1
00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:06,760
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,480
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

3
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:18,720
Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day

4
00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:22,280
Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

5
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:24,880
Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

6
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:27,680
Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

7
00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,319
Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

8
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,960
Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

9
00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:36,839
Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Let's get to the

10
00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:39,000
Speaker 2: view on Wall Street this morning. Russ Coastrick of Black

11
00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:40,920
Speaker 2: Rock right in the following. While our base case is

12
00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,959
Speaker 2: no recession, the energy shock suggests a moderation in near

13
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,440
Speaker 2: term growth expectations. Russ joins us now for more. Russ,

14
00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:49,320
Speaker 2: welcome to the program. You and a team have been

15
00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:51,000
Speaker 2: de risking where and what.

16
00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:55,040
Speaker 3: In Good morning, Jonathan, we've been to you risking across

17
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:57,960
Speaker 3: the board. We've really been getting most of the benchmark

18
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:02,520
Speaker 3: in our equity positions, benchmarkt duration. We've been bringing down

19
00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,240
Speaker 3: some of the factor risks and the portfolio and there

20
00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:07,399
Speaker 3: are a couple of reasons for that. The obvious one

21
00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:09,119
Speaker 3: is we don't know how long this is going.

22
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:11,000
Speaker 2: To go to continue.

23
00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:13,280
Speaker 3: I think you used exactly the right word a few

24
00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 3: moments ago, persistence, and the longer this persists, the greater

25
00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:21,400
Speaker 3: the risk to inflation the economy. But the other reason

26
00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:25,400
Speaker 3: for de risking is that there really aren't any hedges

27
00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:29,360
Speaker 3: in this context. In twenty two, the dollar actually was

28
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:31,160
Speaker 3: an effective hedge against the.

29
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:32,200
Speaker 1: Sell off inequities.

30
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:37,000
Speaker 3: Last decade, treasuries were providing some downside when they're concerns

31
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:41,800
Speaker 3: about growth. In other circumstances, gold has been working. Nothing

32
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:44,000
Speaker 3: is working right now, So really the only thing you

33
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:47,440
Speaker 3: can do within a portfolio, other than making some adjustments

34
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,200
Speaker 3: at the stock level, is to bring the risks down.

35
00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:53,560
Speaker 2: I often say in moments like this, the bonds don't work,

36
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,200
Speaker 2: They make things worse. Yields right now up again by

37
00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:58,800
Speaker 2: four basis points for US tens at four forty five

38
00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:01,120
Speaker 2: twos of four percent LEASA and I yes that I

39
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,040
Speaker 2: spent a lot of time on a week two year oction,

40
00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:06,560
Speaker 2: a week five year oction followed by a week seven

41
00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:07,960
Speaker 2: year oaction as well.

42
00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:08,320
Speaker 1: Russ.

43
00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:10,800
Speaker 2: What is happening that? What's behind those moves.

44
00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,400
Speaker 3: This to me is actually maybe even a bit more interesting.

45
00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:17,200
Speaker 3: It's going on in equity market, so it's very easy

46
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:21,160
Speaker 3: to understand. You have an oil shock, higher inflation, hit

47
00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:24,400
Speaker 3: to growth, and what's happening with stocks. The bottom market,

48
00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:27,000
Speaker 3: I think is more nuanced. Obviously, the bottom market is

49
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:30,520
Speaker 3: reacting to what will be an increase in headline inflation.

50
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:33,240
Speaker 3: That said, as you point out, I think most people

51
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:38,040
Speaker 3: realize higher energy, not just oil, but natural gas, higher

52
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:42,320
Speaker 3: food prices, higher fer fertilizer prices, all of which leads

53
00:02:42,320 --> 00:02:46,440
Speaker 3: to an increase in headline inflation. But the problem is

54
00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:51,000
Speaker 3: one that doesn't necessarily flow into core, and two, it

55
00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:53,760
Speaker 3: is also a drag on growth. And there's happening at a

56
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,120
Speaker 3: time when the labor market has already a bit solved.

57
00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:58,680
Speaker 3: So the notion that you just want to keep selling

58
00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,280
Speaker 3: bonds into this, to me, that's less obvious.

59
00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:03,280
Speaker 2: And I do think at some point.

60
00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:06,480
Speaker 3: If the concerns about growth continue to build, if we

61
00:03:06,520 --> 00:03:08,840
Speaker 3: do have one hundred dollars or higher oil for prolonged

62
00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:11,400
Speaker 3: period of time, there is a question about at what

63
00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,680
Speaker 3: points you want to start bringing bonds back into your

64
00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:17,800
Speaker 3: portfolio as a hedge against weaker growth. Which is going

65
00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:19,360
Speaker 3: to be another risk we're going to contend with.

66
00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:21,560
Speaker 4: Part of the reason why it's been so hard for

67
00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:23,800
Speaker 4: us to get a handle on when that point is

68
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:26,320
Speaker 4: when people should step in and by duration? Is it's

69
00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:29,000
Speaker 4: unclear exactly what's behind the sellof Is it technical? Is

70
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,200
Speaker 4: it a question of central banks that are selling what

71
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,560
Speaker 4: they can to raise money for possible fiscal stimulus. Is

72
00:03:34,600 --> 00:03:38,800
Speaker 4: it a potential concern for a fiscal response to any

73
00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:40,280
Speaker 4: kind of slowdown in the future.

74
00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,360
Speaker 1: What's your take on this. I think it's a great question.

75
00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:45,320
Speaker 1: To my mind.

76
00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,400
Speaker 3: One of the things that's clearly going on is a

77
00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,600
Speaker 3: pricing out.

78
00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,400
Speaker 1: Of what would have been a number of.

79
00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,840
Speaker 3: Rate cuts from the FED and pricing in a greater

80
00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:02,200
Speaker 3: possibility of hikes, particularly from the So is the front

81
00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:04,720
Speaker 3: end of the curve is adjusting. You're seeing that movement

82
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,680
Speaker 3: throughout all of the yield curve. But again, if we're

83
00:04:07,720 --> 00:04:11,040
Speaker 3: going to be an environment where hunderdollar oil persists, and

84
00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:13,160
Speaker 3: I think you all raised a good point a few

85
00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:15,720
Speaker 3: moments ago, it's not as if oil is going to

86
00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:18,360
Speaker 3: go back to sixty five the second the shooting stops.

87
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:21,640
Speaker 3: There's been damage to infrastructure, there are questions about how

88
00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:23,919
Speaker 3: long it takes to open the straits of horror moves,

89
00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,920
Speaker 3: there is likely to be a war premium or a

90
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:31,840
Speaker 3: risk premium embedded in oil for many, many months. So

91
00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:34,440
Speaker 3: if you're going to have that period of prolonged higher

92
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:37,159
Speaker 3: energy and all the knock on effects, you've got to

93
00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:39,719
Speaker 3: start to bring down your growth expectations, most of which

94
00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:42,400
Speaker 3: we're high coming into the year, and at some point

95
00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:46,960
Speaker 3: that probably does suggest bring you to ration up further, which.

96
00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:49,760
Speaker 4: Is something that I know others, including JP Morgan, has

97
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:53,160
Speaker 4: been thinking of doing this doing given all of this

98
00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,280
Speaker 4: and given what we know in terms of the prolonged conflict,

99
00:04:56,440 --> 00:04:59,320
Speaker 4: do you think that right now we're facing a market

100
00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:01,680
Speaker 4: that is over complacent when it comes to the growth

101
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:03,000
Speaker 4: shock that's coming down the pike.

102
00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:06,680
Speaker 3: I don't think it's overly complacent, because they do think

103
00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,000
Speaker 3: you've already seen a fairly significant adjustment.

104
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:12,560
Speaker 2: I also believe that at least in the US, I think.

105
00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:15,680
Speaker 3: The situation in Europe is certainly more serious, giving their

106
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:17,440
Speaker 3: exposure to higher energy prices.

107
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:19,919
Speaker 2: I think the US can probably.

108
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:23,039
Speaker 3: Survive eighty or ninety oil still have a year when

109
00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,760
Speaker 3: growth is positive. Of course, the difference is going to

110
00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:28,320
Speaker 3: be that we're not going to get, or we're much

111
00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:31,279
Speaker 3: more less likely to get the type of above trend

112
00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:34,360
Speaker 3: growth that investors were expecting just a few months ago.

113
00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:36,600
Speaker 3: And if you look, what the equity market has been

114
00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:41,360
Speaker 3: doing is actually responding to that. The rotation that dominated

115
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,840
Speaker 3: back in late twenty five early twenty six was all

116
00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:48,840
Speaker 3: about the broadening out. You bought cyclicals, you bought value,

117
00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:51,440
Speaker 3: you bought international stocks, you bought small caps.

118
00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:53,839
Speaker 2: To my mind, those trades.

119
00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:57,000
Speaker 3: Were predicated on above trend growth. As you start to

120
00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,880
Speaker 3: price that growth out, you're seeing a reversal of many

121
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,919
Speaker 3: those trends. Investors have been looking for more defensive parks

122
00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:06,520
Speaker 3: in the market, and interestingly enough, they've also been looking

123
00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:09,400
Speaker 3: at tech, at least on a relative basis, is holding

124
00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:12,200
Speaker 3: up better in a world which economic growth is.

125
00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:15,080
Speaker 2: Not as much of a tailment. Stay with us more

126
00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:27,359
Speaker 2: Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this. Let's talk about europe

127
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:29,920
Speaker 2: Global central banks facing the thread of higher inflation as

128
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:33,520
Speaker 2: energy prices saw the ECP navigating mixed signals, with some

129
00:06:33,560 --> 00:06:37,480
Speaker 2: policymakers ready to act fast, others urging caution. Join us

130
00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:40,080
Speaker 2: now to discuss as an ECB Governing Council member, and

131
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:43,440
Speaker 2: the National Bank of Beolgium. Governor Pierre Funch, Governor, Welcome

132
00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:45,760
Speaker 2: to the program, sir. Let's just start with the nature

133
00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:48,680
Speaker 2: of this shark. From your perspective, Is this the kind

134
00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:51,159
Speaker 2: of shark that a central bank should look through?

135
00:06:53,440 --> 00:06:58,240
Speaker 1: Well, that's of course the big question, and we know

136
00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:01,880
Speaker 1: the textbookcase is for looking for if you're confronted with

137
00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:05,200
Speaker 1: the supply shock. Now, in the meantime, we have the

138
00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:07,480
Speaker 1: episode of twenty two, and in twenty two we were

139
00:07:07,640 --> 00:07:10,760
Speaker 1: a little bit late and reacting. We had team transitory.

140
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,160
Speaker 1: We're not alone. I was maybe one of the first

141
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,040
Speaker 1: governors to be concerned about the fact that inflation might

142
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,760
Speaker 1: might go up further than what we had in our models.

143
00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,320
Speaker 1: So now we're there, we have again a supply shock,

144
00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,680
Speaker 1: and we have to decide how to react to it.

145
00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:33,320
Speaker 1: We should not overreact. I think so far we were able,

146
00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:37,280
Speaker 1: I think to communicate the fact that we would react

147
00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:39,320
Speaker 1: if need be, but that we were not going to

148
00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: rush to do anything that would would be looking like overreaction.

149
00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:49,160
Speaker 1: But anyway, I mean, we have to Twenty two is different.

150
00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:51,920
Speaker 1: We have the textbook and we find we need to

151
00:07:51,960 --> 00:07:53,960
Speaker 1: find a middle way between what we have in the textbook,

152
00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:56,440
Speaker 1: which is we don't react, and the experience we had

153
00:07:56,440 --> 00:07:57,960
Speaker 1: in twenty two. But in twenty two, of course, there

154
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:03,240
Speaker 1: were a lot of bottlenecks in the system, very tight

155
00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,800
Speaker 1: labor markets, you had a lot of fiscal support coming

156
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,320
Speaker 1: out of the COVID crisis, and that's not the situation

157
00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:13,200
Speaker 1: we're in today. The labor market is a bit weaker

158
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,320
Speaker 1: in Europe. So we will have to find a good

159
00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:20,960
Speaker 1: balance between the textbook situation and again what we experienced

160
00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:21,400
Speaker 1: twenty two.

161
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:23,360
Speaker 2: The governor, does that give you more time? Does that

162
00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:25,680
Speaker 2: give you more time? And it's April too soon to

163
00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:28,320
Speaker 2: know what kind of shock this is to understand if

164
00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:30,160
Speaker 2: you should look through it or react to it.

165
00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:35,559
Speaker 1: Well, if the conflict is mainly over by April, then

166
00:08:35,840 --> 00:08:40,719
Speaker 1: I guess we will be closer to what we have

167
00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:44,280
Speaker 1: in our baseline. We just made some projections over the

168
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,680
Speaker 1: during the last weeking of the Governing Council. I think

169
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:50,600
Speaker 1: the base case that we produced was still relatively benign.

170
00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:53,240
Speaker 1: Inflation was moving to a peak of three percent but

171
00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:56,240
Speaker 1: not only yearly basis, and then going down quite quickly

172
00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:59,520
Speaker 1: to two percent. On the basis of that, it's not

173
00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:02,559
Speaker 1: clear that the reaction would be warranted. Of course, we

174
00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:05,439
Speaker 1: were doing the projection on the basis of two hikes

175
00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:08,360
Speaker 1: that were priced by the market. But I would say,

176
00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:10,520
Speaker 1: you know, if we're if we are still close to

177
00:09:10,559 --> 00:09:14,000
Speaker 1: the baseline, that it's not clear we have to react.

178
00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:16,439
Speaker 1: If we move to what we call the adverse or

179
00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:20,199
Speaker 1: the CV scenario, then we have higher inflation and certainly

180
00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:23,760
Speaker 1: more persistent in the case of the cvere, and then

181
00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,520
Speaker 1: my guess would be that we have to do we

182
00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:27,760
Speaker 1: would have to do something. But even then I think

183
00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:31,520
Speaker 1: we need to make a distinction between reacting so that

184
00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:36,800
Speaker 1: real rates remain stable or reacting and increasing real rates.

185
00:09:36,840 --> 00:09:39,280
Speaker 1: So if you believe that core inflation is going to

186
00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:42,560
Speaker 1: go up for a period over a year, you may

187
00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:45,160
Speaker 1: want to react, and the first tike might just be

188
00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,640
Speaker 1: adjusting to this higher core inflation. And then there is

189
00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:51,199
Speaker 1: a stage if the shock is bigger and you have

190
00:09:51,679 --> 00:09:54,720
Speaker 1: significant second round effects, which is of course a big

191
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,200
Speaker 1: part of the uncertainty, where you might have to to

192
00:09:57,320 --> 00:09:59,959
Speaker 1: tighten as such, And I would still make this different

193
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:04,320
Speaker 1: hiking as such, if core inflation is going up, might

194
00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:07,000
Speaker 1: not be tightening. And I'm not talking about you know,

195
00:10:07,480 --> 00:10:10,320
Speaker 1: a spot real rates, but say, over a period of

196
00:10:10,360 --> 00:10:12,360
Speaker 1: one or two years, depending on what's our review of

197
00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:12,840
Speaker 1: the world is.

198
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:16,280
Speaker 4: Governor, it sounds like your more patient, potentially than some

199
00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:18,959
Speaker 4: other members on the ECB. I'm thinking, for example, of

200
00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:22,520
Speaker 4: a recent interview that President ECB President Christine Leaguard did

201
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,640
Speaker 4: with The Economist yesterday, saying that the ECB would have

202
00:10:25,720 --> 00:10:28,120
Speaker 4: to respond in a force flow persistent way if inflation

203
00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 4: looks set to sit well above it's two percent target

204
00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:32,520
Speaker 4: for an exodent period, most people would agree, but she

205
00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:35,880
Speaker 4: said even a more modest overshoot could call for a

206
00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:39,000
Speaker 4: measured rate move. Do you agree with that that if

207
00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:41,160
Speaker 4: inflation does not look like it is poised to go

208
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,680
Speaker 4: down to two percent, say by the end of this year,

209
00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:46,520
Speaker 4: that it makes sense to signal to markets that you're

210
00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:50,480
Speaker 4: serious about containing inflation by making a hike.

211
00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:54,640
Speaker 1: Well, if I gave the impression that was not aligned

212
00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:56,679
Speaker 1: with Christine Lagad, I'm sorry for that, because we are

213
00:10:56,720 --> 00:11:00,240
Speaker 1: completely aligned, or I'm aligned to her with her you,

214
00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:04,320
Speaker 1: but I was just discussing the case where by the

215
00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:08,000
Speaker 1: meeting of April the conflict would be over and then honestly,

216
00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:13,240
Speaker 1: it's still something that is relatively probably relatively benign and

217
00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,400
Speaker 1: we might have to react or not, but that's not,

218
00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:19,200
Speaker 1: you know, a difficult situation probably to deal with. My

219
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,360
Speaker 1: concern is, of course, and the concern of many people

220
00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:22,960
Speaker 1: and of the market, is that it would not be

221
00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:26,920
Speaker 1: over by by April, or maybe not even over by June.

222
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:30,079
Speaker 1: What I would like to have is a better mapping

223
00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:33,480
Speaker 1: of the scenarios that we are making to actually the

224
00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:38,840
Speaker 1: conflict lasting until April or until June, that we have

225
00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:42,800
Speaker 1: a better mapping of our scenarios and basically the meetings

226
00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:46,160
Speaker 1: of the Governing Council. But it's moving fast. So one

227
00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,520
Speaker 1: meeting is April, another meeting is June. If the conflict

228
00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:53,160
Speaker 1: is not over by June, then we are, you know,

229
00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:58,440
Speaker 1: most probably way above our baseline and that would probably

230
00:11:58,520 --> 00:11:59,960
Speaker 1: warrant some some kind of react.

231
00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,920
Speaker 4: Governor, do you think that the ECB is hamstrung by

232
00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:05,160
Speaker 4: the fact that it is a single mandate FED dealing

233
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,480
Speaker 4: with an inflationary shock The FED looks like it's currently

234
00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:12,000
Speaker 4: prepared to look through given that there is a serious

235
00:12:12,200 --> 00:12:14,760
Speaker 4: growth hit on the other side that is potentially going

236
00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:15,480
Speaker 4: to transpire.

237
00:12:17,559 --> 00:12:19,679
Speaker 1: Well, in a way, it makes it easier because if

238
00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:22,840
Speaker 1: you have only one objective, you only look at one target,

239
00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:26,959
Speaker 1: but we always insist that we have an objective over

240
00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:31,400
Speaker 1: a medium term horizon. So we do integrate the impacts

241
00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:33,400
Speaker 1: of the shock on growth, and to the extent that

242
00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:36,400
Speaker 1: the impact of the shock on growth would be to

243
00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:38,840
Speaker 1: some extent deflationary, I don't think that's the base case,

244
00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:40,920
Speaker 1: but of course we would have to take that into account.

245
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:44,400
Speaker 1: But it's taking into account the impact of the shock

246
00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:49,200
Speaker 1: on the real economy and then the repercussion in terms

247
00:12:49,200 --> 00:12:51,800
Speaker 1: of whether we're going to be faced with second rounds

248
00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:55,520
Speaker 1: effects or not. If the economy weakens fast, then the

249
00:12:55,559 --> 00:13:00,800
Speaker 1: second round effects might be limited, which might warrant less

250
00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:04,200
Speaker 1: of a move. And the big uncertainty is, of course

251
00:13:04,679 --> 00:13:07,600
Speaker 1: the labor markets and the economy is less tight than

252
00:13:07,640 --> 00:13:11,520
Speaker 1: it was in twenty two coming out of the COVID crisis,

253
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:15,160
Speaker 1: with all these bottlenecks in the system. But the economic

254
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,240
Speaker 1: agents were surprised by the pickup in inflation. We had

255
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,360
Speaker 1: known a period of low inflation for a long, very

256
00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:24,439
Speaker 1: long time, so people reacted as much as we did

257
00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:28,480
Speaker 1: in a way slowly to the inflation developments. The big

258
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:31,320
Speaker 1: thing now we have to monitor is whether economic agents,

259
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:35,679
Speaker 1: firms and then workers will adapt more quickly this time

260
00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:39,120
Speaker 1: to the shock. If this is the case, it might

261
00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:42,560
Speaker 1: lead to second round effects that will be quote in

262
00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:47,000
Speaker 1: quote higher ketrist paribus compared to the level of the shock.

263
00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:51,160
Speaker 1: If because of weaknesses in the economy in the labor market,

264
00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:55,520
Speaker 1: firms and then workers don't react fast and basically take

265
00:13:55,559 --> 00:13:59,200
Speaker 1: the hit, then the case for reacting is less strong.

266
00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:02,640
Speaker 2: Final question, listening to you to recap what I hear

267
00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:07,040
Speaker 2: is patients the prospect of two different scenarios with different responses.

268
00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:10,480
Speaker 2: What I see in markets, though, is tied to financial conditions.

269
00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:13,959
Speaker 2: The market doing the work for you already high yields

270
00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:17,440
Speaker 2: on government bonds, pricing in the prospect of hikes from

271
00:14:17,480 --> 00:14:20,000
Speaker 2: the Central Bank over the next year or so. When

272
00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:22,640
Speaker 2: you look at that, do you consider that an unwarranted

273
00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:25,880
Speaker 2: timeing of financial conditions given the patients that you've pledged

274
00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:29,120
Speaker 2: this morning already?

275
00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:33,000
Speaker 1: Well, I'm you know, I'm patient today, But in April,

276
00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:35,360
Speaker 1: if we're still there, I might not be patient. So

277
00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:37,760
Speaker 1: I don't want to convey the message that we are

278
00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:41,080
Speaker 1: not ready to act. But I'm comfortable with what I

279
00:14:41,120 --> 00:14:43,720
Speaker 1: see in the market. But given the uncertainty, the uncertainty

280
00:14:43,760 --> 00:14:47,280
Speaker 1: is huge, So you know making any judgment today or

281
00:14:47,280 --> 00:14:50,080
Speaker 1: what we could do in April or June. Given the

282
00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:55,480
Speaker 1: uncertainty the market signals or reaction will be different next

283
00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:59,080
Speaker 1: week and the week after next. We have to monitor that.

284
00:14:59,120 --> 00:15:04,200
Speaker 1: We have to at least, I mean we should not overreact.

285
00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:06,600
Speaker 1: I mean, we are not going to control the first

286
00:15:06,680 --> 00:15:09,080
Speaker 1: round effects of this shock, so we should not even

287
00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:11,840
Speaker 1: try to control the first round effects. So in this

288
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:17,160
Speaker 1: sense we have time to react react adequately depending on

289
00:15:17,200 --> 00:15:19,560
Speaker 1: what is our perception of what the second round effects

290
00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:22,560
Speaker 1: will be. But you know, April is not out of

291
00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:27,080
Speaker 1: the question. If if by April we have solid evidence

292
00:15:27,120 --> 00:15:31,040
Speaker 1: that the shock will be lasting and will lead to

293
00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:35,880
Speaker 1: a big hike in inflation that is likely to have

294
00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:38,880
Speaker 1: some degree of persistence, then we might have to do something.

295
00:15:38,920 --> 00:15:41,400
Speaker 1: But you know, we still have some time before the

296
00:15:41,480 --> 00:15:44,240
Speaker 1: April meeting, and I don't want to take any any

297
00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:45,640
Speaker 1: bed in one or the other direction.

298
00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:49,560
Speaker 2: Stay with us. More Blandberg surveillance coming up after this.

299
00:15:58,520 --> 00:16:01,080
Speaker 2: So here's the laces. This morning, the President, continuing his

300
00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:03,640
Speaker 2: post for our interest rates is the confirmation of French

301
00:16:03,680 --> 00:16:07,040
Speaker 2: chan nominee Kevin Walsh remains on pause. Sona desire Franklin

302
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 2: Templeton writing, even before the current shark, I was not

303
00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:12,560
Speaker 2: expecting any more cuts, but it is too early to

304
00:16:12,640 --> 00:16:15,160
Speaker 2: forecast rate high. Sonal joins us now for more, Sonal,

305
00:16:15,240 --> 00:16:17,920
Speaker 2: welcome to the program. I know so many people in

306
00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,200
Speaker 2: fixed income itching to get long duration because yields have

307
00:16:21,280 --> 00:16:24,560
Speaker 2: backed up, but they're nervous. What are you advocating for?

308
00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:28,440
Speaker 5: So you know, we came in Thanks for having me on, Jonathan,

309
00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:31,520
Speaker 5: but we came into this year actually a little bit short,

310
00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,480
Speaker 5: and we are moving slowly towards neutral, but I am

311
00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:38,920
Speaker 5: not tempted to go a long yet. This is essentially

312
00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:42,680
Speaker 5: when we talk about the two, it's either bimobile distribution

313
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,680
Speaker 5: or more accurately, there are two tail risks, and we

314
00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,440
Speaker 5: certainly can't predict which of those tail risks comes to

315
00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:52,720
Speaker 5: fruition if either either one.

316
00:16:52,600 --> 00:16:53,360
Speaker 2: Of them i e.

317
00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:57,720
Speaker 5: A very protracted conflict or a very short conflict. I

318
00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:01,400
Speaker 5: mean you can't, you can't actually position your portfolio to

319
00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:03,120
Speaker 5: either one of those two tail risks.

320
00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,080
Speaker 4: Son Now, forgive me. I keep harping on this one topic.

321
00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:09,359
Speaker 4: Why are long end body yields rising right now? And

322
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,399
Speaker 4: I look at inflation expectations and the break even rates

323
00:17:12,440 --> 00:17:15,119
Speaker 4: market long term inflation is not taking up, If anything,

324
00:17:15,119 --> 00:17:17,960
Speaker 4: it's going down. This is a real rate move at

325
00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:20,840
Speaker 4: a time when people are looking out to the potential

326
00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:24,640
Speaker 4: of a decline in growth. Can you explain what's going

327
00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:26,800
Speaker 4: on currently in a long end of the yeld curve?

328
00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:31,240
Speaker 5: To me, actually, what the market is doing is really rational.

329
00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:34,919
Speaker 5: It is anticipating that, yes, there may well be a

330
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:37,639
Speaker 5: decline in growth, and the response to that decline in

331
00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:40,520
Speaker 5: growth is going to be massive physcal eating. You know

332
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:44,720
Speaker 5: your prior guest from the ECB, he only spoke about

333
00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:49,200
Speaker 5: monetary policy. He didn't mention what the probable fiscal response

334
00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:51,960
Speaker 5: would be if this were to be a protracted conflict.

335
00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:54,600
Speaker 5: There isn't a government in the developed world which will

336
00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:59,120
Speaker 5: probably not react by trying to accommodate some of that

337
00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:03,280
Speaker 5: weakening through a greater fiscal push. So I think that

338
00:18:03,359 --> 00:18:06,200
Speaker 5: bond markets are actually behaving pretty rationally right now.

339
00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:08,800
Speaker 4: Do we think that we're pushing up against the limits

340
00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:12,840
Speaker 4: of using a fiscal lever to offset weakness based on

341
00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,160
Speaker 4: the pushback that we're seeing right now from the bond market.

342
00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:21,200
Speaker 5: So it depends, Well, that's a useful statement. I don't

343
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:23,720
Speaker 5: think we're getting to a limit. Okay, because here's the thing.

344
00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:28,440
Speaker 5: There is an enormous amount of liquidity floating around globally.

345
00:18:28,520 --> 00:18:32,960
Speaker 5: There is the ability to finance more bonds. However, at

346
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:36,840
Speaker 5: this point, clearly the market is not accepting that the

347
00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:41,320
Speaker 5: yield is an adequate compensation for the prospect of higher

348
00:18:41,320 --> 00:18:44,560
Speaker 5: inflation and higher bond supply. But you do find a

349
00:18:44,560 --> 00:18:48,120
Speaker 5: market clearing point, So how much can fiscal do. Even

350
00:18:48,160 --> 00:18:53,040
Speaker 5: automatic stabilizers by themselves will lead to widening fhyscal deficits.

351
00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:55,200
Speaker 5: So you know the fact that unemployment goes up to

352
00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:58,959
Speaker 5: unemployment benefits go up, and so you will have a

353
00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,440
Speaker 5: widening the event of a significant slowdown. And I think

354
00:19:02,440 --> 00:19:05,000
Speaker 5: there's a big difference between what's happening in Europe as

355
00:19:05,119 --> 00:19:09,320
Speaker 5: I think I think you've mentioned yourself, versus what's happening

356
00:19:09,359 --> 00:19:11,560
Speaker 5: in the US. But in the US, for a whole

357
00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:15,120
Speaker 5: host of other reasons, we're looking at physcal profligacy as

358
00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:17,160
Speaker 5: we've never seen before. For the last five years, we've

359
00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:20,359
Speaker 5: seen it, and I see no indications that this is

360
00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:22,520
Speaker 5: going to go away anytime soon.

361
00:19:22,880 --> 00:19:24,760
Speaker 2: So, now what you just said there on FISCO, I

362
00:19:24,800 --> 00:19:28,040
Speaker 2: think it's really important for multiple reasons. Here's one. Do

363
00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:30,440
Speaker 2: you think it increases the odds that we'll see second

364
00:19:30,560 --> 00:19:33,400
Speaker 2: order effects if governments step in and try and support

365
00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:35,280
Speaker 2: consumers in this moment.

366
00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:38,919
Speaker 5: Oh, in terms of inflation. Yeah, yeah, because actually it

367
00:19:38,920 --> 00:19:42,480
Speaker 5: was the opposite way around. If you think back to

368
00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:45,399
Speaker 5: the famous transitory period of twenty twenty one, what was

369
00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:48,080
Speaker 5: really going on in twenty twenty one. We did have

370
00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:52,280
Speaker 5: very easy monetary policy, but the reality is we had

371
00:19:52,600 --> 00:19:56,399
Speaker 5: an enormous fiscal splurge in the first quarter of twenty

372
00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:59,359
Speaker 5: twenty one as a new administration came in. It was

373
00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,920
Speaker 5: absolutely enormous, and so back in those back at that time,

374
00:20:03,480 --> 00:20:06,280
Speaker 5: to me, it appeared absolutely self evident as you were

375
00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:09,680
Speaker 5: going to get demand push inflation, which the FED kept

376
00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:13,000
Speaker 5: saying was a supply side impact, and eventually, of course,

377
00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:16,879
Speaker 5: we got the results we got. If you do get

378
00:20:17,119 --> 00:20:21,480
Speaker 5: that physical accommodation of a shock of this nature, you

379
00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:25,000
Speaker 5: will get second right of it. Ultimately, let's take an

380
00:20:25,040 --> 00:20:29,840
Speaker 5: extreme scenario. Let's suppose that we really are hitting and

381
00:20:29,920 --> 00:20:33,240
Speaker 5: taking out not just twenty percent, but oil facilities, say

382
00:20:33,280 --> 00:20:36,119
Speaker 5: in other parts of the Gulf, which is responsible for

383
00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:39,159
Speaker 5: thirty percent of global oil supply. Supposing you actually do

384
00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:44,399
Speaker 5: something much more terrible, which leads to a several year contraction.

385
00:20:45,040 --> 00:20:49,160
Speaker 5: You can't accommodate it because ultimately you need demand destruction,

386
00:20:49,560 --> 00:20:51,439
Speaker 5: which translates into slower growth.

387
00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:56,359
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg's Events podcast, bringing you the best

388
00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,680
Speaker 2: in market economics, angier politics. You can watch the show

389
00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:02,720
Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

390
00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:06,600
Speaker 2: nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

391
00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:08,960
Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

392
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:11,400
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.