WEBVTT - Who Actually Wins (and Loses) in a Trade War?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey brain Stuff

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogelbaum. Here, the economics of international trade are notoriously sticky.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The World Trade Organization was formed for the express purpose

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of getting countries to play nice when it comes to

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the often dangerous and always intricate matters of global trade.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But what happens when politicians don't want to play nice?

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Who actually wins and loses in a trade war? To

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>investigate this question, we have to talk about tariffs. A

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tariff is basically a border tax levied on products coming

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>into a country based on things like the country of origin,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>say China, or the type of product, say steel. When

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States implements a tariff, it is the US

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>importer who pays the tax, not the foreign exporter. So,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, let's say the Trump administration orders a twenty

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>five percent tariff on Chinese steel. If an American company

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to buy one million dollars worth of steel from China,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it would cost that American company one and a quarter million,

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>including Trump's tariff. The extra quarter of a million goes

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the American government, and again it is the American

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>importer that pays this increasing cost. Not the Chinese exporter.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea behind tariffs is that they should boost American business,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with the hopes that instead of paying that quarter of

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a million dollar tax, American companies in need of steel

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>will buy from American producers, thus helping this hard hit industry,

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which in turn will hire more workers to keep up

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with the increased demand. And sounds like a win for

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>American business. But there's no guarantee that tariffs will play

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out this way, because none of this happens in a vacuum.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Chinese steel is still less expensive than American steel

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>even with the tariff. Maybe American steel producers aren't equipped

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to step up production fast enough to meet demand. If

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>American companies in need of steel decide it's easier, for

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, to just keep importing Chinese steel, consumer prices

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>will go up on everything that contains steel, like cars

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>or washing machines. That's because the cost of making those

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>goods will go up, and companies aren't going to just

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>eat the extra cost. They're going to pass it on

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the consumer that in turn can have further reaching

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>negative effects. Maybe consumers don't buy those products at all,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which is bad for the companies. If consumers do cough

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>up the dough for the higher price, they'll have less

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>money to spend elsewhere. That means other American companies could suffer,

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>which could cause a pullback in those industries, actually costing

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>American jobs overall. For the article, this episode is based

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on how Stuff Works spoke back in twenty eighteen with

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Charles Hankla, professor of political science at Georgia State University

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. He said, what trade does in the aggregate.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It expands production, it expands jobs, it lowers prices. It

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>benefits countries in the aggregate, but it has distributional impacts.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>What does he mean by that. Let's stick with the

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>example of steel. The American steel industry has been hurt

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>by the trade of less expensive steel coming in from

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>other countries. But the industries that use steel, those car

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or washing machine manufacturers, have benefited because the price of

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>steel has gone down, and these days there's a lot

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>more Americans working in manufacturing than in production. Of course,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tariffs were not invented during the current political cycle. They're

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a fact of international trading. The World Trade Organization provides

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a forum for virtually all countries. It has on one

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty four members to hammer out trade agreements.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The WTO got started just after World War II with

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the General Agreement on Tariffs in Trade, and it implements

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and monitors trade agreements, which includes what could be described

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as tariffs or trade barriers or taxes negotiated by all parties.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Other agreements could be struck among nations too, like NAFTA

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the North American Free Trade Agreement which covers the US, Canada,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mexico, but again those are deals that have to

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be agreed upon by all parties. U S presidents normally

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot impose tariffs without first going through the US International

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Trade Commission, which is an independent, nonpartisan government agency that

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was established in nineteen sixteen that researches international trade issues,

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>provides analysis to the President and Congress, and helps settle disputes. However,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trade Act of nineteen seventy four gave presidents power

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to impose tariffs in response to matters of national security.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how Trump was able to push tariffs through in

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>his previous term, during which his administration hit China with

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ten percent tariffs on two hundred billion dollars worth of imports,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>then increased that to twenty five percent. These penalties affected

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the prices that US consumers paid for scores of products

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>ranging from computers to luggage, and Chinese officials responded by

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stepping up border inspections of US goods, holding up licenses

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for US companies to do business in China, and adding

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>their own tariffs on US products. That kind of retaliation

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the cansteiny business is common in a trade conflict. In

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>early January of twenty twenty five, Trump spoke about expanding

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>tariffs by declaring a national Economic emergency, instituting global tariffs

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>of as much as ten percent, a tariffs on Canadian

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and Mexican products of up to twenty five percent, and

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese products of up to sixty percent. Experts say

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that that would invoke a different act, the Inner National

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Emergency Economic Powers Act of nineteen seventy seven, though there's

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>argument about whether that act would actually legally allow the

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration to do that, and furthermore about whether Trump

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>was even making a serious threat. But this is hardly

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the first time that the US and other nations have

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>become involved in conflicts over trade. Trade wars can happen

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for various reasons. It could be that one nation decides

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it's getting a raw deal because another nation provides subsidies

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to its manufacturers so they can export goods that are

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>priced too low to compete with. Or it could be

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that a nation decides it wants to nurture its own

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>industries by hindering their foreign competitors with protective tariffs. Trump

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>has spoken extensively about wanting to lower the trade deficit

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and bring back American manufacturing jobs. However, many economists don't

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>see the US trade deficit, which occurs when a country

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>imports more than an exports, as that big of a deal.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Some consider it necessary to the strength of the global economy,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and many economic experts say that reviving manufacturing in America

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is a lost cause, that advancing technology is driving the

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>industrialization here, not bad trade deals. Centuries ago, trade wars

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>often involved actual violence. In the seventeen and early eighteen hundreds,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, China sold a lot of tea and porcelain

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to the British Empire, so much so that the British

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>got worried about the outflow of silver to pay for it.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>They decided to fix the trade imbalance by getting China

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to import large quantities of opium that the British produced

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in India. When the Chinese government eventually bulked at this arrangement,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the British sent in their warships and forced the Chinese

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to sign the eighteen forty two Treaty that not only

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>opened up China to British trade, but gave the territory

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of Hong Kong to the British. This conflict became known

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as the First Opium War, and it's super complicated a

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>different episode, but even a bloodless trade war can cause

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>plenty of suffering. A lot of observers are seeing unsettling

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>parallels between Trump's multi front trade warfare and the trade

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>war that erupted in the nineteen thirties after President Herbert

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Hoover signed into law the Smoot Holly Act, which raised

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>US tariffs by an average of sixteen percent. Other countries

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>enacted their own tariffs in response, leading to a disastrous

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>global decline in trade. Hastuffworks also spoke via email back

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen with Douglas A. Irwin, an economics professor

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at Dartmouth College. He said Smoot Hawley was passed by

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the House in the spring of nineteen twenty nine, before

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the business cycle peak at a time when the economy

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was doing well and the unemployment rate was low. However,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it got held up by the Senate, and by that

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>time the stock market had crashed in the fall of

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty nine and the economy was moving into a recession,

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>which later became the Depression. The economy continued to get

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>worse after the passage of Smooth Holly, and the retaliation

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>against US exports that occurred because of it is thought

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to have contributed to the severe economic difficulties at the time.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So there is a cautionary tale here. Just because the

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>economy is doing well and close to a peak does

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>not mean that things cannot go badly if one moves

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in a protectionist direction. Smoot Hawlly also helped stimulate a

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>surge of angry nationalism in other countries. Irwin said, if

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>one country slaps tariffs on your goods, the usual response

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is to take offense and retaliate, rather than to turn

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the other cheap. Nationalists gain strength on perceived slights. And

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>just think about how China still remembers being humiliated by

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Western powers during the Opium Wars of the nineteenth century,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's vow to never be so weak again, when

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration bullies countries today on trade, it naturally

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>leads other countries to stiffen their resild to resist the US.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Another big problem with trade wars is that, again, there

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can be a lot of collateral damage. Poor people tend

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to suffer disproportionately since basic necessities that they already struggle

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to afford, like food, shoes, and transportation, can become more expensive,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and working class jobs can take a hit as well.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue with the example of steel, which the Trump

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>administration actually did impose tariffs on in twenty eighteen from Canada, Mexico,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and the European Union. Ast off Works spoke by email

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen with Philip I. Levy, who's now a

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lead trade economist at the World Bank. He explained, if

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you are in a steel using sector, like an autoparts manufacturer,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you are more likely to be hurt by the steel tariffs.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're in the construction sector, you're likely to be

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hurt by terras on steel. These are hits to income

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and employment, which are in addition to the hits people

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>take as consumers. To be fair, if you're a shareholder

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>US Steel, you're pretty happy you don't have to face

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as much competition. True for workers as well, but much

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of the job loss has been to automation, not trade,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>so the tariffs don't fix that. The world economy and

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>global trade are stronger today than they were in the

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen thirties, but a trade war today might be

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>even more damaging. Letty said, there's this unusual argument about

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>why this is a great time for a trade war.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little like saying that today is a good

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>day for me to slam my hand in the car

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>door since I don't have to give a piano performance

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in the near future. While that may be true, it's

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>still not a good idea to slam my hand in

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a car door. He continued. Why might now be worse

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>than the nineteen thirties for the United States? Back then

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone was doing it and we didn't really have global

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. And now it is not the case that

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all countries are raising trade barriers against everyone else. It's

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States that is carving itself out of global

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. All of that means that because most of

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world is still playing nice with

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>trade deals, American businesses could be uniquely disadvantaged by expanding

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>tariffs in the United States. Today's episode is based on

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the articles who Wins and Loses in a Trade War?

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Written by Patrick J. Higer and who Wins and Loses

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>If the US imposes Steel Tariffs written by John Donovan

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>on HowStuffWorks dot Com. Brain Stuff was production of iHeartRadio

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in partnership with how Stuffworks dot Com and is produced

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>by Tyler Klang. Four more podcasts my heart Radio, visit

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.