WEBVTT - S3 – INTERVIEW 3: Drew Gray

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcomed Unobscured, a production of I Heart Radio and Aaron Minke.

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Drew Gray is a historian of the eighteenth and

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen centuries who teaches at the University of Northampton, where

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he's the subject lead for History. He's our guest for

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>this episode. You won't be surprised to hear that he

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>also specializes in the history of crime and punishment. His

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>books on Jack the Ripper include London's Shadows, The Dark

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Side of the Victorian City and Jack in the Thames

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Torso Murders a New Ripper Those hit the shelves, alongside

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>big projects like his book Crime, Policing and Punishment in

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>England from sixteen sixty to nineteen fourteen. You can also

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>find his writing on his blog The Police Magistrate, which

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>tells dramatic stories from England's history of summary justice. Dr

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Gray is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>He has been a member of the editorial Board of

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>The London Journal since two thousand eleven and is a

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Fellow of the Royal Historical Society. Recently, Dr Drew has

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>been publishing articles on the myths and legends around Jack

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the b and how historians would benefit from paying more

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to the murderers in Victorian Whitechapel. You could say

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's been doing a little un obscuring of his own,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're delighted to have him on the show. We

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>begin with his thoughts on Jack the Ripper as a myth,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>as someone who never ever existed, and then move on

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>from there. This is the Unobscured Interview series for season three.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm erin Minky. Well, if I could start by saying

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>something probably signly controversial, which is to say, there's there's

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>no such person as Jack the Ripper. He never existed.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there was a serial killer or possibly serial killers,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and that person was responsible for the murder of several

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>very poor and vulnerable women. But the monster that's come

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 1>down to us as Jack the Ripper is in many

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>ways an invention of popular print culture and then subsequently

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a century or more of how it's a sluicing and

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>reculation about the killer. So Jack is a sort of

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>dark fantasy figure that was created in and has developed

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>ever since, and in doing so has taken on the

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>aspects of each succeeding generation that's looked at him. I'm

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not unlike in some respects the way in which Sherlock

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Holmes has been reimagined to suit the age in which

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>he inhabits. So since we don't know who Jack was,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we can continue to continue to offer up suspects that

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>reflects our own fears and our own prejudices, the things

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that bother us in our own in our own ages.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And this process starts right at the beginning of the case,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the autumn of when the murderers first thought of

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to be possibly a sort of top hatted top a

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>slumming Burlington bertie, or a psychotic doctor carrying a gladstone

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>bag full of sharp knives, or perhaps even a crazy

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>immigrant do an anarchist revolutionary bent on destroying English society.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And then when you throw in dark alleyways covered in

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.839
<v Speaker 1>fog from which a murderer can sort of emerge raith

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like clutching a knife and then vanished just as easily,

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving the police behind looking baffled, you've got the kind

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of perfect recipe for a Gothic horror story. And the

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that this bears very little resemblance to the truth

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of immaterial. The industry that's grown from the

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>murder of these women is the reality that most people

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>today understand. Another observation that you make in that same book,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>London's Shadows, is that most of what we know about

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the reality of life in London in the eighties is

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>filtered through the middle class sensibilities of the time. How

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>would you describe those sensibilities and the way that they

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>shaped then and shaped now what we can know about

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that moment in the city's history. Maybe you know, in

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Britain's history, what kinds of documents do we have that

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>guide us through the details of what was happening in

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the East End, or or the murders themselves. How do

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we get at that? Well, of course, it's extremely difficult

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>before our century, or the twentieth century perhaps to know

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at all what people thought about the world around them.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Especially it's especially true for what you might call ordinary

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>working class people. Even if people could read and write,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>which is very far from universal in the eighties, not

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>many of them would have at the time to do so,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all the money to spare on ink and paper to

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>write them, So working class memories of life in the

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Victorian period are extremely rare. Instead, we have examples of

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>popular culture, so musical song things like my old man,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>My old Man's a dustman, for example, which provide the

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>plimpses of now folk understood their society at the time,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming down to through song and music, hall

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and jokes and that kind of thing. Um. But that's

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>very little from working class people. Instead, historians have had

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to make do with the diaries and writings of the

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>middle class um and the elite um. So I'm kind

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of thinking of men like William instead that the newspaper

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>editor or authors like George Sims or Andrew Mens, or

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>social investigators and reformers like Charles Booth or Beatrice Webb.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course these people mostly from the middle classes

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>right as as to some extent, we all do from

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>their own perspective, and so this history is kind of

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>naturally imbued with their own prejudices and their own moral compass,

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>which was quite different, of course from the way in

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which working class people understood their lives. And in terms

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of documentation about White Chapel and the White Chapel murders,

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got very little, you know. I always think that

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a truism that people in the past

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>don't really think about the needs of researchers in the

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>future when they're keeping or not keeping documentation. Most of

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what we do have is kept well. Most of what

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we do have in the public realm is kept at

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the National Archives, a que in in the south of

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the River in London, in a couple of police files,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is actually rather disappointing when you actually get

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. There are some case papers, but

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>these are pretty thin. There are some photos of the

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>victims which are widely known now and they're all over

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. And a lot of letters sent to the

0:06:55.440 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>police impressed during and after the summer and autumn um

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>In addition, we have the reports of coroner's inquests and

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>our commentary on the police investigation through the pages of

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers, and over the decades have passed, various pieces

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of evidence have emerged um like, for example, the Maybrick Diary,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which have been hotly disputed, or the Little Child letter

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>which these bits and pieces have provided more angles for

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>researchers to hang their speculations on what not necessarily much

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>illumination into the case itself. And I think most researchers

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>will agree that we've probably lost as much evidence over

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the years as we've found, and there's so that we're

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>left with very little that a modern detective force could

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>use to identify the killer in terms of the history

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of White Chapel in the East End, in terms of

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of documentation, we have census records which are interesting.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We have street directories which tell us quite quite a bit,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and we have Charles Boo's fantastic maps of London in

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteenth century which indicate the areas of poverty

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and relative wealth, but of course not really very much

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>survived because again, what why would you keep that kind

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of stuff? That stuff we want to find out about

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ordinary people's lives. They just don't generate those records unless

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they're appearing something, for example, like a court case. Mhmm. Yeah.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And and speaking of of court cases and and settings

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where where documents are generated. Um, you mentioned that your

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>your focused as a historian is on crime, and you've

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of work on Victorian police courts and

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>published regularly on the Police Magistrate blog, which is full

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of fascinating stories. Um. Can you describe Victorian police courts

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and the role that they played in the US, The

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>system of the weight eight Yeah, the the the Victorian

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>police court and the Victorian police court magistrates that presided

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in these courts is part of a long tradition of

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>summary justice in England which has a very long history,

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of been the focus of most of

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>my career um since I started in academia. And so

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, whe do you think it's quite it' quite

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>difficul to say a little when you can settle for

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>um the police court. A police court magistrate presided over

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of different sorts of um cases throughout

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century. They were they were appointed as men

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with who had at least seven years of experience of

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>practicing law and they sat in rotation in a series

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>of courts. So there were there were police magistrates courts

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>from the late eighteenth century from on was a little

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier for places like both streets and they covered

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>most of the metropolis. So there were places at Westminster

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Great Marble Street and Queens Square, there was a

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>couple in the East Standard Worship Street and Thames Um.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>There was police courts in in Southbok and Lambeth, and

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>then later in the century they moved out to the suburbs,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like places like Highgate for example, so so you could

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>see a magistrate right across the city and there were

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>In addition, of course, there were two magistrates courts in

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the city of London itself, which is a separate authority,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>as a separate urban authority, it is not it's not

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>under the same government as the rest of the metropolis.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And these police court magistrates sat alone, which which made

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>them unique in England, where most magistrates would sit in

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pairs or threes, but in London they had extra powers.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>They were advised by a clerk, but otherwise they make

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>decisions on whether to send someone to prison to find

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>them or or to send them on for a trial

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for a jury entirely on their own, so there's no

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>jury in these trials. They sit at the bottom, if

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you like, of the criminal justice system, below the the

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter sessions and then the assize or the old baby

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>court and police court magistrates would have dealt with all

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sorts of crime, but also a lot of social problems.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So they would deal with a tremendous amount of drunken

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>disorderly behavior, but also petty theft, some quite serious theft

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like burglary and fraud, right through two cases of domestic

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>violence assorts on the police and murder. They if it

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>came to an arder, they wouldn't be convicting somebody of murder,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but they will be pushing them up through the criminal

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>justice system. So this this is a place of first

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>first hearing, so it's where some of the facts of

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>cases are established before they then sent on up through

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the criminal justice system. But these courts are also the

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>first port of call for those complaining about all sorts

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of things that bothered them in Victorian London. So people

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>being overcharged by cab drivers, policemen bringing cost costomongers bringing

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in market traders for obstructing the streets, or for the

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>very poor in London who are requesting help. Um this

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is where you'll find people accused of committing suicide or

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>attempted suicide, escaped lunatics, dangerous dogs. All these sorts of

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>things will come before the police courts. So there are

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>fantastic wind into the Victorian um capital. Unfortunately, going back

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to the problem of documentation in the past, these courts

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>leave us very little in the way of archival material.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Most of the records are lost if they were ever

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>kept for very long. There are a small smattering of

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>cases of case books from the Thames Court, but but

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>not much else outside of Bow Streets. But we do

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have newspaper reports because the newspapers daily reported on the

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>cases that came for the police courts, because I think

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>their readers were ready interested in looking at life through

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this this particular lens. M Turning now a little toward

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the East End. You've also written that it's a place

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that had a diverse culture. You say, many places of worship, entertainment, trade,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a long history. Um. But that after a eight everyone

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world new where White Chapel was. But at

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time the Ripper murders obscured the reality of

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that part of London. So if the murders didn't actually

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>define White Chapel and you know, hide what life was

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>actually like thereby be by growing beyond the you know,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the do of those events, how could the East End

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at the time be more justly described, you know, with

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with your historians eyes looking back beyond those obscuring events,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>How do we describe the East End of London at

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this time? I think it of course, with everything becomes

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of mired in in representations from the period. I

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>always trying to imagine that I'm going back in time

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm stepping out onto the rather dirty streets of

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>London in the nineteenth century. But I would describe the

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>East End is a multicultural melting pot, a kind of

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>vibrant community of people struggling to vibe in a in

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a society, of course, which generally failed to support those

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that fell on on hard times. So I see a

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>series of communities, not not one community, but several communities

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>known and not always seeing eye to eye, where kind

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of new immigrants mingled with established ones and native east

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Enders for want of a better word, rubbed shoulders with

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>new arrivals, and with slumming tourists, you know, wealthier people

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>coming into the area to kind of gorput what they

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>could see. I see White Chapel is somewhere where poverty

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was endemic, but at the same time there's an entrepreneurial

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:49.119
<v Speaker 1>spirit kind of everywhere. So words I'd used to describe

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>White Chapel in the would be bold, with brassy, sometimes shocking,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>often funny, amusing, always lively and exciting and and ever changing.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'd probably go further and say that that's actually

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how I see the East End, That East End and

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>short ditch and white chaplains, Pittel Fields in twenty one

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>century Britain. It's very much that kind of exciting, exciting

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>place to be. The first place my mind went when

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I read that passage that you'd written was those those maps.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles Booth maps that you mentioned where there there

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you said, you know, there's the color coding and for

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>showing different levels of of wealth, of class, of success.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, so there's a the markings for very deep

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>poverty and they're marked in black. And with that stereotype

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about the East End, I go to look at the map,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's really a mix it's not there are these

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>pockets where he's marked in black, you know, desperate poverty.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.359
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned the entrepreneurial spirit and these different communities

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of shoulder to shoulder, kind of jostled up together,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and I see even in terms of class, there are

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some very very wealthy neighborhoods in the East End as

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>well as some of the very poor. So even in

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the documents that we do have from the time Mike

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Charles Booth's maps, you can see that kind of the

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>mixing and people shoulder to shoulder who are living quite

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>different lives from each other, even in the same neighborhood. Um,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>when what were the contrasts between East and West London

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>as victorians imagined them in the eighteen eighties. How for

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how fair were the kinds of generalizations maybe that they

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>had about each other. Mhmm, yeah, I think yeah. I

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>mean the all all of what you've just said about

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the about Boothes is stuff I would certainly point to.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean the West End, or in popular parliance, the

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>best in was to the wealthy. It was a playground

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for those who had money, and of course it was

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a magnet for people who wanted to work. So plenty

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of East London has worked in the West End, worked

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>in the shops and the pubs and the clubs, and

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the and came over, you know, the women came over

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes to act as prostitutes and escorts in that part

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of town. And this is where the shops and the

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>clubs and the theaters of Victoria and London were. Um,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is where you'd find the elegant streets

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and the squares around Bloomsbury, And this is this is

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>what looked like the capital of the greatest Empire of

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the world had ever seen, all of it, beautifully lit

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and well served by transport networks. If you contrast that

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with the East End of London, um, this is poor, dark,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>overcrowded and largely degraded. Um. So, as I've I've said before,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the while the West End was affluent, the East End

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>was affluent, kind of strich stinking in the noses of

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>those that visited it. And that's the image we have

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the contrast between the East and West ends of

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>London in nineteenth century, and it's probably the image that

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>most Londoners would have had, certainly most West Londoners and

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>people from outside the capital. How fair was this? Well,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the East End was poor, it was overcrowded, and it

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was home to those dirty trades that were necessary, such

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as slaughtering and tanning. Those industries has always been placed

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the east of the capital, and that that goes

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>right back in history. But Charles Boo's Great Survey of Poverty,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>his mapping of London, reveals that there were certainly more

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>areas of wealth and prosperity in the West End than

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the East End. But the East End wasn't entirely

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>riddled with poverty so rare. It's for commercial and well

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to do streets mingle with black and dark blue areas

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>which denote poverty and criminality. Um, and you will find

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pockets of deprivation across the capital right in what in

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>West London as well. So the contrast is a useful

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>starting point. But London was a very mixed city in

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds and poverty and wealth often lived cheap

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by jiles side by side. That remains the case about

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>London in a way that it's not true of some

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of some other European cities like Paris in the nineteenth

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 1>century or or today, which which kept the wealthy and

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>poorer areas much better, um, separated mhm. Can you describe

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the role of journalism, like like the Median Tribute of

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Modern babylone series that was published I believe in eight five, Um,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how the journalism that was being published in the eighties

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>helped to kind of create that imaginative geography, you know,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the stereotypes of the East End. Mm hmm, Well, I

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think I mean. One thing we have to remember, of course,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is that most people were certainly most middle class people,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>even middle class people in London, and these were the

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people that read most of the newspapers rarely ventured into

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the East End or any of London's other poorer areas.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like St. Giles or the Borough in southern and

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't go there. Instead, they learned about those

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>areas through the newspapers they read, and papers gave them

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a partial and a biased view of those areas. Not

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>unlike the way in which Darkest Africa was described by

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the missionaries who went there to you know, loosely use

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the term civilized it in the nineteenth century, so colorful

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of the East End, you know, featuring the strange

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>people that lived there, There weird customs, there smeeady foods,

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and the clothes that they wore. We're all printed in

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that was similar to the descriptions offered of far

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>away in exotic lands in India and China and in Africa,

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>all the parts of the all the parts touched by

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the British Empire MHM, and people like William Stead, who

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pioneered what what we could probably call who pioneered what's

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>been termed new journalism, recognized the power that the media

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>had to affect change as well as turning a profit.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>By saying newspapers. Steadies a very modern journalist and newspaper editor,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and he'd fit right in to our modern media circus.

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So sensational articles like his made in Tribute of Modern

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Babylon or or Andrew mens Is a bitter Cry of

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>outclass London, which stead also published, were intended to both

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>shock and titillate the readers. Since most most people have

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>no first hand experience of the way that the poor lived,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the articles that they read in the pages of Organs

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Powerma Gazette would have shocked and concerned them

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and helped to sort of create this vision of um

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the East End and other parts of London which whilst

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>having germs of truth in them, it's not to say

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that these things weren't true, but they come to dominate

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>all the narratives. But it's it's rather like I would say,

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>until people started to travel in the sort of seventies

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>onwards to other parts of the world, including the United States,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>people got their ideas about other countries through television, so

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all have and you know, I grew

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>up having an idea of nineteen seventies and nine eighties

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Americas and I've never been there, and would you like,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, your prime time television to be the accurate

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>portrayal of you know, American life. And you know it's

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's a similar to the Americans watching Downton

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Appe and thinking that's how English people live. Popular culture

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>presents us with an image which isn't necessarily true. Yeah. Yeah,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>last night I watched since in Sensibility film with my wife,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, yeah, And I watched Perry Mason. There

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we Go, the New One or or or City of Angels.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the only thing I'm watching at a moment.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I know all about America in the

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties thirties because I watched for Walk Empire and

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>all these kind of HBO, big budget things, so I

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what it's like over there. Ye. Well, and

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there's another Booth, William Booth, who's working in White Chapel

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen eighties. So at the same time that

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that Charles Booth is producing his maps and that these

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>journalists are writing stories, there are people who are motivated

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to take action. And William Booth and his wife Katherine, uh,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they've formed the Salvation Army, and that's in the East

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>End right, absolutely so he founded the East London Christian

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Mission in eighteen sixty five. Um, I think on the

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>White Chapel Road. Um, it's I think his first part

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of his first preaching sessions was in a building which

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 1>is now a pub called the Blind Beggar, which has

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>more famous modernity connections to the Cray Twins in the nineties. Yeah,

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the he adopted. They adopted the Salvation Army tag in

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in eight They were former Methodists and they wanted to

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>bring religion and abstinence from alcohol to the people of

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>East End. They operated by holding large public meetings and

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>organizing marches through through communities. Of these marches are accompanied

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>by brass bands made up of their members. Um, there's

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a military system of organizations. So General Booth is at

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the head and they have soldiers, and of course they

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>distribute their weekly newspaper, the War Cry, on the streets

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and by going into public houses and Booth Like many

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>social reformers at the time, saw alcoholism as an integral

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cause of poverty, immorality and then of domestic violence, and

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>his Army challenged men and women to change their lives,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>looking to recruit from within those working class communities, and

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they brought their their kind of brand of religious further

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>into into communities like White Chapel, which often drew down

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of abuse and ridicule from the locals.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And it might he might not have listened to the

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric that they were putting out their their Christian vision,

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>because in the early days of the Army of the

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>marching bands delivered a sort of a rather terrible din

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than a badley of beautiful music, because they weren't

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly good at playing their instruments. And you quite often

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>find Salvationists being brought before magistrates by the police for

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>causing a nistance not or causing an obstruction. But they're

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly people who were driven by their very strong religious

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>beliefs to affect change in the communities they see that

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are so blighted by alcohol and poverty, crime and homelessness.

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about journalists publishing stories about the

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>East End in a way that connects them to the

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>margins are the reaches of the British Empire. I thought

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it was so interesting that William Booth he picks up

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on the in Dark Africa kind of stereotype and he

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>publishes a book called in Darkest England, right, yeah, and

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I think in eighteen nine one, um, yes, he he

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>publishes a book because it's taking that kind of idea

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the missionary. So if we're sending missionaries out to Africa,

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're sending the likes of Stanley and Livingstone,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of explorers come missionaries to bring the word

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of It's not just the word of God, is it.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's it's the it's the world word of

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>white civilization. Two so called uncivilized African tribes in that

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>in that terribly imperialistic way that was such a feature

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteenth century. And but if you're going to

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do that in Africa and you've got desperate poverty and

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>people who are living in immoral conditions, people not getting

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>married and having children out of word and in Andrew

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Menss term, you know, incest is common in in the

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hovels of Leash, London. Even if he was exaggerating,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then surely you need missionaries to go out to White

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Chapel and Spittlefields and then down below the river south

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the River into the Borough and Southolk and Burman's

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in place of that where you've got Similarly, it looks

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like the world has been neglected. It looks like Christ

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is not permeating into those parts of the Empire, so

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>darkest England is it's kind of perfect vehicle for him

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to to make that point. Mm hmmm. And it strikes

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>me that if we're talking about a place that is,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you said at the beginning, a multicultural melting part um,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>then some of what we've been discussing when it comes

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to middle class sensibilities is also it's mixing and being

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>motivated by some of those ideas about white civilization too,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about bringing it to the margins of

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Empire or into this multicultural region of your own city. Yeah,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's I mean, we need to be really clear.

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a different it's a different world, it's a different

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a different society. But but nine century Britain is

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a is a quite it's quite a racialist society. You know,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were the British see themselves as superior, and superior is white,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but superior is British English and then pretty much the

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, and we look down on pretty

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>much everybody. In the nineteenth century, and waves of immigrants

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>from from Eastern Europe that are coming into London will

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>be disparaged. We are pretty pretty down on the Irish,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We are pretty down on the Chinese, who have the

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>small pockets of communities around Lime House. And even the

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Europeans are fellow Europeans like the French and the Germans,

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>well we have a beef with them as well throughout

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the century. So everybody is everybody compares very badly to

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>white British civilization. HM. And when you're talking about social

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>reform and there's kind of missions into the East, and

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned some of the attitudes towards alcohol, especially for

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>William Booth, but I know those are more general as well.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>What were some of the attitudes towards you mentioned earlier prostitution?

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>How do the social reformers talk about prostitution as a

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>part of kind of anti vice campaigning and that kind

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of thing in the East End. So prostitute, I mean,

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>attitudes towards prostitution, they kind of they yo yo through

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the century, the eighteenth and nineteen centuries, so there are

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>varying views of prostitution. They kind of come in and

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>out of fashion. So prostitutes are quite often seen as

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a necessary evil sort of protecting the pure and innocent

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>young women from from lust from male lust, which which

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are seen as kind of natural or at least uncontrollable. Um,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they're also seen as victims, so the kind of trope

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the poor servant girl who's forced into prostitution after

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>being ruined by a predatory master or or a dishonest

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lover who's promised to marry her and then run off UM.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But in the aftermath of the Crimean War in the

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>eight fifties, the problem of prostitution became mostly focused around

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>sexually transmitted diseases, particularly the diseases of syphilis and ganaria,

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because these are he's a kind of undermined being the

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>British war effort against Russia and the Crimea UM. Many

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>more people were lost to disease than were lost to

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>bullets and cavalry savers of the Russians, So this kind

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of dominates the discourse surrounding prostitution and its effects on

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>society in the sixties. And in the sixties there are

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>attempts to control prostitution and the spread of what we

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>today would call s T I s U, particularly the

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>spread of sexually transmitted infections in the armed forces, the

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>army and the Navy, and a series of acts had passed,

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Contagious Diseases Acts, which helped to cement the idea

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that prostitutes were a pollutant within society. They are spreading disease.

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is coupled with the concepts that are criminal

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>class existed in Victorian London, not a particularly new concept,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but one that sees a revival in the sixties once

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we stopped transporting people to Australia. So instead of getting

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>rid of our criminals, they're kind of with us still.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They're in our prisons and they're back on our streets,

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of reinvigorates this idea of a criminal class,

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a subspecies of humanity that had the power to corrupt

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the honest, respectable working man and his family. And prostitutes

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>were seen as the kind of female bit of this

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>criminal fraternity, even though technically prostitutions not not actually a crime,

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and so prostitutes were associated with immorality, with drunkenness, with

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>theaters and musicals, and of course with poverty. So there's

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of things that come with the Victorian

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 1>associations with prostitution. In the Victorian period. Mhm, Let's let's

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>take a step into the East End. We've been talking

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about the attitudes, the stereotypes, but how did people in

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the East End actually live? Um? You know, I'm interested

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for thing king about the White Chapel murders. Um, what

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are the model dwellings that you write about, the pabod

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>buildings or or other structures like them. Um, what were

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these model dwellings? And relatedly, kind of who owned the

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>property in the East End where where all these people lived?

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So Peabody homes or model dwellings are an attempt from

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the pretty from the eighteen sixties onwards to rehouse, to

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>re home the poor in better well ventilated and her

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Genie Holmes, there's a recognition that London is full of

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant slums um really badly built and and crumbling housing

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>from the eighteenth and early and nineteenth century. There are

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of London where which almost no go areas so

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>around St Giles, parts of White Chapel where the term

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>rookery is used, you know, kind of thinking of crows

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>living living together in in nests at the top of

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of trees. These rookeries are um full of

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>crime and vice and systematically, the the authorities try to

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>knock them down and build better places, or sometimes they

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>knocked down for example around Liverpool Street to build the

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>new railway station in the nineteenth century. But the idea

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of model dwellings really comes from movements in the eight

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to fruition in the sixties, and so you have

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly gathering momentum through the philanthropy of George Peabody, who

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is a wealthy American banker, and he kind of gets

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>together with the architect Henry Derbyshire to establish a trust,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Peabody Trust, which is to which is designed to

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>build affordable block housing tenement housing across London. Of one

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the first of these is in the East End.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So these are large tenement blocks um sort of built

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>around built in a sort of square and oblong around

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the central courtyard, which is creating a safe space for

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>communities which are shut off from the streets outside. And

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Peabody is not the only organization doing this, there are

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>other companies who are doing this is part philanthropy, but

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're making profit, hopefully but a small profit out

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of this. So there's the Rothschild Buildings in Flarendine Street,

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>which built. But many of these places, whilst the emphasis

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is on rehousing the poor, they only really accommodate the

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>working class who could guarantee to pay the rent, so

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>they acted as a sort of some of these these

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>people are acting as a sort of moral land owner.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>The model's Weddings movement a kind of moral and owners. Yeah,

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>this is where you'll find people like Octavia Hill from

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the charity organization Society charity visitors who come around and

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>check on the people that were living here. So they're

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>checking that the men are in work, they're checking that

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the children at school, that the rooms are clean and tidy.

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you fail in any of these areas, or

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't pay your rent, then you're going to be evicted.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So and that's very difficult to guarantee for people at

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the very bottom end of society, people who are the

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>casual poor, who don't have regular jobs, who are alive,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>for example, on work at the docks, on picking up

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>work on a daily or a weekly basis. Now you

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>can't guarantee that you can pay your rent, so you're

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.959
<v Speaker 1>not going to get into a model's wedding. And they're

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>actually the people that really need this decent housing. So

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the models only movement is definitely a good thing. And

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you can see many of the model dwellings people buildings

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>are still existent in London today. They built them very well,

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful examples of Victorian engineering and building, but they

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>weren't in placea so many other people in the East

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 1>End will have been forced into you know, poor crowded housing,

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and we see terrible examples of people living all the

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>way down to two sellers where they're living in sort

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of stigen conditions in dark, unlit um damp basements all

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the way up to living in attic spaces, whole families

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in one room. Um I no sanitation. You know, you

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>might have um shared pridulate facilities in the yard at

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the back. So very poor, very cold in winter, very

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hot in summer. Um. So you see lots of images

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of white chapel of people outside, people being outside because

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to be inside. Because also your inside

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>space is also probably your workshop space. So people who

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are working, um piece workers, copying or building matchboxes were

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>going to do that at home. So you've kind of

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>got to get the kids out from under your feet

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to turn them your space into a into

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a workspace during the day, families sharing beds. These these

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>conditions were what shocked the middle classes when they came

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to investigate. And below that, if you, if you, if

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't afford even that sort of to rent a room,

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then you'd be on casual lodging houses where you are

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>paying a few pennies a night for a room or

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>not even a royom, but you're paying for your bed

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or even a rope to sleep on in the worst

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>possible conditions. And these are some of the situations that

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the women who found themselves as victims of Chapter Ripper,

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're living in the nights before they died. And

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>there's even below that, below the casual lodgings are is

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the workhouse. The workhouse casual ward where you went in

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the evening, you've got a little bit of bread

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to eat, and you've probably got south down as some

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of wash um, your clothes, taking your belongings taking

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>away and workhouse close to where and in the morning

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you get breakfast. Such a thing it was, but in

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>return for doing some work, breaking rocks or picking oakum

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So there's a whole degree of

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>poor housing in the East end um, none of it

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is very good. And who owns it well, it's owned

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>by by slim landlords, mostly people like McCarthy who owns

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>most of whites Row and Dorset Street where Mary Kelly

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is murdered. These are these are landlords who are not

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>wealthy themselves, but a certainly exploiting the fact that people

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>need somewhere to live in a desperate for anything they

0:41:54.920 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>can care mhm h. In all of these conditions, as

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you say, existed side by side in Whitechapel. Yeah, they

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>they're they're all running and people will probably fall through

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>different gaps, you know. They they Your life was determined

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>by what money you had. So in a society without

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a benefit system, if you had work then you would

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>probably great. So if you were reasonably if you you

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and your wife were in work, or you're in work

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and your wife could look after the kids, and yeah,

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you could live in a model's warning and probably have

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a decent, clean environment to live in. Nobody in the

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>working class has been played very much. But if you

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lost work, you've got ill um, your wife died, your

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>husband died, um, then you were very quickly going to

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fall into poverty and then fall through those gaps in society,

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So you would fall from a model's welling into a

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cheap lodging, UM in a room and a cheap lodging,

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>how too, maybe a bunk in a in a kit

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>house to a workhouse, UM to the streets, because because

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>once you once you can't even afford the two or

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>three pence a night for um for part of a

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bed in a shared lodging, then you're going to be

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on a park bench. M Thinking about the kinds

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of people that were living in these neighborhoods. You mentioned

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a large Irish community, a large Jewish community. Um, what

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was it like to be Irish in London's East End?

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 1>What was that exp was the experience of being Irish

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in the East End typical of what they would be

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like in other places in London? What kinds of trades,

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of residence as homes were open to London's

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Irish population. I think being Irish and being working class

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Irish and in the East End was probably much to

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>being working class Irish anywhere else in London or anywhere

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>else in England. You know, places like Liverpool had large

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Irish communities as well, so poor and the Irish population

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was generally poor, but it was pretty well established. I

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>mean Irish people have been coming to England forever, but

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the nineteenth century after the Potato family. They

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>were generally lower skilled than most other Londoners, that which

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>made them more at risk to unemployment, to lower wages

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and therefore impoverishment in London. In the East End, they

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>could find work at the docks, because irishman were noted

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as strong and capable and good workers. They made they

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>made good doctors and importantly they made good Stevie doors,

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which are the higher end of the of the dock industry.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Irish women would find work in workshops, so they might

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they might work as seamstresses or match girls, and many

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of course would have been as they would have been

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else in than they would have been employed as

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>domestics and domestic servants. So I mean the Irish being

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what it was like to be Irish in London. I

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>mean there's prejudiced against the Irish, but it's it's not

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that it might have been prejudiced

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:22.439
<v Speaker 1>towards people on on the basis of their hum their race.

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 1>As such, the Irish um were associated very much with

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a with a hard drinking and a hard fighting culture

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and um and their their predominant religion, which is Catholicism

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for many of the ones that came over, set them

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>apart from largely Protestant England. And I think what you

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>find from the seventies onwards into the eight is the

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of growth of it's the growth of Irish nationalism.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So Irish home rule becomes very much on the comes

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to dominate politics, domestic politics from the seventies onwards, and

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>then in the eighties we start to see, although it

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has happened earlier in the eighteen sixes, we start to

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 1>see episodes of Fenian Irish Republican terrorism. So there's a

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>series of bombings in the eighties, which probably means that

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Irish are um that they're suspected. They become a

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>suspected part of society, and that probably increases prejudices their Catholics,

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>their bombers, their drunkards, they're violence and they're probably all thieves.

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's probably a prevalent view of the Irish, but they

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have it as bad as some other people. I think, Hm,

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can you describe the Jewish community in the East End

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Um again kind of homes, trades, attitudes.

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>How long had there been a Jewish community in the

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>East end of London. Well, there's been a Jewish community

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the East end of London for a tremendously long

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time, because it's Oliver Cromwell in the period

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the English Republic who allows the Jews who have

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>been expelled from England in the medieval period back in.

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So they aren't to establish communities, but they're not allowed

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to live in trade in the city of London, so

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>they set up around the edges. So that's kind of

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>why we get a Jewish community around Spittle Fields on

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the on the edge of the city, in the edge

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of Mita Square. Um. This community, which is well established

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>by the eighteenth century but quite small, is mainly made

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>up of Sephadic of Portuguese Jews, and this changes in

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century with large numbers of Eastern European Central

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>European Jews coming and fleeing from persecution and economic distress

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Russian Empire, so that the so called pale

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of settlement where they're forced to live and forced to

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>serve in the Czar's armies. So Jewish people are are

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving Russia, UM and places like Poland and Lithuania what

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we would call today, and they're and they're coming across

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Europe to settle in England or to travel on to

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>whether I think they really want to go, which is America.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And when they settle in places like Spittlefields where there's

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>already an established community, this works for them because there

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they can find work as shoemakers and as tailors and shopkeepers.

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>They can they can understand the language, which generally becomes

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a kind of speaking of Yiddish. And they are concentrated

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in areas around brook Lane, Went Street, Flower in Dean

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Street and Galston Street where where their their synagogues are

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>whether people that understand them, where they can buy the

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>food they're used to and actually from descriptions at the time,

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is looking like another country. Actually, of course,

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>if you travel to White Chapel today, you'll see a

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>similar thing, but with a different community. You've got a

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Bengali community there lots of people from from Um, a

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>different part of the world. But but but similarly to

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish community in the nineteenth century, you would have found,

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, black things posted in Hebrew signs on walls

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in Hebrew. So they brought their own customs, their religion,

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>their language, their clothes, their food. And they also, of course,

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's also helped with their prejudice against them,

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they bought some of their radical political ideas like socialism

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:53.919
<v Speaker 1>and anarchism. Mhm hm um. Jumping forward just a little

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>bit to touch on White Chapel before we continue some

0:49:56.480 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of these general comments. Um, just before any Chapman's murder,

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Star begins to publish the story that that Polly

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Nichols killer was a Jew named leather apron Can you

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>describe what kinds of prejudices, as you said, against Jewish

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>life that kind of reporting would have conjured up for

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the Stars readership. Yes, I mean there's a there's a

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the suggestion that the Whitechapel murderer was a guy called

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:34.280
<v Speaker 1>leather apron Um sometimes identified as John Piser, and that

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>this is this is very much in keeping with contemporary

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>views of Jews, but also the way in which the

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Whitechapel murderer was the idea of the Whitechapel murderer was

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>constructed at the time and has come down to us

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>ever since. So the descriptions of leather Apron in the

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>newspapers highlighted things like his small black eyes and his

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew features, which is probably suggesting he had a large nose,

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of Semitic appearance, and the color of his skin.

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 1>He was described as sinister um. He was in the

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>trades that we would associated, not exclusively with Jewish immigrants

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth century, but certainly with many of them.

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He was a shoemaker or a bootmaker or a slipper maker,

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was said to be someone who

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>terrorized local women with a long sharp knife. Now I

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's important because English people weren't necessary associated with knives.

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>You associated foreigners with knives, Portuguese sailors, um, Jewish barbers

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and shoemakers, Native Americans escaping from buffalo bills while west

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 1>traveling show. So it was easier for people in London

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth century to believe that Jack the Repper

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>was a foreigner. He was a crazy immigrant, someone identified

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>as other, rather than an indigenous resident of White Chapel.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So those are all things which it's the presence of

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>large numbers of Jews in that area, and the prejudice

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and the anti Semitism, which is definitely rife in Victorian London,

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>which helps to allow someone like the start to point

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the finger at a leather ape. And for what it's worth,

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of course John Piser wasn't chatter rippey. He had an

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>alibi for that. That that's um night and the sergeant

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Thick that arrested him ended up having to protect

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>him from the mob outside. Mhm, mhm. In the opening

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of London Shadows, you mentioned, um that there are some

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:45.439
<v Speaker 1>distinctly theological aspects of the East Ends reputation. Uh. And

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the Salvation Army and you know, mentioned

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of missionary efforts and that kind of way of

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what was going on. Um. And in your

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>book you say it wasn't the worst, the most criminal

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>place to live in London in the eighteen eighties, but

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it was representative from many Victorians of the depths to

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>which humanity could sink when separated from a close relationship

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:14.879
<v Speaker 1>with God and Christianity. Can you say a bit more

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about how theology is shaped the ideas we've been talking

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:23.000
<v Speaker 1>about about crime and poverty and vice. Yeah, for sure,

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll never get used to hearing my words come back

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at me. Um, yeah, I think I mean Victorian British

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 1>society was a lot more religious than modern Britoness society is,

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even if going to church wasn't as ubiquitous as as

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.479
<v Speaker 1>some people probably thought it ought to be. But most

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:49.800
<v Speaker 1>social reformers were motivated by their Christian beliefs. And this

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of manifested itself in a in a highly

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>moral discourse about society and charity was closely linked to Christianity, or,

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the Jewish community, to traditions within Judaism.

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a moral obligation to help the poorest,

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but that obligation sat side by side with a belief

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that some sections of Victorian society had lost sight of

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the message of Christ. They had to be enlightened. The

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Word of God needed to be brought to the people

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of our chapel, just as missionaries will bringing it to

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the supposedly uncivilized peoples of Africa. Um. So, I think

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got that kind of sense that the all the

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>people that are writing about the East, and Andrew Mens,

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>William Stead, Samuel Barnett, you know, the women like Helen

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>den Dendy, Helen Bows and Cake, Beatrice Web. Very many

0:54:52.280 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of those social reformers, Charles Booth, they are motor of eight.

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They can't separate out there their religion. It's such a

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:09.879
<v Speaker 1>part of them, and I think that's quite different. It's

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>quite difficult, I think, to get that across to people

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in our world because religion doesn't play that kind of

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>role in our society. It's very much an add on

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.839
<v Speaker 1>for many people in Britain today. You know, you go

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to church at certain times for for weddings and funerals

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and baptisms perhaps, but it's not part of your daily

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>life in the way that it would have informed the

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>lives of people at that time. So everything kind of

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:41.880
<v Speaker 1>gets seen through that particular lens. Mhm, mhm. Thinking about

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>life and death in the East End, Um, what we

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>consider today the Ripper murders weren't the only killings in

0:55:56.480 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the White Chapel area or across the East End. And

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there's violent crime on record in the neighborhood throughout the

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen EIGHTI its not just you know, in a few months, um,

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but how violent And again we're kind of talking about

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>stereotypes of versus reality. How violent was Whitechapel really and

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and then what was the general understanding of that violence

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that did occur. Yeah, and it's obviously very difficult to

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:29.240
<v Speaker 1>measure violence in the past. It's quite difficult to measure

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>violence in our own society. Is very diffult to measure

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of violence in the past because because you're you can

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>only measure statistics of violence. So you can you can

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>measure reported crime, you can measure prosecuted crime, you can

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:50.320
<v Speaker 1>measure convictions, so the number of assaults and number of murders, etcetera, etcetera,

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really have those sorts of stats for

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nine century. There's a sense that violence is how the

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking crime has been in the decline from the

0:57:01.920 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifties onwards and is beginning to rise again in

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. And that's probably also to do with cycles

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of of economic cycles. It's also to do with economic cycles,

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because poverty and crime are are interlinked. And when we

0:57:19.760 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about violent crime in the past, we're often talking

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about violent property crime like robbery, rather than violence per se.

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think violence was endemic in the East ending White Chapel,

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but murder was relatively uncommon, or perhaps we could say

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was no more common than anywhere else in London,

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the White Chapel murders of course are notable because

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of their particular brutality and the and the sequence that

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 1>was unusual. Casual violence, assaults, fights between men in pubs,

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse were daily occurrences and we can see this

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the prosecutions at the police magistrate courts. At places

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like Thames and Worship Street, m violence was mostly carried

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>out by men, either against other men, against the police,

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or against their female partners and wives, or violence was

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>directed at children. And the East End Whitechapple Spittlesfields was

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a rough area, but I don't think it's helpful to

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>see it as more violent than any other poor district

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in the UK at that particular time. Well, I can

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:36.000
<v Speaker 1>say a bit about other murders if that's useful, Yeah, sure, yeah, yeah,

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there were there were other murders, and not

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not least the Thames torso mystery, which which could possibly

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be linked to the rip of Killings um so. In

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that case, there was a discovery of a female torso

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Thames at Raynham in May seven, with more

0:58:56.440 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>body parts surfacing that that same year and then in

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>September right while the White Chappel cases is kind of

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>reaching its enif another torso was being found amongst the

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>building worked for police headquarters at Whitehood and in June,

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>third dismembered female body was dragged from the Thames at

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Horsby down before in September of that year, the police

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>discovered the rotting torso underneath arches in Pension Street, which

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't far from where There's Stride had been murdered just

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a year earlier. There were several other high profile murders

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in London. Only four men were sent to the gallows

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of the result of that, so I think we have

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to put it into context that we think of it

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as being a murderous age, but actually they weren't sending

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that many people. We weren't executing that many people for murder.

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The most compelling murder of eighteen eighty I think was

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>probably that of Joseph Rumbold, who was killed in May.

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>He was a was in the wrong place at the

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong time. He was killed as he strolled in Regent's

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Park with his girlfriend um and this is part of

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a gang feud out of hand and his killer was

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen year old there was sentenced to death, but

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>reprieved on account of his age. So he kind of

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>tells us that that there were there were domestic murders,

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there were murders through robberies, there were gang murders. The

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Ripper murders because they were serial, because they were particularly brutal,

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are different. But but but there wasn't a particularly more

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>murderous here than any other. Mm hmmmm. Well, And in

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>your book Jack and the Temps Torso Murders, Um, you

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>describe those cases that you just mentioned at Raynom and

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Whitehall and Pension Street, UM, in a way that I

1:00:53.240 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think is very that I found very helpful and compelling,

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because we do talk as if even and this is

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the myth of Jack the Ripper, that what

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we call the White Chapel murders were particularly horrifying and brutal,

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were. But reading about the Torso murders I

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>found equally horrifying. UM. And so I appreciated what you

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>did with that book, and so I'm glad you. I'm

1:01:27.360 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>glad you went on to mention them in this conversation

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>now despite me not dropping that into the outline, because

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and Paul Beg does this too in his book Forgotten Victims,

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where he talks about the way that you think about

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the White Chapel murders, and often it's a favored suspect

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>or something that based on you know who, uh, someone

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know who's identified as a suspect brings in or

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>omits certain crimes are killings that happened in the East

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>End in that year. So I thought that was very

1:02:04.720 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>helpful in your own work when we're talking about building

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a case and how connected to see these things or

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not um that there's so much of of life of death,

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>even of the crimes that were committed. That's that gets

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>omitted from the stories that we tell for sure. Yeah, absolutely.

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean we focus on what we want to focus

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on in the replicase and that that's how that's how

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been driven. And that's kind of the falsification of

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>history in a way, because you leave out the bits

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that don't fit the argument you want to make. And

1:02:40.320 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think even even the best historians are are guilty

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of of that um at some point, because it's in

1:02:50.280 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as you don't admit things which as long

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as you don't admit omit things which completely dismantle your argument.

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's trying to probably get away with with

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>with emphasizing the facts or the situations which they think

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>are most compelling to drive the narrative that they want

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to present. Thinking about the agencies responsible for investigating or

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>preventing all of these crimes. Um, you mentioned earlier that

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the City of London Police is different from the Metropolitan Police.

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the Thames River Police. There's also the c

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>i D at Scotland, the Criminal Investigative. I'm sorry, what's

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the department? Yes? Can you briefly describe those various agencies

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>how they related to each other? Uh, you know, give

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>our listeners a sense of what was going on with

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this complex, sometimes seemingly byzantine, policing organization in a complicated

1:03:51.800 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>city like London. Yeah. Well, the first thing we have

1:03:55.480 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to establish, a course, is that London. London didn't have

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a police force until so the police in still relatively new.

1:04:04.960 --> 1:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That might seem a strange thing to say, but but

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's only fifty or sixty years of policing

1:04:11.680 --> 1:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>by the time you get to eight. Since Peel passed

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the Metro and Police Act in eighteen twenty nine. The

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that created a professional police force which covered all of London,

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>apart from the City of London, which kept its own

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>discreete police force. The City of London is governed differently

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of London. It still is governed differently

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of London. It has its own corporation.

1:04:39.880 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So by eight for the Rippmoders, when the Rippermoders take place,

1:04:45.880 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>London has divided into twenty six police districts, effectively plast

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the city of London. Um, so you've got they're all

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they're all given a letter, so aid through to to

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>why Um, I don't think this is it? Actually there

1:05:05.280 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>might be, so scrap that bit. But anyway, there's there's

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they've all they're all given a letter, and so H

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Division looks after most of White Chaplain's bittlefield. But there

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is there is the ability to draft in officers from

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>different divisions. But they've all got their own particular divisional

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>commanders and therefore their own petty jealous and rivalries. So

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't think that A division and H Division are

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily getting on with each other. And there's certainly a

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>divide between uniform and playing clothes. The detectives and detection

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>has a bad press in England. It took a long time,

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so there wasn't a detective agency in England in nine

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>when the police was first formed. It took until eighteen

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>forty two, and it took at Chilly a couple of

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic failures of the police to catch murderers, high profile criminals,

1:06:08.960 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>criminals for them to create the detected apartment in eighteen

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>forty two, and that that was a very small number

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of officers, and you could ask ordinary uniform officers to

1:06:25.440 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>go into playing clothes. But the British kind of didn't

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of playing clothes policing at the time.

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It kind of smacked of Napoleonic spies. They had quite

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>strong memories of of Napoleon's secret police, and we didn't

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really want to have a detective in that way. It

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>only that only really changes in the nineteenth centuries as

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>detectives get a place in popular culture. So Dickens the

1:06:54.600 --> 1:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>American Wilkie Collins, and then of course um Sherlock Holmes,

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that they these characterizations of detection, if not police detective

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the case of homes, that they begin to establish

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in the popular mind, the idea that detection

1:07:11.040 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a good thing because Jenery speech and we

1:07:14.360 --> 1:07:19.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a good thing. Um. Alongside the Met

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and the City of London Police Force, you have the

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Criminal Investigation Department which is created in it's basically the

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Detective Division, the Detective Department renamed so in there's a

1:07:36.880 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>massive scandal um called the turf fraud scandal, when several

1:07:45.080 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>members of the detective departments are um fingered as as

1:07:52.320 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>being part of a criminal fraud racket surrounding betting, and

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a there's a um. Some of these

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>these detectives kind of flee and the trackdown and eventually

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a big trial at the Old Bailey in in

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in October November eight and a couple of officers are

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I think three officers are eventually sent to prison for

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for the fraud. And there's a Home Office inquiry after

1:08:24.040 --> 1:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that which looks at the defects in the Detective Department

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not just in London but elsewhere. And there's a reorganization

1:08:33.640 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>led by a guy called Howard Vincent who becomes the

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>first director of the Criminal Investigation Department and he appoints

1:08:42.600 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Frederick Adolphus Williamson as the first Superintendency.

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I d he'd been in the detective department and he

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of survived the scandal. He'd come out of that

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>smelling of roses and he investigated the guys that have

1:08:59.120 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>been been called up in it, and so they redeemed

1:09:03.200 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it the Criminal Investigation Department so that it didn't have

1:09:08.479 --> 1:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the word detective in its Yeah. Um, and then once

1:09:17.280 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we're into the eighteen eighties and we're headed for the

1:09:22.400 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>year of the White Chapel murders. Before we get there, Ah,

1:09:28.000 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Charles Warren comes in as Commissioner of Police. Um. Can

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you describe his personality and maybe some achievements from his

1:09:38.800 --> 1:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>career leading up to his appointment as commissioner and what

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>were his relationships to these various players in the in

1:09:47.880 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>the Metropolitan Police, the Home Office, the Detectives. Mm hmm.

1:09:52.960 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>As Charles Warren is is an interesting character. UM. He's

1:09:58.040 --> 1:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a military man. He's background is in the military. In fact,

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>his his background was particularly in the Royal Engineers. So

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a kind of military man who builds bridges, literally

1:10:14.360 --> 1:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>builds bridges, UM, does earthworks and as part of the Empire,

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that's extremely important. So he's a very successful military man.

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>For most of his career. He blots that a bit

1:10:26.760 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 1>later on, but will come to that. UM and he

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's prior to the his appointment in six

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as head of the Metropolitan Police, he for example, investigated

1:10:41.320 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the disappearance of an eminent Orientent. Orient and eminent Orientent,

1:10:46.439 --> 1:10:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I can't say that a guy called Professor Edward Henry Palmer.

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>He disappeared in Syria. UM and he looked into into

1:10:58.760 --> 1:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what had happened to him on bath of the government. UM.

1:11:02.680 --> 1:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>He earned a knighthood for his service in South Africa

1:11:06.479 --> 1:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in Becuana Land, so he was he was kind of considered.

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He must have been considered as a safe pair of

1:11:12.280 --> 1:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>hands and Henderson had to well. Henderson resigned from the

1:11:17.800 --> 1:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>MET has been been in charge for many, many years

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and he resigned for the MET following the West End

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>riots of when the police mishandled the demonstration in Table

1:11:31.280 --> 1:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Square which ended up with rioters smashing windows in power

1:11:36.000 --> 1:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Mau and I think what what the authorities wanted was

1:11:43.640 --> 1:11:47.519
<v Speaker 1>someone who could who could impose some discipline on the police,

1:11:47.520 --> 1:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>because there were also concerns that the police we weren't

1:11:50.120 --> 1:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>disciplined enough and weren't able to deal with these sorts

1:11:52.800 --> 1:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of difficult situations, and I think his military background in

1:11:56.880 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 1>many respects defines his time as commissioner of them. He

1:12:00.560 --> 1:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get detection, he didn't get planes closed, so

1:12:04.479 --> 1:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he clashed with C I, with I D. And he

1:12:06.960 --> 1:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't get on with his boss, who was the Home Secretary, Matthews,

1:12:16.080 --> 1:12:20.479
<v Speaker 1>so he wasn't well served by his relationship. Probably I

1:12:20.479 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>imagine it was quite a prickly upstanding military guy. You

1:12:25.360 --> 1:12:28.519
<v Speaker 1>probably see him in those sort of images of him

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 1>in those things like the Charge of the like Brigade,

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's sort of great films from the sixties and

1:12:33.400 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>seventies of British Imperial military figures, so I kind of

1:12:40.320 --> 1:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>see him like that. Um, but actually a very successful

1:12:46.240 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>military man until he resigned in their memor, not as

1:12:52.080 --> 1:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>people say, because of the failure of the police to

1:12:55.320 --> 1:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>catch the ripper, but actually because he he published a

1:12:59.160 --> 1:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of defensive himself in a and a popular magazine,

1:13:03.600 --> 1:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and he forgot to ask his boss for permission to

1:13:06.680 --> 1:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>do so, so he kind of had to fall on

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:13.479
<v Speaker 1>his um, on his sword and leave the police. I

1:13:13.520 --> 1:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>suspect he was probably quite bad of that, and he

1:13:15.600 --> 1:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>went back to the army and and and in this

1:13:22.240 --> 1:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>case he ends he ends up in in eighteen nine,

1:13:26.000 --> 1:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so eleven years after the Ripper case, serving um in

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the South African War that what sometimes owned as the

1:13:33.120 --> 1:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Boar War. And he's he has to lead the assault

1:13:37.120 --> 1:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>on Spine Cop which is an unmitigated military disaster. He

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>got through that and actually he recovered his reputation in

1:13:46.080 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the relief of the the town of Ladysmith. And I

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting that Paul Big describes him as a

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>man to whom fate certainly dealt to cruel hands. Leadership

1:13:56.640 --> 1:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of the police during the Ripper case, which is probably

1:13:59.680 --> 1:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in sible for them to solve, and leadership of a

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of the of soldiers at the battles Fine Cop where

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>they were rudely defeated by the boors. So yeah, interesting guy.

1:14:14.720 --> 1:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>One other piece of the legal process that becomes very

1:14:17.880 --> 1:14:25.519
<v Speaker 1>important in the White Chapel case is coroners. There there

1:14:25.560 --> 1:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of surgeons and coroners who have a hand

1:14:29.880 --> 1:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the investigation, uh the inquests, the examinations in general.

1:14:37.680 --> 1:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>How significant were coroners in the legal process of the

1:14:40.920 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>eighties when it came to murder or violent crime. Well,

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think of the coroner is very important

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>because they kind of declare that someone's their role is

1:14:55.400 --> 1:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to decide that someone has been unlawthy killed, So that

1:14:59.760 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do tears to investigate sudden or unexplained death so long

1:15:04.080 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>as that's been notified as a death by a member

1:15:06.200 --> 1:15:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of the public um. But we shouldn't assume that they

1:15:11.000 --> 1:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>investigated every suspicious death, or that that every homicide was

1:15:15.400 --> 1:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>identified as such. I think in the case of the

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Ripper motors is pretty clear that you didn't need a

1:15:22.840 --> 1:15:25.599
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of medical knowledge to know that somebody had

1:15:25.640 --> 1:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>been murdered in those situations. But in recent years, I

1:15:30.120 --> 1:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>think historians have concluded that as the costs of coroner's

1:15:33.880 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>inquest and the cost of investigation investigating crime increased in

1:15:37.920 --> 1:15:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century, some of the homicides that were deemed

1:15:41.880 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to solve might might more commediently been labeled

1:15:46.600 --> 1:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>as accidental death by by coroner's um so and going

1:15:52.880 --> 1:15:55.559
<v Speaker 1>on from the eight fifties, the police took on quite

1:15:55.560 --> 1:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a few of the duties of the coroners. So you

1:15:57.880 --> 1:16:01.519
<v Speaker 1>have policemen appointed as coroner's office is, and that they're

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:04.599
<v Speaker 1>the intermediates between the police and the coroner, so by

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>corner is important. But the police also have their own

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>attached officers and of course the police surgeons to help

1:16:12.720 --> 1:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>them determine whether a death was suspicious, and then if

1:16:16.120 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 1>it was, what clues whatevidence could be gleaned about the

1:16:20.479 --> 1:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cause of death and any potential perpetrated mhm, mhm. And

1:16:26.760 --> 1:16:33.599
<v Speaker 1>so we come to and let's begin with Emma Smith

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and Martha Tabram. What were the circumstances of their murders

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and how were they interpreted when they first occurred and

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:50.479
<v Speaker 1>were examined and discussed. They're quite different. I think the

1:16:50.520 --> 1:16:52.599
<v Speaker 1>two murders, the murders of m Smith and the murder

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of Martha Tabron, should probably be separated out. I think

1:16:57.200 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll find as a as a consensus growing now that

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Martha Tabran was a ripper victim was killed by the

1:17:05.040 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>same man who killed the five canonical victims. Not not

1:17:09.920 --> 1:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody would agree that with that, But then not everybody

1:17:12.400 --> 1:17:15.599
<v Speaker 1>would agree that the five canonical victims were killed by

1:17:15.600 --> 1:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the same person anyway, But then a Smith is quite different.

1:17:19.800 --> 1:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>She was most probably a prostitute living in spittlefields, living

1:17:25.680 --> 1:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in George Street who in April was set upon by

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a gang of men on Osborne Street, which is at

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the foot of Brick Lane. It looked like a particularly

1:17:38.120 --> 1:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>nasty street robbery and Emma was left was left for dead.

1:17:44.840 --> 1:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>She she managed to crawl back to her digs, but

1:17:48.560 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>she died later she was she was taken on on

1:17:51.320 --> 1:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the stretcher to a London hospital where she died of

1:17:54.520 --> 1:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>peritonitis on the fourth of April. So I think she

1:17:59.880 --> 1:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>was killed by a group of men, which doesn't really

1:18:02.320 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>fit in with them the rest of the murders, and

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time I think it was just put down

1:18:09.400 --> 1:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to a group of bullies, bullies being like a group

1:18:13.240 --> 1:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of pimps, prostitutes, pimps or bullies. Martha Tabram is a

1:18:20.200 --> 1:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>bit different. I mean, she's thirty seven year old woman,

1:18:25.640 --> 1:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>possibly a prostitute um but like many of the victims,

1:18:30.120 --> 1:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, she may not have been a prostitute. She

1:18:32.680 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>may she may have temporarily been a prostitute. She had

1:18:36.400 --> 1:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a family background, but she was an alcoholic and she

1:18:42.640 --> 1:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>had a reputation for being seen out with men that

1:18:45.840 --> 1:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't going out with, which might have tainted her reputation.

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>And she was found dead on the landing of George

1:18:53.760 --> 1:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Yard Buildings on the seventh of August. She'd been stabbed

1:18:57.880 --> 1:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine times. Most of the wounds have targeted her abdomen,

1:19:02.920 --> 1:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>so she hadn't had her throat slashed, and she hadn't

1:19:05.880 --> 1:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>had organs removed, which would be like the later killings

1:19:09.960 --> 1:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or some of the later killings. But I think there's

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:16.479
<v Speaker 1>enough in in Martha's murder which is suggestive of somebody

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>early on in the process developing the the modes operandi,

1:19:22.200 --> 1:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which was which we would see in later killings. I

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think at the time it was considered to be a

1:19:30.120 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>very brutal murder, and there was a suggestion it might

1:19:32.080 --> 1:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have been carried up by soldiers off duty soldiers, a

1:19:35.160 --> 1:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>though there was never any proof of that. Um it

1:19:38.520 --> 1:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>made a link to prostitution because again she one of

1:19:42.240 --> 1:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the women that came forward in the aftermath of her

1:19:44.400 --> 1:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>murder was a woman called Mary Anne Connolly or pearly Pole,

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>who was a local prostitute, who said that she and

1:19:49.920 --> 1:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Martha had been out and picked up men on the

1:19:52.120 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 1>White Chapel Road. UM So it made the identification between

1:19:56.520 --> 1:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>prostitution and a killer on the streets and that there's

1:19:59.439 --> 1:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of those kind of links, But it wasn't until

1:20:04.880 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Polly Nichols was murdered at the end of all, because

1:20:07.720 --> 1:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the people began to put those two things together in

1:20:10.800 --> 1:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers. Yeah, and when you talk about the newspapers

1:20:14.240 --> 1:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>starting to put things together with the murder of poly Nichols,

1:20:17.760 --> 1:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>can you describe the way that the press covered murders

1:20:22.680 --> 1:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like this and maybe, um, what relationship did that put

1:20:27.720 --> 1:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>journalism in with the police. Yeah, I think probably the

1:20:33.680 --> 1:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is that the relationship between the press and the

1:20:37.080 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>police in the throughout the Rippl case was was pretty

1:20:41.040 --> 1:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>mixed and and that depended on as well on what

1:20:46.200 --> 1:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>newspaper you were reading. So the police, Charles Warren in fact,

1:20:51.800 --> 1:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>had drawn both praise and criticism for the way that

1:20:54.960 --> 1:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they dealt with things like Bloody Sunday, which is the

1:20:57.320 --> 1:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>suppression of writing in Faco Square in the November seven

1:21:01.200 --> 1:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the previous year. Um So the Times, which is an

1:21:05.920 --> 1:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>establishment newspaper, kind of admired the strong armed tactics used

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>against a mob of near due worlds and vagrants. But

1:21:14.880 --> 1:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the more liberal press, so the Star radical press like

1:21:18.840 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the Star or William Staid to powermal gazette tended to

1:21:22.560 --> 1:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>condemn police brutality and heavy handedness, and that follows through

1:21:26.360 --> 1:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>into the Ripper murders as they as the Watchhopple murders

1:21:30.240 --> 1:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>unfolded and they become a national and then an international story.

1:21:34.920 --> 1:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The inability of the police to catch the killer, to

1:21:38.280 --> 1:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>catch Jack, drew down greater criticism on them and and

1:21:43.320 --> 1:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>onto Warren. And then once you start to see the

1:21:46.880 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>publication of taunting letters from supposedly coming from the murderer

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>himself or officers advice from the public, the police investigation

1:21:56.200 --> 1:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>actually becomes part of the story and that becomes a

1:21:59.360 --> 1:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>negative or that it's very easy for the press to

1:22:02.760 --> 1:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>snipe at the police. And you have that business as well,

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:12.519
<v Speaker 1>if you wouldn't have today of the police investigation being

1:22:12.760 --> 1:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tainted by the fact that journalists are all over it.

1:22:15.520 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So as soon as the murder occurs, there's not that

1:22:17.800 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>business of a sort of clean police space for them

1:22:20.360 --> 1:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>to investigate. It's full of journalists with pens and paper

1:22:25.560 --> 1:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and ask interviewing witnesses. And you have examples of the

1:22:29.920 --> 1:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>police interviewing somebody and then half an hour later they're

1:22:34.520 --> 1:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>being interviewed by by a journalist and that there were

1:22:38.400 --> 1:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to have been printed in the newspapers. That's very difficult

1:22:41.520 --> 1:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for the police to control the investigation in that way.

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Mhm hm. Why so you mentioned those letters. Why did

1:22:50.920 --> 1:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the press publish the what's called the Dear Boss letter.

1:22:55.640 --> 1:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe the significance of that letter and

1:22:59.360 --> 1:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's public pitian for the case and for an understanding

1:23:04.800 --> 1:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of these murders. Well, I think actually the reality is

1:23:08.040 --> 1:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that the letter was of course, the letter is not

1:23:10.400 --> 1:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>written by Jack the Ripper. It's given the name Jack

1:23:12.760 --> 1:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper. It's not coming from the killer. It's probably

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>coming from an enterprising journalist or a newspaper editor. And

1:23:18.600 --> 1:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we probably know now that that is Tom

1:23:20.880 --> 1:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Bullying and Charles Moore of the Central News Agency. They

1:23:25.160 --> 1:23:27.559
<v Speaker 1>could see a good story when they saw one, and

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>they and they exploited it by penning that letter and

1:23:31.680 --> 1:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>getting it onto the pages of the London Press. And

1:23:34.720 --> 1:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think probably with the compliance it will be reluctantly

1:23:38.120 --> 1:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at first of the police. The police are desperate from lead,

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>so they this might work. This might get people to

1:23:45.439 --> 1:23:48.599
<v Speaker 1>recognize the handwriting, who knows, might trigger a memory. That's

1:23:48.600 --> 1:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>why they That's why they do it. But in publishing it,

1:23:52.439 --> 1:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they kind of created the monster that we know as

1:23:55.120 --> 1:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper. Before the Deer Boss letter was published, UM,

1:24:00.400 --> 1:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was published in the newspapers and on bill

1:24:03.000 --> 1:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bill posters, at least two women have been brutally murdered

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>by a person or persons unknown. After the release of

1:24:11.040 --> 1:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Better and the subsequent double event, that the killing

1:24:15.280 --> 1:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of two women on one night, a mythical lone assassin

1:24:19.200 --> 1:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>has been established in the minds of the Victorian public.

1:24:22.840 --> 1:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And significantly, I think we've we've never shifted from that

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>view of the killer in the hundred and thirty or

1:24:28.320 --> 1:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more years that have passed since the murders ended. And

1:24:32.680 --> 1:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the power of the Victorian press. It created the

1:24:36.080 --> 1:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>idea of a lone assassin. What in the history of

1:24:43.680 --> 1:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of the British press, what kinds of precedents were therefore

1:24:47.760 --> 1:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>discussing a case like this? UM. Was the sensational journalism

1:24:54.640 --> 1:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>part of a tradition or you mentioned that it's called

1:24:57.920 --> 1:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the new journalism? Is it something really new? Yeah?

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So what was new about new journalism was its focused

1:25:06.479 --> 1:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think on an investigation on highlighting and interrogating social

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>ills scandals in some depth. But This is actually prompted,

1:25:16.680 --> 1:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, in part by the greater freedoms of publishing.

1:25:19.640 --> 1:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So in previous part of the century there's been restrictions

1:25:23.880 --> 1:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>on the presidents, some degree of censorship which could form

1:25:26.479 --> 1:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the way largely by the nineteenth century, and taxation. So

1:25:29.360 --> 1:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>newspapers are expensive. And if you couple this with the

1:25:32.840 --> 1:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that what we see coming across from from the

1:25:36.439 --> 1:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>USA is the technological development in printing that makes us

1:25:42.080 --> 1:25:47.599
<v Speaker 1>able to produce newspapers um more rapidly and cheaper. And

1:25:47.640 --> 1:25:50.559
<v Speaker 1>then of course things like railways allow us to distribute

1:25:50.640 --> 1:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>distribute them more quickly, so news could travel further and

1:25:54.840 --> 1:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>travel faster. Many more people could read, or know somebody

1:25:59.520 --> 1:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who could read, so they could read to them, sit

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>around in the pub and read it. More people could

1:26:04.360 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>afford to buy a newspaper because they're cheaper, and so

1:26:07.200 --> 1:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the newspaper industry is growing. So it's a massive takeoff,

1:26:10.720 --> 1:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly from the sixties and seventies, in newspaper readership and

1:26:16.720 --> 1:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>newspaper production. Um So the kind of modern newspaper industry,

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>certain newspaper industry we're familiar with by the middle of

1:26:26.240 --> 1:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century is kind of established in the late century,

1:26:33.000 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, newspaper editors are looking for more

1:26:37.040 --> 1:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and more sensational copy, especially stories that are going to

1:26:40.360 --> 1:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>plug readers in and keep them coming back for next installments.

1:26:43.600 --> 1:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're a daily newspaper, what are you going to

1:26:47.280 --> 1:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to attract your reader to come

1:26:49.320 --> 1:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>back Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. Um. If you're a

1:26:54.479 --> 1:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>weekend newspaper and you've got that's more time to think

1:26:57.280 --> 1:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>about the story you're putting out. What kind of sensation

1:27:00.040 --> 1:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your story do you want to represent to your readers

1:27:03.200 --> 1:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to get them to buy your newspaper on Sunday rather

1:27:06.360 --> 1:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>than your rivals. And you've got paper boys crying the

1:27:10.120 --> 1:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>news in the streets and literally shouting the headlines and

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>persuading people to part with their pennies and shillings. So

1:27:17.880 --> 1:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's really important to have an installment story, and the

1:27:22.640 --> 1:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Ripper case is perfect for that in terms of sensational

1:27:27.800 --> 1:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>crime news, though there's nothing particularly new about in news terms.

1:27:34.200 --> 1:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime news had filled columns in the papers going right

1:27:37.720 --> 1:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>back to the eighteenth century, right back to the early

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>days of the newspapers, and which which emerged really after

1:27:43.280 --> 1:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the English Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, and in

1:27:47.080 --> 1:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>addition to newspapers, there's a tremendous English print culture, British

1:27:52.720 --> 1:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>print culture, which had provided a regular diet of murder

1:27:57.360 --> 1:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>news and moral panics for readers all the way through

1:28:00.000 --> 1:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>through that period. So every execution there would be people

1:28:03.280 --> 1:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>selling pamphlets about the person being executed, so you could

1:28:07.080 --> 1:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of read about the person you're seeing slowly strangled

1:28:09.920 --> 1:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to death. And the Victorians, as I think writers like

1:28:14.479 --> 1:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Judith Flanders and Rosalind Crone have both eloquently described, the

1:28:19.960 --> 1:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Victorians are fascinated by murder, and they followed all the

1:28:23.040 --> 1:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>gruesome details of homicides, from the discovery of dead bodies

1:28:26.960 --> 1:28:29.839
<v Speaker 1>through to the capture of the killers, to their trial

1:28:30.439 --> 1:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and then and then at least until eight their public execution.

1:28:35.560 --> 1:28:38.439
<v Speaker 1>And actually, I think Flanders has argued that once you

1:28:39.640 --> 1:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>remove hanging from the public gaze, whence it's no longer

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:48.519
<v Speaker 1>taking place on in front of a prisoner, on the

1:28:48.560 --> 1:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>roofs of a prison, and you put it behind brick walls.

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Actually that makes people's fascination with murder grow even more.

1:28:59.000 --> 1:29:01.519
<v Speaker 1>And of course, by the sixties we were only hanging

1:29:01.560 --> 1:29:03.559
<v Speaker 1>people for murder. We weren't hanging people as we did

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:08.519
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteenth century for all forms of crime MHM.

1:29:08.680 --> 1:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>One case from the eighteenth century that looks like an

1:29:14.320 --> 1:29:18.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting point of comparison or a precedent is the London

1:29:18.960 --> 1:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>monster case. Can you describe that in brief terms and

1:29:23.360 --> 1:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe how it was published about in the press? Yes, briefly.

1:29:29.040 --> 1:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>In there were a series of attacks in London on

1:29:32.080 --> 1:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>women which kind of provoked a sort of moral panic.

1:29:36.040 --> 1:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>They kind of happened like this, So a strange man

1:29:38.200 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>would approach respectable women, offered to let them smell his

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>his bunch of artificial flowers, his nosegay, and then stabbed them,

1:29:47.040 --> 1:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>usually whilst making suggestive comments. And he generally stabbed them

1:29:50.120 --> 1:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in in, in the behind, in the buttons, and sometimes

1:29:54.160 --> 1:29:56.639
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't even realize they've been stabbed until they got home.

1:29:56.680 --> 1:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And because they wore so many players of clothing. Yeah,

1:30:00.000 --> 1:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And the story occupied the columns of newspapers, which created

1:30:03.439 --> 1:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a sensation. And the man named John Julius Augustine, he

1:30:08.920 --> 1:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>was a wealthy insurance broker, off with a fifty pound reward,

1:30:13.160 --> 1:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>which fifty pounds is a considerable sum of money. And

1:30:17.760 --> 1:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually someone was caught and put on trial in July

1:30:21.160 --> 1:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ninety a man named Rennick Williams. He was an

1:30:23.880 --> 1:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>artificial flower sell um. He had two trials because the

1:30:29.320 --> 1:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>first trial is a bit of a fast but it

1:30:30.800 --> 1:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was he was convicted and sent to prison. And I

1:30:33.640 --> 1:30:36.599
<v Speaker 1>think we can see some links between the man because

1:30:36.600 --> 1:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>he was dubbed the London Monster or the monster two

1:30:41.160 --> 1:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>event in and and of course to the context of

1:30:46.520 --> 1:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. I think it's important to always to see

1:30:49.360 --> 1:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>history in context. And it's seventeen eighty nine. We know

1:30:52.240 --> 1:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about seventeen eighty nine is there was a revolution going

1:30:54.720 --> 1:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on across the channel in France. But the revolution in France,

1:30:59.200 --> 1:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>following on from the the revolution in America in the

1:31:02.360 --> 1:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventies, had raised all these ideas about rights and freedoms,

1:31:06.680 --> 1:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and one of the rights and freedoms that people talk

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>about was women's rights and freedoms. And I think when

1:31:13.320 --> 1:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at the London Monster, while it didn't directly

1:31:16.360 --> 1:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>influence press reporting of the White Chapels, there's a connection

1:31:21.040 --> 1:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in between the way in which the demonizing of the

1:31:23.479 --> 1:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>represvctives as loose women operating outside of male protection, and

1:31:28.040 --> 1:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the late eighteenth century advice for women to stay off

1:31:30.320 --> 1:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the streets for fear of the London Monster. There's a

1:31:32.920 --> 1:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>connection there in this idea that women should stay off

1:31:37.040 --> 1:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the streets. So the White Chapel murder and the London

1:31:39.880 --> 1:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Monster of both examples along with spring Hill Jack in

1:31:44.280 --> 1:31:49.559
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century, of characters who target women, and male

1:31:49.640 --> 1:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>characters and target women and are kind of saying get

1:31:53.360 --> 1:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>back inside the house. Stopped straying into what is male

1:31:57.479 --> 1:32:04.599
<v Speaker 1>masculine territory. So regarding uh, the letters that came that

1:32:04.640 --> 1:32:10.599
<v Speaker 1>followed after, Um, the Dear Boss letter that, as you say,

1:32:10.760 --> 1:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gives the kind of mythological character of Jack the Ripper,

1:32:14.479 --> 1:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>his his name and you know, a kind of saucy identity. Um,

1:32:22.000 --> 1:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you've written that it's highly likely that all of the

1:32:24.960 --> 1:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>letters are fakes or hoaxes and do not come from

1:32:28.400 --> 1:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the killer at all. You mentioned the only one that

1:32:31.880 --> 1:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that maybe is different from that is the what's called

1:32:34.240 --> 1:32:38.559
<v Speaker 1>the Fromhell letter. Um. You explore those ideas at length

1:32:39.080 --> 1:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Torso Murders book. Can you say a bit

1:32:42.920 --> 1:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more about that point about the letters likely all being hoaxes.

1:32:48.400 --> 1:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>How difficult was it for police to trust any kind

1:32:52.160 --> 1:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of tips or notes or witness statements that they got. Yeah,

1:32:58.080 --> 1:33:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think most researchers today would agree that

1:33:00.479 --> 1:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of the letters, certainly the letters that

1:33:03.840 --> 1:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are purport to be from the killer are either fakes

1:33:07.960 --> 1:33:11.559
<v Speaker 1>or hoaxes. I mean, lots of people writing letters, were

1:33:11.600 --> 1:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>writing letters which were offering advice, and we probably have

1:33:13.960 --> 1:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with them slightly differently. Um, but it's not

1:33:18.560 --> 1:33:21.519
<v Speaker 1>it's not beyond the bounds of credibility that the killer

1:33:21.560 --> 1:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would try and communicate with the police of the public.

1:33:23.920 --> 1:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the States, and you have the Zodiac killer,

1:33:27.200 --> 1:33:31.559
<v Speaker 1>who certainly did. It's just that these particular letters generally

1:33:31.600 --> 1:33:35.479
<v Speaker 1>seem incredulous. And I think the exception being made from

1:33:35.560 --> 1:33:40.879
<v Speaker 1>hell letters because it wasn't signed chat the Ripper. Um.

1:33:41.040 --> 1:33:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Also that handwright some handwriting experts, and I would qualify

1:33:45.479 --> 1:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that because they don't all agree. Do hold out the

1:33:48.000 --> 1:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>possibility that this was the work of some poorly educated

1:33:52.080 --> 1:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>individual who was unused to writing, perhaps someone learning their

1:33:55.840 --> 1:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>letters as an It's one of the points that we

1:33:58.560 --> 1:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>make in attempts to also case a book about the

1:34:01.960 --> 1:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>tempts also cases that we imagine that our guy was

1:34:07.439 --> 1:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially kind of trying to trying to improve himself. So,

1:34:13.920 --> 1:34:17.559
<v Speaker 1>but regardless of whether the letters are real or fake,

1:34:17.880 --> 1:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>hoaxes or whatever. Um, it follows that in such a difficult,

1:34:25.000 --> 1:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fevered situation as the police found themselves, they'd have to

1:34:28.880 --> 1:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>check every single lead they got, regardless of whether it

1:34:31.800 --> 1:34:35.519
<v Speaker 1>was credible or not. Um. So hours and hours and

1:34:35.560 --> 1:34:38.639
<v Speaker 1>hours of police time would have be wasted following up

1:34:38.760 --> 1:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those kind of false leads sent in by attention seekers.

1:34:42.800 --> 1:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>If that's how we want to see them. Um, just

1:34:45.720 --> 1:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because the stuff is looks obviously fake of him, what

1:34:49.360 --> 1:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>if it had been true? And I think that's probably

1:34:51.360 --> 1:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>explains also why they published the deer Bost letter, because

1:34:53.880 --> 1:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's what if when it when it came to investigating crimes, um,

1:35:00.400 --> 1:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to what extent did police depend on good informants and

1:35:05.240 --> 1:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>good tips in order to solve a tricky case? Were

1:35:10.400 --> 1:35:13.439
<v Speaker 1>there any significant or high profile crimes that were solved

1:35:14.080 --> 1:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>with the assistance of like an anonymous letter leading up

1:35:18.439 --> 1:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to this point, I, yeah, it's one of your curveballs.

1:35:22.160 --> 1:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know of any. I mean, what I

1:35:24.360 --> 1:35:28.800
<v Speaker 1>can say is that the police use informants, and you know,

1:35:28.960 --> 1:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the use of informants by detectives by polices is often reported.

1:35:32.840 --> 1:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So there are very many cases that have become for

1:35:34.800 --> 1:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the police, magistrates, or before the old baby in the

1:35:39.200 --> 1:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century where you will hear a policeman saying acting

1:35:42.360 --> 1:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on information, acting on information, and some of that information

1:35:45.800 --> 1:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>will be information by what we would call a steak out,

1:35:48.920 --> 1:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching a watching a building, watching watching particular

1:35:53.280 --> 1:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>suspected criminals. But often it's information from the criminal um fraternity,

1:36:01.880 --> 1:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>from neighbors overhearing conversations. In much the same way that

1:36:07.720 --> 1:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the police have probably always and will always gain information.

1:36:11.160 --> 1:36:13.639
<v Speaker 1>The public will tell them some, they'll get some from

1:36:13.640 --> 1:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>criminals who want two um get a lighter sentence, or

1:36:20.360 --> 1:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll pay money to people on the margins of

1:36:24.040 --> 1:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>criminality in order to get information. All of that kind

1:36:26.880 --> 1:36:28.599
<v Speaker 1>of stuff is really important. I don't think the police

1:36:28.600 --> 1:36:31.479
<v Speaker 1>could operate without and I don't think the police in

1:36:31.520 --> 1:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the ninete century could operate without informants, without information. Um.

1:36:36.240 --> 1:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to bear in mind because of the nineteent

1:36:38.080 --> 1:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>century police don't have many of the tools that the

1:36:41.880 --> 1:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>modern police have, you know, like DNA testing, fingerprint testing,

1:36:46.280 --> 1:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>close circuit television, and they have none of that stuff.

1:36:50.479 --> 1:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>M mhm. Thinking um, back to the people who were

1:36:58.080 --> 1:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the women who were targeted. You challenge the idea that

1:37:02.040 --> 1:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the women killed in the White Chapel murders

1:37:04.160 --> 1:37:07.479
<v Speaker 1>were prostitutes, and you mentioned this earlier in this conversation too.

1:37:08.160 --> 1:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Um you wrote, one of the first things that anyone

1:37:11.160 --> 1:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>reads about the Ripper murders is that all of the

1:37:13.400 --> 1:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>victims were prostitutes. However, it is probably more accurate to

1:37:16.760 --> 1:37:18.479
<v Speaker 1>say that all of the women killed by the White

1:37:18.520 --> 1:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Chapel murderer had been selling themselves for sex in the

1:37:21.240 --> 1:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>streets shortly before they met their death. So can you

1:37:25.840 --> 1:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>describe the significance of the distinction that you're making there,

1:37:30.479 --> 1:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because I do think it's important, But I'd like to

1:37:33.280 --> 1:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>hear hear you talk a little bit more about how

1:37:36.120 --> 1:37:38.479
<v Speaker 1>from your understanding of what was going on in the

1:37:38.520 --> 1:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>East End of One at the time, what life was

1:37:40.160 --> 1:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like there, how important this distinction is. Mhmm. Yeah, well,

1:37:45.960 --> 1:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's become it's now become wholly contested whether

1:37:48.960 --> 1:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the victims um of Jack the Ripper, specifically the canonical

1:37:54.760 --> 1:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fire victims were prostitutes. I think I'd make a distinction

1:37:58.439 --> 1:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the grounds ocasionally selling sex in order to get

1:38:01.920 --> 1:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>enough money to eat, drink, or pay for the roof

1:38:03.920 --> 1:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of your head is not the same thing as being

1:38:06.160 --> 1:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a full time sex worker. It may well be that

1:38:09.920 --> 1:38:14.479
<v Speaker 1>all of Jack's victims were impoverished prostitutes, as they've been

1:38:14.479 --> 1:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>described for over a century, But I think we should

1:38:17.360 --> 1:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>hold out the possibility that at the time that they

1:38:21.000 --> 1:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>met their deaths, they were so down and out the

1:38:26.160 --> 1:38:31.679
<v Speaker 1>prostitution was their only option. It's, of course very easy

1:38:31.760 --> 1:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for the police. It was very of course, very easy

1:38:33.920 --> 1:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for the police and oppressed to dismiss these women as

1:38:36.720 --> 1:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate who brought their own deaths upon themselves. They were

1:38:40.280 --> 1:38:44.559
<v Speaker 1>all thought to be prostitutes. But whether that's because they

1:38:44.560 --> 1:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>were single women, or they were women who were out

1:38:47.920 --> 1:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>drinking and they're women out on their own, I mean,

1:38:50.640 --> 1:38:54.760
<v Speaker 1>those all fit with ideas of what prostitutes were. So

1:38:54.920 --> 1:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of that boundary between being what we might describe

1:38:58.280 --> 1:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>as a woman of loose morals and a prostitute. A

1:39:03.520 --> 1:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>prostitute somebody who sells sex for money. Women to lose

1:39:07.240 --> 1:39:11.599
<v Speaker 1>morals doesn't necessarily sell sex at all, and she might

1:39:11.680 --> 1:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have sex with people who she's not married to m

1:39:16.320 --> 1:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and have multiple partners and that might even in our

1:39:19.240 --> 1:39:23.519
<v Speaker 1>own society be frowned upon, rightly or wrongly, but in

1:39:23.520 --> 1:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century most certainly would have been So I

1:39:26.160 --> 1:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>think for me, all these women were killed because the

1:39:32.680 --> 1:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the killer for they were prostitutes. There is also a

1:39:35.920 --> 1:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>distinction there. I think the killer believed that they were

1:39:38.400 --> 1:39:42.519
<v Speaker 1>prostitutes and that was his motivation for killing them. But

1:39:42.720 --> 1:39:47.559
<v Speaker 1>the same token prostitutes would present themselves in parts of

1:39:47.600 --> 1:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>London where it was they made themselves vulnerable to a

1:39:50.800 --> 1:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>killer who targeted strangers in the way that we think. Yeah. Yeah,

1:39:56.080 --> 1:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And and in some of your writing you followed Walker

1:40:00.439 --> 1:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with in describing Eastern sex workers as members of the

1:40:05.320 --> 1:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>working class. Can you describe how how that point helps

1:40:10.920 --> 1:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>us to understand their lives, how they would have thought

1:40:16.360 --> 1:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>about themselves, their control over their own trade. How is

1:40:20.400 --> 1:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it helpful to think of sex workers as members of

1:40:22.439 --> 1:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the working class. Yeah, absolutely, I think it's really important.

1:40:26.400 --> 1:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, these are poor women. None of them

1:40:29.400 --> 1:40:31.519
<v Speaker 1>came from wealth, and we know a bit more about

1:40:32.479 --> 1:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the work of various members of the White

1:40:34.880 --> 1:40:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Chappele Society and authors like Neil Sheldon. We know that

1:40:40.000 --> 1:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>many of these represctives had kind of normal, respectable lives

1:40:43.800 --> 1:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>before they arrived in the East Den. But but almost

1:40:46.120 --> 1:40:49.479
<v Speaker 1>invariably their lives are characterized by kind of decline into

1:40:49.479 --> 1:40:56.559
<v Speaker 1>poverty exacerbated by by alcoholism, um, personal tragedies, broken marriages,

1:40:57.080 --> 1:41:00.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, bereavements, financial insecurities. This is of what led

1:41:00.560 --> 1:41:04.599
<v Speaker 1>them to the East End. But they're all working class women.

1:41:04.600 --> 1:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>None of them came from a higher ranking society. And

1:41:09.800 --> 1:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Walker which is interesting in saying that when

1:41:13.240 --> 1:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>we look at Victorian prostitutes, who who are invariably described

1:41:16.840 --> 1:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>as fallen and unfortunate by people at the time, these

1:41:21.120 --> 1:41:23.479
<v Speaker 1>these are women who have fallen from grace, who are

1:41:23.520 --> 1:41:26.679
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately in the situation. They find themselves a Walker which

1:41:26.720 --> 1:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to turn that around. And I think this is

1:41:29.080 --> 1:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see these women as being empowered and independent

1:41:33.920 --> 1:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>being you know, these are women who have refused to

1:41:36.360 --> 1:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>follow the kind of path in life that's been mapped

1:41:40.080 --> 1:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>out for them by men generally, and instead of gone

1:41:44.040 --> 1:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for the relative quick prosperity and freedom that that that

1:41:51.400 --> 1:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>prostitution might bring them, at least in the short term.

1:41:55.120 --> 1:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So I mean we again, context is everything. We have

1:41:58.120 --> 1:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to remember that late nineteenth century British society was heavily patriarchal,

1:42:03.200 --> 1:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with women's rights, feminism. These are things that are emerging,

1:42:07.280 --> 1:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but but it's very very slow. For the vast majority

1:42:12.240 --> 1:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of working class women, life offered not very much. You

1:42:15.880 --> 1:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>had a life of judging, drudgery. You had a life

1:42:18.160 --> 1:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which is it's a life characterized by almost constant pregnancy

1:42:23.240 --> 1:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or childcare, and a marriage to a man who, frankly

1:42:27.080 --> 1:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was probably considered decent if he didn't beat you up.

1:42:30.760 --> 1:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps it's not unreasonable for some young women to

1:42:33.960 --> 1:42:37.559
<v Speaker 1>choose to prostitute themselves for a relatively brief period of

1:42:37.560 --> 1:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>time if it brought them much more money than they

1:42:42.040 --> 1:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>would earn by sewing or charing or something else. Um Like,

1:42:48.920 --> 1:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like young women of all ages, they want to be

1:42:51.240 --> 1:42:54.559
<v Speaker 1>able to spend money on nice things, on the hats

1:42:54.560 --> 1:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and clothes and jewelry. And I think we should recognize

1:42:59.680 --> 1:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that that that this sort of female independence was frequently

1:43:03.560 --> 1:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>being repressed by by male and female actors in society

1:43:06.920 --> 1:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at all classes. Victorian society is obsessed with notions of

1:43:10.600 --> 1:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>respectability and the proper social order of things. So prostitutes

1:43:14.960 --> 1:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are independent women who clearly didn't know their proper place,

1:43:19.479 --> 1:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and who flaunted their sexuality, and for some that set

1:43:22.880 --> 1:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>them apart as social priors, and in many ways, of course,

1:43:26.560 --> 1:43:31.599
<v Speaker 1>justified the actions of a serial killer in murdering them. Um.

1:43:31.720 --> 1:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's something that um Donald Romblo for his sites is

1:43:36.520 --> 1:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>it's for some victorians that the Ripple was just engaged

1:43:39.920 --> 1:43:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in street cleaning. Um. You mentioned Neil Sheldon, and you

1:43:45.720 --> 1:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>know in reading I mentioned already Paul Begs Forgotten Victims book.

1:43:50.320 --> 1:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But in those studies that have looked at the lives

1:43:52.880 --> 1:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of these women, you know, we find as you mentioned,

1:43:56.080 --> 1:43:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that any Chapman was married to a coachman for a

1:43:59.760 --> 1:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>time and lived with him in Berkshire where she where

1:44:03.200 --> 1:44:06.439
<v Speaker 1>he attended to sear test marry um before she ended

1:44:06.479 --> 1:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up in Whitechapel, And that Liz Stride she opened a

1:44:10.400 --> 1:44:13.639
<v Speaker 1>coffee hall with one of her husbands. Um. What sort

1:44:13.760 --> 1:44:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of of class positions were these? Were these still working

1:44:17.479 --> 1:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>class people? Um kind of what from what heights did

1:44:25.280 --> 1:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>any Chapman and list Ride in particular fall if we're

1:44:28.880 --> 1:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>talking in that kind of parlance of the time. But

1:44:32.960 --> 1:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, Liz Stride, you know, should come

1:44:36.040 --> 1:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>over from Sweden, so she's an immigrant and a very

1:44:41.520 --> 1:44:43.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting life, and it's reasiful to know about her life

1:44:43.760 --> 1:44:46.519
<v Speaker 1>because I think much of it was invented by her

1:44:46.600 --> 1:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and tellings of it. And that's one of the problems

1:44:50.160 --> 1:44:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that we have. We know very little about the repect

1:44:52.920 --> 1:44:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and dreading. We're very very little about Mary Kelly, for example,

1:44:56.640 --> 1:44:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so that allows people to him fill with invention stories

1:45:00.000 --> 1:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out um. But I think in terms of the fall yeah,

1:45:06.360 --> 1:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a danger here to say that these

1:45:08.720 --> 1:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>women have these women are unusual in um in in

1:45:14.160 --> 1:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>falling through the social thrawning down the social staircase. But

1:45:20.840 --> 1:45:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that's true of very many women in in

1:45:24.200 --> 1:45:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Victorian society. I think you would probably characterize this drivers

1:45:32.680 --> 1:45:34.760
<v Speaker 1>coming from the working class with a bit of entrepreneurial

1:45:34.880 --> 1:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>spirit in setting up a coffee shop. And we're not

1:45:37.400 --> 1:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about somebody who's going to have a string of

1:45:39.720 --> 1:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks up and down the country. Is not It's not

1:45:43.720 --> 1:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is not a rich entrepreneur. This is somebody

1:45:46.080 --> 1:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>getting by running a coffee shop. And um, so the

1:45:53.040 --> 1:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>coachman is still a servant. So any chapman is married

1:45:57.200 --> 1:45:59.519
<v Speaker 1>to a coachman, but a coachman is a respectable servant,

1:45:59.560 --> 1:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a domestic servant, so you're still tied

1:46:03.240 --> 1:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to a family house and depends upon um, your master,

1:46:07.640 --> 1:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a subservient position in society. Is

1:46:11.320 --> 1:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a member of the working class. But there are degrees

1:46:14.360 --> 1:46:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of working class life. And I think, what's happening to

1:46:17.840 --> 1:46:19.760
<v Speaker 1>these women and we see it and it's very it's

1:46:19.880 --> 1:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>very well illustrated in in Reuben Holtz book. Is is

1:46:23.280 --> 1:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the way that a series of events, tragic events, undermined them.

1:46:29.320 --> 1:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you add things like drinking to that or something,

1:46:32.320 --> 1:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a drink which is the catalyst for this. That's

1:46:35.360 --> 1:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>when they start to slip. And a woman without a

1:46:39.800 --> 1:46:45.280
<v Speaker 1>husband is is really in a very very dangerous situation,

1:46:45.680 --> 1:46:48.479
<v Speaker 1>which is why so many women in working class women

1:46:48.560 --> 1:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in Victorian London would have quickly found another partner adopted

1:46:52.400 --> 1:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>his name. So you know, with several of the Ripper victims,

1:46:55.800 --> 1:46:58.559
<v Speaker 1>their names are kind of movable. It's whoever they are

1:46:58.640 --> 1:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with it becomes their common law husband. And marriage is

1:47:01.920 --> 1:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily something you need to have. UM in that

1:47:05.479 --> 1:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>respect of quite modern, I suppose, but there is a

1:47:09.439 --> 1:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fall from grace. But we know about these five or

1:47:13.720 --> 1:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>six women because they were murdered by someone who's come

1:47:17.720 --> 1:47:19.839
<v Speaker 1>down to history as Jack the Ripper. And it's interesting

1:47:19.920 --> 1:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because one of the criticisms of ripper ology has been

1:47:23.439 --> 1:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that it focuses on the ripper and not on the victims.

1:47:27.240 --> 1:47:29.439
<v Speaker 1>But of course we would only know that. We only

1:47:29.520 --> 1:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>know the victims because they were killed by the Ripper.

1:47:32.560 --> 1:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, millions of working class women died. Plenty of

1:47:36.880 --> 1:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>them were murdered or or beaten and then died of

1:47:41.320 --> 1:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>injuries or died of relative starvation or illness in the

1:47:45.080 --> 1:47:47.479
<v Speaker 1>nine century, or died in childbooth. We don't know any

1:47:47.520 --> 1:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of their names. They weren't killed by a syrial. I'm

1:47:53.960 --> 1:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not making a case for a statue to

1:47:56.720 --> 1:47:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the Ripper. It's just it is another way to look

1:47:59.479 --> 1:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>at him. Well. And I yeah, when you were talking

1:48:04.439 --> 1:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>about Liz Stride coffee shop, when I read that detail

1:48:09.840 --> 1:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of her life, that was actually what I just felt,

1:48:13.280 --> 1:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>such a close connection to someone like that. No, I haven't,

1:48:17.320 --> 1:48:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't, but I do have friends. I do have

1:48:18.800 --> 1:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>friends who you know, opened a small shop. So when

1:48:21.880 --> 1:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about yeah, of course, but that's that's

1:48:23.880 --> 1:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing, isn't it. It's like walking the streets to

1:48:25.479 --> 1:48:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Whitechapel and it's like being in a place where someone

1:48:27.840 --> 1:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was Those are the things that connected to it. You know.

1:48:31.680 --> 1:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The class is is you know famously in another country,

1:48:34.920 --> 1:48:37.679
<v Speaker 1>but actually it's a most of things that we recognize

1:48:37.720 --> 1:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in it. M hm. So you mentioned earlier, UM that

1:48:44.160 --> 1:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in November the murder of the murder investigation is under way, UM,

1:48:53.080 --> 1:48:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and the police are not catching the killer. There's been

1:48:56.760 --> 1:49:01.599
<v Speaker 1>a huge mobilization of the forces in October that has

1:49:01.680 --> 1:49:08.639
<v Speaker 1>been unsuccessful in charging anyone with these crimes. And as

1:49:08.680 --> 1:49:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, that's often pointed to as the reason for

1:49:11.360 --> 1:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Charles Warren's resignation. UM. But he publishes his article the

1:49:15.200 --> 1:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Police of the Metropolis in Murray's magazine. UM. And you

1:49:19.720 --> 1:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about the consequences of that already

1:49:22.320 --> 1:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with with Matthews in the Home Office. But what was

1:49:24.760 --> 1:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the substance of the article, UM? You know, what's this

1:49:29.000 --> 1:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>this military man who is now in charge of the police.

1:49:32.400 --> 1:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>What's he arguing about the way that policing should be done.

1:49:36.320 --> 1:49:39.559
<v Speaker 1>What's he saying? Well, I think what what is mostly

1:49:39.680 --> 1:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>saying in that article is that he hasn't been able

1:49:43.320 --> 1:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to run the police in the way that he wants

1:49:45.040 --> 1:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to run it. He's being he's having interference, is frustrated

1:49:48.600 --> 1:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>by interference from from c I D you know, from

1:49:51.960 --> 1:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the detectives. Um, he's suffering a tremendous amount of criticism,

1:49:57.000 --> 1:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and it suggested he's trying to resign several times and

1:49:59.280 --> 1:50:02.519
<v Speaker 1>not been allowed to resign. UM. So I guess what

1:50:02.600 --> 1:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he's really saying in that is the police are a

1:50:04.920 --> 1:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>fine body of men. My police are working extremely hard,

1:50:10.479 --> 1:50:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and UM, while I'm working with one hand type behind

1:50:16.320 --> 1:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>my back, I'm not able to properly run this case

1:50:19.000 --> 1:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as I want I want to. And I think that's

1:50:21.280 --> 1:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a kind of inevitability you get in that In

1:50:23.760 --> 1:50:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that that conflict which which exists in British policing, I

1:50:31.320 --> 1:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think even to some extent people would probably arguing it

1:50:34.520 --> 1:50:37.800
<v Speaker 1>still exists. It certainly existed in British society right through

1:50:37.880 --> 1:50:42.519
<v Speaker 1>until the relatively recent decades of that tension between the

1:50:42.680 --> 1:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>uniform and playing clothes, uniform and detection. The detectives are

1:50:48.760 --> 1:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of seen as a they see themselves as an

1:50:51.280 --> 1:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>elite part of the police, and they're kind of seen

1:50:55.040 --> 1:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>as people who don't have to follow the rules by

1:50:57.560 --> 1:51:00.879
<v Speaker 1>by others and therefore resented to get better pay conditions

1:51:00.920 --> 1:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. It may be the

1:51:04.240 --> 1:51:11.559
<v Speaker 1>same in the US, but it's certainly um frustrates Sir

1:51:11.680 --> 1:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Charles Warren. And I'd rather suspect you couldn't get out

1:51:15.439 --> 1:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of the police quick enough so that the article for

1:51:18.520 --> 1:51:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Laurie's magazine was his chance to have a goal for

1:51:21.360 --> 1:51:27.439
<v Speaker 1>those who criticize and called for his resignation. I mean,

1:51:27.640 --> 1:51:29.559
<v Speaker 1>and you just look at the reaction of the press

1:51:29.640 --> 1:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to it. I mean, you know, the start as a

1:51:33.880 --> 1:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>real go in from it. You know, it's it says

1:51:37.320 --> 1:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I wrote this down. A more extraordinary document never found

1:51:41.200 --> 1:51:44.479
<v Speaker 1>its way into print. It would be charitable to suppose

1:51:44.560 --> 1:51:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that when he penned this remarkable addition to the literature

1:51:47.320 --> 1:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of Connie Hatch, Sir Charles Warren was laboring under some

1:51:50.600 --> 1:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>unusual excitement for contents. Coney Hatch is London's largest lunatic asylum.

1:51:56.960 --> 1:51:59.760
<v Speaker 1>It was it's kind of like saying that he'd gone

1:52:00.000 --> 1:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that basically, No, and I didn't. I didn't mention this

1:52:04.040 --> 1:52:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in any of the outlines. But I've been thinking a

1:52:05.800 --> 1:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lot about Charles Warren bringing that kind of imperial military

1:52:10.840 --> 1:52:13.840
<v Speaker 1>discipline to the London police. And you know, a lot

1:52:13.880 --> 1:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of the discussions that I'm a part of here in

1:52:16.760 --> 1:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the United States today are about the militarization

1:52:20.160 --> 1:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>of the police. You know, it's kind of the phrase

1:52:21.840 --> 1:52:24.519
<v Speaker 1>that we used to get at that issue here and now,

1:52:25.600 --> 1:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and and I've read a little bit about some of

1:52:28.320 --> 1:52:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the radical press criticizing Charles Warren along similar grounds, saying

1:52:33.320 --> 1:52:37.439
<v Speaker 1>that he was turning the London Police the met into

1:52:38.479 --> 1:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a military and occupying military force. Um, this wasn't the question.

1:52:43.479 --> 1:52:45.479
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you don't have something prepared, but would you

1:52:45.520 --> 1:52:47.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to say a few more words about you know,

1:52:48.080 --> 1:52:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was it fair to criticize Charles Warren for militarizing the

1:52:51.439 --> 1:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>police in London. I think it's. Um, it's certainly something

1:52:55.240 --> 1:52:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's thrown at him, and it's thrown at him in

1:52:56.800 --> 1:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the wake of Bloody Sunday in November Heaven, when when

1:53:01.560 --> 1:53:05.679
<v Speaker 1>he kind of he doesn't want to suffer what happened

1:53:05.720 --> 1:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to his predecessor Henderson in in the pal mall all

1:53:10.000 --> 1:53:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the West End Rights of six. So he tries to

1:53:14.400 --> 1:53:17.800
<v Speaker 1>close down demonstrations in Trafalgar Square, which is kind of

1:53:17.880 --> 1:53:23.600
<v Speaker 1>London's traditional place for demonstrations and political gatherings and that

1:53:23.800 --> 1:53:27.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of He's met with cries of outrage, cries about

1:53:27.640 --> 1:53:31.559
<v Speaker 1>free speech, as you might imagine, and protests go ahead,

1:53:31.640 --> 1:53:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and he sends in the soul. He ends in his

1:53:35.640 --> 1:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he's disciplined policeman with in a in a battle, charged

1:53:40.080 --> 1:53:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to crack heads and clear the square, and that creates

1:53:42.800 --> 1:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a riot. And some fantastic cartoons from the time depicting

1:53:48.640 --> 1:53:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Warren as on top of Nelson's column and policeman beating

1:53:52.320 --> 1:53:56.880
<v Speaker 1>up protesters on all the plints around the square, um

1:53:57.360 --> 1:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lions getting involved in everything else, and there's a

1:54:01.000 --> 1:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there's that kind of sense of the he's an own

1:54:03.160 --> 1:54:06.320
<v Speaker 1>goal really for Warren because the press can can rage

1:54:06.400 --> 1:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>against his militarization into Faga Square. Although some of them

1:54:10.960 --> 1:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are very pleased with what he does, the Times are

1:54:13.240 --> 1:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>very pleased with what he does. And and when it

1:54:17.680 --> 1:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to the riplicate, of course he doesn't catch the killer.

1:54:22.080 --> 1:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a you know, the criticism is aimful square

1:54:27.920 --> 1:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at the metroids and police because here is a murderer

1:54:29.840 --> 1:54:35.280
<v Speaker 1>who's killing poor women in East London, and here is

1:54:35.320 --> 1:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a commissioner of the met who sent his men into

1:54:39.160 --> 1:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>beat up poor men in the West end of London,

1:54:43.240 --> 1:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's kind of a it's a it's a very

1:54:47.480 --> 1:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious target for radical press, for the liberal press to

1:54:52.600 --> 1:54:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have a go up, to have a go out warrant

1:54:54.320 --> 1:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, whether it's fair. He did concentrate on military discipline,

1:55:00.920 --> 1:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but he probably thought that was very important. And let's

1:55:04.320 --> 1:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>face it, he only becomes a commissioner in late he

1:55:09.920 --> 1:55:11.840
<v Speaker 1>has not had that much time to do very much

1:55:11.920 --> 1:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with metropologies, and already they've got one of the most

1:55:16.280 --> 1:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>high profile murder cases, were the most high private profile

1:55:19.600 --> 1:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>murder case for decades, So it's a bit tricky for him. Really.

1:55:23.920 --> 1:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I always started off disliking to Charles Warren and I

1:55:28.120 --> 1:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of have a lot of sympathy for him now. Hm.

1:55:33.200 --> 1:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the press covering the murders and

1:55:36.640 --> 1:55:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the investigation, um stories start to dwindle after the inquest

1:55:45.040 --> 1:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of Mary Kelly. Why is that? Why Why does the

1:55:50.320 --> 1:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>press kind of decide that the story is over at

1:55:54.720 --> 1:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that point? Well, I guess someone like Stanley Cohen and

1:55:58.720 --> 1:56:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sociologists would argue that a moral panic with us out

1:56:01.240 --> 1:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and the press eventually get bored of it and they

1:56:03.480 --> 1:56:05.280
<v Speaker 1>move on to something else. But I think the answer

1:56:05.360 --> 1:56:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is quite simple really, in the police refuse refused to

1:56:10.480 --> 1:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with the press in the wake of Mary Kelly's murder.

1:56:14.760 --> 1:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>They stopped providing any information or access. You kind of

1:56:18.080 --> 1:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine them closing down. You imagine, I imagine reporters standing

1:56:23.520 --> 1:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>outside Lehman Street and being told to go away by

1:56:26.240 --> 1:56:31.280
<v Speaker 1>by uniformed officers. And when they've got the the inquest

1:56:31.400 --> 1:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is closed down. And that's another trific place for the

1:56:34.360 --> 1:56:38.280
<v Speaker 1>press to get information. So there's no inquest, there's no

1:56:38.400 --> 1:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>information coming out of the police headquarters. Coppers on the

1:56:43.240 --> 1:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>beat aren't talking to the press. There's nothing to print.

1:56:47.840 --> 1:56:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So if there's nothing to print, then you go on

1:56:51.320 --> 1:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and start talking about something else. H M. Of course,

1:56:56.400 --> 1:57:00.200
<v Speaker 1>those of us who are looking back at the year,

1:57:00.840 --> 1:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at the case, at the killings with um historical interest,

1:57:08.800 --> 1:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there are things that follow events, documents that do continue

1:57:14.840 --> 1:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to draw interest, and one of those is McNaughton's memorandum.

1:57:20.280 --> 1:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>H can you talk about Melvin McNaughton and who he was?

1:57:26.440 --> 1:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What is this this memorandum that he wrote, and to

1:57:29.680 --> 1:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what extent it is or is not significant, especially in

1:57:32.600 --> 1:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>light of one of the comments you've written that that

1:57:35.520 --> 1:57:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he in particular may have been invested with too much

1:57:38.800 --> 1:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>significance by others who have looked at the investigation. Yeah.

1:57:44.160 --> 1:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one thing you probably have to

1:57:46.280 --> 1:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>say is if you you could ask, you could ask

1:57:49.160 --> 1:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a dozen different so called experts about the replication about McNaughton,

1:57:53.840 --> 1:57:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and you'd probably get a dozen slightly different answers. But this,

1:57:57.240 --> 1:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this would be mine, I think. So we know Melville

1:58:00.520 --> 1:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>mcdorton was Chief Comsortable c I D In June, so

1:58:05.640 --> 1:58:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he has an indirect connection to the Whitechapel murdericers. He

1:58:08.480 --> 1:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would have known people who were involved in the case,

1:58:11.160 --> 1:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even though he wasn't directing the case himself. In February

1:58:17.320 --> 1:58:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a report on the case, and that was

1:58:20.800 --> 1:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>prompted by speculation in the Sun newspaper of the day

1:58:24.440 --> 1:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that the murderer as a man named Thomas cut Blush,

1:58:29.080 --> 1:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was kind of refuting that. I think the

1:58:32.640 --> 1:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>report really comes to light though, in in nineteen fifty nine,

1:58:37.400 --> 1:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>when mcnorton's daughter allowed a TV documentary maker access to

1:58:43.320 --> 1:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>her father's papers. Um, so that's kind of how we

1:58:48.200 --> 1:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we get this this thing. The report itself is quite short,

1:58:52.440 --> 1:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and it In it mcdaorton named three possible ripper suspects,

1:58:57.720 --> 1:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So three people that were supposedly known to the police's

1:59:00.560 --> 1:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the investigation at the time, and these were Monskey,

1:59:06.640 --> 1:59:13.320
<v Speaker 1>John Druitt, Michael Ostrog's Michael Michael Ostrog and a guy

1:59:13.480 --> 1:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just known as Kosminski, not given a first name, but

1:59:16.680 --> 1:59:21.720
<v Speaker 1>generally has been given the name Aaron Kazmitski, but Kazminski

1:59:21.760 --> 1:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a police jews how mc norton right. The mc norton memorandum,

1:59:28.000 --> 1:59:31.880
<v Speaker 1>as it's known, has been given significance, considerable significant over

1:59:31.920 --> 1:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the years since because because it names three men and

1:59:35.840 --> 1:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because it suggests the police had them in mind. Um.

1:59:39.920 --> 1:59:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And this supported the claims of Sir Robert Anderson, who

1:59:43.280 --> 1:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was head of c D at the time of the murders,

1:59:45.760 --> 1:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we can consider to be a fairly reliable

1:59:49.120 --> 1:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>source um. And he said this in he said the

1:59:53.880 --> 1:59:56.360
<v Speaker 1>police knew who the rewards in his memoirs, which were

1:59:56.400 --> 2:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>published in nine Now police memoirs and notoristly difficult because

2:00:03.080 --> 2:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they're often self justifications and they're written after the event.

2:00:06.880 --> 2:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So we we can give them quite a lot of credibility,

2:00:10.920 --> 2:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but we need to also be skeptical at the same time.

2:00:13.960 --> 2:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And when we look at mc norton's trier of suspects,

2:00:16.560 --> 2:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>my problem is that they broadly fit the typology of

2:00:21.400 --> 2:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>who the Victorians thought ought to have ought to have

2:00:24.400 --> 2:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>been the killer I someone who was considered to be

2:00:27.880 --> 2:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a social other. So we have an upper class gentleman,

2:00:31.680 --> 2:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a psychotic doctor, and we have a deranged

2:00:34.320 --> 2:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>immigrant dr um, deranged Jewish immigrants. That they're all the

2:00:40.680 --> 2:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are drew it or strong on Kosminski, and

2:00:43.800 --> 2:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's rather convenient that mc norton identifies those

2:00:48.920 --> 2:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three as the people that the piece we're looking for,

2:00:51.240 --> 2:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>because those are the sort of people the press we're

2:00:53.760 --> 2:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>telling the police they ought to be looking for. So yeah,

2:00:59.240 --> 2:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>m the annoying thing about McNaughton is spending his name right.

2:01:05.160 --> 2:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That's his name spelled differently all the times, and I

2:01:08.200 --> 2:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>spelt it wrong, having corrected it in my book, my

2:01:11.000 --> 2:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>last book, And that was one of the reasons that

2:01:13.280 --> 2:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Ripper ologies had such a nothing like, nothing like a

2:01:18.400 --> 2:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>typo to get them upset. I spelled a few of

2:01:21.240 --> 2:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>my own I spelled it a few of my own

2:01:23.840 --> 2:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ways to um you mentioned at the beginning of this conversation,

2:01:29.520 --> 2:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>when you were talking about Jack the Ripper has a

2:01:32.560 --> 2:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>modern myth um that kind of without the mystery, the

2:01:39.120 --> 2:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>White Chapel murders are just another tale of statistic killing,

2:01:43.600 --> 2:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and that part of what makes it compelling is the

2:01:45.960 --> 2:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to project our own ideas into the gap where

2:01:51.400 --> 2:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a person there. Can you speak a

2:01:54.200 --> 2:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more to the idea that it's the uncertainty

2:01:57.560 --> 2:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about the identity of the killer that keeps this story

2:02:00.040 --> 2:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>your life. Do you have more to say about that

2:02:01.720 --> 2:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>than you already already said? Well, I can certainly try.

2:02:05.320 --> 2:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, and I think identifying Jack the Ripper,

2:02:09.240 --> 2:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or arguing about the identity of the White Chappel murderers

2:02:13.120 --> 2:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>as has kind of fuel the ripper industry. It's an

2:02:15.960 --> 2:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>industry which has existed for over hundred years. I mean,

2:02:19.640 --> 2:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>there are ripper tours taking place whilst the murders are

2:02:24.200 --> 2:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are happening. You know, ripper tours aren'to modern invention. People.

2:02:28.200 --> 2:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>There was a waxworkshell on Whitechappel High Street at the

2:02:31.240 --> 2:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>time of the Ripper murders. This is an industry which

2:02:34.000 --> 2:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>started in and has continued the pace ever since, and

2:02:37.880 --> 2:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>now we have films and movies, and we have franchises

2:02:42.280 --> 2:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like Assassin's Create the video game which references the Rapper.

2:02:47.920 --> 2:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You can play as Jack the Ripper if you want to.

2:02:49.960 --> 2:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And there are numerous Ripper solution histories, and there are

2:02:55.080 --> 2:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Ripper novels, and um, you know, I have a Ripper

2:02:59.000 --> 2:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper game. You can get rapp Jack the

2:03:02.200 --> 2:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Ripper themed T shirts, you know, all sorts of things, Um,

2:03:08.520 --> 2:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack the Ripper if you want to. Um. But the

2:03:13.120 --> 2:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that so many facts in the case of disputed

2:03:15.520 --> 2:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like like, for example, just a number of victims, how

2:03:17.760 --> 2:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>many were there? Were there? Five? Were? The six? Were

2:03:19.440 --> 2:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the eight? Were? Nine? Were? Were there more? The writing

2:03:22.600 --> 2:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on the wall in Galston Street graffiti, the Ripper letters themselves.

2:03:27.440 --> 2:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether the Dear Boss or from Hell or

2:03:29.280 --> 2:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the others are real or not, all of

2:03:32.000 --> 2:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>those things. I mean, we can keep on revisiting the

2:03:34.320 --> 2:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>case in the hope of finding new evidence, or more accurately,

2:03:38.080 --> 2:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we can look for new interpretations of old evidence. But

2:03:44.360 --> 2:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think it's worth saying this again. But

2:03:47.120 --> 2:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>more than this, successive popular representations of Jack the Ripper

2:03:50.320 --> 2:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have kind of recast the killer for their own age.

2:03:53.480 --> 2:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So currently Jack has become sort of Mr Ordinary, a

2:03:58.200 --> 2:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mundane every day a killer hiding him side. And I

2:04:02.680 --> 2:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's interesting because he's like the modern terrorists who

2:04:05.800 --> 2:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't notice until he draws his knife or he

2:04:09.040 --> 2:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>reveals he's wearing a suicide. So I think it's the

2:04:13.000 --> 2:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ability of Jack to fit in where we want him to.

2:04:17.000 --> 2:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And of course we all love the past, and we

2:04:19.760 --> 2:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>love the Victorians because they kind of seem very close

2:04:23.600 --> 2:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to us. I mean, they're only a hundred or so

2:04:25.360 --> 2:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago. You know, there are people alive who were

2:04:28.000 --> 2:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>alive in almost alive in the Victorian period UM. And

2:04:33.800 --> 2:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>my grandmother was born um at the turn of the century.

2:04:38.400 --> 2:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean she she's passed away now, but she's you know,

2:04:41.360 --> 2:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>she could tell me things from her mother which were

2:04:43.960 --> 2:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>about Queen Victoria's jubileean things. It seems close, but it's

2:04:48.760 --> 2:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so different. And in Jack's London there are things we'd recognize,

2:04:52.240 --> 2:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but they're all kind of I want to say, swathed

2:04:55.800 --> 2:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of gas, like a sort of mystic

2:04:57.960 --> 2:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>mystic missed in a smoke that kind of swirls around

2:05:02.840 --> 2:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and giving that kind of touch of Gothic horror. That's

2:05:05.320 --> 2:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so much part of our way of viewing that period. Um.

2:05:11.560 --> 2:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we'll ever be able to conclusively

2:05:14.160 --> 2:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>prove who Jack the Ripper was, um, at least not

2:05:19.400 --> 2:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to prove to a standard that you could

2:05:21.560 --> 2:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>prosecute somebody in a port in England today. But that

2:05:26.920 --> 2:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of sense of mystery of wanting to work out

2:05:30.440 --> 2:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>who it was, and then spinoffs from that that keep

2:05:33.760 --> 2:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the story going. So organizations like the White Chapel Society

2:05:38.480 --> 2:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>are people who have moved on from just identifying the

2:05:41.640 --> 2:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Ripper trying to They're now interested in the victims. They're

2:05:44.600 --> 2:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in the streets, the buildings, the social history, the

2:05:48.360 --> 2:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>popular culture of the time, that that the riplication is

2:05:54.120 --> 2:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so much more than it was even twenty years ago.

2:05:56.880 --> 2:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think. I mean, I'm planning a conference in two

2:06:00.800 --> 2:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty two if we ever get through lockdown. Um,

2:06:06.040 --> 2:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to have an international conference at

2:06:08.000 --> 2:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Northampton that brings people who are amateurs rheologists as we

2:06:12.200 --> 2:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>might call them, Whitechappel Society and their their their groups

2:06:15.840 --> 2:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>together with serious academics like you know some I like

2:06:19.200 --> 2:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you the walk of It or you know, um, some

2:06:22.680 --> 2:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of the people that have researched, who have researched things

2:06:25.760 --> 2:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>like prostitution and crime, and bring those people together to

2:06:28.840 --> 2:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation because they get pro fascinating mm hm um,

2:06:34.760 --> 2:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and you just to kind of sew things up for us. Um.

2:06:40.640 --> 2:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I read your Jack in the terms torso murderous book

2:06:44.520 --> 2:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>as one of those studies that does look at Jack

2:06:48.080 --> 2:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as or the killer, because there is noough Jack as

2:06:52.640 --> 2:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those kind of everyman figures, someone who wasn't

2:06:57.640 --> 2:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those three stereotypes, but who instead was at

2:07:01.600 --> 2:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>home and fit in and would have been recognizable as

2:07:04.600 --> 2:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>belonging in the East end. Um. Could you talk about

2:07:10.200 --> 2:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your own thinking about why it was important to put

2:07:15.760 --> 2:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that book together and explore the reasons for making an

2:07:19.320 --> 2:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>identification of the killer the way that you did. Yes,

2:07:23.120 --> 2:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know how very aware that in under

2:07:27.160 --> 2:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>shadows I kind of said, you can't do this, So

2:07:29.680 --> 2:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's no point is there are much more interesting things

2:07:31.680 --> 2:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. And now I wrote a book saying

2:07:35.120 --> 2:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>who I thought the report was. Um, I mean I

2:07:37.800 --> 2:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have very particular reasons for doing that. I wrote it

2:07:41.960 --> 2:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with someone else, with Andy Wise, who felt he had

2:07:44.640 --> 2:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a story to tell and I wanted to enable him,

2:07:47.200 --> 2:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as a former student of mine, to tell his story,

2:07:50.040 --> 2:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think he was a struggle to get that

2:07:52.480 --> 2:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>out into print in the way that perhaps with a

2:07:54.760 --> 2:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of background behind me, I was able to

2:07:58.120 --> 2:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>enable him to do so. There was partly a personal

2:08:01.000 --> 2:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>story of allowing Andy to tell the story he wanted

2:08:04.440 --> 2:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell. And then he'd spent many, many years researching UM.

2:08:09.520 --> 2:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I always felt it was problematic to identify a killer,

2:08:12.480 --> 2:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of still do. But I think Harderman

2:08:15.840 --> 2:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is as good as suspect, as as any and better

2:08:18.120 --> 2:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>than many. And I think so. I mean, one of

2:08:20.600 --> 2:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the things we concluded was if we if we tried

2:08:22.760 --> 2:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to apply historical research methods and the rationale of a

2:08:26.640 --> 2:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>police detective who's looking for means, motive and opportunity, we

2:08:32.120 --> 2:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>could point the finger at a local man who we

2:08:34.240 --> 2:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>believed was responsible, a man involved in them trade. He

2:08:37.920 --> 2:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to fit. So we we figured that the killer

2:08:43.440 --> 2:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>had to know White Chapel. He had to be able

2:08:45.680 --> 2:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to move around White Chapel in Spittlefield without causing suspicion.

2:08:50.640 --> 2:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and I had to know all these dark alleys

2:08:54.560 --> 2:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and cut throughs. He had to appear to avoid police patrols,

2:08:59.200 --> 2:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly as has more and more police were put on

2:09:01.880 --> 2:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the streets, particularly following the double event. So this is

2:09:07.160 --> 2:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>someone who needs to know his local environment, and that

2:09:09.160 --> 2:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really fit with a doctor from outside, or a

2:09:11.560 --> 2:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>slumming top or any of these other people. It has

2:09:14.600 --> 2:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a local man. I think you had to

2:09:18.160 --> 2:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have somebody who had a clear motive for wanting to kill.

2:09:20.400 --> 2:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>In many of the books I've read about Jack Ripper,

2:09:22.480 --> 2:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't really understand why he would do the things

2:09:25.480 --> 2:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he would do. That's kind of a bit that the

2:09:27.600 --> 2:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>writers don't tell you why would you do that? Now?

2:09:30.440 --> 2:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand, of course that without knowing who the killer ism,

2:09:34.200 --> 2:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>without a confession, we can never know why somebody chooses

2:09:37.680 --> 2:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to murder. Um. We think of serial killers today and

2:09:42.280 --> 2:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of time spent pouring over what they

2:09:45.040 --> 2:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have to say, if they can say, or they choose

2:09:47.640 --> 2:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to say what they want to say, and we can't

2:09:49.320 --> 2:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily trust it anyway. But I feel you had to

2:09:52.680 --> 2:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>find a try and identify a motive, and in this

2:09:55.120 --> 2:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>case we found somebody who had means, motive and opportunity.

2:10:00.080 --> 2:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So James Hardiman had been flagged up in a previous

2:10:04.680 --> 2:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>short article in a couple of short articles for a

2:10:07.120 --> 2:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>phiologists and and he thought he was worth investigating, so

2:10:11.160 --> 2:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he set off to investigate him. And James Hardiman was

2:10:14.760 --> 2:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a pet food salesman and someone who probably worked

2:10:19.080 --> 2:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>as a horse slaughterer. We accept that you can't find

2:10:22.280 --> 2:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>records for many of these things, so it's very difficult

2:10:24.280 --> 2:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to prove, but it seems quite likely um And if

2:10:28.320 --> 2:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>he was a horse slaughterer, if he was involved in

2:10:30.840 --> 2:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the meat trade, he was probably familiar with or operate

2:10:34.560 --> 2:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or he was probably familiar with or working for a

2:10:37.560 --> 2:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>company called Harrison Barber in the eighteen eighties because they

2:10:40.840 --> 2:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>entirely dominated horse saughtering and horse slaughtering. You know, it

2:10:45.440 --> 2:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>might seem like a niche occupation, but London is entirely

2:10:50.880 --> 2:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>powered by horses. In the nineteenth century. There are thousands

2:10:54.680 --> 2:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of horses carrying carts, people riding horses, pulling carriages, hands

2:10:59.480 --> 2:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and cabs. Everything is horse drawn. We talk about horsepowering cars,

2:11:03.600 --> 2:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but this is literally horsepower. And horses get sick and

2:11:08.320 --> 2:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they get old, and when they get old and sick,

2:11:11.240 --> 2:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't go and live in some nice

2:11:13.040 --> 2:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>little paddocks somewhere on the outskirts of London. They're slaughtered,

2:11:17.800 --> 2:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and their flesh and their bones and all their bits

2:11:21.040 --> 2:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and pieces are turned into other products like blue and

2:11:24.560 --> 2:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>pet food and all sorts of other things, and sometimes

2:11:27.320 --> 2:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Dickens suggested human food. So it's kind of ubiquitous. And

2:11:33.920 --> 2:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the man pushing a cart run the street selling captives

2:11:37.360 --> 2:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone and know who was but no one really see

2:11:39.760 --> 2:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>him because he was just that guy, you know, that

2:11:42.440 --> 2:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>strange guy, probably a bit weird. So that's kind of

2:11:46.000 --> 2:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>why he's having in plain sight. And as for motive,

2:11:49.800 --> 2:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we believe that Harderman had contracted syphilis, probably from a prostitute.

2:11:55.320 --> 2:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>He would have passed up to his wife, who passed

2:11:57.440 --> 2:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it to their child, and their own a child who died,

2:12:01.000 --> 2:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and then his wife died in the hospital. She was

2:12:03.120 --> 2:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in London for a long time, so he had plenty

2:12:05.320 --> 2:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity. He lived in White Chapel, he lived in

2:12:08.600 --> 2:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Henning Street, His family lived in Hambury Street where any

2:12:12.480 --> 2:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Chapman was killed. He lived right next door to where

2:12:15.520 --> 2:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>any chapman was killed by that court, so he was

2:12:18.200 --> 2:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>right at the heart of the killing zone. And we

2:12:23.680 --> 2:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of extrapolated that to think that perhaps Hardyman was

2:12:26.760 --> 2:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not just responsible for the White Chapel murders, but we

2:12:29.360 --> 2:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>also believe he could be connected to the four Torso

2:12:31.880 --> 2:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>murders that occurred in London between May seven and September

2:12:36.680 --> 2:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty nine. And in total, we argue that that

2:12:41.120 --> 2:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Harderman is probably responsible for thirteen murders and three more

2:12:45.800 --> 2:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fatal attacks over a period of nearly four years. He

2:12:49.600 --> 2:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>died in December eight He was only thirty two. And

2:12:55.240 --> 2:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Alice Mackenzie is the last victim in the series, dying

2:12:58.560 --> 2:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in February UM and her death is looks like a

2:13:05.680 --> 2:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>tired killing. You know that that she she almost survives

2:13:08.680 --> 2:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at least, and comes upon her bodies has had a

2:13:10.840 --> 2:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>throat cut and nothing else has been done to I

2:13:13.280 --> 2:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think I concluded that James Hardyman is as good as

2:13:19.320 --> 2:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>suspect as many and I think you know, you can

2:13:24.240 --> 2:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>criticize quite a lot of our case, um wides quite

2:13:29.040 --> 2:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my writing, but he certainly bears close examination.

2:13:35.560 --> 2:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to know who the ripper was.

2:13:38.080 --> 2:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>No one is going to be satisfied who the ripper

2:13:40.280 --> 2:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>was for the quite simple things. As soon as you

2:13:42.800 --> 2:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>decide who the ripper was. And we agree that kills

2:13:45.920 --> 2:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the industry, or or it kills one branch of the industry.

2:13:51.680 --> 2:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week's episode of Unobscured. Stick around

2:13:55.680 --> 2:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>after this short sponsor break for a preview of what's

2:13:58.960 --> 2:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in store for next week. It's a very hard life

2:14:09.520 --> 2:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that the people were living at that time, particularly in

2:14:13.000 --> 2:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the East End. But an event like a murder captures

2:14:16.600 --> 2:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the witnesses and the investigators in that moment of time

2:14:20.920 --> 2:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>going about their day to day lives, and they're things mains.

2:14:24.480 --> 2:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>As I said, mainstream histories don't often tell you. For example,

2:14:29.120 --> 2:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there were lots of horses, lots of them. What did

2:14:32.720 --> 2:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you do if your horse was injured in an accident

2:14:35.840 --> 2:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>or if it dropped dead in the street? And how

2:14:39.480 --> 2:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>dirty were those streets are washed with horse urine and worse?

2:14:45.120 --> 2:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And what was it really like to travel in a

2:14:47.160 --> 2:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>handsome cab rocking along like a ship tossed in a storm.

2:14:50.920 --> 2:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So we you know, all of that is sort of

2:14:53.680 --> 2:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you don't normally find out about. Even the

2:14:57.240 --> 2:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes story have you have homes rolling along in

2:15:00.840 --> 2:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a handsome cap, but we don't actually get told when

2:15:03.560 --> 2:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it was really like Unobscured was created by me Aaron

2:15:22.640 --> 2:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Manky and produced by Matt Frederick, Alex Williams, and Josh

2:15:26.040 --> 2:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Thane in partnership with I Heart Radio. Research and writing

2:15:29.840 --> 2:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for this season is all the work of my right

2:15:31.880 --> 2:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hand man Carl Nellis and the brilliant Chad Lawson composed

2:15:35.240 --> 2:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the brand new soundtrack. Learn more about our contributing historians,

2:15:39.320 --> 2:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>source material and links to our other shows over at

2:15:42.520 --> 2:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>history unobscured dot com, and until next time, thanks for listening.

2:15:55.360 --> 2:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Unobscured is a production of I Heart Radio and Aaron

2:15:57.600 --> 2:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Monkey for More podcast for my heart Radio, because heart Radio, app,

2:16:00.800 --> 2:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

2:16:06.000 --> 2:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>H