WEBVTT - Draft Show: Trusting The Tape More This Year?

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>war room for incenter news and draft analysis from deep

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>within the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star in Fresco,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys like d Lamb and now your hosts Dane Brugler,

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeomans on we are

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>just fifty five days away from the NFL Draft as

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>we continue on this long off season journey that is

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. It's a brand

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>new Thursday edition. We're glad you're along with us here

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com. Kyle Yeoman's alongside Dame Brugler,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Cavanaugh, and the great Kevin kat Turner as always

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>here on this Thursday. Guys were starting to get close.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it on Tuesday with the other group

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of guys. But the combine now should be quote unquote

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the rear view mirror. But there's still a lot

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of information gathering to be done because protas are on

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the horizon, Dane, and it continues to be an offseason

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and a draft process really unlike any other. Yeah, that continues.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>We had the combine list come out this week, which

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because it means not quite as much this

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>year without having a combine. Now you know it'll mean

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>something because you know, a you in terms of the medicals,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's something that will be funneled through the process

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, be it gives us a better

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of some of the players that are a lot

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of NFL teams are looking at and some of the

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>players that maybe they're are not very high on. UM.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we have around thirty uh non combine

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>guys get drafted every year, and then it'll probably happen

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this year even though it is a little different. Um.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's just it's just everything's unprecedented. And as we

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of work our way through, we got Pro days

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be starting up here um next week, um, and

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>those gonna run all the way through April, and you know,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just talking to people around the league how it's gonna work,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's really interesting. They're gonna kind of break

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>it up in the regions. Um, and just with how

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the scouts are gonna travel to these pro days, just

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>really interesting as they try to navigate through all this.

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, we're still gonna get all the height, weight, speed,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We're still gonna get all the agility numbers. Uh, you know,

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's gonna be weird because we're gonna be

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>hearing a lot of numbers coming out of uh, you know,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>workout facilities too, and you know, it's some of them

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are probably are pretty close, some of them are probably bogus,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, hopefully these guys choose to run

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>at the pro day and don't just rely on what

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they are what they're doing at their facilities. So just

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a really really interesting part of this weird draft process. Jeff,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>how tough do you think it is to kind of

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>balance those two because in the past, we've had kind

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of that easy comparison between these players and sometimes even

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>getting to see them back to back and getting to

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>see these different workouts, and then all of a sudden,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that and you have to go by region,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to break it up across the country. And

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's tougher on these scouting departments to really kind

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of compare guys, especially whenever it comes to the same position. Yeah,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think the only tough part is that it's

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 1>not as standardized because it's not all at the same

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>place on all the same things. And maybe if you're

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about electronics and lasers, teams are going to be

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with that anyway. But I've seen numbers that are

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>coming out of these the workout facilities where guys are training,

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just kind of grant, like, everybody's super fast,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody's incredible, and I'm just like, all right, yeah, okay,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we get handheld timers that are going real well for

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys. So yeah, I think it's I think the

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>challenges that it's no longer going to be. I mean,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess like dating, it's still gonna be standardized, right, Like,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna be hand timing at the like look

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>scouts will, But we're gonna get standardized numbers off of

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>off of a lasers, aren't we. I mean, I don't know,

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're not gonna be able to do standardized you know,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lasers at every single pro day. It's just not feasible.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And so for just continuity purposes, are they going to

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do hand times? Probably? I mean a lot of teams

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they use hand times anyways, even with the combine, they'll

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, just and they do that so they can

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have apples to apples comparisons with how they time at

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pro days. So h you know, I don't, I don't.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel really, I'm not really confident that we're

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have, you know, the standardized part of the process. Katy,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's more of a Trust the Tape

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>type of year than any that we've seen so far. Yeah.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean my friends Dane and Jeff used to do

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a podcast it was very popular called Trust the Tape.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>And there's a guy Why I asked you that question. Yeah,

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a reason that podcast wasn't called Trust the

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Pro Day or Trust the Calm Dine or Trust his

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>names were taken. Those were all taken. Trust the milk

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in my fridge after the expiration day. There's a reason

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't entitle it. That's it's Trust the Tape. I

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest challenge comes to your holdouts more than

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>I know. These numbers are important and things like that,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think when we start talking about people who

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't play in twenty twenty, how are you convinced that

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing changed from who they were in twenty nineteen. Hey,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what the challenge is. And also I think my

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>questions you see all these things like, um, okay, this

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>prospect as he's got a zoom meeting with the Colts

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Jaguars or whatever. It's like these play get

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>knocked if the if the players you can't really hear

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>them very well on their zoom, like they have a

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bad zoom set up. Are you knocked in the prospect

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think if you have a lot of patience

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for that, if you Wi Fi can't pick him. What's

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that poster on his wall behind him? Oh yeah, cross

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>him up the list. He's out. Yeah no, but he

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't wear a suit to the to the zoom interview.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to happen. Um. With all of this

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>being said, though, I mean, there's so many different factors

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that go into it anyways, and I feel like we've

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>always talked about it on this show previously. But it's

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all going to verify what you've seen on tape. It's

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all going to kind of supplement what you have on tape.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So nobody's ever going to, like, like KG just said,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>trust the combine and trust the protas and things of

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the sort. So that's the positive thing about it all.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And even with the opt outs, it'll be tougher, but

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>these the studying is still going on. But Dane, you

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>brought up a really fun thing in our in our

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>group message throughout the weekend. I kind of want to

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hit this in the first segment, and then in the

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>third segment we're gonna hit some offensive lineman because offensive

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>line is kind of an undersung position in this class,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think we definitely need to talk about it,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're the Cowboys with an offensive tackle. And

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe some later rounds to try ensure up some depth.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about a roundtable segment that

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you had an idea of, and it has to do

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with three different things. It's the favorite player in the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>class of study, prospect evaluation in this class that gives

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the most trouble to everybody, and then your favorite player

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>comp And I think this will be fun because I

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>know all of these are different. But Dan, since you

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>came up with the idea, I'll let you go first,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll go with Kat next, and then I'll

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>round it out after Jeff. But who is your favorite

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>player in this class to study? So far? It's hard

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to name just one. I think Zach Wilson. I've been

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a big Zach Wilson fan since the fall. Just his

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ability off platform to make those spontaneous decisions and to

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be naturally accurate on the move. It's just it's so impressive,

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>makes things happen. So Zach Wilson would definitely qualify Kyle Pitts.

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know that I could have an answer,

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, for this and not mentioned Kyle Pitts with

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>just he's he's a cheek coat. You know. It's just

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>watching him make plays over defensive backs, watching him separate,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>watching him just you know, be a boss out there,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is just it's just a lot of fun. So those

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>two guys immediately come to mind. Just talking about my

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>favorite guys the study so far this year. Yeah, I mean,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think just to throw out some different names because

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>those are definitely fun guys. Obviously, Coromla from Notre Dame

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of fun, just the way he flies around.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I want to just have a little fun. I want

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to throw a running back in there, like Kenneth Gainwell

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of Memphis was a lot of fun and just a

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>number of ways he was used, especially on the rare

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>occasion that they would line him out if the X

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and throwing the ball, but like get little

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>things like oh, here's a wheel route. It was just

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the way they used him a lot. Was fun to

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>watch it. And another one, I'll say, I'm just going

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to the offensive line. I'm a big Deontay Brown fan.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Offensive guard, Like, if you wanna talk about just snapping

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball and then beating the crap out of the

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>guy in front of you, I kind of like the

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>way Deontay Brown rolls, like I kind of want him

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in my posse, to be honest, Like, have you ever

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>called them all three hundred and sixty five pounds of him? Yeah,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good guy to have on your side.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Let's just put it that way. So I'm a big

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Deontae Brown fan. He watched his film was a lot

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of fun. Deef Our Darius Washington, sweet sweet art Darius

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington the best safety in this draft class. Who's gonna

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get picked? Who knows? Where? Is he gonna be picked

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round even though he's the best because

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he's five foot eight, I think that's possible. And then

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>my other guy would be Divine Diablo because he's got

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the best name in the class and he talks about

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>him but he's good on tape. He's just a two

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and almost thirty pounds safety, so I think that

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>throws people off, but I think he's a He's a

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really good player, whether he's going to be a linebacker

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>or a safety at the next level. So I'm going

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to safeties Sweet Sweet or Darius Washington aka Safety one

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and Divine Diablo da quickly before we move on. I

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>want to hear your thoughts on Divine Diablo as well,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because I liked him going into the Senior Bowl. He

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was one of my players to watch. Yeah, I mean,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a good player. I think he's probably early Day

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>three guy for me in terms of just where I

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>see him. He is a little bit of a tweener,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a linebacker safety, But yeah, he runs well.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a former wide receiver. That's that's what he was

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>when he arrived at Blacksburg, So you see that at

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>times with his ability to play the ball. I just

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he is enough juice to hold

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up in man coverage or even to make plays on

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, passing lanes and own so I don't I'm

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent sure what I'm doing with him. Uh,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, on base defense. But I think he's gonna

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>survive on special teams and think he's just a really

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>quality player that can round up my roster. I'm just

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>not sure what's his ceiling for me. So that's why

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I have more of an early fourth, fifth, sixth somewhere

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>early day three on him. So I've got a really

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>easy answer for my favorite player to watch, And it

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was just because a lot of people maybe forgot just

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how dominant he was because twenty opt out. No, it

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Jaylen Darden. I'm not gonna say that, I promise

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought about saying it. Jamar Chase Lsu. How about

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that wide receiver. I mean, the fact that he was

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>able to dominate NFL caliber corners the way that he

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>was as a redshirt sophomore just was unbelievable to me.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I was really sad when he opted out,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because I mean it allowed guys like Davante Smith and

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle to kind of take over. I mean, even

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>like another opt out in Rashi Bateman who came back

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and then opted out again. I mean, they were the

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that kind of took over college football. But I

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think the year that jamar Ches would have had for

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>LSU would have been comparable to any of those, even

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>without Joe Burrow at quarterback, because I think he's just

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic player overall, so I think he would probably

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be my favorite. Now reversing the order a little bit here, Jeff,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>who was the toughest player for you to tab this

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>year in the draft class? Oh, that is a great question.

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of us don't prep as well for these segments

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as others. So I'm currently looking at my list of players.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Toughest guy andre Cisco, Syracuse safety, Okay, because I know

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>there's people that like him, and I know that in

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>theory he's hyper athletic, and I know that he had

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>a ton of interceptions. But then I watched his tape

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think I've seen a safety give up

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>more big plays than andre Cisco. So I don't know,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is somebody going to pick him in the top fifty

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's an athletic guy with a history of creating turnovers?

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Or do you just say, guys, I don't want him

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because the number of and this is run plays, pass

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>plays underneath deep like andre Cisco's tape. I just kept typing,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You're the last line of defense. What are you doing?

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say, Andre Cisco, who I'm trusting the tape

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and i put him in the fourth or fifth round,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure he's going to go higher than that,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but it happens. Plus he's coming off the acl which

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is another you know, obviously that doesn't that's not as

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>damning as you know, maybe fifteen years ago, but still

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>every every knee responds differently. So just something else that

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is important for Cisco's evaluation. I mean, I think you

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you got him nailed. I think just in terms of, yeah,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he'll he'll make big plays, but he gets up big plays,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's more of a style thing,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a preference, you know, And what do you want?

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are you looking for in your safety?

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>A guy that is a little feast or famine, or

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>you want a more conservative player. You know, I was

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>watching a guy last night, Kayden Stearns, the Texas safety

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's the exact opposite. He does not make a

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of big plays, but he also doesn't give up

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a ton of big plays either, because he's just so conservative.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's just you know, I don't I don't know

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's my style either as a safety. So it's

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just an interesting juxtaposition between those two guys. Tats. Yeah.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean for me, there's there's quite a few names,

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but one I would only want to throw out is

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Brown, the defensive vineman from Texas A and M.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, you're watching it and when you see

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the flashes, you go wow, and then you go why

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that happen more often? And there are plays when,

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, it just looks like he's not trying hard.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if that's the case. Maybe he's tired,

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was banged up, those types of things. But

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Brown was a very up and down evaluation for me.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And when you're talking about putting a guy in your

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred or or you know, maybe trying to

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get this guy to be a Day two pick, you know,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure Bobby Brown was consistent enough for me

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to take him on, you know, the third round. So

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's there's a there's a lot there to like.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely consider him in that third or fourth

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>round range. But Bobby Brown was an evaluate It was

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a frustrating watch. I guess I'll put it was very

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>up and down. Dang. Uh So I've got a few

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Um that's uh. I mean for those young evaluators out there,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let this segment kind of be a lesson.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, don't get discourage when you watch a player

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're just like, I don't know what to do

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with him, because it's okay. That happens a lot. Um.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Some guys are just confusing and it's just gonna take

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more work and homework to figure him out.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Like for me, Anthony Schwartz, is that guy from Auburn, UM.

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the fastest humans in this country. Um.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>He in high school you ran a ten point zero

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>seven in one hundred meters, Jeff? Is that fast? I

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, you would think he would be on pace

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to be running in the Olympics in a year or two.

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That was his goal. I mean he ran at Auburn, UM.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, he he was a two sport athlete at Auburn.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>He set a few sec records. I think he was

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty five nine in the sixty meters. Um. I mean,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy can fly, there's just no doubt about it.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But just real quick Dane. Like when you see high

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>school guys, and they're talking about the fastest guys in

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the country in football. You're gonna see like ten four,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ten five. Yeah, that's that's blazing. That flying ten o

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>seven is stupid. It's it's ridiculous. Uh uh. He won

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the silver medal and the hundred meters at the World

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Championships as a senior in high school in Finland. Um

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and just I mean, this guy is just ridiculous. Uh

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, just that. And it translates to the football field,

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but it translates speed wise, but not big play wise. Um.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And so a guy with that type of speed, you

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>would expect all these these big plays, either on as

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a return man or you know, the just underneath plays

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that he's able to stretch out a stride and you know,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>take eighty yards or just winning deep. But looking at

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>his as his film, it was just a lot of

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of feast or famine. I mean

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he was looking at I just blame well And that's

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly that's part of it. That's part of it too.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>So you know, looking at his his his tape of

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>his one hundred and seventeen catches, only nine point four

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of them resulted in a play twenty five yards

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or more. I mean, that's just that's not the that's

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>not the percentage the odds that you want to see

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from a player at this type of speed. But yes,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you factor in he's a young player who uh you know,

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was also a track athlete at Auburn. So in the offseason,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not training for football, he's not working out with football,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he's training with track and obviously two different sports with

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>two different uh you know, conditioning process and in preparation. Um,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>now that he's football only, is Zach going to be

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>able to improve? You know, what's his ceiling on the

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>football field. It's it's a really interesting evaluation because there's

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of projection there. Where do you feel comfortable

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>drafting him? And then a guy on the defensive side

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, Chris Rump at a duke, really really

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting because he didn't start playing. His dad, longtime college

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>in NFL defensive coach, defensive coach at defensive coordinator at Florida,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>now is in the NFL with the Bears, is their

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>defensive line coach. Really extensive background in coaching at a

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>high level, but he didn't let his son, Chris Rump

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the second, he didn't allow him to play football until

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>high school, and so he was one hundred and seventy

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>pound junior in high school and so just way behind

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his body in terms of just football development.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Goes to Duke and the last two years this guy

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was was hard to lock U thirty four total passes

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or tackles for a loss, But I don't know what

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to do with them because he's undersized and he's a

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>liability in the run game. Once blockers get their hands

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on him, they can shut him down fairly easily. So

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>where are you playing him? Is he a sub package guy?

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Or can can you get something out of him as

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an off ball player in early downs? I'm just trying

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to figure out his exact role is really tough. I

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we talk about, um, you know, gadget

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>players on offense. You know, we don't talk enough about

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gadget players on defense. You know we don't. We don't

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>use that term for defenders. To me, Rough is a

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gadget player. You know. However you want to use him,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's definitely value there. You just have to

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>figure out the right role, the right way to deploy him,

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, he has speed. Um, you know, he's

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>got a knack for finding the crease and you know,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>creating havoc in the backfield. Just it's a lot of

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch. But trying to nail down his exact

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>project action at the next levels a little bit of

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a challenge. I like it real quickly. I'm going to

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get my back to back starting with the comp player,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>or excuse me, starting with my toughest to evaluate, and

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 1>that's Jason Away, edge rusher out of Penn State. And

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is because I want to love the

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>traits and I do, and I want to love the film,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and I try and talk myself into loving the film.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>But he also didn't have a sack at all this

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>past season, and I know there wasn't necessarily a whole

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>lot to work with on that Penn State defense. They

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>really struggled on that side of the football this year

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>without Michael Parsons back there, without some of the other

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 1>guys that like a geter, grossmatos and players that had

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>left previously. But he has every single bit of the

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>tools available to potentially make it and be successful in

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I've still tapped him as one of my

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>top edge rushers, but it was still kind of tough

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for me to really look at it and say, I

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to get to the quarterback in the

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL whenever he didn't have a single sack in twenty twenty.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>My favorite comp other than Dane Brugler's comp of Carlos

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Basham junior where he comped him to Marcus Davenport earlier

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in the year. I love that comp Dane, by the way,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>so props to you on that one. I tweeted this

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out though, Quincy Roche edge rusher out of Miami. I

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>compared him to Bradley and I, and I think Roche's

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>way better than and I, But I also I think

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they win in certain ways. They were both uber productive

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>during their collegiate ten years, and then all of a sudden, Roche,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>whenever Gregory Rousseau opted out, had a bigger opportunity to

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>be productive, and he ended up having a huge sack year.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And he wins with short arms and not a ton

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of speed, which is exactly what I had written down

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for Bradley and I last year. And so I compared

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>those two guys together once again, I think Roche is

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>just a better player overall. More polished than and I was.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>And with that being said, he's still one of my

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>top eight edge rochers as well. Dane. Yeah, it's Roche

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. He's he's tough to stack in this class

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many any talented rushers in that you know,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>rounds two to four range. Um, you know, he's he's

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>log jammed in there with guys like Rashad Weaver and

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Turner and Patrick Jones. Um. Yeah, so it's tough

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to stack him. Um. I don't like him as much

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as you do. But he did I thought he did.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He helped himself with the Senior Bowl. He he played,

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>showed a little more juice live than I saw on tape,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>which is good to see. But I mean another guy

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Oway not much production. Um, you know, uh Rochet,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have a ton of stack production as a

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>as a senior at Miami. Um. So it's you know,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>he could be a little bit difficult too. Who is

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your favorite cop, Dame? Um, so I've got a few

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. I really like the Travon Merrick to Jesse

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Bates um comparison, because you're talking about guy's tall, linear,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a little a little leaner, than you want, and that'll

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>show in the run game. But guys that are proven

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>ballhawks or you know, they got range, they know how

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to make plays on the ball, you know they're probably

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be first rounders. I mean, maybe Mary gets

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, but I think probably more early

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>second you know, kind of like Jesse Bates for for

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same reasons. And then a linebacker

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Jamie and Davis at a Kentucky who's a Day two

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>player in this draft. He is a carbon copy, a

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>clone of Zach Cunningham, who at a Vanderbilt went to

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. I just think they're the exact same player

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was. It just hit me over the head

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>watching Davis's tape how how similar they were. So those

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>two really stood out as easy comps for me, Katy. Yeah,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>for me, I'm gonna go a little off the beaten

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>path here. When I watched Notre Dame tight end Tommy Trimble,

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of getting Joe Daguarra vibes, if you remember,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>from Cincinnati, kind of lined up everywhere. You can line

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>him out at ax you could play him as the

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>h back, and I know you can do it with

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tight ends, but just kind of the

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>way they moved and the way they played. I kind

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of kind of had that as my my cops that

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I that I liked. Um, Tommy Trimble and Joseph Daguira,

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think went went the third round and then he

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>tore his acl um. You know, I think I always

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>get uncomfortable with comps with quarterbacks because there's so much

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going on at the quarterback level that I'm I'm really

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really uncomfortable doing that. Um, So I don't know, I'm

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay away from the quarterbacks. One guy, and I

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do not like his tape really at all from this year,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his most recent tape. But I do see

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the running style. When I watched Cuba Hubbard, I see

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of upright style that Darren McFadden had. Now

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>way different obviously, H McFadden All American first round pick

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Chuba Hoverard. You know, I don't think it's crazy to

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>say that he might not get drafted, but I think

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he probably goes in the fifth, sixth, seventh round something

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. But when I watched it, I typed that

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on my note right there, like, hey, it's kind of

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like that mcfaddened style. But there's a lot going on

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with Cuba Hoverard. When I watched him, I was not impressed.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff oh or Darius Washington honey Badger. I don't know

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if I have to say it over and over again. Yeah,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>my five eighth safety, he's honey badger and that's awesome,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And the other one is a bad comp I'm gonna

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>throw that out before I give you the comp just

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because the size is so much different. But ken Darius Tony,

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Florida wide receiver, his tape reminds me of when

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I was ten years old or however old, I was

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>watching Dante Hall with the Kansas City Chiefs, because it's

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like three people will run into each other or run

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>into him, and somehow he's still going and they're all

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. Just the change of direction and the

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>contact balance and how in the hell did he squirt

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>out of that? So Canarius Tony reminds me of every

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>great punt returner ever, and he does it while he's

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>playing wide receiver or taking handoffs. But yes, Ardarius Washington

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>TCU safety, honey badger. Do you I thought you were

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>comparing Kadarius Tony to yourself at ten years old? That's

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what I thought it was. I will tell at ten,

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>At ten, I had wiggle. I was ahead athletically at ten.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It was at about fifteen that people caught up. Should

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you also want a rapping career like Kadarius Tony? And

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I would like it? Yeah, that'd be great. I could

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>go country music or rap. I would go either one,

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take it. I mean, if anybody out there's offering,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I need to update my report on Tony to change

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>my compform. It's a ten year old Jeff Kavanaugh. Yes,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I think that'd be fun. Jeff. I

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>think you're you're witty and like quick witted enough to

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be a like a freestyle rapper. Like if you had

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to sit down and write it, I don't know if

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you could do it, but I think if you're sitting

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there and just rattling it off the top of your head,

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you could get it done. I thought so too, Kyle,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And then I tried. You tried? How did that? It

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't go? Well? Not? Well, that's unfortunate. Well, I like

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>your comp of Kadarius Tony. I had him with Percy Harvin.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>That was who I had him tabbed as kind of

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>once again, another nice returner, somebody that is lightning quick

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and shifty. So plenty of comps to go around, and

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of course that's one of the fun parts about the draft,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is trying to look for those comps. And we just

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>gave a couple of our favorites. We might do this again, Dane,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we should do this again, maybe when we

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>get real close to the draft and kind of go

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>up and talk about it again, kind of our favorites,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>our hardest since then, and maybe even our comps since

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>then as well. But when we come back here on

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft show, time for some

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>twitter on the twenty we'll do it right after the break.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes nothing beat for Classic Miller Light The original light

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>beer proved with great taste and only ninety six calories

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>available for delivery. Celebrate responsibly, Miller Brewing Company. We'll walk

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you this contint ninety six calories three point two cars

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for twelve ounces. We're back in a tasty treat that's

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper and

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor and Cream Soda.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combo that's music? To my Ears Okay,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Time music to My Ears and mouth New Doctor

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Pepper and Cream Soda delas Hey, Cowboys fans, if you're

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about attending a game this season, visit Cowboys Travel

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com to book your travel package today. Stay at

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Team Hotel, have dinner with a Cowboys legend, and

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>experience at and T Stadium's exclusive VIP Owners Club. Also

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>tour the Star, get autographs from your favorite players, and

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>talk xs and os with me. Mickey Spagnola, the official

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, will take care of

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all your travel needs a Cowboys Travel dot Com. There's

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing as unique as our eyes, which is why Selor

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pioneers ways to make lenses as unique as you. Varilux

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, and Crisolve

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for freedom from glare. Three cutting edge solutions in a

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist on Selor

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>visit your local slor experts and find a perfect lens

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for you to see more, Do more, slure. Sometimes nothing

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>beats a classic Miller Light. The original light beer brewed

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with great taste and only ninety six calories available for delivery.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Celebrate responsively, Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ninety six calories

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>three points two cars for twelve ounces. Is that Dallas

0:29:50.920 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show? Entering segment numbered here the

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Glad you're with us,

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris being back in studio. We've got Dan Brugler, Kevin

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>kat Turner, the great Jeff Kavanam, Kyle Yeoman's time now

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for some twitter on the twenty as always, Like I said,

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Beemer doing work in the back at the SWBC Mortgage studios.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, starting things off with a very quick rapid

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>fire question for you, and I'm going to direct this

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>toward Dane Brugler. Jason Bruitt asked yearly question that has

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one weirdness kind of added to it.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But even though there wasn't a traditional combine this year,

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of course that being snubbed and moved to pro days.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Who do you see as some of the snubs and

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>surprises from the list that came out of the quote

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>unquote combine invites Dane. Yeah, there were three hundred and

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three names on the list that they released yesterday.

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>A few of the guys that I thought were it

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was a little surprising they were left off. Running back

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Brown from UAB is a good player, UM. A

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of wide receivers like Marlon Williams from UCF, Demonte

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Coxey Memphis. A couple of Senior Bowl guys bowling green

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end Quentin Morris, uh Riley Cole the lineback from

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>South Alabama. UM, Terek Thompson, the safety at a San

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Dieo State. So there were a few. I don't I

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't think any were you know, necessarily egregious. Um. You know,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the names I just mentioned are borderline draft picks. So uh,

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a not a huge surprise, but you know,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought it's it's always interesting when you know, you

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>get to get the combined list and some of the

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>players that are left off, and you know it's because

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it just you know, peak behind the curtain. Uh. You know,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the National NFS they put this combine on terms and

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they they vote on, you know, which players they want

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to see, and you know, obviously teams have their input.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So just it's interesting to see which players got the

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>most votes to be represented at the combine. All right, Well,

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in a year like this, to be

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>snooped from the combine. I feel like it's not necessarily

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not as big of a deal. And like you

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>said in the first segment, there's usually thirty or forty

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>guys or in between that mix that end up going

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and getting drafted that did not end up at the combine,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and some a little bit higher than others. Let's go

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to Jeff already answered this question on Twitter, but I

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>want to answer it on the show as well. But

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Downey asked what prospect do you not want the

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to draft at ten out of the ones that

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are realistic for the Cowboys to draft at ten? And

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he did say, Jeff Cavanall, you're not allowed to say

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Rousseau because we knew that would probably be the answer.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But Jeff, who else would you not want the Cowboys

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to select the ten Oh, that is a really good question.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Tempted to say Micah Parsons, but I'm going to say

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>any edge rusher. I just don't think there's one eligible

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to me to be picked at ten, and as zaz

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Asulari is my top one out of Georgia U, I

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a pass rusher worth the tenth pick.

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good answer because I mean what,

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure what the other answer would be,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because for me at least, I mean I would be fine,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>even though I wouldn't be my preference. I wouldn't be

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mad if they drafted Jalen Waddle. Um, you know, I

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be mad if they drafted Kyle Pitts. Wouldn't be mad. Uh,

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know if they drafted um, you know, any any

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of these top linebackers later. Yeah, I mean you don't

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you it might not be your first choice. You might

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not love it, but I don't. I wouldn't. It wouldn't

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be like upset about it. So yeah, I think that's

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a good answer. Any of the edge rushers, maybe Christian Barbore,

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little early for him. Um yeah,

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Maybe you know, I like j C. Horn,

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but even ten feel a little early for him. But

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I still wouldn't be like, you know, let's be up

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in arms about it. So yeah, that's I think any

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>any any of the EDG dresser is probably a little

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>too early for them at that tenth pick. And I

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>want to weigh in, like if where they're at a

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>ten if for now and it's maybe a bad assumption.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>But if you can assume that four quarterbacks are going

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in front of you at ten, or just for the

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sake of this discussion, let's say that, then we know

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that we have six players coming down down your way.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>If five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, right, stack that

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>board up, and if you really want to focus on defense,

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you can move things around. But like, stack

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that board up, you can easily know who you want

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and you will have every scenario lined up. You need

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>six picks that you have to deal with right here,

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>six players, and you should have one, two, three, four

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>scenarios lined up. I think where I think where the

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>discussion gets interesting is if you trade back, and that's

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>where you start pitting Osilary against jac Horneum or dres

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>against you know, maybe it's Derris against yeah against Barmore

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or Vara Tucker or however you want to play it.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're thinking offensive line there, like if there's a

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>trade back and you're in that seventeen to twenty region,

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think it gets a little more difficult.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's pretty simple to draft someone you

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>like at ten when you know that three or four

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks have been going in front of you. I really

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can go wrong there if you've done

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>your work and you have it stacked the way that

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to want to go. And I'm saying the problem, well,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that in terms of picking the guy you want, Yeah,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say the only problem with that is when

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you said stack up your next six guys. I think

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>my next six guys play offense, and I think that

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that's not ideal for the Cowboys because to me, the

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>best six guys would be some combination of Pena Suel,

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Rashaan Slater, Kyle Pitts, Jamar Chase, Jalen Waddle, Davante Smith.

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So four quarterbacks go. I think the six next best

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>players all play offense, well, at least maybe seven and

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 1>eight might be Defensean Farley and certain might be there

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe if that, If that's where you have him ranked,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>my easy answer to this question would be Mac Jones.

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Please don't ever talk to me about drafting Mac Jones

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at ten, even if he is the only quarterback available

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>at that point. You haven't signed Dak Prescott because I feel,

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like Katie, you're talking about all these big scenarios. But

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>even with the scenarios that are outside of the draft itself,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in Dak Prescott's contract negotiations and everything that's going on there.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>If mac Jones is the presumed pick at ten, I

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>would be lived. I would hate that. It'd be better

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>than not picking a quarterback if you haven't signed your

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterbaw no, no, I don't want it. I don't want

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it to drift. I would rather drift. I would kick

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that can down the road before I would I would

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>draft mac Jones. You know that down the road is

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like the next draft having Keaton Slovis and who knows

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 1>what else. We'll figure it out. There's a lot of quarterbacks.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback now I'm just saying, I'm just saying quarterback. I'm

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm saying we will figure it out rather than

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>having mac Jones. Because I don't want mac Jones at

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like really at all. That's my one thing. But I

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong. I've been wrong before. I'm going out

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on a limb to say that I think mac Jones

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a terrible pick of ten. But kind of

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to what Kat was just

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>saying because it is intriguing to me because last year,

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>when we were picking at seventeen, there were conversations about

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anybody, and we thought, of course Ceedee Lamb

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even a part of that conversation, and he was

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the one that fell. I think this could be a

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>whole segment in itself, and we may do this next week.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But if we do trade down, or if the Cowboys

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>do trade down, then what is the what are the scenarios?

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>What are those different players, like you said, stacking up

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a horn versus in Ozolari and talking about these different

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>prospects that aren't top ten prospects but are still really

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>good players. And what would you get in return for

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the second in the third round to kind of

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>add onto your draft. I think that might be a

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>fun segment we do next week. Overall, Kat, I like

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>your heads out in that regard, looking for my page refreshed.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>This is bad radio looking. I do that every day, brother,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I know it's the worst hours of it. Yeah. Adam

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>asked what or what prospects get under opponent's skin the

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>best in this draft class because he wants Dallas to

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>end up with some dogs, some guys who can trash talk,

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>bring some personality, honey badger like intensity, who are some

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that could potentially bring that. Kelvin Joseph the Kentucky

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>corner and Jac Horn South Carolina corner. Those are the

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>two guys that they don't stop. It's fun because when

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see that on tape, you just get to

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine what's happening. But those are the two guys by

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>far that jump out as they're gonna talk to you.

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna play hard, they're gonna make you mad, and

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna tell you they made you mad, and

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna make a play, and then they're gonna

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>tell you they made a play. Yeah, Jac Horn, Kelvin Joseph.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing that I'd worried about with Horn

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>is how much is a good the other way? How

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>much is uh you know for how easy is it

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for receivers to get underneath his skin? Um? You know,

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>because he does play so emotional and so aggressive and

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that that is a that is a tough one. Oh.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I got Gil Brent calling Meoul. Should I answer that

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and put him on? Yes? Yes, no, hold on all rightly? Um,

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know he's he's a missed opportunity for the show

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>right there. I wouldn't do that to Gil, but he

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>uh not not the Godfather, come on. Um. So with

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>JC Horn he plays still emotional. That does worry me

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>both ways because yeah, he will get after it, he

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>will talk. He's not as flashy as his dad, you know,

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Horn, but he's still you know, you could see

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that alpha mentality in him. But I also think it

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>goes the other way too, where when the receiver might

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>might have a few wins against him, it starts to

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>go south a little bit. And so, uh, you know

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>when you see that in on some of these tapes

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>where some of the receivers they'll go right at them

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>because they try to get under a skin early, try

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set the precedent early in that game.

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So it just horns an interesting one when you talk about, uh,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, wearing his emotions on his sleeves and being aggressive.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I would to point out something that I'm not sure

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about on this show, Like we all will

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 1>talked about how, hey, Jacy Horns a little grabby down

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the field sometimes right things like that, So is Patrick

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Curtan No one really talks about it. The big difference though,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is Patrick Curtain will grab a guy down the field,

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and he'll just put his head down and run back

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like get back into you know, go out to the

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>huddle or whatever, like jac Horn. This is why it's

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just he's just so demonstrative every time he'll hold a

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>guy and then he'll turn around and go what non

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>non non, Nope, and it's like, hey, man, Curtan like

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very pro about it. Hey, I'm gonna hold you, I'm

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna grab you. I'm gonna grab you. I'm gonna grab

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Just go back to the huddle, normal, normal day at

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the normal day at the office. I do think it's

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it stands out way more when you watch

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Horn than it does with Certain It maybe Horn's a

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>little more grabbier than Certain but like st act like

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Curtan's not getting his hands in there a little bit.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>He just he just has a good way of not

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>showing it after the play and a good timing to

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of pull it back at the right time

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and not like play to the refs. It's very fun.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>The differences is that it's Horn's primary coverage technique. Yea, yeah,

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he does it a lot more. I mean it happens

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of corners, but I more so with

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>JC Horn. Every time he gets up he is looking

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>for the official, either to make sure he didn't throw

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a flag or to complain because the flag wasn't thrown.

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's amazing when you're watching him every time

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>after a play he gets up and meanly finds the

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>official for one reason or the other. It's it's just

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating with him, even with like the grabbiness and the

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>hands And I've always had trouble kind of deciphering this myself,

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'll pass this question onto you guys. But when

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>does it become a problem whenever there is a corner,

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like like you're you're differing even certain and far or

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>excuse me in Horn here, But when does it become

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem whenever they are handsy downfield? Because it is

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a technique thing and it is something that can be taught, right, Yeah, No, No,

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem when it's in the super Bowl and

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest want to throw a lot of flags. True,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm more of saying I agree, But I'm I'm

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to say, when is it more of

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a draft issue? When are you going to knock a

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>guy for being handsy as opposed to another guy for

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.760
<v Speaker 1>being handsy, because everybody's gonna be physical in some sense

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>whenever they're in a cornerback position. But what is the

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>threshold of it being a problem and it being fixable?

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>From a draft prospect, I think you just have to

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out is he doing that because he's incapable of

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>covering or is he doing that because it gives him

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>an added advantage and he knows he can get away

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with it at the college level. For JC Horn, I'll

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, at the moment, he's my cornerback number one.

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's while acknowledging that he is the graviest corner

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I've ever studied. Because I also see that his athleticism

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't require that. So if it becomes a big

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>issue and he's getting flagged twice a week in the NFL,

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna have to take it away. But I

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>also view it as the positive of that's that aggressive mindset,

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that you're not you get nothing from me like

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm going to be with you every step of

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the way. You're gonna feel me. I'm going to be here.

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So unless it's to cover up for a lack of something,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I won't kill you yet. It's just a matter of

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>in the league. If you start getting flagged every week

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>then and we can't take it away from you and

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have you still be good. But I think his athleticism

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is good enough that it's not required. I think the

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>other thing too with that is I'd rather give me

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the aggressive guy and we'll try to scale it back

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the non aggressive guy, the passive player,

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and try to crank it up with him. You know,

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather give me the JC Horns of the world,

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and we'll manage it and work on it as opposed

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to the opposite. So you know, that's that's another reason

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>why I think Horns. You know, even though he is

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>grabby what five penalties and seven games this year, you

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know you still feel comfortable with him as a first

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>round pick. No. I like that a lot. I mean,

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a great answer. If it relies if his athleticism

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>relies on the fact of him being hanzy to be successful,

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>then that's an issue. And if not, then hey, it's

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a teachable thing and hopefully professional coaches could make an impact.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I like that a lot. That's a good answer from

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>both of you, guys. Let's go ahead and take our

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>second break. When we come back, there's some offensive lineman

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that we need to talk about on this show, because

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk a whole lot about the offensive line,

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>especially on the interior. We'll talk about it next the

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>hog Miley's up front when we return here on the

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Draft Show. Sometimes nothing. The classic Miller Light, the

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.720
<v Speaker 1>original light beer brewed with great taste and only ninety

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>six calories available for delivery. Celebrate responsively. Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Ninety six calories three point two cars for twelve ounces.

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers and five

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>championships shows us what success looks like. Where Turkey is

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day, Where we

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are all defined by one single thing, the Star, where

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we as fans know it's our job to keep the

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be the

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support the

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>quest of living life. The Cowboys Way Copyright twenty twenty,

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. Honey, big news, scary? Are you okay? Oh?

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Gary anymore. I'm Jackie Flash. What see? I

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>want the latest smartphone? But the best deals are only

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for new customers. So to get a new customer deal,

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll change my name to it Jackie Flash. Okay, but

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the best smartphone deals at AT AT and Tea for everyone,

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>new and existing custom That's huge. Then guess who's getting

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a deal. Is it Jackie Flash, Jackie Flash. It's not

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 1>complicated at AT and t our, best smartphone deals are

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Restrictions apply. Is it att dot com for details.

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Before there was a draft, you get sized up a

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:17.919
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. The crease in his hat,

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life throw at him,

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas, there's still the

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting cowboys, and Stetson is

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com slash Cowboys.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes nothing beats the classic Miller Light, the original light beer,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>brewed with great taste and only ninety six calories available

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>for delivery. Celebrate responsively. Miller Brewin Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Ninety

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>six calories three point two carbs for twelve ounces. Is

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Draft Show final segment to hear

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, Glad you're

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with us, Everybody, just take a moment and say a

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>quick prayer for Jeff Cavanall's phone batteries, so that way,

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he stays with us the entirety of this final segment,

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but if not, he'll join us next week. I guess

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if if we can't get him back up and go him.

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But Dane Burglar, Jeff Cavana, Kevin, Katie Turner, I'm Kyle Yeomans,

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and well, Dane, there are some offensive linemen we need

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Katie. You put this in our group

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>message as well this past week, and I know Jeff

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has been hitting up on these these offensive lineman too,

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a lot of offensive line talk and

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go gonna go through that quite a bit

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>here over the next couple of moments. But Katie, what

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were some of the topics that you wanted to hit

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever it came to the front five and how we

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be shaped out in this draft class. Well,

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a lot of things to

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about with these guys, and anytime Jeff is tweeting

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>him out offensive lineman, you know that you're in good

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>shape to talk about this. You want to take advantage

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of Jeff because generally Jeff didn't like to talk about

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman with me. So I liked the Jeff sitting

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out so well, look, there was a time where I

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to worry about it on the Cowboys, and

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so I grew to not care about watching offensive lineman

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>because you didn't need them. And now it might be

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>time to turn that page. So I have to do

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the annoying work of watching offensive line. Now we've talked

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>so much about Pinney Sewell and Rashawn Slater. I don't

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>want to spend a tole lot of time on those

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>guys today, but I think there is a conversation to

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be had about what happens after that, and day I'll

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>go to you dry saw as I think a lot

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of people's offensive tackle three. You start to get Vera

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Tucker from USC in there, Oklahoma State's Tevin Jenkins, and

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of guys Eikenberg, if you want to talk

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>about him, there's tons of guys. I start to think,

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the Cowboys success, I do know. I feel

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like I know how the Joneses operate a lot. I

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like they feel comfortable taking first round off. It's

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a lineman, and I do think that's in play if

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they traded back. And I don't know if that's the

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.839
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do, but if there was a trade back,

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I still think offensive lineman would be in play. But

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that I've been thinking about is if

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting there at forty four and you're trading up

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>into the back of the first round, or you're trading

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>up into the top of the second round, and it

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was for a player, who would it be? And I

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>know you can look the names are limitless, But for me,

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I start to think about, do they even know that

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>they needed offensive tackle? The answer is probably yes, but

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 1>they might need a guard just the same way they

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>need a tackle, And I think those are questions they're

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be balancing. And the easy answer is find a

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who can play both. Yeah, And that's obviously easier

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>said than done, but you know, it's if you're gonna

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>find one. I think this is a class to do it.

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>There's this week on the Athletic I posted my top

0:49:56.239 --> 0:50:00.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve offensive tackles, top ten guards, top eight centers, um.

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of future NFL starters in there,

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them, and uh several of them do

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have the position flexibility that you're looking for, whether it

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be tackle, guard, guard, center. Um. So you know this

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this draft is. I don't think we talk enough about

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line and how uh strong of a group

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>it is. You know, it's it's it's I don't think

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it's up there with you know, necessarily wide receiver or um,

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, even even Ed Dresser I think is up there.

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Corner is up there. But the offensive line is it's

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 1>a really strong group. And you could pull Coles in

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>these guys. I mean, Christian Derris saw it bugs the

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.280
<v Speaker 1>heck out of me. How he just doesn't he plays

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>for like ninety percent of the play and then he's good,

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like just just finish, man, come on, give

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>me give me a killer instinct here. Um. You know,

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like that drives me nuts. But that's why that's why

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I put Tevin Jenkins ahead of Derrissaw on mine because

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that he plays harder, like he wants to

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>finish you. He plays with that mentality. And Derrissaw plays like,

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is easy. You know, he gets the

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>job done, he does his job, and he's just kind

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.399
<v Speaker 1>of like cool. And Jenkins is like, I want to

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kill you, yeah, and I'm not no no arguments for

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>me on that. They three and four are very close

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from me. I went Derris saw Jenkins, but if if

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you flip those no issue with that at all. Jenkins

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is so uniquely powerful, um, and he does have that

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>killer instinct that you want to see more from from

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Derris Saw. Jenkins a little short armed, and that worries

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit. UM. But I do think both

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, I don't see why either of these

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>guys wouldn't be able to move inside to guard if

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you needed him too. So you know we're talking about

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a trade back situation from from ten. You know, maybe

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 1>either of those two guys are on the radar um

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and if they wait until day two to address the position,

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's gonna be options. Dylan Radins from

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota State Deante Smith, East Carolina. Um, you know

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>guys with tackle and guard experience, who you know your

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>your football team is going to be better if you

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>draft these guys. Your offensive line depth is going to

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.359
<v Speaker 1>be better. And it's just it's it's going to help

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>your entire offense. So it might not be the sexiest pick,

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think it would make sense for this team.

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it would be easier to address the

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>offensive line issues in Day two than it would be

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to add safety or a corner or somebody on the

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on the defensive side of the football if you didn't

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>go offensive tackle at ten? Dane, riddle me this, tell

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>me if you think I'm too early on this. But

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you talk about having him play both or having the

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to. What if you took Alex Leatherwood in the

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>second round, Alabama's left tackle that I think some are

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>going to view him as a guard and maybe he

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>could do both. Is that too early for Leatherwood? Yeah?

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's later what they picked forty four.

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, that's exact right right where Leatherwood

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>should be drafted, you know, somewhere between thirty five and fifty,

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he's in that range. Personally, I

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>grat him as a guard. He's just he's not the

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>most blusive guy. He's got a little bit of stiffness

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in his lower body, and so I think that he's

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be better inside a guard. He played it

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>what as a sophomore before he moved back to left

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>tackle as a junior and senior, so we do have

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>some tape of him at guard. But yeah, I think

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be a tackle, and so I think

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he's shown enough that you feel okay with him if

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep him outside. But again, I think

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>he's better inside. And again that's why we're talking about

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick and not a first round pick

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:32.879
<v Speaker 1>with some of his issues. But in the second round, yeah,

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you feel good about Alex Leatherwood. And the

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>way they operate is like free agency clean up holes

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for the draft. So do they bring Cam Irving back?

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Do they bring Joe Looney back? Do they add any

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>depth that you know, guard or tackle to make make

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you go okay? Now, we just need to focus on tackle,

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you're doing that, you're just folks on tackle.

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where your names like Leam Eickenberg of Notre Dame

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>come into play. Maybe on day two, maybe Samuel Cosmi

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>from Texas, maybe that comes into play, or if you

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 1>need a guard. I mean I mentioned him earlier. He's

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:08.439
<v Speaker 1>my guy, and he may not fit what they want

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to do on offense. They might want to play a

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>little faster um. But man, I am a big, big

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fan of Deontay Brown. I know I mentioned earlier, and

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can get him on Maybe you can get

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>him at seventy five in round three. You know the

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>other guy, it's a very interesting name if you need

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it interior offensive line help. And who knows how far

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he'll drop is Landed Dickerson of Alabama. After the ACL

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll knock him a little bit, but I don't think

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna drop him too far. So maybe there's a

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>little day two value, maybe a guy who sides a

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit just because he might be a little late

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to the party. You know, maybe he's ready to start

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>training camp. He should be at least pretty close to

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that is that's a great name because you know, we

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:52.439
<v Speaker 1>know this team in the second round, they're not they're

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 1>not scared to take an injury guy or a character guy.

0:54:56.120 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And Landard Dickerson, that's that's that's a great point. I

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:02.439
<v Speaker 1>mean he would be if he fell at a forty four.

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Scoop him up. I mean, this, this guy. The injury

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 1>history is long, extensive and worrisome, but he's also an

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>easy first round talent. I actually like him better at guard,

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>even though he played almost primarily center at Alabama, but

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he could play both. He brings that culture that you

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 1>want his football characters outstanding on the field outstanding. Um,

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just you worry about him staying on the field,

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the greatest predictor of future injury is

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>past injury, and he has you know, more than enough

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. So but if he's gonna be there a

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>forty four, it might be worth the risk. Dane. You

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>say all of these great things about about him and

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about his character and his on the field talent and everything,

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you say the injury history and how it's

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>extensive and now it's a predictor, and then like I'm

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>all out again on him. I mean all I'm already

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>out because I don't want the same offensive line trouble

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys had this past year, because that's exactly

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what it was. It was a lot of Bama evolving door.

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Bama hate out of you opens today.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just no Jones, no Landon Dicker. Where did they

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 1>do to you? That's true? Yeah, I don't know. Maybe

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it is just Alabama. I just I also hate DeVante Smithton. No,

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. I don't hate you. Oh No, Kyle, No, No,

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.839
<v Speaker 1>he's really good. No, he's really good. I promise, I promise, Kyle,

0:56:18.880 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick, real quick. I got a question for you then,

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't want at the injury history bothers

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you there, does round four Walker a little from Stanford

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>do anything for you? Yes, because it's less. I mean

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what would we already have had four picks before that,

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick, a second round pick, and potentially

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:39.399
<v Speaker 1>two third round picks, So he'd be your fifth pick

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. I would take that. I would take

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Walker a little at that point. Yeah. I think he'd

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 1>be a steal at that point too. Yeah. He's he's he.

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>He had a missed opportunity by not playing at the

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl. He had his invite, he declined it. I

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a big missed opportunity for him. Um, we

0:56:57.640 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>just haven't seen him on the fuel. No, you know,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>almost two years, so you know, he's a really talented player.

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:08.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just tough he would have qualified for that first

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>segment when we went over guys that are just tough

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, and with him, it's just because the

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lack of sample size and just haven't seen him in

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a while. And just to be clear on Dickerson specifically,

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I still have him as a as a top five

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lineman or wait no, he is seventh on my list

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>at the moment in terms of interior offensive lineman. He's

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 1>seventh at the point. So I still think very highly

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of him, and I think he's a He's an incredible

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 1>player and an incredible leader. You saw that just from

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the SEC Championship game and the reaction that he had

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and then of course whenever he came back in and

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>took the final neel down of the Natty. I mean, overall,

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he was the heart and soul of that offense.

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But I want to go back to a question, or

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not even a question, but something that Bucky Brooks said

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday show, and he said, if you're going to

0:57:56.880 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be in a position that the Cowboys are in and

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to get an offensive tackle, go get him

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at ten. Don't don't wait and go get a Duke,

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Go get a Slater, Go get a deisol or even

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if Sools somehow miraculously fell, I mean it happens every year.

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>If he somehow fell, get one of these top guys

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at tackle, and then worry about the rest of your

0:58:17.280 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>team later on. Do you agree with this standpoint from

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 1>an overall look of the Cowboys, because I mean, have

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that kind of my rebuttal to that would be, well,

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you say the same thing about corner? You know,

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>why why would it? Why wouldn't you say the same

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 1>thing about well, you know, go get you know you

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys may have a chance to draft the best

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>corner in this in this class. You know, why wouldn't

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you say that also about corner instead of, you know,

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see what's available for you in the second round. So,

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't necessarily disagree with it. I just

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think you could say that about several positions for this

0:58:56.840 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>team and for this class. Dane Slater, Rashawn Slater and

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Newsome or Patrick Certan and Alex Sletherwood, U Slater

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and Newsome Well Newsom make forty four. No. I mean,

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's he's going in the first round. The only the

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing you worry about Newsome is yeah, again, a

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that's missed at least three games each year. Um,

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and so he's got a very lean, wiry frame. Um.

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>His him not holding up would be the only reason

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he isn't going the first round in my opinion, just

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a really I comped in the Kyle Fuller. I think

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a top four corner in this draft. It just

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 1>comes down to, you know, do you trust him to

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 1>stay out there? And if you do, I think he's

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go in the first round. Okay, Slater and Newsome

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or Sir Tannon Jenkins said again, now, what was it?

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Slater and Newsome or Sir Tan and Tevin Jenkins? Tevin

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Jenkins at forty four would be amazing, that really nice. Yeah,

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he might have held up a convenience. If you got

1:00:10.160 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>something something, it would be a ton of thing. He's

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>still still a huge Yeah. I would still go with

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the Northwestern route, just because I think I would too.

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm that high on Newsome, but that definitely makes you

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think more. I guess Jenkins is really good and obviously

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Curtains a really good player. So that I mean, if

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you're choosing between those two scenarios, the draft's

1:00:35.160 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>working out okay for you, I think he would be

1:00:38.800 --> 1:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>happy with either one of those. I would be bumped

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about either one of those if you're the Cowboys, because

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you're fixing your offensive line or at least adding some

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>depth and then adding some potentials there and then you're

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>turning around, then you got yourself a starter on defense

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in each of those realms at cornerback. But we're running

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>out of time. That's gonna do it for us here

1:00:56.320 --> 1:00:58.919
<v Speaker 1>on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Be sure

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to follow all of these guys on Twitter. They have

1:01:00.880 --> 1:01:03.479
<v Speaker 1>great work throughout the week DAYE on the Athletic of course,

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Katie and Jeff in the local radio markets as well,

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and continue to do fantastic work. But until then, until

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>next Thursday, ten am Central Time, We'll see you next

1:01:14.280 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>time for Dan Burglar, Kevin, kat Turner, for Jeff Kavanaugh,

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bean Back in studio, I'm Kyle Yeoman. Thanks for

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. This

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.