WEBVTT - Why Africa Borrowed Billions of Dollars From China

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe Wisenthal. Joe, I feel

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like has been such an unusual and crazy year with

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things going on, that there's actually some

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty important news that hasn't gotten as much attention as

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it would normally. If it was any other year, I

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people would be reading about this

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and talking about this, at least in this sort of

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>investment industry. Yeah, it's kind of like how, uh, you know,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>news you might like put out on a Friday and

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>no one really notices it. It's like all of is

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Friday news dump because you could put there's

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>so much all their stuff to pay attention to, the

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>virus obviously, the econ aomic shock on the election, that

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>no one really has had the bandwidth for anything else. Yeah,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good way of putting it. So the

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>event that I'm talking about that I don't think has

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten as much attention as it normally would is basically

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a debt crisis in Africa. And this month, let's see,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we're recording in November, so this month Zambia actually defaulted

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on some bonds and it's the first sort of COVID

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>related default by an African nation, and a lot of

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>people expect there will be more. Even though we've seen

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>some countries, some creditors, the G twenty agree a few

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>efforts to try to help indebted countries in Africa. There's

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a G twenty debt service suspension initiative. But even with

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that aid, people are expecting distress in Africa's debt market

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to get probably worse before it gets better. I I

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, like if a zombiean debt default would

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have been the kind of thing they're like, oh, let's

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:12.119
<v Speaker 1>do an episode on that much earlier. But in a yes,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly gotten less attention than I think it's lost.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's one of those things where I'm sure

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>even saw the headlines on it, and I meant to

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ask more questions in a meeting one day, and I

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>meant to click on it and learn more, and I

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't because again I probably had, like, you know, some

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>question about what's going on with the presidential transition or

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>something that took over my mind for the day. You

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>mean you weren't thinking purely of Zambia. Believe it or

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not in a meeting in New York. So in the

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>midst of all this debt distress in Africa, there's also

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention being paid to China and its

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>role in building up that excess debt. But also what

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>China is going to do now that Africa is, you know,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>economically stressed. Is China going to let up on some

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of those debt pay amens in the same way that

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe multilateral organizations or other creditors are thinking about doing.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to get into that side of the

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>African debt crisis quite a bit as well. But more

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>than that, we're going to talk about how that debt

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>build up actually happened, and we're going to do it

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in a slightly different way. We have someone um who

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously comes from Africa, from Liberia, and who had an

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>official role in the Librarian government and a lot of

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that role involved, you know, being involved in infrastructure projects

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for which you would incur debt you take out a

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>loan so you could build a bridge or a road

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>or a railway or something like that. And so we're

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get a different perspective on Africa's debt problem. Excellent,

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>really looking forward to this. Okay, great, so uh without

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>further ado, then I want to bring in our guest,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>JUDEA More. He's a scene your policy fellow at the

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Center for Global Development. He previously served as Liberia's Minister

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for Public Works and was also Deputy chief of Staff

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to the President. So, like I said, a lot of

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>experience in a government position within Africa, and it's going

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating to hear his perspective. Judy, thanks so

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on h morning, guys, and thanks for

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>having me. It's a pleasure to be here. So I

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>remember the first time I ever went to Africa. I

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>went to Mozambique back in two thousand and ten, and

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that really struck me, and that

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I found quite weird at the time was if you

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>were in Maputo, the capital, everything was Chinese. The cars

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>were Chinese, the trucks were Chinese, the stadium was built

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese. There were Chinese characters all over the place.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>It's really really striking the extent to which China has

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>become involved in the Africa market. Why has that happened? Yeah, yeah,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you had gone to say Ethiopia, you're going

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to add is you would have saying the same thing,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and across the continent and to a large extent, especially

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>even in Zambia that you spoke about, you just saying

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. There's been an extensive growth in terms

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese presence and the deepening of Chinese relationship with

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>African countries. A part of that, I guess it's historical.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>One is that, um, you know, at the turn of

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the century, when you know, would worried about why two

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>K China is entering the w t O. But and

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>China also on veils is first going out strategy and

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the only uncontested region in the world in which Chinese,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>because they weren't as powerful as they are now, could go,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was the region of the world in which, you know,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>most Western policy toward Africa at the time was filtered

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>through the lenses of humanitarian assistance and development. Africa wasn't

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>seen as a place to go and do business, and

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for China it worked out perfectly because there wasn't a

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>peer competitor there. I mean, there were some European engagement,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't to the extent that the Chinese would do.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The second thing was just the need that was on

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the continent and what China could provide um so, even

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>up to today, Africa still lags every other region of

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the world in terms of the provision of infrastructure, mainly

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>paved roads and power. More than six hundred million people

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the continent still lack access to electricity, and so

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>China had this excess capacity in providing infrastructure and and

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>normally provide infrastructure at costs. Right. So, before the arrival

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese, the infrastructure space in Africa had been

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>dominated by European firms. We're talking about your your breed,

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>your if I've the large Vincy, the larger French, spanishi

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and and to certain extents extent Italian firms. But the

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>cost of of infrastructure from those firms tended to be high.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Chinese came and were able to First, Chinese

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>firms where state sponsored um and so the state owned

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>firms and could therefore they had access to capital that

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was much cheaper and could provide infrastructure um so at

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>cost that they were competitive in terms of costs. The

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>second reason was simply because they brought money with them.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of instances, there were African countries who

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't afford um to pay for this upfront, and the

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese were willing to extend loans to them. Uh and

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>so for for a lot of African countries which at

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the time didn't have access to international financial markets to

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>issue sovereign bonds and stuff for home development, financing from

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the model lateral institutions was just not enough, especially concessional financing,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and and so with nowhere else to go, they were

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>happy for a partner who seemed not to worry too

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>much about public financial management, who seemed not to care

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about the quality of governance in terms of corruption, and

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>who said those things were internal and they had nothing

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. And so there was this a

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>confluence of interest between what China wanted to do at

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the time and what Africas did were and so because

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of that we saw a huge ramp up in terms

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of African debt. The final thing I would say to

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that also was that it coincided with this huge build

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>up in terms of a boom for commodity exports, and

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>most African economies were growing at you know, seven two, two,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>nine percent and and and China seemed to have an

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>insatiable appetite for for African commodities, and so it's like

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody was invited to the party, and the party went

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>really well for a while, So lots of things came

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>together in sort of an ideal manner for both parties

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or for multiple parties. What years, just to help us

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>frame the conversation, we talked about this boom, and we

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about this build up, this eventual debt build up.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>What years are we talking about in terms of when

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this really got going and when the sort of really

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>hit it hit it transactional pig Yeah, So I would

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>say it started in two thousand at the first FORKAK.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>So the FORECACH is the Forum of China Africa Cooperation.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this UM is held every three years when and

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the first one, I think forty three African has a

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>state in governments arrived in China and it's been held

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>every three years, and this is when China says, over

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the next three years we're going to invest you know,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>UM five billion, twenty billion. It went up at the

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>last two forecascas China pless to spend up to sixty

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in Africa. So the ramp up starts maybe

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand and six. In terms of the numbers

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>begin to increase around and then, but the Chinese arrival

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>in this form that we're seeing begins around two thousand

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the financial crisis of two thousand and AID

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>basically left China unchallenged. Uh. I mean, I think a

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of the global recovery was driven by the Chinese

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>uh spending on capital projects and and at the end

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of that, China was left with this exx capacity that

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>had to go somewhere, and I think a lot of

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that is what drove even the Belt and Road initiative.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But with that excess capacity, we saw an even significant

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ramp up of Chinese spending. So you go back and

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>look at Zambia as a debt profile in terms of

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation of death in a place like Zambia, well,

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>most African countries were beneficiaries first of the debt debt

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>waivers on the hippoc right and did jubilie the activity

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>around waiving debt and so come around, a lot of

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the countries suddenly have significant space to borrow a gain.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And so with China left with this excess capacity, we

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>see this significant ramp up of Chinese lending for infrastructure

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the company. So this is one thing I always wondered,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But well, actually, okay, I have two questions. So first

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of all, could you maybe describe a little bit more

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what uh what these Chinese infrastructure deals actually look like

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and how they work. So you had things operating under

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>official state sanctioned banners like the Belt and Road Initiative,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but you also had private Chinese companies who would come

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>in and tender offers alongside European and American companies or

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>companies from anywhere in the world. How did those actually work?

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, if China was financing a lot of

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this infrastructure build, Africa is still enormously behind on infrastructure obviously,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Like why didn't it make more of a difference. Why

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't there you know, bridges and railway railways and airports

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and things like that all over everywhere. I think, first

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I have to really good question. I think first, it's

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just the baseline I mean we're coming from. You have

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to remember towards end between and say the year two thousand,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that the country, the continent is ravaged about a number

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of crises. Right first, there are a significant amount of

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>civil wars, the Liberian Civil War, the Syrian Union Civil War,

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>UM the rewinding general side mulga tissue, even Mozambique. We

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about this significant amount of wars and a lot

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure is either not built or destroyed during these

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>wars right and then, and because of those those wars,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of humanitarian crisis right and and

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, we had an AIDS pandemic

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that was wiping out a significant number of the population

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>across Center and Southern Africa, and so a significant amount

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of money that was available went towards the health crisis,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>went towards just basically beating needs, and not a lot

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was done in terms of infrastructure. And so the baseline

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>from which we come means that in spite of all

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the ramp up we did, we only just scratch the surface.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The African development back now puts the gap in terms

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure finance into around up to a hundred and

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars a year. So so you can imagine

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>how how deep the whole was in terms of what

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was available and the way it worked. You're right, there

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>were like three UM nodes of Chinese engagement where your

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>large state owned companies UM that were owned by the

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>central government UM and then there were your provincial companies,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and then finally you had these like quais that profit

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>private companies. Each of them came with the promise of

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the back end of Chinese policy banks. So they were

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>always promised that they could get you access to financing

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>once the government. I mean, what the required was a

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sovereign guarantee. They needed the government to back that loan

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and if the government did. And because you have so

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>many actors, it would seem to me, you know, I

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that as much about how the Chinese system

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>works on their side. But for example, if I went

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to the World Bank, UH said the Ministry of Public

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Works engaged the Work Bank. Most of that engagement would

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>happen through the Ministry of Finance the Work Bank. We

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't look at like the areas that portfolio and be

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>able to say you can't afford this. Right on the

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese side, it just seemed not to work like that.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So you had multiple Chinese pinis that are competing. So

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a provincial company, construction company that is access in finance. Somehow,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it has a line of credit that it can extend.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>UH it's working through the local the provincial branch of

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the X and bank, and then you have the large

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Stadia company, and it seemed as if there were in

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a central node that process all of

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it to be able to say no, it looks like

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Zambia has taken a lot more debt than the ZIM

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that can afford you see what I mean? Like that

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that didn't seem to be if they're were, it was

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>almost maybe it was ignored or it just didn't exist. Whatever,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason was a lot of countries, as a few countries,

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of them, like Ya, Zambia as your

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>UH South today and and and and Angola were allowed

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up significant amount of debt UH that was

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>tight and to be honest to UH, commodity exports that

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be going up and up and up. And

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>so I would like to add though that beyond the

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just huge infrastructure deficits, there was another thing driving Africa's

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>need to borrow from China to finance this. Everywhere else

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world, as a population has either stabilized or

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>its declining, right except in Africa, where the population continues

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to grow, where more than fifty percent of the population

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think is on the nineteen and because this of

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this huge increase in the population, governments are under significant

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure to provide both you know, hard physical infrastructure and

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>social infrastructure for for these and so they are all

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of these. And then Africa's exports tend to be largely

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on processed natural resource UH products and because of that,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>there's were so low down the value chain that what

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>accrues to us as value from our exports it's just

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>not enough to be able to finance our infrastructure. And

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>so because of that, like all of these pressures on

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>governments and the faint I thing I would say to

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that is all. So it seems kunto intuitive, but it

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>was like the more the more democratic a country became,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the closer it came to China. Why because when we

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>ran our elections, we you know, promised people that we

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would build infrastructure because that was the largest need. And

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>so when the election has ended and we needed to

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>deliver on the promises we made, China was one of

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the few who had both the appetite for our risk

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and the resources to be able to lend us money

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to build the infrastructure we needed. And so all of

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>these I guess all of these forces and and factors

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of just created this perfect I don't want to

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>call it a store. We just created a perfect circumstances

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>m for for for this Chinese lending to to Africa

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and UH and in Africa borrowing from from China. So

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there was no entity, whether it's on the provincial or

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>policy bank side in China or the government of the

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>various African countries that were the recipients of this UH

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>loan money and infrastructure capacity, no one had an incentive

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to do any sort of meaningful UH debt sustainability. And

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>now it sounds like that, doesn't it. It just seems

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>it seems that well, on our side in Liberia, we

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>really didn't have We didn't really have the option to

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>do that because you see, we we just come out

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of war and almost five billion dollars of our debt

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had been waived. But that meant we had to enter

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>an IMF program, which meant at the Ministry of Finance

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in Liberia there was a person there from the i

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>m F who reviewed our debt profile and UH and

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in Liberia we have something called the Debt Management Committee

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that reviewed every application for for debt from say an

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>agency of government ministry and measured that against our death

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>stock and and this death servicing, and we just come

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>back to say we just couldn't afford this. It doesn't

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>seem that that kind of infrastructure and that kind of

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, institutional arrangement existed across the continent, and instances

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where it did, it just seemed like the incentives were

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in alligned for people to actually give it the power

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to operate at its shoot. Then on the Chinese side,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it just um, you know, um, there didn't seem to

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be a significant effort. It looks like that's changing now

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that it started to change around the eighteen FORCAC, when

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the sum being began talking about you know, we're no

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>longer going to finance you know, advantage of projects or

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>political projects called them. I think something started to change

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. It might have been because of domestic reason.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It might have been China's own position in terms of

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>how much capital it had to be able to expand overseas.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Something began to change. But in those you know, in

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the heyday of of borrowing that has us in the

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>crisis that we're in now. In a number of African countries,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say maybe like seven in which Chinese debt

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually a either of debt distress, um that that

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem to be on the Chinese side, and some

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of coordination to be able to take And the

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>final thing I would say on that is that we

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>know that China has been sort of like a reluctant multilateralists.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>That China was not a member of the Paris Club,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and the Paris Club of Rich countries had had des

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sustainability rules, and because China wasn't a part of it,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really subject to this rules. Reluctant multilateralist is

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a great way of putting it. UM. I want to

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk more about how China's approach might

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be changing, especially the summer during the debt crisis. But

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>before we do, I mean, I think we have to

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about the loans. So there

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is a perception that China's loans tend to be or

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>its financing tend to be unfair in some way, or

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they come with a lot of strings attached, and that

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, China maybe doesn't necessarily care about debt sustainability

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>because it's trying to um, how do I put it,

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's trying to get a hook into a particular

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>country or into a particular resource or a strategic port

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So it's not necessarily worried about

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>getting paid back. So how much is that reputation deserved

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in your view? So I think it was First it

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was an Indian writer writing an outfit in an Indian

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>paper who coined the phrase dead trapped diplomacy. And then

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the US in its uh great power competition with the

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese simpler ramp ramp that up. And thing

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>my understanding of the narrative of that trap diplomacy is

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that the whole plan is for China to ensnare is

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as um is putitive partners in this unhealthy relationship as

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a means of being able to take over flagship infrastructure

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>like ports and airports just off like that. And the

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>example that gets bandied about is Humbun data, you know,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in in the UH is Sri Lanka, Yeah, in Africa.

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a lot of studies. They China Africa

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Research Initiative at the Johns Hopkins University has done a

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>study on this, and there's no real there's no evidence

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for this. It gets repeated often, but there's no real

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>evidence for this. The second thing I would say on

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this question is that about seven countries in Africa, seven

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>or eight the dead crisis they have currently, the dead distress,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>China plays a role, right, so in terms of Africa's

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>student deaths that China is responsible for about UM about

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. So it's sort of seems like we we've

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>become so consumed we're talking about and not focused on

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the right. A significant portion of the debt UH is

0:22:55.600 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>old to domestic UM creditors and to private creditors, and

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of it is UH the multilateral UH

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lending agencies, and so I it's worked really well to

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the US is advantage in terms of painting China as

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this irresponsible lender who's out to take over UM. The

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of the countries is supposedly UH it is working

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with that that it hasn't really borne out in terms

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence that this is what the Chinese. But

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the question is, I think the critique of Chinese lending

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>at a scale and pace that was just completely sustainable,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>especially for for economies who were dependent on commodity exports,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>knowing the fluctuations of commodity exports. I mean, I think

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen simply ended up being an excellerent of a

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis that was coming anyway, right, and and so we

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just didn't expect it to be this shock, but it

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was coming anyway, and and and Zambia had all has

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>been there. I would also like to point out that

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Zambia is a bit different right from from other countries

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how quickly the debt ramped up in

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Zambia and how much that it actually had, and how

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>dependent it is on a single export um copper. I

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>think we were fortunate enough that the picture out of

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Africa after the Zambian debt default is going to be mixed.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 1>So on Friday, at a Thursday of Friday called Devoir

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>went to the market, becoming the first African country I

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have since COVID to issue your bonds and it was

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>five times oversubscribed. So it appears that the market is

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>being really nuanced and sophisticated about the risk that African

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>countries present. And there still seems to be some sort

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of appetite for for African debt. And so I think

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>China as as a factor in Africa. Again we're talking

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about fifty four economy is in China being a significant

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>imp up part of maybe seven or eight. And then

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>if you take out Angola, China's influence drops in elect

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>significantly because a significant portion of Africa's debt to China

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually Angola's debt to China. And then of course

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you have your Kenya that's changing because you know, at

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the last forecast, Kenya went with the hope of getting

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>more money for this second and final portion of the

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>standard gage rail from you know, it's currently it comes

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from ambassador to Nairobi is supposed to go further than that,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and and the Chinese played hardball and didn't because first

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the current one is not able to pay his bills,

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is the debt is very difficult for them to service.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there was a committee in the Kenyan parliament

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>who suggested go back to the Chinese to say, look,

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we're in over our heads. We can't do this. Um

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the DS as I you mentioned, Kendya initially didn't want

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to participate because Kenya still wants to retain his access

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>to markets. But Kenya is strongly reconsidering that decision at

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So I and I think, uh, just paint

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>China as the driver of debt, especially with you know,

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>nefarious intense. It's just the evidence just really really doesn't

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 1>bear that up. So Chinese debt is an important contributor

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to the total of dead stock, but it's not the

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>only story. I want to go back to something you said,

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Um a little bit earlier on, and we were talking

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about this perfect storm of there being an opportunity um

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>China looking at Africa and saying there wasn't really any

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of other main entity there from a business standpoint.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Most of the Western dollars came more from a born

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>aid perspective than an investment perspective. Is there a strategic

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity now? Or is it just never made any sense?

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if the countries where China has been

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very active um in lending or largely commodity exporters, obviously

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>China has this voracious demand for these commodities, Do other

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of Western players, whether it's the U S or

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>countries in Europe, have much of a sort of strategic

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>business reason to invest aggressively in Africa or do they

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>just not have the same UH calculations that would lead

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>them there in the first place due to their sort

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of different needs of their economists. Sure, and just quickly

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>before I responded out, just at that. Part of what

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>drove you know, China's investment in African resources was also

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the needs to have access to the resources at source, right,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>because China could always buy them on the international marketing

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy them from Glencore, right. But but they certain

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>mineral resources will consider strategic and and and they want

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese companies controlling them, and so that that drove that.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a question. I'm glad you bring

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>up this question about, you know, beyond China or is

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>there a strategic reason for others to to be engaged

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>with the continent now. So one of the things that

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we that we've seen is the rise of these continent

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>sized economies, right that dominant the global landscape now in

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the political economy of the world. So you

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>have the United States, you have the combined EU, you

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>have your China, you have India and in their dominant

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and compared to Africa, where you have fifty four fragmented,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very small states. I mean, the largest economy in Africa

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is Nigeria, but Nigeria's GDP is still smaller than the

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington DC area, right, So it's I mean, it might

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be large for Africa, but in terms of a global scale.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really not. I mean, it's just how it

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of people. And then up to ninety

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of Nigeria's revenue come from oil exports. So Nigeria's

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>large economy is is pretty fragile, especially because now we're

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to a post carbon economy. So what the African leaders,

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but they understood their inherent weakness of acting as individual units,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and so they decided to create something called the African

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Continent of Free Trade Area, who would combine all of

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>their markets into a single market. And we just by

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that become a three trillion dollar market. So now

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it makes Africa attractive as a place to invest because initially,

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if you were going to invest in any country, you

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>had to and wanted to scale up across the continent,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you had to, you know, deal with fifty four if

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you wanted a presence in our countries. But fifty four

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environments that it's just way too expensive and and

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the payout the dividend doesn't seem to match

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the cost. But because now it's going to be a

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>single market, um, it might be more attractive, right, And

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think with that change, it's really really important

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that people begin to take a second look at Africa.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is, you know, over the last ten months, um,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the large economies, I mean they've spent close to uh

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's ten to twelve trillion hours propping up their economies

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>against the economic fallout of the coronavirus. It means that

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when the recovery does come for a long time, we're

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna see very low or negative interest rates in the

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>developed markets. And because of that, I think the risk

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>profile or the risk appetat of investors and private money

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>will change, and Africa presents an opportunity, especially you know,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for infrastructure and and the long term returns on infrastructure.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I just saw it's in the Financial Times that by

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the summer, investors has poured close to

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen trillion dollars into negative year bonds. I mean that

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>cannot continue indefinitely. And so I think Africa presents um,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, with you know, five just seven percent interests.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Africa still presents an opportunity for for investments.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is uh that. The second thing is, you know,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the State Department two weeks ago or about maybe eight

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>days ago, released the policy planning Department Bureau at the

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>State Department released this report on on the chance that

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the China challenge, and it lists at ten things in

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of how the US is going to organize itself

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to that China's conduct is the reason China poses a

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>challenge in China's model of leadership and and one of

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the places what we've seen really growth with setbacks sometimes

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 1>yet but in terms of the democratic space has been

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in Africa, and and I've argued elsewhere that the Chinese

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>model of governance, it's desirability or applicability is pretty limited

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in Africa. And so I can imagine where the democracies

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the world, like the US and and and much

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of Europe would see Africa as a place where there's

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>some sort of shared community or values of source and

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that itself is reason to to be able to and define.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing I would say is, like you know, as

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I noted in my comments earlier, I mean parts of

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe has been decimated because of the the population question,

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to affect Western Europe too, and so

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the only place that will be vibrant with a young

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>population that's working is going to be Africa. And so

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something the Chinese saw and the

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we're able to make a long term bet on the

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>continent UM twenty years ago when no one saw Africa

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in a place where you could even think of investment,

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and today you know, we're seeing that. So I think

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're there are opportunities for growth, especially in the

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure space, especially in the agriculture and agric process in

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>space that UH one would expect Europe, Africa's neighbor right

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to to have an interest in investing there, and and

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of course UH the United States to invest in there.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>What I do see though, is that China is just

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>continuing to deepen its hold. So the Chinese Foreign Minister

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>has already promised that China will provide support to the

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>African Continental Free Trade UH Area the secretariat or provide

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>money for training, and Chinese state media is already entertaining

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of linking the African Continental Free Trade Area

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to the b r I and bringing Africa closer into

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>China's here. So I think that there is there are

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons both economic and strategic for um UM actors other

0:33:51.760 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>than China to pay attention to what's happened in Africa.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to talk a little bit more about

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what's been happening this year and sort of over the summer.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So the distress in African debt is well known, and

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the G twenty react um as I mentioned

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the intro, but I think one of the sticking

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>points are one of the discussion points has been the

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>behavior of the Chinese, whether or not they would agree

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of stand still on on debt payments

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or basically act like other creditors um, like the multilateral creditors.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>How big of an issue is that and do you

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>see signs that China might be softening its stants on

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this front. It is a huge issue, and we've heard

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>incuragan things, but it's it's yet to be seen. So

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to this Zambia story, Zambia had

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gone to his creditors, the private creditors, and asked for

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a standstill deferral. They decided they were going to meet.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They put it off to November thirteenth, and then around

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they came back and said no, and and so the

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>design and then the recriminations right so on the Zambian side,

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Zambian Finance minister said that the private creditors refused

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to sign an n d A, and the private creditors

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know what kind of arrangement Zambia was having

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with China, because the fear was we would defer the debt,

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we would defer payments and then Zambia is simply gonna

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>pay the Chinese. So they wanted to see But China,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>as I noted, as a reluctant multilateralist, and China prefers

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>doing these things on a ball at run basis. Unfortunately,

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not just one of those times, right and

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the scale of the crisis and and the

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>number of actors, it is just not amenable to a

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ballad le discussion. But China insists on going the balladd

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>ra way, and so because of this, the private creditors

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just felt that there just wasn't enough information, especially about

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what China was doing for for them to make any

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>decision on that, and so that remains an issue. The

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>second thing was China x him. This isn't really a

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>huge problem in Africa, but it's a huge problem with

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the dss I total. China is arguing that it's a

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>China Development Bank and other policy banks are lending on

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a commercial basis, and so they ought to be treated

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the same way private creditors are being treated. That the

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>only Chinese, only Chinese lender who might participate in this

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>is probably a China Xim well. But China Development Bank

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is a huge player now in Africa. In Africa it

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>lends money into a goal on maybe and so China

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is is just trying to draw a line between what

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is you know, a national a state creditor and what

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is a private creditor. And so because of this, China

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>has not been as as you know, eager to participate

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in this process as one would like. The final thing

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that you know, after the last

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>dead crisis, most of the Western Oy City Paris club

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>members have moved away from baladteral lending. So I think

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 1>seven to two of of death servicing over the next

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>four years are the Chinese lenders. And so because of that,

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>China is a dominant player in this new death crisis,

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not just in Africa but just generally, and in China

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has hesitation to two. Part of it is China has

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>way more to lose, It's way more leverage right then

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>most of the the G twenty. So we keep saying

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.959
<v Speaker 1>G twenty, But if seven seven two is going to China,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are we is there really a G twenty right in

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of the dead question, it's it's really China. However,

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the saudiast who chaired the G twenty now said that

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they had agreed in principle on a framework to handle

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>something debt that will be useful going forward, and supposedly

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, the Chinese on board on board with this.

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, I mean, in the past, China has you know,

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>said uh, but they make these general comments that could

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be yes or no or maybe so we were it's

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>yet to were yet to see if China is as

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>committed to this new framework or if China is going

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to be more active in in in this in this space.

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But it remains that China is such a dominant actor

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>here and that China's hesitation to to fully participate is

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a significant storyline in the debt crisis. So does this

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>create a sort of I mean, it sounds like there

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>was some whole in the existing sovereign debt law or

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>some ambiguity the situation that allowed the dispute about whether

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the lending should be characterized as private sector lending or

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>official sector lending. What does a sort of updated version

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of sovereign debt law looked like so that going forward, Uh,

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there's more clarity on how these things are characterized. Yeah,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it just seemed, you know that after the first UM

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>more sometime around thirteen that the I M f UM

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would have I think, I'm not even I wasn't even

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>finance ministering like there, right, I just happened to sit

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>within the presidency and then control of ministry that was

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty big. Every time there was an IMF mission in Liberia,

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>they met with me as one of the largest spenders

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the government, and so everybody knew that

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the issue of serving debt, especially for countries that were

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just coming into the market, would be an issue, and

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for some reason there was never sort of nothing created

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of an international mechanism to be able to

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>resolve this when it did happen. So this framework would

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be that. But I think the difficulty with with any framework,

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's going to be when when when could

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bevore cells debt for a billion dollars or billion euros?

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The people buying that debt are you know, pension funds,

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, private creditors who you know, have finisher responsibilities,

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities to their their investors and the people whose money

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're investing. So this isn't just countries. I mean

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with countries, well you know, the legislature and there's stifican

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>make a decision here. Because of the strange mix of

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>creditors we have, it creates this UH difficulty in terms

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of hot one arranges this. So in terms of what

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this looks like, it's it's really unclear to me what

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>what what a new mechanism looks like. UH and to

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to handle this, because this is going to

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>happen as long as these frontier markets continue to have

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>access to UH international financial markets in terms of in

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of debt, We're going to see this happen again.

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It might be from shops within the economy or external shocks,

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but these are gonna happen. So how we restructure the

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>international system so that this doesn't happen? To be honest,

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm just one of the guys on

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the sideline who's saying, you know, we need to do this,

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And when you ask me how, be like, oh, I

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know, um so I think, but I'm confident that

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are way smarter than me are thinking about this. UM.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>But insofar as Africa is concerned earned it's investment, it's

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure gap doesn't go away. It's weakness in terms of

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>financing that infrastructure from his budget doesn't go away. And

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think, UM, this is just a pause in

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and in an exorable march toward more day and and

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think it makes sense that this framework that

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the salady. We're waiting to see what the framework looks like.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe we can have this conversation again when

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the framework comes out to see if it is adequate

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>UM to be able to resolve these kinds of tensions

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when they arise in the future. Judy, I think that's

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a natural place to leave it. UM. But

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. That was a really interesting conversation,

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and really appreciate your perspective. Listen, I am really really

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 1>happy you reached out and I'm glad you have participated

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in this. Thank you. Yeah, that was fantastic. Thank you

0:42:50.320 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. So, Joe, I found that conversation very very

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting and timely. And I feel I feel a little

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>bit bad because I feel like this is a subject

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that we probably should have gotten to much faster. But again,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed, given everything that's happening in there's just

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lots going on. But I also thought Juday's point about

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>how China is very active in Africa obviously, but that

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>even the sort of private sector deals, loans that were

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 1>coming from companies or you know, deals that were struck

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with with private companies were in some way or another

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they end up being financed by the Chinese state. And

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have a private company competing with a state

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>funded entity, that cost is almost always going to be uneven,

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think the state entity is almost always going

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to win out. And that was that was one reason

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for China's UM I guess advantage in African UM financing

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that I hadn't considered before. Yeah, no, that was that

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>was extremely interesting and I hadn't either this sort of

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>like straddling the line, I guess and look, I mean

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it fits even when we talk about China domestically and

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of ambiguous nature of the banks and the

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>degree to which their private enterprises but also UM but

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>also serve policy purposes and policy. Economic policy in China domestically,

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>as we've discussed before, is often conducted very directly through

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the banks, and so I get I think it's interesting

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it from a sort of external standpoint,

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of being the same thing. It's like this

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of unique Chinese UM financing approach, and this was

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the first time we've discussed it sort

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of outside of China's borders, but fundamentally it sort of

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing in some way. Yeah, and Juda's

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>point about how, you know, we talk about China having

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 1>extended a bunch of money to Africa, but of course

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's much more nuanced than that, and it's really

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>seven countries that account for the bulk of that financing,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and then one in particular, Angola. I think that's a

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>point well taken. But I think the reason everyone's talking

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about China now or over the summer is because of

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>how it's playing a part in these debt restructuring talks

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>right and there. There are even some people complaining that,

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, no other creditors are going to agree to

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a deal if they think that China is going to

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>be the holdout, and so any money that you know,

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>African nations do have ends up getting diverted to China

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>before the rest of the group. So it even if

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>China sort of has a smaller role than many people think,

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it does have an outsized role in these particular debt negotiations. Yeah. No,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, that's really well put. And now I feel

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>like that conversation, Um, it cleared up a lot of

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>things for me, I would say. And I think also,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's obviously that particular sort of dead build

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>up and boom, the sort of perfect storm that occurred

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with African commodity exporters voracious demand for commodities from China,

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like that specific set of scenarios may not be repeated

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>imminently anywhere else. But I mean, obviously China still has

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>um ambitions in terms of expanding its trade and also

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>expanding consumer destinations for its own exports of finished goods,

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and so the sort of fundamental questions of how commodity

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investment works and what makes sense for other countries

0:46:56.000 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to accept that obviously isn't going away. Yeah, I gotta say,

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I do hope they finished that that railway in Kenya

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>because that would be very, very helpful. And I can

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.720
<v Speaker 1>speak from personal experience that when the railways aren't working

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or there is no railway. Actually going along the highways

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>can often be a very very stressful um and extremely

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>dangerous UM proposition. So I am looking forward to some

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure development in Africa once we can all travel. I

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>hope you get to. I hope you get to. I

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>don't see that in my uh, in my path anytime soon.

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know we've you're more of a globe trotter

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>than me, and so for your sake, I hope you

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>get to experience that finished railway. Sometimes you don't think

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go on like a Kenyan railway in

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic maybe two, I don't know, but I'm sure you'll

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>have a wonderful Instagram pictures of it regardless. Thank you.

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>All right on that note, Uh, shall we leave it there?

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there? Okay. This has been another episode

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Trade the Alloway. You

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at Tricy Alloway and I'm

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe wi Isn't all. You can follow me on Twitter

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwart, and you should follow our guest on Twitter,

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>ju Day More. He's at ju day More. Ju Day's

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>about g y U d E underscore More. Follow our producer,

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening.