WEBVTT - Got Your Note - Before You Sent It

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, paything everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, don't I

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know you from somewhere? I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren Vocalban,

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. And today we wanted to talk about

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the speed of communication and how that might one day

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. Have you listened to our previous podcast,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you probably heard us talk about how we've really kind

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of cracked the speed nut as far as communication goes

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth. It's more of a throughput or bandwidth

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>issue than a speed issue. But when you start looking

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>beyond Earth, we still have that speed problem, don't we,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and cross long enough distances? Yeah. Yeah, And we have

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a fairly recent example of how this can become a

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge with the the landing of the Curiosity Rover on

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Mars that happened in right, I was I remember where

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the night this happened, So do I remember I was

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>covering it live for this Weekend Tech. Yeah. I was

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just blogging about it on Facebook basically, and uh, and

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the live stream and uh, which is

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting because there were two delays going on. There was

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the delay between what was happening on Mars and the

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>people at the actually imported at the NASA JPL finding

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>out about it, and then the delay of course between

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>them and then me at my house getting the stream.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and so. But when you think about that, it's

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting because those are totally two totally different scales of delay. UM.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>One is a very small delay based on throughput, like

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>how long does it take the bits of data from

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>their transmission to get to my computer so I can

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>watch them as pixels on my screen? Um? And And

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that's throughput, like we talked about last time. Yeah, it's nothing.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's is trying to squeeze that data into the wire

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>fast enough and reconstituted on the other end here. But

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the other one has a really serious, significant physical limit, yes, um.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And what is that limit? Well, it's the speed of

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>light in a vacuum, uh so, which is very fast

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but quite fair. It's like a thousand miles miles per

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>second basically, and we think of it as the universal

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>speed limit, although more on that later. Yeah, well, well

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we can say that now, right, that's a good thing

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to start with. Actually, um uh Einstein's theory of relativity

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>says that essentially nothing with mask can go the speed

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of light or faster. It's it's an absolute limit. And

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the reasons for that are multiple, but basically it would

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>take infinite energy and and and by the time that

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you worked up to it, you would have infinite mass

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>and everything would be messy. Ye yeah, yeah, that's exactly it.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be impossible to propel yourself because you anyway, yeah, good,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>good way to put that. Um. So uh so we

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's the universal speed limit. Um. Well that and

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that's what resulted in the fact that it took us

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>so several minutes to learn the right, That's what I

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was getting too. So we're here on Earth and the

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>people at I realized, the people of the Jet Propulsion

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Lab didn't know for about fourteen minutes whether the lander

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>had succeeded or whether it was you know, like Martians

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had captured it and taken it for their purposes, right,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>um or what We just had no idea, And so

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>here it was just an issue of suspense um. Because

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the transmission traveling at the speed of light at the

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>maximum speed, takes that long to get to us, and

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know, but this could actually be a

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>real problem for exploring other planets, right, what if you

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>needed to control something in real time on another planet

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Mars landing was relatively simple, I mean, it's

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we were pretty sure that we weren't crashing it and

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>attending any mountains, you know, and that they were we

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>were pretty sure there were no giant space lugs out

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there ready to eat it, so it was okay. But

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, but if there have been space lugs, or

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if there the planet's surface had been treacherous enough where

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for some reason we thought a human being would be

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>more capable of piloting that ship rather than a very

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated computer than obviously, that would have been an issue

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>because there would have been a very long delay from

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the time when the the lander would be able to

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>relay that information to you, and then just as long

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for your commands to go back to the land there

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>so that it could adjust in any way. And by

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that time conditions will have changed dramatically. I mean you're

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>talking half an hour almost, right. So this is a

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>weird case where it's not really a problem here on Earth,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but when you start exploring the galaxy, the speed of

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>light just isn't fast enough, so we need something faster

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we do. Is there a way to talk to the

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>curiosity lander faster than light can get from one place

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to another. Well, before I give my answer, I think

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we should probably talk about some some potential ways that

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>according to give my answer at the end, According to

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>star Trek, there these there, there's the subspace that's kind

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of like a parallel dimension that these are these particles

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>called called tetrians are floating around, and these these are

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>really really random momentum particles, and when they bleed over

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>into real space, all kinds of wacky stuff happens that

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>makes for really compelling television hopefully. Um right, but but

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but but as far as I can tell, this is

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not this is not one of those things. It's really

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a plot device more so, right, It's than any kind

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of physics. It's say, how do we get around this

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problem. Let's explain it away with something that doesn't

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>really particles, and then we just say, oh, they were

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>discovered in two so that way no one can complain

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that these things don't seem to exist. Well,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the Vulcans have been using them since Earth Year. The vulcans.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they universes hipsters? We have established that, you know,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>they were. They were using tetrion particles before it was cool.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They even have the little hipster bangs like they They however,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have already moved beyond the ironic mustache. Yes, yes, clearly.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. Well, it's funny that the difference essentially between

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>science fiction and fantasy is that the magic things in

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>fantasy are designed to sound like religious items, and the

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>magic things in sci fire design to sound like things

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>from a science text book. Well, and of course, and

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and tetrion is really close like obelisks of you know,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:41.119
<v Speaker 1>like it's just yeah, well but tetrians is a really

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>close word to take on. Yeahh there we go. Well,

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so some people do think that maybe take eons could

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>help us talk faster than light, get information from one

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>place to another at a superliminal speeds. So so what

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>what is a tack eon? Well, attack eon is partically

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I want to emphasize this, a hypothetical particle

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that means and that's different from a theoretical particle. Um

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>theoretical would be one that that's integral, like to some

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>theory that yeah, Higgs integral to some theory that we

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have good evidence for hypothetical just means like we can

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>posit it and we can sort of talk about it,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's no evidence for it. You can justify it

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of creating a mathematical expression that that

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>where it makes sense, but there's no other evidence whatsoever, right, um,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And and even the first thing you said, the making

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sense math mathematically is questionable, but we can talk about

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. So tacons are super liminal particles,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and that means that they always go faster than the

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>speedy We cannot approach the speed of light. They cannot

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>slow down that much because it would take again an

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>infinite amount of energy, right to slow them down. So

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you sort of imagine, imagine a big X shape, and

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we and all the matter that we know about are

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom triangle of that X. Right. We live

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>down there, and as we and the where the exes

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>where the triangles intersect, basically the cross of the X,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the speed of light, alright, So it's the center

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the X, right, And as we approach that, going

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>up towards the top of our little triangle, things start

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>getting wonky. Of course, you know that we have time

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>dilation and and crazy stuff, and we can't get to

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the apex of that triangle. Um. They live in the

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>top triangle. Tachyons are up there, and they're basically an

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>inverse of everything that we experience in the bottom half.

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>As they approach the speed of light going down towards

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that cross, things get wonky. It stops making sense. But

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they travel faster than light. If they exist, it's possible.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Some people think that, well, could we harness them to

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>communicate faster than light? And there are some serious objections

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think to this hypothesis. UM. One of them, of course, is,

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as we said, we have no proof that these things

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>even exist, so we're talking hypothetically anyway, and that should

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>always be noted as a major objection. UM. But number two, Uh,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you would bring on causality paradoxes if you could really

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>use what some some physicists described this device as the

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>tachyonic anti telephone. Right. It's a device that allows you

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to call the past as the person who receives your

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>message would get it before you had actually sent it, right,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And and that's actually what Einstein's theory relativity says. Right,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If if you go faster than the speed of light.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>What it seems to imply is that you would start

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>going backward in time, which doesn't make any sense at all,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at least as far as we can understand, right, And

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's another major objection. Uh. Also from what I've read,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>if you if you look at tach eons um, the

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>math is really strange to to justify them. So again

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>using relativistic equations, what it looks like is that in

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>order for attack on to have actual real energy, it

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>has to have imaginary mass. Right. I remember seeing an

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>example being it would have a mass of the square

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>root of negative one. That's exactly right. Imaginary, an imaginary

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>number hurt my brain. I'll tell you what's hurting my brain.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So Joe was talking about this x where all of

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>our matters on the bottom and all the tachyon stuffs

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on the top. Who lives on the left and right?

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the new Trinos from the Teenage

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon series. Okay, all right, well, and

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the street Sharks they're over on the right. I'm back up.

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm back up to speed now, but I've been lost

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>since then, so sorry. Yeah, relativistic street sharks carry our

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>data faster than light, and then we've done it. No.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But so basically the tachy on business is really complex

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and definitely above my head. But from everything I've read, uh,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>people who know what they're talking about don't seem to

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>give this much credibility. They don't think you can do it. Um.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And one major problem is again you mentioned the two

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the X. Well, they're two different parts

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of the X. So even if these things exist up there,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to know that we can mess with them.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>There may be no way to interact with that at all.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>They could be um what what physicists would call free particles,

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they just don't interact with our type of matter. Right. Well, uh,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I have another I have another little hypothetical thing. This

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one's this one, This one's very goofy. Yeah, alright, So

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say that Lauren, that you are in a you're

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>living in a space station, like yeah, you know what

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You're you're building robots to eventually take over the planet

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>around which your space station orbits. I've asked you not

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this in public. I'm sorry which planet

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>it would be for the for this argument's sake, we'll

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>say Earth, this is all a certain ringed planet. It

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was all documented in the movie Determinators. Um. And then

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>let's say that I'm on a space station that's five

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>d light years away. Good okay, and and so no,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I mean. This show is going to

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have one less host, one fewer host in a minute. Um.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that that I want to send I

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get Lauren's attention, but I'm five hundred light

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>years away. If I were to send a message uh

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>from our respective points of view, that would take five

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred years at light speed to go from my my

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>station to her station. And in five dred years, Lauren

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>might not care so much that I found her old

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>cell phone that left in the station. That that that

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook status update would not be critical. So let's

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>say that I've devised an ingenious plan. I have a

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>bell installed in Lauren's space station, and attached to that

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bell is a string that's five hundred light years long,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and the end of that string is inside my space station.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I just grabbed the end of that string

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and I give it a really good tug, so they

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>will ring the bell inside Lawrence space Station. Now, wouldn't

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that bell ring the instant I pull that string. Thus

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I am able to communicate. I'm able to get some

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>form of information across instantaneously across five hundred light years

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>without having to send a message all the way through. No,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And that would actually be way way slower than a

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>normal and light speed because we're talking about sound speed, right.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>A radio transmission travels at the speed of light. A

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>wave propagation along a string travels at the speed of sound. Right, Yeah,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the same thing. Might even be slower

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>than the SPEEDI that's essentially string speed of sound, speed

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of push or speed of poll is the way a

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say it. But it's the speed of

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sound through that particular medium. So in other words, uh, like,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if we were to change that and instead of it

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>being a string, it's it's a pole. So it's like

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>a metal pole that stretches five hundred light years and

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I start to move my end of the metal pole,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it would actually take longer than five years for that

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to propagate across the entire length of the pole, so

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that the end that's in Lawrence Space Station would start

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to wiggle. This seems counterintuitive, but it's completely true. It's

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>depending completely upon that that that vibration propagating across, that

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wave propagating across and you can see this. There's some

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>great videos on YouTube where people have a slinky and

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they're holding one end of the slinky up vertically like

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that the bottom of the slinky is

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>off the ground, and then they let go of the

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>top of the slinky and you you watch it in

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>slow motion. You can actually watch the wave propagate across

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the length of the slinky. Now, the top of the

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>slinky starts falling towards the ground according to gravity, pulling

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it down. It's accelerating at at the speed of gravity,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but the bottom of the slinky remains in place until

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that wave propagates acrocess. So yeah, you'll actually see like

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the top of the slinky is falling to the ground

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the bottom of the slinky is still there until

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that wave propagates, and then the bottom of the slinky

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>starts to fall. So this is now on on Earth.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is so quick that we barely notice it. Right,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going an incredibly long slinky for us to notice

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this when it's not slowed down to super slow speeds,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but when you're talking about light years. That's a huge distance,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and it that at that scale this stuff really matters.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why you could not just have, you know,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>two cans and a piece of string and and just

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>chat across the emptiness of space that way. Expect an

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>answer anytime soon. Anyway, So we've established that Tachian is

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>probably a no go treehouse telephone, not as good as

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what NASA uses. I tried really hard. So what else

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is left? Are there other ways people might think we

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>might be able to go faster than what we've got, Well,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>there's there's here's another theoretical sort of well hypothetical sort

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of thing, but it falls apart once you do the math.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a whole lot of detail on it,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to kind of give a quick

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>shout out to the Casimir effect, which is a small

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but measurable force that exists between two uncharged conducting plates

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when they are incredibly close together, and photons that travel

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>across the gap between these two uncharged conducting plates go

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light by a very very

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>very small amount. Yeah, so from based upon measurements, the

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>photons are actually moving faster than what photons can move. However,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>once and this is all theory, by the way, but

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but theoretical investigations into this effect to see if this

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a way to scale this in any form

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of communication have turned out to show that there's nothing there.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't you can't communicate this way um. Then there's

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement. Speaking of photons, yeah, this photons

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are are one thing you could do. You could do

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>with polarization of photons. But quantum entanglement. This is the

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that before we get into this, we should say

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that this is the big one, right, this is the

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>big kuna. This is the one that people think, they

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really do think maybe there's this one, this one in

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum tunneling. These are the two big ones. They're they're

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they're actually talking about setting up a setting up a

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum entanglement experiment on the International Space Station. Yeah, so

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get into ye. So, so quantum entanglement brings

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>in some problems with quantum theory, I say problems, Einstein

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>said problems. Einstein found this idea of quantum entanglement to

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>be really problematic and scary, spooky, yeah, you actually call

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it spooky action at a distance. Well, so, quantum entanglement

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is this concept where you get these two sub atomic

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>particles and they are entangled in such a way that

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of one will tell you something about the

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>behavior of the other. So necessarily, like you definitely know

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>when they're entangled. Yeah, well, not definitely, notily um, because

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little complicated. Uh, because Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>tells us that we cannot know everything about we can

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we can draw a conclusion about something about the other

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>particle's behavior. So, for example, we might talk about the

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>spin of a subatomic particle. Now, spin can be across

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>different axis. It's not just across one axis. But for

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of this, I'm just going to say we're

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna look at one axis of spin to make

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this a simple example. But please keep in mind that

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this is just as simplified example. It's not how the work. Right. So,

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you've got two subatomic particles that are entangled,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and one of them is spinning along an axis in

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>a clockwise direction relative to your position. So when you

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>observe it, it looks like it's moving in a clockwise position.

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember everything's relative. Well, then the other particle, even though

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't even looked at it, you will know that

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because the two are entangled, the other particle is going

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to spin in the opposite direction of the first one.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's spinning in a counterclockwise or witter Shan's direction

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>based upon your uh, your perspective, read your Shakespeare Joe

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>uh so, so yeah, it's it's clockwise and and and counterclockwise.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Or as one of my uh one of my my

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>directions once said for a fan that I was trying

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to build anti counter clockwise would be the first one,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and clockwise would be whatever. So we have one starring clockwise,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the other one string counterclockwise. By observing one, you know

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what the other one is doing. But at that point

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that entanglement breaks down. They are no the behavior of

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>one is no longer dependent or entangled with the behavior

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the other. They're not to be right because you've

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>observed it. That system is broken down. That's one of

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the big challenges, or really the big barrier to quantum

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>entanglement is that you cannot actually pass information through entanglement. Well,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I don't know if we said for sure,

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>why this would be faster than the speed of light,

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And that would be because you can take these things

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>really far apart, right, you can. You could take one

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particle to the other end of the universe,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in theory, and once once even tangled them,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>they're they're entangled, right, It's non localized. It's the locality

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:18.959
<v Speaker 1>is not an issue at least well locality as we

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>understand it in the sense of space. In the quantum world,

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>locality means lots of different stuff. So that's it's one

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of those things where part of the problem is just

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the vocabulary and the way that the quantum physicists use

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it as opposed to people like me. It could be

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that these two quanta are actually right next to each

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>other in a dimension that we can't even see. That.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>That's one way of looking at it. Yes, so in

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the in the dimension of space, they could be very

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>far apart. You could have one on the other side

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of Alpha Centauri, one here on Earth, and by observing

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the one here on Earth, you know what the one

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on Alpha Centauri, what what that one behavior of the

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one in Alpha Centauri was doing. So that's positing the

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>transfer of information uh, instantaneous lee or Another thing I

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>read was that they think maybe it goes at like

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand times the speed of lighters. Yeah, that's what

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what one professor has come up with. Well recently,

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Einstein Boris Podolski and Nathan Rosen all thought that

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this was that this was a terrible idea, that that

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it was clearly that the problem was that we just

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand enough about quantum theory and that this could

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not be possible. They raised what was called well, now

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we do know different things, we do know more, but

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we know we know it's impossible for different reason, for

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a different reason than what they They came up with

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>what was called the EPR paradox, which is essentially what

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, that you know, you cannot transmit information

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light. And in fact I

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>saw a great example Karen Masters that Cornell has a

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>has a little uh web page where she was answering

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>questions about this sort of stuff, and she said, all right, now,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine this scenario. You've got two friends and they are

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>an equal distance away from you on the other side

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy, So ones on one direction, ones in

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the other direction, And before they left, you told them

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that you would send a beam of light uh to

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>each of them, and the beam for one of them

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>would be read and the beam for the other one

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>would be blue, and you would send them both at

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the exact same time. So you send those beams, and

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the one on one end of the galaxy ss red,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>so they know that the one on the other end

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy is blue. Does that mean that they

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>have received information faster than the speed of light in

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the answer is no, because they actually already had the

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>information subluminally, because they learned about it before they even

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>left Earth. That they haven't gained anything new here, and

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is no way to actually communicate real information

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>using this method. You all you can do is draw conclusions.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's this barrier. It's it's an interesting phenomenon

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and phenomenon, I should say, and it would be really

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>cool to learn are about it, but it does not

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>look like there's any way to harness it to actually

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>communicate any information, right right right. It's it's not like

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a like a Morse code kind of thing where you write, no,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you can you can look at a photon to learn

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a fact, but you can't send information for one thing,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you cannot even manipulate those those quanta to do what

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you want. They what's happening is the quanta are in

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>an unknown state and then you observe it, you learn

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the state. But at the same time that breaks down

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that entanglement. So you can't manipulate the state of the quanta.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can manipulate the state like crazy if

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you're a politician. I mean, essentially, what you're saying is

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that the problem with quantum entanglement is you may be

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>able to know things across a great distance really fast,

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>even faster than light, but all you can do is

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just no a random outcome far away and you can't

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>know everything. Yeah, so that's the other thing is that

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're learning that it's changed. You can you can

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know random outcome, but you can't get messages back

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and forth exactly. And so yeah, it's not it's not communication, right.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe someday we'll learn some way of harnessing that. But

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's a fundamental element of the universe.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>It's something that is just beyond our ability to to manipulate.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Can I tell you, I'm really excited about all the

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>email we're going to get about how we're totally misunderstanding this. Well,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>i'll be sure to afford it to you. Actually you're

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>on that list, so you'll be able to see it yourself.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to quantum tunneling. Excellent, because the tunneling,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a quantum tunneling. Have you heard about that? What

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is that? What quantum dwarves do know? Is that what

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those quantum the quantum worms from tremors, you know, Oh,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're talking about. But those were not

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum No, no, they were on far too great a

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>scale to be on the quantum scale. Well, okay, just

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tell me about your boring quantum tunneling. Sure will, so,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, Now, when you get down to really super

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>super super tiny scales like the nano scale, all right,

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and or the atomic scale, that's that's even better. So

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you get to the atomic scale, let's say you've got

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>an electron traveling down a pathway. You don't really know

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly where the position of that electron is at any

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>given moment. You really can just create sort of a

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>sphere around the potential places where that electron could be

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>given its momentum. So you don't. You don't really know

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>exactly where that electron is. That's my point, all right.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>So that sphere is a certain size, you have like

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a probability, a probability, there's a probability that could be

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at any on any point in that sphere. Now that

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>sphere is approaching an electronic gate, so a transistor. So

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we'd see in a microprocessor, and

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact, quantum tunneling is something that microprocessor manufacturers have

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually worry about. So it gets towards this gate.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The gate is closed, which means that the electron should

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>not pass through it. But if the gate is thin enough,

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about a microprocessor that's got very very

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>very tiny connections in order to pack as many transistors

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in there as possible. If the gate is thin enough,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>then that field where the electron possibly could be could

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>overlap that gate and actually pass on to the other side.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And because the probability is there that the electron might

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>be on the other side, sometimes it is on the

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>other side, so it it's as if it has passed

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>through the gate without actually passing through it. On one moment,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it's on one side. On the next the next moments

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. Now, with microprocessors, this is a

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>problem because if the gate is supposed to be closed

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and blocking off the electrons, and the electrons are passing

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>through any then we don't want tron electron to be

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. Yeah we've got you can get

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>computer errors, you know, things that it's just not working

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>properly because it cannot control the flow of electrons the

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>way it needs to in order to run processes. So

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a real problem when it comes to micro architecture.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>This gets into a thing about matter, right that solid

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>matter isn't really solid. Yeah there's more empty space, and

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>yeah there's all that as well, but that's that's slightly different,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>but an interesting idea. So the part about quantumunneling that

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>gets too faster than light communication is that it appears

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that the electron can pass over a distance faster than

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a photon would be able to travel that same distance.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>So you know this this jump where it would go

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>from one side of the gate to another side of

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the gate. It could do that at a speed that's

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light. How is that possible?

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Because an electron has mass. I see, that's a good question,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and honestly the answer is really more like we probably

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it's probably another manifestation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, where to

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>us it appears as if the electron is moving faster

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light, when in reality it's not.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's really just a probability issue more so than

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a right, it's more of a probability thing than a

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>than actual speed thing. But then you know, there are

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>those who have said that you if you calculate it

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>at these incredibly tiny distances. Remember this is we're talking

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the nano scale here, so very small sto nanometer is

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one billionth of a meter, so we're talking really really

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny at that scale. Uh, it's essentially that electron might

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>move at what would be equivalent to four point seven

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>times the speed of light. But again it's all this

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>probability and certainty stuff. It may not have anything to

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do with speed at all. It has to do with

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of of quantum mechanics. Well, yeah, I mean

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it would have to write because that would posit like

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier, that the electron would have to

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have infinite mass and infinite energy, right, So obviously that's

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not happening. And again most physicists are saying that there's

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>even with this interesting phenomenon, there's no capacity here for

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>faster than like communication. So you know, we've been shooting

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>down these things left and right. I think ultimately what

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion we come to is, as we understand the

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>world to operate, as of right now, there is no

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>faster than like communication opportunity out there. That's not to

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>say that we won't find it later done the line,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and that some discovery won't allow us to have this

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>This what to us right now really does seem well,

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it does seem impossible based on what we know. But

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we should point out that almost every really

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.959
<v Speaker 1>really cool innovation has come by people trying to do

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>things that were said to be impossible, right, Yeah, Yeah,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And and who knows what we'll know tomorrow? Yeah, who

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>knows what we'll know by the time this podcast goes live. Yeah,

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get more of those emails, right, excellent, And if

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're lucky, maybe we already received them because they were

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sent faster than light and they've traveled back in time

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to before we only they had gotten here just before

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we recorded, we could have prevented all that attacking on

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>anti email server. Yeah, I think I've got my spam

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>filter blocking all tacky on messages. So yeah, all right,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Well that that's a good discussion on fast and light communication.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna wrap this sucker up. So guys, if you

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions on topics we should tackle in future

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Forward Thinking, get in touch with us. Let's know,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got an email address that's f W Thinking at

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>discovery dot com. Or drop us a line on our

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>website that's fw thinking dot com. You can read our

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.479
<v Speaker 1>blogs there, you can watch the video series, you can

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to more episodes of the podcast. You can join

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>us on our social media, and you can tell us

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>how we all need to go attend a quantum mechanics

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lecture to make sure that we know what we're talking about.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I am fairly confident, but then I'm also tired. But

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we will all talk to you again, maybe in the past.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic in the future of technology,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>visit forward Think dot com problem brought to you by Toyota.

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places