like, we could save money just giving it to

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this other giant public company who was only worth eighty

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>nine billion, and is both of their thoughts, but this

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is a situation where and what was it I was

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>reading the other day We just had him on the show,

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>an economist called Darren Usimoglu. I'm probably saying his name wrong.

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Mit just interviewed him. I should know it better by now,

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long day down but he said that

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>there should be criminal prosecution. CEOs will actually fully fucking agree. Yeah,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I know this sounds crazy, but if you break half

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the world's computers, you should go to fucking prison. Satcha

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in cuffs today, hot take to have sounds hit that

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm only fifty percent joking because if your direct decisions

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and neither I know both of you don't want to

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>touch this with.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.800
<v Speaker 2>A we can talk about it in an abstract.

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But also just giving it making it clear that I

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>can say the crazy shit. But it feels like that aren't.

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And Duron's argument is not put them all in chains.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>It's these consequences should exist.

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 5>And consequences should exist.

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the back of them is why these things keep happening. Because, Okay,

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>an FDC find that finds Facebook four billion dollars is

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>bad for the homogenous lump. That is meta, but it

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't like Mark Zuckerberg has any fear there.

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 4>And it was pretty good when he had apologized to

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 4>the families stood up in court.

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 5>But I don't think that's real consequence, you know.

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Slightly embarrassing for the man without feelings and it's it's

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just Sachy Nadella should have a criminal a criminal inquiry here.

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>There should be an actual Department of Justice investigation into this.

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>With both CrowdStrike and Microsoft, there will not be. I

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred percent of they might be a Senate

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing if we're lay. But it's all of these CEOs.

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>They operate in this weird kind of bubble where oh,

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a corporate thing. We don't get angry at people

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for corporate things. But if I went around because I

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.839
<v Speaker 1>was the Flash I assume, and smashed every like five

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand computers with a big crow bar, if they

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.239
<v Speaker 1>could catch me, but I'm the Flash, they couldn't. They

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would put me in jail. Have to be I don't know.

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the raft from Spider Man of mixing

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>up my Marvel and DC right now. But nevertheless, it's

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like this person who smashed a bunch of computers would

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>go to jail, but the person who's direct decision making

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was the reason that all of these computers went down,

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:30.479
<v Speaker 1>they're fine. And it's like, it feels like that needs

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to have there needs to be some regulation of this.

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But also where are the consequences. It's why Sam Altman's

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>accumulated all this power, it's why all of these Steve

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Jobs horrible man, but he the crimes he committed that. Well,

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the California DA came after him for welfare. That was

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a form of consequence, and it was extremely effective. He

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.479
<v Speaker 1>went from being a deadbeat father to a shitty one,

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 1>which is progress from mister Jobs. And it's just what

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much trundling towards is it doesn't feel anything's

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna change as a results of this, right.

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right.

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that the fines point is really important because

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I think they just price it into their budget.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, there was a great Times article about training

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 4>data and how these like meta executives in their boardroom were.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Like, we that was so good. I talk about it

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 5>all the time. These have you seen this?

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 4>I have not these meta executives in their boardroom or wherever.

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 4>They were like, we need training data and we don't

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 4>care if we breaked a law because we need to

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 4>be first.

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 5>And it's so explicit, like we don't care. It's priced in.

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 5>We need to be.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 4>First, and we don't care if we're stealing content, which

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 4>is crazy.

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And I will say this, that's where The Times did

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>their job the best.

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.280
<v Speaker 5>That was a really great article people, But the fact.

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't read it is my fault. But also that

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>should have been fucking CNBC TV every day. That should

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>have been a bigger story. The fact that these companies

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>can operate not just without concern for safety, but basically

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>being like, oh, it's not a fine, it's a fee.

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>M it's insane. But if Mark Zkapa could go to prison,

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I wouldn't lost a day.

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I do think a lot of the.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 3>I have frustrations just because of how I wonder how

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 3>deep you can go in a mainstream publication on pretty

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 3>technical stuff before losing people, and like even like i've uh,

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 3>I've been super interested in the open source debate, which is, like,

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, in short, just like should all the code

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 3>for these things.

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Be out there or not?

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Some people believe it's very dangerous, some people are I

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 3>think that's over exaggerating it.

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:41.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know which one is.

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Right, by the way, is why I've not done an

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>open source episode, right, I don't know, And.

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it's yeah, and like I find that whole

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 3>thing very interesting, and like I've been trying to write

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 3>about it a lot, but like I'm like, a lot

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:00.439
<v Speaker 3>of this ship is very dense and very and heart

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 3>not just for and there's no like actual answers to

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it and trying to like get that

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 3>out to a mainstream audience while saying, here's why it's important,

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 3>here's why you should care about it, here's why you

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 3>should read this article in the first place. I think

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 3>gets stopped a lot of the time compared to some

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 3>things that might be easier to grasp.

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 2>But I don't, you know, and that's not to insult

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the general public.

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just sort of like these things that require a

0:54:28.600 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of attention and reading just to like break into

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 3>where the argument starts.

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 4>I've been cut I don't know how many times from

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 4>writing articles because they're too technical or and a thing

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 4>I've had to do lately.

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Which is so funny.

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, okay, if it's really highly technical or just

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of a waste of space, like tokens, how much

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 4>does this model cost for input output tokens? And I

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 4>didn't include it in a Verge article recently, and the

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 4>comments were like, well, how much does it cost? I

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:57.440
<v Speaker 4>was like, God, durmit guys, so I replied, I was like,

0:54:57.480 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 4>I will add it next time, but like, who cares

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 4>about the tokens anyways.

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I actually see where the readers are coming from.

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 5>If they want it, I want to deliver it to them.

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But if they don't want it and it takes up

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 4>space in their mind and they can't comprehend the material,

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:12.920
<v Speaker 4>then it's not helpful. So like figuring that out for

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 4>readers can be hard well.

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So as someone went, like the average better offline and

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>listener is like most of their days taking up like

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>holding people up at gas stations, stealing Catholic converters stuff

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in that and these people, I'm so sorry. But what

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I've found is because my listeners are because of I

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>think iHeartRadio because of the way they is. I get

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who aren't the traditional listeners, and

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I do love them. And you don't steal Catholic converts

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>unless you do.

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 5>And shout out them.

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to the wrong.

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Uns are cadmium.

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>It's it's what I'm funny is that people actually want

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:57.760
<v Speaker 1>things explained more, even the technical stuff. Robert Evans, Surphie

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Lichten and wonderful people run calls. The all thing is

0:56:01.200 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to like break it down. Whatever you think is too simple,

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 1>go simpler. And I think people in the media for

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 1>good reason overestimate how difficult something is to get. And

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I because when you start explaining stuff and planning, it's

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>just like tokens, for example, very confusing and offuscated things.

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's just isn't it just one token? A word?

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, a character? So it is it's it is

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 4>very simple. But how many times do I explain that

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 4>per article? Every time? I'm like these you know, it's

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of a it's like algebra that you have to

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 4>do when you write so many of these articles. If

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the audience wants me to do it, that's you know,

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 4>that's what I told them. I will do it. But

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, something Weinberger told me is like, if

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 4>you can't explain it simply, then you don't understand it,

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 4>you know. And I think about that all the time

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:52.759
<v Speaker 4>because I feel like I see that all the time

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 4>with tech reporters. No shade is that like you're seeing

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 4>something really complicated, probably because you don't understand it. And

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 4>that's fine, but it's really it's really hard to break

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 4>these complex topics.

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Down early days of the newsletter. I'm just gonna admit

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that definitely happened.

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 5>I did that when I was a young reporter. I

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 5>still am a young reporter, but.

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Still still though it's and I think it's because it's

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just media is kind of hot and take. You do

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>actually have to understand a lot of shit. Y Yeah,

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like especially with the general Avai I said. And it's

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>funny because as much I bang on about people not

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it right, it is extremely annoying to explain yes.

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Every single time.

0:57:26.440 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 4>It feels like you have to include so much context

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 4>and it's like when is this helpful for the reader

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 4>and not kind of like X formerly Twitter all the

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 4>readers really please just stop saying formally, Twitter.

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Stop my epic based website, Please stop stop dead naming.

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like.

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It's it's very I think they're a different challenges.

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Like I'll explain it just in terms of like

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the Times challenge, which is like who are you trying

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 3>to reach? Who's reading this? Uh, what is the like

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:59.800
<v Speaker 3>format for what you're writing sort of thing? And like

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I I like to what you were saying, I definitely

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 3>don't I think readers are can be smart and curious

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 3>about what's happening in the world, and I don't think

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 3>treating them like idiots is the right way to go.

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's like, how do you present that

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in a way that doesn't either derail the story you're

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to tell or make your story three times longer

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 3>than it might need to be, or whatever, which I

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 3>think as like a tangent like length is often equated

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 3>with quality, which I don't think.

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Is always the case.

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh, I think in the media industry, like someone's like,

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 3>we dropped a five thousand word piece, and I'm like, eh,

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I think they could be like a two thousand word

0:58:40.600 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 3>piece throught that, but like, and that's not always a case,

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 3>but like, I just think that you can probably do

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 3>it in different like formats or different like story packaging

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 3>ways that that I don't know that and but it's

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 3>like a challenge for me constantly because I'm like, all right,

0:58:56.280 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 3>who am I talking to? Am I talking to someone

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 3>in New York who is never used a computer? Or

0:59:02.480 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 3>am I talking to like someone in the valley who's like,

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 3>don't explain this to me for the fifteenth time, And

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It's every time I don't explain something, one of the

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 1>listeners I assume, in between holding a knife to a

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 1>granny is will be like, you didn't explain that clearly enough,

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And actually I like that. I like explaining it because

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 1>also this whole thing about like word counts, I do

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>not have that problem with my newsletter. I put on

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>even thousand words.

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Just like just like completely go at it.

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just fuck it. But also people get so.

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Angry when they're like Jesus christad in all.

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>The funniest one was I did like a four thousand

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>word one and someone sent me an email being like, yeah,

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that was too long, And the next one was eleven

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand words and.

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Relationship your audio, I know.

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He was planning to bomb.

0:59:59.400 --> 1:00:03.320
<v Speaker 5>A bank, like thousand words quickly.

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this helpd me up.

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Your general if a I think was a great soundtrack

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to me chasing a man down the street with a hatshit.

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry.

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 8>I know you guys on all criminals, just a large majority.

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 8>Maybe it's funny because you've really crystalized the problem here,

1:00:20.480 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 8>which is what the fuck does the tech media actually do?

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Like what is the actual job here? And it doesn't

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>even feel like the various bulkanized outlets.

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 5>No, can I say what I think it is? I

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 5>don't know.

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 4>I am the most junior person in this room. Let

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 4>me say extremely good thank you. But I think you

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 4>do more work than I do, so you guys, But

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I think like what I want to do is bring

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 4>information that they want or didn't have, like love a

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 4>good scoop, Like, look, I'm giving you information you've never seen,

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 4>and I want to give it to you in a

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.919
<v Speaker 4>way that's like that's helping you understand the world better.

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of why I joined The Verge too,

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:59.920
<v Speaker 4>because they had like crazy multimedia team and I really,

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>I really love podcasts because it's an easy way for

1:01:02.760 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 4>me to consume stuff. And I think there's a younger

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 4>generation who is not consuming stuff like you know, five

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 4>thousand words. So like, however, you can get that information

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:14.120
<v Speaker 4>to people to help them, you know, whether it's podcasts

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:17.479
<v Speaker 4>or you know, newsletters, any of that, I think that's

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 4>our job.

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, look on oh, I.

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Was like, I fully agree. I think the thing that

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I really enjoy too is just like it makes me

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>feel good when someone who may be like intelligent but

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>unfamiliar with a topic came away from a piece that

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I wrote and says that was interesting.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I probably wouldn't have read about that before.

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>But like now, I like, even if I don't dig

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it into it anymore, I enjoyed reading about that. Yeah,

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, and like that's ideal for me, just in

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>some form of like why are we doing this?

1:01:54.720 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Why are we doing this?

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:01:56.360 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think it can be really corroded by so

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>many things, money and egos and like any other business,

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>And that's what I think we see, like kind of

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>that pressure at the top for a lot of us

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.479
<v Speaker 4>journalists and maybe why they're really tired. But I think,

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, the best journalists really just want to do

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 4>their job for the reader the best that they can.

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's not but it's not easy, and we're tired.

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We need more fucking nerds.

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 5>We do need more nerds.

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:22.439
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that.

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We need more little goblin freaks like myself like that.

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And it's enough about my festival for nerding out

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 9>on this stuff is good, Like it's just like you

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 9>understand the topic, you want to get in the weeds

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:39.440
<v Speaker 9>of it.

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a good thing.

1:02:40.320 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But also a list that is in between brewing poisons,

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they love it though, and the crimes explained of your audience. No,

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but in no serious my non criminal listeners and indeeds

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the criminals. They like the fact that so

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>my last Step episode that went out and it's a

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>weird timeline when I'm recording this. But the episode that

1:03:04.640 --> 1:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I think really changed my show was did you read

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this paper? Chat GBT is bullshit?

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:09.439
<v Speaker 5>Now?

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It s there's this paper by these three academics in

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Glasgow called chat gbt's bullshit? But it's based on the

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Frank thirty and definition from on bullshit defined bullshits. Oh

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember that, and so I cannot remember what the

1:03:22.520 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>definition is. Just bullshitting myself, I guess. And I get

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on the call thinking this is going to be like

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three starchy academics and they're cracking beers and they're having

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a good time and we had the funniest chat for

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>an hour and I came out there being like, it's

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the best episodes ever. But also I think

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>people want more of that. In take, everyone knows the

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Opening Eye is fucking everything up. Everyone's going to know

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about the crowd strike situation. Everyone's going to know all

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of these things, and they're all dominated by bad news,

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>good news, weird news. But we need to get back.

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>We need to get back to talking about the weird

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>shit again because of me earlier stuff Kylie. In business

1:04:01.800 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you were talking to weird random device.

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I loved it so much.

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I went into weird communities. And I think the tech

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>right now is saturated by stories about everything and everyone

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for good reason. By the way, just with sympathy here

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there is everyone wants it, everyone wants the traffic. You

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have to write, Kylie about the jupt for Minie like

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>h Everyone has to cover these things because it's your beat,

1:04:26.320 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's getting in the way of the weird fun shit.

1:04:29.920 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I ran a pr from at day job and

1:04:32.200 --> 1:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I write like eighteen thousand letter words I don't know,

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>can't speak newsletters every week. I should not be the

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one finding the weird shit and talking to them. I am, though,

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm paid to. But I just feel like there's

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so much magic in this industry. There's so much like

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as doom and gloom as I can be on this show.

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>The joy of sending a weird picture of some dumb

1:04:53.360 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>shit I found on Twitter to someone on someone yesterday,

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it was this picture of doctor Robotnik in a forklift

1:05:01.360 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it said, you're too late, Sonic. I'm for Forklift certified,

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and that made my day. It's still magic to the Internet,

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's still fun and people are fucking mad about

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, but they're still such good in there. People

1:05:15.320 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are always saying, in between reading the Unibomber's manifesto, my

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>listeners will say I got something there. I don't know

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if I want to know, but in between various crimes,

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna summarize that. My listeners, they also will say

1:05:37.760 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I want something positive, and then I respond, I'm sorry,

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to find you download another podcast. I'd say

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>download it all in.

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>But too far, too far.

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason Jason calacanis very damp anyway, dampness aside. The positivity

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is that and I myself have found myself falling into

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this kind of I don't want to say doomerism because

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a fucking stupid term, but the doom

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and gloom that everything, and we do need to cover

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies messing up. But I think what the problem

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is and where my anger comes from, and I think

1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll share this is all of the bad stuff's getting

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in a way of some really funny shit TikTok and

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this needless cinophobia. But like, yeah, it's like

1:06:23.720 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got to ban TikTok because they're stealing data. They're

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like using data with our our users. We only let

1:06:29.480 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>American companies do.

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>That, right.

1:06:32.160 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok has given birth to some of the funniest and

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sweetest posts. There is a growing community of zoos on

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Instagram, whereas just they put like a camera

1:06:41.240 --> 1:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on a spoon and I feel like worms to and

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like there is still magic, there's still joy within

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this industry. And I think that the return to blogging

1:06:53.040 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that I am so sivorously suggesting and the wider head

1:06:56.880 --> 1:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>zychron empire that I dream of one day is genuinely

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>like a return to this, a return to this kind

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of not seeing the movie. It's a return to this

1:07:07.160 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>thing where we kind of need to stop mining this

1:07:09.680 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>shit again. We need to get back to finding the

1:07:12.280 --> 1:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quirky little startups that might die but they're doing something interesting. Yeah,

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the weird I think less the meme stuff. I do

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think people who just cover memes all day should get

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>real job. Sorry, Uh, someone's gonna be angry at that.

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but like there's about Internet culture and

1:07:27.320 --> 1:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more just about the things being built there the course,

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you've still got a shit ton of

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>open source software people who are just like. One of

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my early joys in tech was PlayStation portable and the

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation Vita and the homebrew communities on them. Ray Wong,

1:07:44.080 --> 1:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>formerly of Imbers got laidoffs. Bullshit. Ray Wong's great. He

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was talking to me the other day about the PlayStation

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>portaborn hacking that thing. It was so much fun, the

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier iPhones with Sita, the helm brewing community, and I

1:07:57.840 --> 1:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>remember g O Hot has now become a very weird guy.

1:08:00.440 --> 1:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was before. Oh he did like an

1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>autonomous cast start up. Okay, but these, I feel like

1:08:07.360 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are the more worthy stories than everyone pursuing the same thing.

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And I again, you're in a weird position.

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>I get No, I do think that there's an element

1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of I mean, honestly, there's corollaries and tech of like

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>oh this person dropped this story or like this is

1:08:23.240 --> 1:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Twitter and media probably played into it for

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>a while, but like I heard mentality, mentality around what

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>people should be caring about or writing about, and like

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:38.519
<v Speaker 3>that actually like even though I have a I guess

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I have a beat, but also like I get away

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:42.040
<v Speaker 3>with pitching a lot of non beat stuff.

1:08:42.080 --> 1:08:45.519
<v Speaker 2>But I think the the thing that.

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that keeps it interesting for me, but also I

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>think can probably help just my job and maybe my

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:56.599
<v Speaker 3>career is like trying to zag when other people are

1:08:56.640 --> 1:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>going after zigging or whatever line it's very is that,

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:07.120
<v Speaker 3>oh god, I sound awful, really like genuinely watch where

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone's going and then like go pursue not just for

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the sake of it, but because there's something interesting there,

1:09:13.280 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, And like I think that can really it

1:09:17.439 --> 1:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>can distinguish you just from a career perspective, but also

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:23.519
<v Speaker 3>just like find like shit that's different, because people get

1:09:23.640 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 3>tired of like reading the same yeah, the same article

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>from five different publications that are saying the same thing.

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:30.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, totally.

1:09:31.000 --> 1:09:34.040
<v Speaker 4>The reason I know ed and Weinberger shout out is

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 4>because I tweeted when I was in college I want

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.640
<v Speaker 4>to read about weird software developer culture shit, and then

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:41.519
<v Speaker 4>he hired me that way, and then that's when I

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 4>wrote a bunch of I wrote a bunch of weird shit.

1:09:44.920 --> 1:09:49.080
<v Speaker 5>I wrote about furries. That was awesome. Yeah, I love

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 5>those like niche communities.

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh my first article, one of my first articles was

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:55.960
<v Speaker 4>about tech talk. So it was just like all of

1:09:56.000 --> 1:10:00.679
<v Speaker 4>these technologists. It was a bunch of develop helpers who

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:04.360
<v Speaker 4>like software developers who make informational or like parody tiktoks

1:10:04.400 --> 1:10:07.760
<v Speaker 4>about software development. It was very tech talk, Yes, tech

1:10:07.800 --> 1:10:10.519
<v Speaker 4>talk like TikTok. It was actually in my pitch like

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:14.879
<v Speaker 4>when I was my my exam. When you get hired. Anyways,

1:10:15.040 --> 1:10:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Uh yeah, I think that's really important to find those

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:18.480
<v Speaker 4>like fun stories.

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, and like I, I, I imagine everyone in this

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:26.719
<v Speaker 3>room and maybe if you are really into caring about tech,

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:30.679
<v Speaker 3>probably there was probably at least some time and maybe

1:10:30.720 --> 1:10:33.439
<v Speaker 3>still now like where you enjoyed being a part of

1:10:33.479 --> 1:10:36.439
<v Speaker 3>it or enjoyed understanding it or right like I, I

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 3>definitely consider myself like a nerd at heart and like

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>grew up building computers. I don't know if I could

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:46.479
<v Speaker 3>do it now, but like I used to and like it.

1:10:46.760 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it is, like I'm sure with like even

1:10:48.520 --> 1:10:51.440
<v Speaker 3>more now with fucking YouTube's the youtubes.

1:10:51.040 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That are but a double past is just that me?

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Was that say again, thermble pace you could just get

1:10:57.200 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>could you have it?

1:10:58.040 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Just like.

1:11:00.360 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Ummy, but like there has to be an element of

1:11:03.040 --> 1:11:06.519
<v Speaker 3>like caring about this stuff, enjoying this stuff, Like there's

1:11:06.560 --> 1:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a reason why I still enjoy fucking around on the internet,

1:11:10.560 --> 1:11:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Like like, yes, there's I have criticisms of maybe like

1:11:16.040 --> 1:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the homogenization of how products develop because other companies are

1:11:22.400 --> 1:11:25.120
<v Speaker 3>looking at how this person is doing it and we

1:11:25.120 --> 1:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>should have to do it like that. But you can

1:11:27.439 --> 1:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>still have fun on there and you can still find stuff,

1:11:30.160 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 3>and like I agree that, like trying to find more

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of that is not a.

1:11:35.040 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 5>Bad thing totally.

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think The Times is going to bring back bits.

1:11:40.040 --> 1:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Dude. That's where I started in twenty Do you know

1:11:41.920 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 3>what bits is? Oh dude, twenty joined twenty fourteen, and

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>we used to have long before my gosh, ten years

1:11:50.479 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in June it was ten years.

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:55.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm a millennial, so I should be hopping around jobs.

1:11:55.600 --> 1:11:57.240
<v Speaker 5>But it's good.

1:11:58.080 --> 1:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I know.

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I know now I can't leave, but I but we

1:12:00.760 --> 1:12:02.680
<v Speaker 3>It was a blog. It was literally The Times had

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a tech blog called Bits and it was it was

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of a function of like everyone's blogging at the time,

1:12:11.160 --> 1:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and like, you know, we need to be blogging. And

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure they got rid of it because I'm not.

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't really know why. The exact reason is probably

1:12:19.880 --> 1:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>because it doesn't they Yeah, I think now.

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:26.599
<v Speaker 3>I think now it's like and even now they're still

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 3>in like a transition period where they're like, we do

1:12:28.680 --> 1:12:32.200
<v Speaker 3>either huge heaves or now they do like live blogs

1:12:32.240 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>on like the big breaking thing they do, and like

1:12:35.880 --> 1:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>this sort of in between sort of.

1:12:38.760 --> 1:12:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Things are going away, is what i'd say.

1:12:40.600 --> 1:12:44.120
<v Speaker 3>The like, yeah, five hundred to seven hundred word articles

1:12:44.160 --> 1:12:47.639
<v Speaker 3>they don't care about as much. And there's probably internet

1:12:47.720 --> 1:12:50.839
<v Speaker 3>traffic reasons for that. There's probably just like what readers

1:12:50.920 --> 1:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>want from a Times article. But Bits was amazing because

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:55.799
<v Speaker 3>it was a blog where I could just dump random

1:12:55.800 --> 1:12:58.679
<v Speaker 3>shit that I that we found interesting and bits.

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>And the funny thing is, I'm sure of the arguments

1:13:00.600 --> 1:13:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that be well real reporting. That's where we get right

1:13:05.160 --> 1:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>except if you remember, and I do because I'm nine

1:13:08.120 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred years old in like Mike's age, there was this

1:13:12.520 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>little guy called Evan Spiegel who Nick Bilton, in a

1:13:15.960 --> 1:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>remarkable act of journalism, wrote about for the first time

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in Bits. It was like one of the first one

1:13:22.240 --> 1:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of the first Snapchat articles. Wasn't bits that's funny and

1:13:25.600 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, guess what, when you have that flexibility, when

1:13:28.120 --> 1:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a bit of fun with it, you find

1:13:30.640 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>weird little NEPO baby freaks who make insanely unprofitable software.

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Being an asshole here obviously, but that is an example

1:13:39.560 --> 1:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I think where the verge can do well. The Virtus

1:13:41.479 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>also had one of my favorite articles of all the time,

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:44.759
<v Speaker 1>which is one about the Internet cables.

1:13:45.160 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh my gosh, yes, yes, that was before I started.

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:47.920
<v Speaker 5>That was so good.

1:13:47.920 --> 1:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Didn't get back to me what I mean, very very hurtful,

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>very unfair. I actually forget his name and will now

1:13:54.360 --> 1:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>look it up like when I'm talking. But it but

1:13:57.200 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>stories like that, But that one's slightly different because that

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was a heavily report. So yeah, but it was good

1:14:02.400 --> 1:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because it was dear. It's a bit weird. Yeah, I

1:14:05.840 --> 1:14:08.759
<v Speaker 1>want and I hope someone does a story about an airport,

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like a regional airport that got shut down by CrowdStrike.

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, look something like that.

1:14:13.120 --> 1:14:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Free story idea right.

1:14:14.080 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 2>There, free story is Actually it's pretty good.

1:14:17.160 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Go for it please, because it's like that is what

1:14:21.680 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the big failure I think of the tech media. The

1:14:24.520 --> 1:14:27.559
<v Speaker 1>biggest is assuming that tech is not and Taylor Renz

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>made this point as well, that tech is not.

1:14:29.200 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Real life, that it's not a human problem.

1:14:31.400 --> 1:14:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that it's just the thing that happens. The Internet

1:14:33.920 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 1>is over here and the real people are over here

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for sure, when it's not been that for like fifteen years,

1:14:41.560 --> 1:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's just the stories like this, I think, like

1:14:44.760 --> 1:14:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the free story idea of giving away because I do

1:14:47.640 --> 1:14:52.479
<v Speaker 1>not have the time, but like a regional airport that

1:14:52.520 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>got fucked up because of the Windows update, that.

1:14:54.600 --> 1:14:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Is the reas' going to talk to the humans.

1:14:56.160 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. And also this is the practical implications of this.

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We talk about tragicta what have you, but like, when

1:15:03.320 --> 1:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you get down to it, what does this actually do

1:15:05.080 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 1>for real people? What's an actual fucking thing happening? And

1:15:08.560 --> 1:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I want like I want bits.

1:15:09.880 --> 1:15:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Back my boss?

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's your boss? Email them now?

1:15:15.760 --> 1:15:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I actually don't talk to.

1:15:18.880 --> 1:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Year mister. That's it with your news prepper fuck ship now.

1:15:29.560 --> 1:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's frustrating as well. And the joy of this

1:15:33.720 --> 1:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>show is the I get to do a bit of that,

1:15:37.240 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but even then I don't get to go like I

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have the time. If they bade me like three

1:15:41.479 --> 1:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year, which is what I demand. No,

1:15:46.439 --> 1:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but if I had more time, it would be like

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sending people out to do that. It could happen here,

1:15:49.800 --> 1:15:52.559
<v Speaker 1>which is a sister show a better offline. I guess

1:15:52.560 --> 1:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we're a sister show of it. They do great work

1:15:54.800 --> 1:15:56.759
<v Speaker 1>because they go out and find these weird fucking stories,

1:15:57.560 --> 1:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want more of that about like, I want

1:15:59.240 --> 1:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>more of the weird because we already know how bad

1:16:01.360 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of Google is and I'm going to keep doing it.

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorry everyone, but it it feels like everyone being tired

1:16:09.760 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is the problem. And also not talking about any specific outlet,

1:16:14.479 --> 1:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but gearing coverage towards conferences has become the other problem,

1:16:19.000 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, well, if we do this, we'll get

1:16:20.479 --> 1:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy to speak on stage and say the same

1:16:22.040 --> 1:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>thing he said in the press release, and then we

1:16:23.439 --> 1:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>will get the money. The writers will not get the money,

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's not how this worked, but they will do

1:16:28.000 --> 1:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the labor. And perhaps I'm saying that the people who

1:16:31.160 --> 1:16:33.519
<v Speaker 1>run these publications haven't written a fucking word of meaning

1:16:33.560 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in maybe ten or fifteen years, or maybe their entire lives,

1:16:35.920 --> 1:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps these publications need to be run by people

1:16:37.960 --> 1:16:40.759
<v Speaker 1>who actually fucking write stuff instead of these goddamn management

1:16:40.760 --> 1:16:42.599
<v Speaker 1>consultants who don't know what the fuck they're doing. But

1:16:42.640 --> 1:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that's just one thing I had.

1:16:44.080 --> 1:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like that the.

1:16:46.640 --> 1:16:52.559
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because there's like models. That's the thing about

1:16:52.680 --> 1:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>media now that I feel like is being hauled out

1:16:55.200 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>is like either there's the big players who have a

1:16:57.200 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>very specific model of like, Okay, these are our reporters,

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:04.519
<v Speaker 3>these are our opinion people.

1:17:04.760 --> 1:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Reporters go out and do this.

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:09.640
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of overhead in that because reporting is

1:17:09.720 --> 1:17:12.360
<v Speaker 3>expensive and you're not going to produce for weeks or

1:17:12.640 --> 1:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a week or whatever, and then you have the one

1:17:17.439 --> 1:17:20.920
<v Speaker 3>or two person shops or whatever on substack or something

1:17:21.000 --> 1:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>that can riff.

1:17:22.200 --> 1:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>But like.

1:17:24.360 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Either, ay, you need to produce like regularly to live, no,

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and you don't have the bandwidth to like fly to

1:17:31.880 --> 1:17:35.400
<v Speaker 3>to Wyoming and talk to you know, the airport that

1:17:35.479 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>got fucked or just like or it's not your thing

1:17:38.400 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and like you do a different sort of thing. And

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:43.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm like it would be ideally, And I think The

1:17:43.560 --> 1:17:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Times even did a push for this where they were

1:17:45.120 --> 1:17:47.519
<v Speaker 3>doing like a newsletter when everyone when everyone in media

1:17:47.560 --> 1:17:48.680
<v Speaker 3>was doing like a newsletter thing.

1:17:49.800 --> 1:17:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Funny, the idea is like, all right, now.

1:17:51.960 --> 1:17:54.719
<v Speaker 3>We can sort of everyone gets subscribed to a newsletter,

1:17:54.760 --> 1:17:55.599
<v Speaker 3>it can riff or whatever.

1:17:56.000 --> 1:17:59.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know where we like net out there,

1:17:59.600 --> 1:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I just don't know.

1:18:01.640 --> 1:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>It was like a classic manager who doesn't write thing.

1:18:04.560 --> 1:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, why is this newsletter big? Because it's

1:18:07.800 --> 1:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a newsletter, right, Like, damn, that's so smart. Let's pay

1:18:11.560 --> 1:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars in salaries to people to do the

1:18:13.880 --> 1:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>same thing they're already doing, which we were already emailing people.

1:18:17.640 --> 1:18:19.280
<v Speaker 5>I can get a million dollars just in emails.

1:18:19.479 --> 1:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just the aggregate spend there. And I think

1:18:23.840 --> 1:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that it's I go back to my

1:18:26.240 --> 1:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>point I just clunkily made, which it's like the people

1:18:28.720 --> 1:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>at the top are not fucking writing, They're like pell whatever.

1:18:33.000 --> 1:18:34.639
<v Speaker 4>This is what I was going to say, is that

1:18:34.760 --> 1:18:36.720
<v Speaker 4>when I came to the verge, as you're going to say,

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>like I did not expect he is like really in

1:18:39.080 --> 1:18:41.519
<v Speaker 4>the newsroom and he is writing all the time, like

1:18:41.560 --> 1:18:43.599
<v Speaker 4>we have this little thing that says like someone published

1:18:43.600 --> 1:18:45.559
<v Speaker 4>an article this in the articles have been published today,

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:47.840
<v Speaker 4>And he is always on there publishing.

1:18:47.479 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 5>Stuff, which I've never had that at a newsroom, which

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:53.000
<v Speaker 5>is crazy for him. I know he's a unit.

1:18:53.360 --> 1:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>He is and I have my problems with him, and

1:18:55.960 --> 1:18:58.519
<v Speaker 1>one day we'll hash it out. But otherwise he's going

1:18:58.600 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to come on, I know, love that yet to email

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:03.519
<v Speaker 1>me back either. I don't know why. It could be

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the things I say in all seriousness is the Verge

1:19:08.280 --> 1:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is actually a great example of Yeah, the top person

1:19:10.280 --> 1:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>should be writing all the time, because if you're not writing,

1:19:13.120 --> 1:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>how the hell do you know what writing is? What

1:19:15.000 --> 1:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do you don't even know what good writing is? You

1:19:16.760 --> 1:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even know where You can't even have the same

1:19:19.840 --> 1:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>struggles as a reporter. And when a reporter, I don't know,

1:19:22.360 --> 1:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I could we talk about anyone says something very rude

1:19:24.840 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in your publication, you fire them the next day for

1:19:27.400 --> 1:19:31.599
<v Speaker 1>pissing off tech bros could be talking about anyone. You're

1:19:31.640 --> 1:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not building solidarity and you're definitely not supporting actual reporting.

1:19:35.280 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the Virgin Boxer fire at this.

1:19:38.000 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Sorry to say gen z terms, but they're really really good.

1:19:42.560 --> 1:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>They're busting. Moment came out of my mouth. I was like,

1:19:47.160 --> 1:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>oh God, don't worry. When I say it, it sounds.

1:19:52.160 --> 1:19:53.000
<v Speaker 5>No cap.

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:58.240
<v Speaker 4>But I think, like, that's that's why I came is

1:19:58.240 --> 1:20:00.960
<v Speaker 4>because they let you write weird ship. They give their

1:20:01.080 --> 1:20:04.160
<v Speaker 4>weird writers like all the bandwidths to do whatever they want,

1:20:04.200 --> 1:20:07.840
<v Speaker 4>and Neili is in the trenches with you writing. He

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:10.880
<v Speaker 4>actually was the one who pointed me towards the Google

1:20:10.960 --> 1:20:13.920
<v Speaker 4>glue story. He was like, this is fucking crazy, and

1:20:13.960 --> 1:20:16.160
<v Speaker 4>it was like my first week and he's just got like,

1:20:17.040 --> 1:20:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, I agree with that's fair enough.

1:20:21.200 --> 1:20:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Stay out of it.

1:20:21.760 --> 1:20:23.599
<v Speaker 4>We don't know it's too much you write.

1:20:25.880 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 5>You remember Google AI overviews. They if you say, oh

1:20:30.080 --> 1:20:32.879
<v Speaker 5>the pizza thing, yes, fuck yeah.

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:37.439
<v Speaker 4>Blue story, and that was like, yes, that was awesome,

1:20:38.439 --> 1:20:41.439
<v Speaker 4>but yeah. So having someone who's like in the trenches

1:20:41.479 --> 1:20:43.760
<v Speaker 4>with you is so cool because you get to learn

1:20:43.760 --> 1:20:45.960
<v Speaker 4>from them and he can tell me like, hey, like

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:47.080
<v Speaker 4>there's a story over there.

1:20:47.120 --> 1:20:47.519
<v Speaker 5>I know it.

1:20:47.600 --> 1:20:50.599
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's one of the reasons Wineburger was so great.

1:20:50.840 --> 1:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He didn't write once, and I'm gonna just chotting at

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Matt Weinberger the entire show. By the way. He did write,

1:20:55.680 --> 1:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he did a little, he didn't write enough. One of

1:20:58.400 --> 1:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the greatest he was running so much, which is a

1:21:00.720 --> 1:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>great tech story but also a classic Weinberger story, is

1:21:03.320 --> 1:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he did a review of the latest Madden at the

1:21:05.400 --> 1:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>time without understanding the rules of football. So the whole

1:21:09.040 --> 1:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is just to be like, Okay.

1:21:10.360 --> 1:21:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Why is this very funny?

1:21:12.360 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But honestly, I actually think that kind of stuff's extremely

1:21:16.240 --> 1:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's good. I would love to like get like a

1:21:20.439 --> 1:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>line cook chat, GPT and just record what their thoughts,

1:21:24.120 --> 1:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>like someone just disconnected for whose regular job is a

1:21:26.320 --> 1:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>real job which actually like sucks and like involves them

1:21:30.439 --> 1:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>having to deal with people like not like a.

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Party, I actually but again free.

1:21:35.080 --> 1:21:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Ideas the whole show. I would love like a We're

1:21:38.479 --> 1:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>currently in a big studio and I would love like

1:21:40.920 --> 1:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a tech like a tech radio show, and I could

1:21:44.080 --> 1:21:49.599
<v Speaker 1>live in here be very damp keyword damp and no cap.

1:21:51.520 --> 1:21:56.519
<v Speaker 1>But also that's in the site. By the way, the

1:21:56.520 --> 1:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Internet cable story is Josh Diseaser dz I easy a.

1:22:01.040 --> 1:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I will put that in the notes as well. Incredible

1:22:03.720 --> 1:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>story and also scary that the Internet is run by

1:22:06.520 --> 1:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of cables. Good break. It's I feel like

1:22:12.560 --> 1:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're discussing here though, is the same thing of

1:22:16.200 --> 1:22:19.559
<v Speaker 1>we're discussing how people actually interact with tech, and I

1:22:19.560 --> 1:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like too much writing is about how people they

1:22:23.360 --> 1:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think people interact with tech. We're writing for tech enthusiastics

1:22:28.720 --> 1:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than how people experience the world. One thing I've

1:22:31.360 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about, and I don't know how to fucking

1:22:32.920 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do this podcast is and by the way, the listener,

1:22:36.439 --> 1:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the listener who keeps bugging me about this, singling you

1:22:39.520 --> 1:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>out without naming you.

1:22:41.040 --> 1:22:42.120
<v Speaker 2>What crime do they commit?

1:22:42.840 --> 1:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I was actually just thinking of what guy currently writing. No, no, no,

1:22:52.120 --> 1:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>no no. It's a fair thing. They say, I'm not

1:22:54.640 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>critical enough of Apple. But the one story I want

1:22:57.479 --> 1:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, and I think this is one that everyone

1:22:59.280 --> 1:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to be honest. Have you used the app store recently?

1:23:02.360 --> 1:23:06.759
<v Speaker 1>It's extremely bad. It is so bad, It's so very bad.

1:23:07.040 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>The apps that chart in some sections are just flat

1:23:09.880 --> 1:23:14.719
<v Speaker 1>out dog shit, ad filled nonsense. The discovery on there

1:23:14.920 --> 1:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is nakedly corrupt. The people in the app store editorial

1:23:18.120 --> 1:23:21.599
<v Speaker 1>fuck you if you're listening. Okay, not really, but no

1:23:21.640 --> 1:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>cap no cap. Seriously, the apps tore editorial people is

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>so nakedly corrupt. Right now, I don't mean fuck you.

1:23:29.920 --> 1:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Please don't punish any podcast other than mine, punish me.

1:23:33.080 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But then they just feed the richest people. They're featuring

1:23:38.160 --> 1:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>popular things. They feature popular apps like why do I

1:23:41.479 --> 1:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>need to feature Facebook. I'm actually gonna load this shit

1:23:44.200 --> 1:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>up right now. I'm fine, I hope I'm not wrong.

1:23:46.520 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look like a real toss pot. Okay. The

1:23:49.200 --> 1:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>top thing on here is tour Monopoly goes Amazing Destinations.

1:23:52.800 --> 1:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Monopoly Go makes billions of dollars. Why is that what

1:23:56.160 --> 1:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple is surfacing?

1:23:57.920 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 2>That's weird. That's like a featured thing and not like

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a charting.

1:24:01.120 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>It is the first thing when you open the apps.

1:24:04.800 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Next Amazon Music, Top apps right now, TikTok Max, Disney Plus, Snapchat,

1:24:09.040 --> 1:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Music. Next one.

1:24:11.760 --> 1:24:13.360
<v Speaker 5>I went to one of their south By Southwest parties

1:24:13.360 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 5>and sud Group love there. That's my only the.

1:24:18.360 --> 1:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Most useful part of Amazon Music.

1:24:20.439 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It was, Yeah, the most useful part of Amazon Music

1:24:24.280 --> 1:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>is an offline. Next thing up is Toka Bocal World.

1:24:27.680 --> 1:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>That's a they make at least one hundred million dollars

1:24:29.439 --> 1:24:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a year. Next one up Squadbusters, which is a game

1:24:32.320 --> 1:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>by super Cell Multimer millions of dollars. Every single thing

1:24:38.080 --> 1:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>on here is just making the rich Richard. The next

1:24:40.479 --> 1:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bluey, which is literally worth billions.

1:24:43.080 --> 1:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that a dog?

1:24:44.760 --> 1:24:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I saw?

1:24:45.680 --> 1:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw Bluey at a Clippers game. Drunk Off is asked,

1:24:48.320 --> 1:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>leering at the cheerleaders. They kicked him out for being

1:24:50.880 --> 1:24:53.799
<v Speaker 1>too drunk. Didn't even make it to the half anyway.

1:24:54.439 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Jokes about blueish side. That's a that's a real problem.

1:24:58.640 --> 1:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>That is a real algorithmic problem that everyone is facing.

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But everyone's kind of in the tech media for good reason.

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Folks in the open AI focused on AI AI AI AI.

1:25:08.600 --> 1:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be this when the real problems are

1:25:11.200 --> 1:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>sitting in front of us, and those are the ones

1:25:14.680 --> 1:25:17.519
<v Speaker 1>that people actually are affected by the fact supercell is

1:25:17.640 --> 1:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>rich because Apple is helping them get rich because Apple

1:25:20.320 --> 1:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>wants thirty percent, Why not send that traffic to someone else,

1:25:23.800 --> 1:25:26.479
<v Speaker 1>send it to small developers. It's too much like hard work.

1:25:27.520 --> 1:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And it pisses me off because well everything pisses me off.

1:25:30.040 --> 1:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess it pissed me off because it doesn't feel

1:25:34.080 --> 1:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>like the tech media is currently built to handle this.

1:25:36.479 --> 1:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's even the fault of the writers.

1:25:38.680 --> 1:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>There needs to be an app store reporter. How do we.

1:25:43.600 --> 1:25:46.200
<v Speaker 5>What they would get?

1:25:46.240 --> 1:25:50.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's no fifty there's no infrastructure. I mean,

1:25:50.520 --> 1:25:52.320
<v Speaker 4>tell that to the media executives. That's what I'm trying

1:25:52.360 --> 1:25:52.679
<v Speaker 4>to say.

1:25:52.800 --> 1:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you're wrong, like what you know, what

1:25:55.040 --> 1:25:58.559
<v Speaker 1>you're describing is the actual problem. These executives don't want

1:25:58.560 --> 1:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest in that. But if the argument is what's important, yeah,

1:26:03.280 --> 1:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>then this is important. It's more important than anything else

1:26:06.600 --> 1:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like Google search, app stole, These are the things that matter.

1:26:10.680 --> 1:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But it feels that the media is engineered towards clicks,

1:26:15.439 --> 1:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>which is then engineered towards pleasing Google, who is currently

1:26:18.360 --> 1:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>fucking up the news media. It's just we're in this

1:26:20.880 --> 1:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>weird cycle now. I don't even think real paper wrong over.

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>It's really funny because I would always, like very vociferously

1:26:28.280 --> 1:26:32.640
<v Speaker 3>fight back against the like clickbait sort of argument, but like,

1:26:32.800 --> 1:26:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1:26:33.920 --> 1:26:36.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's harder to depend against these days because

1:26:36.760 --> 1:26:40.920
<v Speaker 2>of how how traffic has declined and how like I

1:26:40.960 --> 1:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>do think metrics play a role across Like every outlet

1:26:44.960 --> 1:26:47.680
<v Speaker 2>has an SEO person who is like paying attention to

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:49.960
<v Speaker 2>what is trending or whatever, you know, and I don't.

1:26:50.240 --> 1:26:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's and and I'll I will make

1:26:55.439 --> 1:26:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the distinction that I don't think are outlet and I

1:26:59.120 --> 1:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think most out it's our only driving traffic as

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the primary reason. But I do think because like, look,

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you have a mission, you have like a thing that

1:27:07.160 --> 1:27:10.400
<v Speaker 2>your north star of coverage should be. But like there

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>is more awareness than there was ten or fifteen years

1:27:12.880 --> 1:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>ago of like what is happening traffic wise and what

1:27:17.000 --> 1:27:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you should be thinking about. And that's a real thing.

1:27:19.800 --> 1:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know what's also happening. Immediately after I stopped talking,

1:27:23.320 --> 1:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You're going to hear an advertisement. And when you hear

1:27:25.439 --> 1:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that ad, you're going to be like, damn, that is

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so thematically relevant. Everything it says that wasn't embarrassing to

1:27:32.120 --> 1:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>add ed didn't feel really annoyed. It didn't make a

1:27:35.000 --> 1:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>specific rule on his reddit so that people don't talk

1:27:37.720 --> 1:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about it. That ad was so well placed. An eye,

1:27:40.240 --> 1:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a new customer of this perfect company will love it.

1:27:43.360 --> 1:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>So please enjoy this extremely relevant ad and we're back.

1:28:00.439 --> 1:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So the whole traffic thing's funny because clickbait is not

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is part of it. And actually I think Bi's done

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>really well with keeping clickbait going but actually doing good

1:28:09.840 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>shit in the topless She's actually found the middle ground,

1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>which is like straight up like clickbait, but the inside's

1:28:16.400 --> 1:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so good but.

1:28:17.000 --> 1:28:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You like it, right, Yeah, Like m Coca actually has

1:28:19.720 --> 1:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>riffed one this before is like that the idea of

1:28:22.400 --> 1:28:25.040
<v Speaker 3>like you made that headline for people to only click,

1:28:25.120 --> 1:28:28.360
<v Speaker 3>like you want people to be interested in your story,

1:28:28.439 --> 1:28:31.400
<v Speaker 3>like there's gonna be. There isn't an art to it, right,

1:28:31.520 --> 1:28:32.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not all.

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:34.280
<v Speaker 5>A thousand words and you know a couple of words.

1:28:34.360 --> 1:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>You gotta figure that out totally.

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's funny as well because I actually think

1:28:40.160 --> 1:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that the take media really needs to realize that other

1:28:43.360 --> 1:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>than chasing clicks. It's like tech stories get a shit

1:28:46.200 --> 1:28:49.439
<v Speaker 1>ton of traffic. That alone should be a sign that

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>there's magic to be found here. And it's not from

1:28:51.479 --> 1:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing, and it's from I think that

1:28:55.000 --> 1:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a way of dressing up like software communities.

1:28:57.680 --> 1:29:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's what That's what I did for almost two years.

1:29:00.439 --> 1:29:03.519
<v Speaker 4>That was my job, was talking about software developer communities

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:04.200
<v Speaker 4>and it was rad.

1:29:05.520 --> 1:29:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know.

1:29:06.200 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I think The Verge is actually the first time I've

1:29:08.000 --> 1:29:11.080
<v Speaker 4>worked at a publication where there are no KPIs or

1:29:11.120 --> 1:29:14.080
<v Speaker 4>like traffic goals or sub schoals. No, no, no one

1:29:14.080 --> 1:29:17.320
<v Speaker 4>bothers me about that. So it's it's sick, yeah, because

1:29:17.920 --> 1:29:20.320
<v Speaker 4>you know a lot of people experience that, and people

1:29:20.320 --> 1:29:22.720
<v Speaker 4>get yelled about that, like you you you could get

1:29:22.760 --> 1:29:25.760
<v Speaker 4>fired over not reaching traffic. So I don't have to

1:29:25.920 --> 1:29:27.439
<v Speaker 4>worry about that, which is great, and I think that's

1:29:27.479 --> 1:29:31.000
<v Speaker 4>really healthy for writers. I wish more writers had that experience.

1:29:31.120 --> 1:29:33.880
<v Speaker 4>But unfortunately, like where where we're at.

1:29:35.720 --> 1:29:37.439
<v Speaker 1>It's does the times have stuff like that?

1:29:37.640 --> 1:29:38.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:29:38.040 --> 1:29:41.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, like I think it's like general vibes, right,

1:29:41.240 --> 1:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>like if I fucking didn't put anything out in a month,

1:29:44.280 --> 1:29:47.960
<v Speaker 3>then like whatever, then I might get a phone call.

1:29:48.000 --> 1:29:51.200
<v Speaker 3>But like, as far as I can tell, or at least,

1:29:51.200 --> 1:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't get called about it.

1:29:52.240 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But I don't. I don't wait, like I've never seen

1:29:55.280 --> 1:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>yeah exactly, but I which time, yeah, short time.

1:30:01.400 --> 1:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I do think that like yeah, I do think there

1:30:03.960 --> 1:30:07.439
<v Speaker 3>is more attention to paid to like metrics now, but

1:30:07.680 --> 1:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>like and I, oh god, I'm just thinking back on

1:30:11.960 --> 1:30:14.519
<v Speaker 3>like my super earliest days of writing, and they.

1:30:14.439 --> 1:30:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Have screens back then where they showed like ranking authority.

1:30:19.560 --> 1:30:21.879
<v Speaker 5>I heard that when I first started journalism.

1:30:21.920 --> 1:30:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what, you have a tyrodactyl that used

1:30:24.600 --> 1:30:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to do the typing for you and turn to your

1:30:27.160 --> 1:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>living Mike is the same age exactly.

1:30:30.640 --> 1:30:33.679
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, I know I get to be resident old guy

1:30:34.120 --> 1:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>but like it now. Even then, you know, I was

1:30:39.720 --> 1:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>still having to churn out more, but now it's just

1:30:41.840 --> 1:30:44.720
<v Speaker 3>gotten like ten times worse. I am totally like all

1:30:44.720 --> 1:30:47.840
<v Speaker 3>the folks who I won't like mention outlets, but like

1:30:47.880 --> 1:30:50.439
<v Speaker 3>I just have colleagues or friends who work at different

1:30:50.479 --> 1:30:52.600
<v Speaker 3>places and have you have to do this mini a

1:30:52.600 --> 1:30:55.559
<v Speaker 3>week or like this is your quota, and like even

1:30:55.600 --> 1:30:57.040
<v Speaker 3>when I was starting out, it was like I had

1:30:57.040 --> 1:30:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to do at least one a day, which I could

1:30:59.760 --> 1:31:04.439
<v Speaker 3>do when I was like twenty four or whatever however old.

1:31:04.560 --> 1:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And now I'm thirty nine and I'm fucking I can't

1:31:08.080 --> 1:31:10.800
<v Speaker 3>even think about that. Yeah, you know, so like it's

1:31:10.880 --> 1:31:14.839
<v Speaker 3>just a very yeah, I don't know, it's super depressing.

1:31:14.920 --> 1:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to complain about it too much.

1:31:17.439 --> 1:31:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I was in the trenches when I was in college,

1:31:20.320 --> 1:31:22.679
<v Speaker 4>so I would I was doing all my college classes,

1:31:22.680 --> 1:31:26.120
<v Speaker 4>and then I was also writing for BI and they

1:31:26.120 --> 1:31:29.920
<v Speaker 4>have famously and well publicized very stringent goals about what

1:31:29.960 --> 1:31:32.080
<v Speaker 4>you're supposed to reach. And I was in the trenches,

1:31:32.080 --> 1:31:34.040
<v Speaker 4>but at least I was writing stuff that was really fun.

1:31:34.080 --> 1:31:35.960
<v Speaker 4>And also it was my first job in journalism, so

1:31:36.040 --> 1:31:36.960
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was the norm.

1:31:37.600 --> 1:31:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Just get them all through.

1:31:39.160 --> 1:31:41.519
<v Speaker 4>But I think, like speaking to why isn't the tech

1:31:41.560 --> 1:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>media getting stuff right? They have really really, really really

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:47.240
<v Speaker 4>rich and powerful people who own their company, and then

1:31:47.479 --> 1:31:49.559
<v Speaker 4>trickles all the way down to people breathing down your

1:31:49.560 --> 1:31:52.040
<v Speaker 4>neck and like, have you written ten stories this week?

1:31:52.360 --> 1:31:53.920
<v Speaker 5>The Messenger is a great example of this.

1:31:54.560 --> 1:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>The poor messenger gone, I forgot all about that.

1:31:56.920 --> 1:31:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Now company forgot until just now, Horri.

1:32:00.439 --> 1:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not dead yet, which is not an actionable threat,

1:32:05.280 --> 1:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but the Messenger is a great example. I think of

1:32:07.240 --> 1:32:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a problem that faces the tech media, which is, again,

1:32:09.760 --> 1:32:14.519
<v Speaker 1>the people making the publications aren't really the ones touching them.

1:32:14.520 --> 1:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Fink le Stein, formerly of The Hill, a hundred million

1:32:17.160 --> 1:32:19.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars off selling The Hill to I assume a private

1:32:19.720 --> 1:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>equity firm. I did say it in a previous episode.

1:32:22.280 --> 1:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I forget everything I say the moment I say it,

1:32:24.840 --> 1:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's frustrating. But also at some point I

1:32:28.520 --> 1:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the tech media could look more like a

1:32:30.960 --> 1:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of four h four medias. I wish I think

1:32:33.760 --> 1:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going that way, because look, the biggest fallacy of

1:32:37.240 --> 1:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these tech pubs is are you can't do

1:32:39.040 --> 1:32:41.559
<v Speaker 1>them profitable without a bunch of trap. Fuck you, you can

1:32:41.560 --> 1:32:44.479
<v Speaker 1>make them super profitable if you don't have fifty people,

1:32:44.840 --> 1:32:49.719
<v Speaker 1>if you have focused people. My granded dreams turn newsletter

1:32:49.720 --> 1:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in a thing where I just have a bunch of stringers, freelancers,

1:32:52.320 --> 1:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>free idea for anyone to copy. You just have to

1:32:54.400 --> 1:32:56.519
<v Speaker 1>be able to write three thousand words in an hour, bitch,

1:32:58.520 --> 1:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's two. But nevertheless, it's I think that that

1:33:03.520 --> 1:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is where it's going because four or four has done

1:33:05.720 --> 1:33:07.679
<v Speaker 1>probably the best Internet culture reporting.

1:33:07.960 --> 1:33:09.080
<v Speaker 5>I love them so much.

1:33:09.120 --> 1:33:11.439
<v Speaker 4>It's so cool to get to see them succeed in

1:33:11.439 --> 1:33:14.599
<v Speaker 4>the way that they have and just completely smash it

1:33:14.640 --> 1:33:17.200
<v Speaker 4>and deliver the best fucking reporting.

1:33:17.680 --> 1:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>What Samlely, Cole Cobbler. They're all fucking brilliant, and they're

1:33:20.680 --> 1:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>brilliant because they're all Internet weirdos. Yes I mean that affectionately.

1:33:24.000 --> 1:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Well, on the Motherboard DNA exactly, Sarah Derek, they

1:33:27.320 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 2>all used to work on Motherboard and that was like

1:33:29.439 --> 1:33:30.439
<v Speaker 2>mother Board was one.

1:33:30.280 --> 1:33:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Of the real good and weird internet sites before Vice

1:33:36.200 --> 1:33:36.640
<v Speaker 3>killed it.

1:33:36.720 --> 1:33:39.679
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, all those people at the top.

1:33:39.560 --> 1:33:41.360
<v Speaker 5>Host I wanted to be them so bad.

1:33:41.439 --> 1:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>They're great too, super great, No, seriously, like one of

1:33:44.760 --> 1:33:46.559
<v Speaker 1>my heroes Edward im Guiso Junior.

1:33:48.000 --> 1:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good guy.

1:33:49.400 --> 1:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I wish he wrote more. I love his work, but

1:33:51.720 --> 1:33:54.599
<v Speaker 1>also another I don't know. He's a logic. I believe

1:33:54.640 --> 1:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>now he's gonna be on the next Better Off Live.

1:33:57.400 --> 1:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's cool.

1:33:58.560 --> 1:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He's so cool.

1:33:59.320 --> 1:33:59.720
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

1:33:59.760 --> 1:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's like guys like that having an opportunity

1:34:02.560 --> 1:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a place like Motherboard is so good. I want to

1:34:05.439 --> 1:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>see like more of these clustered publications because if you

1:34:09.160 --> 1:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>really look at the old school tech Crunch, and I

1:34:11.320 --> 1:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>know people have fairly very negative views about Michael Arrington.

1:34:15.360 --> 1:34:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about him as a person because all

1:34:17.520 --> 1:34:21.519
<v Speaker 1>of that sucks. However, the original days of tech Crunch

1:34:21.600 --> 1:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>resemble four oh four media so much more than they

1:34:24.160 --> 1:34:26.519
<v Speaker 1>do tech Crunch today in that it was a bun.

1:34:26.600 --> 1:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It was Michaelarrington, and there's a big myth that it's like, well,

1:34:29.400 --> 1:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>tech Crunch is very dry. It was be like Mike

1:34:31.760 --> 1:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Clownton going, You'll never believe who I saw the melt.

1:34:36.040 --> 1:34:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I forgot the creamery like a black or the ghost

1:34:40.160 --> 1:34:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of it is a black from here and he.

1:34:41.600 --> 1:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Would just like hang out. They'd be like, you'll never

1:34:43.400 --> 1:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>believe what I And it's great This is why I

1:34:46.080 --> 1:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>say gossip.

1:34:46.960 --> 1:34:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Because this is what it is.

1:34:48.840 --> 1:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Is what it was in the oldest, Like ooh, I've

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>heard that Inside Partners is going to do this. It's

1:34:53.880 --> 1:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>inside Partners. Is that one of the VY people, one

1:34:57.479 --> 1:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the big vcs, he'd hear some ship and and

1:35:00.200 --> 1:35:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that would be an even poor cars dirty but even

1:35:03.720 --> 1:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he did the same thing. Sarah lazy but it's okay,

1:35:07.320 --> 1:35:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit me and she did some good ship.

1:35:09.120 --> 1:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, she.

1:35:10.120 --> 1:35:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Did a really good book, actually the once You're Lucky

1:35:12.360 --> 1:35:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Twice You're good. You should read that.

1:35:14.479 --> 1:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing, shouldn't.

1:35:16.160 --> 1:35:18.479
<v Speaker 5>I need to learn way more about this old school.

1:35:20.560 --> 1:35:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've fought a lot over the years, but

1:35:22.720 --> 1:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>she has ship. Some of her reporter is really good.

1:35:25.000 --> 1:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>But also, this is what my longer term vision I'm

1:35:27.920 --> 1:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just saying it on the pod is. I want to

1:35:29.720 --> 1:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>rebuild solidarity within the tech media. It's a very lonely industry.

1:35:34.200 --> 1:35:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's very much an island. Even the Virgin which I love.

1:35:37.520 --> 1:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>The Virginal podcast is the Virgin people talking to the

1:35:39.720 --> 1:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Virgin power stuff every four and four. Same deal. I

1:35:42.760 --> 1:35:45.639
<v Speaker 1>love four and four, but the same deal, and it's

1:35:46.640 --> 1:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone's bulkanized a bit, but also it will allow for

1:35:51.000 --> 1:35:54.479
<v Speaker 1>delicious beefs and gossip, and I think that people love that.

1:35:54.600 --> 1:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people like it's like, oh, you'll never believe.

1:35:57.240 --> 1:36:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh they're angry at each other again. People love this shit.

1:36:00.960 --> 1:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's low stakes drama. Oh you got the scoop on grumbus.

1:36:04.960 --> 1:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I had the scoop on grumbus. You aggregated my grumbus.

1:36:08.280 --> 1:36:12.240
<v Speaker 5>I just had this conversation today. Actually, grumm.

1:36:12.960 --> 1:36:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think that we It's like journalists can be

1:36:15.720 --> 1:36:19.160
<v Speaker 3>often very catty and insecure, and that is.

1:36:19.120 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Like the biggest culture shot. Getting into this.

1:36:21.280 --> 1:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>I was like, fuck, this is like like throwing elbows.

1:36:25.200 --> 1:36:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I got like literally elbowed in the

1:36:27.160 --> 1:36:28.599
<v Speaker 4>teeth so many times by people.

1:36:28.600 --> 1:36:31.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm like, fuck God, but it isn't.

1:36:31.439 --> 1:36:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, sorry, I was more agro I think when I

1:36:36.000 --> 1:36:39.759
<v Speaker 3>was younger, and I get it, Like I think I'm

1:36:40.520 --> 1:36:42.519
<v Speaker 3>also like because I work at the times, there's a

1:36:42.520 --> 1:36:46.639
<v Speaker 3>whole weirdness around that and like people often with good

1:36:46.680 --> 1:36:48.680
<v Speaker 3>reasons in the past, like we didn't used to like

1:36:48.760 --> 1:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>not link a lot. Now I think we're way I

1:36:50.920 --> 1:36:53.559
<v Speaker 3>will spend time that. Yeah, I mean I get it

1:36:53.560 --> 1:36:56.559
<v Speaker 3>all the time. But I think I was trained, probably

1:36:56.560 --> 1:36:58.479
<v Speaker 3>because I came up and blugging to like link and

1:36:58.520 --> 1:37:01.280
<v Speaker 3>like credit and I think our desk is very good

1:37:01.320 --> 1:37:05.800
<v Speaker 3>about it now. But like everyone is just like I

1:37:06.000 --> 1:37:08.799
<v Speaker 3>described this a lot, like I feel like journalism today

1:37:08.920 --> 1:37:12.000
<v Speaker 3>is a lot of like very insecure overachievers, and everyone's

1:37:12.080 --> 1:37:14.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of like looking over their shoulders and trying to

1:37:14.200 --> 1:37:16.679
<v Speaker 3>compete and trying to like make their mark or whatever.

1:37:16.800 --> 1:37:20.679
<v Speaker 3>And I think getting your I have a fucking ego,

1:37:20.760 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 3>but trying to get yeah, exactly, try trying to tamp

1:37:26.520 --> 1:37:30.200
<v Speaker 3>that down as much and just like keep it and also,

1:37:30.320 --> 1:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>like people, one thing I've tried to do, even though

1:37:33.200 --> 1:37:35.760
<v Speaker 3>it's hard, is like people like really remember when you

1:37:35.800 --> 1:37:38.920
<v Speaker 3>pay them compliments on us totally like just doing a

1:37:39.000 --> 1:37:41.960
<v Speaker 3>nice posting like that was a great story.

1:37:42.280 --> 1:37:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a nice thing.

1:37:43.520 --> 1:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>That's something I do with lots on this show, because

1:37:46.640 --> 1:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like I really am, I've got and it's.

1:37:48.600 --> 1:37:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Easy to like shoot on someone's stuff and then they

1:37:50.880 --> 1:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>fucking they'll remember that, right. I remember, you.

1:37:54.120 --> 1:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Can't do one you have to do like, okay, you

1:37:57.040 --> 1:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can't do just being nice. I realized that is an option.

1:37:59.200 --> 1:38:04.040
<v Speaker 4>That I it's down here on the low road.

1:38:05.680 --> 1:38:09.519
<v Speaker 1>You think I've gone lower, I will, but there is

1:38:09.560 --> 1:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a degree here of like, of course I'm like, I

1:38:11.240 --> 1:38:15.479
<v Speaker 1>will criticize Jesus, fuck that word up. But there's so

1:38:15.560 --> 1:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>much good there and I think the like four or four.

1:38:18.200 --> 1:38:19.519
<v Speaker 1>The reason I bring them up so much is they're

1:38:19.520 --> 1:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the're fucking like they are, Like, I love sharing their work. Yeah, Defecto,

1:38:22.920 --> 1:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>which Irillas is outside of tech David Roth. Most people

1:38:27.280 --> 1:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like Ray Rato, like you've got really like specialized reporters,

1:38:30.439 --> 1:38:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's sports, I realized. But that model of Hey

1:38:33.840 --> 1:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>defined voices that people really love, that love for who

1:38:36.920 --> 1:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they are. Drew McGarry covering Ship. People aren't going there

1:38:40.320 --> 1:38:42.479
<v Speaker 1>just to hear about sports. They're going because Drew has

1:38:42.479 --> 1:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a thought. Same with David. And I think that model

1:38:45.360 --> 1:38:47.559
<v Speaker 1>in tech is something that the verge has done a

1:38:47.560 --> 1:38:50.800
<v Speaker 1>good job on. I think they can go further, but

1:38:50.840 --> 1:38:53.679
<v Speaker 1>it's something that was in bits. It was something that

1:38:54.000 --> 1:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had Man'd you do?

1:38:55.280 --> 1:38:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Did I think that The Times is uh? This is

1:38:58.400 --> 1:38:59.200
<v Speaker 2>my personal view.

1:38:59.280 --> 1:39:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that they can be ambivalent on personalities, like

1:39:08.120 --> 1:39:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in one way, like it serves them a lot to

1:39:10.400 --> 1:39:15.559
<v Speaker 3>have columnists who like people will go for you know,

1:39:15.680 --> 1:39:18.240
<v Speaker 3>this is a different generation. But like David Brooks or

1:39:18.280 --> 1:39:20.599
<v Speaker 3>Tom Friedman or these folks who have been coming there

1:39:20.600 --> 1:39:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and drive a lot of traffic or talk to the

1:39:22.920 --> 1:39:26.400
<v Speaker 3>president and like are important in some capacity. But at

1:39:26.439 --> 1:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the same time, I think Times folks are Times. People

1:39:29.880 --> 1:39:33.599
<v Speaker 3>at the top are always like the brand is first, right,

1:39:33.680 --> 1:39:37.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a New York Times. It's not Mike Isaac at

1:39:37.080 --> 1:39:39.439
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times some thing right, And like, I.

1:39:39.439 --> 1:39:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Do think there's a tension there.

1:39:40.840 --> 1:39:43.880
<v Speaker 3>But in this one thing that I think have expressly

1:39:43.920 --> 1:39:47.720
<v Speaker 3>said outwardly is like in an age of Ai producing

1:39:47.880 --> 1:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>mountains of bullshit, one advantage we might have is knowing

1:39:52.040 --> 1:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that our reporters are people and explaining that they have

1:39:55.200 --> 1:39:58.080
<v Speaker 3>expertise and like going into them. So like it, I

1:39:58.120 --> 1:40:00.599
<v Speaker 3>do think there's like a tension there. I would love

1:40:00.680 --> 1:40:03.720
<v Speaker 3>if they let us be a little more free.

1:40:03.479 --> 1:40:07.040
<v Speaker 5>But like that is the tension, and we all see it.

1:40:07.080 --> 1:40:09.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's kind of what you give up

1:40:09.600 --> 1:40:13.040
<v Speaker 4>for the Times, is what it seems like as the outsiders, like, Okay,

1:40:13.120 --> 1:40:14.679
<v Speaker 4>if you want to work for the Times, you're gonna

1:40:14.680 --> 1:40:17.400
<v Speaker 4>have to give that up. And that's it's not just

1:40:17.439 --> 1:40:19.720
<v Speaker 4>the Times. The it's like you know, like a lot

1:40:19.760 --> 1:40:22.000
<v Speaker 4>of of the top publications. You you're not gonna have

1:40:22.040 --> 1:40:24.160
<v Speaker 4>that voice because of what they do.

1:40:24.240 --> 1:40:24.839
<v Speaker 5>It's different.

1:40:24.960 --> 1:40:28.479
<v Speaker 1>What's funny, though, is I'm old enough to remember that

1:40:28.600 --> 1:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>this was the model. David Poge at the New York Times,

1:40:31.960 --> 1:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric Benderoff, I think it was at the Tribune here

1:40:35.280 --> 1:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was a bray. I think at the Boston Globe you

1:40:37.520 --> 1:40:39.760
<v Speaker 1>had tech colonists and they were insane. You still got

1:40:39.760 --> 1:40:41.519
<v Speaker 1>like Jim Rossman, I think that that was morning use

1:40:41.960 --> 1:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>mixing up with someone. Nevertheless, you have a few, but

1:40:44.760 --> 1:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>regional tech columists used to get paid insane money. M

1:40:49.080 --> 1:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a rumor. There was a rumor that, like

1:40:51.479 --> 1:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I think seen it, tried to pay Nick Bilton a

1:40:54.200 --> 1:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollars.

1:40:54.960 --> 1:40:57.599
<v Speaker 2>I remember that. I don't even remember.

1:40:58.280 --> 1:41:00.599
<v Speaker 5>I've heard Felix Salmon stories.

1:41:01.960 --> 1:41:05.120
<v Speaker 4>This is like passed down from older journalists to me

1:41:05.320 --> 1:41:06.240
<v Speaker 4>through generations.

1:41:06.720 --> 1:41:08.639
<v Speaker 2>So the Fusion days, Oh that was great?

1:41:09.000 --> 1:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>What was this? We need to tell you?

1:41:10.200 --> 1:41:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, Well do.

1:41:11.680 --> 1:41:13.519
<v Speaker 3>You remember the Fusion Do you remember Fusion?

1:41:13.560 --> 1:41:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Does that?

1:41:13.880 --> 1:41:15.719
<v Speaker 5>I remember? Like the logo?

1:41:16.760 --> 1:41:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean you shouldn't because it was literally like a

1:41:19.520 --> 1:41:25.440
<v Speaker 3>production of Telemundo that wanted to do is tech company Olsen.

1:41:25.320 --> 1:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Or h ship.

1:41:27.520 --> 1:41:31.160
<v Speaker 3>There was a bunch of cash Hill there. Kevin Russ

1:41:31.240 --> 1:41:35.680
<v Speaker 3>work there, and what they did was uh uh And

1:41:35.720 --> 1:41:38.519
<v Speaker 3>they hired Felix Oh like just magical. So what they

1:41:38.560 --> 1:41:41.880
<v Speaker 3>did though was like come in and throw like money

1:41:41.920 --> 1:41:44.400
<v Speaker 3>at everyone. I fucking rude the day that I didn't

1:41:44.439 --> 1:41:46.360
<v Speaker 3>try to get a job there because my salary would

1:41:46.400 --> 1:41:50.599
<v Speaker 3>be like four x what it is nice but right, right, right,

1:41:50.720 --> 1:41:53.240
<v Speaker 3>But I think the rumor was I'm not going to

1:41:53.600 --> 1:41:55.840
<v Speaker 3>say exactly what it was, but just there were rumors

1:41:55.880 --> 1:41:59.160
<v Speaker 3>on how much people were getting paid and we all

1:41:59.160 --> 1:42:01.599
<v Speaker 3>should have done that great and that the company went

1:42:01.600 --> 1:42:04.160
<v Speaker 3>out of business like two week years later. No, no,

1:42:04.200 --> 1:42:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they bought got bought by Gizmoto, which then fucking I

1:42:07.000 --> 1:42:07.840
<v Speaker 3>don't even know what.

1:42:07.920 --> 1:42:10.040
<v Speaker 2>No, Gizmoto got bought by Telemando.

1:42:10.600 --> 1:42:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Media is not just fun anymore.

1:42:12.360 --> 1:42:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Fucking human centipede of shit that is media industry.

1:42:15.960 --> 1:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Again. I will have drinks every city I'm in. Everyone

1:42:18.800 --> 1:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>will get drunk together, and then everyone will be mad

1:42:20.840 --> 1:42:22.479
<v Speaker 1>at each other and then we'll have stuff like this.

1:42:23.120 --> 1:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's I think it is partly also the remote

1:42:25.200 --> 1:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>work movement.

1:42:26.200 --> 1:42:28.479
<v Speaker 5>And I've only been a remote journalist, which is crazy.

1:42:28.680 --> 1:42:29.759
<v Speaker 2>You're are going to an office.

1:42:29.920 --> 1:42:34.000
<v Speaker 5>I will, but like, I've never had a newsroom never.

1:42:34.439 --> 1:42:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's a that's a bummer.

1:42:36.000 --> 1:42:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Whenever I say that, people who are journalists before COVID

1:42:39.080 --> 1:42:39.799
<v Speaker 5>or like that sucks.

1:42:39.880 --> 1:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, also though that is somewhat romanticized though, because.

1:42:43.680 --> 1:42:45.320
<v Speaker 2>You're because you're anti you're anti.

1:42:45.520 --> 1:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's not even a remote work thing. It's just

1:42:47.439 --> 1:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the newsroom of Future Publishing when I work there. Eight shit,

1:42:51.240 --> 1:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>don't live in England anymore. Future Publishing there was there

1:42:55.920 --> 1:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was just a mood of depression in that books. It

1:42:57.400 --> 1:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was a depressing place to work run by us White.

1:43:00.040 --> 1:43:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

1:43:00.960 --> 1:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And so then you go into the BBC one or

1:43:04.000 --> 1:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg one, you're like, Okay, I fucking get it.

1:43:06.320 --> 1:43:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Like I would be, oh, yeah, the Bloomberg one sounds awesome,

1:43:08.720 --> 1:43:10.240
<v Speaker 4>but the BBC one, at least the old one.

1:43:10.280 --> 1:43:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been into the Big Tower too, And I

1:43:14.520 --> 1:43:17.559
<v Speaker 1>feel like that it'd be cool if a tech newsroom

1:43:17.560 --> 1:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>exists like that. It just in the world, just practically speaking.

1:43:20.200 --> 1:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But also I don't know if one. I guess all

1:43:21.920 --> 1:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>things that you kind of had one.

1:43:23.360 --> 1:43:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we had like a we were like weirdly

1:43:26.120 --> 1:43:29.759
<v Speaker 3>remote hybrid. We had like a work space or something

1:43:29.840 --> 1:43:35.080
<v Speaker 3>in Soma, but I think that like, like, look, it's

1:43:35.120 --> 1:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>we are romanticizing it. But I do like and I

1:43:38.000 --> 1:43:40.920
<v Speaker 3>fucking work from home literally all the time. But but

1:43:41.400 --> 1:43:44.760
<v Speaker 3>my the thing that I miss about working at headquarters

1:43:44.800 --> 1:43:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in New York was just like you walk around run

1:43:47.800 --> 1:43:48.759
<v Speaker 3>into people bullshit.

1:43:48.920 --> 1:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I know.

1:43:49.240 --> 1:43:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually do sometimes come up with interesting things or

1:43:52.439 --> 1:43:55.879
<v Speaker 3>like share tips and whatever just because you saw someone.

1:43:56.120 --> 1:43:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And I do think there's.

1:43:57.280 --> 1:43:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Value there, No, there is, there is definitely. And I

1:43:59.880 --> 1:44:03.000
<v Speaker 4>was to say box as a New York office business

1:44:03.040 --> 1:44:04.479
<v Speaker 4>insider does fortune does.

1:44:04.600 --> 1:44:07.240
<v Speaker 5>I just have always lived in California my entire lifests

1:44:07.280 --> 1:44:08.120
<v Speaker 5>and I'm not moving to New.

1:44:08.120 --> 1:44:12.679
<v Speaker 1>York updated long term a heads that I was recently

1:44:12.720 --> 1:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>releasing the psychiatric Ward for example, That's where we met

1:44:19.320 --> 1:44:21.519
<v Speaker 1>those people. Like they may remember, I was very pro

1:44:21.520 --> 1:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>remote work and I still am. I've never been his

1:44:24.080 --> 1:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>anti office at all. Yeah, and that is like the

1:44:27.080 --> 1:44:29.879
<v Speaker 1>reason I do these in studio ones is because remote

1:44:29.920 --> 1:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is fine. But this is cool. This is energy, Yes,

1:44:33.160 --> 1:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>each other. We can be focused, and I think the

1:44:37.120 --> 1:44:40.559
<v Speaker 1>I do it's the real dumb startup guy thing in

1:44:40.600 --> 1:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>my house, like we should have a coworking splost for

1:44:43.000 --> 1:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the tech media. That's like a really good twenty eleven

1:44:45.439 --> 1:44:47.720
<v Speaker 1>asked Idea.

1:44:47.280 --> 1:44:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, I think the thing that gets lost from

1:44:49.280 --> 1:44:52.679
<v Speaker 3>like again, I'm older than you and like I came

1:44:52.760 --> 1:44:55.479
<v Speaker 3>up in like where remote work was not a thing,

1:44:56.040 --> 1:44:58.760
<v Speaker 3>not really, and like now I am very much a

1:44:58.880 --> 1:45:01.120
<v Speaker 3>remote per in a lot of the time.

1:45:01.320 --> 1:45:04.679
<v Speaker 2>But like I do at least appreciate the.

1:45:04.840 --> 1:45:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Time that I had in I think it means something

1:45:08.400 --> 1:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>very different when you're when you're younger in your career

1:45:11.160 --> 1:45:14.000
<v Speaker 3>rather than you're older in your career, and I forget that.

1:45:14.400 --> 1:45:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Like I was in the Times headquarters from twenty fourteen

1:45:17.320 --> 1:45:20.479
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen, and that was super valuable for me because

1:45:21.200 --> 1:45:24.920
<v Speaker 3>like just the whole like fucking face time with who

1:45:25.439 --> 1:45:27.559
<v Speaker 3>you should know or what everything is real? You know?

1:45:27.920 --> 1:45:30.519
<v Speaker 1>And I will like again, I'm like missed the remote work.

1:45:30.560 --> 1:45:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But my first job was at Pcson Magazine with Future,

1:45:33.800 --> 1:45:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and as miserable as that place was, it was because

1:45:35.640 --> 1:45:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of the management, yep, not because of people like Will

1:45:38.280 --> 1:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Porter and Steve Hogatine, people I work with who were

1:45:40.920 --> 1:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there to tell me to stop playing World of Warcraft

1:45:43.360 --> 1:45:46.760
<v Speaker 1>during work. And then I would say to them, no,

1:45:46.920 --> 1:45:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I've done all my work, and then they would say, no,

1:45:49.560 --> 1:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you haven't, and then I would say, yes, I have

1:45:51.720 --> 1:45:53.559
<v Speaker 1>go check and then they would be really pissed off

1:45:53.560 --> 1:45:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and tell me to stop playing anyway. Jokes aside, having

1:45:56.800 --> 1:45:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Will redline my shit in person broke my spira.

1:46:00.040 --> 1:46:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh, that's awesome.

1:46:01.360 --> 1:46:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But actually it was really valuable because I then went

1:46:03.840 --> 1:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and had coffee with Steve Hogerti, who then said he's

1:46:07.160 --> 1:46:10.519
<v Speaker 1>right though, and that also hurt. But it was also

1:46:10.640 --> 1:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I could go back to Will and

1:46:12.000 --> 1:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have a conversation about what the fuck he meant.

1:46:14.720 --> 1:46:18.479
<v Speaker 1>He's a wonderful edity, genuinely like and having that experience

1:46:18.479 --> 1:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of like having the moment being like,

1:46:20.080 --> 1:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>oh my spirit, but not having that on my own

1:46:23.320 --> 1:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at home, separated from the world, I actually think was

1:46:26.880 --> 1:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>quite valuable. It's just I keep coming back to this

1:46:29.439 --> 1:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>solidarity thing. I think it's just.

1:46:31.840 --> 1:46:33.000
<v Speaker 5>We have that solidarity.

1:46:33.120 --> 1:46:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I think, like physical physical I have adapted as a

1:46:37.840 --> 1:46:41.560
<v Speaker 4>journalist just fine. I would have loved a newsroom that

1:46:41.600 --> 1:46:44.360
<v Speaker 4>would be great, but I adapted. I went to tons

1:46:44.360 --> 1:46:46.360
<v Speaker 4>of events, I've met tons of and then I've also

1:46:46.439 --> 1:46:49.120
<v Speaker 4>like reached out to like more established journalists a ton

1:46:49.200 --> 1:46:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, hey, can I get your advice on this?

1:46:50.880 --> 1:46:53.000
<v Speaker 4>All the time, and people my age, I think, like

1:46:53.560 --> 1:46:56.080
<v Speaker 4>I definitely have that as harsh as it is, like

1:46:56.520 --> 1:46:59.400
<v Speaker 4>especially in San Francisco, like, for instance, people on my beat.

1:46:59.479 --> 1:47:02.439
<v Speaker 4>Rachel met at Bloomberg. I see her at events. We

1:47:03.040 --> 1:47:05.640
<v Speaker 4>talk all the time, like having those people who are

1:47:05.640 --> 1:47:08.240
<v Speaker 4>more established who can be like hey, like, we still

1:47:08.280 --> 1:47:10.720
<v Speaker 4>have that, I think, but younger generalists have to know

1:47:11.000 --> 1:47:11.720
<v Speaker 4>to reach out for that.

1:47:11.800 --> 1:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe it's more defined. I'm just trying to find,

1:47:15.040 --> 1:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like an excuse to throw a party.

1:47:16.439 --> 1:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>I think I would go to your party.

1:47:19.040 --> 1:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:47:19.400 --> 1:47:22.960
<v Speaker 4>The last time I saw Mike at a party actually

1:47:23.000 --> 1:47:24.040
<v Speaker 4>there was a thing in December.

1:47:24.200 --> 1:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>But let's wrap this up though. So I've really enjoyed

1:47:28.800 --> 1:47:32.720
<v Speaker 1>having you both here. Thank you so much. Mike. Where

1:47:32.720 --> 1:47:33.519
<v Speaker 1>can people find you?

1:47:38.080 --> 1:47:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm writing occasionally at The New York Times,

1:47:40.960 --> 1:47:44.320
<v Speaker 3>where I work for my full time job, and then

1:47:45.160 --> 1:47:50.680
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, but more on Instagram too now just like

1:47:50.760 --> 1:47:53.280
<v Speaker 3>google my name and then you can find on my show.

1:47:53.400 --> 1:47:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So I wrote a book which if I would love

1:47:56.040 --> 1:47:59.519
<v Speaker 3>to plug. It's called super Pumped The Battle for Uber

1:47:59.720 --> 1:48:04.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you don't like reading, you can watch the show,

1:48:04.080 --> 1:48:05.400
<v Speaker 3>which is on Netflix.

1:48:06.120 --> 1:48:09.519
<v Speaker 2>Right off the show, Thank you very cool.

1:48:10.280 --> 1:48:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll just say I love that show so much

1:48:12.920 --> 1:48:15.400
<v Speaker 4>because I had such a huge crush on Jesseph Gordon

1:48:15.439 --> 1:48:17.559
<v Speaker 4>Levitt was growing up. And then I also didn't know

1:48:17.560 --> 1:48:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Travis Kalenick was such a dick. That show is awesome.

1:48:23.320 --> 1:48:25.400
<v Speaker 2>J g l is also a lovely human being, but.

1:48:25.400 --> 1:48:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god, I love him, so you.

1:48:27.479 --> 1:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Can be yeah, doubly secure.

1:48:30.000 --> 1:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And problem with that show was it felt like they

1:48:32.760 --> 1:48:36.360
<v Speaker 1>cost the wrong guy as Travis. There's a guy who

1:48:36.400 --> 1:48:39.639
<v Speaker 1>just looks exactly like Travis Kalenick who plays like coming.

1:48:39.840 --> 1:48:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it was funny.

1:48:41.320 --> 1:48:43.600
<v Speaker 3>A lot of super employees were like, they should have

1:48:43.880 --> 1:48:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Chandlers.

1:48:46.200 --> 1:48:47.240
<v Speaker 5>So good. I ate that up.

1:48:47.920 --> 1:48:52.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you can find me on Twitter x at Kylie Bites.

1:48:53.120 --> 1:48:57.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm on threads at Kylie dot Robinson not Robinson with

1:48:57.280 --> 1:48:59.559
<v Speaker 4>an N in the middle, no en And then I'm

1:48:59.720 --> 1:49:02.519
<v Speaker 4>right the Verge full time about AI and tech stuff.

1:49:02.880 --> 1:49:04.599
<v Speaker 1>And you can find me, of course on the Better

1:49:04.640 --> 1:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Offline podcast. Ask your parole officer to listen to you

1:49:08.840 --> 1:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one podcast. I'm so sorry, I promise I don't think

1:49:11.120 --> 1:49:13.720
<v Speaker 1>all of you are criminals. I love you all. I'm

1:49:13.720 --> 1:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>saying it like I love you all, like the menu

1:49:15.960 --> 1:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you remember that. Don't know if they let you

1:49:18.120 --> 1:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>watch that clink, but thank you so much for listening everyone,

1:49:21.880 --> 1:49:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Better offline dot com. You'll then get the same liner

1:49:24.560 --> 1:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that plays off every episode. Thank you for listening, Thank

1:49:35.920 --> 1:49:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer

1:49:38.680 --> 1:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can

1:49:41.560 --> 1:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>check out more of his music and audio projects at

1:49:43.960 --> 1:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Mattasowski dot com, m A T T O s O

1:49:48.080 --> 1:49:51.559
<v Speaker 1>W s ki dot com. You can email me at

1:49:51.560 --> 1:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>easy at Better offline dot com, or visit better offline

1:49:54.439 --> 1:49:56.519
<v Speaker 1>dot com to find more podcast links and of course

1:49:56.560 --> 1:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chatt

1:50:00.160 --> 1:50:02.479
<v Speaker 1>your ed dot am to visit the discord and go

1:50:02.560 --> 1:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to our slash Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit.

1:50:05.840 --> 1:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening.

1:50:08.040 --> 1:50:10.519
<v Speaker 5>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media.

1:50:10.680 --> 1:50:14.040
<v Speaker 4>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia

1:50:14.080 --> 1:50:16.880
<v Speaker 4>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

1:50:16.960 --> 1:50:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts