WEBVTT - RERUN: Copyright and Fair Use

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you up Here? In the

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>United States? It is Martin Luther King Junior Day, and

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that means that we have the day off work, so

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do a rerun today because I'm I'm

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not working today. So this episode originally published

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in one and I keep wanting to say that's last year,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of remind myself it's not two anymore. Yeah,

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this came out may see is called copyright and fair use.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's always important to revisit this topic because

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's one that's a little complicated, and I

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people have misconceptions about what fair

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>use is and how it works. So enjoy and I'll

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>chat with you a little bit at the very end.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It has been a while since I've done an episode

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about the concepts of copyright and fair use. And after

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I keep seeing the phrase no copyright infringement intended over

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and over on places like YouTube and Instagram, I figure

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good time to tackle this again, because people

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to pretend like copyright infringement only applies under very

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>specific circumstances and that with just a little bit of

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>verbiage you can get around it, when really the opposite

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is true. And since the Internet and technology allows for

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities for a copyright infringement, and because various governments

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and around the world have passed legislation to you know,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically tackle copyright infringement, and companies have lobbied endlessly for

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>more restrictive copyright rules, I think it fits the scope

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of tech stuff, particularly since a lot of these laws

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>were formed in reaction to changes in technology. So first,

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>let's kind of define what copyright is now. Essentially, copyright

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>guarantees the creator of a work or an entity that

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has been designated by the creator of the work, the

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>right to profit off of that work, the right to

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>make copies of that work and then distribute or sell them,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you just you own that intellectual property.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>No one else can come and make copies of it

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>without your permission. The works in this case range from

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the written word to music, to paintings, sculpture, uh to

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>digital files. I mean, copyright now applies to lots of stuff. Clearly,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it didn't apply to all of that in the beginning.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>But something that has a voulved over time. It does

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not include inventions. Those are covered under patent law. And

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>then you also have things like trademarks, which make things

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. I might talk about trademarks and copyright in

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a future episode to kind of talk about how those

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>complicate things because companies have tried to use trademarks in

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>order to extend copyright protection. But trademarks last in perpetuity.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Copyright only lasts a certain amount of time, at least

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in theory. We'll get to all that. So along with

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the right to profit from intellectual property comes with it

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>protections against others who are taking a work and profiting

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>off of it without permission. Now you can see the

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>value of this concept right away, I imagine. So let's

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>say you are a musician and you write a song.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It was your work, you create the whole piece, You

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote the music, and you wrote the lyrics, and you

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>plan to earn money through this song. Maybe you're going

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to record it to some form of media and then

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>sell copies of the song. So you filed a copyright

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for the song, which gives you the exclusive rights to

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>make copies of it uh in whatever format you like,

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's digital files or physical media, or even like

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>sheet music. You can charge whatever you like for your work,

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>though obviously if you go bonkers and you ask for

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculously high price, you aren't likely to get a

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of takers. You also have the protection should someone

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>else start making copies of your song without your permission.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they are performing it themselves, in which case they

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>should secure a license first, or maybe they're taking your

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>original recording and just duplicating it. So let's say that

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you created an MP three file and they just copy

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the MP three file endlessly and start either giving it

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>away or selling it to people. You could sue that person,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>and in court you could prove that you hold the

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>copyright to that piece of music, and assuming the court

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>agrees with that the copyright is legitimate, you could then

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>seek damages against the person or entity that made the

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>unauthorized copies of your work. Music is actually really a

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.799
<v Speaker 1>special case because you can have multiple copyrights on the work.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You could have one for the lyrics, then you could

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>have another for the musical composition itself, and that would

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that someone who wanted to play your music but

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>change the lyrics would still potentially be liable for copyright violations.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to get back to that a little

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>bit later in this episode, but it is something to

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind. However, Then there are such things as

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>mechanical licenses. This sets out the rules for stuff like

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>playing recorded music in particular places. So if you've ever

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>been to like a restaurant or a theater and you've

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>heard music being played over the sound system, chances are

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that that place of business has paid out a license

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fee in order to be able to do that. Intellectual

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>property rights get pretty complicated. Uh. It also depends upon

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the size of the venue. I might have to do

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a future episode to kind of talk about all the exceptions, because,

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it does get complicated, and in some cases,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's a very small venue, Uh, they can sometimes

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>be exempt from having to pay the same sort of

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>license fees that larger venues have to pay. And part

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the argument there is that the number of people

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who would actually experience the music is much smaller because

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the venue is smaller. Anyway, in the old days, as

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in before the printing press, copyright wasn't really that big

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of a thing, like, there wasn't a big concern for it.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>There were predecessors for formal copyright, but truthfully, there wasn't

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>much occasion to use them because the act of copying

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>a work involved actually making a copy out by hand,

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>handwriting the copy of a written work. This was a

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>painstaking process and not something that could be done on

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>any sort of scale, and so copyright wasn't as huge

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a concern just because infringement itself was not something that

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>was easy to do. And to that the fact that

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>much of the world's population was illiterate and there just

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a foundation for copyright infringement to really take hold.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Then a smarty pants named Johann Gutenberg had to go

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and invent the movable type printing press, at least the

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>European version. I should stress that Europe, because other parts

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world were actually further advanced with printing technologies

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>than Europe was. But this is the one that Western

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cultures tend to talk about because we get a little myopic.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But i'll i'll set aside the commentary. So with the

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>printing press, it became possible to set the type on

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the press then print out sheets one after the other

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in relatively quick succession. Now, it still took time to

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>set the press between pages because you had to change

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all the type out right. You had to remove all

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the type, set the type again, and then print the

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>next sheet. So you would typically use the press to

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>print a bunch of the same sheet in a row

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>before you would reset the type and move on to

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the next sheet. However, you could also use a single

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>large sheet of paper to set up multiple pages of text,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you could divide up the quadrants of a

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>printing press and change the type up so that you

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>are actually creating multiple pages per press. And then you

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fold the paper in such a way that that makes

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all sense, Like if you fold it once along a

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>vertical line, so you you fold it in half vertically. Um,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>then are along the vertical access, I should say. Then

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you end up with a folio that was a single

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>large sheet of paper that would have one page printed

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the left side, one page printed on the right side.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You have a vertical fold in the middle, and then

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you can just keep printing those over and over again,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you bind a bunch of those together and

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got a book, or you could do a double fold,

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>and you could have a quarto, which would also involve

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>you having to make a cut along the horizontal line.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But then you've got four pages per sheet, so you

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>could do that and that it means that with one

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>press you're effectively printing four pages, and then you let

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it dry, you flip it over and you can print

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>another four pages. Very useful. So this was these were

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>different ways that you could end up creating books fairly quickly.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The process of publishing became much faster than with people

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it by hand, but there wasn't yet a formalized

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>protection in place for the creator of the works. And

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point, the typical approach was for an author

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to receive a flat fee for their work, which would

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>then go to a book printer to produce, so the

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>printer would take ownership of that work from that point forward.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Then it was just a matter of time before other

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>printers would get hold of the book and start making

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their own copies, at least for books that proved to

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be popular for authors. There really wasn't a whole lot

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of profit in this approach. William Shakespeare, who you know,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you could argue was one of the greatest English writers,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly known for his plays but also his poetry, He

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>never sought out the printing of his plays. Others would

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>give it a shot. Either they would try to copy

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>down plays as they were being performed and then go

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and print what they had transcribed, or they would try

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to get hold of the sides that actors were using

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in their roles, or a combination of the two. It

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>was really only after Shakespeare's death that his friends got

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>together and did their best to gather his plays and

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>publish them. Now, based on what I know about Shakespeare,

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the reason that he did not seek out

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>publication of his works was that it really wasn't where

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the money would be for him. He would get a

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pay the flat fee for every play he wrote, but

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, he was a part owner of the theater itself,

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like the Globe Theater or the Rose Theater. He was

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the company that owned the theater, so that

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>meant he would actually take a share of the box office. So,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in other words, his main goal was to attract crowds

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to the theater. That's where the money was. But you

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can bet that if there had been serious money in

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>publication back in those days, Shakespeare would have been all

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>over it because a quick glance at some of the

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits he was involved with during his lifetime indicates he

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>had a certain appreciation for the accumulation of wealth. So Shakespeare,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>great artist, also a business guy, and had publishing been

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a bigger business for the author, he certainly would have

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>gone that route. I'm sure of it. Now. The printing

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>press was a truly transformational piece of technology. It became

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>easier to produce many copies of a work book. Printing businesses,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>which would evolve into true publishing houses, began to pop

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>up all over Europe, and the powers that be, that is,

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Church and the various governments of Europe viewed book

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>printers as both an asset and a potential threat. Through

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the printers, these organizations could spread information quickly. The Bible

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was a very early candidate for printing, as the Guttenberg Bible.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Prooves and governments could use printing presses to spread information

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about laws and declarations and that kind of thing. But

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>printing presses also meant it was easier to print stuff

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>that undermined authority. People who had a boned pick with

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the folks who were in charge could potentially spread their

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas and maybe find sympathetic souls who shared those same beliefs.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So the printing press could enable existential threats to the

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>power structure. And this is where we get a predecessor

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to copyright. Now, this predecessor wasn't so much about making

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sure the author of a book was fairly compensated. Instead,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it was more about keeping printing houses under control. The

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>basic idea was that any business that wished to print

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>materials had to first secure an official license from, you know,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the government of that region. These licenses typically meant that

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a specific printer would be responsible for the printing of

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>particular works to the exclusion of all other printers. So

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you might say that this one printer can print this

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>one book, and no other printer in the region is

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that, so they have a monopoly on

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that specific title. In fact, they called the monopolies. These

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>agreements would last a set number of years, which wasn't

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>too different from the concept of modern copyrights. If any

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>other printer was found to produce a work that some

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>other printer had exclusive rights to, that matter could go

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to court. But this was all about the printing houses,

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>not authors. England passed its first actual copyright law in

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ten. This law changed things quite a bit. A

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>publisher would have a fourteen year period of exclusive rights

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to publish any new book. Existing books that the printing

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>house was already printing would enjoy protection for twenty one years.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>After that, the author of the work could choose to

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>renew the copyright if the author was still alive. Otherwise

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the work would enter into the public domain, meaning anyone

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>would be legally allowed to make a copy of that

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>work or use it in any way they liked. There

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>were no longer any protections on that piece of work,

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was available for any public use. The United

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>States wouldn't get its first true copyright law until nearly

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a century later. But let's be fair, there was no

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>such thing as the United States in seventeen ten, so

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna cut the Young Nations some slack here. The

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>copyright law of the US followed closely in the footsteps

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Copyright Act of Britain, which was also known

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>as the Statute of Ann as in Queen Anne. So

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that the US law worked was that an

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>author would register their work with the U. S District

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Court of their particular region, and they would in return

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>receive an exclusive copyright for fourteen years, with the option

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to renew for a second fourteen year period, and after

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>those twenty eight years, assuming that you actually renewed your copyright,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the work would then enter into the public domain with

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Statute of ann and the Copyright Act of seventeen

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety in the US or at the point where authors

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would get a little more protection and a chance to

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit more from their own work. It was no longer

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the case of a one time flat fee in every instance. Now,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I say authors, but often we're really still talking about publishers. Here.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>The publisher retains the copyright because the copyright allows the

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>publisher to, you know, publish the works. Otherwise the author

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would have to grant permission for each printing. You'd have

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a license for it. It all gets clunky, right,

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that the author has exclusive copyright to their work, they

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have to grant permission to whichever entity is creating copies

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of that work. You often see this reflected today in

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ways that are kind of confusing. When you agree to

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>certain platforms, there's language there that seems to suggest that

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>anything you post on that platform is that platform's property.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But usually the reasoning for the language is to make

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that the platform has the necessary permission to display

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is you're posting, because otherwise, every single time

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you posted, you would have to have some sort of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>licensing agreement or something that would give permission to the

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>platform to actually display the thing you wrote. It gets

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty complicated now. The same would be true for most

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>music produced in the modern era. The copyright isn't necessarily

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>held by the artist, but by a music label. It's

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how Thomas Edison made sure that his

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>name was on every patent produced out of his business.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>He might not have had a direct hand in the

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>creation of every invention. In fact, we know that he

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a direct hand and a lot of them,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but he sure as heck made sure that his signature

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was on the patent to every single one, so that

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he had a right to each of them anyway. One

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>of the consequences of all of this is that, to

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this day, getting the permission of an author or artist

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to use their work typically isn't enough. That's

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because in many cases that individual creator doesn't actually hold

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the copyright to the work. It's more likely that some

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate entity will hold the copyright on behalf of that creator.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So you really have to get the permission of whatever

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>entity holds the copyright for any specific intellectual property. In

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>some cases it might be an individual creator, in other

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cases it might be a big company. So let's say

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you met an artist for Disney in a cafe

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and this artist told you, oh, it's totally cool if

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you use they're drawing of a popular Disney character for

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>something you're doing, that's probably not good enough because that

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>artist wouldn't even hold the copyright for that work. Disney would,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and copyright laws would evolve quite a lot over the

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>following centuries. They expanded to include more types of works,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>as well as to allow for things like licenses, And

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>without these considerations, it might be illegal to, you know,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>play playback an album without first getting permission of the

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>music label, which is clearly absurd. You wouldn't have it

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>where you bought an album, you went home, and every

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>time you were to play the album, you first had

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to get permission from the music label to do that.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>That just doesn't make sense. But that's the sort of

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff that actually had to be codified into law. It's

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not enough to just everyone agree like,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>oh well, that's absurd. It actually had to be written

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>down somewhere and ratified. One of the biggest changes to

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>copyright has been how long that copyright protection lasts. This

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>also ties into how many capitalist societies treat corporations, which

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is uh ridiculously in my mind. So here in the

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>United States in particular, corporations are treated legally like a person.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about that's kind of bonkers more

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>than kind of bankers. I should say, people get old,

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>people pass away. Corporations, Assuming that they are run well

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and they provide some sort of goods or services that

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>people want or need, they can exist indefinitely. And to

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>corporate and that relies heavily on intellectual property, is quite

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>loath to give up that meal ticket, and so corporations

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>over the years have lobbied hard to extend copyright in

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>order to prevent the i P that they own from

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>falling into the public domain. And then they can no

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>longer exclusively exploit that i P. They could still exploit it,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they could still sell stuff with it, just it doesn't

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>stop anyone else from doing the same thing. Perhaps the

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>most high profile of all these companies was one that

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed fixated on a particular mouse that I've already mentioned.

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain more after this quick break. Before the break,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I tease that corporations played a huge part in lobbying

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Congress to extend the protections of copyright, and one of

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>those corporations is the Walt Disney Company and the cultural

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that is Mickey Mouse. The cartoon Steamboat Willie, which

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was the first Mickey Mouse cartoon, was released in nineteen

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. Now, at that time, US copyright law had

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a twenty eight year protection limit, which could then be

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>renewed for a second twenty eight year term, which would

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>provide a total of fifty six years of copyright exclusivity

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to the owner of an i P. But then the

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>i P would enter the public domain. That means that

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>if copyright law had remained unchanged since Steamboat Willie, Steamboat

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Willie would have entered the public domain back in nineteen

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>eight four. Spoiler alert, As of the recording of this podcast,

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Steamboat Willie is not in the public domain yet, so

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>things did not remain the same. By the nineteen seventies,

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Disney Company was lobbying hard to change copyright laws,

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be clear they weren't the only ones,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but you freaquently here Disney specifically in regard to lobbying

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for copyright law extensions, and it worked. Congress changed the

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection so that copyrights that were held by individual

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>authors protection would last the lifetime of that author plus

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>another fifty years. So now we're well beyond guaranteeing the

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>right of a person to profit off of their work.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you're saying you're guaranteeing that multiple generations of

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an author's family can continue to benefit from the work

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the author. The author will be dead and fifty

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>years will pass, and until those fifty years are up,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the estate will continue to benefit monetarily from that author's work,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>assuming that you know people are still buying it. Obviously,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>if it falls out of favor and no one's purchasing anything,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>then those rights, while they're important, don't actually leverage into

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>any kind of monetary gain. But this is where I

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>start feeling a little weird about all this, because I

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>think it's one thing to want to provide for your family,

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>right you want to earn money and help contribute to

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your family or households well being. But it's another to

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>create generational wealth that removes the need for future generations

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, make any sort of meaningful contribution themselves.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of cases where the children of authors

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>who were incredibly successful, uh have themselves gone on to

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do amazing things, which is great. But there are also

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>cases of people who just kind of, you know, never

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>bothered to do anything because they didn't really have a

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>need to. They were all of their needs were already

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>met because they were earning income on something that their

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>parents or grandparents or great grandparents had done, and there

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>never was any need for them to do anything. Not

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>super helpful for the general society. Not very healthy in

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>my mind anyway. For corporations that owned i P. It

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was a different story, right, because corporations don't die, so

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you can't say the life of a corporation plus fifty years.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, the Copyright Protection extended the term

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>for works that had been published before nineteen to a

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>total term of seventy five years of protection. UH. The

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Extension pushed that that protection of Steamboat Willie to

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three because of that, because it was published

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy five years later would be up to

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three. However, in nineteen Congress passed the Copyright

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Term Extension Act, also known as the Sunny Bono Copyright

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Term Extension Act, after the late congressman and musicians Sonny

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Bono Bono had passed away in an accident while Congress

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was hashing out this extension bill, so he was posthumously

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>honored with the title of the the Act. This act

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>extended the copy of right protection for any work published

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty three or later. And the extension meant

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that the copyright protection now went from the life of

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the author plus fifty years to the life of the

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>author plus seventy years for those works that were created

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>by an individual artist. And it meant for works of

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate authorship, you know, works that like Steamboat Willie from Disney,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they went from having seventy five years of protection to

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>either ninety five years after publication or one twenty years

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>from the date of creation, whichever ended earlier. So you know,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate corporations might create something but not yet publish it.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>So in some cases you would actually have a shorter

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>period between time of creation and a hundred twenty years

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>than time of publication in ninety five years. Anyway, any

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>published work before nineteen seventy eight would get an additional

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years of copyright protection, so they went from seventy

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>five years to ninety five years, and those extra twenty

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>years meant that Steamboat Willie will now enter public domain

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially at the beginning of twenty twenty four, unless between

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>now and then there's yet another change to copyright law,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>which seems highly unlikely because there is a large opposition

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. Since the Copyright Act I've mentioned so far

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>retroactively protected any work published after nineteen twenty three, it

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>meant that we finally saw some published works go into

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the public domain beginning in twenty nineteen. So on January one,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, any copyrighted works that were published in nineteen

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, with a few exceptions that have to do

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with music because music is complicated otherwise, they entered the

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>public domain at that point. This was the first time

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty one years and a large collection of works

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>fell out of copyright protection and into the public domain

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>only because of the timing of changes to copyright law

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, So works from nineteen twenty two

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>had entered the public domain back in nineteen nine eight,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>but then you had the change the copyright law, and

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so any works from nineteen three enjoyed twenty more years

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of protection because of that recent extension, and thus they

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>only entered the public domain in twenty nineteen. That's the

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>difference that a single year can make. This year in

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>one we saw works like f Scott Fitzgerald's The Great

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Gatsby go into the public domain. You can now make

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as many copies of The Great Gatsby as you like.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You can hand them out for free. You could charge

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for them if you want to. It's public domain. Dr

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Doolittle's Zoo also went into public domain this year. Agatha

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Christie's The Secret of Chimneys made its exit from copyright protection.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen twenty five silent film version of been Her,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>not the Charlton Heston version, but the silent film version

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is in public domain, as is Lawn Cheney's The Phantom

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Opera. Also, the silent film version of Wizard Oz.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Again not the big musical version, you know, not the

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the follow the Yellow Brick Road version, but the silent

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>film version of Wizard of Oz is also in the

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.959
<v Speaker 1>public domain this year. Now, that means that if you

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>want to make copies of Lawn Cheney's Pohntom of the

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Opera and you want to distribute those widely, if you

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>want to post the entire movie on YouTube, you can.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You can do it for free. You could also, you know,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sell DVDs of it if you wanted to, you could.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>You could have press DVDs with Lawn Cheney's Pountom of

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Opera and you could sell them. I don't know

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if anyone would buy them, but you can do it.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You can do it here, you can do it there,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you can do it everywhere in the US anyway, it

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is no longer in copyright now, backtracking just a little bit,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the printing press had made copyright protection more or less

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a necessity to prevent publishers from pouncing on each other

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and flooding the market with copies of various books. But

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time, copyright was just something that

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>big companies were mostly concerned with. It was a non

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>fact for the average person. I mean, it affected us,

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't come into any sort of conflict with

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection because most of us just didn't have access

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to equipment that we would need to replicate an original work.

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>If back in the mid nineteen twenties you managed to

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get your grubby hands on a copy of The Great Gatsby,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably didn't have the ability to copy that work

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and then sell it to two people yourself, you know,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like undercutting big bookstores or whatever. Publishing houses were protecting themselves,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but they were doing so mostly from other publishing houses.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The average person was not a threat. So the nature

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of copyright law was all about corporate entities protecting themselves

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from each other. This, by the way, is what kind

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of becomes an issue in the modern day, where you've

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>got the the effect of like a nuclear arsenal, you know,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>corporations against each other that could then be aimed against

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the individual because the nature of copying has changed, so

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a disproportionate hardship on the individual because of that.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So over time, various inventions meant more people would have

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to create copies of stuff, And these technological

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>advancements always came hand in hand with media companies freaking

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the heck out about it, which is not an exaggeration.

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>The invention of technologies like cassette tapes or VHS, tapes,

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>burnable compact discs, and of course, digital media all sent

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>media companies into a tizzy. Each invention prompted the companies

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to object strenuously and to proclaim that should these technologies

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>fall into the hands of the common, unwashed masses like myself,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that the era of stuff like film or television or

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>popular music would all come to an end and the

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>entire industry would crash down on its self, and we

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would then be back to banging rocks together for entertainment.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>News Alert. None of that happened, but in the process

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw lots of other laws passed that expanded copyright

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>protection by creating a pretty extensive framework for prosecution should

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>an IP holder discover that someone has copied or distributed

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they hold the rights to without proper authorization.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I will cover more of those in the next episode. Now.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons the public domain is important is

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that works can have a great deal of relevance and

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>usefulness many years after they were published. Think of all

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the classics that are out there that have stood the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>test of time. But if copyright lasted forever, these works

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>would be under a tight restriction in perpetuity. Public domain

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>means that eventually these works will become widely accessible. It's

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>balancing out the benefits that go to the I P

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>holder against the benefits of society as a whole. All right,

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But what about fair use? Okay? So, fair use is

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a concept that allows someone to use part of a

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>copyrighted work that uh without permission in one of several ways.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's fairly narrow in its scope, but also kind

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of fuzzy at the edges. So it's narrow in scope,

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but there are no hard yes or no answers to

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. In general, fair use allows someone to make

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>limited use of a portion of a copyrighted work for

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of news reporting, research, teaching, or criticism and commentary.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Parody falls into that last category as well, but we're

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back to that because it's a more specific

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>approach than just adding funny words to existing music. Fair

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>use means that you don't have to secure permission from

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the copyright holder if you're using a small portion of

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that original work in one of these ways. So, for example,

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>if I were criticizing a film, I could use small

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>clips of that film during my critique. Let's say I'm

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>uploading a video to YouTube where I am critiquing a movie,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I could include tiny clips of that film in order

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate specific points of my criticism, and I wouldn't

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have to get permission first. The clips I used would

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>need to relate directly to that criticism. However, I might

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about lighting composition, and I'll use clips

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>from Robert Egger's film The Lighthouse, because that film had

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal lighting in it. So I'd use those examples to

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about specific lighting techniques and how they shape storytelling

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and what significance they play in the unfolding of the

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>story of the Lighthouse. But if I were to get

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more loosey goosey, my protection of fair use would not

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be as solid. Similarly, if I would use very short

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>clips of the film in my critique, my argument of

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fair use is better supported then if I were to say,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>include thirty minutes of the movie surrounded by like five

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes of criticism. Now, does that mean there's a specific

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>safe amount of copyrighted material that you can use without

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fear of retribution. No. There is a common misconception that

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if you use less than say, fifteen seconds of audio

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>from a source or six seconds or whatever that that's

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>small enough to be fair use and no one's going

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to come after you. That is just not true. Or

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rather it's it's not a guarantee. Specifically, it's not a

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>guarantee if you're not using that as some form of

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>commentary or criticism on the work itself, If you're using

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>it as like the button to a moment, you know,

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like a sound bite or whatever, there's very little support

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for a fair use argument there. So if I just

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>filled up this podcast with sound bites from various films

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and music, TV shows and radio spots and stuff like

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that without paying a license for all of those things,

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I would be flying pretty darn close to the sun.

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Because unless I'm using those snippets in very specific ways,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>such as to criticize those original works that the snippets

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>belong to, or to report on the news of those snippets,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 1>well I would be infringing on copyright. That doesn't necessarily

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>mean anyone is going to come after me. I mean,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>chances are, for really small stuff, i'd probably be okay

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>unless my podcast got wildly successful, in which case I

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>could represent a pretty lucrative target. If the copyright holders

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>looked at my podcast and said, well, that show is

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>making X million dollars a year, and a lot of

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that popularity, we could argue comes from its use of

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>our intellectual property. We can get a piece of that

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that pie like that. That would be the thought process,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and it could actually work in court. So it doesn't

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>mean on bulletproof if I'm just using tiny little clips.

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not until it goes to court that I really

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm going to have to pay or not.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So fair use isn't a concept that has hard borders

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's all interpretive stuff. And here's the key

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to all of it. Fair use is something that gets

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>determined in court. So, in other words, you can't really

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>use fair use proactively as a defense. It's a defense

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that you make if a copyright holder pursues a claim

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>against you for copyright infringement. So let's say that I

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>did that critique of The Lighthouse and the film company

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>A twenty four which released and distributed the film here

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Let's say that that that company

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>came after me for copyright infringement, and I would have

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to defend my use of those clips in court, and

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have to cite fair use in that process.

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the proceedings, I would likely have to prove that

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the way I use those clips was in fact to

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>critique the film, and that the excerpts I used were

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>appropriate and constituted a relatively small percentage of the overall

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>critique and a very small percentage of the original film.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Courts decide on a case by case basis if a

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>particular instance is fair use or not. There isn't a

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>blanket fair use defense. You gotta go in front of

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the courts to do it. And this is what I

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>meant by that nuclear arsenal. When it comes to companies

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>versus companies, typically you have lawyers on both sides who

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>are just perpetually employed by these companies that call each

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>other up and they work things out, and you might

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have a licensing agreement, or you might agree to a settlement,

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but it rarely goes to court. When it comes to individuals,

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>most of us don't have access to that kind of

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>legal defense. So for us, it's like a math sive,

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>well funded company with high paid lawyers versus the little guy,

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and it means that the little guy has to shell

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>out the big bucks in order to defend themselves. Against

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the corporations, even if the little guy is totally in

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the right, If the the use is inarguably fair use,

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to that decision magically. You have to

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 1>go to court for it, and court is expensive. We're

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>going to pause the conversation right here, take a quick break,

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be right back now. The courts tend to

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>look at four factors when deciding if any given instance

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>constitutes fair use. One is the purpose and character of

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the use of the original material, including whether the use

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is for a commercial nature or is nonprofit and educational. So,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if I'm making videos where I critique

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>films and I include clips of those films in the videos,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm monetizing those critique videos, that can be a

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a strike against me because I'm using

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>someone else's work in something on my own in order

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to make money. That's not a failure rail the gate,

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but it does make my argument harder. So it doesn't

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that a court is going to decide I'm not

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>engaging in fair use. But in general, if the use

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is nonprofit and it's educational, it fits more easily into

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the fair use category, and courts tend to be a

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more forgiving. Then there's the nature of the copyrighted

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>work itself. In general, it is easier to make a

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>fair use argument if the thing you're sampling from is

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a non fictional work. Works that are about creative expression,

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like novels or movies, have a higher burden of proof

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>than works that are nonfiction. So, for example, in this podcast,

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I will some times quote specific sources those are non

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction sources, and I quote from them to establish facts.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>That's easier to defend as fair use than if I

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>were to include, say a minute long audio clip from

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a science fiction television show that's a work of fiction.

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a work of creative endeavors that is harder to

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>justify as fair use unless I'm specifically critiquing the show itself.

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Then comes the amount and substantiality of the portion of

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the copyrighted work that I used in my critique of

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The Lighthouse. If I'm using very short clips that just

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>show up in my video for like five or ten

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>seconds each as I talk about lighting techniques, that's easier

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to defend as fair use. I'm not showing a significant

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 1>part of the movie. People aren't going to feel like

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they saw the entire film. By watching my critique, they're

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>just getting a flavor of what I'm talking about and

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>getting an understanding of what I mean when I'm critiquing

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the use of lighting. If I'm, however, using very long

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>stretches of the original film, particularly stretches that don't include

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>changes in lighting, well that's going to be a lot

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>harder to defend in court. And then there's the effect

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of the use upon the potential market for the copyrighted work.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>If my derivative work could possibly hurt the sales of

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the original by displacing the sales of that original, that's

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And this one is a tricky one, right

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because what if I'm not critiquing the technique of a film,

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but the quality of a film. And what if I

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>present a video where I do an extensive tear down

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of a movie and I explain how I think it

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a good film, or I'm arguing that people

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go see that movie, that it would be a

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 1>waste of their time and money. Well, if folks value

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>my judgment, I could well be said to have a

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>negative impact on the sales of the original work. However,

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>generally that would still be protected However, if I were

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to use the original in some way that would make

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>people want to buy my derivative work or consume it

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>for free or whatever instead of the original, well that's

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to defend. So let's say, like in my critique

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of The Lighthouse, I included the entire film of the

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Lighthouse in my critique. That would be very hard to defend,

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not just because I'm using a substantial amount of the

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>original work, but also the company did argue, Hey, why

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>would people pay to see our movie if they can

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>see it for free? Just wrapped up in the context

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of this supposed criticism video, the copyright holder it can

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>make a valid claim that my derivative work would not

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>exist without the copyrighted original piece, and yet it was

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially siphoning sales away from that original piece that is

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not protected under fair use. Okay, we've got that all established.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna make a couple more points before we wrap

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this up. Um, So, when it comes to stuff like music,

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that you can copyright the musical composition, and

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you can copyright the lyrics separately. One other thing you

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can do, however, is copyright individual performances of a piece

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of music. So, for example, let's say that you're making

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a video and you want to make use of a

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>recording of Beethoven's Ode to Joy. Now, Oh to Joy

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>is part of Beethoven's Symphony number nine. Beethoven composed that

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen twenties, and it has long since passed

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.959
<v Speaker 1>into the public domain. You can use Ode to Joy

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in anything you like for free. There's no one to

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>pay royalties to as far as that's concerned, or licensing fees. Two. However,

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that just covers the music itself. A performance of Ode

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to Joy will have its own copyright which dates to

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the recording of that piece. So even though the music

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is in public domain, a performance lily is not unless

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you're using a performance of Oh to Joy. The dates

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from before the nineteen twenties. So you could perform to

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Joy yourself in your project, you'd be good to go.

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>The music is in the public domain, the performance is yours.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You're fine. But if you wanted to, say, use a

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>recording of the London Philharmonic's performance that they did sometime

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen nineties of Oh de Joy, well then

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you would have to deal with some licensing arrangements to

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>get the proper permissions to make use of that music,

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because while the musics in the public domain, the performance

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is not. Then there are other things to consider as well.

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So remember when I said parody is kind of a

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>special case with fair use. This one gets even more

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 1>complicated than other forms. So technically parody falls under fair

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>use if it falls under the criticism and comment consideration

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for fair use. A typical definition of parody is quote

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and immit pation of the style of a particular writer, artist,

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect end quote.

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't automatically mean that it's fair use. For

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it to be fair use, that specific parody really needs

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to comment upon or criticize the original work that it

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is parodying. For that reason, some but not all, of

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>weird Al Yankovic's parody songs would easily fall under fair use,

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and others would be questionable. Now. I mentioned weird Al

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>because he's the most famous parody artist I can think of,

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>that probably the one that most people have heard of,

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and some of his parodies do tend to target the

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>original work. So Smells Like Nirvana is a parody of

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Nirvana song Smells Like teen Spirit, and it's all

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about critiquing the original song. There are lyrics of what

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.919
<v Speaker 1>is this song all about? Can't figure any lyrics out

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that comments on the lyrics of the original work. Other

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>verses fun at Kurt Cobain's slurring and mumbling of words,

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.280
<v Speaker 1>making it hard to understand what is actually being sung,

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So that song parody would probably hold up under fair use.

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But then take a song like Foil. Foil is a

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>parody of Lord's song Royals, so it's using the music

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and lyrical structure of Royals. You know, they change the

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>actual lyrics, but it's the same rhyme, scheme and scanshion

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of Royals. But the song Foil isn't a commentary on Royals. Instead,

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a comedic song about aluminum foil. And I'm pretty

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sure you couldn't make an argument that it's somehow commenting

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on the original work, which means that would be harder

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to defend as fair use. It's not a bad song,

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way. This isn't a commentary on the quality

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of the parody, but rather whether it would fall under

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the consideration of fair use or not. Now, to be clear,

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>weird al makes it a practice to get permission to

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>do his parodies before he does them. He licenses the songs.

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>In cases like smells like Nirvana, he might have been

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>able to skip that step, or more likely his music

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>label would have if they were, you know, willing to

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.240
<v Speaker 1>defend any lawsuits that came their way as a result.

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But as both the courtesy and kind of the necessity,

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 1>he reaches out before recording parodies. Usually, um, there's at

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>least one version of this where things didn't work out, though,

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>actually there's a couple I can think of, but I'm

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna mention one in particular. So back in two thousand six,

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>where All Yankovic was working on an album and he

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to include a parody of the James Blunt song

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You're Beautiful. Yankovic's version was a parody called You're Pitiful

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 1>about a middle aged dude who seriously down on his luck.

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Blunt was receptive and he gave the go ahead to Yankovic.

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But as Yankovic's album neared publication, Blunt's record label, Atlantic Records,

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Yankovic's label and demand did that the

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.439
<v Speaker 1>song not appear on the album. And you know, music

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>labels typically hold the I p for the actual songs

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of an artist in this case is a little more

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. So getting permission from Blunt, while a

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>good thing, wasn't totally legally binding. Blunt probably could have

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>pushed back on Atlantic Records about this, but that's not

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly an easy thing to do when you're an artist.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you you want to work with your label.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't want that to be a confrontational relationship. And

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, defending fair use is expensive because

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>it all goes to that consideration of a court, and

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that means lawyers and lawyers have fees, and so defending

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>an instance as fair use in court can mean that

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you're paying thousands or tens of thousands of dollars in

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fees just to defend yourself. There's a financial disincentive to

0:48:57.960 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the average person because again, these laws were made with

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>corporations in mind, big entities that can afford these kind

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of things. The average person can't. So corporations like music

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>labels or publishers have you know, entire teams of lawyers

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>who do this stuff all the time. They can put

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure on folks with threats of lawsuits. And even if

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>those folks are in the right. You know, even if

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>their works clearly would fall under fair use, to defend

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:29.439
<v Speaker 1>it in court could be way too expensive for these

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>individuals to afford it. There have been cases in which

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people have settled out of court for thousands of dollars,

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.720
<v Speaker 1>not because they felt they were legit and the wrong,

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but because trying to prove that they were innocent of

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>infringement was more expensive than settling. It's pretty darn brutal. Now,

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:49.439
<v Speaker 1>what about all those posts and YouTube videos that say

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>no copyright infringement intended? Those are pretty much worthless. It's

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>akin to posting on Facebook that you aren't giving Facebook

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the rights to your data. That's also useless because just

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>by sign going on to Facebook and making an account,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to agree to Facebook's terms of service. That

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of supersedes your little post that says you're not

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Facebook using your data. Facebook's responses too bad,

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>because you agreed to it by being on the platform.

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:17.439
<v Speaker 1>That's part of our terms of service. If you don't

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>want us to take your data, don't be on Facebook.

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the way that works. So if you

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>come across a video that says no copyright infringement intended,

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or a picture on Instagram that clearly doesn't belong to

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the account that posted it. Just note that that phrase

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>means nothing. Intent is not part of determining whether someone

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is infringing copyright in the first place. It doesn't matter

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what you intend. There's definitely a gradient when it comes

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to copyright infringement. Like if I include half of a

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>music video online, that's copyright infringement. But if I include

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, that is worse. And if I monetize

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the video where I do it, that's even worse. But

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>even that smallest for example I gave is still infringing.

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter whether I think it is or not. You know,

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 1>if I can think something's not a crime, but if

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>legally it's a crime, it doesn't really matter what I think.

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:13.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of other things I need to

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>say about this, but one thing I want to sum

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>up with right here before I close out, and we

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>will pick back up in the next episode, is that

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom Scott did a great job exploring the issues of

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>copyright and YouTube in particular, and I'll look more at

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube in the next episode. He did in a video

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>titled YouTube's Copyright System isn't broken, the world's is, and

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>shout out to listener Kat, who first turned me onto

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom Scott's videos. Scott does what I do, only he

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>does it with a British accent, so he's better at

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it than I am by default. Also, he's genuinely good

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>at explaining stuff like this, so make sure you check

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that out. And we'll come back to talk more about

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and copyright infringement and content i D and some

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the laws that have been passed after big media

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>companies have lobbied Chris in the United States that have

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>changed the way information gets shared on the Internet. We'll

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>also talk about some of the crazy movements that companies

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 1>have made against individuals and an effort to crack down

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>on things like piracy. Because all this is tied up

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.719
<v Speaker 1>together and it's all a mess, And really what it

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>boils down to is that copyright law itself is in

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>dire need of a full rewrite. But that's dangerous because

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the parties that are particularly interested in a rewrite of

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>copyright law are not looking to make it better, They're

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>looking to make it last longer. I hope you enjoyed

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that episode from Copyright and Fair Use. Uh yeah, fair

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>use is one of those things that we can't easily

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>leverage ourselves, even in a podcast in a big company.

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you might wonder, why don't I do an episode about,

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, a certain musical instrument like the mog synthesizer

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and then include a whole bunch of mog music. Well,

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it's because even though you could argue, yeah, it's fair use,

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you're commenting on something and you're using it as an example,

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's the vast majority of the material is original.

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not taken from a copyrighted work. That's still something

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes up in court cases, right, Like, that's something

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you argue once you've already been sued, and ain't nobody

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to get sued. So yeah, it is a complex thing,

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that that unless you're paying licenses to

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>use material for so that you can make absolutely certain

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that you're not treading on any toes, you've got to

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be super careful. So I hope you enjoyed that episode

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>about copyright and fair use. I hope that was interesting

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and informative to you. We'll be back with new episodes tomorrow,

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so I will chat with you. Then. Oh wait, that's

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not how I end this. I'll talk to you again

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 1>really soon. M Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production.

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the i

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:13.720
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.