1 00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:15,920 Speaker 1: The Action Network Podcast. 2 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 2: What's going on? 3 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 3: Everybody? Welcome into the Action Network Podcast to Brendan glas 4 00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:28,479 Speaker 3: Sheen with our UFC crew to preview UFC two seventy 5 00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:31,720 Speaker 3: five in Singapore. We've got eleven fights to get to. 6 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:34,199 Speaker 3: We won't get to all fights, but we'll get to 7 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 3: some of the you know, the keys of the weekend. 8 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:41,559 Speaker 3: We've got the main event, Comane Dogs props, Fight of 9 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 3: the Night, Sean and Billy's Fight of the Night prop 10 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:47,240 Speaker 3: bet each of the guys like best bets and also 11 00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:51,040 Speaker 3: we'll have a DFS outlook from Billy. Billy Ward, former 12 00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 3: professional MMA fighter also one of our best MMA analysts 13 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 3: at the Action Network. Shan Zarillo, also a senior writer, 14 00:00:57,800 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 3: covers the fighting side for us as well. Looking forward 15 00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 3: to it. Good to be back on the pod talking UFC. 16 00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:07,040 Speaker 3: We've got a great main event here. We've got Glover 17 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 3: to Shia and Yuri Prahashka. Prahashka is the favorite. Zarrillo. 18 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:14,400 Speaker 3: What's the read here on the Fight of the night? 19 00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:16,040 Speaker 3: What do you got or the main event? 20 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 4: I should say I love the unders here and I 21 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:22,120 Speaker 4: don't view it so dissimilarly from what was my other 22 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 4: biggest bet of the Year on the unders in the 23 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 4: gatcheol of Air fight. In that matchup and in this matchup, 24 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 4: you have two fighters who were glass cannons, offensive dinamos 25 00:01:32,240 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 4: with big holes and liabilities on the defense event. Yuri's striking, volume, output, 26 00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 4: speed reach all advantages for him here, but he's been 27 00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 4: hurt in both of his UFC fights. He's been hurt 28 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 4: consistently regionally knocked out four times, I believe in his career, 29 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 4: not in a while, but hurt badly in both of 30 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:53,800 Speaker 4: his UFC fights. Actually went out for a minute and 31 00:01:53,840 --> 00:01:56,559 Speaker 4: then recovered. Against Dom Reyis got mounted in that fight. 32 00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:01,000 Speaker 4: If Glover gets on top of your it could be 33 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:03,880 Speaker 4: an instance. Ub. I think there's major holes in Yuri's 34 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 4: grappling game. His takedown defense is pretty subpar. You can 35 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:09,960 Speaker 4: get him to the ground, and if Glover mounts them 36 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:12,240 Speaker 4: like Dom did, I don't think Year's getting back up. 37 00:02:13,320 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 4: That said, Glover also gets hurt in every fight, and 38 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 4: both of these guys tend to recover pretty quickly and 39 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 4: end up rallying. And that's why they're both on winning 40 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 4: streaks because they've rallied back to victory. But they're both 41 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:26,960 Speaker 4: very able to be hurt. Both very open on the 42 00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:30,079 Speaker 4: defensive end. Yuri's kind of wild to leave himself open 43 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:32,080 Speaker 4: for takedowns, but Glover is there to be hit, and 44 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:35,240 Speaker 4: with the speed advantage that Uri has, I think he's 45 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 4: probably gonna catch him multiple times early. The question is 46 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,120 Speaker 4: whether Glover can withstand those and maybe get into a clinch, 47 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 4: get the takedown and go from there. So the under 48 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:46,359 Speaker 4: one and a half could hit certainly. I paid juice 49 00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:48,160 Speaker 4: on the unders. I bet the under two and a 50 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:49,919 Speaker 4: half at minus one seventy eight, the under three and 51 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 4: a half at minus two to eighty, and then even 52 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 4: the under four and a half at minus four hundred. 53 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:55,800 Speaker 4: This fight to end inside the distance was listed as 54 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 4: high as minus seven hundred on some. 55 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 2: Of these books. 56 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 4: It's come down a little bit, but even that minus 57 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 4: four hundred for the under four and a half I 58 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 4: think is actually five to seven percent edge. I projected 59 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 4: this around eighty eight percent to end inside the distance. 60 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:09,760 Speaker 4: I do not see it going the full twenty five minutes. 61 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,920 Speaker 4: I have a lot of money on these unders, but 62 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 4: in terms of money line side a value side between 63 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 4: the two fighters, I think Glover is probably the side 64 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,359 Speaker 4: from a moneyline perspective, that's that I prefer as inside 65 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 4: distance props. Inside the distance at plus U fifty for 66 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:28,080 Speaker 4: Glover projected that closer plus two hundred and a submission 67 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 4: prop you can get around plus three eighty at fan. 68 00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:31,600 Speaker 2: I believe I. 69 00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:34,680 Speaker 4: Projected that around plus you eighty. So Glover and the unders, 70 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:36,800 Speaker 4: Glover inside the distance and the unders. That's how I'm 71 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 4: attacking this fight. But just pure violence, very binary. But 72 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 4: I expect somebody to get finished and probably relatively quickly. 73 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 3: Bill, you're struggling to come around on a side here 74 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:50,840 Speaker 3: or what's how are you compartmentalizing to make a pick? 75 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, this isn't one where I see, you know, either 76 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 5: side is necessarily having a good value from a straight 77 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 5: up money line standpoint. If I had to put a 78 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 5: straight up bet on this one, I like Urian that's 79 00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 5: only minus one fifty, So we're just getting a little 80 00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 5: better price on that than on some of the unders 81 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:05,520 Speaker 5: and stuff like that. 82 00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 2: But I'm with Sean. 83 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 5: I see this fight going out exactly the way he did. Honestly, 84 00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 5: my favorite bat if you will, this is the prize 85 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 5: picks line. You can get Glover under one and a 86 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:16,280 Speaker 5: half takedowns. That's what they've got it set right now, 87 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:18,440 Speaker 5: and Sean laid out exactly why I think that's a 88 00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 5: good bat. I don't think Gary gets back up if 89 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 5: he does get taken down and into a bad position. 90 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:24,280 Speaker 2: So there's just a lot of ways that. 91 00:04:24,200 --> 00:04:26,680 Speaker 5: One's go right in terms of year getting a quick knockout, 92 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,159 Speaker 5: or once Glover gets on top of him, then it 93 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 5: looks like, you know, a submission is probably pretty eminent. 94 00:04:31,800 --> 00:04:33,800 Speaker 5: But h yeah, you know, this is one I'm very 95 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:37,479 Speaker 5: interested in and for DraftKings and daily fantasy stuff, just 96 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,840 Speaker 5: because of Sean laid out, it's super likely to end 97 00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:42,120 Speaker 5: inside the distance, but not one that I'm really very 98 00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 5: confident in any individual bets on. 99 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:48,239 Speaker 3: Okay, let's move on then to the Co Maine event. 100 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:54,360 Speaker 3: We've got Valentina Chivchenko and Tyla Santos. Santos the significant 101 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,680 Speaker 3: dog at plus four to twenty five. Chivchenko is at 102 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:01,279 Speaker 3: minus six point fifty. But of course, you know, we 103 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 3: don't really see much value there in Schevchenko, so we'll 104 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:08,400 Speaker 3: go to Billy first. Here, Billy, what's the how could 105 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 3: you bet this fight? 106 00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:10,040 Speaker 2: If you've got to read on it? 107 00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, Chevchenko is quite arguably the best female 108 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 5: fighter we've ever seen inside the UFC. Her only two 109 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:19,240 Speaker 5: losses in the UFCRE to Amanda Nunas up a weight class, 110 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:21,840 Speaker 5: and she's looking to make a seventh consecutive title run 111 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 5: or a title defense in this run right now against 112 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,920 Speaker 5: Tyler Santos. So you know, that explains the lines that 113 00:05:27,960 --> 00:05:30,359 Speaker 5: we're seeing in the stuff, like and how wide it 114 00:05:30,400 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 5: is right now. She's a former high level boxing and 115 00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:36,279 Speaker 5: kickboxing fighter, but she hasn't really finished anyone on the 116 00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:38,560 Speaker 5: feet as of late. You know, most of her stoppages 117 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 5: lately have been ground and pound elbows from Mount Crucifix, 118 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 5: stuff like that, and that's why I'm starting to see 119 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:45,719 Speaker 5: a little bit of an angle on Santo's here. Santos 120 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 5: started out as a muhite tai fighter. Santos has three 121 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,800 Speaker 5: knockdowns in her five fight USC career. Chef Chenko has 122 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:55,080 Speaker 5: won in I think thirteen fights. So, you know, we've 123 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,680 Speaker 5: seen a lot of WMMA fights where there's been big abscess. 124 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:00,480 Speaker 5: You know, Rowsey lost to Holmes, Amanda new As losing 125 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:03,320 Speaker 5: to Penya recently, and I'm starting to feel like this 126 00:06:03,400 --> 00:06:05,160 Speaker 5: might be another one where we're seeing a plus four 127 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:07,640 Speaker 5: to fifty fighter. But I think has at least a 128 00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:10,679 Speaker 5: reasonable power edge here. She looks like the bigger, stronger fighter, 129 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:12,280 Speaker 5: and she could also kind of just bully shove a 130 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:14,919 Speaker 5: Chenko up against the cage. So it's really more based 131 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:17,160 Speaker 5: on a like a gut feeling and an all title 132 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:18,799 Speaker 5: rans have to come to an end at some point. 133 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:21,280 Speaker 5: But I actually like Santos's money line at plus four 134 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 5: fifty in this one. 135 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:24,919 Speaker 3: All right, looking at the co made Zerrilla the women's 136 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 3: flyweight belt, what do you have for us? 137 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:30,839 Speaker 2: Yeah? So I see the path for Santos. 138 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 4: As Billy mentioned, if she can bullier, maybe get a 139 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,279 Speaker 4: couple of takedowns. Jennifer Mya believe the only person to 140 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,120 Speaker 4: take a round off of Valentino aside from Amanda Nunez, 141 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 4: and that was with the takedown and holding her down 142 00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 4: on the ground. Can Santos do it three times? 143 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 2: I'm not sure. 144 00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:46,880 Speaker 4: She's never been five rounds before, so that's a major 145 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:49,960 Speaker 4: question mark. Her level of competition is actually pretty questionable. 146 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,479 Speaker 4: I think her best win in terms of wins that 147 00:06:52,520 --> 00:06:54,840 Speaker 4: have aged well is maybe Molly McCann, who's two and one, 148 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,760 Speaker 4: since they fought her. Other three opponents that she's beaten 149 00:06:57,760 --> 00:06:59,359 Speaker 4: in the UFC are one and four, and two of 150 00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:02,600 Speaker 4: them have retired, and that win was over Priscilla Catchware, 151 00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 4: who's one of the lesser fighters in WMMA and the UFC. 152 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 3: So I could see. 153 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:10,800 Speaker 4: Santos maybe winning one of the first three rounds. I 154 00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 4: would probably look to jumping live on shift Chenko if 155 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 4: her price drops from where it is currently currently, maybe 156 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 4: to minus three hundred, if it has something like that, 157 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 4: If it's one one after two, that would be an 158 00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:26,280 Speaker 4: angle I'd look to take. If I'm playing the Santos side. 159 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:28,200 Speaker 4: The one place I did project value on this fight 160 00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 4: is Santos by decision. You can get value on that 161 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:34,239 Speaker 4: at plus twelve hundred. I projected it closer to plus 162 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:37,880 Speaker 4: one thousand. So maybe a very small small stab, like 163 00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:40,760 Speaker 4: a tenth of a unit stab on Santos by decision 164 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:43,240 Speaker 4: if you want to pre fight bet. But probably the 165 00:07:43,280 --> 00:07:45,960 Speaker 4: way I'll look to play it is to take Shiftchenko 166 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:47,640 Speaker 4: at a better price if she drops one of the 167 00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:48,600 Speaker 4: first two rounds. 168 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:51,960 Speaker 3: Let's talk some dogs now, UFC two to seventy five 169 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:56,040 Speaker 3: again in Singapore at the Singapore Indoor Stadium, looking at 170 00:07:56,080 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 3: dogs and Zorilla. I'll go to you first here, you 171 00:07:57,840 --> 00:07:59,840 Speaker 3: got something for us coming up as well in the 172 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:02,840 Speaker 3: fight of the night that's coming next. But you're gonna 173 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 3: go with some plus money here, some good plus money 174 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:06,280 Speaker 3: for a DOUG. 175 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm gonna take a total that's an underdog. The 176 00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:12,440 Speaker 4: over two and a half rounds between Maha Chete and 177 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 4: Steve Garcia can get that a plus one forty. It 178 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:18,120 Speaker 4: goes to the decision line is plus one eighty, So 179 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 4: this is a lightweight fight. Lightweight fights go to decision 180 00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:24,080 Speaker 4: around forty eight percent of the time, finish right at 181 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:27,200 Speaker 4: lightweight to fifty two percent. This bout is line closer 182 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 4: to sixty five percent to end inside the distance. So 183 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:32,640 Speaker 4: I just think it's gone a little bit too far. 184 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,880 Speaker 4: I don't see either fighter as a particularly potent finisher. 185 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:40,280 Speaker 4: Steve Garcia of the two, maybe the one who's less durable. 186 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 4: He's come up and wait, got hurt in his last 187 00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:45,440 Speaker 4: fight against Charlie and Taveras, who's a very low level fighter. 188 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:48,000 Speaker 4: I'm not sure this is durable one to fifty five, 189 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,840 Speaker 4: as he was at one forty five. That said, I 190 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:52,960 Speaker 4: don't really see either guy as a potent finisher. I 191 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,080 Speaker 4: would expect this fight to go to a decision around 192 00:08:56,120 --> 00:08:59,199 Speaker 4: the average for lightweight, and you're getting close to a 193 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,199 Speaker 4: seventy to ten percent edge there relative to your average 194 00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 4: lightweight fights. So fight to go to the distance at 195 00:09:04,320 --> 00:09:06,600 Speaker 4: plus one eighty and then i'll have more on the 196 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:08,400 Speaker 4: over two and a half at plus one forty. 197 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:10,520 Speaker 3: Billy favorite Dog. 198 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:13,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm going a little bit longer odds with this 199 00:09:13,600 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 5: one that I'm super comfortable with. But Jacob malcoun is 200 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 5: all the way up to plus two to fifty on 201 00:09:18,040 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 5: DraftKings and he's fighting Brendan Allen, who one hasn't super 202 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 5: impressed me lately. But Allen is mostly a submission guy 203 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:27,199 Speaker 5: who doesn't really have great takedown defense. We saw Malcoon 204 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 5: in his last fight attempt like eleven or twelve takedowns 205 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 5: just kind of relentlessly pursue it. So it really feels 206 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:35,080 Speaker 5: like a fairly clear path to a Malcoon victory here. 207 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:37,400 Speaker 5: He just needs to continue to get those takedowns, do 208 00:09:37,559 --> 00:09:39,760 Speaker 5: enough damage on the ground, and stay out of the submission. 209 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 5: I don't think we've really seen Malcoon fight any high 210 00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:45,040 Speaker 5: level submission type fighters, at least not in the UFC, 211 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:46,840 Speaker 5: so it's a bit of a question mark in terms 212 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 5: of whether he's gonna be able to avoid that from Allan, 213 00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 5: but I do think at plus two to fifty, with 214 00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:53,319 Speaker 5: such a clear path, that's a pretty good value. 215 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:57,680 Speaker 3: Okay, very good. Moving on to the fight of the night, 216 00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:00,000 Speaker 3: and you gotta go back to twenty twenty early twenty two, 217 00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:03,559 Speaker 3: arguably the fight of the year, a rematch between Yojana 218 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:08,800 Speaker 3: Drecheck excuse me and Jung Whaley Wayley at minus one 219 00:10:08,920 --> 00:10:13,560 Speaker 3: seventy five at Draychrek at plus one. This is the 220 00:10:13,559 --> 00:10:17,079 Speaker 3: first time we're going to see Ye Drechek since that 221 00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:20,080 Speaker 3: fight in early twenty twenty, so it's been a while. 222 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,000 Speaker 3: Zorilla will start with you, how do you go about 223 00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:25,439 Speaker 3: handicapping this one? 224 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:29,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, going from a five round war to a three 225 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:31,440 Speaker 4: round fight, maybe we get a more tepi and pace. 226 00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 4: I think Johanna's biggest issue in that fight is that 227 00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:35,880 Speaker 4: she went to war and she doesn't have as much 228 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:40,479 Speaker 4: power as Whaley. She's more technical, she's faster, better defensively, 229 00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:44,560 Speaker 4: and if she makes this a more technical fight, I 230 00:10:44,559 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 4: don't see how it's not a fifty to fifty fight. 231 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:49,920 Speaker 4: Wiley with the power the way Joanna has head swalled 232 00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:52,560 Speaker 4: up the optics for the judges, I think that's ultimately 233 00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:54,559 Speaker 4: why she'd want it. I think most people would actually 234 00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:57,079 Speaker 4: agree that Yanna has the better cardio in five rounds 235 00:10:57,080 --> 00:11:00,160 Speaker 4: as opposed to three rounds, would probably help her in 236 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:02,080 Speaker 4: the first fight. If it ended after three, she would 237 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 4: have won a split decision, So I think that fact 238 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 4: is interesting. The margins and these rounds were so close. 239 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:09,240 Speaker 4: I think the break or won. I think Wiley won 240 00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:11,559 Speaker 4: the fight. She probably had an argument for winning forty 241 00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:13,640 Speaker 4: nine forty six, where Johanna would have had to edge 242 00:11:13,679 --> 00:11:15,960 Speaker 4: out a forty to forty seven split, And if you 243 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,480 Speaker 4: look at the media scorecards, that's generally where the consensus 244 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:21,560 Speaker 4: opinion was a bunch hat at forty nine to forty 245 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 4: six for Wiley, a few hat it for Joanna three 246 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,680 Speaker 4: to two. But Johanna just wore the damage really badly. 247 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,000 Speaker 4: And if she's a bit more technical this time, doesn't 248 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:32,880 Speaker 4: try to go to war uses her speed advantage, stays 249 00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:35,320 Speaker 4: on the outside with her footwork, I think she can 250 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:37,679 Speaker 4: certainly win a decision here. The margins are going to 251 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:41,240 Speaker 4: be very thin for scoring these rounds. I mentioned the 252 00:11:41,280 --> 00:11:45,040 Speaker 4: power optics definitely swing towards Wiley, But if she can't 253 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:47,720 Speaker 4: get on the inside of Johanna. She can't get takedowns here, 254 00:11:47,760 --> 00:11:50,640 Speaker 4: and she has the grappling upside Wiley does, but I 255 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:53,040 Speaker 4: don't see her getting takedowns at high volume or keeping 256 00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 4: Johanna dead for long. So if it's not a war 257 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:57,719 Speaker 4: this time, it's basically a coin flip. I would have 258 00:11:57,760 --> 00:11:59,720 Speaker 4: been happy to take either fighter plus money, it didn't 259 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:03,360 Speaker 4: really matter who it was. So Joanna plus one forty 260 00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 4: five is a bet for me. But I'm also going 261 00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 4: to take the fight to go to a decision minus 262 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:09,840 Speaker 4: two hundred when I projected this closer to minus two sixty. 263 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 4: So I have bets both on the fight to go 264 00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:14,960 Speaker 4: to distance and on Johanna's money line. You could just 265 00:12:14,960 --> 00:12:17,160 Speaker 4: bet her decision prop as well, around plus two hundred. 266 00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 4: I see value on that as well, But I'm gonna 267 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:21,680 Speaker 4: split my wagers hope for a push at worst, and 268 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 4: maybe we cash both of them. 269 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:25,640 Speaker 3: All right, Billy, Fight of the Night kind of laid 270 00:12:25,679 --> 00:12:27,720 Speaker 3: it out for you there, and Sorillo did a good 271 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:30,920 Speaker 3: job recapping how do you go about looking at this fight? 272 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:34,040 Speaker 5: Yeah, Sean made a ton of similar points to what 273 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:35,680 Speaker 5: I was looking at, Like, I'm really glad he brought 274 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:38,439 Speaker 5: up where the scorecards were after three rounds. I think 275 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:41,520 Speaker 5: the public consensus is that Johanna has better cardio, so 276 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:44,640 Speaker 5: therefore a three round fight actually shifts it towards Dang. 277 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:47,160 Speaker 5: But you know, she has the team behind her, she's 278 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:49,560 Speaker 5: training an att I think they're going to recognize that 279 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:51,319 Speaker 5: and say, hey, it's only three rounds. You can turn 280 00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:53,040 Speaker 5: up the volume, you can push the pace a little 281 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:55,720 Speaker 5: bit more here, and some of that power and damage optics, 282 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:57,720 Speaker 5: maybe those don't look so bad after three rounds. 283 00:12:58,000 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 2: You know, the hum of tomato on her. 284 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 5: Forehead about third the size after three rounds as it 285 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:03,199 Speaker 5: was by the end of the night. 286 00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:05,600 Speaker 2: So does that, you know, work in her favor too. 287 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:07,720 Speaker 2: The only thing that gives me a little pause is 288 00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 2: just a two year layoff. 289 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,160 Speaker 5: But in those two years, Jang has been knocked out 290 00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 5: by Rose Nammunis and then lost another fight to Rose 291 00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 5: nam Unis, So it doesn't really look like we're seeing 292 00:13:16,400 --> 00:13:19,840 Speaker 5: Jang having improved in that time span, where Jouana very 293 00:13:19,840 --> 00:13:21,680 Speaker 5: well could have. She could have taken those two years 294 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:24,120 Speaker 5: got with a good team, really plugged up some holes 295 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 5: in her game. So I think plus one to forty 296 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:27,760 Speaker 5: five is the best you can get on her and 297 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 5: I'm all over that on this. 298 00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:34,800 Speaker 4: One now onto Sleeper. Sleeper is the fastest growing fantasy 299 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 4: platform today with millions of players. You probably already have 300 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 4: a fantasy league on there. I use it for mine. 301 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,560 Speaker 4: It's a game changing product unlike anything else in the industry. 302 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:45,959 Speaker 4: And now you could win on Sleeper by playing their 303 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 4: new over undergame. It's super simple. First, in any sport, 304 00:13:50,360 --> 00:13:52,320 Speaker 4: she's two or more players that you like, and pick 305 00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:55,200 Speaker 4: they're over or under for example number of points in 306 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 4: basketball or hits in baseball. Then choose the amount of 307 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:00,640 Speaker 4: money you want to enter into the contest. If you 308 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 4: pick correctly, you can win anywhere from two to over 309 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:06,600 Speaker 4: twenty times the amount you put in. The main reason 310 00:14:06,679 --> 00:14:09,080 Speaker 4: I'm excited about over Under on Sleeper is that it's 311 00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:11,800 Speaker 4: the only app where I can join my buddies contest 312 00:14:11,880 --> 00:14:14,760 Speaker 4: and play together. It's got a built in group chat 313 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 4: where I can see and copy my friend's picks with 314 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:19,680 Speaker 4: the tap of a button. It's insanely fun to ride 315 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:22,520 Speaker 4: it out together. So stop what you're doing and download 316 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 4: Sleeper now to play their new over undergame. Have fun 317 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:28,360 Speaker 4: with your friends, make some money. Make sure to use 318 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:31,480 Speaker 4: promo code action and Sleeper or match your deposit up 319 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 4: to one hundred dollars. Again download Sleeper, then use promo 320 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 4: code action when you deposit. Terms and conditions apply. See 321 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 4: Sleepers Terms of use for details. 322 00:14:40,240 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 2: Okay, back to the show. 323 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:45,360 Speaker 3: Excellent, very good. Let's go to some props, and we 324 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 3: encourage this of course with any bit you make, but 325 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:49,640 Speaker 3: shop those lines, especially when it comes to the player 326 00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:51,600 Speaker 3: props that are available. What do you got for is 327 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,680 Speaker 3: Sean Zarillo in the prop market for UFC two seventy five. 328 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:57,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, one of these fights got canceled, so I only 329 00:14:57,120 --> 00:14:59,800 Speaker 4: have one favorite prop left. The other rould have been Starboys. 330 00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:03,000 Speaker 4: Side the distance that fight is off. Billy already laid 331 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 4: out the case for Jacob malcun Now, I'm not sure 332 00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:07,480 Speaker 4: if this guy could bust the grape if you put 333 00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 4: it in front of him. He is very much a 334 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 4: decision machine, going to try to take you down, hold 335 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:14,720 Speaker 4: you down for extended periods, and in terms of how 336 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,640 Speaker 4: fights are scored now, it's not particularly friendly to the 337 00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 4: judges because he doesn't do a lot of damage. He 338 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:22,560 Speaker 4: just sort of turns himself into a blanket and lays 339 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:26,040 Speaker 4: on top of you. But just by the math Malcot 340 00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:28,800 Speaker 4: is very likely to win his bouts by decision. I 341 00:15:28,960 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 4: projected the decision as sixty percent of his wing condition. 342 00:15:31,560 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 4: I actually probably could have put it higher, closer to 343 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:37,440 Speaker 4: seventy or seventy five percent. There's some plus nine hundreds 344 00:15:37,440 --> 00:15:39,520 Speaker 4: out there on malcoun by decision. And if you just 345 00:15:39,560 --> 00:15:42,080 Speaker 4: take his money line, you take his decision prop. The 346 00:15:42,120 --> 00:15:44,120 Speaker 4: market's telling you that he's going to win a decision 347 00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:46,240 Speaker 4: about thirty five to forty percent of the time and 348 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:48,360 Speaker 4: finish around sixty percent of the time. That doesn't make 349 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:50,480 Speaker 4: any sense to me. It should be double that. So 350 00:15:50,520 --> 00:15:53,680 Speaker 4: I projected a decision number around plus five hundred plus 351 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:55,640 Speaker 4: five to fifty, you can get a plus nine hundred 352 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:57,680 Speaker 4: out there. I like that, probably all the way down 353 00:15:57,720 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 4: to plus seven hundred on malcom by decision. Not a 354 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:02,560 Speaker 4: huge bet for me, about a quarter unit, but I 355 00:16:02,560 --> 00:16:04,920 Speaker 4: think tremendous value based on how he fights and how 356 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:07,640 Speaker 4: he needs to win his fight. It's just a massive number. 357 00:16:08,760 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 3: All right, Billy, you've worked at the you've looked at 358 00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 3: the prop market here, and you've done some surfing. 359 00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:15,000 Speaker 2: What do you have? Yeah? 360 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 5: I wish I would have looked at the prop market 361 00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:18,880 Speaker 5: a little harder before I gave out Malcom straight up 362 00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 5: as soon as I saw the email from Toronto, is like, yeah, no, 363 00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 5: that makes a lot more sense. That's a great line 364 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:25,480 Speaker 5: on that one, But I'm looking at I believe it's 365 00:16:25,520 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 5: the opener between the second fight between Naliang and Silvanna 366 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:32,080 Speaker 5: Gomez Juarez. You can get that one at plus two 367 00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:34,160 Speaker 5: hundred to go the distance, and this is one hundred 368 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 5: and fifteen pound female fight. Like, I really just don't 369 00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:39,080 Speaker 5: understand this line at all. Both women have been finished 370 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 5: in all of their UFC fights. Neither of them have 371 00:16:41,400 --> 00:16:44,320 Speaker 5: a finish though, so I'm not really sure how exactly, 372 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 5: you know, betting markets or sportsbooks think this one's going 373 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:49,680 Speaker 5: to end so early. But Silvannah Huire seems to be 374 00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:52,640 Speaker 5: the better striker. She's got some knockout wins. Naliang has 375 00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 5: some submission wins. 376 00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:56,160 Speaker 2: But they've both fought fairly low level competition. 377 00:16:56,440 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 5: I think the odds are better than not that this 378 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:00,960 Speaker 5: one cancels out to an extent when they're in at 379 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 5: least moderate level competition in each other. We've got the 380 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:05,480 Speaker 5: big cage for the pay per view event one hundred 381 00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 5: and fifteen pound women, This one shouldn't be plus two 382 00:17:07,600 --> 00:17:08,479 Speaker 5: hundred to go the distance. 383 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:10,960 Speaker 4: I also really like the over one and a half 384 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 4: there as well. I you know, maybe there's a late 385 00:17:13,359 --> 00:17:16,320 Speaker 4: finish here, but you rarely get an over one and 386 00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:18,760 Speaker 4: a half in a woman's fight, particularly a strawweight fight, 387 00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:22,800 Speaker 4: particularly a lower level strawweight fight, where maybe these girls 388 00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:26,159 Speaker 4: are finish reliant, but I don't necessarily see it. I 389 00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:29,520 Speaker 4: again would project this closer to the divisional average in 390 00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:30,080 Speaker 4: terms of the. 391 00:17:30,040 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 3: Line UFC two seventy five significant also from a DFS perspective, 392 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:43,200 Speaker 3: Daily Fantasy because this event actually kickstarts the Draft Kings 393 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 3: Fantasy Championship, so this week is the first round. Full disclosure, 394 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:50,800 Speaker 3: I'm in Connecticut, so I don't get to pull up 395 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:53,520 Speaker 3: the contest. So I turned this over to Billy and 396 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:55,919 Speaker 3: he gives us his DFS breakdown. What do you have 397 00:17:55,960 --> 00:17:56,520 Speaker 3: for us, Billy? 398 00:17:57,200 --> 00:17:59,600 Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm very excited for this one. I qualified for 399 00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:01,680 Speaker 5: the champion all the way back in December, so it's 400 00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:03,920 Speaker 5: been a real slow burn. We were never quite sure 401 00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:05,600 Speaker 5: exactly when they were going to start it off. But 402 00:18:06,040 --> 00:18:08,679 Speaker 5: I really like the format here. There's seventy qualifiers. The 403 00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 5: first round of it is basically a cash game because 404 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 5: thirty of the seventy get through. So that's where my 405 00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:15,080 Speaker 5: head's at in terms of dfs this week. I'm really 406 00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:17,080 Speaker 5: just looking at the best cash plays. And it's an 407 00:18:17,080 --> 00:18:19,000 Speaker 5: interesting week for cash games because we have two five 408 00:18:19,080 --> 00:18:22,720 Speaker 5: round title fights. We have another assuming high action fight 409 00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:27,360 Speaker 5: between Jang and Dradchick on the main card, and I'm 410 00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 5: not quite sure that we can just stack all four 411 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:32,120 Speaker 5: title fighters on this one. That's baking two losses into 412 00:18:32,119 --> 00:18:36,199 Speaker 5: your lineup automatically. And then we've seen such ridiculous stopajojs. 413 00:18:36,200 --> 00:18:38,000 Speaker 5: You know, Sean laid out the case or YEARI Glover, 414 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:41,200 Speaker 5: so that one's pretty interesting. I think you're definitely gonna 415 00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 5: want to just have one of those guys because whoever 416 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:43,600 Speaker 5: loses that. 417 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:45,679 Speaker 2: One probably has almost nothing in terms of score. 418 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:48,520 Speaker 5: We also both were on you know, the Santo Chevchenko 419 00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:50,480 Speaker 5: fight to be a little bit closer than the betting lines, 420 00:18:50,680 --> 00:18:51,439 Speaker 5: So that's where I'm going to. 421 00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:54,160 Speaker 2: Look to stack for my cash games. And then again, 422 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 2: you know. 423 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:56,840 Speaker 5: We talked about young Jake Chick. She's fairly cheap, I 424 00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 5: think only seventy four hundred, seventy two hundred something like that, 425 00:19:00,640 --> 00:19:02,240 Speaker 5: and just giving the output in the volume that she 426 00:19:02,240 --> 00:19:04,399 Speaker 5: could put up over three rounds. That's, you know, my 427 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:07,680 Speaker 5: Schanzerla special in terms of a female underdog with long 428 00:19:07,720 --> 00:19:09,679 Speaker 5: stop of Jodds who's probably gonna at least give you 429 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:12,280 Speaker 5: a decent score even in a losing performance. 430 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:15,200 Speaker 2: Beyond that, it's pretty weak at the top end. 431 00:19:15,280 --> 00:19:17,600 Speaker 5: My favorite like nine thousand plus fighter is now off 432 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 5: the card and Manual cop so I think sing Win 433 00:19:20,800 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 5: Shoi has a decent odds or a decent path to 434 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:25,800 Speaker 5: putting up a big score. He's really the only thing 435 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 5: I like at the top end. 436 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:29,920 Speaker 2: In the middle. You know, Sean talked about Steve Garcia. 437 00:19:29,960 --> 00:19:32,159 Speaker 5: I also really like Jack della Madalina, who will get 438 00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:34,440 Speaker 5: to in a little bit. And then if you're going cheap, 439 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:36,560 Speaker 5: we like Jacob malcoun. You know, Brendan Allen should be 440 00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 5: able to get up a bunch of times if he 441 00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:40,320 Speaker 5: gets taken down. Could he rack up seven or eight 442 00:19:40,359 --> 00:19:42,639 Speaker 5: takedowns giving himself a good score even in a loss. 443 00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:45,680 Speaker 5: I think that one's pretty likely. So I'm pretty much 444 00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:47,639 Speaker 5: staying away from the GPPs this week. You guys are 445 00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 5: on your own if you're trying to build those tournament lineups. 446 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:51,480 Speaker 5: But that's what I'm looking for in terms of the 447 00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:53,840 Speaker 5: mostly cash game format of the championship round. 448 00:19:55,160 --> 00:19:57,000 Speaker 3: Very good showing any anything you want to weigh in 449 00:19:57,040 --> 00:19:58,399 Speaker 3: on before we go to best bets. 450 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:02,320 Speaker 4: It's eleven fights, so you need to be unique. If 451 00:20:02,320 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 4: you are playing GPPs, maybe Santos against Shifchenko is a 452 00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:07,280 Speaker 4: way to get there. Would expect your chanco to be 453 00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:10,679 Speaker 4: extremely highly owned, but yeah, just try to be different 454 00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 4: and definitely go contrarian this week if you're playing tournaments, 455 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:15,440 Speaker 4: because you don't have too many options. 456 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:18,919 Speaker 5: And Santos can be in even the tournament optimal with 457 00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:21,439 Speaker 5: the loss here right, if it goes five rounds, then 458 00:20:21,480 --> 00:20:23,280 Speaker 5: she has good output, gets a takedown or two, some 459 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:25,679 Speaker 5: control time against defense. If we don't see a lot 460 00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 5: of underdogs put up big scores, that wouldn't shock me 461 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:28,239 Speaker 5: at all. 462 00:20:28,280 --> 00:20:29,879 Speaker 2: So I think she's a much better tournament player than 463 00:20:29,960 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 2: chef Chenko. 464 00:20:30,800 --> 00:20:32,760 Speaker 4: And I think this is a good card for underdogs. 465 00:20:32,760 --> 00:20:34,359 Speaker 4: You know, you could definitely take a shot with a 466 00:20:34,359 --> 00:20:36,159 Speaker 4: lot of these dogs. Maybe you don't even get close 467 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:40,080 Speaker 4: to the maximum salary if you're playing a line up 468 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:41,320 Speaker 4: and you want to be contrariy and just take a 469 00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:45,960 Speaker 4: bunch of dogs. Maybe one favorite and go completely contrarian here, Billy. 470 00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:48,040 Speaker 3: Of course, we wish you luck, I mean thank you. 471 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:50,199 Speaker 3: We hope to check back in and you're moving on. 472 00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:53,119 Speaker 5: So yeah, I'll be tweeting out the link on Saturday 473 00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:54,879 Speaker 5: night if anyone wants to sweat it out with me 474 00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:57,600 Speaker 5: so we can all I'll dred that throughout the night. 475 00:20:58,160 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 3: Nice love that for you. All Right, let's go, Let's 476 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:06,000 Speaker 3: go to best bets. We will start with Sean Zarillo. 477 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:09,399 Speaker 4: Already laid out the case for the unders in the 478 00:21:09,440 --> 00:21:11,720 Speaker 4: main event, and of the bunch, the under two and 479 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:13,639 Speaker 4: a half at minus one seventy I think is the 480 00:21:13,680 --> 00:21:15,680 Speaker 4: sweet spot. I stayed away from the under one and 481 00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:17,399 Speaker 4: a half. Maybe there's a tep and pace early, but 482 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 4: I don't see this fight going over halfway. Both guys 483 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:24,919 Speaker 4: very vulnerable defensively. Either it could get knocked out. Glover 484 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:27,920 Speaker 4: definitely has a high probability of his submission as well 485 00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:31,760 Speaker 4: or a technical knockout on the ground positional TKO. So 486 00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 4: definitely love the unders in the main event amongst my 487 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:36,879 Speaker 4: biggest bets of the year. With the unders in the 488 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:38,880 Speaker 4: Gatol of Aer fights, the under two and a half 489 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:40,640 Speaker 4: at minus one seventy is the play. 490 00:21:42,119 --> 00:21:42,439 Speaker 2: All right. 491 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,680 Speaker 3: Speaking of dogs and getting some some plus money, we've 492 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:47,679 Speaker 3: done that quite a bit on this episode today on 493 00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 3: the Action Network podcast UFC two to seventy five. Billy, 494 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:52,080 Speaker 3: you've got some plus money for your best bet? 495 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:53,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, just slightly. 496 00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 5: Here I'm looking at Jake Matthews at plus one twenty five. 497 00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:58,679 Speaker 5: He's fighting hundred at Fiallo in Fiallo. 498 00:21:58,800 --> 00:22:01,120 Speaker 2: This is his fourth fight already in twenty twenty two. 499 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:03,560 Speaker 5: You know, Brendan mentioned it earlier. This fight's in Singapore. 500 00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:06,200 Speaker 5: He's been traveling all over the place, and I think 501 00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:08,399 Speaker 5: staying busy to an extent is probably a good thing 502 00:22:08,440 --> 00:22:11,200 Speaker 5: for MMAY fighters. But you know, it's when you're between 503 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:13,119 Speaker 5: fights and when you have those long layoffs and training 504 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:15,679 Speaker 5: camps is when fighters really get better. I think this 505 00:22:15,760 --> 00:22:17,240 Speaker 5: is going to start to catch up to Fiallo at 506 00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:19,520 Speaker 5: a certain point. Like four fights in six months is 507 00:22:19,560 --> 00:22:22,240 Speaker 5: just an insane pace. And it's also a tough matchup. 508 00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:25,000 Speaker 5: You know, Jake Matthews probably has all the grappling upside here. 509 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:27,720 Speaker 5: He's getting about two takedowns for fifteen minutes. Fiallo is 510 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:29,159 Speaker 5: just going to come out and swing and try to 511 00:22:29,160 --> 00:22:32,400 Speaker 5: put you away early. Fiallo doesn't have great striking defense, 512 00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:34,639 Speaker 5: so I think it's pretty close to a coin flip 513 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:36,960 Speaker 5: in terms of the stand up, although Fiallo is the 514 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 5: better power. But if Matthews is smart, he's just gonna 515 00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:41,080 Speaker 5: put him on his back, do some damage on the 516 00:22:41,080 --> 00:22:42,960 Speaker 5: ground hunt for submissions, which he's. 517 00:22:42,800 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 2: Done pretty well in the past. 518 00:22:44,400 --> 00:22:47,040 Speaker 5: So plus one twenty five i'd have this fighters about 519 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:49,280 Speaker 5: a coin flip, or honestly, maybe even Matthews is a 520 00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 5: slight favorite, so plus one twenty five is a good 521 00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:52,359 Speaker 5: value on him. 522 00:22:52,680 --> 00:22:55,160 Speaker 4: Yeah, Fialla is such a headhunter to very one dimensional. 523 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:57,679 Speaker 4: He doesn't throw any kicks, So if Jakes is very 524 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 4: smart about game planning, I could definitely see him as 525 00:23:00,600 --> 00:23:02,640 Speaker 4: the favorite. He's just mentioned that he could. He thinks 526 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:04,080 Speaker 4: he could take Fiallo out on the feet. 527 00:23:04,640 --> 00:23:05,000 Speaker 2: I don't know. 528 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:07,000 Speaker 4: Jake Matthews is a weird guy. He's a bit new 529 00:23:07,040 --> 00:23:08,880 Speaker 4: to le trains with a small gem like. He makes 530 00:23:08,920 --> 00:23:11,240 Speaker 4: me nervous. But I would certainly lean Matthews if I 531 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:12,400 Speaker 4: was picking a side in that fight. 532 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:15,480 Speaker 5: You and you always just hope that that's just fighters 533 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 5: talking just to talk, because like you have to say that, 534 00:23:17,680 --> 00:23:19,880 Speaker 5: like I've never you know, I've had some interviews and stuff. 535 00:23:19,920 --> 00:23:21,000 Speaker 5: I'm not going to go, oh well, I'm just going 536 00:23:21,080 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 5: to try to take him down and make this boring, 537 00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:24,879 Speaker 5: like you can't say that ahead of a flight. So 538 00:23:25,200 --> 00:23:27,040 Speaker 5: hopefully it's just running his mouth and that's not really 539 00:23:27,119 --> 00:23:29,040 Speaker 5: the plan. But you know, if it is, he'll be. 540 00:23:29,080 --> 00:23:29,920 Speaker 2: It all right. 541 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:33,320 Speaker 3: Looking forward to it, gents, UFC two seventy five, Saturday 542 00:23:33,400 --> 00:23:37,440 Speaker 3: Night in Singapore at the Singapore Indoor Stadium. Looking forward 543 00:23:37,480 --> 00:23:40,360 Speaker 3: to it for Action Network Senior writer Sean Zarello again 544 00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:45,080 Speaker 3: former pro MMA Fighter, our MMA Analystic, Action Network Billy Ward, 545 00:23:45,320 --> 00:23:47,640 Speaker 3: Brendan glass Sheeen. We come to you every Friday, of course, 546 00:23:47,640 --> 00:23:50,440 Speaker 3: when there is an event to preview. Every Friday here 547 00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 3: on the Action Network Podcast. Best of luck with all 548 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 3: of your bets and your picks, folks. We'll join you 549 00:23:55,480 --> 00:24:01,160 Speaker 3: again next time. Thanks for tuning in, and don't then 550 00:24:01,680 --> 00:24:01,920 Speaker 3: Sai