WEBVTT - Tesla Faces NHTSA Probe Over Model 3 Emergency Door Handles 

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is a lie from coast to coast, with

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hide in New York and Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Tech. I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on today's show.

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Intel shares fall on a report that in Vidia halted

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>tests to use Intel's.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Methods in chip making. Plus, the federal.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Judge gives the ok for the Trump administration to move

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>ahead on a one hundred thousand dollars fee on new

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>H one B visa applications. What that means for Silicon

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Valley hiring and Tesla faces more regulatory scrutiny with a

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 2>new federal probe over its emergency door release. All that

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 2>and more coming up. Let's take a look at these markets.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 2>It is Christmas Eve, there is no training volume to speak.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Of, but you can see the S and P five.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Hundred up slightly on this Wednesday, hier by about two

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 2>tenths of a percent. The NAZAQ one hundred underperforming. Will

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>tell you why in just a minute. The Philadelphia Semiconductor

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 2>and also green but really slight gains here. Volatility continuing

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>to drain out of these equity markets. The Vicks Trading

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>with a thirteen handle on this Christmas Eve. Meanwhile, let's

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>get to two specific names that are restraining what you're

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing when it comes to the big tech complex, Intel

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and Invidia. Intel down about one and a half percent,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>in Vidia down nearly one percent. Given how big Nvidia is,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>that is really acting as a weight on the overall benchmarks. Here,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in Bloomberg Equities reporter Ryan Blastelica for the

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>latest on what's going on here. The headline that I'm

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 2>reading on the terminal, Intel falling on a report that

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Invidia has halted a production test of some of its

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>advanced chip making capacity.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Here, Ryan, what do we know so far?

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Hey, good morning, Thanks for having me. So the background

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 4>for this is that for several years now, Intel has

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 4>really struggled against perception that it is falling behind in

0:01:54.880 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 4>chip manufacturing, especially through companies like PSMC overseas. Now, there

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>was a lot of hope this year following an investment

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 4>from Nvidia, following the government taking a stake that it

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>would be able to better finance this ambitious turnaround program

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 4>to sort of re establish its leadership position in chip manufacturing.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>So this report basically says and in Nvidia try to

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 4>have some of the latest chip processing out of Intel,

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 4>and it's pausing that.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think this will come.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 4>As a huge surprise, because there was seen as a

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 4>pretty significant gap between Intel and TSMC, you know, and

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>the other major chip manufacturers. However, this is probably just

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 4>enough of a cost for disappointment in Intel, which has

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 4>really been bid up quite dramatically this year on the

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>back of all this news that it's seen about the

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>investments and so forth.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, absolutely, just to recap in Nvidia itself agreed to

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>invest five billion dollars into Intel in September. That followed

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the US government announcing that it was also taking a

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>roughly ten per state ten percent stake in the company.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of hopes, as you say, for

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a potential turnaround story here for Intel. We know that

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>they have new CEO as well, but just give us

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>some context here, you know, how this specific year's performance

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>compares to the last several years of disappointment for Intel.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So one thing I would just say is that

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 4>when Nvidia announced the stake in Intel, they did make

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>a point of saying that there wasn't any sort of

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 4>agreement that it would be using the chip manufacturing here,

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 4>but clearly they've been trying it out, they've been testing it,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that they are pausing here it's just

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 4>enough of the you know it sort of underlines how

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Intel has really sort of fallen behind competitors in this

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>pretty significant area. Now, there is still a lot of

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>interest in building out domestic chip manufacturing. Ine building a

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 4>chip here, I believe it's in Ohio, TSMC has building

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 4>a chip that I think is in Arizona. There's a

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of money surrounding this that Chipsas was involving this.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of significance here, especially when it comes

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 4>to issues like national security here. So this is something

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 4>people are paying a lot of attention to. And certainly

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 4>if the news had been the opposite and Intel Nvidia

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>had come out and said that it is going to

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>be using Intel, I think that would be a pretty sick,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>magnificant game change for Intel as we go into twenty

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty six. The idea that is really re establishing itself

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>in manufacturing, I think would cause a lot of people

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 4>to reassess the stock in its prospects.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely and tell definitely a story to keep an eye

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>on in twenty twenty six. Ryan, before I let you go,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>you had a great story out on the terminal in

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 2>the past two days talking about how it's the boring

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 2>bets when it comes to tech that seems to be

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>working the best this year. Memory chips, hard disk drives

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.119
<v Speaker 2>come to mind. What are some of the specific names

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 2>that really stood out in the tech space this year.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, Micron especially has been a really big gainer this year.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 4>It's memory chips, the high bandwidth memory that's a pretty

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 4>significant part of overall AI infrastructure. That stock is I

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 4>think roughly tripbolder. So this year it recently had results.

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 4>Results were very strong, the stock moved up even more.

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>And if you look beyond that, the companies that are

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, typically don't get a ton of interest, companies

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>like sand Disk, Western Digital, Seagate Technology, makers of hard

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 4>disk drives, also a part of the AI infrastructure. This

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 4>is something that people were saying, was it fully appreciated?

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Hard to make that case. Now some of these stocks

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>have doubled, tripled. They're some of the biggest gainers on

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the S and P five hundred this year. And it

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 4>is you know, in I kind of bet ironically and

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a part of the market that otherwise would be a

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>little bit too dull for most people to be excited about.

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Ryan really appreciate reporting this year. That is Bloomberg's

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Ryan blast Elica. Meanwhile, let's get a broader look at

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the tech markets and one investors are looking ahead to

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six with epec Oscar desh Kaya cis

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>quote senior market analyst. Great to have you with us.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>So I actually want to start where we left off

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 2>with Ryan. It's really interesting that you think about what

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>really worked in twenty twenty five. It was the so

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>called boring parts of the AI trade. A lot of

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 2>these you know, memory disc makers, memory chip makers that is,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the likes of Micron. I wonder you know whether

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 2>you expect that will be the momentum headed into twenty

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty six.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's pretty much explainable why these memory chips, boring

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 5>park yourself department of the market gain more than the

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 5>other exciting parts. One of the reasons for that is

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 5>that because the AI chip demand was so strong that

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 5>many manufacturers actually assass more capacity in producing these chips

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 5>in demand, and they reduce their capacity for producing other

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 5>and more boring podcasts off the market. That's one of

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 5>the reasons why what explains actually the rally that we've

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 5>seen in Standings and Seagate and Western Digital and likes

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 5>into twenty twenty six. We think that not only that

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 5>the boring, the most boring and undervalued pockets of the

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 5>market will be an investors' radar, but we will also

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 5>expect to see actually this technology and AI rarely broaden

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 5>towards the non technology podcasts off the market because the

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 5>AI productivity, AI cost efficiencies will also benefit to any

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 5>other sector out there, including banks, healthcare industries. And I

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>think that this is going to be the big story

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty six.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, and we don't have much longer to it.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk a little bit about, you know

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 2>what didn't necessarily work when it comes to the overall

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 2>AI trade in twenty twenty five, and it's something to

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about that as a monolith. But while memory chip

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 2>makers seem to have a great year, you take a

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>look at some of these software names. Adobe comes to mind,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>for example, and it feels like some of these companies

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>just can't get their footing under them. Service now Salesforce

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Force also examples there. I wonder, you know what you

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>make of what's going on in that sector.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, these companies have come under the pressure of AI.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 6>You would expect that making.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 5>AI tools available to investors would boost their revenue, but

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 5>it actually had the exact opposite impact effect on these companies.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 5>They have not been able to monetize and sell these

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 5>AI boosted models to investors as much as they wanted.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 5>And actually the fact that other models, other AI models

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 5>came to the market to challenge these companies, have also

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 5>been a big problem for these companies. We think that

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 5>in terms of AI applications, the competition is going to

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 5>be quite rough in twenty twenty six because there are

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 5>a lot of AIMI some of them are going to

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 5>be where some of them are going.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 6>To be losers.

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 5>But it's exactly the same story for the big AI

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 5>applications and the likes of AI A Dope for example,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 5>or Shutter Circle. These companies that just integrated AI applications

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 5>on their products offering will have to face that competition.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 5>I think that that's going to be also waiting on

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 5>the margins.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a good reminder of dure that there are

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>companies that are doing the disrupting and then there's companies

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that the market thinks are being disrupted right now.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>But I also want to talk.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 2>A little bit about you know, what we're seeing when

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>it comes to Capex. That has remained one of the

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>dominant stories when it comes to you know, every three

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>months we get those earnings report, and we've seen it

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>start to really get expressed in certain companies. Oracle comes

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to mind, both their equity and their debt. This pressure

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to see some sort of ROI when it comes to spending.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if you see that pressure broadening out next

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>year EPEC of course.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean since the last three months, since the last

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 5>earning season, what we have seen is that the headline

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 5>shiny headline figures were no longer impressive for investors. They

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 5>wanted to dig deeper into these reports. One, how are

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 5>the revenues are being accounted? And two what's happening with

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 5>the debt? Is the debt too high? Or is the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>debt being uploaded? Was also one of the questions that

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 5>investors have been asking and have been worried about. So

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 5>what investors want today is to see slowing investment until

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 5>we see return on investment. The problem here with the

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 5>technology is that if there isn't overspending. The risk is

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 5>that this technology gets outdated by the time revenues start

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 5>coming in. So we really think that spending is going

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 5>to be one of the major issues and major major

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 5>talking points into twenty twenty six.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 6>And one way to go around this.

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 5>Risk is to choose companies that are able to turn

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 5>this over spending into an immediate revenue opportunity, like the

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 5>ones that do have data center. Is that the ones

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 5>that are actually able to rent their chips out And

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 5>in this context what we see is Microsoft, Amazon, Aret

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and Google are the three companies that could help investors

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 5>reduce this risk of overspending in AI and EPEC.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I've less than a minute with you, but before I

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>let you go, I would love to hear heading into

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, what is your highest conviction.

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, the highest conviction right now is rotation again from

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 5>technology to non technology pockets off the market.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 6>I think it is important to note.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 5>That the macracinic backdrop remains positive for technology stocks as well,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 5>so we think that the reley could continue, but it

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 5>might decelerate next year, and again the AI enthusiasm will

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 5>probably move toward the non technology pockets off the market.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.239
<v Speaker 5>Toward toward the sectors that actually do also use technology

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 5>that could be boosted by a IT tools.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, that rotation, especially from growth to value, has been

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>fascinating to watch over the past couple of weeks.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Ipec Osker Deshkai.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Of Swiss quote great to get some time with you.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up on B tech, a judge has ruled

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>in President Trump's favor upholding one hundred thousand dollars H

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>one B visa fees. Some of the most vulnerable companies are.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>In the tech sector, but the legal fight is an over.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>More on that.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Next, this is Bloomberg Well, a federal judge says that the.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration can move ahead with a one hundred thousand

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 2>dollar fee on new H one V visa applications. Now

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 2>that is adding pressure on US tech companies that rely

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>on hiring foreign skilled workers. Eric laws and Larson, he

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>covers legal affairs and politics for Bloomberg News, please to

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>say he joins me now on set. So Eric, give

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>us some context here. You know, we tend to talk

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 2>about tech companies when it comes to these visa fees,

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 2>but just how exposed is the industry to this potential

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand dollars.

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Fee minor sending from these lawsuits that have been filed

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and from the data we've seen is that they're pretty exposed. Notably,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these companies did not file lawsuits challenging the visa. It

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was filed by other groups. The ruling we just got

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was from the Chamber of Commerce. So maybe they're waiting

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to see where this goes. But certainly the Trump administration

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and other government officials say that these companies can afford them,

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>even though they do use them quite a bit and

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they are pretty exposed. The government simply argues there are

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of American workers who they could be paying to

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>do the same job, just paying them more.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you think about some of these giant

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>tech companies with deep pockets. Talk to us about the

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>public sector though when it comes to healthcare and education,

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>because again we talk about tech all the time, but

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>these sectors also rely on H one B visas exactly.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And there is another lawsuit that was filed by nineteen

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic attorneys general. Most of the Democratic led states are

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>part of this lawsuit, led by California, which has the

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>most of these visas are mostly in California, and these

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>states argue that they're suing on behalf of the public

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>sector because of healthcare. They say that they have to

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>look out for the healthcare industry, the residents and their states.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>They say that the quality of healthcare will simply suffer

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because there is a shortage of these skilled healthcare workers

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who use these visas and won't necessarily be able to

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>afford one hundred thousand dollars fee from these hospitals. You know,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe the companies can afford that, but hospitals not so much.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>So there's not really a carve out for them, and

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the hospitals could suffer according to these states that sued

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month, and there's a hearing in that case

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>in February, so remains to be seen how a judgabile

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>rule on that aspect.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's the rub, right.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 2>You think about Amazon, Microsoft, Meta Apple, for example, if

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 2>they're playing millions of dollars potentially for specific AI talent,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 2>a one hundred thousand dollar fee probably doesn't seem like

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that much then.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 3>But to your point, you know, if it's.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Hospital having to pony up that fee, it's a much

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 2>different conversation. Walk us through how you might expect the

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 2>legal fight to take shape next, because it seems like

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of different moving parts here.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, So the ruling that we just got was from

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit filed by the Chamber of Commerce in Federal

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Court in Washington. That case is essentially over unless there's

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>an appeal. It was a summary judgment. The judge, who

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was an Obama appointee, by the way, just ruled flat

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>out that the government was correct. The President had brought

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>authority to issue this under the powers given to him

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act. But these

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit filed by the Democratic led States, that is, like

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, there will be a hearing on their motion

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for an injunction against the visa in February. There isn't

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a hearing set on the third lawsuit, which is filed

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>by unions, So this could take months to play out,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and as with so many of the other legal challenges

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>involving the president's policies and executive orders, it could end

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>up at the Supreme Court, and that could be quite

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>some time. The big question for employers and potential visa

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>holders is whether or not this program, this fee will

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>stay in place during the entire legal challenge. Right now,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it is, but these other lawsuits could result in different outcomes.

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Eric, really appreciate your reporting.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Great to see someone else in the office on Christmas

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Eve as well.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>That is Bloomberg's Eric Larson.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, another story that's tying together tech and politics is

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that the Trump administration has imposed visa sanctions on former

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>European Union Commissioner Theory Breton, along with four other activists

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>who have pushed for regulations to online content moderation. Now

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a post on

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>x Quote, for far too long, ideologues in Europe have

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>viewpoints they oppose. We stand ready and willing to expand.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>This lifts this list if others do not reverse course

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>for more. Let's go now to bloom It's Laura Davison

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>live in Washington. So Laura, first, give us the reaction

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>that you're seeing and hearing. Was this move necessarily a surprise?

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 7>This move was a surprise and really came as a

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 7>shock to both the people who were the subject of

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 7>these visa sanctions as well as to other European officials,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 7>both at the EU level, and individual countries. There's been

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 7>a really a strong and forceful pushback saying that this

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>is a move that amounts to censorship and is very inappropriate.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 7>On the US side, this is, you know, sort of

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 7>just a one prong and what has really become a

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 7>multifaceted cold war between the US and the EU, particularly

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 7>as it relates to tech companies and who has the

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 7>power to regulate and tax them.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, we talk about, you know, this

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>censorship potentially of American viewpoints, what specific platforms, you know,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>was the Trump administration holding up as an example where

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>censorship actually did take place.

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So there's a couple different here. Largely the big

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 7>social media platform so Facebook, Instagram, and in particular Elon

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 7>Musk's platform has been the subject of a rather large

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 7>fine earlier this year for not allowing these content moderation

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 7>to feed out hate speech from the platform. So, you know,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 7>X had to pay this fine. This has kind of

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 7>become this ongoing tit for tat war of you you know,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 7>and you could almost see these visa sanctions coming from

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 7>the US as a response to that fine earlier this year.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Laura really appreciate the update that is Bloomberg's

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Laura Davison joining us from Washington, well as Warner Brothers

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Discovery in Paramount Way. Their next moves media deal making

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is back in focus. Joining us now is Stephen wolf Perira.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>He is CEO and founder of Alpha, an independent AI

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>governance intelligence firm for board directors and C suite executives.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you with us, Stevens. So let's talk

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 2>about Warner Brothers. You had Larry Ellison coming out with

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>his personal guarantee of forty billion dollars for the Paramounts

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>guidance hostile bid. That is, do you think that that

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 2>goes far enough to address some of the Warner Brothers

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>board's concerns about financing.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 8>So it's great to be here, Happy holidays. But this

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 8>is very going to be a gift for the Ellsons

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 8>because if you think about what they are doing, they

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 8>are truly amassing one of the biggest and most important

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 8>collection of media assets in record time. And you know

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 8>whether the thirty dollars a share is going to be enough.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 8>I think they're going to have to sweeten the deal.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 8>But I think you need to look at this from

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 8>a larger advantage point because if you really look at

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 8>the assets that they're starting to consolidate. It really is

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 8>concerning on the one hand, exciting on the other. But

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 8>when you think about Paramount combined with potentially TikTok obviously

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 8>Warner Brothers Discovery, you just look at all the different

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 8>pieces of this puzzle. We're really seeing the reshaping of

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 8>the American media landscape right before our eyes.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk through some of the concerns here.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 2>As you said, it's exciting, but there's also concerns.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 3>In highest order. What would you say tops the list?

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, one is this really trying to understand what

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 8>really is going to be the governance and implications of

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 8>this when you think about the amount of data that

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 8>they are now going to have to be able to

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 8>train all their AI. Again, this is not just a

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 8>media company. Obviously, Larry Ellison with Oracle understanding the TikTok angle,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 8>this is really connected to the dots and all these

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 8>AI companies are desperate for more data to train their models.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 8>And so when you really look at this, this is

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 8>a truly incredible opportunity to consolidate data all under this

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 8>massive umbrella, which is really going to be Skydance, Paramount

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 8>and Oracle.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, So you're saying that Oracle, you know, if we

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>actually see Paramount Skuiddance be able to win the Warner

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discovery bidding war, that Oracle might then potentially use

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 2>their content library for training for their models.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 8>I mean, again, you have one hundred percent control over Paramount,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, what's to say, what is the control going

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 8>to look like? You know, for one of Brother's Discovery.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 8>Once it's under that umbrella, You're just going to have

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of ability to kind of blur the lines

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 8>and us really see who is going to be able

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.479
<v Speaker 8>to have some type of guardrails governance guidelines around all

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 8>of this, And I think that that's something that shareholders

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 8>need to look into. Obviously, you want to have your

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 8>furniturey responsibilities as a shareholder, but certainly the board is

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 8>going to have to make some really tough decisions. I

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 8>think there is a really interesting reason why the board

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 8>has actually rejected the Ellisons repeatedly until they had to

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 8>go public with this hostile takeover.

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is a fascinating situation where you have the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers board saying that we've approved, we recommend the

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Netflix offer. At the same time, you have Paramount basically

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 2>going directly to the shareholders with this tender offer.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what do you make of it? How do

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 3>you see the investor.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Base actually swaying here when it comes to what the

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 2>board is saying and what Paramount is saying.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 8>Look, the truth of the matter is you have a

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 8>very deluded shareholder base. Obviously, you're going to have the

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 8>large institutional investors, the Black Rocks, Vanguard, State Street, We're

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 8>controlling a lot of the shareholder count. But when you

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 8>really think about where investors are going to be, they're

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 8>going to really vote for what's going to be the

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 8>best return for them. And so I think you really

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 8>are going to see Netflix really trying to have to

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 8>up the ante. They obviously have a very clean, you

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 8>know kind of approach, They have a very clean deal,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 8>obviously have a better credit rating. When you think about

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 8>what the levered company is going to look like, combined

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 8>with Paramount as well as one of our discovery, I

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 8>think it's going to be north of maybe six seven

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 8>times you know det Tim at DA. So just from

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 8>a capital perspective, it's going to be an extremely levered asset.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 8>That's part of the reason why Larry Ellison is doing

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 8>the personal guarantee and.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Steven, we have less than a minute here left with you.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 2>But you know, when you look into your crystal ball,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 2>how long do you think this saga will continue? How

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>long will it take to actually get a conclusion here?

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, obviously they pushed out the shreword of vote

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 8>down to January twenty first, and then you're going to

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 8>have obviously all the regulatory you know, kind of theater

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 8>that you're going to have to go through. But I

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 8>feel like this is just the beginning, because this is

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 8>now the reshaping of American media. And when you really

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 8>understand what is happening, this is a data play, and

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 8>when you really connect the dots, this is truly going

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 8>to reshape the way that all the AI companies are

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 8>going to be able to have access to data. Who

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 8>is controlling that? And where are the government s guardrails

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 8>around it?

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 6>All?

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Right? Stephen, really appreciate your time.

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 3>That is Stephen wolf Perrera.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 2>He is the CEO and founder of Alpha. Let's take

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 2>a look at these markets on this Christmas seve the

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred, A little bit of green

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>on the screen. As I said at the top, no

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 2>trading volume to speak of, but you can see we're

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 2>drifting about three tenths of a percent higher. Tech not

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>quite outperforming today at the NASAQ one hundred higher by

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 2>just about two tenths of a percent. You can see

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index a little bit below that as well.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Very quiet though when it comes to volatility as measured

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>by the VIS, you can see we are down about

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 2>forty seven ball points and trading with a thirteen handle.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about why you can see the NAZAQ one

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred underd performing. A lot of that comes back to Nvidia,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and it comes back to Intel. Reuter's reporting this morning

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>that basically in Nvidia has halted a test to use

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Intel's production process to make advanced chips. That is adding

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>to pressure on Intel down about one point four percent.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>In Vidia shares also in the red as well. For

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 2>more on this story, let's bring in Bloomberg Television Markets

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 2>correspondent Normal Linda sitting to my left.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 3>So, Nora, what do we know so.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Far about this so called eighteen A process.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, the fact that Nvidia is halting using Intel's eighteen

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 9>A manufacturing process, it actually is concerning for a lot

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 9>of investors because we know that this is critical to

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 9>Intel's turnaround story, especially as it tries to scale and

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 9>really compete against the likes of say TSMC. They are

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 9>a global competitor, and people are really concerned right now

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 9>as to whether or not Intel is really able to

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 9>display the fact that it's able to keep up in

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 9>this space.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And so talk to us about the Nvidia of it

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>all and how it comes in. We know that in

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Vidia agreed to invest five billion dollars into Intel two September,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So how are the two companies fortunes kind of aligned here.

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's a bit of a complex relationship between Nvidia

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 9>and Intel, because it's not that Intel is necessarily giving

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 9>in Nvidia is not necessarily a customer of Intel. In

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 9>video actually works primarily with TSMC. But the fact that

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia was able to test out the eighteen A from Intel,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 9>people are really seeing this essentially as a marquee player

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 9>in the mix, actually co signing this company and essentially

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 9>giving more legitimacy, validity to a name that we know

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 9>we've seen the US government coming in trying to back

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.239
<v Speaker 9>taking a ten percent stake in this company. As we're

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 9>really trying to see more production in the chip space

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 9>here in the United States.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>And what sense do we have of why, you know,

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Intel and the market in general is reacting in.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>This way to this news.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be some sensitivity here, even though there

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 2>wasn't necessarily a contract between these two companies.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 9>It wasn't necessarily a contract between the two companies, But

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 9>this still raises doubts about the fact of Nvidia stepping

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 9>away from this partnership here, especially because in video sorry

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 9>excuse me, investors are looking for proof that Intel can

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 9>essentially attract top tier customers. So that's what's really key

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 9>here in this moment. The Nvidia name is what's really

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 9>helping to elevate Intel in this moment, and to see

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 9>in Nvidia potentially stepping away from that test run of

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 9>the eighteen A manufacturing process is essentially giving investors some concern.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 2>All right, great reporting, Nora, I'll be seeing you in

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 2>just about thirty minutes time. Nora and I will take

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you through the close this early Close today from twelve

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to two pm on BTV. But let's keep this conversation

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>going right now, because twenty twenty five has been a

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 2>landmark year for ETFs, with actively managed funds taking the

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 2>baton to surpass passive funds for the first time. Let's

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>bring in Sylvia Jablonski. She is CEO and CIO over

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 2>at Defiance ETFs.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Sylvia, great to talk to you on this Christmas eve.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's certainly the case that active ETFs have been

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 2>on fire for the past several years twenty two twenty five,

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>no exception, and we're seeing a lot of activity, a

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of interest from investors in these leverage single stock

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>ETFs which do count as actively managed products. We know

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>that Defiance, of course is involved in that space. Talk

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 2>us through you know how you see that interest evolving,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 2>if at all in twenty twenty six.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, hy Katie.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 10>Great to be with you today and happy holidays, Merry

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 10>Christmas and happy New Year. Yeah, I think you know

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 10>it's it's been a stellar year for levertytfs in general,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 10>both index based and.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Single name funds.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've seen billions of dollars of assets flowing

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 10>into those funds and to your point, to active funds.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 10>And so what I think has happened over the last

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 10>couple of years, and you and I have talked about

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 10>this a bunch, is you know, we went through this

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 10>period of time where it was it was all passive,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 10>and a lot of the ideas that were coming out

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 10>resembled the others. So there were a lot of me

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 10>too products out there, whether it.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 6>Was the Mattos or anything else.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 10>And really over the last two years, we've seen a

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 10>lot of innovation, and we've seen that in single name

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 10>leverage stocks, and we've seen that in option and space products,

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 10>so a lot of single names that pay income, for example.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 10>And I think that, you know, you've seen huge amounts

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 10>of growth in that because investors we're looking for that,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 10>right And so what I expect to happen in the

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 10>next couple of years is to see that transition with

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 10>new and exciting names coming out in the single name

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 10>leverage space, some of the new you know, picks and

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 10>shovels of AI for example, quantum names, some of the

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 10>themes that are really popular and growing into the next year.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 6>And then I think we'll see other things grow out too.

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 10>I think we'll see new thematics as some of these

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 10>AI themes, quantum themes, you know, infrastructure, anything related to

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 10>the advancement of tech really kind of change and grow.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 10>So investors are getting very comfortable with ETFs and expect

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 10>that to continue.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 2>And stepping back a bit, I always wonder, you know,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 2>if you're managing a stable of you know, single stock ets,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you know that some will probably take off be very popular.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>There are certain names that retail investors in particular, just

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 2>seem to gravitate to. But at the other end of

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum, there's some names that you know probably aren't

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 2>going to garner that same interest.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Ever, And I wonder, you know, as an.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Issuer of ETFs, do you basically just hope you get

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a few hits when it comes to the single names

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 2>and hope that that sort of subsidizes the rest of

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the lineup, which may or may not take off.

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think as an issuer, we you know, we

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 10>do a lot of due diligence on this, right. We

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 10>research the names that we're interested in launching, and we

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 10>kind of look and see, you know, what is their beta,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 10>what is their sort of volatility score, what kind of

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 10>interest there is in social media, what kind of interest

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 10>there is amongst institutional clients, what kind of interest there

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 10>is just in general media press research on certain topics.

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 10>So we do a lot of work before we actually

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>bring a product to market, so we have high conviction

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 10>and everything that we're launching, as I would think most

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 10>etfishuers do.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 6>Right to your.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 10>Point, some of them just don't hit, and you know,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 10>and that's disappointing. But the way we view this is,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, we essentially just just move on and just

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 10>try to make sure that we're capturing the right trends

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 10>and the right themes that investors are looking at. And

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 10>if products, you know, if some products are unprofitable, then

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 10>that's a result of this moment in time and it

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 10>can only change.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 10>We've seen products that sat for two years and did

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 10>nothing take off three years later.

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, allanges No, it's a good point.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think a Bloomberg intelligence has some unofficial Lazarus

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 2>list where you know, a name does nothing for a

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 2>couple of years and ETF does nothing and then all

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden it rises from the dead, if you will.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But in any case, I do wonder, you know, when

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>we talk about themes. Obviously AI has been a big

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>theme when it comes to equity ETFs, but then you

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>think about what's happening in the bond markets right now

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and sort of the AI debt deluge if you will,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>has definitely emerged as a theme when it comes to

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>credit markets in twenty twenty five. Would you ever consider

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 2>launching a fixed income thematic ETF or is that something

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that maybe they're just isn't a market for.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think that there could be a market for

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 10>different fixed income products, and you know, I would suspect

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 10>that issuers such as ourselves are doing research in the space,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 10>and you know, there could be some some opportunities there.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 10>It's you know, it's it's something that we're always looking at.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 10>And I think, you know, to your point, yes, there

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 10>is you know, sort of that debt issue with AI.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 10>There's also a concentration issue growing with AI. Right, I

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 10>think a lot of the big eats are out there

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 10>in the space.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 6>But I actually think there's more to come.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, you saw on December twentieth, actually the Trump

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 10>administration just announced that they're going to be putting a

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 10>big agenda and a big priority on researching and building

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 10>out six G so that the United States has leadership

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 10>in that space. Right, and so that's an area that

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 10>we're super excited about. Like we have a six G

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 10>ETF and that hasn't been talked to me you know,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 10>to the point of like ETFs being popular.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 6>At different times.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 10>Five G was all the rage, and here we are now,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, oh, we have to focus on this because

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 10>of our AI build out and because of our quantum

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 10>build out, and so you know, there's always different directions

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 10>to grow in terms of the matt at ETF's weather

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 10>fixed incomer equity based.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about one ETF that did get a

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of interest of yours in twenty twenty five, and

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that was your quantum ETF.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>The ticker there is qt um, and.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's all a pretty steady stream of inflows all throughout

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the year, but especially starting in about Midsummer or so.

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 2>When you think about the quantum space and the different

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 2>names that populated, what is your view heading into next year.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so the viewing quantum is you know, kind of

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 10>very much the same, and it's evolving. You know, we

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 10>view this as a long term investment, and in the

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 10>last year, I think the reason that we've seen so

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 10>much interest and so much inflow into the space is

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 10>because you've started to get these proof points of reality

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 10>and commercialization, right, whether it was the bond pricing example

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 10>with HSBC or you know, some of the big kind

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 10>of quality balance sheet mag seven or just you know,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 10>large tech companies like IBM and Cisco and Oracle in

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 10>addition to the Max seven investing in the space and

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 10>producing you know, products there and having quantum services available

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 10>through clouds and Amazon and things like this. So I

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 10>think as it becomes more commercial and scalable and you know,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 10>proves itself as a technology that investors are really buying into,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, you could potentially see some performance in those names.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 10>But I do you think it's like AI, right, It's

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 10>very much in its infancy. AI is maybe a toddler.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 10>Quantum is still just learning to call right. So it's

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 10>a long term buy and hold, and I think that

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 10>investors understand that and they're in it for the long run.

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is really interesting.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like quantum it's just starting to get socialized

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>right now. But as you said, I don't think it exactly.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Knows how to walk yet.

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>But Sylvia, I mean you make the point that this

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>is a buy and hold investment when it comes to

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>your lineup, and you know, you have a broad array

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of funds ranging from Quantum, which of course, as you say,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 2>is buy and hold, and then you have again those

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>leverage single stock ETFs. What is the profile of the

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>investors coming into your lineup? Is it safe to say

0:32:58.160 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>it's broadly retail.

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 10>It's not necessarily broadly retail. There's a good mix of

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 10>retail and institutional clients. What I would say is there

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 10>are different risk profiles for our clients. So clients that

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 10>are in the thematic products tend to be long term conservative,

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, buy and hold, looking to allocate to their

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 10>portfolios for longer periods of time, whether institutional or retail.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 6>In terms of the single name stocks.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 10>It tends to be sophisticated. Whether it's an institution or

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 10>it's a retail day trader, it's a sophisticated trader who

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 10>understands that these are meant to be traded and not held,

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 10>that you know, you're getting returned for a period of time,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 10>not beyond one day, and you know kind of user

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 10>beware and understand how these products work over time.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 6>And so it's just a different risk profile.

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 10>But there's a mix of both types of clients, retail

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 10>and institutional, across all the product suites.

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Sylvia, great to get some time with you.

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Happy holidays. That is Sylvia Jablonski of Defiance ETPs.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up on.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>B Tech, we'll discuss the outlook for Tesla. It's sure

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>price has been on a tear, but what challenges all wait?

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty six, Steve Wesley, founder of the Wesley Group,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>he joins us. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. Well, Tesla

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>has had quite a year. It shares have soared, its

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>CEO secured a record pay package. It's robotaxis launched in

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a limited way in Austin and San Francisco. But on

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the horizon are challenges, among them declining sales, shrinking profits,

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and moves by global regulators. Sources telling us here at

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg that the company is facing a new US government

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>probe over the door handles of its Model three sedans.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Steve Wesley, he is a former Tesla board member and

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>managing partner of the Wesley Group, joins us. Now, Steve,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>great to have you with us. Let's start again with

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 2>these door handles. We have had a month's long investmentgation

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 2>over here at Bloomberg. We know that the NHTSA has

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 2>opened an investigation in September, and I wonder what you

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 2>make of how this is evolving and the reputational damage

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>that this could inflict on Tesla.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 11>Look, it's a serious issue, but a lot of other

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 11>auto companies have had similarities, for Volkswagen General Motors.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 12>But it's not a simple software fix.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 11>So here's a time where Tesla's really got to be

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 11>firing on all cylinders to fix this.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, from what you can tell the company's

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>public posture, do you think that they are treating this

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>with the appropriate degree of seriousness.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, we'll see, this is not a simple software fix,

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 11>so they're going to have to go in re engineers

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 11>and things. The cost is probably going to take a while,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 11>but it's not the first time it's happened.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 12>It's happened with other auto companies.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 11>But I think everybody in the sector is going to

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 11>be focused in on this one. Tesla, as you know,

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 11>has had some other brand challenges, so they want to

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 11>come out. They're trying to position themselves and look like

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 11>a testnology leader, not just an auto company. Fixing this

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 11>sweep top of that priority list absolutely.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about the year for Tesla more broadly,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 2>because shares are up about nineteen percent on a total

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 2>return basis, we know that that has come with a

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of volatility.

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You think about where we stand right now.

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Sure, shares have surged in the past few months, but

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>sales continue to be an issue. You think about the US,

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>you think about Europe. You mentioned that Tesla wants to

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>be positioned as a technology company here, but this feels

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 2>like a pretty fundamental issue that is going to need attention.

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 11>Look, this is a huge issue in twenty twenty six

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.479
<v Speaker 11>is going to be a pivotal year. Share price at

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 11>record highs one point six trillion dollar market cap. That's astonishing.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 11>But Tesla's latency. It's second year in a row of

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 11>declining sales and shrinking profits. So the robotaxi approval it

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 11>has got in Austin is great. They no longer need

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 11>drivers in the cars. That still leaves them way behind Weymouth.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 11>So Tesla's really got to get into a higher gear

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 11>on regulatory approval. They've got to get into more cities faster,

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 11>and they need to get revenue growth to keep that

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 11>share price up.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 12>Let's see how well they do.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, I mean you mentioned Weaimo, and you think

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 2>about the gap. Weymol obviously has that first mover advantage

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 2>Tesla trying to close it here? Do you think that

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that is actually achievable when you think about how far

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out Weimo is and all the different markets it has

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 2>already entered.

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.439
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's going to be tough for Tessa to catch

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 11>up because look, Waimo's already in six cities operational Large City,

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 11>San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Miami, Atlanta. But they've announced

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 11>another sixteen cities they're going into. They'll do twelve million

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 11>to fourteen million rides by the end of this year

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 11>next week, but next year, I think they're looking at

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 11>a number close to thirty five million. They're already making

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 11>plants way international. They're doing trials now at London, Tokyo,

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 11>New York City. Waimo's got a huge lead. Tesla's got

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 11>its work cutout for it to catch up. If you're

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 11>positioning yourself as a technology company, they've got to get

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 11>in the race and go toe to toe with Weimo and.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 3>See if we've got just about a minute left.

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about door handles, we've talked about sales, we've talked.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 3>About the robotaxis.

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 2>What else should Tesla be focusing on in twenty twenty six.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think there's two things. The key one is

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 11>their energy division is booming. And say what you want

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 11>about Tesla needing new models and maybe being behind in

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 11>full self driving, but every out of company in the

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 11>world today is also an energy company, and Tesla provides

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 11>three products. Power walls you probably see them in garages, megapacks,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 11>energy blocks for utilities. The takeaway is there's a revolution

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 11>AI and data centers forcing utilities to look for new

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 11>power suppliers.

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 12>Tesla's filling that void.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 11>Their energy division will grow from ten billion and twenty

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 11>twenty four, so I think about fourteen billion this year.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 11>They can provide forty percent year of a year growth.

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 11>That's going to help, all right.

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Steve really enjoyed this conversation. Happy Holidays. That is Steve Wesley.

0:38:52.680 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 2>He is CEO of the Wesley Group. Service Now reaching

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 2>an agreement to buy cybersecurity startup Armists in a cash

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>deal valued at seven point seventy five billion dollars, marking

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 2>its biggest acquisition today. I caught up with Service Now

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 2>president and COO on Zaveri yesterday take.

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 13>A lesson when we saw this opportunity and seeing the

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 13>way that AI adoption is going. This is a great

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 13>opportunity for us to continue expanding in our security space.

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 13>So today our security business has crossed billion dollars at

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 13>service now and addition of Armies will allow us to

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 13>now get into more new capabilities with customers are demanding

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 13>from us, as well as allow us to really be

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 13>differentiated as we add AI data workflow with all of

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 13>it being around security and making sure that no breaches

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 13>customers have to deal with. So that's really the thinking

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 13>and Armies is a very innovative company, very well regarded,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 13>great team, very good domain expertise, and the combination of

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 13>US and them can really change the game in the

0:39:56.320 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 13>cybersecurity space and build a cybersecurity automation abilties very fast.

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 14>It gets to this idea too. I mean you mentioned

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 14>sort of the potential addition to revenue. I think they

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 14>talked about a three hundred million dollar a run rate

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 14>right now that they're sort of dealing with. This isn't

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 14>obviously just about the additional revenue that you get specifically

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 14>from Armies. I assume this is also about bringing in

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 14>new clients and more importantly keeping the clients you have there.

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, this is very strategic play. I mean, we are

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.479
<v Speaker 13>very confident of our own revenue plans, right, We don't

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 13>depend on armies to deliver our fifty plus rule of

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 13>fifty plus right, which is twenty plus percent as subscription

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 13>revenue growth and for thirty plus percent in terms of

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 13>having free cash flow margins. So we've been fifty plus

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 13>the last ten years and we keep on delivering that

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 13>and we're not dependent on armies to deliver on what

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 13>we have been sharing with the street. So this is

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 13>much more of a strategic play. They are three hundred

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 13>and forty million in revenue already growing at fifty percent.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 13>But the key thing is the technology and the IP

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 13>we're bringing in together with Service now capabilities as well

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 13>as a lot of the joint customers, we can go

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 13>together with and really provide them a full capability around

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 13>cybersecurity and help them with all the issues they're dealing

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 13>with from one platform perspective.

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 13>They have OURMISS has a lot of data around all

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 13>the assets company has, the physical assets. If you look

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 13>at now physical AI is coming into play as well

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 13>robotics and other things like that. That information combined with

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 13>our service NOWS Confrigation Management database which has access around

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 13>software and hardware. We can really give you full security

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 13>posture management and really give you the exposure guarantee that

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 13>nothing can go wrong.

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 2>And I want to talk about your dealmaking posture overall,

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 2>because we're talking about armists today. But you rewind the

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 2>clock to March, you struck an agreement to buy move

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Works for about two point eighty five billion dollars.

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Should we expect to see more.

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>M and A from Service Now in twenty twenty six.

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 13>No, I think we have all the assets we require.

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 13>I think this is an opportunity for Service Now to

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 13>really get into spaces where customers are asking us to

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 13>get quicker, so wrote myp ACS plus scaled capabilities will require.

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 13>But I think we are very confident with all the

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 13>things we have announced so far as the core things

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 13>we require from our portfolio perspective and execration we need

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 13>to do. We always can do continue doing what we've

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 13>been doing before around tukens and small IP purchases. But

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 13>from the security perspective, I think we have what we

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 13>need to become the premium security platform provider in the

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 13>market today.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 2>That was Service Now President on Itt Zavari. Now, before

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.240
<v Speaker 2>we go, it's time for talking tech. First up, Bitcoin

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 2>missing out on the Christmas chair, currently trading around eighty

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand today. That comes after a brutal sell off

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 2>in October, not from record highs. Token on track for

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>its worst quarterly performance since twenty twenty two. Plus, ads

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 2>could be coming to chat GBT. Open Ai is said

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to be working out the details.

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 3>To integrate ads into its.

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 2>AI chatbot, according to a report from The Information and

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet's WEAMO says it's updating software across its fleet to

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 2>better handle power outages. The move comes after self driving

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 2>taxis froze and costs a traffic jam during major power

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 2>failure last weekend in San Francisco. Beck does it for

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Don't forget to check out

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 2>our podcast This is Bloomberg