WEBVTT - #276 Jason Flom with Charles McCrory

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty five, Charles and Julie McCrory were having

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>marital trouble and seeing a counselor while amicably sharing both

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the care of their three year old boy, Chad, and

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>occasionally the same bed. On May thirtieth, nineteen eighty five,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Charles left Julie's house around ten to fifteen pm and

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>made a phone call in the pre cell phone era.

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>This corroborated that he had arrived at his apartment the

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>following morning. Charles's parents were expecting Julie to drop off

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Chad and began to worry when she did not show.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>After several unanswered calls from Charles and his parents, Charles's

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>father was the first to discover Julie's body just inside

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>her front door. It was determined that she had died

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of blunt force head trauma sometime in the early hours

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the morning. A red bandana was found near the body,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and a clump of hairs were found in her hand

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that did not belong to her or Charles. Besides conflicting

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and dubious reports of a car that looked like Charles's

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at Julie's house that morning, no evidence connected him to

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the crime. Despite a similar incident within a month committed

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by a man known to wear red bandanas, the police

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>maintained their focus on Charles. Since the district attorney was

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to charge Charles, Julie's family hired a private prosecutor

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>team who sought the help of notorious junk science dentist

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Dick Suveran. Suveran testified that some of Julie's wounds were

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not only bitemarks, but that they were made by Charles

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the time of death, effectively sealing his fate. Suveran

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>has since recanted that testimony, including the assertion that the

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wounds were even bite marks at all. Yet, somehow Charles

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is still serving a life sentence in an Alabama prison.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>This is wrongful conviction. Welcome back to wrongful conviction. You know,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>when listeners of our show asked me, what are some

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of the most disturbing cases I've ever heard of? I

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>will list off Vincent Simmons, Richard Glossip, Pedro Renoso. I mean,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there's so many others I could mention, But before we

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>even start today, I think Charles McCrory has to be

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>added to that horrifying list. Joining us Besides the man himself.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>We have his attorneys first from the Southern Center for

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Human Rights, Mark Louden Brown, Mark, welcome to Wronful Conviction.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for having me and a voice

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>you'll all recognize, I'm sure, Chris Fabricant. Chris is the

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>strategic Litigation director at the Innocence Project, the author of

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the fantastic book You've heard me talk about it before,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Junk Science and the American criminal justice system. And he's

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>also a frequent guest on the show and was featured

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on our Junk Science podcast hosted by Josh Dubin where

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>he talked about bite mark analysis, which was the pivotal

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>thing in this case. And so Chris, welcome back to

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be back.

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Jason, thanks for having us.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And now calling in from an Alabama prison where he's

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>been locked up for I hate I even have to

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>say this for over thirty seven years. Charles McCrory, thank

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you, I appreciate you having me.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're happy to have you here despite the reason

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>why you're here, or more to the point where you

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are as you call us today, and that reason is

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bitemark analysis. Which is a proven junk science. It fails

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that not only reliably concluding who made a bite mark,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but also at reliably identifying wounds as bite marks at all,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>especially because these wounds are found on skin and the

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>medium itself is elastic and usually changing over time as

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it heals or decomposes or grows. And then some Charlottan

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>comes into court claiming that they can match a suspects

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>teeth to usually a photograph of an injury, and they

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>say they can do this to the exclusion of every

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>other set of teeth on the planet. It's just fuck

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and bananas. But it's only recently that lawyers like Chris

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and Mark have been battling these junk science experts in

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>post conviction, because at the time of conviction, everybody bought

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into these lies. And Chris, I've been quoting your book

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>left and right, And of course the book I'm talking

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about is junk science and the American criminal justice system.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>But what are some of the other common threads between

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>these wrongful convictions that are based on junk science and

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>bite mark analysis?

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 3>In particular, what I've seen in all of these cases.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I've been involved in all the bite

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>mark cases over the last ten years, is that I

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 3>have never seen an effective cross examination of a bitemark

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>expert a trial, and all the transcripts that I've read,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I've never even seen the question, you know, even the

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>most basic one. You know, you think about when an

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 3>injury is inflicted, usually during the crime itself, nobody was there.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Nobody knows the position that the perpetrator or the victim

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>was in at that time. But we know one thing

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 3>is that it's not not on a mortuary slab where

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>the photographs were taken of this injury. And we know

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 3>that the injury has changed, often quite dramatically as a

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 3>result of decomposition of the body, and they continued decomposition,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So you may match quote unquote a bitemark quote unquote

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>one day and not the next. It might be one

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>hour and not the next hour, right, because skin is

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 3>changing all the time, particularly with the deceased victim. So

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 3>you never see that type of cross examination and you

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 3>never see like, how is it that you know that

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 3>this is a bitemark? What is it about being a

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>dentist that makes you an expert in diagnosing an injury

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>as a bite mark?

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>What the proximity to teeth nonsense, right, So you never

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>see those. And I think that just as a general

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 3>matter on junk science convictions broadly speaking, is that it's

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 3>almost impossible to cross examine your way out of a

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>wrongful conviction with junk science. Once the judge lets it in,

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 3>you got two strikes against you anyway, you know, And

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure Johnny cochrane could have saved Charles McCrory

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 3>once Dick subern gets on the stand and you know,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>spouts these invented credentials, right the American Board of Friends

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>of go Toontology. That's what I wrote about this in

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 3>the book. It's just an invented organization. Never tested any

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>of their members on their abilities to actually match bike

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>marks or even diagnose them. They just gave each other

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 3>board certifications to bring into court and Wougers and places

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>like andlus Alabama, and they led to a lot of

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 3>wrongful convictions, including at least three others by Dick Suberan.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And we'll go further into how this junk science applies

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to Charles's case in just a bit, but first I'd

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like to go back before all of this happened. Tell

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>us Charles about your life growing up. Were you born

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama?

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I was born actually in the Panhandle of Florida, and

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 4>lived in Mobile a couple of years when I was

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>in like first to second grade, But anyway, we moved

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 4>and Bluja at the beginning of my third grade year

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 4>and grew up there and graduated and Lujah High School.

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Went to junior college there at Lurley Wallace for a

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 4>year or so, and then I transferred to MacArthur Tech

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 4>College and Op which is just fifteen miles or so away,

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and I finished a associate degree in computer science. A

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 4>few months later. They started working for the junior college

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 4>that I had been a student and that previously, and

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>set up and then later ran the computer center there.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>They didn't really have one when I started there. You know,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>this is back in seventy nine, so we're in a

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 4>very early period as far as computers were concerned. And

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 4>worked there for five years, and then had gone over

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 4>to the Power Company album an Electric co op it

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>was called in it's now Power South. So pretty much

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 4>far a living, That's all I'd really ever done full

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 4>of time was computer work.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So okay, you were working in the field that has

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>become central to all that we do, so plenty of

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>potential in your life. And I understand you were also

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a volunteer EMT the Rescue Squad as it was called

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Andalusia, Alabama.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Rescue Squad was an all volunteer organizations about

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 4>thirty men that provided damas and rescue for that area.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, we wore work, to.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Say the least, Yes, saving Lise kind of the freaking

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>opposite of being a murderer, right.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And of course during this rise in your career,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>both professional and in the volunteer space, you had married

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>your high school sweetheart Julie Bonds in nineteen eighty had

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a great job fulfilling community service, and had your son,

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Chad in nineteen eighty two, through which you and Julie

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>shared a bond that could not be broken even if

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>your marriage was going through a rough patch.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, and it was, you know, the look back, it

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 4>was just a lot of poor decisions on probably both

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 4>of our part, but certainly on mind and we kind

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 4>of grew apart, I guess, you know. I say we

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 4>had we had a good relationship, very very amicable to

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>say the least. We were together pretty much every day

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>even during the time that we later separated and I

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>had an apartment across town, we were still very involved

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 4>with course with our son as well as you know,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 4>mutual friends and things like that, and we were together

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 4>constantly even though we were we were separated and trying

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 4>to work out marritder issues and so forth.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it seems that things may have worked out

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>in your marriage had all of this tragic series of

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>events not come to pass. The night before Julie died,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you two had actually spent the evening together correct.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 4>That night, I'd been over there. We had actually been

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 4>to see a marriage counselor, had had an affair before

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 4>that for several months prior to that, and it had

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 4>ended it although I was still talking to the lady

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 4>for a while there, and anyway, Julie and I were

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 4>trying to work through those things, and so we had

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 4>actually had an interview with it marriage counselor that night,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 4>if and then we had actually met back over at

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 4>the house later and stayed at the house for I

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 4>guess a couple of hours or so, and left around

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 4>ten fifteen, ten thirty, somewhere in that range.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And this affair that you mentioned, the woman you're referring

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to is Gloria Wiggins. So at least from trial testimony

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>said that you had called her on the phone from

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>your apartment. I remember this is the era before cell phone,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so this is corroborative evidence that you were actually at

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the apartment.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, at that phone call. I'm at the apartment when

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 4>I made the call. And then, you know, I just

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>go to sleep, and the next morning I get up

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 4>at whatever time, six thirty six forty five, had to

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 4>be at work at seven thirty.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So this is the morning of May thirty first,

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five, and you were having what you thought

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a normal day, and as per usual,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>your parents were waiting for Julie to drop off Chad

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>at their house on her way to.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Work right usually around eighties, and so there was times

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>when she'd bring me breakfast her, you know, or whatever.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 4>And so that morning I had called her about that

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 4>and picking up something on her way and didn't get

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 4>an answer, and turn around call right back. I figured

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 4>I'd just dial the wrong number or something. Still didn't

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 4>get answer, and even then it didn't particularly alarm it.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, you just think, okay, she left for work,

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 4>a little earlier something I really thought a little of it,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 4>and then later on it was I believe after eight

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I called my mom's house and she hadn't got there yet.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>And my mom, of course, if once something like that

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>had she just starts worrying. So, you know, I called

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the house a couple more times and get no answer,

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and so eventually I called her workplace. They had not

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>seen her either, and about that time, you know, my

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 4>mom was like, so he Dad's going to check on.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I said, okay, okay, I'll go there and just you know,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of like we're leaving, you know, fears, so to speak.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 4>And so I leave work, go toward the house, and

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 4>many of the rescue squad members we had two way

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 4>radios in our personal vehicles, and so as I'm going

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 4>to the house, I hear them on the radio call

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 4>about a namas going to beside Charles McCrory's house or

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 4>near Charles mccrary's house. And even then, you know, my

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 4>thought was maybe a neighbor in trouble or somebody outside,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 4>or I call and tell him, you know, I look,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm on my way over there anyway, And when I

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 4>get there, my dad's outside and he's just you know,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 4>he's upset, and said, something's wrong with Julie. You know,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>where is she? And he just kind of like falling

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 4>towards the house. I said, where's Chad, and he said,

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I've already got Chad. He's at the neighbors. He had

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 4>he had already been in the house and founder the

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 4>front door was a jar when he got there.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So your father was the first to see this horrible

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>crime scene before whisking away your three year old boy,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>who was thankfully unharmed. It's the only silver lining in

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. And as you mentioned, he had taken

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>him to the neighbors. Julie, on the other hand, was

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:23.239
<v Speaker 1>not so fortunate. She had been beaten to death. Rigormortis

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>typically sets in about three to six hours after death,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>and by the time investigators arrived on scene around nine am,

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>rigor mortis had not yet set in, so the murder

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>must have occurred sometime between three and six am. Well,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't seen her since about ten to fifteen pm,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>despite conflicting and dubious reports of a car that looked

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>like yours having been allegedly seen at the house during

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>those hours. And we're going to get to that in

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but first I want to talk about the

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>crime scene itself. Now, this was a terribly violent struggle.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>A stocking had been tied to her right wrist. Hair

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>was found at her left hand, hair that must have

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>logically belonged to the person but to whom she was

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>fighting for her very life. There was also a red

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>bandana found near the body. Now, the fire poker from

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the fireplace appeared to be missing and was never found again.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>From the autopsy, it appears that she was struck four

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>times in the back of the head, with one wound

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to the side of the head blunt trauma's the left

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>part of her skull, eleven puncture wounds to the left breast,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fractures on both mandibles, bruises on her face and ribs,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and two bruises that may or may not have been

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>bite marks on her right shoulder. So this is your wife,

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the mother of your son, and now you've come upon

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this unbelievably bloody and brutal crime scene.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 4>When you walk in and see that, you just mean,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 4>you don't know, you just don't know what sits to do.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you don't know what to think. It's so

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 4>shocking that there's really no standard response for it. You know,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 4>after I had saying that Julie was dead, and then

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 4>the risky score got there right after that. And of course,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, I knew all the guys on the squad,

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 4>they were all friends of mine, and they were you know,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 4>wanting to see At that point, the police had not

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 4>arrived or anything. And so as we do that, I

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>come out and I go across the street to Chad

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 4>and I remember I remember holding him and just I mean, really,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the thought that come to mine is, my god, what

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 4>is happening. I remember him kind of pushing back a

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 4>little bit. I guess I was squeezing him too tight

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>or something. But and then in the coming days, you know,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>he would ask for and we'd try to answer him

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 4>as best you can.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>This is an incredibly brutal crime and the perpetrator undoubtedly

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>would have been very bloody. And there was only lads

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>to a been about four hours passed between the last

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>time that mister McCrory he saw the victim in this case,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and when he was first questioned by police at that time,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>they turned over all of his clothes, they searched the

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>intertor's car, they searched his house, They found no trace

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of blood on anything. Then they examined the hares that

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>were clutched in the victim's hand. Those hairs were not

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 3>from the victim, and they were not from Charles McCrory.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 3>In other words, they were from a third person. We

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>still don't know whose hairs those were. There was also

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>a red bandana found near the victim's body. There was

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a construction worker that worked next door to the victim's

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 3>house was known to wear a red bandana. There was

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 3>an open window on that side of the house, the

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 3>same side as the construction site, that had a fresh

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>bootprint outside that window. The police took an impression of

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>that bootprint, but then never compared it to anything or anybody,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 3>and never dusted the the window sill that was open

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>for fingerprints. But we know that a man who worked

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>at that construction site named Ainsworth was known to wear

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a red bandana. And we know that a few weeks

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>after this murder, he committed a home invasion rape and

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>served twenty years in prison for that crime. Was never

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>investigated as a suspect in this case. Then we also

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>know that mister McCrory had been entirely cooperative with the

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 3>prosecution from beginning to end, had voluntarily supplied samples of

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>his hair, his DNA, his body, all of which was exculpatory,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>nothing to point to mister McCrory's guilt. The only physical

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>evidence was concocted, and we'll talk about the bite marks

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>in a second. The only other evidence was that neighbor

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>across the street who claimed that around four o'clock in

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the morning, his nineteen year old kid decides to get

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>up and check on the garden, but he wasn't sure

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of the date, was sure of the truck, but he's

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>thought that on the date in question that he had

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>seen a truck similar to mister McCrory's.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And despite this extremely dubious teenage middle of the night

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>gardening scenario, we also found out later that he and

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>later his grandfather not only exaggerated their vantage point, but

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>also several other neighbors with much more credible recollections reported

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>only Julie's car in the driveway on the date and

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>time in question.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the only evidence that they had apart from this

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>bite mark.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And the bite mark. Even their trial expert Dick Suveran,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>years later admitted that he wasn't even sure if it

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>even was a bitemark at all. But even back in

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five, other than the refuted recollection of this

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>teenage middle of the night gardener and his grandfather, all

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>other evidence pointed away from Charles. But tunnel Vision had

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>already said in and some say that it came back

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to something Charles had said at the crime scene and

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what later the prosecutor tried to use against him a trial.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It was when at the scene, looking at the body

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>with the other rescue squad guys on police and seeing

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the gash on the back of her head, Charles said

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>something to the effect of do you think it was

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the licks to her head? Is that what killed her?

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So they just totally ignored the clump of hair in

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>her hand, the red bandana, any alternative suspects, the lack

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of blood on anything that Charles owned, and started turning

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>their focus on him anyway, on Charles, do you remember

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>when that happened?

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I do know there was a time when the fielding

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 4>is almost like the atmosphere changed. You could just feel

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 4>it in the air, And in fact, I believe later Saturday,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 4>I told my mom that looked you know, they're turning

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>this on me. They're looking at me. And then it

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 4>was on Saturday night. The mayor of Andalusia was a

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 4>man named Chalwmers, Brian. He was a longtime family friend

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 4>of ours. He was a deacon in our church and

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 4>I had known Chalmers a long time. He was also

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 4>one of the charge members of the resk You squad,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 4>so I knew him through that. And he called me

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 4>and said, look, I want to talk to you. So

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 4>we talked on Saturday night for a good while and

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Chalmers told me then he said, you know they think

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 4>you did this. He told me, say, I don't believe that,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 4>he said, But I'm the mayor. I can't get involved

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 4>in this, you know, I've got to let the police

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>do their work.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow. So, okay, if you're at home listening to this

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>insane story right now and thinking, well, okay, but you're

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>somehow safe, You're somehow insulated from the possibility of being

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the victim of a wrongful conviction. Are you friends with

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the mayor? Because even a friendship like that couldn't save Charles,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>which shows us, in very stark terms that none of

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>us are safe. So just after Julie's funeral. On that Monday,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they brought you in for a more accusatory interview that

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up in your arrest. Did they try to extract

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a confession, as we so often see.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, as we were walking over to the county

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 4>jails when one of them said, you know we can

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 4>help you on this. And you got a long record

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 4>of community service, you come from a good family. You know,

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 4>all these kinds of positive things about my life that

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 4>they seem to soon forget. But they say, you know,

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 4>we can do a deal here where you know, we'll

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 4>talk to the DA and see if we can't. You know,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 4>I think we can do ten years at that time

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 4>manslaughter without a weapon. I believe it was called for

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 4>like ten years is the max. And said, you know

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 4>you'd be home in two or three years for Chad

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 4>even gets in school. Good. You know you'd already be home.

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not pleading guilty to something I didn't do.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>And that kind of ended that discussion.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And oddly enough, the Covenant County DA Grady Lanier, had

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>no plans on indicting you none. The case against you

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>was just too weak. A false confession would have definitely

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>changed his tune. But you didn't crumble. This is why

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Julie's family, on this bizarre Alabama law, was able to

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>bring in private prosecutors to do with Grady Laneer rightfully

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>did not want to do He declined to do it. Mark,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>do I have that right?

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right from talking to folks in the community that

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 2>he was at best lukewarm about the prospect of indicting

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 2>mister McCrory and trying the case, as you would think

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 2>he would be, because, as you pointed out, there was

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 2>no evidence against mister McCrory, and the evidence that there

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>was was exculpatory, right, And so I believe it was

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Julie's uncle approached this father son duo of Frank and

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Harvey Tippler, who were very well known trial attorneys, and

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>so he went out and paid them to prosecute the case.

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the point at which this alleged

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 2>bite mark, sort of as Chris said, gets concocted.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 3>There were a number of puncture wounds on the victim's body.

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>It was the tiplars who took this injury and decided

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 3>that these were potentially teeth marks and took this evidence

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to doctor Dick Suveran who rose to fame as one

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of the forensic odentologists. Is they like to call themselves

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 3>when they're in court. It's just a fancy way of

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 3>saying forensic dentist. And Suvron decides that these R and

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 3>D teeth marks, but he's very noncommittal about associating these

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 3>teeth marks with mister McCrory. Then the case gets closer

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and closer to trial. And you see this in wrongful

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 3>conviction after wrongful conviction, particularly as it relates to junk science.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And this is why junk science is so convenient, because

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>it really can say whatever you needed to say. And

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't saying enough before trial. But by the time

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 3>it got to trial, Dick Suban was saying that it

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>was mister McCrory's tea, to exclusion of everybody else on

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the planet's teeth that made this particular bitemark.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So, according to this letter from Souveran to the Tiplers

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that was hidden from the defensive trial, Souvan shared his

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>own doubts about making that match in court, but then

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>he later did it anyway a trial. Now how he

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>squared that circle for himself know, But the Tiplers now

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>had their you know, the piece of evidence that they

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>needed to win, not to get justice, but to win

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for trial. And this is just five months later in

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>October nineteen eighty five. And remember Charles was doing well

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in life, so he was able to hire a real

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>solid team Bubba, Marcel and Larrigus said, who were experienced

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>defense layers. They just couldn't overcome what was eventually the

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>recanted false testimony of Dick Suveran.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>So it's a short trial, a couple of days. What

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>is frustrating is that the opening and closing statements are

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>not transcribed, so we only have the testimony of the witnesses.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>And like you mentioned, it really comes down to the

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>bitemark by doctor Souverron.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>But in addition to that, the Tiplers presented the marriage

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>counselor as well as the woman with whom Charles had

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>had an affair, Gloria Wiggins, to solidify their narrative that

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>marital trouble was a potential catalyst or motive. But oddly enough,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this woman, Gloria Wiggins, actually corroborated that Charles was back

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in his apartment around ten thirty pm, not at Julie's.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>They also brought up this comment from Charles at the

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>crime scene about the quote licks to the back of

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>her head. Now again, he was making an observation and

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>she had a massive gash to the back of her head.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So far, this is not a compelling case at all.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Then they brought out the nineteen year old with the

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy midnight gardening story, Willie Meeks, who had been staying

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>with his grandfather, Hubert Walker, Julie's neighbor, who also testified.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>There's this teenager kitty corner from Julie's home who claims

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 2>that he was out at four point thirty at five

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 2>o'clock in the morning checking on his grandfather's garden. It

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>may have been the morning of May thirty. First, he's

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 2>not really sure, and he sees this car that looks

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>similar to the one that mister McCrory drives parked at

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Julie's house, right, so whatever that is worth. Interestingly, his

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>grandfather there, who lives in that home, also testifies and

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>claims that he is also up in the morning and

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>also says that he sees a similar car, but he

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>says that the car is parked somewhere else in a

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>different location. So like you have these two stories that

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the prosecution probably hoped would corroborate each other,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>which actually didn't corroborate each other, probably because they were inaccurate.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, Mick said that he saw the truck there,

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 4>and my attorney had him draw a sketch, and that's

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 4>part of the trial records. There's actually a hand drawn

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 4>sketch of where the truck was parked. And I think

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 4>it's the point a lot of people just didn't catch

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in the jury at the time. The house has a

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 4>double driveway in it, and Julie's car would always parked it,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, closer to the front door, and my Bronco

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 4>was sit beside it, but there was plenty of room

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 4>in the driveway for both vehicles. So when I got there,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 4>my dad's car was already there, parked beside Julie's car

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 4>in the drive so I just pull up behind him

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 4>over on the grass to the left side of the driveway.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 4>So then Danny leaves to go tell mother what had happened,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and so when he leaves, that leaves an opening in

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 4>the driveway. And so that's exactly how Meeks drew it

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 4>on his diagram, and to me, it's obviously what Meeks

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 4>saying is what he'd remembers seeing that morning after the

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 4>police got there and after all this had happened, And

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 4>there's an aerial photo of the scene taken by the

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 4>police that shows that.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like maybe this kid was interviewed in

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath about seeing Charles's car a few days after

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the fact, and his recollection was a bit fuzzy. Perhaps

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>his memory was enhanced by that aerial photo. We'll never know. Perhaps,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen in other cases, you just had a

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>kid who, for whatever reason, wanted to insert himself into

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>an investigation to help the police. However, what we found

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>out just before the evidence you hearing that Chris and

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Mark recently tagged him, was that an investigator working for

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris checked out the properties and get this, the vantage

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>point that Willie Meeks and his grandfather had. They checked

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it out, and what they found is that that vantage

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>point was totally misrepresented to the jury. The jury had

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>been told that they were right across the street, but

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were standing where they said they were standing

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and looking at Julie's house, you would not have been

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>able to see the driveway in the way that they claimed.

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 3>This kid who testified they was checking the garden as

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 3>the father of a teenager. It struck me when I

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>read the transcript, it was like who does that? Who

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 3>gets up? But like, you know, I think that you know,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 3>normally when you would have a testimony like that at

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>a trial, that you would have some sort of explanation. Yeah,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 3>it was part of my job, like to go out

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, make sure that the garden was still

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>there at four thirty in the morning, when it's still

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 3>basically dark out.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>The defense called two other neighbors, one of whom had

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>an actual explanation that was credible for why they were

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>out on the morning of May thirty. First, that is,

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>they were getting in their car to go to work.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>These were you know, and it was an adult who

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 2>had a job. These two witnesses said there was no

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>car there, meeting that description.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So this midnight, pre dawned gardening teenager and his grandfather,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>who remember, whose accounts did not corroborate each other, were

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>refuted by two other neighbors with credible recollections of that

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>morning who said that both said that Charles's car was

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>not there. And in addition to this weak evidence, the

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Tiplers presented no confessions, eyewitnesses, forensic evidence because there wasn't any.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>The hares found in Julie's hand were not a match

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for Julie or Charles. Charles's clothes, his car, fingernails, his apartment.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>No blood evidence at all was found. In fact, get

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this prior to trial. At one point they even claimed

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that they had found blood on his tennis shoes, but

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>when it came back for the lab it turned out

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to be Coca cola. Now, the defense presented Charles, who,

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of course reiterated the same statement that he had been

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>making since day one, recounting his every step and maintaining

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>his innocence. The defense tried to up to the evidence

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of an intruder coming through the open rear window, the bootprint,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and the red bandana, as well as the construction worker

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Ainsworth who worked behind Julie's house and committed a rape

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and home invasion just a month after Julie's murder, but

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>none of it gained enough traction to overcome the testimony

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of Dick Suveran.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Richard Suveran, fresh off his testimony convicting Ted Bundy.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Suveran is a charismatic guy, one of the sort

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of godfathers of forensic odonology. Right, he's got resume full

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of credentials, at least he did in nineteen eighty five.

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>At the time of this trial. Fancy doctor flies up

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to ende Lujahl Obama from Miami and wow's the jury

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>with this quote unquote science. And you know, I think

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the private prosecutors, the Tipplers, knew how important he was

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>because they saved him to the end of their case

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>against mister McCrory. And right at the end of his testimony,

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>they do this series of questions, is this a bitemark?

0:29:58.160 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Did mister McCrory make this by mark?

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Did he do it during the murder? Essentially? Yes? And

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're a juror, that's hard to overcome. You know. Yeah,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>there's tons of all their expalatory information out there, obviously,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>but you just had this fancy doctor who flew up

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>from Miami saying this guy bit her while.

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>He was killing her.

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's usually at this point that I ask if you

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>were still holding out hope that the jury got it right,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't sound like anyone did. Can you take

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>us back to that moment, that awful moment when the

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>jury came back in.

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, when when they walked in, I mean, I could

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 4>have told you the verdict before they're in, just jurors

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 4>that were smiling and looking at us and so forth.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 4>But when they came back in that they were not

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 4>looking at our way, and I knew then, you know

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 4>that it was over. When jeordge Balwin, you know, fantastic

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 4>guilt to I told him then that I didn't kill her.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I knew it wasn't gonna make any real difference, but

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 4>there's something I felt I had to say. I had

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 4>to tell him personally, well, you know, I wanted to

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 4>stay in front of everybody. I need not do this.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 4>And we were surprised that the judge allowed me to

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 4>remain out on bond until sentence, and that was just

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 4>unheard of. And I've often thought that maybe that was

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of how he felt about the case,

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 4>because you just don't get convicted the murder and stay

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 4>out on bonding. And I went out for ten more days.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Prison is a horrible place. You don't want to be there,

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 4>and you don't want your family there, to say the least.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 4>There's a real adjustment. That's not the word for it.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 4>It's culture shock. I mean, it's just not something I

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>ever dreamed in the worst nightmare, what ever happened. And

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 4>so to get sentenced to a life sentences, you know,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 4>it takes a while to adjust to that.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>There's no way I'd ever want to even imagine. Must

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>us live through it? I mean, seeing what Dick Suvron did,

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>did you have any hope that this could ever be undone?

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Uh? Well, we of course did a direct appeal to

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 4>criminal court appeals like you normally would, and that was

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 4>shot down, although there were some comments in their opinion

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 4>that you know, they agreed that Subarun's testimony had substantially

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 4>changed from the time he wrote the letter until he

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 4>actually came in the courtroom and that should have been

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 4>revealed to us under discovery laws. But the judge said

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 4>that Marcel, my attorney, did not object at the proper

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 4>time to preserve it for appellate review. And it's like

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't believe that, I mean, your attorney doesn't object

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.239
<v Speaker 4>even though they think there's an issue here. And then,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 4>of course we didn't know until after I was at

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Kilby for a while at a hearing on a motion

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>for a new trial. The DA greatly near at the

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>time Grady made the comment about Harvey went down there

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 4>one day, and that's when we first learned that Harvey Tippler,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 4>the young the son of the Tipplers, had act going

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 4>down to Carl Gables, Florida and met with Suverron from

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 4>the time of the letter until the time of the trial.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 4>So now it's like, Okay, now we're seeing some understanding.

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Why did this testimony change like it did?

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So now things begin to appear a bit clearer.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, another thing happened after this case. The Tipplers,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 3>younger member of their duo went to federal prison serving

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 3>life sentence for solicitation and murder as an aside, right,

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>So these are the guys that prosecuted an innocent man.

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So it appears Harvey Tippler may have been willing to

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>fudge evidence to ruin an innocent man's life, which makes

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 1>his solicitation of murder conviction not that surprising, let's face it.

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So what did the Alabama Supreme Court do with this

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>information album?

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 4>The Supreme Court, they really just didn't do anything with it,

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 4>and then it just sat for a while. And I'm

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 4>not sure the date here in the early two thousands

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 4>or someone of the two thousands that the cases involved

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 4>in Michael Way and the dental mess over there in

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Mississippi where two different men were sentenced to death row.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Lavon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer. That was like two

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven, two thousand and eight. Michael West was

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>basically exposed as being a fixer for hire. If you

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the evidence you needed to con back, he'd

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>basically just show up and match any teeth to almost

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>any injury.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly. That case became public and we got wind

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 4>of it and Newsweek magazine I believe it was, and

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 4>so after that we file Rule thirty two trying to

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 4>attack the dental evidence, but at that point we didn't

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 4>have near the resources. Any serious ammunition didn't come up

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 4>until I got a letter from Mark earlier the Innocence

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Project of New York could ask if we would be

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 4>willing to provide records. They were doing, I think a

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 4>task force or study in dental cases around the country.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 4>So we provided all the records.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, when we in strategical litigation at the Innocence

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Project decided to focus on bank Mark comparison at evidence

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 3>we identified as well as we possibly could every bite

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Mark conviction in the history of time, and we focused

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 3>on death penalty cases initially, and then we started, you know,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 3>litigating all of these cases because we know that any

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 3>conviction that rests on junk science is inherently unreliable. And

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 3>because Mark and I have litigated many post conviction cases previously,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 3>including another wrongful conviction of Shila Denton in Georgia that

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 3>was also a bite Mark case. We reached out to Mark,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, because Mark and the Southern Center for Human

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Rights litigates and Georgia and in Alabama and referred mister

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 3>McCrory's case to him.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 2>I read the transcript and I thought, yep, we're going

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>to take this. You know, mister McCrory's lead trial council's

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 2>deceased now, but the junior trial attorney at the time

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is not. And you know, he was practicing in nineteen

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty five. He's still practicing, So that's a career of

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 2>something like thirty seven thirty nine, forty years. When I

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>walked into his office after I learned of this case

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago, he had mister McCrory's file

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 2>sitting behind his desk, and he said, that's where I

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 2>keep my file because this is that case, this is

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the case that haunts me. One of the first things

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 2>we did was we've talked with Chris and we said, well,

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 2>let's just see if doctor Suvron what he thinks today,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and so we asked him.

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm not very popular with the dentists, as

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 3>you can imagine, particularly after publishing my book, but I

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 3>do have respect for forensic analysts of any discipline that

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 3>are willing to review their prior case work and to

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 3>recant when they know they've been wrong, when they know

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>that their opinion may have led to the conviction of

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 3>an innocent person. And I think that with notable exceptions

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 3>that we've talked about on your show before, Jason, but

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 3>most forensic analysts are trying to do the right thing.

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 3>They're not trying to frame innocent people for crimes that

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 3>they didn't commit. And you know, when you have the

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 3>influence of you know, prosecutors saying that that you know,

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 3>this guy is a guilty murderer and we need your

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 3>opinion to help put him away, you know, many friends

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 3>analysts believe that they're doing the right thing by giving

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 3>the opinion to the prosecution that.

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 2>They want dix.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.919
<v Speaker 3>Zuban went back, he reviewed his testimony, he reviewed the

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 3>evidence at issue, and he entirely recanted his opinion. Once

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 3>that happened, Mark and I decided to co counsel this

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 3>case together and we filed a petition for a new

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 3>trial untainted by false, misleading. Evidence that was presented, nonetheless

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 3>is so called scientific evidence to mister McCrory's jury, So.

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what we want.

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 3>We filed this motion for a new trial in the case,

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 3>and we were granted an evidentiary hearing, and in the

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 3>lead up to this evidentiary hearing, the day before, we

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 3>got an offer from the prosecution for time served, which

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 3>means that all mister McCrory has to do is accept

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 3>responsibility for this murder, and he goes home that day

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 3>day that day, goes back to his son, to his sisters,

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to his life after thirty seven years in prison. He

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 3>did not hesitate for one second in rejecting it. I

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 3>think I'd plead guilty almost anything to get out of

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 3>prison after being in for that long, And to me,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 3>that was as much evidence as anything else that mister

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 3>McCrory is an instant.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Man, and the fact that it was offered in the

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>first place, and the fact that they let him go

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>home after he was sentenced, but before he went to prison.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>All of it adds up to an even more searing

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>indictment of the whole system.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Someone asked me recently, did you entertain it? And I

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 4>know I didn't entertain it. I'm not about to plead

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 4>guilty to a murder that I did not do for

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 4>many reasons. I mean, obviously I want to get out

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 4>of prison, but we want to know what happened and

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 4>who did it and so forth, And it seems to

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 4>be that we're the only ones chasing those answers. The

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 4>police have long since given up on trying to help that.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 4>It seemed like in many ways they've tried to cover

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 4>their tracks on their inepness. Back when all this occurred,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, investigator blay geartt destroys and burns several things

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 4>that could have been used for DNAs. That's when DNA

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 4>was just becoming known and just becoming popular, and yeah,

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 4>he burns these things.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, we would love to do DNA testing of the

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 2>fingernail scrapings that were taken from Julie right, despite no

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 2>scratches on mister McCrory, the hair that was found clutched

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>in her head, the red bandana like the one that

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Ainsworth wore. We'd love to test all of that for DNA,

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>but one of the police officers burnt it all and

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 2>so it's unavailable for testing.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Who burns evidence? This is insane, like at least lie

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to us, right it was, tell us that you lost it,

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 1>but you burned it. It just speaks to the fact

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that all the people in positions of power really must

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>know that he's innocent.

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Is just astonishing. So we proceed to the hearing, and

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 3>in addition to the recantation that was done in an

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.479
<v Speaker 3>Affidavid and you know, notably, the prosecution did not call

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 3>pigsu Verron to try to rehabilitate him or to try

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 3>to salvage his commcsion. Instead, we put on the evidence,

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>and we put on two forensic dentists, Adam Freeman and

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Cynthia Berezowski, both of whom are to extent that anybody

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 3>can be well qualified in this field. They're both very

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 3>well qualified and studied it, and they both opined that

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 3>this was not a bite mark. They looked at the

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 3>other injuries that had not been called teeth marks and

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>pointed out that these things that were called teeth marks

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and these other things that weren't appeared to be the

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 3>same instrument that created all these injuries which were not

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 3>teeth right. And then additionally and importantly, we had an

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 3>investigator go out to the scene a couple of days

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 3>before the hearing and take a look at the vantage

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 3>point that the kid across the street and his grandfather

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 3>claimed to have seen mister McCrory's truck or something that

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 3>looked like his truck, maybe on the.

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Day of the murder, maybe not.

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 3>And the description of the vantage point that they gave

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>to mister McCory's jury, it was described as being directly

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 3>across the street. But if you were standing where they

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 3>said they were standing, and you were looking toward the

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>victim's house, you would not have been able to see

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the driveway in the way that they claimed. And when

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 3>we put our investigator on the stand, we showed evidence

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 3>from the nineteen eighties that showed that the houses were

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 3>in the same position, that there were no new structures,

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 3>and that they were the same when we did the

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 3>hearing last year. So even this one shred of weak

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 3>evidence was further undermined at this hearing.

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 2>To sort of close out the rest of the hearing.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, we felt like we did it. That's the

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 2>only evidence. It's not there anymore. Right, And so what

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>does the prosecution do. A prosecution has an investigator from

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 2>their office read the direct testimony of some of the

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>witnesses who testify in nineteen eighty five. So this guy's

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 2>just literally reading the transcript. He's not reading the cross examinations,

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>he's not reading any of the defense witnesses.

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He's just reading.

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Certain prosecutor and witnesses from nineteen eighty five, which seems

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>to me a concession that they have no response to

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 2>anything that we've said. And then in closing argument, get

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 2>up and create an entirely new theory of guilt.

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Liliana Sigoura and Jordan Smith did an article for The

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Intercept on this case, and they called the closing argument

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a fever dream. It was just this story that the

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 2>new prosecutor made up, completely inconsistent with the theory that

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.399
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution had at the time. And so we're sitting

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 2>there like, what is going on? What is this? This

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 2>makes no sense this is a totally new theory. And

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 2>so a few days after the hearing, in Investergeiter and

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I went down to the prison where Harvey Tipler was

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 2>serving his prison. Since he was agreeable he knew the

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 2>case well. He has since passed away. He spoke with

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 2>us for quite a while about his memory of the

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 2>case because I mentioned at the outset, we didn't have

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the opening statement or the closing argument, and so we

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what the prosecution argut in closing. So we

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 2>went to the source and we said, mister Tipler, what

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 2>did you say in closing? And he said, oh, it

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is the bitemark. That was all we had, you know.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 2>And so we submitted a notice to the court saying

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 2>we would like to let the court know that mister Tipler,

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the lawyer who tried the case, disagrees with the new tact,

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 2>essentially that the prosecution has taken and the court didn't

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 2>allow us to add that to the record, so they

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 2>had no response to the new evidence and instead made

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 2>up this story. And the real kicker was when they

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>said that the jury was free to decide for itself

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 2>that it was mister McCrory's bitemark. So notwithstanding three dentists

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 2>who said it's not a bitemark let alone. Mister McCrory's

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 2>execution said, well, but the jury could have decided that

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 2>it was, and therefore his convictions should stand.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 3>So to put it differently, lagers are more capable of

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 3>engaging in junk science than the junk scientists themselves, right,

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 3>So that the idea is is that you don't even

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 3>need an expert witness. We can just put this junk

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 3>science in front of the jury and that would be

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 3>good enough for government work.

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 4>You know what, do you bring in somebody LASU or

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 4>all these big fancy pictures and all that, and they're

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 4>gonna believe what he says. And the idea that somehow

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 4>they can take that out and the jury would have

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:35.800
<v Speaker 4>reached the same verdict is ridiculous.

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It's unfucking real. And then on the first of March

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, you guys filed the motion to reconsider

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the order. In it, you've described all of the other

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>bitemark cases that resulted in overturned convictions, and this emotion began.

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is so powerful, just with the names

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of thirty five people who combined probably served over a

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand years in prison. If I to guess, and we

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>know some of these names because they've been on the show,

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and I mean we can read them one at a time,

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we should go in each take turns

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>reading the names.

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Keith Harward, Robert Stinson, Gerard Richardson, Willie Jackson, Roy Brown,

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Ray Cron, Calvin Washington, Joe Williams, James O'Donnell, Levon Brooks,

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy Brewer, Benny.

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Starks, Michael Christine.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey Muldowan, Anthony Keko, Harold Hill, Dan Young Junior, Greg Wilhoyt,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Crystal Weimer, Stephen Cheney, William.

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Richards, Alfred Swinton.

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Sherwood Brown, John Kunzo, Garry Sifazzari, Sheila Denton, Robert de Boys,

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Eddie Lee, Howard, Gilbert Pool, and of.

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Course the man we're talking about today, Charles McCrory. And

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 1>each of these people was wrongfully convicted due to bite

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>mark evidence. And there are countless other names that could

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be added to this list that we haven't been able

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to help yet. So with that, Charles is in your

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty of this slow moving train wreck, you know, I

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>want to find out from you guys, is there any

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>steps that people can take as their petition. Is there someone?

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>What can people do?

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 2>We are appealing the case. We've partnered with some Alabama

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.439
<v Speaker 2>lawyers who are helping us do the best we can

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to try to convince the appellate court that the trial

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 2>court will get it wrong. And so that's the next step.

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think just the more people who know about

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the case, the better.

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Reshare the podcast the articles to those listeners in Alabama

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to write into your lawmakers and question, you know why

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Charles McCrory, an instant man, is still in prison and

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 3>this is correctable. Charles McCrory can still live the rest

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 3>of his life and be reunited with his family. So

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I hope that listeners will help spread the word, help

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 3>put pressure on the decision makers to do the right thing.

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 2>We really want people in Alabama to know that this

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.439
<v Speaker 2>is happening in their backyard.

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 3>And this is not a right or a less issue.

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 3>This is a human rights issue. There should be no

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 3>politics in freeing the innocent.

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So please do get involved. We'll put links in the

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>bio to action steps you can take. Again. Chris Fabricant,

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>go get the book Junk Science. Some of these stories

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are just too crazy to be believed. But you'll understand

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the issue so much better. And it's a great read

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to read like a novel. And now we turn to

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the part of our show that I know everyone looks

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>forward to like I do, which is called closing arguments.

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And Chris, you know how it works. Charles was going

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell you how it works right now, and Mark,

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So basically I thank you closing arguments. I'm going to

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>turn my microphone off and leave it on for each

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of you guys to share any thoughts that you have,

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>anything we may have left out, or anything else you

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to say. So we'll go Chris, then over to

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you Mark, and then of course mister McCrory, Charles, please

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>close it out.

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 3>I'd like people to retain their skepticism and that it's

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 3>really important that we all serve on juries, that we

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 3>have skeptical jurors and that don't believe anything that somebody

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:13.240
<v Speaker 3>tells you just because they're board certified or they're wearing

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 3>a white lab coat.

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to just read a quote that I think

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 2>is important for people to keep in mind. You know,

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Chris and I have mentioned a few times that we

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 2>represented a woman by the name of Shila Denton in

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Georgia who was a bitemark case and in twenty twenty

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Miss Denton was granted a new trial. This is died

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in Waycross, Georgia, conservative part of Georgia, and the judge

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:42.879
<v Speaker 2>chief judge wrote, quote proven unreliable scientific evidence should never

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 2>serve as the basis of a conviction and should be

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 2>dealt with by the courts if and when it is found.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And like doctor Suveran, who we applaud for admitting his mistake,

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 2>like this judge who wrote this, who applaud for being

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 2>courageous enough to overturn a murder conviction because it was

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 2>based on proving unreliable scientific evidence. I just hope that

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 2>there are more judges and prosecutors out there who have

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 2>the courage that this judge did to see that and.

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>To enforce that.

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Well. Again, I appreciate your interest in the case, and

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 4>I just say that I think I wrote this recent

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 4>but there should not be a finality in a case

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 4>where an innocent person is in prison. And I think

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.720
<v Speaker 4>what some courts want to do is close the door.

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 4>This is not the only case we know of thirty

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 4>something exoneries just from dental evidence alone, and how many

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 4>others are out there so juries. While they try to

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 4>make I think good decisions, they do not make perfect

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:45.760
<v Speaker 4>decisions and there should be a real process for people.

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Seriously look at this when people claim innocence, and I

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 4>appreciate groups like yourself and others that are working on that.

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to raw Conviction. I'd like to

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>thank our production team Connor Hall, Jeff Cliburn, and Kevin Wardis,

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with research by Lyla Robinson. The music in this production

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph.

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction,

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction Podcast, and on Twitter at

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava for Good. On

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.959
<v Speaker 1>all three platforms, you can also follow me on both

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Instagram at It's Jason Flam. Wrongful Conviction is

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the production of Lava for Good podcast and association with

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Signal Company Number one