WEBVTT - When You Come at the King: Holding Presidents to Account (with Elie Honig)

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:29.404
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:29.524 --> 0:00:32.164
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanikova.

0:00:31.804 --> 0:00:32.884
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:33.484 --> 0:00:36.044
<v Speaker 1>So today on the show, we have a special guest

0:00:36.124 --> 0:00:41.004
<v Speaker 1>for you, Ellie Honig, who is CNN's senior legal analyst,

0:00:41.204 --> 0:00:47.124
<v Speaker 1>former federal prosecutor, author of two prior bestsellers, Hatchetman and Untouchable,

0:00:47.444 --> 0:00:51.524
<v Speaker 1>and he has a new book coming out called When

0:00:51.604 --> 0:00:52.924
<v Speaker 1>You've Come at the King.

0:00:54.124 --> 0:00:54.884
<v Speaker 3>It was great.

0:00:54.964 --> 0:00:58.124
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed it. Ellie and I actually first met

0:00:58.524 --> 0:01:01.244
<v Speaker 1>many years ago when I was working on my book

0:01:01.404 --> 0:01:04.164
<v Speaker 1>The Confidence Game about con artists, and we were introduced

0:01:04.164 --> 0:01:07.364
<v Speaker 1>by his former BOSSU pret Berrara, and both of them

0:01:07.404 --> 0:01:11.804
<v Speaker 1>were incredibly hopeful to me in yeah, getting the background

0:01:11.844 --> 0:01:15.124
<v Speaker 1>for that, getting case information and basically taking down some

0:01:15.244 --> 0:01:16.804
<v Speaker 1>of the con artists, some of the bad guys who

0:01:16.884 --> 0:01:19.404
<v Speaker 1>I took down in my book. So it's uh, it's

0:01:19.444 --> 0:01:22.284
<v Speaker 1>great to be uh to be here with you. Congratulations

0:01:22.364 --> 0:01:24.284
<v Speaker 1>on the book which is out this week.

0:01:26.004 --> 0:01:28.164
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you so Maria. You you know I

0:01:28.204 --> 0:01:30.404
<v Speaker 3>had you on my podcast, if you remember, I did

0:01:30.444 --> 0:01:32.724
<v Speaker 3>a mob podcast and I needed somebody to help me

0:01:33.124 --> 0:01:36.004
<v Speaker 3>deep dive the psychology of what goes into a gangster.

0:01:36.044 --> 0:01:39.804
<v Speaker 3>You had written about that for some magazine outlet and

0:01:41.684 --> 0:01:45.084
<v Speaker 3>some outlet or other whatever it's called. And Nate, you

0:01:45.124 --> 0:01:46.644
<v Speaker 3>are in the book, by the way, you are in

0:01:46.684 --> 0:01:47.204
<v Speaker 3>this book.

0:01:48.204 --> 0:01:51.324
<v Speaker 1>Nate, you're on page Nate, you're on page one fifty three.

0:01:51.964 --> 0:01:53.564
<v Speaker 3>Pretty good. How long is this book?

0:01:53.564 --> 0:01:54.804
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it the first half?

0:01:55.004 --> 0:01:56.764
<v Speaker 3>You're in exactly halftime.

0:01:56.884 --> 0:01:58.884
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's about three hundred pages long, so you're about

0:01:58.924 --> 0:02:03.004
<v Speaker 1>le halfway through. On the Hillary Clinton emails and whether

0:02:04.124 --> 0:02:06.764
<v Speaker 1>the cam An investigation ended up costing her the.

0:02:06.684 --> 0:02:09.284
<v Speaker 3>Election, you got it. And and Nate you your conclusion

0:02:09.284 --> 0:02:13.084
<v Speaker 3>I think was boiled down was basically probably. But we

0:02:13.124 --> 0:02:15.644
<v Speaker 3>can't know for sure, right, we can't know for sure.

0:02:16.524 --> 0:02:17.884
<v Speaker 3>I've blurred it all out of my head.

0:02:18.364 --> 0:02:23.524
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the book takes us through the history of

0:02:24.444 --> 0:02:26.404
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to call it, Special Counsel and

0:02:26.444 --> 0:02:30.044
<v Speaker 1>dependent council. Depending on the point in time that we're

0:02:30.084 --> 0:02:33.844
<v Speaker 1>talking about, it's called different things. But before we move forward,

0:02:33.964 --> 0:02:36.604
<v Speaker 1>can you just define what this is what this office

0:02:36.804 --> 0:02:38.444
<v Speaker 1>actually is, regardless of name.

0:02:38.684 --> 0:02:40.804
<v Speaker 3>So it's changed a bit over the years, but currently

0:02:40.844 --> 0:02:44.644
<v Speaker 3>we call it special Counsel and this is an official

0:02:44.684 --> 0:02:48.164
<v Speaker 3>who can be appointed by the United States Attorney General

0:02:48.524 --> 0:02:51.884
<v Speaker 3>in order to conduct a criminal investigation that would pose

0:02:51.884 --> 0:02:55.004
<v Speaker 3>a conflict of interest for DOJ itself or other quote

0:02:55.044 --> 0:02:58.324
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary circumstances. So conflict of interest would mean something like,

0:02:58.364 --> 0:03:01.644
<v Speaker 3>we're investigating the president, who can hire and fire the

0:03:01.644 --> 0:03:04.804
<v Speaker 3>attorney general. But also plenty of ags have pointed to

0:03:04.924 --> 0:03:09.684
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary circumstances, which means essentially whatever the AG feels like me,

0:03:09.724 --> 0:03:12.404
<v Speaker 3>and so there's definitely some wiggle room there. But it's

0:03:12.444 --> 0:03:15.564
<v Speaker 3>a prosecutor within DJ appointed by the Attorney General for

0:03:15.684 --> 0:03:17.484
<v Speaker 3>a specific high profile case.

0:03:18.004 --> 0:03:22.964
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, I'm I'm going to represent that

0:03:23.164 --> 0:03:28.164
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing substantial minority, maybe majority, of a civil bulletin

0:03:28.244 --> 0:03:31.604
<v Speaker 2>audience who thinks.

0:03:31.364 --> 0:03:33.364
<v Speaker 3>All this legal stuff. They just don't really.

0:03:33.164 --> 0:03:36.404
<v Speaker 2>Have the compartment for it in their brain, right. They

0:03:36.564 --> 0:03:40.204
<v Speaker 2>like elections, they like strategy, they like maybe they like

0:03:40.204 --> 0:03:43.644
<v Speaker 2>cultural fights. But the legal stuff. Yeah, so I'm gonna

0:03:43.644 --> 0:03:45.164
<v Speaker 2>be the I'm gonna ask the dumb questions.

0:03:45.284 --> 0:03:47.764
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for asking that. No, but listen, this book

0:03:47.844 --> 0:03:50.164
<v Speaker 3>is No. I don't do legal ease, and if I do,

0:03:50.244 --> 0:03:52.844
<v Speaker 3>I will explain it. But like, what drives this book

0:03:52.924 --> 0:03:56.364
<v Speaker 3>is the stories. I mean, I interviewed thirty five thirty

0:03:56.364 --> 0:03:58.324
<v Speaker 3>six people on record. By the way, nobody. I didn't

0:03:58.324 --> 0:04:01.244
<v Speaker 3>allow anybody to be anonymous. People who from WA Aregate

0:04:01.284 --> 0:04:04.004
<v Speaker 3>prosecutors up until Donald Trump and Jack Smith that case.

0:04:04.044 --> 0:04:06.084
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't talk to Donald Trump and Jack Smith,

0:04:06.124 --> 0:04:09.364
<v Speaker 3>but people lawyers on the case. So what really drives us.

0:04:09.724 --> 0:04:11.444
<v Speaker 3>I love the stories, I love the drama of it.

0:04:11.484 --> 0:04:14.764
<v Speaker 3>And what you see is it's so human, Like we

0:04:14.964 --> 0:04:17.844
<v Speaker 3>look at the law as a set of written statutes

0:04:17.884 --> 0:04:20.724
<v Speaker 3>and rules. But having been a lawyer and a prosecutor

0:04:20.764 --> 0:04:23.284
<v Speaker 3>for fourteen years and having written this book, I guess

0:04:23.484 --> 0:04:26.644
<v Speaker 3>one of the major themes is it's so much about

0:04:26.684 --> 0:04:31.284
<v Speaker 3>the human element, the human emotions, motivations, frailties, and as

0:04:31.364 --> 0:04:33.724
<v Speaker 3>much as we try to design these systems, and that's important,

0:04:34.124 --> 0:04:35.844
<v Speaker 3>the actual people are way more important.

0:04:36.684 --> 0:04:39.444
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think we get at that from the

0:04:39.484 --> 0:04:42.204
<v Speaker 1>title of the book. The title comes from you know,

0:04:42.204 --> 0:04:44.804
<v Speaker 1>one of the best TV shows of all time, Slash,

0:04:44.844 --> 0:04:46.884
<v Speaker 1>one of the best political science books of all time.

0:04:47.124 --> 0:04:49.844
<v Speaker 1>So When You Come at the King is originally Machiavelli,

0:04:50.444 --> 0:04:53.684
<v Speaker 1>but we know it from Omar in the Wire, and

0:04:53.684 --> 0:04:55.764
<v Speaker 1>that was a very very I think that's such an

0:04:55.804 --> 0:04:59.924
<v Speaker 1>interesting choice because Omar is not exactly like the hero

0:05:00.124 --> 0:05:03.164
<v Speaker 1>that you would think that, you know, a prosecutor would

0:05:03.204 --> 0:05:05.324
<v Speaker 1>choose to title his book, and he has a very

0:05:05.404 --> 0:05:07.204
<v Speaker 1>he has a code of ethics, right, he has his

0:05:07.284 --> 0:05:10.284
<v Speaker 1>code of morals, but it's very specific. So I just

0:05:10.364 --> 0:05:13.324
<v Speaker 1>wanted to before we get into, you know, the important

0:05:13.324 --> 0:05:15.844
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the book, I wanted to ask about the

0:05:15.884 --> 0:05:19.124
<v Speaker 1>inspiration behind your title and kind of the background of that.

0:05:20.284 --> 0:05:22.804
<v Speaker 3>Taken from Omar and The Wire. Omar, of course, for

0:05:22.804 --> 0:05:24.404
<v Speaker 3>those who haven't watched The Wire is sort of the

0:05:24.444 --> 0:05:28.084
<v Speaker 3>lone wolfson pace Michael K. Williams May the late great

0:05:28.124 --> 0:05:31.804
<v Speaker 3>Michael K. Williams. He is the lone Wolf assassin basically,

0:05:31.844 --> 0:05:33.724
<v Speaker 3>and one of it there's a famous scene where he says,

0:05:33.764 --> 0:05:35.724
<v Speaker 3>you come at the King, you best not miss now.

0:05:35.844 --> 0:05:38.924
<v Speaker 3>I will confess I had a sense that that maybe

0:05:39.204 --> 0:05:42.444
<v Speaker 3>went pre Omar, and as you said, Maria, it did

0:05:42.484 --> 0:05:45.364
<v Speaker 3>go back, goes back to Machiavelli, Emerson, others, but let's

0:05:45.404 --> 0:05:48.524
<v Speaker 3>be real, nobody said it as well as Omar. And

0:05:48.844 --> 0:05:51.084
<v Speaker 3>there's really two things that motivate I didn't have the

0:05:51.084 --> 0:05:52.444
<v Speaker 3>title one. I mean, I don't know if you tend

0:05:52.444 --> 0:05:54.524
<v Speaker 3>to have your titles when you start your books. I haven't.

0:05:54.724 --> 0:05:57.444
<v Speaker 3>I come up with them as I go, right, But

0:05:57.564 --> 0:06:00.244
<v Speaker 3>two things. One, the stakes for all involved. I mean

0:06:00.284 --> 0:06:03.604
<v Speaker 3>I talk to these people who are very accomplished prosecutors,

0:06:03.604 --> 0:06:06.244
<v Speaker 3>defense lawyers, white House officials, and they all basically were

0:06:06.284 --> 0:06:08.644
<v Speaker 3>like I'm paraphrasing, you know, but they all basically said,

0:06:08.684 --> 0:06:10.964
<v Speaker 3>we knew that this is this was all I'd be

0:06:11.044 --> 0:06:16.604
<v Speaker 3>remembered for. This was life or death politically, legally, et cetera, professionally.

0:06:17.004 --> 0:06:19.004
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is the retribution angle, right, That's the

0:06:19.044 --> 0:06:20.804
<v Speaker 3>point of what Omar saying, if you're gonna come after

0:06:20.844 --> 0:06:23.404
<v Speaker 3>the king, you best not miss otherwise there will be retribution.

0:06:23.884 --> 0:06:26.204
<v Speaker 3>And that I think reflects very much what's happening certainly

0:06:26.324 --> 0:06:28.084
<v Speaker 3>right now with Donald Trump.

0:06:28.724 --> 0:06:33.004
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think retribution has definitely been part of the

0:06:33.964 --> 0:06:37.324
<v Speaker 1>both implicit and explicit motives for for a long time.

0:06:37.604 --> 0:06:41.084
<v Speaker 1>The office, and what I say the office, I mean

0:06:41.124 --> 0:06:45.684
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Special Counsel is first created after Watergate, right,

0:06:45.724 --> 0:06:49.524
<v Speaker 1>not before, like when Watergate happens, this doesn't even exist.

0:06:49.564 --> 0:06:52.604
<v Speaker 1>It leads to the creation. I somehow didn't realize that.

0:06:52.724 --> 0:06:56.004
<v Speaker 1>But you know, can we just talk about you know, first,

0:06:56.084 --> 0:06:58.404
<v Speaker 1>why now, like why you decided to write this right now,

0:06:58.684 --> 0:07:02.364
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, like why why we're starting you know, why

0:07:02.404 --> 0:07:04.804
<v Speaker 1>you decided to take kind of this historical approach as

0:07:04.804 --> 0:07:07.324
<v Speaker 1>opposed to just like boom, we're going to start with

0:07:07.364 --> 0:07:09.524
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump put us right in the.

0:07:09.444 --> 0:07:11.804
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, there are two chapters here about Donald Trump,

0:07:11.884 --> 0:07:14.324
<v Speaker 3>the two big Trump investigations. But the end part, and

0:07:14.364 --> 0:07:16.364
<v Speaker 3>this is the why now, is geared at what's happening

0:07:16.444 --> 0:07:19.364
<v Speaker 3>right now, because I argue in the book it's fundamentally

0:07:19.364 --> 0:07:22.724
<v Speaker 3>different in kind than anything we've seen throughout our history. Now,

0:07:22.964 --> 0:07:24.804
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to go back. I actually wondered when was

0:07:24.804 --> 0:07:27.444
<v Speaker 3>the first outside we'll just call them outside prosecutors, because,

0:07:27.444 --> 0:07:30.684
<v Speaker 3>as you say, the nomenclature changes. But you know, Watergate's

0:07:30.724 --> 0:07:32.644
<v Speaker 3>the first one that I think registered for all of

0:07:32.804 --> 0:07:35.364
<v Speaker 3>you know, I mean, it's before all three of our times.

0:07:35.644 --> 0:07:37.364
<v Speaker 3>I will say I was born in nineteen seventy five,

0:07:37.444 --> 0:07:41.284
<v Speaker 3>so it was over by then. But the first one

0:07:41.364 --> 0:07:43.204
<v Speaker 3>was Grant Ulysses ays Grant. The reason I put it

0:07:43.244 --> 0:07:46.204
<v Speaker 3>in there is because so many of the moves we've

0:07:46.204 --> 0:07:49.004
<v Speaker 3>become accustomed to we're being done back then. Like it's

0:07:49.044 --> 0:07:50.964
<v Speaker 3>a long story, I tell it in like one page,

0:07:50.964 --> 0:07:53.844
<v Speaker 3>but basically there was a kickback scheme with whiskey distillers

0:07:53.844 --> 0:07:56.524
<v Speaker 3>in Missouri, and so Grant gets pressured into appointing an

0:07:56.524 --> 0:07:59.724
<v Speaker 3>outside process of course, right, And what ends up happening.

0:08:00.044 --> 0:08:02.724
<v Speaker 3>The outside prosecutor starts, you know, picking up some low,

0:08:02.804 --> 0:08:04.924
<v Speaker 3>low hanging fruit, and then he starts getting close to Grant,

0:08:04.924 --> 0:08:07.244
<v Speaker 3>and Grant fires him, and then the media attacks Grant,

0:08:07.244 --> 0:08:09.124
<v Speaker 3>and then Grant says, the media is out to get me.

0:08:09.164 --> 0:08:12.924
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's all so familiar. We've seen it happen many,

0:08:12.964 --> 0:08:16.084
<v Speaker 3>many times. But Watergate, you're right, I mean people may

0:08:16.124 --> 0:08:19.204
<v Speaker 3>not realize. John Dean, the famous you know, Watergate witness,

0:08:19.284 --> 0:08:21.404
<v Speaker 3>the former White House counsel, said to me it was

0:08:21.444 --> 0:08:25.124
<v Speaker 3>improv There was no at that time, special council, independent

0:08:25.124 --> 0:08:28.204
<v Speaker 3>council laws, regulations anything that we got them right after

0:08:28.324 --> 0:08:30.644
<v Speaker 3>because of Watergate. But they were making it up as

0:08:30.684 --> 0:08:32.324
<v Speaker 3>they went along. They did a pretty good job. But

0:08:33.524 --> 0:08:36.004
<v Speaker 3>you know that that was the motivation, that was the

0:08:36.364 --> 0:08:37.804
<v Speaker 3>reason we have these rules now.

0:08:39.364 --> 0:08:42.164
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even back then, though, I found it

0:08:42.204 --> 0:08:47.764
<v Speaker 1>really interesting that they were scared that their investigation would

0:08:47.804 --> 0:08:50.764
<v Speaker 1>be shut down, yeah, and that the evidence would be destroyed.

0:08:51.204 --> 0:08:53.564
<v Speaker 1>So I actually thought it was really interesting that people

0:08:53.644 --> 0:08:56.764
<v Speaker 1>brought files home and hid them to try to make

0:08:56.804 --> 0:09:00.444
<v Speaker 1>sure that they would actually have evidence to prosecute. That

0:09:00.644 --> 0:09:03.964
<v Speaker 1>was not something we learned in US history, you know

0:09:04.044 --> 0:09:07.124
<v Speaker 1>that even back then, because to me it seemed, you know,

0:09:07.404 --> 0:09:09.604
<v Speaker 1>I think, because I'm not a lawyer, I don't know,

0:09:09.804 --> 0:09:12.324
<v Speaker 1>don't have a legal background. So maybe this, you know,

0:09:12.364 --> 0:09:15.764
<v Speaker 1>as just a consumer of this, it's probably quite naive

0:09:15.844 --> 0:09:17.684
<v Speaker 1>of me, But I had thought that this kind of

0:09:17.884 --> 0:09:22.524
<v Speaker 1>threat to you know, to the prosecution was more of

0:09:22.564 --> 0:09:26.404
<v Speaker 1>a modern thing, right, was something that just happened basically. Now,

0:09:26.724 --> 0:09:28.884
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that this is something that people had

0:09:28.924 --> 0:09:31.404
<v Speaker 1>been living with, and that the office was partly created

0:09:31.684 --> 0:09:32.644
<v Speaker 1>to try to mitigate that.

0:09:33.044 --> 0:09:33.524
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:09:33.524 --> 0:09:37.724
<v Speaker 1>We protect the people who were trying to run these investigations.

0:09:37.884 --> 0:09:40.244
<v Speaker 3>So the book opens with the story from Jill Wyne Banks,

0:09:40.284 --> 0:09:42.964
<v Speaker 3>who was then thirty years old, one of the Watergate prosecutors,

0:09:42.964 --> 0:09:45.804
<v Speaker 3>and she told me candidly she would bring photo copies,

0:09:45.844 --> 0:09:48.684
<v Speaker 3>not originals, but photocopies of key pieces of evidence, notes,

0:09:49.324 --> 0:09:52.284
<v Speaker 3>witness summaries home and put them in a box because

0:09:52.364 --> 0:09:56.764
<v Speaker 3>they were afraid that Nixon's goons would ransack the office,

0:09:56.844 --> 0:09:59.444
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of ended up happening and she says

0:09:59.484 --> 0:10:02.804
<v Speaker 3>to me something like, I don't know how smartly I

0:10:02.884 --> 0:10:04.604
<v Speaker 3>thought through my options, and it may have been on

0:10:04.644 --> 0:10:06.724
<v Speaker 3>the borderline of what we call Rule six e, which

0:10:06.764 --> 0:10:09.004
<v Speaker 3>is like the grand jury secrecy rules, she said, but

0:10:09.124 --> 0:10:11.444
<v Speaker 3>we like, in order to protect our investigation, we had

0:10:11.484 --> 0:10:13.604
<v Speaker 3>to do that. And I love the historical echoes in

0:10:13.644 --> 0:10:16.364
<v Speaker 3>the book because if you fast forward forty some years,

0:10:16.764 --> 0:10:19.764
<v Speaker 3>the Mueller team did almost the same thing, higher tech,

0:10:20.084 --> 0:10:22.484
<v Speaker 3>but they you know, I talked to FBI agents and

0:10:22.844 --> 0:10:25.404
<v Speaker 3>prosecutors on that team. They said, we made a point

0:10:25.444 --> 0:10:28.044
<v Speaker 3>of backing up like you back up your files every

0:10:28.124 --> 0:10:31.484
<v Speaker 3>day to an off site server, because we were worried

0:10:31.924 --> 0:10:34.204
<v Speaker 3>that same thing that Trump's people would come in and

0:10:34.324 --> 0:10:36.644
<v Speaker 3>take over and shut down the office. So when you

0:10:36.684 --> 0:10:39.564
<v Speaker 3>see those echoes, I think it tells us something about

0:10:39.724 --> 0:10:42.924
<v Speaker 3>sort of the common instinct for self preservation that both

0:10:42.964 --> 0:10:44.564
<v Speaker 3>presidents and prosecutors have.

0:10:45.644 --> 0:10:49.764
<v Speaker 2>There's got to be some like Kinkos in Arlington, Virginia

0:10:49.844 --> 0:10:52.044
<v Speaker 2>where they know every government secret from like nineteen seventy

0:10:52.044 --> 0:10:54.444
<v Speaker 2>five until what do people saw photocopy in two thousand

0:10:54.484 --> 0:10:55.284
<v Speaker 2>and five or something.

0:10:55.684 --> 0:10:57.324
<v Speaker 3>I can I tell you something along those lines of day.

0:10:57.444 --> 0:10:59.204
<v Speaker 3>So there's a moment in here when I'm talking about

0:10:59.204 --> 0:11:00.844
<v Speaker 3>the Star Report, which I don't know how old you

0:11:00.844 --> 0:11:02.684
<v Speaker 3>all are, but that, right, this is the big Ken

0:11:02.764 --> 0:11:05.764
<v Speaker 3>Star Report, and I was trying to explain to people.

0:11:05.564 --> 0:11:08.364
<v Speaker 1>Are fifty shades of gray right exactly?

0:11:08.404 --> 0:11:12.004
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, A how this broke was the first real massive

0:11:12.084 --> 0:11:13.844
<v Speaker 3>Internet moment. I mean, I remember I was in law

0:11:13.844 --> 0:11:16.364
<v Speaker 3>school at the time. I remember download download download things

0:11:16.364 --> 0:11:19.284
<v Speaker 3>were crashing, right, and there's all these articles about like

0:11:19.404 --> 0:11:22.244
<v Speaker 3>can this new thing called the internet support this? But

0:11:22.404 --> 0:11:26.324
<v Speaker 3>at one point I wrote, however many copies Borders order? Borders,

0:11:26.364 --> 0:11:28.284
<v Speaker 3>you guys both know was the big bookstore, right. I

0:11:28.284 --> 0:11:31.564
<v Speaker 3>spent half our lives in Borders as kids. And my

0:11:32.604 --> 0:11:35.124
<v Speaker 3>one of my copy editors, a much younger person, said,

0:11:35.564 --> 0:11:37.924
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have to drop a parenthetical explaining what

0:11:37.964 --> 0:11:39.724
<v Speaker 3>that is. So there is a section there where I

0:11:39.724 --> 0:11:41.524
<v Speaker 3>say borders and it's sad, but I had to have

0:11:41.804 --> 0:11:47.124
<v Speaker 3>borders Parenz, which used to be a major national bookstore Kinkos.

0:11:47.124 --> 0:11:50.204
<v Speaker 3>I think Faul would fall into the same category eight this.

0:11:50.444 --> 0:11:53.444
<v Speaker 1>I think the Star Report was a really you know,

0:11:53.524 --> 0:11:56.124
<v Speaker 1>as I could have told you before we started taping.

0:11:56.564 --> 0:11:59.484
<v Speaker 1>My first I was still in I think elementary school,

0:11:59.524 --> 0:12:01.604
<v Speaker 1>you know, when this was all happening, and it's my

0:12:01.684 --> 0:12:05.404
<v Speaker 1>first political memory, like my first big political memory was

0:12:05.764 --> 0:12:08.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, Monica Lewinski and Star and all of this.

0:12:08.524 --> 0:12:10.004
<v Speaker 1>I didn't read it too little.

0:12:10.444 --> 0:12:12.764
<v Speaker 3>It was allowed to. It was a little too.

0:12:12.684 --> 0:12:17.004
<v Speaker 1>Tittilating for the likes of me. But you know, it

0:12:17.164 --> 0:12:21.284
<v Speaker 1>was a really I think interesting moment where a lot

0:12:21.324 --> 0:12:24.604
<v Speaker 1>of people's political consciousness were awakened, like especially people who

0:12:24.644 --> 0:12:28.044
<v Speaker 1>hadn't lived through Watergate, right, who hadn't who hadn't kind

0:12:28.044 --> 0:12:32.164
<v Speaker 1>of seen the start of this. So I'd love to

0:12:32.284 --> 0:12:34.564
<v Speaker 1>just kind of talk through that as just like a

0:12:34.604 --> 0:12:38.004
<v Speaker 1>big historical moment and what it meant for how the

0:12:38.084 --> 0:12:41.284
<v Speaker 1>office went forward, because, as you point out, Clinton was

0:12:41.324 --> 0:12:44.604
<v Speaker 1>the last one to renew the law that was then

0:12:45.484 --> 0:12:47.884
<v Speaker 1>take you know, was then used to try to take him.

0:12:47.804 --> 0:12:52.484
<v Speaker 3>Down immediately boomerang. Yeah, look, Ken Starr killed the Independent

0:12:52.524 --> 0:12:54.924
<v Speaker 3>Council Law. I mean, the Independent Council Law was passed

0:12:54.924 --> 0:13:00.484
<v Speaker 3>after Watergate, signed by Jimmy Carter, and it died at Sunset.

0:13:00.564 --> 0:13:03.004
<v Speaker 3>Congress let it die in ninety nine, but it would

0:13:03.004 --> 0:13:04.804
<v Speaker 3>come up every five or ten years for renewal, and

0:13:04.844 --> 0:13:09.124
<v Speaker 3>basically every president didn't like it. Ronald Reagan's DJ concluded

0:13:09.124 --> 0:13:12.004
<v Speaker 3>that it was unconstitutional, but he was like, politically, he

0:13:12.004 --> 0:13:13.604
<v Speaker 3>felt he had no choice. He had to sign it.

0:13:13.724 --> 0:13:16.284
<v Speaker 3>When it came up for the final reauthorization in ninety four,

0:13:16.724 --> 0:13:19.964
<v Speaker 3>George H. W. Bush, the father who Clinton had just

0:13:20.004 --> 0:13:23.084
<v Speaker 3>defeated in the ninety two election, counseled him like, as

0:13:23.084 --> 0:13:25.924
<v Speaker 3>a fellow president, you're not gonna want to sign this thing.

0:13:25.924 --> 0:13:28.604
<v Speaker 3>But Clinton also felt he had no choice signs it

0:13:28.644 --> 0:13:31.524
<v Speaker 3>and then it becomes the bane of his existence. And

0:13:31.604 --> 0:13:35.004
<v Speaker 3>you know, that is such a memorable moment. I mean,

0:13:35.044 --> 0:13:37.284
<v Speaker 3>I was in law school. People may not realize how

0:13:37.364 --> 0:13:39.644
<v Speaker 3>much on the razor's edge we were. I mean there

0:13:39.684 --> 0:13:41.684
<v Speaker 3>was a moment when Bill Clinton calls a press conference

0:13:41.724 --> 0:13:44.244
<v Speaker 3>and we didn't know is he resigning or is Al

0:13:44.324 --> 0:13:48.044
<v Speaker 3>Gore going to be president by tonight? And you know,

0:13:48.084 --> 0:13:51.004
<v Speaker 3>I talk about how some of the indelible lines I

0:13:51.004 --> 0:13:53.884
<v Speaker 3>give the backstory. Right, the two probably most famous lines

0:13:53.964 --> 0:13:56.324
<v Speaker 3>or infamous lines from that whole thing are, I did

0:13:56.324 --> 0:13:59.244
<v Speaker 3>not have sexual relations with that woman, miss Lumis. That's

0:13:59.244 --> 0:14:01.644
<v Speaker 3>my Clinton and the other one is it depends on

0:14:01.684 --> 0:14:04.924
<v Speaker 3>what the meaning of is is. And I give the

0:14:04.964 --> 0:14:06.804
<v Speaker 3>backstory on both of them. I won't give it all

0:14:06.804 --> 0:14:08.684
<v Speaker 3>the way, but I'll just tell you that one of

0:14:08.724 --> 0:14:10.844
<v Speaker 3>the people I intern was the prosecute so ken Star

0:14:10.884 --> 0:14:13.404
<v Speaker 3>passed away a few years ago, but his number two

0:14:13.484 --> 0:14:15.724
<v Speaker 3>was a guy named Saul Weisenberg, who asked the question

0:14:15.764 --> 0:14:17.804
<v Speaker 3>that Bill Clinton answered, it depends on what the meaning

0:14:17.844 --> 0:14:20.524
<v Speaker 3>of is is. I also talked to Bill Clinton's lawyers,

0:14:20.524 --> 0:14:22.764
<v Speaker 3>Whore and the White House lawyers who were by his side.

0:14:22.924 --> 0:14:25.044
<v Speaker 3>But I asked Weisenberg. I said, how did you feel

0:14:25.044 --> 0:14:28.324
<v Speaker 3>when he gave you that answer? And Wisemberg said he

0:14:28.324 --> 0:14:30.124
<v Speaker 3>was very honest. He goes, Look, I'll tell you the truth.

0:14:30.684 --> 0:14:33.444
<v Speaker 3>That was a four hour timeframe that we had. That

0:14:33.564 --> 0:14:35.564
<v Speaker 3>was about three hours in and up to that point

0:14:35.604 --> 0:14:38.084
<v Speaker 3>Clinton was kicking our ass. We didn't get anything out

0:14:38.124 --> 0:14:40.444
<v Speaker 3>of him. He looked in control, he goes, But when

0:14:40.484 --> 0:14:43.604
<v Speaker 3>he gave that answer, he looked so smarty, and what

0:14:43.644 --> 0:14:46.204
<v Speaker 3>he said was so ridiculous. He was a former DOJ lawyer.

0:14:46.244 --> 0:14:48.164
<v Speaker 3>He said, if I was trying this case to a jury,

0:14:48.164 --> 0:14:50.044
<v Speaker 3>I would have turned to them and been like, can

0:14:50.084 --> 0:14:52.164
<v Speaker 3>you believe this guy? And of course that's you know,

0:14:52.324 --> 0:14:54.684
<v Speaker 3>that's the moment that lives on from that. That's a

0:14:54.724 --> 0:14:56.364
<v Speaker 3>precipitous moment in history right there.

0:14:56.644 --> 0:15:01.244
<v Speaker 2>When did this all kind of become a partisan hellscape

0:15:01.564 --> 0:15:03.684
<v Speaker 2>in your opinion, Elias? I mean, how much it was

0:15:05.124 --> 0:15:07.484
<v Speaker 2>during the Clinton years or has it just been upping

0:15:07.484 --> 0:15:09.924
<v Speaker 2>the ante one presidency at a time.

0:15:10.324 --> 0:15:13.724
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's always been somewhat. I don't know if partisan

0:15:13.804 --> 0:15:15.284
<v Speaker 3>in the early days is quite the right word, but

0:15:15.324 --> 0:15:17.924
<v Speaker 3>it's always been a battle. I mean, everyone's always circled

0:15:17.924 --> 0:15:21.524
<v Speaker 3>the wagons and geared up for survival Watergate. When you

0:15:21.564 --> 0:15:24.924
<v Speaker 3>look back at it is shockingly non partisan, right like

0:15:25.324 --> 0:15:28.644
<v Speaker 3>people within DJ stood up to him. I have scenes

0:15:28.684 --> 0:15:31.244
<v Speaker 3>in there on the Sunday morning after the Saturday Night

0:15:31.284 --> 0:15:34.084
<v Speaker 3>massacre where the team is wondering, have we all been.

0:15:34.044 --> 0:15:36.564
<v Speaker 1>By the way, for our listeners who don't know, Saturday

0:15:36.644 --> 0:15:37.684
<v Speaker 1>Night ostacer.

0:15:37.604 --> 0:15:40.244
<v Speaker 3>That was when Nixon fired the special counsel, and then

0:15:40.284 --> 0:15:43.444
<v Speaker 3>the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General resigned rather than fire,

0:15:43.604 --> 0:15:46.164
<v Speaker 3>So the three top officials were all gone. And I

0:15:46.204 --> 0:15:48.764
<v Speaker 3>talked to the players. They they came in Sunday morning

0:15:48.764 --> 0:15:51.084
<v Speaker 3>and they didn't know there was actually an erroneous report

0:15:51.084 --> 0:15:52.444
<v Speaker 3>in the top New York Times that they had all

0:15:52.484 --> 0:15:55.124
<v Speaker 3>been fired, but they hadn't, and Archibald Cox comes in

0:15:55.164 --> 0:15:57.204
<v Speaker 3>and says to them, basically, you keep doing this work,

0:15:57.244 --> 0:15:59.604
<v Speaker 3>don't give him what he wants. Two weeks later, there's

0:15:59.644 --> 0:16:02.084
<v Speaker 3>a new special prosecutor and ends up, you know, ends

0:16:02.124 --> 0:16:05.804
<v Speaker 3>up resulting in Nixon's resignation. I think it got really ugly,

0:16:06.604 --> 0:16:09.764
<v Speaker 3>you know Clinton. I think Clinton ken starrs when people

0:16:09.844 --> 0:16:13.564
<v Speaker 3>really took their sides and people really dug in. And

0:16:13.604 --> 0:16:16.284
<v Speaker 3>we've seen that certainly with the Jack Smith Trump case,

0:16:16.364 --> 0:16:19.924
<v Speaker 3>both sides, certainly with the Joe Biden Robert her classified

0:16:19.964 --> 0:16:23.484
<v Speaker 3>documents case. I mean, I think everything since Clinton has

0:16:23.524 --> 0:16:27.364
<v Speaker 3>been pretty politicized. Maybe not the Scooter Libby Pat Fitzgerald case.

0:16:27.404 --> 0:16:29.804
<v Speaker 3>That one was George Bush was the president was like

0:16:30.164 --> 0:16:33.644
<v Speaker 3>he was fairly supportive of that investigation happening, but everything

0:16:33.684 --> 0:16:35.644
<v Speaker 3>else has become just partisan warfare since then.

0:16:36.244 --> 0:16:39.124
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting that you would put it that in that

0:16:39.204 --> 0:16:41.844
<v Speaker 1>modern era, because you know, in the book, when you

0:16:41.924 --> 0:16:44.444
<v Speaker 1>kind of give our Whiskey scandal that we started the

0:16:44.444 --> 0:16:47.524
<v Speaker 1>show with, you say that that was really the playbook

0:16:47.564 --> 0:16:50.324
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of still being used to this day, right

0:16:50.404 --> 0:16:54.724
<v Speaker 1>that we've had the bones of this for centuries.

0:16:54.924 --> 0:16:57.964
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean, I mean the moves that were made,

0:16:58.044 --> 0:17:00.084
<v Speaker 3>like why does Grant appoint a special counsel because he

0:17:00.084 --> 0:17:02.924
<v Speaker 3>feels political pressure because his opponent says, I found this

0:17:03.044 --> 0:17:05.004
<v Speaker 3>scandal and Greg goes, well, well, hold on, we're going

0:17:05.084 --> 0:17:06.364
<v Speaker 3>to take care of it. We're going to appoint an

0:17:06.364 --> 0:17:10.124
<v Speaker 3>independent guy. That guy goes out, he starts making headway.

0:17:10.644 --> 0:17:13.484
<v Speaker 3>When he gets too close, Grant fires. Grant actually tries

0:17:13.524 --> 0:17:16.604
<v Speaker 3>to do a move that Nixon did a century later.

0:17:16.684 --> 0:17:20.244
<v Speaker 3>Grant tries to have a military tributal takeover. Nixon tried

0:17:20.244 --> 0:17:22.444
<v Speaker 3>to have the CIA takeover, but both of them failed,

0:17:22.924 --> 0:17:25.524
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately it becomes finger pointing both ways, and the

0:17:25.564 --> 0:17:28.484
<v Speaker 3>media says he's you know, he's covering up, and Grant says,

0:17:28.484 --> 0:17:29.724
<v Speaker 3>the media is. I mean, he might as well have

0:17:29.764 --> 0:17:31.844
<v Speaker 3>called it fake news. He didn't use that phrase, but

0:17:31.924 --> 0:17:35.484
<v Speaker 3>he all but says that in eighteen seventies speak. So

0:17:36.764 --> 0:17:39.964
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to understand, you know, people who've

0:17:40.044 --> 0:17:43.724
<v Speaker 3>only been really following this since Muller think it's brand new.

0:17:44.644 --> 0:17:47.484
<v Speaker 3>What's happening now Trump two point zero is brand new.

0:17:47.804 --> 0:17:51.324
<v Speaker 3>But really from Grant through the Jack Smith case, there's

0:17:51.364 --> 0:17:53.804
<v Speaker 3>a lot of connective tissue. Yeah.

0:17:53.044 --> 0:17:56.444
<v Speaker 2>I always try to emphasize when people are understanding the

0:17:56.484 --> 0:18:00.244
<v Speaker 2>current very polarized moment in politics that like, you know,

0:18:01.924 --> 0:18:05.244
<v Speaker 2>maybe my generation of political reporters, or maybe maybe one

0:18:05.284 --> 0:18:08.844
<v Speaker 2>generation older than me, probably right, but not two generations

0:18:09.404 --> 0:18:12.204
<v Speaker 2>we have grew up in like the lore of post

0:18:12.244 --> 0:18:15.844
<v Speaker 2>World War two elections, right, Yeah, the fifties, the sixties,

0:18:16.324 --> 0:18:19.164
<v Speaker 2>the seventies, and if you look historically, this is a

0:18:19.204 --> 0:18:23.164
<v Speaker 2>time of a very low polarization relative to the baseline,

0:18:23.284 --> 0:18:26.164
<v Speaker 2>and a time when the fifties in particular, you know,

0:18:26.324 --> 0:18:28.764
<v Speaker 2>the United States is doing very well. We had a

0:18:28.764 --> 0:18:30.764
<v Speaker 2>common enemy, we defeated in World War Two. You have

0:18:30.804 --> 0:18:34.004
<v Speaker 2>this baby boom, this prosperity boom. Right, we have the

0:18:34.044 --> 0:18:38.364
<v Speaker 2>space race. Right, things are looking up. That's so great

0:18:38.404 --> 0:18:41.244
<v Speaker 2>if you're a minority in the nineteen fifties or a

0:18:41.244 --> 0:18:43.644
<v Speaker 2>woman or day or whatever else. Right, But like, but

0:18:43.804 --> 0:18:46.444
<v Speaker 2>you know, people, society had less conflic than it does now.

0:18:46.484 --> 0:18:47.884
<v Speaker 2>And you go before that to the turn of the

0:18:47.884 --> 0:18:52.404
<v Speaker 2>previous century, we had a civil war, Right, partisanship is

0:18:52.484 --> 0:18:55.564
<v Speaker 2>kind of the norm. But Ellie, but you do think that, like,

0:18:56.404 --> 0:19:02.764
<v Speaker 2>it's not just MSNBC exaggeration when people say what Trump

0:19:02.844 --> 0:19:07.204
<v Speaker 2>is doing is is much worse. Half an order of

0:19:07.244 --> 0:19:09.844
<v Speaker 2>magnitude worse or an order magnitude worse than we've seen before.

0:19:10.204 --> 0:19:13.404
<v Speaker 3>I often disagree with MSNBC, but I do think it's

0:19:13.444 --> 0:19:16.364
<v Speaker 3>accurate to say that about what's happening right now this part,

0:19:16.404 --> 0:19:20.604
<v Speaker 3>because what's different is every president up until now, and

0:19:20.644 --> 0:19:23.484
<v Speaker 3>I include Trump won in that every president up until

0:19:23.484 --> 0:19:26.324
<v Speaker 3>now has at least understood there does need to be

0:19:26.404 --> 0:19:30.844
<v Speaker 3>some sort of outside prosecutorial mechanism, whether they're investigating the

0:19:30.964 --> 0:19:33.604
<v Speaker 3>president or someone around him, or maybe they're kind of quiet.

0:19:33.604 --> 0:19:37.004
<v Speaker 3>There wasn't much of this during the Bush or Obama eras,

0:19:37.804 --> 0:19:40.364
<v Speaker 3>but that I do need to respect this, I do

0:19:40.444 --> 0:19:42.364
<v Speaker 3>need to let it go. Look, every president or most

0:19:42.404 --> 0:19:44.884
<v Speaker 3>presidents who've been involved in these cases have tried to

0:19:44.964 --> 0:19:47.924
<v Speaker 3>undermine them or obstruct them to some degree. But Trump

0:19:47.924 --> 0:19:49.364
<v Speaker 3>has just come in now and said, oh, we're not

0:19:49.404 --> 0:19:52.124
<v Speaker 3>even going down that road any There will be no

0:19:52.284 --> 0:19:56.204
<v Speaker 3>inward looking investigation at me, Donald Trump or anyone around me.

0:19:56.324 --> 0:19:58.684
<v Speaker 3>And more to the point, and this gets to the title,

0:19:59.204 --> 0:20:02.044
<v Speaker 3>anyone who looked at me in the past is now

0:20:02.124 --> 0:20:05.284
<v Speaker 3>getting investigated. It's when you come at the king and

0:20:05.324 --> 0:20:08.004
<v Speaker 3>also Nate to your other point, you know, I spoke

0:20:08.044 --> 0:20:10.564
<v Speaker 3>to Carl Bernstein for this book, who I know through CNN.

0:20:10.604 --> 0:20:13.324
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Carl was the legendary Washington Post reporter who

0:20:13.764 --> 0:20:16.684
<v Speaker 3>helped break the whole Watergate story. And I said, how

0:20:16.724 --> 0:20:19.444
<v Speaker 3>did this take so long to play out? Like Nixon

0:20:19.484 --> 0:20:23.564
<v Speaker 3>survived ten months after that Saturday night massacre during the

0:20:23.604 --> 0:20:26.844
<v Speaker 3>seventy two election. People may not realize this Watergate break

0:20:26.884 --> 0:20:29.844
<v Speaker 3>in happened before that. And Carl had already linked a

0:20:30.004 --> 0:20:33.644
<v Speaker 3>check from the burglars to a Nixon campaign, and Nixon

0:20:33.724 --> 0:20:36.484
<v Speaker 3>won wins, you know, fift forty nine states and five

0:20:36.564 --> 0:20:39.924
<v Speaker 3>hundred something electoral votes in seventy two. And I said

0:20:39.924 --> 0:20:42.084
<v Speaker 3>to Carl, like, how could this be? And he sort

0:20:42.084 --> 0:20:44.204
<v Speaker 3>of was, He's great, but he was sort of like, okay,

0:20:44.204 --> 0:20:46.444
<v Speaker 3>young man, let me explain something detail. But he basically

0:20:46.484 --> 0:20:50.004
<v Speaker 3>said things were different then. He said, by and large,

0:20:50.044 --> 0:20:53.404
<v Speaker 3>if the president denied something, you didn't automatically take him

0:20:53.444 --> 0:20:55.684
<v Speaker 3>at his word. But the public was much more likely

0:20:55.724 --> 0:20:58.084
<v Speaker 3>to give him the benefit of the doubt, as was Congress.

0:20:58.324 --> 0:21:00.364
<v Speaker 3>And he said things just move slower back then, like

0:21:00.444 --> 0:21:02.724
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't this twenty four hour boom boom news culture,

0:21:02.764 --> 0:21:05.084
<v Speaker 3>social media, so you know, but when I sat down,

0:21:05.284 --> 0:21:06.804
<v Speaker 3>the one point in the book where I sort of

0:21:06.804 --> 0:21:10.044
<v Speaker 3>cop out and just have a timeline is because it's

0:21:10.084 --> 0:21:12.804
<v Speaker 3>so confusing, and I think I just said, boom boom,

0:21:12.804 --> 0:21:15.804
<v Speaker 3>this happened, This happened, this happened, and then we do analysis,

0:21:15.884 --> 0:21:17.804
<v Speaker 3>but like you have to have that because I cannot

0:21:17.804 --> 0:21:19.444
<v Speaker 3>believe how long it took for that to play on.

0:21:19.444 --> 0:21:21.404
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe how long he survived politically.

0:21:21.924 --> 0:21:26.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you know, bridging, bridging those kind of two

0:21:26.844 --> 0:21:30.084
<v Speaker 1>things together kind of from the Watergate era two nights

0:21:30.164 --> 0:21:34.804
<v Speaker 1>question just now, and how different right Trump two point

0:21:34.884 --> 0:21:37.124
<v Speaker 1>zero is because you write in the book that he,

0:21:37.444 --> 0:21:40.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump one point oh, the original hadn't quote

0:21:40.284 --> 0:21:43.604
<v Speaker 1>fully grasped the lovers of executive pet power, yeah, unquote,

0:21:43.964 --> 0:21:46.084
<v Speaker 1>and now he definitely has. Right the second time around,

0:21:46.164 --> 0:21:47.964
<v Speaker 1>he knows you.

0:21:47.964 --> 0:21:50.524
<v Speaker 3>Just flip it off, Okay, exactly.

0:21:50.404 --> 0:21:53.804
<v Speaker 1>That's what you do to that. And I was actually

0:21:53.884 --> 0:21:57.764
<v Speaker 1>curious under kind of the current regime, right, what has

0:21:57.804 --> 0:22:01.324
<v Speaker 1>happened right now? And kind of the really weird definition

0:22:01.444 --> 0:22:05.484
<v Speaker 1>of presidential immunity right kind of all of that. Do

0:22:05.564 --> 0:22:08.324
<v Speaker 1>we think that all of the cases that you write

0:22:08.324 --> 0:22:10.964
<v Speaker 1>about in the book, including Gate, could they happen today?

0:22:11.164 --> 0:22:11.324
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:22:11.684 --> 0:22:14.244
<v Speaker 1>Like if something like that happened, if we had a

0:22:14.284 --> 0:22:16.244
<v Speaker 1>Watergate level scandal right now.

0:22:16.364 --> 0:22:19.564
<v Speaker 3>The realistic answer is today, you know, September of twenty

0:22:19.604 --> 0:22:22.524
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. No, because Donald Trump's president and Pambondi's ag

0:22:23.164 --> 0:22:25.284
<v Speaker 3>And I mean, if if you had any question about

0:22:25.284 --> 0:22:26.564
<v Speaker 3>that to me, there was a sort of moment of

0:22:26.644 --> 0:22:29.284
<v Speaker 3>truth with Pambondy a few months ago when the signal

0:22:29.324 --> 0:22:32.084
<v Speaker 3>scandal broke out, right, Mike Waltz and others were using

0:22:32.164 --> 0:22:35.324
<v Speaker 3>this non secure app and discussing military plans. And I

0:22:35.364 --> 0:22:37.204
<v Speaker 3>point out in the book every time we've had any

0:22:37.244 --> 0:22:40.724
<v Speaker 3>sort of classified documents issue before, it's been at least

0:22:40.764 --> 0:22:44.444
<v Speaker 3>an investigation Hillary Clinton's email, Joe Biden, or an investigation

0:22:44.524 --> 0:22:47.124
<v Speaker 3>and an indictment. Donald Trump was indicted for that. And

0:22:47.164 --> 0:22:51.684
<v Speaker 3>Pam Bondi comes out three days after no investigation and says, no,

0:22:51.964 --> 0:22:53.924
<v Speaker 3>nothing to see here. We're not investigating and you all

0:22:53.924 --> 0:22:56.404
<v Speaker 3>should be focused on the success of the military strike

0:22:56.684 --> 0:22:58.644
<v Speaker 3>more than anything else. That was it. What would have

0:22:58.644 --> 0:23:01.324
<v Speaker 3>happened in almost any prior administration, as DJ would have

0:23:01.524 --> 0:23:04.364
<v Speaker 3>convened an investigation. We're taking this very seriously, and six

0:23:04.404 --> 0:23:06.644
<v Speaker 3>months later, maybe they would have issued some report, maybe

0:23:06.644 --> 0:23:08.924
<v Speaker 3>they would have found someone needed to be indicted, But

0:23:09.884 --> 0:23:12.644
<v Speaker 3>here Pambondi was just slammed the door before it could

0:23:12.644 --> 0:23:15.364
<v Speaker 3>even start. Now, I don't think it has to be

0:23:15.484 --> 0:23:18.164
<v Speaker 3>this way forever. And essentially the pitch I make in

0:23:18.204 --> 0:23:22.764
<v Speaker 3>the book is, whenever president comes next forty eight, whoever

0:23:22.764 --> 0:23:26.284
<v Speaker 3>that is, you, sir or ma'am, are going to find

0:23:26.284 --> 0:23:28.644
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of guardrails have been kicked down, and

0:23:28.684 --> 0:23:30.884
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be mighty tempting for you to leave them down,

0:23:30.924 --> 0:23:34.404
<v Speaker 3>because who wants ethics, who wants restrictions on private profits?

0:23:34.724 --> 0:23:38.564
<v Speaker 3>Who wants special counsel, who wants inspectors general? But this

0:23:38.724 --> 0:23:41.164
<v Speaker 3>one is too important And if we just let this

0:23:41.204 --> 0:23:44.004
<v Speaker 3>one stay dead, then we're gonna have big problems down

0:23:44.044 --> 0:23:48.124
<v Speaker 3>the line.

0:23:48.764 --> 0:23:50.164
<v Speaker 1>And we'll be back right after this.

0:24:06.084 --> 0:24:07.324
<v Speaker 2>How bad was Watergate?

0:24:07.444 --> 0:24:07.644
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:24:07.724 --> 0:24:11.044
<v Speaker 2>Because you hear about like a quarterback or baseball play,

0:24:11.124 --> 0:24:14.804
<v Speaker 2>you know, Reggie Jackson hit whatever forty seven home runs

0:24:14.804 --> 0:24:16.044
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty eight or whatever?

0:24:16.204 --> 0:24:17.604
<v Speaker 3>Are we doing like era inflation?

0:24:18.804 --> 0:24:21.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, like if wanting it happened today.

0:24:22.284 --> 0:24:24.604
<v Speaker 3>Would it be It's a good yeah, that's a good question.

0:24:24.644 --> 0:24:27.324
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's think about it. So let's let's use

0:24:27.324 --> 0:24:28.684
<v Speaker 3>a real life example who do you want to be

0:24:28.724 --> 0:24:31.644
<v Speaker 3>the bad guys? Democrats are Republicans. Let's make democrats, let's

0:24:31.644 --> 0:24:34.084
<v Speaker 3>say democrats. Let's flip it. Let's flip it. If it

0:24:34.164 --> 0:24:36.604
<v Speaker 3>turned out that a group of burglars had broken into

0:24:36.604 --> 0:24:39.004
<v Speaker 3>the RNC or hacked into an R and C server

0:24:39.644 --> 0:24:42.684
<v Speaker 3>and downloaded a bunch of stuff, and then that was

0:24:42.764 --> 0:24:46.724
<v Speaker 3>tied back to let's say Joe Biden, and it turned

0:24:46.764 --> 0:24:48.884
<v Speaker 3>out Biden knew about it and was in on a

0:24:48.964 --> 0:24:51.844
<v Speaker 3>cover up, that'd be I think that'd be pretty bad, head,

0:24:52.044 --> 0:24:54.804
<v Speaker 3>I mean, right, But then again, I mean if you

0:24:54.844 --> 0:24:56.364
<v Speaker 3>look at some of this stuff Trump, I mean, January

0:24:56.404 --> 0:24:58.884
<v Speaker 3>sixth is hard to compare to anything, you know, the

0:24:58.884 --> 0:25:01.924
<v Speaker 3>possession of classified documents, but I think it's pretty bad.

0:25:01.964 --> 0:25:04.124
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't you know, I look back at Watergate

0:25:04.164 --> 0:25:06.644
<v Speaker 3>and see it as this had to happen. I look

0:25:06.724 --> 0:25:09.564
<v Speaker 3>back at ken Starr and think that was an out

0:25:09.604 --> 0:25:12.404
<v Speaker 3>of control prosecutor, and I think that's I'm certainly not

0:25:12.444 --> 0:25:15.564
<v Speaker 3>alone with that many many Republicans. I mean Clinton left

0:25:15.564 --> 0:25:18.524
<v Speaker 3>office in one Nate, this is up your alley with

0:25:18.564 --> 0:25:22.004
<v Speaker 3>a sixty six percent gallop approval rating, in large part

0:25:22.044 --> 0:25:24.804
<v Speaker 3>because of backlash over the ridiculous impeachment. And by the

0:25:24.804 --> 0:25:27.804
<v Speaker 3>way I talked to in the book, the prosecutor Bob Ray,

0:25:27.924 --> 0:25:31.084
<v Speaker 3>who replaced Ken Starr, comes in at the end and

0:25:31.204 --> 0:25:34.644
<v Speaker 3>he has the unfortunate the impeachment's already over, the failed impeachment.

0:25:34.924 --> 0:25:38.284
<v Speaker 3>He's got to decide, will you indict Bill Clinton? And

0:25:38.324 --> 0:25:40.244
<v Speaker 3>I said to him, Bob, you gotta be kidding me.

0:25:40.284 --> 0:25:42.444
<v Speaker 3>There's no way you're gonna indict in two thousand and

0:25:42.444 --> 0:25:46.524
<v Speaker 3>one Bill Clinton, for you'll never get a single vote

0:25:46.524 --> 0:25:49.364
<v Speaker 3>to convict him. And Bob basically ninety nine percent of

0:25:49.364 --> 0:25:51.244
<v Speaker 3>the way, And the book says, we had all the

0:25:51.244 --> 0:25:53.564
<v Speaker 3>pieces in place. If he didn't reach an agreement with us,

0:25:53.564 --> 0:25:55.004
<v Speaker 3>we would do what we had to do. Now, he

0:25:55.084 --> 0:25:57.604
<v Speaker 3>ended up paying a fine twenty five thousand dollars and

0:25:57.684 --> 0:26:00.924
<v Speaker 3>making a sort of Clintonian statement about misleading the American

0:26:00.964 --> 0:26:04.204
<v Speaker 3>public and giving up his bar license. But I mean,

0:26:04.284 --> 0:26:07.404
<v Speaker 3>I'm shocked by that. But Bob said, I'm glad that

0:26:07.524 --> 0:26:09.164
<v Speaker 3>I didn't it didn't come to that. I'm glad he

0:26:09.204 --> 0:26:11.364
<v Speaker 3>took a deal. And Bob said, by the way, if

0:26:11.404 --> 0:26:13.604
<v Speaker 3>we had indicted him, we could have had a situation

0:26:13.644 --> 0:26:16.484
<v Speaker 3>where we had a president sitting in the dock of

0:26:16.484 --> 0:26:19.444
<v Speaker 3>a criminal courtroom eight months later, nine months later when

0:26:19.484 --> 0:26:21.524
<v Speaker 3>nine to eleven happens, and that would have been Can

0:26:21.564 --> 0:26:23.604
<v Speaker 3>you imagine how horrible that would have been. So, you know,

0:26:23.924 --> 0:26:25.524
<v Speaker 3>it's crazy to me to think that he might have

0:26:25.604 --> 0:26:27.604
<v Speaker 3>indicted Clinton, But if Clinton had said I'm not giving

0:26:27.644 --> 0:26:30.444
<v Speaker 3>an inch, it's pretty clear that he would have been indicted.

0:26:30.484 --> 0:26:32.284
<v Speaker 3>He would have been equitted, but he would have been indicted.

0:26:33.324 --> 0:26:36.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's really interesting to me when you know,

0:26:36.404 --> 0:26:38.644
<v Speaker 1>when reading this book, and obviously there were some cases

0:26:38.684 --> 0:26:41.964
<v Speaker 1>that I knew and others that I hadn't heard of before.

0:26:42.724 --> 0:26:44.684
<v Speaker 3>It's no listen, nobody knows all these.

0:26:45.764 --> 0:26:52.724
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, the this wide spectrum of seriousness

0:26:52.924 --> 0:26:54.444
<v Speaker 1>is actually quite eye opening.

0:26:54.764 --> 0:26:54.924
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:26:54.964 --> 0:26:57.364
<v Speaker 1>You have you have things that you're like, okay, like

0:26:57.444 --> 0:27:00.124
<v Speaker 1>I understand, and then you have things that just seem petty,

0:27:00.484 --> 0:27:04.124
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, why are we investigating this? And then

0:27:04.164 --> 0:27:05.844
<v Speaker 1>you realize, and you point this out in the book,

0:27:05.924 --> 0:27:08.404
<v Speaker 1>that the blame isn't just with the special prosecutor. You know,

0:27:08.764 --> 0:27:12.124
<v Speaker 1>it's with people like Reno who say, yes, you know,

0:27:12.324 --> 0:27:13.924
<v Speaker 1>we should we should do this.

0:27:14.164 --> 0:27:15.684
<v Speaker 3>Expand into Monica lays.

0:27:15.444 --> 0:27:20.564
<v Speaker 1>Sad, Yeah, into Lewinsky and they're just some some the

0:27:20.604 --> 0:27:23.604
<v Speaker 1>scale of it seems totally off, and I feel like

0:27:23.644 --> 0:27:25.764
<v Speaker 1>maybe we wouldn't be where we are today if it

0:27:25.804 --> 0:27:29.164
<v Speaker 1>had been more uniformally applied.

0:27:29.324 --> 0:27:31.484
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it needs to be applied judicially. I

0:27:31.524 --> 0:27:34.404
<v Speaker 3>mean some of these cases where special councils were appointed

0:27:34.444 --> 0:27:37.044
<v Speaker 3>are preposterous. The first, this is one of my favorite facts,

0:27:37.244 --> 0:27:39.964
<v Speaker 3>the first ever independent council. So Watergate happens, we get

0:27:39.964 --> 0:27:42.684
<v Speaker 3>this new law. In seventy eight, the first ever special

0:27:42.724 --> 0:27:46.484
<v Speaker 3>council was appointed to our independent council was appointed to

0:27:46.524 --> 0:27:52.124
<v Speaker 3>investigate alleged cocaine use by a White House, a White

0:27:52.164 --> 0:27:54.964
<v Speaker 3>House advisor at Studio fifty four in Manhattan. I mean,

0:27:55.004 --> 0:27:59.004
<v Speaker 3>what could be more disco era than that? And you know,

0:27:59.084 --> 0:28:00.964
<v Speaker 3>the main guy they talked to was some Johnny C,

0:28:01.244 --> 0:28:03.444
<v Speaker 3>some drug guy at Studio fifty four who was like,

0:28:03.484 --> 0:28:05.164
<v Speaker 3>I think I might have given some guy a two.

0:28:05.564 --> 0:28:07.364
<v Speaker 3>And of course that didn't ever get charged, you know

0:28:07.364 --> 0:28:08.684
<v Speaker 3>they I mean a lot of times the right move

0:28:08.764 --> 0:28:13.124
<v Speaker 3>is you don't charge. But I think he was the

0:28:13.164 --> 0:28:17.164
<v Speaker 3>chief of staff. What's his name, Hamilton Jorden. It spelled

0:28:17.244 --> 0:28:19.724
<v Speaker 3>Jordan j O r Dam, but it's pronounced Jorden as

0:28:19.724 --> 0:28:22.124
<v Speaker 3>I learned during my audiobook, so it was the chief

0:28:22.164 --> 0:28:24.324
<v Speaker 3>of staff to the White House. In fact, the second

0:28:24.564 --> 0:28:27.404
<v Speaker 3>investigation was also a guy using coke. I mean, it

0:28:27.404 --> 0:28:30.244
<v Speaker 3>couldn't be more seventies. But I think I think the

0:28:30.284 --> 0:28:33.084
<v Speaker 3>bar has been raised, and I think people on both

0:28:33.084 --> 0:28:36.684
<v Speaker 3>sides politicians generally now understand we're not going to appoint

0:28:36.724 --> 0:28:40.404
<v Speaker 3>special counsel on pitdling matters. Although you could look at

0:28:40.444 --> 0:28:43.404
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Biden, that prosecutor, and I talked to Hunter's team,

0:28:44.044 --> 0:28:47.924
<v Speaker 3>Abby Lowell, his lawyer, who ferociously objected to this. It

0:28:47.964 --> 0:28:51.164
<v Speaker 3>was a gun and tax case on an Indi private individual.

0:28:51.684 --> 0:28:53.764
<v Speaker 3>And I think there's a lot of criticism to be

0:28:53.804 --> 0:28:57.444
<v Speaker 3>had of Merrick Garland for agreeing to turn that prosecutor,

0:28:57.564 --> 0:29:00.844
<v Speaker 3>David Wise, from a regular DOJ prosecutor. Then he decides

0:29:00.844 --> 0:29:02.844
<v Speaker 3>he wants to be special counsel, and Garland says sure,

0:29:02.884 --> 0:29:04.644
<v Speaker 3>but I think that was a mistake, and I think

0:29:04.924 --> 0:29:06.324
<v Speaker 3>I think you do have to look at what's the

0:29:06.364 --> 0:29:07.804
<v Speaker 3>seriousness of the charges here.

0:29:08.044 --> 0:29:11.924
<v Speaker 2>So do you do you think Democrats came and missed

0:29:12.804 --> 0:29:15.364
<v Speaker 2>with Trump? Do they not go hard enough on the

0:29:15.364 --> 0:29:16.044
<v Speaker 2>best cases?

0:29:16.804 --> 0:29:19.484
<v Speaker 3>So the short answers yes, And the person who I

0:29:19.564 --> 0:29:21.604
<v Speaker 3>laid most flame at in the book is Merrick Garland

0:29:21.684 --> 0:29:25.004
<v Speaker 3>because Jackson. The first sentence of the Jack Smith chapter

0:29:25.204 --> 0:29:28.444
<v Speaker 3>is jack Smith never had a chance because by the

0:29:28.524 --> 0:29:31.884
<v Speaker 3>time Merrick Garland wastes two years and appoints Jack Smith's

0:29:31.884 --> 0:29:35.644
<v Speaker 3>special counsel in November of twenty twenty two, almost two years.

0:29:36.044 --> 0:29:38.204
<v Speaker 3>I wrote in my prior book, which came out in

0:29:38.284 --> 0:29:41.644
<v Speaker 3>mid twenty twenty two, it's already too late. I quoted

0:29:41.684 --> 0:29:43.564
<v Speaker 3>the movie Searching for Bobby Fisher, which I don't know

0:29:43.564 --> 0:29:45.844
<v Speaker 3>if you guys seen a great movie, right, Chess Prodigy movie, yep,

0:29:45.884 --> 0:29:48.084
<v Speaker 3>And the kid says to his opponent, you've already lost.

0:29:48.124 --> 0:29:50.324
<v Speaker 3>You just don't know it yet. And it turned out

0:29:50.324 --> 0:29:52.964
<v Speaker 3>that was correct. There was never any way, if you

0:29:53.044 --> 0:29:56.484
<v Speaker 3>know how long federal prosecutions take, if you knew, which

0:29:56.564 --> 0:29:58.044
<v Speaker 3>we did, because I wrote about in my last book,

0:29:58.044 --> 0:29:59.644
<v Speaker 3>they were going to have to deal with the immunity issue.

0:29:59.684 --> 0:30:01.484
<v Speaker 3>It was going to go to the Supreme Court. There

0:30:01.524 --> 0:30:03.404
<v Speaker 3>was never any way jack Smith was going to get

0:30:03.404 --> 0:30:07.924
<v Speaker 3>his case done tried before the twenty twenty four election. Now,

0:30:07.924 --> 0:30:10.484
<v Speaker 3>if Trump had lost, okay, you know, you try him later.

0:30:10.764 --> 0:30:12.324
<v Speaker 3>But you always knew there was at least a fifty

0:30:12.324 --> 0:30:15.324
<v Speaker 3>to fifty chance Trump would win, So they took that

0:30:15.444 --> 0:30:17.164
<v Speaker 3>risk and they lost. But I think there's there's a

0:30:17.164 --> 0:30:20.084
<v Speaker 3>lot of discussion in here about why Merrick Garland, you

0:30:20.124 --> 0:30:23.564
<v Speaker 3>know the fact that Merrick Garland took too long, and look,

0:30:23.604 --> 0:30:28.324
<v Speaker 3>does that justify retribution? Absolutely not. But Trump has now

0:30:28.364 --> 0:30:30.724
<v Speaker 3>you know, they shot and missed, and Trump's now coming

0:30:30.764 --> 0:30:32.724
<v Speaker 3>back at them.

0:30:32.284 --> 0:30:34.244
<v Speaker 1>And they're not the first ones. So one of the

0:30:34.244 --> 0:30:37.124
<v Speaker 1>things that you know, I was noting as I went

0:30:37.324 --> 0:30:39.204
<v Speaker 1>through the book was, you know, a lot of the

0:30:39.204 --> 0:30:42.724
<v Speaker 1>people who came at the King missed, right, Yeah, well

0:30:42.884 --> 0:30:43.684
<v Speaker 1>missed the mark.

0:30:43.644 --> 0:30:46.484
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and some decided not to take the shot. I mean,

0:30:46.684 --> 0:30:49.004
<v Speaker 3>Robert her with Joe Biden is a good example. You know,

0:30:49.084 --> 0:30:52.404
<v Speaker 3>everyone remembers that Robert Herr said, oh, Biden's an elderly

0:30:52.404 --> 0:30:54.284
<v Speaker 3>man with a faulty memory, blah blah blah. That was

0:30:54.324 --> 0:30:56.684
<v Speaker 3>the big But but what everyone kind of missed is

0:30:56.724 --> 0:31:00.444
<v Speaker 3>that Robert Hurr found that Joe Biden knew he had

0:31:00.444 --> 0:31:03.964
<v Speaker 3>classified documents, like Joe Biden denied that for years. Anything

0:31:03.964 --> 0:31:06.724
<v Speaker 3>I had was in Adverton accidental, accidental. But there's a

0:31:06.764 --> 0:31:10.364
<v Speaker 3>tape we find out of Joe Biden's say to his ghostwriter,

0:31:11.364 --> 0:31:13.764
<v Speaker 3>I just found all the classified stuff downstairs, meaning in

0:31:13.804 --> 0:31:16.244
<v Speaker 3>his private office. So like I sort of said, look,

0:31:16.524 --> 0:31:20.004
<v Speaker 3>Robert Herr could have I think he did the right

0:31:20.044 --> 0:31:22.964
<v Speaker 3>thing by passing on this, but he could have written

0:31:23.004 --> 0:31:25.844
<v Speaker 3>a report that said, while I cannot indict the sitting

0:31:25.884 --> 0:31:28.404
<v Speaker 3>president under long standing DOJ policy, to talk about that

0:31:28.444 --> 0:31:30.644
<v Speaker 3>in the book, I do find that the evidence would

0:31:30.644 --> 0:31:33.444
<v Speaker 3>have been sufficient to uphold a criminal charge. There is

0:31:33.484 --> 0:31:39.604
<v Speaker 3>a criminal charge for knowingly mishandling classified documents. And really

0:31:39.964 --> 0:31:44.804
<v Speaker 3>that statement by Robert Herr is offered to explain his

0:31:44.924 --> 0:31:47.364
<v Speaker 3>calculation on the state of mind, the intent. He says, well,

0:31:47.564 --> 0:31:49.244
<v Speaker 3>it would have been hard to, you know, show a

0:31:49.324 --> 0:31:52.164
<v Speaker 3>jury that he was fully aware, fully remembered. He would

0:31:52.204 --> 0:31:54.084
<v Speaker 3>have been sympathetic to a jury. I mean, but look,

0:31:54.124 --> 0:31:56.164
<v Speaker 3>I talked to Bob Bauer, who's Biden's lawyer, who was

0:31:56.164 --> 0:31:58.684
<v Speaker 3>fiercely critical of her. Said he went too far, said

0:31:58.684 --> 0:32:00.364
<v Speaker 3>he put politically, you know, stuff he shouldn't have put

0:32:00.404 --> 0:32:02.404
<v Speaker 3>in his report. So I kind of leave some of

0:32:02.444 --> 0:32:04.004
<v Speaker 3>this to the reader, you know, I mean, I don't.

0:32:04.604 --> 0:32:06.724
<v Speaker 3>I will let people withdraw their own conclusion, some of them.

0:32:06.764 --> 0:32:09.444
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a definitive conclusion to be drawn. But O,

0:32:09.484 --> 0:32:11.644
<v Speaker 3>there's I think, you know, it depends how you see it.

0:32:11.684 --> 0:32:13.804
<v Speaker 3>So sometimes you know, Look, I make a point of

0:32:13.884 --> 0:32:15.524
<v Speaker 3>saying this in the book, and I say this as

0:32:15.564 --> 0:32:17.324
<v Speaker 3>someone who was a prosecutor for a long time. You

0:32:17.324 --> 0:32:20.404
<v Speaker 3>can't just judge prosecutors. I'm like, what's their stats? Like,

0:32:20.444 --> 0:32:22.564
<v Speaker 3>how man? How many people did you ring up here?

0:32:22.764 --> 0:32:24.964
<v Speaker 3>Because sometimes the right move the better move, and the

0:32:25.004 --> 0:32:28.124
<v Speaker 3>right move is to exercise your discretion against the charge.

0:32:28.644 --> 0:32:30.884
<v Speaker 3>And I think reasonable minds can differ on the Biden case,

0:32:30.924 --> 0:32:33.524
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's hard to say her was wrong.

0:32:34.324 --> 0:32:38.044
<v Speaker 2>What do prosecutors not understand about politics?

0:32:40.084 --> 0:32:43.444
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question question I want to say everything.

0:32:43.644 --> 0:32:46.084
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, if you would talk to me six

0:32:46.164 --> 0:32:48.444
<v Speaker 3>years ago. Let's say I've been doing media stuff for

0:32:48.444 --> 0:32:51.124
<v Speaker 3>seven years now. In early in my media cra I

0:32:51.164 --> 0:32:52.964
<v Speaker 3>was fresh out of fourteen years of being a prosecutor.

0:32:53.004 --> 0:32:55.364
<v Speaker 3>And I have this very like purest notion of prosecutors.

0:32:55.364 --> 0:32:58.604
<v Speaker 3>Like what we do, especially at DJ is pure. It

0:32:58.684 --> 0:33:02.564
<v Speaker 3>is uninfected by politics. It is separate, apart, and probably

0:33:02.604 --> 0:33:08.204
<v Speaker 3>above from politics. The reality, however, is prosecution is part

0:33:08.284 --> 0:33:11.444
<v Speaker 3>of our It exists within our political system. I mean

0:33:11.564 --> 0:33:14.524
<v Speaker 3>why do we have DJ and an attorney general and

0:33:14.564 --> 0:33:17.244
<v Speaker 3>an executive branch. It's from the Constitution, where all we

0:33:17.284 --> 0:33:19.564
<v Speaker 3>all spring from the same document. And I think it's

0:33:19.964 --> 0:33:23.684
<v Speaker 3>a bit naive to say that like prosecutors are just

0:33:23.724 --> 0:33:27.404
<v Speaker 3>you know, where are white knights and never aware of policy.

0:33:27.444 --> 0:33:29.244
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, this is part of the complexity of

0:33:29.324 --> 0:33:32.484
<v Speaker 3>Jack Smith. Like did he do his job in a straightforward,

0:33:32.524 --> 0:33:35.764
<v Speaker 3>aggressive way, yes, but there's no question he was rushing

0:33:35.804 --> 0:33:38.884
<v Speaker 3>like mad to get Trump tried before the twenty four election.

0:33:39.004 --> 0:33:43.924
<v Speaker 3>That's an uncomfortable intersection of politics and prosecution and people

0:33:43.964 --> 0:33:46.764
<v Speaker 3>who you know, I point, people sort of defended Jack

0:33:46.764 --> 0:33:49.444
<v Speaker 3>Smith reflexively. I think, because like there was a thing

0:33:49.484 --> 0:33:51.444
<v Speaker 3>for a while, anyone who's going after Trump is good

0:33:51.444 --> 0:33:54.644
<v Speaker 3>by me. I don't buy into that. But Jack Smith

0:33:54.844 --> 0:33:59.484
<v Speaker 3>initially demanded a trial date for Trump five months after

0:33:59.484 --> 0:34:02.924
<v Speaker 3>the indictment on a case with thirteen million pages of discovery.

0:34:03.204 --> 0:34:06.164
<v Speaker 3>That is impossible and unheard of. I actually looked up

0:34:06.204 --> 0:34:08.724
<v Speaker 3>the data. The average case in that court, in DC

0:34:08.884 --> 0:34:11.324
<v Speaker 3>Federal Court, and I'm just talking drug and gun rips

0:34:11.324 --> 0:34:14.444
<v Speaker 3>mostly took twenty eight months. The defendant got twenty eight

0:34:14.444 --> 0:34:17.124
<v Speaker 3>months to prep that two years and change, and Jack

0:34:17.124 --> 0:34:19.404
<v Speaker 3>Smith says, here, we have like the most complex, most

0:34:19.444 --> 0:34:21.644
<v Speaker 3>important case in US history, and he needs to go

0:34:21.684 --> 0:34:23.404
<v Speaker 3>to trial in five months. And I talked to Trump's

0:34:23.484 --> 0:34:28.244
<v Speaker 3>legal team and they said, correctly, like, there's no physical

0:34:28.324 --> 0:34:30.724
<v Speaker 3>way we could have gone through the evidence in that time.

0:34:30.884 --> 0:34:32.444
<v Speaker 3>And the only reason he wasn't able to do it

0:34:32.524 --> 0:34:35.084
<v Speaker 3>was because the immunity decision came in and everything I'll

0:34:35.084 --> 0:34:37.364
<v Speaker 3>put on hold, and then Trump won. So look, I

0:34:38.524 --> 0:34:41.004
<v Speaker 3>understand Jack Smith, I think has the closest to my

0:34:41.484 --> 0:34:45.324
<v Speaker 3>prosecutorial background of like cea target attack target. But I

0:34:45.364 --> 0:34:47.644
<v Speaker 3>also think you can't tell me that Jack Smith was

0:34:47.764 --> 0:34:50.564
<v Speaker 3>unaware of the looming election and trying to get his

0:34:50.604 --> 0:34:53.644
<v Speaker 3>case tried before the election. There's no rational observer who

0:34:53.644 --> 0:34:55.284
<v Speaker 3>could say that he had no idea and didn't care.

0:34:55.364 --> 0:34:56.084
<v Speaker 3>Of course he cared.

0:34:56.444 --> 0:34:59.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we have a lot of, you know, important

0:34:59.084 --> 0:35:02.364
<v Speaker 1>questions about what should happen, you know, going forward. But

0:35:02.444 --> 0:35:04.364
<v Speaker 1>I do have to say that I did one piece

0:35:04.404 --> 0:35:08.044
<v Speaker 1>of outside research that I was inspired to do based

0:35:08.044 --> 0:35:11.804
<v Speaker 1>on your book, and you included a detail about Patrick Fitzgerald,

0:35:12.204 --> 0:35:14.684
<v Speaker 1>who was the special counsel who was put in charge

0:35:14.724 --> 0:35:18.324
<v Speaker 1>of investigating the Bush administration for leaking the identity of

0:35:18.444 --> 0:35:21.964
<v Speaker 1>a CIA agent. But that's not what I took away

0:35:22.004 --> 0:35:24.484
<v Speaker 1>from that chapter. What I took away was that he

0:35:25.044 --> 0:35:29.684
<v Speaker 1>was one of people's fifty sexiest men Alive of two

0:35:29.764 --> 0:35:30.364
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five.

0:35:30.444 --> 0:35:33.204
<v Speaker 3>Yes, sexy, and he wasn't, but he was on the list.

0:35:33.324 --> 0:35:37.124
<v Speaker 1>No, Matthew McConaughey that year was the sexiest man alive. Yes,

0:35:37.324 --> 0:35:39.484
<v Speaker 1>just edged him out. And I was like, what the fuck? Like,

0:35:39.564 --> 0:35:42.164
<v Speaker 1>who is this guy? So I looked him up and

0:35:42.284 --> 0:35:44.124
<v Speaker 1>my answer is what the fuck?

0:35:44.164 --> 0:35:47.844
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So my editor, my editor, Maria, one of my

0:35:48.044 --> 0:35:50.364
<v Speaker 3>fact checkers and editors, who was a woman of about

0:35:50.404 --> 0:35:54.964
<v Speaker 3>your age, dropped and note in the manuscript saying, holy shit,

0:35:55.044 --> 0:35:59.284
<v Speaker 3>did you just disappoint me? Because because Pat Fitzger, she

0:35:59.324 --> 0:36:02.724
<v Speaker 3>did the same thing as you. She googled him. Now, child,

0:36:03.084 --> 0:36:05.644
<v Speaker 3>he's a good looking guy, right, Like he's above that average.

0:36:06.324 --> 0:36:09.684
<v Speaker 1>He's maybe above average, I don't know, but fifty sexes

0:36:09.804 --> 0:36:12.404
<v Speaker 1>met alive? Like what was he doing as a special

0:36:12.484 --> 0:36:14.484
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor that made him?

0:36:15.004 --> 0:36:15.084
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:36:15.564 --> 0:36:17.164
<v Speaker 1>What what a funny moment in history?

0:36:17.284 --> 0:36:23.164
<v Speaker 3>Number one? Number one? That is, you know, objectively, he's

0:36:23.204 --> 0:36:26.964
<v Speaker 3>the only special counsel ever named sexiest anything. I've never seen.

0:36:27.244 --> 0:36:28.964
<v Speaker 3>You know, the guy from the Whiskey Rain was not

0:36:29.044 --> 0:36:32.604
<v Speaker 3>named sexiest anything by the New York Herald number two.

0:36:34.404 --> 0:36:37.124
<v Speaker 3>I think it's actually a good reminder of like I remember,

0:36:37.164 --> 0:36:39.644
<v Speaker 3>because I had just started at DJ. I started an

0:36:39.844 --> 0:36:42.524
<v Speaker 3>four and this investigation went crazy in five six oh

0:36:42.564 --> 0:36:44.804
<v Speaker 3>s and Fitzgerald had come out of the office I

0:36:44.844 --> 0:36:46.884
<v Speaker 3>had started in. I don't know him, I've never met him.

0:36:46.884 --> 0:36:49.044
<v Speaker 3>He didn't talk to me because he's sort of retired.

0:36:49.084 --> 0:36:50.524
<v Speaker 3>He lives like in I don't want to say where,

0:36:50.564 --> 0:36:52.644
<v Speaker 3>but he lives a quiet life out of the law now.

0:36:53.164 --> 0:36:56.244
<v Speaker 3>And he very politely declined. But everyone at the office

0:36:56.284 --> 0:37:00.524
<v Speaker 3>I worked at worshiped this guy. Loved him. He's hilarious,

0:37:00.564 --> 0:37:03.564
<v Speaker 3>he's brilliant, and I think just something he was the guy.

0:37:03.684 --> 0:37:07.204
<v Speaker 3>He was the Jack Smith, the Robert Muller of two

0:37:07.284 --> 0:37:09.444
<v Speaker 3>thousand and five six, and you know, like that what

0:37:09.644 --> 0:37:13.364
<v Speaker 3>kind of iconography or whatever? You know, I talk about

0:37:13.364 --> 0:37:15.844
<v Speaker 3>that with Muller, right, remember all the Muller action figures

0:37:15.884 --> 0:37:18.124
<v Speaker 3>and memes and He's gonna get you and all this.

0:37:18.484 --> 0:37:20.844
<v Speaker 3>You know, Muller's team made a really interesting points. I

0:37:21.364 --> 0:37:23.644
<v Speaker 3>talked to a couple of the prosecutors. They said, people

0:37:23.684 --> 0:37:26.524
<v Speaker 3>who were spreading that stuff Muller, she wrote, and you know,

0:37:26.844 --> 0:37:29.084
<v Speaker 3>Muller's gonna do it justice. And by the way, they

0:37:29.084 --> 0:37:30.724
<v Speaker 3>did the same thing the other side with John Durham,

0:37:30.764 --> 0:37:32.644
<v Speaker 3>and they did the same thing with Jack Smith. These

0:37:32.644 --> 0:37:35.644
<v Speaker 3>guys said to me, that was first of all, completely

0:37:35.684 --> 0:37:38.204
<v Speaker 3>a disservice to Robert Muller, the man who was an

0:37:38.204 --> 0:37:40.684
<v Speaker 3>American hero. The guy was shot in Vietnam through his

0:37:40.764 --> 0:37:44.404
<v Speaker 3>leg and returned. He was he was a recipient of

0:37:44.404 --> 0:37:48.284
<v Speaker 3>a purple heart. He's, you know, an FBI director during

0:37:48.324 --> 0:37:51.764
<v Speaker 3>nine to eleven. He hated that crap. He hated being,

0:37:52.404 --> 0:37:55.604
<v Speaker 3>you know, a Twitter meme for liberals. And they also

0:37:55.684 --> 0:37:58.484
<v Speaker 3>say it didn't help us, by the way, because it

0:37:58.604 --> 0:38:02.164
<v Speaker 3>gave the other side fuel to say, look, they're coming

0:38:02.204 --> 0:38:05.244
<v Speaker 3>after us. They've put this attack dog on us. And

0:38:05.324 --> 0:38:08.564
<v Speaker 3>so as much as some liberals had fun with their

0:38:08.644 --> 0:38:11.284
<v Speaker 3>Muller memes, Owlers own team hated it, and they talk

0:38:11.324 --> 0:38:12.124
<v Speaker 3>about that in the book.

0:38:12.204 --> 0:38:14.044
<v Speaker 1>No, that's definitely sorry.

0:38:13.844 --> 0:38:17.764
<v Speaker 3>About Pat Fitzgerald. By the way, I pretty handsome.

0:38:18.404 --> 0:38:22.204
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, it's okay, But you know you aren't you

0:38:22.284 --> 0:38:25.444
<v Speaker 1>happy that you've inspired in dependent historical research on the

0:38:25.444 --> 0:38:26.404
<v Speaker 1>part of your readers.

0:38:26.684 --> 0:38:29.804
<v Speaker 3>I hope for Pat fitz Cherald's spike right right about now.

0:38:29.844 --> 0:38:31.004
<v Speaker 3>That's a good sign.

0:38:36.044 --> 0:38:52.524
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break. Who would

0:38:52.564 --> 0:38:54.644
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk to that you weren't able to

0:38:54.684 --> 0:38:56.204
<v Speaker 2>pin me? And what would you ask them?

0:38:56.284 --> 0:39:00.004
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. The guy I wanted to talk

0:39:00.044 --> 0:39:02.884
<v Speaker 3>to most was Jim Comey, who takes a lot of

0:39:02.884 --> 0:39:06.284
<v Speaker 3>heat in this book. Now, Jim Comy again. I started

0:39:06.364 --> 0:39:10.084
<v Speaker 3>at the SDN y five months for something like that

0:39:10.124 --> 0:39:12.084
<v Speaker 3>after Jim Comy left, and I say in the book

0:39:12.124 --> 0:39:15.444
<v Speaker 3>when I got there, everyone who was already there loved

0:39:15.484 --> 0:39:17.964
<v Speaker 3>and worshiped Comy. They you know, Comy's like six set.

0:39:17.964 --> 0:39:19.724
<v Speaker 3>I've met him. I've had nice conversations with him in

0:39:19.764 --> 0:39:23.124
<v Speaker 3>green rooms and stuff. But Comy declined to speak with

0:39:23.164 --> 0:39:25.404
<v Speaker 3>me because we all know how shy Jim Comey is

0:39:25.404 --> 0:39:29.484
<v Speaker 3>about the meeting. That's a joke. But look, Jim Comy

0:39:29.564 --> 0:39:31.204
<v Speaker 3>takes a lot of shit in this book, and I

0:39:31.204 --> 0:39:34.764
<v Speaker 3>think he deserves it. The incident with Hillary Clinton's email

0:39:34.764 --> 0:39:36.804
<v Speaker 3>that we talked about before, Nate, that you looked into

0:39:36.804 --> 0:39:39.644
<v Speaker 3>whether it may have flipped the election, that is the

0:39:39.644 --> 0:39:42.884
<v Speaker 3>perfect example of why we need rules because what happened

0:39:42.884 --> 0:39:44.724
<v Speaker 3>was Loretta Lynch has our meeting on the tarmac with

0:39:44.764 --> 0:39:48.444
<v Speaker 3>Bill Clinton. They both say nothing inappropriate has happened, was discussed,

0:39:48.444 --> 0:39:51.044
<v Speaker 3>but Loretta Lynch herself said that meeting cast a shadow.

0:39:51.124 --> 0:39:53.804
<v Speaker 3>That's her word over the investigation. She showed at that

0:39:53.844 --> 0:39:55.684
<v Speaker 3>point of a point that a special council it was

0:39:55.684 --> 0:39:59.164
<v Speaker 3>actually briefly considered, but she doesn't. Instead, she says, I'm

0:39:59.164 --> 0:40:00.884
<v Speaker 3>going to just defer to the FBI, which is not

0:40:00.964 --> 0:40:03.004
<v Speaker 3>the way it works. The AG's in charge, Well, what

0:40:03.004 --> 0:40:05.604
<v Speaker 3>do you do. What happens when Jim Comy is told

0:40:05.604 --> 0:40:07.884
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to defer to you. He runs wild. He

0:40:07.924 --> 0:40:10.524
<v Speaker 3>doesn't abide by any of the rules or regulations. He

0:40:10.604 --> 0:40:13.364
<v Speaker 3>does whatever he wants. And that results in two announcements

0:40:13.364 --> 0:40:16.764
<v Speaker 3>shortly before the election, and since then, I don't think

0:40:16.764 --> 0:40:19.844
<v Speaker 3>anybody defends Comey other than himself. I mean, three different

0:40:19.844 --> 0:40:24.204
<v Speaker 3>attorneys general of both parties, a Democrat and two Republicans

0:40:24.204 --> 0:40:26.644
<v Speaker 3>have publicly said that Jim what Jim Comy did was

0:40:26.684 --> 0:40:29.484
<v Speaker 3>absolutely wrong, violated DJ norms. And so if you want

0:40:29.524 --> 0:40:32.124
<v Speaker 3>to know what happens when we try to investigate the president,

0:40:32.164 --> 0:40:34.364
<v Speaker 3>but we make it up as we go along, look

0:40:34.404 --> 0:40:36.004
<v Speaker 3>at Jim Comy, so he didn't he didn't want to

0:40:36.004 --> 0:40:37.644
<v Speaker 3>talk to me. I wish he would have.

0:40:38.084 --> 0:40:41.044
<v Speaker 2>You get these things in like, if you're watching the

0:40:41.164 --> 0:40:44.564
<v Speaker 2>NFL or NHL or NBA whatever, right, where like the

0:40:44.644 --> 0:40:49.044
<v Speaker 2>decisions that officials make are not totally unbiased with respect

0:40:49.124 --> 0:40:51.204
<v Speaker 2>to the game score and the effect on the outcome

0:40:51.284 --> 0:40:54.084
<v Speaker 2>and the and the and the star power of the

0:40:54.124 --> 0:40:57.604
<v Speaker 2>athletes involved, right, And they'll say, well, look, we're trying

0:40:57.644 --> 0:41:00.484
<v Speaker 2>to manage the game. It's an entertainment product. And like, yeah,

0:41:00.524 --> 0:41:02.284
<v Speaker 2>if you're calling some tiki tech foul want to play

0:41:02.284 --> 0:41:05.124
<v Speaker 2>the determines the super Bowl, then that's not good game.

0:41:05.244 --> 0:41:08.204
<v Speaker 3>As an Eagles fan, that hurts. But yeah that's the

0:41:08.204 --> 0:41:10.524
<v Speaker 3>first Chief super Bowl, which bullshit. But god, yeah, you

0:41:11.044 --> 0:41:18.084
<v Speaker 3>guys are spoiled. Now I'm not complaining, but yeah.

0:41:16.404 --> 0:41:22.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is a better prosecutor unaware of politics or not? Right, Like,

0:41:22.524 --> 0:41:23.644
<v Speaker 2>let's say you have something that's.

0:41:23.484 --> 0:41:26.964
<v Speaker 3>Gonna know Again, I don't buy into this ideal of

0:41:27.004 --> 0:41:29.284
<v Speaker 3>like the prosecutor locked in a vacuum and just looking

0:41:29.284 --> 0:41:31.964
<v Speaker 3>at the DOJ Justice Manual. Like, I think a good

0:41:31.964 --> 0:41:34.644
<v Speaker 3>prosecutor has to be aware of what the politics are,

0:41:34.764 --> 0:41:37.084
<v Speaker 3>especially in these special council cases because you're gonna have

0:41:37.084 --> 0:41:40.284
<v Speaker 3>the White House involved, You're going to be requesting information

0:41:40.324 --> 0:41:42.644
<v Speaker 3>from the White House. Congress may get involved the media,

0:41:43.604 --> 0:41:45.244
<v Speaker 3>but I think you have to keep your head down

0:41:45.364 --> 0:41:48.524
<v Speaker 3>and I mean it sounds pollyanna ish maybe, and do

0:41:48.604 --> 0:41:51.164
<v Speaker 3>your best to do the job without regard to the

0:41:51.404 --> 0:41:53.524
<v Speaker 3>certainly not the Okay, let me put it this way.

0:41:53.684 --> 0:41:55.964
<v Speaker 3>You have to be aware of an account for the politics,

0:41:56.164 --> 0:41:58.804
<v Speaker 3>but you should never be playing a partisan role. There's

0:41:58.804 --> 0:42:01.884
<v Speaker 3>a difference there. Right, you exist in a political universe.

0:42:02.084 --> 0:42:03.884
<v Speaker 3>But I think when it gets to a point where

0:42:03.884 --> 0:42:07.324
<v Speaker 3>people are with some credibility saying now that's something that

0:42:07.364 --> 0:42:11.164
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't ordinarily be done. Now you're potentially crossing the line

0:42:11.204 --> 0:42:12.124
<v Speaker 3>into partisanship.

0:42:13.484 --> 0:42:15.844
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a good moment to kind of

0:42:15.884 --> 0:42:19.444
<v Speaker 1>turn to your recommendations, right, which you kind of have

0:42:19.564 --> 0:42:21.924
<v Speaker 1>some end at the end of the book for kind

0:42:21.964 --> 0:42:24.684
<v Speaker 1>of going forward. Now that this office has been like

0:42:24.724 --> 0:42:27.324
<v Speaker 1>completely gutted, right and we don't even know what's going on,

0:42:27.644 --> 0:42:31.044
<v Speaker 1>we basically need to start over. What would your ideal

0:42:31.484 --> 0:42:33.804
<v Speaker 1>look like? How do how do we come back from

0:42:33.844 --> 0:42:36.284
<v Speaker 1>where we are now? How do we create an office

0:42:36.284 --> 0:42:39.724
<v Speaker 1>of whatever we call it? Independent Council Special whatever it is,

0:42:40.364 --> 0:42:43.444
<v Speaker 1>What do we do so that we have investigations that

0:42:43.484 --> 0:42:47.164
<v Speaker 1>are as impartial, you know, with all the caveats as possible,

0:42:47.484 --> 0:42:51.284
<v Speaker 1>and that actually keep people to account who need to

0:42:51.324 --> 0:42:52.124
<v Speaker 1>be held to account.

0:42:52.204 --> 0:42:55.044
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, first of all, if you look at history,

0:42:55.044 --> 0:42:57.724
<v Speaker 3>every quarter century or so, we sort of revamped this, right,

0:42:57.764 --> 0:42:59.604
<v Speaker 3>we did one in the seventies, one in the nineties.

0:42:59.644 --> 0:43:04.084
<v Speaker 3>Now Here we are, and there is no perfect system.

0:43:04.124 --> 0:43:06.404
<v Speaker 3>There's no way I do lay out a system at

0:43:06.404 --> 0:43:07.924
<v Speaker 3>the end. There's no way I would tell you it's

0:43:07.964 --> 0:43:11.964
<v Speaker 3>infallible or every you know, there are certainly arguments against it,

0:43:12.364 --> 0:43:14.684
<v Speaker 3>but my first argument is some system is better than

0:43:14.684 --> 0:43:16.644
<v Speaker 3>no system. Just look at Jim Comy again. If you

0:43:16.684 --> 0:43:19.924
<v Speaker 3>want to freestyle all these get ready for more Comy's

0:43:21.084 --> 0:43:23.644
<v Speaker 3>second of all, the crux of what and in coming

0:43:23.724 --> 0:43:28.084
<v Speaker 3>up with this proposal A I looked at scholarly articles

0:43:28.084 --> 0:43:31.324
<v Speaker 3>and law review articles and various other legislative proposals. But

0:43:31.324 --> 0:43:33.884
<v Speaker 3>I also everyone I talked to for this book, all

0:43:33.884 --> 0:43:36.284
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutors, defense layers, white House officials, you name it.

0:43:36.324 --> 0:43:39.204
<v Speaker 3>I said, what how did the rules work for you?

0:43:39.284 --> 0:43:41.364
<v Speaker 3>What rule do you wish have been different? Which which

0:43:41.364 --> 0:43:43.964
<v Speaker 3>ones were effective. The number one thing I think we

0:43:44.044 --> 0:43:48.644
<v Speaker 3>need is a semi permanent special council within DJ nominated

0:43:48.684 --> 0:43:51.084
<v Speaker 3>by the President, confirmed by the Senate to give some

0:43:51.124 --> 0:43:54.004
<v Speaker 3>political look. There has to be some accountability. You can't

0:43:54.004 --> 0:43:57.124
<v Speaker 3>just have a super powerful prosecutor. The AG and all

0:43:57.124 --> 0:43:59.084
<v Speaker 3>the US attorneys have to be nominated to confirm this

0:43:59.124 --> 0:44:01.644
<v Speaker 3>person has the same powers, if not more, and so

0:44:01.924 --> 0:44:06.204
<v Speaker 3>needs to have that political legitimacy to It needs to

0:44:06.244 --> 0:44:08.164
<v Speaker 3>have a set term of years, sort of like the

0:44:08.204 --> 0:44:10.724
<v Speaker 3>FBI director serves for five years, although now Trump just

0:44:10.764 --> 0:44:12.844
<v Speaker 3>fires them at will, but for a long time it

0:44:12.884 --> 0:44:15.084
<v Speaker 3>was like ten years FBI director, I should say, but

0:44:15.204 --> 0:44:17.844
<v Speaker 3>you know, you just you inherited that Mueller carried over

0:44:17.964 --> 0:44:23.204
<v Speaker 3>over various administrations. And the person needs a semi permanent

0:44:23.284 --> 0:44:27.604
<v Speaker 3>staff of prosecutors, analysts, investigators, so you don't have this

0:44:27.684 --> 0:44:32.364
<v Speaker 3>scenario of Ken Starr, Bill Clinton go go. You know,

0:44:32.484 --> 0:44:35.444
<v Speaker 3>Jack Smith, Donald Trump go. So you are looking at

0:44:35.524 --> 0:44:37.364
<v Speaker 3>various things at once. But you know, one of the

0:44:37.364 --> 0:44:39.444
<v Speaker 3>concerns is aren't you going to incentivize this person to

0:44:39.484 --> 0:44:42.324
<v Speaker 3>always be breathing down the president's neck. My answer is

0:44:42.404 --> 0:44:44.844
<v Speaker 3>not if you have the right person. I mean not

0:44:44.884 --> 0:44:49.004
<v Speaker 3>if you have a person who understands prosecutorial restraint and

0:44:49.844 --> 0:44:51.924
<v Speaker 3>you know, so, Look, we rely on the people to

0:44:51.964 --> 0:44:53.964
<v Speaker 3>an extent. But I also think this person needs more

0:44:54.204 --> 0:44:56.844
<v Speaker 3>higher level protection against firing. I think we need to

0:44:56.884 --> 0:45:00.204
<v Speaker 3>more carefully vet our people who are on that team

0:45:00.244 --> 0:45:04.004
<v Speaker 3>for any outwards political biases. There have been people on

0:45:04.044 --> 0:45:07.404
<v Speaker 3>these teams who have been donors and been to campaign parties.

0:45:07.604 --> 0:45:11.684
<v Speaker 3>I think that's disastrous. I talked about one of Muller's

0:45:11.684 --> 0:45:13.564
<v Speaker 3>team members who was at the Hillary Clinton what was

0:45:13.564 --> 0:45:16.404
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be victory party but was not, and has donated.

0:45:16.804 --> 0:45:20.844
<v Speaker 3>And he has defended himself by saying, well, but I

0:45:20.844 --> 0:45:23.604
<v Speaker 3>didn't make any I didn't get anything wrong though. Whatever

0:45:23.644 --> 0:45:25.564
<v Speaker 3>my personal beliefs, I was able to put them aside.

0:45:25.564 --> 0:45:27.964
<v Speaker 3>And I said, yeah, but the other people on the

0:45:28.004 --> 0:45:29.444
<v Speaker 3>team said they had to stop you a couple of

0:45:29.444 --> 0:45:32.764
<v Speaker 3>times from doing things that were inappropriate. And I also said,

0:45:32.764 --> 0:45:34.524
<v Speaker 3>this person wouldn't talk to me either. But I also

0:45:34.644 --> 0:45:37.004
<v Speaker 3>used a baseball analogy. I said, this would be like

0:45:37.084 --> 0:45:39.164
<v Speaker 3>if in the seventh game of the World Series, the

0:45:39.204 --> 0:45:41.044
<v Speaker 3>home plate it was Yankees and Dodgers. I should have

0:45:41.124 --> 0:45:44.644
<v Speaker 3>used a Phillies Astros or something, but Yankees Dodgers. I said,

0:45:44.644 --> 0:45:48.764
<v Speaker 3>what if the homeplate umpire ended up with a high

0:45:48.764 --> 0:45:50.684
<v Speaker 3>game score? Like you know, the computer said he did

0:45:50.684 --> 0:45:52.844
<v Speaker 3>a good job. But on his Instagram page he was

0:45:52.844 --> 0:45:55.484
<v Speaker 3>wearing a Dodgers hat every day. Like would Yankees fans

0:45:55.524 --> 0:45:58.044
<v Speaker 3>be expected to accept that guy? Would the general public

0:45:58.084 --> 0:46:00.524
<v Speaker 3>be expected to accept that guy? So I think we

0:46:00.564 --> 0:46:04.964
<v Speaker 3>need to vet for political bias, you know, donations and

0:46:05.244 --> 0:46:08.644
<v Speaker 3>public statements, that kind of thing. It's not perfect, but

0:46:08.884 --> 0:46:10.924
<v Speaker 3>I do think I do reject the idea that like

0:46:11.124 --> 0:46:12.884
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to throw my hands up and say

0:46:13.004 --> 0:46:15.924
<v Speaker 3>this is all broken, because that's not dealing with the problem.

0:46:15.964 --> 0:46:17.924
<v Speaker 3>That's just washing your hands of it.

0:46:18.164 --> 0:46:21.084
<v Speaker 2>Ellie, how much could be done via legislation as opposed

0:46:21.124 --> 0:46:23.084
<v Speaker 2>to requiring constitutional changes.

0:46:23.244 --> 0:46:25.364
<v Speaker 3>So you can do all of this basically, I think

0:46:25.404 --> 0:46:28.724
<v Speaker 3>by legislation, I'm not sure, you know, the current Congress

0:46:28.724 --> 0:46:30.804
<v Speaker 3>certainly wouldn't do it, and I'm not sure any But

0:46:31.204 --> 0:46:34.764
<v Speaker 3>the real fallback option A is legislation. Option B is

0:46:34.844 --> 0:46:38.124
<v Speaker 3>DJ can pass its own REGs. The current Special Council.

0:46:38.124 --> 0:46:41.484
<v Speaker 3>There is no law, it's just DJ reggs which are

0:46:41.524 --> 0:46:45.044
<v Speaker 3>passed by DJ itself. So those are the fallbacks I think,

0:46:45.084 --> 0:46:47.324
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, there would be a constitutional challenge.

0:46:47.404 --> 0:46:50.084
<v Speaker 3>There have been over time. It's the systems have always

0:46:50.124 --> 0:46:52.804
<v Speaker 3>withstood it. But that would happen as well.

0:46:54.164 --> 0:46:57.964
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, for people who you know read this,

0:46:58.124 --> 0:47:01.724
<v Speaker 1>who kind of get acquainted with the history, who feel

0:47:01.764 --> 0:47:05.364
<v Speaker 1>your frustration about the current moment and kind of take

0:47:05.404 --> 0:47:08.564
<v Speaker 1>it to heart, what's kind of the big message that

0:47:08.604 --> 0:47:10.844
<v Speaker 1>you want people can have take away from this?

0:47:10.964 --> 0:47:13.964
<v Speaker 3>The big message is we have been grappling with this

0:47:14.084 --> 0:47:15.884
<v Speaker 3>problem for a long time, but it's a problem we

0:47:15.964 --> 0:47:18.204
<v Speaker 3>have to grapple with. And as much as the prior

0:47:18.244 --> 0:47:20.444
<v Speaker 3>investigations have been highly imperfect, and a lot of the

0:47:20.444 --> 0:47:23.484
<v Speaker 3>book is about how flawed some of these investigations were,

0:47:24.124 --> 0:47:27.844
<v Speaker 3>we need this mechanism. It's a crucial check on the presidency.

0:47:28.364 --> 0:47:31.284
<v Speaker 3>And although Donald Trump will be you know, it will

0:47:31.284 --> 0:47:35.444
<v Speaker 3>be go dormant during the next three years, it can

0:47:35.484 --> 0:47:37.684
<v Speaker 3>come back and it needs to come back because otherwise

0:47:37.764 --> 0:47:39.964
<v Speaker 3>we're going to lose a key check on not just

0:47:40.044 --> 0:47:44.404
<v Speaker 3>presidential power, but runaway executive branch power as a whole.

0:47:45.484 --> 0:47:47.444
<v Speaker 1>So, at the end of the day, are you an

0:47:47.444 --> 0:47:49.684
<v Speaker 1>optimist that that will happen or are you a pessimist?

0:47:49.724 --> 0:47:51.324
<v Speaker 3>I tend to be an optimist. I mean, look, I've

0:47:51.364 --> 0:47:53.364
<v Speaker 3>been in media for seven years. I've seen all sorts

0:47:53.364 --> 0:47:56.284
<v Speaker 3>of crazy stuff happen. But I do believe in our institutions.

0:47:56.284 --> 0:47:58.804
<v Speaker 3>I do believe in our laws. I don't think they're perfect,

0:47:58.884 --> 0:48:01.524
<v Speaker 3>but I reject the hyperbolic. You know, I've heard people

0:48:01.524 --> 0:48:03.804
<v Speaker 3>say we'll never have another election. In twenty twenty eight,

0:48:03.844 --> 0:48:06.044
<v Speaker 3>Trump's going to run again. I've always rejected that. I

0:48:06.044 --> 0:48:07.764
<v Speaker 3>don't think that's going to happen. I don't think that's

0:48:08.124 --> 0:48:09.764
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he wants to do that. I do

0:48:09.844 --> 0:48:14.684
<v Speaker 3>believe our laws and our constitution are sturdy enough. They're imperfect,

0:48:14.924 --> 0:48:16.804
<v Speaker 3>but I think they're sturdy enough. They've stood up for

0:48:16.804 --> 0:48:20.644
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and fifty years, and I think if we

0:48:20.724 --> 0:48:23.964
<v Speaker 3>give them thought, they'll continue to stand up.

0:48:25.044 --> 0:48:27.884
<v Speaker 1>I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you so much

0:48:28.044 --> 0:48:32.084
<v Speaker 1>for coming on and sharing your wisdom and your optimism

0:48:32.124 --> 0:48:35.124
<v Speaker 1>with us. Congrats again on the release of your new book,

0:48:35.444 --> 0:48:36.684
<v Speaker 1>When You Come at the King.

0:48:36.844 --> 0:48:38.844
<v Speaker 3>Thanks very much, guys, I appreciate it was great talking

0:48:38.844 --> 0:48:39.084
<v Speaker 3>to you.

0:48:45.124 --> 0:48:46.924
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:48:46.964 --> 0:48:50.644
<v Speaker 1>out to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot FM.

0:48:50.844 --> 0:48:54.364
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanakova.

0:48:53.644 --> 0:48:56.364
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a cool

0:48:56.404 --> 0:49:00.364
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:49:00.364 --> 0:49:04.724
<v Speaker 2>by Isaa Carter. Our associate producer is Sonia gerwit Lydia,

0:49:04.844 --> 0:49:07.724
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:49:07.724 --> 0:49:11.604
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Gold's mixing by Sarah Bruguer.

0:49:11.884 --> 0:49:14.124
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:49:14.124 --> 0:49:16.764
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:49:16.924 --> 0:49:18.724
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:49:18.764 --> 0:49:20.964
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.