WEBVTT - David Koepp on Screenwriting and Walter Murch on Editing

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Alec Baldwin and you were listening to Here's

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Thing from My Heart Radio. In filmmaking, there are

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>public roles like the actors and directors, and there are

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>critical behind the scenes roles filled by people who rarely

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>become household names. Among them screenwriters who provide dynamic material

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to work with and editors who in the end shape

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the film. You see. My guests today are two of

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the most successful people in the film industry. Screenwriter David

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Kepp and film editor Walter Merch have worked with legendary

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>directors such as Francis Ford Coppola, Steven Spielberg, and Brian

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>de Palma, just to name a few. Walter Merch started

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>his career as a sound editor. He received his first

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Oscar nomination for his work on the nineteen seventy four

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>classic The Conversation. He worked on Apocalypse Now, for which

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>he won his first Oscar, and he later picked up

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two more Academy Awards for the English Patients, becoming the

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>first person to win for both sound mixing and editing

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on the same film. But first, I'm talking to writer

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and director David Kepp. He's written some of the biggest

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>blockbusters in movie history films like Jurassic Park, Indiana Jones,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man, and Mission Impossible. He's also directed several of

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the films he's written, including last year's You Should Have

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Left with Kevin Bacon and Amanda Seyfried. David kept says

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he started writing because, as a boy, he found a

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>typewriter in his family's basement in Pewaukee, Wisconsin. He quickly

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>tapped into the human condition. I thought it would be

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>great in my room to have this typewriter on a

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>typewriter stand. And then I think I was probably ten

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or eleven, and I thought I should write a story

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>because I had him. Now I had an office product.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So the next step was writing a story. So I

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>would write stories about some kid who didn't want to

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>go to camp, but his horrible parents made him go

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to camp, and then something terrible happened to camp, and uh.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Then in high school I'd write stories about some teenager

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>who was misunderstood by young women and one of the

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>things that were a little close to the bone. I

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just enjoyed it. I mean I had a lot of fun.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember in English class in high school, I had

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a friend who hated writing, so I said, well, I'll

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>write your story. So I wrote him a story which

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was sort of blagiarized from John and Mary, the Dustin

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Hoffman movie, which I'd seen on TV a few nights before.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But his story won a prize, which really made me crazy.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>So that was I started. I just I liked that

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need anybody's permission. I could just go upstairs

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and start typing. So I'm assuming you were a movie

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>buff as well while you're starting your writing career. Yeah, absolutely,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I love movies. Were you watching phonos when you were

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a kid. Yeah, you watched what was on TV? It

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was Channel four, six, twelve and the uh F Channel

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eight teens, and so the ones I really remember vividly

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>were the uh F Channel eight teen ones because they

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>were the cheapest ones they could get. It was a

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of Godzilla movies. I remember for years they ran

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the Basil Rathbone Nigel Bruce Slock Holmes, and I was

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>watching one the other day, Terror by Night. There was

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one during World War Two which bends with them in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a car in front of a rear projection of the

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Washington Monument and stuff and talking about how

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>America is going to come into the war and save

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>democratic values. It still makes me kind of misty. But

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember my mother telling me when I was about

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ten that I needed to stay up late tonight because

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there was a very special movie on TV and I

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>had to watch it with her, and it was Notorious

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Hitchcock movie. And I it's a great movie, and even

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>at ten, I could appreciate it was a great movie.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But the concept of staying up till midnight on a

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>school night for a movie, I think kind of fused

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea that movies were fun and you could get

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>away with stuff and have a good time. What do

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you think it was that your mother wanted you to

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stay up the midnight watching movies. She wanted a movie companion.

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think she and my dad were not getting along

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>very well. I was in the identical situation and my

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>dad was the movie goer. The very first movie that

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I began that to do with my dad was Sorry,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Wrong Number, which to this day I have an annual

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>appointment with Burt mine Caster and Barbara Stammick and Ed

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bigley Senior. Sorry Wrong Number is one of my favorite

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because I love a confined space thriller, and it also

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>contains the classic barbera stand mclin operator. Operator, I'm a

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>hopeless invalid, and I just likes the idea of describing

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>herself as hopeless. I love that actor. What was that

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>actor who plays the old man? And he says, I

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>can be reached the Bowery to one thousand, and then

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>she calls back said, no, we can't take no messages. Yeah, man,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what number am I calling? He says, the city Morgue. Man,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not a music queue. Don't know what now? Where

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Where did you go to college? I went to several

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I started at the University of Minnesota. I was born

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin, but I didn't get into my first choice

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>college and they had the latest application deadline. It wasn't

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a great plan. And then I transferred to went to

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the University of Wisconsin at Madison for a few years,

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>which was great. I wanted to be an actor in

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>those days, and I did tons of theater. But over

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the course of those couple of years, I realized writing

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was the thing I wanted to do. Had you been

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>writing while you were in college or you and I

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>had a playwriting teacher who was directing me in Arsenic

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and hold Lace at the time, and I asked him

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>how I was doing, and he started complimenting my my

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>play that I was writing, and I said, no, no, no,

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the show. I I know what you mean,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr kapp I, and he encouraged me to get out.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>He said, if you want to make movies, which I

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>did by then go west or go east. But we

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>don't really do them here. So I applied to u

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>c l A's Film School and got in there for

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>graduate school. No still undergrad. I stretched it out to

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a healthy eleven years. Junior year was three of the

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>best years of my turn thirty in my film class

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and was the focus when you were at UC on screenwriting. Yeah,

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but then I knew that's I want to write scripts.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And whether it distinguished moms or whether they distinguished mentors

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that come in guest teach or none of them. They

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't then, I mean you'd get the occasional person coming

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and showing you their movie and doing a Q and A.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of faculty, the guy like best was

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a professor named Richard Walter who was there for probably

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and he was very good and very imitatable

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and very quotable, but he was also very brass tacks,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>which was great because he would interrupt someone midstream when

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about when they're trying to tell their idea, and

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he'd say, do you know what kind of movies I like?

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>I like films that are not boring films and force

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you into move it, move it. Things must happen early

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and often, and that's how character revealed. And I like

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that when you're there and you're in a prestigious program,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a teacher in a classic that what does he or

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.239
<v Speaker 1>she have to offer you? There are two things. First,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you start taking yourself seriously, which if you're from a

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>small town in Wisconsin, is an important step because everyone

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks you're, you know, an asshole for wanting to do

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what you do or in Midwestern terms, making kind of

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a production out of yourself. So to want to go

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>off and work in Hollywood is absurd. And when you

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>get to a place where people start to accept that

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>as the norm and most other people want to do

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that too, it's a really important step. But the most

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>important thing I think I got out of u c

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>l A. Was relationships with other students, because everyone there

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of writing where you really need community

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because especially because it's going to be so relentlessly collaborative

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as your career goes on, if all goes well, And

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to be surrounded by other people who want to write,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>who want to do what you want to do, and

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>who are nowhere in their career so you don't have

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to worry about jealousy is huge. And you learn from them,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and you see some who are better than you, and

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you see ideally some who are worse than you, and

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>those were really important relationships. Remember Alexander Payne was he

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was getting his masters when I was getting my undergrad

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>But we you know, y'all work on each other's films,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and you just kind of you can spot the winners

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. You can tell who's good. And

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Alexander was always supremely confident and his stuff was really good.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy named Don Payne who since passed away,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who went on to write a lot of the Simpsons

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in a number of films. Don and I were great friends.

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But you find those people who will read your work

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and be critical without devastating you, and those are essential relationships.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>When you finished U c l A. What happens next?

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I had an internship working for a guy who was

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a distributor's rap in the US, and so if there's

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a video distributor in Australia and they wanted horror to idols,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we would buy horror titles like Sorority House, Massacre three

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and then get the deliverable elements to them in their

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>home country. A certain amount of porn, but you know,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of slasher movies and a lot of stuff

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. So I would go to film markets, which

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>was eye opening to see what they were like. I

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>actually went to can when I was twenty four years old.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>He paid for it because we were picking up all

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>these titles for foreign distributors and it was the Can

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Film Festival, but we weren't going to the festival. It

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was just at the same time we were going to

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the can Film Market, which is in the basement of

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the Pale. It is truly a horror show. But you know,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I was making money to work in the movie business,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and again I learned an enormous amount because I I

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>saw a ton of movies and I read a lot

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of scripts and I felt like I can do better

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>than this. And through that I met an Argentine director

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>named Martin Donovan, not the actor Martin Donovan and he

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>had an idea for a movie which we wrote together,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and then just sort of a point at ourselves producers

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of and went out and raised money by hooker crook

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and credit cards and made our first movie, which was

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Apartment Zero. And then from there I started working. And

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>how much money was the budget of the film here

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we call it was a million two, of which we'd

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>raised about five hundred thousand when we started shooting it was.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>It was terribly planned, and I was twenty four years old,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so I had no idea what I was doing. You

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't know how stupid it was what you were doing,

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>so you just kept going no. And I was also

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for some reason we were comfortable lying to people. We

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>tricked Colin Firth and Hart Bochner into being in the film,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>both of whom were you working actors at the time,

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and assumed that we would be able to pay our bills.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And then we using that cast and a budget which

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we turns out had were in no way able to meet.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We banked it with our c A Columbia home video

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with some help from this guy was working for and

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>UH borrowed against the contract and and then there was

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>an unscrupulous real estate guy from the Man who Died

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>and it was really as a classic indie movie story.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But we got our movie done, and then when we

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>got to post and had no money to finish, I

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>managed to sell a script which became this movie Bad

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Influence that Curtis Hansen directed, and so I just took

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>everything from that script and put it into finishing Apartment Zero.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And what was it like working with Donovan? What did

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you learn in your first experience about that relationship between

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the director and the writer. Martin was somebody who took

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>me seriously I think mentors because he was a mentor figure.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>He told me I was good and valued the stuff

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I wrote. He was fourteen years older than me, which

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>helped because I also took him seriously, and he had

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>directed one indie movie before, very low budget like fifty

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty I think. And he also had a reverence for

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>old Hollywood, so we watched everything. I mean, the look

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>on his face when he would ask me if I

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>had seen a film like a Place in the Sun

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'd say no, was one of joy. He wasn't

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>looking down on me for what a terrible hole in

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your film vocabulary. It was what an exciting opportunity. We're

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>going to rent it now and watch it tonight, and

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of unbridled enthusiasm. You can't find any just everywhere,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So that was that was important. He took me very seriously,

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and we wrote one or two other scripts together, another

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>one of which was made. But then I was feeling

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable writing on my own and Altarphew points were

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wildly different when you worked with him when the film

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>was being made. What was your initial experience with someone

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>shooting your material? Because he was also the writer we

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote it together. He was more collegial about it. He was,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but it was an unusual experience also because I was

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>also the producer with him, and even at that age,

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was far more realistic about what we had and what

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have. And Martin would do things like come

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>up with a tango scene in the street and call

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all his friends on the way to the set that

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>day and then one of shoot at that night, and

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have to say maybe one or two answers

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in the background. Absolutely, I think no, there would be

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred of them, would be there will be elephants. Yeah,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember. I was horribly spoiled. Colin Firth, who was

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>probably twenty eight at the time and was just getting

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some renown in England, came to me on one of

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the first nights and there was a line he wanted

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to change and he felt that the thing he wanted

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, but that I had at the beginning. He

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be easier at the end. And what

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mind terribly if if he moved that a line

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the thing, And I said, no,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that'd be great, go ahead, And I sort of assumed

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that's how it would always be in Hollywood. A request,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a request, I'd like to fill out a

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>form No. After the Martin Donovic experience, what was next? Well,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this bad influence was the script I had written on

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>my own. How was Hanson different from Donovan? Curtis was

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>far more tethered in what can really be accomplished, what

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can be done? Martin is a brilliant but impractical dreamer,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and Curtis it had been in Hollywood for a very

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>long time. So we went and I rewrote the whole

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>script with him in his garage office, and it was

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>a tutorial specifically about screenwriting. I felt like I knew

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot about writing, but about screenwriting for movies that

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are about to go get shot. That's where I learned

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton. For example, there was a scene in Bad

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Influence where Roblow comes to be at a bad guy

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're worried about James Spader and James Spader's brother

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>played by Christian Clementson, and we're going to Christian Clemenson's

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>apartment and to make us worried, you know, I had

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a scene with Rob Blows two pages long. He was

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>menacing somebody on the street and then he goes into

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the building and Curtis said, I'd rather lose track of him,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and also, I don't have time to shoot that. There's

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a fence and it's got vertical spiky bars in it,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and as we panned down, as we tracked down the

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>line of vertical spiky bars, we see that one of

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>them is missing and he pushed is in slightly the

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>implication in the viewer's mind being somebody took the scary

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>spiky bar out. And it was just brilliant screenwriting. It

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>used an image to convey menace instead of a two

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>page dialogue scene, which is again like the old Billy

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilder person of if you use the visual to show something,

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the audience will love you forever because they draw the

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>conclusion in their own mind and their participants in your

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>movie instead of just watching screenwriter and director David Kepp.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>In the annals of great film partnerships, few have been

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as long lasting and celebrated as Martin Scorsese's with his

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>editor Thelma Schoonmaker. She's worked on every movie of his

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>since Raging Bull. She told me their collaboration begins when

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>she watches the daily footage. He wants me to look

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at it cold and tell him if it works. So

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that is my part of my job. So I tell

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>him what I think. He tells me what he thinks

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>them from those incredibly rich where actions of him. I

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>then begin to create selection. Then I do the first

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>cut before he comes in, when he's through shooting, and

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>then from that point on we do all the rest

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of the twelve different edits of the movie together, very

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve different edits of the movie. That's what we prefer

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to do. If we can hear more of my conversation

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with film a Schoonmaker at Here's the Thing dot Org.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>After the break, David kept talks about a time he

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with Steven Spielberg over a scene in the sequel

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to Jurassic Park. I'm Alec Baldwin and this is here's

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing. David kept as quick to admit he got

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>very lucky early in his career. A turning point came

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>when his script for a film he thought would be

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a small one caught a big name director as I

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Death Becomes Her a script I'd written with Martin that

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we had imagined would be another indie movie, maybe a

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar budget this time. But I was starting

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to get some notice at the time for bad influence,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I managed to sell it to Universal. And

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember Casey Silver, who was the head of Universal.

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Universal thought it was sort of a lark and it

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>was this strange black comedy that maybe they'd make or

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe they wouldn't, but it barely cost anything. And I

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>remember Casey Silver, who was a great supporter of mine,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>who was the head of production at the time, called

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>me one day and said, so I sent your script

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to a few directors and I said, oh good, and

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>he had to go and he said, Bob's a mechis

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to direct it. And he sounded he sounded disappointed

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because Bob at the time for Universal had just finished

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the Back to the Future trilogy. No doubt they wanted

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>something a little more surefire commercial out of him, but

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he took an interest in this bizarre black comedy which

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>then he cast with In an Inch of Its Life

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn and Bruce Willis and

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>made the delightfully bizarre movie he made, and then I

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was sort of off and running. Then that got Spielberg's attention,

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to meet and read some of the other

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>things I've done for Universal, because I was writing for

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>them at the time and was looking for somebody to

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>help him with the Jurassic Park. It's a loathsome story

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mine from twenty four to nine years old. Really, it's

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a miracle I have any friends at all. Sad It's

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to tell because it went so riotously well

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, and it's just not emblematic of what you

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>need to do really in the movie business. You gotta

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>hang around and keep writing and keep writing and keep writing.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to think those days came from me later,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because you can't all go like that all the time,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't. When you're working with the director who's

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a big director, and they say to you, I'm gonna

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>cut the first two pages whatever their edict is, and

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>then I'm talking about you earlier in your career. You

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just differ. What do you use it? And do you

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of push back? I would push back and I

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>would invariably lose. I remember one of the first things

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked Bob was what do we do when we disagree?

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And he said, one of we talk about it endlessly,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and one of us will persuade the other through logic,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which sounds good, and I'm absolutely sure that he intended

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that to be the case, but that's not the case.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>A director will and must do what they see. And

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think that if you can get in their

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>head enough to create doubt about something that you think

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is a mistake, did you do that? Did you did

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you succeed it that? From time to time I would try,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and I would occasionally succeed, but not often. Now it went,

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it went very well. I liked our collaboration on death

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>becomes or our sensibilities were a little different his, perhaps

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>broader and more visual mind, a bit drier. There's a

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>scene in which in an emergency room, when Sydney Pollock

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>comes in and has to tell her she's dead, and

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's the tone I would have liked

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>for the whole movie. It's a sort of masterpiece of dry,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>understated comedy. But Bob had different ideas and was thinking

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>more in terms of the emerging CG and how to

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>use it, and that's fine. The only one that really

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of bothered me and I could never get over.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I felt there was a note that caused our structure

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to partially collapse in a later draft to meet Movies

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are structure, and that structural idea, to me, was sort

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of central to making the whole thing work. But in

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>general it was great, and I was working with big,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>accomplished to Hollywood movie stars at the peak of their

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>crafts as the writer, at what point did you discover

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that you had to process the notes of the star

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as well? What movie bad influence? Because Rob Lowe, who

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was very hot at the time, was attached to play

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the lead, and I thought that was a mistake because

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a sympathetical lead who we have to imagine it

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do very well with women, and I didn't see

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>anybody believing that. But there was a sort of seductive

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bad guy character, and I felt he'd be much better

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>off playing Nobody really agreed with me, so I got

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>robbed to have lunch with me. I remember talking about

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Donna Reid and from Here to Eternity and saying, you've

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>never done this, they won't see it coming. Of course

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you should be the bad guy, and he agreed, and

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so I managed to turn things around a little bit.

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>So I saw, also, though, the importance of getting the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>star on your side, because they're the ones who have

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and I really have. I really felt

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like my high school and college acting was has been

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to me my whole career, because you're the one

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>who has to do it. You're the one who's doesn't

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>want to look stupid. You're the one who doesn't want

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to look fat in these clothes, and I can't run

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in these shoes, and those are really valid points. I've

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>been frustrated by actor's notes sometimes because because their difficult

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>or I don't agree with it or whatever. But a

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>really good actor always comes like their character's lawyer. They're

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of just passionately different. Well, my client, my client

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>simply wouldn't do that, and I get it. You're their

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>advocate for that character, and they must see it from

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that character's point of view. You have to juggle everybody's.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But when you come two, the Spielberg experience, and of

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>course Jurassic Park was a novel. Yeah, it was a

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Creton novel. They tried a couple of different versions of

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the script. They tried one with Crichton, one with one

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>or two other writers, and it wasn't working out. But

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Stephen had some very clear ideas about how to make

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>these things real. So he wanted someone to commit and

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>start over, and you shared credit with Yes. The problem

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with Stephen is, you know, when I was thirteen years old,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Jaws came out and I had to ride my bike

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Lake Theater and Milwaukee to watch it because

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>my parents wouldn't let me go. So from the years

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>when I was thirteen till I would say twenty was

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Jaws Close and Owners, Raiders of the Lost rk et.

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>These are your formative, sponge like years. So for a

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>writer of my generation, it's Spielberg's it. So now to

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>write for him and to disagree with him and to

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>offer critical assessments of his ideas was really tough, and

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm he was used to it, so I remember in

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>our first couple of meetings he went out of his

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>way to say things like, you know, well, when I'm

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>working with a peer like yourself, what I It was

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>obvious he was trying to tell me to relax. All

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I had going for me was my opinions and if

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I was going to come in and just pair it

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>his a certain amount of that. Sure, sure everybody likes it,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>but you don't want a newtered collaborator. You want somebody

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to come in who's going to have some ideas to

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>contribute and possibly resist some of yours that might not

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>be good. How did it go? It went fine. I

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>think it took me a few movies I've written for

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>his that he directed, and I think it took me

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a few movies to get more into my stride on that.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>There was one kind of clarifying moment was in the

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>second movie, A Lost World. There was a bit where

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Goldman's adopted daughter as a gymnast, and Stephen wanted

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a sequence later in the movie where she spins around

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some bars and kicks a velociraptor and makes it fall over.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And I never liked it. I just I thought the

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of the little girl kicking the velociraptor was bad

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>for her character and bad certainly bad for the velociraptor's character.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I would just not write it and not write

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it and not write it, hoping it would just go away.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. One day, the double golden rod pages had

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>gone in or something. We were shooting, and he said, hey,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I know you forgot again to do the velociraptor thing

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on the bars. You gotta write that up because we're

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>when we shoot that, we're gonna blah blah blah blah blah.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, Steven, I don't want to write that.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna work. I'm afraid people will

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>laugh at it. It was as straightforward and negative about

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it as I could possibly be. And he paused and

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he said, oh, no, you other. No you shouldn't, no, no, no, no,

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>don't write absolutely, if you feel that strong, you should

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not write it when I shoot it. What I'm gonna

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>do is I'm going to bring her right. And I

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>realized what you have to get about directors is they

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>must do what they see. You can't bend them to

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>your will. But what you've worked with so many great

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>really legendary directors, And I'm wondering, like, when you work

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with Spielberg, Among his many gifts, what's the gift that

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>impressed you the most about him as a director? There's

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as a director and as a storyteller. As a director,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>his ability to compose on the fly. I've never ever

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like it. As a storyteller. What I most

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate about Stephen is there's a real joyfulness and he

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>has no contempt for the audience. He is the person

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the audience with popcorn. So in your filmography, from

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>one legendary director to the next, you go from Crichton's

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>World of Dinosaurs to Machina was a Puerto Weecan crime

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>boss in New York. And I'll never forget the getting

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a shot of that film, a great opening shot. He's

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Guerney, the overhead shot that film with Brian Dipoma.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>What was the Dipoma experience. Curlyto's Way was the first

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of three movies Brian and I would do. And again, yes,

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 1>very very hands on, but Brian wants you to do

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the writing. He's not there to do it himself, or

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he do it himself. He's probably written about half the

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>movies he's directed, or more so, he is certainly there

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for your viewpoint and wants to listen to you and

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>would like you to be right. What I found Brian

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and Stephen both had in common. If there was a

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>shot they wanted to do or a sequence they wanted

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to, and they saw it very clearly, and

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>they told it to me. They were really happy to

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>let me figure out how on earth is the story're

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna accommodate this? How is that going to end up

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in this movie? And I was happy with that because

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then I got to go away and do the work.

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You usually don't want someone to try to figure out

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>your problems for you. Tell me what the problem is,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>tell me what the challenges Brian was There's just a

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>great sense of comradeship. You know you're really in it.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Brian's a lot of laughs. He's a very funny guy, clever.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>He's very clever, and he I think probably of all

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the directors I've ever worked with, Brian is the one

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>who listens the most. That doesn't mean he's going to

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>go along with whatever you have to say, but he's

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>genuinely listening when you're talking and processing and enjoys the debate,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll tell you if you're wrong or why he

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>thinks you're wrong. What was the hardest one for you

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to write? I did an Indiana Jones movie, and it

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>was just the weight of expectation of twenty years history,

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty years of cultural expectation. And you know, everybody who's

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>seen those movies and loves those movies has a feeling

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>about what it ought to be. Steven's feelings about what

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it ought to be, George lucas Is feelings which are

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not always the same Harrison's. It was just it was

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a crushing load of things to try to satisfy. It

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>would have been far easier to write the heartbreaking story

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>my parents divorce. Let's talk about directing. Whim May you

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>decide to take the ultimate leap? I think I should

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>direct the script. Actually I knew that writing is what

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I love to do the most, is what gives me

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the most satisfaction. Directing is what you do when you

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have something that you would like to see the way

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it is in your head, and for better or worse,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a far better chance of seeing it the

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>way it is in your head than you do. Working

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with even a talented director. That doesn't mean it will

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>be better, but it means it will be yours, and

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes that are made are yours. And I really

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>most wanted the chance to edit and to work directly

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with actors. As a screenwriter, you're censoring yourself with actors

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want to undercut the director. It's a

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of sacred relationship they have and you don't want

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to get in the middle of that. So you offer

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>your insights, but you can't say everything you'd like to say.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you started directing, that later on. But when

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you began, what was your shortcoming? What was the thing

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you needed the most work on. I remember a director

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, who is far too blunt but I

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>love him for it, occasionally said, when he saw my

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>first cut of it, he said, you shot your script.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, yeah, did you laprt? I love that you

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't interpret your script. My god, you shot the script.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's so you He said, no, he said, you didn't

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>interpret it. You shot it. Literally, everything everywhere of your

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>script is there. And that's great if that's what was

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>your intention, but it doesn't have you didn't take the

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>step away from writing and into directing. It because they're different,

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't know for a couple of movies. Are

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you going to direct another movie you're directing against soon?

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope so I got you know, I got a

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of writing to do at the moment. I just

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>finished another book and I have a few things, so

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I would like to yet. I am your biggest fan.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean the breadth of your work, that the distinctive

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>styles of films, Carlado mission, all of them. Thanks for

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this pleasure, David Kepp. His most recent work is

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a film he wrote in erected You Should Have Left,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>starring Kevin Bacon and Amanda Seyfried. It came out last year.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Walter Merch is a legendary film and sound editor. He

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was part of the early days of American Zootrope, the

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>film production company founded by Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>He is well known for his long partnership with Coppola

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and later with the late Anthony Mingela. Walter Merch's most

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>recent project is a documentary he wrote and edited called

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Kup fifty three, about a US and British led effort

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to overthrow the Iranian government in nine. I met the

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>director Tuggy on Morani when I was editing another documentary,

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Particle Fever, about the search for the Higgs boson at

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva. We hit it off

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>because Tuggy graduated in physics from Nottingham University and this

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was particle physics. We just kept up a relationship and

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I never thought i'd work on it. But I was

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>editing for Brad Bird on his film Tomorrow End, and

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that came to an end, and I was at loose ends,

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and my wife and Toggy put their heads together and said,

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what Walter needs is to work on a little documentary

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for six months. And it sounded good. It still is good,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but the six months has turned into six years. I

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>watched the film and it seems that almost the beginning

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is like a preface. You linger with that guy, that's Taggy,

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the director, Taggy Armarni, and you kind of stay

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>with him for quite a bit of time. It's about

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>half an hour, I mean half an hour in a

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>film comedy turny, but but but you with him, it's

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>almost like the film becomes a completely different film and

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it takes off into the case if you will, well,

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we were just following the structure of Psycho, which does

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a similar trick. You know, you're with Marion Crane for

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty five minutes and then she's gotten rid of dead

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and you follow the rest of the story. I'm going

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to quote you on that Psycho was the template for

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty three. If Hitchcock could do it, so could we.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But it evolved organically. The film took off really from

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the discovery of this transcript of the m I six agent,

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and if we have the transcript, there must be tapes

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>or there must be a film that goes with it.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was the search for those missing ingredients that

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we never found, but we found contradictory evidence. Some people

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>said they don't exist, some people say they do exist.

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So the question that was a trail that we followed

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for about fifteen minutes actually of searching for them, and

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>then at that point we said, we've reached the end

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the trail and we're going to ask Rathe Fines

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to walk over them. I love that For those who

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see it, Raith Fine creates this character, this real

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this real person, and he inhabits that character. And what

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a coup no pun intended for you to have Rafe

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Finds part in your film. He's such a wonderful actor.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I met Rafe when we were doing English Patient back

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle nineties, and we kept up over the years,

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and we came to this fork in the road, which is,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we have the transcript, but how are we going to

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>turn it into cinema, And well, let's get an actor

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to read the lines. Why don't we got Ray Finds

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the actor, and then why don't we stage

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the very same room at the Savoy Hotel,

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And which all of these other interviews were done in

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the mid eighties, which revealed the essence of what had

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>happened in this coup, which was a British American co production,

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, and which successfully unfortunately deposed this name

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>democracy in Iran and spoiled for it. Ever since, history

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is the wiser for what happened back then. Now to

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>wind it back in the origin story, you grew up

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in New York and when you went to Hopkins, you

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>were going to go into into a scientific field, correctly,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>oceanography and geology. Yeah, my interest in film didn't really

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>evolve until a couple of years later, and that dovetailed

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>with a teenage obsession which I've had with tape recording

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and the manipulation of that tape, cutting it up into

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>little pieces is basically a simple kind of filming. So

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that was where I kind of returned to my roots

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in a sense that the passions that you have when

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you're ten or eleven years old or somehow more fundamentally

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>who you are than before or after, because you know,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know thing about the world, but you're not yet

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>infected with peer pressure in quite the same filtering. Yes,

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're less filtered. Yeah, Now when you're there at Hopkins,

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you meet Deschanel when you're there, correct, and you guys

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>decided to head off together. He's a year younger than me,

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. Matthew Robbins and I who I met at Hopkins.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We went off to USC Cinema as a graduate students,

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and Caleb phoned us up a couple of months later

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and said, how is it out there? And we said

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's great, come on out, and he did. He followed

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>us and immediately became known as a great cameraman. There

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>was something about his his knees that allowed him to

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>move with a camera with a kind of steadicam camera

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>before Steadicam was with the Human Steadicam. So you're out

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there and you're at USC for two years, you're in

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the graduate program, and what's the first thing you want

0:35:58.239 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to do when you're out there, Like you're at USC

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>in school for what you know? That's the lecture that

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they give on the first day of school is we

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>know you all want to become directors, but we're going

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to smash that dream immediately. You're going to have to

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do everything and it's only at the end that you

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>will discover where your real talents lie. And even if

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you've become a director, having experienced all these other crafts,

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll know what it takes to be a good sound recorders.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 1>When you finish at USC, what are you saying to yourself?

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go do what I'm married about

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a kid, and you just try to support job. Yeah,

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So when you leave there and you've got to get

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a job, what's your first job sweeping floors at Encyclopedia

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Britannica Films. And I graduated there from sweeping floors to

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>editing one of their dotmentary films, and then I was

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>out of work and you trying to pick up gigs.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of the gig economy. Can you think a

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>d R lines? Yeah, I can do that, and then

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I got all of it. You'd studied that you at

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>at USC. Yeah, you had that that background from us.

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you had to do everything so exactly whatever

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they asked you to do, you would say yes, even

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if even if you didn't know how to do it.

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You said yes, I can do that, and then you

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>learn how to do it, and you meet Lucas before Coppola. Correct, well,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I met George. You knew Lucas in school. From school, Yeah,

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Francis was a legend. He was four years older than

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>us at U C. L A. And he'd done this

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>hat trick, which is he not only got a job

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>directing a real film, but he handed it in for

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>his master's thesis. So the fact that somebody from film

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>school actually directed a film. Who who? Somebody who had

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>no connection with the film industry. Francis came out of

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the blue, and he was an inspiration to us and

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.959
<v Speaker 1>George and I at school had been up for a

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>scholarship at Warner Brothers. George one naturally, because even back

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>then he was George Lucas and he wanted to be

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>an animation you know, he founded what later on became Pixar,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>which his connection. But he arrived the day they shut

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>down the animation studio at Warner Brothers. So he just

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>wandered around and he saw somebody directing a film on

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the lot. One person. The guy had a beard, George

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>had a beard. So beards connect with each other. And

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it was Francis understand each other, Yeah, they understand each other,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was Francis and Francis said, Okay, George, come

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>up with a one good idea every day and I'll

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 1>shoot it. And George did. This was on the film

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Finean's Rainbow, Fineans Ring. So George and Francis bonded and

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing led to another, and I got a call

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>from George in early nineteen sixty nine saying could I

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>cut the sound for the film that Francis had just directed,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The rain People. And that started my relationship with Francis,

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>which continues to this day. Then, assuming that once you

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 1>go to northern California and we'll get into the American

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Zoo trope and Francis or a bit there, what was

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the impetus state for you to move there? For you

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to relocate there. Why did you do that again? George

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and Francis they had were both they were both living

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>up there. Yeah, well they had been. They had shot

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the rain People and ended up shooting the last four

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks in Ogelona, Nebraska, operating out of an old Tom

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>McCann's shoe store that had gone out of business. And

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it, they thought, wait a minute,

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been making a motion picture out of an old

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>shoe store in the Aska. We don't have to be

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. We can be anywhere, you know, youthful idealism,

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's when Francis decided to set up a studio

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, which became trup Trump. What was it

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 1>about Coppola? You won an oscar for cutting his film?

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What was it about him? You think was his gift?

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>The quote I love from him is when he was

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>shooting Cotton Club and the reporter asked him. They were

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on location and things weren't going well, and the reporter said, well,

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you're the director, why don't you just make it happen?

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And he said, you misunderstand what a director of a

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>film is. The director of a film is the ringmaster.

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Of a circus that is inventing itself. So there's this

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>collaborative aspect to it that Francis holds everything together at

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and it's always veering into chaos, but

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>chaos can be very productive if you can control it.

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean. An example of his directorial essence, I think

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is something that happened almost on the first day of

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>shooting The Godfather. And he had made a pact with

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>himself and with all of the actors that there was

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to be very little motion of the hands with the Italians,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that he wanted things to be very sober and business like.

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And he was shooting the baker coming to ask for

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>permission for his daughter to marry the prisoner of war

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that was working in the bakery, shooting over Marlon Brando's shoulder,

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and okay, take one, and the baker starts giving his

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>speech and the hands come up and the hands are

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this incredible dance, and Francis later said his heart

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>sank because this is exactly what he didn't want. This

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>is like an alman for the whole film was going

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to be things he didn't want. So what do you

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>do in that case? At the end of the take

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, cut very good. In fact, the performance was

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fine except for the hands. So he said Tom, meaning

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hagen, Robert Duval, Tom, you would have already given

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to do it again because I made a mistake.

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Francis said, we're coming in in the middle of this scene,

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Hagen would have already given you a glass

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of brandy because he knows you would be nervous. So

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Robert Duval came over and filled up a little glass

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of brandy right to the brim, put it in the

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>actor's hands, and then said, that's okay action. So you know,

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna remember that the hands are moving, but you

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can't spill the brandy. But they're they're not the over

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gestural problem that happened with take one, So Francis said,

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's my fault, and so the actor. The performance on

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the second take was even better because now the actor

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to save Francis from francis mistake. So that's

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the take that's in the movie. Oh my God. Oscar

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 1>winning sound and film editor Walter Merch. If you're enjoying

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, tell a friend and be sure to follow.

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing on the I Heart radio app Apple

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. When we come back,

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Walter Merch talks about Francis Ford Coppola's controlled chaos style

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of filmmaking. I'm Alec Baldwin and this is here's the thing.

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>In the early years of American zoo Trope, Walter Merch

0:43:56.360 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 1>was often juggling various projects between founders George Lucas and

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Francis Ford Coppola. We were making Tight while Francis was

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>shooting The Godfather, and when we finished d h X,

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>we took it to con It played on the kind

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of the anti festival there, and then I came back

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to work on the sound of the post production sound

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of The Godfather, the mix the sound effects in the mix.

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Did you kind of have a sense when you were

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>doing that, because when you're doing the sound, you're given

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a final cut of the film to mix the sound

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and the film is locked correctly. No, it was. It

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was evolving as we were working on it. That's part

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Zootrope aesthetic is that the sound influences the editing,

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and the editing influences the sound. Is that common? Is

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that ordinary? No? Certainly not back then, but it's part

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of this controlled chaos idea that it's risky, but we

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>felt it was worth the risk. Well, I want to

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>get to the controlled chaos, and we talked about apocalypse.

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>But what I want to also ask you is you're

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the first person to win an Oscar for a film

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>cut on an Avid correct. Yes, and you are one

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of the only people to be nominated and or win

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oscars on multiple platforms. I think you've been nominated and

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you've won Academy Awards on like four different iterations of

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>editing equipment. Correct right, Yes, true. Films are edited now

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>so much quicker than they were forty years ago. Do

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>you feel that something's lost as a result of that.

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the amount of time has remained essentially the same.

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>What's changed is that as you edit it, you can

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>investigate lots of different ways. But the distance from the

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>end of shooting too, when the films are in the theaters,

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty constant. That it's about a year from the

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>beginning of shooting to the film in the theater, whether

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you're editing on a digital platform or not. If you

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>really want to edit fast, if that's the only goal, yes,

0:45:56.280 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you can do it faster now using digital tool, But

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not the only requirement. We want to make a

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good film, and to make a good film, you have

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 1>to take the time, and that's the creative time is

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the determinament on this Now. I just want to have

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a quick glance at Apocalypse when he first contacted you, like,

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.399
<v Speaker 1>how did you get involved in that film? How would

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you describe because Apocalypse is always presented even from his

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>wife's documentary, eleanor that it was this chaotic experience. What

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is your recollection of the making of Apocalypse? It was it?

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Like for you? It was crazy. I was editing the

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>film Julia in London and I got a call from

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Francis can you fly to the Philippines to discuss the

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>final mix? Sure, so a trip was arranged over the

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend to fly from London to Manila and then to

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the location. And people were coming from all over the world. Tomita,

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>who was going to do the music for the film,

0:46:56.880 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>was coming from Japan, and Richard Begs Richie Marks were

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>coming from San Francisco. So it was a big meeting

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that was planned. But that was right after Marty Sheen

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>had his heart attack. So we all arrived and everything

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>was in this wonderful chaos, you know, but we had

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the meeting. I mean, this is another example of Francis's determination.

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>His main actor has had a heart attack and he

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is now hosting a meeting to discuss the technicalities of

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a mix that won't happen for an ultimately for another

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>two years. That was where the idea of inventing a

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>totally new format for this film was born. How long

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have they been shooting when you showed up almost a year?

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Are they done shooting or they're getting close to being done?

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.720
<v Speaker 1>There are three months away from the end of shooting,

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which is the normal schedule for film. His three months

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:56.839
<v Speaker 1>there in the final thing that that says it all.

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in the final three months of shooting, two and

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty six days of shooting. Had you been looking at

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>footage prior to that? There was a typhoon, speaking of

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 1>chaos in the summer of seventies six. Francis had been

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>shooting for perhaps four months, and the typhoon destroyed all

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the sets, so production was shut down. Francis came back

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco and we had a meeting. He showed

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.720
<v Speaker 1>me what he had shot up until then, and he said,

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is there anything missing, And I thought, well, there's a

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>scene missing I think, which is it would be good

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to have a scene where the boat does what it's

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do as it goes up river. This is

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a patrol boat that is supposed to stop contraband material

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>from getting down river. So let's write a scene where

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the boat does a police action and something goes bad

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and people get killed, and they kill the family in

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the boat. Right, And he said, okay, right, that scene

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and we'll do it. So I sat down and wrote

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sampan massacre scene, and the Francis took it back

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Philippines and you know, obviously changed it and

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>actors do what actors do. But essentially, the idea of

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that scene was something that occurred to me from reading

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and looking at the material of things that have been

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>shot up to that point. Now you cut the film,

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you edited the film. Well, I mean, that's another story.

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I was hired just to do the sound because when

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I joined the film it was August seventy seven, and

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea was somehow improbably that the film would be

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in the theaters by Christmas, And you know what, did

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, maybe maybe it's possible, but it was pretty

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>clear to me at that point that this was not

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And that's when I joined the editorial team.

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>There were two editors working on the film at that time.

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I became the third editor on the film. Now, when

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 1>have there been moments where you fought for a cut

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you were right either to lift out or preserve something,

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and you fought for a cut and the director you

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 1>were wrong and they were right. Before I answered that question,

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we were doing eight final a d R with Marlon

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Brando on The Godfather and we got about halfway through

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the film and Francis said, well, I gotta go now,

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so you guys continue. So I was whatever, I was,

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty six years old, and here I am in the

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>dark alone with Marlon Brando supposedly directing him in a

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>d R. And they're changing reels and in the dark,

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I hear this voice that says, people say I mumble.

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought, what am I going to say to Marlon

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Brando about that? I said, yes, that's true. People do

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>say that you mumble. And he said, well they're right.

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I do mumble, and I'll tell you why. Because when

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.959
<v Speaker 1>we shoot the films, I don't know what these scenes

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in the film or out of

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the film. I don't know what order the scenes are

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:07.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be in. So when I'm doing the scenes,

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't move my lips very much so that if

0:51:10.760 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it comes to it, we can change the dialogue, I

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:19.359
<v Speaker 1>can change my performance and nobody I never thought of that.

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, in my mind, you couldn't think about

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of what drove the story. It was

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all about behavior and and and performance. Correct, Yeah, yeah,

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to say at that point in the film

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there were two editors, and I was editing the first

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>half of the film up to and including the Sampan massacre,

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Richie Marks was handling everything after that, so I

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was an observer to what they were doing, but I

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't know all of the ins and outs of that.

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the famous should we cut this scene in

0:51:56.239 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that film is the French plantation scene, which was a

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>huge restored for the Redux, A hugely huge operation, the

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:09.839
<v Speaker 1>very expensive, very detailed set, lots of characters, and as

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we were editing the film, the scene shrink and its

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>strength and its strength until I think in the end,

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just before it completely disappeared. There were maybe two or

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:24.720
<v Speaker 1>three shots from it. It was like a kind of

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a mist of a scene. It was just some images

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't know what to make of them, and

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.319
<v Speaker 1>then finally it disappeared completely. We put it back in

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Apocalypse Redus. In fact, putting that scene back was the

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>whole reason for doing the reducts the French Canal Plus

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people wanted a DVD extra because Christian Marcon, the actor

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in that scene, had just died and they wanted to

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>see him. And then as these things happened, one thing

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>led to another, and it became this huge operation of

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 1>rehabilitating an umber of scenes that had been cut out.

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But the scene essentially comes too late in the film

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for you to know how to take it digest it.

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So you directed one film, returned to OZ and it

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was a disappointing experience for you from what I read.

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>What was your feeling about directing again after that experience? No,

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean after it was finished. You know, there's inevitably

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a period of recovery on any film, and then I

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>tried to get a couple of other projects off the ground.

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So you wanted to direct again after? Yeah? But no,

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I have four kids, and there's the old joke, you know,

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you spell directing? W A I T I

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>n G that when you're directing trying to get something

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>off the ground, there's a lot of downtime unless you're

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>completely established. Director Returned to Oz was a financial failure

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and critically extremely mixed results. It's a wonderful film, by

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, it just didn't happen. I directed one film,

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and I had the resources to make a wonderful film.

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I had a great script, had a great cast. What

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I learned about directing was that patients you need to

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>help see everything. You're You're being asked about everything, and

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, the patients to stand there all day long,

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>because when you're an actor, you go back to your

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>trailer and you go read a magazine. And with the director,

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 1>you can't hide in your trailer. You've got to be

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there and you've got to answer the questions and you're

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in charge, so to speak. And I found I didn't

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have the patients to direct other actors to tell the

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 1>cinematographer no, no, put the camera here. I wanted here.

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And I just didn't have the patients to negotiate with

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all those people, you know what I mean. Wonderful quote

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>from Warren Beauty who also is an actor director, and

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>he said, the key to acting is to be in

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>control of being out of control. The key to directing

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is to be out of control of being in control.

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing that drives you crazy when you

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>go in front of the camera and then go behind

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the camera. Is the alternating between you know, searing heat

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the one side and ice on the other. So

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you also have to be in the moment, which is

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 1>what's you're shooting right now, but you also have to

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>live in the past, meaning taking to generation everything that

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you've shot up to now, and you have to live

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in the future, which is, what are we going to

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do tomorrow? What are we gonna do next week? So

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a highly uncomfortable state of being unless you're completely

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>adapted to it, I think, And that's why you become

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a director. When you're a combat age, which is to say,

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty years old, then it kind of becomes

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>part of who you are. That wasn't the case where

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was forty when I directed returned to

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>OZ and in a sense I knew too much. I

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 1>was already to set in my ways a certain thing,

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was I had to learn how to undo

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>some of those assumptions. I'm assuming you have some thoughts

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about how the COVID has affected the way we shoot

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>and exhibit films as well. Does that trouble you? Well

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually it helped us in a weird way

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with KU fifty three because we had a great premiere

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of the film at Tell You Rode and London, but

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>no distributor would pick it up. It's there's some kind

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of third rail aspect of the film that makes distributors

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't want it's still unseld today. You haven't seld

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it yet. No, no, So we're distributing it ourselves, and

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:32.919
<v Speaker 1>we're doing it through v o D and we're doing

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it in a cooperation with Arthouse Theater. So so so

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:39.479
<v Speaker 1>where would people go to see the film? How would

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:41.919
<v Speaker 1>they see the film? You go to KU fifty three

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>dot com and say what country are you in? You know,

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>United States, UK, Ireland or Canada at the present moment,

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and then select a theater and you click on that theater.

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's twelve bucks is the ticket? We split fifty fifty

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's how that's how it works. But without COVID,

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have gotten the momentum that it got because

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of all the closing of the theaters and thank god,

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, thank god you benefited from that. Yeah, in

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a weird way, we benefited from it. How would you

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>say the methodology by which you choose which films you're

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do? How has that changed over the years.

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It's three things, and it's always remained the same. It's

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the script. I like a script that I can connect with,

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but that moves me out of my comfort zone because

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to just keep doing the same thing

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Are there the resources to pull

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this off? And who am I going to be working with?

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, as an editor, you are in a room

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with the director for the better part of a year ultimately,

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's an intense thing and you have to get along.

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So those are the three categories. If all three of

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>those are in place, then oh it's rare that you

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>get all three cleanly. You You usually have to make

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>an educated guess. I've got two out of three. Okay,

0:58:08.560 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll make a bet. The film Tomorrow Land I was

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>working with Brad Bird, and they obviously had the resources

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because it was a hundred and eighty million dollar film.

0:58:18.400 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Or something with Disney, But I never got to read

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the script before we started shooting. He was working on

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the script and finally I was on location in Vancouver

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks before shooting, and finally the script arrived. So

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you can never tell exactly how things are going to

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>work out. Is it safe to say that to the

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:41.439
<v Speaker 1>extent that any one of the characters you've mixed that

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you are? That character is the little boy who's cutting

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the tape together? Is Hackman in the conversation? Is that you? Yeah?

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that probably would you know. That's ultimately why

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Francis asked me to edit the film. He said, it's

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a film about a sound man, and you're a sound

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 1>man and you've edited films. So no, that was my

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 1>first editing job on a feature film because of that

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>feeling of identity. Listen, I'm a great admirer of yours.

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You you've made a lot of great movies. You've made

0:59:11.800 --> 0:59:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great movies, and you've been a part

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of movie history. You know, it's really exciting, and thank

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for doing this with us, and good

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>luck with the film. My pleasure. Thank you. Oscar winning

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>sound and film editor Walter Merch my thanks to him

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and to screenwriter director David Kepp. I'm Alec Baldwin and

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this is here's the thing. We're produced by Kathleen Russo,

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Carrie donohue and Zach McNeice. Our engineer is Frank Imperial.

0:59:42.360 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. That's if trying to come