WEBVTT - Businessweek Extra- Filmmaker Nick Bilton

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Masser and I'm Tim Stanovic. Welcome to the Bloomberg Business

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Week Extra. It's a weekly podcast bringing you a highlight

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>our favorite interview from the week. And this week it's

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>really a simple question, Carol, do you want to be famous?

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I really did love this interview. It's a question asked

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>by a new HBO Max documentary. It provides really a

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>window into the world of influencers. It's called Fake Famous.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been described as a yearlong social experiment to turn

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>three individuals into Instagram influencers behind the camera, in front

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of the camera, and creating the influencers. Is a veteran

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>technology journalist Nick Bilton. He's written for Vanity Fair, the

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. He's also the author of the book

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Hatching Twitter, A true story of money, power, friendship and betrayal.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>By the Way, it's a good book. He wrote, produced

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and directed the documentary, and we began with just kind

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of asking how it all came about. I've been a

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter for almost twenty years now, and um I

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was a Fanity Fair about five years ago, and Graydon

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Carter was my editor chief, and you know, we were

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>kicking around a few documentary ideas over the years, and

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years back, he said, oh, we should

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>do a documentary on influencers, uh. And I said, oh, well,

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry is a bit of a joke. And

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>he said what do you mean. I said, well, I

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>could make an influencer in ten minutes. And he said, well,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>that's our documentary and um, and that was essentially how

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this all began. And I had been at the New

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>York Times. Uh, I had written about box. You know,

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>these these uh fake accounts that exist on social media

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that can be created by writing code and so on,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I had written about the rise of them and

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>how advanced they were getting over the years. I had

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>then written about them when I was a bandy fair

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the election, how Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>both had millions and millions of fake accounts following them,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and of course influencers employed these same tactics. And that

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>was essentially what we wanted to show in the film.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And Nicky say that influence our culture is is a

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a joke, but hey, there's there's real money

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>behind this, and and there's real money behind it's still

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it seems like a lot of people and

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>companies are in on the joke. Well, I think it's

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because there is real money behind it, um, But

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's at the same time it's not. It's it is

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so inauthentic in in the way that the money, you know,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>changes hands, in the way that influences essentially purport to

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be kind of these these new bearers of ideas and

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>culture and consumerism and so on. It's you know, when

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we really kind of show this in the film, I mean,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we talk about is is

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how influencers the entire concept of it, uh is it is.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It is very similar to advertising, but even more extreme

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in that the whole goal is to make you feel

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>worse about yourself, so that you want to experience what

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>an influencer experiences in their wonderful life of their free

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>vacations and their fancy Lamborghinis and this, that and the other,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and and really they're getting all this stuff for free,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're not necessarily being honest about whether they actually

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like it or not. And so sorry, well, this is

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this is like kind of social media at its core, though, right,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just influencers who we are posting the highlight reel. Right,

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this is like how how normal people use Instagram. Right,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They show off the best parts of their lives. It's

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like a holiday letter, you know, the trips to Africa

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and the kids are all getting straight a's on steroids. Well,

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's completely true. I think that you know, Instagram,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I personally believe is the worst at this. They're the

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>guiltiest of it because Instagram was founded on this idea

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of being deceptive to the viewer and the uh the

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>whole point of filters that were there was a highlight

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram, which can make your really bad photo look

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>really good by just pressing a single button. And the

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>founders of Instagram, they wanted it to feel like like

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a Vogue magazine or a Vanity Fair. They wanted people

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to post the beautiful shot images and make it appear

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as if you know, that was the life that you

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't living. And I think that the end result of

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that was that you now have a system in place

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>where I think it's just the most inauthentic platform on

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Every every platform has the problems. You have

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter where it's and everyone's just angry at everyone else,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they all have their things, but Instagram,

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is the absolute most deceptive of them all. Well,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and talk about deception. I mean it's like when you

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>find out reality show, what do you mean that that's

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>not real? Um? And you're finding it out with Instagram

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love where you know you showed and you

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>guys use like a toilet seat to be a plane window,

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like who to thunk? Like it's just amazing a new toilets.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting is you know, and Tim had you know,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim and I were talking before we got going. You know,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>kids want to do this. They want to be influencers,

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to be famous, which is something you ask

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a group of of twenties some things right when you

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of line up a couple of people to work with.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So the one of the other aspects of the giving

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of this film that we did a lot of research

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>into and I had read about before, was, um, when

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at the studies that have been done, there's

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>all these longitudinal studies who have been done Lais done

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>them other other universities to where over the years they

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ask kids every single year, what do you want to

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>be when you grow up and back in the sixties

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and seventies, kids used to be wanted to be a

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>teacher or a lawyer, doctor. Back in the eighties, they

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>started to kind of get a little bit interested in fame,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was famed for something that they had done,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like they wanted to be a basketball player or an

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actor or something. Fast forward to today and kids just

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be famous and they want to be famous

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>influencers because they think that is the fast track to

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>get there. And so now eight seven percent of children

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>say in America say they want to be famous influences

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>when they grow up. And you know, that's interesting that

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>you say, because you do highlight three three people, Chris,

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Dominique and Wiley, And that's kind of without giving too

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 1>much away, that's that's kind of the conclusion that that

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris comes to, right, he talked about how he wants

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to be famous for being him. Yeah, so we you know,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the film started off with this idea of like, let's

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>go and get three people who have a very small

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>following online. Let me go and buy them fake followers. Um,

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, fake box that exists on social media. Let's

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do a bunch of fake photo shoots. As you said,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where we you know, we we took an aeroplane seat.

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>You hold it up against the screen that looks like

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's out of an airplane window. You take a photo

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and it actually looks like you're in a private Yeah,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it's really amazing. We're all going to be like buying

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>toilet seats now Rember on a fake private jet. And

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>then we took we took three people in this regard,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>did all this stuff and then wants to see which

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>direction they would go. And we we genuinely had no

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>idea how it was going to work out. I didn't

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know if if they were all become superstars or there

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>would or it would just sailed dismally. And we were

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really lucky that it took three different routes. We had

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys who was just like, I am

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>not interested in this. This is ridiculous. Uh, this is

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all fake. I want real fame. I want I'd rather

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not be famous than have fake fame. We had another

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>guy who essentially panicked in the middle of all this

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and was bullied online and shut his account down, and

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>his story was pretty fascinating to watch and and sad.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And then we had our third person who essentially went

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all the way and became a want of a better description,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a famous influencer and um, and she got so much

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>reached stuff, all because we had bought her fake followers

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and it looked like she had hundreds of thousands of

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>real followers. I mean, it was a It was a

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>life changer in some ways for her. Right, she was

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>an actress, you know, and she talked about kind of

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>going out beforehand, and you know, it wasn't so easy.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But once she built up are you built up in

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Instagram following? For her, she was getting callbacks and people

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>would note that when she went back, you know, to

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>those auditions. Well, I think that this is I think

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the status aspect of our culture today, especially

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>business and and people's young people's pursuits of what they

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>want to do when they grow up, you know and

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>get out of school and so on. When you go

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to an audition in Los Angeles as an actor and actress,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the first thing they're looking at is how many follows

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you have on Instagram, which is just such a stupid metric.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, it just doesn't mean anything exactly. Could you

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine if Meryl Street had to say, show how many

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>followers you had on social media before she got a gig.

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But it but it's not just that industry, every industry.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's writing, it's radio, it's just a creative industry. And

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's and I think it is such a uh, just

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the wrong metric to be looking at, and I completely

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fault the people who run these industries for doing it.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's just so shortsighted. But what was

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so evident in the in the filming of the doc

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was that the Dominique who we got to follows her

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>life change as a result. She got called back, she

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>got you know, there was one moment that we didn't

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>put in the film where she her mom was in

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>town visiting her in l A. And she was they

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>were trying to get into the stancy restaurant. They couldn't

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>get in. Her mom showed her dominique Instagram account and

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and showed how many falls they had and they let

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>her right in. Well, I can't believe that made that.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe that we didn't film it something that

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>happened on the side. But but it's just just even

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>that was just so ludicrous. And I think that it's

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like a currency almost it's a currency. That's exactly what

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. So is this the way that you see

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>things continuing nick even though there is more scrutiny, especially

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with this documentary around the industry, because you do make

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the point that hey, this isn't the best interest of

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of everyone involved, that this thing doesn't come tumbling down.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>This influencer culture, I mean, I think that I think

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>influence the culture has already burned itself quite frankly. I mean,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that the most influencers lived in the bubble

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and think that people believe that they're you know, that

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>their lives and their lives, and I think most people

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>realize that they're not. Um. I think that, you know,

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it's we have this expert on the in

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the film, just In Bateman, who of course as a

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>child star and has gone on to written an amazing

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>book about fame and what it means for society, and

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>she says that these people are not famous. Their incommercial hosts,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're hawking a product. And that really stuck

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with me because I think, at the end of the day,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that's really what influencer culture is. It's just you're just

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a fancy infomercial host and and one thing that was

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>evident to us is we we filmed some influencers doing

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>certain things, and and behind the scenes, they you know,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they hated the trip they were on, they hated the

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>hotel they were at, they thought the food was awful,

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but they still posted it lying saying that they loved it,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>because if they were honest, they wouldn't get invited back,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or they wouldn't get invited to the next thing. And

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what people really have to realize.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>When you're scrolling through your phone and you're seeing these

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>people live the so called wonderful life, the reality is

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>they're only showing you the peak peak highlights, and even

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that is fake and exaggerated. But from a marketing perspective,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this must work because it is working for brands and

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>companies to send these influencers these things, and there is

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a return on investment, else they wouldn't be doing it right. No, Well,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing, it's not. The thing is that they're

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing. It works sometimes for these American companies and

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>these brands, but it doesn't work most times, and the

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>marketing companies don't know which ones are going to work

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and which ones are not, so they just throw all

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the spaghetti against the wall and hope and the best

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and really for them. You know, you could buy a

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a TV spot on the Super Bowl, you know, and

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it costs. You gave millions and

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars, or you can you can say, oh,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>we're going to work with fifty influencers or a hundred

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>influences for the same amount of money. One of them

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>may may get that reach, and so I think that

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't. But it does not work in the respect

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of the way most people think it does. Nick. You

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>did talk with our own Bloomberg News reporter, Sarah Fryar.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>She's our tech reporter, one of our tech reporters. She's

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>written a book, No Filter, The Inside Story of Instagram,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And I talked with her too before our interview, and she,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, she'd never having a conversation. She brought up

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a good point. She goes, why has nobody done something,

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, or who should do something about all of

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this fakery on Instagram. You know, the fact that you, Nick,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>were able to buy all these followers and all this

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>engagement for these regular people and make them look famous,

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get them brand deals. Is this on the companies? Is

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>it on the FTC? I mean, what do we do well?

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that the you know, when it comes down

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to it, the people that are most of fault here

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond far and away are the technology companies. Um, it

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is not in their interests in Saraces is in the

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>film and um this is said the buss Sarah and

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I have reported in the past, it's not in their

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>interest to to make sure that they they fix this.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Instagram supposedly has a billion users, right and

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>based on the experts we spoke to and bought dealers

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, you could you know, it's it's

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>feasible that there are around half of the of the

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>accounts on Instagram are fake or debt accounts or whatever.

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But Instagram has no incentive to get rid of those

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fake accounts because if they did, they wouldn't have a

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>billion users. And if they didn't have a billion users,

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook stock isn't worth what Facebook stock is. Advertisers don't

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>think that they're the value for what they're paying is

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>worth what it is, and so they don't do anything

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of it. And I think the other

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it is that Instagram makes sure that the

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>likes and the comments and the number of follows you

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have and all those little metrics that give people so

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>much anxiety that they are so high up on the

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>scale of things that you see. And I think that

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that is one aspect of the film that we really

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Two is it's how it's leading to anxiety

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for kids and depression and so on and so forth.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>And Instagram does care one iota. All they care about

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is the metrics. It's like a constant like popularity, race,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>um and right, and like we talked about it here,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>you know news like you know our followers and are

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned? And it's it's it's crazy and you think

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>about on a younger but you think about on a

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>younger population, right, Like what this does to these kids?

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to go follow up on what

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you just said. I think I know the answer. So

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the valuations of these companies, whether it's Facebook, whether it's Instagram.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Within Facebook, you know their user numbers, the metrics they

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>are giving advertisers, is it all based on totally fake data?

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And does it even matter if they are because does

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem kind of work? I mean, the eCos it's

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>funny the ecosystem, the system works. It really truly does.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's funny. Like on Instagram, I get get

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>ads that are sent to me that I'm like, oh,

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>actually I would click on that. I mean, I won't

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>out of principle because I don't want to give them

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the money. But but you know, the targeting works. There's

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a reason that Google and Facebook are value to what

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>their value that simply based on advertising. So it does work.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the reality is is that there

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is an incredible amount of deception going on at the

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>same time from these companies. And I think that and

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they're fully aware of it. You know. It's like you

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>think about the advertising. You know, you can say I

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>want to advertise a pink bicycle to people who like

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pink and live in in this town. Uh, and the

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, wake up at six am and drink green juices,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can do that. You can literally target that

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>person and they'll probably click on your bike and buy it.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But so if they if they have the technology and

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the and the smarts to be able to pull out off,

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they also have the technology and the smarts to be

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>able to kill the box. But they don't because it's

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>not in their best interests because if they had to

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be honest, they would probably have half the number of

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>users that they really have. And what's that going to

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>do for the stock price? Right? Nick? You, you, by

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>your own admission, have have been covering these companies for

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen years. Facebook just had its its seventeenth birthday. Um.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>You open up the film with this sort of montage

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of of you appearing on different television programs, saying that

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you used to be the one who would go on

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>TV and defend these social platforms. It does seem like though,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in recent years, with fake news proliferating on Facebook and

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, fake news and bad things happening on Twitter,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the rise of the influencer and

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the mental health issues that are associated with Instagram, it

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>does seem like the conversation around social media has really shifted.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It from it being a tool that, you know, in

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the words of Mark Zuckerberg, right, is about connecting and

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sharing two more that that's one about, you know, the

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>effect that these platforms are having on our lives and

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in not a good way. When did that shift happen

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>for you? When did you start to see that happening.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's a great question. And I

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think you know, one thing I've noticed is, you know,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the technology people, both reporters and people who work in

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>tech and so on, who I know, on a personal level,

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we were kind of old the nerds, if you will,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that got on these platforms first. You know, we were

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the first ones on Instagram and Snapchat and Twitter, and

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think in those early days, what was so

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>intriguing about them was that they were what they said

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be. They were a place for

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you to connect and share things and and and take

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty photos and just have have a you know, and

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>people could comment on them. And I think what happened

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>is over time they started to become the worst versions

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of themselves. And you know, Twitter, I think is just

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I used to be on their twelve hours

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a day, would be in the background in the news

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>room when I was working. I was constantly tweeting links

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and articles and comments and thoughts and this, that and

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the other. I barely look at it now because it's

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>so the triolic. It's got so much hatred and anger

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on there, and and you can be you can see

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>your career destroyed by for one tweet because someone doesn't

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like it. And I think that, um, you know, all

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>across the board, these platforms have grown so quickly and

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so so big that the and the companies haven't put

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the effort forth to try to control them and try

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to make them, you know, work in the same way

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they did in the beginning. That um, that they are

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>now in the place that they are. And and and

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>for me and all those early people to bring this

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>back to what I say earlier, all those early nerves

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that start signed up, none of them use them anymore.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>None of them people who used to work on Twitter,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I know who built the platform do not use it.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that the reason for that is

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because it has become it's become such a bad thing

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in society. It has become so negative and and I

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think that people are fed up. Well, I should say,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you did write the book Hatching Twitter. You wrote the

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>book on Twitter, so you do know a thing or

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>two of them the early days of Twitter. Yes, well,

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And I would say, though, social influencers can also be good.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And you point this out, whether it's Black Lives Matter,

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's me Too, whether it's climate change, whether it's

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Arab Spring right, it can be a force for good.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It can be. But I think that here and there's

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>no question if it was you know, if it wasn't

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>for I mean, look, I can't say this definitively, but

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is, would me to have happened

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't for social media? Would Black Lives Matter

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>have happened if it wasn't for social media? There are

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>certain people who say, well, black lives matter, for example,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the nineties sixties we had the civil

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rights movement that was no social media then, right, so

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know that, that's one argument some people make.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the answer is true or if

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I don't necessarily think me too would have

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>happened if it wasn't for it. And I think that

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are and the climate change stuff that's happening,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and so on. I think that the reality

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is though that you know that Kevin Kelly, who started Wired,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a technology philosopher, if you will, and he said

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to at one point he said, look, when you look

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 1>at technology, it makes there are always bad sides to it.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>In his opinion, technology makes society fifty one better and

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for worse, So they're there are bad things that happens.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>My opinion about social media today is that it makes

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>things worse and better, and I think when technology starts

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that, it's time for us to question if

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we should be still using it or fixing it or

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>how to fix it. Speaking of that, there is this

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>scene in the movie where you're on your hands and

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>knees cleaning up after your kids. I think you're picking

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>up magnetiles. It's something that's very familiar in my household

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. I spent a lot of time cleaning up magnetiles. UM.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts about your kids and social media?

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Nick and your family and social media? Well, it's really interesting.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing that I came away from in

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this film was, you know, when I've written about tech

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in the past and and um and different technologies and

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>how they've changed and so on, I have been UM.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that that has been interesting is

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I always thought that you had to teach kids when

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>they were teenagers not to use you know, to be

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>more aware of social media and technology. And so when

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was like it was a thing that

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you taught them when they was twelve or thirteen. And

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I've realized during this making this film

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was that you need to be teaching them when they're

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>three and four and five years old. Um. You know.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Barton day Thurston is one of the commenters in the movie,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has this great line where he says, you know,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to most things in society, we we

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>protect our kids from them. We we don't let them

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>go near a gun until there's twenty one years old

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or eighteen years old. We don't let them drive a

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>car or drink and all these different things until they

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are that age. And when it comes to technology, we've

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>left into the Wolves, and the Wolves of course being

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>those big bad companies that all they care about their

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>metrics and and I think that for me, I'm now

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>teaching my kids, you know when they look at YouTube

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and things like that and go online, that some of

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the things they say are not real and some of

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>them are bad. So I just want to know, have

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you ever done a selfie in front of the pink Wall?

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have not done a selfie in from

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Pink Pink Wall, but we we did when we

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>shot the film. Were the opening of the film, there

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was a good three days we were there, and we

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely had some fun with our phones messing around in

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>front of it. Well, it's a lot of fun to watch.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting what you say about kids, because you

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>finished off the documentary showing all these pictures of kids

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, obviously disturbing in my opinion. We we yeah

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of the film, which doesn't give anything away

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>for listeners, but at the end of the film, we

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to bring it back to the beginning of

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the film where we talked about that study of what

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>kids want to be when they grew up and and

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember saying that to the one of the bruces, like, oh,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we should see we can get some pictures of like

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>kid influencers. And I've never really looked at kid influencers before.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And when we looked and I and we saw these photos,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it was completely shocking to see these kids that are

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their influencers. And we were so lucky. We had worked

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>with Michael Abels, who did the music and the score

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 1>for the film, and he's done a lot of horror

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>movies and when he did the music for the end,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he said, I see, he's like, I've got this and

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he completely did that was veteran technology journalist Nic Built

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and the documentary is fake famous on HBO. One of

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the things I think you and I both agree on

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what was so disturbing is just the little kids who

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be influencers. Yeah, I mean I had this feeling, Carol.

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's okay to say, but as

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the documentary, I was like, Okay, we

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really live in how Oh my god, No, I think

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say. And you see how kind of

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tortured people were about the process. Um, I really love

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this film. You've been listening to Bloomberg Business Week Extra,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>be sure of listen to our Bloomberg Business Week Daily

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>radio show, airing live Monday through Friday at two pm

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Well Street time on Bloomberg Radio. Are we influencers? I

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I'm definitely not. But watch us on

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>our daily broadcast on YouTube just search Bloomberg Global News

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can also see me on Bloomberg Quicktake, available

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot Com, slash qt, and st mean platforms

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like Roku, Apple TV, Samsung TV, and more. I'm Tim

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Stentovick and I'm Carol Mancer. This is Booker m