WEBVTT - The Null Ship

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>in today's episode, we're going to be looking at a

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>spectacular bit of hypothetical air travel that has intrigued us

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for centuries. The vacuum airship or knull ship as I've

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>seen it referred, and that's such a cool name for

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>something that I think I had to front loaded on

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but usually it's just referred to as a

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airship. And the basic principle, as we'll discuss, is

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple. Hydrogen, helium or hot air filled balloons allow

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>an airship to traverse the skies because these gases are

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lighter than the surrounding air, and even lighter gas is

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the absence of any gas at all, the vacuum. If

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>one could create a vacuum chamber or bladder that was

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>itself light enough, then this could be used to provide

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>lift for airships on Earth or even on other planets.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's such an obvious extension of the idea

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>underlying balloons indirigibles all lighter than air flight craft. You

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would have to assume that if if you don't see

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>things like this being used all the time, there must

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good reason. And I guess we'll get

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to that in a little bit. But yeah, it's it's

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like an obvious place to take the idea. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>And and so it's ultimately such a fascinating topic because yeah,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>there's the basic underlying science of the principles of it

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are pretty sound. There are material challenges in place, but

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>then the history of the concept is pretty interesting as well.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Thus far, however, the main place you'll see these vacuum

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>airships deployed are going to be within the pages of

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>science fiction and fantasy. And one of the main examples

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of this and this and you'll see this why le

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Cited is a novel that was serialized between nine thirty

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>by Edgar Rice Burrows titled Tarzan at the Earth's Core,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not to be confused with At the Earth's Core, which

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was his nineteen fourteen novel that established the hollow Earth

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>world of Pellucidar, which is this, like it sounds, it's

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like a world within our world. It it has a

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>race of intelligent and I think psychic terra Saar overlords

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>called the Mahar or the Mahar and the that novel

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>prominently features a subderine. So we've actually mentioned that book

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>on the show before in our episode about subderines, which

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is another sort of fantastic um hypothetical, uh, means of

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>traversing the natural environment. But this Tarzan at the Earth

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>score is a crossover novel which features Tarzan traveling to

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the inner world v a vacuum airship. And I had

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to dive into this in a little bit. I assume

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't read this one either. No, I haven't read it.

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I do remember it was mentioned in that earlier episode.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But also it just got me thinking about, like, wait,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where do all of these science fiction books about a

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>hollow earth with like a different biosphere or or some

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of archaic state. Uh, where does all that come from?

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Because this isn't the first one. This is in what thirty,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but like as far back as the eighteen sixties you

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>had Jules Verne with Journey to the Center of the Earth,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 1>which is very similar concept. I don't think it has

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like psychic pterosaurs, but it does have a hollow earth

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with like essentially a mirror biosphere on the inside that

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>has dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures. Well, it makes me

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think we should come back into a proper episode on

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the hollow Earth. You know why why

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it it wouldn't work A quiet individuals thought that it

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>could have worked, and why it has uh, you know

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>why it has captivated people's imagination for so long. Yeah,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know of anything older than than Jules Verne,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but but there may be. So I had not read

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this book either. I think the only Edgar Rice Burrows

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>novel that I have read is one called The Monster Men,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>which memory serves is largely it seems very inspired by

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Island of Dr Moreau, but it was it was

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun, as I remember it, And so I went

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead and and dove into this one, and I was

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like reading through it trying to find some good examples

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of them talking about vacuum airships. And I think I

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>wasted a good, uh like minutes just scanning through the

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 1>book trying to do some searches. And then I realized

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>that I was looking at the wrong one. I was

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Earth's Core instead of Tarzan at the

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Earth's Core. But I switched to the correct book, and

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they talk about the vacuum airship a lot in that one,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So I can't just find like the one spot where

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about it there. It's a frequent topic of conversation.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to read just a fragment here

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>from it where they touch on it. Uh. So this

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is Edgar Rice Burrows from Tarzan at the Earth Score

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>again from ninety. The greatest risk that we would have

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to face would be a possible inability to return to

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the outer crust owing to the depletion of our helium

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gas that might be made necessary by the maneuvering of

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the ship. But that is only the same chance of

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>life or death that every explorer and scientific investigator must

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be willing to assume in the prosecution of his labors.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>If it were but possible to build a whole sufficiently

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>light and at the same time sufficiently strong to withstand

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric pressure, we could dispense with both the dangerous hydrogen

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>gas and the rare and expensive helium gas, and have

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the assurance of the utmost safety and maximum of buoyancy

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in a ship supported entirely by vacuum tanks. Perhaps even

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that is possible, said Tarzan, who was now evincing increasing

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>interest in Gridley's proposition, the Americans shook his head. It

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>may be possible someday, he said, but not at present

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>with any known material. Any receptacle having sufficient strength to

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>withstand the atmospheric pressure upon a vacuum would have a

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>weight far too great for the vacuum to lift. Okay,

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so first of all, I am definitely picturing this as

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Kristoff Lambart Tarzan from from gray Stoke. This has

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>got to be it, right, Yes, yes, it's it's a

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>gentleman Tarzan here. Mild spoiler for the for the book.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they figure it out. I believe some sort of

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>rare element or metal is introduced that it makes the

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>impossible possible, because otherwise, how are you gonna get Tarzan

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Inner Earth to battle psychic terra stars. I mean,

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's funny how this Psychic Terrastar book does uh correctly

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>diagnose some of the problems with existing lighter than air craft.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So one problem is needing to have continued access to

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>your lighter than air gas so that so that you

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 1>can like refill the balloon or the tank do because

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be some kind of leakage or

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially even damage that would allow the gas to escape.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to have a way to get more helium

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in there. If it's helium. Of course, if it's hydrogen,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you run into a whole uh raft of other problems,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as one can see with the history of the henden

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bergens and fourth hydrogen very flammable and having the same

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, fixed access problems as helium. But yeah,

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with with a vacuum like, you don't need to carry

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>vacuum around with you. All you would need to do

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is find a way to pump out the chamber. Yeah,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so you can see why it's such an attractive option.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And this this passage kind of encapsulates all that I

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking around too. I noticed that it's It's been

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>noted that at least two other authors that we've mentioned

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show before have also employed vacuum airship principles.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Peter Wattson makes use of them in his Rifters books

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as a means of enabling flying machines. I totally forgotten

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about this, and then Ian in Banks invoked them in

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at least three different novels, including at least one that

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely read, but I also don't remember mentioned of them.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess I just wasn't My mind wasn't as open

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of vacuum airships when I was reading

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>these books. And I've also read that they factor into

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Neil Stevens since The Diamond Age, which I have not read,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but I've heard good things about. So wait a minute,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually know almost nothing about Tarzan. Where old does

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Tarzan go? Is he like the lepre Con or like

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he goes to space, he goes to the to the ocean,

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he goes to the Hollow Earth? Does he does he

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>go to Las Vegas at some point? What? What? What

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are all his adventures? Well, Joe, there are twenty four

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Tarzan novels by bar Rice Burrow, so you know he

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he ultimately gets around. I have not read any of them,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but you can just when you when you start scanning

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the titles, you realize that he maybe starts running out

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of jungle and he has to has to go to

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>lost Empires in the Earth's core, in a city of gold,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>forbidden City. Uh. Looks like he may join the Foreign

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Legion at one point, so, uh, you know, he's got

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to get out there and travel around and and explore

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the outer world. But I think generally speaking, he's always

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>going to battle or befriends some sort of the large animal.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for correcting my tarzan ignorance. Now I know,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, But I guess before we go any further

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>exploring the history of proposals for vacuum airships, it would

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be worth briefly explaining the underlying reasoning, and that is that,

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking about a lighter than air gas inside

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a balloon or a rigid chamber containing a vacuum, the

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>physics phenomenon that would cause this, uh, this balloon or

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or chamber to fly is what's known as Archimedes principle,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>named after the ancient Greek inventor and mathematician. And I

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think the core idea you really need to understand in

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>order to grasp Archimedes principle at a gut level is

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of fluid displacement. Fluid displacement so a few

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>extreme experimental conditions aside. Basically, if you are on Earth,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you are submerged within a fluid. So if you're a

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>barracuda or a jellyfish, that fluid is going to be water.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>If you are a human standing in line at King

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that fluid is the atmosphere. Both gases and liquids are

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>fluids because they both flow to fill containing environments. And

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>when you occupy space within a mass of either kind

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of fluid, whether it's liquid or gas, you are taking

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>up space that this fluid would otherwise fill, would otherwise

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>rush in to fill, So, in other words, you are

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>displacing gas or liquid. The inside about physics that our

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>comedes had is that objects submerged within a fluid are

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>pushed upward, meaning in the opposite direction of gravity, by

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a force that is equal to the weight of the

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>fluid displaced by that object. And this is why boats float.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, humans have been making boats for a long time,

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but uh, it took us a while to figure out

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what is the exact physics principle governing the flotation of boats.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So a boat, for example, may have a steel hull,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and steel is very dense, So you would think that

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a steel boat should sink, right, I remember wondering about

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this when I was a little kid. How does you

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>know metal sink? So how does a metal boat float?

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>A metal boat floats because the hull of the boat

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>displaces a lot of water. An amount of water that

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is as heavy as the boat itself. So when a

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>boat gets launched out into the ocean, it sinks down

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in the water until the amount of water it displaces

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is the same as the weight of the boat overall.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And then after it reaches this equilibrium, it's held up

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of the water by that buoyancy, that

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>force pushing upward on the boat equivalent to the weight

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the water it displaces. And this, of course is

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>also why a ship sinks when water leaks into its hull.

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It's water that is denser than air filling that void

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that was otherwise filled with with air. So kind of weird,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think accurate. Way to think of a ship

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on the ocean is a rigid balloon filled with air. Now,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the same principles that apply in water also hold true

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fluid of the atmosphere. Is a force pushing

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up on an object that is equivalent to the weight

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the air that that object displaces. Now, for most

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>objects around us, the the atmospheric buoyancy is negligible because

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>objects are way more dense than the atmosphere that they're displacing. Uh.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Though technically it is true that your body has a

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>measurable buoyancy within the air. It's not enough to make

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you float up off the ground, because you know, human

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bodies are are pretty massive. But based on some rough

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>calculations I looked up, it seems like it's probably a

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fraction of a pound at sea level for the typical

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>range of human body weight. It's one estimate I saw

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was that it's like zero point two pounds for a

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy pound adult. So how can you change

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>an object in order to take advantage of that atmospheric

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>buoyancy and make it float up in the atmosphere like

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a boat floats on the water. Well, as demonstrated by

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>balloons and dirigibles, what you can do is make that

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>object take up a lot of space, mostly with material

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that is lighter than the atmosphere itself, which is usually

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lighter than air gas like hydrogen

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>or helium. But of course it could also be a

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>chamber that has no gas in it at all, nothing

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in it at all, which would be the lightest possible

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>way of taking up space. Now here's a weird fact.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I was just wondering about which of the fundamental forces

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>actually causes the force of buoyancy. Where is that force

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>pushing up on a boat or pushing up on a

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>balloon coming from? Counterintuitively, that force originates with gravity, which

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is kind of strange because the force of buoyancy is

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going in the opposite direction of gravity. Right, Why would

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gravity cause something to rise up from the ground instead

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of sinking down? But you have to think about a

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of chain of causes here. So, whether you're talking

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about the atmosphere or the ocean, gravity is pulling all

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that fluid toward the Earth's center of mass. It's pull

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.119
<v Speaker 1>ling all the water or the gas down. So gravity

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is the cause of air pressure and water pressure, and

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it is the downward pressure of the surrounding fluid that

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>causes buoyant objects within that fluid to rise. So, to

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>use some kind of approximate and anthropomorphic terms, when a

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.239
<v Speaker 1>balloon floats, it's because the heavier gas of the atmosphere

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>around it is all rushing down to get to the surface,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and it has to push the balloon out of the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>way to get there. And it can push the balloon

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the way because the balloon is less dense

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>than it is. It's kind of like if asking, well, hey,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm why if everybody's trying to get to the TV

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>section of the big box store on Black Friday, everybody's

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to get there, then why is the four Why

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>am I being pushed out of the store because everybody

0:14:51.760 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>else is pushing harder than you are. Thank But to

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>come to real world proposals for vacuum airships. Uh. One

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I was shocked about was how far back this

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>idea goes. I would have imagined it was something dreamed

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up in the nineteenth century. Yeah, I was very much

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the same. But then I started looking into it, and

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, the roots go all the way back to

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth century. So our story here begins with an

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Italian Jesuit priest by the name of Francesco Lana Detersi,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>who lived sixty one through six seven, sometimes called the

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>father of arionnautics. His groundbreaking book from sixteen seventy, titled

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Prodromo de larte Mastra, was apparently the first to discuss

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of human flight via mathematical calculations and an

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding of physics. Uh. These were no mere loss speculations either.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>This was a work that was translated and then circulated

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout Europe, and subsequent advancements in ballooning, for example, are

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are often directly linked to this work, namely thinking of

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the month Gaffier Brothers a flight in seventeen eighty three,

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>which was an unmanned balloon flight lasting about ten minutes. Now,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to stress we're largely talking with with the

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Western and European sphere of of exploration here. If you

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get into the Eastern accounts, there are some some older

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>accounts of possible you know, unmanned hot air balloon experimentation

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in China for example, going back you know to I

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think like the third century see wow, but again unmanned. Now,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in this particular book, Lana covered many subjects uh here

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and I was reading about this in a paper titled

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jesuit Contribution to Written Art Technological Sources in the

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and eighteen centuries by Karina Gramatki from sixteen. Apparently

0:16:54.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the topics include invention itself, drawing, design, pigments, chemistry, medicine, arithmetic,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the production of telescopes, microscopes, and finally aeronautics. Pick a lane.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was an age where yeah, if you

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>were if you were into stuff, you were you were

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>into everything. Yeah, so, um a particular interest to Lana

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>here though we were recent advancements in the creation of

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum pump. This would of course been a continuation

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of suction pump technology. Uh. The idea of the vacuum pump.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 1>The first vacuum pump was invented in sixteen fifty by

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the German scientists Otto von Garrick and subsequently experimented on

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>by others. Oh. Yeah, we've talked about Otto von guerricky

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>before in I think in an episode that we did

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about atmospheric pressure, specifically reference to his experiments with the

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so called Magdeburg hemispheres, which was a really interesting experiment

0:17:55.080 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that took place in the sixteen fifties, I believe, And uh,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it's been while since we talked about it, so I

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>may be forgetting some of the details, but basically, from

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>what I recall, they took two brass hemispheres half spheres,

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and then greased the edges of them with lard and

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>then pressed them together and then used the invention of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the air pump to remove air from inside these two hemispheres,

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>creating a vacuum within of course, a partial vacuum. You know,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to get every single molecule out, but yeah,

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they're getting getting most of the gas out of them.

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 1>And then they hooked these hemispheres up to horses and

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>had the horses pull in opposite directions to try to

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>pull them apart, and they couldn't. Like that, even horses

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>could not separate them. What they were demonstrating there was

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>how heavy the atmosphere is. That when you take all

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the atmosphere out of the inside of these two

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>two half spheres, you create such a disequilibrium that the

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the atmosphere is essentially reaching down and and

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>uh clutching these two things and pressing them together so

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that even great force cannot pull them apart. Yeah. There

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of papers on this topic that

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I was reading from New Scientists actually, like I was

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting the impression that maybe the editor at

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>New Scientists is like pounding the desk that I need

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>more vacuum airship stories. But one of them was from

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine by Paul Collins titled The Rise

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and Fall of the Metal Airship, which is ultimately about

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>metal airships in general and not just the vacuum airship concept,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but he mentions, uh this this experiment, writing uh quote

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Otto von Gerriki had drawn together small copper hemispheres with

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>such a strong vacuum that teams of horses could not

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pull them apart. But he mentioned some other things of

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>note here. Collins also writes that the concept of a

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airship appears in a German interplanetary travelog of seventy four,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>envisioning trips to Mars. So another example of something ultimately

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>far earlier than I would have had, oh guessed it.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>If I was to guess, well, when when we were

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people first thinking about vacuum airships in the atmosphere of Mars,

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I would not have gone with the mid Uh. Now

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is a brief detour. I want to touch on another

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that Collins mentions here um to get to the

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>title of his paper, there actually was eventually a metal

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>non vacuum airship, and this was in the first one

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was a thirty eight meter airship designed by David Schwartz

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and helped into the sky by the Prussian airship Battalion.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And it was a It was blimp shaped, but its

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>skin was riveted aluminum plates, and it traveled about six

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>kilometers total before it stopped. They put the brakes on

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and it caused the thing to crumble due to its

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>rigid construction. But the advantage of a fully functional metal

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>airship would be speed. Though so uh the the idea

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't go completely away, and in good years, original airship

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>designer Ralph Ubson quote formed the Metal Clad Airship Corporation

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to build an aluminum clad helium airship, the z m

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>C two for the U. S. Navy. Although notoriously difficult

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to handle, the quote unquote tin bubble, as it was dubbed,

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>could reach a speed of a hundred kilometers an hour,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and it put in twenty two hundred flight hours before

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it was decommissioned in n and that was it for

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>metal airships. That was the last one that took to

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the skies here on Earth. And yet that was the

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Detroit z m C two Angel. I include a picture

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of it here for you. If one was looking at

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you might not guess that what you're looking at is

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is a metal structure, aluminum clad helium airship. That I mean,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>if I've ever seen a tin bubble, that is the

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>tin bubble. But to clarify again, the one the actual

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>examples we've just been talking about, the people got up

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the air flying even if they were even if

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they failed early on, these were not vacuum airships. These

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>were airships that you even though they had rigid out

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or hulls, they did use some form of gas inside. Yeah. Yeah,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, as as we'll discuss, the vacuum airship is

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>still a concept that individuals are still chasing today. Now

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>coming back to Lana's book here, another important connection here

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would be to Robert Boyle's work proving that air has weight. Essentially,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it was proven that all of the atmosphere could be

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mechanically drawn out of a volume. Maybe the nature didn't

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>abhor a vacuum quite as much as previously supposed, and

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Lana has taken the next step by speculating one exciting

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>way that such a vacuum could be made to work

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for us. So what Lana does here is he basically

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>applies what was known at the time regarding the nature

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of air, vacuum and cylinders to devise a means by

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>which first vacuum spheres would be made that would float

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>up through the air, and secondly that with enough vacuum

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you could also float a vessel. So he proposed a

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>vessel consisting of a basket with a say ill and rudder,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>held aloft by four large twenty five ft spheres made

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of thin copper sheeting and bound together by rigging. Uh.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>This was of course never actually built, but there have

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>been various illustrations of what this would have looked like.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I included one here for you, Joe. It looks positively whimsical.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Why does it? Does it have an oar? I guess

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that's some kind of rudder. Actually, yeah, this is some

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of rudder device to steer it. Though it really

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>does look like a paddle for the air. Now again,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>now again, Atlanta was a very serious individual, so it

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>is he's not just dreaming here. He's applying what was

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>known about about the atmosphere and you know, current understanding

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of physics, and so he was. He was serious about

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the underlying principles at work here. So he discusses not

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>only how this concept might work, but he also gets

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>into some of the objections to it. For instance, do

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you might ask, well, wouldn't this just float up into

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>outer space until the people aboard died and it would

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>just be completely uncontrollable. Well, he describes how controlling the

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>air vacuum levels would allow you to make adjustments and

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>keep yourself from just floating up to heights altitudes beyond

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>which you had intention of traveling to. Right, So, I

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>guess the fear is that, you know, if the vacuum

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>is potent enough that it would just float you up

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the atmosphere and you'd sit on

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it like a boat floats on top of the water. Now,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, you have to remember that even though a

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>vacuum chamber would have buoyancy within the atmosphere, it also

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>again there is weight, you know, there is weight made

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>up of the shell surrounding the chamber and the boat

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and all that. So that would counterbalance that to some extent.

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>But then also, yeah, the other thing is that you

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>could control altitude just by allowing some amount of gas

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>back into these partial vacuum chambers, and then so that

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would help you sink back down and then if you

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>want to float up again, you would once again pump

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that gas out. Yeah. Now, the big problem here, of course,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is the notion of containing that vacuum um. The big

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>question would be wouldn't it crush the copper spheres that

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>are contained that vacuum, or you know, that are allowing

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the whole system to supposedly float to begin with. And

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer we know now is yes, it would

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have just crushed those spears. But at the time Lanta

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>contended that, now, this is the perfect shape of the

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sphere would hold up to the equal pressure of the

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>vacuum within it. Again, we know now this wouldn't work,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>but his hypothesis was that it could possibly function. Right,

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So I guess here you're you're getting into the idea

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of a balancing act, right, so that you can, of

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>course create a pretty pretty strong vacuum within a sealed

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>chamber without the weight of the atmosphere crushing it, just

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, turn smashing that chamber like a tin can.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But in order to do that, you have to make

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the outsides of the chamber pretty darn strong. And in

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>order to make them that strong, you have to add

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more weight to the chamber, thus counteracting the

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>buoyancy effect of the vacuum within. Right, So you're chasing

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the buoyancy here, and can you achieve it without adding

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so much metal that you lose any buoyancy? You might

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>be seeking after and can you can you make the

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>materials thin enough without just causing it to collapse anyway,

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And this will remain important when we get into subsequent

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>attempts to make this hypothesis and a reality. But here's

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.959
<v Speaker 1>another little bit of of interesting, ultimately speculation by Atlanta

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>on the use of aerial technology, because he ends up

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>concluding in the book that God would never allow such

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a vessel to actually be built, as it could then

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be used to attack cities and towns from above, and

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that there would be absolutely no stopping such vessels. So

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, God would just shut that down. It would

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be like a tower of of battle situation. Oh, this

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>theological prediction must have been very well vindicated then when

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>when later people came along, I think Leibniz was one

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of them, uh, showing that like no materials we know

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>about are strong enough to make this work. Yeah. But

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but but again this idea of of of aerial dominance

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>say that would be possible in a military a situation.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>To a large extent line, it was correct here about

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just how devastating this would be. Because, of course, during

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>War War one, Zeppelin served as the world's first long

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>range bombers, though their dominance would be short lived due

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to their their weakness versus interceptor aircraft, but aerial bombardment

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>would indeed be a defining factor of warfare from the

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century onward. Yeah, the invention of air power, I

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>guess I'd say air power, along with like long range artillery,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>completely changed war in the twentieth century. Now, on that note,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>let's move to the next chapter in our history of

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of the vacuum airship or our pursuit of the vacuum airship,

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>because this will take us to the late nineteenth century

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>right up until the dawn of the twentieth century. Because

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>there was at least one spirited individual who thought, yes,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum airship can work, and it will work. And

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that is one author, Debase set Uh. And this is

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>detailed in Balloons to Jets, A Century of Aeronautics and

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Illinois by one Howard L. Scame Horn. So author debossit

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>here was a Chicago doctor who quote designed and electrically

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>powered vacuum tub balloon which he intended to use for

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>transporting passengers and freight over vast distances at high speeds.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is described as an air tight tube cone

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>shaped at either end, and it was going to be

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>made of thin steel sheets and it would stay aloft

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>when all of the air had been pumped out of it.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And again it would be used for high speed transportation

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of passengers and freight presumably, uh, you know, from Chicago

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to two other important cities. I mean, if you can

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>create that without the atmosphere crushing it, good on you.

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But I am doubtful. Yeah. But and so at this

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>point you might think, Okay, Chicago doctor daydreaming about his airships.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Well know, h he went a step further or uh,

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the good doctor actually organized a company with three associates,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the Aerial Navigation Company of Chicago, and they raised a

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty thousand dollars at the time through the

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sale of stock to construct one of the ships. So

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>already it's sounding a bit more like a legitimate effort now, right.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's more. Uh, When they hadn't produced anything with

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it with these funds, they turned to Congress for more funds,

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and funding bills were introduced in both houses of Congress

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>by then a representative Ransom W. Dunham of Chicago, And

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it was apparently some traction or momentum here, but both

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>bills failed to pass. Why does this sound like something

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that should be associated with the Chicago World's Fair. I

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>know I was thinking the same thing, you know, and

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess to a certain extent, we are talking about,

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the same sort of you know, futuristic, technological,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>um optimistic ideas that were circulating at the time. You

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>know that, like, well, we have the technology, but we

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>can do this. We can make these airships a reality,

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna fundamentally change the way we travel and

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the way we move cargo. It's this is great, Let's

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>do it. Let's get the funding. Okay, well maybe we

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>need a little more funding. Let's get Congress on the Horn.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, it really it sounds like there should be

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a chapter about the Vacuum airship and Devil in the

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>White City. Yeah, so skame Horn rights that The fight

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Chicago Void vessel here went on for a

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>good twenty years up until the dawn of the New century,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Debausit trying in vain to raise enough money

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to build one of these ships, all the while dealing

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with scientific critics that he had just insisted would be

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>proved wrong if they would just let him build one.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>He was like, look, just just fund it. Just let

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>me build one, and then you'll see you'll see that

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this this is possible. Um, but it sounds like the

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>real nail in the coffin. Was that one of a

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of leading US aeronautical authorities of the time, Octave

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Channeux and uh Alvary France's zomb quote publicly denounced and

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>mathematically prove the fallacy of the vacuum principle. Now, I

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know the basis of the fallacy they're talking about there,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but I would have to assume that again, it's going

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to be, uh, it's going to be rooted in the

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lack of a material strong enough and light enough to

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>create this kind of vacuum shell. That if you're going

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to create a rigid shell to contain a vacuum, the

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere is always going to crush it unless you make

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it so thick and so heavy that it that it

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>again out does the buoyancy effect of the vacuum and

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>makes it unable to fly. Right. Yeah, I mean that's

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that has always been and still is largely the achilles

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>heel of the whole concept. Um by the way. The

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>same book also reveals that during this same time period

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there was at least one other Illinois based inventor trying

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to raise funds for an airship. It wasn't a vacuum airship,

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but still airships were very much on the brain. And

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it does sound like, yeah, the people of the White

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>City at the time, Uh, we're sharing some of the

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>same dreams for what the future of air travel looked like.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>What if H. H. Holmes, instead of operating like a

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a murder hotel, had operated a murder airship. Well, now

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got a good movie, pitch. We haven't had a

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've had a good airship movie recently, right,

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it could be all like a haunted airship or yeah,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a murder airship. I can't think of one. I think

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of that scene in Indiana Jones and the Last Cersae.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That's about it. Yeah, yeah, there was there was another one.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Or when he when he punches the Nazi out of

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the window no ticket, Yeah, yeah, yeah, there's a and

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that had some some very neat scenes with with the

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Zeppelin there there was also a movie called Zeppelin that

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>had Michael Yorke in it. This would have come out

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 1>and I remember seeing bits of it. I don't think

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I've watched it in its entirety, but I remember catching

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bits of it. I'm like American movie Classics or something,

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and and being impressed by some of the scenes of

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>people aboard these these airships. Than all right, well, let's

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>take things into the twenty one century. Another New Scientist article. Again,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>New Scientist is your go to place for articles about

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airships. Uh. Noted science writer Philip Ball discussed this

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in in a New Scientist article titled flying on Empty

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>from and as Ball discusses, yeah, this idea has never

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>quite gone away, in part because if it could be

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled off again, you don't need hot air or flammable

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen or precious helium to keep the ship afloat. It's

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not about pump putting something in. It's about just taking

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere out. And if you could only figure out the

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>materials problem, then you know the world is your oyster.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And again, the materials problem is designing an outer shell

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be strong enough to withstand the atmospheric pressure

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to crush it in, but also light enough to

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>stay afloat. Right, And of course, as we get into

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the modern era. We're in this age of of of

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>special you know, nanomaterials and new ways of looking at

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how these materials can be put together. And of course

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>this is this has led to a number of ideas

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been possible yet. We've been able to look

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>to the future and say, well, what what might we

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to do If we can just create something

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that's strong and flexible enough, you know, space elevators can

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>become a reality then, as well as things potentially like

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum airship. And so Ball mentions an individual by

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the name of Ben Jenet, who at the time of

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>publication was working on his doctorate at the Massachusetts Institute

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of Technologies Center for Bits and Atoms, and Jenet devised

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the use of lightweight quote unquote lattice materials to make

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the shell of a vacuum ship possible. So Ball points out,

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Genet calculated that even with currently available materials, a

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>shell with a thickness one tenth of the radius of

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the sphere it contains will be able to withstand the

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>air pressure without buckling, and this would then have to

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>be covered with a thin, impermetable skin. Uh Genet's idea

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>would also involves creating the vacuum at a higher altitude,

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was interesting where air pressure is lower,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you would have some I think what it

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was discussed here is solar powered hot air would be

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>used to allow the vessel to rise up to that

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>initial altitude, and then you would begin the vacuum process

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when it's easier to pull that off, and then you

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>would have would have a theoretical operating altitude of something

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like twenty meters or sixty thousand, six sixteen feet. Okay,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 1>so that makes sense. Up at a higher altitude, the

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>air pressure is going to be reduced, which means there's

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>less crushing force on the outside of the chamber. Yeah. Yeah,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my understanding here. So Ball points out the

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Genet and his collaborators here were in at least we're

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in prep still are in contact with Boeing, so Aurora

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Flight Sciences on the concept, and then an Italian company

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>called oh Boot was also looking into vacuum ship ideas.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Ball reported that while most of the emphasis was on

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>shipping with these modern concepts, the idea of at least

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>some level of human travel wasn't beyond possibilities as well.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>At least for short jaunts. And again you come back

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to this sort of the the romanticism of airships. I

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>can imagine where this would be the case. Well, one

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>thing you mentioned that operating altitude you said, twenty thousand

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>meters or like sixty feet, is well above the normal

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>operating altitude of fixed wing aircraft. So so I wonder what,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 1>what does what does it look like once you get

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>up that high? Are you starting to get into like

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at seeing the curve of the Earth territory? I

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yeah, it sounds like a situation where you

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you could easily get into this area where you're pretty

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>selling the tickets to celebrities and so forth, kind of

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen with with these other high altitude flight

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>near space travel scenarios. So I don't know. It would

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see where where things go in the

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>decades ahead. But I wouldn't be surprised at all, uh

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to see one of these concepts sort of come to

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fruition in at least in that uh, that scenario. But

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I know when it happens, I'll be able to turn

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to New Scientist to read an article about it for

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>all your null ship needs. Yes, So One thing I

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>looked into is that vacuum airships have also been proposed

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>in various ways for exploring other planets, particularly Mars. I

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 1>think there have been a few ideas along these lines,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but the main one I was reading about was linked

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to a U T. Austin aerospace engineering professor named John

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Paul Clark, who I think until just recently was here

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in town at Georgia Tech. But Clark and colleagues UH

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>submitted a paper that I saw published under the NASA

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Innovative Advanced Concepts Program, or in i a C. This

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was a Phase one proposal called Evacuated Airship for Mars missions.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was reading about this in another summary that

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Clarke had prepared that's hosted on the NASA website, and

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>he makes some interesting points. One funny thing is that

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>advanced project briefs like this always have the obligatory section

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>where they rag on whatever technology we're currently using. So

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this one takes a few good wax at ground based

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>rovers on Mars. It's like, you know, we're over with wheels,

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can fall in a ditch, get stuck, you know, and

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got limited line of sight, can't see over mountains,

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems with with ground based rovers. You

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>know what would be better a rover that could fly,

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But of course it's going to be very hard to

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>fly on Mars. And here's where a vacuum airship could

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>come in. Obviously, a vacuum airship would be useful in

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>planetary explorations for some of the same reasons it would

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be useful on Earth. You get the general transportation efficiency

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>benefits of air travel without having to rely lie on

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a fixed supply of low density gas like hydrogen or helium.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>To keep a vacuum airship afloat, you don't need a

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>supply of gas. Technically, all you need is power power

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>like electricity to operate a pump that will continuously evacuate

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gas particles from the inner void. Now, Clark points out

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that there is a good reason what we've never developed

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum airship for use on Earth. It's the same

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>reason we've been talking about already. There is no homogeneous

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>material yet discovered that is strong enough to be completely

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>evacuated and withstand the crushing pressure of Earth's atmosphere, at

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>least not without the structure becoming too heavy to float

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Earth's There is cruel to vacuum airships. But Clark argues that,

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>based on his team's calculations, not only is this not

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>true on Mars, the atmosphere of Mars is kind of

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>an ideal environment for a vacuum airship. Now this immediately

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>went against my into sans because before I really reasoned

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>it through and read the argument here, I would have thought, well, okay,

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere of Mars is much less dense than Earth's atmosphere. Uh,

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the average surface density is something like zero point zero

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>two kilograms per cubic meter. Compare that to Earth's, which

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is more like one point two kilograms per cubic meter.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So Earth's is a couple of orders of magnitude greater

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in density than the Martian atmosphere. Martian atmosphere is very thin,

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course a balloon floats by having contents that

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are less dense than the atmosphere. So in an atmosphere

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with lower basically in a thinner atmosphere, I would have

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>assumed it's got to be harder for a balloon to float.

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But here is where I would have been wrong. Of Course,

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum is always less dense than even a very

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>thin atmosphere. So if it can be contained and it

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>displaces more atmosphere than the weight of the craft itself

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>than the weight of the shell and the payload, it

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>will float. The real benefit of Martian atmosphere is in

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>its pressure to density ratio, so the main constituent of

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Martian air is carbon dioxide. Unlike on Earth, which has

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mainly nitrogen and oxygen. At a molecular level, carbon dioxide

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>is denser than nitrogen and oxygen, and the cold temperatures

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on Mars also help make that CEO two even denser.

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>You're probably familiar with the idea that hot gas expands,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>cold gas contracts, and yet at the same time, a

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>cool advantage of Mars is that there is far less

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric pressure pressing on the outer shell of the airship,

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so you should be able to construct a vacuum envelope

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that can stand up to the weight of the atmosphere

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on Mars without buckling, using a design that is still

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>light enough to float. To read a section from the

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.879
<v Speaker 1>n I a C Paper quote, Mars having the most

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>suitable atmosphere for the vacuum airship is quite remarkable, since

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the martiantmosphere is a severe detriment to all other flight

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicle designs. So you know you try to do like

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a fixed wing aircraft on Mars, that that's going to

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be really hard. Continuing the quote, the Martian atmosphere is

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>comprised almost entirely of carbon dioxide, so vehicles cannot use

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>typical combustion fuels which require an atmospheric oxidizer. Glider, plane

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and helicopter designs are all hindered by the atmosphere of

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Mars due to the low Reynolds number and relatively low density. Additionally,

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum airship provides benefit over other airship designs and

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>super pressure balloons because of the inherent robustness of the design. Moreover,

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if damage is sustained, the vacuum airship can land be

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>repaired and then re evacuate to resume operation, whereas another

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>airship would need to be refilled with a lighter than

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>air gas. Therefore, the evacuated airship design thrives in an

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>environment where most other aircraft are added disadvantage, and in

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this paper, Clark and colleagues claimed to have already modeled

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the design that should be able to carry a payload

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>of fives in Martian air and UH and that way,

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they say could be increased with further design improvements. So

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the argument here is that not only is it a

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>situation where to make uh, to make our vacuum airship

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>dreams possible, we must go to Mars, it's instead, no,

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that makes this the concept that makes this the design

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that makes the most sense on Mars if we're going

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to have anything flying around, right, that's their argument. And

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this has ever made it beyond

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>this this phase one or phase two proposal level. So

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of any evidence that this is actually

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like being developed for Mars missions. But at least the

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 1>initial case they make is really interesting, and I wonder

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if if anybody's going anywhere else with it, But yeah,

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly intrigued. So Earth, with its thick atmosphere, may

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>well hate vacuum airships. It may just forever crush them.

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's no way we could really design one that

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>would would feasibly work on Earth, but Mars maybe a

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>completely different story that that thinner atmosphere. Maybe just the

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>place to make the stream of reality. Now, of course,

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this this all brings to mind a previous episode of

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the show that we did titled airships over Venus, which

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:15.720
<v Speaker 1>discusses the the hypothetical use of airships in the opper

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere of Venus, at least for unmanned craft, but also

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of the more extreme and in fantastic concepts

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>that have been discussed in some of the literature, the

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:30.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that you could potentially have a human being travel

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to the upper atmosphere of Venus and be inside especially

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>designed airship. I think one of the ideas for for

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>crude aircrafts there is literally that you could have the

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>crew inside the balloon because in the Venusian atmosphere, breathable

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>air floats. Yeah. Now, looking around, I noticed that there

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>there have been some papers that have come out, uh,

0:44:54.600 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>speculating about the use of vacuum airships in the Venusian atmosphere,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the upper atmosphere. So it looks like there there at

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 1>least are some individuals out there who are thinking about

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>taking the vacuum concept to the upper atmosphere of Venus

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. You just hope it doesn't sink. I talk

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about heavy, heavy, crushing atmospheres, yes, yeah, the Venusian atmosphere

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is is an atmosphere that crushes everything all right. Well,

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're gonna go and close out this episode,

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 1>but we'd love to hear from everyone out there if

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you have thoughts on vacuum airships or just airships in general. Uh,

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these uh, these these concepts we've discussed regarding

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the atmospheres of other worlds. Everything is fair game, right in,

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>let us know what you think. We'd love to hear

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from you. As always, Core episodes of Stuff to Blow

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind, the podcast we found in the Stuff to

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind podcast. Feed Core episodes on two season Thursdays,

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Listener Mail on Monday's short form Artifact or Monster Fact

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays, and on Fridays, we do Weird How Cinema.

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That is our time to set aside most serious concerns

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and just talk about a strange film. Huge thanks as

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest topic

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for My Heart Radio,

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you're

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to your favorite shows.