Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Hug, the DNC's Delusional Night two.
Speaker 1: In the books Deep State Yates goes full Live Democrats,
Speaker 1: dust Off Russia, Insanity and good Year Band Maga hats.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission where
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America Great American Again, The buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show begins. He's a great guy. No, welcome everybody to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. Honor and a privilege to have
Speaker 1: you here. As it always is. And now with each
Speaker 1: passing day, it's like we're just we're both hurtling toward
Speaker 1: and slowly crawl toward. The election. Depends on what time
Speaker 1: of day you ask me. I can't tell if the
Speaker 1: time is flying or if it's like we're locked in
Speaker 1: solitary confinement and all the time just blends together. But
Speaker 1: we are going to get there soon to the election,
Speaker 1: and it will. The good news is that it will
Speaker 1: be done at some point that I can promise you.
Speaker 1: The bad news is that if we lose, things are
Speaker 1: going to be pretty rough. And the President certainly understands that.
Speaker 1: Play clip four. You know better than anyone. The survival
Speaker 1: of our nation is at stake in this election. And
Speaker 1: I will tell you I never thought i'd say it
Speaker 1: because we had a great election. We had a great
Speaker 1: election a little while ago, four years ago. I never
Speaker 1: thought i'd say anything could compete with twenty sixteen. This
Speaker 1: election that we're going into is the most important election
Speaker 1: in the history of our country because we had cricket Hillary.
Speaker 1: But this is something these people are sick, and we
Speaker 1: have to make sure that this radical left, socialist and
Speaker 1: beyond because this is beyond socialism, this is beyond socialism,
Speaker 1: that it doesn't happen or we will indeed have Venezuela
Speaker 1: on steroids. So we can't do it. So here's here's
Speaker 1: what I would want to spend some time on today.
Speaker 1: When people talk about the survival of the nation is
Speaker 1: at stake, that I think automatically at least sounds to
Speaker 1: most of us like political exaggeration, right, the fiery words
Speaker 1: of a political season. But isn't it possible for the
Speaker 1: nation of a survival to truly be at stake? And
Speaker 1: by that I do not mean that everyone in the
Speaker 1: country will die. It's not that all of us individually
Speaker 1: our survival is at stake. No let's let's just pose
Speaker 1: it here for the purposes of discussion. As the DNC,
Speaker 1: it really just tries to misrepresent what it is and
Speaker 1: and it's rewriting history every night in real time as
Speaker 1: well as just constantly lying. There's constant lying that goes on.
Speaker 1: They always accuse Trump of that. I think it's so fascinating.
Speaker 1: Democrats can't speak it scenes about any policy issue or
Speaker 1: any major issue of political contention without just making stuff up,
Speaker 1: make it crap up, that's what they do. But the
Speaker 1: survival of the nation, when I think of that term,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking of, is it the same country at its core,
Speaker 1: at its essence that it was before. Is it possible
Speaker 1: for a nation to die? Well, of course we know
Speaker 1: if a country is invaded by a foreign country, it
Speaker 1: can be overrun, overtaken the nation. We've seen this all
Speaker 1: throughout history. In fact, human history is really in many
Speaker 1: ways a cataloging when you look back into what we've
Speaker 1: paid attention to, a cataloging of the powerful invading and
Speaker 1: overtaking the week in different parts of the world for
Speaker 1: as long as we've had human history and eliminated. Sometimes
Speaker 1: they bring in that society into their own and there
Speaker 1: can be more pleasant ways for societies to combine than
Speaker 1: just the force of arms. But generally speaking, it's seizure
Speaker 1: from the outside and that country can cease to exist.
Speaker 1: In fact, if you look in ancient Greek literature, you
Speaker 1: look at the most famous, the most famous epic poem
Speaker 1: of all time, the Iliad. It's about the destruction of
Speaker 1: a city, and how the ancient Greeks consider that the
Speaker 1: elimination of a polis, which was their equivalent of a
Speaker 1: nation state, the elimination of the polis was the worst
Speaker 1: calamity that could befall mankind. There could be nothing worse
Speaker 1: than the absolute destruction of a city, because then it
Speaker 1: also usually meant the enslavement and or murder of all
Speaker 1: of its inhabitants. Now, I'm not worried about the Democrats
Speaker 1: yet trying to round us all up into camps or
Speaker 1: anything like that, and I'm really not worried about that.
Speaker 1: I am worried about what happens to this country if
Speaker 1: they win this election. Is it the same country once
Speaker 1: they've had their way for four years? And I think
Speaker 1: that perhaps we've forgotten a little bit because we've had
Speaker 1: three years of a Trump corrective to the Obama presidency.
Speaker 1: Just how radical and how far the Obama administration took
Speaker 1: us toward socialism and state control. He didn't get everything.
Speaker 1: There were some areas they were They were stymied on amnesty,
Speaker 1: they were blocked on full federalization of whether we're talking
Speaker 1: about the climate of healthcare. There were some places where
Speaker 1: they weren't able to go all the way. But they
Speaker 1: keep as progressives. There is actually a lot of truth
Speaker 1: in that name, because they keep progressing along with their agenda.
Speaker 1: They would say it's progress for the betterment of humanity
Speaker 1: and of America. But I'm telling you that they are
Speaker 1: incrementally gaining ground. Conservatives for a long time now have
Speaker 1: been on defense, and this is part of our philosophical
Speaker 1: a philosophical disadvantage. You know, the old line standing athwart history,
Speaker 1: yelling stop right from Buckley, that's what we're supposed to do.
Speaker 1: The problem with that is that we're going to eventually
Speaker 1: not be there to stand athwart that history. Right. We're
Speaker 1: eventually in a position where they get something, and then
Speaker 1: we don't want to use the same state mechanisms to
Speaker 1: push back what they've taken. We say, okay, that's settled now,
Speaker 1: whether it's the Supreme Court, whether it's aspects of our culture.
Speaker 1: Even now, I don't even know how. Don't even can
Speaker 1: make jokes anymore. Nothing's allowed to be funny. We have
Speaker 1: allowed humor and this seems small, but it's not small.
Speaker 1: We've allowed humor in America to be effectively eliminated. There
Speaker 1: are some very small areas where you're allowed to make jokes.
Speaker 1: There are so many things that I would love to
Speaker 1: let rip on this show, but I know that while
Speaker 1: funny might get me in a bit of trouble, and
Speaker 1: in this cancel culture we live in, just not worth it.
Speaker 1: You do a risk calculation, it is just not worth it.
Speaker 1: And this is all through all throughout our day to
Speaker 1: day now and because of social media, everybody is now
Speaker 1: plugged into the matrix of politics. Just walking outside your
Speaker 1: home now, just going out on the street, Oh, you're
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask. Someone might take a photo of
Speaker 1: you that could go viral. You have an argument with
Speaker 1: somebody in the store. If you go into a restaurant
Speaker 1: and say, why am I wearing a mask? When I
Speaker 1: walk in? But then I sit down, the mask is down,
Speaker 1: This doesn't make sense. Somebody might start a fight with
Speaker 1: you about that go on video. And so now you
Speaker 1: have the hyper politicization of society which has been going
Speaker 1: on now for years, and you also have a Democrat
Speaker 1: scorched dirt, stop at nothing approach to power, right. And
Speaker 1: this is why the Marxism at the root of say,
Speaker 1: the BLM movement, and ultimately the statism. I know this
Speaker 1: seems contradictory, but there is statism at the heart of
Speaker 1: Antifa as well. They call them solves Antifa, but liberals
Speaker 1: call themselves liberal and they're anti liberty, which well I
Speaker 1: call them libs as a not fond shorthand Antifa says
Speaker 1: they're anti fascists, but they doth protest too much. They
Speaker 1: are in fact, much closer to fascists than any other
Speaker 1: political movement in the country at this point. Do what
Speaker 1: they say. They have a list of demands, and their
Speaker 1: demands for the state. The state must do the following
Speaker 1: things and have the power to enact the following policies.
Speaker 1: They are statists, they are fascists. They seek the levers
Speaker 1: of government power. They do not actually want anarchy, not
Speaker 1: in the sense that people usually consider anarchy. I mean
Speaker 1: the true the classical anarchists who had fights stretching back
Speaker 1: to the turn of the twentieth century. In the late
Speaker 1: nineteenth century, fights with the Marxists, the socialists over what
Speaker 1: the best society would be, the classical anarchists, and you
Speaker 1: can look at Michael Bakounin and there are others that
Speaker 1: wrote about the need to eliminate state power or in
Speaker 1: order to have independent collectives, which starts to sound a
Speaker 1: lot more like communism, But that's fanciful Pine the sky
Speaker 1: stuff that never really caught on. Antifa today is in
Speaker 1: fact an entity of the Democrat Party that also pretends
Speaker 1: to be as American as apple pie when it is
Speaker 1: a socialist party. So when we're talking about the as
Speaker 1: the President says, the survival of a nation at stake,
Speaker 1: nations can die from politics and culture. A nation can
Speaker 1: end itself because there are enough people and it doesn't
Speaker 1: have to be a majority, and it usually isn't. It's
Speaker 1: a dedicated minority that decides this country needs to be
Speaker 1: radically upended. Bernie Sanders uses rhetoric like we need a
Speaker 1: political revolution in these in this country. Okazio Cortez is
Speaker 1: calling for revolutionary changes to our system. They put Biden
Speaker 1: forward because he is supposed to fool people. Oh, it
Speaker 1: can't be that bad. He is a figurehead of the establishment,
Speaker 1: so called normalcy that the Democrats are pretending they still represent.
Speaker 1: But the moment you dig down into the policies, the
Speaker 1: things they approve, the things they disapprove of, you recognize
Speaker 1: that this is a party that has moved dramatically from
Speaker 1: where it was even twenty years ago, even fifteen years ago.
Speaker 1: Conservatives largely want the same things life, liberty, to pursuit
Speaker 1: of happiness, contracts to be honored, streets to be safe
Speaker 1: from crime, everyone to be judged in the same way
Speaker 1: under the law, race neutral, race blind justice system, low taxes,
Speaker 1: limited government. You know, we have a philosophy that we
Speaker 1: try to stick to over time. The philosophy hasn't shifted.
Speaker 1: Sometimes we're imperfect with it, but we're still trying to
Speaker 1: because we think that's what creates And now we can
Speaker 1: get into Plato and soccer, but we think that's what
Speaker 1: creates a good society. For Democrats, it's about racking up wins.
Speaker 1: They're progressives. We want this. We want abortion for all
Speaker 1: nine months of our pregnancy. Got it good. Put that aside.
Speaker 1: We want racially conscious, We want, essentially the racial entitlement statement.
Speaker 1: Good have that keep that. We want a government that
Speaker 1: can spend trillions and trillions of dollars a year creating
Speaker 1: financial bondage for future generations that they have no say
Speaker 1: and because that gives us power, now good? Got it?
Speaker 1: Add that to the ledger. They keep racking up winds
Speaker 1: because they view it as the accumulation of power. We
Speaker 1: on the other side of this are trying to say, no,
Speaker 1: hold on, let's decentralize, let's move power aside, let's let
Speaker 1: individuals make choices, let's pursue freedom. Freedom is under assault now, friends,
Speaker 1: It's under assault in a way that I've never seen
Speaker 1: it before in my lifetime. This is worse than the
Speaker 1: aftermath of nine to eleven from a civil liberties perspective,
Speaker 1: from a government intrusiveness in a perspective, we're seeing things
Speaker 1: that I would have assumed the American people would revolt against,
Speaker 1: shutting down private parties, threatening to arrest people because they
Speaker 1: won't do something that they claim is scientifically necessary with
Speaker 1: wearing a bandana over your face. But there's actually no
Speaker 1: science that proves that this is necessary, and any scientific
Speaker 1: necessity through policy would have to be a question of
Speaker 1: benefit in a risk and reward. It's not even viewed
Speaker 1: that way. It's do what we say or else, do
Speaker 1: what we say or else. Was Russia the same country
Speaker 1: after the October Revolution and the Soviet the Soviets took power, No,
Speaker 1: of course, not have changed this name. Even so, we
Speaker 1: know that a country can end that wasn't for an invasion,
Speaker 1: that was internal, that was internal dissent. Those were radicals
Speaker 1: from within their own society that had been around for
Speaker 1: many years. Stalin was an agitator in the Georgian underground
Speaker 1: for a long time. Of course, his name isn't Stalin,
Speaker 1: that means man of steel. His name was Yosip Yosif Jugasvili.
Speaker 1: But he was running in these commi circles. And guess
Speaker 1: what he was a journalist of sorts, a man who
Speaker 1: would print these little pamphlets about the need for a
Speaker 1: more equitable and more fair society. And it eventually, at
Speaker 1: the moment that was most vulnerable to the Russian nation
Speaker 1: state and the state of the Czars, he and well
Speaker 1: others along with him let him, were able to seize power,
Speaker 1: change the whole transform the whole country. Do you really
Speaker 1: think that if Joe Biden gets into power, Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is his VP that they won't pursue amnesty, which will
Speaker 1: mean that the Democrat Party will what we see in
Speaker 1: California will become America very high taxes, the racial entitlement state,
Speaker 1: where some people get some benefits that other people don't get. Criminality,
Speaker 1: excused litter, and lawlessness in the streets, justified and inept
Speaker 1: government promising things that it can't deliver on taking from
Speaker 1: the middle class and pretending they're actually really taking from
Speaker 1: the rich will always find ways to avoid avoid this pain.
Speaker 1: And also rich people raising their taxes isn't really going
Speaker 1: to be noticed that much. But for people that are
Speaker 1: making fifty k, one hundred k, one hundred and fifty k,
Speaker 1: taxes matter a lot. So that's what's going to happen,
Speaker 1: the california Ization of the whole country. If the next
Speaker 1: election goes to the Democrats, does that mean that America
Speaker 1: is the same place afterwards? I wouldn't be surprised if
Speaker 1: in time they wanted to start having constitutional amendments. Excise
Speaker 1: some constitutional amendments, they'll remove the Second Amendment if they can,
Speaker 1: and oh they can't. Buck why you think Texas will
Speaker 1: stay red forever. You think Florida's going to stay red forever.
Speaker 1: They use the system of government itself to promote the
Speaker 1: political party that is the Democrats, that is the socialists.
Speaker 1: They leverage this themselves. And look at the way that
Speaker 1: they use institutions, the teachers unions, Democrat Power Center, right,
Speaker 1: the federal government and all of its various bureaucrats, Democrat
Speaker 1: Power Center, Hollywood, academia, all these different places that create perception. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: in our society, they're all in the tank for the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. You think they really can't pull this off.
Speaker 1: Look at where we are now. We're in a society
Speaker 1: where you will be mocked and ridiculed for saying that
Speaker 1: you don't want your twelve year old girl in school
Speaker 1: to be showering next to a twelve year old boy
Speaker 1: and you can't call him a boy anymore. And this
Speaker 1: is real, folks, this is happening right now. You think
Speaker 1: that they're going to stop. No, the Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: going through both a mass delusion and a mental illness
Speaker 1: brought on by Trump which they they view him as
Speaker 1: a threat to all that they hold dear and what
Speaker 1: they think about themselves, and so whatever it takes to
Speaker 1: defeat him, they'll do. And the people that are most
Speaker 1: equipped to defeat him are the same ones that are
Speaker 1: the most radical, the people that are willing to do
Speaker 1: anything to exploit the media, to use academia illicitly against
Speaker 1: this president, the deep state actors within the federal government.
Speaker 1: They want to destroy him. And once they do, once
Speaker 1: they beat him, who's going to hold them back? Or
Speaker 1: you think this Republican Party is just ready with all
Speaker 1: the fighters in the background, I don't think so. The
Speaker 1: survival of the nation is in fact at stake, because
Speaker 1: if you think America is a set of ideas, traditions, history,
Speaker 1: and culture, all of that is under assault from the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They want to change it. They are telling you that's
Speaker 1: the goal. They are taking actions already to that end,
Speaker 1: and they want this to be a very fundamentally different country,
Speaker 1: as Obama said, a fundamental transformation of this country. If
Speaker 1: they win the next election, that's the goal. That's the plan,
Speaker 1: and those are the stakes you're in the freedom mind.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Congresswoman ilhan Omar,
Speaker 1: I mean, I hear the booze. How to hell did
Speaker 1: she win the primary? How the hell did she win?
Speaker 1: This woman is crazy, She's a horrible woman who hates
Speaker 1: our country. Mail in vote, Who'll have to check there,
Speaker 1: Let's check the mail in vote the Seriously, how does
Speaker 1: a woman who hates our country, who says nothing but
Speaker 1: bad things about our country and Israel and other of
Speaker 1: our allies? How does this woman win? Where are the
Speaker 1: people that would vote for him? Are called the Minneapolis
Speaker 1: police a cancer and said they were rotten to the route.
Speaker 1: But Joe Biden did not condemn the comments. He didn't
Speaker 1: want to talk about it. He didn't disavow her endorsement.
Speaker 1: He displays it proudly on his website. This is what's
Speaker 1: going to be running the country. It's true, AOC Tolib
Speaker 1: Pelosi is fine with all of this too. As long
Speaker 1: as she stays in power. She has no problems. And
Speaker 1: she's a she's a lib. That's what you're going to see.
Speaker 1: You know, these are the people, these are the individuals.
Speaker 1: You know, Schumer and Pelosi and Tolib and Omar, They're
Speaker 1: gonna be running the country if Trump loses this election.
Speaker 1: How does that make anybody who cares about this country feel?
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. To the Busess and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Long time listeners of this
Speaker 1: show know that I've been saying that deep state Yates
Speaker 1: was a partisan hack all along. It was obvious her
Speaker 1: completely unnecessary grandstanding. I will not I will not carry
Speaker 1: out the order of this president when it comes to
Speaker 1: the travel band. Remember the travel ban ended up being
Speaker 1: upheld by the Supreme Court, so Elliates mighty a legal refresher.
Speaker 1: But she showed everybody who she was there, and that
Speaker 1: was a brand move for her. That was Oh, all
Speaker 1: the libs now know who she is after she had
Speaker 1: been working from behind the shadows, behind the fiction of
Speaker 1: her civil service role, you know, just helping out, just
Speaker 1: helping out the country, helping out people, No no political
Speaker 1: beliefs whatsoever. That's what she wants you to think, hiding
Speaker 1: behind that fiction for many years at the DOJ, along
Speaker 1: with people like Struck and Page and Lynch and Komey
Speaker 1: and right, this is all. This is all part of it.
Speaker 1: And I've known that she's somebody who hated Trump and
Speaker 1: was a giant lib and was one of these these
Speaker 1: deep staters all along, and I think she was much
Speaker 1: more involved in some of the efforts to take down
Speaker 1: the Trump administration than we have even yet found. I've
Speaker 1: always thought she was the one who, when she heard
Speaker 1: about the Logan Act and all this stuff trying to
Speaker 1: get General Flynn was was involved in all of this
Speaker 1: in ways that we have yet to fully even understand.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping the DRM report will at least give us
Speaker 1: clarity on that. But and I told you, I think
Speaker 1: that you've seen probably your only, your only prosecution from
Speaker 1: the DRM report already. And if that's the case, I'm right,
Speaker 1: and I've been right all along, So we'll see. I
Speaker 1: could be wrong. But when they when they go after
Speaker 1: someone like Yates or Comy, you know, when they bring
Speaker 1: charges against somebody of that stature, that then we'll know
Speaker 1: that the GOP is going to get some justice. Then
Speaker 1: will know that the DJ is is serious. You know,
Speaker 1: the left goes all the way. The right always says, well,
Speaker 1: we don't want to be too rough, and we see
Speaker 1: how that plays out time and again across our country.
Speaker 1: But here is Yates doing exactly what I knew she
Speaker 1: would do, which is just read me. Why is she
Speaker 1: speaking of the DNC. I thought she was a non
Speaker 1: partisan civil servant. Oh you mean she's actually a Democrat
Speaker 1: hack operative kind of like. It wasn't really the Mueller probe.
Speaker 1: It was the Weissmann probe. We were told, Oh, no,
Speaker 1: he's a career dj guy. He's not some ideological democrat
Speaker 1: using the prosecutor's powers to go after his political enemy.
Speaker 1: Oh and then he came out and was going to
Speaker 1: start doing fundraisers for the DNC. Friends, let's let's stop
Speaker 1: with this nonsense. Look, I always say this, I can't
Speaker 1: There are certain situations in which I know that I
Speaker 1: can't trust people if I think that they're a committed
Speaker 1: ideological lib Professionally, it's very very hard to do that.
Speaker 1: I think you do that at your own risk. Too
Speaker 1: many ways, to too many ways to get hurt with that.
Speaker 1: So here's Sally Yates saying that Putin was trying to
Speaker 1: pick our president the return of the Russia Collusion delusion
Speaker 1: play eleven. Well, I think that this report establishes the
Speaker 1: same thing that the Muller report did, and the same
Speaker 1: thing that our intel community had found before, but they've
Speaker 1: done it in even greater detail now, and that is
Speaker 1: that the Russians were interfering in our election to try
Speaker 1: to assist at Donald Trump. Essentially, Vladimir Putin was trying
Speaker 1: to pick our president. And even more frightening thing I
Speaker 1: think is that they're still up to it. They're still
Speaker 1: working now in this election. They're still working now, and
Speaker 1: they're still Putin's trying to pick Trump. The Russians at
Speaker 1: this point have just got to be laughing their asses
Speaker 1: off at us, or at least at the Democrats that continue, well, no,
Speaker 1: probably all of us, because we hoped to sit around
Speaker 1: and deal with this. This is idiocy. Putin didn't pick Trump. Okay,
Speaker 1: sixty three million Americans or whatever the number was in
Speaker 1: twenties sixteen who voted for him. Did Trump has ninety
Speaker 1: seven percent, ninety nine percent approval in the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: There's this is a fantasy. But she continues with this.
Speaker 1: This was part of what you saw the DNC last night.
Speaker 1: These people have learned nothing. Have you ever seen her
Speaker 1: out there apologizing for spying illegally on Carter Pitch? Oh?
Speaker 1: But Buck, they used the FIZA process. Yeah, they cheated
Speaker 1: in the FISA process. You know, this would be like
Speaker 1: a cop who shows up at the scene of a
Speaker 1: suspected of a suspected criminals house and plants a gun,
Speaker 1: and then for years we hear, well they found the
Speaker 1: gun in his house. Yeah, but they planted it there.
Speaker 1: They cheated, But no, they don't. They don't care if
Speaker 1: people are so. One of the big issues with this
Speaker 1: whole Russia Gate spygate mess is that it proves who
Speaker 1: has good judgment and who's actually smart, who could really
Speaker 1: think through that issue and figure it out. All these
Speaker 1: liberals who think they're very bright, Oh, look at their
Speaker 1: credentials and look at the careers they've had in government
Speaker 1: service or whatever. They believed all this because they're just
Speaker 1: not as smart as they thought they were. That's very important. Ego,
Speaker 1: the connection from ego to politics matters a lot to people,
Speaker 1: and as I've said, it's one of the most powerful
Speaker 1: aspects of the Democrat brand. It gives very unimpressive people
Speaker 1: an excuse to think they are much more impressive than
Speaker 1: they are. That's one of the most powerful parts of
Speaker 1: being a liberal today. It comes with all of this,
Speaker 1: Oh look at me, I'm one of the I'm one
Speaker 1: of the smart, good people. I care so much because
Speaker 1: I vote Democrat. I care so much about the poor.
Speaker 1: I care so much about downtrodden minorities, right, I care
Speaker 1: so much because I vote for Joe Biden. I don't
Speaker 1: think that casting a vote for Donald Trump means something
Speaker 1: about a person. It means that they want things that
Speaker 1: they believe Donald Trump will do in office, and they
Speaker 1: support his actions as president or the actions you would take,
Speaker 1: and that would take again for four more years. But
Speaker 1: Sally Yates I've known all along. She just she reminds
Speaker 1: me of people that I knew in the intelligence community
Speaker 1: when I worked there, that have been around a long time,
Speaker 1: and they were just the most smug, sanctimonious lives. Mediocrits,
Speaker 1: intellectual mediocrits who burrow deep into the bureaucracy and become
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy mediocrity. They become somebody who were supposed to
Speaker 1: look up to and listen to. It's terrifying that she
Speaker 1: was making decisions at the DJ that affected people's lives.
Speaker 1: She's not a just person. She believes all this crap.
Speaker 1: I'm sure she would tell you that Rovie Wade was
Speaker 1: a good, constitutionally sound decision, which is dumb, right. I'm
Speaker 1: sure she would say all the things that you would
Speaker 1: expect a lib to say. She was acting Attorney general
Speaker 1: of this country under the Trump administration. Granted during the transition,
Speaker 1: but that's what was happening here. That's how high up
Speaker 1: the chain she went. And now she's a hero over
Speaker 1: an MSNBC speaking at the DNC and willing to carry
Speaker 1: water for the weekend at Berney's presidency of Joe Biden
Speaker 1: played ten well. I think Joe Biden is absolutely up
Speaker 1: to the task. You know, when I think about this election,
Speaker 1: to me, it all really comes down to who do
Speaker 1: you trust, Who do you trust to put the country first,
Speaker 1: who do you trust to live up to our values,
Speaker 1: and who do you trust to tell us the truth.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, you know, has all of those things. And
Speaker 1: when people talk about, you know, the decency and integrity
Speaker 1: that he has, that's absolutely the case. The decency and
Speaker 1: integrity that he has. Let's think about that for a moment.
Speaker 1: We know that he has been a plagiarist. We know
Speaker 1: that he's lied about his background, just flat out lied
Speaker 1: to puff himself up for political advantage. And we know
Speaker 1: that Democrats, until what feels like five minutes ago, recognize
Speaker 1: that he was an unimpressive and just generally deficient politician.
Speaker 1: He was a senator from Delaware, which is really like
Speaker 1: being the you know, top alderman for the city of
Speaker 1: San Francisco or something like. No one's really that impressed.
Speaker 1: It's just not anything that you would think is a
Speaker 1: stepping stone to the presidency. And yet they forget all
Speaker 1: of this now and tell us that he's such a
Speaker 1: good man. Why is he such a good man? I
Speaker 1: want to know. Was he such a good man when
Speaker 1: he would go swimming naked in front of female members
Speaker 1: of his Secret Service detail? Was that really respectful and cool?
Speaker 1: Was that a cool thing for me? Because he did that.
Speaker 1: I've been told that by people who are honestly good
Speaker 1: service details. So was that really cool? Was that really respectful,
Speaker 1: great guy thing to do. They have torn everything about
Speaker 1: Trump's life apart. They have lied about him. They've brought
Speaker 1: up divorces, They've made these accusations about you know, Stormy Daniels,
Speaker 1: who has no evidence that she ever actually had a
Speaker 1: relationship with Trump, but somehow she has no evidence of it,
Speaker 1: but you know, we're supposed to believe her, And she
Speaker 1: had the most dishonest and disgusting lawyer in the country.
Speaker 1: Remember that guy. I mean, the Democrats keep assuming that
Speaker 1: we all have no memory of what they've said before,
Speaker 1: what they're willing to do they had. It's funny. I
Speaker 1: want to call him the creepy porn lawyer, which I
Speaker 1: know is what Tucker calls him. I'm forgetting his name. Now,
Speaker 1: what's what's that guy's name? He's uh, I want it's
Speaker 1: not scarro mooch. The mooch is a different guy. No,
Speaker 1: the creepy porn lawyer. Who's the ah, I'm you know who?
Speaker 1: You know who I'm talking about. You know, he's now
Speaker 1: in a position where I think he's going to federal prison.
Speaker 1: Abanati I remembered, now Avanati, Michael Avanati. He was on
Speaker 1: CNN seventy times. I think at one point over a
Speaker 1: three month period, seventy times that guy was on. He
Speaker 1: was like the most frequent guest on CNN for a while.
Speaker 1: A total scum, an unethical. This is a guy who
Speaker 1: steals money from a client of his. You know who's
Speaker 1: in a wheelchair. Democrats elevated this person, elevated him, said
Speaker 1: that he was great, thought about maybe having him run
Speaker 1: for president, But now they want to play the oh
Speaker 1: we care so much about character game for Joe Biden's benefit.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has lied repeatedly about the tragic accident that
Speaker 1: killed his then wife, and I believe it was his daughter.
Speaker 1: I know he lost a child. I think it was
Speaker 1: a daughter, not a son. He's lied about that and
Speaker 1: said that the guy was drunk, A horrible slander. The
Speaker 1: guy was not drunk the car accident. There's actually a
Speaker 1: record of this. His wife drifted into the l with
Speaker 1: an oncoming truck and there was a tragedy, a horrible
Speaker 1: tragedy the truck. No, nobody was drunk on the other side.
Speaker 1: That's a that's a really terrible thing, but it's it's
Speaker 1: part of Joe Biden's just make stuff up. Says that
Speaker 1: he marched in the civil rights movement. He never marched,
Speaker 1: said that he was arrested to go see Mandela, was
Speaker 1: never really arrested. I mean, this guy is a serial fabricator.
Speaker 1: And you know he's got his son Hunter on the
Speaker 1: boards of companies and using his name and all this stuff,
Speaker 1: and everybody knew. They'll pretend they didn't now that that
Speaker 1: was gross and unethical, even if it wasn't necessarily illegal.
Speaker 1: But who knows Joe Biden such a great, such an honorable,
Speaker 1: decent guy, how because he's got a big grin and
Speaker 1: we'll shake hands and you know, puts on the whole
Speaker 1: blue collar Joe, I ride Amtrak thing. He's worth like
Speaker 1: forty million dollars now, gave a lot of speeches and
Speaker 1: you did a lot of glad handing for big checks
Speaker 1: as soon as he could. Now. I'm not opposed to
Speaker 1: people making money in this world, but at the political level,
Speaker 1: it feels a little bit like buying influence. Right, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's speeches are not worth one hundred k or one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty k a pop, just like Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: How many Clinton speeches do you think there are right
Speaker 1: now or there have been in recent years where Bill
Speaker 1: or Hillary gets a half a million dollars for a speech.
Speaker 1: How many of those do you think there have been.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go zero since Hillary lost because it wasn't
Speaker 1: really about paying for speeches, it was about buying influence.
Speaker 1: But again, we're told that Joe Biden is so ethical
Speaker 1: and so decent from someone like Sally Yates, who I'm
Speaker 1: sure hasn't lost a night's sleep about the ruination of
Speaker 1: General Flynn's character and life by her and her colleagues
Speaker 1: out of partisan spite because they are such cry babies. Now,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of things that I believe are
Speaker 1: defining characteristics for Democrats, but being a bunch of cry
Speaker 1: babies is at the top of the list. If they
Speaker 1: don't get their way, a freak out, they don't have
Speaker 1: the mental and emotional and spiritual fortitude to accept that.
Speaker 1: You know, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, you move on.
Speaker 1: This is why they can't accept that they lost the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election. They couldn't accept they lost the two
Speaker 1: thousand election because it's a party of cry babies. Sallyates
Speaker 1: is a part of it, and she's a cheerleader for
Speaker 1: all the crybabies. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Donald Trump says, we're leading
Speaker 1: the world. Well, we are the only major industrial economy
Speaker 1: to have its unemployment rate triples at a time like this.
Speaker 1: The Oval Office should be a command center. Instead, it's
Speaker 1: a storm center. There's only chaos, just one thing. Never
Speaker 1: changes his determination to deny responsibility and shift the blame.
Speaker 1: The buck never stops there. Now you have to decide
Speaker 1: whether to renew his contract or are someone else. If
Speaker 1: you want a president who defines the child of spending
Speaker 1: hours a day watching TV and sapping people on social media,
Speaker 1: he's your man. Denying, distracting, and demeaning works great if
Speaker 1: you're trying to entertain or inflame, but in a real crisis,
Speaker 1: it collapses like a house of cards. COVID just doesn't
Speaker 1: respond any of that. To beat it, you've got to
Speaker 1: actually go to work and deal with the facts. Our
Speaker 1: party is united and offering you a very different choice.
Speaker 1: Notice how they always say there's a failure of leadership
Speaker 1: with Trump and that we could have beaten COVID if
Speaker 1: we did what exactly? What's the claim there? India huge
Speaker 1: surgeon cases in the last couple of months, Brazil, huge
Speaker 1: surgeon cases. What were we supposed to do that was
Speaker 1: going to beat COVID? I never say it. But more
Speaker 1: importantly to me right now than that comment from Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton is the photo of him getting a BackRub from
Speaker 1: one of the Epstein sex slaves that The Daily Mail published.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, hats off. The Daily Mail is one
Speaker 1: of the best websites out there these days. Ever since
Speaker 1: Drudge abandoned us and went crazy. You know the Daily Mail. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of tabloidy, trash stuff. But they also
Speaker 1: they break big stories. They got the George Floyd first
Speaker 1: ten minutes of the arrest video out, They got this,
Speaker 1: the photos of Bill Clinton getting a BackRub. They break
Speaker 1: news that Democrats don't want right now, you can see
Speaker 1: that the national news media they're not going to do
Speaker 1: anything that hurts Democrat chances. Now. I don't want to
Speaker 1: get conspiratorial about the Epstein stuff because that's very easy
Speaker 1: to do. But I will say Bill Clinton has lied
Speaker 1: about this. He has lied about the frequency of his
Speaker 1: travel and his travel to so called pedophile islands. Lied
Speaker 1: about these things. And Bill Clinton talking about the propriety
Speaker 1: of what's going on in the Oval office is beyond comedy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I just know what I was there. I would just
Speaker 1: be like, hey, what's upen, You know, I'd say, you
Speaker 1: know what I really need right now? I need some
Speaker 1: time with an intern. I need to just I need
Speaker 1: to mentor that intern for a long long time. So
Speaker 1: everyone knows to shut the doors. And that is who
Speaker 1: the Democrats rallied around defended. Let's recall that all their
Speaker 1: stuff about Trump. Trump hasn't done anything while he's the
Speaker 1: president in the oval office that is in the same
Speaker 1: universe as the stuff that Bill Clinton was doing when
Speaker 1: it comes to propriety, when it comes to decency and
Speaker 1: an honorableness, And yet he's still speaking at the DNC.
Speaker 1: I don't I honestly, no person of intelligence should give
Speaker 1: a crap with Bill Clinton has to say about anything.
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton is like an accident of political history. The
Speaker 1: only reason that his presidency wasn't an even greater wasn't
Speaker 1: a disaster, was because he managed to get out of
Speaker 1: office before he got hit with nine to eleven, which
Speaker 1: was all all the momentum, all the planning was occurring
Speaker 1: while he was the president, wasn't doing crappy battocks, who's
Speaker 1: too worried about the Monica hearings. And he got very
Speaker 1: lucky with the creation really and the exponential expansion of
Speaker 1: the Internet and all the economic activity that came along
Speaker 1: with that, and had a divided government and Newt Gingridge
Speaker 1: and a Republican Congress, so they were able to hold
Speaker 1: them in check at some level. But they're not impressive
Speaker 1: about Bill Clinton. People look at the Bill Clinton legacy
Speaker 1: what was it exactly. You go back and look at
Speaker 1: what his federal government. I mean, it's just stunning. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. It was coordinated. You had Stone coordinating it.
Speaker 1: You had Stone talking to Wiki Leaks, who had Stone
Speaker 1: talking to Trump. They knew when all of this was
Speaker 1: coming out. You had Stone, on the day of the
Speaker 1: Access Hollywood tape coming out, push to get the Wiki
Speaker 1: Leaks information out there because he wanted to stir the
Speaker 1: pot up and have a distracting headline. So again, anybody
Speaker 1: that talks about a Russian hoax, as I've said weeks ago,
Speaker 1: as I wrote in a Washington Washington Vost column a
Speaker 1: few weeks ago, They're just gonna look like absolute fools
Speaker 1: and useful idiots throughout throughout history. I don't know if
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough's playing a character in the Mornings where he's
Speaker 1: a moron, a moronic Republican, or just a moron. I
Speaker 1: don't understand how anybody can be this deluded at this point,
Speaker 1: especially because remember who he was a big Trump fan
Speaker 1: during the actual presidential contest of twenty sixteen. Then Joe
Speaker 1: and Mika had a falling out with Trump and it's
Speaker 1: all personal. That's all that matters. The Russia hoax is
Speaker 1: a hoax. What are you talking about, oh Stone? And
Speaker 1: you know, talking to Wiki leaks and this thing and
Speaker 1: the other thing and what Everyone who has looked at this,
Speaker 1: who has been a final word on any aspect of it,
Speaker 1: has said no evidence of Russia collusion whatsoever. None. Roger
Speaker 1: Stone sending a message to wiki leaks, there is nothing there.
Speaker 1: This is the Muller probe didn't find any collusion. You
Speaker 1: had a group of Democrats get together under the guise
Speaker 1: of being a special counsel who were running a destroyed
Speaker 1: Trump operation, and they came up with nothing at the end. Nothing.
Speaker 1: They did everything they could, but they couldn't fabricate the evidence.
Speaker 1: Although in retrospect, I'm sure some of them were upset
Speaker 1: about it. But you see, the Democrats still continue to
Speaker 1: believe that Russia collusion was real, no matter how many
Speaker 1: reports there are, no matter how many commissions and hearings
Speaker 1: and special counsels, They're gonna go back with this. This
Speaker 1: is stunning to you. You hear this and go back.
Speaker 1: Why are we even These people are lunatics, they're nuts, yes,
Speaker 1: but this is powerful for the Democrat Party. They're bringing
Speaker 1: back to Russia. As I have been telling you for months,
Speaker 1: They're bringing back Russia. Oh, Russia collusion. Wait, it's fake. No,
Speaker 1: it's real, it's real. It's absolutely it's absolutely absurd. It's
Speaker 1: just it's just wrong. What's going on here? It's just wrong.
Speaker 1: But that's what we see happening. That is the circumstance
Speaker 1: in which we find ourselves. You have let's see here,
Speaker 1: Oh David David Pluff on a MSNBC really going for
Speaker 1: it on this Russia stuff. Play one. I think next
Speaker 1: week's convention, the Republican mention is far more important because
Speaker 1: he's behind. So what does he do? Is it basically
Speaker 1: a series of grievances and insults in White power hours?
Speaker 1: Or does he try and make a compelling argument for
Speaker 1: a second term. So again, I think the Russia story
Speaker 1: is should make Democrat redouble their efforts in vigilance and
Speaker 1: understand we're up against a lot here voting in a pandemic.
Speaker 1: Maybe a postal service delays a lot of confusion, disinformation.
Speaker 1: The Russia is doing everything they can to have their
Speaker 1: asset remain in the Oval office. As strange as that sounds,
Speaker 1: but it's more motivation. So whether it's front certain the election,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I think it should give us
Speaker 1: all more motivation because who knows what little second term
Speaker 1: will be. Like I think we do know it will
Speaker 1: be Moscows for the taking. His second term will be moscows.
Speaker 1: Still the Russian assets stuff. It's like we haven't learned
Speaker 1: anything in the last four years. There's been no investigation,
Speaker 1: there's been no people or nuts. They'll believe us no
Speaker 1: matter what. The conspiracy will never go away. They'll never
Speaker 1: abandon this. They'll never say, you know what, maybe we
Speaker 1: were a little bit off on that one. Do they
Speaker 1: ever look at what we found out about people like
Speaker 1: struck in Page and now this guy Kline Smith, who
Speaker 1: were either get doing things that are bad enough to
Speaker 1: get fired from their jobs their senior bureaucrat jobs in
Speaker 1: the government, or in the case of Cline Smith that
Speaker 1: maybe even get a felony conviction. They ever look at that?
Speaker 1: Why was that happening? Just imagine for a second that
Speaker 1: the Bush administration had its top officials involved in a
Speaker 1: clear conspiracy to ensnare the incoming Obama National security advisor
Speaker 1: in a perjury trap and were lying on FIZA forms
Speaker 1: to do a surveillance of somebody associated with the Obama campaign.
Speaker 1: These are facts. This is what we know that happened.
Speaker 1: We would it would be Watergate times ten. I mean,
Speaker 1: the liberal It's all you would hear about for eternity.
Speaker 1: In fifty years, you would still have libs whining about
Speaker 1: the targeting of the Obama administration by the Bush administration.
Speaker 1: And they pretend like what happened to Trump is nothing.
Speaker 1: They pretend that this was all somehow fine, it was warranted.
Speaker 1: In fact, he's an asset of Moscow. How by getting
Speaker 1: NATO to be stronger than it was in the past,
Speaker 1: by blowing up a couple of one hundred Russian paramilitaries
Speaker 1: in the Syrian desert, by sending Javelin anti tank missiles
Speaker 1: to the Ukrainian militaries that they can blow up Russian
Speaker 1: paramilitaries in eastern Ukraine. That's how he's Putin's puppet. They
Speaker 1: say this because they think it sounds smart, and there
Speaker 1: their audience, they're smart of the in Russia. Russia, ha ha, No,
Speaker 1: this is appearing at the DNC. They've they've brought this
Speaker 1: narrative back because the truth never really mattered. They prefer
Speaker 1: to live in this in this delusion where Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is a Russian asset and Hillary Clinton, oh, didn't commit
Speaker 1: over a hundred, over one hundred crimes of classified information
Speaker 1: miss handling what she did as clear as as day
Speaker 1: she did. We all know that. But look, people don't
Speaker 1: want to believe it. They're wrong. They never want to
Speaker 1: have to face reality, intellectual and emotional accountability or things
Speaker 1: that liberals reject wholesale. They want none of that. They
Speaker 1: want to just believe what they believe and think what
Speaker 1: they think. The Trump supporters that I know, and I
Speaker 1: just was down in North Carolina having a lot of
Speaker 1: conversations with Trump supporters. Just people came up, they wanted
Speaker 1: to talk and they're all, there's always stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: I wish Trump would do this right. They're very clear
Speaker 1: eyed about what they see from the Trump administration that
Speaker 1: they like and don't like. They don't worship him, they
Speaker 1: like the movement. They like the sense of there's kind
Speaker 1: of a little bit of a sense of Trump, you know,
Speaker 1: a little bit of sense of troublemaker Joy just by
Speaker 1: going around with your maga hat on and everything else.
Speaker 1: You know, they like that there's something fun about this,
Speaker 1: but they also understand that it's not perfect, and you
Speaker 1: got to keep pushing the president to do the right thing.
Speaker 1: This DNC stuff that you're hearing now is just all
Speaker 1: it's all a construct. They are trying to cobble together
Speaker 1: a coherent narrative of why Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: should be the President and Vice President of the United States, respectively,
Speaker 1: when they don't really believe. They don't really believe a
Speaker 1: lot of things that they're saying in order to convince
Speaker 1: people of this. But it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: There are things that they want, They want to see
Speaker 1: their team in. This is just the most basic, straightforward tribalism.
Speaker 1: My side has to win, my team has to win,
Speaker 1: and if that means they have to continue to lie
Speaker 1: about the Russia stuff, they are happy to do so
Speaker 1: and will continue to do so even though it's oh
Speaker 1: eight the dumb sky on TV. Steve Schmidt's out there.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not selling out people you to work for.
Speaker 1: He's gone TV saying dumb things and being a dumb
Speaker 1: ass play twelve. Look, the campaign was compromised, it colluded
Speaker 1: with the Russian government, with the Russian intelligence services. There
Speaker 1: was a stock top to bottom with useful idiots. And
Speaker 1: the Russians are doing the same exact thing in this
Speaker 1: election cycle, spreading misinformation. The misinformation is routinely repeated by
Speaker 1: United States senators like Lindsey Graham and Ron Johnson, poisoning
Speaker 1: the discourse in this country, and it says nothing about
Speaker 1: your Trump's behavior over these recent years as president of
Speaker 1: the United States is fetished for booting the insistence that
Speaker 1: they're not being interpreters in the room. It's incredibly suspicious behavior.
Speaker 1: But concussion about whether there was collusion between the campaign
Speaker 1: and the Russian government, it's been settled for a long time. Look,
Speaker 1: the word collusion has a meaning in the English line,
Speaker 1: which and the actions that the campaign made, but the
Speaker 1: meaning of their word they I mean, this is the
Speaker 1: ultimate gas lighting. We've gone through years of hearings and
Speaker 1: investigations and prosecutions and all this the Mola report, no collusion,
Speaker 1: There was no collusion, and here you have a former
Speaker 1: republic I mean, this guy is just a political mercenary,
Speaker 1: will do whatever to get paid by whoever, don't care,
Speaker 1: has no principles, has no honor, and he's really a
Speaker 1: scummy fellow. All you have to know is that HBO
Speaker 1: made him the good guy in the Just Crash Sarah
Speaker 1: pale In movie. They did game change. If HBO makes
Speaker 1: you to be, if HBO makes you the good guy
Speaker 1: in a movie about politics, you're the bad guy. But
Speaker 1: this is what you're going to see, the continuation of
Speaker 1: the false narrative of Russia collusion. That's what they're gonna say.
Speaker 1: That's what they're gonna do. And they don't care that
Speaker 1: they're misliving their audience. They don't care that this is absurd,
Speaker 1: that this is wrong. In fact, I think they kind
Speaker 1: of enjoy. They enjoy the epic thermonuclear level gas lighting
Speaker 1: that they're engaging in. Here. What there was, There was collusion,
Speaker 1: Yeah there was. This is the Democrat Party's equivalent of
Speaker 1: slapping you across the face and then five minutes later
Speaker 1: saying I didn't slap you. That's what Russia collusion is
Speaker 1: for them, and their bass loves it. You're in the fedot.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, the most durable,
Speaker 1: the most pernicious, the most unfair, destructive, and favorite lie
Speaker 1: of the Democrats is about Trump praising praising the white
Speaker 1: nationalists in Charlottesville. I mean, we've heard more about that
Speaker 1: gathering of whatever it was, a couple one hundred maybe
Speaker 1: white nationalists, than any other group of disgusting racists I
Speaker 1: think in history. Yeah, they're morons, they're evil, no one
Speaker 1: likes them, no one supports them. But why do we
Speaker 1: keep hearing about it? Well, one, because I remember there
Speaker 1: was this whole story about the rise of white nationalism
Speaker 1: beginning in Trump all these news stories, Oh, white nationalists
Speaker 1: are on the march, white nationalists and the white This
Speaker 1: was like the Red Scare, except it was the white
Speaker 1: nationalists scare. It wasn't real, by the way, the Red
Speaker 1: Scare was real. Whole other conversation. There were penetrations of
Speaker 1: the government, there were fellow travelers. There were communists who
Speaker 1: today would just be called Democrats, who were working for
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union. But anyway, this is why we have
Speaker 1: to keep fighting over history. We can either fight over
Speaker 1: history we can let them completely rewrite it for their
Speaker 1: own purposes using falsehoods, innuendos, and smears like the sixteen
Speaker 1: nineteen project does. Right that's what we can either we
Speaker 1: can either fight back on this or allow them to control,
Speaker 1: allow the left to control the narrative of this country.
Speaker 1: But the lie about Charlottesville, for me, is always a
Speaker 1: test because it is so easily disproven. But they don't care.
Speaker 1: The allegation they think is still too powerful. Their base
Speaker 1: gets so excited when they hear it. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: that it's a lie. They get usage out of it.
Speaker 1: Even though here's Kazir Khan, who, remember it is a
Speaker 1: gold star father who appeared in a political political capacity
Speaker 1: to attack the president. And here is what he's saying
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump. Again, this is the Democrats are all
Speaker 1: the greatest anti Trump hits. That's what they're rolling out
Speaker 1: with now play fifteen three years ago, my beloved city, Charlottesville, Virginia,
Speaker 1: was attacked by white supremacists and a young woman was killed.
Speaker 1: We were attacked again when Donald Trump praised those racists,
Speaker 1: turning his back on a community that just wanted peace.
Speaker 1: That was the day Joe Biden decided to join this
Speaker 1: battle for the soul of America. Over time, my wife
Speaker 1: Lazzella and I have come to know his soul. He's
Speaker 1: a decent compassionate man. He will bring this nation together.
Speaker 1: He's lying. The President didn't praise the Charlottesville racist just gold.
Speaker 1: You don't have to take my word for it. Go
Speaker 1: watch the video, look at the transcript. I mean, he
Speaker 1: said something that was could be open ended interpretation if
Speaker 1: you really want to be giving him no benefit of
Speaker 1: the doubt at all. And within the same you know,
Speaker 1: the President obviously speaks very free form it and clarified
Speaker 1: in that same press conference and that I'm not talking
Speaker 1: about the white nationalist I'm talking about the people that
Speaker 1: were in favor of keeping some of the statues because
Speaker 1: of our history, which is a debate that still goes
Speaker 1: on to this day in society. The Trump praised the
Speaker 1: Charlotsville white nationalist. Lie is why you can't trust himcrats
Speaker 1: because they all sign on for this because it's so
Speaker 1: emotionally um, so emotionally volatile. Right. You hear that, and
Speaker 1: you say, oh my gosh, the President United States praise
Speaker 1: neo Nazis, and he noticed that where have been all
Speaker 1: the other have there been only all these other neo
Speaker 1: Nazi rallies or white nationalist rallies across the country, Because
Speaker 1: then I remember the first two years of the Trump presidency,
Speaker 1: we were always being told that there was this this
Speaker 1: huge rise of the white nationalists, and where where are
Speaker 1: all those routes that they don't exist, They're not happening.
Speaker 1: If they did, oh my gosh, it would be the
Speaker 1: biggest news story in the country. But it was all
Speaker 1: useful at the time to cover this and to create
Speaker 1: a narrative of Trump as the bad guy who supports
Speaker 1: white nationalists, even though there's just there's not a basis
Speaker 1: for this in reality. Just look at look at the transcript.
Speaker 1: That's what I've been saying along. Look at the transcript,
Speaker 1: and you know for yourself that they will they will
Speaker 1: continue to mislead you, they will continue to just make
Speaker 1: things up about this, and it's just never It's never
Speaker 1: gonna stop. It's never gonna stop. Oh. I also want
Speaker 1: to point out to you that socialist Warren is out there.
Speaker 1: I saw. I kept having a hard time with this.
Speaker 1: Was she really speaking at a at a like a
Speaker 1: Native American Caucus meeting or something. I kept saying this online,
Speaker 1: which I find that hard to believe. But maybe maybe
Speaker 1: they did do that. I don't know. I feel like
Speaker 1: it was the parody from the Sacramento Sacramento Bee. What
Speaker 1: the Babylon Bee whoop Sacramento Bee is a real thing,
Speaker 1: unintentional parody. Here's Warren on what's going to happen if
Speaker 1: the Democrats win. Just remember this one, folks play thirteen.
Speaker 1: Let's just look at the facts. Joe Biden has committed
Speaker 1: to build back better and let me tell you what
Speaker 1: that means. Three jail Biden his own plans. It means
Speaker 1: investing in working families. So he said he's going to
Speaker 1: invest in childcare, in canceling student loan debt, that he's
Speaker 1: going to expand Social Security, and better care for seniors,
Speaker 1: including seniors that are cared for at home. He says
Speaker 1: he's going to make the rich pay their fair shares.
Speaker 1: Going to be painful for you to Stephen, but that's
Speaker 1: what's going to happen. That he's going to insist on
Speaker 1: corporations having some accountability. These are the kinds of plans
Speaker 1: that I don't think are just about Democrats. I think
Speaker 1: these are the plans that all of America wants. These
Speaker 1: are the plans that will make our country work, not
Speaker 1: just for a handful of folks at the top, but
Speaker 1: make our country work for everyone? Make the country work
Speaker 1: for everyone? What does that mean? That's my favorite question
Speaker 1: ask about things that Democrats say. What does that really mean?
Speaker 1: The country work for everyone? There are people who work,
Speaker 1: the people who don't work, and the Democrats want to
Speaker 1: give more from the people who work the people who
Speaker 1: don't work. So is that working for everyone? I just
Speaker 1: I want to know what they really mean by this.
Speaker 1: We know that they mean they want to get rid
Speaker 1: of cops. Play a sixteen. Why can't folks imagine a
Speaker 1: world without the cops? Why can't folks imagine a world
Speaker 1: without prisons? Why can't people expand their imaginations to include
Speaker 1: community care, to include an abolitionist future. And I'm talking about, like,
Speaker 1: for real for abolition, not just watered down d NC
Speaker 1: version of abolition. We're talking about abolishing the police. We're
Speaker 1: talking about abolishing ice, We're talking about abolishing prisons. Your
Speaker 1: Democrat party, folks, that's what they want. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. There's this trend among conservatives in the media,
Speaker 1: at least that I see, where they're always kind of
Speaker 1: looking for an opportunity to show the general public that
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're how how decent they are. You
Speaker 1: could call this virtue signaling, and I think that we
Speaker 1: saw a bit of this when it comes to the
Speaker 1: Jill Biden. Look, I watched the Joe Biden speech, the
Speaker 1: John Kerry speech, I heard the John Legend performance. I
Speaker 1: gotta say I was telling Bruser Mark for the show
Speaker 1: John Legends pretty talented. I mean, his politics are super
Speaker 1: annoying and his wife treats people horribly on Twitter, but
Speaker 1: the guy is talented. But I watched these speeches and
Speaker 1: I was I was seeing all of this, all of
Speaker 1: this happening. I'm thinking of myself, Um, well, first of all,
Speaker 1: what is the message that they're really trying to get
Speaker 1: across with all of this, because it feels quite a
Speaker 1: bit disjointed. But then I watched the Jill Biden that
Speaker 1: Jill Biden's speech, and it was interesting because I saw
Speaker 1: it after all of the conservatives that were out there saying, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, Jill Biden is so amazing and so impressive
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. Okay, let's take a look at
Speaker 1: that for a second. Here's part of Jill Biden. Notice
Speaker 1: not doctor Joe Biden, Jill Biden. Here's her speech, Play eight.
Speaker 1: The burdens we carry are heavy, and we meet someone
Speaker 1: with strong shoulders. I know that if we entrust this
Speaker 1: nation to Joe, he will do for your family what
Speaker 1: he did for ours. Bring us together and make us hope,
Speaker 1: carry us forward in our time of need, keep the
Speaker 1: promise of America. Okay, this is pretty boilerplate standard political rhetoric.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's nothing in there that you wow, that's
Speaker 1: really a compelling point. I would like them to show us.
Speaker 1: I would like to know what is the what is
Speaker 1: the new information that we have because even Democrats were
Speaker 1: aware as of last year, even Democrats were aware of
Speaker 1: the deficiencies of Joe Biden. They didn't want him as
Speaker 1: their as their candidate early on in the primary. I
Speaker 1: know it all. It all shifted over time, but nobody
Speaker 1: was in immediate least excited about Joe Biden. He ran
Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight and he couldn't get above
Speaker 1: a couple of percentage points. So what is what has changed? Well,
Speaker 1: he fits the need that Democrats have to try to
Speaker 1: convince swing state voters that the Democrats are not the
Speaker 1: party of lunatics like AOC, who don't know anything, who
Speaker 1: are full of self righteousness and are just ignorant and dangerous.
Speaker 1: They want to get away from that. So they're going
Speaker 1: to go with, oh, you know, how dangerous can the
Speaker 1: government be in the hands of Joe Biden. That's their pitch.
Speaker 1: But I just want some information about what has changed
Speaker 1: about Biden that we should believe makes him qualified now.
Speaker 1: When even Democrats realized he wasn't qualified before they put
Speaker 1: John Carry ahead of this guy. They put John John
Speaker 1: Cary spoke last night here the most most boring, the
Speaker 1: most boring and pompous, worthless politician in the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: In many ways Play fourteen. For the eight years of
Speaker 1: the Obama Biden administration, we led by example. We eliminated
Speaker 1: the threat of an Iran with a nuclear weapon. We
Speaker 1: built a sixty eight nation coalition to destroy ISIS. We
Speaker 1: forged one hundred and ninety five nation agreement to attack
Speaker 1: climate change. We stopped Evola before it became a pandemic.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump inherited a growing economy in a more peaceful world,
Speaker 1: and like everything else he inherited, he bankrupted it. When
Speaker 1: this pressent and goes overseas. It isn't a good will mission,
Speaker 1: it is a blooper reel. He breaks up with our
Speaker 1: allies and writes love letters to dictators. America deserves a
Speaker 1: president who is looked up to, not laughed at. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump pretends Russia didn't attack our election, and now he
Speaker 1: does nothing about Russia putting a bounty on our troops,
Speaker 1: so he won't defend our country. He doesn't know how
Speaker 1: to defend our troops. The only person he's interested in
Speaker 1: defending is himself. That from a guy who was secretary
Speaker 1: of State to a president who escalated over a hundred
Speaker 1: thousand soldiers into Afghanistan so that people would stop pointing
Speaker 1: out that Obama didn't know a damn thing about the
Speaker 1: military or national security or military service or combat or
Speaker 1: any of those things. Who has a foreign policy record
Speaker 1: to stand on here, Let's go back the obamaministration. The
Speaker 1: collapse of Syria into a civil war that turned into
Speaker 1: a regional conflagration where five hundred thousand plus people died,
Speaker 1: led to the rise of Isis, the collapse of Iraq,
Speaker 1: the last minute effort to save the Kords from from
Speaker 1: the genocide of the Islamic State, the collapse of Olivia,
Speaker 1: the spread of ISIS franchises all over the world. ISIS
Speaker 1: inspired mass casualty attacks like the Pulse Nightclub and San
Speaker 1: Bernardino on US soil. How does Obona's foreign policy look
Speaker 1: good to anybody? Again? Oh, begging the Mullah's for a
Speaker 1: deal in Iran? That no person who understands Iran in
Speaker 1: a meaningful way believe that they were going to uh,
Speaker 1: they were going to adherit you over the long term
Speaker 1: and not pursue nuclear weapons when it was all said
Speaker 1: and done. That's that's the legacy. Unbelievable, unbelievable. John Kerry's
Speaker 1: is such a joke and a jerk, but he's at remember,
Speaker 1: Democrat nominee for the presidency. Democrat nominee for the president. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'll admit, like I met Romney not great,
Speaker 1: and he was our nominee. One point, John McCain politician,
Speaker 1: John McCain not great, and he was our you know,
Speaker 1: we've had a straight look Bush. I got very mixed
Speaker 1: feelings about. I do think I think Bush is a
Speaker 1: good guy. But it's very very tough to look at
Speaker 1: the Bush presidency as a conservative and come out of
Speaker 1: that saying that he was really adept in the role
Speaker 1: of president, very very tough folks. Yeah, I see, I'm
Speaker 1: honest here. I mean, John Kerry's a joke. There's a
Speaker 1: guy who just kept he's the gentleman senator from Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: You know, as long as the wife is funding everything else, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, with with with money made by another man.
Speaker 1: By the way, you know, I think the whole thing
Speaker 1: is is really just depressing. Actually, this DNC, I think
Speaker 1: it's a depressing circumstances. All right, let me get back
Speaker 1: to did Jill Biden says he all these conservatives? Oh,
Speaker 1: Jill Biden saw me. I don't have a problem with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. But I don't I don't see what all
Speaker 1: the hubbub is about. I don't really understand. And here's
Speaker 1: a question that I think that should be answered, and
Speaker 1: it won't be, of course. Play nine. The president's campaign
Speaker 1: this week released an ad just really attacking your husband's
Speaker 1: cognitive ability, suggesting that he's lost a step or two
Speaker 1: in the last few years. As far as you're concerned,
Speaker 1: is that a fair attack? Is that something that should
Speaker 1: be debated as part of the campaign. No, No, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: I mean, Joe's on the phone every single minute of
Speaker 1: the day talking to governors who are who are calling
Speaker 1: him and Nancy Pelosi. He's on the zoom, he's doing fundraisers,
Speaker 1: he's doing briefings. I mean, he doesn't stop from nine
Speaker 1: in the morning till eleven at night. So that you know,
Speaker 1: that's ridiculous. Who are you gonna believe Joe Biden's wife
Speaker 1: for your lying eyes. Maybe Joe Biden is also I've
Speaker 1: thought this for a while. He might also just be
Speaker 1: dumber than people have thought before. And so they think
Speaker 1: it's cognitive decline, but maybe it's just cognitive limitation. This guy,
Speaker 1: who's never been somebody of a high intellectual caliber ever,
Speaker 1: no one's ever thought that gives a speech, sounds the part,
Speaker 1: looks the part. You know, he's kind of a throwback.
Speaker 1: He's like the perfect Democrat politician from nineteen eighty five,
Speaker 1: and he was a politician in nineteen eighty five. So
Speaker 1: it's not really surprising when you think about it. And
Speaker 1: we're told he will save the country, we're told that
Speaker 1: he has his finger on the pulse. I just want
Speaker 1: you all to be prepared for the greatest gas lighting
Speaker 1: in the history of your life. That is what will
Speaker 1: be occurring between now in the election, on Russia, on
Speaker 1: Biden's cognitive, a bill at ease, what they used to
Speaker 1: say about Biden, what they used to say about Harris,
Speaker 1: and what they're all gonna be claiming now. It's just
Speaker 1: the truth is going to be so hard to find
Speaker 1: in any media coverage. It's going to be covered in
Speaker 1: a layer of one hundred lies from MSNBC, The New
Speaker 1: York Times, CNN, and all the rest of it. So
Speaker 1: we might we might as well understand that's what it
Speaker 1: is right now. Oh wait, I want here's no Actually,
Speaker 1: we don't want to hear anymore from Biden. I've had
Speaker 1: enough Joe Biden. I don't understand why we're all supposed
Speaker 1: to say it's Oh, it's so impressive. I'm sure. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm sure she's probably a nice lady. I'm not emitting
Speaker 1: against Joe Biden. I'm I'm on some lunatic that hates
Speaker 1: people's families because I disagree with their politics. Actually a
Speaker 1: nice person, But I don't think I have to sit
Speaker 1: around and be like, oh my gosh, Joe Biden. Maybe
Speaker 1: I should vote for Joe because of Jill no, No,
Speaker 1: it's you know, Jesus wife. She's saying nice things about him.
Speaker 1: That's fine, But I also would note that we do
Speaker 1: have this tradition now of spouses and politics get to
Speaker 1: be political figures without really being criticized. Melania gets trashed
Speaker 1: all the time. That the gorgeous six language speaking immigrant
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is married to, She's trashed all the time,
Speaker 1: of course, But if you criticize a Democrat politician's spouse,
Speaker 1: we look, we all know. These are the double standards
Speaker 1: that exist, and we'll continue to exist because liberals will
Speaker 1: gas light us and say that they don't. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, all right?
Speaker 1: So how are we looking right now? With the DNC
Speaker 1: two days done, and we got the Republican Convention coming
Speaker 1: up soon. Poles are starting to tighten. Is Trump gonna
Speaker 1: keep America great with four more years or not? We
Speaker 1: got my man Harlan Hill in the mix to talk
Speaker 1: to us about this. He is a political consultant, a
Speaker 1: buddy of mine down in DC. Mister Harland A while, buddy,
Speaker 1: how are you. It's great to be with you. I
Speaker 1: miss you being down here, but I'm sure you don't
Speaker 1: miss the swamp. Yeah, man, well I miss some of
Speaker 1: the people. I miss some of the people you and
Speaker 1: some of the squad tell him to stay out of trouble.
Speaker 1: All right, what's going on with the Trump campaign as
Speaker 1: you see it right now? And perhaps well, actually let
Speaker 1: me start with this. Well, what do you think this
Speaker 1: DNC is gonna make a bump happen for them? Oh?
Speaker 1: This has been such a flop. You know, I've been
Speaker 1: calling it the Democratic National zoom call. It's painful to watch.
Speaker 1: I mean last night, in particular, the celebration after Joe
Speaker 1: Biden officially accepted the nomination as the as the leader
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party, it was so anti climactic. I mean,
Speaker 1: I pray that on our side, we're taking notes about
Speaker 1: how bad this has gone, like how low the ratings are,
Speaker 1: how anti climactic it is, how small ball it looks,
Speaker 1: and we're making some adjustments so that next week we
Speaker 1: have a stark contrast. But you know, my number one
Speaker 1: takeaway I gotta be honest last night was there is
Speaker 1: still very much a civil war raging within the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party between the AOC wing in the more moderate pragmatic
Speaker 1: wing of the Democratic Party and it was on full
Speaker 1: display last night. I feel like we should, probably because
Speaker 1: we haven't yet done it. Play the clip that got
Speaker 1: a lot of attention last night with AOC mark play two.
Speaker 1: In a time when millions of people in the United
Speaker 1: States are looking for deep, systemic solutions to our crises
Speaker 1: of mass evictions, unemployment, and lack of healthcare. In elispir
Speaker 1: To del Pueblo, and out of a love for all people,
Speaker 1: I hereby second the nomination of Senator Bernard Sanders of
Speaker 1: Vermont for President of the United States of America. Now, however,
Speaker 1: we made a big deal out of this. My understanding
Speaker 1: is that there's some procedural thing where you gotta you know,
Speaker 1: you gotta have the nominating even the people show up
Speaker 1: who aren't going to be to get a nominating. I
Speaker 1: don't know. It's like arcane nonsense about how convention worked.
Speaker 1: But the fact that AOC was the what they picked
Speaker 1: us say this, I think as a reminder of the
Speaker 1: progressive base, Oh don't worry, we're actually gonna be running stuff.
Speaker 1: Absolutely and book. I'll also point out that she could
Speaker 1: have at least referenced Joe Biden in her statement, and
Speaker 1: she didn't. In the two minutes that she was on air,
Speaker 1: that she was given this platform at the Democratic National
Speaker 1: Zoom Call, she didn't throw her support even modestly or
Speaker 1: even acknowledge Joe Biden. So there is a war raging
Speaker 1: within the party. And I also wanted to take note
Speaker 1: of the fact that the Democrats have tried to downplay
Speaker 1: the importance of black lives matter of that they've tried
Speaker 1: to focus less on some of the par left social issues.
Speaker 1: And this isn't an effort if you look at all
Speaker 1: of their messaging to appeal to more moderate voters. They
Speaker 1: know that in order to win, it's not going to
Speaker 1: be AOC's people. Yeah, they've they've they've done the calculus,
Speaker 1: and they think we're gonna have to take part progressives
Speaker 1: for granted, and we're gonna have to move back to
Speaker 1: the middle. Now, as the polls titan, as we get
Speaker 1: closer to the election and they grow concerned about keeping
Speaker 1: their base motivated to get out and vote against President Trump,
Speaker 1: I think that might change. I think that they're going
Speaker 1: to have to make some concessions, especially because someone like
Speaker 1: AOC I think she telegraphed last night, and they're not
Speaker 1: going to be just silent partners in this. They want
Speaker 1: a platform. They want to talk about the Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: They want to talk about socialism, they want to talk
Speaker 1: about universal basic income, they want to talk about socialized medicine. Like.
Speaker 1: They are not going to sit around and just allow
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party to ignore them because they fear that
Speaker 1: once the Democrat the Moderate Democratic Party is in power,
Speaker 1: that they'll be forgotten. So they're going to make their
Speaker 1: mark on this process. What are we expecting because you know,
Speaker 1: you talk the folks from Trump campaign, you know, all
Speaker 1: those people down there. Harlan's a good swamp creature. Everybody.
Speaker 1: He's like, you know, they're in the Wizard of Oz.
Speaker 1: There's the good Witch and the bad Witch. Hardens. Harlan's
Speaker 1: the good swamp creature. So he knows what's going on
Speaker 1: inside the belt. What are we expecting for the r
Speaker 1: NC You said, you hope they've earned their lessons and
Speaker 1: then just the campaign going forward. Do we have the
Speaker 1: right pieces in play for the campaign infrastructure? Are we
Speaker 1: going to have, you know, the best possible showing for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump? Yeah, you know, I'd be I'd be lying
Speaker 1: if I said that. Um, I think this is going
Speaker 1: to be easy. You know, Buck, I look at the
Speaker 1: polling and all of the major battleground states and it's
Speaker 1: tight or we're losing. And I think that the polling
Speaker 1: will will sharpen up as we get closer to November.
Speaker 1: But I know for a fact that the campaign is
Speaker 1: making some adjustments to messaging, to leadership to keep this
Speaker 1: campaign on the right track and to give the president
Speaker 1: the best possible chance at four more years. But I
Speaker 1: know for I also know that just pointing to m
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's mental confidence is asking the question, you know,
Speaker 1: does he have dementia or Alzheimer's? You know that's not
Speaker 1: going to be sufficient. We truly need to start laying
Speaker 1: out in a more articulate way what our plan is
Speaker 1: for the next four years. I mean, I go around town.
Speaker 1: I ask a lot of our fellow Republicans, you know,
Speaker 1: what is the messaging of the Trump campaign in twenty twenty, Like,
Speaker 1: what is the value proposition we're giving to voters for
Speaker 1: why the president deserves four more years? And I haven't
Speaker 1: gotten a coherent answer from a single person that I've
Speaker 1: spoken to. Now, I think that they're making some adjustments
Speaker 1: and they're starting to build out the platform now and
Speaker 1: I think that that will really be rolled out next
Speaker 1: week at the RNC, and so I view the RNC
Speaker 1: as an important make or break reset in the campaign
Speaker 1: and really the formal debut of the reelection effort. Harlan
Speaker 1: Hill everybody political consultant. If I ever ran for office,
Speaker 1: which I won't, I'd have Harlan run the campaign. There
Speaker 1: you go, Harlan Man. Thanks, thanks so much, but buddy,
Speaker 1: talk to you soon. Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: sets and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well,
Speaker 1: luckily it's minimal, but yes, we do absolutely have our challenges.
Speaker 1: We have people who are afraid and scared because of
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. We now have literally tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: people who are unemployed because of the economic downturn occasion
Speaker 1: by the shutdowns that were necessary because of the President's
Speaker 1: failed leadership on COVID nineteen. And we're dealing with the
Speaker 1: reckoning across the Chicago as in many cities across the
Speaker 1: country related to systemic racism. So we are on the
Speaker 1: front line an incredible moments in our civic history, not
Speaker 1: only in Chicago, but across the country. And I have
Speaker 1: to say the remark about the bridges. One of the
Speaker 1: bridges where we put up is near Trump Tower because
Speaker 1: our protesters and vigilantes would love nothing more than to
Speaker 1: attack Trump Tower. So those little notes that I guess
Speaker 1: from Eric Trump after every time that we protected that property,
Speaker 1: if they want us to stop stay the woods, lawlessness, lawlessness,
Speaker 1: and more lawlessness, we all see it. Lory Lightfoot can
Speaker 1: try to come up with as many explanations for while
Speaker 1: the city of Chicago is having record high shootings and murders,
Speaker 1: but we already know what the answer is. We know
Speaker 1: it's because the Democrat Party, in a fit of rage
Speaker 1: and a fit of childish anti Trump anger and feeling
Speaker 1: like they're not in power they need their people in
Speaker 1: power in DC, decided to undermine police and with that
Speaker 1: really a fundamental, a fundamental bulwark of our whole society.
Speaker 1: That's what happened. They can try to come up with
Speaker 1: as many different diversions and digressions from it as possible,
Speaker 1: but it's very clear to anyone who's paying attention and
Speaker 1: being honest that we're seeing the spike in violence in
Speaker 1: the cities. You know they're still looking for that guy
Speaker 1: out in Portland who kicked the individual in the face.
Speaker 1: Many of you might have seen this video. He's pulled
Speaker 1: out of a car, there's an angry mob. They beat,
Speaker 1: they throw him on the ground, and then they beat
Speaker 1: him while he's on the ground, and then this guy
Speaker 1: runs up and just soccer ball kicks him right in
Speaker 1: the face. He's totally defenseless, helpless, doesn't see it coming.
Speaker 1: It's such a cruel and vicious thing. These are all
Speaker 1: Democrats who are doing this. The people that want to
Speaker 1: lecture you how could you vote for Trump? Have no
Speaker 1: contempt for the people that are representing, in their own way,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party who are burning down neighborhoods and attacking
Speaker 1: people and engaged in just the most disgraceful mob activities imaginable, right,
Speaker 1: But they don't care. They don't care the looting, the rioting,
Speaker 1: none of that really matters. In fact, they secretly like it.
Speaker 1: I've always believed that there's a much broader support for
Speaker 1: this looting among Democrats than you'll usually see then you'll
Speaker 1: see out in the open, because they think that America
Speaker 1: needs to be punished. I really believe this. I think
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party believes that America needs to be punished,
Speaker 1: and even if you know it's a collective punishment, and
Speaker 1: even though it's going to affect a lot of Democrats too,
Speaker 1: we need to be made to suffer for the sin
Speaker 1: of electing Donald Trump. And that's central to a lot
Speaker 1: of what you see going on here. You're just never
Speaker 1: going to convince Democrats that he won the election fair
Speaker 1: and square in twenty sixteen. And even if you could,
Speaker 1: then they would say, well, clearly, this country needs to
Speaker 1: be cleansed of its Trump support. This country needs to
Speaker 1: go through a very difficult and danger injurious time for
Speaker 1: the for the crime of electing Donald Trump. That is
Speaker 1: how they view it. You know, I told you this.
Speaker 1: I remember in the twenty twelve election, in Barack Obama
Speaker 1: won four more years. There was no sense, There was
Speaker 1: no part of me that was, oh, you know, let's
Speaker 1: let's say he cheated, or let's pretend he's not the president.
Speaker 1: Let's go march and say he's not really the president.
Speaker 1: Let's figure out a way to entrap his senior officials
Speaker 1: and maybe try to imprison him or members of his family,
Speaker 1: all things that Democrats do when Trump wins. And I
Speaker 1: think that one of the problems in this paradigm that
Speaker 1: we have to address is we've been led to believe
Speaker 1: that the two political parties in this country are like,
Speaker 1: you know, man and wife or you know, a man
Speaker 1: and woman, that that we you need to come together.
Speaker 1: There's an inherent Yeah, they're different. Oh no, I know,
Speaker 1: two genders, right, you're not allowed to say that anymore,
Speaker 1: but that they come together, you know, unitive, and then
Speaker 1: they procreate and it's better for the future, and that
Speaker 1: you know, you need the one. You know, we're yin
Speaker 1: and yang. However, whereever you want to put it, you know,
Speaker 1: we're the necessary ballast in our societies that we have
Speaker 1: these two parties. Keep in mind that the history of
Speaker 1: a lot of political parties around the world is that
Speaker 1: eventually one of them, you know, becomes the hamster in
Speaker 1: the cage that eats all the other hamsters, which, as
Speaker 1: either state, it could happen. Sometimes eventually they they grow
Speaker 1: to a one party a day facto, if not de
Speaker 1: jure one party state. And I think Democrats see that
Speaker 1: in their future. I think that they believe that, and
Speaker 1: I also think that the Democrat Party what it what
Speaker 1: it has stood for in the past that at the
Speaker 1: time was it was either a good idea or at
Speaker 1: least a sensible idea or whatever. They now have reached
Speaker 1: a point where there's nothing that they are advocating for
Speaker 1: that I say, in practice, this will work the way
Speaker 1: they say it will, and it will be good for
Speaker 1: all of us. There's nothing I can think of where
Speaker 1: that is the case. In fact, the same way that
Speaker 1: I tell you, I believe that the Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: movement will make everything worse for everyone. I believe it
Speaker 1: has done that. I believe that the Democrat Party, if
Speaker 1: they're in power, is going to accomplish the same feat
Speaker 1: of making things worse for everybody. I think that's absolutely,
Speaker 1: absolutely the case, and that's why I think it's so
Speaker 1: important that we continue to push with everything we have
Speaker 1: against this Democrat on slot against Trump, because it's it's
Speaker 1: going to be something that we all pay for. If
Speaker 1: they manage to get their way here, and they they're
Speaker 1: able to convince it's not that hard to do. It's
Speaker 1: going to be a very close election. If they're able
Speaker 1: to convince people that they should get another shot, that's
Speaker 1: some kind of a change. Remember hope and change, some
Speaker 1: kind of a change is necessary, then they'll they'll be
Speaker 1: in a position to perhaps turn America into the one
Speaker 1: party state using I already tell you that the mechanism is,
Speaker 1: it's not that hard. They want amnesty. If they get
Speaker 1: amnesty for legal aliens in this country, they have an
Speaker 1: unbeatable national voting advantage because they're gonna get amnesty, and
Speaker 1: then they're going to pass as soon as they can
Speaker 1: voting rights for those who are amnesty in the country.
Speaker 1: That's it's it's a one two punch, folks. There's no
Speaker 1: way that they're not going to do that. And once
Speaker 1: you give a right like that, you're not going to
Speaker 1: able to take it away. So if that happens, then
Speaker 1: you can forget about winning national elections and you're just
Speaker 1: going to be left with whatever you can whatever freedoms
Speaker 1: you think you can get from your state government while
Speaker 1: your state's still read which not going to be that
Speaker 1: many of those left either. So I'm just saying, we
Speaker 1: need to understand what the other side wants and what
Speaker 1: they would do, and we also have to see what
Speaker 1: the tactics are going to be. You know, they've got
Speaker 1: the Russia klue Usian story out there. They've got the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion story, but they've also got this Post office
Speaker 1: situation that continues to play out there. They're talking to
Speaker 1: us all the time about how this is a way
Speaker 1: that Trump is going to steal steal the election. And
Speaker 1: you notice some of the furthest left members of Congress
Speaker 1: are the ones who are pushing this the most. Play seventeen.
Speaker 1: You know, Postmaster de Joy can say whatever he wants
Speaker 1: about what changes will or will not happen in the future.
Speaker 1: He has lost the trust of the American people. He
Speaker 1: has lost our trust to make sure that he will
Speaker 1: follow through. After they said that they would suspend taking
Speaker 1: mailboxes out, there were reports and there was confusion about
Speaker 1: whether that was continuing to happen or not. We need
Speaker 1: to get him under oath on a committee letting us
Speaker 1: know what is happening, and we have to undo the
Speaker 1: damage that he has already done. What damage has already
Speaker 1: been done. And I think it's fascinating that there's the
Speaker 1: assumption that, you know, limiting limiting people's ability to vote
Speaker 1: by the mail is automatically going to dramatic, dramatically benefit
Speaker 1: Democrats every run all across the country, and maybe true.
Speaker 1: But why is that true? I think that's worth digging
Speaker 1: into a little bit more than anybody has recently in
Speaker 1: the media. But the postmaster to joy as bad guy
Speaker 1: story that we're told here, they've already said, we're not
Speaker 1: gonna move. We're not gonna move anymore post office boxes.
Speaker 1: We don't want everybody to freak out, So we're gonna everybody.
Speaker 1: Everybody needs to calm down a little bit here. We're
Speaker 1: gonna figure this out. Just chilax, It's gonna be all right. No,
Speaker 1: Democrats can't do that because if they get everybody all
Speaker 1: worked up about this from the very beginning, then guess squad,
Speaker 1: even if if they lose the election, they have a
Speaker 1: built in excuse. And if they win the election, well them,
Speaker 1: they'll say they'll be very happy that they got as
Speaker 1: much mail in voting as they possibly could, so they
Speaker 1: feel like they get it other way. Oh, I just
Speaker 1: as a something that I left that I wanted to
Speaker 1: get to here. You know, the one person that you're
Speaker 1: just absolutely not allowed to criticize at all as a
Speaker 1: member of the media and in in public discourse. And I
Speaker 1: mean you can't say anything Michelle Obama, and I give
Speaker 1: credit a credit to President Trump because the former, the
Speaker 1: pre Trump GOP, would have absolutely adhered to the no
Speaker 1: criticism of Michelle Obama rule. And that is one of
Speaker 1: the reasons why we lose right because they can create invincible,
Speaker 1: invincible messengers for their side, and we play along with
Speaker 1: this and say, whoa oh, we can't criticize that person
Speaker 1: even when they're stepping out into public and becoming a
Speaker 1: political figure. President Trump had some thoughts on Michelle Obama
Speaker 1: speech play twenty night. She said, you're in over your
Speaker 1: head and the wrong president was over her head. And frankly,
Speaker 1: she should have made the speech live, which she didn't do.
Speaker 1: She taped it, and it was not only taped, it
Speaker 1: was taped a long time ago because she had the
Speaker 1: wrong deaths. She didn't even mention the vice presidential candidate
Speaker 1: in the speech. And you know, she gets these fawning reviews.
Speaker 1: If you gave a real review, it wouldn't be so fawning.
Speaker 1: I thought it was a very divisive speech, extremely divisive. No.
Speaker 1: I thought her speech was very divisive, and frankly, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't even be here if it weren't for Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: See was standing in the White House. I wouldn't be
Speaker 1: in the White House except for Barack Obama because they
Speaker 1: did a badge Biden. That's one of the things I
Speaker 1: love about the President is that they would they would
Speaker 1: expect under any other Republican. With any other Republican, you
Speaker 1: just have to bow down to Saint Michelle Obama. You're
Speaker 1: not allowed to say anything other than the speech was amazing.
Speaker 1: And there's a little bit of that with the Joe
Speaker 1: Biden stuff last night. Why look, if if you think
Speaker 1: it's fine, I would say, yeah, it sucking. Her husband's fine.
Speaker 1: Whatever it was, it was forgetful. I don't care. Eons
Speaker 1: Oh they're also impressed with her. I don't know why
Speaker 1: conservatives can't help it. We have so many people in
Speaker 1: conservative media and particularly who just want the Libs to
Speaker 1: pat them on the head a little bit on Twitter
Speaker 1: or just want, you know, a New York Times writer
Speaker 1: to say, oh, he or she, I guess isn't so
Speaker 1: bad after all. We have this need, this compulsion for
Speaker 1: that little pat on the head from the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: It's it's so very sad, but that is what happens.
Speaker 1: President Trump willing to say about Michelle Obama what other
Speaker 1: people are not which is that the speech wasn't that great.
Speaker 1: It's not really that impressive. I don't know why we
Speaker 1: all to act like this is everything she does is amazing.
Speaker 1: And oh I've said before that I think she'd be
Speaker 1: very potent for the Democrats if they were to run her.
Speaker 1: But that's just because Democrats are obsessed with Democrats love
Speaker 1: Michelle Obamas. Do you have a huge based turnout, huge
Speaker 1: African American turn out. But if we're trying to be
Speaker 1: objective about who who she is and what she's capable
Speaker 1: of and what I mean, don't don't. I don't really
Speaker 1: see it. They didn't Colin Powell speak last night too.
Speaker 1: I don't. I didn't see his speech, But come on,
Speaker 1: Colin Powell, who cares you? I think of anything? It's
Speaker 1: useful to have these former quote Republicans who come forward,
Speaker 1: the Romneys and the Colin Powell's, who come forward and
Speaker 1: say stuff that just lets us all know they were
Speaker 1: never really conservative. They were kind of they were kind
Speaker 1: of gentlemen Republicans. You know, they're kind of like country
Speaker 1: club Republicans. You're in the Freedom U. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast, Goodyear Tires Gets Woke. Oh Yeah,
Speaker 1: here we go. Another company that you would never think
Speaker 1: is super political decides it's time to get really political.
Speaker 1: Goodyear tires, according to slides that have been shared, Now
Speaker 1: Online has a policy banning maga hats or any attire
Speaker 1: for employees on the job under its ban on a
Speaker 1: hateful speech. So this is now a large corporation that
Speaker 1: is saying you wanting to support the current occupant of
Speaker 1: the White House is hateful speech. Trump tweeted about this.
Speaker 1: Don't buy Goodyear tires. They announced a ban on maga hats,
Speaker 1: get better tires for far less. This is what radical
Speaker 1: left democrats do. Two can play the same game, and
Speaker 1: now we have to start playing it now. This is
Speaker 1: about response to lib corporate political tyranny. And I'm somebody
Speaker 1: who has always said I don't like Boycott's I wish
Speaker 1: people would stop. But we have entered the fight fire
Speaker 1: with fire phase of this now. So yes, I think
Speaker 1: the people shouldn't buy Goodyear tires. I've evolved on this
Speaker 1: point or changed or flip flopped, or whatever you wanna
Speaker 1: call it. I go back and forth. I think there
Speaker 1: are competing goods here. On the one side of things,
Speaker 1: I don't want a hyper politicized society where everything is
Speaker 1: constantly about who you support and what you know, who
Speaker 1: you voted for. And I do think that we need
Speaker 1: for us to be a healthy society areas of our
Speaker 1: of our lives that are escapes from that, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: like sports, which the Libs have also taken away from
Speaker 1: us now. So I think that's all very important. But
Speaker 1: I also think that the only way that they will
Speaker 1: stop what they do is if they understand that this
Speaker 1: becomes mutually assured destruction, because they otherwise they just have
Speaker 1: an advantage. Right, It's a one way it's a one
Speaker 1: way war, and they're gonna win over time. So the
Speaker 1: President calling for a for not buying Good Year tribes,
Speaker 1: I'm sure they're going to say this some kind of
Speaker 1: violation of I don't know, the Constitution or the Hatch
Speaker 1: Act or something like that. I'm quite sure that will
Speaker 1: come out of this at some point, because they've always
Speaker 1: they've always got some some rule book reason for whatever
Speaker 1: Trump did is terrible. It's the worst thing ever. You also,
Speaker 1: a Good Year cannot wear anything that supports Blue lives
Speaker 1: Matter or all lives matter, if they one to guess though,
Speaker 1: can you have black Lives Matter. Oh, yes, you can
Speaker 1: have that. You can have black lives so you can
Speaker 1: have a left wing Marxist political movement responsible for the
Speaker 1: destruction of neighborhoods and the murder and assault of individuals
Speaker 1: all across the country. You can have that. But you
Speaker 1: can have Blue Lives matter. You can't have Okay, you
Speaker 1: can't have stuff like that. They also put out a
Speaker 1: good year put out in their statement. We asked that
Speaker 1: they refrain from workplace political campaigning, as well as other
Speaker 1: similar forms of advocacy that fall outside the scope of
Speaker 1: equity issues. This is the company officially saying it, okay,
Speaker 1: so equity issues. So you can wear you know, LGBTQ
Speaker 1: pride shirts, you can wear black Lives matter, whatever the
Speaker 1: left approves of as an equity issue. I noticed they've
Speaker 1: moved from equality to equity, and it's a very important distinction.
Speaker 1: Equality is that we all are treated the same in
Speaker 1: the eyes of the law. Equity as we all have
Speaker 1: the same not that we done, not just the concept
Speaker 1: that we are the same as people. That's equality. Equity
Speaker 1: as we all have the same stuff. At the end,
Speaker 1: it's a quality of outcome, not a quality of opportunity.
Speaker 1: But you see how corporate media is very clearly letting
Speaker 1: people know that there will be carve outs, just like
Speaker 1: in the pandemic gathering policy, there are carve outs for
Speaker 1: BLM protests. There are carve outs and ORPID speech. Now
Speaker 1: yes to BLM, no to MAGA. This is a toxic
Speaker 1: part of our corporate culture that we have to fight
Speaker 1: back on. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast at the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: for wherever you get your podcasts. The show ain't over yet,
Speaker 1: folks keeping it real, It's time for roll Call Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com, slash Buck Sexton or Team Buck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com. Let's get to it. Alex writes book I
Speaker 1: discovered you about a year ago, and your show quickly
Speaker 1: became a daily aunt. Miss. I appreciate the unique, knowledgeable,
Speaker 1: and often hilarious perspective you bring the news talk, even
Speaker 1: in the repetitive beat down news cycles of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I feel like I'm gonna find some gold by tuning
Speaker 1: in or downloading each day. Well, Alex, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: That's really very very kind of you and very motivating
Speaker 1: as a conservative in my twenties. It's been great to
Speaker 1: discover our team has some young intellectuals that bring fresh
Speaker 1: perspective and make worthwhile points. And it's nice to know
Speaker 1: I don't have to get yelled at by the most
Speaker 1: grating voices of any time I want to get a
Speaker 1: news digest outside of the main stream. Who are those
Speaker 1: really grading voices who yell at people? I wonder. I
Speaker 1: hope the platforms of interesting, collected, and entertaining hosts like
Speaker 1: you at Mike Slater only continue to grow exponentially because
Speaker 1: I'm sure it will play an important role in winning
Speaker 1: over the younger generations who conservatives have been failing to
Speaker 1: reach for so long. They desperately need to get a
Speaker 1: true picture of what conservative is about so the brainwashing
Speaker 1: cycles of mainstream culture can be broken. Thank you for
Speaker 1: standing up for your beliefs, and know that I will
Speaker 1: be passing the buck to anyone. I don't worry, we'll
Speaker 1: throw a brick through my window shield's eye. Well, Alex,
Speaker 1: great to have you as part of the team. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for your kind, your kind note, and
Speaker 1: willingness to pass the buck. And yeah, the conservatives because
Speaker 1: I said this for a long time, because Conservatives don't
Speaker 1: go through life, especially in the culture and an academia.
Speaker 1: They don't go through life with the constant expectation that
Speaker 1: they will have their beliefs reflected by all the people
Speaker 1: around them, and that they understand that if they share
Speaker 1: their thoughts, people will find it acceptable to attack them.
Speaker 1: We are much more durable and rigorous in our intellectual
Speaker 1: positions than your average leftist is. It's just true. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've always said that while I went to a very
Speaker 1: liberal college, I came out of it more confident than
Speaker 1: ever in my conservative beliefs because I was always having
Speaker 1: to go toe to toe with the other side, including
Speaker 1: the professors in my classes, which wasn't really helpful for
Speaker 1: my GPA. But I'm used to that. And one thing,
Speaker 1: you know, I've been asked before, why why did you
Speaker 1: become a conservative? And it really comes from you could
Speaker 1: say it's just having a BS detector of source. But
Speaker 1: I remember being told things that were liberal beliefs or ideas,
Speaker 1: you know, progressive democrat kind of stuff at a very
Speaker 1: young age. I mean going back maybe to freshman year
Speaker 1: of high school, even eighth ninth grade. I would be
Speaker 1: told things and I would just say but that's not true,
Speaker 1: that's not what really happens, or that's not really what
Speaker 1: did happen in the past. That was where I had
Speaker 1: my first sense of conservative seeing things or if you
Speaker 1: see things for what they are, and you have the
Speaker 1: ability to be objective about different aspects of reality, history,
Speaker 1: the human experience, you will be conservative. If you think
Speaker 1: that your emotional connection to ideas and the self fulfillment
Speaker 1: of the connection to those ideas is the most important thing,
Speaker 1: you will increasingly find yourself a liberal. Right This misplacement
Speaker 1: of they would consider it idealism, and I think it's
Speaker 1: just shallow virtue signaling. This is how, this is how
Speaker 1: people I know become liberals, because the liberals that I
Speaker 1: know in New York, and I do know plenty of them,
Speaker 1: you know, they will tell you that they care so
Speaker 1: much about BLM, for example, and then I'll all you
Speaker 1: have to do to really enrage them. I'm talking about
Speaker 1: white liberals now that I know is say, really, when
Speaker 1: was the last time that you spent the night in
Speaker 1: a majority black neighborhood. What was the last time? I
Speaker 1: asked my white liberal friends, when was the last time
Speaker 1: you slept over at a at a black friend's house, Steven,
Speaker 1: what what exposure do you liberal have in real terms
Speaker 1: to the black community in high crime areas. I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about you know, your your buddy that also went
Speaker 1: to Harvard with you and lives across the street in
Speaker 1: Tribeca or something. I'm saying with the black community that
Speaker 1: is struggling. What connection to liberals have to The answer
Speaker 1: is nothing. The answers their total phonies on it. And
Speaker 1: yet they like they like to believe that because they
Speaker 1: will vote for Joe Biden, they have such a such
Speaker 1: a connection to the black community. It's it's pretty stunning.
Speaker 1: It's a really self a grandizing delusion. That's what you
Speaker 1: end up getting from it. And and there are there
Speaker 1: are a conservative idea is that that are out there
Speaker 1: that I I struggle with. I go back and forth on,
Speaker 1: you know, I how much protection can religion have from government?
Speaker 1: And there are there are areas of real intellectual pursuit
Speaker 1: and areas of real debate that need to happen. You know,
Speaker 1: the death penalty is one for me, that's always one
Speaker 1: to you know, I bring that one up a lot
Speaker 1: where I say I I'm uncomfortable the death penalty until
Speaker 1: I see what happened to that five year old boy
Speaker 1: in North Carolina, and then I'm ready to flip the
Speaker 1: switch myself on the guy who shot him. Right. That's
Speaker 1: and I know that, and maybe that's an emotional response,
Speaker 1: but I you know, I do feel some hesitation, especially
Speaker 1: because I feel like the state is not to be
Speaker 1: trusted in general. The state is not to be trusted.
Speaker 1: So there there, I go back and forth and that way,
Speaker 1: and I see what That's what happens, though, Alex. You
Speaker 1: write in something like that to me, and you get
Speaker 1: me really going on some things. And I'm a little
Speaker 1: little delayed on the rest of the roll call now,
Speaker 1: so let's get to it. Brett, Yo, Buck, I'm getting
Speaker 1: my concealed carry here in Ohio, in a town just
Speaker 1: outside Cincinnati. I call my local sheriff's office to schedule
Speaker 1: an appointment on August third, got a return call in
Speaker 1: August tenth. The first available appointment was September thirtieth. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure how many appointments per day they have, but
Speaker 1: it feels good knowing everyone in mid town is getting
Speaker 1: their concealed carry. Yeah, Brett, that's I wish it were
Speaker 1: legal here in New York. I would love someone to
Speaker 1: explain to me how a person with zero criminal record,
Speaker 1: nothing but a history of responsible civic behavior, and you know,
Speaker 1: someone like me who has been trained by the federal
Speaker 1: government to use firearms safely and properly, why shouldn't I
Speaker 1: be able to go just just go to the if
Speaker 1: I want the local police precinct, not not one police
Speaker 1: plause of the big police station, the headquarters in New York,
Speaker 1: which looks like something out of the Soviet Union, looks
Speaker 1: like you're never gonna come out of it when you
Speaker 1: go in. But why can't I just go to my
Speaker 1: local precinct and you fill out one form and get
Speaker 1: a concealed carry permit, or maybe take a two hour
Speaker 1: class or something if they want me to. But no,
Speaker 1: in New York, it's basically impossible unless you're politically connected.
Speaker 1: Unless you got some ability to move the needle a
Speaker 1: little bit with the powers that be, you can't get
Speaker 1: Why can't I get a concealed carry permit? I have
Speaker 1: a Second Amendment right to bear arms and to defend myself,
Speaker 1: but they take that away from me. I'm glad Brett
Speaker 1: that you are able to enjoy your Second Amendment right.
Speaker 1: So good on you with that, TJ. Buck. In regards
Speaker 1: to the cringeworthy DNC speeches, what do you think Republicans
Speaker 1: ought to do to make their convention a little more bearable?
Speaker 1: Has there been any consideration to live audiences at various locations,
Speaker 1: obviously with appropriate social distancing measures to avoid any sort
Speaker 1: of scrutiny from the left. Alternatively, maybe they should scrap
Speaker 1: some of the speeches and instead have live panel discussions
Speaker 1: where people can write questions into the guest speakers, or
Speaker 1: have some long form interview segments with some of our
Speaker 1: favorite podcasters and radio hosts. Hint, hint, nudge, nudge and guests.
Speaker 1: Just my two cents, let's make this virtual convention great
Speaker 1: or at least greater than the Democrat convention. TJ. I
Speaker 1: have no idea what the Republicans have planned for their convention,
Speaker 1: but I am with you and that I am very
Speaker 1: hopeful that it is far more impressive than what we
Speaker 1: have seen from the Democrat convention so far. I think
Speaker 1: the Democrat Convention will be forgotten before it's even over. Like,
Speaker 1: nobody cares, nobody remembers, no one has emerged as a
Speaker 1: new star of this convention. Interestingly, the only gave AOC,
Speaker 1: what sixty seconds to speak. You would have thought that
Speaker 1: they would have tried to elevate her more. But it
Speaker 1: makes sense, doesn't it. Biden the pragmatic centrist, that's what
Speaker 1: they're saying, and Kamala Harris the pragmatic moderate. Right, they
Speaker 1: don't want to give too much of a spotlight to
Speaker 1: AOC because AOC is going to speak the truth about
Speaker 1: the radicalism of the Democrat Party. They don't want that.
Speaker 1: They want somebody that they can play this game of Oh,
Speaker 1: you know, it's just a person who's got some thoughts
Speaker 1: on some stuff. Yeah, so TJS. As for the specific
Speaker 1: mechanics of how this is all going to work and
Speaker 1: what can be done, you know, I just I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know what they're able to do. I think
Speaker 1: that I'm hoping they've got something good plan. That's all
Speaker 1: I can tell you. Because what would be so great
Speaker 1: would be to have I mean, could you imagine if
Speaker 1: Trump was able to do the rallies again, if we
Speaker 1: didn't have this pandemic. It's like this whole thing was
Speaker 1: Taylor made to even the odds between Trump and Sleepy Joe.
Speaker 1: It means you can't gather. It means the economy is down.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, this is why you just you never
Speaker 1: know in politics, I would have to bet the farm,
Speaker 1: so to speak. Back in December of twenty nineteen that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was gonna win reelection. How could he not?
Speaker 1: Now it just feels like it could go either way.
Speaker 1: I think, Look, I'm I'm hopeful. I think he's gonna
Speaker 1: pull it off. But you're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Richard writes in Buck Happy,
Speaker 1: who's your hellos? If AOC does this postcard thing, we
Speaker 1: should all sign up and send them postcards of guns
Speaker 1: or dip them in oil, pro life cards, etc. And
Speaker 1: just watch the libs heads explode. Sh'll tie. Uh well, Richard, Richard,
Speaker 1: That's that's one way to go. I'm not sure that
Speaker 1: would really work out all that well. But I see
Speaker 1: what you're doing. I like the humorous attempt, but I
Speaker 1: don't think I don't think we're gonna get too far
Speaker 1: with that one. I don't see that one really happening.
Speaker 1: Eric Buck and producer Mark I ordered Life cinnamon from Instacart.
Speaker 1: The box was a little damaged. The box was opened,
Speaker 1: but plastic closed. What do I do also, how do
Speaker 1: we get rid of the blasio? I work in alcohol
Speaker 1: sales at bars and some out some owners are not
Speaker 1: hearing indoor seating until next year. Thanks for the great work.
Speaker 1: I'll take the second part and I'll pass the first
Speaker 1: one to producer Mark. I don't believe that democrats are
Speaker 1: going to allow the major cities to open indoor dining
Speaker 1: until twenty twenty one. Just eat the damn cereal. It
Speaker 1: was sealed. Producer Mark says, eat the cereal. Don't be
Speaker 1: a whimp. But they can hear us. They can hear
Speaker 1: meat too. No, I no, I'm just affirming that that
Speaker 1: is your I mean what do you eat it? Um? Yeah,
Speaker 1: as long as the plastic was still sealed, I'd eat it.
Speaker 1: Like if you if you look at the plastic, could
Speaker 1: you see like a holllunar or something? Yeah? I would
Speaker 1: go return this areal, but just the boxes damage? Who cares?
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, where are you on dropping food on the
Speaker 1: ground and then eating it? You don't eat it? Interesting
Speaker 1: and listening is like a very specific circumstance where maybe
Speaker 1: you just cleaned the floor, but what about washing it? Though? No? Well,
Speaker 1: what is it? Like? Is it raw? Chickens. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: drop a grape on the floor, do you eat it?
Speaker 1: Or no? No? Why why risk it? I guess there's
Speaker 1: it's not like you have one grape, right, You're gonna
Speaker 1: have a bowl of grapes. You usually have a lot
Speaker 1: of grapes, so that might that might work out in
Speaker 1: that respect. Yeah, yeah, No, it's um. You know, it's
Speaker 1: always a sad thing when you get your your life.
Speaker 1: Cereal in the box is broken. There you go, Eric,
Speaker 1: I'm glad that it's all gonna work out in the
Speaker 1: end for you though, Patrick, Right, seriously, you don't know
Speaker 1: that Buffalo Springfield was an iconic group that was at
Speaker 1: the start of the country rock movement. From that group
Speaker 1: sprang Crosby Stills, Nash and Young and Poco, who members
Speaker 1: later showed up in Loggins and Messina and The Eagle.
Speaker 1: Still everybody loves Buck Sexton. Thank you, Patrick. No, there
Speaker 1: are some there are some holes in my music knowledge,
Speaker 1: and I did not, in fact, no Buffalo Buffalo Springfield.
Speaker 1: But to be fair, producer, Mark, did you know Buffalo Springfield.
Speaker 1: I've heard the name. I've definitely heard of Crosby Stills
Speaker 1: a Nash, but I wouldn't say, it's my go to
Speaker 1: listening habits. Yeah, yeah, yeah, fair enough, Cec. Next up
Speaker 1: in the mix here. My boyfriend and I listen every day.
Speaker 1: Thank you, cec. That's awesome. It makes us so happy.
Speaker 1: Since MSM talking heads can only seem dispute complete lies
Speaker 1: fed to them by their globalist masters, it has been
Speaker 1: so refreshing to hear your intelligible thoughts on today's current events.
Speaker 1: We pass the buck every chance we get. Keep up
Speaker 1: the good work, Shields Hi, Cecie, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Passing the buck is how we get more and more
Speaker 1: people to listen to this show to counter act the
Speaker 1: lib insanity. And it is the single most helpful and
Speaker 1: it's it's our favorite thing. We love when people pass
Speaker 1: the buck. Spotify. If you know someone listen Spotify so easy.
Speaker 1: Just type in buck Sexton'll pop up. They can listen anytime.
Speaker 1: Subscribe There the iHeart Radio app. You can type in
Speaker 1: buck Sexton, same thing, I'll pop up and listen and
Speaker 1: it's on demand, so you can listen live if you
Speaker 1: want to the iHeart app, or you can listen to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton channel, right, producer Mark, Isn't that how
Speaker 1: it goes? Well? Yes? There's a buck Sexton channel that
Speaker 1: we will just play random shows all day and obviously
Speaker 1: the real show will be live six to nine. And
Speaker 1: then if you search the buck Sexton Show podcast, you
Speaker 1: can get the show on demand anytime you want. There
Speaker 1: you go anyway, thank you, see, I gotta say cc.
Speaker 1: I think it's just c thank you see. We really
Speaker 1: appreciate it. And then we bring it home here with
Speaker 1: Alan Buck I suspect you may be wrong about Kamala's
Speaker 1: success Succession side note, guys, Succession is a great show,
Speaker 1: highly recommend. Loved every episode, maybe one or two episodes
Speaker 1: a little slow, but really thought it was a great
Speaker 1: show and think that you should all check it out.
Speaker 1: It's very very good and also really enjoying bosh I
Speaker 1: think bosh is. I give bosh An a maybe an
Speaker 1: A plus. Same with Succession, and I was without show
Speaker 1: to watch for a while, so this is very exciting
Speaker 1: for me that I found two great Although Succession is done,
Speaker 1: I need the third season to come back. Alan then
Speaker 1: writes about the Kamala succession. They will have Robo Joe
Speaker 1: hold the seat for two years and one day, then
Speaker 1: retire him so Kamala can make a run at the
Speaker 1: nine years and three and sixty four day pregnancy sorry presidency,
Speaker 1: making it effectively a three term dem demolition project. Not
Speaker 1: that I want this, but as crazy as everything else
Speaker 1: has gone this year, I think it's probable. Isn't that
Speaker 1: kind of I didn't I say that after Joe I
Speaker 1: said on the midterms she'll leave and hand it over
Speaker 1: to Kamo so she can then run as president for reelection.
Speaker 1: So how does that work? Though? Can she get a
Speaker 1: second term out of that? I don't know. That's a
Speaker 1: good question. Has it ever happened in history? I feel
Speaker 1: like if anyone knew, you would and I usually that
Speaker 1: is true of me, but producer Mark, I appreciate the faith,
Speaker 1: but on this one, I actually don't know. I assume
Speaker 1: you can only get I assume that your your partial
Speaker 1: term is considered a term, but we'll check into that.
Speaker 1: Thanks everybody for being here. Pass the buck, check us
Speaker 1: out of bucksxon dot com. She'll tie