WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM: NASA and AI: Decoding Our Universe

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, it's Robert and Joe here. Today we've got

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit different to share with you. It's

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a new season of the Smart Talks with IBM podcast series.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>This season on Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Gladwell is back,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and this time he's taking the show on the road.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm is stepping outside the studio to explore how IBM

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>clients are using artificial intelligence to solve real world challenges

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and transform the way they do business.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>From accelerating scientific breakthroughs to reimagining education. It's a fresh

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>look at innovation in action, where big ideas meet cutting

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>edge solutions.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>You'll hear from industry leaders, creative thinkers, and of course

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Gladwell himself as he guides you through each story.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>New episodes of Smart Talks with IBM drop every month

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Learn more at IBM dot com slash smart Talks.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a paid advertisement from IBM.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>If I were to go back, I don't know thirty

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>years in Kenya. What's the difference between then and now

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>in terms of tree cover. I'm talking to Philip thego

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Special Technology envoid.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 4>To the Kenyan president, let's speak as if you think

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 4>about we aren elevent trol posts and previously we were

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 4>more than twenty percent. So we are cutting trees more

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 4>than we're planting them.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 3>In thirty years, Kenya last half its tree cover half.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 3>And here's why that matters. Kenya is a mountainous country.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Dotted throughout the highlands are dozens of what canyons call

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 3>water towers natural reservoirs, densely forested areas capable of absorbing

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the enormous amount of water that falls on the country

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>during the rainy seasons. The tree roots and undergrowth secure

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and capture moisture, then slowly release it into the rivers

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 3>that flow down into the country's low lying coastal areas.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>But in recent years the water towers have depleted, settlements

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>have encroached on them, trees have been chopped down, thousands

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>of acres cleared, the natural reservoirs ceased to hold nearly

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>as much water, so now Kenya is prone to extremes.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Too much water flowing down from the highlands in the

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 3>rainy season and too little water left during the dry season.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 4>So you have a couple of hours of water then

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 4>you have a couple of hours with no water that

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 4>it tops off to be dry by the city authority.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 4>So that's the significance of the water towers we have

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 4>when they cannot hold water.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Kenya desperately needed to restore its water towers by planting

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 3>as many trees as humanly possible. So in the fall

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty three, the Kenyan government took action. It

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 3>started a national holiday, national Tree Growing Day, a day

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 3>to allow the citizens of Kenya to go out into

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the forest to dominate the Kenyan countryside and plant as

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>many trees as they can, and the government decided on

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a number.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>The presidents focus right around how to ensure that we

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 4>do not lose more forests was in this very ambitious

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 4>campaign around fifteen billion trees.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>That's right, fifteen billion with a B.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 4>So imagine that number will tell you the ambition, not

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 4>as he tells you the deficit. It has to be

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 4>fifteen billion in the next eight years.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen billion trees over eight years averages out to more

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>than five million trees per day. That's a lot of trees.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>But with such a massive goal, how can you track

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>your progress? How do you know where to plant those

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>trees so they'll have the most impact. How do you

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>monitor where older trees are still being cut down? Well,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the answer to those questions came from IBM and a

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>little space agency called NASA. That's right, folks, Smart Talks

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>is going to space. My name is Malcolm Glawell. You're

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>listening to the latest episode of Smart Talks with IBM,

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>where we offer our list a glimpse behind the curtain

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of the world of technology. In this season, IBM has

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>gone inside elementary school classrooms, toured formulation labs at Loreel,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and spoken with the fan development team at Scuderia Ferrari HP.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>In this episode, how IBM is partnering with NASA to

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>build geospatial models using data from satellites to better understand

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>our Earth and Solar system.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:39.119
<v Speaker 5>Five four three two one zero all engine running liptoff.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 5>We have a liptoff thirty two minutes past the hour

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 5>liftoff on Apollo eleven.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 3>IBM has worked on space related projects since before I

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>was even born.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Im all for man.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>A team of four thousand IBM engineers helped create the

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Saturn five rocket that took Neil Armstrong to the Moon.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Buy up plate.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And when I think of NASA. I tend to picture

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the moon landing, or the team of people back in

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Houston guiding the Apollo mission, or the Hubble telescope, or

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>astronauts aboard the International Space Station. What I didn't think

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>about until now are NASA's geographers.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 6>In order to go places, you need at map things.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>This is Kevin Murphy, chief Science Data Officer at NASA's

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Science Mission Directorate.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 6>But I think that there's an assumption that NASAs all

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 6>about rockets and astronauts, and certainly that's a really large

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 6>part and important part of NASA.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>NASA sends people to space and looks out of the stars,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 3>but NASA also looks down at the Earth. The agency

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>has about one hundred and fifty satellites that use radar, lightar, landset, Aquaterra, cloudset, AURA,

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 3>low Earth orbit, Medium Earth orbit, geostationary orbit, on and on.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 3>In one sense, NASA makes hardware to build rockets and

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>spacecraft and all those satellites that circle the Earth. But

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally NASA also collects data. It's scientists and engineers people

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>like Kevin want to make the best use possible of

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 3>all the information gathered by all those many dozens of instruments.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 6>Right now, we gather around twenty five petabytes of new

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 6>observational data per year. In the next couple months, we're

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 6>about to launch a high resolution global radar. When that launches,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 6>will double how much we collect every year to about

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 6>fifty petabytes of information.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Actually, since we recorded this conversation, NASA launched that global radar,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>what they call NYSAR. So NASA is already generating new

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 3>data at the rate of fifty petabytes each year. To

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 3>put that in perspective, a single petabyte could hold about

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 3>five hundred billion pages of standard printed text. You know,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>can anyone sort of apply to use this data.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Is they don't even have to apply. It's free and

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 6>open data. It advances how we understand what we do

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 6>on Earth and how we see ourselves within the universe.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 6>People can take it for so many different downstream applications.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 6>So you can go to our websites today, you can

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 6>search through our tools and you can download information from

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 6>the Mars rovers, you can download information from the Lunar

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Reconnaissance Orbiter or any of the Earth Science Data satellites.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 3>And give me an example of a really cool application,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 3>a really cool use that someone I don't know in

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>academic or whatever has used your data for it is there?

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 6>It okay. So one of the really kind of cool

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 6>but unexpected observations that we had is that we launched

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 6>a pair of satellites in their early two thousands called Grace,

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 6>and these satellites orbit the Earth and they can measure

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 6>very precisely the distance that they're away from each other

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 6>as they orbit the Earth, and as you go into gravity,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 6>you can actually see a satellite accelerate and the other

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 6>one accelerate after it, right, And using that information, we

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 6>were trying to map kind of the gravity fields of Earth.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 6>What what they found is that they can actually map

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 6>below kind of the mass of Earth to where water

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 6>storage is. For instance, so aquifers, right, so you can

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 6>monitor through gravity how much water is being depleted or

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 6>added to an aquifer or the density of glaciers.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>So, just to back up for a moment, the presence

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and density of water deposits below the Earth's surface have

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 3>an effect on gravitational fields that are being measured in space.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 6>Correct.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And so does that tell you presume you learn

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>things like where there's an aquifer where you didn't think

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>there was an aquifer.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 6>Or if it's being depleted faster.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So who's using that kind of data?

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 6>All sorts of different organizations, whether they're you know, NG

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 6>or government agencies or people that are planning a large

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 6>agricultural product.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 3>How did you Was that an intentional decisisse?

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't. It was accidental.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>It was accidental. NASA has assembled a historically unprecedented mountain

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>of data about the physical world, free and open to anyone,

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and the possibilities for how that information can be used

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>are so vast that even NASA is still uncovering them.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>When I was a kid, I loved legos. I had

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge bin full of them. At the time, legos

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>were really just colored bricks of various sizes. They weren't

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>as complicated as they are today. And what I realized

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>even then was that there were more possibilities in a

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 3>box of legos than I could ever imagine on my own.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I played with my brother and he would show me

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>something that hadn't occurred to me, And I go to

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 3>my friend Bruce's and see that he was off on

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>some legos tangent that I'd never even thought of, like

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a cool bridge or a castle or a truck. I

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 3>use legos one way. Bruce used his legos in a

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>completely different way. NASA's data treasure trove is like a

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 3>very very big box of Legos. And here's the question.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>With so much data, containing so many possible connections, could IBM,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and specifically IBM's artificial intelligence help NASA scientists uncover patterns

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and connect systems in a way they've never done before.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 7>Everything started with a question, right.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking to one Bernabe Moreno, director of IBM Research

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>in Europe.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 7>As we advance AI, we have new tools to understand

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 7>the around this, understand the world, understand the language, and

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 7>understand our planets. And the question that we were asking

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 7>ourselves was all these new advances that we see in language.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 7>It was a post GPT moment. Could we apply the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 7>same idea and the same architecture and technology to a

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 7>dour planets?

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 3>The advent of AI created a new opportunity. What if

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>all of NASA's mountain of data could be organized, analyzed,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>understood by artificial intelligence. The original idea was to create

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>a geospatial foundation model for the Earth and from there

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 3>create additional specialized models for other scientific priorities of NASA,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>and finally quit an AI system that can understand all

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the data across those specialized models in order to uncover

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>hidden insights and relationships. Together, these models could unlock an

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>infinite number of potential applications. I asked Kevin Murphy at

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>NASA about the beginning of these Earth models.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 6>Has some colleagues, and we were investigating a number of

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 6>different avenues of using AI with our data, but also

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of the management and stewardship of the data, so

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 6>not only like the observations, but how we make it

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 6>available to people, make it discoverable. And they said, hey,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 6>we see these transform architectures. We think that they can

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 6>be applicable to some of the sequential observations that we make.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 6>We'd really like to work with IBM on that. And

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 6>I was like, I'm really skeptical, but because I hadn't

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 6>seen those types of tools really produce results that were

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 6>commensurate with the amount of effort you put into them, right,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>So we were getting some really good results and deep

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 6>learning approaches, but they took a lot of effort.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>But Kevin came around quickly.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 6>When we typically develop a new data product or an algorithm,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 6>it takes anywhere from you know, twelve months, eighteen months,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty four months to go from data and hypothesis to

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 6>results which is validated. We were able to get approximately

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 6>the same precision for some well known types of benchmarks

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 6>with and I think it was about four four months. Oh,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 6>instead of starting the work.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, so was it happened faster than you thought,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 3>much faster. In twenty twenty three, IBM and NASA launched

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 3>a foundation model trained on NASA's harmonized landset sentinel to

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>satellite data across the continental United States. They named the

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>model Prithvi, the Sanskrit word for Earth. The first version

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 3>of Prithvy used only Earth observation images and just that

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 3>was enough to totally change Kevin's idea of what foundation

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>models could do. But they didn't stop there. IBM and

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>NASA were encouraged at how well Prithvy worked for Earth

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>observation tasks, so they decided to create a more complex

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>version of Prithvy that could understand whether and climate data.

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 3>They hoped this new version of Prithvi would allow researchers

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to answer new questions about the Earth, from short term

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 3>weather forecasting to longer term climate effects. Imagine you have

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a map of all the different temperatures, pressures, clouds, rainfall,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and more from around the globe. With this map, IBM

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>and NASA could implement advanced tasks. They could track the

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 3>formation of El Nino or predict how the path of

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>a hurricane would change if the ocean temperature went up

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 3>by half a degree.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 7>I would always remember this moment was when we created

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 7>the Weather and Climate Foundational Model. The senior methodologist of NASA,

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 7>it was like, I cannot believe that it has changed

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 7>the way I think about the AI And ever since

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 7>he's been kind of preaching with this A samples.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>One and his team then took the model and decided

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 3>to test it, really tested. They took away ninety nine

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>percent of the data points and ran the experiment again.

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 3>What they were trying to figure out is if the

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 3>model had learned enough about the basic principles of the Earth,

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the underlying physics of the way the planet works, to

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 3>fill in the blanks on its own with just one

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>percent of the original data, would it still be accurate

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in its predictions. What happened The model crushed it so

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>it was able to extrapolate on the basis of one

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 3>percent of the data what the entire picture looked like yes,

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 3>because pre learned everything right, Yeah, it learned the kind

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of principles of exactly. Yeah. Oh wow, that's very very impressive.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So at that moment when you realize you could do that,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 3>and just curious about your emotional I mean, did you

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 3>jump up and down? What did you do that?

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 7>So he's like, wow, it was a very emotional meeting

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 7>because you know, having this person say now I'm convinced right, Yeah,

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 7>it was kind of a quite a special moment. These

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 7>moments make your life as a researcher.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Ibm And as a launch prith Fee for Weather and

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Climate in twenty twenty four, and while ibm And as

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>a scientist could use Privy to run interesting experiments, they

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>were even more excited about how Prithy could help people

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 3>in the real world. So let's go back to Kenya

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Ambassador Philip Diego and the country's great tree planting project.

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 4>So on those initial months there was a massive effort,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 4>including a couple of national holidays.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>For tree planting.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, where the entire cabinet was sent.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Ah, did you plant trees as I did?

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, I said, The entire cabinet plus someone

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 4>we have to be seen.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Are you good at the planet two weeks ago?

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's very easy to go hole put a tree

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>in the ground show.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Well wow, what planting a tree is easy? But remember

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 3>it has to happen fifteen billion times. IBM research has

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>been operating in Nairobi since twenty thirteen, and what Kenya wanted,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>at least in the beginning was straightforward. Fee model that

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>IBM and NASA built could be used to essentially make

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the world's greatest map, and Kenya, with IBM's help, could

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 3>use that model to make the world's greatest map of Kenya.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>The first step was to lay a grid across the

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 3>topography of the country, break the forest into manageable bite

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>sized pieces, each of which could be analyzed separately.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 4>So, because our forest is massive when you look at

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 4>it in terms of green hite, but only lay it,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 4>you're able to break it into pieces, like into boxes.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 4>And for us that was important because then it's easy

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 4>to tackle it when it's in a greed system than

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 4>just as a massive forest. So that was also what

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 4>the model was able to do.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Then the model painstakingly sorted through each of those boxes

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 3>and look for what Philip calls hotspots, so.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 4>You can see, for example, very quickly, which other areas

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 4>are being eroded very fast, and that you need to

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 4>quickly protect. Yeh, because you sometimes and that's where you

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 4>want to target, right, I mean it's not possible to

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 4>do everything at the same time.

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a definition of a hotspot? And how

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 3>many hotspots are there according to that definition? H, there

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 3>are a lot.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 4>So we have more than forty water towers, and I'll

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 4>tell you all of them have hotspots. And the hot

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 4>spots in my definition areas that are being degraded faster

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 4>and in a very unusual way. Right. You can literally

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 4>see how human activity is seriously degrading that particular area

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 4>that if you do not have a direct intervention, we'll

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 4>lose the entire forest. So that's the hot spot for us,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>because you think about cutting one hundred trees a day

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 4>and cutting a million trees a day, So that's a

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 4>hot spot. You want to look at places where there's

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 4>just unusually high activity of deforestation.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 3>In a hot spot. The size of each box in

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the grid was ten by ten meters, about half a

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>tennis court. That's how closely they were examining the forest,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>so very crudely. The model ingests all of this satellite

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 3>data and it helps you answer some very specific questions

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>like where should we prioritize our tree planning efforts, which

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 3>areas down to an extraordinary level of specificity, are eroding

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 3>most quickly. You know, all those kinds of practical questions

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 3>about how to direct your strategy.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 4>So if you think about a smart forest, right, and

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 4>that's really for us according it smart fencing, smart forests,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 4>everything that's smart because of AI. If you think about

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 4>your usual what you can see with your eyes and

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 4>then the satellite layer which just zooms in and you

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 4>see green. So what the model has been able to

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 4>do is to create a smart layer, right, and then

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 4>that smart layer you can actually see many things, from analytics,

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 4>to the greeds, to a dashboard, one a lot. So

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 4>able to layer to those blocks, you can quantify degradation

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 4>by blocks. You can match integrations, you can match reforestation.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I asked Philip to imagine what it would have been

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 3>like to attempt the tree planting project in an era

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>before AI. His answer was, plant fifteen billion trees, restore

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the water towers. Impossible. With Prithvie on Kenya's side, though,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>it's really happening. What should be clear by now is

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>how versatile Prithvie can be. Want to know how to

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 3>combat deforestation, Prithvy can model that. Want to know when

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 3>the best time in the year to plant your crops is,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>prithvy can help predict that too. Last year, six months

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>after IBM started helping Kenya with reforestation, Kenya needed Prithvy's

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 3>help on something else. And it was an emergency.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 4>So something was happening in the world that we sort

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 4>of had these flats that we didn't expect.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>In the spring of twenty twenty four, Kenya was hit

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 3>with thunderstorms and torrential rain, days and days of it.

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 4>And so I got a call from the Red Cross,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 4>the one of my friends, and they're like, Ambassador, we

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 4>need a little bit of help on how we deal

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 4>with response because what we see is unusual, right, because

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 4>normally you would only have one area. All of a sudden,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 4>we had an entire country flooding. In April, we had

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 4>about three eight hundred kilometers square kind of total land flooded,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 4>which is unusual for Kenyon. And so when I got

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 4>this call, we were like, Okay, there's someone could do

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 4>with IBM. We only did one function for the trees.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 4>It was actually a climate model, and we said, can

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 4>we use this to help us better respond to floods

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 4>And so that was how we started having this discussion

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 4>with IBM in terms of repurposing the model to help

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 4>us deal with this new challenge around floods.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Again, Prithvy is versatile. Prithe could use everything it knew

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 3>about the land, the forests and infrastructure to analyze how

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and where and when floods would occur. The Kenyan government

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>could then use the model to help the Red Cross

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 3>organize its respet pants, show areas that needed to be

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>evacuated or safe places where the Red Cross could set

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 3>up camps. That information was invaluable.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 4>Historically, what has happened is that they would set up

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 4>camp based on population congregation right where people assembly is

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 4>where they set up a camp, not based on any data,

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 4>right simply because people are there, they will come there

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>to provide services and emergency response. What we realize is

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 4>that that model doesn't work. So what we've been able

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 4>to do with IBM is be able to to sort

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 4>of give Red Cause very specific locations or options where

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 4>to set up camps. So if people come here, just

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 4>tell them no, move here. That's the safe place you

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 4>really want to go. So I think for me that

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 4>was really amazing. So we're calling them were a very

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 4>funny word for it, flood assembly points. We always have

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 4>fire for assembly points, but now we can say we

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 4>have literally flat assembly points that are safe or citizens.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating. So the model has ingested this incredibly granular

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 3>picture later of the topography and weather patterns of Kenya.

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>It's just giving you a set of useful predictions about

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 3>how you should shape your response.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and what we did remember is that, as I said,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 4>it was a full multistate called capability. What IBM gave

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 4>us was a base map. We didn't have that before

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>and a base model. So you cannot have these layers

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 4>up on layers, up on layers to be able to

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 4>make intelligent decisions.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Throughout my reporting on this episode, I've been really impressed

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>by what Prithvie can do. But it doesn't stop at

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 3>floods and reforestation. Prithvie has also been used to look

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 3>at wildfires and floods in the UK, and Kevin told

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 3>me that researchers in Africa have even used Prithvy to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 3>identify locust breeding grounds, which could help them prevent swarms

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 3>that destroy crops. All these are issues on land.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I always say to people, seventy percent of

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 8>our land mask is ocean.

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Kate Rice is the director of the Heart Tree Center,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 3>which focuses on adopting AI into UK's public and private sectors,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and one of those sectors is the blue economy oceans, fish, shellfish.

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 3>But oceans are huge, and getting data formotions is difficult.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 8>So you're dealing with something where there's not a lot

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 8>of people walking around collecting data. So the real difficulty

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 8>is understanding that collecting enough data to make anything makes sense.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 8>And oceans are very complex in terms of their interaction

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 8>with our climate and how they interact with the climate,

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 8>so understanding the physics space models is pretty challenging too.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Once again, enter IBM IBM created a new geospace to

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 3>help us better understand our oceans. Hartree and IBM, along

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 3>with the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, the UK Science and Technology

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Facilities Council, and the University of Exeter have all partnered

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 3>to focus the model's power on the waters around the

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 3>United Kingdom, which ultimately will help the UK's blue economy.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 8>You get these major blooms in algae, so the ocean

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 8>goes green and you might see it in lakes as well. Now,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 8>if you are shell fishing and that's what you're harvesting,

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 8>you can't harvest cockles muscles to be very colloquial, when

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 8>you have algae blooms because they're poisonous. So there are

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 8>certain times the year where you can harvest. In a

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 8>certain times of year, you can't if you keep having

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 8>the algal blooms. Just to put it on an economic terms,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 8>that's a problem. So if we look at it that way,

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 8>that's an issue. We really do need to try and

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 8>understand where these algal blooms will happen, when they will happen,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 8>and how to limit them, because obviously, if you're shell

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 8>fishing as your livelihood, that's going to really impact you.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Kate told me that understanding these algal blooms, how they form,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 3>why they form, and how they move would allow people

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>to better manage them.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 8>What is it you're putting in the water. Are you

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 8>putting fertilizers in the water in the near shore environment

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 8>that is causing those algal blooms? Is it because we

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 8>are heating up the oceans and particularly our near shore environments.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 8>That is causing that. I don't know. I'm not a specialist,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 8>but that's what you're trying to figure out. Is there

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 8>something we are doing that is creating those environments that

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 8>is causing those algal blooms or is it natural? And

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 8>natural is always a difficult one because I would say

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 8>we live in the very managed environment, and particularly in

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 8>the UK, very few landscapes are natural. Most of it

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 8>is managed in some way. Are we managing it in

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 8>an appropriate way? Is there changes in how we behave

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 8>that could make things better?

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Not that I needed more examples to sell me and

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 3>how useful the Prispian models are, but Kate gave me

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 3>a few more use cases that reinforced just how exciting

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 3>foundation models are for our oceans.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 8>These big brown seaweeds can really help with carbon sequestration.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 8>Imagine if we could improve the environment enough so that

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 8>we could have more of that, so that we could

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 8>SEQUENTI more carbon. The other thing is wind power. In

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 8>the UK, we have a lot of offshore wind farms

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 8>and we're doing really well with our renewable energy resources.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 8>So where do we put that and how does that

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 8>impact sand movements? So these sandbars and things aren't static,

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 8>they move, So understanding that is really important for where

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 8>you're going to put your suboceanic infrastructure. So you've got

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 8>cables going across the oceans. If we're going to use

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 8>our oceans more, we need to understand what that environmental

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 8>impact is going to be long term.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 3>The Ocean Model launched at the end of September twenty

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. The research is only beginning. When I sat

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>down with Kevin Murphy at NASA, I wanted to understand

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>where all of this impressive work was going. And one

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of the signature aspects of this work is that it's

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 3>not just for IBM and NASA researchers. Anyone can use

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 3>these models.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 6>So before, if you were a researcher, or let's say

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 6>you were a farmer or maybe a technology informed person

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 6>that was interested in something like this, you would have

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 6>to learn about how to do remote sensing, how to

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 6>calibrate the imagery, how to stitch it together, because you

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 6>know they come in kind of postage stamps that you

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 6>have to squash together, and then you'd have to learn

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 6>about the algorithms necessary to do all the processing right,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 6>So a lot of work, and then you could actually

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 6>do the mapping that you were interested in. Today. What

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 6>you can do is you can go to hugging face,

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 6>which is where this model exists in the open using

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 6>kind of our open science principles, and you can apply

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 6>it to future or historical observations without having all of

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 6>that background information.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 3>And with the partnership between NASA and IBM, these foundation

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 3>models are multiplying. The new version of Prithvi I mentioned

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 3>launched in September twenty twenty four. Then in August twenty

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, NASA and IBM launched another foundation model called Syria,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 3>based on data from the Sun. Soria can help predict

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 3>solar flares which can disrupt communications and increase radiation for

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 3>high altitude flights. And then there's the Ocean model I

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 3>talk about with Kate Royce. So what does the future

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 3>look like for all these foundation models built from NASA data?

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 3>If I wanted to look five or ten years out

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to understand erosion patterns in a coastal town, you could

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 3>give me.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Eventually, I think we'll get there. Yeah, you know, we've

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 6>really only been doing this for the past few years.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 6>There is a lot of I think capabilities to still

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 6>discover and uncover with how we use these models for

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 6>like especially long term predictions. Like you're talking about.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you think you can't do and that you

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 3>really love to do. What's the kind of like great

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 3>white whale problem.

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 6>We can't do this today, but I'd like to be

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 6>able to do it in the future, which is really

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 6>the linking of the models together. Right. So right now

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 6>we have these isolated areas where you know, we have

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 6>the harmonized Lansat Sentinel or gspatial model. We have the

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 6>weather model, which can look at short terms. We're building

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 6>out the heliophysics model to look at the sun dynamics.

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 6>But they're probably going to have to be additional models

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 6>built so that we can understand how they interact with

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 6>one another, right, And that is you know, kind of

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 6>towards a digital twin of kind of the Solar system

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 6>or Earth systems, which which I think is a big

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Harry problem, but if we understand it, we might be

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 6>able to address some of the questions that you just

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 6>asked about prediction.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 3>So if you linked all of those models together, basically

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying is, can I you say a digital twin.

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 3>You're essentially replicating holistically how our world works. And do

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 3>you think that is achievable.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's immediately achievable, but based on kind

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 6>of the progress that we've seen in the last three

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 6>or four years, I think it's more achievable today than

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 6>it was then.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 3>You think you'll see it in your Yeah, and I've

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 3>got a couple of years last. Smart Talks with IBM

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>is produced by Matt Ramano, Amy Gains McQuaid, Trina Menino,

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 3>and Jay Harper. Were edited by Lacy Roberts. Engineering by

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Nina Bird Lawrence, mastering by Sarah Buguer, music by Gramoscope,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Strategy by Tatiana Lieberman, Cassidy Meyer and Sophia Derlin. Special

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 3>thanks to the team at NASA's Science Mission Directorate. Smart

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries and

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia. To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 3>to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Glawell. This is a paid advertisement

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 3>for my The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily represent

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 3>IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. Since we recorded this episode,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 3>IBM and NASA released Syria their solar weather model. In

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 3>early testing, it showed us sixteen percent improvement in solar

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 3>flare prediction accuracy. This is the kind of improvement that

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 3>helps protect our satellites, our power grids, and our GPS

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>systems from the Sun's unpredictable nature. And the next step

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in this partnership another model coming in twenty twenty six.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Looking beyond the Earth and the Sun, the universe of

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 3>possibilities just keeps expanding.