WEBVTT - Where are the alternatives to Facebook?

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of all things tech. Over the last

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, I've covered a lot of stories that

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>were either directly about Facebook or they related back to

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the social media platform in some way. From Cambridge Analytica,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know that whole scandal. There are a couple of

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes about that. Two calls from the US government to

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>break up some big tech companies. That's back in the news.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>As I record this, Facebook has had a lot of coverage.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It has been front and center, particularly over the last

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. There are a lot of good arguments

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to suggest people would be better off if they were

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not on Facebook, if they weren't using it, didn't have

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>an account there, And there is plenty of evidence that

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>shows that misinformation campaigns and extremist groups are leveraging Facebook's

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>algorithms to get widespread coverage and momentum, that they are

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>using the social networking site for malicious purposes, and because

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the site ends up benefiting from this through the whole

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>advertising realm, they have been largely complicit, or at least

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they haven't cracked down on it as much as they

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people feel they should have until fairly recently.

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Now all that being said, I gotta be upfront with you, guys,

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I still have a Facebook profile over there, and I

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>am still on Facebook way too much. It is a

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>complicated thing because I recognize that it would probably be

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>better if I were not on there, but it's where

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>most of my friends maintain a social presence, and particularly

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in the era of COVID, I can't get together with

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>my friends in person, and even before COVID was a thing,

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it was hard to find time for all of us

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to get together in person anyway. So for folks like me,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>staying on Facebook can feel like it's necessity unless I'm

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just willing to cut ties with my friends. I mean,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not like people talk on the phone anymore, right Like,

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>especially my younger friends, the thought of them getting on

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the phone for a conversation, to actually talk on the

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>phone fills a lot of them with anxiety. So I

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>feel like there aren't a whole lot of alternatives. And

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>this got me to thinking that I really wish there

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>were a viable social networking alternative to Facebook. You know,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a social media platform that could serve as a place

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>to connect with people, but one that doesn't rely on

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's model of engagement, which in turn gives a leg

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>up on those malicious campaigns I mentioned. But we've seen

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms come and go, and none have really

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>managed to have staying power, and the ones that are

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>still around are definitely not challenging Facebook for superiority. So

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>today I thought we would go through some social media

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>platforms that either predated Facebook and then faded away, or

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they tried to challenge Facebook but failed in some way.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook launched in two thousand four, and there were several

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>social networking sites that existed before that. One of the earliest,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and by some accounts, the first true social networking site

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was six degrees dot com, which launched in n Now,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure most of you are familiar with the concept

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of six degrees of separation, that any two people in

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the world are at most six social connections apart from

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one another. So the degrees in this case talk about

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>those social links. So, for example, I have met the

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>actor Colleen Camp and she was Inclue the movie Madeline

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Khan was also include the movie and Madeline Khan was

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in Young Frankenstein with Gene Wilder. So I am two

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>degrees separated from the late great Gene Wilder and one

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>degree separated from the late great Madeline Khan, and that

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.119
<v Speaker 1>there are two social contacts that link me with Gene

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilder and one social contact that links me with Madeleine

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>con that being calling Camp. Now to call calling Camp

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a social contact as being grandiose. She likely has no

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>memory of me, whatsoever. I met her one day on

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>a movie set. It's just an example I wanted to use. Now,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if I went through all of my social contacts, like

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>every single person with whom I have a connection, I

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>might find that my link to Gene Wilders even closer.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It may be that one of my friends or acquaintances

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>worked directly with Gene Wilder. But you get the idea.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And this concept was turned into something of a game,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the famous game of six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, where

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>you would try to find the fewest number of professional

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>acting links between Kevin Bacon and some other actor. So

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you would just name different films that the actors were

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in to try and find a link to Kevin Bacon.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The joke being that Kevin Bacon was in so much

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you frequently didn't have to go more than

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>three links before you you found a connection. Anyway, six

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>degrees dot Com was a social platform where you could

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>upload photos and you could connect with friends, you know,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the basic stuff of making a profile and connecting with

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>people that all social networks sort of share in common.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And you could also then see the folks that your

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>friends are friends with, so you could connect with people

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>up to three degrees out from your personal contacts. And

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those early platforms that really demonstrated,

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that small world phenomenon, how our social circles

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have way more overlap in them than we typically realize.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you had an experience where you saw two

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>friends that you know from very different circles in life

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>talking with one another and think, how do they know

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>each other? Because in my world, this person belongs to

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this group of friends and that person belongs to this

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>totally disconnected group of friends. That happens a lot, and

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>six degrees dot com was kind of about illustrating that.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But there was a problem. You see, now in n

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks had not really yet ventured into

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the Internet world at large, or the World Wide Web

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular. So while a relatively large number of people

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>were signing up for six degrees dot com, you often

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>felt really isolated on the site because while there were

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people collectively, it's not like a lot

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of people everyone knew were on there at the same time.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So there were just not enough people that folks do.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>There weren't enough friends or acquaintances. Also, on six degrees,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it was like a bunch of disconnected individuals who were

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on there, So it's more like a bunch of tiny

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>island chains separated by vast oceans than an interconnected social network.

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>A media called youth Stream Media, which specialized in developing

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Internet sites with the youth market in mind, typically you know,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like high school and college kids, ended up purchasing six

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>degrees dot com in nine for a cool one hundred

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million dollars, a princely sum indeed, But youth

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>stream apparently couldn't do much with six degrees, and a

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>year later the site would go dark. Just two years

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>after that, another company called Alloy acquired youth Stream Media's assets,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire company's assets for just seven million dollars now

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars a lot of money. I know, saying

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just makes it sound like it's not. But when you

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>consider that youth stream paid a D five million for

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>six degrees and then another company bought youth Streams assets

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for just seven million dollars, you really see where the

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>value of that company plummeted. So what happened, Well, the

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble burst for one thing, as for six

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>degrees dot com, and eventually returned in some form or another.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Though I honestly don't know what it looks like today

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>because when I went to go check it out with

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>my browser as part of my research for this episode,

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 1>my browser told me, yo, buddy, I really don't think

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you should go in there, essentially saying the site is insecure,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly a host of malware, and I don't want any

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of that garbage on my computer. So I quietly backed away. Now,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>six degrees dot com wasn't a bad idea. It was

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just way ahead of its time. There weren't enough people,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't enough saturation on the web to make the

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>model work. But the idea behind it was obviously solid.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Because anyone who has studied social networks online or otherwise

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>would recognize the value proposition. Now, a few other folks

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>would try to launch social networking sites over the next

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, but I think it's fair to say

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that the first that got some mainstream traction was Friendster,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and that one would come out in two thousand two,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so five years after six Degrees had originally launched, and

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>two years before Facebook would launch. Now, Friendster was founded

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by Jonathan Abrams and Peter Chen, and this site also

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to that six degrees of separation concept. If you

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>looked at someone's profile, you'd see how you were connected

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to that person and whether or not it was a

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>close connection, so perhaps you might have a mutual friend

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in common with that person, or you would see if

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a more tenuous connection, like I know someone

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows someone who knows someone who knows that person

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. And like a lot of social networking sites,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it was used primarily by people who are looking to

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>find a date um or at least a lot of

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>people were using it that way. Maybe primarily is too

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>strong a word, but it was a popular use for

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the site. Oh and uh profiles also had a view

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>counter attached them. Fun times. Now, I don't know if

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember when it seemed like every web page

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet required a view counter. It's a little

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>counter up in typically you know, the top of the page,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the corner, and it would just tell you

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>how many people had visited the website. And it became

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>a way to gauge not just the popularity of the

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>web page or website, but also by extension, it gave

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>an implication of whether or not the site was a

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>good quality, you know, the idea being that if that

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>many people have visited the site, then it must be

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>doing something right. And we still see elements of this today,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, you like in view numbers for YouTube videos

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>or how many people like or share a post on

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>various social media sites or tweets, that kind of thing,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but we don't typically see them on web pages as

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>much these days now. Finster started strong, but with popularity

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>comes challenges, and one of those was just in scaling.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>As more people were joining the site and we're making

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>profiles and uploading photos and interacting with one another, the

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>company had to scale up the back end systems and

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this became challenging. Google would actually come forward and make

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>an offer of thirty million dollars to acquire the company

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand three, but the business owners turned that

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>offer down, and that was probably one of the reasons

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the company would later remove the founder, Jonathan Abrams as

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO in two thousand four, the idea of we could

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have cashed out and you said no. Following Abram's departure

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as CEO, there was the old revolving door routine of

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>other CEOs. I mean, seriously, if you look at a list,

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just like one replaced by another, typically more than

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one in a year, which is really bad. And users

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>began to abandon the site. They were frustrated by performance

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>problems and that linked back to those challenges with scaling,

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and the users were flocking over to another social networking site,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one that for a while seemed like it was going

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the definitive social networking platform, my Space, because

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this was, you know, a little bit later after my

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Space had gotten started. But we'll get back to my

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Space later in this episode. Before that, I should probably

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>explain what actually happened with Friendster. It floundered as a

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>social media platform for several more years. It lasted long

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to see my Space eventually falled behind the upstart

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>competitor of Facebook. Spoiler alert there as if you didn't know.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But in two thousand eleven, friends to changed from a

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>social networking platform to more of a social gaming network.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And this was really kind of an effort to get

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the trap and had found itself in by

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>competing directly with Facebook. It couldn't do that, that was

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly a lost cause. So Friendster would instead operate as

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a social gaming network and they did that for a

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>few more years, but ultimately shut down in t and

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the brand is pretty much non existent today. So with Friendster,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>we have a social networking site that pre existed Facebook,

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but was enable to scale to serve a growing user

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>base and thus giving opportunities to competitors. And the next

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>platform I should talk about is high five. It's Hi

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and the numeral five. This is a social network site

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that made a profit in its first year of operation.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It was actually a profitable web based business right at

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the gate, not a very common thing even today now.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>This is according to CBS News. By the way, there

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was an entrepreneur named Ramu Yala Manchi who founded the

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>site in two thousand three. And I do apologize for

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my pronunciation of his name. I am terribly ignorant, and

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that is all on me. But anyway, while I was

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>researching this episode and I came across High five, I thought, huh,

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a social networking site. I don't think I've ever

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>heard of before, except maybe I have, because apparently I

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>already created a profile for it. See high five is

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>still around today, at least theoretically it is. And so

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know what I'll do. I'll make a

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>profile on there. I'll create a profile to check out

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what this site looks like. Only when I tried to

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, when I tried to make a profile with

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>my my private email address, I got a message that

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>said that my email was blocked, which was odd because

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I'm using a particularly you know, shady

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>email service. It's Gmail for those who want to know,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing bad. So I thought, how that's weird. Well,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe what that means is that I may have already

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>made a high five accountant. I just forgot about it.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So I chose the forgot my password feature, you know

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that useful thing, and then I put my email address

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the little field and I hit the button, and

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the site said it was going to send an email

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to me with instructions on how I could log in,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and as of this moment, I have not received that email.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That was hours ago when I I did that. Nothing

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>has happened since. So there are a few possibilities. One

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just taking a really long time. Maybe

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>High five servers are few and far between and overloaded.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Another possibility is that the site just isn't active like

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I had been led to believe, and that it's really dormant.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't really find any information that says one way

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>or the other. Another possibility is that I never had

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a profile on there, and everyone gets the message about

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>an email being sent, whether they have a profile on

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>High five or not, if they go through that whole

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>forgot my password process. So I could find that out

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>by just making up a fake email address and or

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>making a brand new email address even and putting it

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in the field, but I didn't go through that that phase.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I was already fed up, so I did try to

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sign in or sign up with my work email address,

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and that didn't work either. So honestly, I'm just not

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sure if there's anything going on at High five or not.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is a page there. It's not like

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it goes to you know, some page that says that

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get the the U r L or anything,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but I can't make it do anything. But anyway, High

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>five started off as another social network site where you

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>would create a profile with information about yourself. There was

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be an age restriction. Users were supposed to

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be at least thirteen years old, but the site had

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>no means of authenticating a person's age, so you know,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there you go. The site would prompt new users to

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>add friends through their contacts with existing services like Yahoo

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>mail or hot mail, and boy those take me back.

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>And users could customize their profile pages. They could do

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like change the background color of their profile. They

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>can move things around on their profile if they wanted to.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>They could even go into HTML editing mode and really

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>change things up and customize things if they if they

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so desired. But from the reports I've read, very few

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>people went to the trouble of doing that. Uh. And

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it also, like its predecessors, was tying into that that

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>concept of six degrees of separation. Now, like for Inster

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and like some others that will be on this list,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>High five would attempt to evolve as sites like my

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Space and later Facebook began to dominate the social networking sphere.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand nine, the site changed into more of

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a social gaming site, similar to why happened with Friendster.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>A company called Tagged acquired High fives assets in two

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven, and then Tagged itself would get scooped up

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>by a company called The Meat Group. That's m E

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>E T, not M E A T, which is a

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>totally different and frankly horrifying company, but anyway, the Meat

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Group got them in two thousand seventeen. Jumping back to

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three, couple of months after High five launched,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we got my Space. Now I've done full episodes about

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>my Space and the whole story of the rise and

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>fall the platform is fascinating. There's a ton of drama

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>going on there, So for this episode, I'm not going

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to go into all that detail. I'll give you more

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of a high overview, and I'll do that after we

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>take this short break. My Space was monumentally successful in

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the early days of social networking. You had your customizable

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>profile pages, similar to what High five was doing. There

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was a fairly robust music industry presence on MySpace from

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the get go, and it became something of a hallmark

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that if you had a MySpace page, you would add

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>songs to your profile uh and someone visiting your profile

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>would be treated or would be forced to endure the

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>music you had selected. If you were particularly mischievous, you

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>could design your profile page so that the playback controls

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like pause and and play and everything we're very hard

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to find on the page, so that people who did

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>visit your profile would have no option but to listen

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to whatever music you had selected. But gosh darn it,

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I needed everyone to really groove to Tarzan Boy by Baltimore.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>It was important. This was also the site where you

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>would have your top eight friends. You could have lots

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and lots of MySpace friends, but on your a file

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>page you would only see the top eight listed. In

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the early days, and Tom, one of the founders of

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>my Space, was automatically your friend from the beginning. You

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>could give him the boot if you wanted to, but

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Tom was everyone's friend when they first joined my Space.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Not Tom. What a mench Now. For the first few

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>years of its existence, it seemed as though my Space

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the definitive social networking site. It

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is this company is just on the

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>up and up. News Core, the company that owned Fox News,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>among lots of other stuff. Rubert Murdoch's company, in other words,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>would end up buying my Space in two thousand five

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for more than half a billion dollars at truly princely

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some and in two thousand six my Space became the

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>most visited site on the entire web. It was valued

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at twelve billion dollars in two thousand and seven. It

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was just astounding, like you would think it's too big

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to fail, right, and then it failed. Funny how that happens.

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So my Space did very well early on, but it

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have fierce competition either Facebook, which cut on with

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>college kids because when it first debuted, Facebook membership was

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to people who had a university or college email address.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't join if you didn't, so it was almost

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>entirely college kids when it launched. Anyway, it ended up

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>getting a ton of momentum after that launch and when

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it opened up to the general public, and it was

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a young demographic, and by two thousand and eight, Facebook

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>started to leave my Space behind. They were they had

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more users and people were spending more time on Facebook

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>than on MySpace. News Corps tried to pivot. They redesigned

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my Space a few times to try and win people

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>back over to the platform, but they couldn't really do

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>much other than, you know, slow the flow of users

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>from their site to the rival of Facebook. It was

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like putting a band aid on a truly massive wound.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>It just wasn't enough, and eventually news Corps sold my

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Space to a company called Specific Media for thirty five

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. So again, news Corps paid eight million for

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the site and then they sold it for thirty five million.

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I need to point out that that's

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not a great deal. Today my Space is technically still around,

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 1>though it's really focused more on entertainment in general and

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the music industry in particular, and it's less of a

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>social networking space for users like some of the other

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>sites we've talked about on here so far. The only

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>way my Space was able to stick around at all

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was to switch its focus from being a social networking

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>platform to a different central focus, but still incorporating some

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>social elements to the experience, so it's more like it's

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a site about music that has some social networking features

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>along with it. Now, our next social platform that preceded

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is orch it Now. This one only came out

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a month before Facebook did, but technically that makes it earlier.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It debuted in January two four, and orch It grew

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Google, where the company had this standing policy

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that employees could devote their work week to their own

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>personal projects within Google, and one of those projects was orchit. Now.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>There have been subsequent allegations that orch it really was

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a replica of UH, an earlier project that the same

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>engineer had created for a different company called Affinity Engines,

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but that that's its own thing now. You might recall

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that Google had attempted to acquire friends Store

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years earlier, but had been turned down.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Or Kit would become Google's first real experiment in social

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>networking platforms, and at first the service was by invitation only,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>which helped drive interest in the platform, because it turns

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out people like to feel that they're part of an

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>exclusive club, and Google would employ this same strategy for

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>several of its products. Further down the line from Gmail

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to another social networking platform, will get to later in

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but going invitation only meant that new users

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>might only know a couple of other people on the

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>entire network, which made it really hard to build out

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a circle of friends and meant that ork It didn't

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have a whole lot of usefulness for those folks. My

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Space would end up taking off faster, although ork It

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>would end up finding some traction in Brazil. Over time,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Brazil and India would become the two main markets where

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>users were flocking to on orch It, but it was

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>largely a bust in the United States. One interesting fact,

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at one point, Marissa Meyer, who would go on to

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO of Yahoo, was the product manager for

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>or Kind. Now the features of Orchid are familiar to

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has visited a social networking platform. Users would

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have profiles, and they could add friends on their network.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Unlike some other examples, or could actually allowed users to

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>visit any profile that was hosted on the platform, at

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>least at first. The other platforms typically would restrict you

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to only being able to visit your friends profiles or

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe a couple of degrees out from your friends, but

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>beyond that you wouldn't be able to visit a profile

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so if it's a complete stranger where you didn't have

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any contacts in common and they were too far separated

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from you, you wouldn't be allowed to see it. Orcutt

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was different. Now eventually they did change that, but at

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>first you could visit any profile on the service. For

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>several years, or Kit would remain more popular in Brazil

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and India than rival social networking sites, So it was

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>outperforming my Space, it was outperforming Facebook, but eventually face

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Book caught up and then surpassed orch It in both

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of those countries. Meanwhile, Google had turned its fleeting attention

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to a different social networking platform from within the company,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to a little bit later, and so

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ork It was essentially operating without a whole lot of

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>support from Google. It would limp along until two thousand fourteen,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>when Google would officially shut it down. Now, I think

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>orc It's main drawback was that limited access very early on,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that users who couldn't get an invite

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>instead would head over to somewhere else like my Space.

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And typically once you establish an online presence somewhere, you

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of motivation to build it out again.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere else, so the likelihood of building out on other

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>networks starts to go down. Now, some people are more

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>than happy to maintain a profile on multiple social networking sites,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of us prefer to focus

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on one or two at the most, Like Facebook and

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter are the two that tend to go hand in hand.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Orc It didn't have the momentum needed to keep up

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with my Space and definitely didn't have the foundation to

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>withstand the Facebook flood that would happen around two thousand eight.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook debuted the month after orc At first launched, so

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in February two four. But heck, this episode is all

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about the attempts to make it an alternative to Facebook,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's no real point talking about Facebook itself. Suffice

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it to say that the social media platform has grown

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond all expectations and plays an incredibly important role when

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the dissemination of ideas and ideologies. Who

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would have thought that what originally started out as a

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>flimsy excuse to try and find dates at a college

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>university campus would eventually become a potential threat to democracy

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and security. But moving on, in two thousand five, a

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco couple launched a social net working site they

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>called Bibo b e b oh. They would seem more

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>success in the United Kingdom and in Ireland than it

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would in the United States. In fact, it actually became

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>more popular than my Space over there in the UK

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and in Ireland at one point. Once again, the site

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>had the hallmarks of your typical social networking services. You

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>could have a profile, you could post blogs, you could

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>share videos and music and photographs and do that kind

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And the success in the UK led to

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the company A O L taking notice of Bibo and

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>making a move that in hindsight often gets lumped in

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with the worst deals of all time in the tech space.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>A O L bought Bibo for the princely sum of

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred fifty million dollars yeawza, and the couple who

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>launched Bibo had like seventy steak in the company, so

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they had something that more than five hundred million dollars

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two of them. Man and this happened in

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight. So A O L was essentially trying

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to establish its presence in the social networking space by

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>taking a shortcut. You know, companies do this all the time.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Where they will scale up, not by building out their

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>their assets, but just buying new assets and trying to

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>incorporate them into the existing company structure, which doesn't always

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>work so well, and it did not work well for

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a o L. The motivation to really get into the

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>social networking space really pushed a o L to pay

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>way too much for Bibo. Now, granted, in two thousand eight,

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was hard to predict that Facebook was going to

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>eclipse all other social networking sites around the world. Maybe

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there was hope that Bibo could maintain its own special

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>space on the web, particularly in places like the UK,

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But the numbers began to fall, and in just two years,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a o L started to look for a way to

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>offload those assets or they were going to shut the

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>whole thing down. In t A o L would sell

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Bibo to an investment company called Criterion Capital Partners for

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of what they paid for it, reportedly just

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars. So to recap, A o L spent

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred fifty million dollars on Bibo in two thousand

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and then in two thousand and ten sold

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it for ten million. Now, this makes the News Corps

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>acquisition and unloading of MySpace look tame by comparison, But

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Criterion Capital failed to really leverage Bibo, just as a

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>o L had failed to do it. And so a

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later, that same couple who had launched

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the site in the first place and made you know,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>half a billion dollars off of it, uh, they ended

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>up buying Bibo back for just one million dollars, so

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of a per cent of what they were

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>paid for it. That's not bad at all. Bibo would

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>relaunch in it floundered a bit, It re branded, it

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>became more about supporting Twitch streamers by offering up streaming software,

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of like overlays and video switchers and

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that streamers use whenever they are live streaming on Twitch.

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And in twenty nineteen, Amazon, the owner of Twitch, acquired

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bibo for twenty five million dollars, So that story kind

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of ends there. In two thousand seven, we got a

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>few more social networks with different value propositions. One of

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>those was Tumbler, the micro blogging site, and Tumbler still

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>around today, but this one was enjoying popularity among younger

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>users for several years. It was like a slightly younger

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>crowd than what you were finding on other social networking sites,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and it passed through various corporate ownership. Yahoo owned it

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while. It acquired the company for more than

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars, an incredible amount of money. Verizon then

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>went on to buy Yahoo assets, including Tumbler, so tumb

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or went with that. Verizon ultimately couldn't figure out really

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what to do with Tumbler and sold it off to

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a company called Automatic that is the current owner of Tumbler.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>One of Tumbler's problems is that the site hosted a

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of adult content, meaning people were posting adult content

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like pornography to Tumbler to the point that it was

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming part of the site's reputation. And that proved to

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be a real problem for some of these corporate owners.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they couldn't very well talk about owning a

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>site that was largely trafficking in pornography. Two shareholders and

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so over different eras at Tumbler, there were different restrictions

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>put in place with regard to the kinds of content

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that could be shared that changed Tumbler quite a bit. Uh. Tumbler,

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said, is still around today. Of course, though

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it does see a lot less traffic than it did

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at its height. Now, out of curiosity, I went to

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>see if I had an account on Tumbler, and I do.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any record election of when I last

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>logged into that account. It's been a few years, but

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the account still exists, still active. All the posts I

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>could see when I logged in and casually scrolled through,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we're all from the official Tumbler account, so I have

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>no idea if anyone that I used to follow on

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler is actually still active over there. So I'm starting

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to sense a theme. And on a side note about Tumbler,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there's one event I really want to mention because it

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is infamous. It doesn't directly tie into our topic, but

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when I will ever get a chance

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it otherwise, so I want to do

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it here. This is one of those examples of something

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that had been built up to be a really special

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>celebration but fell far short of what was promised, which

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is putting it lightly. I'm talking, of course, about dash Con,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>which was fire festival before there was a fire festival,

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>though on a much more modest scale. So for those

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>who don't know about this at all. Dash Con, which

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>was originally called tumble Con, although the organizers would change

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the name in order to show that the convention was

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not officially a sanctioned Tumbler event or anything like that.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It was meant to be a gathering of the tumbler

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>community to allow Tumbler creators, many of whom were creating

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>incredible video and art, to get together and to celebrate

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>their community. And it was gonna have panels and special

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>performances by bands. The podcasts were going to be there,

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>including Welcome Tonight Vale, which was really taking off in

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>popularity and had a huge following on Tumbler. And it

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to take place in the summer. Of a

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>small group of organizers who I think it's safe to

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>say we're clearly out of their depth, attempted to throw

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>together a three day convention and they rented out of space,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and they created a path schedule with lots of stuff

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to do and a lot of grandiose promises about what

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>was going to be there, and there was a ball pit,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the famous ball pit. Well, there were problems from the

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>very beginning before the convention even got around, but those

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>problems became apparent at the beginning of the convention itself. Really,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just as the convention was getting started, the organizers announced

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to the relatively small crowd that was there that the

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>hotel they were using as the host for this convention

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was demanding full payment for the entire weekend in advance,

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and that was an amount equal to seventeen thousand dollars. Now,

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>according to the organizers, they anticipated that they would have

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>all the money to pay for the hotel by the

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>end of the weekend just from the attendance of the convention,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't have the money on hand, so it's

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like a liquidity problem. They didn't have the liquid assets available,

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so they took up a collection from the people who

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>were there, and amazingly they got enough money to meet

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that seventeen dollar goal. Now there were talk of reimbursements,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that people were going to get paid back whatever money

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they were putting in, because again the organizers were saying, hey,

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>we should be making enough money from admissions to cover

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that cost. So really this is just so that we

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>can pay the bill and then you'll get your money back.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But from what I can tell, there never really was

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a sincere effort put forward to even keep track of

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>who was donating how much money. So I'm not sure

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that that was ever going to work out, and it

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>ended up being a moot point anyway. Now that massive

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>problem was really just the start of the issues, with

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it soon becoming clear that guests were canceling performances were

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. The night Vale crew left because

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the payment they had been promised had fallen through. It

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was really ugly and making matters worse, the organizers had

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>no real way to make this up to the attendees,

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>apart from promising some extra time in the ball pit,

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, if you haven't seen the photos, you

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>need to search Dashkong Ballpit. It's just this little inflated

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pool filled with maybe a couple of thousand plastic balls.

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>We now, I would do a whole episode about dash Con,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but really you should just head over to YouTube and

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>watch a video that's titled Tumblers Failed Convention The Story

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of dash Con. It's by Sarah Z. Sarah is a

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>talented essayist video sayst on YouTube. She has no connection

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to me. As far as I know, she doesn't know

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>who I am. She doesn't know I'm talking about this.

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I just really like her work, and her piece is

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly researched. It's really interesting. It's also fifty minutes long,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of like a tech stuff episode Anyway. Anyway,

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>dash Con was an unmitigated disaster, and some of the

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>stank of that failure would rub off on Tumbler itself,

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which is hardly fair. Anyway, I had to throw that

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in here. Plus give a shout out to Sarah's ez YouTube. Seriously,

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>go check out the video. It's it's pretty dope, as

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the kids are like to say. When we come back,

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>i'll chat about a couple of other challenges to the

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>throne of Facebook, and we'll pontificate for a short while

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's even possible for some new platform to make

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a space in a Facebook dominated web. But first, let's

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Another service that launched the same

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>year that Tumbler launched was friend Feed. Now this wasn't

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>really so much of a standalone social networking site, but

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>more of an aggregator created by some former Google employees. Now,

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you could post stuff just a friend feed if you

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to. You could post photos and files and messages,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but the main attraction was that you could link friend

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fee to other services like your Facebook profile or Twitter

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or Flicker or YouTube. And let's just say that I

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>joined friend feed and I connect with you as my

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>first friend high friend. Now, at that point, I would

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>see a feed of all the stuff you were posting

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>on the services you had connected to friend Feed, and

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I would see it in real time and posted in

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>reverse chronological orders, so the most recent posts would be

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the page. So, assuming you had

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 1>connected all of your services to friend feed, and let's

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 1>say that you had just posted something to Facebook, I

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>would see your Facebook status update within friend feed. And

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 1>then let's say after that you popped over to Twitter

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and you posted a tweet, Well, then I would see

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the tweet pop up on friend Feed. So instead of

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>having to follow someone on multiple services, like I'm following

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you on Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, etcetera, etcetera, I

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>could just follow your friend feed and get everything your

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>post sting, or at least everything you chose to share

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with friend feed, and that ended up making it really,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of useful. Now, not everyone was crazy

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>about this, because one big concern was that if you

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>linked to say, a blog post, to friend feed, The

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>concern was that people were going to read the content

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on friend feed, but they wouldn't actually click through to

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>go visit the blog. And if the blog is supported

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>by advertising, as most blogs were, that's not very good

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>because it would mean that the blogger was getting lower

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>page views, and that would mean that they would see

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>less revenue from their work. So people would be reading

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>their stuff, but it wouldn't be counting toward the ad

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>deals that these blogging sites had, so that was something

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of a problem. Facebook thought that friend feed was a

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty rad idea, so in two thousand nine, just two

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>years after friend feed had launched, Facebook announced plans to

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>acquire the service for a reported fifty million dollars. Facebook

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>continued to allow the service to operate. It never really

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>cut on in a big way. I mean, the people

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 1>who used it tended to like it, but not that

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>many people were using it, and Facebook would finally pull

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the plug on the service in two thousand fifteen. The

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>last friend had been fed, I suppose. And the third

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 1>social networking site that began in two thousand seven was Twitch,

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>though not not actually Twitch, not in that form. It

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was really the predecessor of Twitch a k A justin

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>dot tv that launched in two thousand seven. It was

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a live streaming video service. Had really changed in a

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>big way a couple of years later because it became

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>clear that video game streamers were dominating the platform. It

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>necessitated the company to spin off a new video game

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>streaming service. That's the one that was called Twitch dot tv. Eventually,

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>justin dot tv would become part of like a subsidiary

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of Twitch dot tv, and a little bit later it

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>would just get shut down entirely. Twitch dot tv became

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the only focus of the company. Ultimately Amazon would come

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>along and acquire that, And of course Twitch dot tv

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is still extremely active today, but it's also a very

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>different platform from Facebook. You can't really compare the two.

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I should add, however, that Facebook really hopes to get

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>into that space by launching their own streaming video services

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and trying to challenge Twitch. So Twitch isn't really trying

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to play in Facebook's yard, but Facebook is trying to

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>play in twitches yard. This is something that Facebook has

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>done on numerous occasions with other sites as well. Then

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got stuff like Instagram, which Facebook would ultimately acquire,

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've got you know, Snapchat, But these social networks

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>also come at things in a very different way from Facebook.

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>They made a space not through competition with Facebook, but

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>by creating something new and different. And then Facebook would

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>either try to emulate what these companies were doing, or

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they would just try to buy the ding day companies

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and and mutate them to fit within Facebook's own business model.

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We see that today with stuff like you know, Twitch

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok. The next traditional social networking platform that I

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>really want to talk about arrived in twenty eleven. This

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was Google's second really big push to get back into

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>social networking. Now. They had tried a couple of other

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>things in between or cut and this. There was Google

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Buzz and Google friend Connect, but neither of those got

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>very far. So this one was called Google Plus. Now.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember the launch of Google Plus really well because

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I was one of those jerks who got early access

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to it when it was invitation only. When I joined

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus, most of the people who were on the

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>site were either in the tech industry or they were

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in the tech journalism industry, so it's a it's kind

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of like being in an exclusive club of my peers,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was a lot of fun. I'm not gonna lie.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It felt like we were all in our own little

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>clubhouse and like or cult. Years earlier, Google chose to

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>make Google Plus invitation only network at first to kind

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of control things and scale things up. Uh. I suppose

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do this gradually and avoid the pitfalls

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that come with like a massive influx of users all

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.760
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Old school Twitter users probably remember

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the fail Whale, the character that would pop up whenever

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would crash, usually because of server overload. Google didn't

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>want that stuff to happen. But while this metered edition

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of users might have meant that the servers weren't being overtaxed,

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it also created that feeling of exclusivity and more people

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted in to try stuff out. And then when they

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>finally did get into Google Plus, they were disappointed to

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>find that, you know, it really wasn't that special, and

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it really wasn't Now that's not to say Google Plus

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>was bad. I don't think it was bad. It just

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't remarkable, And so it would be natural for someone

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>who had their expectations really built up to be this

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing, like You're gonna go and see the chocolate factory.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be disappoin I did it, and Google

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Plus was kind of not at fault for all of that,

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>partially of fault, I guess. And it did have some

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.720
<v Speaker 1>cool features. One of those was that you could organize

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the people you know into different circles, Like you would

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>literally drop and drag names into different circles. So, for example,

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you could have a circle that you make for your

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>close friends, and another for family members, and one for

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>co workers, and maybe one for acquaintances. You could have

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 1>people belong to more than one circle if you liked.

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you know there's a cousin you're

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly close to, so that cousins both in your family

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>circle and your close friends circle. When you post something,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you could choose which circles in your network could see

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that post. So maybe you want to post something about

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a birthday party and you just want friends and family

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to see it. You don't want to include like coworkers

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or distant acquaintances that kind of thing. It was pretty

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>easy to do that, easier, I would argue, than the

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>way Facebook does it. You could also create a circle

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for no good knicks whom you wish to ignore, and

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't see those folks on Google Plus, and they

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to see your stuff either. Google made

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>things a bit blurry with Google Plus, and that if

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you were to make a Google account for stuff like

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube or Gmail, that was a Google account that was

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>good across all Google services. So let's say you sign

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 1>up an account so that you can have a Gmail address.

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Your Google login would give you access not just to Gmail,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but also you could have a YouTube account so you

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can start uploading videos if you wanted. Uh, you would

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have a Google Drive account where you could store files

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and use services like Google Docs. Google Plus was part

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of that package, and I think it's safe to say

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of folks who had a Google account,

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but they rarely, if ever, would duck into Google Plus.

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>That became more apparent when you started looking at engagement

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>versus the number of active users. Google Plus had a

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>high active user number within the first couple of years

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of launch, really high, like it was on track to

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be a Facebook competitor, but those users were barely spending

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>any time at all on the actual platform. In January,

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>CNN reported that users were spending about three and a

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>half minutes on Google Plus for the month of January,

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas they had spent seven and a half hours on Facebook.

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not even competitive, right. And There's a lot more

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I could say about Google Plus and that experiment, including

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 1>how Google forced YouTube creators to have accounts linked to

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus accounts for a while and how all of

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that turned into a total disaster, But I think that

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>would warrant its own episode when it comes to explaining failures.

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I think Google Plus really fell short of expectations. It

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't provide enough of a reason for people to leave

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Facebook for Google Plus. And also Google did a great

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>job at alienating a large percentage of its user base

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>by you know, forcing the linking of accounts together. Now,

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna this with a quick overview of

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the social networking site l O E l l O

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>created by Paul Budnitts and Todd Berger. They launched the

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>site in two thousand fourteen, and the founders were trying

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to do something that I think was a really nice

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:19.280
<v Speaker 1>idea just ultimately didn't take off. They wanted to launch

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a social networking site where you are not the product.

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>That was actually a quote in their manifesto, and that

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>gets back to hell. Facebook makes money which is largely

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>through advertising, and we the users, are the product that

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is selling. Facebook is selling access to us to

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>various advertisers. And it's not just the fact that there

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people on Facebook. I mean that

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 1>alone makes it valuable, but it's also that by interacting

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, by sharing our interests, by commenting on things,

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>by liking things, we're giving Facebook an extremely detailed look

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at who we are, sp pole at our preferences. Facebook

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>knows what we like and what we don't like. It

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>knows what sort of stuff catches our attention and what

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we're likely going to just scroll right past. That means

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>advertisers can target people who are most likely to respond

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to their ads. A Facebook user isn't valuable just because

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they use Facebook. They might be valuable because they happen

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to like shoes or sports or you know, a particular band.

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And so much of Facebook's decisions, many of which have

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.919
<v Speaker 1>proven to be detrimental to society in the long run,

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:39.439
<v Speaker 1>are motivated by the desire to serve customers, which would

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be their advertisers, and they want to serve them the

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>best product, which is our information. Elo said to Heck,

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with all that our social network isn't going to have

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ads on it. The idea was you would get a

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>stripped down ad free experience on Elo. You could build

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 1>out your social network, you could have a profile, all

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>without fear that all your activities were really just metrics

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that were being analyzed by algorithms so that the service

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>provider could sell ad space to you. But the delusion

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of interested users who flocked to l O when it

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>was still nothing but an invite field where you would

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>just type in your email address indicated there was going

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem. The service wasn't really ready to

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>handle the number of people who wanted to try it,

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course led back to that whole exclusivity feel again. However,

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>LO chose to keep accepting new users rather than shut

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>down operations or you know, close off choke points. They said,

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna deal with this. If the service goes down,

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:42.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it back up as fast as we can,

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>but we don't want to end up making this like

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive club. According to analysts, a lot of LO

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>users would get access to the site and then not

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do anything else. A company called r g A Metrics

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>took a sample of more than a hundred fifty thousand

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>l O users and found that thirty six percent of

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the accounts they looked at had never posted anything, and

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>only twenty percent of users who had signed up remained

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>active users six days afterward. So in other words, one

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>out of every five users who signed up would still

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be active six days later. That's not great. Elo seemed

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a lot of initial appeal but no staying power,

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think a big part of the problem was that, well,

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone was already over on Facebook. So unless your whole

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>social circle is making the move with you, then it

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do you any good to jump off Facebook because

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>no one you know is on the new network. It's

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the same problem lots of other attempts have had. Posting

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on Elo was kind of like posting on six Degrees

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>way back in There's a good chance no one you

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>knew was ever going to see it. It was sort

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of a catch twenty two problem. L O would pivot

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other social networking sites, and it

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately changed its focus to be more of an artist

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>centric network. L is a great place to discover artists

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>who are working in different types of media, but it's

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not a replacement for Facebook, and it makes you wonder

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if anyone will ever create a social networking site that

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>has the appeal and stickiness of Facebook. Some days that

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:20.279
<v Speaker 1>just seems like it's impossible, that it's no way that's

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 1>ever going to happen. But then there was also a

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>time when it was obvious quote unquote that my Space

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the future of social networking, and

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that played out very differently. So who knows. Maybe Facebook's

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>also too big to fail. Wink wink. That's all for

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this episode of tech Stuff. I hope you guys enjoyed it.

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions for topics I should tackle

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the future, reach out to me on Twitter. The

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>handle is text stuff H s W and I'll talk

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. H