WEBVTT - Dissolver of Worlds

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to start off today by thinking about containers. Um,

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if you ever look around a chemistry lab, you will

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>notice that there are a lot of containers made out

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of glass. Glass is often thought of as the chemist's friend, right,

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>And this is because silica, the stuff that glass is

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>made out of, is generally chemically inert, not much reacts

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with it, and glass is insoluble in in most solvents,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's not going to be leeching off and contaminating

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 1>your sample. But this is not true in all cases.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there's a chemical we've talked about on the

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>show before called hydrofluoric acid, the solution of hydrogen fluoride

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or HF in water. Hydrogen fluoride is known to actually

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>corrode even glass, and there's some pretty good videos of

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>this that you can look up, like the YouTube channel

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>called Periodic Videos has one you can find where they

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>dissolve a glass light bulb in hydrofluoric acid. I think

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>while it's plugged in by the way, at least when

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>when the glass finally does dissolve and break off in

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the liquid, the the filament inside the light bulb, I

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>recall is like sparking in the solution in a in

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a very weak and creepy and cursed way. But it's

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of disturbing to see even glass, the ultimate non reactor,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>just getting sort of cleanly sheared off of the top

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of a bulb when it's dipped into this this stuff

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and then falling away and eventually just dissolving into it

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and becoming a liquid itself. Regular glass, of course, is

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>made of silica sand, which is made of silicon dioxide

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or s I O two. And when you put glass

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>into hydrogen fluoride into hydrofluoric acid, the hydrogen fluoride breaks

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the bonds between silicon and oxygen in silica to form

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>silicon fluorine molecules, and the result is the hydrofluoric acid

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>eats right through the solid glass. So here you've got

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this material, this hydrofluoric acid, that cannot be stored in

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>regular glass containers, asked to be stored in special plastic

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>containers or it might eat right through the bottle and

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>spill everywhere. And this is a jumping off point for

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>today's episode, because we're gonna be looking at the question

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of what if you were to imagine a material that

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>push the boundaries even farther, if there was a solvent

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that that could dissolve everything it touched, a sort of

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent. Yeah, this reminds me a lot of our

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>discussions in the episode on Hollywood Acid, the the way

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that acids are sometimes presented in science fiction, especially where

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you wound a xenomorph and it's so

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it's acidic blood seems to just burn its way

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>through every floor, you know, all the way through the

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>hull of the ship. Yeah, precisely. So this will be

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a follow up episode to that, but but

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>going more into the history of alchemy and getting into

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the metaphorical realms of these these high powered solvents. Now,

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing this immediately relates to for me is a

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment that I remember encountering from reading some of

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the American philosopher Daniel Dennett's books, where um Dennett often

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>talks about a metaphor that he uses called universal acid.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It's basically exactly what we're describing here, but he doesn't

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it in the pure material sense. Dinn It uses

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the metaphor of universal acid to describe evolution. Uh And

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and what he means there is that evolution is a

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>concept that is not just a theory in biology. It's

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not just that when we discovered evolution by natural selection,

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we could suddenly explain the diversity of species on Earth.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That was true, but it's also a sort of revolutionizing

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>world view that changes everything it touches. And so, to

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>quote from his summary of this idea from his book Intuition,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, then it writes, universal

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>acid is a liquid so corrosive that it will eat

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>through anything. But what do you keep it in? It

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dissolves glass bottles and stainless steel canisters as readily as

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>paper bags. What would happen if you somehow came upon

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or created a dollop of universal acid? Would the whole

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>planet eventually be destroyed? What would it leave in its wake,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>after everything had been transformed by its encounter with universal acid?

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>What would the world look like? Little did I realize

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that in a few years I would encounter an idea,

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Darwin's idea bearing an unmistakable likeness to universal acid. It

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>eats through just about every traditional concept and leaves and

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>it's ake a revolutionized worldview with most of the old

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>landmarks still recognizable but transformed in fundamental ways. Now there's

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>a thing here where the metaphor I think might not

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>be the best one because we get Hollywood acid in

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our brains, and when we think about Hollywood acid, Hollywood

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>acid doesn't just change, it destroys. Right. You put the

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Batman in the Hollywood acid, and then the Batman is

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>no more. Yeah, I mean a lot of this though,

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>comes down to what we I mean when you talk

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about things being destroyed. This is a very human viewpoint.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a very um, you know, organism based view

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. That the Batman is destroyed in the acid,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that the the car is destroyed in the crash, that

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>or that even something is destroyed when it is um

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it's just you know, a metal or

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>something and it's melted or it's uh or it's it's

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's put into some sort of an acid or

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a base. But you know, it comes back to the

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>basic principle that matter can neither be uh, you know,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately created or destroyed. Everything can only be transferred into

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>different states or broken down into different components. That's a

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>very good point. Yeah, from the sort of like chemical

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>view of the universe, nothing has been destroyed. But I

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think it'd be fair to say that if you put

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a batman in a bunch of sulfuric acid and then

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>you liberate all the possible water molecules from him and

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just leave a bunch of elemental carbon, you could say,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in some sense the Batman has been destroyed conceptually at least, yes,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But I mean part of that is the difficulty of

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>then recreating a Batman, right because I mean we would

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have to recreate not only the batman's body, but the

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>batman's psyche, and and you know, they're huge hurdles, not

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>only in terms of of science and our understanding of psychology,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but also time. It's a huge time investment to try

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and reproduce another Batman. Right. So, so I don't know

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>if maybe he could have used a slightly better metaphor

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>for what he means, because what I think he means

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is not that the concept of evolution destroys everything it

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>touches in culture, but rather it reacts with everything it touches,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>so it leaves the world we knew before populated with

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the same questions and beauties and wonders, but each of

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>them sort of now upgraded by a chemical reaction, each

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>one sort of changed somewhat by our new perspective. You

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>have a new scientific way of thinking about everything that

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you knew before. Yeah, you know, I think this this

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>argument it certainly applies to evolution very strongly, uh, but

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, into evolutionary theory. But it also can apply

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to even um hypotheses that we've discussed in the show before.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You know that take for instance, the bi cameral mind

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis by Julian Jaynes. That's an example of of of

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a very infectious idea that once you have, if you've

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>really gotten into it, you it kind of can change

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about so many other things. Um.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there are even less you know, controversial ideas

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you can think of where once you have, once you

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>were alert to say a oh, just you know, certain

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of psychological ideas about how, uh you know, how

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>things like trauma work. You know, uh, it changes the

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>way you think about reality because you have a different

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>way of processing what is going on or maybe going

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on with other people and other groups and throughout history. Yeah,

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the metaphorical sense, I mean, all kinds of ideas

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess can become a mental universal solvent. I would say,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases with with more use than in other cases,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes we just start applying an idea to everything

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's really fun. And in other cases we start

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>applying idea an idea to everything because we get we

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we at least believe we're getting some kind of analytical

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>use out of it, like it's explaining more than, uh

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>than than other ideas that we had previously. Though, I

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>would say, be cautious of any lens that seems to

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>explain everything, because you know, I've been through phases in

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>my life where I sort of like learned a new

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>analytical lens and then it explained literally everything in the world,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and you like, you gotta be careful about those that

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>usually you're probably over applying it at that point. Yeah,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Like if you if you just apply aliens to everything

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it works, uh, you know, you're probably over

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>applying aliens. That There was actually a sample I hear

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>every now and then in a in a track where

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>someone saying, you know, listing off all these different things

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and then saying you drop aliens in the middle of

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this and everything makes sense. It's always true, it's always true.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So if there's anything like that, yeah, you could. You

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>can sub anything for aliens if if it feels like

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect fit, that it explains everything that it

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that it absolutely dissolves all the mysteries of life. I

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's it's probably not the universal solvent you're

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you're really looking for, but it can seem like that.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>But before we get back into the fully metaphorical space,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but what it means to to think about the world

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of universal solvents. I want to actually consider

0:09:55.559 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the the real material possibility of a universal solvent, especially

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as it has figured into the history of alchemy, because

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you probably know, even if you only have passing familiarity

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with alchemy, that one of the endeavors of of alchemy

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>was this search for these sort of dream materials, these

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>holy Grail materials. What an author I'm going to be

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>quoting extensively in this episode, Lawrence Prince you pa calls

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>chemical arcana or I guess singular chemical arcanum. Uh, these

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>objects that are sort of the mcguffin's of alchemy, that

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>alchemists were requesting after. So one of these things might

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be like the Philosopher's stone that could allow you to

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>transmute base metals into gold in the process known as chrysopoeia,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or other ones might be Actually I talked about one

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in an artifact episode and it did not too long ago. Uh,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>it's an idea that you can find going all the

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>way back to ancient Roman times, and that's the concept

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of bindable glass. The vitrum flexile or vitram malley abel

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that you could have glass that could be soft like

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>dough and shaped into into different you know, in whatever

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>form you needed. But another similar arcanum in alchemy was

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the concept of alcahest a, a substance that would act

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as a universal solvent that could break down anything. Now,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>discussing alchemy is always a little bit difficult because alchemy

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat controversially defined, like different people try to insist

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>on different historical understandings of exactly what alchemy was. I mean,

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't say it's a it's the general output of

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a group of certain scholars who, you know, we're kind

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of secretive about their beliefs, and we're working with materials

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in some way. I mean, it's a kind of slippery concept.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>In English, the term has been used to refer to

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge range of beliefs and behaviors, with special emphasis

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on things done that that sound in some way related

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to sorcery, the hermetic, and the occult, and these associations

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely not without foundation. Like that they much of

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>alchemy does have a cult and and and supernatural connections.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But another way to understand alchemy, for the purpose of

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>today's discussion at least, is that it is sort of

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the proto scientific study of the dynamics of matter, particularly

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned with transforming one type of matter into another, or

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of isolating the constituents of a material, refining that material,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or enhancing its alleged properties, many of which were perceived

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to be medicinal properties. I know a lot of people

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in the modern era when they think of alchemy, they

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think about people trying to turn lead into gold, and

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and then that was a preoccupation of some people in

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the world of alchemy. But also a huge part of

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>alchemy was a quest for medicine. Yeah. I guess to

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>two points to make here. One is that we do

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>often think of that when we think of alchemy, we

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>may think of a very Western context and we think

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of people who look like wizards, you know, or even

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>specifically someone who looks like John d or Merlin, Uh,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>toying around with science stuff. You know. Alchemy is science

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff what wizards do. Uh. But it is also important

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to note that that alchemy and things that we think

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of in English and in the end in the Western

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>world as alchemy, you also find that in the in

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Arabic world, you find it in in ancient India,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you find it in ancient China. Uh. You know. So

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>alchemy can very broadly speaking, be seen as kind of

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a global effort of learned individuals trying to learn more

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about the world. UM. I think one way to think

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of it too is think about geographic discovery. You know,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>people setting out on on voyages trying to find distant

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lands that they know to exist or that they have

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>heard to exist. Sometimes those lands do not exist at all.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they are you know, islands of the imagination. But

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the quest to find those play pass, they find

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>real places, and ultimately this leads up to a a

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more accurate and more refined understanding of the world. Own

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting parallel between alchemy and your geography example, during ages

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of exploration, where people were trying to get away from

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>their home country and figure out what else was out

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there that they could find. They're going to be different

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>levels of perspicacity and reporting, you know, because like whatever

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you've discovered, you may think of this as, oh, this

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is knowledge I want to share with the world, but

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you may also very much think of it as like

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a trade secret or a personal you know,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this is something I've discovered for me and my my,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>my buddies, and we need to keep this secret and

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>not let everybody else get in there before we've had

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a good go at it. Yeah, and then you have

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the pesky situation of discovering the real but keeping it

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>secret or only holding on to it because of your

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>quest for the unreal. And we've touched on this before

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show before um when we were talking about

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>urine at point Urine's role in alchemy, and uh, I

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>forget that the exact chemical episode who were discussing this,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But the history of alchemy is full of such scenarios,

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. I was reading actually a Washington Post article

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from January eighteen by Ben Guarino that interviews Lawrence Princeipe,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the authors who's an expert

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on alchemy that we're gonna be talking about in this episode.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And this article ends up talking a lot about p

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was one part I found very funny. It's

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about how in Prince ships lab he will try

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to recreate some some old alchemy experiments as they are

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>described from these these texts, and so the artifacts of

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>these experiments are all all around his lab. And and

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the article here describes on the counter sits a large

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>jar labeled flim of acidified urine. More than one alchemical

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>recipe calls for human p. Prince Ship said. An old

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Arabic text used the phrase the secret is within you,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>probably meaning well, reader, you go figure it out, and

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>then it quotes Prince Bay saying, but some people took

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that more literally, so they ended up using vast amounts

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of urine. Oh that's wonderful. Yeah, and and that now

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that they've had a second to reflect. It was our

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our invention episode or episodes on the match stick. Uh yeah,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we're we're talking. I can't read. So we talked about

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple people who used urine. At least one of the

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>main people who was big into two urine experiments. Was

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was the seventeenth century alchemist Hinnig Brund who who really

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically wanted urine from beer drinkers. So it was like,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>go to the bars, get the drunks to p in

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a bucket, and I will create a huge, a gigantic

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>vat of beer drinker p. Yes, yes it was brand

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>He was in search of the philosopher's stone um, but

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in doing so made these discoveries that ultimately tied into

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of a phosphorus and matches and you know,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or matches being the one of the the actual real

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>world and world inventions to come out of this quest

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for the fantastic. But it's so funny also about like

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreting the line the secret is within you two mean

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like literally in your bladder, because that that seems just

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>just perfect for the world of alchemy, because there was

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sort of metaphors and secret keeping, kind

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of coded language. A Prince Pay talks in in one

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>interview I was watching about how you know, in some

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>alchemical texts, the author will not say the conventional names

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the chemicals that he's talking about. He might instead

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of saying nitric acid. He will say the red dragon,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and instead of saying, um, you know, like add nitric

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>acid to this solution, he would say something like allow

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the red dragon to consume the white eagle or something. So,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of you have to like dig

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>through and figure out what all of these code words

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>refer to, not in every case, but in many. Yeah.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So it it makes looking back on some of these

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>recipes and ideas oftentimes confusing because like I'm reminded of

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of the recipe that I looked at once for the

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>creation of a homunculous and it has this kind of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>coded language in it. So sometimes it's hard to determine,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much of what you're looking at is

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just abject occultism and in sorcery, and how much is

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>coded material referring to something more closely related to to

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the world of chemistry and reality. Oh right, So like

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>is it actually asking for like a bat swing or

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is it or is that a code for like saltpeter

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, And I guess you can you can

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>look at similar situations throughout our you know, the world

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of language and spirituality and all. But um, I guess

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things to drive home with with alchemy

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is that, yes, we're talking about ultimately a proto scientific sphere. Uh. One.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is one though, in which scientific considerations

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are either inherently mingled with philosophic and supernatural ideas, or

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at the very least are heavily susceptible to flowing into

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>those subjects. And as the author um Mercia Eliade put

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the Forge and the Crucible quote, alchemy posed

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as a sacred science, whereas chemistry came into its own

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>when substances had shed their sacred attributes. Oh that's interesting,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, One thing I do want to talk

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>about as we go on is the ways that different

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>uh practitioners of the alchemy period didn't They weren't just

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for chemical formulas, but they really thought chemicals meant something. Yeah. Yeah,

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And you you can imagine too where this gets. You know,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't look at something without working without you know,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>without our brain beginning to ponder over the possible metaphors there.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, how does this relate to me? Um? And

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're we get we're a little further from that now,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we have to sort of put ourselves

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in the mindset of of older Uh, you know, experimentors.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>And uh, this is where I want to bring up

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the thoughts that Terence McKenna

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>brought to the table concerning alchemy. Um and and I

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>think he I think he made he made some good,

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>good points on the topic. He gave a series of

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lectures on alchemy in the late nineties um and touched

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on this. And I want to read a quote from

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it from a transcription. In this he is citing Iliade,

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but also putting his own spin on things. Quote. The

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>shaman is the brother of the smith. The smith is

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the metallurgist, the worker in metals. And this is where

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>alchemy has its roots. We who take this for granted,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how mysterious and powerful this seemed to

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>ancient people, and in fact, it would seem so to

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>us if we had anything to do with it. I mean,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>how many of us are welders or casters of metal.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a magical process to take, for instance, cinnabar, a

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>red soft ore, and by the mere act of heating

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it in a furnace, it will sweat liquid mercury onto

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>its surface. We have unconsciously imbibed the ontology of science,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where we have mind firmly separated it out from the world.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>We take this for granted. It's effortless because it is

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the ambiance of the civilization that we've been born into.

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>But in an earlier age, some writers would say, a

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>more naive age. But I wonder about that mind and

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>matter were seen to be alloyed together throughout nature, so

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that the sweating of mercury out of cinnabar is not

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a material process. It is a process in which the

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mind and the observations of the metal worker maintain an

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>important role. Well, I don't know what to think about

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that claim about the idea the role of the mind

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the transformations, but I think he's absolutely right that,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, it's one of the frustrations of the

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>modern world is that we rely so on so much

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>um science and technology in the background of our lives

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that we can lose sight of the sheer wonder that

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that is on, you know, visible if you're actually watching

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>these processes unfold in firsthand. Yeah, I mean, we talked

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>about technological metaphors all the time on the show. How

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>how often we think about our own cognition in terms

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of computers and cameras and digital recordings and so forth,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>uh and photoshop, etcetera. You know, and and these can

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>all be useful, but they can also distort and create

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a a distorted version of of what's actually going on

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>inside the mind or outside of it. And yeah, I

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think you know, if you were to put yourself in

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who day in and day out, was not using

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone, was not using a PC or a GO

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or a Mac or whatever, but was instead, uh working

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>with the base materials and with metals and chemicals and

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out their properties. Like this would be

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the primary way that they would also think about the mind.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it, it makes perfect sense to me, Like

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>these would be there, This would be their telephone, their television,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>their computer. These would be the ways that they might

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>then self reflect. Well, yeah, I mean it's it's apparent

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that witnessing chemical reactions suggested to people some kind of deep,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>underlying spiritual reality that was like more than just an

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>idea about like different types of atoms and how they

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>can fit together, but suggested like like big truth so

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that applied to everything. You know, that that alchemy could

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in its own way become a one of these metaphorical

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>universal solvents, that it explains everything about about God and

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the universe and humankind in our minds. Now, since I

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>did mention McKenna, one might easily say, well, for Terence McKenna,

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>surely mushrooms, psychedelics were kind of the universal solvent. And yeah,

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I can certainly that can you can certainly

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>make a case for that, especially within certain works of

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>his you know, the Food of the Gods, etcetera. Um,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a case where you can say, oh,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you drop mushrooms in the middle of this and everything

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Um. Oh, did he suggest that Paracelsus took mushrooms? Uh? No,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually he in these lectures, he he really took quite

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the opposite approach. And that's why I want to share

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>one more, uh snippet from from this lengthy lecture series,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, you can find online um in

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>several places, either in you know, audio form or transcribed.

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>But this is what he had to say. Quote. I

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>will not claim and do not in fact think it

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is so that there was anything overtly psychedelic in the

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sense of pharmacologically based about alchemy. When we look back

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>through the alchemical literature, there's very little evidence that it

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was far pharmacologically driven. Only when you get to the

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very last adamirations of the out of the alchemical impulse

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in someone like Paracelsus, do you get use of opium.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting that the great drugs of modern society

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>were accidentally discovered by alchemist in their research distilled alcohol

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as a product of alchemical work, and as I mentioned,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>opium was very heavily used. Um of the Paracelsian school.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But what they possessed was an ability to liquefy their

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>mental categories and then to project the contents of the

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>mind onto these processes and read them back. Now, um,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>real quick, uh, Paracelsus. We'll we'll get back to Paracelsus

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. But this was an individual of four

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>or four through fifteen forty one, a Swiss physician and

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>alchemist of the German Renaissance, and he made a number

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>of contributions to modern medical science. And he's come up

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>before on the show, I think in our episodes on

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the Trident, on dangerous foods, on Frankenstein, and on blood drinking,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>which I guess are all areas where you might well

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine that the realms of chemistry and UH and alchemy

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>might come together to some degree. Yeah, Paracelsus is considered

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the sort of granddaddy's of alchemy. Um. Paracelsis

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is his nickname. By the way, it's worth mentioning his

0:25:54.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>real name, which was Philippus Areolas, the Ephrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that Bombastus. Yeah, I think there's some question

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about whether the word bombastic comes from his name because

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he he would throw down like Paracelsis would get into it.

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I want to read a a a passage

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>from a book that that I'm going to be referring

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to for the rest of the episode. That is by

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence in Prince Shop called The Secrets of Alchemy that

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was published in by the University of Chicago Press. Prince

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>HP is professor at Johns Hopkins University, specializing in the

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>history of science and technology, and he's written a ton

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about alchemy and and its role in the development of science.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>But um, there's a passage from his book where he

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>briefly introduces the figure of Paracelsus, and he does it

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. He says Paracelsis spent much of his life,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>wandering from town to town, generally stirring up trouble wherever

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>he went with his iconoclastic and quick tempered ways. It

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>has been claimed erroneously that the word bombastic in the

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of pompous beach derives from his name. Okay, so

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that was he's saying. No, that is not where it

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>comes from. But I have encountered that erroneous claim. Bridge

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Bay goes On. Paracelsis is best known as a vociferous

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>critic of traditional medicine. His writings, frequently imitated in style

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>by later followers, are filled with vitriolic and sarcastic condemnations

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of physicians, apothecaries in the entire medical establishment. It is

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reported that he publicly burned the medical writings of Ibben Sinah,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>standard texts for medical education at the time, as a

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sign of his contempt. Paracelsis's other provocative habits included lecturing

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for the short time he gave medical lectures in Basle

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and writing in his native Swiss German rather than Latin,

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and promoting the use of German medicinal plants over more

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>established classical Mediterranean ones. He was a strong advocate of

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>alchimia but only as one of the pillars of medicine,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that is to say, for its ability to prepare pharmaceuticals

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and to explain body the functions. He showed no interest

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in chrisopoeia and occasionally wrote contemptuously of it. And again,

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>chrisopoeia is the is the attempt to transmute base metals

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>into gold. It's interesting, all these are our attributes of

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>someone who very much wanted to dissolve the rigidity of

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the of of the establishment. You know, you could you

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>could look at them acting as a kind of trying

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to act as a kind of universal solvent within their

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>own culture. Yeah, And I guess that should bring us

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to the concept of the universal solvent itself, because Paracelsus

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote of something called alcohest, but Paracelsis meant something different

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>by it. Paracelsis wrote of alcohest as a type of

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>medicine for treating a bad liver. But in the wake

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of Paracelsis, some later alchemists would take the idea of

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>alcohest as a universal solvent and really run with it.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember, again, as I said earlier, alchemy is often

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>concerned with the search for these particular chemical arcana in

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>princeps terms. So again, this might be a method for

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>transmuting base metals into gold doing the process of chrysopoeia. Uh.

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that this is despite the fact that

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>some people are still trying to do this today. This

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is not really possible by conventional chemical means. Like gold

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as as we have it here on Earth is forged.

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a product of nucleosynthesis that occurs in some

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most violent phenomena in the universe, like neutron

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>star collisions or exploding you know, stars at the end

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of their lifespan. Uh. Like, you can't turn lead into gold.

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That is just not a human power, I guess, unless

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking maybe about I don't know, like like tiny

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>amounts of it in particle colliders or something, you know,

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>atomic experiments that accelerate protons to extremely high speeds and

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>collide with things. And even in that case, I'm not sure.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I just can't rule it out there by conventional chemical means,

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about significant amounts of matter, you cannot

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>turn base metals into gold. That would require rearranging the

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>nucleus of an atom, which we just don't have the

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>power to do right, and maybe if you were John

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>d and you could actually um, you know, if you

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>were actually going to capture or utilize an angel and

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you could somehow tap into their powers. Uh, they're they're

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>just like base energy level. Then okay, maybe maybe it

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>would be possible, but but not without any like additional

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>supernatural add ons to the chemical understanding that we have. Right,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and so, while the transmutation of base metals like lead

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>into gold is probably the best known quest of alchemy,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Prince Bay writes a lot about how alchemy is so

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than that it. Alchemy was not just the

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>greedy gold slog of people who had you know, Mida's brain,

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>uh like, it was generally the study of chemical change.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And the study of chemical change is a really important

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and fascinating subject that you understand, sort of unlocks all

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the other physical sciences. I already mentioned the idea

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of of recipes for bendable glass. I think this is

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a much more obscure one, but I just bring it

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>up because I did an episode on it. A big

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>part of alchemy, as we've already mentioned, was concerned with

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>refining and improving medicines. But of course another holy grail

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of alchemy was the universal solvent alcohest. And so the

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>place where alcohest really comes into the picture is in

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the work of the influential Flemish chemist and physician Jean

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Baptista van Helmont, who lived fifteen seventy nine to sixteen

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>forty four uh, and of van Helmont is responsible for

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>has more of a legacy than you might expect. Van

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Helmont is responsible for coining the English word gas. Uh.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the first people, maybe the first

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to identify a gas other than general air, when he

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>differentiated carbon dioxide as a distinct form of matt from

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the gas in the atmosphere. Apparently the

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>word gas that he coined comes from the Greek word chaos. Now,

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Prince Bay writes that Van Helmont is the is the

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>origin of this search for alcohest as the as the

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent, but notes that Paracelsus, as I already said,

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>had used the word alcohest previously, and this was again

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for a very special medicine for the liver. But Van

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Helmont would take that word alcohest and start using it

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to describe a hypothetical substance that would be able to

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dissolve any other substance the universal solvent, and apparently a

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsus had a similar idea for a universal solvent that

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been a material called circulated salt or cell

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>circulatum um. But but for van Helmont, alcohest became not

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just something that you wanted to be able to make,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but something that was fundamental in understanding the very nature

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of matter. Because Van Helmont held a fascinating and mostly

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong but maybe not entirely wrong, at least sort of

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of being right in some interesting ways

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a view of matter that had these qualities, and it

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>brought in ideas from medicine and theology and previous studies

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of chemicals. But the idea was that Van Helmont believed,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>basically everything is made of water, that water is quote

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the basic material substratum of all substances. You drop water

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this and everything makes sense very good. Um.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So this was a departure from previous ideas about the

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the constituents of matter. Again, Paracelsus had written about something

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>called the Tria prima, which means the three primary things,

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and Paracelsus he did not originate this idea fully either,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he was building upon the pre existing chemical knowledge, mostly

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>passed down from Arabic scholars who had written that some

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>metals and minerals could really be reduced to fundamental constituents,

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>which were mercury and sulfur. Uh. This was not correct,

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but it did show a tendency of thinking that was

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>scientifically useful, which was the idea that matter could be

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>decomposed into its constituent parts, different chemical parts that would

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>come together to make molecules of familiar substances, which is

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>very true and the basis of what would become the

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>real science of chemistry. And so Paracelsus is picking up

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on this idea. Uh. And he concluded that it was

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>not just that some metals and minerals were could be

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>broken down into mercury and sulfur. He concluded that basically

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all material could be broken down into three things mercury, sulfur,

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and salt. Again factually wrong, but a a but trending

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 1>in a useful direction in terms of ways of thinking

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>about matter. Yeah, kind of coming back into what we're

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about with destruction, Like, if you were to destroy anything,

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>what would remain? What are the things that make up

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole? Sure? Uh, and I actually wanted to go

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>into a brief digression on paracelsus is mingling of theological, metaphysical,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and protoscientific thinking from a paragraph in prince Ship base

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>book that that I found really interesting. So in writing

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about Paracelsus is idea of the Tria prima, prince ship

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>A writes quote. These three chemical principles provided a terrestrial

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>material trinity that reflected the celestial immaterial trinity as well

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as the human triune nature of body, soul, and spirit. Further,

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsus endeavored to generate an entire world system embracing the

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>whole of theology and natural philosophy as an alternative to

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and he no doubt hoped ultimately a substitute for prevailing

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>contemporaneous systems. For him, chemical processes provided the fundamental model

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for explaining natural processes in the physical universe as well

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>as with the human body. For example, the cycle of

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>rain through sea, air, and land was for Paracelsis a

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>great cosmic distillation. The formation of minerals underground, the growth

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of plants, the generation of life forms, as well as

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the bodily functions of digestion, nutrition, respiration, and excretion, where

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for him inherently chemical processes, God himself is the master chemist.

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>His creation of an ordered world out of primordial chaos

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was akin to the chemist's extraction, purification, and elaboration of

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>common materials into chemical products, and his final judgment of

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the world by fire, like a chemist using fire to

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>purge impurities from precious metals. Paracelsis system has been called

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a chemical world view, and it proved remarkably influential in

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>succeeding generations. So for Paracelsis, not only did he inspire

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the later search for a literal universal solvent that we're

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about, but it seems very much again

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the metaphorical, in the mind space, alchemy was his

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent. It it explained everything. I remember. Van Helmont

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>would go on to break with Paracelsus in believing that

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>matter could be reduced beyond the tria prima ultimately always

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>down to what it was made of at bottom, which

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>was water. So why would van Helmont think that ultimately

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>everything was made of water? Well, his reasoning was partly theological.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was the primacy of water in the

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>genesis account of creation. Uh and this also calls to

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>mind how in the recent Nile episode we discussed the

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>prominence of water not just in the Biblical creation story,

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but as probably at least in the estimation of the

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>scholar David Leming, the single most common theme in creation

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>narratives around the world, if you like, compare all of

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the world's religions creation myths. He says, the thing that

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is in the most of them is water. You know,

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>primordial cosmic oceans. Yeah. Yeah. And then oftentimes, like we

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>discussed in that episode, we even would think of the

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>cosmos as ocean. Uh so, I mean you would if

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not in the beginning there's some void or some

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>just empty space of darkness, which I guess to a

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>large point, you could be a large part point you

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>could say is derived from our modern popular understanding of

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of what outer space is. They've never been to space,

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know what space was. Yeah, the the vast

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>emptiness was the ocean. That was the that was the

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>vast mystery, the vast primordial body. But it wasn't just

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>these theological influences. Van Helmont also based this belief in

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the material primacy of water on physical experiments that he

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>conducted in the lab. So here's an example, as described

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>by Prince you Pay. In Van Helmont's most famous experiment,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>he planted a willow tree sapling that he had weighed beforehand.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>The willow tree was five pounds, and he planted it

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a container with two hundred pounds of soil. Then he

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>watered the tree for five years, and at the end

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of five years the tree had grown from five pounds

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and sixty nine pounds. It had gained about

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty three or thirty four times its original weight. But

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>he also measured the soil that the tree had been

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>planted in, and he discovered that the soil weighed almost

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same as it did when he planted it. Thus,

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Van Helmont concluded that water alone had been transformed into

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the substances that make up the tree, the wood,

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the leaves. This is all just water that has been

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>somehow transformed into higher forms of water, more solid forms

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of water. And in a way he was he was

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>partially correct. I mean, much of the bodies of living

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>organisms is made of water. Uh. But also without understanding

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the science of photosynthesis, Van Helmont didn't realize that the

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>car been content of the tree which is the bulk

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of its non water weight, was actually from carbon dioxide

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>from the air, which is absorbed from the atmosphere by

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the leaves, and then a chemical reaction powered by energy

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from the sunlight breaks apart the CEO two so that

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it can be used to make these carbon molecules that

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the tree needs to make its body. Again, We've talked

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.479
<v Speaker 1>about this on the show a million times, but it's

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the most astounding facts that you know, trees

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are made out of air. But without this knowledge of

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>photochemistry and botany, it was somewhat reasonable for for Van

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Helmont to believe that what had gone into the tree

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was simply what he had put into it, which was water.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the only thing he'd added to it. So how

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>did this system of this this protean water based matter

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>work well to read a section from from Prince Pay

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>describing Van Helmont's thinking quote, The various transformations of water,

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he argued, are managed by semina or seeds capable of

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>organizing water into other substances. Most materials can be turned

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>back into primordial water through heating and cold, thus establishing

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a continuous cycle of creation and destruction. Fire destroys substances

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by turning them into gas again, a word Van Helmont

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>coined from chaos. A non condensable substance more subtle than

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>any vapor. Gas rises to the upper parts of the atmosphere,

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>where exposed to extreme cold, it returns to elemental water

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that falls with the rain. The alcohest performs this return

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to water more quickly and usefully, so it base everything

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is made of water, and we're just seeing different forms

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of water. And if you get something really hot in

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a fire, it will transform. It will transform not only

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>into liquid water, but sort of beyond this point into

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a gas that floats up into the atmosphere. Then when

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's up in the atmosphere, it cools down, turns back

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>into liquid water falls as rain. So it's sort of

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>water to water, wet to wet worldview. And then the

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>alcohest comes in as a universal solvent because it seems

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to serve the function of reducing all matter back down

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the state of liquid water without degrading it in

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the process. So, according to Van Helmont, if you were

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to heat a substance mingled with alcohest, it will first

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>be reduced to its proximate ingredients. These would be sort

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the middle constituents. Right before you get all the

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>way to water, it will break down into some other

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>things first, and these would be comparable to Paracelsis idea

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Tria prima. But then further heating with alcohest

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>will reduce even these proximate ingredients to the ultimate base material,

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>which is water. So from Van Helmont's point of view,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the alcohest was was not a chemical arcanum because it

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>would turn your lead into gold and make you rich.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It was actually desirable as the ultimate research tool. Alcohest

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been the ultimate implement for studying what every

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.439
<v Speaker 1>type of matter is made of. And there's a there's

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a sentence from Van Helmont that's quoted in print based

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>book where he writes, there is no more certain genus

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of acquiring knowledge than when one knows what is contained

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in a thing and how much of it there is.

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So how would you do this? Well? Van Helmont thought

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that if you could stop the reaction between alcohest and

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the material in question at just the right time, and

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>then distill the alcohest to remove it, you would be

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>left with what was called the first essence or the

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>ends prem um. And this ends primum would be there

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the container left behind as a kind of crystalline salt.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And so you could make better medicines this way, for instance,

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because the this ins prem um would have the medicinal

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>powers of whatever substance that you had been working on,

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but it would remove all of the toxic or noxious

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of side effects and impure at ease that

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>could be caused by the original medicinal thing. And thus,

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in Van Helmont's view, the alcohest was a tool for research.

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a tool for what was called kimi atria,

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or the development of medicines through chemistry. Now Van Helmont

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>claimed that he had been able to make alcahest. He's like,

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I figured it out, I know how to do it.

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I can prepare it. But he never revealed his secret recipe,

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and many other scholars struggled in vain to discover Van

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Helmont's formula for the universal solvent. Some at various points

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>believed they had found it. For example, Princepa sites a

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>laboratory notebook entry by the seventeenth century Colonial American alchemist

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>George Starkey, who wrote quote at Bristol on twentieth March

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fifty six. God revealed to me the whole secret

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the liquor alcohest let. Eternal blessing, honor and glory

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be to him. So I'm not sure exactly what he discovered,

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but I do not think it was a real universal solvent.

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I like that it's described as the liquor alcohest I

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine if alcohoest was a liquor, would it be impossible

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a cocktail with it? Would it always like

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>break the cocktail back down into its uh it's primary ingredients.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean you probably wouldn't want to drink it. Yeah,

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>if you would just melt, you just become water. Right,

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I always wanted to be water. It's the ultimate in

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>refreshment though. Right, that's good marketing. Now. I was looking

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at another book by Lawrence prince pay about alchemy called

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>The Transmutations of Chemistry, And this is chemistry spelled with

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a an intentionally archaic spelling c h y M I

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>S t r y, which is uh to distinguish it

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>from the modern science of chemistry. Uh. This was published

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in by University of Chicago Press, and in this case

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Prince pa is discussing the efforts of alchemists like Jan

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>von Helmont to perform chemical analysis of materials such as

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the bodies of plants, where the idea was, yeah, you

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.760
<v Speaker 1>can use fire to break materials down into their constituent parts.

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that fire, while it will decompose

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the materials into the approximate constituents, fire was deceitful as

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it would corrupt to those constituents in the process. And

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of course the solution was alcahost, which could break things

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>down without corrupting them in the process. And there's a

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>part here where alcohost is referred to as better than fire.

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It is the fire of Gehenna, which that's a Biblical metaphor.

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a metaphor for ignominious destruction that is used in

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. That is often a little little Bible interpretation note,

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>often translated into English Bibles as hell. Uh. The previous

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>show guest bart Erman, who's a secular Bible historian. He

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>explains that this translation is actually really misleading. It's actually

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 1>reading later theology about the afterlife into the original text. Uh.

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And he argues that Gehenna in the original text is

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to refer to a place of eternal suffering

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>after life. But in fact it was a real place.

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>It is basically a desolate valley that was um It

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was historically associated with human sacrifice. And so, according to Irman,

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>being sent to Gehenna, as is often discussed in the

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>New Testament, has nothing to do with an afterlife of

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>eternal suffering, but rather as a sort of it's a

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:22.959
<v Speaker 1>squalid and unceremonious annihilation. It's sort of equivalent to telling

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody that they're going to die and be thrown into

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a garbage dumpy. Not nice either way, but but somewhat

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>different than the idea of everlasting suffering in Hell. Yeah.

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, if you're putting a garbage dump, and I

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>guess in the right conditions, you are going to break

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>down and become a part of the natural world again,

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>get to become your tria prima and then and then water,

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Yeah. But in Gehenna it sounds like it

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 1>would have been It wouldn't be like a modern garbage dump.

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>That would be a place where you break down or

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:58.240
<v Speaker 1>probably partially consumed by scavenging beasts that you know, ultimately

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know pretty could anyway that that was just a

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Bible nerd side note. So it probably doesn't figure in

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>here because I would guess Van Helmont is is referring

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to the supernatural hell interpretation. So alcahest is much better

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>than earthly fire. It's like a holy supernatural fire. But

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>again Van Helmont writes about how the alcahest could decompose

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>matter into its tria prima, or its constituent parts, and

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>then eventually back into water with no compromise or destruction

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the properties along the way. And uh, and Principe

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>writes about how, again we mentioned earlier, this could be

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>used to make better medicines, and in this section he

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>actually mentions what a couple of these medicines would have

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>been quote. Van Helmont describes several pharmaceuticals he claims to

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>have prepared using the alcohest, most notably a cure for

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>kidney and bladder stones made from a mineral he calls lutus,

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and an elixir of life prepared from Lebanon cedar wood.

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The only obstacle in this glorious royal road for chemistry

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was that no one knew how to prepare Van helmonts alcohestan.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the obvious is is that is the truth

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that if the Alcohest was possible. If there was a

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent to be found, then surely modern chemistry would

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have found it in the wake of alchemy. Yeah, and

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>so here we revealed that there are several flaws to

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental assumptions on which the the Alcohest was based.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing is that Van Helmont's conception of

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:38.760
<v Speaker 1>all material ultimately being based on water is not true.

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that modern chemistry is is without

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>some really exceptional, exquisite dissolvers that will, maybe while maybe

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not being universal solvents, will break down lots of stuff,

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a shocking amount of stuff. Uh So, a couple that

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>are worth mentioning. One I wanted to talk about is

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the chemical known as aqua regia, which the name literally

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>means royal water in Latin. It's made with one part

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>nitric acid and three parts hydrochloric acid. It is extremely corrosive.

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a liquid with a reddish orange color that can

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not only cause severe burns if you touch it, it

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>can literally dissolve otherwise nonreactive metals like gold and platinum.

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Aqua Regia briefly came up in our episode on heavy Water.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I think because we were talking about the historical anecdote

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>where the chemist George to Heavish, she had to had

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>had to quickly find a way to hide the Nobel

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Prize medals which I think we're made of gold in

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory of nils Bore when the laboratory was being

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 1>captured and searched by the Nazis, and he ended up

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>dissolving the metals in Aqua Regia to prevent them from

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>being found out. So Aqua Regia sounds refreshing. Is not refreshing, though,

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>do not buy a bottle of it at your local

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>convenience store. Not a good lacroix flavor, maybe better than coconut. Oh,

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I love coconut. Coconut coconut is a good lacroise you

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do for me at least at the beach, and as

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>long as it's cold. But if it warms up and

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at the beach, then uh yeah, it's certainly

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>both of those are true. Then yeah, I don't want

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>any part of it. I'm a picky so I do

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>love the soda waters, I like the lacroise, I like

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>most flavors, uh and and I like real coconut stuff,

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>but the coconut lacroise something about it. It's like, for me,

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like drinking sunscreen. It's something's wrong. I think maybe

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why I like it, because it kind of tastes

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like what sunscreen historically smelled like. And so it's like

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it's like drinking the the you know, the alchemical truth

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of the beach um while at the beach. So I

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 1>can go on even better on these uh, these dissolvers.

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing I've been reading about called Piranha solution.

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a class of industrial and laboratory

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>grade cleaning solutions colloquially known as per Ranna solutions, and

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you can guess how they got their name. They are

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>typically used as a ruthless and very dangerous way to

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>strip all residue of organic molecules from a container, surface,

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or substrate. Now, it's interesting that it has it is

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it is getting closer. It sounds like to what we

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think of as as Hollywood acid, but in doing so,

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it invokes Hollywood piranhas. Yes, yes, yeah, yeah yeah. So

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's making you think of what's the James Bond movie

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 1>where you only live twice? Right with the bridge that

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>goes over the piranhas and if you like, that's your

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bad performance review means that your fish food. Yeah, that's

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the one with Donald pleasants is blowfeld. Oh yeah. So

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:47.399
<v Speaker 1>a common formulation of Piranha solutions extremely dangerous material would

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be three parts sulfuric acid or H two S O

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>four and one part hydrogen peroxide, which is H two

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>O two. Piranha solution is, from everything I read, extremely temperamental.

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Seeing the elements in the wrong order, or in the

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong ratio, or in the presence of the wrong contaminants

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.879
<v Speaker 1>can immediately lead to explosions. It seems like there are

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just lots of ways that using it can lead to explosions.

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:15.399
<v Speaker 1>More on that in a bit. So I was trying

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, Okay, how exactly does this stuff work? Um,

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a helpful podcast episode I found. The Royal

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Society of Chemistry has a podcast called Chemistry and Its Element,

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>though sometimes I see it referred to just as the

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Chemistry World podcast. Chemistry World is their magazine, their publication.

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But this podcast episode was hosted by Sam Tracy and

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's about Piranha solution and I appreciated the way Tracy

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>explained what the solution does at the molecular level. First

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, I wanted to point out Tracy notes that

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not just named Paranha solution for its ability to

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to dissolve all organic matter that it comes into contact with,

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps also for its tendency to boil vigorously when

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it's in the presence of organic matter. So like in

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that scene and you only live twice, where the piranhas

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>started attacking somebody, it looks like the water has been

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>put on the boilers, bubbles everywhere. Yeah, almost as if

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>um a bubbling mechanism was placed underwater to create the

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:16.240
<v Speaker 1>illusion of a horde of piranhas um, you know, tearing

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:19.359
<v Speaker 1>something apart in movie fashion. Actually, here's something I want

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to see, Uh, answer this question if you were actually

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>attacked by a school of piranhas. I don't know if

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>they even swarm like that in reality, I kind of

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>doubt it. But if you were, would it would it

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:32.359
<v Speaker 1>would the water boil like that? Or would it look

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>very calm on the surface. Well, I think we should

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:37.399
<v Speaker 1>answer this question into an episode on piranhas. I don't

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>know that I've i've ever we've ever devoted an episode

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to piranhas. So let's let's come back to it. They're

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they're beautiful fish. Okay, So how does it work well?

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Piranha solution again, as I mentioned as two main ingredients

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as sulfuric acid H two S O four and hydrogen

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>peroxide H two O two. So if you imagine a

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.760
<v Speaker 1>glass container with organic residue of glucose and sugar stuck

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to the inside, uh, and imagine this is exposed to

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a Piranha solution for cleaning. Each of the two ingredients

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 1>plays a different role in cleaning the sugar away. So sugar,

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, is an organic molecule. It's a carbohydrate molecule

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>with the formulas C six H twelve O six. At

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>least that's glucose. Different types of sugar have different chemical compositions,

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's got carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and when exposed

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to concentrated sulfuric acid, this acid acts as an aggressive

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>dehydrating agent, so it will chemically react to remove water

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>molecules as much as it can, so the sugar molecules

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>will get broken apart and the sugar will lose hydrogen

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and oxygen atoms in the form of water vapor. H

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>two O and so if you have a molecule like

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 1>sugar that's based on carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and you're

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 1>rapidly pulling hydrogen and oxygen off of it, what are

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you going to have left over a lot of carbon? So,

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen this experiment where you douse sugar

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and sulfuric acid, there there are a lot of videos

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you can look up online. Um usually you will have

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like a beaker with a bunch of sugar in it.

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Somebody douses it and sulfuric acid and then stirs it

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up with a glass pipette. Uh, the sugar will first

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>turn brown and then black and then give off all

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of these fumes. I think it's giving off both water,

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 1>vapor and noxious fumes of sulfur dioxide. So you shouldn't

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>do this experiment without you know, supervision of somebody who

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 1>knows what they're doing, because it gets very hot and

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it puts off these fumes. It can be dangerous potentially.

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:35.879
<v Speaker 1>But but what eventually ends up happening is that the

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>carbon residue that's left over from the reaction of the

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>acid with the sugar, This carbon residue will start to

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>climb out of the beaker in a looming column like

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a giant tube worm or snake that is made out

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of charred sit uh. And you can find a whole

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>genre of carbon snake pictures online from demonstrations of this reaction.

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.839
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty great. Yeah, they can be quite impressive. Yeah,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all praise be to the carbon snakes. But Sam Tracy

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in in this podcast, I was talking about mentions that

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the role of sulfuric acid is twofold quote. It's acidity

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>catalyzes the reaction and being a hygroscopic substance, it combines

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with the water, releasing a great quantity of heat, meaning

0:57:18.360 --> 0:57:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the reaction cannot go in the reverse direction and can

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>only proceed to completion. But of course this alone would

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not make a cleaning agent, because sulfuric acid alone would

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to simply eat up organic molecules, strip them of

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what water can be pulled out of them, and leave

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of black elemental carbon in its wake. And

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not clean. Like, you don't want black elemental

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>carbon stuck to your glass surfaces or your electronics or

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.960
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your wafer chips, whatever whatever it is

0:57:47.000 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to clean. So this is where the hydrogen

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>peroxide comes in. Hydrogen peroxide serves to eat away the

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 1>remaining carbon byproduct that would have been left over from

0:57:56.600 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the acids attack on the carbohydrate. Uh So, hydrogen oxide

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 1>H two O two will react with the elemental carbon

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>by donating oxygen atoms to the carbon, which combined to

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>produce carbon dioxide gas, which floats away in the air,

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually leaving your substrate clean of all organic material. So hypothetically,

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you you have and again I'm not advising to do this,

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely dangerous, but what would happen is you have

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a glass container or an electronics part, whatever it is

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to clean off. It's got a little bit

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of organic material on it, maybe some sugar or some

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 1>other kind of carbohydrates something like that, and you add

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this solution to it. It is uh the organic materials

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are ripped apart by the acid and then the remaining

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon is just removed and evaporated by the hydrogen peroxide.

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about many ways that the Piranha solution is,

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 1>as I've said several times now, extremely dangerous. This is

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not one to try it with a home chemistry set,

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as it can easily explode and cause severe injuries and burns.

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a story that was sent to UH

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in a letter to Chemical Engineering News by a couple

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of researchers in the year nineteen nine. That was about

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple accidents that had occurred in university labs with Piranha solutions.

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>One where a container of Paranha solution was sitting stored

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in a fume hood and about a week after it

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was mixed, it just spontaneously exploded. Another one they talked

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about is UH it occurred at Cornell University where I

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think what happened is that some Piranha solution was accidentally

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and very unfortunately mixed with ascet tone and this caused

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a violent explosion that like ripped apart the hood that

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it was under, severely injured the person who was working

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on it. They ended up, you know, covered in this

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>corrosive liquid with a bunch of glass embedded in them.

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So it is not something to screw around with. So

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not literal alcohost, not a literal universal solvent, but but

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Paranha solution will get you a lot of the way there.

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you know, at this point we're reaching

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the podcast, and I think the only

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.040
<v Speaker 1>only way to really go at this point is to

0:59:59.440 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>at least briefly discuss New Age occult thinking and um

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>also uh tech doz lingo. Okay, let's let's start with

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>with the with the New Age, New age and occult

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>psych and psychedelic thinking, basically discussing universal solvent as a metaphor. Now.

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Earlier in our discussion, I brought up Terrence McKinnon his

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lectures on alchemy, and again McKenna said that he didn't

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>see much of a connection between alchemy and psychedelics. Uh.

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Those certain important pharmacological discoveries would come out of alchemy.

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, psychedelics were the domain of the shaman.

1:00:35.440 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But of course other schools of thought would later on

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in human history come back to alchemy uh, and it's

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sacred and obscure dimensions and find new meanings there. So,

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we see that with the unions, and we

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>also see that with psychedelic and New Age thinking as well. Again,

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're dealing with with recipes that are dealing

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about the red dragon and using code words,

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but all so dealing in philosophical and magical ideas. It's

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>irresistible to come back and sort of um, you know,

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and view your own meaning into it and uh and

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps even rediscover aspects of your your your current

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>your contemporary system by breathing it into this archaic apparatus. Yeah,

1:01:21.080 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, I think alchemy. Concepts from alchemy

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>were very popular to be played around with by like

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the uh, the sort of new religious

1:01:30.480 --> 1:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>movements of the late nineteenth century. Yeah. Yeah, and and

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really this ultimately fits the basic format of alchemy throughout history.

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of alchemy even you know, you know,

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, revolved around looking back at old texts,

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>piecing together bits from old texts, and trying to to

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>break new ground, understand what these these other authors were

1:01:52.200 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about and uh and creating some new frame of

1:01:55.960 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning around it. You know. Something that alchemy also has

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in common with religious texts is pseudonymous writings. Uh so

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in in for example, in the early centuries of Christianity,

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge thing that would often go on is like

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you would write a new book that you know, you

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>would want to be taken as scripture that would advance

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your view of the correct theological interpretation of Christ. But

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like well, and nobody knows who I am,

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to say that this was written by St. Peter,

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, this is the Gospel of Peter. Like,

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely not written by Peter. Um. The people

1:02:28.640 --> 1:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>were doing this kind of thing all the time. The

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing happened with alchemy. People would write pseudonymously as like,

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as one of the great masters of alchemy. Yes,

1:02:37.520 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this was by Paracelsus, but it actually wasn't. It was

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just some somebody well, you know, in in in dealing

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically with it with alcohoest and the idea of a

1:02:46.760 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent. You know, I looked through some of the

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>writings of uh and and lectures of McKinnon. I looked

1:02:52.840 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>through uh iLiad's work, and uh, you know, it's possible

1:02:57.200 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I miss something, but I didn't find any case where

1:03:00.320 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>either of them specifically spoke or wrote about the algohoest um. However,

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you do see the alcohoes pop up in New Age

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and psychedelic literature as a metaphor in some cases for

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic compounds. Um, you know, a way of thinking about

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what something like the psilocybin can do in the mind.

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But it reminds me a little bit of McKenna's arguments

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of the argument that psychedelics in the West may have

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>enabled Buddhism to spread more thoroughly through Western thought. I'm

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure I agree with them completely on that, but

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a it's a valid point that as

1:03:31.800 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a culture's understanding of consciousness changes, it does open them

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>up to the discovery and rediscovery of various spiritual concepts. Okay, So,

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in if you're thinking in the Terence McKenna type vein,

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that, uh is that the use of

1:03:48.080 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics would have broadly enabled sort of reduced the mind

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to its trie a prima or to its more proximate

1:03:54.800 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>constituents without degradation, allowing uh more different types of states

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of mind to be accessed, as opposed to the narrower

1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>window of different ways you can think based on your

1:04:06.760 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>cultural upbringing. Yeah, yeah, I think so. And and yeah,

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I like this idea. I like the idea of using

1:04:12.560 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>alcoholst as a as a kind of metaphor for anything

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that like breaks down unuseful rigidity and thought or culture. Um. Yeah,

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and and and I also like the idea of of

1:04:23.600 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics being seen as some sort of universal solvent potentially,

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and and and again you know you then the breaking

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>down of things that I think it also drives home

1:04:32.440 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's a delicate process and you know what you're doing,

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to you know, to to go

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>too far and dissolve too much. Uh but uh, you know,

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>breaking down the mind that's too rigid to melt right. Um.

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The one point mckinna does point out that there's this, um,

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this alchemical aphamism that in in in Latin is dissolutio

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at coagulato, which we were just discussing this off mic. Uh,

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like this basically break down to the dissolving and m

1:05:03.720 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and the coagulation of things to break things down and

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>then things build back up. Um, and that that ultimately

1:05:10.520 --> 1:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this is all one needs to know about like the

1:05:12.640 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>nature of reality. Uh, you know, the the alchemical truth

1:05:15.960 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of things. And uh, I think this is you know,

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a basic idea that you can

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>apply to the physical world. But also too you can

1:05:24.160 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you can see how readily one could take to this

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as a as as a psychological concept as well, and

1:05:31.560 --> 1:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly a psychedelic concept. You know, the idea of breaking

1:05:34.200 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>things down. But then but then that rigidity is going

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to is going to return. There's gonna be some coagulation

1:05:40.080 --> 1:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to take place again, you know, I do.

1:05:42.640 --> 1:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we end, though, I want to come back to

1:05:44.600 --> 1:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>something that I think we touched on earlier, which is

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the potential dangers of of seeing the world in terms

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of universal solvents. I mean, one thing we learned as

1:05:53.600 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>alchemy passed away and gave way to modern chemistry is

1:05:57.160 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that there is in fact no such thing as a

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>as a universe solvent in chemistry. I mean, there are

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>solvents that will dissolve lots of things, but but there

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is no universal acid in the Daniel Dennett sense. And

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that is also a lesson that should

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be applied in in the metaphorical way, sort of coming

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>back against everything we've talked about in this episode, because I,

1:06:17.240 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I really do believe that a huge amount

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of trouble and confusion in the world comes from people

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>getting overly attached to a certain lens of viewing the

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>world or or analytical tool or new strategy and thinking

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that it will solve everything, uh, that it will answer

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>all questions that it will solve all your problems, you know,

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like that that that is something that

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we all have a tendency for, but it's it's very

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and something to watch out for in yourself. And

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the weird ways I was thinking about this

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually pulling us away from the the mysterious worlds

1:06:56.240 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at the intersection of you know, theology and metaphysics and

1:06:59.640 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>science in chemistry. I was thinking about this in terms

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of tech business because I was just thinking about all

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the different universal solvents that we have witnessed come

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and go over the years working in digital media, and

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they come and they go, and they come and they go,

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm thinking about the universal solvents of search

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>engine optimization. You remember when like everything on the Internet

1:07:23.200 --> 1:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>suddenly had to change to be search engine optimized, and

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it kind of ruined a huge amount of content that

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was good previously and then was just destroyed by optimization

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for Google search results. And then that kind of and

1:07:35.360 --> 1:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>then you know, they change how their search results are

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>calculated anyway, so it becomes obsolete later on. And then

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember the the u GC revolution. At some point

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it was like, well, everything's got to be user generated content,

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and everything is Wikipedia now, yeah, and so

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of destroyed everything in its path, and

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>then that kind of went away, and you know, the

1:07:56.200 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>various pivot to videos and the optimization for the Facebook

1:07:59.600 --> 1:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>news eat and then that, and then the pivot to

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and everything. You know. It's like every every few

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>years in our business space, we we see a universal

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>solvent come along that maybe changes some things, maybe destroys

1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>some things, and maybe maybe hopefully there are some things

1:08:16.280 --> 1:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that are relatively unscathed by it. But then it just

1:08:19.000 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>goes along on its own way. And and usually h

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>these things do not actually solve all the problems and

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do not will not last forever. Well, I guess it

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately comes down to who is applying a supposed universal solving, right,

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and it generally comes down to these these businesses of disruption.

1:08:36.400 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It is about dissolving the rigidity of the of some

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the industry. But it comes back to that

1:08:43.400 --> 1:08:46.519
<v Speaker 1>that that alchemical truth that we just laid out right,

1:08:47.120 --> 1:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the dissolution and coagulation there, And it's not so much

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the dissolution that they're into. It is the eventual coagulation

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because they wish to be the masters of that coagulation.

1:08:57.520 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, I want I don't want to make everything

1:08:59.560 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>free so that it remains free. I want to make

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>everything free because I have a new model of how

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to charge for it, you know. Uh. And that's what

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we see time and time again with these different disruption

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>strategies you want to disrupt, they take uh, you know,

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>cable television, right, I mean, it's just it's it's it's classic.

1:09:18.439 --> 1:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, all these uh, these services that came along

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to cut our costs and cut our chords, and you know,

1:09:25.200 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're at the point now where, yeah, if you

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:29.759
<v Speaker 1>want to watch everything that everyone's talking about, you're spending

1:09:29.760 --> 1:09:32.639
<v Speaker 1>as much money as you were as you were probably

1:09:32.640 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>spending in previous decades on your your cable and your

1:09:35.439 --> 1:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>satellite and so forth. So it's just but just the

1:09:38.400 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>structure of it and the masters of it having some

1:09:40.920 --> 1:09:43.519
<v Speaker 1>cases changed. Yeah, I mean, I guess it is often

1:09:43.520 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're just finding that you go through destruction and

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>then there's some kind of return to a new equilibrium.

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, but along the way, I would just say,

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be careful not to be led astray or to lose

1:09:53.160 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>too much to something that seems like it. I guess

1:09:57.320 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that seems like it does anything the universal solve

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and where the panacea, I mean, nothing actually works in

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>every case. And even if something is good, it's something

1:10:06.560 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not good at everything, right, It just might

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>just reduce your product um to a to a carbon husk. Right,

1:10:17.240 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we're gonna go ahead and close the

1:10:19.680 --> 1:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>alchemical books on this one. But I'm sure we will

1:10:23.600 --> 1:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>return to alchemy in the future when we deal so

1:10:26.000 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>much with the history of of science and uh, and

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know in the history of religion and spiritual concepts

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, that inevitably, uh, alchemical topics will arise once more,

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and and I look forward to it. And hey, uh,

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll do an episode in Piranhas in the near

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>future as well. I love a good a good biology

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>exploration as well. In the meantime, if you like to

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know where to find them. There in the Stuff

1:10:53.000 --> 1:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind podcast feed, where you can get

1:10:54.800 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. You'll find Core episodes on

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays and Thursdays, you'll find Artifact episo. It's on Wednesdays.

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Listener mails. On Monday's Fridays, you'll find episodes of Weird

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>House Cinema. That's where we just talk about a weird

1:11:06.479 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>movie with little or no concern for science or alchemy,

1:11:10.479 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>uh either. And then on the weekends we air a

1:11:13.840 --> 1:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a repeated form of a Vault episode.

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Huge thanks, as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

1:11:22.040 --> 1:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

1:11:24.240 --> 1:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>to suggest topic for the future, just to say hello,

1:11:26.960 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

1:11:39.800 --> 1:11:42.479
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my

1:11:42.520 --> 1:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:11:45.600 --> 1:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to your favorite shows. First The Town

1:12:03.280 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>by a Father