1 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:07,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim 2 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:11,080 Speaker 1: Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day 3 00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 1: we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews 4 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: for you and your money, whether at the grocery store 5 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,960 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast 6 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. All right, 7 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:31,600 Speaker 1: let's just bring in Stephen Dennis, who is our Bloomberg 8 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: Senate reporter, and he has been following the confirmation hearings 9 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:39,080 Speaker 1: that are being held in Washington today. We know that 10 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 1: Rex Tillerson, former chief executive of Exxon Mobile attampt to 11 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 1: be the next Secretary of State. Stephen Dennis, So anything 12 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:49,479 Speaker 1: stand out to you in the in the questioning or 13 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:53,279 Speaker 1: is it pretty much standard Democrats going after Rex Tillerson 14 00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:56,320 Speaker 1: and his ties and his business experience in Russia and 15 00:00:56,360 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 1: the Republicans UH supporting Rex Chillensen. Actually, I think it's 16 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:05,959 Speaker 1: pretty bipartisan. The tough questioning senators like Marco Rubio are 17 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: going after Tillerson very hard on his ties to Putin 18 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 1: and also on Putin's record of having uh of his 19 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 1: dissidents disappearing and getting murdered on the death of civilians 20 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: and Aleppo, which Rubio charges the Russian the Russians with 21 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:29,760 Speaker 1: perpetrating crimes against Aleppo civilians. And uh So, it's been 22 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:32,880 Speaker 1: very tough on Tillerson, I think, except for Tillerson has 23 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: sort of said, sort of deflected everything and basically said 24 00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:39,760 Speaker 1: that he needs to know more information and needs no 25 00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 1: classified information, which he won't have until he's confirmed, and 26 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 1: then he'll give advice. Um So, I think Tillerson is 27 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:51,040 Speaker 1: basically hopes that he can get through on that sort 28 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 1: of basis of just sort of trying to deflect as 29 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 1: much as he can. And uh and it's gonna be 30 00:01:56,480 --> 00:02:00,080 Speaker 1: a real question now for people like Rubio, McCain and 31 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:04,360 Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham whether they're gonna ultimately vote for Tillerson if 32 00:02:04,720 --> 00:02:07,800 Speaker 1: he loses though that that trio, he will not be 33 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:10,079 Speaker 1: there's a big chance he will not be confirmed. He 34 00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:14,160 Speaker 1: needs to get some Democratic support. Um So, this might 35 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:18,359 Speaker 1: be the most interesting nominee as far as whether this 36 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 1: nominee can get confirmed ultimately. Everybody expects that he will, 37 00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:25,680 Speaker 1: but you know, he's got to. He's got to make 38 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:31,359 Speaker 1: these Republicans hawks on Russia happy and there's certainly been 39 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:34,400 Speaker 1: more and more about Russia, and we're certainly going to 40 00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:38,280 Speaker 1: hear a lot of from Trump about whether he has 41 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: ties to Russia. He keeps denying that on Twitter. You know, 42 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:45,000 Speaker 1: I expect he'll probably deny it, and with questions when 43 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: questions are asked about the leaked report that came out yesterday, 44 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:55,120 Speaker 1: and also about his own personal finances, he still hasn't 45 00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 1: really detailed everything that he owns, and also how all 46 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,880 Speaker 1: of his loan I wonder if they'll ask about whether 47 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 1: he will release his tax returns. I would I would 48 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:09,120 Speaker 1: expect something along those lines, and also how he had 49 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 1: will extricate himself from his business. And you know, he 50 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:15,639 Speaker 1: promised a press conference in December on this very topic 51 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:19,280 Speaker 1: until hasn't happened talking about that. Why is he holding 52 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: a press conference now at the same time as a 53 00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:25,440 Speaker 1: hearing for one of his cabinet nominees. Well, you know, 54 00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 1: I think now it's probably as good a time as 55 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:30,760 Speaker 1: any you know, I mean when he was going to 56 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,919 Speaker 1: have it, Uh, you know, you want to do it 57 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 1: in the middle of the week, get maximum attention. And 58 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 1: you know to the extent that Tillerson is the one 59 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 1: pick who may be in the most danger, along with 60 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 1: possibly the Treasury Secretary pick Stephen manutian Um and maybe 61 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:52,680 Speaker 1: a few others. Uh, you might you might as well 62 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: have your press conference, have the the big bully pulpit 63 00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: um to try and bluster things away. Is there any 64 00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:05,200 Speaker 1: evidence that any of the nominees feel that they are 65 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,800 Speaker 1: going to be unfairly treated as part of the hearings 66 00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 1: because this is not something that is brand new to 67 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:15,240 Speaker 1: Washington and many of the people, at least as far 68 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 1: as the Senators are concerned. But for many of the nominees, 69 00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 1: this is really their first interaction with the way Washington works. Yeah. 70 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:25,200 Speaker 1: I mean, there are a couple of things that are 71 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 1: different about this cabinet. You know that it's the richest 72 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 1: cabinet by far. You have billionaires in this cabinet. Just 73 00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:35,560 Speaker 1: dealing with a paperwork when you're a billionaire is an 74 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,240 Speaker 1: order of magnitude different than if you're just you know, 75 00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,880 Speaker 1: Joe Q citizen. So people like Wilbur Ross and Betty 76 00:04:41,920 --> 00:04:44,839 Speaker 1: de Voss, who who are very wealthy and are in 77 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: this cabinet, you know, their paperwork is taking a while. Um. 78 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 1: But also these are people by and large who have 79 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,800 Speaker 1: never been in government before, so being in a hearing 80 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: is is a new experience. Now Rex Stillerson's testified before 81 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:02,600 Speaker 1: Congress before is ex ce Jeff Sessions, who was at 82 00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:07,840 Speaker 1: his first very marathon hearing yesterday, is certainly experienced as 83 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:11,279 Speaker 1: a before the Judiciary Committee for Attorney General, right and 84 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 1: and and so Sessions sort of kind of anticipated where 85 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,000 Speaker 1: the questions were going and kind of knew how to 86 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:20,120 Speaker 1: dance around most of the questions. Uh, this will be 87 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: an interesting thing to see whether Stephen Manuchian, the Treasury 88 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:27,800 Speaker 1: Secretary pick, when he has his hearing in the future, um, 89 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:31,040 Speaker 1: and some of these other picks who have not really 90 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 1: been before Congress, that they're really going to be under 91 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:35,560 Speaker 1: the gun and the Democrats are really going to go 92 00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:40,479 Speaker 1: after them because they want to show that the populist 93 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:45,560 Speaker 1: Trump is not how Trump is governing. He's picking plutocrats 94 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 1: in their eyes who don't really have the interests of 95 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:50,280 Speaker 1: working people at heart. And you know you're going to 96 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 1: see them go. They're already going very hard after Mr 97 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:56,880 Speaker 1: Poster the well Elaine, I just want to mention Elaine. 98 00:05:56,920 --> 00:06:02,279 Speaker 1: Elaine Chow, who's the nominee for Secretary Transportation, is the 99 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:05,560 Speaker 1: only Trump appointee who has previously worked at the cabinet level. 100 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:07,680 Speaker 1: If you know, I wanted just to break in, I 101 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 1: mean about the press conference that we're going to be watching. 102 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:12,640 Speaker 1: I wanted to understand kind of the process of how 103 00:06:12,680 --> 00:06:15,919 Speaker 1: it usually goes down. I mean, how long should president 104 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:19,719 Speaker 1: elector or does a president elect usually speak for? And 105 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:23,080 Speaker 1: then how much time is usually allotted to questions. You know, 106 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:25,719 Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised to see this go on a 107 00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 1: little bit longer since there hasn't been a press conference 108 00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:32,440 Speaker 1: in an unprecedented period of time since the election, and 109 00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:35,359 Speaker 1: there are frankly, so many questions out there. But it 110 00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: really depends on Trump, you know. He he can bluster 111 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 1: at the beginning for a few minutes and then open 112 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:45,159 Speaker 1: it up to questions. Uh. Typically you get six eight 113 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:48,359 Speaker 1: ten questions at a at a scheduled press conference like 114 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:53,040 Speaker 1: this with the President Obama. Uh. Trump could go longer 115 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 1: than that or not. And the other thing is that 116 00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 1: the reporters, you know, keep in mind, these reporters have 117 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:01,600 Speaker 1: have not had access to Trump and large they might 118 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 1: try to ask three and four part questions because there 119 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:08,080 Speaker 1: are so many unanswered questions. You know, he tweets uh, 120 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 1: little details and and never really interacts with the press 121 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,120 Speaker 1: in a meaningful three or four part way. This is 122 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 1: the first real opportunity beyond the few interviews that he's 123 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:26,120 Speaker 1: done with UH, with sort of adversarial press course. So 124 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:28,040 Speaker 1: this is going to be very interesting to watch how 125 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:33,040 Speaker 1: he interacts, whether he tries to be marker garious or combative. 126 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:36,920 Speaker 1: And after yesterday UH and the tweets were seeing in 127 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 1: all caps this morning decrying fake news and dismissing this 128 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 1: report as total fiction, I expect he'll probably be very 129 00:07:44,320 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 1: compative and very critical of the press for not treating 130 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: him fairly. Stephen Dennis is our Bloomberg Senate reporter and 131 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:53,720 Speaker 1: he's with us. You know, I was just looking at 132 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 1: the schedule of hearing is You're gonna be kind of 133 00:07:55,560 --> 00:08:00,960 Speaker 1: busy nine thirty tomorrow morning when Washington James maddis the 134 00:08:01,040 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: nominee for Secretary of Defense. He'll be testifying before the 135 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:09,120 Speaker 1: were inveted. He'll be questioned by the Senate Armed Services Committee. 136 00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:12,360 Speaker 1: Then you have Ben Carson. I believe he'll be before 137 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:17,000 Speaker 1: the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. That's 138 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 1: a ten am. Yeah. I think Mattis is probably a 139 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:23,640 Speaker 1: slam dunk. He's a favorite of John McCain, who's no 140 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:27,760 Speaker 1: friend of Trump most days. Um. But you know, that 141 00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:31,679 Speaker 1: could be interesting if Maddis Rebuke has a different position 142 00:08:31,720 --> 00:08:35,240 Speaker 1: than Trump on Isis on torture, on a number of things. 143 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: So that's something to watch for. You know, Ben Carson, 144 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 1: that could be a very entertaining hearing. He's a guy 145 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:44,040 Speaker 1: who previously said he doesn't have much experience in government 146 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 1: and had there was a real question whether he wanted 147 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,719 Speaker 1: to even be an administration and so I think the 148 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:52,480 Speaker 1: Democrats are going to try and test whether he really 149 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 1: has the knowledge to handle that that department. And uh, 150 00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 1: Wilbur Ross also he's up at ten am tomorrow as 151 00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:07,520 Speaker 1: well in Washington's before the Commerce, Science, and Transportation uh committee. Yeah, 152 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 1: now Ross is sort of interesting, obviously well known on 153 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:17,079 Speaker 1: Wall Street billionaire. UM. I think the real question with 154 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 1: him is how he's going to handle conflicts of interest 155 00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:23,200 Speaker 1: um and that sort of thing. But you know that 156 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 1: there's no real expectation that his his nominee is nomination 157 00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 1: is going to be in trouble. And you know, part 158 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:31,199 Speaker 1: of the thinking I think is, you know, you don't 159 00:09:31,240 --> 00:09:36,280 Speaker 1: really want to get a billionaire mad Yeah, well so, 160 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 1: uh so that that'll be uh someone interesting for you know, 161 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:42,360 Speaker 1: people who watch Wall Street to see how he handles 162 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,480 Speaker 1: handles himself. But I think that will probably be pretty standard. 163 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:51,200 Speaker 1: Fair Stephen, have you heard about Republican and frankly or 164 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: Democratic senators getting together before these hearings and trying to 165 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:56,720 Speaker 1: come up with a game plan, because it does feel 166 00:09:56,760 --> 00:10:00,880 Speaker 1: like there has been some I don't know conflict if 167 00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:06,480 Speaker 1: in turn to seeing conflicts certainly between some Republicans. Now absolutely, 168 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:10,520 Speaker 1: I think the Republicans and Democrats sort of treat these 169 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:14,200 Speaker 1: things by and large as teams, and they sort of 170 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 1: dole out who's gonna ask which line of questioning, who's 171 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:20,240 Speaker 1: gonna you know, with the Jeff Sessions, who was going 172 00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:21,679 Speaker 1: to defend him on X and who was going to 173 00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 1: defend him on why? There there wasn't a whole lot 174 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:27,439 Speaker 1: of Republicans who really wanting to go after Jeff Sessions, 175 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 1: and the Democrats you know, went after him a little bit, 176 00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 1: but they didn't go after him as hard as they 177 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,720 Speaker 1: potentially could have. You know, he's a he's a colleague, 178 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:36,839 Speaker 1: he's going to win confirmation. You've got to deal with 179 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: him as Attorney General. So uh, he didn't really go 180 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:44,880 Speaker 1: that hard at the allegations of racism as they could 181 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: have um in his past. And uh so that we're 182 00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:51,520 Speaker 1: going to see more of that today. I mean the 183 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:57,400 Speaker 1: unprecedented spectacle of Corey Booker going after UM Jeff Sessions, 184 00:10:57,600 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 1: a fellow senator that's basically on heard of, and it 185 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:04,439 Speaker 1: could be something that sets up Corey Booker to potentially 186 00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 1: run help him run for president four years from now. Um. 187 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:10,560 Speaker 1: You know, he's one of the rising stars in the 188 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:14,520 Speaker 1: on the Democratic side, and they're looking at the party 189 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 1: spaces looking for fighters right now, and they see him 190 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:19,480 Speaker 1: as one. I just want to mention that I mentioned 191 00:11:19,520 --> 00:11:21,960 Speaker 1: Wilbur Ross. He's not going to be uh at the 192 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:27,920 Speaker 1: hearing tomorrow. It'll be January. Stephen Dennis, thank you so 193 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 1: much for joining us. Steven Dennis Blueberg, SENEC reporter. It 194 00:11:41,280 --> 00:11:43,200 Speaker 1: is the big debate. It is the debate that is 195 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 1: keeping up people at night and is keeping bond. King's 196 00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: going at each other with the numbers. I want to 197 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 1: get a number from Mike materas So, Senior Vice president 198 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:58,000 Speaker 1: and co chair of Franklin Templeton's Fixed Income Policy Committee. 199 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 1: Mike thank you so much for joining us. Do you 200 00:12:00,559 --> 00:12:03,680 Speaker 1: think that there is a certain threshold, a certain number 201 00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 1: for US ten year yields to climb above at which 202 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:10,920 Speaker 1: we can say goodbye to the thirty five year bond 203 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:15,640 Speaker 1: bull market? Um? Well, is there a number? I don't 204 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: know if there's specifically a number, but uh, we're of 205 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:23,080 Speaker 1: the opinion that we we could see yields move as 206 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 1: high as three percent this year, probably more towards the 207 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:29,679 Speaker 1: end of the year, but that wouldn't necessarily mean that 208 00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 1: that the bull the bull bond market has has ended. 209 00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 1: I think that there are a lot of demographic trends 210 00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:40,200 Speaker 1: globally that are in place that will keep UH global 211 00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:44,440 Speaker 1: growth as well as inflation under control over the intermediate 212 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:47,560 Speaker 1: to possibly even longer than that. That's a that's an 213 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:49,599 Speaker 1: important point. In other words, even if the if the 214 00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:52,800 Speaker 1: yields on ten year treasuries to does climb, do climb 215 00:12:52,840 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 1: above three percent, there still could be potentially a plateauing 216 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:58,840 Speaker 1: from there, in your view, I think, I think so. 217 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:04,240 Speaker 1: I think that uh there that higher interest rates at 218 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 1: some point will will choke off economic growth and slow 219 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:12,760 Speaker 1: slow US the U S economy down as well as 220 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:17,319 Speaker 1: other economies, and with that UH not see inflation rise 221 00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:21,079 Speaker 1: and UM and UH interest rates rise as well. Mike, 222 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:24,000 Speaker 1: could you comment on municipal bonds because I was reading 223 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:27,319 Speaker 1: a story today about how corporate tax cuts could actually 224 00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 1: reduce demand for municipal bonds from banks and insurance companies 225 00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:36,720 Speaker 1: because lower rates make municipals less attractive compared with taxable investments. 226 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,320 Speaker 1: How does that work out? Well, I think it's more 227 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:43,679 Speaker 1: a matter of depending upon how the tax code ends up, 228 00:13:44,080 --> 00:13:48,560 Speaker 1: but it will make UH corporate bonds and even treasuries 229 00:13:48,640 --> 00:13:53,120 Speaker 1: more attractive, especially if you go with the Republican UH proposal, 230 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 1: which I think is a sixteen and a half percent 231 00:13:55,559 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 1: tax UH paid by individuals UM so, so I don't 232 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:05,520 Speaker 1: think it has an impact per se on municipal rates, 233 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:10,800 Speaker 1: but it gives provides more competition for municipal bonds. Having 234 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:13,600 Speaker 1: said that, I think it's important to realize that a 235 00:14:13,720 --> 00:14:17,160 Speaker 1: ten year double A municipal bond right now has a 236 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,320 Speaker 1: yield of about a hundred and fifteent higher than the 237 00:14:20,400 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 1: ten year treasury, so it has a spread over treasuries 238 00:14:23,440 --> 00:14:27,760 Speaker 1: to begin with. So I think that it will provide 239 00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 1: more competition, but not necessarily be apparel for the municipal 240 00:14:31,440 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 1: bond market. Mike, you know one question that I have 241 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:37,720 Speaker 1: given your prediction that ten year treasure yields will climb 242 00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 1: above three percent this year, I have to wonder what, 243 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:45,960 Speaker 1: I'm sorry, approach three not approach okay, approach three percent 244 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:49,520 Speaker 1: this year? What does that mean for corporate bonds. I 245 00:14:49,560 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: know that we've seen the fastest pace of issuance of 246 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 1: investment grade bonds to start the year. UH and meanwhile, 247 00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 1: yields on junk bonds have climbed to the lowest in 248 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 1: two thousand and fourteen, leaving a pretty all cushion of 249 00:15:00,720 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: extra spread to sort of absorb that kind of increase. Yeah, 250 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:07,160 Speaker 1: that's sort of the quandary that fixed income investors are 251 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:09,400 Speaker 1: in right now. I think that with a lot of 252 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 1: the proposals UH that of the Republicans and Trump administration, 253 00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 1: if if they're passed, I think it extends the business cycle, 254 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:22,160 Speaker 1: which is good for for corporations. At the same time, though, 255 00:15:22,200 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 1: a lot of the a lot of that positive news, 256 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:27,720 Speaker 1: and potentially I think it's important. Not necessarily it's not 257 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:29,920 Speaker 1: necessarily going to be passed, but a lot of it 258 00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 1: is already reflected in UH in yields on corporate investment 259 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:37,280 Speaker 1: grade corporate bonds as as well as high yield. So 260 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: we are we're positive on credit, less positive on relative value. 261 00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:44,680 Speaker 1: Right now we would in other words, what does that 262 00:15:44,720 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: mean in terms of a trade? Oh? Sure, So what 263 00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 1: it means is that, uh, given womans and most would 264 00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:52,560 Speaker 1: say that we are in the latter stages of the 265 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:57,480 Speaker 1: business cycle. Fiscal policy that will be passed to the 266 00:15:57,480 --> 00:16:00,240 Speaker 1: extent that it's past, it's passed later on this year 267 00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:04,600 Speaker 1: will probably extend the business cycle. That's positive for corporate credit. 268 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:08,480 Speaker 1: That when that the prospects of a recession are further off. 269 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:12,080 Speaker 1: At the same time, though, spreads have come in on 270 00:16:12,640 --> 00:16:16,440 Speaker 1: investment ary corporate bonds probably about thirty thirty basis points 271 00:16:16,440 --> 00:16:18,920 Speaker 1: over the last few months, and even more so on 272 00:16:19,040 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 1: high yield, so they're spread to treasuries. The risk premium 273 00:16:22,680 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: has shrunk. Should there be any disappointments where risk premiums 274 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:31,360 Speaker 1: rise on these on these sectors of the markets, we 275 00:16:31,400 --> 00:16:33,520 Speaker 1: would look at look at that as an opportunity to 276 00:16:33,560 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: buy because we feel the business cycle will be longer. 277 00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:40,960 Speaker 1: But current levels were just moderately we find corporate bonds 278 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,400 Speaker 1: and high you'll just moderately attractive, just moderately attractive for 279 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:48,440 Speaker 1: high you because I note that the inflows into et 280 00:16:48,680 --> 00:16:52,800 Speaker 1: f s exchange traded funds, particularly for a high yield debt, 281 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:58,920 Speaker 1: added about a billion and a quarter. I was gonna say, 282 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 1: a tremendous, tremendous influence a very and it's a very 283 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:05,520 Speaker 1: efficient way of getting exposure to the high yield market. 284 00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:09,520 Speaker 1: I shares seven to ten year treasury bonding TF had 285 00:17:09,560 --> 00:17:13,439 Speaker 1: the biggest outflows. Is this an indication of what we 286 00:17:13,480 --> 00:17:17,040 Speaker 1: can expect if indeed we get some kind of fiscal 287 00:17:17,119 --> 00:17:21,879 Speaker 1: spending bill passed by the Congress. Well, typically it's interest 288 00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:28,679 Speaker 1: rates are rising because business prospects are getting better, and 289 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:31,040 Speaker 1: that's good for corporate credit. And that's the reason why 290 00:17:31,119 --> 00:17:34,240 Speaker 1: individuals are buying corporate bonds is there they feel comfortable 291 00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:37,440 Speaker 1: with the credit quality. And in that type of environment 292 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:40,760 Speaker 1: of rising treasury rates, corporate bond yields are going to rise, 293 00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:43,960 Speaker 1: but not as much as treasury yields will rise, So 294 00:17:44,040 --> 00:17:47,120 Speaker 1: it gives you some some protection to the downside. Mike, 295 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:51,280 Speaker 1: what's your greatest conviction call on the markets? Uh? This year? 296 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 1: I mean, do you have any sort of contrarian bets 297 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:58,760 Speaker 1: that you're making on either a recovery or a big loss. Yeah, 298 00:17:58,760 --> 00:18:00,959 Speaker 1: I would say probably the more. In the In the 299 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:02,919 Speaker 1: near term first half of the year, I think that 300 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:06,040 Speaker 1: we could see a bit of a disappointment and growth 301 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:11,359 Speaker 1: given that interest rates have risen, that oil prices have risen, UH, 302 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:13,960 Speaker 1: the dollar has risen, and I think all of these 303 00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:17,960 Speaker 1: are our headwinds to the US economy and the global 304 00:18:17,960 --> 00:18:21,639 Speaker 1: econ We've had a global manufacturing rebound in the second 305 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:24,280 Speaker 1: half of this year and that probably will taper off 306 00:18:24,320 --> 00:18:26,000 Speaker 1: in the first half of the neck of the of 307 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 1: of this year last year's rebound UH, and I think 308 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:31,800 Speaker 1: that we may see see a little bit of disappointment 309 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:35,080 Speaker 1: instead of I think in the near term treasury yields 310 00:18:35,080 --> 00:18:39,160 Speaker 1: can can rise, probably from maybe upport around the two 311 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 1: and three quarter area. But I think that we could 312 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,560 Speaker 1: see a declining yields in the first half of the 313 00:18:44,600 --> 00:18:47,280 Speaker 1: year based on growth disappointment, only then to see in 314 00:18:47,280 --> 00:18:49,560 Speaker 1: the second half of the year are rebound as more 315 00:18:50,119 --> 00:18:53,879 Speaker 1: as more of the fiscal policy UH is discussed and 316 00:18:53,960 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 1: hopefully passed, which will have a positive effect on two 317 00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:00,639 Speaker 1: thousand and eighteen growth. So look possibly lower yields in 318 00:19:00,680 --> 00:19:02,480 Speaker 1: the first half of the year rather than higher yields. 319 00:19:02,680 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 1: I think that's a contrary of you. I want to 320 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:06,840 Speaker 1: thank you very much for spending time with us. Mike 321 00:19:07,160 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 1: Matta Rosso is the senior vice president and co chair 322 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: of Franklin Templeton's Fixed Income Policy Committee. Now let's turn 323 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:31,440 Speaker 1: our attention to an ongoing story which has to do 324 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:37,560 Speaker 1: with an unsubstantiated intelligence reports involving Russia and the President elect. 325 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:39,480 Speaker 1: And here to tell us more as Chris Strom, he 326 00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:44,520 Speaker 1: is Justice Department reporter for Bloomberg News. Chris, what can 327 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:49,119 Speaker 1: you tell us about this report and is there any 328 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,680 Speaker 1: veracity in it? Is it truthful at all? Well, this 329 00:19:53,240 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 1: is a thirty five page report that is just full 330 00:19:56,200 --> 00:20:02,840 Speaker 1: of multiple allegations that are unsubstantiated. However, some of them 331 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:07,960 Speaker 1: appear to be rooted in reality to a degree. For example, 332 00:20:08,200 --> 00:20:12,440 Speaker 1: there's there's indications in the report that the that there 333 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 1: have been UH questions about business dealings by UH by 334 00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 1: Trump associates. Now we know from our reporting that the 335 00:20:23,240 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 1: FBI has already been looking into UH possible corruption UH 336 00:20:29,840 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: tied to Donald Trump's X campaign chief Paul Manafort over 337 00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:40,640 Speaker 1: in Ukraine. Now, there are multiple, multiple allegations in these 338 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:42,800 Speaker 1: thirty five pages. They're also I just so, I just 339 00:20:42,840 --> 00:20:46,159 Speaker 1: want to mention and having looked at the documents that 340 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 1: you're talking about, there are multiple grammatical mistakes, there are 341 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:55,760 Speaker 1: multiple repetition, there's multiple repetition. Uh, it doesn't seem like 342 00:20:55,800 --> 00:21:03,280 Speaker 1: a coherent document. It just seems grammatical and substantive mistakes. Yeah, 343 00:21:03,320 --> 00:21:07,280 Speaker 1: and it just seems it doesn't seem like a document 344 00:21:08,040 --> 00:21:13,520 Speaker 1: that was prepared by any um, I guess, substantiated organization. 345 00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:18,080 Speaker 1: Where does this come from? Well, the the belief at 346 00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:22,399 Speaker 1: this point is that it came from a former m 347 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,840 Speaker 1: I six intelligent agents over in Great Britain and his 348 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:30,080 Speaker 1: intelligence team put it together. UM. We are still trying 349 00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:33,880 Speaker 1: to verify exactly where the report came from and what 350 00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: in it might actually have any sense of credibility. What 351 00:21:38,160 --> 00:21:42,200 Speaker 1: we do know is that there was a a two 352 00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:46,280 Speaker 1: or three page summary that was attached to the briefing 353 00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:50,840 Speaker 1: that the intelligence agencies gave Donald Trump in President Obama 354 00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:55,880 Speaker 1: last week, and we have not seen what is in that. 355 00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: It's that very slim down version, and questions remain whether 356 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:05,119 Speaker 1: the intelligence agencies in that, in that very condensed version 357 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:11,399 Speaker 1: only presented information that seems to have uh, you know, 358 00:22:11,520 --> 00:22:17,600 Speaker 1: some sense of credibility or some additional independent sources verifying 359 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:20,639 Speaker 1: what was in it. But certainly the document as a 360 00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:28,439 Speaker 1: whole contains all kinds of unsubsidiated allegations. Aside from this document, 361 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:31,879 Speaker 1: that we've heard that the Russia is suspected of hacking 362 00:22:32,280 --> 00:22:34,879 Speaker 1: the Republican National Committee as well as the d n C, 363 00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:38,760 Speaker 1: and that they're holding material that could potentially be damning 364 00:22:38,840 --> 00:22:41,399 Speaker 1: for President elect Trump and that they could you know, 365 00:22:41,560 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: use is basically a bargaining chip that they have some 366 00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:48,000 Speaker 1: leverage when it comes to negotiations. Is there anything in 367 00:22:48,240 --> 00:22:52,000 Speaker 1: this memo that was attached to Adassier given to us, 368 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:55,040 Speaker 1: allegedly given to President elected Trump. Is there anything that 369 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:58,280 Speaker 1: sort of seems like the most possible thought er for 370 00:22:58,880 --> 00:23:02,440 Speaker 1: UH leverage or or that the Russians could use to 371 00:23:02,680 --> 00:23:06,359 Speaker 1: just sort of get President elect Trump to do something 372 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:09,680 Speaker 1: that perhaps uh might not be And there's nothing, there's 373 00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:12,880 Speaker 1: nothing that I can say right now that that we 374 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:17,280 Speaker 1: have any indication that it is going to be something, uh, 375 00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:20,879 Speaker 1: something that is verified incredible that could be used to 376 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:25,920 Speaker 1: blackmail Donald Trump. UM. I think that there's concern now 377 00:23:26,600 --> 00:23:30,800 Speaker 1: uh between among lawmakers in Congress that this needs to 378 00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 1: be looked at in in in detail to find out 379 00:23:34,720 --> 00:23:36,880 Speaker 1: if there is anything. But it's also important to remember 380 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,080 Speaker 1: that that, you know, Trump has sent out tweets saying 381 00:23:40,119 --> 00:23:42,840 Speaker 1: that this is fake news and that there's nothing. He 382 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:47,800 Speaker 1: saying that the Russians and the Russians have also But 383 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:50,119 Speaker 1: it's important to remember the Russians also denied hacking, as 384 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:52,320 Speaker 1: you know, they denied hacking as well. And I think, 385 00:23:52,600 --> 00:23:55,160 Speaker 1: you know, the intelligence agencies have pretty fortunately come out 386 00:23:55,560 --> 00:23:58,239 Speaker 1: with you know, the uh, you know, back backing up 387 00:23:58,280 --> 00:24:00,760 Speaker 1: the idea that that the Russian government was hacking the 388 00:24:00,840 --> 00:24:03,159 Speaker 1: DNC and other political groups. Well, we're just going to 389 00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:06,560 Speaker 1: mention that. In one of Donald Trump's tweets earlier, he 390 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:10,439 Speaker 1: asked if these leaks, the leaks of this dossier or 391 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: this document of he described dirt, meant that we are 392 00:24:13,680 --> 00:24:17,760 Speaker 1: quote living in Nazi Germany, says he prepares to hold 393 00:24:17,800 --> 00:24:19,680 Speaker 1: his first I mean this this memo, you know, it's 394 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:21,600 Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's it's a bomb that just went 395 00:24:21,680 --> 00:24:23,639 Speaker 1: off last night, and we're all trying to's we're all 396 00:24:23,720 --> 00:24:25,679 Speaker 1: kind of scrambling now to try and figure out what 397 00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 1: it means, what might be in it that has any 398 00:24:29,040 --> 00:24:32,440 Speaker 1: you know any any substance so far. Is there anything 399 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:35,520 Speaker 1: that sort of stood out to you? One thing? I 400 00:24:35,560 --> 00:24:37,640 Speaker 1: can't say if there's anything that jumped out to me, Um, 401 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:39,880 Speaker 1: I I don't want to. I don't want to identify 402 00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:44,040 Speaker 1: anything in particular that that you know that we don't have, 403 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:46,119 Speaker 1: that we don't have. You know that we haven't been 404 00:24:46,119 --> 00:24:49,240 Speaker 1: able to independently verify your back up yet. That's fair enough. 405 00:24:49,359 --> 00:24:51,199 Speaker 1: I respect that. Thank you so much for joining us. 406 00:24:51,240 --> 00:24:54,760 Speaker 1: Chris Strom, Justice Department reporter for Blueburg New speaking to 407 00:24:54,880 --> 00:25:10,679 Speaker 1: us from Washington, d C. Talking about how markets are 408 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:13,200 Speaker 1: trying to find direction ahead of the Ahead of the 409 00:25:13,240 --> 00:25:16,480 Speaker 1: press conference by President elected Trump, James Crombie, an editor 410 00:25:16,600 --> 00:25:20,240 Speaker 1: of Boomer Briefs, has been talking with economists about their 411 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,840 Speaker 1: predictions regardless of what President elect Trump may say or 412 00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:27,560 Speaker 1: tweet today. James, must be a particularly difficult time to 413 00:25:27,600 --> 00:25:32,719 Speaker 1: sort of nail down the top forecasters given the political uncertainty. 414 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:35,679 Speaker 1: What struck out, what was stood out to you as 415 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:39,760 Speaker 1: sort of the most notable uh IDEA Well, we ranked 416 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:42,240 Speaker 1: the best forecast is in the fourth quarter for a 417 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:46,280 Speaker 1: variety of US indicators, and we talked to a lot 418 00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 1: of the top ranked forecasts, and what really stood out 419 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:52,520 Speaker 1: for us in terms of surprises were that one headline 420 00:25:52,520 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: growth could be higher potentially, although not as high anywhere 421 00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:58,720 Speaker 1: near as what what Trump suggested four percent when he 422 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:01,760 Speaker 1: was campaigning. UM. But a lot of people were also 423 00:26:01,760 --> 00:26:04,400 Speaker 1: saying that the you know, the Trump effect, that what 424 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 1: one described as Trump flation may not be anywhere near 425 00:26:08,040 --> 00:26:09,879 Speaker 1: as much as as what some people were expecting, and 426 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:12,960 Speaker 1: also not happen in the short term, so it could 427 00:26:13,040 --> 00:26:15,359 Speaker 1: deliver at the end of next year. For example. UM. 428 00:26:15,400 --> 00:26:18,640 Speaker 1: The other big thing unemployment, as you mentioned earlier, will four. 429 00:26:18,720 --> 00:26:20,560 Speaker 1: We had one of our top forecast is suggesting that 430 00:26:20,560 --> 00:26:22,240 Speaker 1: it could get to four point one percent by the 431 00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:25,360 Speaker 1: end of next year, which is very low. UM. And UM, 432 00:26:25,400 --> 00:26:27,199 Speaker 1: you know that really implies that the Fed has to 433 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:30,080 Speaker 1: move more quickly than probably is priced into the market 434 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:33,960 Speaker 1: right now. The other thing inflation, UM two percent at 435 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:36,720 Speaker 1: some point this year. PC could hit two percent by 436 00:26:36,720 --> 00:26:40,600 Speaker 1: mid year. UM. That's the Fed's key indicator. Again, that 437 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 1: means the FED may have to move. When we asked 438 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:44,800 Speaker 1: one of the forecast is what that means in terms 439 00:26:44,840 --> 00:26:47,440 Speaker 1: of hikes next year, he said, if you held the 440 00:26:47,440 --> 00:26:49,840 Speaker 1: gun to his head, he'd say more more four than two, 441 00:26:50,119 --> 00:26:52,880 Speaker 1: which is surprising and it's certainly not priced in um. 442 00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:56,040 Speaker 1: And the other thing that stood out fed transition. You know, 443 00:26:56,200 --> 00:26:59,919 Speaker 1: will Trump replace the current line up with a lot 444 00:26:59,920 --> 00:27:02,880 Speaker 1: of hawks. Um, certainly policy will change in some way 445 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 1: that can you imagine somebody actually holding a gun to 446 00:27:04,880 --> 00:27:07,360 Speaker 1: somebody's head and saying, you know, come on, how many 447 00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:12,240 Speaker 1: FED hikes next year? Anyway? Um? No, I hope not. James. 448 00:27:12,880 --> 00:27:16,879 Speaker 1: Just want to get your thoughts on accelerated inflation because 449 00:27:16,920 --> 00:27:20,840 Speaker 1: I was looking today and JM. Smucker talking about raising 450 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:24,919 Speaker 1: coffee prices six percent and another note, looking at the 451 00:27:24,920 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 1: grains market specifically soybeans and wheat, and those prices are 452 00:27:30,280 --> 00:27:34,480 Speaker 1: trending higher. What is the outlook for inflation? Well, I 453 00:27:34,480 --> 00:27:36,080 Speaker 1: think you know we're seeing it all over and not 454 00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:39,919 Speaker 1: just in commodities. But um, you know, if there is 455 00:27:39,960 --> 00:27:44,199 Speaker 1: this big fiscal push, then that will obviously have some 456 00:27:44,240 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 1: inflationary impact. If there is a bad for bonds, good 457 00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:51,760 Speaker 1: for stocks possibly. But markets are moving in strange ways 458 00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:54,280 Speaker 1: as you as you as you probably watched the moment. Well, 459 00:27:54,320 --> 00:27:56,160 Speaker 1: I was just looking at the ten ure. For example, 460 00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:58,199 Speaker 1: in the yield there is two point three eight percent 461 00:27:58,240 --> 00:27:59,679 Speaker 1: a little bit of a sell off and in the 462 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:02,480 Speaker 1: third year two point nine seven and that's kind of 463 00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:05,680 Speaker 1: hovering around that three percent level, which I believe. Jeffrey 464 00:28:05,720 --> 00:28:09,080 Speaker 1: good Lack at the double line and Bill Gross at 465 00:28:09,160 --> 00:28:13,080 Speaker 1: Jonas Uh they mentioned very specific levels I think to 466 00:28:13,280 --> 00:28:16,960 Speaker 1: six and three saying the bond bull market is over. Yeah. 467 00:28:16,960 --> 00:28:20,199 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm curious, James, when you talked with some 468 00:28:20,280 --> 00:28:23,480 Speaker 1: of these forecasters, was there more hemming and hiring more. 469 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:25,720 Speaker 1: I don't know what's going to happen. Then you've heard 470 00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:28,320 Speaker 1: in the past. Um, I think all of them, you know, 471 00:28:28,320 --> 00:28:30,119 Speaker 1: they've been doing this a long time. They see Trump 472 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:32,320 Speaker 1: as a lot of noise. In lots of cases, they've 473 00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:34,439 Speaker 1: some of them have said that they've become a bit 474 00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:36,840 Speaker 1: more nimble. They've made their models smaller and easier to 475 00:28:36,880 --> 00:28:40,200 Speaker 1: adjust because of the new political situation. Um. But they're 476 00:28:40,280 --> 00:28:42,480 Speaker 1: you know, they're still forecasting, and they're still you know, 477 00:28:42,520 --> 00:28:44,240 Speaker 1: they need to make calls. They need to see through 478 00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 1: that noise. And Dave, you know, just sort of to 479 00:28:46,600 --> 00:28:49,520 Speaker 1: that point at people still need to make calls, but 480 00:28:49,560 --> 00:28:52,840 Speaker 1: not necessarily right ahead of a Trump press conference. It 481 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:54,840 Speaker 1: seems like, you know, you spoke about how there isn't 482 00:28:54,840 --> 00:28:56,640 Speaker 1: a lot of direction that people are kind of waiting. 483 00:28:56,640 --> 00:28:58,320 Speaker 1: I mean, do you have a sense from volumes or 484 00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:02,040 Speaker 1: just sort of a certain activity of just how sort 485 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:04,920 Speaker 1: of how much traders are with bated breath right now 486 00:29:05,200 --> 00:29:07,000 Speaker 1: waiting to get a sense of what direction we're going 487 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,520 Speaker 1: to head in. Well, just taking a quick look at 488 00:29:09,920 --> 00:29:12,720 Speaker 1: the first half hour or so trading, I mean, it 489 00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:15,080 Speaker 1: was pretty much in line with what we saw yesterday 490 00:29:15,120 --> 00:29:19,080 Speaker 1: when you look at NYC and NAZAC listed stocks. So 491 00:29:19,280 --> 00:29:21,160 Speaker 1: I mean there's a big mo just looking at a 492 00:29:21,240 --> 00:29:25,719 Speaker 1: big board. Volume is down right now, I touch, you know, 493 00:29:25,920 --> 00:29:28,920 Speaker 1: not much and as much as anything, you know, it 494 00:29:28,960 --> 00:29:31,880 Speaker 1: becomes a matter of where we go from here. And 495 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:34,600 Speaker 1: I would just note since you're talking about inflation that 496 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:37,560 Speaker 1: you know, we got numbers out of Super Value grocery 497 00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:41,200 Speaker 1: chain and their earnings came up well short of estimates 498 00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:44,479 Speaker 1: and the stocks down eight percent, So you know, and 499 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:47,520 Speaker 1: that's an area, particularly when you talk about food, that 500 00:29:48,040 --> 00:29:50,479 Speaker 1: you know there's a concern that you know that the 501 00:29:50,520 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 1: grocery chains and everyone sort of alongal line may suffer 502 00:29:54,480 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 1: because prices are falling rather than rising. Within that piece 503 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:01,400 Speaker 1: of the inflation puzzle, one it doesn't necessarily get a 504 00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:03,600 Speaker 1: lot of attention because if you think about cord inflation, 505 00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 1: it excludes food as well as energy drives or takes 506 00:30:07,760 --> 00:30:11,200 Speaker 1: any kind of vehicle or really eats foods about volatility, 507 00:30:11,200 --> 00:30:14,720 Speaker 1: PIM clearly, thanks very much. Dave Wilson, Bloomberg stocks Commas 508 00:30:15,200 --> 00:30:17,560 Speaker 1: appreciate it. Just send Dave an email at d Wilson 509 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot net and sign up for his daily 510 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:23,240 Speaker 1: free email newsletter. Our thanks alson James Crumbie. He is 511 00:30:23,280 --> 00:30:32,600 Speaker 1: the editor of Bloomberg Briefs. Thanks for listening to the 512 00:30:32,600 --> 00:30:36,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to 513 00:30:36,040 --> 00:30:41,280 Speaker 1: interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. 514 00:30:41,560 --> 00:30:44,840 Speaker 1: I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox. 515 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:47,840 Speaker 1: I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one 516 00:30:48,120 --> 00:30:50,840 Speaker 1: before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on 517 00:30:50,920 --> 00:31:00,120 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio. It