WEBVTT - Coercive Control, the Invisible Basis of Abuse

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is Stuff you

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>should know the podcast.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Big trigger warning just straight from the jump here,

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because this is about a form of domestic violence, more

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically intimate partner violence, and it's a tough one. So

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>trigger warning.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The reason that it's worth specifying the difference between

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence and intimate partner violence is that domestic violence,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>like you could have a kid who beats up a parent,

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that's still domestic violence. Intimate partner violence is specifically between

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 2>two people same sex, different sex, non binary in a

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>relationship where one abuses the other. That's intimate partner violence,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>and it almost always includes actual physical violence.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or as we'll see, where they both abuse each other,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which is not as typical.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously it may be a myth as well. We'll get

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to that later. Okay. Yeah, So what we're talking about

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is not just intimate partner violence or domestic violence, but

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a specific kind of domestic abuse that for a while

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>just kind of seemed like its own thing. But it

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>seems like as more and more research gets built upon it.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>This thing that we're going to talk about, coercive control

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>is actually the basis for a lot of the domestic

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>violence or wife battering that it was long called. That

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>it's actually what's actually going on beneath the surface, and

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that the actual beatings and the actual rapes inside the

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>home are symptoms or just the most obvious parts or

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>factors in this larger thing, which is called coerceive control,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>where one partner essentially controls the other partner's life. And

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that's generally what we're talking about today.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the word coercion means, you know, persuasion through threat.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, coerceve control is controlling that partner

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>generally through through threat. And then you know, we'll see

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a host of sort of components to all this,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but actual violence is almost always a part of it.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily always, but a lot of times that violence

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is part of a like you said, like a larger

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>plan to use the threat of that violence for control.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, or the violence itself for sure.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 2>So our understanding of coercion in general dates back to

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>just after the Korean War, and I remember us discussing

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>this in the brainwashing episode. But there was a whole

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>thing where some POWs appeared to be to turn collaborators

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Chinese and Korean captors, and it was chalked

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 2>up to brainwashing, that they had been brainwashed, which must

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>mean that they probably were pretty weak minded to begin with,

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>so give him a break. And there was a social

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>scientist named Albert Bitterman who was not satisfied by the answer,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and he started studying what tactics the Korean and Chinese

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>captors had used on the POWs to get them to

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>seem to collaborate. And what he found was that they

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 2>used tactics that he came to kind of break out

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>into what constitutes coercion, how somebody could make someone act

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>against their will seemingly under their own will and without

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>just using phys violence. And he came up with a

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>whole list of stuff.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, and you know, again just to point out,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like his whole jam was, this is not brainwashing. This

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is something entirely different. And I think and I agree

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with him. I think he thought he was making it

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>more almost easier to believe, because brainwashing sounds so kind

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>of out there when you it kind of just conjuous

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to mind, like people that literally don't have control of

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>their mind anymore. Where he's like, hey, coercion can kind

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of happen to anyone, and your because your brain's not

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>being taken over. And like you said, he came out

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with this chart of coercion and was like, you know,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese and Korean captors are doing this. It's not

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>like uh in World War Two with Germany in Japan,

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when actual physical torture was you know, sort of the

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>main component in this case. And again there is some violence,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's more these tactics and the threat of violence

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that get someone under your sort of spell in a way.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because threatening violence, when you're violent with somebody, there's

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>an end to it. There's a point that the person

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>knows is it's going to come to an end. So

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>now this thing that they've been worried about is actually happening,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and that means that the end is coming soon too.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>The threat of violence, there is no end to it.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>It's always around the corner. So it can generate like

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>real anxiety in ways that actual violence can't. Yeah, that's

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>just part of it. Another part of it is isolation,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>monopolization of perception, like keeping people in a room with

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the lights on twenty four hours a day. It just

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 2>has all sorts of weird effects on people. It also

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>helps to restrict information so they are completely isolated and

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>have no contact or way to get information from outside

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 2>of their captivity. Those are just a couple of them.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the list goes on with humiliation, any kind of

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>degrading punishment, you know, stripping people naked, no privacy, not

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed to take care of their bodies and you know

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the bathroom in a normal hygienic way or

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bathe themselves, to basically kind of turn people and to

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>animals and break them down so they don't resist. Exhaustion,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, is one of them. You know, these long interrogations,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, limiting food, limiting sleep obviously, so all of

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is sort of working them hard. All of

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is going to weaken their ability to resist

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the coercion.

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the one that gets me the most is

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 2>the most despicable of all occasional indulgences. Yeah, I know

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna say that, because not only does it it

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>almost like creates like an affinity for the captor in

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the mind of the pow who's being mistreated, Suddenly there's

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 2>like this generosity that they can latch onto and be like, yes, people,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>there is goodness still in the world. But the reason

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>that they're doing that is because it keeps you from

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>getting used to being mistreated. Man, isn't that just the

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>most despicable thing you can imagine?

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because what that says is that a human being

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>could potentially get so used to that abuse, coercive abuse

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and physical abuse that they're not going to talk. So

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>throw them a bone every now and then, and it

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>just shakes up their mental sort of processes so they

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get used to it.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it makes all abuse after that that much

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>more effective. Continuously. There's also demonstrating omnipotence, which I guess

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>just revealing information that they wouldn't guess that you had

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>would be pretty shocking and would also make you feel like, well,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>there's no way to hide anything from these people. They

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>know everything. And then another one was trivial rules. Did

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you see that one?

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I mean that's I mean, that can be

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just any mundane thing, like you know, you answer after

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we knock this many times, or you approached the door

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way, just any kind of little trivial rule.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And again it's just about control.

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, and it creates a habit of complying in the

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>subject too, right. So if you put all this together,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Bitterman is widely considered to have essentially identified the techniques

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of coercion that anybody could use on anyone else. And

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>in fact, the US government apparently used Betterman's tactics as

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>a playbook at Guantanamo Bay. I'm sure elsewhere as well

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>that we just don't know about at the moment. And

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>there was also this kind of weird thread that also

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>came about a couple decades after Bitterman's research in the fifties.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Already in the seventies, the women's movement, like we've talked about,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 2>really started to gain steam, right, And one of the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>things that a huge focus was the plight of women

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>who were physically abused by their husbands battered women, that's

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 2>what they call them at the time, back in the seventies.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that scholars, feminist scholars in

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>particular at the time noticed was that there were real

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:31.479
<v Speaker 2>parallels between the tactics that Bitterman had identified of coercion

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 2>used against POW's in the Korean War and reports of

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>how women were treated in the home when they were

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>victims of domestic abuse, and it became clear that these

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>coercion tactics had kind of been adopted unconsciously by men

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>who abused their wives, and that, in a very roundabout way,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>for decades later, laid the groundwork for our idea of

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>coercive control.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I mean you grew up. You were

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a little younger than me. But in the seventies and eighties,

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the notion of you know, like you said, what they

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>call it at the time, the battered woman, the battered wife,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was a real It was really on the radar. I

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>remember when I was a kid, there there were movies,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>there was this It just scared the crap out of me.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Not to get too personal with my family, but you know,

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a little bit before about having a nuts

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>great childhood, and that just that the awareness of that

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and fighting in the house all combined to just terrify me.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid. I remember there was and

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I looked it up today because I was like, man,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was a TV movie with the guy

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>from mash that just terrified me. And I looked at

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you from Honeycut, So I looked at it was an

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>NBC TV movie called Battered, and it was three sort

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of stories. Mike Ferrell was one of them, like the

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>nicest guy ever on MAS played an abusive husband and

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it just told each of these stories and it was

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I remember this coming on and it just like it

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was awful for a young kid to watch that while

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>also was sort of living in a household of yelling

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and fighting and stuff like that. So it was just

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>it was a big part of the national landscape if

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>like a kid is hearing about this stuff all the

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>time via TV movies. Another one that came out was

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously The Burning Bed, which was is a big case

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to talk about now because it was

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the movie it was a landmark TV movie,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but the case that it was based on also a

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>landmark case in a lot of ways.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, One, I'm really sorry that you experienced that as

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 2>a kid. That's awful things. And two, yes, the Burning

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Bed was a huge, huge deal. It changed everything. Like

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>this was nineteen eighty four that the TV movie came out.

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the book came out in nineteen eighty and

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing was based on the experience of a

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>woman who throughout the seventies suffered tremendously at the hands

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>of her husband and then ex husband, who continued to

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>abuse her even after they were divorced. The woman's name

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>was Francine Hughes. Her husband and then ex husband's name

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>was Mickey Hughes. And he did everything like he beat her,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 2>he raped her, he controlled her. The story itself is

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>actually you could do an entire episode on it easily.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>It was just so horrible that this happened, and it

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 2>so captured the attention of America. Thanks to the book

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>and then to the TV movie, it really kind of

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>helped move forward this awareness of just how bad the

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>lives of battered women were, because it was not a

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>secret that there were women who were beaten by their

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>husbands in America. I think it was outlawed in the

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>United States, first by Alabama in eighteen seventy one. By

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty, every state has had outlawed wife abuse in

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the home right, Yeah, but in the courts that wasn't enforced.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>There was very frequently not enforced, and in general American

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>culture viewed wife battering spousal abuse as a private family matter.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>As long as it happened buying closed doors and your

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>your wife didn't show up to work, if you let

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>her have a job with black eyes, people were probably

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 2>going to look the other way. Even if you ended

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>up in court over it, criminal court over it, you

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>were still probably going to get off because it was

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>a family matter. And I saw, just real quick, I

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>saw a quote that a writer named Aaron blakemore for

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I think history dot Com found there was a New

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>York City councilman in nineteen seventy six named Leon Katz

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>who said, are we to break up a marriage simply

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>because a man beats his wife? Like that was the

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 2>attitude at the time. So this is what the feminist

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>movement was up against. And circling back to the burning

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>bed help a.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Lot, yeah, big time. You know you mentioned in case

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people are confused about how or why he continued to

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>abuse her after their divorce. This is over a thirteen

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>year period. But they divorced in nineteen seventy one, he

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>got in a bad car accident and she let him

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>move back into the house and suffered six more years

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of abuse. And this guy was a despicable human being.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>If all of this abuse wasn't enough, and we're talking,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is stuff that'll come out, you know, as

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>clear examples of course of control, like not just the

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>physical violence, but threatening her life. She made her drop

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>out of secretarial school, burn her books the night of

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the final incident. And this seems to be a common

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thing as far as tying in historical cultural at the

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>time domestic roles of like, you know, the wife cooks

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for the husband and takes care of the kids. In

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this and that he like destroyed the dinner, threw it

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, made her clean it up, made her

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>cook it again, that kind of thing. And then in

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>another incident, strangled his daughter's kitten in front of uh.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>He actually did. He didn't just threaten.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>To no, no, no, He did so a despicable human

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the point where after that final night where she

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was raped, one final time, he passed out drunk and

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>she set his bed on fire, which is why it's

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>called the burning bed. And Fara Faucet got a lot

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of acclaim for taking on like a really serious role

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and portraying Francin and Hughes to the great Paul La

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt's despicable Mickey Hughes.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I had not heard of him. I didn't bother to

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>look him up. Who is he? What did he do?

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? He was He was a great actor in the seventies.

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>He was in a lot of stuff.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I didn't recognize him.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you remember Melvin and Howard Jonathan Demmy move about

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the true story of the when the guy picked up

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Howard Hughes as a hitchhiker. No, he was Melvin and

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he was in a lot of stuff, Paulick guy in

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the seventies and eighties.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I got to see that movie. I've never heard

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not what you think.

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not a fun road trip in that tradition of

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>road trip.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, it's a very good movie. But that's a

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very small part of it. Anyway. Just a couple of

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>more quick points just of how reprehensible this case was.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>When the cops came they that night, they didn't arrest him,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and in front of the cops, they later testified the

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>police said that in front of them, he said it's

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>over for you because you called the police in front

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the cops and they still didn't arrest him. And

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>after she killed him, she drove straight to the police

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>station and confessed.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, and we should say they had kids, and the

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>first thing she did was get the kids out of

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the house and then go back in and set the

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>bed on fire or said the bedroom fire around him.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, there was. Yeah, the impact that the book

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 2>and then the TV movie had and spreading awareness is

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>like really hard to overestimate. But it had another really

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>significant impact too in the courts, because remember we said

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 2>that the course would just kind of be like, yeah, sorry,

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't have burned dinner. I mean that's just what

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>women do. You cook dinner and you do it right

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 2>or else who knows what your husband's gonna do kind

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of thing. Right. And this, this case that Francine Hughes

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>actually went through when she turned herself into the police

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and was charged with first degree murder, she got off

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 2>just because she used a temporary insanity defense. I think

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that that was what it took for a jury to

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 2>be like, okay, fine, we'll we'll let you off. We'll

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>buy that, but we can only buy that because it

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter what else he did to you. All we

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 2>know about is the physical abuse that happened from time

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to time, And yeah, that sucks, but is it enough

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to kill a man and she had to use temporary insanity.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 2>And shortly after that, I think because of that case,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a psychologist named Leonora Walker started studying women who had

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>killed their abusers and found that there were a lot

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>of similarities between them, and she came up with a

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>concept called battered Women's syndrome, and essentially it sought to

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>explain how a woman put in a position of being

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>abused could reasonably kill her abuser, even if the abusers

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>not in the act right then of committing violence against them.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And it laid a really great legal groundwork for a

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of women to follow who did kill their abuser,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>because this had kind of been established like this is

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 2>a thing, and that ultimately kind of came out of

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the Francy Use case.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and she she got off on temporary insanity, but

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>also may have only gotten off on temporary insanity because

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the credible groundswell of support from you know, obviously

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>largely women protesting outside the court. I mean, it was

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a very well known case and a very big deal,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was not one that could just be sort

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of dealt with as usual because there were hundreds and

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of women outside the court every day with signs

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like demanding acquittal for Francy and Hughes. So it was

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>just sort of one of those moments in time and

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>history that changed everything because people spoke.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Up so that the whole the syndrome really gets a

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of people. Woman's gets a lot of people too.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>There's some issues with the concept of battered women's syndrome

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>and that it basically says you have to be the

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of woman who is submissive and passive and your

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>husband's still beating you up. You're still cooking dinner correctly,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 2>and your husband's still beating you up. It calls for

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 2>like a certain kind of perfect victim for juries to

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>accept battered women's syndrome defense, and some people are like, Okay,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>we need something that's like more gender neutral and essentially

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 2>says any reasonable person would kill their abuser given these circumstances.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 2>And so battered women's syndrome has kind of evolved over time,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and the circumstances that have kind of been laid. Is

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the groundwork for that reasonable woman to kill her abuser

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>or reasonable person to kill her abuser was coercive control.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and within that Leonora Walker sort of groundwork that

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>she laid one of the big things that she focused

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>on with something called learned helplessness, and that is this

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>concept that, hey, they have they have learned to be helpless.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>They probably didn't go into this relationship or not necessarily

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>went in to this relationship like that, but through the

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tactics of coercive control a KA torture when looked at

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in a military setting, they have learned to be helpless

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the only option is to set their back

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on fire.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's also a good example of how other communities,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 2>like black communities, like black women in particular, are left

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>out of that battered women's because again, it requires them,

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the victim to be perfect white, submissive, middle class typically,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and if you're a black woman culturally speaking in America,

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>you're viewed is much stronger physically emotionally than a white

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>woman of that description. And so it'd be tough for

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you to use battered women's syndrome because maybe you didn't

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 2>learn learned helplessness, and that's a part of it. Maybe

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you do seem like you wouldn't put up with much guff,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>so you killed the guy who knows it's just that

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>battered women's syndrome was much more limiting. And then one

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of the things that coercive control does is really kind

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of spread it out and it takes the woman out,

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and it takes the syndrome out and says, this happens

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and it's a pattern that can result in

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the abuse. Are being killed by the abuse, and that's

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a reasonable response to that kind of treatment.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, should we.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Take a break, Yeah, for sure.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll be right back with more on coercive control.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've been throwing that word around a lot.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>That term, rather coercive control, was actually coined by a

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>guy named Evan Stark, a sociologist, and again it's sort

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of trying to highlight the idea that what's going on

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is not just physical violence, but really just a deprivation

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of freedom, making sure that your partner doesn't have autonomy

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>by controlling them. And he wrote a book in two

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven called Coercive Control colin of course, the

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. Evan Stark has done

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>some pretty great work. In nineteen seventy nine started getting

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>into domestic violence work along with his wife, who was

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a physician named Anne Flitcraft who worked at Yale New

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Haven Hospital and noticed in the seventies that way more

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>women were coming into the er that had been beaten

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>up by their partner than the statistics typically had indicated.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it was supposedly like one in twenty and

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>she said it's actually more like one in four.

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That was another way that I think society lived

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>with itself and being complicit in allowing domestic abuse. It

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>was this pretty rare, and Flickcraft was like, no, twenty

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>five percent of women who come into the er were

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>beaten by their husbands or sent there by their husbands. Right. So,

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in addition to kind of supporting the women's movement at

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the time and their assertions that this was a big

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>deal and we need to do something about it and

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>it's really widespread, Flickcraft's research inspired her husband to kind

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>of go off and do this parallel work I guess

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 2>where he tried to figure out how to explain how

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>a woman could kill her husband and it not be

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 2>because she's crazy or because she was a perfect victim.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>So he started looking into like they did some side

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>research together, and they found something that people hadn't really

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>realized before that in addition to women reporting being beaten.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 2>They also reported this whole kind of cluster of other

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 2>mistreatment at the hands of their spouse, and that they

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of followed a pattern, and those patterns really resembled

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the coercion that Albert Bitterman had identified back in the fifties.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it was kind of Bitterman plus almost

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>because in the context of a domestic partnership or marriage

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and not a pow. And again, this is

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies and early eighties, when you know,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the culture of how you partner and what partners are

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>responsible for was a lot different than it is now.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>So this is in context of back then.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean even ten years ago chuck, Oh.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, But especially in the late seventies and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>early eighties, it was as far as coercive control goes,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, things again like dinner, are my clothes ready?

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Are they iron properly? Have you cared for the kids

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in the right way? And not just like oh I'm watching,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but like you said, even the perfect dinner could be

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>made and that's thrown on the floor. It's all about,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, controlling and manipulating and that threat of physical

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>violence that is peppered in along the way to you know,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of hold that weight.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the fact that at the time, especially American

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>culture viewed those roles as specifically for women. Then a

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>man being upset when dinner wasn't made correctly, I mean,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>that's that didn't strike anybody as completely abnormal. That wasn't

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>like a hey, hey, what's going on here kind of thing,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and that helped reinforce these patterns of domestic abuse that

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>included coercion, like constant criticism and nagging that led to

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>dehumanization and the humiliation that that having your dinner thrown

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>on the floor, being made to clean it up and

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 2>then recook it creates in the person. This is the

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff that that Evan Stark really started to tease out

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>from the Battered Women literature and created like this whole

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>body of research that it's weird. The way that I

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>saw it was he took this kind of like little

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 2>germ that grew out of like a flower that was

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 2>in the midst of blossoming, and found that that germ

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>led to actually the foundation that the flower was growing

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 2>out of was it the confusing So the women's movement

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>was making a headway with the Battered Wives Awareness movement. Right,

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>that's the flower blossoming. And then Evan Start comes along

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>is looking at that and he notices there's a little

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>piston or something or stamen can never remember what's what

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>pist and sure, and that's growing, not a piston, a pistol, right,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's growing out of that flower. And that pistol

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is the is coercive control. And as he started to

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 2>follow it, he realized that actually, that's not just this

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>little part of the flower. This is the thing, the

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>substance that the flower is growing from. That coercive control

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 2>is really what's going on in the vast majority of

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>domestic abuse cases. The battering that can bring the cops

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to the house. That's just what we witness. That's just

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>what pops its head up in the public sphere behind

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 2>closed doors. It's even worse than any of us even imagined.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know what this all led to is

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>basically the long and the short was they were saying,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you shouldn't have to show bruises to have

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>someone believe that you're being abused, because there's all kinds

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of abuse a woman, you know, at the time, and

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure this still goes on sometimes, but at the time, like,

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if you were an abused partner in a relationship and

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you had children, they may take your kids away as

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the victim slash survivor because the kids witness this stuff

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and they might be in foster care. So this was

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a normal thing at the time, and they

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>were saying, like, no, you don't have to show bruises.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The partner doesn't necessarily have to have mental health problems

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and lose their children. So in nineteen ninety Stark opened

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a forensic social work practice where he would go in

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and testify in court on behalf of these women and say,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and sort of preach this gospel basically on

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>behalf of these women, saying you can't take their kids away.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>There was I believe fifteen women in New York that

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>had their kids placed in foster care that he testified

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for as and one of them actually murdered her abusive husband.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So he was really doing some pretty astounding work.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, imagine Chuck, like you have to plead insanity or

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 2>temporary insanity so that you don't get the electric chair

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of the gas chamber. But then they're like, okay, but

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you're crazy, So you can't have your kids anymore because

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>your husband abused you. That's the hand you were ended

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>up being dealt in life.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I mean, and you know, once they started

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>diving into the research, they found that sixty to eighty

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of women who look for assistance because of violence

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in the household have experienced coor some of control. So

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty to forty percent is just physical violence, but up

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to eighty percent is like controlling and manipulating their lives,

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they make movies about this stuff. Now.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Don't know how this became a movie plot, but I

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like I've seen half a dozen movies where there's

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some sick o guy that like has detailed instructions written

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for their wife to follow to the tea over you know.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of any of them right now, of course,

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but someone just recently.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't think of any either right now.

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've just seen that as a plot line a

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot lately. And that's that's all coercive control. Of course,

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in these movies, you know, it's always a great like

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>sleeping with the enemy, that kind of thing.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he was a physical abuse or two, oh.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. And that's an old one. I feel

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like the newer ones have been more along the lines

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of these what was it I just saw recently, But

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the end, of course, there's always a

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>good inning and that guy gets what's coming to him.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, because.

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a movie.

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So as Stark's research kind of gelled and solidified, like

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 2>you said, in the eighties, nineties, especially up until I

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>think two thousand and seven when he published that book.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, he came up with basically signs and

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>symptoms of coercive control as a form of domestic abuse,

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and there is physical violence that is actually not just

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a part of coercive control, but in relationships where the

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>husband dominates the wife through coercive control, the physical abuse

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>that the woman suffers is actually worse than other kinds

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of couple situations where physical abuse happens. So it's more

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 2>frequent and it's worse. But you really want to kind

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of limit that part because it can easily mislead you

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 2>into being like, this is what we're focusing on, because

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>that's what we did for decades, and it's like, no,

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 2>there's focus on this, but also expand your your focus

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to include all this other stuff as well.

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some of this other stuff, and again it'll sound

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot like what we detailed with torture in the

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Korean War. But isolation, of course, that's a big one.

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Isolating a partner or spouse from their family and their friends,

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>controlling their comings and goings and social activities, spreading lies.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe hey, we need to move to another state to

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like really isolate them. You can't go to this thing,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't go to your book club, that kind of thing.

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, isolation and constant monitoring, and these days

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that goes all the way to like you know, cameras

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 1>in different rooms of the house and spywaar in GPA

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>tracking and stuff like that.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the more people that your abused spouse interacts with,

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the higher the likelihood that they're going to be confronted

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>with this idea that what they're being treated like is

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>not okay and not normal. So if you limit their interactions,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you can keep them more under your thumb. That's something

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that Stark identified. Also, another way to control them is

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 2>through restricting their finances, which is another thing that was

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 2>up until very recently very culturally supported as well. The

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>man had the checkbook right, and a lot of a

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of traditional families, the man had the credit card,

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the car was in the man's name, the house was

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in the husband's name. Like it was, That's just how

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.719
<v Speaker 2>it was. So it didn't seem particularly abnormal or a

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 2>form of control, even though that's how it's used a

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of times where the man is able to keep

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>his wife from running away because she doesn't have the

0:33:58.120 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 2>money in some cases.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and also like I have you know, no credit,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>no bank account, no no job, no job history, no car.

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's really like it's so it's it's such a

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>limiting thing that the very idea of leaving is scarier

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>than staying in a and of course this has got

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>huge air quotes around it, but a stable situation as

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>far as having a home above your head, right and

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, being able to buy groceries and stuff

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the resources that are out there that are like, no,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to have a car, you don't have

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 2>to have a credit card, will come get you, will

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 2>take care of you, will help you get on your feet,

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>which I think was really well demonstrated in that that

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 2>movie or limited series made.

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I never saw that one.

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 2>What is her name?

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Margaret quality.

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Oh, it's just amazing, Like I just think about

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 2>that every once in a while. It's just so good.

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 2>But they did a good job of showing like how

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 2>that actually works. The problem is is if you're being

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>constantly monitored, including your internet activity, if you go onto

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>one of those sites you're in trouble, you're going to

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 2>raise the the attention of your abuser. And those sites

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 2>actually when you go on to them, like a domestic

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>violence help site, they'll pop up, will come up immediately

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and say, hey, if your computer's being monitored, they can

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 2>see that you're visiting the site, so be careful. So

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>it's like just complete. You can't escape. The places that

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>can help you escape, you can't reach out to because

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 2>you're being monitored. And then on top of it, and

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 2>this is like a day to day thing like your sleep,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>you're eating, your whatever, medications you take, whatever, just basic

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 2>things that people take care of themselves. This is controlled

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 2>for you, Like your medicine's left out. This is what

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have for dinner. Make sure it's it's

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 2>cooked by six on the dot. We're gonna go to

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 2>bed at this time, and we're going to have sex

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>now and you're just going to go along with it.

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 2>That's another huge part sexual coersion.

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>This Another one is humiliation. You know, we talked about

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that as far as the war torture, same deal, criticizing

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>their appearance, making fun of them in front of other people,

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and then controlling how they look. You know, you don't

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wear this, don't wear that. You have to wear what

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I say, you have to wear your hair like this,

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pus. Also, don't forget threats. Those are a big

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 2>deal too, not just the threat of violence, but also

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 2>the threat of saying like I'm going to get the kids.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 2>If you try to leave me, I'm taking the kids

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 2>from you. They're coming with me. Like any kind of

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 2>threat helps just kind of underpin this sense of control

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>or helplessness. And so there's another kind of separate thread

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>of I guess research by a guy named a sociologist

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>named Michael Johnson who identified the same thing as course

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 2>of control. But he said, no, I'm going to call

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>this intimate terrorism. And he said that there's basically just

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 2>different kinds of domestic violence, and course of control is

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 2>one of just a few of them.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you mentioned earlier somebody getting abused in

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a situation, but it's not part of a larger abuse pattern.

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>He defines that as situational couple violence, whether it's you know,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>one person hitting the other, both of them kind of

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going at it after, you know, usually consuming alcohol. It's

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a big component of a lot of this, And especially

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies, all those movies I've talked about, they

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>were all those guys were all drunks as well, and

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a result of anger management skills, poor conflict

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>revolution still terrible, but not coerceive control. And then the

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:50.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of violent resistance, which is the person being beaten

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately will will retaliate basically, either as retaliation, as payback

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to resist being controlled, or just to

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>maintain their dignity. And in those situations it's sort of

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like there is no other choice at this point other

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>than to strike back.

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, That's the opposite essentially, or the outcome of coercive control. Sometimes.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's what Farah Faucea did in the Burning Bed. Yes,

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 2>there's also this concept that you touched on way early

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 2>in this episode about how it could be mutual mutual

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 2>violent control or mutual abuse and that's kind of a

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 2>controversial topic because some people are like, No, by definition,

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 2>coercive control means one partner has power over the other partner.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 2>They can't have equal power over each other or even

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 2>like sea sawing power. It doesn't work that way. And

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 2>I think some people think it's a myth because what

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>they're saying is you're seeing an abused person push back

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 2>or fight back or defend themselves, and you're mistaking that

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 2>for abuse, when really they're responding to being abused. That

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make it mutual. That's a normal, rational response to

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 2>being abuse used is to fight back, And I think

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that's why people who think it's a myth say it's

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 2>a myth.

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, course of control versus just sort of

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a situational violent episode or episodes. You're more likely if

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it's course of control, and this makes a lot of sense,

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, to suffer from mental health problems later on

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as a survivor than you would with just situational violence.

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>When partners separate, it is actually likely to get worse. Yeah,

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, which that was the case with the burning bed.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were divorced, he moved back in and

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there were six more years of abuse, but separation is

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>going to threaten that sense of control, so a lot

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>of times it will intensify. And that's when stalking behaviors,

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick up obviously if they're not in the

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>same household anymore, and course of control, the violent episodes

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are usually more serious and more frequent, which is what

0:39:59.120 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to early.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 2>Right, So Chuck, I say, we take our second break

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and come back and talk about whether this whole thing

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 2>is gender specific or not.

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do it.

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 2>So there's a just kind of a discussion or a

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>debate about coercive control and whether it's gender specific and

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 2>specifically meaning the husband dominates the wife, and researchers like

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Evan Stark, who coined the term coerceive control. Another sociologist

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 2>named Kristin L. Anderson say yes, that's absolutely how it is.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Some of them may even allow like it does in

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 2>very rare instances, happened the opposite way, where the woman

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 2>dominates the man. But for the most part, because of

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>these social structures that coercive control takes advantage of to

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of hide in plain sight and seem normalish, that

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 2>requires that it be a man dominating a woman.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Livia helped us with this, and she did

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>something that Lvia rarely does, which is sort of include

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>her own speculation. And I totally agree that when Stark

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was doing his work sort of in the late seventies

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and early eighties or through the eighties, things were different.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Dynamics were different, and women do have more access to

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>institutional power these days, and the idea of just sort

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of traditional roles in the household are different these days.

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But from where Stark was coming from, I totally get

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>where he would say, essentially that like even if violence,

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like if a woman hits a man, it's very very

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>very rare for a woman to have the kind of

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>economic control and financial control in the household. Maybe a

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>better job, she came into it, more money, she's the

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one that owns a house that was just a lot

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>more rare back then.

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Well. Plus also, Chuck, there's studies that show that even

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>earning a higher income than your husband not only doesn't

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 2>protect you from domestic violence, it actually increases your risk.

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a twenty twenty one Australia study that said that

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 2>if you earn more than half of the household income,

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 2>your risk of being a victim of domestic violence as

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 2>a woman increases thirty five percent. So yeah, it really

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of supports the idea that this whole thing is

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 2>based on these gender norms of a man dominating a woman.

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a sociologist named Kristin Anderson in two thousand

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and nine rot a paper that kind of supported that.

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Basically was like, one of the reasons that men might

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>engage more in course of control or maybe even exclusively,

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is to devalue femininity and to boost up their own

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>male ego. And in cases where and this isn't way

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>before like eleven years four that when you cited, she

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the fact that when a woman earns

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>more than her husband, that threatens a man's masculinity and

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's when trouble happens.

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So on the other hand, there are also studies

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that say, no, women actually do use coercive control. In

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 2>some cases, it might not be as widespread and there

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 2>might not be as much physical violence, but all of

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 2>the other stuff like monitoring, isolating from support network, threats, humiliation,

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 2>that is not gender specific, and it can go the

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 2>other way, according to a twenty twenty two study in

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the UK, So it is it depends, I think, on

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 2>how nuanced a definition of coercive control you want to give,

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 2>whether it's kind of gender specific or not.

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. In that twenty twenty two study, just to be clear,

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was when they have found women who have been the

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>perpetrator of intimate partner violence in those situations, they are

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely than their male counterparts to have used course

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of control rather than physical abuse, which is a big distinction.

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 2>It is, for sure. But then one other thing that

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>has come out of research too is that this can

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 2>also occur in same sex couples, that one can dominate

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the other, which also kind of undermines the idea that

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it's gender specific.

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.919
<v Speaker 2>So there's a big push to say, Okay, we've got

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 2>this whole domestic violence battered women's syndrome defense going, let's

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, what about the women who don't show up

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 2>to the er with a broken arm or a black

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 2>eye or something, but their lives are still completely controlled

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and just destroyed by their husbands. How do we get

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>them out of those situations? And some people are like, well,

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 2>let's figure out how to outlaw coercive control, and some

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 2>places have as a matter.

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Of fact, Yeah, for sure, there have been some states

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that have passed some laws about course of control, some

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>countries that have taken action, and they all kind of

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>work in myriad ways. In the UK it is defined

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as a crime, which is great. In the United States,

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like California, they made it. This is interesting, they made

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it a civil violation as part of their the Family

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Code of the state, so you can use it. It's less

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 1>like a crime throw a person in jail, and more

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>use it civilly to get a restraining order maybe, or

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 1>if there's a custody dispute or something. It can be used.

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And we should draw a clear distinction here. It's like

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious, I think, but this is not. This has

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with like BDSM, which can involve dominating

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>someone very specific instructions and control on you know, sexual

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>behaviors in the bedroom as a completely different things. And

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>then what we're talking about here.

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it's willing, there's no coercion involved, even it's

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 2>like simulated exactly. Yeah, And Livia cited this California case

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 2>that where a woman was able to use coercive control

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.359
<v Speaker 2>where she did not suffer any physical violence, but was

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 2>controlled by her husband, like who gave her pages and

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 2>pages of instructions on how to do everything from wash

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 2>the dishes to those of the time right exactly. This

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 2>guy actually did it to what time she was to

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 2>wake up and get out of bed, and every day

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 2>at eight thirty pm, they had a standing appointment where

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 2>he would go over how she did that day and

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there would be the threat of punishments or something like that.

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 2>And I couldn't find what the punishments entailed, but that's

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 2>how she lived. And she finally escaped it by getting

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a restraining order based on that, and that was a huge,

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>huge case that came out of California, and so other

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 2>places are like, oh, we can do this. Other advocates

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>are like, wait, wait, wait, we should be careful with

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:03.280
<v Speaker 2>this because there's already a history of abusers using anti

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 2>abuse laws against their victims. Like when the cops show up,

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 2>very often the abusers are the more convincing of the two.

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>And if you have a he said, she said, and

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you're a male cop who kind of thinks that you

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 2>know a woman's place actually is in the home, you're

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>probably going to believe the abuser, or in other cases,

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna arrest both people just to be sure. So

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 2>that means that a victim of abuse is likely to

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 2>get arrested for being abused if the cops come out.

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 2>And so because they have a history of already using

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 2>the existing laws, course of control is even harder. It's

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 2>even squishier to prove or to see your witness, So

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 2>it may be even likelier that a victim of abuse

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 2>will end up going to jail because their abuser accused

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 2>them of doing the abuse.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was a case in Australia sort of a

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a really spot on example of how awful

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this can can get when you're you know, coming to

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the front door as a police officer and there's something

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that's happened there. This woman's name was Tamika Malayley, a

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>witty Indigenous woman who was attacked by her partner Mervyn Bell.

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Cops show up. She's trying to get the cops to

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to her father to try and like verify that

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.919
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is going on. The cops aren't listening. She's

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:31.399
<v Speaker 1>arguing with the cops and then allegedly spit on them

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or spit at them, and so they arrest her. She

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>goes into custody and while she was in custody, her

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 1>partner kidnapped and killed her baby.

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It caused a huge national reckoning about you know,

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 2>cops believing not just women, but especially marginalized women and

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 2>women from marginalized communities who do not get the benefit

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of the doubt compared to say, like a white woman

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in the same exact situation. And so that's another example

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 2>of them being like, Okay, should we really outlaw this

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff and make it easier for the abuse to be arrested.

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's still it seems to be up in the air,

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, which way to go. But I feel like

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 2>people are going more toward outlawing course of control than

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 2>saying like whoa, whoa, we shouldn't do that.

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know, criminalizing is one thing. A lot

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the other things that researchers have pointed to that

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 1>can help, you know, just an episode like this, for example,

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>public awareness on stuff like this, encouraging friends and family

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to sort of pay attention to that kind of thing

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than just like looking for bruises or whatever, or.

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Being like, yeah, husbands get jealous. That's just what husbands do,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and like explaining it away.

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, providing resources to help people because you know, we

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, especially with course of control. A lot of

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>times there are in situations where they they will leave

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with nothing, so resources so people feel like they can

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>leave with nothing and still survive is very very important.

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then improving women's like position in society overall

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:11.280
<v Speaker 2>would help a lot. If women were treated more equally,

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:14.720
<v Speaker 2>not just on paper, but culturally as well, that would

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 2>solve a lot of these problems.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 2>So there has been some progress. The Violence Against Women

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Act of nineteen ninety four was passed and since then

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 2>in domestic violence, non fatal domestic violence in the United

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 2>States fell sixty three percent, and intimate partner homicides fell

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 2>from twenty two hundred to sixteen hundred and forty for

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 2>female victims eleven hundred to seven hundred for male victims.

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>So there is there is, like you know, progress being made,

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 2>but there's still a long long way to go unfortunately.

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and to be clear, that is cases of physical violence.

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't have studies like that on course of control,

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>which is part of the problem.

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Yep, you got anything else.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, we should encourage people. There is a

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>National Domestic Violence Hotline. It's open twenty four to seven

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>In English and Spanish, it's one eight hundred. I guess

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just eight hundred these days. Chose how old I am

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>nine seven two three three eight hundred seven nine nine

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>seven two three three. I can't imagine how hard it

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is to make that phone call. But if this episode

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>speaks to your life in a specific way, then please

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 1>seek help and reach out to a friend or family

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:39.479
<v Speaker 1>member for help to help you pick up that phone

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if that's what it takes.

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, Chuck, We'll put in thanks for saying that too.

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and whatever country you're in most likely has some

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of hotline, so we can't list them all here,

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 1>but please look into that.

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you want to know more about coercive control,

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>start reading about it on the internet. There's a growing

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 2>body of research about it, and it's fascinating and repellent

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, but hopefully it's going to improve

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 2>lives across the board. And since I said that, it's

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.760
<v Speaker 2>time for listener mail, I'm.

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Gonna call this documentary documentary recommendation for you, my friend.

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, I like that.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, I've been listening for a long time. Love

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Never really thought i'd every reasoned email,

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but this felt to kismet. It's kind of a fun coincidence.

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>My roommate and I just watched the documentary The World

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Before Your Feet last night, and in the movie there's

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trash on the streets of New York,

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and we were just curious about the trash issue and

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole situation. We'd both been to New York, but

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it had been a while, so we forgot how bad

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it was. Midway through that episode of Yours Now and

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh said, I wish there was a way to see

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what was there. I knew I had to write in

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>because this is probably a documentary that he would enjoy nice.

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>In the doc Matt Green has a goal to walk

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>every street in New York City. In the dock, he

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>has followed around on parts of his journey by the documentarian,

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and he tells stories about New York City and its

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>history throughout the journey. He also writes comprehensive blog posts,

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and in those posts he writes about New York's history

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and what buildings and spaces used to be. So, whether

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to watch the doc or read the blog post,

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's an answer to your curiosity, and that is again.

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's called The World Before Your Feet and that is

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from Tia.

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot, Tia, I appreciate that. I will definitely

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.280
<v Speaker 2>go check that out. It is right up my alley

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 2>walking every street in New York. Man, I'm still wrapping

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:39.439
<v Speaker 2>my head around that one.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool.

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you want to be like Tia and recommend

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 2>a documentary, please do, especially if it has nothing to

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 2>do with ancient aliens. You can wrap it up, spank

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 2>it on the bottom, and send it off to stuff

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 2>podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts to my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.